{include:Teesworks - keywords - menu} [[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001776-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GEN.1.2 Position Statement Hornsea Project Four and BP - June 2022.pdf|EN010103-001776-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GEN.1.2 Position Statement Hornsea Project Four and BP - June 2022.pdf]]:27:Figure 13: Fugro Meridian courtesy of Spirit Energy. ............................................................................ 29 [[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001776-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GEN.1.2 Position Statement Hornsea Project Four and BP - June 2022.pdf|EN010103-001776-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GEN.1.2 Position Statement Hornsea Project Four and BP - June 2022.pdf]]:27:Figure 14: Fugro 2D seismic tow lines, image courtesy of Spirit Energy. ................................................ 30 [[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001776-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GEN.1.2 Position Statement Hornsea Project Four and BP - June 2022.pdf|EN010103-001776-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GEN.1.2 Position Statement Hornsea Project Four and BP - June 2022.pdf]]:27:Figure 15: Tow trials being carried out between the ‘Fugro Meridian’ and tug the ‘Deilginis’, image [[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001779-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix BIO.1.39 Example Marine Pollution Contingency Plan - June 2022.pdf|EN010103-001779-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix BIO.1.39 Example Marine Pollution Contingency Plan - June 2022.pdf]]:29: Fugro ERT, Gait 8, Research Park South, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, EH14 4AP [[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001141-NZT DCO 6.4.30 ES Vol III Appendix 14B Fisheries and Fish Ecology Baseline Part 3.pdf|EN010103-001141-NZT DCO 6.4.30 ES Vol III Appendix 14B Fisheries and Fish Ecology Baseline Part 3.pdf]]:57: MarineSpace Ltd, ABPmer Ltd, ERM Ltd, Fugro EMU Ltd and Marine [[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000496-Section 15 App 15.3 Stage 1 geoarchaeological assessment.pdf|TR030002-000496-Section 15 App 15.3 Stage 1 geoarchaeological assessment.pdf]]:10: assessment (Fugro 2014 and Dunelm 2014a) (Figure 1). These logs were collected [[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000496-Section 15 App 15.3 Stage 1 geoarchaeological assessment.pdf|TR030002-000496-Section 15 App 15.3 Stage 1 geoarchaeological assessment.pdf]]:10: (Fugro 2014) were assessed by a qualified geoarchaeologist. The locations of the [[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000496-Section 15 App 15.3 Stage 1 geoarchaeological assessment.pdf|TR030002-000496-Section 15 App 15.3 Stage 1 geoarchaeological assessment.pdf]]:17:Fugro Alluvial Offshore Ltd. 2014 Environment and Benthic Ecology Site Investigation River [[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf|TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf]]:15: Fugro 2014 [[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf|TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf]]:16: 0 0.5 1 Kilometres Source: Fugro 2014 PE3 8DW [[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf|TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf]]:17:8.3.5 The benthic ecological survey was undertaken during July 2014 by FugroEmu. In addition to the [[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf|TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf]]:17: undertaken by FugroEmu. [[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf|TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf]]:14: survey was carried out by Fugro in July 2014. [[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:119:gibber, and Tubificoides swirencoides (Royal Haskoning 2009, Fugro 2014). One macrobenthic faunal [[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:120:and 2013 (58 species in total and 19 fish species, (Fugro 2014)). Further information regarding the fish [[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:120:2013 (Fugro 2014) compared to 85% in 2019, with Ophiura sp. alone accounting for 80% of individuals [[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:307:Fugro, 2014. York Potash Harbour Facility – Marine Ground Investigation Report [[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:495:where sandy mud and slightly gravelly sandy mud dominated the sediment groups present (Fugro 2014). This [[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:495:diversity across all stations (Fugro 2014). Interestingly, the opportunistic species Capitella capitata was only [[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:495:2009, Fugro 2014). C. capitata is regarded as an opportunistic species given its tolerance to pollution, such as [[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:495:Haskoning 2009, Fugro 2014). [[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:496:have been recorded in previous surveys within the estuary area (Fugro 2014) however, this taxa was more [[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:496:species, (Fugro 2014)). The discrepancy in the number of species present appears to be related to the number [[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:496:previous survey data. Echinodermata only accounted for 1 % of total numbers of individuals in 2013 (Fugro [[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:497:Fugro (2014) Environmental and benthic ecology site investigation River Tees, UK. Rep Number 140539-1 1:35 [[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:119:gibber, and Tubificoides swirencoides (Royal Haskoning 2009, Fugro 2014). One macrobenthic faunal [[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:120:and 2013 (58 species in total and 19 fish species, (Fugro 2014)). Further information regarding the fish [[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:120:2013 (Fugro 2014) compared to 85% in 2019, with Ophiura sp. alone accounting for 80% of individuals [[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:307:Fugro, 2014. York Potash Harbour Facility – Marine Ground Investigation Report [[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:495:where sandy mud and slightly gravelly sandy mud dominated the sediment groups present (Fugro 2014). This [[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:495:diversity across all stations (Fugro 2014). Interestingly, the opportunistic species Capitella capitata was only [[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:495:2009, Fugro 2014). C. capitata is regarded as an opportunistic species given its tolerance to pollution, such as [[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:495:Haskoning 2009, Fugro 2014). [[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:496:have been recorded in previous surveys within the estuary area (Fugro 2014) however, this taxa was more [[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:496:species, (Fugro 2014)). The discrepancy in the number of species present appears to be related to the number [[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:496:previous survey data. Echinodermata only accounted for 1 % of total numbers of individuals in 2013 (Fugro [[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:497:Fugro (2014) Environmental and benthic ecology site investigation River Tees, UK. Rep Number 140539-1 1:35 [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:198:2014 Anglo American Harbour Facilities benthic survey (Fugro, 2014) [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:203:gibber, and Tubificoides swirencoides (Royal Haskoning 2009, Fugro 2014). One macrobenthic faunal [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:204:and 2013 (58 species in total and 19 fish species, (Fugro 2014)). Further information regarding the fish [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:204:2013 (Fugro 2014) compared to 85% in 2019, with Ophiura sp. alone accounting for 80% of individuals [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf]]:20:Of these, Y. limatula is believed to represent a first record for the UK waters (Fugro, 2021). [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf]]:22:estuarine environment that is subject to a degree of pollution (Fugro, 2021). [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf]]:22:to comprise slag deposits from the adjacent steel works (Fugro, 2021). Predominantly sand and gravel [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf]]:51: Customer Fugro Geoservices Ltd, Fugro House, Hithercroft Road, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, OX10 9RB [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf]]:83: Customer Fugro Geoservices Ltd, Fugro House, Hithercroft Road, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, OX10 9RB [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf]]:124: Customer Fugro Geoservices Ltd, Fugro House, Hithercroft Road, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, OX10 9RB [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf]]:156: Customer Fugro Geoservices [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf]]:200: Fugro Project No. C2124 [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf]]:200: Fugro Document No. C2124-R001-WP2 [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf]]:200: Fugro Legal Entity Fugro GB Marine Limited [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf]]:202:On the instruction of Tees Valley Combined Authority, Fugro performed an environmental site [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf]]:216: On the instruction of Tees Valley Combined Authority, Fugro performed an environmental [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf]]:226: report (Fugro, 2021b). [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf]]:227: the field report (Fugro, 2021b). All accepted samples were photographed, and their details [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf]]:236: depth (this would typically be rejected under Fugro sample rejection criteria (Fugro, 2021b); [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf]]:239: Fyke nets FN_01 and FN_02 after deployment Fugro personnel setting fyke nets FN_03 and FN_04 [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf]]:241: Packages 3 and 4” (Fugro, 2021a). [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf]]:325: Fugro. (2021a). Tees south bank marine surveys overwater ground Investigation-Work [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf]]:325: Packages 3 and 4. Fugro report No. C2124-R-001. [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf]]:325: Fugro. (2021b). RHDHV Tees south bank overwater ground investigation – WP2 Benthic [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf]]:325: Characterisation. Fugro report No. 200835-R-001. Fugro GB Marine Limited. [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf]]:333:This report (the “Report”) was prepared as part of the services (the “Services”) provided by Fugro GB [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf]]:333:Marine Limited (“Fugro”) for its client (the “Client”) under terms of the relevant contract between the [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf]]:333:two parties (the “Contract”). The Services were performed by Fugro based on requirements of the [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf]]:333:Client set out in the Contract or otherwise made known by the Client to Fugro at the time. [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf]]:333:Fugro’s obligations and liabilities to the Client or any other party in respect of the Services and this [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf]]:333:in the Contract as implied by the law of the Contract) and Fugro provides no other representation or [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf]]:333:other purpose. Furthermore, Fugro has no obligation to update or revise this Report based on [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf]]:333:The Services were performed by Fugro exclusively for the Client and any other party identified in the [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf]]:333:Fugro accepts no liability whatsoever for any such use and/or reliance. [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:198:2014 Anglo American Harbour Facilities benthic survey (Fugro, 2014) [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:203:gibber, and Tubificoides swirencoides (Royal Haskoning 2009, Fugro 2014). One macrobenthic faunal [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:204:and 2013 (58 species in total and 19 fish species, (Fugro 2014)). Further information regarding the fish [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:204:2013 (Fugro 2014) compared to 85% in 2019, with Ophiura sp. alone accounting for 80% of individuals [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf]]:20:Of these, Y. limatula is believed to represent a first record for the UK waters (Fugro, 2021). [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf]]:22:estuarine environment that is subject to a degree of pollution (Fugro, 2021). [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf]]:22:to comprise slag deposits from the adjacent steel works (Fugro, 2021). Predominantly sand and gravel [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf]]:51: Customer Fugro Geoservices Ltd, Fugro House, Hithercroft Road, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, OX10 9RB [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf]]:83: Customer Fugro Geoservices Ltd, Fugro House, Hithercroft Road, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, OX10 9RB [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf]]:124: Customer Fugro Geoservices Ltd, Fugro House, Hithercroft Road, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, OX10 9RB [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf]]:156: Customer Fugro Geoservices [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf]]:200: Fugro Project No. C2124 [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf]]:200: Fugro Document No. C2124-R001-WP2 [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf]]:200: Fugro Legal Entity Fugro GB Marine Limited [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf]]:202:On the instruction of Tees Valley Combined Authority, Fugro performed an environmental site [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf]]:216: On the instruction of Tees Valley Combined Authority, Fugro performed an environmental [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf]]:226: report (Fugro, 2021b). [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf]]:227: the field report (Fugro, 2021b). All accepted samples were photographed, and their details [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf]]:236: depth (this would typically be rejected under Fugro sample rejection criteria (Fugro, 2021b); [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf]]:239: Fyke nets FN_01 and FN_02 after deployment Fugro personnel setting fyke nets FN_03 and FN_04 [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf]]:241: Packages 3 and 4” (Fugro, 2021a). [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf]]:325: Fugro. (2021a). Tees south bank marine surveys overwater ground Investigation-Work [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf]]:325: Packages 3 and 4. Fugro report No. C2124-R-001. [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf]]:325: Fugro. (2021b). RHDHV Tees south bank overwater ground investigation – WP2 Benthic [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf]]:325: Characterisation. Fugro report No. 200835-R-001. Fugro GB Marine Limited. [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf]]:333:This report (the “Report”) was prepared as part of the services (the “Services”) provided by Fugro GB [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf]]:333:Marine Limited (“Fugro”) for its client (the “Client”) under terms of the relevant contract between the [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf]]:333:two parties (the “Contract”). The Services were performed by Fugro based on requirements of the [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf]]:333:Client set out in the Contract or otherwise made known by the Client to Fugro at the time. [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf]]:333:Fugro’s obligations and liabilities to the Client or any other party in respect of the Services and this [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf]]:333:in the Contract as implied by the law of the Contract) and Fugro provides no other representation or [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf]]:333:other purpose. Furthermore, Fugro has no obligation to update or revise this Report based on [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf]]:333:The Services were performed by Fugro exclusively for the Client and any other party identified in the [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf]]:333:Fugro accepts no liability whatsoever for any such use and/or reliance. [[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0830-CD/R-2021-0830-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF|R-2021-0830-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF]]:50:existing habitat are based primarily on information in the Fugro environmental report entitled, “Tees [[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0830-CD/R-2021-0830-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF|R-2021-0830-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF]]:52:According to the Fugro report, “The infauna of the intertidal section on the southern bank, assessed [[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0830-CD/R-2021-0830-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF|R-2021-0830-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF]]:52:a criterion that was used in the Fugro assessment and one which would not apply to vertical [[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0830-CD/R-2021-0830-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF|R-2021-0830-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF]]:52:intertidal area. As the Fugro report noted this includes from historical construction activities [[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0830-CD/R-2021-0830-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF|R-2021-0830-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF]]:52:This criterion is based on the number of faunal/flora communities present. The Fugro reports notes [[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0830-CD/R-2021-0830-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF|R-2021-0830-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF]]:53:The Fugro report summarises the habitat in the following terms; “The intertidal section of the survey [[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0832-CD/R-2021-0832-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF|R-2021-0832-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF]]:50:existing habitat are based primarily on information in the Fugro environmental report entitled, “Tees [[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0832-CD/R-2021-0832-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF|R-2021-0832-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF]]:52:According to the Fugro report, “The infauna of the intertidal section on the southern bank, assessed [[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0832-CD/R-2021-0832-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF|R-2021-0832-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF]]:52:a criterion that was used in the Fugro assessment and one which would not apply to vertical [[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0832-CD/R-2021-0832-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF|R-2021-0832-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF]]:52:intertidal area. As the Fugro report noted this includes from historical construction activities [[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0832-CD/R-2021-0832-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF|R-2021-0832-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF]]:52:This criterion is based on the number of faunal/flora communities present. The Fugro reports notes [[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0832-CD/R-2021-0832-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF|R-2021-0832-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF]]:53:The Fugro report summarises the habitat in the following terms; “The intertidal section of the survey [[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:29:  2014 Anglo American Harbour Facilities benthic survey (Fugro, 2014) [[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf]]:8:2014 Anglo American Harbour Facilities benthic survey (Fugro, 2014) [[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf]]:13:gibber, and Tubificoides swirencoides (Royal Haskoning 2009, Fugro 2014). One macrobenthic faunal [[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf]]:14:and 2013 (58 species in total and 19 fish species, (Fugro 2014)). Further information regarding the fish [[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf]]:14:2013 (Fugro 2014) compared to 85% in 2019, with Ophiura sp. alone accounting for 80% of individuals [[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-XA6-9_Profile_300920.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-XA6-9_Profile_300920.pdf]]:1: Fugro 02/12/16 [[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-XA6-9_Profile_300920.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-XA6-9_Profile_300920.pdf]]:2: Fugro 02/12/16 [[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-XA6-9_Profile_300920.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-XA6-9_Profile_300920.pdf]]:3: Fugro 02/12/16 [[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0831-CD/R-2021-0831-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF|R-2021-0831-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF]]:50:existing habitat are based primarily on information in the Fugro environmental report entitled, “Tees [[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0831-CD/R-2021-0831-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF|R-2021-0831-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF]]:52:According to the Fugro report, “The infauna of the intertidal section on the southern bank, assessed [[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0831-CD/R-2021-0831-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF|R-2021-0831-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF]]:52:a criterion that was used in the Fugro assessment and one which would not apply to vertical [[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0831-CD/R-2021-0831-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF|R-2021-0831-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF]]:52:intertidal area. As the Fugro report noted this includes from historical construction activities [[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0831-CD/R-2021-0831-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF|R-2021-0831-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF]]:52:This criterion is based on the number of faunal/flora communities present. The Fugro reports notes [[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0831-CD/R-2021-0831-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF|R-2021-0831-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF]]:53:The Fugro report summarises the habitat in the following terms; “The intertidal section of the survey [[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0096-CD/R-2022-0096-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0408-02-Rem_Strat_South_Bank_West_Rev01 (Part 1).pdf|R-2022-0096-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0408-02-Rem_Strat_South_Bank_West_Rev01 (Part 1).pdf]]:9: – Marine Vibrocores and Marine Drilling, ref C2124-R001-WP3_WP4 03, prepared by Fugro [[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0096-CD/R-2022-0096-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0408-02-Rem_Strat_South_Bank_West_Rev01 (Part 1).pdf|R-2022-0096-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0408-02-Rem_Strat_South_Bank_West_Rev01 (Part 1).pdf]]:13:Mercia Mudstone outcrops in the riverbed [[Fugro 2021]]. [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:198:2014 Anglo American Harbour Facilities benthic survey (Fugro, 2014) [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:203:gibber, and Tubificoides swirencoides (Royal Haskoning 2009, Fugro 2014). One macrobenthic faunal [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:204:and 2013 (58 species in total and 19 fish species, (Fugro 2014)). Further information regarding the fish [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:204:2013 (Fugro 2014) compared to 85% in 2019, with Ophiura sp. alone accounting for 80% of individuals [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:198:2014 Anglo American Harbour Facilities benthic survey (Fugro, 2014) [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:203:gibber, and Tubificoides swirencoides (Royal Haskoning 2009, Fugro 2014). One macrobenthic faunal [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:204:and 2013 (58 species in total and 19 fish species, (Fugro 2014)). Further information regarding the fish [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:204:2013 (Fugro 2014) compared to 85% in 2019, with Ophiura sp. alone accounting for 80% of individuals [[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:198:2014 Anglo American Harbour Facilities benthic survey (Fugro, 2014) [[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:203:gibber, and Tubificoides swirencoides (Royal Haskoning 2009, Fugro 2014). One macrobenthic faunal [[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:204:and 2013 (58 species in total and 19 fish species, (Fugro 2014)). Further information regarding the fish [[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:204:2013 (Fugro 2014) compared to 85% in 2019, with Ophiura sp. alone accounting for 80% of individuals [[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf]]:8:2014 Anglo American Harbour Facilities benthic survey (Fugro, 2014) [[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf]]:13:gibber, and Tubificoides swirencoides (Royal Haskoning 2009, Fugro 2014). One macrobenthic faunal [[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf]]:14:and 2013 (58 species in total and 19 fish species, (Fugro 2014)). Further information regarding the fish [[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf]]:14:2013 (Fugro 2014) compared to 85% in 2019, with Ophiura sp. alone accounting for 80% of individuals [[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:29: 2014 Anglo American Harbour Facilities benthic survey (Fugro, 2014)