ospar_sampling_guidelines
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| ospar_sampling_guidelines [2025/11/20 13:56] – removed - external edit (Unknown date) 127.0.0.1 | ospar_sampling_guidelines [2026/01/07 21:05] (current) – [Interactive Calculator] nefcadmin | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ===== OSPAR Convention and OSPAR Agreement 2014-06 ===== | ||
| + | The OSPAR Convention is a treaty that aims to prevent and eliminate pollution and conserve the marine ecosystems of the North-East Atlantic. It was adopted in 1992 and entered into force in 1998, and covers land-based, offshore and dumping sources of pollution. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The UK is a signatory to the OSPAR Convention and so this governs the UK licencing of disposal of dredged material at sea. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The OSPAR Convention organisation issues guidelines which the signatories sign into as agreements. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Paragraph 5 of OSPAR Agreement 2014-06 specifies the requirements for sampling procedure before material can be licensed for disposal at sea. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Paragraph 5 is very explicit as to the purpose of sampling and quantitative as to the way in which sampling should be carried out. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== OSPAR Agreeement 2014-06: 5. Dredged material sampling ====== | ||
| + | |||
| + | 5.1 Dredged material will require sampling and analysis (cf. Technical Annex I) to provide sufficient information for permitting purposes. Local conditions will dictate what information is relevant to a particular operation. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 5.2 The location and depth of sampling should represent the horizontal and vertical extent of the area, and the quantity of material to be dredged. In many maintenance dredging campaigns, grab sampling will be sufficient. Sampling from dredged material within disposal vessels or barges is not advisable for permitting purposes. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 5.3 Samples should provide a good spatial (surface) and vertical (depth) representation of the material to be dredged and should take account of the exchange characteristics of the area, i.e., more samples may be required in a low energy enclosed and semi-enclosed areas, and less in high energy environments such as open areas. The minimum number of separate sampling stations recommended to obtain representative results, assuming a reasonably uniform sediment distribution in the area to be dredged is as follows. The number of sample stations can also be determined on the basis of the size of the area to be dredged: | ||
| + | |||
| + | |**Dredged area (m< | ||
| + | |< | ||
| + | |10,000 - 50,000|4 – 8| | ||
| + | |50,000 - 100,000|9 – 10| | ||
| + | |> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Where projected depth of dredging is significant, | ||
| + | |||
| + | |**Amount dredged (m< | ||
| + | |Up to 25,000|3| | ||
| + | |25,000 - 100,000|4 – 6| | ||
| + | |100,000 - 500,000|7 – 15| | ||
| + | |500,000 - 2, | ||
| + | |> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Contracting Parties are encouraged to use the Guidelines for the Sampling and Analysis of Dredged Material Intended for Disposal at Sea (IMO, 2005) to inform sampling regimes. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 5.4 Normally, the samples from each sampling station and different depths in the sediment should be analysed separately. However, if previous analyses have shown that the sediment is clearly homogenous with respect to sediment texture and known contamination it is possible to analyse composite samples. OSPAR recommends no more than three adjacent sampling stations at a time be composited, and providing there are no distinctly different observable attributes (same colour, consistency, | ||
| + | |||
| + | The original individual samples should be stored or preserved according to procedures in the JAMP Guidelines for Monitoring Contaminants in Sediments (OSPAR Agreement 2002-16) until the permitting procedure has been completed, in case further analyses are necessary. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Frequency of sampling | ||
| + | |||
| + | 5.5 The period between sampling has been agreed as three years, but if the results of the analyses indicate that the material meets national assessment criteria (e.g. below lower action level), sampling in the same area may be reduced to every five years, provided that there are no material changes to the sediment (e.g. dredging) or new sources of contamination likely to lead to deterioration of the quality of the material in the meantime. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 5.6 It may be possible, following assessment of the results of an initial full survey, to reduce either the number of sampling stations or the number of determinants and still provide sufficient information for permitting purposes. If a reduced sampling programme does not confirm the earlier analyses, the full survey should be repeated. If the list of determinants is reduced, further analysis of the complete list of determinants is advisable every five years. The second and third sentence of this paragraph needs to be applied consistent with the provisions of the primary list of chemical determinants in Technical Annex I. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 5.7 In areas where sediment chemistry has been shown to exceed action levels, i.e. demonstrates high levels of contamination, | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== UK Regulations ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | The UK Government Regulations ([[https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | So the wording of OSPAR Agreement 2014-06 is key to understanding how sampling plans are developed for Marine Licence applications. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Tees 10 Year Maintenance Dredging Renewal Application MLA/ | ||
| + | |||
| + | The sediment sampling plan ([[this> | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Incorrect Volume Approach Taken in Sampling Plan ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | "1.2 PD Teesport Limited undertakes maintenance dredging of the Tees Estuary and Hartlepool Channel to maintain navigable depths as part of their statutory harbour authority responsibilities. Under marine licence L/ | ||
| + | |||
| + | The MMO and Cefas considered that 31 samples were sufficient for the annual disposal of the stated 2, | ||
| + | |||
| + | "1.1 This advice relates to sampling to support mid-licence condition compliance for the disposal of material from the Tees Estuary and Hartlepool Channel. It is understood that this advice will also be used to support the submission of a marine licence application in 2025 to continue disposal activities." | ||
| + | |||
| + | It is not immediately obvious why the full 10 year volume or at least 3 years volume isn't used as sampling is only repeated every 3 years and the licence covers the dredging for the full 10years. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |**Assessment Basis**|**Dredge Volume (m3)**|**OSPAR Guideline Application**|**Required Samples**|**Approved Plan**| | ||
| + | |**Annual Rate**|2, | ||
| + | |**Total Licence Volume**|22, | ||
| + | |||
| + | Paragraph 2.2 licence [[this> | ||
| + | |||
| + | "2.2 In accordance with the recommendations of the OSPAR Guidelines for the Management of Dredged Material, samples should be taken to provide a good representation of the volume of material to be dredged. The distribution and depth of sampling should reflect the size and depth of the area to be dredged, the amount to be dredged and the expected variability in the horizontal and vertical distribution of contaminants. The MMO also uses the OSPAR guidelines to inform our advice on sampling requirements for other activities which are likely to lead to the mobilisation of sediments. Based on the information submitted (as described above), the following sampling and analysis is required." | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Spatial Representation Required to Comply Correctly with OSPAR Guidelines ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | There are 2 distinct areas which PD Ports as the statutory harbour authority are responsible for the River Tees and the Port of Hartlepool. | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{ : | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | === MLA/ | ||
| + | |||
| + | In this marine licence application, | ||
| + | |||
| + | From the [[this> | ||
| + | |||
| + | |**Area m< | ||
| + | |**< | ||
| + | |**Subsequent 100, | ||
| + | |**16685800**|**839**| | ||
| + | |||
| + | These figures are based on the map supplied by PD Ports to define the area they want to dredge in, which defines the whole river and port areas, as such 839 stations would have been required. | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{ : | ||
| + | |||
| + | === MLA/ | ||
| + | |||
| + | In this marine licence application, | ||
| + | |||
| + | From the [[this> | ||
| + | |||
| + | |**Area m< | ||
| + | |**< | ||
| + | |**Subsequent 100, | ||
| + | |**12171400**|**614**| | ||
| + | |||
| + | These figures are based on the map supplied by PD Ports to define the area they want to dredge in, which defines the whole river and port areas, as such 614 stations would be required. | ||
| + | |||
| + | It is obvious that in order for the L/ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Interactive Calculator ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | OSPAR 2014-06 paragraph 5.3: "Where projected depth of dredging is significant, | ||
| + | |||
| + | This is well reflected in the number of samples calculated based on these tables, where dredging more than 5m depths shows that the volume table recommends a greater number of samples than the area station numbers. | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{url> | ||
