Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- 260906_cefas_eir_request_-_maintenance_dredging_protocol_consultations [2026/09/20 20:31] – [Summary] nefcadmin
+++ 260906_cefas_eir_request_-_maintenance_dredging_protocol_consultations [2026/09/21 20:03] (current) – [Summary] nefcadmin
@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 The SHAs are responsible to keep navigation channels open and so are tasked by specific Acts of Parliament to dredge their ports' navigation channels.  This means the SHAs are the competent authority for the operations involved in maintenance dredging and so are responsible to ensure that these activities are compliant with all environmental legisations/regulations.
-So if the SHAs perform the same function as the MMO do for certain types of dredging why do they not regularly consult Cefas as the MMO do.
+So if the SHAs perform the same function as the MMO do for certain types of dredging why do SHAs not regularly consult Cefas as the MMO do?
 Cefas refered me to the the [[https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69f46f16ab602a88957eefa2/20260408_Ports_Sandbox_Top_Tips_v3_Final.pdf|Ports Regulatory Sandbox]], while this does mention Cefas explicitly it does state that all MDPs have been signed off by Natural England.  So I await NE's response to a simialr EIR request.
@@ Line 100: / Line 100: @@
 Follow us @CefasGovUK : [[https://linktr.ee/cefasgovuk|LinkTree]]
+===== Request for Clarification =====
+While I accept that you do not hold the information I requested, I do not understand your reasons for this.
+Cefas's role in the development of Maintenance Dredging Protocols is explicitly defined in the 2007 Defra document [[https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/20121031094143mp_/http://archive.defra.gov.uk/wildlife-pets/wildlife/protect/documents/mdp-cap.pdf|Maintenance Dredging and The Habitats Regulations 1994 - A Conservation Assessment Protocol for England]].
+When I communicated with the Marine Management Organisation over Maintenance Dredging Protocols, I have been told that the MMO have no role in the oversight of dredging operations themselves as they are not the competent authority and so do not regulate any environmental impacts of the dredging operations. The MMO have stated however, they are the competent authority for the disposal of dredged material and so do advise / regulate environmental impacts of the disposal of dredged material.
+So I am now concerned that either I have asked the wrong questions or that the competent authorities (Statutory Harbour Authorities) are not seeking Cefas advice for dredging operations in the same way that the MMO are for disposal of dredged material.
+I assume that I need to contact Defra to clarify how dredging operations are being overseen.
+===== Clarification =====
+For the purposes of your Environmental Information Regulations (2004) request, we can confirm the following:
+We have reviewed the link you provided and do not agree that it designates Cefas as having an explicit role in reviewing Maintenance Dredging Protocols. The Marine and Fisheries Agency was a regulatory agency that preceded the MMO, and Cefas was never part of this agency.
+Regarding your concern that "competent authorities (Statutory Harbour Authorities) are not seeking Cefas advice for dredging operations" we reiterate that there is no such requirement for this consultation, and no agreement or arrangement exists - or (to our knowledge) has ever existed - to enable this, outside of routine Marine Licensing advice coordinated through the MMO (and its predecessors).
+We trust that this response, together with our comprehensive response to the duplicate request submitted directly to our Senior Advisor, clarifies Cefas' position regarding the issues raised.
 ====== Other Pages That Link To This Page ======
 {{backlinks>.}}