North East File Collection - NEFC

This page is read only. You can view the source, but not change it. Ask your administrator if you think this is wrong.
{include:Teesworks - keywords - menu}

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf|EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf]]:27:          the combustion gases from a typical CCGT plant contain negligible amounts of

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf|EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf]]:56:      Therefore, it is considered that the effects of operational traffic would be negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf|EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf]]:66:           negligible – imperceptible effect to an environmental resource or receptor; or

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002386-Environment Agency - Comments on any other information submitted at Deadline 10.pdf|EN010103-002386-Environment Agency - Comments on any other information submitted at Deadline 10.pdf]]:4:       analysis suggests that this will have a negligible impact on ambient DIN

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002421-NZT DCO 9.42 - Comments on D9 Submissions & Additional Submissions - Oct 2022 (D11).pdf|EN010103-002421-NZT DCO 9.42 - Comments on D9 Submissions & Additional Submissions - Oct 2022 (D11).pdf]]:27: negligible and does not address the matters set      powers sought and the extent of the Order

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf|EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf]]:39:         Ramsar as a result of site plant and NRMM emissions is likely to be negligible and not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf|EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf]]:49:         are either not sensitive to nitrogen deposition or will be affected to a negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf|EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf]]:50:            therefore considered to have a negligible effect on air quality. Pollution from

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf|EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf]]:70:         between negligible and potentially impactful projects and plans.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf|EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf]]:100:             dismiss atmospheric pollution impacts as negligible. Therefore, this impact pathway is screened in for Appropriate Assessment where the updated modelling

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf|EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf]]:112:         c.     Since the area around the Proposed Development is of negligible importance to The Wash and North Norfolk Coast harbour seal population, no in

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf|EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf]]:135:         reaching the coast, then it can be concluded that there would be negligible risk of any

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002528-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf|EN010103-002528-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf]]:27:                   done at night in order to have a negligible impact on users of the surface land. Requirement

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf|EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf]]:41:         Ramsar as a result of site plant and NRMM emissions is likely to be negligible and not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf|EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf]]:52:            be affected to a negligible degree Likely Significant Effects, LSEs on the Durham Coast

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf|EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf]]:52:            therefore considered to have a negligible effect on air quality. Pollution from

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf|EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf]]:72:         between negligible and potentially impactful projects and plans.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf|EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf]]:100:             dismiss atmospheric pollution impacts as negligible. Therefore, this impact pathway is screened in for Appropriate Assessment where the updated modelling

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf|EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf]]:112:         c.      Since the area around the Proposed Development is of negligible importance to The Wash and North Norfolk Coast harbour seal population, no in

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf|EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf]]:135:         reaching the coast, then it can be concluded that there would be negligible risk of any

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002254-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf|EN010103-002254-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf]]:27:                   done at night in order to have a negligible impact on users of the surface land. Requirement

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002323-NZT DCO 9.36 - Nutrient Nitrogen Briefing Paper Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf|EN010103-002323-NZT DCO 9.36 - Nutrient Nitrogen Briefing Paper Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf]]:24:              made. Initial analysis suggests that this will have a negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002323-NZT DCO 9.36 - Nutrient Nitrogen Briefing Paper Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf|EN010103-002323-NZT DCO 9.36 - Nutrient Nitrogen Briefing Paper Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf]]:28:              made. Initial analysis suggests that this will have a negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000910-NZT DCO 6.2.18 ES Vol Chapter 18 Archaeology and Cultural Heritage.pdf|EN010103-000910-NZT DCO 6.2.18 ES Vol Chapter 18 Archaeology and Cultural Heritage.pdf]]:14:Negligible                                                            Assets whose values are compromised by poor

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000910-NZT DCO 6.2.18 ES Vol Chapter 18 Archaeology and Cultural Heritage.pdf|EN010103-000910-NZT DCO 6.2.18 ES Vol Chapter 18 Archaeology and Cultural Heritage.pdf]]:15:Low                              Moderate                  Minor               Minor              Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000910-NZT DCO 6.2.18 ES Vol Chapter 18 Archaeology and Cultural Heritage.pdf|EN010103-000910-NZT DCO 6.2.18 ES Vol Chapter 18 Archaeology and Cultural Heritage.pdf]]:15:Negligible                       Neutral                   Neutral             Neutral            Neutral

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000910-NZT DCO 6.2.18 ES Vol Chapter 18 Archaeology and Cultural Heritage.pdf|EN010103-000910-NZT DCO 6.2.18 ES Vol Chapter 18 Archaeology and Cultural Heritage.pdf]]:15:        would be less than substantial. A minor or negligible (not significant) effect

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000910-NZT DCO 6.2.18 ES Vol Chapter 18 Archaeology and Cultural Heritage.pdf|EN010103-000910-NZT DCO 6.2.18 ES Vol Chapter 18 Archaeology and Cultural Heritage.pdf]]:17:              therefore negligible due to its presumed poor level of preservation. It is

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000910-NZT DCO 6.2.18 ES Vol Chapter 18 Archaeology and Cultural Heritage.pdf|EN010103-000910-NZT DCO 6.2.18 ES Vol Chapter 18 Archaeology and Cultural Heritage.pdf]]:17:              negligible as its value is limited by its poor preservation. It is assessed there

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000910-NZT DCO 6.2.18 ES Vol Chapter 18 Archaeology and Cultural Heritage.pdf|EN010103-000910-NZT DCO 6.2.18 ES Vol Chapter 18 Archaeology and Cultural Heritage.pdf]]:17:              asset is assessed to be negligible as it is no longer extant. There would be

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000910-NZT DCO 6.2.18 ES Vol Chapter 18 Archaeology and Cultural Heritage.pdf|EN010103-000910-NZT DCO 6.2.18 ES Vol Chapter 18 Archaeology and Cultural Heritage.pdf]]:18:              and their archaeological interest and value is assessed to be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000910-NZT DCO 6.2.18 ES Vol Chapter 18 Archaeology and Cultural Heritage.pdf|EN010103-000910-NZT DCO 6.2.18 ES Vol Chapter 18 Archaeology and Cultural Heritage.pdf]]:18:        but, as the sites no longer survive, they have negligible archaeological

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000910-NZT DCO 6.2.18 ES Vol Chapter 18 Archaeology and Cultural Heritage.pdf|EN010103-000910-NZT DCO 6.2.18 ES Vol Chapter 18 Archaeology and Cultural Heritage.pdf]]:18:        interest and their value is negligible. There would be no impact to the assets’

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000910-NZT DCO 6.2.18 ES Vol Chapter 18 Archaeology and Cultural Heritage.pdf|EN010103-000910-NZT DCO 6.2.18 ES Vol Chapter 18 Archaeology and Cultural Heritage.pdf]]:19:        understanding of the industrial heritage of the area, but they have negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000910-NZT DCO 6.2.18 ES Vol Chapter 18 Archaeology and Cultural Heritage.pdf|EN010103-000910-NZT DCO 6.2.18 ES Vol Chapter 18 Archaeology and Cultural Heritage.pdf]]:19:        archaeological interest and their value is negligible. There would be no

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001119-NZT DCO 6.4.20 ES Vol III Appendix 12C Preliminary Ecological Appraisal Part 1.pdf|EN010103-001119-NZT DCO 6.4.20 ES Vol III Appendix 12C Preliminary Ecological Appraisal Part 1.pdf]]:12:                • Negligible (common and widespread ecological features that have very

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001119-NZT DCO 6.4.20 ES Vol III Appendix 12C Preliminary Ecological Appraisal Part 1.pdf|EN010103-001119-NZT DCO 6.4.20 ES Vol III Appendix 12C Preliminary Ecological Appraisal Part 1.pdf]]:19:               therefore assessed as having negligible nature conservation value.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001119-NZT DCO 6.4.20 ES Vol III Appendix 12C Preliminary Ecological Appraisal Part 1.pdf|EN010103-001119-NZT DCO 6.4.20 ES Vol III Appendix 12C Preliminary Ecological Appraisal Part 1.pdf]]:20:               substituted and of negligible nature conservation value, however where they

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001119-NZT DCO 6.4.20 ES Vol III Appendix 12C Preliminary Ecological Appraisal Part 1.pdf|EN010103-001119-NZT DCO 6.4.20 ES Vol III Appendix 12C Preliminary Ecological Appraisal Part 1.pdf]]:22:               therefore assessed as having negligible nature conservation value.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001119-NZT DCO 6.4.20 ES Vol III Appendix 12C Preliminary Ecological Appraisal Part 1.pdf|EN010103-001119-NZT DCO 6.4.20 ES Vol III Appendix 12C Preliminary Ecological Appraisal Part 1.pdf]]:22:               assessed to be of negligible value.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001117-NZT DCO 6.4.20 ES Vol III Appendix 12C Preliminary Ecological Appraisal Part 4.pdf|EN010103-001117-NZT DCO 6.4.20 ES Vol III Appendix 12C Preliminary Ecological Appraisal Part 4.pdf]]:7:boarded up securely and has only negligible potential for bats. Amenity shrub and

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf|EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf]]:94:                  negligible adverse effect for the Proposed Development in isolation. A

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf|EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf]]:118:            decommissioning are predicted to be negligible adverse and there will be no

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf|EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf]]:119:            greater than negligible adverse.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf|EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf]]:123:                      not lead to any breaches of national air          ecological receptors are assessed as negligible and not significant.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf|EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf]]:123:                                                                        site plant are also assessed as negligible and not significant.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf|EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf]]:124:                      proceed.                                   Development are predicted to result in negligible adverse effects at all

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf|EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf]]:134:                                                              negligible and therefore not of significance, while there will be no physical

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf|EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf]]:138:                      connectivity of the green Infrastructure   mineral resources considered is negligible (Chapter 10 ‘Geology and

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf|EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf]]:138:                      plant available; containment of noise      or negligible adverse or less. There would be a moderate/minor adverse effect

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf|EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf]]:144:                                                                 predicted to be negligible adverse (not significant).

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf|EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf]]:144:                      while paragraph 2.2.6 notes that the       and junctions are anticipated to be negligible and therefore not significant.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf|EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf]]:144:                                                                 considered to be negligible (not significant).

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf|EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf]]:144:                                                                 therefore, anticipated to be negligible (not significant). A Decommissioning

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf|EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf]]:153:                      options considered for installing the     construction is considered negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf|EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf]]:189:                Plan      Strategy         transport network.          be negligible given that only the CO2 Gathering Network and parts of the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf|EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf]]:191:                Plan                       transport network.          operational traffic will be negligible given that only the CO2 Gathering

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001735-Redcar & Cleveland Borough Council - EN010103-001527-NZT-ExQ1-editable-version.pdf|EN010103-001735-Redcar & Cleveland Borough Council - EN010103-001527-NZT-ExQ1-editable-version.pdf]]:22:                                     summarise potential impacts on tourism to be negligible adverse during the construction

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001735-Redcar & Cleveland Borough Council - EN010103-001527-NZT-ExQ1-editable-version.pdf|EN010103-001735-Redcar & Cleveland Borough Council - EN010103-001527-NZT-ExQ1-editable-version.pdf]]:23:                                        iv)    Is the Applicants’ assessment that potential impacts on tourism would be negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf|EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf]]:27:              deposits with low permeability that have negligible significance for water supply

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf|EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf]]:88:              negligible within the water bodies directly affected and are not significant to

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf|EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf]]:89:              Tees Estuary (S Bank) waterbody. However, this risk is considered negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf|EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf]]:97:        surface water runoff, then a negligible impact is predicted to the Tees Coastal

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf|EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf]]:99:        considered to have a negligible impact, especially at the water body level.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf|EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf]]:100:        of impact is predicted to be negligibleminor and highly localised, especially

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf|EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf]]:100:        therefore predicted to be negligibleminor and highly localised, especially at

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf|EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf]]:100:        of unfavourable conditions), and so a negligible impact on fish is expected.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf|EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf]]:106:        considered to be minorminornegligible and localised, and not significant at

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf|EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf]]:108:        negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf|EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf]]:109:        deposition, then a negligible impact is considered appropriate for this

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf|EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf]]:111:        storage areas would be adequately bunded, negligible impacts on these

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002046-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf|EN010103-002046-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf]]:27:                    done at night in order to have a negligible impact on users of the surface land. Requirement

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001246-EA_NZT_OFFICIAL_171221_Redacted.pdf|EN010103-001246-EA_NZT_OFFICIAL_171221_Redacted.pdf]]:9:intertidal habitats is considered to be negligible. However, the Applicant has failed

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf|EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf]]:25:                         negligible. EW confirmed that this is pending detailed modelling which is underway.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf|EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf]]:103:                         far field. EW noted that this is considered to be negligible, if it is

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001604-NZT DCO 9.4 - APPENDIX 5 LATEST AUDITED ACCOUNTS – TOTAL GAS & POWER CHARTERING LIMITED.pdf|EN010103-001604-NZT DCO 9.4 - APPENDIX 5 LATEST AUDITED ACCOUNTS – TOTAL GAS & POWER CHARTERING LIMITED.pdf]]:117:induced is likewise considered negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf|EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf]]:43:negligible methane emissions, the question whether using a                 applies across the spectrum of hydrogen provenance and it

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf|EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf]]:166:     and operational impacts are negligible, then the GHG

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf|EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf]]:167:          negative or negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf|EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf]]:169:                           Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf|EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf]]:169:     effect. It is down to the practitioner to differentiate                   emissions, is assessed as having a negligible effect that is

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf|EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf]]:170:     ‘negligible’ non-significant effect conclusion does not               and indicates exemplary performance where a project

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf|EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf]]:170:       adverse effects and beneficial effects are considered to be significant. Minor adverse and negligible effects are not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf|EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf]]:170:       Negligible: the project’s GHG impacts would be reduced through measures that go well beyond existing and

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf|EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf]]:170:       achieved well before 2050. A project with negligible effects provides GHG performance that is well ‘ahead of the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf|EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf]]:174:     into the assessment of additional mitigation and residual       negligible / beneficial]”.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf|EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf]]:230:be considered and which are determined to have only a negligible effect on the environment. The

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf|EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf]]:12:              Negligible (or Low for groundwater) and is dependent on the assessment

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf|EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf]]:14:Negligible         No geological exposures, little /             Geology         e.g. significant depth of made

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf|EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf]]:14:                   Negligible is not applicable to Groundwater                   N/A

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf|EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf]]:17:Negligible        Results in effect on attribute, but of               Geology       Very minor loss or detrimental

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf|EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf]]:18:Receptor               No change              Negligible              Minor             Moderate             Major

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf|EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf]]:18:Negligible             Neutral                Neutral                 Neutral or        Neutral or           Slight

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf|EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf]]:35:              impact from any loss is considered negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf|EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf]]:36:              considered is negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf|EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf]]:37:                 Infrastructure is installed. However, the loss is likely to be negligible given

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf|EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf]]:45:Construction         Geology                     Very High          Foundations                          Negligible               GI is required to confirm Baseline    Slight       P

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf|EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf]]:46:Construction         Groundwater –               Very High          Changes to Hydrogeological           Negligible               GI and groundwater level and          Slight      P/T

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf|EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf]]:52:Operation            Groundwater –               Medium -           Impacts on groundwater and          Negligible                 Storage and handling of processed Slight        P

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf|EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf]]:53:Decommissio Groundwater –                        Medium -           Impacts on groundwater could      Negligible                   Implementation of DEMP, SWMP,        Slight      T

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002077-NZT DCO 9.31 - Response to Examining Authority's Written Questions DLV1.7 ii August 2022 (D6).pdf|EN010103-002077-NZT DCO 9.31 - Response to Examining Authority's Written Questions DLV1.7 ii August 2022 (D6).pdf]]:8:           operation and opening would result in a very low impact and a negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002248-NZT DCO 9.36 - Nutrient Nitrogen Briefing Paper - Sept 2022(D8).pdf|EN010103-002248-NZT DCO 9.36 - Nutrient Nitrogen Briefing Paper - Sept 2022(D8).pdf]]:22:              made. Initial analysis suggests that this will have a negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001060-NZT DCO 6.4.25 ES Vol III Appendix 12H Supplementary Habitat Information Report Coatham Sands Part 1.pdf|EN010103-001060-NZT DCO 6.4.25 ES Vol III Appendix 12H Supplementary Habitat Information Report Coatham Sands Part 1.pdf]]:14:               dune (less than 5 m wide and 1.5 m high) of very loose sand with negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000904-NZT DCO 6.2.20 ES Vol I Chapter 20 Socio-economics.pdf|EN010103-000904-NZT DCO 6.2.20 ES Vol I Chapter 20 Socio-economics.pdf]]:6:                negligible – an imperceptible effect on an impact area; or

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000904-NZT DCO 6.2.20 ES Vol I Chapter 20 Socio-economics.pdf|EN010103-000904-NZT DCO 6.2.20 ES Vol I Chapter 20 Socio-economics.pdf]]:6:              been classified as minor, moderate, major or negligible. The assessment of

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000904-NZT DCO 6.2.20 ES Vol I Chapter 20 Socio-economics.pdf|EN010103-000904-NZT DCO 6.2.20 ES Vol I Chapter 20 Socio-economics.pdf]]:7:              major (adverse or beneficial). Effects identified as being negligible or minor

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000904-NZT DCO 6.2.20 ES Vol I Chapter 20 Socio-economics.pdf|EN010103-000904-NZT DCO 6.2.20 ES Vol I Chapter 20 Socio-economics.pdf]]:7:              Medium                 Major                      Moderate       Minor               Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000904-NZT DCO 6.2.20 ES Vol I Chapter 20 Socio-economics.pdf|EN010103-000904-NZT DCO 6.2.20 ES Vol I Chapter 20 Socio-economics.pdf]]:7:              Low                    Moderate                   Minor          Negligible          Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000904-NZT DCO 6.2.20 ES Vol I Chapter 20 Socio-economics.pdf|EN010103-000904-NZT DCO 6.2.20 ES Vol I Chapter 20 Socio-economics.pdf]]:7:              Very Low               Minor                      Negligible     Negligible          Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000904-NZT DCO 6.2.20 ES Vol I Chapter 20 Socio-economics.pdf|EN010103-000904-NZT DCO 6.2.20 ES Vol I Chapter 20 Socio-economics.pdf]]:30:        restrictions to access the resources. This results in a negligible (non-

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000904-NZT DCO 6.2.20 ES Vol I Chapter 20 Socio-economics.pdf|EN010103-000904-NZT DCO 6.2.20 ES Vol I Chapter 20 Socio-economics.pdf]]:32:        temporary diving restrictions are anticipated to be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000904-NZT DCO 6.2.20 ES Vol I Chapter 20 Socio-economics.pdf|EN010103-000904-NZT DCO 6.2.20 ES Vol I Chapter 20 Socio-economics.pdf]]:33:        limited and temporary closure of PRoW routes. This results in a negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000904-NZT DCO 6.2.20 ES Vol I Chapter 20 Socio-economics.pdf|EN010103-000904-NZT DCO 6.2.20 ES Vol I Chapter 20 Socio-economics.pdf]]:35:              Infrastructure is therefore required. This is assessed as a negligible (non-

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000904-NZT DCO 6.2.20 ES Vol I Chapter 20 Socio-economics.pdf|EN010103-000904-NZT DCO 6.2.20 ES Vol I Chapter 20 Socio-economics.pdf]]:37:Tourism impact (including local                  Negligible effect             Low sensitivity, low

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000904-NZT DCO 6.2.20 ES Vol I Chapter 20 Socio-economics.pdf|EN010103-000904-NZT DCO 6.2.20 ES Vol I Chapter 20 Socio-economics.pdf]]:37:PRoW users                                       Negligible adverse effect     Low sensitivity, low

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000904-NZT DCO 6.2.20 ES Vol I Chapter 20 Socio-economics.pdf|EN010103-000904-NZT DCO 6.2.20 ES Vol I Chapter 20 Socio-economics.pdf]]:37:Community disruption and                          Negligible adverse effect    Limited migration to the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001109-NZT DCO 6.4.21 ES Vol III Appendix 12D Bat Survey Report Part 1.pdf|EN010103-001109-NZT DCO 6.4.21 ES Vol III Appendix 12D Bat Survey Report Part 1.pdf]]:6:                • Negligible – unlikely to be used by roosting bats;

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001109-NZT DCO 6.4.21 ES Vol III Appendix 12D Bat Survey Report Part 1.pdf|EN010103-001109-NZT DCO 6.4.21 ES Vol III Appendix 12D Bat Survey Report Part 1.pdf]]:13:               No evidence of bats was found within B1a. It is assessed as having negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001109-NZT DCO 6.4.21 ES Vol III Appendix 12D Bat Survey Report Part 1.pdf|EN010103-001109-NZT DCO 6.4.21 ES Vol III Appendix 12D Bat Survey Report Part 1.pdf]]:15:               No evidence of bats was found, and B1c is considered to have negligible bat

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001109-NZT DCO 6.4.21 ES Vol III Appendix 12D Bat Survey Report Part 1.pdf|EN010103-001109-NZT DCO 6.4.21 ES Vol III Appendix 12D Bat Survey Report Part 1.pdf]]:15:               Given the structure of B2, it is assessed as having negligible suitability for

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001109-NZT DCO 6.4.21 ES Vol III Appendix 12D Bat Survey Report Part 1.pdf|EN010103-001109-NZT DCO 6.4.21 ES Vol III Appendix 12D Bat Survey Report Part 1.pdf]]:16:               Structure B3 is assessed as having negligible suitability.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001109-NZT DCO 6.4.21 ES Vol III Appendix 12D Bat Survey Report Part 1.pdf|EN010103-001109-NZT DCO 6.4.21 ES Vol III Appendix 12D Bat Survey Report Part 1.pdf]]:16:               having negligible suitability for used by roosting bats.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001109-NZT DCO 6.4.21 ES Vol III Appendix 12D Bat Survey Report Part 1.pdf|EN010103-001109-NZT DCO 6.4.21 ES Vol III Appendix 12D Bat Survey Report Part 1.pdf]]:16:               The bridge is considered to be of negligible bat roost potential due to its

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001109-NZT DCO 6.4.21 ES Vol III Appendix 12D Bat Survey Report Part 1.pdf|EN010103-001109-NZT DCO 6.4.21 ES Vol III Appendix 12D Bat Survey Report Part 1.pdf]]:17:               The bridges are assessed as having negligible suitability for roosting bats.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf|EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf]]:26:              deposits with low permeability that have negligible significance for water supply

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf|EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf]]:77:              negligible within the water bodies directly affected and are not significant to

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf|EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf]]:77:              Tees Estuary (S Bank) waterbody. However, this risk is considered negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf|EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf]]:85:        surface water runoff, then a negligible impact is predicted to the Tees Coastal

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf|EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf]]:86:        a negligible impact.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf|EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf]]:87:        to migratory species, and so a negligible impact on fish is expected.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf|EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf]]:90:        negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf|EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf]]:91:        deposition, then a negligible impact is considered appropriate for this

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf|EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf]]:92:        storage areas would be adequately bunded, negligible impacts on these

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf|EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf]]:134:             limit of detection (LoD), indicating a negligible presence of sanitary pollutants

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf|EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf]]:157:                                                                       to either minor adverse or less or negligible adverse or less. .

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf|EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf]]:626:      increase in traffic flows and HGV flows and is expected to have a negligible impact.”

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002255-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf|EN010103-002255-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf]]:27:                    done at night in order to have a negligible impact on users of the surface land. Requirement

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf|EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf]]:11:        negligible, minor, moderate or major (adverse or beneficial).

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf|EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf]]:11:Medium                              Major                    Moderate                 Minor                 Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf|EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf]]:11:Low                               Moderate                      Minor              Negligible               Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf|EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf]]:11:Very Low                            Minor                    Negligible            Negligible               Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf|EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf]]:11:        purposes of the EIA Regulations; minor and negligible effects are ‘not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf|EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf]]:25:        would be negligible and a detailed assessment of the operational phase of

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf|EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf]]:38:        on the A1042 Kirkleatham Lane and negligible (not significant) on all other

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf|EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf]]:38:        negligible (not significant) on all other links.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf|EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf]]:38:        minor (not significant) on the A1042 Kirkleatham Lane and negligible (not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf|EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf]]:39:              Development on road links is negligible, the effect on highway safety is

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf|EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf]]:39:              considered negligible (not significant).

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf|EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf]]:39:        that the driver delay effect of the Proposed Development would be negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf|EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf]]:40:        Port Clarence Road and negligible (not significant) on all other links.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf|EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf]]:40:        and negligible (not significant) on all other links.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf|EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf]]:41:        minor (not significant) on the A1046 Port Clarence Road and negligible (not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf|EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf]]:41:        Development on road links is negligible, the effect on highway safety is

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf|EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf]]:41:        considered negligible (not significant).

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf|EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf]]:42:        overall effects during operation are therefore considered to be negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf|EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf]]:42:        percentage increase in traffic due to decommissioning would be negligible,

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf|EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf]]:43:        and decommissioning phases are predicted to be negligible adverse (not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf|EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf]]:43:        to be negligible and thus not significant. Notwithstanding, a number of traffic

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf|EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf]]:43:        negligible (not significant).

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf|EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf]]:43:        traffic and are, therefore, anticipated to be negligible (not significant)..

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001683-Marine Management Organisation - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ1.pdf|EN010103-001683-Marine Management Organisation - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ1.pdf]]:32:                                     washing would rapidly disperse nitrogen deposits rendering any potential effects negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001683-Marine Management Organisation - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ1.pdf|EN010103-001683-Marine Management Organisation - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ1.pdf]]:66:                                     summarise potential impacts on tourism to be negligible adverse during the construction

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001683-Marine Management Organisation - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ1.pdf|EN010103-001683-Marine Management Organisation - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ1.pdf]]:66:                                        iv)    Is the Applicants’ assessment that potential impacts on tourism would be negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001683-Marine Management Organisation - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ1.pdf|EN010103-001683-Marine Management Organisation - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ1.pdf]]:66:                                     indicate a negligible adverse effect on tourism during the construction phase only.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001683-Marine Management Organisation - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ1.pdf|EN010103-001683-Marine Management Organisation - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ1.pdf]]:66:                                         iv)    Would the negligible adverse impact identified in paragraph 20.6.28 be on any

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001683-Marine Management Organisation - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ1.pdf|EN010103-001683-Marine Management Organisation - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ1.pdf]]:68:                                     are ‘negligible adverse’. However, the effects during construction are described as ‘minor

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002321-NZT DCO 9.36 - Nutrient Nitrogen Briefing Paper (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf|EN010103-002321-NZT DCO 9.36 - Nutrient Nitrogen Briefing Paper (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf]]:24:              made. Initial analysis suggests that this will have a negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002321-NZT DCO 9.36 - Nutrient Nitrogen Briefing Paper (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf|EN010103-002321-NZT DCO 9.36 - Nutrient Nitrogen Briefing Paper (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf]]:28:              made. Initial analysis suggests that this will have a negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf|EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf]]:9:               • Negligible (common and widespread biodiversity features of such low

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf|EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf]]:10:        ES as outlined in Table 15-1. The category of ‘Negligible’ effects, defined in

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf|EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf]]:67:airborne pollutant emissions.                depend for foraging, breeding or                  impacts as negligible for ecological       (‘Construction’).

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf|EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf]]:74:        exactly to the boundary of the PCC Site, affecting a negligible area of

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf|EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf]]:74:        a negligible effect on birds that is not significant (neutral) for all ornithological

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf|EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf]]:75:        Therefore, there will be a negligible impact on the species within Coatham

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf|EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf]]:76:        Coatham Dunes or Coatham Sands as this operation will cause negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf|EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf]]:83:        feeding will be negligible in the context of the wider availability of habitats

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf|EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf]]:87:        negligible adverse and not significant for all ornithological receptors.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf|EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf]]:93:              alone and a negligible increase in noise levels further away from the PCC

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf|EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf]]:59:                       assumption        that    only     these   Ornithology (APP-017), which concluded negligible magnitude of impact and therefore both species were not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf|EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf]]:60:                                                   which concluded negligible magnitude of impact in relation to the potential for barrier effects. For auk species, the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf|EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf]]:64:                      EIA should have given attention to      Hornsea Four alone has been assessed as negligible. As such, the physical presence of Infrastructure from comparable

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf|EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf]]:65:                                                                 variation meaning negligible. As such, the cumulative impact would remain to be not significant in EIA terms.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf|EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf]]:91:                       electromagnetic field (EMF) from            the cable, with the EMF rapidly attenuating horizontally and vertically away from the source to negligible levels

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf|EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf]]:93:                                                                        either at ‘peak’ or during more typical or average times, is considered to be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf|EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf]]:128:                                                                                           Chapter 8, Table 8.25), these noise levels are below the threshold of negligible impact.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf|EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf]]:145:                      robust objection. Our client is extremely concerned that other potentially        vehicle movement will be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf|EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf]]:147:                                                    impact is negligible, and this is not significant in EIA terms.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf|EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf]]:159:                  between Long Lane/Shepherds                                   Est. Negligible                  Sub-station.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002533-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons Tracked Nov 2022 (D12).pdf|EN010103-002533-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons Tracked Nov 2022 (D12).pdf]]:79:                   typically be done at night where possible in order to have a negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001197-NZT DCO 6.2.4 - ES Vol I Chapter 4 - Oct 2021.pdf|EN010103-001197-NZT DCO 6.2.4 - ES Vol I Chapter 4 - Oct 2021.pdf]]:8:       the gaseous fuel, the combustion gases from a CCGT contain negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf|EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf]]:38:          SPA/Ramsar as a result of site plant and NRMM emissions is likely to be negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf|EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf]]:49:              nitrogen deposition or will be affected to a negligible degree Likely Significant Effects

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf|EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf]]:49:              therefore considered to have a negligible effect on air quality. Pollution from

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf|EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf]]:66:          between negligible and potentially impactful projects and plans.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf|EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf]]:92:             dismiss atmospheric pollution impacts as negligible. Therefore, this impact pathway is screened in for Appropriate Assessment where the updated modelling

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf|EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf]]:104:          c.   Since the area around the Proposed Development is of negligible importance to The Wash and North Norfolk Coast harbour seal population, no in

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001466-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons - Apr 2022.pdf|EN010103-001466-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons - Apr 2022.pdf]]:77:                typically be done at night where possible in order to have a negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf|EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf]]:41:                                                          negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002000-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum - August 2022(D5) - Tracked.pdf|EN010103-002000-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum - August 2022(D5) - Tracked.pdf]]:27:                     done at night in order to have a negligible impact on users of the surface land. Requirement

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf|EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf]]:223:  caused to a number of heritage assets, ranging from negligible, slight or small to moderate in one instance (PR 5.7.259) and

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001469-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Tracked) - Apr 2022.pdf|EN010103-001469-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Tracked) - Apr 2022.pdf]]:31:          also typically be done at night in order to have a negligible impact on users of the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000825-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 2.pdf|EN010103-000825-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 2.pdf]]:213:risk exposure is considered to be negligible. Not shown in the table are the gross settlement amounts (inflows) for the receive leg of derivatives that

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf|EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf]]:24:                         negligible. EW confirmed that this is pending detailed modelling which is underway.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf|EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf]]:102:                         far field. EW noted that this is considered to be negligible, if it is

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001142-NZT DCO 6.4.31 ES Vol III Appendix 14C Marine Mammal Baseline.pdf|EN010103-001142-NZT DCO 6.4.31 ES Vol III Appendix 14C Marine Mammal Baseline.pdf]]:6:14.2.4         If the risk of injury or significant disturbance cannot be reduced to negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf|EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf]]:39:          Ramsar as a result of site plant and NRMM emissions is likely to be negligible and not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf|EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf]]:49:          are either not sensitive to nitrogen deposition or will be affected to a negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf|EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf]]:50:            therefore considered to have a negligible effect on air quality. Pollution from

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf|EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf]]:68:          between negligible and potentially impactful projects and plans.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf|EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf]]:96:             dismiss atmospheric pollution impacts as negligible. Therefore, this impact pathway is screened in for Appropriate Assessment where the updated modelling

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf|EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf]]:108:          c.   Since the area around the Proposed Development is of negligible importance to The Wash and North Norfolk Coast harbour seal population, no in

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf|EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf]]:130:         reaching the coast, then it can be concluded that there would be negligible risk of any

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001994-NZT DCO 9.26 - Riparian Mammal Report - August 2022(D5).pdf|EN010103-001994-NZT DCO 9.26 - Riparian Mammal Report - August 2022(D5).pdf]]:13:           confluence with the River Tees, are comprised of small rocks affording negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001994-NZT DCO 9.26 - Riparian Mammal Report - August 2022(D5).pdf|EN010103-001994-NZT DCO 9.26 - Riparian Mammal Report - August 2022(D5).pdf]]:24:         negligible, making it unlikely that otter will rest within these areas and there is no

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf|EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf]]:40:                                                          negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf|EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf]]:136:even when the physical health risks may be negligible.” PHE supports the inclusion of this

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000824-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons.pdf|EN010103-000824-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons.pdf]]:73:                   have a negligible impact on users of the surface land.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf|EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf]]:39:         Ramsar as a result of site plant and NRMM emissions is likely to be negligible and not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf|EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf]]:49:         are either not sensitive to nitrogen deposition or will be affected to a negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf|EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf]]:50:            therefore considered to have a negligible effect on air quality. Pollution from

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf|EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf]]:71:         between negligible and potentially impactful projects and plans.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf|EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf]]:101:             dismiss atmospheric pollution impacts as negligible. Therefore, this impact pathway is screened in for Appropriate Assessment where the updated modelling

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf|EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf]]:113:         c.   Since the area around the Proposed Development is of negligible importance to The Wash and North Norfolk Coast harbour seal population, no in

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf|EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf]]:136:         reaching the coast, then it can be concluded that there would be negligible risk of any

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002532-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons Clean Nov 2022 (D12).pdf|EN010103-002532-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons Clean Nov 2022 (D12).pdf]]:77:                 typically be done at night where possible in order to have a negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000898-NZT DCO 6.2.12 ES Vol I Chapter 12 Terrestrial Ecology.pdf|EN010103-000898-NZT DCO 6.2.12 ES Vol I Chapter 12 Terrestrial Ecology.pdf]]:8:                Negligible (common and widespread biodiversity features of such low

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000898-NZT DCO 6.2.12 ES Vol I Chapter 12 Terrestrial Ecology.pdf|EN010103-000898-NZT DCO 6.2.12 ES Vol I Chapter 12 Terrestrial Ecology.pdf]]:9:        of ‘Negligible’ effects, defined in Chapter 2: Assessment Methodology (ES

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000898-NZT DCO 6.2.12 ES Vol I Chapter 12 Terrestrial Ecology.pdf|EN010103-000898-NZT DCO 6.2.12 ES Vol I Chapter 12 Terrestrial Ecology.pdf]]:30:                                              Cleveland.                                                                                                            the negligible residual risk.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000898-NZT DCO 6.2.12 ES Vol I Chapter 12 Terrestrial Ecology.pdf|EN010103-000898-NZT DCO 6.2.12 ES Vol I Chapter 12 Terrestrial Ecology.pdf]]:45:12.6.44 There would be a negligible impact on bats and their habitats as a result of

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000898-NZT DCO 6.2.12 ES Vol I Chapter 12 Terrestrial Ecology.pdf|EN010103-000898-NZT DCO 6.2.12 ES Vol I Chapter 12 Terrestrial Ecology.pdf]]:45:12.6.48 There would be a negligible impact on common lizards and its habitats as a

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001240-EN010103_Marine_Management_Organisation_Relevant_Representation_17122021_Redacted.pdf|EN010103-001240-EN010103_Marine_Management_Organisation_Relevant_Representation_17122021_Redacted.pdf]]:11:        negligible) within the application.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001240-EN010103_Marine_Management_Organisation_Relevant_Representation_17122021_Redacted.pdf|EN010103-001240-EN010103_Marine_Management_Organisation_Relevant_Representation_17122021_Redacted.pdf]]:11:        concurrently or consecutively, the potential for cumulative impacts is negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000903-NZT DCO 6.2.19 ES Vol I Chapter 19 Marine Heritage.pdf|EN010103-000903-NZT DCO 6.2.19 ES Vol I Chapter 19 Marine Heritage.pdf]]:9:Low                                 Moderate                     Minor         Minor                    Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000903-NZT DCO 6.2.19 ES Vol I Chapter 19 Marine Heritage.pdf|EN010103-000903-NZT DCO 6.2.19 ES Vol I Chapter 19 Marine Heritage.pdf]]:21:              on these assets, resulting in a negligible effect.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf|EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf]]:39:          Ramsar as a result of site plant and NRMM emissions is likely to be negligible and not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf|EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf]]:49:          are either not sensitive to nitrogen deposition or will be affected to a negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf|EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf]]:50:            therefore considered to have a negligible effect on air quality. Pollution from

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf|EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf]]:70:          between negligible and potentially impactful projects and plans.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf|EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf]]:99:             dismiss atmospheric pollution impacts as negligible. Therefore, this impact pathway is screened in for Appropriate Assessment where the updated modelling

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf|EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf]]:111:          c.   Since the area around the Proposed Development is of negligible importance to The Wash and North Norfolk Coast harbour seal population, no in

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf|EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf]]:134:          reaching the coast, then it can be concluded that there would be negligible risk of any

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf|EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf]]:33:             considered to be negligible at all human receptors and the effect is therefore

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf|EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf]]:36:               the loss is likely to be negligible given the low quality of the existing soils

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf|EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf]]:44:       during operation are therefore considered to be negligible and not significant.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf|EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf]]:49:7.14.7 There is expected to be a negligible effect on community disruption and

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001738-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1b Preliminary Onshore Ground Investigation for GIR Report - June 2022.pdf|EN010103-001738-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1b Preliminary Onshore Ground Investigation for GIR Report - June 2022.pdf]]:94: Insignificant      1      Would result in negligible delays or disruption

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001738-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1b Preliminary Onshore Ground Investigation for GIR Report - June 2022.pdf|EN010103-001738-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1b Preliminary Onshore Ground Investigation for GIR Report - June 2022.pdf]]:253:deemed negligible and thus acceptable with regard to other contaminants identified within the CSM. However, it should

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:24:Very low                                   Negligible                          <6

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:27:        minor and negligible, and adverse, neutral or beneficial). Each effect has been

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:28:High                               Major                      Moderate          Minor                  Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:28:Medium                             Moderate                   Minor             Negligible             Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:28:Low                                Minor                      Negligible        Negligible             Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:29:                       negligible – imperceptible effect of no significant consequence;

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:29:11.3.71 For the purposes of this assessment, negligible and minor effects are considered

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:36:                                             vibration effects would be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:50:NSR1 – 58          Daytime        Negligible         Negligible         Negligible   Negligible Negligible         Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:50:Redcar             Evening        N/A2               N/A2               N/A2         Negligible Negligible         Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:50:                   Night-         N/A2               N/A2               N/A2         Negligible Negligible         Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:50:NSR2 – 51          Daytime        Negligible         Negligible         Negligible   Negligible Negligible         Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:50:                   Evening        N/A2               N/A2               N/A2         Negligible Negligible         Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:50:                   Night-         N/A2               N/A2               N/A2         Negligible Negligible         Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:50:NSR4 –     Daytime                Negligible         Negligible         Negligible   Negligible Negligible         Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:50:           Evening                N/A2               N/A2               N/A2         Minor        Minor            Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:50:                   Night-         N/A2               N/A2               N/A2         Minor        Minor            Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:50:        Site are predicted to be negligible adverse (not significant) during the daytime

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:51:              for evening and weekend working indicate minor adverse or negligible effects at

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:51:              negligible effects at all NSRs. Construction activities, particularly those taking

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:51:NSR1 –         Daytime Negligible adverse Negligible adverse Negligible adverse                          Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:51:Broadwa        Evening Negligible adverse Negligible adverse Negligible adverse                          Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:51:y West,        Night-       N/A2                        Negligible adverse N/A2                          Minor adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:51:NSR2 –         Daytime Negligible adverse Negligible adverse Negligible adverse                          N/A1

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:51:Road           Evening Negligible adverse Negligible adverse Negligible adverse                          N/A1

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:51:Redcar         Night-       N/A2                        Negligible adverse N/A2                          N/A1

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:51:NSR3 -         Daytime Negligible adverse N/A1                                 Negligible adverse        Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:51:Broadwa        Evening Negligible adverse N/A1                                 Negligible adverse        Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:51:NSR4 -         Daytime Negligible adverse Negligible adverse Negligible adverse                          Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:51:House          Evening Negligible adverse Negligible adverse Negligible adverse                          Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:51:               Daytime Negligible adverse N/A1                                 N/A1                      N/A1

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:52:NSR5 -    Evening Negligible adverse N/A1                                      N/A1                      N/A1

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:52:NSR6 -   Daytime Negligible adverse N/A1                                       N/A1                      N/A1

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:52:Hill     Evening Negligible adverse N/A1                                       N/A1                      N/A1

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:52:NSR7 -   All time Minor adverse                         N/A1                   Minor adverse             Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:52:11.6.32 While daytime effects of construction noise are classified as negligible adverse,

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:52:        CO2 Gathering Network Pipeline are predicted to be negligible adverse (not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:53:              as negligible. CO2 Gathering Network Pipeline construction will not generally

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:53:        effects are predicted to be negligible adverse during the daytime and up to minor

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:53:        Export Pipeline are predicted to be negligible adverse during the day and up to

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:54:A1085 Trunk Road,               16820               10.2%                70         17238       9.9%        70          +0.1               Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:54:A1085 Trunk Road,               24677               12.9%                82         25999       12.6%       82          +0.2               Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:54:A1042 Kirkleatham               14141               6.7%                 52         14345       6.6%        52           0.0               Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:54:A1085 Trunk Road,               25800               15.6%                83         27122       15.1%       83          +0.2               Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:54:A1085 Broadway,                 11382               6.9%                 53         11712       6.7%        53          +0.1               Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:54:A1380 High Street,   11624                          9.8%                 50         11668       9.7%        50           0.0               Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:54:A66, 140m east of               28931               20.6%                66         29792       20.2%       66          +0.1               Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:54:A1046 Port Clarence             9701                12.1%                47         9831        12.0%       47           0.0               Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:55:A178 Seaton Carew               9920                14.3%                72         10050       14.2%       72           0.0               Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:55:Unnamed Road,                   5395                18.4%                59         5439        18.7%       59          +0.1               Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:55:A1053 Greystone                 23412               13.0%                97         23543       13.1%       97           0.0               Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:55:A174 (west of                   40520               7.6%                 97         40605       7.7%        97           0.0               Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:56:        Development. This will result in negligible adverse effects (not significant/no

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:56:        negligible (not significant).

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:56:        receptors, vibration effects are likely to be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:58:        effects are therefore categorised as negligible (not significant) with no

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:59:Initial classification of effect             Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Minor                        Minor

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:60:        in negligible adverse effects during the daytime.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:61:NSR1 – 58 Broadway West,                      47                               Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:61:NSR2 – 51 York Road Redcar                    51                               Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:61:NSR4 – Marsh House farm                       60                               Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:63:Classification of NZT           Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Minor                Minor

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:63:Classification of               Negligible Negligible Minor              Negligible Negligible Negligible Minor        Minor

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:63:        negligible to minor adverse (not significant) with the addition of simultaneous

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:67:Construction              Noise effects         Negligible              Further detailed Minor adverse or St, T, D

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:67:Construction              Noise effects Negligible/                     Further detailed Minor adverse or St, T, D

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:67:Construction              Noise effects Negligible                      Further detailed Minor adverse or St, T, D

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:68:Construction              Noise effects Negligible/minor Further detailed Minor adverse or St, T, D

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:68:Construction              Noise effects Negligible                      Further detailed Minor adverse or St, T, D

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:68:Construction              Noise effects         Negligible              Further detailed Negligible              St, T, D

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:68:Decommissioning Noise effects Negligible                                Further detailed Negligible              St, T, D

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf|EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:69:Decommissioning Noise effects Negligible/                               Further detailed   Minor adverse or St, T, D

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000918-NZT DCO 6.2.25 ES Vol I Chapter 25 Summary of Significant Effects.pdf|EN010103-000918-NZT DCO 6.2.25 ES Vol I Chapter 25 Summary of Significant Effects.pdf]]:2:                 (adverse or beneficial) or major (adverse or beneficial). Minor and negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001470-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum - Apr 2022.pdf|EN010103-001470-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum - Apr 2022.pdf]]:31:             also typically be done at night in order to have a negligible impact on users of the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf|EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf]]:16:         based on predicted impacts being negligible beyond approximately 2km from the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf|EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf]]:24:          also typically be done at night in order to have a negligible impact on users of the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf|EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf]]:90:                                                                        considered to be negligible”. This statement explains that intertidal

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf|EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf]]:98:                                                                         negligible, being <0.06°C in all scenarios modelled, with the higher

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf|EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf]]:98:                                                                         mouth of the Estuary and as there are only negligible increases in the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf|EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf]]:106: for effects to intertidal habitats is considered to be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf|EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf]]:245: addressed (or be shown to be negligible) within the             protection will be undertaken post-DCO consent and will include appropriate

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf|EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf]]:246: the potential for cumulative impacts is negligible and         cumulative effects is considered limited.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf|EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf]]:25:                         negligible. EW confirmed that this is pending detailed modelling which is underway.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf|EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf]]:103:                         far field. EW noted that this is considered to be negligible, if it is

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf|EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf]]:26:          the combustion gases from a typical CCGT plant contain negligible amounts of

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf|EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf]]:55:      Therefore, it is considered that the effects of operational traffic would be negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf|EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf]]:65:           negligible – imperceptible effect to an environmental resource or receptor; or

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000820-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 6.pdf|EN010103-000820-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 6.pdf]]:53:(e.g. realized prices, costs per boe) and also negligible was the impact on depletion charges. Other oil companies may use different conversion rates.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf|EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf]]:40:          Ramsar as a result of site plant and NRMM emissions is likely to be negligible and not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf|EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf]]:51:          be affected to a negligible degree Likely Significant Effects, LSEs on the Durham Coast

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf|EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf]]:52:            therefore considered to have a negligible effect on air quality. Pollution from

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf|EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf]]:72:          between negligible and potentially impactful projects and plans.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf|EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf]]:100:             dismiss atmospheric pollution impacts as negligible. Therefore, this impact pathway is screened in for Appropriate Assessment where the updated modelling

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf|EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf]]:112:          c.   Since the area around the Proposed Development is of negligible importance to The Wash and North Norfolk Coast harbour seal population, no in

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf|EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf]]:135:         reaching the coast, then it can be concluded that there would be negligible risk of any

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001603-NZT DCO 9.4 - APPENDIX 4 LATEST AUDITED ACCOUNTS – SHELL U.K. LIMITED.pdf|EN010103-001603-NZT DCO 9.4 - APPENDIX 4 LATEST AUDITED ACCOUNTS – SHELL U.K. LIMITED.pdf]]:99:Under this approach, we reported Shell share of emissions from energy         in other categories is negligible at present.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001609-Redcar and Clevland Council Local Impact Report.pdf|EN010103-001609-Redcar and Clevland Council Local Impact Report.pdf]]:13:given the magnitude of change is considered to be negligible where human receptors are

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001609-Redcar and Clevland Council Local Impact Report.pdf|EN010103-001609-Redcar and Clevland Council Local Impact Report.pdf]]:14:therefore can be considered to be insignificant/ negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002360-NZT ISH6 S1.pdf|EN010103-002360-NZT ISH6 S1.pdf]]:14:negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001023-NZT DCO 6.4.8 ES Vol III Appendix 8C Air Quality - Amine Degradation Assessment.pdf|EN010103-001023-NZT DCO 6.4.8 ES Vol III Appendix 8C Air Quality - Amine Degradation Assessment.pdf]]:6:               would be negligible from gas fired plant, and therefore are considered to have

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001023-NZT DCO 6.4.8 ES Vol III Appendix 8C Air Quality - Amine Degradation Assessment.pdf|EN010103-001023-NZT DCO 6.4.8 ES Vol III Appendix 8C Air Quality - Amine Degradation Assessment.pdf]]:6:               negligible effect on degradation of the solvent.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf|EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf]]:38:             SPA/Ramsar as a result of site plant and NRMM emissions is likely to be negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf|EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf]]:49:             nitrogen deposition or will be affected to a negligible degree Likely Significant Effects

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf|EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf]]:49:             therefore considered to have a negligible effect on air quality. Pollution from

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf|EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf]]:67:             between negligible and potentially impactful projects and plans.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf|EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf]]:93:                dismiss atmospheric pollution impacts as negligible. Therefore, this impact pathway is screened in for Appropriate Assessment where the updated modelling

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf|EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf]]:105:             c.   Since the area around the Proposed Development is of negligible importance to The Wash and North Norfolk Coast harbour seal population, no in

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf|EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf]]:37:                                                                              critical loads) would be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf|EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf]]:38:                                                                                                                          confidence that NRMM would have a negligible impact.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf|EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf]]:38:                                                                                                                          to be either negligible adverse or insignificant at the receptor locations assessed

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf|EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf]]:38:                                                                                                                          at greater distance from those already assessed would have negligible effect on

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf|EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf]]:48:                                                                                                                           to be negligible and not significant.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf|EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf]]:48:                                                                                                                           of the impact is considered to be negligible. Thus, the effect of artificial lighting

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf|EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf]]:53:                                                                                                                             negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf|EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf]]:62:                                        negligible.                                                                           effect on integrity is likely to arise. Paragraph 8.8.3 of Air Quality Appendix 8B

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf|EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf]]:93:                                                                                                                                the PCC Site (Viewpoints 1, 2, 6, 10 to 12) would be negligible. It is

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf|EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf]]:93:                                        a number of different national and local LCAs as well as the North Yorkshire            negligible effect, largely as a result of the intervening distance and

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf|EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf]]:113:                                                                                                                          and receptor would have negligible impact on the predicted noise levels.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf|EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf]]:127:                     HBC                20.6.28 and Table 20-8 summarise potential impacts on tourism to be negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf|EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf]]:127:                                                   be negligible adverse during the construction phase only reasonable?

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf|EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf]]:127:                                        Paragraph 20.6.28 and Table 20-8 indicate a negligible adverse effect on                       section provides an assessment of amenities regardless of their proposed

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf|EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf]]:127:                                            iv)      Would the negligible adverse impact identified in paragraph 20.6.28        iii.   The applicant can confirm there are no further receptors to be added.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf|EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf]]:127:                                            v)       Have the effects on tourism and recreation (including PRoW users)                 in the assessment, where the negligible adverse impact refers to the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf|EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf]]:130:                                                                                                                                 therefore considered to constitute a negligible highway impact and

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf|EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf]]:132:                                        transportation effects are ‘negligible adverse’. However, the effects during        effects, from table 16-2 the impact is below 30% and can then be defined as

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf|EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf]]:133:                                        How are these statements compatible?                                               Kirkleatham Lane due to its high sensitivity (Ref table 16-1) and negligible on all

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf|EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf]]:133:                                                                                                                           purposes of the EIA Regulations; minor and negligible effects are ‘not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf|EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf]]:133:                                                                                                                           both “negligible” and “minor-adverse” effects are not significant in EIA terms, the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf|EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf]]:152:                                                                                                                           Additional traffic movements associated with this would be negligible and would

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002529-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf|EN010103-002529-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf]]:27:                   done at night in order to have a negligible impact on users of the surface land. Requirement

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000828-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum.pdf|EN010103-000828-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum.pdf]]:30:            also typically be done at night in order to have a negligible impact on users of the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001744-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1a Factual Report Part 16 - June 2022.pdf|EN010103-001744-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1a Factual Report Part 16 - June 2022.pdf]]:536:influence zone of the cone tip measurement and the loss of meaningful resolution is negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001744-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1a Factual Report Part 16 - June 2022.pdf|EN010103-001744-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1a Factual Report Part 16 - June 2022.pdf]]:630:    is large enough for end effects to be negligible allowing the test to be modelled as a plane strain

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001744-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1a Factual Report Part 16 - June 2022.pdf|EN010103-001744-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1a Factual Report Part 16 - June 2022.pdf]]:647:two important assumptions about this output; that it is linear and that the hysteresis is negligible. The

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001836-Birketts LLP on behalf of Northumbrian Water Limited - Comments on responses to the ExA’s ExQ1.pdf|EN010103-001836-Birketts LLP on behalf of Northumbrian Water Limited - Comments on responses to the ExA’s ExQ1.pdf]]:6:would be negligible and would have no impact on

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001108-NZT DCO 6.4.15 ES Vol III Appendix 10D Geotechnical Risk Register.pdf|EN010103-001108-NZT DCO 6.4.15 ES Vol III Appendix 10D Geotechnical Risk Register.pdf]]:4:Negligible                  1                            Very Low                   1                No significant                                 Negligible impact       1 to 4

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf|EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf]]:25:                         negligible. EW confirmed that this is pending detailed modelling which is underway.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf|EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf]]:103:                         far field. EW noted that this is considered to be negligible, if it is

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf|EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf]]:71:                                             negligible and that no deterioration would be caused. Does the EA also agree

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf|EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf]]:164:Increase      Possible      Air quality    Construction       Medium        Increased                Consequence is minimised through the measures          Unlikely        Low         Low           Negligible   No          None

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf|EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf]]:282:        negligible due to the following reasons:

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002049-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf|EN010103-002049-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf]]:78:                   typically be done at night where possible in order to have a negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001526-NZT-ExQ1.pdf|EN010103-001526-NZT-ExQ1.pdf]]:32:                                     washing would rapidly disperse nitrogen deposits rendering any potential effects negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001526-NZT-ExQ1.pdf|EN010103-001526-NZT-ExQ1.pdf]]:65:                                        summarise potential impacts on tourism to be negligible adverse during the construction

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001526-NZT-ExQ1.pdf|EN010103-001526-NZT-ExQ1.pdf]]:65:                                           iv)    Is the Applicants’ assessment that potential impacts on tourism would be negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001526-NZT-ExQ1.pdf|EN010103-001526-NZT-ExQ1.pdf]]:65:                                        indicate a negligible adverse effect on tourism during the construction phase only.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001526-NZT-ExQ1.pdf|EN010103-001526-NZT-ExQ1.pdf]]:66:                                           iv)   Would the negligible adverse impact identified in paragraph 20.6.28 be on any

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001526-NZT-ExQ1.pdf|EN010103-001526-NZT-ExQ1.pdf]]:68:                                     are ‘negligible adverse’. However, the effects during construction are described as ‘minor

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001022-NZT DCO 6.4.7 ES Vol III Appendix 8B Air Quality - Operation Phase.pdf|EN010103-001022-NZT DCO 6.4.7 ES Vol III Appendix 8B Air Quality - Operation Phase.pdf]]:4:               Development become negligible well within approximately 2 km and

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001022-NZT DCO 6.4.7 ES Vol III Appendix 8B Air Quality - Operation Phase.pdf|EN010103-001022-NZT DCO 6.4.7 ES Vol III Appendix 8B Air Quality - Operation Phase.pdf]]:23:               negligible at all receptor locations. In addition, in combination with the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001022-NZT DCO 6.4.7 ES Vol III Appendix 8B Air Quality - Operation Phase.pdf|EN010103-001022-NZT DCO 6.4.7 ES Vol III Appendix 8B Air Quality - Operation Phase.pdf]]:23:               negligible at all receptor locations. In addition, in combination with the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001022-NZT DCO 6.4.7 ES Vol III Appendix 8B Air Quality - Operation Phase.pdf|EN010103-001022-NZT DCO 6.4.7 ES Vol III Appendix 8B Air Quality - Operation Phase.pdf]]:24:               insignificant/ negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001022-NZT DCO 6.4.7 ES Vol III Appendix 8B Air Quality - Operation Phase.pdf|EN010103-001022-NZT DCO 6.4.7 ES Vol III Appendix 8B Air Quality - Operation Phase.pdf]]:24:               all locations and therefore can be considered to be insignificant/ negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001022-NZT DCO 6.4.7 ES Vol III Appendix 8B Air Quality - Operation Phase.pdf|EN010103-001022-NZT DCO 6.4.7 ES Vol III Appendix 8B Air Quality - Operation Phase.pdf]]:39:negligible adverse.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001022-NZT DCO 6.4.7 ES Vol III Appendix 8B Air Quality - Operation Phase.pdf|EN010103-001022-NZT DCO 6.4.7 ES Vol III Appendix 8B Air Quality - Operation Phase.pdf]]:40:the cumulative impact of CO emissions from the developments assessed is negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001022-NZT DCO 6.4.7 ES Vol III Appendix 8B Air Quality - Operation Phase.pdf|EN010103-001022-NZT DCO 6.4.7 ES Vol III Appendix 8B Air Quality - Operation Phase.pdf]]:40:relevant AQALs and therefore can be considered to be insignificant/ negligible at all

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001022-NZT DCO 6.4.7 ES Vol III Appendix 8B Air Quality - Operation Phase.pdf|EN010103-001022-NZT DCO 6.4.7 ES Vol III Appendix 8B Air Quality - Operation Phase.pdf]]:40:emissions on human health receptors from the developments assessed is negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002347-0006-P1A4.5NTLIKC015-NTL SUBMISSIONS AND POSITION STATEMENT CAH3 ON BEHALF OF NORTH TEES GROUP 17.10.22.pdf|EN010103-002347-0006-P1A4.5NTLIKC015-NTL SUBMISSIONS AND POSITION STATEMENT CAH3 ON BEHALF OF NORTH TEES GROUP 17.10.22.pdf]]:7:only very negligible and does not address the matters set in these submissions.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf|EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf]]:39:         Ramsar as a result of site plant and NRMM emissions is likely to be negligible and not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf|EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf]]:49:         are either not sensitive to nitrogen deposition or will be affected to a negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf|EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf]]:50:            therefore considered to have a negligible effect on air quality. Pollution from

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf|EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf]]:71:         between negligible and potentially impactful projects and plans.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf|EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf]]:101:             dismiss atmospheric pollution impacts as negligible. Therefore, this impact pathway is screened in for Appropriate Assessment where the updated modelling

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf|EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf]]:113:         c.   Since the area around the Proposed Development is of negligible importance to The Wash and North Norfolk Coast harbour seal population, no in

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf|EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf]]:136:          reaching the coast, then it can be concluded that there would be negligible risk of any

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf|EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf]]:38:            SPA/Ramsar as a result of site plant and NRMM emissions is likely to be negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf|EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf]]:49:              nitrogen deposition or will be affected to a negligible degree Likely Significant Effects

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf|EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf]]:49:              therefore considered to have a negligible effect on air quality. Pollution from

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf|EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf]]:66:            between negligible and potentially impactful projects and plans.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf|EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf]]:92:               dismiss atmospheric pollution impacts as negligible. Therefore, this impact pathway is screened in for Appropriate Assessment where the updated modelling

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf|EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf]]:104:            c.   Since the area around the Proposed Development is of negligible importance to The Wash and North Norfolk Coast harbour seal population, no in

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001999-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum - August 2022(D5) - Clean.pdf|EN010103-001999-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum - August 2022(D5) - Clean.pdf]]:27:                    done at night in order to have a negligible impact on users of the surface land. Requirement

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000887-NZT DCO 6.2.2 ES Vol I Chapter 2 Assessment Methodology.pdf|EN010103-000887-NZT DCO 6.2.2 ES Vol I Chapter 2 Assessment Methodology.pdf]]:6:              moderate, minor and negligible, and adverse, neutral or beneficial). Each

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000887-NZT DCO 6.2.2 ES Vol I Chapter 2 Assessment Methodology.pdf|EN010103-000887-NZT DCO 6.2.2 ES Vol I Chapter 2 Assessment Methodology.pdf]]:7:              throughout this ES (major, moderate, minor and negligible), and effects are

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000887-NZT DCO 6.2.2 ES Vol I Chapter 2 Assessment Methodology.pdf|EN010103-000887-NZT DCO 6.2.2 ES Vol I Chapter 2 Assessment Methodology.pdf]]:7:               • negligible – imperceptible effect to an environmental resource or

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000887-NZT DCO 6.2.2 ES Vol I Chapter 2 Assessment Methodology.pdf|EN010103-000887-NZT DCO 6.2.2 ES Vol I Chapter 2 Assessment Methodology.pdf]]:8:Medium                     Major                      Moderate                  Minor         Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000887-NZT DCO 6.2.2 ES Vol I Chapter 2 Assessment Methodology.pdf|EN010103-000887-NZT DCO 6.2.2 ES Vol I Chapter 2 Assessment Methodology.pdf]]:8:Low                        Moderate                   Minor                     Negligible    Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000887-NZT DCO 6.2.2 ES Vol I Chapter 2 Assessment Methodology.pdf|EN010103-000887-NZT DCO 6.2.2 ES Vol I Chapter 2 Assessment Methodology.pdf]]:8:Very Low                   Minor                      Negligible                Negligible    Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf|EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf]]:39:          SPA/Ramsar as a result of site plant and NRMM emissions is likely to be negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf|EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf]]:50:            nitrogen deposition or will be affected to a negligible degree Likely Significant Effects

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf|EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf]]:50:            therefore considered to have a negligible effect on air quality. Pollution from

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf|EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf]]:70:          between negligible and potentially impactful projects and plans.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf|EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf]]:97:             dismiss atmospheric pollution impacts as negligible. Therefore, this impact pathway is screened in for Appropriate Assessment where the updated modelling

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf|EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf]]:109:          c.   Since the area around the Proposed Development is of negligible importance to The Wash and North Norfolk Coast harbour seal population, no in

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf|EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf]]:134:         reaching the coast, then it can be concluded that there would be negligible risk of any

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002045-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf|EN010103-002045-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf]]:27:                    done at night in order to have a negligible impact on users of the surface land. Requirement

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf|EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf]]:38:             SPA/Ramsar as a result of site plant and NRMM emissions is likely to be negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf|EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf]]:48:             nitrogen deposition or will be affected to a negligible degree Likely Significant Effects

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf|EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf]]:49:              therefore considered to have a negligible effect on air quality. Pollution from

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf|EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf]]:66:             between negligible and potentially impactful projects and plans.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf|EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf]]:92:                dismiss atmospheric pollution impacts as negligible. Therefore, this impact pathway is screened in for Appropriate Assessment where the updated modelling

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf|EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf]]:104:             c.   Since the area around the Proposed Development is of negligible importance to The Wash and North Norfolk Coast harbour seal population, no in

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf|EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf]]:39:            SPA/Ramsar as a result of site plant and NRMM emissions is likely to be negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf|EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf]]:50:            nitrogen deposition or will be affected to a negligible degree Likely Significant Effects

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf|EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf]]:50:            therefore considered to have a negligible effect on air quality. Pollution from

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf|EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf]]:68:            between negligible and potentially impactful projects and plans.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf|EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf]]:94:               dismiss atmospheric pollution impacts as negligible. Therefore, this impact pathway is screened in for Appropriate Assessment where the updated modelling

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf|EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf]]:106:            c.   Since the area around the Proposed Development is of negligible importance to The Wash and North Norfolk Coast harbour seal population, no in

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001106-NZT DCO 6.4.19 ES Vol III Appendix 12B Ecological Impact Assessment Methods.pdf|EN010103-001106-NZT DCO 6.4.19 ES Vol III Appendix 12B Ecological Impact Assessment Methods.pdf]]:6:                • Negligible (common and widespread ecological features of such low

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001215-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf|EN010103-001215-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf]]:31:          also typically be done at night in order to have a negligible impact on users of the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001871-Hartlepool Borough Council.pdf|EN010103-001871-Hartlepool Borough Council.pdf]]:2:negligible adverse during the construction phase.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001871-Hartlepool Borough Council.pdf|EN010103-001871-Hartlepool Borough Council.pdf]]:2:        negligible adverse during the construction phase only reasonable? Should any

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001153-NZT DCO 5.9 - Statutory Nuisance Statement.pdf|EN010103-001153-NZT DCO 5.9 - Statutory Nuisance Statement.pdf]]:16:3.2.4      The ES provides an assessment of the potential effects on receptors as negligible,

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001153-NZT DCO 5.9 - Statutory Nuisance Statement.pdf|EN010103-001153-NZT DCO 5.9 - Statutory Nuisance Statement.pdf]]:17:           scale, and negligible at a regional or national scale. The Proposed Development is

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001153-NZT DCO 5.9 - Statutory Nuisance Statement.pdf|EN010103-001153-NZT DCO 5.9 - Statutory Nuisance Statement.pdf]]:18:           with construction phase vehicle movements were concluded to be negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001153-NZT DCO 5.9 - Statutory Nuisance Statement.pdf|EN010103-001153-NZT DCO 5.9 - Statutory Nuisance Statement.pdf]]:19:           Agency, 2016). However, in practice the predicted impacts become negligible at a

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001153-NZT DCO 5.9 - Statutory Nuisance Statement.pdf|EN010103-001153-NZT DCO 5.9 - Statutory Nuisance Statement.pdf]]:19:           Development are predicted to result in negligible adverse effects at all receptors

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001153-NZT DCO 5.9 - Statutory Nuisance Statement.pdf|EN010103-001153-NZT DCO 5.9 - Statutory Nuisance Statement.pdf]]:20:           emissions during construction has been determined as ‘negligible’ for earthworks

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001153-NZT DCO 5.9 - Statutory Nuisance Statement.pdf|EN010103-001153-NZT DCO 5.9 - Statutory Nuisance Statement.pdf]]:21:           Development would be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001153-NZT DCO 5.9 - Statutory Nuisance Statement.pdf|EN010103-001153-NZT DCO 5.9 - Statutory Nuisance Statement.pdf]]:24:           negligible adverse effects relating to the following activities of the Proposed

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001766-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix PPL.1.3a - South Tees Regeneration Master Plan - June 2022.pdf|EN010103-001766-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix PPL.1.3a - South Tees Regeneration Master Plan - June 2022.pdf]]:56:                                                                                                                                 have negligible to low potential to support this species.    2.12.9 INVERTEBRATES

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002521-NZT DCO 9.48 - Applicants' Comments on D11 Submissons - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf|EN010103-002521-NZT DCO 9.48 - Applicants' Comments on D11 Submissons - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf]]:14:          that this will have a negligible impact on      deposition at the Tees Coastal WFD

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001120-NZT DCO 6.4.36 ES Vol III Appendix 16A Transportation Assessment Part 1.pdf|EN010103-001120-NZT DCO 6.4.36 ES Vol III Appendix 16A Transportation Assessment Part 1.pdf]]:52:        would be negligible and a detailed assessment of the operational phase of

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001120-NZT DCO 6.4.36 ES Vol III Appendix 16A Transportation Assessment Part 1.pdf|EN010103-001120-NZT DCO 6.4.36 ES Vol III Appendix 16A Transportation Assessment Part 1.pdf]]:92:Therefore, it is considered that the effects of operational traffic would be negligible and a detailed assessment of

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001779-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix BIO.1.39 Example Marine Pollution Contingency Plan - June 2022.pdf|EN010103-001779-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix BIO.1.39 Example Marine Pollution Contingency Plan - June 2022.pdf]]:19:        the risk of encountering shallow hydrocarbon/gas at the proposed borehole location is negligible. Any

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001779-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix BIO.1.39 Example Marine Pollution Contingency Plan - June 2022.pdf|EN010103-001779-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix BIO.1.39 Example Marine Pollution Contingency Plan - June 2022.pdf]]:21:  proposed NEP borehole location is negligible. Any potential hydrocarbon release risk is

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001779-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix BIO.1.39 Example Marine Pollution Contingency Plan - June 2022.pdf|EN010103-001779-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix BIO.1.39 Example Marine Pollution Contingency Plan - June 2022.pdf]]:74:  hydrocarbon/gas at the proposed location is negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001121-NZT DCO 6.4.36 ES Vol III Appendix 16A Transportation Assessment Part 2.pdf|EN010103-001121-NZT DCO 6.4.36 ES Vol III Appendix 16A Transportation Assessment Part 2.pdf]]:7:and are short-lived (approximately 3 months). Therefore, effects are considered negligible and a

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf|EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf]]:91:               negligible adverse effect for the Proposed Development in isolation. A

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf|EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf]]:115:             decommissioning are predicted to be negligible adverse and there will be no

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf|EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf]]:116:             greater than negligible adverse.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf|EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf]]:119:                      not lead to any breaches of national air          ecological receptors are assessed as negligible and not significant.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf|EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf]]:119:                                                                        site plant are also assessed as negligible and not significant.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf|EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf]]:120:                      proceed.                                   Development are predicted to result in negligible adverse effects at all

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf|EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf]]:130:                                                              negligible and therefore not of significance, while there will be no physical

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf|EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf]]:134:                      connectivity of the green Infrastructure   mineral resources considered is negligible (Chapter 10 ‘Geology and

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf|EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf]]:134:                      plant available; containment of noise      or negligible adverse or less. There would be a moderate/minor adverse effect

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf|EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf]]:140:                                                                 predicted to be negligible adverse (not significant).

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf|EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf]]:140:                      while paragraph 2.2.6 notes that the       and junctions are anticipated to be negligible and therefore not significant.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf|EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf]]:140:                                                                 considered to be negligible (not significant).

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf|EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf]]:140:                                                                 therefore, anticipated to be negligible (not significant). A Decommissioning

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf|EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf]]:149:                      options considered for installing the     construction is considered negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf|EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf]]:185:              Plan        Strategy         transport network.          be negligible given that only the CO2 Gathering Network and parts of the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf|EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf]]:187:              Plan                         transport network.          operational traffic will be negligible given that only the CO2 Gathering

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf|EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf]]:39:          Ramsar as a result of site plant and NRMM emissions is likely to be negligible and not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf|EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf]]:49:          are either not sensitive to nitrogen deposition or will be affected to a negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf|EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf]]:50:            therefore considered to have a negligible effect on air quality. Pollution from

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf|EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf]]:70:          between negligible and potentially impactful projects and plans.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf|EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf]]:99:             dismiss atmospheric pollution impacts as negligible. Therefore, this impact pathway is screened in for Appropriate Assessment where the updated modelling

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf|EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf]]:111:          c.   Since the area around the Proposed Development is of negligible importance to The Wash and North Norfolk Coast harbour seal population, no in

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf|EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf]]:134:          reaching the coast, then it can be concluded that there would be negligible risk of any

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002006-NZT-ExQ2-FINAL.pdf|EN010103-002006-NZT-ExQ2-FINAL.pdf]]:39:                                    bodies from atmospheric deposition of nutrients would be negligible and that no deterioration

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000907-NZT DCO 6.2.23 ES Vol I Chapter 23 Population and Human Health.pdf|EN010103-000907-NZT DCO 6.2.23 ES Vol I Chapter 23 Population and Human Health.pdf]]:21:                 and decommissioning are predicted to be negligible adverse and there

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000907-NZT DCO 6.2.23 ES Vol I Chapter 23 Population and Human Health.pdf|EN010103-000907-NZT DCO 6.2.23 ES Vol I Chapter 23 Population and Human Health.pdf]]:22:                 no adverse effects predicted that are classified as greater than negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000896-NZT DCO 6.2.4 ES Vol I Chapter 4 Proposed Development.pdf|EN010103-000896-NZT DCO 6.2.4 ES Vol I Chapter 4 Proposed Development.pdf]]:8:       the gaseous fuel, the combustion gases from a CCGT contain negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002025-Environment Agency - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf|EN010103-002025-Environment Agency - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf]]:8:                be negligible and that no deterioration would be

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001920-Stockton on Tees Borough Council-ExQ1-editable-version.pdf|EN010103-001920-Stockton on Tees Borough Council-ExQ1-editable-version.pdf]]:10:                                           summarise potential impacts on tourism to be negligible adverse during the construction

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001920-Stockton on Tees Borough Council-ExQ1-editable-version.pdf|EN010103-001920-Stockton on Tees Borough Council-ExQ1-editable-version.pdf]]:10:                                              iv)    Is the Applicants’ assessment that potential impacts on tourism would be negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001017-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 3.pdf|EN010103-001017-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 3.pdf]]:22:even when the physical health risks may be negligible.” PHE supports the inclusion of this

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf|EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf]]:81:                negligible adverse effect for the Proposed Development in isolation. A

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf|EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf]]:105:              decommissioning are predicted to be negligible adverse and there will be no

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf|EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf]]:106:              greater than negligible adverse.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf|EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf]]:110:                      not lead to any breaches of national air          ecological receptors are assessed as negligible and not significant.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf|EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf]]:110:                                                                        site plant are also assessed as negligible and not significant.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf|EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf]]:111:                      proceed.                                   Development are predicted to result in negligible adverse effects at all

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf|EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf]]:121:                                                              negligible and therefore not of significance, while there will be no physical

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf|EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf]]:125:                      connectivity of the green Infrastructure   mineral resources considered is negligible (Chapter 10 ‘Geology and

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf|EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf]]:125:                      plant available; containment of noise      or negligible adverse or less. There would be a moderate/minor adverse effect

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf|EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf]]:131:                                                                 predicted to be negligible adverse (not significant).

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf|EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf]]:131:                      while paragraph 2.2.6 notes that the       and junctions are anticipated to be negligible and therefore not significant.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf|EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf]]:131:                                                                 considered to be negligible (not significant).

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf|EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf]]:131:                                                                 therefore, anticipated to be negligible (not significant). A Decommissioning

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf|EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf]]:140:                      options considered for installing the     construction is considered negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf|EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf]]:175:                       Strategy         transport network.          be negligible given that only the CO2 Gathering Network and parts of the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf|EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf]]:177:                                        transport network.          operational traffic will be negligible given that only the CO2 Gathering

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf|EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf]]:39:           SPA/Ramsar as a result of site plant and NRMM emissions is likely to be negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf|EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf]]:50:            nitrogen deposition or will be affected to a negligible degree Likely Significant Effects

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf|EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf]]:50:            therefore considered to have a negligible effect on air quality. Pollution from

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf|EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf]]:68:           between negligible and potentially impactful projects and plans.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf|EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf]]:94:              dismiss atmospheric pollution impacts as negligible. Therefore, this impact pathway is screened in for Appropriate Assessment where the updated modelling

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf|EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf]]:106:           c.     Since the area around the Proposed Development is of negligible importance to The Wash and North Norfolk Coast harbour seal population, no in

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001021-NZT DCO 6.4.6 ES Vol III Appendix 8A Air Quality - Construction Phase.pdf|EN010103-001021-NZT DCO 6.4.6 ES Vol III Appendix 8A Air Quality - Construction Phase.pdf]]:8:Low                                     Low risk                       Low risk              Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001021-NZT DCO 6.4.6 ES Vol III Appendix 8A Air Quality - Construction Phase.pdf|EN010103-001021-NZT DCO 6.4.6 ES Vol III Appendix 8A Air Quality - Construction Phase.pdf]]:8:Low                                     Low risk                       Low risk              Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001021-NZT DCO 6.4.6 ES Vol III Appendix 8A Air Quality - Construction Phase.pdf|EN010103-001021-NZT DCO 6.4.6 ES Vol III Appendix 8A Air Quality - Construction Phase.pdf]]:8:Medium                                  Medium risk                    Low risk              Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001021-NZT DCO 6.4.6 ES Vol III Appendix 8A Air Quality - Construction Phase.pdf|EN010103-001021-NZT DCO 6.4.6 ES Vol III Appendix 8A Air Quality - Construction Phase.pdf]]:8:Low                                     Low risk                       Low risk              Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001021-NZT DCO 6.4.6 ES Vol III Appendix 8A Air Quality - Construction Phase.pdf|EN010103-001021-NZT DCO 6.4.6 ES Vol III Appendix 8A Air Quality - Construction Phase.pdf]]:24:              be considered negligible as both: the change between the Do Minimum and

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001021-NZT DCO 6.4.6 ES Vol III Appendix 8A Air Quality - Construction Phase.pdf|EN010103-001021-NZT DCO 6.4.6 ES Vol III Appendix 8A Air Quality - Construction Phase.pdf]]:27:              negligible where human receptors are present.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf|EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf]]:7:               • Negligible (common and widespread biodiversity features of such low

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf|EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf]]:8:              ‘Negligible’ effects, defined in Chapter 2: Assessment Methodology (ES

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf|EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf]]:33:              only considered to be negligible, and, in the very unlikely event of an incident

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf|EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf]]:33:              on the species and communities they support will be negligible. In the unlikely

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf|EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf]]:35:              (i.e. chemical spills) are considered to be negligible with the implementation

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf|EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf]]:35:              There will be negligible impacts on habitat (i.e. from fine sediments) and

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf|EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf]]:36:              impacts on water quality are considered to be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf|EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf]]:38:              potential impacts are considered to be negligible and the effects on aquatic

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf|EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf]]:38:              14 during operation will be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf|EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf]]:38:              Development on water quality of the watercourse would be negligible and the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf|EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf]]:39:              potential indirect impacts on aquatic habitats will be negligible, after

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002050-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf|EN010103-002050-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf]]:74:                    have a negligible impact on users of the surface land.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf|EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf]]:40:                          outside, however recovery from the impact should have a negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf|EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf]]:40:                          have a negligible long-term impact on the sites. The plants are located

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf|EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf]]:26:              deposits with low permeability that have negligible significance for water supply

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf|EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf]]:85:              negligible within the water bodies directly affected and are not significant to

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf|EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf]]:85:              Tees Estuary (S Bank) waterbody. However, this risk is considered negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf|EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf]]:94:              surface water runoff, then a negligible impact is predicted to the Tees Coastal

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf|EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf]]:95:        considered to have a negligible impact, especially at the water body level.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf|EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf]]:95:        of impact is predicted to be negligible and highly localised, especially at the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf|EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf]]:96:              outfall. The magnitude of impact is therefore predicted to be negligible and

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf|EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf]]:96:        unfavourable conditions), and so a negligible impact on fish is expected.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf|EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf]]:103:              negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf|EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf]]:104:        deposition, then a negligible impact is considered appropriate for this

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf|EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf]]:106:        storage areas would be adequately bunded, negligible impacts on these

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf|EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf]]:40:         Ramsar as a result of site plant and NRMM emissions is likely to be negligible and not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf|EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf]]:50:         are either not sensitive to nitrogen deposition or will be affected to a negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf|EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf]]:51:            therefore considered to have a negligible effect on air quality. Pollution from

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf|EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf]]:69:         between negligible and potentially impactful projects and plans.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf|EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf]]:97:             dismiss atmospheric pollution impacts as negligible. Therefore, this impact pathway is screened in for Appropriate Assessment where the updated modelling

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf|EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf]]:109:         c.      Since the area around the Proposed Development is of negligible importance to The Wash and North Norfolk Coast harbour seal population, no in

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf|EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf]]:131:         reaching the coast, then it can be concluded that there would be negligible risk of any

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002628-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 4 - Total - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf|EN010103-002628-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 4 - Total - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf]]:116:induced is likewise considered negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf|EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf]]:12:                            anticipated that any construction-phase effects would be short-term and negligible with any residual impacts being managed effectively through best-

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf|EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf]]:35:        offshore schemes of available habitat is considered to be negligible and the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf|EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf]]:35:        SSC is predicted to be negligible and the effect would be not significant.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf|EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf]]:36:        is considered as negligible and the potential for cumulative effects is not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf|EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf]]:37:        negligible and as such the potential combined effect is considered to be not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf|EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf]]:38:        is considered to be negligible and the effect is considered to be not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf|EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf]]:39:        negligible effect. Specifically, the CO2 Export Corridor would be under the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf|EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf]]:39:        to occur concurrently, the effect on marine heritage would be negligible and

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf|EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf]]:25:                         negligible. EW confirmed that this is pending detailed modelling which is underway.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf|EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf]]:103:                         far field. EW noted that this is considered to be negligible, if it is

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf|EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf]]:40:          SPA/Ramsar as a result of site plant and NRMM emissions is likely to be negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf|EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf]]:51:            nitrogen deposition or will be affected to a negligible degree Likely Significant Effects

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf|EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf]]:51:            therefore considered to have a negligible effect on air quality. Pollution from

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf|EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf]]:72:          between negligible and potentially impactful projects and plans.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf|EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf]]:99:             dismiss atmospheric pollution impacts as negligible. Therefore, this impact pathway is screened in for Appropriate Assessment where the updated modelling

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf|EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf]]:111:          c.   Since the area around the Proposed Development is of negligible importance to The Wash and North Norfolk Coast harbour seal population, no in

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf|EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf]]:136:         reaching the coast, then it can be concluded that there would be negligible risk of any

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000818-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 4.pdf|EN010103-000818-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 4.pdf]]:120:likewise considered negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001129-NZT DCO 6.4.40 ES Vol III Appendix 17B LVIA Proposed Methodology.pdf|EN010103-001129-NZT DCO 6.4.40 ES Vol III Appendix 17B LVIA Proposed Methodology.pdf]]:7:Negligible           The effects may influence the development site only.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001129-NZT DCO 6.4.40 ES Vol III Appendix 17B LVIA Proposed Methodology.pdf|EN010103-001129-NZT DCO 6.4.40 ES Vol III Appendix 17B LVIA Proposed Methodology.pdf]]:10:Negligible No discernible improvement or deterioration to the existing landscape character.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001129-NZT DCO 6.4.40 ES Vol III Appendix 17B LVIA Proposed Methodology.pdf|EN010103-001129-NZT DCO 6.4.40 ES Vol III Appendix 17B LVIA Proposed Methodology.pdf]]:15:                        occupy a negligible proportion of the view.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001129-NZT DCO 6.4.40 ES Vol III Appendix 17B LVIA Proposed Methodology.pdf|EN010103-001129-NZT DCO 6.4.40 ES Vol III Appendix 17B LVIA Proposed Methodology.pdf]]:16:Negligible No discernible improvement or deterioration in the existing view.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf|EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf]]:18:                negligible because the material was largely granular in nature and has been

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf|EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf]]:22:                max. 0.2%) were measured and gas flow rates were negligible. Arcadis

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf|EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf]]:38:                non-agricultural soils giving the soils a negligible impact value.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf|EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf]]:38:                soils are deemed to have a negligible impact value.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf|EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf]]:38:                underlain by urban and non-agricultural soils giving the soils a negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf|EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf]]:38:                categorised with a negligible impact valve. The Grade 4 and 5 soils fall

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf|EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf]]:38:                deemed to have a negligible impact value.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf|EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf]]:38:PCC Site                                            Urban and non-agricultural   Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf|EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf]]:38:CO2 Export Pipeline                                 Non-agricultural             Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf|EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf]]:38:Water Connection Corridors                          Urban and non-agricultural   Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf|EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf]]:38:CO2 Gathering Network and Natural                   Grades 4 and 5, Urban and    Negligible to Low

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf|EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf]]:38:Electrical Connection Corridor                      Urban and non-agricultural   Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf|EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf]]:75:         permeability that have negligible significance for water supply or river base

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf|EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf]]:259:Negligible 1 Very              1 No significant impact on                               Negligible impact on cost         1 to 4

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf|EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf]]:26:Negligible                             Results in effect on                        No risk identified to surface water quality or

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf|EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf]]:26:                                       magnitude to affect the use                 Negligible change in peak flood level (≤+/- 10

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf|EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf]]:27:Negligible               Neutral / Slight                 Neutral / Slight             Slight                         Slight

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf|EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf]]:54:       deposits with low permeability that have negligible significance for water

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf|EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf]]:80:       is considered that there could be short term, localised and negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf|EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf]]:81:             temporary negligible magnitude of impact would give a worst case Slight

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf|EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf]]:81:       suspended sediment in runoff would be negligible with the mitigation

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf|EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf]]:83:             further downstream, is considered to be negligible resulting in a Slight effect

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf|EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf]]:83:       workers is considered to be negligible resulting in a Slight effect (not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf|EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf]]:83:       negligible magnitude of impact is predicted to construction workers resulting

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf|EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf]]:83:       negligible to construction workers given the implementation of standard good

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf|EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf]]:83:       considered to have a negligible effect on construction workers, which gives a

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf|EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf]]:87:       quality monitoring) then a negligible impact is predicted to the North Sea at

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf|EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf]]:88:       migratory routes for fish. In EIA terms the impact is therefore negligible, which

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf|EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf]]:88:       Bay. As such, a negligible impact is predicted at this stage, with no changes

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf|EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf]]:89:       magnitude of impact is expected to be negligible for all ponds within the Site

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf|EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf]]:90:9.6.61 Given the low level of enrichment of Pond 14 a negligible impact is predicted

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf|EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf]]:91:             involving substantially less water, a negligible impact is predicted giving a

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf|EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf]]:91:       negligible to Tees Bay, giving a Slight effect (not significant).

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf|EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf]]:91:       Plant). Given that the proposed development is expected to have negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf|EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf]]:92:9.6.77 It is considered that the Proposed Development would have a negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf|EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf]]:92:       operation is considered negligible. As such, the effect is Neutral (not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf|EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf]]:98:             Development and the above schemes will have negligible impact on flooding

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf|EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf]]:99:Surface Water Quality –              Tees Estuary, Tees       Tees Estuary: Negligible                   Tees Estuary: Negligible    Further to the              Tees Estuary: Neutral

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf|EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf]]:99:                                                              (Tees Bay): Negligible                     adverse (not significant)                               adverse (not-significant)

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf|EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf]]:99:                                                              Belasis Beck: Negligible                   adverse (not significant)   during construction will be Belasis Beck: Slight

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf|EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf]]:99:                                                              (S Bank)): Negligible                      (not significant)                                       The Fleet: Slight adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf|EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf]]:99:                                     Drain, ditches and ponds ponds: Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf|EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf]]:100:                                     Tees Estuary: Low (for                Tees Estuary: Negligible    Tees Estuary: Neutral       None proposed –              Tees Estuary: Neutral

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf|EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf]]:100:Flooding from fluvial                Flood Risk: Very High                 Negligible                  Slight (not significant)    Implementation of            Slight adverse (not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf|EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf]]:100:Flooding from surface                Flood Risk: Very High                 Negligible                  Slight (not significant)    Implementation of            Slight adverse (not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf|EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf]]:100:Flooding from                        Flood Risk: Very High                 Negligible                  Slight (not significant)    Implementation of            Slight adverse (not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf|EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf]]:101:Flooding from drainage               Flood Risk: Very High                 Negligible                 Slight (not significant)    None proposed.            Slight adverse (not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf|EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf]]:101:Potential Pollution of               Tees Coastal Waterbody                Negligible                 Tees Coastal Waterbody      Implementation of         Tees Coastal Waterbody

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf|EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf]]:101:Potential Impacts on      Tees Coastal Waterbody                           Negligible (TBC)           Slight adverse (not         Implementation of         Slight adverse (not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf|EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf]]:101:Potential Impacts on         Tees Coastal Waterbody                        Negligible                 Slight adverse (not         Implementation of         Slight adverse (not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf|EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf]]:102:Pond 14: Water Quality    Pond 14: Very High                               Ponds 14: Negligible           Pond 14: Slight adverse     None required.           Pond 14: Slight adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf|EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf]]:102:Potential impacts on                 Tees Coastal Waterbody                Negligible                     Slight adverse (not         Scour protection         Slight adverse (not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf|EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf]]:102:Increase in potable water Potable Water Supply:                            Negligible                     Neutral (not significant)   Northumbrian Water       Neutral (not significant)

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf|EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf]]:102:Foul water discharge                 Dabholm Gut (Tees                     Negligible                     Slight adverse (not         Consultation to be       Slight adverse (not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf|EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf]]:102:Flooding from fluvial                Flood Risk: Low to Very               Negligible                     Slight adverse (not         Implementation of the    Slight adverse (not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf|EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf]]:102:Flooding from pluvial                Flood Risk: Low to Very               Negligible                     Neutral (not significant)   Implementation of the    Neutral (not significant)

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf|EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf]]:103:Flooding from                        Flood Risk: Low                       Negligible              Neutral (not significant)   Implementation of the   Neutral (not significant)

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001141-NZT DCO 6.4.30 ES Vol III Appendix 14B Fisheries and Fish Ecology Baseline Part 3.pdf|EN010103-001141-NZT DCO 6.4.30 ES Vol III Appendix 14B Fisheries and Fish Ecology Baseline Part 3.pdf]]:47:        construction in Q3 2022), climate change is expected to have a negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf|EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf]]:13:              Development become negligible well within 2 km and therefore sensitive

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf|EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf]]:14:                 reduce potential impacts at receptors to insignificant or negligible; and

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf|EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf]]:15:              negligible. Emissions of SO2, CO, benzene, and 1,3-butadiene from road

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf|EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf]]:19:75% or less of         Negligible             Negligible             Negligible   Minor              Moderate

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf|EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf]]:19:76-94% of              Negligible             Negligible             Minor        Moderate           Moderate

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf|EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf]]:19:95-102% of             Negligible             Minor                  Moderate     Moderate           Major

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf|EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf]]:19:103-109% of            Negligible             Moderate               Moderate     Major              Major

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf|EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf]]:19:110% or more           Negligible             Moderate               Major        Major              Major

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf|EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf]]:20:              ‘negligible’ impacts are likely to lead to effects that are ‘not significant’ and

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf|EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf]]:20:              emission may be considered insignificant (or negligible) where:

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf|EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf]]:20:                PC <=10% of the AQAL represents an ‘insignificant’ (negligible) impact;

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf|EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf]]:21:8.3.54        Where emissions are not screened as insignificant (negligible), the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf|EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf]]:21:              for EIA purposes. Effects found to be ‘minor’ or ‘negligible’ are considered to

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf|EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf]]:35:8.6.5         The impact at all human receptors can be considered negligible as both the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf|EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf]]:36:8.6.7         The significance of the effect of construction traffic is therefore negligible and

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf|EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf]]:36:              negligible with reference to the IAQM/EPUK screening criterion. The effect of

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf|EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf]]:36:              as a result of site plant and NRMM emissions is likely to be negligible and

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf|EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf]]:36:              or not. Where this cannot be screened as negligible, the predicted

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf|EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf]]:38:Maximum NO2 hourly mean                                                                                                                                        Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf|EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf]]:38:                                                                                                                                                               Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf|EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf]]:38:Maximum CO 1-hour mean                                                                                                                                         Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf|EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf]]:38:Maximum          CO      8-hour      rolling                                                                                                                   Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf|EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf]]:38:                                                                                                                                                               Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf|EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf]]:38:                                                                                                                                                               Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf|EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf]]:38:                                                                                                                                                               Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf|EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf]]:38:Maximum amines (as MEA)                                                                                                                                        Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf|EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf]]:38:                                                                                                                                                               Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf|EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf]]:38:                                                                                                                                                               Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf|EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf]]:39:                                                                                                                                                               Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf|EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf]]:39:Maximum Formaldehyde                                                                                                                                           Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf|EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf]]:39:                                                                                                                                                               Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf|EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf]]:39:Maximum Ketones                                                                                                                                                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf|EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf]]:39:                                                                                                                                                               Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf|EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf]]:39:Maximum amines Acetic Acid                                                                                                                                     Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf|EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf]]:40:              Development are predicted to result in negligible adverse effects at all

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf|EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf]]:15:                                         Negligible                        No effect on designated sites, ecosystems,

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf|EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf]]:47:                 be negligible. Thus, there is considered to be no pathway for impacts to

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf|EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf]]:53:        the area this would represent is considered to be negligible and the spatial

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf|EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf]]:55:        expected, although the area this represents is negligible. Overall, the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf|EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf]]:57:             predicted to be negligible. The results from this modelling exercise support

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf|EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf]]:59:        construction is predicted to have a negligible effect on air quality. As such,

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf|EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf]]:60:        predicted to be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf|EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf]]:81:       negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf|EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf]]:86:       in steaming distances would be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf|EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf]]:86:       to be negligible and therefore the effect is Not Significant.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf|EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf]]:92:       average), and therefore is considered to represent a negligible change in

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf|EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf]]:93:       from thermal discharge through the outfall is predicted to be negligible and the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf|EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf]]:95:       communities in terms of abundance and diversity owing to the negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf|EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf]]:95:       Estuary are negligible, being <0.06°C in all scenarios modelled, with the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf|EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf]]:95:       as there are only negligible increases in the Estuary itself when considered

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf|EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf]]:95:14.6.221     Thus, the magnitude of impact is predicted to be negligible and the effect

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf|EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf]]:97:       considered to be negligible and therefore the effects are predicted to be Not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf|EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf]]:98:       negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf|EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf]]:99:       entanglement and obstruction to fishing gear would be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf|EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf]]:99:       displacement of commercial fishing activities is concluded to be negligible. A

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf|EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf]]:100:       community structure of benthic habitat and species would be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf|EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf]]:103:14.9.9 For the purpose of this assessment, negligible impacts are not considered to

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf|EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf]]:104:        available habitat is considered to be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf|EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf]]:104:        disturbance is considered to be negligible and therefore the effect is

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf|EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf]]:105:             increases in SSC is predicted to be negligible and therefore the effect is

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf|EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf]]:105:        cumulative impacts is negligible and therefore the effect is Not Significant.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf|EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf]]:106:             to occur concurrently, the loss of fishing grounds would negligible and as such

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf|EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf]]:107:        is considered to be negligible. The area of temporary and permanent habitat

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf|EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf]]:108:       habitat is considered to be negligible given the homogenous nature of the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf|EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf]]:109:       is considered to be negligible, meaning that in-combination with the effects of

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf|EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf]]:112:       demersal eggs and larvae) are predicted to be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf|EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf]]:113:       negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf|EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf]]:5:                 to construction dust (i.e. at more than negligible risk) and receptors

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf|EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf]]:14:Neutral/ Negligible Where the combined effects of the Proposed Development upon an individual or

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf|EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf]]:14:(adverse or         collection of environmental receptors would result in a negligible and not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf|EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf]]:15:        effects are assessed to be neutral/ negligible, it is considered that such

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf|EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf]]:19:              effects are assessed to be neutral/ negligible, it is considered that such

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf|EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf]]:32:3 – Tees Combined Scoped in - significant cumulative effects are not considered for                  Negligible cumulative air    NA                     No residual

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf|EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf]]:32:16 – Grangetown             Scoped in - significant cumulative effects are not considered for        Negligible cumulative air    NA                     No residual

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf|EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf]]:34:68 – MGT Teesside Scoped in - significant cumulative effects are not considered for                  Negligible cumulative air    NA                     No residual

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf|EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf]]:34:77 – Redcar                 Scoped in - significant cumulative effects are not considered for        Negligible cumulative air    NA                     No residual

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf|EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf]]:36:        developments assessed is negligible adverse and would not result in a

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf|EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf]]:37:        threshold for short term impacts and is therefore considered to be negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf|EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf]]:37:        from the developments assessed is negligible adverse.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf|EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf]]:37:        insignificant/ negligible at all receptor locations. It is therefore considered that

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf|EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf]]:37:        developments assessed is negligible adverse and would not have a

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf|EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf]]:38:        ecological receptors would be negligible and the cumulative air quality effects

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf|EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf]]:38:        would therefore be negligible and not significant, during both construction

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf|EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf]]:41:17 - HCA                Scoped in – This is adjacent to a         Construction: There would be negligible impact     Mitigation as presented in   Construction: All

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf|EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf]]:44:        developments would have a negligible impact on water quality and flooding

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf|EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf]]:47:                distance at which some noise                                   cumulative construction noise effects at all cumulative effects                             Negligible adverse at

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf|EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf]]:49:                        will have negligible noise effects upon all

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf|EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf]]:51:        would be negligible adverse. For NSR1 (58 Broadway West), NSR2 (51 York

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf|EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf]]:51:        the cumulative effect would be negligible adverse and for NSR7 (Bran Sands

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf|EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf]]:52:        increase from negligible to minor adverse (not significant) compared to the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf|EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf]]:54:3 – Tees CCPP           Scoped in - point source combustion                    Negligible cumulative air quality effects upon   NA                                     No residual

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf|EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf]]:54:16 –                    Scoped in - point source combustion                    Negligible cumulative air quality effects upon   NA                                     No residual

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf|EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf]]:55:68 – MGT                Scoped in - point source combustion                    Negligible cumulative air quality effects upon    NA                                   No residual

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf|EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf]]:56:77 – Redcar             Scoped in - point source combustion                    Negligible cumulative air quality effects upon    No additional mitigation required for        No residual

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf|EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf]]:73:        available habitat is considered to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf|EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf]]:73:        disturbance would be negligible and would not result in a significant

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf|EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf]]:74:        increases in SSC is predicted to be negligible and the effect would be not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf|EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf]]:74:        cumulative effects is negligible and therefore the effect is not significant.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf|EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf]]:75:        loss of fishing grounds would be negligible and as such the potential for

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf|EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf]]:76:        alone and a negligible increase in noise levels further away from the PCC

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf|EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf]]:77:         therefore be negligible and not significant.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf|EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf]]:78:         ZoI. Landscape receptors that have been assessed as having negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf|EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf]]:78:         that the addition of a negligible adverse effect to the cumulative effects of

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf|EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf]]:81:                                     Opening (Year 1): As above for Coastal Fringe LCT.                                                           Very low              Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf|EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf]]:81:                                     Operation (Year 15): As above for Coastal Fringe LCT.                                                        Very low              Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf|EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf]]:82:24.5.119 Visual receptors that have been assessed as having a negligible effect due

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf|EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf]]:83:              cumulative effects, as it is considered unlikely that the addition of a negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf|EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf]]:94:              Proposed Development, ranging from negligible or minor (not significant) to

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf|EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf]]:95:              human health receptors is considered negligible with reference to the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf|EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf]]:96:        negligible or not applicable and have therefore been excluded from any

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf|EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf]]:96:24.6.11 There would be negligible adverse effects due to construction traffic noise

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf|EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf]]:96:        materials would be negligible. Hence any construction traffic and transport-

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf|EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf]]:97:        operational Proposed Development would result in negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf|EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf]]:97:        negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf|EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf]]:97:        operation due to the creation of employment. There would be a negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf|EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf]]:101:                 compared to a negligible adverse effect for the Proposed Development

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf|EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf]]:39:         Ramsar as a result of site plant and NRMM emissions is likely to be negligible and not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf|EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf]]:49:         are either not sensitive to nitrogen deposition or will be affected to a negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf|EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf]]:50:            therefore considered to have a negligible effect on air quality. Pollution from

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf|EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf]]:70:         between negligible and potentially impactful projects and plans.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf|EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf]]:100:             dismiss atmospheric pollution impacts as negligible. Therefore, this impact pathway is screened in for Appropriate Assessment where the updated modelling

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf|EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf]]:112:         c.     Since the area around the Proposed Development is of negligible importance to The Wash and North Norfolk Coast harbour seal population, no in

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf|EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf]]:135:          reaching the coast, then it can be concluded that there would be negligible risk of any

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002322-NZT DCO 9.36 - Nutrient Nitrogen Briefing Paper Clean Oct 2022 (D9).pdf|EN010103-002322-NZT DCO 9.36 - Nutrient Nitrogen Briefing Paper Clean Oct 2022 (D9).pdf]]:19:              made. Initial analysis suggests that this will have a negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf|EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf]]:70:NSR1 – 58 Broadway West, Redcar                          Daytime               Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf|EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf]]:70:                                                         Evening               Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf|EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf]]:70:NSR2 – 51 York Road Redcar                               Daytime               Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf|EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf]]:70:                                                         Evening               Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf|EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf]]:71:NSR3 - 131 Broadway West                                 Daytime               Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf|EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf]]:71:                                                         Evening               Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf|EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf]]:71:NSR4 - Marsh House Farm                                  Daytime               Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf|EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf]]:71:                                                         Evening               Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf|EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf]]:71:NSR5 - Billingham (Charlton Close)                       Daytime               Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf|EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf]]:71:                                                         Evening               Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf|EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf]]:71:NSR6 - Haverton Hill                                     Daytime               Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf|EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf]]:71:                                                         Evening               Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf|EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf]]:71:NSR7 - Northumbrian Water site offices                   All time              Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf|EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf]]:84:        habitats and therefore this impact would be not significant (negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf|EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf]]:26:                   leakage rates will be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf|EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf]]:47:                                   increase from negligible, minor or moderate to major.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf|EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf]]:47:                                   from negligible or minor to moderate.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf|EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf]]:47:                                   topic, to increase from negligible to minor.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf|EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf]]:47:     Consequence                 Very low                       Negligible     Negligible                Minor

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf|EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf]]:47:                                 Low                            Negligible       Minor                 Moderate

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf|EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf]]:51:Increase             Possible                            Air quality                              Medium    Increased construction   Consequence is            Unlikely Low                  Low Negligible No None

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf|EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf]]:61: Consequence              Very low          Negligible          Negligible     Negligible   Negligible       Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf|EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf]]:61:                          Low               Negligible             Minor         Minor        Minor             Minor

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf|EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf]]:61:                          Medium            Negligible             Minor       Moderate     Moderate         Moderate

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf|EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf]]:61:                          High              Negligible             Minor       Moderate       Major             Major

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf|EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf]]:61:                          Very high         Negligible             Minor       Moderate       Major             Major

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf|EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf]]:64:Increase in           Very Likely            All receptors          See-Increase      See-Increase   Very Unlikely   Very low      Negligible   No                       None

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf|EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf]]:64:Increase in           Very Likely            Construction           Overheating of Detailed in      Very Unlikely    Very Low      Negligible   No                       None

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf|EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf]]:64:Increase in           Very Likely            All receptors          None              None           Very Unlikely   Very low      Negligible   No                       None

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf|EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf]]:64:Increase in           Possible               All receptors          None              None           Very Unlikely   Very low      Negligible   No                       None

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf|EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf]]:65:Decrease in           Likely                 All receptors          None              None         Very Unlikely   Very Low      Negligible   No                       None

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf|EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf]]:67:Increase              Possible               All receptors          None              None            Very Unlikely   Very Low      Negligible   No                       None

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf|EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf]]:67:Sea level rise        Very Likely            Assets,           See- Increase          See- Increase   Very Unlikely   Medium        Negligible   No                       None

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf|EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf]]:68:Increase in           Very Likely            All receptors          See-Increase      See-Increase      Very Unlikely   Very low      Negligible   No                       None

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf|EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf]]:70:Increase in           Very Likely            All receptors          None              None         Very Unlikely   Very low      Negligible   No                       None

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf|EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf]]:70:Increase in           Possible               All receptors          None              None         Very Unlikely   Very low      Negligible   No                       None

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf|EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf]]:75:Increase              Possible               All receptors          See- Decrease See- Decrease Very Unlikely         Very Low      Negligible   No                       None

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf|EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf]]:75:Increase in     Unlikely                     Marine assets          Physical          • All           Very Unlikely   Very High     Negligible   No                       None

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf|EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf]]:75:                                             Assets,           Damage to              •The FRA       Very Unlikely    Very High     Negligible   No                       None

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf|EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf]]:76:                                             Marine assets          Physical         • All              Very Unlikely   Very High     Negligible   No                       None

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf|EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf]]:77:Increase in           Very Likely            All receptors          See-Increase      See-Increase     Very Unlikely   Very low      Negligible   No                       None

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf|EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf]]:77:Increase in           Very Likely            Deco. plant   Overheating of To be detailed               Very Unlikely   Very Low      Negligible   No                       None

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf|EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf]]:77:Increase in           Very Likely            All receptors          None              None             Very Unlikely   Very low      Negligible   No                       None

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf|EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf]]:77:Increase in           Possible               All receptors          See-Increase      See-Increase     Very Unlikely   Very low      Negligible   No                       None

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf|EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf]]:77:Decrease in           Likely                 All receptors          None              None             Very Unlikely   Very Low      Negligible   No                       None

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf|EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf]]:78:Increase to           Possible               Deco. plant   See-Increase               See-Increase     Very Unlikely   Very Low      Negligible   No                       None

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf|EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf]]:78:Increase              Possible               All receptors          None              None             Very Unlikely   Very Low      Negligible   No                       None

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002075-NZT DCO 9.29 - Cumulative GHG Onshore and Offshore Assessment August 2022 (D6).pdf|EN010103-002075-NZT DCO 9.29 - Cumulative GHG Onshore and Offshore Assessment August 2022 (D6).pdf]]:16:           are considered to be significant. Minor adverse and negligible effects are not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-002075-NZT DCO 9.29 - Cumulative GHG Onshore and Offshore Assessment August 2022 (D6).pdf|EN010103-002075-NZT DCO 9.29 - Cumulative GHG Onshore and Offshore Assessment August 2022 (D6).pdf]]:16:             Negligible         The projects GHG impacts would be             Not significant

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf|EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf]]:7:       Assessment (EIA) practice; while minor and negligible effects are considered

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf|EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf]]:8:        minor and negligible effects are considered to be ‘not significant’. Where

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf|EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf]]:31:        landscape character at a local scale and negligible at a regional or national

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf|EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf]]:34:NCA 23: Tees              Medium              Construction activities associated with the Proposed Development will directly impact the Very low                   Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf|EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf]]:34:MCA 22 Tyne,              Medium              The Proposed Development lies within this MCA and will introduce views of construction         Very low              Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf|EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf]]:35:Rural Fringe LCT Medium                       The Proposed Development lies outside of this LCT but will introduce very limited views of Very Low                  Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf|EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf]]:36:NCA 23: Tees                Medium              The Proposed Development will introduce views of the PCC Site within the NCA. The existing                Very low        Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf|EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf]]:36:MCA 22 Tyne,                Medium              The Proposed Development lies outside of this MCA but will introduce views of the PCC Site due to         Very low        Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf|EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf]]:37:Estuarine LCT               Medium              The Proposed Development lies outside of this LCT but will introduce views of the PCC Site due to the Very low      Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf|EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf]]:37:Rural Fringe LCT            Medium              The Proposed Development lies outside of this LCT but will introduce limited views of the PCC Site    Very low      Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf|EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf]]:38:NCA 23: Tees                Medium              The impacts during operation are anticipated to be similar to the opening assessment scenario. The    Very low          Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf|EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf]]:38:MCA 22 Tyne, Tees Medium                        The impacts during operation are anticipated to be similar to the opening assessment scenario. The   Very low           Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf|EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf]]:38:Estuarine LCT               Medium              The impacts during operation are anticipated to be similar to the opening assessment scenario. The       Very low       Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf|EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf]]:38:Rural Fringe LCT            Medium              The impacts during operation are anticipated to be similar to the opening assessment scenario. The       Very low       Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf|EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf]]:40:Significance of effect at construction                               Residential and PRoW users       Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf|EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf]]:40:Significance of effect at opening                                    Residential and recreational     Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf|EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf]]:40:Significance of effect at operation                                  Residential and recreational     Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf|EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf]]:41:Significance of effect at opening                                    Residential and recreational     Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf|EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf]]:41:Significance of effect at operation                                  Residential and recreational     Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf|EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf]]:45:Significance of effect at construction                             Recreational                     Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf|EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf]]:45:Significance of effect at opening                                  Recreational                     Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf|EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf]]:45:Significance of effect at operation                                Recreational                     Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf|EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf]]:49:Significance of effect at construction                           Recreational                    Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf|EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf]]:49:Significance of effect at opening                               Recreational                     Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf|EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf]]:49:Significance of effect at operation                             Recreational                     Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf|EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf]]:50:Significance of effect at construction                             Residential                      Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf|EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf]]:50:Significance of effect at opening                                  Residential                      Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf|EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf]]:50:Significance of effect at operation                                Residential                      Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf|EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf]]:51:Significance of effect at construction                                Recreational                    Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf|EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf]]:51:Significance of effect at opening                                    Recreational                     Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf|EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf]]:51:Significance of effect at operation                                  Recreational                     Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf|EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf]]:53:1               High                 Albion Terrace, Hartlepool                Residential and    Negligible adverse       Negligible adverse    Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf|EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf]]:53:2               High                 The Cliff, Seaton Carew                   Residential and    Minor adverse            Negligible adverse    Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf|EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf]]:53:6               High                 Cowpen Bewley Country Park                Recreational       Negligible adverse       Negligible adverse    Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf|EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf]]:53:10              High                 Eston Nab                                 Recreational       Negligible adverse       Negligible adverse    Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf|EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf]]:53:11              Medium               Longbeck Lane                             Residential        Negligible adverse       Negligible adverse    Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf|EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf]]:54:12              High                 Carpark off A1085 Coast Road,             Recreational    Negligible adverse       Negligible adverse    Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf|EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf]]:57:       that have been assessed as having negligible adverse effects have not been

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf|EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf]]:57:       that the addition of a negligible adverse effect to the cumulative effects of other

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf|EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf]]:59:Estuarine LCT                    Medium                                                                                                     Very low                   Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf|EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf]]:60:Estuarine LCT             Medium                             assessed to remain at very low, the same as for the Proposed      Very low           Negligible adverse (not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf|EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf]]:62:17.9.10 Visual receptors that have been assessed as having a negligible effect due to

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf|EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf]]:62:        cumulative effects, as it is considered unlikely that the addition of a negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001912-NZT DCO 9.17 - Hydrogeological Impact Assessment July 2022 (D4).pdf|EN010103-001912-NZT DCO 9.17 - Hydrogeological Impact Assessment July 2022 (D4).pdf]]:26: Negligible         Slight            Slight               Neutral/Slight   Neutral/Slight

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001912-NZT DCO 9.17 - Hydrogeological Impact Assessment July 2022 (D4).pdf|EN010103-001912-NZT DCO 9.17 - Hydrogeological Impact Assessment July 2022 (D4).pdf]]:30:            conditions will have a negligible impact of neutral/slight significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001912-NZT DCO 9.17 - Hydrogeological Impact Assessment July 2022 (D4).pdf|EN010103-001912-NZT DCO 9.17 - Hydrogeological Impact Assessment July 2022 (D4).pdf]]:33:            Localised dewatering of the Tidal Flat Deposits will have a negligible impact on the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001912-NZT DCO 9.17 - Hydrogeological Impact Assessment July 2022 (D4).pdf|EN010103-001912-NZT DCO 9.17 - Hydrogeological Impact Assessment July 2022 (D4).pdf]]:34:            negligible with an impact of neutral significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001912-NZT DCO 9.17 - Hydrogeological Impact Assessment July 2022 (D4).pdf|EN010103-001912-NZT DCO 9.17 - Hydrogeological Impact Assessment July 2022 (D4).pdf]]:35:            Development will be negligible with an impact significance of slight.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001912-NZT DCO 9.17 - Hydrogeological Impact Assessment July 2022 (D4).pdf|EN010103-001912-NZT DCO 9.17 - Hydrogeological Impact Assessment July 2022 (D4).pdf]]:35:            decommissioning of the Proposed Development will be negligible with an impact

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001912-NZT DCO 9.17 - Hydrogeological Impact Assessment July 2022 (D4).pdf|EN010103-001912-NZT DCO 9.17 - Hydrogeological Impact Assessment July 2022 (D4).pdf]]:37:        CO2 Gathering Negligible           Neutral/slight   No change       Neutral

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001912-NZT DCO 9.17 - Hydrogeological Impact Assessment July 2022 (D4).pdf|EN010103-001912-NZT DCO 9.17 - Hydrogeological Impact Assessment July 2022 (D4).pdf]]:37:        CO2 Export    Negligible           Slight           No change       Neutral

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001912-NZT DCO 9.17 - Hydrogeological Impact Assessment July 2022 (D4).pdf|EN010103-001912-NZT DCO 9.17 - Hydrogeological Impact Assessment July 2022 (D4).pdf]]:37:        Other         No change            Neutral          Negligible      Slight

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001912-NZT DCO 9.17 - Hydrogeological Impact Assessment July 2022 (D4).pdf|EN010103-001912-NZT DCO 9.17 - Hydrogeological Impact Assessment July 2022 (D4).pdf]]:37:        All elements  No change            Neutral          Negligible      Slight

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001912-NZT DCO 9.17 - Hydrogeological Impact Assessment July 2022 (D4).pdf|EN010103-001912-NZT DCO 9.17 - Hydrogeological Impact Assessment July 2022 (D4).pdf]]:37:        All elements  No change            Neutral          Negligible      Slight

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001131-NZT DCO 6.4.42 ES Vol III Appendix 18A Cultural Heritage Baseline Report.pdf|EN010103-001131-NZT DCO 6.4.42 ES Vol III Appendix 18A Cultural Heritage Baseline Report.pdf]]:6:               ‘medium’, ‘low’, ‘negligible’, or ‘unknown’. This rating is based on an

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/the-net-zero-teesside-project/EN010103-001131-NZT DCO 6.4.42 ES Vol III Appendix 18A Cultural Heritage Baseline Report.pdf|EN010103-001131-NZT DCO 6.4.42 ES Vol III Appendix 18A Cultural Heritage Baseline Report.pdf]]:7:  Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:44:                                                 can have on biodiversity, especially birds. Paragraph 2.7.2 requires the applicant      concludes that the Site has negligible ecological value for habitats and species of flora and

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:58:                                                                                                            adverse effects are predicted in relation to ecology. The assessment concludes that the Site has negligible ecological

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:62:                                                                                                         adverse effects are predicted in relation to ecology. The assessment concludes that the Site has negligible ecological

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf|EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf]]:103:negligible.” PHE supports the inclusion of this information within EIAs as good

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000361-Appendix A - DCO 6.3.14_Tees CCPP_ES_Annex H_HRA_UPDATED 230418.pdf|EN010082-000361-Appendix A - DCO 6.3.14_Tees CCPP_ES_Annex H_HRA_UPDATED 230418.pdf]]:27:    a.     Impacts from emissions during construction and decommissioning (such as from traffic) are considered negligible (see

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000361-Appendix A - DCO 6.3.14_Tees CCPP_ES_Annex H_HRA_UPDATED 230418.pdf|EN010082-000361-Appendix A - DCO 6.3.14_Tees CCPP_ES_Annex H_HRA_UPDATED 230418.pdf]]:29:    a.     Impacts from emissions during construction and decommissioning (such as from traffic) are considered negligible (see

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000361-Appendix A - DCO 6.3.14_Tees CCPP_ES_Annex H_HRA_UPDATED 230418.pdf|EN010082-000361-Appendix A - DCO 6.3.14_Tees CCPP_ES_Annex H_HRA_UPDATED 230418.pdf]]:31:    a.     Impacts from emissions during construction and decommissioning (such as from traffic) are considered negligible (see

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000361-Appendix A - DCO 6.3.14_Tees CCPP_ES_Annex H_HRA_UPDATED 230418.pdf|EN010082-000361-Appendix A - DCO 6.3.14_Tees CCPP_ES_Annex H_HRA_UPDATED 230418.pdf]]:33:    a.     Impacts from emissions during construction and decommissioning (such as from traffic) are considered negligible (see

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000361-Appendix A - DCO 6.3.14_Tees CCPP_ES_Annex H_HRA_UPDATED 230418.pdf|EN010082-000361-Appendix A - DCO 6.3.14_Tees CCPP_ES_Annex H_HRA_UPDATED 230418.pdf]]:34:    a.     Impacts from emissions during construction and decommissioning (such as from traffic) are considered negligible (see

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf|EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf]]:37:         of negligible ecological interest and that all protected species issues had

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf|EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf]]:46:          negligible due to the size of the site, the distance to sensitive receptors

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf|EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf]]:47:          Proposed Development would generate negligible impacts and this matter

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf|EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf]]:47:          impacts from dust, PM10 and PM2.5 during construction would be negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf|EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf]]:48:          operational traffic would be negligible and this matter is not considered

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf|EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf]]:51:          mitigated to negligible residual impacts. The Applicant noted that the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf|EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf]]:53:          stack height based on the knowledge that negligible impacts on sensitive

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf|EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf]]:54:          be limited and result in negligible change in impacts [[REP5-005]]. As with

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf|EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf]]:60:4.10.7.   The ES explains that the site is of negligible ecological value and that NE

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf|EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf]]:65:          negligible to minor adverse and therefore not significant.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf|EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf]]:79:           whichconcludes that changes in total trafficwould be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf|EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf]]:82:          negligible impact in terms of construction traffic and therefore will result

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf|EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf]]:83:          be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf|EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf]]:83:          negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf|EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf]]:122:          change would be negligible. Any noise impacts of lateral movement

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:19:having no impact or to be of negligible magnitude and will          While the above provides a general framework for identifying impacts and assessing the significance of their effects, in practice the approaches and

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:4:        hardstanding proposed for the Project is negligible, the risk associated with

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:4:        this effect is also anticipated to be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:14:        and water quality to be assessed as large, medium, small or negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:16:            Negligible     A change well within the bounds of normal natural variation. No effect

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:18:            Negligible      A change within the bounds of natural variation and below assessment criteria

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:20:             Negligible     A change within the bounds of natural variation and below Freshwater EQS, no

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:21:6.46    Impacts of negligible magnitude always lead to an effect which is not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:21:        the site, and potential increase risk of flooding from the Project is negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:21:6.48    As the flood risk at the site has been assessed as negligible, no further

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:36:         the resource value of groundwater at the Project site to be ‘negligible’.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:43:        new engineered industrial surface is considered to be a negligible change,

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:43:        therefore any permanent soil loss will be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:43:        considered to be negligible in relation to topsoil and minor in relation to

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:46:Excavation of Construction            Inhalation of         Low        High        Small      • Identification and           Negligible          Not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:46:Excavation       Construction         Dermal                Low        High        Small      • Identification and           Negligible          Not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:46:Traffic          Construction         Inhalation of         Low        High        Small      • Dust suppression using       Negligible          Not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:47:Disturbance    Potential to        Spreading of         Low           High       Medium      • Identification and           Negligible          Not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:47:Disturbance      Potential to          Migration of        Low       Medium       Small      • Ensure discharge of all      Negligible          Not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:48:Disturbance      Potential to erode    Migration of         Low       Medium       Small      • Ensure discharge of all      Negligible          Not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:49:Dewatering       Discharge of          Migration of       Medium      Medium      Medium      • Identification and           Negligible          Not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:50:Increased          Potential for         Migration of          Low       Medium       Small      • Dust suppression using      Negligible          Not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:50:Increased          Potential for         Migration of          Low        High        Small      • Dust suppression using      Negligible          Not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:50:Use of plant       Potential of          Overland flow       Medium      Medium      Medium      • Storage, handling and       Negligible           Not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:51:Use of plant      Potential of            Vertical            Medium        Low       Medium      • Storage, handling and        Negligible          Not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:51:Use of plant      Potential of            Direct spill of     Medium       High       Medium      • Storage, handling and        Negligible          Not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:52:Excavation,    Potential for        Creation or                                   -           Medium            Medium          • Ensure no large increase in              Negligible            Not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:53:            until the site is decommissioned, although the loss is likely to be negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:55:Site         Operational users,            Inhalation,          Low        High        Small      • Storage and handling of        Negligible          Not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:55:Permanent      Permanent loss of     -                  High                Low      Negligible   • Where possible some small      Negligible          Not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:55:Permanent      Reduction in          -                  High                Low       Medium      • Water monitoring plan          Negligible          Not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:55:Site activities   Spills and leaks, e.g.   Spill of             Low       Medium      Medium      • Storage and handling of        Negligible          Not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:56:Site activities   Spills and leaks of oil,   Vertical            Low         Low        Small      • Storage and handling of      Negligible          Not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:57:Site activities   Accidental spillage        Spill of             Low       Medium       Small      • Storage and handling of       Negligible          Not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:57:Site activities   Spills and leaks of oil,   Direct spill of      Low        High        Small      • Storage and handling of       Negligible          Not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:58:Footprint of    Potential for                    Creation or                  Low          Medium               Small           • The area of hardstanding /              Negligible             Not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:62:Excavation of        Demolition             Inhalation,        Low        High        Small      • Identification and      Negligible         Not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:62:Dewatering of        Demolition             Dermal          Very Low      High        Small      • Identification and      Negligible         Not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:63:Removal of           Demolition            Inhalation of        Low       High        Small      • Development and          Negligible         Not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:63:Traffic              Demolition            Inhalation of        Low       High        Small      • Development and          Negligible         Not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:63:Decommissioning Potential of               Overland             Low      Medium       Small      • Storage and handling     Negligible         Not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:64:Decommissioning      Potential of           Vertical           Medium        Low        Small      • Storage and handling     Negligible         Not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:64:Decommissioning      Potential of           Direct spill of      Low        High        Small      • Storage and handling     Negligible         Not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:65:Increased traffic    Potential for          Migration of       Low       Medium       Small      • Dust suppression         Negligible         Not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:65:Export,              Potential to remove,   Migration of     Medium      Medium      Medium      • Identification and       Negligible         Not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:66:Export               Potential to remove,   Migration of        High         Low       Medium      • Identification and      Negligible         Not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:66:Export,              Potential to remove,   Migration of         Low        High       Medium      • Identification and      Negligible         Not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:66:Removal of           Discharge of           Migration of         Low       Medium       Small      • Minimise potential to   Negligible         Not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:67:Removal of           Change in the          Migration of       High         Low       Medium      • Minimise potential to   Negligible         Not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:67:Removal of           Preferential           Contaminated      Medium        Low       Medium      • Development and         Negligible         Not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:67:Excavation, soil     Potential for an       Creation or          -        Medium      Medium      • Minimise potential to   Negligible         Not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-Advice-00011-1-Planning Inspectorate comments on draft NSER.pdf|EN010082-Advice-00011-1-Planning Inspectorate comments on draft NSER.pdf]]:8:                       supporting evidence (for example, where the footnotes refer to negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000179-EN010082-6.2.8-ES-Chapter 8-Noise and Vibration-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000179-EN010082-6.2.8-ES-Chapter 8-Noise and Vibration-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:3:        suggests changes will be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000179-EN010082-6.2.8-ES-Chapter 8-Noise and Vibration-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000179-EN010082-6.2.8-ES-Chapter 8-Noise and Vibration-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:7:Council Environmental Health         during construction as both have been considered as negligible. The assessment has shown that daytime noise        DCO Requirement 20 details

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000185-EN010082-6.2.14-ES Chapter 14-Human Health-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000185-EN010082-6.2.14-ES Chapter 14-Human Health-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:32:         traffic is considered negligible (see Section 7.4.2).

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000185-EN010082-6.2.14-ES Chapter 14-Human Health-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000185-EN010082-6.2.14-ES Chapter 14-Human Health-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:33:         existing junctions, coupled with the negligible magnitude of change from the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000185-EN010082-6.2.14-ES Chapter 14-Human Health-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000185-EN010082-6.2.14-ES Chapter 14-Human Health-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:38:         These effects will be appropriately managed and no greater than negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000193-EN010082-6.3.3-ES Annex C-Flood Risk Assessment-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000193-EN010082-6.3.3-ES Annex C-Flood Risk Assessment-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:16:         the risk of failure is almost negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000193-EN010082-6.3.3-ES Annex C-Flood Risk Assessment-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000193-EN010082-6.3.3-ES Annex C-Flood Risk Assessment-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:17:         considered negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000193-EN010082-6.3.3-ES Annex C-Flood Risk Assessment-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000193-EN010082-6.3.3-ES Annex C-Flood Risk Assessment-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:19:        the risk of flooding from the Project is considered to be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000184-EN010082-6.2.13-ES Chapter 13-Socio Economic Characteristics-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000184-EN010082-6.2.13-ES Chapter 13-Socio Economic Characteristics-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:18:             Negligible      •     An impact that would not result in a variation beyond the baseline

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000184-EN010082-6.2.13-ES Chapter 13-Socio Economic Characteristics-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000184-EN010082-6.2.13-ES Chapter 13-Socio Economic Characteristics-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:42:         negligible adverse effects are anticipated in respect of disruption to local

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000184-EN010082-6.2.13-ES Chapter 13-Socio Economic Characteristics-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000184-EN010082-6.2.13-ES Chapter 13-Socio Economic Characteristics-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:44:                                                                                                                     These effects are of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000184-EN010082-6.2.13-ES Chapter 13-Socio Economic Characteristics-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000184-EN010082-6.2.13-ES Chapter 13-Socio Economic Characteristics-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:44:                                              These effects are of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000184-EN010082-6.2.13-ES Chapter 13-Socio Economic Characteristics-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000184-EN010082-6.2.13-ES Chapter 13-Socio Economic Characteristics-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:45:                                             and traffic impacts are anticipated. The effect is therefore            The effect is therefore negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000184-EN010082-6.2.13-ES Chapter 13-Socio Economic Characteristics-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000184-EN010082-6.2.13-ES Chapter 13-Socio Economic Characteristics-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:45:                                             negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000184-EN010082-6.2.13-ES Chapter 13-Socio Economic Characteristics-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000184-EN010082-6.2.13-ES Chapter 13-Socio Economic Characteristics-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:45:                                             These effects are of negligible significance.                           These effects are of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000525-7.3 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with Redcar  Cleveland - FINAL - 06.07.18.pdf|EN010082-000525-7.3 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with Redcar  Cleveland - FINAL - 06.07.18.pdf]]:25:19.3    The Site has negligible ecological value for habitats and species of flora and fauna and taking account of

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000393-7 7 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with Historic England - DRAFT.pdf|EN010082-000393-7 7 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with Historic England - DRAFT.pdf]]:7:        be minimal to small with the overall level of effect considered to be negligible to minor adverse and

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000388-7 2 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with NE - Signed_Redacted.pdf|EN010082-000388-7 2 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with NE - Signed_Redacted.pdf]]:10: 2.11    The assessment confirms that the Project Site has negligible ecological value for habitats and species

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000396-8 5 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Comments on Relevant Reps - FINAL (2).pdf|EN010082-000396-8 5 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Comments on Relevant Reps - FINAL (2).pdf]]:12:                    3.1.3. The project site currently supports habitats of negligible ecological interest and all

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf|EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf]]:8:                                 emissions from the short term use of auxiliary boilers are negligible and only      operate on start-up of the Proposed Power Plant to supply either, or both of the following:

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf|EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf]]:10:                                 Quality Management (IAQM) guidance on the assessment of dust from                   a degree that residual impacts are negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf|EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf]]:10:                                          significance of effect prior to mitigation and as a residual effect (for   negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf|EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf]]:18:                                                                                                                       At distant nature conservation sites change would be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf|EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf]]:18:                                                                                                                       effectively negligible. The other structures in Works No. 1-4 relates only to buildings of less than 1/3rd stack height, there is

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf|EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf]]:31:                                  judged to be significant whereas minor and negligible impacts are considered        “In predicting magnitude the effect of all the project mitigation in place (i.e. committed to by Sembcorp) will be taken into account.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf|EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf]]:42:                                                                                                                have a localised effect and within the wider context of the NCA, it will represent a negligible magnitude of change. The Project does

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:83:                                            as negligible. The assessment has shown that daytime           health, the assessment concludes that there are no

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:296:                having no impact or to be of negligible magnitude and will          While the above provides a general framework for identifying impacts and assessing the significance of their effects, in practice the approaches and

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:303:                The Project Site itself is of negligible ecological importance and the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:327:                      considered as negligible and has assumed the installation of a 75m stack.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:327:                      considered as negligible. The assessment has shown that daytime noise

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000562-Report on the Implications for European Sites.pdf|EN010082-000562-Report on the Implications for European Sites.pdf]]:32:     considered negligible (see ES Chapter 7 Air Quality, Paragraphs 7.107 and 7.115 [[AS-020]]) and have been screened

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000202-EN010082-6.3.12-ES Annex G1-Effects of Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000202-EN010082-6.3.12-ES Annex G1-Effects of Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:11:(1) For South Gare & Coatham Sands SSSI, the PC/CL% is 1.02. This is a negligible increase over 1 and therefore the site has been included in the <1% category and is not considered to exceed the screening criteria. In practice, as the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000202-EN010082-6.3.12-ES Annex G1-Effects of Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000202-EN010082-6.3.12-ES Annex G1-Effects of Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:24:        by these sites, the contribution of the Project to the effects is negligible, for

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000206-EN010082-6.3.16-ES Annex I1-Transport Assessment-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000206-EN010082-6.3.16-ES Annex I1-Transport Assessment-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:46:          will be a negligible increase in trips and any significant increases in traffic will occur

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000206-EN010082-6.3.16-ES Annex I1-Transport Assessment-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000206-EN010082-6.3.16-ES Annex I1-Transport Assessment-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:51:          network peak’ periods. The impact during the network peak periods is negligible. The

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000206-EN010082-6.3.16-ES Annex I1-Transport Assessment-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000206-EN010082-6.3.16-ES Annex I1-Transport Assessment-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:124:          negligible increase in trips and any significant increases in traffic will occur outside of the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000536-8.46 - Tees CCPP - Applicant's Response to ExA's Second WQs - Deadline 5 - FINAL - 07.08.18.pdf|EN010082-000536-8.46 - Tees CCPP - Applicant's Response to ExA's Second WQs - Deadline 5 - FINAL - 07.08.18.pdf]]:10:                                assessed in the ES and what would be consented though the DCO. The                       There would be negligible change in impacts as these fine-tunings are marginal in comparison to the overall design.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000181-EN010082-6.2.10-ES Chapter 10-Traffic and Transport-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000181-EN010082-6.2.10-ES Chapter 10-Traffic and Transport-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:18:             Negligible           <30%                         No discernible change in conditions

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000181-EN010082-6.2.10-ES Chapter 10-Traffic and Transport-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000181-EN010082-6.2.10-ES Chapter 10-Traffic and Transport-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:25:          construction phase as operational vehicle movements are negligible. Changes

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000181-EN010082-6.2.10-ES Chapter 10-Traffic and Transport-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000181-EN010082-6.2.10-ES Chapter 10-Traffic and Transport-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:29:              negligible impact in terms of construction traffic (<30% increase in traffic and

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000181-EN010082-6.2.10-ES Chapter 10-Traffic and Transport-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000181-EN010082-6.2.10-ES Chapter 10-Traffic and Transport-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:30:              negligible impact in terms of operational traffic (<30% increase in traffic and

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000181-EN010082-6.2.10-ES Chapter 10-Traffic and Transport-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000181-EN010082-6.2.10-ES Chapter 10-Traffic and Transport-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:31:          change is considered to be negligible and therefore does not warrant further

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000181-EN010082-6.2.10-ES Chapter 10-Traffic and Transport-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000181-EN010082-6.2.10-ES Chapter 10-Traffic and Transport-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:31:          have a negligible environmental impact in terms of traffic for the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000181-EN010082-6.2.10-ES Chapter 10-Traffic and Transport-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000181-EN010082-6.2.10-ES Chapter 10-Traffic and Transport-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:32:          that there will be a negligible increase in trips and any significant increases in

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000181-EN010082-6.2.10-ES Chapter 10-Traffic and Transport-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000181-EN010082-6.2.10-ES Chapter 10-Traffic and Transport-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:33:Construction                 Increased traffic flows on             All traffic to use the Strategic Road Network       Negligible impacts.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000181-EN010082-6.2.10-ES Chapter 10-Traffic and Transport-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000181-EN010082-6.2.10-ES Chapter 10-Traffic and Transport-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:33:Construction                 Increased HGV traffic on A1053, A66,   Construction Traffic Management Plan                Negligible impacts.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000181-EN010082-6.2.10-ES Chapter 10-Traffic and Transport-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000181-EN010082-6.2.10-ES Chapter 10-Traffic and Transport-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:33:Abnormal Indivisible         AILs on Tees Dock Road, A66, A1053.    Abnormal load routing to be agreed through          Negligible impacts.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf|EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf]]:37:         of negligible ecological interest and that all protected species issues had

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf|EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf]]:46:          negligible due to the size of the site, the distance to sensitive receptors

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf|EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf]]:47:          Proposed Development would generate negligible impacts and this matter

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf|EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf]]:47:          impacts from dust, PM10 and PM2.5 during construction would be negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf|EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf]]:48:          operational traffic would be negligible and this matter is not considered

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf|EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf]]:51:          mitigated to negligible residual impacts. The Applicant noted that the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf|EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf]]:53:          stack height based on the knowledge that negligible impacts on sensitive

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf|EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf]]:54:          be limited and result in negligible change in impacts [[REP5-005]]. As with

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf|EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf]]:60:4.10.7.   The ES explains that the site is of negligible ecological value and that NE

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf|EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf]]:65:          negligible to minor adverse and therefore not significant.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf|EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf]]:79:           whichconcludes that changes in total trafficwould be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf|EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf]]:82:          negligible impact in terms of construction traffic and therefore will result

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf|EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf]]:83:          be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf|EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf]]:83:          negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf|EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf]]:122:          change would be negligible. Any noise impacts of lateral movement

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000476-Applicant’s Comments on Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council’s Responses to the Examiner’s Written Questions D3.pdf|EN010082-000476-Applicant’s Comments on Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council’s Responses to the Examiner’s Written Questions D3.pdf]]:18:                                                                                       have been considered as negligible and has assumed the installation

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000476-Applicant’s Comments on Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council’s Responses to the Examiner’s Written Questions D3.pdf|EN010082-000476-Applicant’s Comments on Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council’s Responses to the Examiner’s Written Questions D3.pdf]]:18:                                                                                       have been considered as negligible. The assessment has shown that

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000350-Placeholder for ExA's Written Questions.pdf|EN010082-000350-Placeholder for ExA's Written Questions.pdf]]:3:                                term use of auxiliary boilers are negligible and only contribute 3% of the total oxides of nitrogen (NOx)

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000350-Placeholder for ExA's Written Questions.pdf|EN010082-000350-Placeholder for ExA's Written Questions.pdf]]:25:                                 moderate impacts are judged to be significant whereas minor and negligible impacts are considered to

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf]]:3:       term use of the auxiliary boilers are negligible and have not been considered,

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf]]:4:            the construction phase of the Project are considered to be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf]]:4:            the emissions arising from these are anticipated to be negligible and have

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf]]:5:            are anticipated to be negligible and have not been considered further (see

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf]]:12: Council (PEIR response)                     State or factors which have been considered as negligible and has assumed the installation of a 75m stack. The     described in this chapter and the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf]]:14:       construction are negligible. Effects on sensitive ecological receptors primarily

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf]]:20:        emissions form the auxiliary boilers are negligible (~2% short term increase in

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf]]:26:                PEC 75% or less of AQS             Negligible         Negligible            Slight             Moderate

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf]]:26:                PEC 76% to 94% of AQS              Negligible         Slight                Moderate           Moderate

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf]]:26:                (not dependent on baseline         Negligible         Slight                Moderate           Substantial

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf]]:27:                 Negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf]]:38:        considered negligible and have been screened out from further consideration.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf]]:52:        negligible. However, it should be noted that due to the nature of dust

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000398-8 7 - Tees CCPP - Written Summary of Oral Case (ISH 10 04 18) - FINAL.pdf|EN010082-000398-8 7 - Tees CCPP - Written Summary of Oral Case (ISH 10 04 18) - FINAL.pdf]]:17:               protect human health. At distant nature conservation sites change would be negligible;

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000477-Applicant’s Comments on the Environment Agency’s Responses to the Examiner’s Written Questions D3.pdf|EN010082-000477-Applicant’s Comments on the Environment Agency’s Responses to the Examiner’s Written Questions D3.pdf]]:16:                                                                                measure objectives. We would welcome any contributions by the applicant         1, Chapter 9 [[APP-051]]. The assessment concludes that the Site has negligible ecological

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000180-EN010082-6.2.9-ES Chapter 9-Ecology and Nature Conservation-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000180-EN010082-6.2.9-ES Chapter 9-Ecology and Nature Conservation-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:4:        surrounding area the Project Site is of negligible ecological sensitivity.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000180-EN010082-6.2.9-ES Chapter 9-Ecology and Nature Conservation-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000180-EN010082-6.2.9-ES Chapter 9-Ecology and Nature Conservation-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:18:        of negligible ecological value (see Section 9.5), and NE agreed that detailed

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000180-EN010082-6.2.9-ES Chapter 9-Ecology and Nature Conservation-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000180-EN010082-6.2.9-ES Chapter 9-Ecology and Nature Conservation-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:28:            was in October 2016, which showed that the Project site was of negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000180-EN010082-6.2.9-ES Chapter 9-Ecology and Nature Conservation-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000180-EN010082-6.2.9-ES Chapter 9-Ecology and Nature Conservation-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:30:9.66   The habitats on the Project site are considered to be of negligible conservation

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000180-EN010082-6.2.9-ES Chapter 9-Ecology and Nature Conservation-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000180-EN010082-6.2.9-ES Chapter 9-Ecology and Nature Conservation-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:32:9.81         The Project Site is of negligible ecological importance and no significant effects

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000180-EN010082-6.2.9-ES Chapter 9-Ecology and Nature Conservation-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000180-EN010082-6.2.9-ES Chapter 9-Ecology and Nature Conservation-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:34:9.90    The Project site has negligible ecological value for habitats and species of flora

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000170-EN010082-6.1-ES Non Technical Summary-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000170-EN010082-6.1-ES Non Technical Summary-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:8:having no impact or to be of negligible magnitude and will          While the above provides a general framework for identifying impacts and assessing the significance of their effects, in practice the approaches and

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000170-EN010082-6.1-ES Non Technical Summary-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000170-EN010082-6.1-ES Non Technical Summary-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:16:0.54    The Project Site itself is of negligible ecological importance and the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000517-8.43 - Tees CCPP - Written Summary of Oral Case - Env Matters ISH - FINAL - 05.07.18.pdf|EN010082-000517-8.43 - Tees CCPP - Written Summary of Oral Case - Env Matters ISH - FINAL - 05.07.18.pdf]]:8:        figures) as between the PEIR and ES; illustrating the negligible effect the building structures have on

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000517-8.43 - Tees CCPP - Written Summary of Oral Case - Env Matters ISH - FINAL - 05.07.18.pdf|EN010082-000517-8.43 - Tees CCPP - Written Summary of Oral Case - Env Matters ISH - FINAL - 05.07.18.pdf]]:8:        effect is negligible. Substantially lowering the stack height to heights comparable with the tallest

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000517-8.43 - Tees CCPP - Written Summary of Oral Case - Env Matters ISH - FINAL - 05.07.18.pdf|EN010082-000517-8.43 - Tees CCPP - Written Summary of Oral Case - Env Matters ISH - FINAL - 05.07.18.pdf]]:9:        ranges from negligible to medium and the significance of effects from not significant to minor. As can be

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000517-8.43 - Tees CCPP - Written Summary of Oral Case - Env Matters ISH - FINAL - 05.07.18.pdf|EN010082-000517-8.43 - Tees CCPP - Written Summary of Oral Case - Env Matters ISH - FINAL - 05.07.18.pdf]]:10:        that negligible impacts on sensitive human and ecological receptors would occur. However, that this is

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000409-8.14 - Table 3.2 update.pdf|EN010082-000409-8.14 - Table 3.2 update.pdf]]:1:                                                                                                                                impacts are negligible”.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000409-8.14 - Table 3.2 update.pdf|EN010082-000409-8.14 - Table 3.2 update.pdf]]:4:                                                                                                                                   have a negligible impact in terms of construction traffic

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000196-EN010082-6.3.6-ES Annex D3-Site Condition Report-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000196-EN010082-6.3.6-ES Annex D3-Site Condition Report-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:99:no risk to human health or the risk is negligible). For the ENVIRON GAC, all the SGV inputs

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000429-Copy of EXA Questions 1.pdf|EN010082-000429-Copy of EXA Questions 1.pdf]]:33:negligible and has assumed the installation of a 75m stack. The design of the gas turbine will be such that it will be capable of meeting a 30mg/m3 emission limit,

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000429-Copy of EXA Questions 1.pdf|EN010082-000429-Copy of EXA Questions 1.pdf]]:33:as negligible. The assessment has shown that daytime noise levels are predicted to be below the 65dB level for all noise sensitive receptors. The developer plans

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000389-7 3 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with Redcar  Cleveland - DRAFT.pdf|EN010082-000389-7 3 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with Redcar  Cleveland - DRAFT.pdf]]:25:        The Site has negligible ecological value for habitats and species of flora and fauna and taking account of

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000387-7 1 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with TVWT - Signed_Redacted.pdf|EN010082-000387-7 1 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with TVWT - Signed_Redacted.pdf]]:9:         the Site has negligible ecological value for habitats and species of flora and fauna, and no significant

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000387-7 1 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with TVWT - Signed_Redacted.pdf|EN010082-000387-7 1 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with TVWT - Signed_Redacted.pdf]]:9: 2.16    In specific regards to breeding birds, it is agreed that there will be negligible effect on bird species

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000203-EN010082-6.3.13-ES Annex G2-Ecological Appraisal_Final.pdf|EN010082-000203-EN010082-6.3.13-ES Annex G2-Ecological Appraisal_Final.pdf]]:11:The Project site is of negligible ecological value with no priority habitats and, in fact, very little

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000203-EN010082-6.3.13-ES Annex G2-Ecological Appraisal_Final.pdf|EN010082-000203-EN010082-6.3.13-ES Annex G2-Ecological Appraisal_Final.pdf]]:12:Of the other priority species, there is negligible suitable habitat on the Project site for any of

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000203-EN010082-6.3.13-ES Annex G2-Ecological Appraisal_Final.pdf|EN010082-000203-EN010082-6.3.13-ES Annex G2-Ecological Appraisal_Final.pdf]]:12:Project site is of negligible importance for that species.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000203-EN010082-6.3.13-ES Annex G2-Ecological Appraisal_Final.pdf|EN010082-000203-EN010082-6.3.13-ES Annex G2-Ecological Appraisal_Final.pdf]]:12:habitat then the Project site is considered to be of negligible importance for both species.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000203-EN010082-6.3.13-ES Annex G2-Ecological Appraisal_Final.pdf|EN010082-000203-EN010082-6.3.13-ES Annex G2-Ecological Appraisal_Final.pdf]]:12:This vegetation is of negligible ecological value being essentially a range of the typical “weed”

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000203-EN010082-6.3.13-ES Annex G2-Ecological Appraisal_Final.pdf|EN010082-000203-EN010082-6.3.13-ES Annex G2-Ecological Appraisal_Final.pdf]]:12:assessed as being negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000203-EN010082-6.3.13-ES Annex G2-Ecological Appraisal_Final.pdf|EN010082-000203-EN010082-6.3.13-ES Annex G2-Ecological Appraisal_Final.pdf]]:12:being negligible, including at a local scale.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000203-EN010082-6.3.13-ES Annex G2-Ecological Appraisal_Final.pdf|EN010082-000203-EN010082-6.3.13-ES Annex G2-Ecological Appraisal_Final.pdf]]:13:surrounding area, eg large water bodies, roofs, etc, this impact is assessed as being negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000203-EN010082-6.3.13-ES Annex G2-Ecological Appraisal_Final.pdf|EN010082-000203-EN010082-6.3.13-ES Annex G2-Ecological Appraisal_Final.pdf]]:13:would be of negligible significance at a local scale.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000203-EN010082-6.3.13-ES Annex G2-Ecological Appraisal_Final.pdf|EN010082-000203-EN010082-6.3.13-ES Annex G2-Ecological Appraisal_Final.pdf]]:13:assessed as being negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000203-EN010082-6.3.13-ES Annex G2-Ecological Appraisal_Final.pdf|EN010082-000203-EN010082-6.3.13-ES Annex G2-Ecological Appraisal_Final.pdf]]:13:The Project site negligible ecological value.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf]]:3:       term use of the auxiliary boilers are negligible and have not been considered,

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf]]:4:            the construction phase of the Project are considered to be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf]]:4:            the emissions arising from these are anticipated to be negligible and have

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf]]:5:            are anticipated to be negligible and have not been considered further (see

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf]]:12:Council (PEIR response)                     State or factors which have been considered as negligible and has assumed the installation of a 75m stack. The     described in this chapter and the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf]]:14:       construction are negligible. Effects on sensitive ecological receptors primarily

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf]]:20:        emissions form the auxiliary boilers are negligible (~2% short term increase in

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf]]:26:            PEC 75% or less of AQS                Negligible          Negligible            Slight              Moderate

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf]]:26:            PEC 76% to 94% of AQS                 Negligible          Slight                Moderate            Moderate

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf]]:26:            (not dependent on baseline            Negligible          Slight                Moderate            Substantial

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf]]:27:                 Negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf]]:38:        considered negligible and have been screened out from further consideration.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf]]:52:        negligible. However, it should be noted that due to the nature of dust

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000205-EN010082-6.3.15-ES Annex H-HRA-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000205-EN010082-6.3.15-ES Annex H-HRA-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:26:             a.       Impacts from emissions during construction and decommissioning (such as from traffic) are considered negligible (see Section 7.4.2 of

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000205-EN010082-6.3.15-ES Annex H-HRA-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000205-EN010082-6.3.15-ES Annex H-HRA-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:27:             a.       Impacts from emissions during construction and decommissioning (such as from traffic) are considered negligible and have been

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000205-EN010082-6.3.15-ES Annex H-HRA-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000205-EN010082-6.3.15-ES Annex H-HRA-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:28:             a.   Impacts from emissions during construction and decommissioning (such as from traffic) are considered negligible and have been

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000205-EN010082-6.3.15-ES Annex H-HRA-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000205-EN010082-6.3.15-ES Annex H-HRA-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:29:             a.       Impacts from emissions during construction and decommissioning (such as from traffic) are considered negligible and have been

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000205-EN010082-6.3.15-ES Annex H-HRA-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000205-EN010082-6.3.15-ES Annex H-HRA-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:30:             a.       Impacts from emissions during construction and decommissioning (such as from traffic) are considered negligible and have been

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:12:         the EIA Regulations, whereas minor and negligible impacts are considered to

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:34:                                           highly developed industrial        be negligible.                     Plant and within the              industrial

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:34:                                                                                                                                                   is negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:34:                                           of the Project Site.               be negligible.                     barely visible.                   to be

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:34:                                                                                                                                                   negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:34:                                           Project Site form this area.       be negligible.                     barely visible.                   to be

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:34:                                                                                                                                                   negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:34:             Wilton)                       limited or no visibility of the    be negligible.                     visible.                          to be

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:34:                                           Project Site from this area.                                                                            negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:34:             Marske)                       buildings there is very            be negligible.                     visible.                          to be

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:35:                                             limited or no visibility of the                                                                          negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:35:                                             landscape unit from where           be negligible.                     Project will be barely visible.   to be

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:35:                                             long distance views are                                                                                  negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:35:                                             industrial development to           be negligible.                     industrial buildings.             to be

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:35:                                             the north and northeast of                                                                               negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:36:                             At night construction           Negligible   Not                                          Small              Minor

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:36:                             considered to be negligible.                                existing lighting around

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:36:                             Impacts due to lighting are     Negligible   Not            footpath.                     Small              Minor

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:36:                             At night construction           Negligible   Not                                          Small              Minor

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:37:                          negligible.                                                more lighting during the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:37:VP4- view   High          Views to site are restricted   Negligible   Not            Views to site are             Magnitude of        Minor to

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:37:                                                         Negligible   Not                                                              Minor

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:38:VP6- view      Medium        Views to the site are          Negligible   Not            Intervening vegetation in    Magnitude of       Minor

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:38:                                                            Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:38:VP7-view       High          Views to site are restricted   Negligible   Not            Intervening vegetation in    Magnitude of       Not Significant

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:38:park/Mille                   Infrastructure corridor.                                   views of the Project.        Negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:39:                                                          Negligible   Not                                          Magnitude of

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:39:                           considered to be negligible.                               be medium

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:39:VP9- View    Medium        Partial long medium            Negligible   Not            The Project will be           Magnitude of       Minor

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:39:VP10- View   Medium        Long medium distance           Negligible   Not            The Project will be visible   Magnitude of       Minor

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:40:                            the Wilton International         Negligible.                   Project will be seen

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:40:VP11- View    High          Very limited long-medium         Negligible     Not            The taller components of     Magnitude of       Not Significant

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:40:                            taller components of the                                       skyline but will be          negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:40:VP12- View    High          Given the distance and a         Negligible     Not            It is unlikely that the      Magnitude of       Not Significant

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:40:m village                   of the Project site and                                        to intervening vegetation.   negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:40:VP13- View    Medium        Given the distance and           Negligible     Not            Very limited long            Magnitude of       Not Significant

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:40:village                     Project site and                                               from the village and foot    negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:41:VP14- View   Medium        Given the distance and due   Negligible   Not            Only the taller elements      Magnitude of       Not Significant

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:41:wn                         facilities, views of the                                 due to existing               negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:48:              negligible owing to distance and the intervening areas of urban development

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:49:        the magnitude of change is considered to be negligible and the cumulative

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf|EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf]]:12:         the EIA Regulations, whereas minor and negligible impacts are considered to

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf|EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf]]:34:                                           highly developed industrial        be negligible.                     Plant and within the              industrial

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf|EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf]]:34:                                                                                                                                                   is negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf|EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf]]:34:                                           of the Project Site.               be negligible.                     barely visible.                   to be

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf|EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf]]:34:                                                                                                                                                   negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf|EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf]]:34:                                           Project Site form this area.       be negligible.                     barely visible.                   to be

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf|EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf]]:34:                                                                                                                                                   negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf|EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf]]:34:             Wilton)                       limited or no visibility of the    be negligible.                     visible.                          to be

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf|EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf]]:34:                                           Project Site from this area.                                                                            negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf|EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf]]:34:             Marske)                       buildings there is very            be negligible.                     visible.                          to be

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf|EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf]]:35:                                             limited or no visibility of the                                                                          negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf|EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf]]:35:                                             landscape unit from where           be negligible.                     Project will be barely visible.   to be

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf|EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf]]:35:                                             long distance views are                                                                                  negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf|EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf]]:35:                                             industrial development to           be negligible.                     industrial buildings.             to be

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf|EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf]]:35:                                             the north and northeast of                                                                               negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf|EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf]]:36:                             At night construction           Negligible   Not                                          Small              Minor

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf|EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf]]:36:                             considered to be negligible.                                existing lighting around

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf|EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf]]:36:                             Impacts due to lighting are     Negligible   Not            footpath.                     Small              Minor

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf|EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf]]:36:                             At night construction           Negligible   Not                                          Small              Minor

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf|EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf]]:37:                          negligible.                                                more lighting during the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf|EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf]]:37:VP4- view   High          Views to site are restricted   Negligible   Not            Views to site are             Magnitude of        Minor to

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf|EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf]]:37:                                                         Negligible   Not                                                              Minor

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf|EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf]]:38:VP6- view      Medium        Views to the site are          Negligible   Not            Intervening vegetation in    Magnitude of       Minor

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf|EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf]]:38:                                                            Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf|EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf]]:38:VP7-view       High          Views to site are restricted   Negligible   Not            Intervening vegetation in    Magnitude of       Not Significant

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf|EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf]]:38:park/Mille                   Infrastructure corridor.                                   views of the Project.        Negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf|EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf]]:39:                                                          Negligible   Not                                          Magnitude of

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf|EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf]]:39:                           considered to be negligible.                               be medium

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf|EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf]]:39:VP9- View    Medium        Partial long medium            Negligible   Not            The Project will be           Magnitude of       Minor

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf|EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf]]:39:VP10- View   Medium        Long medium distance           Negligible   Not            The Project will be visible   Magnitude of       Minor

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf|EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf]]:40:                            the Wilton International         Negligible.                   Project will be seen

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf|EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf]]:40:VP11- View    High          Very limited long-medium         Negligible     Not            The taller components of     Magnitude of       Not Significant

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf|EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf]]:40:                            taller components of the                                       skyline but will be          negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf|EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf]]:40:VP12- View    High          Given the distance and a         Negligible     Not            It is unlikely that the      Magnitude of       Not Significant

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf|EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf]]:40:m village                   of the Project site and                                        to intervening vegetation.   negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf|EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf]]:40:VP13- View    Medium        Given the distance and           Negligible     Not            Very limited long            Magnitude of       Not Significant

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf|EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf]]:40:village                     Project site and                                               from the village and foot    negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf|EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf]]:41:VP14- View   Medium        Given the distance and due   Negligible   Not            Only the taller elements      Magnitude of       Not Significant

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf|EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf]]:41:wn                         facilities, views of the                                 due to existing               negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf|EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf]]:48:              negligible owing to distance and the intervening areas of urban development

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf|EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf]]:49:        the magnitude of change is considered to be negligible and the cumulative

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:44:having no impact or to be of negligible magnitude and will          While the above provides a general framework for identifying impacts and assessing the sign

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:52:        from the site would be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:53:        to have an impact on the Lovell Hill Pools is negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:55:        negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:56:be of negligible magnitude.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:64:have negligible significance for water supply or river base flow. Records

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:77:        of above negligible magnitude are the potential disturbance to nesting birds

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:78:numbers of Lepidopteran species, is considered to be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:89:        example SO2, CO and PM10/PM2.5) will be negligible. The impacts of NO2 will

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:111:        impacts on land use will be negligible. This criterion will not therefore be

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:11:         the EIA Regulations, whereas minor and negligible impacts are considered to

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:33:                               highly developed industrial      be negligible.                  within the backdrop of a very     industrial

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:33:                                                                                                                                  negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:33:                               limited visibility of the        be negligible.                  barely visible.                   to be

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:33:                               Project Site.                                                                                      negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:33:                               visibility of the Project Site   be negligible.                  barely visible.                   to be

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:33:                               form this area.                                                                                    negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:33: Wilton)                       very limited or no visibility    be negligible.                  visible.                          to be

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:33:                               of the Project Site from this                                                                      negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:34: Redcar and                    Centre buildings there is        be negligible.                  visible.                          to be

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:34: Marske)                       very limited or no visibility                                                                      negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:34: )                             landscape unit from where        be negligible.                  Project will be barely visible.   to be

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:34:                               long distance views are                                                                            negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:34:                               industrial development to        be negligible.                                                    to be

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:34:                               the north and northeast of                                                                         negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:35:                                                           Negligible   Not                                                                Minor

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:35:                           considered to be negligible.                               perceptible in the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:36:                                                           Negligible   Not           and footpath.                   Small              Minor

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:36:                            At night construction          Negligible   Not           At night, operational and       Small.             Minor

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:36:                            be negligible.                                            during construction, the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:36:VP4- view     High          Views to site are restricted   Negligible   Not           Views to site are restricted    Magnitude of       Minor to

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:37:                                                            Negligible   Not                                                                 Minor

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:37:VP6- view      Medium        Views to the site are          Negligible   Not           Intervening vegetation in the     Magnitude of        Minor

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:37:                                                            Negligible                 upper portions of the HRSG

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:37:VP7-view       High          Views to site are restricted   Negligible   Not           Intervening vegetation in the     Magnitude of        Not Significant

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:37:park/Mille                   Infrastructure corridor.                                  Project.                          Negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:38:                                                          Negligible   Not                                           Magnitude of

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:38:                           considered to be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:38:VP9- View    Medium        Partial long medium            Negligible   Not           The Project will be partially   Magnitude of       Minor

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:38:VP10- View   Medium        Long medium distance           Negligible   Not           The Project will be visible     Magnitude of       Minor

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:39:                           Area and along main           Negligible.                 view, existing lighting

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:39:VP11- View   High          Very limited long-medium      Negligible    Not           The taller components of the      Magnitude of       Not Significant

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:39:Castle                     the taller components of                                  will be difficult to              negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:39:VP12- View   High          Given the distance and a      Negligible    Not           It is unlikely that the Project   Magnitude of       Not Significant

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:39:m village                  of the Project site and                                   intervening vegetation.           negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:39:VP13- View   Medium        Given the distance and        Negligible    Not           Very limited long distance        Magnitude of       Not Significant

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:39:village                    Project site and                                          foot path due to intervening      negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:40:VP14- View   Medium        Given the distance and due   Negligible   Not           Only the taller elements will    Magnitude of       Not Significant

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:40:wn                         facilities, views of the                                existing stacks/other            negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:47:              negligible owing to distance and the intervening areas of urban development

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:48:        the magnitude of change is considered to be negligible and the cumulative

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:11:         the EIA Regulations, whereas minor and negligible impacts are considered to

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:33:                              highly developed industrial        be negligible.                  backdrop of a very large           industrial

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:33:                                                                                                                                    is negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:33:                              of the Project Site.               be negligible.                  barely visible.                    to be

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:33:                                                                                                                                    negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:33:                              Project Site form this area.       be negligible.                  barely visible.                    to be

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:33:                                                                                                                                    negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:33:Wilton)                       limited or no visibility of the    be negligible.                  visible.                           to be

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:33:                              Project Site from this area.                                                                          negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:33:Marske)                       buildings there is very            be negligible.                  visible.                           to be

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:34:                                limited or no visibility of the                                                                         negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:34:                                landscape unit from where           be negligible.                   will be barely visible.            to be

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:34:                                long distance views are                                                                                 negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:34:                                industrial development to           be negligible.                                                      to be

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:34:                                the north and northeast of                                                                              negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:35:                          At night construction           Negligible   Not            hedgerows.                                          Minor

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:35:                          considered to be negligible.                                perceptible in the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:35:                          Impacts due to lighting are     Negligible   Not                                             Small              Minor

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:36:                             At night construction          Negligible   Not            At night, operational and         Small              Minor

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:36:                             negligible.                                                during construction, the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:36:VP4- view      High          Views to site are restricted   Negligible   Not            Views to site are restricted      Magnitude of       Minor to

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:37:                                                            Negligible   Not            A1053 and industrial area in    background.         Minor

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:37:VP6- view      Medium        Views to the site are          Negligible   Not            Intervening vegetation in the   Magnitude of        Minor

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:37:                                                            Negligible                  upper portions of the HRSG

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:37:VP7-view       High          Views to site are restricted   Negligible   Not            Intervening vegetation in the   Magnitude of        Not Significant

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:37:park/Mille                   Infrastructure corridor.                                   Project.                        Negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:38:                                                          Negligible   Not                                            Magnitude of

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:38:                           considered to be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:38:VP9- View    Medium        Partial long medium            Negligible   Not            The Project will be partially   Magnitude of       Minor

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:38:VP10- View   Medium        Long medium distance           Negligible   Not            The Project will be visible     Magnitude of       Minor

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:39:                            Area and along main              Negligible.                  existing lighting within the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:39:VP11- View    High          Very limited long-medium         Negligible    Not            The taller components of the      Magnitude of       Not Significant

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:39:                            taller components of the                                      be difficult to differentiate     negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:39:VP12- View    High          Given the distance and a         Negligible    Not            It is unlikely that the Project   Magnitude of       Not Significant

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:39:m village                   of the Project site and                                       intervening vegetation.           negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:39:VP13- View    Medium        Given the distance and           Negligible    Not            Very limited long distance        Magnitude of       Not Significant

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:39:village                     Project site and                                              foot path due to intervening      negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:39:VP14- View    Medium        Given the distance and due       Negligible    Not            Only the taller elements will     Magnitude of       Not Significant

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:39:wn                          facilities, views of the                                      existing stacks/other             negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:47:              negligible owing to distance and the intervening areas of urban development

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf|EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf]]:48:        the magnitude of change is considered to be negligible and the cumulative

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000215-EN010082-5.9-Statutory Nuisance Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000215-EN010082-5.9-Statutory Nuisance Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:8:       negligible magnitude is deemed not to have a significant effect for the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:105:negligible.” PHE supports the inclusion of this information within EIAs as good

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000183-EN010082-6.2.12-ES Chapter 12-Cultural Heritage-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000183-EN010082-6.2.12-ES Chapter 12-Cultural Heritage-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:15:              been assessed on a five point scale of high, medium, low, negligible and

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000183-EN010082-6.2.12-ES Chapter 12-Cultural Heritage-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000183-EN010082-6.2.12-ES Chapter 12-Cultural Heritage-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:16:              Negligible                 Buildings of no architectural or historical note; buildings of an intrusive

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000183-EN010082-6.2.12-ES Chapter 12-Cultural Heritage-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000183-EN010082-6.2.12-ES Chapter 12-Cultural Heritage-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:17:              Table 12. 4. Four levels of effect are defined: negligible, minor, moderate and

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000183-EN010082-6.2.12-ES Chapter 12-Cultural Heritage-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000183-EN010082-6.2.12-ES Chapter 12-Cultural Heritage-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:17:                              Medium          Negligible       Minor             Minor to                   Moderate to

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000183-EN010082-6.2.12-ES Chapter 12-Cultural Heritage-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000183-EN010082-6.2.12-ES Chapter 12-Cultural Heritage-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:17:                              Low             Negligible       Minor /           Minor                      Minor to

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000183-EN010082-6.2.12-ES Chapter 12-Cultural Heritage-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000183-EN010082-6.2.12-ES Chapter 12-Cultural Heritage-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:17:                                                               Negligible                                   Moderate

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000183-EN010082-6.2.12-ES Chapter 12-Cultural Heritage-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000183-EN010082-6.2.12-ES Chapter 12-Cultural Heritage-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:17:                              Negligible      Negligible       Negligible        Negligible                 Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000183-EN010082-6.2.12-ES Chapter 12-Cultural Heritage-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000183-EN010082-6.2.12-ES Chapter 12-Cultural Heritage-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:27:         which the Project is located will be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000183-EN010082-6.2.12-ES Chapter 12-Cultural Heritage-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000183-EN010082-6.2.12-ES Chapter 12-Cultural Heritage-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:30:        negligible and therefore not significant.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000183-EN010082-6.2.12-ES Chapter 12-Cultural Heritage-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000183-EN010082-6.2.12-ES Chapter 12-Cultural Heritage-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:32:        to be negligible to minor adverse and therefore not significant.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf|EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf]]:37:         of negligible ecological interest and that all protected species issues had

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf|EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf]]:46:          negligible due to the size of the site, the distance to sensitive receptors

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf|EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf]]:47:          Proposed Development would generate negligible impacts and this matter

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf|EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf]]:47:          impacts from dust, PM10 and PM2.5 during construction would be negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf|EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf]]:48:          operational traffic would be negligible and this matter is not considered

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf|EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf]]:51:          mitigated to negligible residual impacts. The Applicant noted that the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf|EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf]]:53:          stack height based on the knowledge that negligible impacts on sensitive

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf|EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf]]:54:          be limited and result in negligible change in impacts [[REP5-005]]. As with

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf|EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf]]:60:4.10.7.   The ES explains that the site is of negligible ecological value and that NE

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf|EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf]]:65:          negligible to minor adverse and therefore not significant.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf|EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf]]:79:           whichconcludes that changes in total trafficwould be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf|EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf]]:82:          negligible impact in terms of construction traffic and therefore will result

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf|EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf]]:83:          be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf|EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf]]:83:          negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf|EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf]]:122:          change would be negligible. Any noise impacts of lateral movement

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:3:       term use of the auxiliary boilers are negligible and have not been considered,

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:4:            the construction phase of the Project are considered to be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:4:            the emissions arising from these are anticipated to be negligible and have

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:5:            are anticipated to be negligible and have not been considered further (see

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:12:Council (PEIR response)                     State or factors which have been considered as negligible and has assumed the installation of a 75m stack. The     described in this chapter and the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:14:       construction are negligible. Effects on sensitive ecological receptors primarily

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:20:        emissions form the auxiliary boilers are negligible (~2% short term increase in

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:26:            PEC 75% or less of AQS                Negligible          Negligible            Slight              Moderate

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:26:            PEC 76% to 94% of AQS                 Negligible          Slight                Moderate            Moderate

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:26:            (not dependent on baseline            Negligible          Slight                Moderate            Substantial

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:27:                 Negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:38:        considered negligible and have been screened out from further consideration.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf|EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf]]:52:        negligible. However, it should be noted that due to the nature of dust

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf|EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf]]:42:having no impact or to be of negligible magnitude and will          While the above provides a general framework for identifying impacts and assessing the sign

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf|EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf]]:50:        from the site would be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf|EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf]]:51:        to have an impact on the Lovell Hill Pools is negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf|EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf]]:53:        negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf|EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf]]:54:be of negligible magnitude.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf|EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf]]:62:have negligible significance for water supply or river base flow. Records

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf|EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf]]:75:        of above negligible magnitude are the potential disturbance to nesting birds

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf|EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf]]:76:numbers of Lepidopteran species, is considered to be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf|EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf]]:87:        example SO2, CO and PM10/PM2.5) will be negligible. The impacts of NO2 will

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf|EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf]]:109:        impacts on land use will be negligible. This criterion will not therefore be

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf|EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf]]:37:         of negligible ecological interest and that all protected species issues had

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf|EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf]]:46:          negligible due to the size of the site, the distance to sensitive receptors

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf|EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf]]:47:          Proposed Development would generate negligible impacts and this matter

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf|EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf]]:47:          impacts from dust, PM10 and PM2.5 during construction would be negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf|EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf]]:48:          operational traffic would be negligible and this matter is not considered

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf|EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf]]:51:          mitigated to negligible residual impacts. The Applicant noted that the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf|EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf]]:53:          stack height based on the knowledge that negligible impacts on sensitive

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf|EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf]]:54:          be limited and result in negligible change in impacts [[REP5-005]]. As with

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf|EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf]]:60:4.10.7.   The ES explains that the site is of negligible ecological value and that NE

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf|EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf]]:65:          negligible to minor adverse and therefore not significant.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf|EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf]]:79:           whichconcludes that changes in total trafficwould be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf|EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf]]:82:          negligible impact in terms of construction traffic and therefore will result

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf|EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf]]:83:          be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf|EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf]]:83:          negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf|EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf]]:122:          change would be negligible. Any noise impacts of lateral movement

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000471-Copy of EXA Questions Updated.pdf|EN010082-000471-Copy of EXA Questions Updated.pdf]]:9:        the assessment of construction noise was based on an even spread of     negligible and has assumed the installation of a 75m stack. The design of the gas turbine will be such that it will be capable of meeting a 30mg/m3 emission limit,

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000471-Copy of EXA Questions Updated.pdf|EN010082-000471-Copy of EXA Questions Updated.pdf]]:9:                                                                                as negligible. The assessment has shown that daytime noise levels are predicted to be below the 65dB level for all noise sensitive receptors. The developer plans

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000366-8.3 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Implication of Non-Mat Change - Final Issue.pdf|EN010082-000366-8.3 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Implication of Non-Mat Change - Final Issue.pdf]]:6:        impacts at the viewpoints ranges from negligible to medium and the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000366-8.3 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Implication of Non-Mat Change - Final Issue.pdf|EN010082-000366-8.3 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Implication of Non-Mat Change - Final Issue.pdf]]:8:                                     background of the view. Existing    Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000366-8.3 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Implication of Non-Mat Change - Final Issue.pdf|EN010082-000366-8.3 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Implication of Non-Mat Change - Final Issue.pdf]]:8:                                     considered to be negligible.                                       will be perceptible in the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000366-8.3 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Implication of Non-Mat Change - Final Issue.pdf|EN010082-000366-8.3 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Implication of Non-Mat Change - Final Issue.pdf]]:9:                                     Impacts due to lighting are           Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000366-8.3 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Implication of Non-Mat Change - Final Issue.pdf|EN010082-000366-8.3 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Implication of Non-Mat Change - Final Issue.pdf]]:9:                                     At night construction lighting        Negligible                     At night, operational and security

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000366-8.3 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Implication of Non-Mat Change - Final Issue.pdf|EN010082-000366-8.3 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Implication of Non-Mat Change - Final Issue.pdf]]:9:                                     negligible.                                                          the magnitude of change is

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000366-8.3 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Implication of Non-Mat Change - Final Issue.pdf|EN010082-000366-8.3 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Implication of Non-Mat Change - Final Issue.pdf]]:9: VP4- view          High             Views to site are restricted due to   Negligible   Not Significant   Views to site are restricted due to

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000366-8.3 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Implication of Non-Mat Change - Final Issue.pdf|EN010082-000366-8.3 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Implication of Non-Mat Change - Final Issue.pdf]]:10:                                     Impacts due to lighting are           Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000366-8.3 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Implication of Non-Mat Change - Final Issue.pdf|EN010082-000366-8.3 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Implication of Non-Mat Change - Final Issue.pdf]]:10: VP6- view         Medium            Views to the site are restricted      Negligible   Not Significant   Intervening vegetation in the gre

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000366-8.3 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Implication of Non-Mat Change - Final Issue.pdf|EN010082-000366-8.3 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Implication of Non-Mat Change - Final Issue.pdf]]:10:                                     Impacts due to lighting are           Negligible   Not Significant

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000366-8.3 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Implication of Non-Mat Change - Final Issue.pdf|EN010082-000366-8.3 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Implication of Non-Mat Change - Final Issue.pdf]]:10: VP7-view          High              Views to site are restricted due to   Negligible   Not Significant   Intervening vegetation in the gre

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000366-8.3 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Implication of Non-Mat Change - Final Issue.pdf|EN010082-000366-8.3 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Implication of Non-Mat Change - Final Issue.pdf]]:11:                                     At night construction lighting       Negligible                     At night, operational and security

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000366-8.3 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Implication of Non-Mat Change - Final Issue.pdf|EN010082-000366-8.3 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Implication of Non-Mat Change - Final Issue.pdf]]:11:                                     negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000366-8.3 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Implication of Non-Mat Change - Final Issue.pdf|EN010082-000366-8.3 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Implication of Non-Mat Change - Final Issue.pdf]]:11: VP9- View         Medium            Partial long medium distance         Negligible   Not Significant   The Project will be partially visib

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000366-8.3 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Implication of Non-Mat Change - Final Issue.pdf|EN010082-000366-8.3 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Implication of Non-Mat Change - Final Issue.pdf]]:11: VP10- View        Medium            Long medium distance views to        Negligible   Not Significant   The Project will be visible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000366-8.3 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Implication of Non-Mat Change - Final Issue.pdf|EN010082-000366-8.3 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Implication of Non-Mat Change - Final Issue.pdf]]:12:                                     dominate in the views                  Negligible.                       view, existing lighting within the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000366-8.3 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Implication of Non-Mat Change - Final Issue.pdf|EN010082-000366-8.3 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Implication of Non-Mat Change - Final Issue.pdf]]:12: VP11- View        High              Very limited long-medium               Negligible      Not Significant   The taller components of the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000366-8.3 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Implication of Non-Mat Change - Final Issue.pdf|EN010082-000366-8.3 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Implication of Non-Mat Change - Final Issue.pdf]]:12: VP12- View        High              Given the distance and a narrow        Negligible      Not Significant   It is unlikely that the Project will

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000366-8.3 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Implication of Non-Mat Change - Final Issue.pdf|EN010082-000366-8.3 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Implication of Non-Mat Change - Final Issue.pdf]]:12: VP13- View        Medium            Given the distance and                 Negligible      Not Significant   Very limited long distance views

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000366-8.3 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Implication of Non-Mat Change - Final Issue.pdf|EN010082-000366-8.3 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Implication of Non-Mat Change - Final Issue.pdf]]:12: VP14- View        Medium            Given the distance and due to          Negligible      Not Significant   Only the taller elements will be

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000510-CONSULTATION REPORT FOR NON-MATERIAL CHANGE.pdf|EN010082-000510-CONSULTATION REPORT FOR NON-MATERIAL CHANGE.pdf]]:23:                                                     viewpoints ranges from negligible to medium and the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/tees-ccpp/EN010082-000510-CONSULTATION REPORT FOR NON-MATERIAL CHANGE.pdf|EN010082-000510-CONSULTATION REPORT FOR NON-MATERIAL CHANGE.pdf]]:26:                              within the original DCO application for the reasons outlined below.            building downwash effects are negligible for both configurations.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf|TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf]]:27:        have a negligible impact on transport, and which were outside the ZOI of all other topics, were also

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf|TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf]]:52:                                    be a negligible effect on local air quality and, therefore, a LSE is not predicted to arise in

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf|TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf]]:55:                                    be a negligible effect on local air quality and, therefore, a LSE is not predicted to arise in

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf|TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf]]:56:                                            the risk of a significant impact arising with respect to the SAC is considered to be negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf|TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf]]:57:                                  arising with respect to these interest features is considered to be negligible (i.e. a LSE is not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf|TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf]]:59:                                          SPA’s interest features is considered to be negligible (i.e. a LSE is not predicted).

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf|TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf]]:65:maximum height to tip, rotor diameter 112m              on most species are considered to be negligible overall. The potential for collision impacts

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf|TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf]]:68:                                                        negligible. As such, no incombination effects are predicted.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf|TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf]]:68:                                                        to the designated sites are reported to be negligible within the ecological assessment

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf|TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf]]:88:          concentration is shown over the intertidal areas, leading to a prediction of negligible sediment being

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf|TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf]]:99:         Tees estuary. This is predicted to be negligible, with no effect on the supply of sediment to intertidal

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf|TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf]]:100:          within the designated sites, and sediment deposition onto the seabed would be negligible beyond the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf|TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf]]:118:         are predicted be negligible. There would continue to be some exceedence of critical load values for

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf|TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf]]:121:          noise levels and, consequently, are considered to be of negligible significance. However, and in order

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf|TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf]]:128:          on fish is, therefore, predicted to be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf|TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf]]:128:          potential cumulative impact is predicted to be negligible. The predicted footprints of sediment

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf|TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf]]:130:          morphology, with the proposed scheme having a negligible effect on deposition of sediment in the berth

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000499-Section 17 App 17.1 Flood Risk Assessment.pdf|TR030002-000499-Section 17 App 17.1 Flood Risk Assessment.pdf]]:16:                       negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000499-Section 17 App 17.1 Flood Risk Assessment.pdf|TR030002-000499-Section 17 App 17.1 Flood Risk Assessment.pdf]]:21:        and severe flood events. Changes in the spatial extent of flooding are likely to be negligible in narrower

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000499-Section 17 App 17.1 Flood Risk Assessment.pdf|TR030002-000499-Section 17 App 17.1 Flood Risk Assessment.pdf]]:23:        known floodplain, but are not predicted to affect flood risk. The piers would have a negligible impact on

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000499-Section 17 App 17.1 Flood Risk Assessment.pdf|TR030002-000499-Section 17 App 17.1 Flood Risk Assessment.pdf]]:23:        The piers to elevate the conveyor route would have a negligible impact on the surface area of the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000499-Section 17 App 17.1 Flood Risk Assessment.pdf|TR030002-000499-Section 17 App 17.1 Flood Risk Assessment.pdf]]:24:        negligible impact on the floodplain surface area, and not exacerbate flood risk.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000499-Section 17 App 17.1 Flood Risk Assessment.pdf|TR030002-000499-Section 17 App 17.1 Flood Risk Assessment.pdf]]:26:                  a negligible impact on the flood plain surface area.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000872-York Potash Ltd 1.pdf|TR030002-000872-York Potash Ltd 1.pdf]]:24:error is negligible, until the pipeline changes direction, when the chance of an error returns.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000872-York Potash Ltd 1.pdf|TR030002-000872-York Potash Ltd 1.pdf]]:29:included in the analysis as this cause is already a negligible frequency when compared to other

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000872-York Potash Ltd 1.pdf|TR030002-000872-York Potash Ltd 1.pdf]]:29:Deliberate violation of pipeline markers - negligible frequency compared to other causes

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000872-York Potash Ltd 1.pdf|TR030002-000872-York Potash Ltd 1.pdf]]:29:Damage to pipeline Cathodic Protection system - negligible frequency compared to other causes

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000872-York Potash Ltd 1.pdf|TR030002-000872-York Potash Ltd 1.pdf]]:29:Security issue leading to terrorist attack on pipeline - negligible frequency compared to other causes

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf|TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf]]:9:           High                    Major                Moderate                Moderate     Minor        Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf|TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf]]:9:           Medium                  Moderate             Moderate                Minor        Minor        Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf|TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf]]:9:           Low                     Minor                Minor                   Minor        Negligible   Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf|TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf]]:9:           Very Low                Minor                Negligible              Negligible   Negligible   Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf|TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf]]:10:4.3.35   Whilst mitigation for minor or negligible impacts may not be specifically defined as a matter of course,

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf|TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf]]:10:         also recognised that minor and negligible impacts could become significant when considered

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf|TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf]]:28:  Amenity &                Minor adverse to users of PROW and open              Negligible/no effects                                                   Negligible/no effects

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf|TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf]]:28:                           negligible/no effects.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf|TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf]]:28:  Noise & vibration        Negligible                                           Negligible                                                              Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf|TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf]]:28:  Air quality              Negligible with a slight adverse effect              Negligible                                                              Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf|TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf]]:28:  Socio-economics          Minor beneficial due to local employment and         Major beneficial at local level and minor beneficial at a sub-          Negligible/minor adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf|TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf]]:28:                           habitats; otherwise negligible or no effects         beneficial effect on reptiles; otherwise no effects                     establishment of additional areas planting,

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf|TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf]]:28:                                                                                change/negligible effects to other receptors

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf|TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf]]:28:  Geology &                Minor/moderate adverse                               Minor adverse                                                           Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf|TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf]]:28:  Hydrology & flood        Negligible                                           Largely negligible; minor adverse effects possible due to               Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf|TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf]]:28:  Land uses and soils      Minor adverse on soil degradation and loss           Minor adverse due to land being taken out of existing use for           Mainly negligible; minor adverse effects on

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf|TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf]]:28:                           of soil resources; negligible effects on other       farming; negligible effects on other receptors                          restrictions

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf|TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf]]:28:                           minor adverse or negligible effects on all           negligible effects on all other identified special qualities

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf|TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf]]:29:  recreation               where the receptor is located                        upgrading of footpath; otherwise negligible/no impacts

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf|TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf]]:29:  Noise & vibration        Negligible                                           Negligible                                                              Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf|TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf]]:29:  Air quality              Negligible                                           Negligible                                                              Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf|TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf]]:29:  Socio-economics          Minor beneficial due to local employment and         Major beneficial at local level and minor beneficial at a sub-          Negligible/minor adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf|TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf]]:29:  Landscape & visual       Lady Cross – mainly minor/moderate                   Lady Cross – minor adverse/negligible effects in Year 1 to              No effects

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf|TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf]]:29:                           adverse; otherwise negligible adverse/no             minor/negligible beneficial effects in Year 15 as landscaping

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf|TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf]]:29:                           Lockwood Beck – mainly major through to              Lockwood Beck – minor moderate/negligible adverse effects in

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf|TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf]]:29:                           minor adverse                                        Year 1 to negligible adverse/no change by Year 15

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf|TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf]]:29:                           Tocketts Lythe – mainly moderate/minor               Tocketts Lythe – minor adverse/negligible effects in Year 1 to

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf|TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf]]:29:                           adverse effects                                      minor/negligible beneficial effects in Year 15

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf|TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf]]:29:  Cultural heritage        Slight/negligible                                    No effects                                                              No effects

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf|TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf]]:29:  Geology &                Mainly negligible; some receptors with a             Mainly negligible; some receptors with minor adverse effects at         Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf|TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf]]:29:  Hydrology & flood        Negligible                                           Negligible/adverse                                                      Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf|TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf]]:29:  Land uses and soils      Moderate adverse due to land being taken             Minor adverse effects due to land being taken out of existing           Mainly negligible or minor adverse effects

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf|TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf]]:29:                           out of existing use; minor adverse on soil           use; otherwise negligible effects

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf|TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf]]:29:                           alteration to drainage systems; negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf|TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf]]:29:                           minor adverse or negligible effects on all           negligible effects on all other identified special qualities

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000460-Section 3 App 3.1 Waste management.pdf|TR030002-000460-Section 3 App 3.1 Waste management.pdf]]:71:         an oxidiser is negligible. Therefore, professional judgement confirms that further testing is not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000460-Section 3 App 3.1 Waste management.pdf|TR030002-000460-Section 3 App 3.1 Waste management.pdf]]:79:       so the likelihood of a hazard H15 arising by this route is negligible. However, there are a

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000502-Section 20 App 20.2 Landscape assessment.pdf|TR030002-000502-Section 20 App 20.2 Landscape assessment.pdf]]:5:Magnitude of change is identified following consideration of several key criteria and is reported as being negligible, low, medium or high for each receptor. Intermediate values of low to medium and medium to

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000502-Section 20 App 20.2 Landscape assessment.pdf|TR030002-000502-Section 20 App 20.2 Landscape assessment.pdf]]:5:Redcar LCA R4 (Coastal Marsh –             Views from the LCA to the conveyor route and proposed              Proposed structures are in keeping with the existing          As above.                                                    No change or negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000502-Section 20 App 20.2 Landscape assessment.pdf|TR030002-000502-Section 20 App 20.2 Landscape assessment.pdf]]:5:Redcar LCA E2 (Escarpment)                 Larger scale features including the conveyor, shiploaders,         Proposed structures are in keeping with the existing          As above.                                                    Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000502-Section 20 App 20.2 Landscape assessment.pdf|TR030002-000502-Section 20 App 20.2 Landscape assessment.pdf]]:6:as being negligible, minor, minor moderate, moderate, moderate major or major and as being either beneficial or adverse. The following colour system is used to highlight significance values:

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000502-Section 20 App 20.2 Landscape assessment.pdf|TR030002-000502-Section 20 App 20.2 Landscape assessment.pdf]]:6:            Negligible beneficial/ no                                  Negligible adverse/ no change

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000502-Section 20 App 20.2 Landscape assessment.pdf|TR030002-000502-Section 20 App 20.2 Landscape assessment.pdf]]:6:Redcar LCA R4 (Coastal Marsh – Coatham               Low              No change/           No change/ negligible adverse   Potential glimpsed views of tops of quay structures may be

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000502-Section 20 App 20.2 Landscape assessment.pdf|TR030002-000502-Section 20 App 20.2 Landscape assessment.pdf]]:6:Marsh)                                                                Negligible adverse                                   visible between steelworks buildings but would not have a

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000502-Section 20 App 20.2 Landscape assessment.pdf|TR030002-000502-Section 20 App 20.2 Landscape assessment.pdf]]:6:Redcar LCA E2 (Escarpment)                           Low              Negligible adverse   Negligible adverse              The proposed development would be barely perceptible as a

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf|TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf]]:4:Magnitude of change is identified following consideration of several key criteria and is reported as being negligible, low, medium or high for each receptor. In addition positive changes are identified as being

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf|TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf]]:4:                                                          east.                                                                                                                                                                                       Negligible to low

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf|TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf]]:4:                                                          that lies between these properties and the                                                                                                                                                  Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf|TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf]]:5:102/2A/2                                 of southern      are possible from 116/31/3 and the               southern conveyor, including the northern       transfer tower are industrial installations     expected to last approximately 17 months.    Negligible and low

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf|TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf]]:5:                                         of northern      corridor between adjoin works and railway        northwards.                                     The conveyor structure and transfer tower                                                    Negligible and low

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf|TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf]]:5:                                                                                                           distances involved, from the northern end                                                                                                    Negligible and low

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf|TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf]]:5:                                                                                                           of 116/31/3, and a negligible change in                                                                                                      adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf|TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf]]:6:102/2/3 (Teesdale Way) and               common           embankment on north and west side              the northern option transfer tower and         would appear in keeping with the existing        expected to last approximately 17 months.    Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf|TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf]]:6:                                                          & 102/2/2).                                    would be very small.                                                                                                                         Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf|TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf]]:6:                                                          locations being imperceptible.                                                                                                                                                              Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf|TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf]]:7:(Seaton Carew)                           west of quay     across open farmland from northern              would be difficult to discern within the         shiploaders) are in keeping with existing        expected to last approximately 17 months.   Negligible/ low

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf|TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf]]:7:                                                          installations are visible against the skyline   would be visible during the operational                                                                                                       Negligible/ low

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf|TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf]]:7:                                                          mostly blocked and dominated by the                                                                                                                                                           Negligible/ low

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf|TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf]]:7:(Bran Sands)                             of quay (to      are available from areas of sand dunes and      discern at the distance involved.                with existing industrial Infrastructure within   expected to last approximately 17 months.   Negligible/ low

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf|TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf]]:7:                                                          depending on tidal conditions, with Redcar      views against the skyline amongst existing                                                                                                    Negligible/ low

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf|TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf]]:7:                                                          chimney/ flare stacks. (views 3 and 4)          and would form a minor change to the                                                                                                          Negligible/ low

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf|TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf]]:7:South Gare Breakwater                    of quay          are available from the marina west of           difficult to discern at the distance involved.   with existing industrial Infrastructure within   expected to last approximately 17 months.   Negligible/ low

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf|TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf]]:7:                                                          forming a prominent detractor.                  the skyline amongst existing tall industrial/                                                                                                 Negligible/ low

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf|TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf]]:7:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        Negligible/ low

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf|TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf]]:8:                                         east             viewing point and is identified as such on     structures would be barely perceptible at       with adjoining large scale industrial            expected to last approximately 17 months.    Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf|TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf]]:8:                                                          north west over the Teesmouth industrial       industrialised setting.                                                                          approximately 17 months.                     Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf|TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf]]:8:                                                          Infrastructure with Wilton International in    constitute a very minor change in view                                                                                                        Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf|TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf]]:11:as being negligible, minor, minor moderate, moderate, moderate major or major and as being either beneficial or adverse. The following colour system is used to highlight significance values:

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf|TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf]]:11:            Negligible beneficial/ no                                        Negligible adverse/ no change

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf|TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf]]:11:                                                 Negligible to low adverse   Minor adverse             impacts during operational and decommissioning phases.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf|TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf]]:11:                                                 Decommissioning             Negligible adverse                                                                          structures would reduce prominence

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf|TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf]]:11:                                                 Negligible adverse                                                                                                      within available views.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf|TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf]]:11:Users of footpaths 116/31/3     Medium           Negligible/ low adverse     Negligible adverse and    Effects relate to the conveyor structure. This would be seen

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf|TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf]]:11:Users of footpaths 102/2/2      Medium           Negligible adverse          Negligible adverse        Effects relate to taller quayside structures. These would be

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf|TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf]]:12:Users of byways S1A and         High             Negligible/ low adverse   Negligible/ minor adverse   Effects relate to taller quayside structures, these would be

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf|TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf]]:12:Visitors to Eston Nab           High             Negligible adverse        Negligible adverse          Taller quayside structures would be visible but would be

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000671-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 1 to 9.pdf|TR030002-000671-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 1 to 9.pdf]]:116:                                                          environment will be negligible. Get on with it ASAP!                                                            help to improve                                                                                                                             outweighs the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000671-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 1 to 9.pdf|TR030002-000671-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 1 to 9.pdf]]:120:7119082       Supportive     In favour     No concerns     great project for north yorkshire and the country.                                  Yes           In favour     beneficial on all counts Support       do not feel there will Supportive       negligible and        Yes                                  The overall     negligible            Positive       after construction

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000671-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 1 to 9.pdf|TR030002-000671-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 1 to 9.pdf]]:120:                                                                                                                                                                                                                  be any negative impact                  manageable                                                 impacts will                          impact         phase negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000671-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 1 to 9.pdf|TR030002-000671-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 1 to 9.pdf]]:120:7119092       Supportive     In favour     No concerns     absolutely wholly in favour. fantastic both locally and nationally.        Yes                    In favour                             Support        negligible               Supportive     no concerns           Yes            no concerns           The overall     negligible            Positive

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000671-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 1 to 9.pdf|TR030002-000671-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 1 to 9.pdf]]:148:                                                          The environmental effect on the York Moors is negligible compared to the                                       support.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000671-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 1 to 9.pdf|TR030002-000671-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 1 to 9.pdf]]:180:                                                          producer with negligible impacts across a wide range of criteria ‐

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000671-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 1 to 9.pdf|TR030002-000671-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 1 to 9.pdf]]:217:                                                             consequences of the project will be negligible. I strongly support the scheme                                                                                                                                                                    temporary

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf|TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf]]:114:negligible.” PHE supports the inclusion of this information within EIAs as good

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf|TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf]]:13:          sediment concentration over the intertidal areas; hence a negligible quantity of sediment would be

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf|TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf]]:17:                     43 LAeq,5min                     40 LAeq,5min         No impact          Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf|TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf]]:17:                     49 LAeq,5min                     40 LAeq,5min         No impact          Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf|TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf]]:17:                     48 LAeq,5min                     44 LAeq,5min         No impact          Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf|TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf]]:18:                               66 LAeq,5min                     47 LAeq,5min         No impact          Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf|TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf]]:18:                               61 LAeq,5min                     48 LAeq,5min         No impact          Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf|TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf]]:18:                               59 LAeq,5min                     50 LAeq,5min         Low                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf|TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf]]:18:                               42 LAeq,5min                     35 LAeq,5min         No impact          Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf|TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf]]:18:                               49 LAeq,5min                     45 LAeq,5min         No impact          Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf|TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf]]:18:                               48 LAeq,5min                     41 LAeq,5min         No impact          Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf|TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf]]:18:                               40 LAeq,5min                     36 LAeq,5min         No impact          Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf|TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf]]:18:                               42 LAeq,5min                     35 LAeq,5min         No impact          Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf|TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf]]:18:                               44 LAeq,5min                     40 LAeq,5min         No impact          Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf|TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf]]:22:         Tees estuary. This is predicted to be negligible, with no effect on the supply of sediment to intertidal

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf|TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf]]:23:          within the designated sites, and sediment deposition onto the seabed would be negligible beyond the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf|TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf]]:31:          potential cumulative impact is predicted to be negligible. The predicted footprints of sediment

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf|TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf]]:32:          dredged as part of the Harbour facilities. As a result, there would be a negligible release of

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf|TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf]]:33:          morphology, with the proposed scheme having a negligible effect on the deposition of sediment in the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf|TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf]]:10:            shown that the proposed Harbour Facilities would have a negligible or

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf|TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf]]:10:            development would result in a negligible impact on commercial

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf|TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf]]:10:            during its construction and operation has been assessed as negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf|TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf]]:11:the scheme are anticipated to be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf|TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf]]:64:            there would be a negligible impact on commercial navigation during the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf|TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf]]:64:            navigation is predicated to be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf|TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf]]:64:            anticipated and the overall impact would be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf|TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf]]:64:7.33        Due to the anticipated negligible construction and operational impacts

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf|TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf]]:66:                impact of negligible significance on water abstraction points.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf|TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf]]:90:               measures will ensure that any effects would, however, be negligible;

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf|TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf]]:90:            change and the effects of the proposed Harbour Facilities are negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf|TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf]]:91:        facilities, the development would result in a negligible impact on

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf|TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf]]:92:            negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf|TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf]]:92:7.138       The overall effects arising are anticipated to be negligible provided that

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000253-Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening document (5).pdf|TR030002-000253-Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening document (5).pdf]]:5:(ES Section 22 paragraph 22.3.5) and for benthic ecology the impacts would be negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-001854-Secretary of State’s Decision Letter and Statement of Reasons.pdf|TR030002-001854-Secretary of State’s Decision Letter and Statement of Reasons.pdf]]:6:impacts would be of negligible significance since the polyhalite is planned to be transported

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-001854-Secretary of State’s Decision Letter and Statement of Reasons.pdf|TR030002-001854-Secretary of State’s Decision Letter and Statement of Reasons.pdf]]:6:surface waters and groundwater would be of negligible significance during construction and

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000453-ES Section 18 Infrastructure.pdf|TR030002-000453-ES Section 18 Infrastructure.pdf]]:15:        sediments beneath. The enclosed grab would result in negligible losses of sediment to the water

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000453-ES Section 18 Infrastructure.pdf|TR030002-000453-ES Section 18 Infrastructure.pdf]]:16:        magnitude of the effect is considered to be very low, and an impact of negligible significance is

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000453-ES Section 18 Infrastructure.pdf|TR030002-000453-ES Section 18 Infrastructure.pdf]]:20:Potential impact on               High               Very low         Negligible        None required. Control measures

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:26:                  Negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:27:                         4      Negligible                                                              the development, does not have either

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:32:5.3.5   The magnitude of change at this viewpoint due to the proposed works is predicted to be negligible, as

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:32:        towards the overall levels of sky glow, although the level of contribution is considered to be negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:32:        Summer Months:                          Negligible                                No Effect          No Effect

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:33:        Winter Months:                          Negligible                                No Effect                     No Effect

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:34:5.4.5   The magnitude of change at this viewpoint is predicted to be negligible, as this viewpoint has no clear

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:34:        towards the overall levels of sky glow, although the level of contribution is predicted to be negligible in

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:35:      Summer Months:                          Negligible                                No Effect                   No Effect

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:35:      Winter Months:                          Negligible                                No Effect                   No Effect

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:36:5.5.6   The magnitude of change at this viewpoint is predicted to be negligible, as this viewpoint has no clear

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:37:        glow, although the level of contribution is predicted to be negligible in respect of the sky glow levels

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:37:        Summer Months:                          Negligible                                No Effect                    No Effect

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:37:        Winter Months:                          Negligible                                No Effect                    No Effect

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:39:         Summer Months:                          No Effect                                 Negligible     Moderate Adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:39:         Winter Months:                          No Effect                                 Negligible     Moderate Adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:39:         Summer Months:                          No Effect                                 Negligible      Minor Adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:39:         Winter Months:                          No Effect                                 Negligible      Minor Adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:42:         Summer Months:                          Negligible                                Negligible      Minor Adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:42:         Winter Months:                          Negligible                                Negligible      Minor Adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:42:         Summer Months:                          No Effect                                 Negligible        Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:42:         Winter Months:                          Negligible                                Negligible      Minor Adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:45:         Summer Months:                          Negligible                                Negligible      Minor Adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:45:         Winter Months:                          Negligible                                Negligible      Minor Adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:45:         Summer Months:                          No Effect                                 Negligible        Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:45:         Winter Months:                          Negligible                                Negligible      Minor Adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:48:         Summer Months:                          Negligible                             Minor Adverse      Minor Adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:48:         Winter Months:                          Negligible                             Minor Adverse      Minor Adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:48:         Summer Months:                          Negligible                                Negligible        Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:48:         Winter Months:                          Negligible                             Minor Adverse      Minor Adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:50:         Summer Months:                          Negligible                             Minor Adverse      Minor Adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:50:         Winter Months:                          Negligible                             Minor Adverse      Minor Adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:51:         Summer Months:                          Negligible                                Negligible        Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:51:         Winter Months:                          Negligible                             Minor Adverse      Minor Adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:54:         Summer Months:                          No Effect                                 Negligible      Minor Adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:54:         Winter Months:                          No Effect                                 Negligible      Minor Adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:54:        have a negligible impact upon this viewpoint and its receptors in terms of luminaire intensity.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:54:         Summer Months:                          Negligible                                Negligible        Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:54:         Winter Months:                          Negligible                                Negligible        Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:56:         winter months would be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:56:         Summer Months:                          Negligible                                Negligible        Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:56:         Winter Months:                          Negligible                                Negligible        Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:57:        lighting is therefore predicted to have a negligible impact in terms of sky glow, light intrusion and

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:57:         Summer Months:                          Negligible                                Negligible        Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:57:         Winter Months:                          Negligible                                Negligible        Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:59:        contribution is considered to be negligible in respect of the sky glow levels currently visible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:59:         Summer Months:                          Negligible                                No Effect          No Effect

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:59:         Winter Months:                          Negligible                                No Effect          No Effect

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:60:6.3   The proposed lighting for the Site is identified as having predominantly negligible effects, however as

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:60:             Summer Months:             No Effect                                   Negligible        Minor Adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:60:             Winter Months:             No Effect                                   Negligible        Minor Adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:61:                Summer Months:          No Effect                                   Negligible        Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:61:                Winter Months:          Negligible                                  Negligible        Minor Adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:61:                Summer Months:          No Effect                                   Negligible        Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:61:                Winter Months:          Negligible                                  Negligible        Minor Adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:61:                Summer Months:          Negligible                                  Negligible        Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:61:                Winter Months:          Negligible                                  Minor Adverse     Minor Adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:61:                Summer Months:          Negligible                                  Negligible        Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:61:                Winter Months:          Negligible                                  Minor Adverse     Minor Adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:61:                Summer Months:          No Effect                                   Negligible        Minor Adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:61:                Winter Months:          No Effect                                   Negligible        Minor Adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:61:                Summer Months:          Negligible                                  Negligible        Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:61:                Winter Months:          Negligible                                  Negligible        Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:62:             Summer Months:             Negligible                                  No Effect         No Effect

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:62:             Winter Months:             Negligible                                  No Effect         No Effect

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:62:             Summer Months:             Negligible                                  No Effect         No Effect

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:62:             Winter Months:             Negligible                                  No Effect         No Effect

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:62:             Summer Months:             Negligible                                  No Effect         No Effect

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:62:             Winter Months:             Negligible                                  No Effect         No Effect

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:62:             Summer Months:             Negligible                                  Negligible        Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:62:             Winter Months:             Negligible                                  Negligible        Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:62:             Summer Months:             Negligible                                  Negligible        Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:62:             Winter Months:             Negligible                                  Negligible        Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:62:             Summer Months:             Negligible                                  No Effect         No Effect

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:62:             Winter Months:             Negligible                                  No Effect         No Effect

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:62:      characterise the long term (i.e. present for the life of the proposed scheme), would be of negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf|TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf]]:63:6.11   Therefore, the long term operational impacts of the proposed scheme are predicted to be negligible in

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000547-Doc 6.6 App 22.2 Representative viewpoint assessment.pdf|TR030002-000547-Doc 6.6 App 22.2 Representative viewpoint assessment.pdf]]:4:dryer stack becomes slightly more noticeable when the vapour plume is being emitted) and have negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000547-Doc 6.6 App 22.2 Representative viewpoint assessment.pdf|TR030002-000547-Doc 6.6 App 22.2 Representative viewpoint assessment.pdf]]:14:Cumulative effect – negligible adverse (all features) (no cumulative change)

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000572-Doc 7.3 Appendix 4 - Economic Impact Report.pdf|TR030002-000572-Doc 7.3 Appendix 4 - Economic Impact Report.pdf]]:46:negligible.                                            be drawn from a wider labour maker of 295,000

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000572-Doc 7.3 Appendix 4 - Economic Impact Report.pdf|TR030002-000572-Doc 7.3 Appendix 4 - Economic Impact Report.pdf]]:49:       by a range of technical assessments undertaken                or negligible after 1 year of operation; and negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf|TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:8:              x     Negligible potential – no features present which could offer bats the opportunity to roost.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf|TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:13:              x     Negligible: features of local (parish) importance or importance within the site and immediate

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf|TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:13:              x     the magnitude of the effect (e.g. high, medium, low, negligible);

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf|TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:14:     Negligible            Negligible impact on integrity and / or conservation status.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf|TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:22:         an impact of negligible significance is predicted.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf|TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:22:         as a result of the loss of these areas; which in turn result in an impact of negligible significance during

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf|TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:22:         residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf|TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:23:        high sensitivity of bats, a low magnitude is predicted; resulting in an impact of negligible significance

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf|TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:23:10.5.13 The residual impact would remain of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf|TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:23:        the surveys to date, resulting in a predicted impact of negligible significance during construction.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf|TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:23:        The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf|TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:24:         magnitude is predicted, resulting in an impact of negligible significance during construction.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf|TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:24:10.5.20 With these measures in place, the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf|TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:24:10.6.2   Given this, a residual impact of negligible significance on habitats is predicted in the operational phase.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf|TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:24:         nesting habitat would have a negligible effect on the conservation status of the local bird populations

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf|TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:24:         during operation and result in an impact of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf|TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:24:         bats. Given this, a residual impact of negligible significance on bats is predicted in the operational

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf|TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:26:           potential impacts are predicted to be of negligible or minor beneficial significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf|TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:26:         Habitats          Low                 Low              Negligible       Majority of habitats would be        Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf|TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:26:         Terrestrial       High                Low              Negligible       Any vegetation removal would be      Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf|TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:26:         Bats              High                Low              Negligible       Lighting proposals to consider BCT   Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf|TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:26:         Reptiles          High                Low              Negligible       Precautionary Method of Working      Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf|TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:26:         Otter             High                Low              Negligible       All trenches and excavations would   Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf|TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:26:         Habitats          Low                 Low              Negligible       Reinstatement of habitats and        Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf|TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:26:         Terrestrial       High                Low              Negligible       Implementation of landscape          Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf|TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:27:Bats              High                Low              Negligible       Implementation of landscape            Minor beneficial

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf|TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:27:Reptiles          High                Low              Negligible       Implementation of landscape            Minor beneficial

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf|TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:27:Otters            High                Low              Negligible       Creation of new shallows and           Minor beneficial

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000736-Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council (Local Impact Report).pdf|TR030002-000736-Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council (Local Impact Report).pdf]]:17:on the predicted increases, an impact of negligible significance is predicted

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000736-Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council (Local Impact Report).pdf|TR030002-000736-Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council (Local Impact Report).pdf]]:17:measures have been suggested to reduce the impact to a negligible level.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf|TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf]]:6:         High                          Major                         Moderate           Minor                    Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf|TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf]]:6:         Medium                        Moderate                      Minor              Minor                    Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf|TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf]]:6:         Low                           Minor                         Minor              Negligible               Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf|TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf]]:6:         Very low                      Negligible                    Negligible         Negligible               Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf|TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf]]:11:         of the Teesdale Way, while an impact of negligible significance is anticipated with regard to the users

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf|TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf]]:11:21.5.9   With the implementation of the above mitigation measures, a residual impact of negligible significance

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf|TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf]]:11:        Based on the above, an impact of negligible significance is anticipated with regard to users of the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf|TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf]]:12:        Plan. A residual impact of negligible significance is predicted.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf|TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf]]:13:         change relative to existing conditions. Based on the above, an impact of negligible significance is

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf|TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf]]:14:21.6.5   No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf|TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf]]:14:21.6.7   The noise assessment presented in Section 14.6 has determined that an impact of negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf|TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf]]:14:         to public rights of way and bridleways during the operational phase would range from negligible to

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf|TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf]]:15:         temporary closure), while an impact on negligible significance is anticipated with regard to the users of

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf|TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf]]:15:21.7.6   With the implementation of the above mitigation measures, a residual impact of negligible significance

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf|TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf]]:16:        on recreation and amenity is predicted to be of negligible significance at worst.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf|TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf]]:17:         associated with indirect disturbance during decommissioning is considered to be of negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf|TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf]]:18:                                                    combined footpath and traffic                         Negligible (Public

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf|TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf]]:18:Direct disturbance to users of the cycle            High (National Trail)           Very low              Negligible                  Non

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf|TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf]]:18:Indirect disturbance to users of the                High (National Trail)           Very low              Negligible                  Non

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf|TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf]]:19:                                                   combined footpath and traffic                           Negligible (Public rights

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf|TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf]]:26:11.5.15 With the implementation of the above mitigation measures, the residual impact would be of negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf|TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf]]:44:        an impact of negligible significance during Phase 2 of the proposed scheme.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf|TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf]]:44:         the navigation channel. The recovery in the operational phase is predicted to be of negligible (but

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf|TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf]]:44:         beneficial, but of very low magnitude. The potential impact is considered to be of negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf|TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf]]:45:         residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf|TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf]]:45:         negligible significance is anticipated.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf|TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf]]:45:11.6.6   No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf|TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf]]:46:         occur during the operational phase, this is predicted to be of negligible significance due to the effect of

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf|TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf]]:48:Potential impact   High                        Very low               Negligible (but   Measures to mitigate the impacts to benthic co

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf|TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf]]:48:Potential impacts  High                        Very low               Negligible        None required.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000253-Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening document.pdf|TR030002-000253-Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening document.pdf]]:5:(ES Section 22 paragraph 22.3.5) and for benthic ecology the impacts would be negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000722-York Potash Limited 4.pdf|TR030002-000722-York Potash Limited 4.pdf]]:8:       controls in place – would be of negligible adverse significance (at worst), with the following

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000722-York Potash Limited 4.pdf|TR030002-000722-York Potash Limited 4.pdf]]:9:        to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000722-York Potash Limited 4.pdf|TR030002-000722-York Potash Limited 4.pdf]]:11:       impacts are predicted to be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000722-York Potash Limited 4.pdf|TR030002-000722-York Potash Limited 4.pdf]]:18:       of the proposed scheme. All impacts are predicted to be of negligible significance, with the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000452-ES Section 17 Coastal protection and flood defence.pdf|TR030002-000452-ES Section 17 Coastal protection and flood defence.pdf]]:8:                    The Environment Agency confirmed that this order of impact would be considered negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000452-ES Section 17 Coastal protection and flood defence.pdf|TR030002-000452-ES Section 17 Coastal protection and flood defence.pdf]]:13:        a potential low magnitude of effect. Hence a negligible impact is predicted.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000452-ES Section 17 Coastal protection and flood defence.pdf|TR030002-000452-ES Section 17 Coastal protection and flood defence.pdf]]:13:17.4.19 No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance with

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000452-ES Section 17 Coastal protection and flood defence.pdf|TR030002-000452-ES Section 17 Coastal protection and flood defence.pdf]]:14:         supports for the conveyor system would have a negligible impact on the surface area of the floodplain.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000452-ES Section 17 Coastal protection and flood defence.pdf|TR030002-000452-ES Section 17 Coastal protection and flood defence.pdf]]:15:        due to the proposed dredging and quay construction, an impact of negligible significance is anticipated

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000452-ES Section 17 Coastal protection and flood defence.pdf|TR030002-000452-ES Section 17 Coastal protection and flood defence.pdf]]:15:17.5.17 No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000452-ES Section 17 Coastal protection and flood defence.pdf|TR030002-000452-ES Section 17 Coastal protection and flood defence.pdf]]:15:         significance of the potential impact is predicted to be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000452-ES Section 17 Coastal protection and flood defence.pdf|TR030002-000452-ES Section 17 Coastal protection and flood defence.pdf]]:16:17.6.3   No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance with

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000452-ES Section 17 Coastal protection and flood defence.pdf|TR030002-000452-ES Section 17 Coastal protection and flood defence.pdf]]:16:         increases in wave height, an impact of negligible significance is anticipated with regard to increased

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000452-ES Section 17 Coastal protection and flood defence.pdf|TR030002-000452-ES Section 17 Coastal protection and flood defence.pdf]]:17:Flooding at and          Low                  Low                     Negligible      No mitigation required          No residual

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000452-ES Section 17 Coastal protection and flood defence.pdf|TR030002-000452-ES Section 17 Coastal protection and flood defence.pdf]]:17:Flooding at and          Low                  Low                     Negligible      Quay construction provides      Minor beneficial

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000452-ES Section 17 Coastal protection and flood defence.pdf|TR030002-000452-ES Section 17 Coastal protection and flood defence.pdf]]:17:Potential for            Low                  Low                     Negligible      No mitigation required          Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000452-ES Section 17 Coastal protection and flood defence.pdf|TR030002-000452-ES Section 17 Coastal protection and flood defence.pdf]]:17:Flooding at and          Low                  Low                     Negligible      No mitigation required          Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000738-York Potash Limited 3.pdf|TR030002-000738-York Potash Limited 3.pdf]]:10:       impacts are predicted to be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000738-York Potash Limited 3.pdf|TR030002-000738-York Potash Limited 3.pdf]]:19:        predicted to be of negligible or minor beneficial significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000738-York Potash Limited 3.pdf|TR030002-000738-York Potash Limited 3.pdf]]:19:7.8.    Although all potential impacts to terrestrial ecology were assessed as being of negligible or

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000450-ES Section 15 Archaeology and heritage.pdf|TR030002-000450-ES Section 15 Archaeology and heritage.pdf]]:11:         Low                                  Moderate                    Minor      Minor        Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000450-ES Section 15 Archaeology and heritage.pdf|TR030002-000450-ES Section 15 Archaeology and heritage.pdf]]:11:         Very Low                             Minor                       Minor      Negligible   Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000450-ES Section 15 Archaeology and heritage.pdf|TR030002-000450-ES Section 15 Archaeology and heritage.pdf]]:23:         the significance of any residual impact would be reduced to negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000454-ES Section 19 Socioeconomics.pdf|TR030002-000454-ES Section 19 Socioeconomics.pdf]]:5:              x     negligible;

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000454-ES Section 19 Socioeconomics.pdf|TR030002-000454-ES Section 19 Socioeconomics.pdf]]:20:         on the churn of the labour market would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000454-ES Section 19 Socioeconomics.pdf|TR030002-000454-ES Section 19 Socioeconomics.pdf]]:20:19.6.6   In this context, the impact of construction workers on temporary accommodation would be of negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000454-ES Section 19 Socioeconomics.pdf|TR030002-000454-ES Section 19 Socioeconomics.pdf]]:21:         impact of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000454-ES Section 19 Socioeconomics.pdf|TR030002-000454-ES Section 19 Socioeconomics.pdf]]:22:        districts and the LEP, resulting in a negligible to minor beneficial impact. As with indirect employment

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000454-ES Section 19 Socioeconomics.pdf|TR030002-000454-ES Section 19 Socioeconomics.pdf]]:22:        estimated but effects would be negligible or beneficial at a LEP level. At a UK level, the impact with

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000454-ES Section 19 Socioeconomics.pdf|TR030002-000454-ES Section 19 Socioeconomics.pdf]]:22:        respect to GVA would be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000454-ES Section 19 Socioeconomics.pdf|TR030002-000454-ES Section 19 Socioeconomics.pdf]]:23:         would, therefore, be of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000454-ES Section 19 Socioeconomics.pdf|TR030002-000454-ES Section 19 Socioeconomics.pdf]]:24:        of the size of the labour market, the magnitude of this impact would be negligible. YPL is committed to

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000454-ES Section 19 Socioeconomics.pdf|TR030002-000454-ES Section 19 Socioeconomics.pdf]]:25:         of the size of the labour market, the magnitude of this impact would be negligible. YPL is committed to

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000454-ES Section 19 Socioeconomics.pdf|TR030002-000454-ES Section 19 Socioeconomics.pdf]]:25:         districts and the LEP, resulting in a negligible to minor beneficial impact.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000454-ES Section 19 Socioeconomics.pdf|TR030002-000454-ES Section 19 Socioeconomics.pdf]]:25:         whole, they would be negligible. However, inevitably, this would be true for any single project.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000454-ES Section 19 Socioeconomics.pdf|TR030002-000454-ES Section 19 Socioeconomics.pdf]]:27:Demand for temporary accommodation by                 N/A                  Negligible            Not Significant          None p

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000454-ES Section 19 Socioeconomics.pdf|TR030002-000454-ES Section 19 Socioeconomics.pdf]]:27:Induced employment effects resulting from             N/A                  Negligible to Minor   Beneficial               None p

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000454-ES Section 19 Socioeconomics.pdf|TR030002-000454-ES Section 19 Socioeconomics.pdf]]:27:Increase in GDP resulting from                        N/A                  Negligible to Minor   Beneficial               None p

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:7:        risk is ‘negligible’.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:13:        receptors can be controlled to ensure impacts are of negligible or of slight adverse significance at

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:14:         High                                      Slight Adverse                     Slight Adverse                      Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:14:         Medium                                    Slight Adverse                     Negligible                          Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:14:         Low                                       Negligible                         Negligible                          Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:14:         Dust Soiling                   Slight Adverse               Slight Adverse                Slight Adverse               Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:14:         Human Health                   Negligible                   Negligible                    Negligible                   Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:14:        considered to be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:24:         R1                        26.18                26.28                 0.10                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:24:         R2                        24.10                24.52                 0.42                 Small                        Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:24:         R3                        23.98                24.03                 0.05                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:24:         R4                        25.85                25.91                 0.06                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:24:         R5                        17.73                17.77                 0.04                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:24:         R6                        18.42                18.49                 0.07                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:24:         R7                        13.98                14.27                 0.29                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:24:         R8                        15.85                16.36                 0.51                 Small                        Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:24:         R9                        20.96                21.93                 0.97                 Small                        Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:24:         R10                       20.54                21.42                 0.88                 Small                        Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:24:         R11                       26.85                28.47                 1.62                 Small                        Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:24:         R12                       25.32                26.72                 1.40                 Small                        Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:24:         R13                       26.88                27.77                 0.89                 Small                        Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:24:         R14                       24.56                25.15                 0.59                 Small                        Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:24:         R15                       25.35                25.95                 0.60                 Small                        Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:24:         R16                       26.46                26.95                 0.49                 Small                        Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:25: R17                       24.61                24.98                 0.37                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:25: R18                       44.83                44.94                 0.11                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:25: R19                       45.46                45.57                 0.11                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:25: R21                       30.13                30.69                 0.56                 Small                        Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:25: R22                       42.35                42.44                 0.09                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:25: R23                       37.80                37.88                 0.08                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:25: R24                       28.94                30.46                 1.52                 Small                        Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:25: R25                       25.35                25.93                 0.58                 Small                        Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:25: R26                       23.99                24.28                 0.29                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:25: R27                       21.38                21.59                 0.21                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:25: R28                       24.10                24.99                 0.89                 Small                        Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:25: R30                       31.39                31.44                 0.05                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:25: R31                       27.30                27.34                 0.04                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:25: R32                       26.54                27.08                 0.54                 Small                        Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:25: R33                       24.23                24.82                 0.59                 Small                        Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:25: R34                       15.48                16.02                 0.54                 Small                        Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:25: R1                        16.83                16.86                 0.03                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:25: R2                        15.89                15.91                 0.02                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:26: R3                        16.51                16.53                 0.02                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:26: R4                        17.74                17.76                 0.02                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:26: R5                        12.03                12.07                 0.04                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:26: R6                        12.42                12.47                 0.05                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:26: R7                        9.49                 9.53                  0.04                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:26: R8                        11.12                11.17                 0.05                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:26: R9                        14.06                14.16                 0.10                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:26: R10                       13.89                13.92                 0.03                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:26: R11                       18.41                18.44                 0.03                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:26: R12                       17.50                17.52                 0.02                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:26: R13                       18.53                18.54                 0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:26: R14                       16.45                16.49                 0.04                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:26: R15                       17.05                17.10                 0.05                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:26: R16                       17.91                17.95                 0.04                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:26: R17                       17.19                17.22                 0.03                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:26: R18                       28.60                28.62                 0.02                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:26: R19                       30.23                30.25                 0.02                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:26: R20                       24.79                24.84                 0.05                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:26: R21                       20.50                20.53                 0.03                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:26: R22                       28.12                28.14                 0.02                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:26: R23                       24.14                24.16                 0.02                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:26: R24                       19.28                19.40                 0.12                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:26: R25                       17.10                17.15                 0.05                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:26: R26                       16.42                16.49                 0.07                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:26: R27                       14.85                14.89                 0.04                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:26: R28                       16.63                16.65                 0.02                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:27: R29                       24.62                24.65                 0.03                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:27: R30                       21.19                21.20                 0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:27: R31                       17.43                17.43                 0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:27: R32                       17.56                17.60                 0.04                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:27: R33                       15.99                16.05                 0.06                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:27: R34                       10.54                10.59                 0.05                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:27: R1                        14.30                14.31                 0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:27: R2                        13.75                13.76                 0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:27: R3                        14.58                14.59                 0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:27: R4                        15.61                15.62                 0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:27: R5                        10.05                10.07                 0.02                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:27: R6                        10.30                10.33                 0.03                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:27: R7                        8.20                 8.22                  0.02                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:27: R8                        9.83                 9.85                  0.02                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:27: R9                        11.11                11.17                 0.06                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:27: R10                       11.32                11.34                 0.02                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:27: R11                       14.15                14.16                 0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:27: R12                       13.61                13.62                 0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:27: R13                       14.67                14.68                 0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:27: R14                       13.35                13.38                 0.03                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:28: R15                       13.73                13.75                 0.02                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:28: R16                       14.07                14.09                 0.02                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:28: R17                       13.87                13.89                 0.02                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:28: R18                       21.38                21.39                 0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:28: R19                       22.72                22.73                 0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:28: R20                       20.10                20.12                 0.02                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:28: R21                       17.87                17.88                 0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:28: R22                       21.44                21.45                 0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:28: R23                       18.43                18.43                 0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:28: R24                       14.64                14.71                 0.07                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:28: R25                       13.58                13.60                 0.02                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:28: R26                       13.18                13.23                 0.05                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:28: R27                       12.20                12.23                 0.03                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:28: R28                       13.37                13.38                 0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:28: R29                       20.01                20.03                 0.02                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:28: R30                       17.00                17.00                 0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:28: R31                       14.04                14.04                 0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:28: R32                       15.11                15.13                 0.02                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:28: R33                       12.94                12.97                 0.03                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:28: R34                       9.05                 9.07                  0.02                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:29:       R1                        15.54                15.55                 0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:29:       R2                        15.01                15.04                 0.03                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:29:       R3                        15.57                15.57                 0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:29:       R4                        18.24                18.24                 0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:29:       R5                        15.14                15.15                 0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:29:       R6                        15.21                15.22                 0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:29:       R7                        14.90                14.92                 0.02                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:29:       R8                        14.95                15.00                 0.05                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:29:       R9                        15.64                15.73                 0.09                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:29:       R10                       15.74                15.81                 0.07                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:29:       R11                       15.72                15.79                 0.07                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:29:       R12                       15.58                15.64                 0.06                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:29:       R13                       16.25                16.31                 0.06                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:29:       R14                       15.43                15.48                 0.05                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:29:       R15                       15.05                15.10                 0.05                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:29:       R16                       15.80                15.84                 0.04                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:29:       R17                       15.96                15.99                 0.03                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:29:       R18                       19.11                19.13                 0.02                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:29:       R19                       19.73                19.75                 0.02                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:29:       R20                       18.50                18.56                 0.06                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:29:       R21                       16.17                16.21                 0.04                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:30: R22                       19.28                19.29                 0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:30: R23                       17.37                17.38                 0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:30: R24                       16.52                16.63                 0.11                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:30: R25                       15.64                15.69                 0.05                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:30: R26                       15.55                15.58                 0.03                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:30: R27                       15.23                15.25                 0.02                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:30: R28                       15.35                15.41                 0.06                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:30: R29                       18.44                18.50                 0.06                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:30: R30                       17.40                17.40                 0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:30: R31                       16.11                16.11                 0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:30: R32                       15.48                15.52                 0.04                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:30: R33                       16.01                16.06                 0.05                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:30: R34                       15.27                15.32                 0.05                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:30: R1                        14.29                14.29                 0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:30: R2                        13.82                13.83                 0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:30: R3                        14.39                14.39                 0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:30: R4                        16.95                16.95                 0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:30: R5                        13.99                13.99                 0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:30: R6                        14.04                14.05                 0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:30: R7                        13.88                13.88                 0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:30: R8                        13.82                13.83                 0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:31: R9                        14.37                14.38                 0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:31: R10                       14.51                14.52                 0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:31: R11                       14.37                14.38                 0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:31: R12                       14.28                14.28                 0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:31: R13                       14.87                14.88                 0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:31: R14                       14.08                14.09                 0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:31: R15                       13.64                13.65                 0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:31: R16                       14.35                14.35                 0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:31: R17                       14.58                14.59                 0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:31: R18                       17.03                17.03                 0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:31: R19                       17.67                17.67                 0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:31: R20                       16.76                16.77                 0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:31: R21                       14.73                14.74                 0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:31: R22                       17.36                17.36                 0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:31: R23                       15.52                15.52                 0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:31: R24                       15.15                15.17                 0.02                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:31: R25                       14.25                14.26                 0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:31: R26                       14.26                14.28                 0.02                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:31: R27                       14.00                14.01                 0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:31: R28                       14.07                14.07                 0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:31: R29                       16.73                16.73                 0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:31: R30                       15.82                15.82                 0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:31: R31                       14.58                14.59                 0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:31: R32                       14.20                14.21                 0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:31: R33                       14.65                14.65                 0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:31: R34                       14.16                14.17                 0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:32: R1                        14.52                14.52                 0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:32: R2                        13.82                13.82                 0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:32: R3                        14.47                14.47                 0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:32: R4                        17.31                17.31                 0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:32: R5                        13.98                13.99                 0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:32: R6                        14.04                14.05                 0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:32: R7                        13.81                13.81                 0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:32: R8                        13.75                13.76                 0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:32: R9                        14.32                14.34                 0.02                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:32: R10                       14.48                14.49                 0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:32: R11                       14.35                14.36                 0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:32: R12                       14.26                14.26                 0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:32: R13                       14.91                14.91                 0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:32: R14                       14.05                14.06                 0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:32: R15                       13.62                13.63                 0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:32: R16                       14.36                14.36                 0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:32: R17                       14.59                14.59                 0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:32: R18                       17.18                17.19                 0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:32: R19                       17.84                17.85                 0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:32: R20                       16.92                16.93                 0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:32: R21                       14.82                14.83                 0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:32: R22                       17.54                17.54                 0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:33: R23                       15.61                15.61                 0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:33: R24                       15.16                15.18                 0.02                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:33: R25                       14.23                14.24                 0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:33: R26                       14.26                14.27                 0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:33: R27                       13.98                13.99                 0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:33: R28                       14.07                14.07                 0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:33: R29                       16.88                16.89                 0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:33: R30                       15.89                15.89                 0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:33: R31                       14.60                14.60                 0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:33: R32                       14.23                14.24                 0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:33: R33                       14.60                14.61                 0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:33: R34                       14.09                14.10                 0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:33: R1                        0                    0                     0                    Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:33: R2                        0                    0                     0                    Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:33: R3                        0                    0                     0                    Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:33: R4                        2                    2                     0                    Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:33: R5                        0                    0                     0                    Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:33: R6                        0                    0                     0                    Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:33: R7                        0                    0                     0                    Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:33: R8                        0                    0                     0                    Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:34: R9                        0                    0                     0                    Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:34: R10                       0                    0                     0                    Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:34: R11                       0                    0                     0                    Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:34: R12                       0                    0                     0                    Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:34: R13                       0                    0                     0                    Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:34: R14                       0                    0                     0                    Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:34: R15                       0                    0                     0                    Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:34: R16                       0                    0                     0                    Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:34: R17                       0                    0                     0                    Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:34: R18                       2                    2                     0                    Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:34: R19                       3                    3                     0                    Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:34: R20                       2                    2                     0                    Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:34: R21                       0                    0                     0                    Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:34: R22                       3                    3                     0                    Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:34: R23                       1                    1                     0                    Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:34: R24                       1                    1                     0                    Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:34: R25                       0                    0                     0                    Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:34: R26                       0                    0                     0                    Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:34: R27                       0                    0                     0                    Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:34: R28                       0                    0                     0                    Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:34: R29                       2                    2                     0                    Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:34: R30                       1                    1                     0                    Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:34: R31                       0                    0                     0                    Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:34: R32                       0                    0                     0                    Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:34: R33                       0                    0                     0                    Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:34: R34                       0                    0                     0                    Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:35: R1                        0                    0                     0                   Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:35: R2                        0                    0                     0                   Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:35: R3                        0                    0                     0                   Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:35: R4                        1                    1                     0                   Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:35: R5                        0                    0                     0                   Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:35: R6                        0                    0                     0                   Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:35: R7                        0                    0                     0                   Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:35: R8                        0                    0                     0                   Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:35: R9                        0                    0                     0                   Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:35: R10                       0                    0                     0                   Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:35: R11                       0                    0                     0                   Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:35: R12                       0                    0                     0                   Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:35: R13                       0                    0                     0                   Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:35: R14                       0                    0                     0                   Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:35: R15                       0                    0                     0                   Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:35: R16                       0                    0                     0                   Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:35: R17                       0                    0                     0                   Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:35: R18                       1                    1                     0                   Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:35: R19                       1                    1                     0                   Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:35: R20                       1                    1                     0                   Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:35: R21                       0                    0                     0                   Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:36: R22                       1                    1                     0                   Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:36: R23                       0                    0                     0                   Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:36: R24                       0                    0                     0                   Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:36: R25                       0                    0                     0                   Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:36: R26                       0                    0                     0                   Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:36: R27                       0                    0                     0                   Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:36: R28                       0                    0                     0                   Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:36: R29                       1                    1                     0                   Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:36: R30                       0                    0                     0                   Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:36: R31                       0                    0                     0                   Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:36: R32                       0                    0                     0                   Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:36: R33                       0                    0                     0                   Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:36: R34                       0                    0                     0                   Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:36: R1                        0                    0                     0                    Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:36: R2                        0                    0                     0                    Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:36: R3                        0                    0                     0                    Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:36: R4                        1                    1                     0                    Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:36: R5                        0                    0                     0                    Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:36: R6                        0                    0                     0                    Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:36: R7                        0                    0                     0                    Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:37: R8                        0                    0                     0                    Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:37: R9                        0                    0                     0                    Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:37: R10                       0                    0                     0                    Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:37: R11                       0                    0                     0                    Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:37: R12                       0                    0                     0                    Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:37: R13                       0                    0                     0                    Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:37: R14                       0                    0                     0                    Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:37: R15                       0                    0                     0                    Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:37: R16                       0                    0                     0                    Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:37: R17                       0                    0                     0                    Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:37: R18                       1                    1                     0                    Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:37: R19                       1                    1                     0                    Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:37: R20                       1                    1                     0                    Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:37: R21                       0                    0                     0                    Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:37: R22                       1                    1                     0                    Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:37: R23                       0                    0                     0                    Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:37: R24                       0                    0                     0                    Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:37: R25                       0                    0                     0                    Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:37: R26                       0                    0                     0                    Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:37: R27                       0                    0                     0                    Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:37: R28                       0                    0                     0                    Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:37: R29                       1                    1                     0                    Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:37: R30                       0                    0                     0                    Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:37: R31                       0                    0                     0                    Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:37: R32                       0                    0                     0                    Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:37: R33                       0                    0                     0                    Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:38:       R34                       0                    0                     0                    Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:38:       R1                        10.38                10.38                 0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:38:       R2                        10.29                10.31                 0.02                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:38:       R3                        10.18                10.18                 0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:38:       R4                        11.33                11.33                 0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:38:       R5                        9.65                 9.65                  0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:38:       R6                        9.69                 9.70                  0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:38:       R7                        9.31                 9.33                  0.02                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:38:       R8                        9.69                 9.72                  0.03                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:38:       R9                        9.98                 10.03                 0.05                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:38:       R10                       10.11                10.15                 0.04                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:38:       R11                       10.36                10.41                 0.05                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:38:       R12                       10.27                10.31                 0.04                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:38:       R13                       11.02                11.06                 0.04                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:38:       R14                       10.34                10.37                 0.03                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:38:       R15                       10.34                10.37                 0.03                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:38:       R16                       10.76                10.79                 0.03                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:38:       R17                       10.86                10.88                 0.02                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:38:       R18                       12.54                12.55                 0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:39: R19                       13.11                13.12                 0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:39: R20                       12.54                12.57                 0.03                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:39: R21                       11.15                11.18                 0.03                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:39: R22                       12.80                12.81                 0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:39: R23                       11.80                11.80                 0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:39: R24                       10.62                10.69                 0.07                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:39: R25                       10.50                10.53                 0.03                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:39: R26                       10.40                10.42                 0.02                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:39: R27                       10.19                10.21                 0.02                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:39: R28                       10.37                10.40                 0.03                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:39: R29                       12.50                12.53                 0.03                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:39: R30                       11.59                11.60                 0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:39: R31                       10.92                10.92                 0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:39: R32                       10.60                10.63                 0.03                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:39: R33                       10.41                10.45                 0.04                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:39: R34                       9.64                 9.67                  0.03                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:40: R1                        9.20                 9.20                  0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:40: R2                        9.21                 9.22                  0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:40: R3                        9.07                 9.07                  0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:40: R4                        10.17                10.18                 0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:40: R5                        8.60                 8.60                  0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:40: R6                        8.63                 8.63                  0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:40: R7                        8.39                 8.40                  0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:40: R8                        8.66                 8.66                  0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:40: R9                        8.80                 8.81                  0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:40: R10                       8.96                 8.97                  0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:40: R11                       9.10                 9.10                  0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:40: R12                       9.05                 9.05                  0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:40: R13                       9.68                 9.68                  0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:40: R14                       9.09                 9.10                  0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:40: R15                       9.02                 9.02                  0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:40: R16                       9.37                 9.37                  0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:40: R17                       9.52                 9.52                  0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:40: R18                       10.53                10.53                 0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:40: R19                       11.06                11.07                 0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:40: R20                       10.82                10.83                 0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:40: R21                       9.89                 9.89                  0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:40: R22                       10.92                10.92                 0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:41: R23                       10.01                10.01                 0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:41: R24                       9.32                 9.33                  0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:41: R25                       9.18                 9.19                  0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:41: R26                       9.18                 9.19                  0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:41: R27                       9.04                 9.04                  0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:41: R28                       9.15                 9.15                  0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:41: R29                       10.80                10.81                 0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:41: R30                       10.08                10.09                 0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:41: R31                       9.48                 9.48                  0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:41: R32                       9.45                 9.45                  0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:41: R33                       9.15                 9.16                  0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:41: R34                       8.65                 8.65                  0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:41: R1                        9.23                 9.23                  0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:41: R2                        9.14                 9.14                  0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:41: R3                        9.02                 9.02                  0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:41: R4                        10.24                10.24                 0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:41: R5                        8.51                 8.52                  0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:41: R6                        8.54                 8.55                  0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:41: R7                        8.28                 8.28                  0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:41: R8                        8.55                 8.55                  0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:42: R9                        8.70                 8.70                  0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:42: R10                       8.86                 8.87                  0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:42: R11                       8.98                 8.98                  0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:42: R12                       8.93                 8.93                  0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:42: R13                       9.60                 9.60                  0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:42: R14                       8.99                 8.99                  0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:42: R15                       8.91                 8.91                  0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:42: R16                       9.27                 9.27                  0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:42: R17                       9.43                 9.43                  0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:42: R18                       10.47                10.48                 0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:42: R19                       11.02                11.02                 0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:42: R20                       10.79                10.79                 0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:42: R21                       9.85                 9.85                  0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:42: R22                       10.88                10.88                 0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:42: R23                       9.94                 9.94                  0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:42: R24                       9.23                 9.24                  0.01                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:42: R25                       9.08                 9.08                  0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:42: R26                       9.09                 9.09                  0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:42: R27                       8.94                 8.94                  0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:42: R28                       9.05                 9.05                  0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:42: R29                       10.77                10.77                 0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:42: R30                       10.01                10.01                 0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:42: R31                       9.39                 9.39                  0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:42: R32                       9.38                 9.38                  0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:42: R33                       9.04                 9.04                  0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf|TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf]]:42: R34                       8.54                 8.54                  0.00                 Imperceptible                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000500-Section 19 App 19.1 Socio economic legislation_policy_guidance.pdf|TR030002-000500-Section 19 App 19.1 Socio economic legislation_policy_guidance.pdf]]:50:negligible.                                            be drawn from a wider labour maker of 295,000

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000500-Section 19 App 19.1 Socio economic legislation_policy_guidance.pdf|TR030002-000500-Section 19 App 19.1 Socio economic legislation_policy_guidance.pdf]]:53:       by a range of technical assessments undertaken                or negligible after 1 year of operation; and negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000732-DEA UK SNS Limited (Written Representation).pdf|TR030002-000732-DEA UK SNS Limited (Written Representation).pdf]]:17:                 16 of the Environmental Statement “Commercial Navigation” which predicts negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf|TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf]]:36:              level and the quay structures would have negligible significance in

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf|TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf]]:49:               negligible effect on human health. With regard to emissions from on-

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf|TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf]]:49:               negligible impact at a further 17 receptors. Increases of NO2 levels at

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf|TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf]]:49:               construction would be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf|TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf]]:53:                negligible significance. With regard to the underwater noise and

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf|TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf]]:53:                negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf|TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf]]:54:            negligible. Visual disturbance could last over a longer period than

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf|TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf]]:54:            the ES concludes that the residual impact would be of negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf|TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf]]:54:            after mitigation the impact would be of negligible significance. Screen

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf|TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf]]:55:            decommissioning are assessed as negligible if any.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf|TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf]]:55:            assesses that there would be impact of negligible significance on

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf|TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf]]:59:            than a negligible impact with none of the works materially affecting

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf|TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf]]:60:            during the construction phase is assessed as have a negligible impact

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf|TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf]]:60:            would be of negligible significance. Overall, the document concludes

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf|TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf]]:62:            as of negligible significance, while the direct loss of fish, fish eggs and

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf|TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf]]:62:            impact of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf|TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf]]:63:            predicted to be of negligible significance. EA subsequently confirmed

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf|TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf]]:65:            impact is assessed in the ES as negligible. As for the mooring

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf|TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf]]:66:                change/negligible impact to minor adverse. As detailed in section

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf|TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf]]:73:            be of negligible significance after mitigation. The mitigation measures

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf|TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf]]:73:            was regarded as likely to have negligible significance and de-

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf|TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf]]:80:                impact of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf|TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf]]:80:                operational transport impact is regarded as of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf|TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf]]:83:            surface waters and groundwater would be of negligible significance

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf|TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf]]:83:            groundwater it would remain negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf|TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf]]:86:            impacts of the scheme would be either negligible or minor adverse and

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf|TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf]]:172:            the scheme would be either negligible or only minor adverse and in all

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000455-ES Section 20 Landscape and visual environment.pdf|TR030002-000455-ES Section 20 Landscape and visual environment.pdf]]:16:           Redcar LCA R4 (Coastal Marsh – Coatham Marsh)                            No change/ negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000455-ES Section 20 Landscape and visual environment.pdf|TR030002-000455-ES Section 20 Landscape and visual environment.pdf]]:16:           Redcar LCA E2 (Escarpment)                                               Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000455-ES Section 20 Landscape and visual environment.pdf|TR030002-000455-ES Section 20 Landscape and visual environment.pdf]]:17:         Users of footpaths 102/2/2 and 102/2/3 (Teesdale Way) and               Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000455-ES Section 20 Landscape and visual environment.pdf|TR030002-000455-ES Section 20 Landscape and visual environment.pdf]]:17:         Users of byways S1A and S1B (Seaton Carew)                              Negligible/ minor adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000455-ES Section 20 Landscape and visual environment.pdf|TR030002-000455-ES Section 20 Landscape and visual environment.pdf]]:17:         Visitors to Eston Nab                                                   Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000455-ES Section 20 Landscape and visual environment.pdf|TR030002-000455-ES Section 20 Landscape and visual environment.pdf]]:18:         Redcar LCA R4 (Coastal Marsh – Coatham Marsh)                         No change/negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000455-ES Section 20 Landscape and visual environment.pdf|TR030002-000455-ES Section 20 Landscape and visual environment.pdf]]:18:         Redcar LCA E2 (Escarpment)                                            Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000455-ES Section 20 Landscape and visual environment.pdf|TR030002-000455-ES Section 20 Landscape and visual environment.pdf]]:19:Users of footpaths 102/2/2 and 102/2/3 (Teesdale Way) and 102/2A/1          Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000455-ES Section 20 Landscape and visual environment.pdf|TR030002-000455-ES Section 20 Landscape and visual environment.pdf]]:19:Users of byways S1A and S1B (Seaton Carew)                                  Negligible minor adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000455-ES Section 20 Landscape and visual environment.pdf|TR030002-000455-ES Section 20 Landscape and visual environment.pdf]]:19:Visitors to Eston Nab                                                       Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000455-ES Section 20 Landscape and visual environment.pdf|TR030002-000455-ES Section 20 Landscape and visual environment.pdf]]:20:         Redcar LCA R4 (Coastal Marsh – Coatham Marsh)                         No change/negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000455-ES Section 20 Landscape and visual environment.pdf|TR030002-000455-ES Section 20 Landscape and visual environment.pdf]]:20:         Redcar LCA E2 (Escarpment)                                            Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000455-ES Section 20 Landscape and visual environment.pdf|TR030002-000455-ES Section 20 Landscape and visual environment.pdf]]:21: Residents at Armitage Road, Dormanstown                              Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000455-ES Section 20 Landscape and visual environment.pdf|TR030002-000455-ES Section 20 Landscape and visual environment.pdf]]:21: Users of footpaths 102/2/2 and 102/2/3 (Teesdale Way)                Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000455-ES Section 20 Landscape and visual environment.pdf|TR030002-000455-ES Section 20 Landscape and visual environment.pdf]]:21: Users of byways S1A and S1B (Seaton Carew)                           Negligible minor adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000455-ES Section 20 Landscape and visual environment.pdf|TR030002-000455-ES Section 20 Landscape and visual environment.pdf]]:21: Visitors to Eston Nab                                                Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000455-ES Section 20 Landscape and visual environment.pdf|TR030002-000455-ES Section 20 Landscape and visual environment.pdf]]:25:        phase, reducing to negligible adverse impact during the operational phase of the scheme.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf|TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf]]:71:                                                                   predicted negligible sediment deposition at Seal Sands.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000562-Doc 6.2 Section 79(1) of Environmental Protection Act 1990 Statement.pdf|TR030002-000562-Doc 6.2 Section 79(1) of Environmental Protection Act 1990 Statement.pdf]]:7:      of Section 14 of the ES.        A negligible impact was identified at all

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000562-Doc 6.2 Section 79(1) of Environmental Protection Act 1990 Statement.pdf|TR030002-000562-Doc 6.2 Section 79(1) of Environmental Protection Act 1990 Statement.pdf]]:7:      residual impact has been determined to be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000562-Doc 6.2 Section 79(1) of Environmental Protection Act 1990 Statement.pdf|TR030002-000562-Doc 6.2 Section 79(1) of Environmental Protection Act 1990 Statement.pdf]]:7:      predicted to be of negligible significance (see paragraph 14.5.29 of

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000562-Doc 6.2 Section 79(1) of Environmental Protection Act 1990 Statement.pdf|TR030002-000562-Doc 6.2 Section 79(1) of Environmental Protection Act 1990 Statement.pdf]]:7:      of construction traffic noise would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000562-Doc 6.2 Section 79(1) of Environmental Protection Act 1990 Statement.pdf|TR030002-000562-Doc 6.2 Section 79(1) of Environmental Protection Act 1990 Statement.pdf]]:8:             negligible significance is predicted for all residential and ecological

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000562-Doc 6.2 Section 79(1) of Environmental Protection Act 1990 Statement.pdf|TR030002-000562-Doc 6.2 Section 79(1) of Environmental Protection Act 1990 Statement.pdf]]:8:             proposed scheme have been deemed to be negligible, (see paragraph

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000562-Doc 6.2 Section 79(1) of Environmental Protection Act 1990 Statement.pdf|TR030002-000562-Doc 6.2 Section 79(1) of Environmental Protection Act 1990 Statement.pdf]]:9:      mitigation suggested, an overall negligible to slight adverse effect has

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000562-Doc 6.2 Section 79(1) of Environmental Protection Act 1990 Statement.pdf|TR030002-000562-Doc 6.2 Section 79(1) of Environmental Protection Act 1990 Statement.pdf]]:10:      concludes there would be a negligible impact on local air quality.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000562-Doc 6.2 Section 79(1) of Environmental Protection Act 1990 Statement.pdf|TR030002-000562-Doc 6.2 Section 79(1) of Environmental Protection Act 1990 Statement.pdf]]:12:        identified as having predominantly negligible effects given that the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000562-Doc 6.2 Section 79(1) of Environmental Protection Act 1990 Statement.pdf|TR030002-000562-Doc 6.2 Section 79(1) of Environmental Protection Act 1990 Statement.pdf]]:13:            scheme) would be of negligible significance or have no effect in terms

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000741-Huntsman Polyurethanes (IK) Limited (2).pdf|TR030002-000741-Huntsman Polyurethanes (IK) Limited (2).pdf]]:14:                 16 of the Environmental Statement “Commercial Navigation” which predicts negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000253-Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening document (3).pdf|TR030002-000253-Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening document (3).pdf]]:5:(ES Section 22 paragraph 22.3.5) and for benthic ecology the impacts would be negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000451-ES Section 16 Commercial navigation.pdf|TR030002-000451-ES Section 16 Commercial navigation.pdf]]:9:         receptor. The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible significance on

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000451-ES Section 16 Commercial navigation.pdf|TR030002-000451-ES Section 16 Commercial navigation.pdf]]:9:16.5.8   No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000451-ES Section 16 Commercial navigation.pdf|TR030002-000451-ES Section 16 Commercial navigation.pdf]]:11:         on the above, it is anticipated that the proposed scheme would have an impact of negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000451-ES Section 16 Commercial navigation.pdf|TR030002-000451-ES Section 16 Commercial navigation.pdf]]:11:16.6.7   No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000451-ES Section 16 Commercial navigation.pdf|TR030002-000451-ES Section 16 Commercial navigation.pdf]]:11:        using the impact assessment matrix presented in Section 4, an impact of negligible significance is

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000451-ES Section 16 Commercial navigation.pdf|TR030002-000451-ES Section 16 Commercial navigation.pdf]]:11:        measures are not required with regard to this impact and a residual impact of negligible significance is

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000451-ES Section 16 Commercial navigation.pdf|TR030002-000451-ES Section 16 Commercial navigation.pdf]]:12:16.8.3   It is predicted that the proposed scheme would result in impacts of negligible significance on

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000451-ES Section 16 Commercial navigation.pdf|TR030002-000451-ES Section 16 Commercial navigation.pdf]]:12:16.8.4   No mitigation measures are proposed for any of the impacts identified, given their negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000451-ES Section 16 Commercial navigation.pdf|TR030002-000451-ES Section 16 Commercial navigation.pdf]]:13:Interference with existing commercial            Medium                    Very low              Negligible               None requ

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000451-ES Section 16 Commercial navigation.pdf|TR030002-000451-ES Section 16 Commercial navigation.pdf]]:13:Interference with existing commercial            Medium                    Very low              Negligible               None requ

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000451-ES Section 16 Commercial navigation.pdf|TR030002-000451-ES Section 16 Commercial navigation.pdf]]:13:Potential impacts to navigational                High                      Very low              Negligible               None requ

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:15:        regarded as imperceptible and, therefore, of negligible significance. If there are no increases greater

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:19:        to be negligible and, hence, have not been assessed in detail.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:20:14.3.53 The negligible threshold at residential receptors used in this assessment applies to noise levels outside

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:20:        noise; therefore on this basis the negligible threshold at residential receptors would produce an internal

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:20:         Negligible        Warehouses, light industry, car parks, agricultural land

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:21:         High                          Major                  Major            Moderate     Minor         Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:21:         Medium                        Major                  Moderate         Minor        Negligible    Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:21:         Low                           Moderate               Minor            Negligible   Negligible    Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:21:         are expected to be negligible. The main noise sensitive receptors associated with the proposed

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:23:         in this context is assessed as negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:37:         levels are predicted to have an impact of negligible significance on all assessed ecological receptors.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:45:          P1                 65 LAeq,5min                    33 LAeq,5min             No impact          Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:45:          P2                 50 LAeq,5min                    26 LAeq,5min             No impact          Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:45:          P3                 65 LAeq,5min                    45 LAeq,5min             No impact          Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:45:          P4                 65 LAeq,5min                    39 LAeq,5min             No impact          Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:46: P5                 50 LAeq,5min                    40 LAeq,5min             No impact          Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:46: P6                 50 LAeq,5min                    40 LAeq,5min             No impact          Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:46: P7                 50 LAeq,5min                    44 LAeq,5min             No impact          Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:46: P8                 50 LAeq,5min                    47 LAeq,5min             No impact          Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:46: P9                 50 LAeq,5min                    48 LAeq,5min             No impact          Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:46: P10                50 LAeq,5min                    50 LAeq,5min             Low                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:46: P11                65 LAeq,5min                    45 LAeq,5min             No impact          Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:46: P1                 50 LAeq,5min                    33 LAeq,5min             No impact          Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:46: P2                 50 LAeq,5min                    26 LAeq,5min             No impact          Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:46: P3                 50 LAeq,5min                    45 LAeq,5min             No impact          Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:46: P4                 50 LAeq,5min                    39 LAeq,5min             No impact          Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:46: P5                 50 LAeq,5min                    40 LAeq,5min             No impact          Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:46: P6                 50 LAeq,5min                    40 LAeq,5min             No impact          Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:46: P7                 50 LAeq,5min                    44 LAeq,5min             No impact          Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:46: P8                 50 LAeq,5min                    47 LAeq,5min             No impact          Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:46: P9                 50 LAeq,5min                    48 LAeq,5min             No impact          Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:46: P10                50 LAeq,5min                    50 LAeq,5min             Low                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:46: P11                50 LAeq,5min                    45 LAeq,5min             No impact          Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:46: P1                 65 LAeq,5min                    35 LAeq,5min             No impact          Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:46: P2                 50 LAeq,5min                    31 LAeq,5min             No impact          Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:47: P3                 65 LAeq,5min                    45 LAeq,5min             No impact          Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:47: P4                 65 LAeq,5min                    39 LAeq,5min             No impact          Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:47: P5                 50 LAeq,5min                    35 LAeq,5min             No impact          Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:47: P6                 50 LAeq,5min                    45 LAeq,5min             No impact          Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:47: P7                 50 LAeq,5min                    41 LAeq,5min             No impact          Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:47: P8                 50 LAeq,5min                    36 LAeq,5min             No impact          Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:47: P9                 50 LAeq,5min                    35 LAeq,5min             No impact          Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:47: P10                50 LAeq,5min                    40 LAeq,5min             No impact          Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:47: P11                65 LAeq,5min                    45 LAeq,5min             No impact          Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:47: P1                 50 LAeq,5min                    36 LAeq,5min             No impact          Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:47: P2                 50 LAeq,5min                    31 LAeq,5min             No impact          Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:47: P3                 50 LAeq,5min                    45 LAeq,5min             No impact          Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:47: P4                 50 LAeq,5min                    39 LAeq,5min             No impact          Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:47: P5                 50 LAeq,5min                    35 LAeq,5min             No impact          Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:47: P6                 50 LAeq,5min                    45 LAeq,5min             No impact          Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:47: P7                 50 LAeq,5min                    41 LAeq,5min             No impact          Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:47: P8                 50 LAeq,5min                    36 LAeq,5min             No impact          Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:47: P9                 50 LAeq,5min                    35 LAeq,5min             No impact          Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:47: P10                50 LAeq,5min                    40 LAeq,5min             No impact          Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:47: P11                50 LAeq,5min                    45 LAeq,5min             No impact          Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:49:        and south conveyor options the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance in all

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:50:        assessed as medium; on this basis, the resulting impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:50:14.5.31 The residual impact would remain of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:51:        low and the associated impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:52:P1                    39                  16                               -23            No impact / Very low   Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:52:P2                    43                  21                               -22            No impact / Very low   Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:52:P3                    45                  20                               -25            No impact / Very low   Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:52:P4                    38                  16                               -22            No impact / Very low   Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:52:P5                    43                  40                               -3             No impact / Very low   Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:52:P6                    43                  43                               0              No impact / Very low   Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:52:P7                    43                  34                               -9             No impact / Very low   Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:52:P8                    43                  27                               -16            No impact / Very low   Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:52:P9                    43                  33                               -10            No impact / Very low   Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:52:P10                   43                  50                               7              Low                    Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:52:P11                   45                  20                               -25            No impact / Very low   Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:53:P1                   48                   19                               -29            No impact / Very low   Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:53:P2                   50                   21                               -29            No impact / Very low   Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:53:P3                   49                   20                               -29            No impact / Very low   Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:53:P4                   45                   16                               -29            No impact / Very low   Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:53:P5                   50                   40                               -10            No impact / Very low   Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:53:P6                   50                   43                               -7             No impact / Very low   Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:53:P7                   50                   34                               -16            No impact / Very low   Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:53:P8                   50                   27                               -23            No impact / Very low   Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:53:P9                   50                   33                               -17            No impact / Very low   Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:53:P10                  50                   50                               0              No impact / Very low   Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:53:P11                  49                   20                               -29            No impact / Very low   Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:54:P1                   39                    14                              -25            No impact / Very low   Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:54:P2                   43                    19                              -24            No impact / Very low   Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:54:P3                   45                    19                              -26            No impact / Very low   Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:54:P4                   38                    15                              -23            No impact / Very low   Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:54:P5                   43                    34                              -9             No impact / Very low   Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:54:P6                   43                    42                              -1             No impact / Very low   Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:54:P7                   43                    31                              -12            No impact / Very low   Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:54:P8                   43                    23                              -20            No impact / Very low   Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:54:P9                   43                    30                              -13            No impact / Very low   Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:54:P10                  43                    46                              3              No impact / Very low   Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:54:P11                  45                    19                              -26            No impact / Very low   Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:54:P1                   48                    18                              -30            No impact / Very low   Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:54:P2                   50                    19                              -31            No impact / Very low   Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:54:P3                   49                    20                              -29            No impact / Very low   Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:54:P4                   45                    16                              -29            No impact / Very low   Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:54:P5                   50                    34                              -16            No impact / Very low   Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:54:P6                   50                    42                              -8             No impact / Very low   Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:54:P7                   50                    31                              -19            No impact / Very low   Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:54:P8                   50                    23                              -27            No impact / Very low   Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:54:P9                   50                    30                              -20            No impact / Very low   Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:54:P10                  50                    46                              -4             No impact / Very low   Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:54:P11                  49                    19                              -30            No impact / Very low   Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:55:         hence an impact of negligible significance is predicted for all residential and ecological receptors.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:56:         associated impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:58:areas 1 and 2) and                               No impact to       Negligible to       x   Locating noisy static plant, such as diesel generators

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:59:                              Medium             No impact           Negligible    None

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:59:at assessed                   Medium             No impact           Negligible    None

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf|TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf]]:59:                             Medium              No impact          Negligible     None

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000482-Section 12 App 12.2 Transport Assessment_2 of 2.pdf|TR030002-000482-Section 12 App 12.2 Transport Assessment_2 of 2.pdf]]:7:M/FP/0982/10/P           Middlesbrough                                                                                                                                                                Discount as proposal is for a low traffic generator that would have negligible impact in Redcar                               No                    NONE

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000482-Section 12 App 12.2 Transport Assessment_2 of 2.pdf|TR030002-000482-Section 12 App 12.2 Transport Assessment_2 of 2.pdf]]:7:                                                                                                                                                                                                      development in the Redcar area would be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000482-Section 12 App 12.2 Transport Assessment_2 of 2.pdf|TR030002-000482-Section 12 App 12.2 Transport Assessment_2 of 2.pdf]]:7:M/FP/1046/11/P           Middlesbrough                                                                                                                                                                Discount as proposal is for a low traffic generator that would have negligible impact in Redcar                               No                    TA

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000482-Section 12 App 12.2 Transport Assessment_2 of 2.pdf|TR030002-000482-Section 12 App 12.2 Transport Assessment_2 of 2.pdf]]:7:M/FP/0220/11/P           Middlesbrough     Erection of 106no dwellinghouses and electricity substation with associated access and landscaping                                                         Discount as proposal is for a low traffic generator that would have negligible impact in Redcar                               No                    TA

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000482-Section 12 App 12.2 Transport Assessment_2 of 2.pdf|TR030002-000482-Section 12 App 12.2 Transport Assessment_2 of 2.pdf]]:7:M/FP/0172/11/P           Middlesbrough     Erection of three storey Police Authority HQ with associated communications mast/vehicular access/parking & landscaping                                    Discount as traffic generation associated with Police Station would be negligible in Redcar area.                             No                    TA

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000482-Section 12 App 12.2 Transport Assessment_2 of 2.pdf|TR030002-000482-Section 12 App 12.2 Transport Assessment_2 of 2.pdf]]:7:M/FP/0261/14/P           Middlesbrough     Residential development comprising 164No dwellings                                                                                                         Discount as proposal is for a low traffic generator that would have negligible impact in Redcar                               No                    TA

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000482-Section 12 App 12.2 Transport Assessment_2 of 2.pdf|TR030002-000482-Section 12 App 12.2 Transport Assessment_2 of 2.pdf]]:8:R/2013/0860/F3M      RCBC              NEW BUILD TWO STOREY TEACHING BLOCK LINKED AT FIRST FLOOR LEVEL BACK TO EXISTING TEACHING WINGS                Extension to existing college. Traffic impact negligible                                          No                    TS

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf|TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf]]:44:        of any related plume would be negligible compared with the dredging-related plume.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf|TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf]]:81:         vibration levels are expected to be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf|TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf]]:84:         these are anticipated to be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf|TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf]]:95:         negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000253-Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening document (4).pdf|TR030002-000253-Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening document (4).pdf]]:5:(ES Section 22 paragraph 22.3.5) and for benthic ecology the impacts would be negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf|TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf]]:17:        be controlled to ensure impacts are of negligible or of slight adverse significance at worst.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf|TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf]]:17:          High                                      Slight Adverse               Slight Adverse              Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf|TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf]]:17:          Medium                                    Slight Adverse               Negligible                  Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf|TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf]]:17:          Low                                       Negligible                   Negligible                  Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf|TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf]]:19:                                                                        Negligible              Slight Adverse             Slight Adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf|TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf]]:19:                                                                        Negligible              Negligible                 Slight Adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf|TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf]]:19:                                                                        Negligible              Slight Beneficial          Slight Beneficial

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf|TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf]]:19:                                                                        Negligible              Negligible                 Slight Beneficial

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf|TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf]]:19:          Note:      Well below Objective = < 75% of the Objective level. An ‘imperceptible’ change would be described as ‘negligible’.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf|TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf]]:25:          Dust Soiling                   Slight Adverse               Slight Adverse     Slight Adverse    Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf|TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf]]:25:          Human Health                   Negligible                   Negligible         Negligible        Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf|TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf]]:25:          Overall Effect                 Negligible – Slight Adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf|TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf]]:31:          Imperceptible                        Negligible                      15                34                   34

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf|TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf]]:31:          Small                                Negligible                      17                -                    -

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf|TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf]]:31:        concentrations. However, all identified receptors are predicted to experience a negligible impact on

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf|TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf]]:32:        a negligible impact on local air quality.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf|TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf]]:34:          Imperceptible                 Negligible                   34                        34                   34

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf|TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf]]:34:         negligible impact on NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations. The overall impact of road traffic emissions

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf|TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf]]:39:         Local Air Quality                              Small -                  Negligible –

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf|TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf]]:40:of Operational Phase        High               Imperceptible             Negligible         Not required

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf|TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf]]:40:of Decommissioning        High               construction phase         Negligible         Not required                   Not significant

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000569-Doc 7.3 Appendix 2a - MDT Planning Statement.pdf|TR030002-000569-Doc 7.3 Appendix 2a - MDT Planning Statement.pdf]]:39:               Officers considered that the impact of the development would be negligible in terms of the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000569-Doc 7.3 Appendix 2a - MDT Planning Statement.pdf|TR030002-000569-Doc 7.3 Appendix 2a - MDT Planning Statement.pdf]]:75:        operation; and negligible by 15 years, as plants designed for visual screening mature.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000253-Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening document (2).pdf|TR030002-000253-Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening document (2).pdf]]:5:(ES Section 22 paragraph 22.3.5) and for benthic ecology the impacts would be negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000501-Section 20 App 20.1 LVIA methodology.pdf|TR030002-000501-Section 20 App 20.1 LVIA methodology.pdf]]:10:            Negligible          Barely perceptible removal or addition of landscape features would occur and

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000501-Section 20 App 20.1 LVIA methodology.pdf|TR030002-000501-Section 20 App 20.1 LVIA methodology.pdf]]:11:            Negligible          Only a very small part of the proposed development would be discernible, or

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000501-Section 20 App 20.1 LVIA methodology.pdf|TR030002-000501-Section 20 App 20.1 LVIA methodology.pdf]]:12:                                   Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000501-Section 20 App 20.1 LVIA methodology.pdf|TR030002-000501-Section 20 App 20.1 LVIA methodology.pdf]]:12:                                                     Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000501-Section 20 App 20.1 LVIA methodology.pdf|TR030002-000501-Section 20 App 20.1 LVIA methodology.pdf]]:12:                                         Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000501-Section 20 App 20.1 LVIA methodology.pdf|TR030002-000501-Section 20 App 20.1 LVIA methodology.pdf]]:12:          categories of minor negligible, minor moderate and moderate major will be used where the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000501-Section 20 App 20.1 LVIA methodology.pdf|TR030002-000501-Section 20 App 20.1 LVIA methodology.pdf]]:13:            Negligible          Insignificant changes in landscape or visual conditions, affecting

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf|TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf]]:7:Negligible           Negligible effect on integrity and / or conservation status.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf|TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf]]:23:         would result in negligible loss of contaminated material. Dredging of sand and gravel, clay and

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf|TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf]]:27:          P5                 43 LAeq,5min                    40 LAeq,5min         No impact          Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf|TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf]]:27:          P6                 49 LAeq,5min                    40 LAeq,5min         No impact          Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf|TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf]]:27:          P7                 48 LAeq,5min                    44 LAeq,5min         No impact          Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf|TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf]]:27:          P8                 66 LAeq,5min                    47 LAeq,5min         No impact          Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf|TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf]]:27:          P9                 61 LAeq,5min                    48 LAeq,5min         No impact          Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf|TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf]]:27:          P10                59 LAeq,5min                    50 LAeq,5min         Low                Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf|TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf]]:28: P5                 42 LAeq,5min                    35 LAeq,5min              No impact            Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf|TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf]]:28: P6                 49 LAeq,5min                    45 LAeq,5min              No impact            Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf|TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf]]:28: P7                 48 LAeq,5min                    41 LAeq,5min              No impact            Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf|TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf]]:28: P8                 40 LAeq,5min                    36 LAeq,5min              No impact            Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf|TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf]]:28: P9                 42 LAeq,5min                    35 LAeq,5min              No impact            Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf|TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf]]:28: P10                44 LAeq,5min                    40 LAeq,5min              No impact            Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf|TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf]]:31:         negligible level.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf|TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf]]:33:9.5.32   It is anticipated that the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf|TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf]]:35:         and a negligible impact is predicted on balance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf|TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf]]:35:         negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf|TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf]]:36:         potential impact. Hence it is concluded that the impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf|TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf]]:36:         generation (i.e. the ship loading operations). The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf|TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf]]:39:         Hence the potential impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf|TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf]]:39:         time of decommissioning. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf|TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf]]:40:        downstream section of Dabholm Gut, which is predicted to be of negligible significance given the low

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf|TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf]]:43:Implication of the             Very high             Loss of            Negligible     None required

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf|TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf]]:43:Noise disturbance to           Very high             Very low           Negligible     The potential impact is mitigated as far as possible in t

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf|TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf]]:44:Noise and visual               Very high             Very low           Negligible     In addition to the embedded mitigation, a Decommissi

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf|TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf]]:50:         potential dredging methods, leading to a prediction of negligible sediment being able to deposit on the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf|TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf]]:50:         be low. It is concluded that the potential impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf|TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf]]:50:         dredging are also of relevance to this impact. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf|TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf]]:58:         the magnitude of the effect would be very low. An impact of negligible significance is therefore

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf|TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf]]:58:8.6.3    No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf|TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf]]:59:         negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf|TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf]]:59:         residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf|TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf]]:61:suspended during             Low                   Low                Negligible      Reduction of sediment plumes during backhoe dredgin

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf|TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf]]:62:disturbance to marine        High                  Very low           Negligible     No mitigation measures are required.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf|TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf]]:62:community following          Low                   Low                Negligible     No mitigation measures are possible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000253-Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening document (1).pdf|TR030002-000253-Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening document (1).pdf]]:5:(ES Section 22 paragraph 22.3.5) and for benthic ecology the impacts would be negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf|TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf]]:14:        bodies/surface water features as far as possible, predicted impacts range from those of negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf|TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf]]:14:        and hydrogeology are of minor adverse significance, with an impact of negligible significance predicted

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf|TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf]]:15:        and sediment quality are predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf|TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf]]:16:        methods to be used during construction; leading to the prediction that negligible sediment would

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf|TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf]]:17:        With this mitigation in place, potential disturbance related impacts are predicted to be of negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf|TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf]]:17:        and disturbance related impacts during the operational phase are predicted to be of negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf|TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf]]:18:        terrestrial ecological receptors, however, all such impacts are predicted to be of negligible significance

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf|TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf]]:19:        construction and operational phases are predicted to be of minor adverse and negligible significance

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf|TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf]]:20:       Given this, the residual impact was predicted to be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf|TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf]]:20:       offsite construction road traffic were predicted to have impacts of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf|TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf]]:21:       was predicted to be of negligible significance for all receptors.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf|TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf]]:22:2.13.3 It was predicted that the Harbour facilities would result in impacts of negligible significance on

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf|TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf]]:22:       based on the predicted increases, an impact of negligible significance is predicted with regard to

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf|TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf]]:23:       resulting in a negligible to minor beneficial impact.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf|TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf]]:25:       residual impact associated with indirect disturbance during decommissioning would be of negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf|TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf]]:26:       impact of negligible significance was therefore predicted.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf|TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf]]:27:        accommodation would be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf|TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf]]:28:        negligible significance. However, inevitably, this would be true for any single project. Moreover, the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf|TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf]]:29:        predicted to be negligible. There would be no deterioration in the status of the groundwater body.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf|TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf]]:29:        predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf|TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf]]:29:3.7.2   Cumulative impacts were assessed to be of negligible significance for the YPP and no deterioration in

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf|TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf]]:30:        to protected species, were assessed as being of negligible and minor adverse significance respectively.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf|TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf]]:30:        the impact to a negligible level.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf|TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf]]:32:       populations as a result of this effect is predicted to be of negligible significance (because they would

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf|TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf]]:32:       wider maintenance dredging programme in the Tees estuary was also predicted to be of negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf|TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf]]:32:       was predicted to be of negligible significance due to the low magnitude of the effect and its temporary

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf|TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf]]:32:       cumulative impact would be of negligible significance. Operational phase cumulative impacts (i.e.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf|TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf]]:32:       implications for vessel traffic management) are also predicted to be of negligible significance and all

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf|TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf]]:37:                 An impact of negligible significance on coastal protection and flood defence.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf|TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf]]:9:        High                            Major                  Moderate              Moderate                Minor               Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf|TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf]]:9:        Medium                          Moderate               Moderate              Minor                   Minor               Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf|TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf]]:9:        Low                             Minor                  Minor                 Minor                   Negligible          Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf|TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf]]:9:        Very Low                        Minor                  Negligible            Negligible              Negligible          Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf|TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf]]:41:         water quality is therefore susceptible to impacts on groundwater but these are assessed as negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf|TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf]]:41:         embankment but this would have a negligible impact on embankment permeability, therefore water

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf|TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf]]:41:         potential impact to surface water is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf|TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf]]:43:         result the potential impact on groundwater, has been assessed as being of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf|TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf]]:44:         the basis that there would be no effect); and the residual impact would be of negligible significance (for

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf|TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf]]:44:         be no effect). The residual impact is, therefore predicted to be of negligible significance (for all

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf|TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf]]:44:         the impact is, therefore, predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf|TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf]]:45:         significance of the impact is predicted to be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf|TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf]]:46:         negligible. The sensitivity of site operatives is assessed to be low and the magnitude of the effect is

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf|TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf]]:46:         also considered to be low; therefore, the significance of the impact is predicted to be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf|TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf]]:46:         effect is considered to be very low. The significance of the impact is predicted to be of negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf|TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf]]:46:         considered to be very low. The potential impact is, therefore, predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf|TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf]]:47:         sensitivity), to be negligible. .

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf|TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf]]:47:         impact is, therefore, predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf|TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf]]:47:         considered to be very low. Therefore, the significance of the impact is predicted to be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf|TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf]]:47:         the effect is considered to be very low. The potential impact is, therefore, predicted to be of negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf|TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf]]:47:         considered to be very low; therefore, the significance of the impact is considered to be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf|TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf]]:48:         predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf|TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf]]:48:         be very low; therefore, the significance of the impact is predicted to be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf|TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf]]:48:         be of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf|TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf]]:48:         Consequently, the significance of the potential impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf|TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf]]:50:Surface water              High               Very Low            Negligible      Detailed design would take account of seepage flow throu

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf|TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf]]:50:Groundwater                Very low –         Very Low -          Negligible      Construction work including piling would be carried out in

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf|TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf]]:50:Human Health               Low -              Very Low -          Negligible –    Implementation of an asbestos management strategy.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf|TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf]]:50:Groundwater                Very Low -         Very Low            Negligible      Physical controls would be in place in the form of enclosed

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf|TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf]]:50:Human Health               Low -              Very Low -          Negligible      Implementation of an asbestos management strategy.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf|TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf]]:51:Groundwater                Very Low -         Low                 Negligible      Construction work would be carried out in accordance with

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf|TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf]]:51:Human Health               Low -              Very Low -          Negligible      Implementation of an asbestos management strategy.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000674-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_1 of 2.pdf|TR030002-000674-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_1 of 2.pdf]]:55:        predicted to have a negligible impact on transport, and which were outside the ZOI of all other topics,

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000674-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_1 of 2.pdf|TR030002-000674-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_1 of 2.pdf]]:72:                                                there would be a negligible effect on local air quality and, therefore, a LSE is not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000674-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_1 of 2.pdf|TR030002-000674-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_1 of 2.pdf]]:74:                                                there would be a negligible effect on local air quality and, therefore, a LSE is not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000674-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_1 of 2.pdf|TR030002-000674-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_1 of 2.pdf]]:75:                                                respect to the SAC is considered to be negligible (i.e. a LSE is not predicted).

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000674-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_1 of 2.pdf|TR030002-000674-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_1 of 2.pdf]]:77:                                                interest features is considered to be negligible (i.e. a LSE is not predicted).

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000674-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_1 of 2.pdf|TR030002-000674-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_1 of 2.pdf]]:78:                                                to be negligible (i.e. a LSE is not predicted).

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000674-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_1 of 2.pdf|TR030002-000674-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_1 of 2.pdf]]:83:to tip, rotor diameter 112m                   species are considered to be negligible overall. The

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000674-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_1 of 2.pdf|TR030002-000674-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_1 of 2.pdf]]:85:                                              lighting, traffic and air quality would be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000674-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_1 of 2.pdf|TR030002-000674-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_1 of 2.pdf]]:85:                                              sites are reported to be negligible within the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf|TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf]]:42:        of any related plume would be negligible compared with the dredging-related plume.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf|TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf]]:79:         vibration levels are expected to be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf|TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf]]:82:         these are anticipated to be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf|TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf]]:93:         negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000573-Doc 7.3 Appendix 5 - MHF Planning Statement.pdf|TR030002-000573-Doc 7.3 Appendix 5 - MHF Planning Statement.pdf]]:8:                phase. Negligible or no impacts on heritage assets, including

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000573-Doc 7.3 Appendix 5 - MHF Planning Statement.pdf|TR030002-000573-Doc 7.3 Appendix 5 - MHF Planning Statement.pdf]]:8:                negligible during the construction and operation phases;

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000573-Doc 7.3 Appendix 5 - MHF Planning Statement.pdf|TR030002-000573-Doc 7.3 Appendix 5 - MHF Planning Statement.pdf]]:8:               The proposal would result in a negligible impact on local air

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000573-Doc 7.3 Appendix 5 - MHF Planning Statement.pdf|TR030002-000573-Doc 7.3 Appendix 5 - MHF Planning Statement.pdf]]:9:                             the hydrology effects and risk of flooding are negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000573-Doc 7.3 Appendix 5 - MHF Planning Statement.pdf|TR030002-000573-Doc 7.3 Appendix 5 - MHF Planning Statement.pdf]]:55:            channel. Negligible or no impacts on heritage assets, including their setting,

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000573-Doc 7.3 Appendix 5 - MHF Planning Statement.pdf|TR030002-000573-Doc 7.3 Appendix 5 - MHF Planning Statement.pdf]]:59:            b)   Noise impacts are predicted to be negligible; dust emissions will be

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000573-Doc 7.3 Appendix 5 - MHF Planning Statement.pdf|TR030002-000573-Doc 7.3 Appendix 5 - MHF Planning Statement.pdf]]:59:                 negligible; and there are no flooding risks (as above).

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000573-Doc 7.3 Appendix 5 - MHF Planning Statement.pdf|TR030002-000573-Doc 7.3 Appendix 5 - MHF Planning Statement.pdf]]:62:       be “very low” and the associated impact would be negligible. The same

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000573-Doc 7.3 Appendix 5 - MHF Planning Statement.pdf|TR030002-000573-Doc 7.3 Appendix 5 - MHF Planning Statement.pdf]]:63:7.61        Overall, it is concluded that the proposal would result in a negligible impact on

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000573-Doc 7.3 Appendix 5 - MHF Planning Statement.pdf|TR030002-000573-Doc 7.3 Appendix 5 - MHF Planning Statement.pdf]]:64:       where the hydrology effects and risk of flooding are negligible. The proposals

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000742-SABIC UK Petrochemicals Limited 2.pdf|TR030002-000742-SABIC UK Petrochemicals Limited 2.pdf]]:14:                 16 of the Environmental Statement “Commercial Navigation” which predicts negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf|TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf]]:112:negligible.” PHE supports the inclusion of this information within EIAs as good

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf|TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf]]:9:             become negligible or beneficial.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf|TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf]]:10:     delivering a predominately negligible or even beneficial impact on receptors

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf|TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf]]:72:      b)   Noise impacts are predicted to be minor to negligible; dust emissions

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf|TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf]]:72:           will be slight-adverse to negligible; and there are no flooding risks (as

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf|TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf]]:72:           anticipated to be negligible, both during construction and operation.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf|TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf]]:74:            negligible (see Policy Theme 5).

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf|TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf]]:78:       agricultural, fishing or mining past (SQ7) is predicted to be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf|TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf]]:78:       negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf|TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf]]:79:             negligible impact on SQ9 is predicted.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf|TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf]]:80:       be negligible. The level of visual intrusion associated with the Mine and

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf|TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf]]:80:       operational phase of the Project and consequently a negligible impact is

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf|TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf]]:82:       (1). Other impacts are negligible or minor adverse in nature. Of the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf|TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf]]:87:                                       High                                 Negligible             Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf|TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf]]:88:                                        High                                 Negligible              Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf|TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf]]:91:             become negligible or beneficial.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf|TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf]]:95:              Noise & Vibration          Negligible                 Negligible                 Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf|TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf]]:95:              Air Quality                Negligible with a          Negligible                 Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf|TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf]]:96:      Socio-Economics     Minor beneficial due Major beneficial at    Negligible/minor

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf|TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf]]:96:      Geology &           Minor/moderate        Minor adverse         Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf|TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf]]:96:      Hydrology & Flood   Negligible            Largely negligible;   Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf|TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf]]:96:      Land Uses and Soils Minor adverse on soil Minor adverse due to Mainly negligible;

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf|TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf]]:96:                          negligible effects on farming; negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf|TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf]]:96:      Noise & Vibration          Negligible                 Negligible            Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf|TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf]]:96:      Air Quality                Negligible                 Negligible            Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf|TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf]]:96:      Socio-Economics            Minor beneficial due       Major beneficial at   Negligible/minor

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf|TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf]]:96:      Cultural Heritage          Slight/negligible          No effects            No effects

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf|TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf]]:96:      Geology &                  Mainly negligible;         Mainly negligible;    Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf|TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf]]:96:      Hydrology & Flood   Negligible                        Negligible/adverse    Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf|TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf]]:96:      Land Uses and Soils Moderate adverse       Minor adverse         Mainly negligible or

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf|TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf]]:96:                          on soil degradation, otherwise negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf|TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf]]:96:                          systems; negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf|TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf]]:97:              Noise & Vibration   Negligible impact on Negligible impact on Negligible impact on

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf|TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf]]:97:              Air Quality         Negligible impact on Negligible impact on Negligible impact on

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf|TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf]]:97:              Socio-Economics     Short term, negligible Minor to major       Adverse effects due

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf|TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf]]:97:              Geology and         Minor adverse          Negligible or no     Negligible or no

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf|TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf]]:97:                                  negligible impact on

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf|TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf]]:97:              Hydrology and Flood Negligible impact on Negligible impact on Negligible impact on

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf|TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf]]:97:             predominately negligible or even beneficial impact on receptors during

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000457-ES Section 22 Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|TR030002-000457-ES Section 22 Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:6:22.3.9   Overall, the potential impact would be of negligible significance given that impact on marine ecology

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000570-Doc 7.3 Appendix 2b - MDT Planning Statement Appendices.pdf|TR030002-000570-Doc 7.3 Appendix 2b - MDT Planning Statement Appendices.pdf]]:20:            be negligible in terms of the local economy. An assessment of the economic impact of the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000570-Doc 7.3 Appendix 2b - MDT Planning Statement Appendices.pdf|TR030002-000570-Doc 7.3 Appendix 2b - MDT Planning Statement Appendices.pdf]]:81:decreased to agronomically negligible levels in many regions of the world, mainly due

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf|TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf]]:21:         present above geological deposits. This method has been proposed as mitigation due to the negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf|TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf]]:21:         on suspended sediment concentrations (with the exception of an enclosed grab due to the negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf|TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf]]:25:         solids in the water column from any of the potential dredge methods is predicted to be of negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf|TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf]]:26:7.5.22   The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf|TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf]]:28:         the above mitigation measures, it is considered that the residual impact would be of negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf|TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf]]:28:         a negligible effect on the overall import of fine sediment into the estuary (less than 0.5%). The effect of

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf|TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf]]:28:         Therefore, it is predicted that there would be an impact of negligible significance on water quality due

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf|TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf]]:29:7.6.7    Mitigation is not required and, therefore, the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf|TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf]]:30:         quality is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf|TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf]]:31:        on marine water and sediment quality are predicted to be of negligible significance at worst.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf|TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf]]:32:Re-suspension of sediment during           Low                Low          Negligible     None required. However controls would be imple

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf|TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf]]:32:Increased suspended sediment               Low                Low          Negligible     None required

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf|TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf]]:32:Impacts on existing land drainage          Low              Low           Negligible      None required

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000765-Document 8.4 Applicants Responses to Other Responses to ExA Q1.pdf|TR030002-000765-Document 8.4 Applicants Responses to Other Responses to ExA Q1.pdf]]:24:order to mitigate against the potential impacts of noise upon          predicted residual impact of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf|TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf]]:16:          (negligible freshwater input through barrage) and “wet” (average 14 cumecs flow

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf|TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf]]:16:          spring tide range of 4.6m). Freshwater discharge at the time was negligible. The model

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf|TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf]]:41:          50.0%          105 days negligible                 negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf|TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf]]:41:          71%            110 days negligible                 negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf|TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf]]:42:          50.0%          105 days negligible              negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf|TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf]]:42:          71%           110 days negligible               negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:1:Significance of change is reported as being negligible, minor, minor moderate, moderate,

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:1:Negligible beneficial/ no                      Negligible adverse/ no

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:2:N2      Distant forward glimpsed view of   Negligible adverse       70.3           0:04

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:2:        Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:2:        Negligible low adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:2:        Negligible low adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:2:        Negligible low adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:2:N11     Glimpsed perpendicular distant     Negligible adverse       40.6           0:02

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:2:        Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:3:E4     Long distance views of minehead        Negligible adverse                  103.6          0:06

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:3:       Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:3:E6     Long distance views of Minehead        Negligible adverse                  249.7          0:14

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:3:       Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:3:E7     Distant views of LCP winding           Negligible adverse                  285.1          0:17

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:3:       Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:3:       Negligible to low

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:3:       Negligible to low

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:3:       Negligible to low

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:3:       Negligible to low

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:4:        Negligible to low                                                                (20 sec)

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:4:        Negligible to low

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:5:       Negligible to low adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:5:       Negligible to low adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:5:       Negligible to low adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:5:       Negligible to low adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:5:       Negligible to low

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:5:       Negligible to low

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:5:       Negligible to low

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:5:       Negligible to low

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:6:W26     Very distant views to LB winding       Negligible adverse                  258.4          0:15

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:6:        Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:6:W28     Oblique very distant views to LB       Negligible adverse                  1743.0         1:44

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:6:        Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:6:W30     Oblique very distant views to LB       Negligible adverse                  1072.9         1:04

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:6:        Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:6:W32     Very distant forward views to LB       Negligible adverse                  681.7          0:40

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:6:        Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:6:W34     Very distant forward views to LB       Negligible adverse                  100.3          0:06

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:6:        Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:6:W36     Very distant oblique and forward       Negligible adverse                  2294.8         2:17

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:6:        Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:6:        Negligible to low adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:6:        Negligible to low and low to

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:8:        Negligible to low adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:8:        Negligible to low adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:8:        Negligible to low adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:8:        winding towers                      Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:8:        Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:8:        Negligible adverse                  Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:8:        Negligible (minehead and LCP)

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:8:        Negligible to low adverse (LB)

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:8:        Negligible to low adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:8:        Negligible to low adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:8:        Negligible to low adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:8:        Negligible to low adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:8:        Negligible to low adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:8:        Negligible to low adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:8:19      Potential distant views to TL       Negligible adverse      553.1          6:38

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:8:        Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:9:21      Potential distant views to TL        Negligible adverse       318.4          3:49

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:9:        Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:10:          Negligible to low adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:10:          to be negligible to low adverse.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:12:2       Very distant views to minehead        Negligible adverse       2260.9         6:46

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:12:        Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:12:        Negligible to low adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:12:        Negligible to low adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:12:        Negligible to low adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:12:        Negligible to low adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:12:16      Oblique filtered very distant views   Negligible adverse       199.3          0:35

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:12:        Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:12:        Negligible to low adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:12:        Negligible to low adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:13:        Negligible to low adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:13:        Negligible to low adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:13:        Negligible to low adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:13:        Negligible to low adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:13:        Negligible to low adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:13:        Negligible to low adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:13:        Negligible to low adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:13:        Negligible to low adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:14:        Negligible to low adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:14:        Negligible to low adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:14:5       Very distant views to LB winding    Negligible adverse       511.4          6:08

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:14:        Negligible adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:14:        Negligible to low adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:14:        Negligible to low adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:14:        Negligible to low adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:14:        Negligible to low adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:14:        Negligible to low adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:14:        Negligible to low adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:14:        Negligible to low adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:14:        Negligible to low adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:15:        Negligible adverse and low

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:15:32      Filtered views of minehead ground    Negligible adverse and minor       528.5          6:20

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf|TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf]]:15:        Negligible adverse and low

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000447-ES Section 12 Traffic and transport.pdf|TR030002-000447-ES Section 12 Traffic and transport.pdf]]:14:           Medium                        Major                         Moderate            Minor                        Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000447-ES Section 12 Traffic and transport.pdf|TR030002-000447-ES Section 12 Traffic and transport.pdf]]:14:           Low                           Moderate                      Minor               Negligible                   Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000447-ES Section 12 Traffic and transport.pdf|TR030002-000447-ES Section 12 Traffic and transport.pdf]]:31:        therefore, the impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000447-ES Section 12 Traffic and transport.pdf|TR030002-000447-ES Section 12 Traffic and transport.pdf]]:32:        therefore, the impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000447-ES Section 12 Traffic and transport.pdf|TR030002-000447-ES Section 12 Traffic and transport.pdf]]:32:        therefore, the impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000447-ES Section 12 Traffic and transport.pdf|TR030002-000447-ES Section 12 Traffic and transport.pdf]]:33:        therefore, the impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000447-ES Section 12 Traffic and transport.pdf|TR030002-000447-ES Section 12 Traffic and transport.pdf]]:33:         Consequently, traffic impact associated with the operational phase is considered of negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000447-ES Section 12 Traffic and transport.pdf|TR030002-000447-ES Section 12 Traffic and transport.pdf]]:35:         forecast as a worst case of minor adverse and negligible significance respectively.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf|TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf]]:13:       controls in place – would be of negligible adverse significance (at worst), with the following

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf|TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf]]:14:        to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf|TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf]]:16:       impacts are predicted to be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf|TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf]]:23:       of the proposed scheme. All impacts are predicted to be of negligible significance, with the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:29:        Based on this, projects that were predicted to have a negligible impact on transport, and which were

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:62:         effect would be negligible at other spatial scales.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:62:         would have a negligible impact at all spatial levels.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:64:5.2.47   At a UK level, the impact with respect to GVA would be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:65:         beneficial effect which would be negligible in the context of the UK’s tax revenue but major in the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:65:         area, a c.0.2% increase, which would have a negligible impact at all spatial levels.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:68:         negligible at all spatial levels.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:70:         YPP with respect to crime and fear of crime is, therefore, predicted to be negligible at all spatial

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:75:                           A place of artistic scientific and literary inspiration; a                  Negligible to

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:80:         impacts to minor or negligible effects.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:80:         pedestrian and driver delay and safety are assessed to be negligible or minor on all links.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:81:5.3.48   The effects of the construction of the Mine with respect to these issues are predicted to be negligible or

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:81:         or negligible significance, as mitigation in the form of green screening with vegetation matures. As this

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:83:         impacts would be reduced to minor or negligible significance after 1 year of operation; and negligible to

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:84:         construction phase and negligible during operation at a NYMNP level.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:84:         Ltd, the displacement effect is expected to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:84:         their significance would be negligible. However, inevitably, this would be true for any single project.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:86:        proposed Harbour development and forecasts worst case impacts of minor adverse and negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:96:         Medium                          Major                 Moderate            Minor       Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:132:        of effect is assessed as very low; resulting in predicted impacts of minor adverse to negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:133:         assessed as low on low value receptors; resulting in the prediction of negligible impacts.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:134:         adverse to negligible significance. Table 6-18 identifies that no screened links are above GEART

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:134:         the prediction of a negligible impact.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:135:         impacts of minor adverse to negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:136:         receptors. Therefore the impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:141:         therefore, the impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:141:         therefore, the impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:142:         therefore, the impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:143:         therefore, the impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:146:         predicted impact of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:146:         negligible impacts.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:147:         negligible impact.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:147:         negligible impacts.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:148:         adverse to negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:148:         3                  505                      321                538                591                Low              Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:149:         that the magnitude of the effect would be very low and result in an impact of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:151:         the impacts resultant from a Sunday scenario can be considered negligible. It is further noted that

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:154:        operational impacts are assessed as negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:154:        construction flows were assessed as having a negligible impact Driver Delay it is therefore the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:154:        maximum operational Driver Delay impact is also assessed as negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:154:        assessed as negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:155:Driver delay                                                                                           Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:155:Severance                                                                                              Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:155:Pedestrian amenity                                                                                     Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:155:Fear and intimidation                                                                                  Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:155:Pedestrian delay                                                                                       Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:155:Highway safety                                                                                         Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:155:Driver delay                                                                                           Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:157:        threshold limit and would be of negligible significance. Any potential intermittent audibility would be

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:158:         measured baseline levels and have a very low magnitude (at worst). Hence an impact of negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:158:         Section 14, and are predicted to have a negligible impact at all residential and ecological receptors.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:158:         night periods in the vicinity of Dormanstown are also predicted to have a negligible impact, as

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:161:        these potentially combined sources would be of negligible significance. Overall, potential cumulative

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:164:        of negligible significance in ES Section 6 and, consequently, such effects are not assessed

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:164:        Potential negligible to minor                       Lockwood Beck Intermediate Shaft Site    Tees Mercia Mudstone & Redcar

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:167:         Chemical                          MHF and MTS Portal - negligible   The cumulative impact on groundwater       None

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:167:         contamination due                 Harbour facilities - negligible   in the bedrock mudstone (Secondary B)

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:167:         to piling                          (groundwater and surface water)   aquifer would be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:167:         Chemical                     Negligible to minor at:                 At the catchment-scale, the Tees Mercia    None

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:167:         extractive material               Tocketts Lythe Intermediate       tolerant of the negligible or minor

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:167:         contamination                                                        groundwater body would be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:167:         negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:167:         body is also predicted to be negligible and would not result in deterioration of the status the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:169:         the different scheme components is, therefore, predicted to be of negligible significance and would not

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:188:         would be 15. This would have a negligible effect with respect to employment and skills demand.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:189:16.2.7   The creation of direct operational employment on the pipeline would be negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:190:         this effect would be negligible. Cumulatively with the YPP, the workforce could have minor beneficial

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:191:        negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:192:        be negligible or beneficial. Any population increase would be dispersed and small in the context of

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:199:         P1                    28                             25              30            No impact      Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:199:         P2                    27                             23              29            No impact      Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:199:         P3                    29                             33              35            No impact      Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:199:         P4                    28                             25              30            No impact      Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:199:         P5                    48                             42              49            No impact      Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:199:         P6                    49                             41              50            Low            Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:199:         P7                    43                             43              46            No impact      Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:199:         P8                    34                             48              48            No impact      Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:199:         P9                    39                             49              49            No impact      Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:199:         P10                   54                             50              56            Low            Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:199:         P11                   30                             42              42            No impact      Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:199:         P1                    16                             <30             30            No impact      Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:199:         P2                    21                             <30             31            No impact      Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:199:         P3                    20                             <30             30            No impact      Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:200:         P4                    16                             <30              30            No impact      Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:200:         P5                    44                             54               54            Low            Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:200:         P6                    43                             47               49            No impact      Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:200:         P7                    34                             <30              36            No impact      Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:200:         P8                    27                             <30              32            No impact      Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:200:         P9                    33                             45               45            No impact      Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:200:         P10                   50                             47               52            Low            Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:200:         P11                   20                             <30              30            No impact      Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:200:         no impact / low and, consequently, a negligible impact at all residential and ecological receptors is

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:200:         P1                    28                             30               32            No impact      Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:200:         P2                    27                             25               29            No impact      Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:200:         P3                    29                             30               33            No impact      Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:201:P4                    28                             30               32            No impact       Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:201:P5                    48                             40               49            No impact       Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:201:P6                    49                             40               50            Low             Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:201:P7                    43                             35               44            No impact       Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:201:P8                    34                             35               38            No impact       Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:201:P9                    39                             40               43            No impact       Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:201:P10                   54                             40               54            Low             Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:201:P11                   30                             35               36            No impact       Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:201:P1                    16                             35               35            No impact       Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:201:P2                    21                             30               31            No impact       Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:201:P3                    20                             30               30            No impact       Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:201:P4                    16                             30               30            No impact       Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:201:P5                    44                             45               48            No impact       Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:201:P6                    43                             50               51            Low             Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:201:P7                    34                             50               50            Low             Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:201:P8                    27                             45               45            No impact       Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:201:P9                    33                             50               50            Low             Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:201:P10                   50                             50               53            Low             Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:201:P11                   20                             40               40            No impact       Negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:202:        consequently, a negligible impact at all residential and ecological receptors is expected.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:210:19.2.2   All of the above were predicted, after the implementation of appropriate mitigation, to be of negligible or

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:211:         bedrock mudstone aquifer and, when combined with the negligible and minor impacts due to the YPP

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:211:         for projects to adhere to environmental best practice, when combined with the negligible and minor

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:212:        contaminants, but there was a negligible risk to deeper groundwater in the bedrock mudstone aquifer.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:212:         Harbour facilities combined with non-YPP developments) is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:213:         predicted to be of negligible significance (with a low risk of arising). Impacts associated with

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:213:         contaminated runoff and leachates from the landfill have also been predicted to be of negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:213:         impact on the water quality in Bran Sands lagoon and Dabholm Gut is predicted to be of negligible

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:213:         Section 9 as being of negligible significance. Using the same methodology, the cumulative effect of

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:213:         negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:220:         components at Wilton and the Harbour facilities are, therefore, predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:220:         schemes is, therefore, also predicted to be negligible.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:220:         designs and, as such, are predicted to be of negligible significance. They would not, therefore,

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:220:         negligible significance and would not result in deterioration of the status of any of the surface water

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:221:         to be negligible. The cumulative impact would not result in deterioration of the status of any of the

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:226:         However, all of the habitats are considered to be of negligible or low nature conservation value.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:226:         with respect to habitat loss are predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:226:         residual cumulative impact of negligible significance is predicted.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:229:         between the YPP and non-YPP developments are, therefore, predicted to be of negligible significance

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:235:         would include distant areas within the NYMNP where negligible or imperceptible impacts would be

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:235:        winding towers from other areas of moorland would result in a negligible and minor adverse impact

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:237:        these wider areas would range between negligible and minor adverse; with the winding towers

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:238:        tower would be possible from the A169 at Goathland Moor, resulting in negligible to minor adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:239:22.3.50 After passing the Lockwood Beck site, a range of no change, negligible adverse and minor adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:240:22.3.63 Between Lady Cross and Freebrough Farm, intermittent negligible adverse and minor adverse

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:242:        winding towers would result in negligible and minor adverse impacts.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:246:         resulting from the YPP, including the Harbour facilities, would have a negligible (if any) influence on this

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:249:         negligible significance is predicted.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:264:        were predicted to be either zero or negligible. No means were identified by which the scheme could

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:271:        dredging programme in the Tees estuary is, therefore, predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:274:         of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:274:         communities would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:274:         effect of the projects in isolation and, therefore, a cumulative impact of negligible significance is

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:275:        populations would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:275:        morphology, with the proposed scheme having a negligible effect on deposition of sediment in the berth

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:279:         response in fish and, therefore, a cumulative impact of negligible significance is predicted on feeding

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:279:         would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:279:         would be of negligible significance at all locations.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:281:         works, but the potential cumulative impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:281:         the EIA concluded that that there would be an impact of negligible significance on existing and new

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf|TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf]]:282:         background movements and the cumulative impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf|TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf]]:11:         to the fact that there is negligible sediment release from an enclosed grab). The modelling used two

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf|TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf]]:11:         is shown over the intertidal areas, leading to a prediction of negligible sediment being able to deposit on

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf|TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf]]:22:         negligible effect on tidal propagation and water levels. Phase 2 would represent the maximum effect of

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf|TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf]]:32:5.6.24   The results for the post-development cases show a negligible effect on the overall import of fine

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf|TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf]]:34:operations. Negligible sediment is predicted to deposit on the intertidal areas.

[[this>Infrastructure/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf|TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf]]:34:                                   x    A negligible effect on tidal propagation and water levels is predicted.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/I&BPB6776R001F01_NGCT scoping document.pdf|I&BPB6776R001F01_NGCT scoping document.pdf]]:8:                                        proposed to revisit the construction traffic demand as the impacts were previously assessed as negligible.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:26:                            field in which the effects of the boundaries are negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:49:Negligible                        The impact is not of concern

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:96:           rotation in the North Sea, compared with a deviation to Felixstowe, are negligible.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:97:        rotation in the North Sea, compared with a deviation to Felixstowe, are negligible.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:125:        be negligible.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:125:        would be negligible. This conclusion is based on the fact that, in order to make

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:125:        considered to be negligible in terms of difference in potential environmental impact.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:129:       of negligible significance associated with the re-suspension of contaminated

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:130:          Risk to human          Low         Medium        Negligible   During construction workers will

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:130:          Risk to deep        Negligible    Negligible     Negligible   Deep groundwater currently

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:131:          Risk to                Low     Low         Negligible   Since neighbouring properties

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:132:       to be negligible. Should the Bran Sands lagoon site be reclaimed using dredged

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:132:       mitigate this potential impact to being of negligible significance. Once operational,

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:132:       negligible changes are predicted to occur on the waterbird population of Seal Sands

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:132:       predicted to have a negligible impact on waterbird populations.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:132:        minor adverse significance. Impacts of negligible significance are predicted to occur

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:138:        as of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:138:        these are anticipated to be of negligible significance but in the case of sulphur

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:138:        road. Overall cumulative impacts were found to be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:139:       on sensitive receptors is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:139:       the container port will have a negligible impact on residential properties and hence

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:139:       movements and the impact of increased rail travel was also found to be negligible in

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:141:       tidal ranges is predicted to be negligible. However a minor adverse impact is

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:179: Climate Change                 To reduce the causes of adverse climate change                           There are negligible impacts associated with the proposed development, although the proposed               -

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:179: Reduction in Waste             To reduce the amount of waste produced and increase the amount           The proposed development would have a negligible impact on overall levels of recycling in the              -

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:180: Provision of Equitable         To ensure that the housing needs and aspirations of the community            There are negligible impacts associated with the proposed development, although the            -

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:180: Provision of Equitable         To raise educational achievement across the region                           There are negligible impacts associated with the proposed development, although the            -

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:180: Crime Reduction                To create safe communities                                                   There are negligible impacts associated with the proposed development, although the            -

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:180: Promotion of a Healthy         To provide opportunities for physical activity to promote healthy            There are negligible impacts associated with the proposed development, although the            -

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:181:                                To increase public involvement in decision making and civic activity     There are negligible impacts associated with the proposed development.                                  -

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:181:                                To maintain and improve the accessibility and quality of key services    There are negligible impacts associated with the proposed development.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:181:                                To encourage in accessible locations the provision of sport,             There are negligible impacts associated with the proposed development.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:181: Promotion of                   To provide reliable, efficient and convenient public transport in        There are negligible impacts associated with the proposed development.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:182: Employment Base                To diversify the economy of the rural areas                               There are negligible impacts associated with the proposed development.                                -

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:183:                                 To promote the growth of tourism                             There are negligible impacts associated with the proposed development.                                -

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:211:       Freshwater discharge at the time was negligible. The model was further

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:232:          design changes are of very small magnitude and are considered negligible in

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:256:        deemed to be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:256:        impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:257:       Seal Sands is therefore predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:257:       impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:259:         aquifer of negligible permeability. It is probable that shallow groundwater within

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:272:  Negligible risk       If contamination sources are present they are considered to be minor in

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:274:        non-aquifer of negligible permeability, and which is likely to restrict the vertical

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:275: Risk to deep groundwater                    Negligible       Any deep groundwater at the site is protected by the relatively

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:276:        non-aquifer of negligible permeability, and which is likely to restrict the vertical

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:277: Risk to deep groundwater              Negligible     Any deep groundwater at the site is protected by the relatively

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:279:           to negligible.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:279:           be low to negligible.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:279:           non-aquifer of negligible permeability, and which is likely to restrict the vertical

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:280: Risk to human health –      Negligible    Following redevelopment, the site will be entirely covered by hardstanding,

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:280: Risk to deep groundwater    Negligible    Any deep groundwater at the site is protected by the relatively impermeable

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:280: Risk to neighbouring        Negligible    Neighbouring properties are largely industrial and hence are considered to be

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:305:       predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:305:       negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:324:    5. Given the above, an impact of negligible significance on benthic community

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:324:    6. No mitigation is possible and the residual impact would be of negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:324:       negligible significance is predicted.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:324:    3. No mitigation is possible and the residual impact would be of negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:325:       negligible significance would arise, with no impact on these communities in

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:325:       be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:326:       suspended sediment concentrations is considered to be of negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:326:    5. No mitigation is required and the residual impact would be of negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:328:       negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:328:       negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:330:       of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:330:       negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:351:        considered to be of negligible significance. It is considered that predicted

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:351:       development, with an impact of negligible significance at North Tees mudflat.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:352:       judged to be of negligible significance at worst.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:352:       negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:353:       of negligible significance given that there is a reasonably high degree of

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:354:       habitats for feeding waterbirds is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:355:       residual impact of negligible significance (Seal Sands) and no residual

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:355:       of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:355:       negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:356:       assessed to be of negligible significance for North Gare Sands, Bran Sands

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:356:       no other mitigation is possible. The residual impact would be of negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:362:       dredger is therefore predicted to be of negligible significance on breeding

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:362:       negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:363:       of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:363:       negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:369:       negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:369:       negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:372:       predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:372:       negligible significance is predicted.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:373:       predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:374:       residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:378:    3. Overall, it is considered that there would be an impact of negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:378:       Harbour Master are required and the residual impact would be of negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:384:       negligible archaeological or heritage value. The site visit confirmed that these

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:388:       activities are predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:389:       based recreation is expected to be of negligible significance, with no residual

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:392:       potential impact of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:392:       negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:397:       per year. It is concluded that this predicted impact is of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:397:    3. No mitigation is required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:402:        accommodate this increased traffic, the impact is considered to be of negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:402:    14. No mitigation is required and the residual impact will be of negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:414:        construction will have a negligible, short term and reversible impact during

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:417:       negligible significance, particularly given the temporary nature of the effect.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:417:       to be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:417:       Therefore, the residual impacts will be of negligible significance (Seal Sands)

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:419:       negligible significance, with no overall effect on the estuarine populations of

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:419:       would be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:420:       the proposed development is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:420:       negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:422:        negligible impact on the nearest properties on Bolckow Road, when compared

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:422:    16. No mitigation measures are required therefore the impact remains at negligible.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:424:       movements on the line past the Navigation Public House are negligible.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:424:       to be negligible.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:424:    10. No mitigation measures are required therefore the impact remains at negligible.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:436:          an impact of negligible significance is predicted.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:437:    5. Although the predicted impacts are negligible, dust emissions during demolition

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:437:    6. The residual impacts are predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:438:       involved is considered to be negligible in comparison to the existing traffic and

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:439:        quality objective of 20µg.m-3, these impacts are considered to be of negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:439:        50µg.m-3, these impacts are considered to be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:440:        objective of 50µg.m-3, these impacts are considered to be of negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:440:        of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:440:        considered to be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:440:        0.02kg.Ha-1; this is considered to be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:440:        scenario, is only 0.005keq.Ha-1; this is considered to be of negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:444:        achieved and the effect of the development on this is negligible for both the 70%

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:445:        impacts are considered to be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:445:        considered to be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:445:        impacts are considered to be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:445:        considered to be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:445:        to be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:446:        considered to be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:446:        0.02kg.Ha-1; this is considered to be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:446:        negligible significance. The impact for Phase 2 is lower than that of Phase 1

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:447:           40µg.m-3 and impact of the development was predicted to be negligible here.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:447:           considered to be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:447:Construction                   NO2                     Short-term          Adverse                 Negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:447:                               PM10                    Short-term          Adverse                 Negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:447:                               CO                      Short-term          Adverse                 Negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:447:                        Nitrogen Deposition            Short-term          Adverse                 Negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:447:                         Acid Deposition               Short-term          Adverse                 Negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:447:                               PM10                    Long-term           Adverse                 Negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:447:Equipment &                    PM10                    Long-term           Adverse                 Negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:447:Shipping                       SO2                     Long-term           Adverse                 Negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:447:                               CO                      Long-term           Adverse                 Negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:447:                        Nitrogen Deposition            Long-term           Adverse                 Negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:447:                         Acid Deposition               Long-term           Adverse                 Negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:449:       considered to be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:449:       are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:454:       are considered to be of negligible significance and would not affect the

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:454:       negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:454:       and show a similar negligible effect on water levels with the proposed

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:455:       Section 22.3.2 and, therefore, the effect remains of negligible significance on

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:455:       negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:472:       based jobs; the displacement of existing jobs, however, is negligible.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:488:       of maintenance dredgings and there will be a negligible effect on suspended

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:488:    3. Overall, the potential impact would be of negligible significance given that

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:488:       negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:494:Impact of dispersion and            Negligible                                                         None possible   Negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:494:Remobilisation, dispersion and      Negligible                                                         None possible   Negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:496:Potential effects on water         Negligible                                                   None required                     Negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:497:Potential smothering effect           Negligible                                                 None possible                     Negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:497:Potential deposition of fine          Negligible                                                 None possible                     Negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:497:Potential smothering effect           Negligible in the short term. No impact in the long term   None possible                     Negligible in the short term.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:497:Implications for benthic intertidal   Negligible                                                 None required                     Negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:498:Potential impact on marine       Negligible                                                             None required   Negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:498:Effect of increased supply of    Negligible                                                             None required   Negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:499:habitats available to feeding       development. Impact of negligible significance at North Tees                                      downstream        of    the

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:499:effect on tidal prism                                                                                                                 negligible significance at

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:499:Effect of increased suspended       Negligible                                                     None required                      Negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:499:Loss of waterbird interest within   Moderate adverse                                               It is proposed that some of the    Negligible to minor adverse

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:499:Potential effect on the             Negligible impact is predicted for intertidal morphology and   None required                      Negligible impact is predicted

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:499:Potential effect of increased       Negligible                                                     None required                      Negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:499:Potential disturbance to feeding    An impact of negligible is predicted for North Gare Sands      None possible                      An impact of negligible is

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:500:Potential for indirect effects on    Negligible                                   None possible                      Negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:500:Direct loss of ecological interest   Negligible                                   None required                      Negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:501:Direct uptake and disturbance     Negligible                       None possible                    Negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:501:Effect of construction light on   Negligible                       Lighting will be directed away   Negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:501:Effect of lighting for the        Negligible                       None required                    Negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:502:Potential for delays due to        Negligible                            None required                        Negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:503:Potential impact on water-based      Negligible significance is predicted for marine activities. No   Notice to mariners will be        Negligible significance is

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:503:Impact of construction traffic on    Negligible                                                       None possible                     Negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:504:Impacts of increased traffic            Negligible                                                   None required                     Negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:504:Potential for additional rail traffic   Negligible                                                   None required                     Negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:504:Impacts on ambient noise levels         Negligible to no impact depending on location of sensitive   No specific mitigation will be    No impact

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:505:Impacts of piling on sites and       Negligible to minor adverse depending on location of site   None required.   Negligible to minor adverse

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:505:Impacts associated with              Negligible                                                  None required    Negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:505:Potential impacts on features of     Negligible                                                  None required    Negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:505:Impact of increased operational      Negligible                                                  None required    No impact

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:505:Impact of increased rail traffic     Negligible                                                  None required    No impact

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:506:Generation of dust during            Negligible                                                    A    number     of    mitigation    Negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:506:Emission of pollutants from          Negligible                                                    None required                       Negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:506:Emission of pollutants from          During phase 1 the impact is deemed to be of negligible       The       assessment         has    During phase 1 the impact is

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:506:construction plant: sulphur          significance. During phase 2, the impact is deemed to be of   considered       the    benefits    deemed to be of negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:506:Emission of pollutants from          Negligible                                                    None required                       Negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:507:Emission of pollutants from         Negligible                None required   Negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:507:Emission of pollutants from         Negligible                None required   Negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:507:Emission of pollutants due to       Negligible                None required   Negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:507:Emission of pollutants due to       Negligible                None required   Negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:507:Emission of pollutants due to       Negligible                None required   Negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:507:Emission of pollutants due to       Negligible                None required   Negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:507:Emission of pollutants due to       Negligible                None required   Negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:508:Impact on the visual character      Negligible                   None required   Negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:508:Potential for effect on risk of  Negligible                      None required   Negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:508:Consideration of the effect of   Negligible                      None required   Negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:510:Implications for marine ecology    Negligible                                                    None required   Negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:518:Shallow coastal    Food availability    Presence and abundance of prey            The capital dredging is predicted to                   N/A            None         Negligible        No effect

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:518:                   Extent         and   No decrease in extent from an             The scheme is not predicted to result                  N/A            None         Negligible        Strictly, the extent

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:522:                    Disturbance             No    significant      reduction     in   It   is   considered       that    shipwash     N/A            None         Negligible        No effect

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Additional Documents/NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf|NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf]]:522:                    Extent         and      No decrease in extent from an             The proposed scheme is not predicted            N/A            None         Negligible        No effect

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/EIA_2017_00041/Response Documents/20171212 MMO Letter with additional comments Teesport Scoping.pdf|20171212 MMO Letter with additional comments Teesport Scoping.pdf]]:3:vibration and air   populations is expected to be of negligible significance, with no

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:39:negligible.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:40:concluded that any difference in environmental impact would be negligible. This conclusion is based on the

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:40:phase of 500m. A decrease of 200m in the first phase is considered to be negligible in terms of difference

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:53: High                     Major           Moderate           Moderate               Minor            Negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:53: Medium                  Moderate         Moderate             Minor                Minor            Negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:53: Low                      Minor               Minor            Minor              Negligible         Negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:53: Very low                 Minor           Negligible         Negligible           Negligible         Negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:53:Whilst mitigation for minor or negligible impacts may not be specifically defined as a matter of course,

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:53:recognised that minor and negligible impacts could become significant when considered cumulatively with

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:93:is considered to be low and the potential impact is deemed to be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:95:The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:96:concluded that there would be an impact of negligible significance on water quality given that the overall

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:96:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:98:predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:98:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:129:negligible significance is predicted.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:129:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:130:Given the above, an impact of negligible significance on benthic community structure is predicted to arise

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:130:and redistribution). Consequently, an impact of negligible significance is predicted

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:130:of this potential impact, it is concluded that an overall impact of negligible significance would arise, with no

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:130:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance. Although

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:134:communities due to changes in the hydraulic regime is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:134:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:135:negligible significance is predicted.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:135:No mitigation measures are required, and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:136:Enteromorpha colonisation. The overall impact of the scheme is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:136:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:137:Based on the above, it is concluded that there would be an impact of negligible significance on the benthic

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:137:No mitigation measures are required, and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:138:negligible.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:138:No mitigation measures are required, and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:158:of the dredger would be negligible in terms of reductions in foraging ability, as the predicted increases in

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:160:be of negligible significance given the very small area of intertidal to be affected on certain states of the

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:160:intertidal areas downstream of the proposed scheme, and a residual impact of negligible significance at

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:162:construction related noise disturbance to waterbirds will be negligible.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:163:will result in an impact of negligible significance to feeding waterbirds.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:163:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:164:waterbirds is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:165:No mitigation measures are possible and it is predicted that there would be a residual impact of negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:165:consequently the potential impact on waterbird populations is considered to be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:165:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:165:Overall, the potential additional impact associated with the proposed scheme is assessed to be of negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:166:residual impact would be of negligible significance for waterbirds at North Gare Sands, Bran Sands and

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:166:dredge frequency is predicted, an impact of negligible significance is predicted to the feeding resource of

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:166:that can be implemented. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:166:significance of the potential impact. Hence it is concluded that the impact would be of negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:167:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:167:As a result, it is concluded that there would be an impact of negligible significance on feeding waterbirds

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:183:                                                                                            below 120m are negligible.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:183:                                                      size classes show huge                negligible in the North Sea.         hide from predators. The preference for sandy          to April depending on spawning            populations that mix during         bivalves. Larger individuals feed on

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:184:                                                                                         becoming negligible beyond 70m                                                                                                                                                      bivalves and crustaceans, but the

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:186:negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:186:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:190:negligible.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:190:impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:190:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of negligible significance. However,

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:191:fishing activities. As discussed in Section 13.5, there would be an impact of negligible significance of

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:193:The recovery in the operational phase is predicted to be of negligible significance for the benthic community,

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:193:and consequently, an impact of negligible significance is predicted on the feeding resource for fish due to

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:193:elsewhere throughout the Tees estuary, an impact of negligible significance is predicted.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:193:would be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:194:predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:194:pollution, no mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:194:due to noise disturbance would be very low; an impact of negligible significance is anticipated.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:194:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:199:receptor. The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible significance on

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:199:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:200:traffic as a result of the proposed scheme would be negligible.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:200:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:201:negligible significance. Therefore, the scope of the TS was confined to the operational phase of the

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:210:conflict between recreational vessels and the construction activities are predicted to be of negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:210:for the construction phase of the works. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:219:negligible significance and would not affect the integrity of any flood defences at this location or throughout

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:220:are only very marginally affected by the input of river flows and show a similar negligible effect on water

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:220:not change the conclusions drawn above and, therefore, an effect of negligible significance is predicted on

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:220:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:226:negligible significance is predicted to both abstractions.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:226:intake and a residual impact of negligible significance at the Corus and Tees Bulk Handling abstractions.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:253:of maintenance dredged material and there will be a negligible effect on SSC outside of the boundary of the

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:256:negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:256:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:257:dredge disposal operations). Overall, the potential impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:257:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:272:therefore, is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:273:impact is predicted to be negligible.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:274:cumulative impact of negligible significance is predicted on feeding waterbirds.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:274:operational noise impact will be of negligible significance at all locations.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:275:to significantly reduce noise levels to birds in Bran Sands lagoon (a residual impact of negligible significance

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:275:at worst is predicted for both schemes). The residual cumulative impact is considered to be of negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:275:cumulative impact of negligible significance is predicted.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:276:works, but the potential cumulative impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:276:in the estuary. As detailed in Section 13, this impact is considered to be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:276:cumulative impact of negligible significance will arise. All vessel traffic in the Tees estuary and Tees Bay is

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:276:will have no impact on fisheries, a negligible impact on marine ecology and no impact on navigation; hence,

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:297:will result in an additional 191 vessel calls per year at the port terminal) will result in a negligible underwater

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:297:by ongoing shipping activity), it is concluded that the impact from NGCT will also be negligible. No effect is

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:298:of the dredger would be negligible in terms of reductions in foraging ability, as the predicted increases in

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:301:around noisy plant, with a predicted impact of negligible significance (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2017). Should

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:301:Facilities (which are closer to the lagoon than the site of the NGCT) and were predicted to have a negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:303:resource for terns due to a change in water quality is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:303:sediment or habitat change) and the conclusion of the NGCT assessment (i.e. negligible effect on feeding

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:329:vibration and air   populations is expected to be of negligible significance, with no

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:361:       Freshwater discharge at the time was negligible. The model was further

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:382:          design changes are of very small magnitude and are considered negligible in

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:567:           represent an impact of negligible significance. Therefore, the scope of this TS is confined to the

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:581:           demand will have an impact of negligible significance. Therefore the scope of this TS was

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:638:scheme. An impact of negligible significance is predicted. The EIA Report concludes that proposed

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf]]:638:spill and an impact of negligible significance is predicted. No further mitigation measures beyond those

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf|20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf]]:14:redistribution of suspended solids would lead residual impacts of negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf|20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf]]:19:and effect of negligible significant for all other factors cumulatively and in-

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf|20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf]]:21:Based on the above, it was concluded that there would be an impact of negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf|20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf]]:25:sediment would be negligible. The applicant also noted that the effect of the dredging

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf|20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf]]:26:is predicted to have an impact of negligible significance on commercial navigation

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf|20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf]]:26:negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf|20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf]]:27:minor/negligible without mitigation and negligible with mitigation.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:39:negligible.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:40:concluded that any difference in environmental impact would be negligible. This conclusion is based on the

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:40:phase of 500m. A decrease of 200m in the first phase is considered to be negligible in terms of difference

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:53: High                     Major           Moderate           Moderate               Minor            Negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:53: Medium                  Moderate         Moderate             Minor                Minor            Negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:53: Low                      Minor               Minor            Minor              Negligible         Negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:53: Very low                 Minor           Negligible         Negligible           Negligible         Negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:53:Whilst mitigation for minor or negligible impacts may not be specifically defined as a matter of course,

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:53:recognised that minor and negligible impacts could become significant when considered cumulatively with

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:93:is considered to be low and the potential impact is deemed to be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:95:The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:96:concluded that there would be an impact of negligible significance on water quality given that the overall

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:96:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:98:predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:98:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:129:negligible significance is predicted.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:129:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:130:Given the above, an impact of negligible significance on benthic community structure is predicted to arise

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:130:and redistribution). Consequently, an impact of negligible significance is predicted

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:130:of this potential impact, it is concluded that an overall impact of negligible significance would arise, with no

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:130:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance. Although

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:134:communities due to changes in the hydraulic regime is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:134:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:135:negligible significance is predicted.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:135:No mitigation measures are required, and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:136:Enteromorpha colonisation. The overall impact of the scheme is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:136:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:137:Based on the above, it is concluded that there would be an impact of negligible significance on the benthic

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:137:No mitigation measures are required, and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:138:negligible.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:138:No mitigation measures are required, and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:158:of the dredger would be negligible in terms of reductions in foraging ability, as the predicted increases in

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:160:be of negligible significance given the very small area of intertidal to be affected on certain states of the

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:160:intertidal areas downstream of the proposed scheme, and a residual impact of negligible significance at

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:162:construction related noise disturbance to waterbirds will be negligible.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:163:will result in an impact of negligible significance to feeding waterbirds.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:163:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:164:waterbirds is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:165:No mitigation measures are possible and it is predicted that there would be a residual impact of negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:165:consequently the potential impact on waterbird populations is considered to be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:165:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:165:Overall, the potential additional impact associated with the proposed scheme is assessed to be of negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:166:residual impact would be of negligible significance for waterbirds at North Gare Sands, Bran Sands and

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:166:dredge frequency is predicted, an impact of negligible significance is predicted to the feeding resource of

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:166:that can be implemented. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:166:significance of the potential impact. Hence it is concluded that the impact would be of negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:167:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:167:As a result, it is concluded that there would be an impact of negligible significance on feeding waterbirds

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:183:                                                                                            below 120m are negligible.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:183:                                                      size classes show huge                negligible in the North Sea.         hide from predators. The preference for sandy          to April depending on spawning            populations that mix during         bivalves. Larger individuals feed on

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:184:                                                                                         becoming negligible beyond 70m                                                                                                                                                      bivalves and crustaceans, but the

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:186:negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:186:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:190:negligible.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:190:impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:190:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of negligible significance. However,

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:191:fishing activities. As discussed in Section 13.5, there would be an impact of negligible significance of

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:193:The recovery in the operational phase is predicted to be of negligible significance for the benthic community,

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:193:and consequently, an impact of negligible significance is predicted on the feeding resource for fish due to

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:193:elsewhere throughout the Tees estuary, an impact of negligible significance is predicted.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:193:would be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:194:predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:194:pollution, no mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:194:due to noise disturbance would be very low; an impact of negligible significance is anticipated.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:194:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:199:receptor. The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible significance on

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:199:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:200:traffic as a result of the proposed scheme would be negligible.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:200:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:201:negligible significance. Therefore, the scope of the TS was confined to the operational phase of the

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:210:conflict between recreational vessels and the construction activities are predicted to be of negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:210:for the construction phase of the works. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:219:negligible significance and would not affect the integrity of any flood defences at this location or throughout

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:220:are only very marginally affected by the input of river flows and show a similar negligible effect on water

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:220:not change the conclusions drawn above and, therefore, an effect of negligible significance is predicted on

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:220:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:226:negligible significance is predicted to both abstractions.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:226:intake and a residual impact of negligible significance at the Corus and Tees Bulk Handling abstractions.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:253:of maintenance dredged material and there will be a negligible effect on SSC outside of the boundary of the

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:256:negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:256:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:257:dredge disposal operations). Overall, the potential impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:257:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:272:therefore, is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:273:impact is predicted to be negligible.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:274:cumulative impact of negligible significance is predicted on feeding waterbirds.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:274:operational noise impact will be of negligible significance at all locations.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:275:to significantly reduce noise levels to birds in Bran Sands lagoon (a residual impact of negligible significance

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:275:at worst is predicted for both schemes). The residual cumulative impact is considered to be of negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:275:cumulative impact of negligible significance is predicted.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:276:works, but the potential cumulative impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:276:in the estuary. As detailed in Section 13, this impact is considered to be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:276:cumulative impact of negligible significance will arise. All vessel traffic in the Tees estuary and Tees Bay is

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:276:will have no impact on fisheries, a negligible impact on marine ecology and no impact on navigation; hence,

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:297:will result in an additional 191 vessel calls per year at the port terminal) will result in a negligible underwater

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:297:by ongoing shipping activity), it is concluded that the impact from NGCT will also be negligible. No effect is

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:298:of the dredger would be negligible in terms of reductions in foraging ability, as the predicted increases in

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:301:around noisy plant, with a predicted impact of negligible significance (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2017). Should

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:301:Facilities (which are closer to the lagoon than the site of the NGCT) and were predicted to have a negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:303:resource for terns due to a change in water quality is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:303:sediment or habitat change) and the conclusion of the NGCT assessment (i.e. negligible effect on feeding

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:329:vibration and air   populations is expected to be of negligible significance, with no

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:361:       Freshwater discharge at the time was negligible. The model was further

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:382:          design changes are of very small magnitude and are considered negligible in

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:567:           represent an impact of negligible significance. Therefore, the scope of this TS is confined to the

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:581:           demand will have an impact of negligible significance. Therefore the scope of this TS was

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:638:scheme. An impact of negligible significance is predicted. The EIA Report concludes that proposed

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf|IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf]]:638:spill and an impact of negligible significance is predicted. No further mitigation measures beyond those

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf|PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf]]:8:concluded that any difference in environmental impact would be negligible. The phasing of the development

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf|PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf]]:11:All construction phase impacts are of minor adverse significance or negligible, with the exception of

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf|PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf]]:12:All of the above potential impacts have been assessed as either minor adverse, negligible or of no impact,

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf|PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf]]:13:All other potential impacts predicted to arise during the operational phase are of negligible significance or

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf|PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf]]:13:Impacts to fish as a result of direct uptake during dredging is considered to be of negligible significance, as

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf|PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf]]:13:Construction lighting is predicted to result in an impact of negligible significance to fish. No impact to fishing

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf|PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf]]:13:All potential impacts which could arise during the operational phase are of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf|PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf]]:14:appropriate signals as required by International Regulations to allow safe navigation. An impact of negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf|PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf]]:15:All impacts during construction and operation are predicted to be of negligible significance at worst.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf|PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf]]:15:be an impact of negligible significance with regard to tidal flooding elsewhere in the estuary system.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf|PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf]]:16:would be a worst case impact of negligible significance on surface water intakes in the Tees during capital

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf|PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf]]:17:activity. An impact of negligible significance is predicted on marine ecology due to smothering of existing

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf|PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf]]:17:Sands lagoon (a residual impact of negligible significance at worst is predicted for both schemes). The

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf|PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf]]:17:residual cumulative impact is considered to be of negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Additional Documents/PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf|PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf]]:18:A cumulative impact of negligible significance is predicted to fish and fisheries and commercial navigation.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Response Documents/Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf|Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf]]:14:redistribution of suspended solids would lead residual impacts of negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Response Documents/Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf|Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf]]:19:and effect of negligible significant for all other factors cumulatively and in-

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Response Documents/Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf|Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf]]:21:Based on the above, it was concluded that there would be an impact of negligible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Response Documents/Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf|Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf]]:25:sediment would be negligible. The applicant also noted that the effect of the dredging

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Response Documents/Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf|Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf]]:26:is predicted to have an impact of negligible significance on commercial navigation

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Response Documents/Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf|Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf]]:26:negligible significance.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2020_00079/Response Documents/Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf|Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf]]:27:minor/negligible without mitigation and negligible with mitigation.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2021_00215_1/MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf|MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf]]:26:from these activities are considered to be negligible and not considered further.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2021_00215_1/MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf|MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf]]:26:from these activities are considered to be negligible and not considered further.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/Additional Documents/Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf|Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf]]:16:exist and the tidal influence is negligible. The long distance upstream of the study area ensures

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/Additional Documents/Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf|Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf]]:40:is seen, a decrease of 0.003 %, which is negligible. The impacts on the hydrodynamic regime

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/Additional Documents/Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf|Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf]]:40:hydrodynamic regime are negligible.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/Additional Documents/Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf|Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf]]:43:is a decrease of 13 %. At Pt 7 Teesport the figure is 0.01 % which is negligible. Again,

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/Additional Documents/Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf|Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf]]:43:negligible.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/Additional Documents/Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf|Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf]]:51:for sand concentrations between the different scenarios are negligible.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/Additional Documents/Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf|Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf]]:72:NC                                Negligible Concentration. Concentration below which the risk of the

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/Additional Documents/Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf|Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf]]:72:                                  ecosystem is considered negligible (/20/).

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/Additional Documents/Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf|Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf]]:72:                                  risk of the ecosystem is considered negligible.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/Additional Documents/Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf|Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf]]:73:Table 8-2 Maximum Permissible Concentrations (MPC) and Negligible Concentrations

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/Additional Documents/Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf|Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf]]:73:Table 8-3 Maximum Permissible Concentrations (MPC) and Negligible Concentrations

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/Additional Documents/Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf|Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf]]:84:             Permissible Concentrations and Negligible Concentrations for metals, tacking

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/Additional Documents/Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf|Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf]]:95:thresholds are given as Negligible Concentration (NC) and Maximum Permissible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/Additional Documents/Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf|Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf]]:95:thresholds are given as Negligible Concentration (NC) and Maximum Permissible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/Additional Documents/Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf|Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf]]:96:thresholds are given as Negligible Concentration (NC) and Maximum Permissible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/Additional Documents/Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf|Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf]]:96:thresholds are given as Negligible Concentration (NC) and Maximum Permissible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/Additional Documents/Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf|Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf]]:97:are given as Negligible Concentration (NC) and Maximum Permissible Concentration

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/Additional Documents/Appendix 16.1d  2006-0416 V01 - Scenario 11 hydrodynamics.pdf|Appendix 16.1d  2006-0416 V01 - Scenario 11 hydrodynamics.pdf]]:5:the channel floor. In Tees channel the differences are negligible.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/Additional Documents/3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf|3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf]]:131:exist and the tidal influence is negligible. The long distance upstream of the study area ensures

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/Additional Documents/3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf|3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf]]:155:is seen, a decrease of 0.003 %, which is negligible. The impacts on the hydrodynamic regime

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/Additional Documents/3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf|3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf]]:155:hydrodynamic regime are negligible.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/Additional Documents/3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf|3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf]]:158:is a decrease of 13 %. At Pt 7 Teesport the figure is 0.01 % which is negligible. Again,

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/Additional Documents/3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf|3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf]]:158:negligible.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/Additional Documents/3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf|3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf]]:166:for sand concentrations between the different scenarios are negligible.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/Additional Documents/3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf|3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf]]:187:NC                                Negligible Concentration. Concentration below which the risk of the

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/Additional Documents/3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf|3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf]]:187:                                  ecosystem is considered negligible (/20/).

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/Additional Documents/3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf|3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf]]:187:                                  risk of the ecosystem is considered negligible.

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/Additional Documents/3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf|3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf]]:188:Table 8-2 Maximum Permissible Concentrations (MPC) and Negligible Concentrations

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/Additional Documents/3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf|3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf]]:188:Table 8-3 Maximum Permissible Concentrations (MPC) and Negligible Concentrations

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/Additional Documents/3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf|3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf]]:199:             Permissible Concentrations and Negligible Concentrations for metals, tacking

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/Additional Documents/3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf|3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf]]:210:thresholds are given as Negligible Concentration (NC) and Maximum Permissible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/Additional Documents/3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf|3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf]]:210:thresholds are given as Negligible Concentration (NC) and Maximum Permissible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/Additional Documents/3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf|3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf]]:211:thresholds are given as Negligible Concentration (NC) and Maximum Permissible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/Additional Documents/3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf|3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf]]:211:thresholds are given as Negligible Concentration (NC) and Maximum Permissible

[[this>RiverTees/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/Additional Documents/3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf|3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf]]:212:are given as Negligible Concentration (NC) and Maximum Permissible Concentration

[[this>Teesworks/1911South-Tees-Master-Plan-Nov-19.2.pdf|1911South-Tees-Master-Plan-Nov-19.2.pdf]]:56:                                                                                                                                 have negligible to low potential to support this species.    2.12.9 INVERTEBRATES

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/Consultations/20210119 MLA202000506 Tees South Bank Quay CP advice + JPQC.pdf|20210119 MLA202000506 Tees South Bank Quay CP advice + JPQC.pdf]]:3:    shows a greater number of minor or negligible outcomes relative to more significant categories

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/Consultations/MLA202000506 and MLA202000507  Draft HRA phase 1 and 2.pdf|MLA202000506 and MLA202000507  Draft HRA phase 1 and 2.pdf]]:9:                                                        clarity is likely to be negligible and not sufficient to cause far-field

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/Consultations/MLA202000506 and MLA202000507  Draft HRA phase 1 and 2.pdf|MLA202000506 and MLA202000507  Draft HRA phase 1 and 2.pdf]]:9:                         •    Wigeon                    likely to be negligible and not sufficient to cause far-field effects on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/Consultations/MLA202000506 and MLA202000507  Draft HRA phase 1 and 2.pdf|MLA202000506 and MLA202000507  Draft HRA phase 1 and 2.pdf]]:10:                                                                              changes in hydrodynamics and waves is likely to be negligible and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/Consultations/MLA202000506 and MLA202000507  Draft HRA phase 1 and 2.pdf|MLA202000506 and MLA202000507  Draft HRA phase 1 and 2.pdf]]:13:                                                                                be negligible and not sufficient to cause far-field effects on the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/Consultations/MLA202000506 and MLA202000507  Draft HRA phase 1 and 2.pdf|MLA202000506 and MLA202000507  Draft HRA phase 1 and 2.pdf]]:15:                                                                               The magnitude of changes in is likely to be negligible and not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/Consultations/MLA202000506 and MLA202000507  Draft HRA phase 1 and 2.pdf|MLA202000506 and MLA202000507  Draft HRA phase 1 and 2.pdf]]:19:                                                                  likely to be negligible and not sufficient to cause far-field effects on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/Consultations/MLA202000506 and MLA202000507  Draft HRA  (2).pdf|MLA202000506 and MLA202000507  Draft HRA  (2).pdf]]:9:                                                                              clarity is likely to be negligible and not sufficient to cause far-field

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/Consultations/MLA202000506 and MLA202000507  Draft HRA  (2).pdf|MLA202000506 and MLA202000507  Draft HRA  (2).pdf]]:10:                       •   Sanderling                                       likely to be negligible and not sufficient to cause far-field effects on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/Consultations/MLA202000506 and MLA202000507  Draft HRA  (2).pdf|MLA202000506 and MLA202000507  Draft HRA  (2).pdf]]:10:                                                                            changes in hydrodynamics and waves is likely to be negligible and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/Consultations/MLA202000506 and MLA202000507  Draft HRA  (2).pdf|MLA202000506 and MLA202000507  Draft HRA  (2).pdf]]:13:                                                                                 be negligible and not sufficient to cause far-field effects on the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/Consultations/MLA202000506 and MLA202000507  Draft HRA  (2).pdf|MLA202000506 and MLA202000507  Draft HRA  (2).pdf]]:15:                                                                                 The magnitude of changes is negligible and not sufficient to cause

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/Consultations/MLA202000506 and MLA202000507  Draft HRA  (2).pdf|MLA202000506 and MLA202000507  Draft HRA  (2).pdf]]:19:                                                                                  likely to be negligible and not sufficient to cause far-field effects on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/Consultations/MLA202000506 & MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phases 1&2 UWN advice + JPQC.pdf|MLA202000506 & MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phases 1&2 UWN advice + JPQC.pdf]]:4:    a result of underwater noise has been assessed as negligible and the assessment concludes that no

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/Consultations/MLA202000506 & MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phases 1&2 UWN advice + JPQC.pdf|MLA202000506 & MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phases 1&2 UWN advice + JPQC.pdf]]:4:    periods of time sufficient to cause TTS or PTS. Disturbance has been assessed as negligible, although I

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/Consultations/20210115 MLA202000506 South Bank Quay-phase 1 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf|20210115 MLA202000506 South Bank Quay-phase 1 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf]]:8:    injury and/or temporary threshold shift (TTS) are considered negligible. I defer to Cefas underwater

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/Consultations/MLA202000506 and MLA202000507  Draft HRA.pdf|MLA202000506 and MLA202000507  Draft HRA.pdf]]:9:                                                                   clarity is likely to be negligible and not sufficient to cause far-field

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/Consultations/MLA202000506 and MLA202000507  Draft HRA.pdf|MLA202000506 and MLA202000507  Draft HRA.pdf]]:9:                         •   Lapwing                               likely to be negligible and not sufficient to cause far-field effects on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/Consultations/MLA202000506 and MLA202000507  Draft HRA.pdf|MLA202000506 and MLA202000507  Draft HRA.pdf]]:10:                                                                            changes in hydrodynamics and waves is likely to be negligible and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/Consultations/MLA202000506 and MLA202000507  Draft HRA.pdf|MLA202000506 and MLA202000507  Draft HRA.pdf]]:12:                                                                               be negligible and not sufficient to cause far-field effects on the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/Consultations/MLA202000506 and MLA202000507  Draft HRA.pdf|MLA202000506 and MLA202000507  Draft HRA.pdf]]:15:                                                                                 The magnitude of changes is negligible and not sufficient to cause

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/Consultations/MLA202000506 and MLA202000507  Draft HRA.pdf|MLA202000506 and MLA202000507  Draft HRA.pdf]]:18:                                                  likely to be negligible and not sufficient to cause far-field effects on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:48: High                     Major           Moderate           Moderate               Minor            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:48: Medium                  Moderate         Moderate             Minor                Minor            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:48: Low                      Minor               Minor            Minor              Negligible         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:48: Very low                 Minor           Negligible         Negligible           Negligible         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:48:Whilst mitigation for minor or negligible impacts may not be specifically defined as a matter of course,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:48:recognised that minor and negligible impacts could become significant when considered cumulatively with

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:112:3, the values are so low (<5mg/l) as to be negligible compared with background levels and, in all cases, the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:112:water quality sampling points during Stage 3 of the dredging and only negligible effects for a short duration

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:112:Stages 3 and 4 of the dredging, only negligible effects are noted, equivalent to variations within the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:118:as to be negligible in such a great depth of water in this deep water offshore area).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:122:enhancement is so small in magnitude and spatial extent as to be negligible in such a great depth of water

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:126:is negligible, whilst to the north it covers a similar zone to the sediment plume for this disposal event, which

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:126:0.1cm. Clearly these magnitudes are extremely low within the licenced disposal site, and negligible beyond.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:126:magnitudes, with negligible changes anticipated beyond the boundaries of the site.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:167:is considered to be medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:167:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:167:impact is of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:167:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:168:be medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:168:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:168:considered to be medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:168:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:174:                                                                                    negligible. As there are no designated

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:175:Negligible                             Is generally tolerant of physical or chemical changes

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:177:temporary change, indiscernible   •   negligible change to existing risk of exposure; or

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:178:                           Moderate       Minor            Minor         Negligible     Negligible    Minor         Minor          Moderate

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:178:                           Minor          Negligible       Negligible    Negligible     Negligible    Negligible    Negligible     Minor

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:178:(negligible) impacts as they may contribute to significant impacts cumulatively or through interactions.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:178:Negligible                            Very small changes in receptor condition (adverse or beneficial), which may be raised as local issues

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:180:the geological sensitivity is considered to be negligible. As there are no designated geological sites recorded

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:186:during construction is considered to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:186:No mitigation measures are required and residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:188:overall impact during construction is considered to be of negligible to minor adverse significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:188:negligible to minor adverse significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:189:very low. Thus, the impact to human receptors is of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:189:No additional mitigation measures required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:190:very low and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:212:impact of negligible significance is predicted.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:212:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:214:Given the above, an impact of negligible significance on marine species and habitats is predicted to arise

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:214:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:215:and tidal regime is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:215:No mitigation measures are required, and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:221: Negligible / very

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:234:                                              0.0003 harbour porpoise                    Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:234:                                              0.000003 minke whale                       Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:234: dredging                                     0.00000024 grey seal                       Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:234:                                              0.0000009 harbour seal                     Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:234:The magnitude of the potential impact of PTS as a result of dredging noise is negligible / very low for harbour

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:234:seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.10).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:234:                    Harbour                             Negligible /                                            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:234:                                                                          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:234: Auditory injury                                        Negligible /                                            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:234: (PTS) from         Minke whale                                           Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:234:                                                        Negligible /                        required.           Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:234: SEL during         Grey seal                                             Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:234:                                                        Negligible /                                            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:234:                    Harbour seal                                          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:235:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:236:                                                                                       Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:236:                                              0.000003 minke whale                     Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:236: underwater noise                             0.00000024 grey seal                     Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:236:                                              0.0000009 harbour seal                   Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:236:The magnitude of the potential impact of TTS and fleeing response as a result of dredging noise, is negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:237:whale, grey seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.13).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:237:                   Harbour                         Negligible /                                     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:237:                                                                  Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:237: TTS or fleeing                                    Negligible /                                     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:237: response from     Minke whale                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:237:                                                   Negligible /                    required.        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:237: SEL during        Grey seal                                      Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:237:                                                   Negligible /                                     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:237:                   Harbour seal                                   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:237:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:238:                                                                                      Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:238:                                                                                      Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:238:    dredging (5% of                                                                   Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:238:                                         0.000005 harbour seal                        Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:238:of negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, the impact significance for any

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:238:potential increase in collision risk with vessels during dredging has been assessed as negligible (not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:239:                        Harbour                      Negligible /

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:239:                                      Low                           Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:239: Potential for          Minke                        Negligible /   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:239: collision risk from                                                                       required, other than   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:239: vessels during                                      Negligible /   Negligible             good practice.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:239:                        Harbour                      Negligible /   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:239:The residual impact would be of negligible significance for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:240:The magnitude of the impact of vessel disturbance to seal haul-out sites is defined as negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:240:resulting in an overall impact significance of negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:240:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:240:have a negligible impact on marine mammals.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:240:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:241:                                                                                  Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:241:                                                                                  Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:241: dredge area                                                                      Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:241:                                     0.0001 harbour seal                          Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:241:Taking into account the low receptor sensitivity, the negligible potential magnitude of the impact and the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:241:negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal (Table 10.17).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:241:                     Harbour                      Negligible /

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:241:                                    Low                           Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:241:                     Minke                        Negligible /    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:241: resource in                                                                                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:241:                                                  Negligible /    Negligible             required.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:241:                     Harbour                      Negligible /    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:241:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:242:10.5.1 and 10.5.2). The magnitude of effect in all species is assessed to be negligible / very low based on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:242:maintenance activities has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.10 and Table 10.13).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:242:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:242:10.5.3). The magnitude of effect in all species is assessed to be negligible / very low based on the maximum

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:242:has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.15).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:242:dredging activities. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:242:assessed as negligible (see Section 10.5.4).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:242:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:243:negligible (see Section 10.5.5).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:243:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:243:negligible (see Section 10.5.6).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:243:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:243:established vessel routes. The magnitude of effect in all species is assessed to be negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:243:for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal has been assessed as negligible (Table

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:243:would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:251: Negligible           Commonplace feature of little or no habitat/historical significance. Loss of such a feature would not be seen

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:252: Negligible        of normal natural variation change to the extent        Change is within the normal range of natural variation.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:253:                               High        Medium       Low           Negligible   Negligible   Low          Medium        High

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:253:                               Moderate    Minor        Minor         Negligible   Negligible   Minor        Minor         Moderate

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:253:                  Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:253:                               Minor       Negligible   Negligible    Negligible   Negligible   Negligible   Negligible    Minor

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:260:grassland is concluded as being of negligible ecological value.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:260:negligible ecological value.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:260:scrub habitat is concluded as being of negligible ecological value.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:261:and ruderal habitat is concluded as being of negligible ecological value.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:261:metal structures, which have been assessed as being of negligible value for roosting bats due to the lack of

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:264: Wharf                            Negligible                          No

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:264: Buildings                        Negligible                          No

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:264: Notable Flora                    Negligible                          No

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:264: Badger                           Negligible                          No

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:264: Water vole                       Negligible                          No

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:265: Amphibians                     Negligible                         No

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:265: Reptiles                       Negligible                         No

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:266:impacts to foraging bats are considered to be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:266:included in the CEMP, and with the implementation of such measures, any impacts will be negligible in

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:266:Negligible impacts on water quality are anticipated during construction of the proposed scheme (Section

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:267:time otters are anticipated to spend in the area, an impact of negligible magnitude is anticipated. Given the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:268:assessed to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:268:With the implementation of the above measures, the residual impact is of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:268:be of local (grayling) and (dingy skipper) significance, and negligible importance within the footprint of the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:294:Both had a peak count of two, which represents a negligible proportion of the SPA / Ramsar site populations.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:296:would have a negligible impact on benthic prey species in the intertidal zone so consequent effects on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:298:of the effects of capital dredging and therefore a negligible impact is predicted on the waterbirds relying on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:298:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:301:minor adverse. A residual impact of negligible significance is predicted at the other sensitive intertidal

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:304:and localised disturbance to feeding resources will result in an impact of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:304:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:305:negligible, and any exceedances of the thresholds stated in Cutts et al. (2009) or Wright et al. (2010) would

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:305:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:305:negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:305:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:305:be negligible, therefore any effects on waterbirds and foraging terns would manifest as a direct behavioural

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:306:on foraging / roosting waterbirds and terns is predicted to be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:306:While impacts are anticipated to be negligible, the implication of best practice mitigation measures set out

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:306:water) will further reduce the impact on foraging / roosting waterbirds. The residual impact is negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:306:negligible impact on intertidal benthos (see Section 9.6.2) and would not adversely affect the availability of

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:306:result of hydrodynamic changes would be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:306:No mitigation measures are considered necessary, therefore the residual impact is negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:321:and beyond. The impact is therefore predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:321:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would remain of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:324:considered to be very low, and the significance of the impact is negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:325:Outside the migratory period, there would be a negligible impact on fish movement up- and downstream

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:327:underwater noise of piling activities is therefore considered to have a negligible impact on migration up-

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:327:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact remains negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:328:negligible impact on fish species within the Tees.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:330:the footprint of the works, and even if there was, the number of vessels/fishers affected would be negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:330:and navigation within the Tees estuary is predicted to be negligible, given that works will be co-ordinated

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:330:are predicted to be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:330:remain negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:330:in motorised vessel traffic is therefore considered to have a negligible impact on fish populations or

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:330:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact will remain negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:331:impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:331:impact would be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:336:receptor. The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible significance on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:336:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:336:receptor. The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible significance on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:337:scheme) and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:337:(human health/safety). The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:337:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:338:The impact of the proposed development’s construction traffic is therefore assessed as of negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:338:proposed schemes operational traffic is therefore assessed as negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:338:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:341: MMO Scoping Opinion     negligible and therefore not necessary to be assessed.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:347: Negligible                       Assets with no significant importance or archaeological/historical interest.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:347: Negligible        The asset’s fabric and/or setting is changed in ways which do not materially affect its heritage significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:348: Significance                    High                       Medium                          Low                      Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:348: Low                            Moderate                      Minor                         Minor                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:348: Negligible                      Minor                      Negligible                  Negligible                   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:348: Negligible              No material change to heritage significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:349:these from other non-significant (negligible) impacts as they may contribute to significant impacts

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:370: Negligible / very low                                                                 < 1.0

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:373: 1            69.7               69.8                      0.1                     Very low          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:373: 2            67.8               68.0                      0.2                     Very low          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:373: 3            70.3               70.5                      0.2                     Very low          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:373: 5            76.3               76.4                      0.1                     Very low          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:373:Predicted changes in BNL, displayed in Table 17.10, indicate impacts of negligible significance at worst

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:373:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:375: NSR1                       52.2 - 59.2                            Very low                            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:375:indicating negligible impact at human receptor locations. This is considered not significant and impact is

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:376:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:391: Dust soiling               High Risk                Medium Risk          Medium Risk            Negligible Risk

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:391: Human health               Medium Risk              Low Risk             Low Risk               Negligible Risk

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:391: Ecological effects         Medium Risk              Low Risk             Low Risk               Negligible Risk

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:391:demolition, ‘medium risk’ for earthworks and construction, and ‘negligible risk’ for trackout. The impacts on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:392:earthworks and construction and ‘negligible risk’ for trackout.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:406:the proposed scheme will have negligible influence on this character area and is not considered further..

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:408:industrial context of outward views, it is predicted that the proposed scheme will have negligible influence

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:411:negligible effect on the existing baseline.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:415:of those features will incur a low adverse magnitude of effect and a negligible overall significance of effect.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:415:magnitude and incur a minor negligible adverse significance of effect.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:415:negligible overall significance of effect.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:416:and the wider environs, the overall significance of effect is considered to be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:419:significance of effect in the view is minor negligible adverse and not significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:419:significance of effect in the view is minor negligible adverse. In terms of EIA these effects are not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:419:negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:434:negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:435:As a result, it is concluded that there would be a negligible impact as a result of the proposed scheme.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:435:a potential impact of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:436:effect on a low sensitivity receptor. Overall, a negligible impact is predicted.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:436:residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:444:The socio-economic impacts of the proposed scheme are identified as ‘beneficial’, ‘negligible’ or ‘adverse’

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:444: Negligible                            No obvious significant effect to a receptor or environment.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:444: Negligible                            Where no discernible effect is expected as a result of the proposed scheme on the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:444:                         High                        Medium                    Low                       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:444: High                    Substantial                 Moderate to               Minor to Moderate         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:444: Medium                  Moderate to                 Moderate                  Minor                     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:445: Low                   Minor to Moderate       Minor                    Negligible to Minor    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:445: Negligible            Negligible              Negligible               Negligible             Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:453:supply scenario forecasts only a negligible increase in employment during the plan period.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:455:term) and negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:455:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:458:employment with the AOI and is therefore considered to correspond to a negligible magnitude of change.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:458:a permanent and negligible impact.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:458:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:458:negligible magnitude of change. The receptor is considered to be of medium sensitivity by virtue of the fact

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:459:a permanent and negligible impact.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:459:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:476:that there would be impacts of negligible significance to the only NSR scoped into the assessment.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:476:would be negligible to minor adverse significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:477:noise and air quality disturbance would be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:477:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:477:negligible significance and not significant respectively. In addition, operational phase impacts to human

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:477:health as reported in Section 8 with regard to land quality are considered to be of negligible significance. It

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:477:and land quality would be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:477:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual impact of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:478:long period prior to this the enhancement is so small in magnitude and spatial extent as to be negligible in

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:479:deposition is predicted to be negligible beyond the boundaries of the Tees Bay C disposal site.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:479:that there would be negligible impact on fish or fisheries due to the proposed deposition of dredged material

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:479:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual impact of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:482:negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:482:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:484:operations). Overall, the potential impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:484:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:485:                                                                                          Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:485:                                              0.000003 minke whale                        Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:485: during offshore                              0.00004 grey seal                           Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:485:                                              0.0000003 harbour seal                      Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:486:dredged sediments is negligible / very low for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:486:negligible (Table 26.5).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:486:                   Harbour                         Negligible /                                     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:486: TTS or fleeing                                                   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:486: underwater                                        Negligible /                                     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:486:                   Minke whale                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:486: offshore                                          Negligible /                    required.        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:486: disposal of       Grey seal                                      Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:486: sediments                                         Negligible /                                     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:486:                   Harbour seal                                   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:486:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:487:                                                                                       Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:487: Potential                                                                             Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:487: of dredged                             0.002 grey seal                                Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:487:                                                                                       Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:487:of negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, the impact significance for any

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:487:assessed as negligible (not significant) for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:487:                        Harbour                       Negligible /

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:487:                                       Low                            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:487: increased              Minke                         Negligible /    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:487: vessels during                                                                               required, other than   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:487: offshore disposal                                    Negligible /    Negligible              good practice.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:487: sediments              Harbour                       Negligible /    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:487:would be of negligible significance for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:488:The magnitude of the impact of vessel disturbance to seal haul-out sites is defined as negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:488:This gives an overall impact significance of negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:488:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:488:relied upon solely. Therefore, any increases in suspended sediments will have a negligible impact on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:488:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:489:                                                                                    Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:489:                                                                                    Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:489: offshore disposal                    0.04 grey seal                                Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:489:                                                                                    Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:489:Taking into account the low receptor sensitivity, the negligible potential magnitude of the impact and the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:489:negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal (Table 26.9).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:489:                      Harbour                      Negligible /

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:489:                                     Low                           Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:489: Changes to prey      Minke                        Negligible /    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:489:                                                                                                                  Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:489: offshore disposal                                 Negligible /    Negligible              required.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:489:                      Harbour                      Negligible /    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:489:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:507:cumulative impact is predicted to be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:509:                                                                                             Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:509:                                                                                             Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:509: approach channel and Anglo                                                                  Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:509:                                                                                             Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:509:                                                                                             Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:509: Hartlepool approach                                                                         Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:510:                                                                                              Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:510:                                                                                              Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:510:                                                                                              Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:510:                                                                                              Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:510: Hartlepool approach                                                                          Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:510:                                                                                              Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:510:Harbour Facilities schemes, is negligible / very low for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:510:harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as negligible (Table 27.5).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:511:cumulative underwater noise impacts. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:511: TTS or fleeing    Harbour                        Negligible /

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:511: response from                                                   Negligible                         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:511: dredging at the                                  Negligible /

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:511:                   Minke whale                                   Negligible                         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:511: Hartlepool                                       Negligible /

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:511: approach          Grey seal                                     Negligible                         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:511: Harbour                                          Negligible /

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:511:                   Harbour seal                                  Negligible                         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:513:on waterbirds at North Tees Mudflat, and negligible impact further downstream (including at Vopak

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:514:supporting habitat was considered a negligible impact in the EIAs for both the Anglo American Harbour

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:514:(even in combination) would have a negligible impact, the cumulative effect with the proposed scheme would

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:515:driving activities (see Section 13.5.3 and 13.5.4). While there is anticipated to be negligible impact from

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:516:works, but the potential cumulative impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:516:impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:516:acceptable (from a navigation risk perspective), with all risks classified as negligible or low, with the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:516:impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:516:The primary assessment identifies that the proposed schemes traffic demand would result in a negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:517:with the proposed scheme are considered not significant and indicate negligible impact, at worst. Therefore,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:521:concludes that the disposal of dredged material will have a negligible impact on fisheries, marine ecology

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:521:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual cumulative impact of negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:568: Lianhetech, Seal Sands   Proposed new buildings, plant upgrade, swale and associated       Approximately   Planning permission     / Ramsar site would be negligible. On this basis,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:576:greater than approximately 200m from source (see Appendix 8). There would be negligible effects on fish

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:578:would be negligible, therefore any effects on SPA / Ramsar site features would manifest as a direct

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf]]:584:negligible effect on feeding resources for terns. When this is considered alongside the localised increase

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-34.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-34.pdf]]:2:locations across the disposal site, at relatively low magnitudes, with negligible changes anticipated beyond

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-34.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-34.pdf]]:11:     •         The reductions in baseline peak currents are negligible, typically less than 0.01m/s, and never

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/19Neurotoxicity of Polychlorinated Biphenyls and Related Organohalogens - nihms-1526851.pdf|19Neurotoxicity of Polychlorinated Biphenyls and Related Organohalogens - nihms-1526851.pdf]]:35:                                    whereas non-coplanar PCBs with one or more ortho chlorine substitution have negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-25.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-25.pdf]]:2:locations across the disposal site, at relatively low magnitudes, with negligible changes anticipated beyond

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-25.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-25.pdf]]:11:     •         The reductions in baseline peak currents are negligible, typically less than 0.01m/s, and never

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-EN-SB-ME-EV-1144-MLA.2022.00506.2 South Bank Quay FIR 20 Response.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-EN-SB-ME-EV-1144-MLA.2022.00506.2 South Bank Quay FIR 20 Response.pdf]]:6:variation are sufficiently negligible”. I note from recent advice by Cefas Coastal Processes advisors

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf]]:26:to the west and east of the disposal site is negligible, whilst to the south and north covers a similar zone to

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf]]:4:changes are sufficiently negligible for the conclusions of the EIA to remain valid, it would be useful to understand what proportion of this

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf]]:4:within the original EIA, in order for me to determine whether impacts from the proposed variation are sufficiently negligible. Please note that I

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf]]:5:determining whether impacts to fish receptors from the latest proposed variation are sufficiently negligible, it would be helpful if the Applicant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf]]:6:to determine whether impacts from the proposed variation are sufficiently negligible. It would also be beneficial to fully understand how the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf]]:8: would be negligible. The degree to which the increase in amount of material disposed at sea would affect shellfisheries is unclear and would

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf]]:28:receptors from increased suspended sediments remains at negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf]]:28:the EIA Report (which was assessed as negligible significance).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf]]:34:                                                                                                The negligible impact significant reported in the EIA Report was based on the fact that mobile individuals would

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf]]:34:                         Negligible            Negligible            Negligible                 scope of the supplementary surveys reported in Section 4.2 and 4.3 was agreed with the Environment Agency

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf]]:34:from dredging and        (dredging);           (dredging); negligible (dredging); negligible    4.2 and 4.3 confirms that the dominant species present in the Tees estuary remain unchanged to those reported

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf]]:34:land-based piling        negligible (piling)   (piling)               (piling)                  in the EIA Report. It is therefore concluded that there is no reason to amend the significance of this potential

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf]]:34:from increased           Negligible            Negligible            Negligible                 The findings of site-specific surveys presented in Section 4.2 and 4.3 reaffirmed the baseline data that was

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf]]:34:                         Negligible            Negligible            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf]]:42:Effects of deposition                                               it was concluded that there would be a negligible impact on food resources. Whilst the data from surveys presented in Section 5.2

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf]]:42:on intertidal food    Negligible     Negligible    Negligible       provide evidence that the North Tees Mudflat offers foraging opportunities for a substantial number of waterbirds, this would have no

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf]]:42:                                                                    It is therefore concluded that the negligible significance impact reported in the EIA Report remains valid.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf]]:43:Noise disturbances      Negligible   Negligible   Negligible      Mudflat supports a number of wintering waterbirds.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf]]:43:increased vessel        Negligible   Negligible   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf]]:43:                                                                  The negligible impact significance detailed in the EIA Report was based around the fact that the habitats at South Bank are of low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf]]:43:                        Negligible   Negligible   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf]]:43:                                                                  Given the above, the negligible impact significance reported in the EIA Report remains valid.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf]]:43:                        Negligible   Negligible   Negligible      impacts to intertidal habitat. Given that all assessments were based on the assumption that the North Tees Mudflat supports non-

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf]]:43:                                                                  breeding waterbirds, the negligible impact significance detailed in the EIA Report remains valid.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_Cefas_comments_for_action_RFI_19.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_Cefas_comments_for_action_RFI_19.pdf]]:3:    me to determine whether impacts from the proposed variation are sufficiently negligible”. I note

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:48: High                     Major           Moderate           Moderate               Minor            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:48: Medium                  Moderate         Moderate             Minor                Minor            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:48: Low                      Minor               Minor            Minor              Negligible         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:48: Very low                 Minor           Negligible         Negligible           Negligible         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:48:Whilst mitigation for minor or negligible impacts may not be specifically defined as a matter of course,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:48:recognised that minor and negligible impacts could become significant when considered cumulatively with

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:112:3, the values are so low (<5mg/l) as to be negligible compared with background levels and, in all cases, the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:112:water quality sampling points during Stage 3 of the dredging and only negligible effects for a short duration

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:112:Stages 3 and 4 of the dredging, only negligible effects are noted, equivalent to variations within the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:118:as to be negligible in such a great depth of water in this deep water offshore area).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:122:enhancement is so small in magnitude and spatial extent as to be negligible in such a great depth of water

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:126:is negligible, whilst to the north it covers a similar zone to the sediment plume for this disposal event, which

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:126:0.1cm. Clearly these magnitudes are extremely low within the licenced disposal site, and negligible beyond.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:126:magnitudes, with negligible changes anticipated beyond the boundaries of the site.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:167:is considered to be medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:167:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:167:impact is of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:167:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:168:be medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:168:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:168:considered to be medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:168:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:174:                                                                                    negligible. As there are no designated

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:175:Negligible                             Is generally tolerant of physical or chemical changes

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:177:temporary change, indiscernible   •   negligible change to existing risk of exposure; or

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:178:                           Moderate       Minor            Minor         Negligible     Negligible    Minor         Minor          Moderate

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:178:                           Minor          Negligible       Negligible    Negligible     Negligible    Negligible    Negligible     Minor

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:178:(negligible) impacts as they may contribute to significant impacts cumulatively or through interactions.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:178:Negligible                            Very small changes in receptor condition (adverse or beneficial), which may be raised as local issues

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:180:the geological sensitivity is considered to be negligible. As there are no designated geological sites recorded

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:186:during construction is considered to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:186:No mitigation measures are required and residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:188:overall impact during construction is considered to be of negligible to minor adverse significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:188:negligible to minor adverse significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:189:very low. Thus, the impact to human receptors is of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:189:No additional mitigation measures required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:190:very low and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:212:impact of negligible significance is predicted.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:212:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:214:Given the above, an impact of negligible significance on marine species and habitats is predicted to arise

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:214:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:215:and tidal regime is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:215:No mitigation measures are required, and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:221: Negligible / very

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:234:                                              0.0003 harbour porpoise                    Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:234:                                              0.000003 minke whale                       Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:234: dredging                                     0.00000024 grey seal                       Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:234:                                              0.0000009 harbour seal                     Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:234:The magnitude of the potential impact of PTS as a result of dredging noise is negligible / very low for harbour

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:234:seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.10).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:234:                    Harbour                             Negligible /                                            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:234:                                                                          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:234: Auditory injury                                        Negligible /                                            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:234: (PTS) from         Minke whale                                           Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:234:                                                        Negligible /                        required.           Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:234: SEL during         Grey seal                                             Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:234:                                                        Negligible /                                            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:234:                    Harbour seal                                          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:235:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:236:                                                                                       Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:236:                                              0.000003 minke whale                     Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:236: underwater noise                             0.00000024 grey seal                     Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:236:                                              0.0000009 harbour seal                   Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:236:The magnitude of the potential impact of TTS and fleeing response as a result of dredging noise, is negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:237:whale, grey seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.13).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:237:                   Harbour                         Negligible /                                     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:237:                                                                  Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:237: TTS or fleeing                                    Negligible /                                     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:237: response from     Minke whale                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:237:                                                   Negligible /                    required.        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:237: SEL during        Grey seal                                      Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:237:                                                   Negligible /                                     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:237:                   Harbour seal                                   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:237:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:238:                                                                                      Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:238:                                                                                      Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:238:    dredging (5% of                                                                   Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:238:                                         0.000005 harbour seal                        Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:238:of negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, the impact significance for any

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:238:potential increase in collision risk with vessels during dredging has been assessed as negligible (not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:239:                        Harbour                      Negligible /

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:239:                                      Low                           Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:239: Potential for          Minke                        Negligible /   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:239: collision risk from                                                                       required, other than   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:239: vessels during                                      Negligible /   Negligible             good practice.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:239:                        Harbour                      Negligible /   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:239:The residual impact would be of negligible significance for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:240:The magnitude of the impact of vessel disturbance to seal haul-out sites is defined as negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:240:resulting in an overall impact significance of negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:240:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:240:have a negligible impact on marine mammals.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:240:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:241:                                                                                  Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:241:                                                                                  Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:241: dredge area                                                                      Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:241:                                     0.0001 harbour seal                          Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:241:Taking into account the low receptor sensitivity, the negligible potential magnitude of the impact and the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:241:negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal (Table 10.17).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:241:                     Harbour                      Negligible /

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:241:                                    Low                           Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:241:                     Minke                        Negligible /    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:241: resource in                                                                                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:241:                                                  Negligible /    Negligible             required.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:241:                     Harbour                      Negligible /    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:241:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:242:10.5.1 and 10.5.2). The magnitude of effect in all species is assessed to be negligible / very low based on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:242:maintenance activities has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.10 and Table 10.13).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:242:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:242:10.5.3). The magnitude of effect in all species is assessed to be negligible / very low based on the maximum

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:242:has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.15).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:242:dredging activities. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:242:assessed as negligible (see Section 10.5.4).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:242:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:243:negligible (see Section 10.5.5).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:243:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:243:negligible (see Section 10.5.6).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:243:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:243:established vessel routes. The magnitude of effect in all species is assessed to be negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:243:for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal has been assessed as negligible (Table

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:243:would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:251: Negligible           Commonplace feature of little or no habitat/historical significance. Loss of such a feature would not be seen

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:252: Negligible        of normal natural variation change to the extent        Change is within the normal range of natural variation.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:253:                               High        Medium       Low           Negligible   Negligible   Low          Medium        High

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:253:                               Moderate    Minor        Minor         Negligible   Negligible   Minor        Minor         Moderate

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:253:                  Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:253:                               Minor       Negligible   Negligible    Negligible   Negligible   Negligible   Negligible    Minor

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:260:grassland is concluded as being of negligible ecological value.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:260:negligible ecological value.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:260:scrub habitat is concluded as being of negligible ecological value.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:261:and ruderal habitat is concluded as being of negligible ecological value.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:261:metal structures, which have been assessed as being of negligible value for roosting bats due to the lack of

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:264: Wharf                            Negligible                          No

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:264: Buildings                        Negligible                          No

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:264: Notable Flora                    Negligible                          No

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:264: Badger                           Negligible                          No

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:264: Water vole                       Negligible                          No

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:265: Amphibians                     Negligible                         No

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:265: Reptiles                       Negligible                         No

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:266:impacts to foraging bats are considered to be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:266:included in the CEMP, and with the implementation of such measures, any impacts will be negligible in

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:266:Negligible impacts on water quality are anticipated during construction of the proposed scheme (Section

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:267:time otters are anticipated to spend in the area, an impact of negligible magnitude is anticipated. Given the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:268:assessed to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:268:With the implementation of the above measures, the residual impact is of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:268:be of local (grayling) and (dingy skipper) significance, and negligible importance within the footprint of the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:294:Both had a peak count of two, which represents a negligible proportion of the SPA / Ramsar site populations.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:296:would have a negligible impact on benthic prey species in the intertidal zone so consequent effects on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:298:of the effects of capital dredging and therefore a negligible impact is predicted on the waterbirds relying on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:298:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:301:minor adverse. A residual impact of negligible significance is predicted at the other sensitive intertidal

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:304:and localised disturbance to feeding resources will result in an impact of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:304:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:305:negligible, and any exceedances of the thresholds stated in Cutts et al. (2009) or Wright et al. (2010) would

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:305:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:305:negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:305:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:305:be negligible, therefore any effects on waterbirds and foraging terns would manifest as a direct behavioural

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:306:on foraging / roosting waterbirds and terns is predicted to be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:306:While impacts are anticipated to be negligible, the implication of best practice mitigation measures set out

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:306:water) will further reduce the impact on foraging / roosting waterbirds. The residual impact is negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:306:negligible impact on intertidal benthos (see Section 9.6.2) and would not adversely affect the availability of

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:306:result of hydrodynamic changes would be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:306:No mitigation measures are considered necessary, therefore the residual impact is negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:321:and beyond. The impact is therefore predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:321:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would remain of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:324:considered to be very low, and the significance of the impact is negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:325:Outside the migratory period, there would be a negligible impact on fish movement up- and downstream

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:327:underwater noise of piling activities is therefore considered to have a negligible impact on migration up-

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:327:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact remains negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:328:negligible impact on fish species within the Tees.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:330:the footprint of the works, and even if there was, the number of vessels/fishers affected would be negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:330:and navigation within the Tees estuary is predicted to be negligible, given that works will be co-ordinated

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:330:are predicted to be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:330:remain negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:330:in motorised vessel traffic is therefore considered to have a negligible impact on fish populations or

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:330:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact will remain negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:331:impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:331:impact would be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:336:receptor. The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible significance on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:336:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:336:receptor. The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible significance on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:337:scheme) and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:337:(human health/safety). The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:337:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:338:The impact of the proposed development’s construction traffic is therefore assessed as of negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:338:proposed schemes operational traffic is therefore assessed as negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:338:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:341: MMO Scoping Opinion     negligible and therefore not necessary to be assessed.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:347: Negligible                       Assets with no significant importance or archaeological/historical interest.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:347: Negligible        The asset’s fabric and/or setting is changed in ways which do not materially affect its heritage significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:348: Significance                    High                       Medium                          Low                      Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:348: Low                            Moderate                      Minor                         Minor                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:348: Negligible                      Minor                      Negligible                  Negligible                   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:348: Negligible              No material change to heritage significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:349:these from other non-significant (negligible) impacts as they may contribute to significant impacts

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:370: Negligible / very low                                                                 < 1.0

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:373: 1            69.7               69.8                      0.1                     Very low          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:373: 2            67.8               68.0                      0.2                     Very low          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:373: 3            70.3               70.5                      0.2                     Very low          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:373: 5            76.3               76.4                      0.1                     Very low          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:373:Predicted changes in BNL, displayed in Table 17.10, indicate impacts of negligible significance at worst

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:373:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:375: NSR1                       52.2 - 59.2                            Very low                            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:375:indicating negligible impact at human receptor locations. This is considered not significant and impact is

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:376:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:391: Dust soiling               High Risk                Medium Risk          Medium Risk            Negligible Risk

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:391: Human health               Medium Risk              Low Risk             Low Risk               Negligible Risk

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:391: Ecological effects         Medium Risk              Low Risk             Low Risk               Negligible Risk

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:391:demolition, ‘medium risk’ for earthworks and construction, and ‘negligible risk’ for trackout. The impacts on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:392:earthworks and construction and ‘negligible risk’ for trackout.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:406:the proposed scheme will have negligible influence on this character area and is not considered further..

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:408:industrial context of outward views, it is predicted that the proposed scheme will have negligible influence

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:411:negligible effect on the existing baseline.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:415:of those features will incur a low adverse magnitude of effect and a negligible overall significance of effect.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:415:magnitude and incur a minor negligible adverse significance of effect.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:415:negligible overall significance of effect.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:416:and the wider environs, the overall significance of effect is considered to be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:419:significance of effect in the view is minor negligible adverse and not significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:419:significance of effect in the view is minor negligible adverse. In terms of EIA these effects are not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:419:negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:434:negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:435:As a result, it is concluded that there would be a negligible impact as a result of the proposed scheme.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:435:a potential impact of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:436:effect on a low sensitivity receptor. Overall, a negligible impact is predicted.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:436:residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:444:The socio-economic impacts of the proposed scheme are identified as ‘beneficial’, ‘negligible’ or ‘adverse’

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:444: Negligible                            No obvious significant effect to a receptor or environment.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:444: Negligible                            Where no discernible effect is expected as a result of the proposed scheme on the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:444:                         High                        Medium                    Low                       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:444: High                    Substantial                 Moderate to               Minor to Moderate         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:444: Medium                  Moderate to                 Moderate                  Minor                     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:445: Low                   Minor to Moderate       Minor                    Negligible to Minor    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:445: Negligible            Negligible              Negligible               Negligible             Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:453:supply scenario forecasts only a negligible increase in employment during the plan period.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:455:term) and negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:455:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:458:employment with the AOI and is therefore considered to correspond to a negligible magnitude of change.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:458:a permanent and negligible impact.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:458:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:458:negligible magnitude of change. The receptor is considered to be of medium sensitivity by virtue of the fact

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:459:a permanent and negligible impact.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:459:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:476:that there would be impacts of negligible significance to the only NSR scoped into the assessment.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:476:would be negligible to minor adverse significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:477:noise and air quality disturbance would be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:477:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:477:negligible significance and not significant respectively. In addition, operational phase impacts to human

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:477:health as reported in Section 8 with regard to land quality are considered to be of negligible significance. It

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:477:and land quality would be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:477:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual impact of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:478:long period prior to this the enhancement is so small in magnitude and spatial extent as to be negligible in

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:479:deposition is predicted to be negligible beyond the boundaries of the Tees Bay C disposal site.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:479:that there would be negligible impact on fish or fisheries due to the proposed deposition of dredged material

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:479:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual impact of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:482:negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:482:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:484:operations). Overall, the potential impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:484:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:485:                                                                                          Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:485:                                              0.000003 minke whale                        Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:485: during offshore                              0.00004 grey seal                           Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:485:                                              0.0000003 harbour seal                      Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:486:dredged sediments is negligible / very low for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:486:negligible (Table 26.5).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:486:                   Harbour                         Negligible /                                     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:486: TTS or fleeing                                                   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:486: underwater                                        Negligible /                                     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:486:                   Minke whale                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:486: offshore                                          Negligible /                    required.        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:486: disposal of       Grey seal                                      Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:486: sediments                                         Negligible /                                     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:486:                   Harbour seal                                   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:486:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:487:                                                                                       Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:487: Potential                                                                             Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:487: of dredged                             0.002 grey seal                                Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:487:                                                                                       Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:487:of negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, the impact significance for any

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:487:assessed as negligible (not significant) for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:487:                        Harbour                       Negligible /

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:487:                                       Low                            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:487: increased              Minke                         Negligible /    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:487: vessels during                                                                               required, other than   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:487: offshore disposal                                    Negligible /    Negligible              good practice.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:487: sediments              Harbour                       Negligible /    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:487:would be of negligible significance for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:488:The magnitude of the impact of vessel disturbance to seal haul-out sites is defined as negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:488:This gives an overall impact significance of negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:488:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:488:relied upon solely. Therefore, any increases in suspended sediments will have a negligible impact on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:488:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:489:                                                                                    Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:489:                                                                                    Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:489: offshore disposal                    0.04 grey seal                                Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:489:                                                                                    Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:489:Taking into account the low receptor sensitivity, the negligible potential magnitude of the impact and the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:489:negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal (Table 26.9).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:489:                      Harbour                      Negligible /

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:489:                                     Low                           Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:489: Changes to prey      Minke                        Negligible /    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:489:                                                                                                                  Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:489: offshore disposal                                 Negligible /    Negligible              required.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:489:                      Harbour                      Negligible /    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:489:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:507:cumulative impact is predicted to be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:509:                                                                                             Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:509:                                                                                             Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:509: approach channel and Anglo                                                                  Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:509:                                                                                             Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:509:                                                                                             Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:509: Hartlepool approach                                                                         Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:510:                                                                                              Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:510:                                                                                              Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:510:                                                                                              Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:510:                                                                                              Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:510: Hartlepool approach                                                                          Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:510:                                                                                              Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:510:Harbour Facilities schemes, is negligible / very low for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:510:harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as negligible (Table 27.5).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:511:cumulative underwater noise impacts. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:511: TTS or fleeing    Harbour                        Negligible /

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:511: response from                                                   Negligible                         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:511: dredging at the                                  Negligible /

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:511:                   Minke whale                                   Negligible                         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:511: Hartlepool                                       Negligible /

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:511: approach          Grey seal                                     Negligible                         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:511: Harbour                                          Negligible /

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:511:                   Harbour seal                                  Negligible                         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:513:on waterbirds at North Tees Mudflat, and negligible impact further downstream (including at Vopak

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:514:supporting habitat was considered a negligible impact in the EIAs for both the Anglo American Harbour

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:514:(even in combination) would have a negligible impact, the cumulative effect with the proposed scheme would

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:515:driving activities (see Section 13.5.3 and 13.5.4). While there is anticipated to be negligible impact from

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:516:works, but the potential cumulative impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:516:impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:516:acceptable (from a navigation risk perspective), with all risks classified as negligible or low, with the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:516:impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:516:The primary assessment identifies that the proposed schemes traffic demand would result in a negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:517:with the proposed scheme are considered not significant and indicate negligible impact, at worst. Therefore,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:521:concludes that the disposal of dredged material will have a negligible impact on fisheries, marine ecology

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:521:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual cumulative impact of negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:568: Lianhetech, Seal Sands   Proposed new buildings, plant upgrade, swale and associated       Approximately   Planning permission     / Ramsar site would be negligible. On this basis,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:576:greater than approximately 200m from source (see Appendix 8). There would be negligible effects on fish

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:578:would be negligible, therefore any effects on SPA / Ramsar site features would manifest as a direct

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:584:negligible effect on feeding resources for terns. When this is considered alongside the localised increase

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf]]:15:effect of negligible significance with regard to increased suspended sediment concentrations. Therefore,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf]]:15:concluding a negligible significant effect.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf]]:15:Even without mitigation, the EIA Report concludes a negligible significance regarding the smothering of

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf]]:16:remains negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf]]:16:In light of the above, an effect of negligible significance on marine species and habitats is predicted to

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf]]:17: Benthic                                Negligible                                         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf]]:17:             Effects of smothering      Negligible                                         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf]]:17:                    Effects of increased SSC                       Negligible                 Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf]]:17:                    Effects of smothering                          Negligible                 Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf]]:56:to the west and east of the disposal site is negligible, whilst to the south and north covers a similar zone to

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507  Final HRA .pdf|MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507  Final HRA .pdf]]:9:                                                                   clarity is likely to be negligible and not sufficient to cause far-field

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507  Final HRA .pdf|MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507  Final HRA .pdf]]:9:                         •   Lapwing                               likely to be negligible and not sufficient to cause far-field effects on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507  Final HRA .pdf|MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507  Final HRA .pdf]]:10:                                                                            changes in hydrodynamics and waves is likely to be negligible and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507  Final HRA .pdf|MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507  Final HRA .pdf]]:12:                                                                               be negligible and not sufficient to cause far-field effects on the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507  Final HRA .pdf|MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507  Final HRA .pdf]]:15:                                                                                 The magnitude of changes is negligible and not sufficient to cause

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507  Final HRA .pdf|MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507  Final HRA .pdf]]:18:                                                  likely to be negligible and not sufficient to cause far-field effects on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf]]:13:dredged material is predicted to have a negligible impact on fisheries, marine ecology

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf]]:13:No significant residual impacts are predicted. A worst case residual impact of negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf]]:13:It is concluded that the impact during the construction phase of the proposed scheme would be of negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf]]:13:are minor beneficial to controlled waters and negligible to human health.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf]]:13:with maintenance dredging. All operational phase impacts are predicted to be of negligible significance,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf]]:14:to marine mammals from dredging has been assessed as negligible. The assessment has concluded

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf]]:14:impacts of negligible significance to all marine mammals with regard to potential for temporary auditory

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf]]:14:movements in the area. A worst-case impact of negligible significance (not significant) is predicted.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf]]:15:Tees, and is therefore expected to have a negligible effect on fish. The removal of the existing wharf

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf]]:16:negligible impacts on both resident and migratory fish. Disturbance during the operational phase, either as

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf]]:16:a result of vessel calls to the new quay or the use of quayside lighting, is predicted to have a negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf]]:16:required by International Regulations to allow safe navigation. An impact of negligible significance on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf]]:16:determined to have minimal effect on the existing navigation profile. An impact of negligible significance is

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf]]:16:Environmental Assessment of Road Traffic), the impact is considered to be negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf]]:18:construction phase noise levels at the South Tees Business Parks would be negligible. No mitigation

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf]]:19:assessed as being permanent and negligible. No mitigation measures during the operational phase are

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf]]:20:disturbance and reductions in air quality are considered to be negligible during construction and operation.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf]]:20:It is therefore concluded that impacts to human health would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf]]:20:is predicted to have a negligible impact on fisheries, marine ecology and marine mammals, and no impact

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf]]:56:                          likely to be negligible and therefore not necessary to be assessed.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf]]:208:Deposition to the west and east of the disposal site is negligible, whilst to the south and north covers a

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf]]:260:     •     negligible ground dissolution.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf]]:284:                                                                                                                buildings is negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:173:representing the final risk score for each hazard, between 0 (negligible) and 10 (high) (see Annex A),

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:173:Hazard risk scores were categorised as either negligible, low, As Low as Reasonably Practicable

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:173:              Negligible       The risk is acceptable and at level where operational safety is unaffected.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:174:construction phase was ‘Contact: Navigation Buoy’ which was scored as 0.72; negligible, driven by its

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:174:                      Negligible              Low                 ALARP             Significant      High

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:176:0.5; negligible, driven by its low consequence.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:176:                       Negligible              Low              ALARP             Significant   High

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:179:be acceptable with all scoring Negligible or Low, with the exception of the impact on ship contact risk,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:180:                                                      Unlikely          Minor           Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:180:                                                      Unlikely          Minor           Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:187:is extremely remote and consequence insignificant such that a risk can be said to be negligible. At the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:190: 1     Negligible           Negligible         Negligible                               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:192:    0 – 1.99               Negligible Risk           A level where operational safety is unaffected.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:192:the final risk score for each hazard, between 0 (negligible) and 10 (high) following which, the final risk

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:192:Hazard risk scores are categorised as either negligible, low, As Low as Reasonably Practicable (ALARP),

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:293:is ‘negligible’.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:296: Low                                  Medium Risk                    Low Risk                          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:296: Low                                    Low Risk                     Low Risk                          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:297: Low                                   Low Risk                  Low Risk                        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:297: Low                                  Medium Risk                Low Risk                        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:299:                             lower sections of proposed quayside features, although the change in the view will be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:301:Significance of Effect       Medium sensitivity x Low magnitude of effect = Minor negligible significance of effect.                                       Minor            Minor

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:301:                             Effects will be permanent during the operation of the proposed quayside and its use in support of the renewable energy        Negligible       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:304:                              Effects will be permanent during the operation of the proposed quayside and its use in support of the renewable energy          negligible     negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:305:                             Effects will be permanent during the operation of the proposed quayside and its use in support of the renewable energy        negligible      negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:306:Significance of Effect       Low sensitivity x Low medium magnitude of effect = Minor negligible significance of effect.                                   Minor              Minor

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:306:                             Effects will be permanent during the operation of the proposed quayside and its use in support of the renewable energy        Negligible         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:307:                              Future baseline: development of the SIZ landside site and associated large scale buildings will have negligible effect on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:308:Significance of Effect       Low sensitivity x Low magnitude of effect = Negligible significance of effect.                                                  Negligible         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:309:                             sections of cranes and stored components, although have negligible beneficial effects to views of taller proposed

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:310:                              Future baseline: development of the SIZ landside site and associated large scale buildings will have negligible effect on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:316:particular development is categorised as high, medium, low or negligible. In accordance with the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:316: Negligible        Size and/or scale: the extent and relative proportion of the existing landscape

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:319: Negligible      Size and Scale

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:320:receptor (high, medium to low) with the magnitude of effect (high to negligible). The evaluation is

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:320: Low medium               Minor negligible effect    Minor effect              Minor moderate effect

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:320: Low                      Negligible effect          Minor negligible effect   Minor effect

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:320: Negligible               Negligible effect          Negligible effect         Minor negligible effect

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf]]:28:receptors from increased suspended sediments remains at negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf]]:28:the EIA Report (which was assessed as negligible significance).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf]]:34:                                                                                                The negligible impact significant reported in the EIA Report was based on the fact that mobile individuals would

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf]]:34:                         Negligible            Negligible            Negligible                 scope of the supplementary surveys reported in Section 4.2 and 4.3 was agreed with the Environment Agency

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf]]:34:from dredging and        (dredging);           (dredging); negligible (dredging); negligible    4.2 and 4.3 confirms that the dominant species present in the Tees estuary remain unchanged to those reported

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf]]:34:land-based piling        negligible (piling)   (piling)               (piling)                  in the EIA Report. It is therefore concluded that there is no reason to amend the significance of this potential

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf]]:34:from increased           Negligible            Negligible            Negligible                 The findings of site-specific surveys presented in Section 4.2 and 4.3 reaffirmed the baseline data that was

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf]]:34:                         Negligible            Negligible            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf]]:42:Effects of deposition                                               it was concluded that there would be a negligible impact on food resources. Whilst the data from surveys presented in Section 5.2

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf]]:42:on intertidal food    Negligible     Negligible    Negligible       provide evidence that the North Tees Mudflat offers foraging opportunities for a substantial number of waterbirds, this would have no

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf]]:42:                                                                    It is therefore concluded that the negligible significance impact reported in the EIA Report remains valid.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf]]:43:Noise disturbances      Negligible   Negligible   Negligible      Mudflat supports a number of wintering waterbirds.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf]]:43:increased vessel        Negligible   Negligible   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf]]:43:                                                                  The negligible impact significance detailed in the EIA Report was based around the fact that the habitats at South Bank are of low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf]]:43:                        Negligible   Negligible   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf]]:43:                                                                  Given the above, the negligible impact significance reported in the EIA Report remains valid.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf]]:43:                        Negligible   Negligible   Negligible      impacts to intertidal habitat. Given that all assessments were based on the assumption that the North Tees Mudflat supports non-

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf|MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf]]:43:                                                                  breeding waterbirds, the negligible impact significance detailed in the EIA Report remains valid.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0754-FFM/R-2021-0754-FFM-INCA2021-67 South Bank access road - Ecology report.pdf|R-2021-0754-FFM-INCA2021-67 South Bank access road - Ecology report.pdf]]:4:location and is of negligible ecological value. A further area of approximately 0.1ha of neutral

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0754-FFM/R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf|R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf]]:9:                •     Negligible – effects which are unlikely to be perceptible to drivers, bus passengers or those

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0754-FFM/R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf|R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf]]:9:                •     Negligible – effects which are unlikely to be perceptible and within the normal variation of

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0754-FFM/R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf|R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf]]:19:                                      Medium         non-motorised users to cross at the                 Minor        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0754-FFM/R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf|R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf]]:19:                                        High                                                           Negligible     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0754-FFM/R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf|R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf]]:20:                       therefore considered to be negligible;

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0754-FFM/R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf|R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf]]:20:                       negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0754-FFM/R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf|R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf]]:20:                safety is expected to be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0754-FFM/R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf|R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf]]:21:                be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0754-FFM/R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf|R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf]]:25:                  A1085 Trunk            Minor adverse        Travel Planning measures, alongside a Servicing       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0754-FFM/R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf|R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf]]:25:                  A66/Normanby           Minor adverse        Travel Planning measures to be introduced to          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0754-FFM/R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf|R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf]]:27:                  A66/Tees Dock          Negligible effect on   None required                           Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0754-FFM/R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf|R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf]]:28:                  A1085 Trunk            Minor adverse          Travel Planning measures, alongside   Negligible - the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0754-FFM/R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf|R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf]]:28:                  A1053                  Negligible effect on   None required                         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0754-FFM/R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf|R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf]]:28:                  A66/Old Station        Negligible effect on   None required                         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0754-FFM/R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf|R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf]]:28:                  A66/Normanby           Minor adverse          Travel Planning measures to be        Negligible - the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0754-FFM/R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf|R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf]]:28:                  A66/Eston              Negligible effect on   None required                         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0754-FFM/R-2021-0754-FFM-63455 01 LM Wind Access Road - Cover Letter 18.08.21.pdf|R-2021-0754-FFM-63455 01 LM Wind Access Road - Cover Letter 18.08.21.pdf]]:2:would be negligible and kept to a minimum.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0754-FFM/R-2021-0754-FFM-63455 01 LM Wind Access Road - Cover Letter 18.08.21.pdf|R-2021-0754-FFM-63455 01 LM Wind Access Road - Cover Letter 18.08.21.pdf]]:3:negligible impact and would not affect the conclusions of the aforementioned environmental statement.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0754-FFM/R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Supplementary Environmental Statement September 2020 Volume 3 Technical Appendices Section 3 Transport.PDF|R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Supplementary Environmental Statement September 2020 Volume 3 Technical Appendices Section 3 Transport.PDF]]:183:                       development is negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0754-FFM/R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Supplementary Environmental Statement September 2020 Volume 3 Technical Appendices Section 3 Transport.PDF|R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Supplementary Environmental Statement September 2020 Volume 3 Technical Appendices Section 3 Transport.PDF]]:193:                       negligible, and the results show that the network, overall, would likely operate

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2022_00248/Additional Documents/Environmental Statement, Chapter G Water Management and Flooding Section 7 Residual effects.pdf|Environmental Statement, Chapter G Water Management and Flooding Section 7 Residual effects.pdf]]:1:                will be minor, so the level of effect is therefore negligible, and not significant. Additional

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2022_00248/Additional Documents/Environmental Statement, Chapter G Water Management and Flooding Section 7 Residual effects.pdf|Environmental Statement, Chapter G Water Management and Flooding Section 7 Residual effects.pdf]]:2:                gives an effect greater than minor or negligible, which is not significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2022_00248/Additional Documents/Environmental Statement, Chapter G Water Management and Flooding Section 7 Residual effects.pdf|Environmental Statement, Chapter G Water Management and Flooding Section 7 Residual effects.pdf]]:2:                receptors, this would result in a negligible level of effect of pollution which would be deemed to

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2022_00248/Additional Documents/Environmental Statement, Chapter G Water Management and Flooding Section 7 Residual effects.pdf|Environmental Statement, Chapter G Water Management and Flooding Section 7 Residual effects.pdf]]:2:                negligible beneficial effect for the other surface waterbodies (Holme Beck, Knitting wife,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2022_00248/Additional Documents/Environmental Statement, Chapter G Water Management and Flooding Section 7 Residual effects.pdf|Environmental Statement, Chapter G Water Management and Flooding Section 7 Residual effects.pdf]]:2:                of the mitigation measures and so a substantial beneficial effect for the Tees and negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2022_00248/Additional Documents/Environmental Statement, Chapter G Water Management and Flooding Section 7 Residual effects.pdf|Environmental Statement, Chapter G Water Management and Flooding Section 7 Residual effects.pdf]]:2:                will be minor, so the level of effect is therefore negligible, and not significant. Additional

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2022_00248/Additional Documents/CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf|CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf]]:16:             demonstrate that there will be a negligible impact on those aspects of the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0342-CD/R-2022-0342-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0395-03-GE Plot.pdf|R-2022-0342-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0395-03-GE Plot.pdf]]:35:likely to be negligible in these strata and as such has not been modelled. Therefore, settlements have been

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0342-CD/R-2022-0342-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0395-03-GE Plot.pdf|R-2022-0342-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0395-03-GE Plot.pdf]]:37:in the Glaciolacustrine Deposits due to imposed loadings on the floor slab are likely to be negligible and therefore

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0342-CD/R-2022-0342-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0395-03-GE Plot.pdf|R-2022-0342-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0395-03-GE Plot.pdf]]:698:                         consolidation                proportionally negligible and any further consolidation will take

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0342-CD/R-2022-0342-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0395-03-GE Plot.pdf|R-2022-0342-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0395-03-GE Plot.pdf]]:701:increase in the Glaciolacustrine deposits due to imposed loadings on the floor slab are likely to be negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0342-CD/R-2022-0342-CD-L05858-CLK-XX-XX-RP-GT-0002 Pile Risk Assessment .pdf|R-2022-0342-CD-L05858-CLK-XX-XX-RP-GT-0002 Pile Risk Assessment .pdf]]:8:           lateral migration will be negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf]]:33:                                   quality                site predicted to be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf]]:33: Moors SAC                         quality                site predicted to be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf]]:45:        has been assumed that negligible traffic from the ERF will travel along the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Preliminary_Ecological_Appraisal.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Preliminary_Ecological_Appraisal.pdf]]:9:              •    Negligible Importance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Preliminary_Ecological_Appraisal.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Preliminary_Ecological_Appraisal.pdf]]:14:           Bare ground                 Negligible        Does not contribute to biodiversity importance of the site.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Preliminary_Ecological_Appraisal.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Preliminary_Ecological_Appraisal.pdf]]:17:        The extended Phase 1 habitat survey confirmed that the site is of negligible nature conservation

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf]]:46:        so that the significance of effects will now be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf]]:46:        in the December 2019 ES. The construction effects will have negligible effect on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf]]:47:        proposed development so that the significance of effects will now be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf]]:47:        is operational will be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf]]:51:             be slight adverse prior to mitigation, as opposed to negligible adverse as

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf]]:51:         •   The potential impact to the River Tees Estuary is considered to be negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf]]:60:        discernible impact recognised on the negligible archaeological resource across

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf]]:67:      effects on employment in other areas and all other effects negligible and not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf]]:72:      human health can be described as ‘negligible’ at all areas of relevant exposure

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf]]:72:        •    All annual mean impacts are ‘negligible’ at all areas of relevant exposure

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf]]:72:        •    All short-term impacts are ‘negligible’ at all areas of relevant exposure, except

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf]]:72:      point of maximum impact could not be screened out as ‘negligible’ using a

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf]]:72:      described as ‘negligible’.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf]]:73:      areas of relevant exposure is ‘negligible’, except for short-term sulphur dioxide

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf]]:73:      quality assessment level (AQAL) and was described as ‘negligible’. Even if this

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf]]:73:      remains ‘negligible’, both alone and when added to process emissions.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf]]:74:      ‘negligible’. The assessment of construction phase dust emissions is unchanged,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf]]:74:      regard to human health are predicted to be ‘negligible’, except for short-term

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf]]:80:        •    A potential impact on severance of negligible significance

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf]]:80:        •    A potential impact on driver delay of negligible significance

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf]]:80:        •    A potential impact on pedestrian delay of negligible significance

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf]]:80:        •    A potential impact on pedestrian amenity of negligible significance

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf]]:81:             amenity, fear and intimidation, and accidents and safety of negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf]]:81:        •    A residual impact on severance of negligible significance

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf]]:81:        •    A residual impact on driver delay of negligible significance

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf]]:81:        •    A residual impact on pedestrian delay of negligible significance

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf]]:81:        •    A residual impact on pedestrian amenity of negligible significance

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf]]:94:      considered to be slight adverse and will now be negligible. The assessment of the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf]]:101:      not be described as ‘negligible’ irrespective of the total pollutant concentration. In

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf]]:104:      application operational phase are considered to be negligible due to the minimal

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:5:                 results of the modelling and indicates where impacts can be screened out as ‘negligible’ or

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:11:                 this AQMA will be negligible. As the impact has been screened out, the AQMA has been excluded

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:27:                     75% or less of AQAL         Negligible      Negligible        Slight           Moderate

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:27:                     76-94% of AQAL              Negligible      Slight            Moderate         Moderate

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:27:                 a 1% change in concentration. For a change in concentration to be described as ‘negligible’

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:27:                 •     < 10% - negligible;

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:31:                 •   all annual mean impacts on human health can be described as ‘negligible’ when the total

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:31:                 •   all short-term impacts on human health can be described as ‘negligible’ or ‘insignificant’ if it is

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:31:                 Although short-term impacts do not screen out as ‘negligible’ for a stack height of 80 m if it is

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:31:                 dioxide and nitrogen dioxide, non-negligible impacts are only predicted to occur under the highly

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:35:                 Impacts that cannot be described as ‘negligible’ irrespective of the total concentration in

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:35:                 ‘as ‘negligible’ irrespective of the total concentration, further analysis has been undertaken.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:39:                 and less than 0.5 of the annual mean AQAL and can be screened out as ‘negligible’ irrespective of

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:39:                 ‘negligible’ irrespective of the total concentration. As shown in Figure 8, the PC is predicted to

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:40:                 therefore, the impact is described as ‘negligible’.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:41:                 2021 WHO guideline values, and is therefore ‘negligible’ irrespective of the total concentration.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:42:                 7 of the AQAL, the impact is described as ‘negligible’.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:43:                 is described as ‘negligible’.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:43:                 as ‘negligible’ irrespective of the total concentration.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:44:                 ‘negligible’ irrespective of the total concentration.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:44:                 cannot be screened out as ‘negligible’. In accordance with the guidance set out in section 5.7.1, the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:44:                 ‘negligible’.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:45:                 Short-term impacts that cannot be described as ‘negligible’ at areas of relevant exposure are only

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:45:                 would be well below 10% of the AQAL and would be described as ‘negligible’.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:45:                 dioxide. These impacts are described as ‘negligible’.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:48:                 and is considered to be ‘negligible’.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:48:                 ‘negligible’. Under these more realistic scenarios the impact of the Proposed ERF on concentrations

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:48:                 concentrations of chromium (VI) is ‘negligible’.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:54:                 impacts from the Proposed ERF that cannot be described as ‘negligible’ are limited to areas in close

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:54:                 ‘negligible’ irrespective of the total concentration at areas of relevant exposure, the inclusion of

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:55:                 ‘negligible’ irrespective of the total concentration and therefore the inclusion of any other

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:56:                 ‘negligible’.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:57:                 AQAL and the cumulative PEC is less than 7 of the AQAL, the impact remains ‘negligible’.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:59:                 AQAL and the cumulative PEC is less than 7 of the AQAL, the impact remains ‘negligible’.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:66:                        ERF can be described as ‘negligible’ in accordance with IAQM criteria at all areas of relevant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:66:                        Proposed ERF can be described as ‘negligible’ in accordance with IAQM screening criteria at

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:100: negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:102:                 of maximum impact, terrain effects have a negligible effect on annual mean concentrations.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-MGE05035 Nuisance.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-MGE05035 Nuisance.pdf]]:1:Both reports state there will be negligible impact on nearby receptors and the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Noise_and_Vibration_Impact_Assessment.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Noise_and_Vibration_Impact_Assessment.pdf]]:13:                                                                                Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Noise_and_Vibration_Impact_Assessment.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Noise_and_Vibration_Impact_Assessment.pdf]]:14:                                                                                                Negligible                 NOAEL

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Noise_and_Vibration_Impact_Assessment.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Noise_and_Vibration_Impact_Assessment.pdf]]:14:            < 1.0                                                               Negligible                        NOAEL

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Noise_and_Vibration_Impact_Assessment.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Noise_and_Vibration_Impact_Assessment.pdf]]:14:                                                                                                    Negligible               NOAEL

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Noise_and_Vibration_Impact_Assessment.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Noise_and_Vibration_Impact_Assessment.pdf]]:15:          Below 35-40 dB LAeq,T design range          Negligible                           NOAEL

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Noise_and_Vibration_Impact_Assessment.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Noise_and_Vibration_Impact_Assessment.pdf]]:23:        deemed to be negligible in the short and long term, to LA 1117. It is not expected that the additional

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Noise_and_Vibration_Impact_Assessment.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Noise_and_Vibration_Impact_Assessment.pdf]]:29:        considered to be negligible as the background noise levels at receptor R1 are typically 22dB below

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Flood_Risk_Assessment.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Flood_Risk_Assessment.pdf]]:11:         through the outline site and surrounding area. Two negligible areas at ‘Medium’ risk are present in

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0246-RMM/R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Flood_Risk_Assessment.pdf|R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Flood_Risk_Assessment.pdf]]:13:                                                             two negligible areas of medium risk. Therefore,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0800-CD/R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf|R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf]]:77:•     Negligible – No effect on species or habitats present are anticipated.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf]]:7: High                     Major           Moderate           Moderate               Minor            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf]]:7: Medium                  Moderate         Moderate             Minor                Minor            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf]]:7: Low                      Minor               Minor            Minor              Negligible         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf]]:7: Very low                 Minor           Negligible         Negligible           Negligible         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf]]:7:Whilst mitigation for minor or negligible impacts may not be specifically defined as a matter of course,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf]]:7:recognised that minor and negligible impacts could become significant when considered cumulatively with

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf]]:1:                             lower sections of proposed quayside features, although the change in the view will be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf]]:3:Significance of Effect       Medium sensitivity x Low magnitude of effect = Minor negligible significance of effect.                                       Minor            Minor

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf]]:3:                             Effects will be permanent during the operation of the proposed quayside and its use in support of the renewable energy        Negligible       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf]]:6:                              Effects will be permanent during the operation of the proposed quayside and its use in support of the renewable energy          negligible     negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf]]:7:                             Effects will be permanent during the operation of the proposed quayside and its use in support of the renewable energy        negligible      negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf]]:8:Significance of Effect       Low sensitivity x Low medium magnitude of effect = Minor negligible significance of effect.                                   Minor              Minor

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf]]:8:                             Effects will be permanent during the operation of the proposed quayside and its use in support of the renewable energy        Negligible         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf]]:9:                              Future baseline: development of the SIZ landside site and associated large scale buildings will have negligible effect on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf]]:10:Significance of Effect       Low sensitivity x Low magnitude of effect = Negligible significance of effect.                                                  Negligible         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf]]:11:                             sections of cranes and stored components, although have negligible beneficial effects to views of taller proposed

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf]]:12:                              Future baseline: development of the SIZ landside site and associated large scale buildings will have negligible effect on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf]]:9: Negligible / very low                                                                 < 1.0

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf]]:12: 1            69.7               69.8                      0.1                     Very low          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf]]:12: 2            67.8               68.0                      0.2                     Very low          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf]]:12: 3            70.3               70.5                      0.2                     Very low          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf]]:12: 5            76.3               76.4                      0.1                     Very low          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf]]:12:Predicted changes in BNL, displayed in Table 17.10, indicate impacts of negligible significance at worst

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf]]:12:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf]]:14: NSR1                       52.2 - 59.2                            Very low                            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf]]:14:indicating negligible impact at human receptor locations. This is considered not significant and impact is

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf]]:15:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf]]:13:It is concluded that the impact during the construction phase of the proposed scheme would be of negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf]]:13:are minor beneficial to controlled waters and negligible to human health.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf]]:13:with maintenance dredging. All operational phase impacts are predicted to be of negligible significance,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf]]:14:to marine mammals from dredging has been assessed as negligible. The assessment has concluded

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf]]:14:impacts of negligible significance to all marine mammals with regard to potential for temporary auditory

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf]]:14:movements in the area. A worst-case impact of negligible significance (not significant) is predicted.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf]]:15:Tees, and is therefore expected to have a negligible effect on fish. The removal of the existing wharf

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf]]:16:negligible impacts on both resident and migratory fish. Disturbance during the operational phase, either as

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf]]:16:a result of vessel calls to the new quay or the use of quayside lighting, is predicted to have a negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf]]:16:required by International Regulations to allow safe navigation. An impact of negligible significance on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf]]:16:determined to have minimal effect on the existing navigation profile. An impact of negligible significance is

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf]]:16:Environmental Assessment of Road Traffic), the impact is considered to be negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf]]:18:construction phase noise levels at the South Tees Business Parks would be negligible. No mitigation

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf]]:19:assessed as being permanent and negligible. No mitigation measures during the operational phase are

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf]]:20:disturbance and reductions in air quality are considered to be negligible during construction and operation.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf]]:20:It is therefore concluded that impacts to human health would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf]]:20:is predicted to have a negligible impact on fisheries, marine ecology and marine mammals, and no impact

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf]]:26:is considered to be medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf]]:26:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf]]:26:impact is of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf]]:26:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf]]:27:be medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf]]:27:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf]]:27:considered to be medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf]]:27:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf]]:10:the proposed scheme will have negligible influence on this character area and is not considered further..

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf]]:12:industrial context of outward views, it is predicted that the proposed scheme will have negligible influence

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf]]:15:negligible effect on the existing baseline.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf]]:19:of those features will incur a low adverse magnitude of effect and a negligible overall significance of effect.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf]]:19:magnitude and incur a minor negligible adverse significance of effect.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf]]:19:negligible overall significance of effect.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf]]:20:and the wider environs, the overall significance of effect is considered to be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf]]:23:significance of effect in the view is minor negligible adverse and not significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf]]:23:significance of effect in the view is minor negligible adverse. In terms of EIA these effects are not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf]]:23:negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Response from applicant.PDF|R-2020-0685-ESM-Response from applicant.PDF]]:2:concluded that all impacts were assessed to be acceptable with all scoring negligible or low, with the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Response from applicant.PDF|R-2020-0685-ESM-Response from applicant.PDF]]:3:negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Response from applicant.PDF|R-2020-0685-ESM-Response from applicant.PDF]]:3:traffic is therefore clearly negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf]]:5:receptor. The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible significance on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf]]:5:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf]]:5:receptor. The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible significance on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf]]:6:scheme) and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf]]:6:(human health/safety). The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf]]:6:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:1:long period prior to this the enhancement is so small in magnitude and spatial extent as to be negligible in

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:2:deposition is predicted to be negligible beyond the boundaries of the Tees Bay C disposal site.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:2:that there would be negligible impact on fish or fisheries due to the proposed deposition of dredged material

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:2:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual impact of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:5:negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:5:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:7:operations). Overall, the potential impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:7:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:8:                                                                                          Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:8:                                              0.000003 minke whale                        Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:8: during offshore                              0.00004 grey seal                           Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:8:                                              0.0000003 harbour seal                      Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:9:dredged sediments is negligible / very low for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:9:negligible (Table 26.5).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:9:                   Harbour                         Negligible /                                     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:9: TTS or fleeing                                                   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:9: underwater                                        Negligible /                                     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:9:                   Minke whale                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:9: offshore                                          Negligible /                    required.        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:9: disposal of       Grey seal                                      Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:9: sediments                                         Negligible /                                     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:9:                   Harbour seal                                   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:9:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:10:                                                                                       Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:10: Potential                                                                             Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:10: of dredged                             0.002 grey seal                                Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:10:                                                                                       Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:10:of negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, the impact significance for any

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:10:assessed as negligible (not significant) for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:10:                        Harbour                       Negligible /

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:10:                                       Low                            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:10: increased              Minke                         Negligible /    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:10: vessels during                                                                               required, other than   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:10: offshore disposal                                    Negligible /    Negligible              good practice.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:10: sediments              Harbour                       Negligible /    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:10:would be of negligible significance for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:11:The magnitude of the impact of vessel disturbance to seal haul-out sites is defined as negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:11:This gives an overall impact significance of negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:11:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:11:relied upon solely. Therefore, any increases in suspended sediments will have a negligible impact on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:11:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:12:                                                                                    Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:12:                                                                                    Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:12: offshore disposal                    0.04 grey seal                                Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:12:                                                                                    Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:12:Taking into account the low receptor sensitivity, the negligible potential magnitude of the impact and the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:12:negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal (Table 26.9).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:12:                      Harbour                      Negligible /

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:12:                                     Low                           Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:12: Changes to prey      Minke                        Negligible /    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:12:                                                                                                                  Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:12: offshore disposal                                 Negligible /    Negligible              required.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:12:                      Harbour                      Negligible /    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:12:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:21:impact is of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:21:is of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:22:overall impact is of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:22:medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:22:range between negligible and minor adverse significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:22:be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:24:negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:24:health is considered to be of negligible to minor adverse significance

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:25:negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:26:residual impact would be of negligible significance. It is acknowledged that a

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:26:considered to be of negligible to minor adverse significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:26:residual impact is therefore considered to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:26:suitable material selection, the residual impact would be of negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:30:sediment, an impact of negligible significance is predicted.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:31:regime is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:32:are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:32:affecting marine communities would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:34:this is that the significance to all receptors would be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:34:this is that the significance to all receptors would be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:34:significance to all receptors would be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:35:overall impact of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:35:negligible impact on marine mammals due to their prey detection methods

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:35:harbour seal is negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:35:residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:35:impact would be of negligible significance

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:36:residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:36:impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:36:practice. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:37:negligible to low.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:37:considered to be of negligible ecological value and therefore have not been

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:38:adverse significance), noise and vibration (negligible significance) emissions,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:38:negligible importance within the footprint of the proposed development. The

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:39:residual impact is of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:39:of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:39:implementation of the mitigation measures, the residual impact is of negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:39:measures, the residual impact is of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:43:and therefore a negligible impact is predicted on the waterbirds relying on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:43:from the operations is therefore considered to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:44:associated with the proposed scheme is assessed to be of negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:44:roosting waterbirds and terns is predicted to be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:44:not significant. The potential increase are considered to have a negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:44:hydrodynamic changes would be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:45:food resources and the residual impact is of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:45:impact is negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:45:impact is negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:45:While impacts are anticipated to be negligible, the implication of best practice

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:45:impact is therefore considered to be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:45:negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:48:is therefore predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:48:considered to be very low, and the significance of the impact is negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:49:therefore considered to have a negligible impact on migration up and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:49:considered to be a negligible impact on fish species within the Tees. With

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:49:therefore considered to be negligible. Consideration has also been given to

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:49:however any conflict is considered to be negligible when co-ordinated by the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:49:negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:50:in motorised vessel traffic is therefore considered to have a negligible impact

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:50:of the estuary as a whole predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:50:fish eggs. The residual impact would remain of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:50:activities. The residual impact remains negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:51:remain negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:51:residual impact will remain negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:51:impact would be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:53:proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:54:development is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:54:impact of negligible significance on navigation safety during the operational

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:54:impacts of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:55:impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:56:negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:57:traffic is therefore assessed as negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:57:considered to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:57:considered to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:63:between no impact and negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:63:would be a negligible impact on human receptor that would be not significant .

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:64:impact would be of negligible significance. With regard to on-site construction

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:64:noise no mitigation is proposed and the residual impact would be of negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:71:with a negligible overall significance of effect.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:72:adverse magnitude and incur a negligible overall significance of effect.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:73:significance of effect being considered to be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:74:significance of effect in the view is minor negligible adverse and not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:74:in the view is minor negligible adverse. In terms of EIA these effects are not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:74:existing, transitory views towards site will be low adverse or negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:75:The ES does conclude that there will be negligible impacts during the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:75:range between negligible to minor adverse. Many of the views considered

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:77:negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:78:negligible impact.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:78:negligible impact.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:79:locally generated waves. The residual impact would be of negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:83:therefore the likely requirement is expected to be low resulting in a negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:84:therefore considered to be result in a negligible impact.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:84:negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:90:receptors is considered to be negligible as set out within Chapter 17 of the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:90:human health would be negligible to minor adverse in significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:90:disturbance would be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:91:air quality disturbance is predicted to be of negligible significance and not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:91:be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:91:disturbance and land quality would be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:91:impacts of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:91:impacts of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:92:beyond, with seabed deposition predicted to be negligible beyond the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:92:would be negligible impact on fish or fisheries due to the proposed deposition

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:93:therefore concluded that the impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:93:disposal operations). Overall, the potential impact would be of negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:94:material, there are considered to be negligible impacts on marine mammals

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:94:would be a residual impact of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:94:would be a residual impact of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:94:would be a residual impact of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 11_Air quality assessment method.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 11_Air quality assessment method.pdf]]:1:is ‘negligible’.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 11_Air quality assessment method.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 11_Air quality assessment method.pdf]]:4: Low                                  Medium Risk                    Low Risk                          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 11_Air quality assessment method.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 11_Air quality assessment method.pdf]]:4: Low                                    Low Risk                     Low Risk                          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 11_Air quality assessment method.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 11_Air quality assessment method.pdf]]:5: Low                                   Low Risk                  Low Risk                        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 11_Air quality assessment method.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 11_Air quality assessment method.pdf]]:5: Low                                  Medium Risk                Low Risk                        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf]]:7:likely to be negligible, and therefore not necessary to be assessed.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf]]:6:                                                                                    negligible. As there are no designated

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf]]:7:Negligible                             Is generally tolerant of physical or chemical changes

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf]]:9:temporary change, indiscernible   •   negligible change to existing risk of exposure; or

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf]]:10:                           Moderate       Minor            Minor         Negligible     Negligible    Minor         Minor          Moderate

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf]]:10:                           Minor          Negligible       Negligible    Negligible     Negligible    Negligible    Negligible     Minor

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf]]:10:(negligible) impacts as they may contribute to significant impacts cumulatively or through interactions.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf]]:10:Negligible                            Very small changes in receptor condition (adverse or beneficial), which may be raised as local issues

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf]]:12:the geological sensitivity is considered to be negligible. As there are no designated geological sites recorded

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf]]:18:during construction is considered to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf]]:18:No mitigation measures are required and residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf]]:20:overall impact during construction is considered to be of negligible to minor adverse significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf]]:20:negligible to minor adverse significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf]]:21:very low. Thus, the impact to human receptors is of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf]]:21:No additional mitigation measures required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf]]:22:very low and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf]]:78:Deposition to the west and east of the disposal site is negligible, whilst to the south and north covers a

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 13_Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 13_Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology.pdf]]:5:particular development is categorised as high, medium, low or negligible. In accordance with the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 13_Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 13_Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology.pdf]]:5: Negligible        Size and/or scale: the extent and relative proportion of the existing landscape

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 13_Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 13_Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology.pdf]]:8: Negligible      Size and Scale

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 13_Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 13_Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology.pdf]]:9:receptor (high, medium to low) with the magnitude of effect (high to negligible). The evaluation is

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 13_Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 13_Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology.pdf]]:9: Low medium               Minor negligible effect    Minor effect              Minor moderate effect

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 13_Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 13_Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology.pdf]]:9: Low                      Negligible effect          Minor negligible effect   Minor effect

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 13_Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 13_Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology.pdf]]:9: Negligible               Negligible effect          Negligible effect         Minor negligible effect

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf]]:14:negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf]]:15:As a result, it is concluded that there would be a negligible impact as a result of the proposed scheme.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf]]:15:a potential impact of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf]]:16:effect on a low sensitivity receptor. Overall, a negligible impact is predicted.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf]]:16:residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf]]:22:impact of negligible significance is predicted.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf]]:22:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf]]:24:Given the above, an impact of negligible significance on marine species and habitats is predicted to arise

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf]]:24:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf]]:25:and tidal regime is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf]]:25:No mitigation measures are required, and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf]]:43:representing the final risk score for each hazard, between 0 (negligible) and 10 (high) (see Annex A),

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf]]:43:Hazard risk scores were categorised as either negligible, low, As Low as Reasonably Practicable

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf]]:43:              Negligible       The risk is acceptable and at level where operational safety is unaffected.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf]]:44:construction phase was ‘Contact: Navigation Buoy’ which was scored as 0.72; negligible, driven by its

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf]]:44:                      Negligible              Low                 ALARP             Significant      High

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf]]:46:0.5; negligible, driven by its low consequence.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf]]:46:                       Negligible              Low              ALARP             Significant   High

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf]]:49:be acceptable with all scoring Negligible or Low, with the exception of the impact on ship contact risk,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf]]:50:                                                      Unlikely          Minor           Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf]]:50:                                                      Unlikely          Minor           Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf]]:57:is extremely remote and consequence insignificant such that a risk can be said to be negligible. At the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf]]:60: 1     Negligible           Negligible         Negligible                               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf]]:62:    0 – 1.99               Negligible Risk           A level where operational safety is unaffected.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf]]:62:the final risk score for each hazard, between 0 (negligible) and 10 (high) following which, the final risk

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf]]:62:Hazard risk scores are categorised as either negligible, low, As Low as Reasonably Practicable (ALARP),

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf]]:62:3, the values are so low (<5mg/l) as to be negligible compared with background levels and, in all cases, the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf]]:62:water quality sampling points during Stage 3 of the dredging and only negligible effects for a short duration

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf]]:62:Stages 3 and 4 of the dredging, only negligible effects are noted, equivalent to variations within the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf]]:68:as to be negligible in such a great depth of water in this deep water offshore area).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf]]:72:enhancement is so small in magnitude and spatial extent as to be negligible in such a great depth of water

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf]]:76:is negligible, whilst to the north it covers a similar zone to the sediment plume for this disposal event, which

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf]]:76:0.1cm. Clearly these magnitudes are extremely low within the licenced disposal site, and negligible beyond.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf]]:76:magnitudes, with negligible changes anticipated beyond the boundaries of the site.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf]]:25:Both had a peak count of two, which represents a negligible proportion of the SPA / Ramsar site populations.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf]]:27:would have a negligible impact on benthic prey species in the intertidal zone so consequent effects on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf]]:29:of the effects of capital dredging and therefore a negligible impact is predicted on the waterbirds relying on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf]]:29:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf]]:32:minor adverse. A residual impact of negligible significance is predicted at the other sensitive intertidal

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf]]:35:and localised disturbance to feeding resources will result in an impact of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf]]:35:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf]]:36:negligible, and any exceedances of the thresholds stated in Cutts et al. (2009) or Wright et al. (2010) would

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf]]:36:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf]]:36:negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf]]:36:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf]]:36:be negligible, therefore any effects on waterbirds and foraging terns would manifest as a direct behavioural

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf]]:37:on foraging / roosting waterbirds and terns is predicted to be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf]]:37:While impacts are anticipated to be negligible, the implication of best practice mitigation measures set out

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf]]:37:water) will further reduce the impact on foraging / roosting waterbirds. The residual impact is negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf]]:37:negligible impact on intertidal benthos (see Section 9.6.2) and would not adversely affect the availability of

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf]]:37:result of hydrodynamic changes would be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf]]:37:No mitigation measures are considered necessary, therefore the residual impact is negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf]]:1:that there would be impacts of negligible significance to the only NSR scoped into the assessment.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf]]:1:would be negligible to minor adverse significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf]]:2:noise and air quality disturbance would be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf]]:2:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf]]:2:negligible significance and not significant respectively. In addition, operational phase impacts to human

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf]]:2:health as reported in Section 8 with regard to land quality are considered to be of negligible significance. It

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf]]:2:and land quality would be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf]]:2:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual impact of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_15. Traffic and transport.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_15. Traffic and transport.pdf]]:1:The impact of the proposed development’s construction traffic is therefore assessed as of negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_15. Traffic and transport.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_15. Traffic and transport.pdf]]:1:proposed schemes operational traffic is therefore assessed as negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_15. Traffic and transport.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_15. Traffic and transport.pdf]]:1:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:8: Negligible           Commonplace feature of little or no habitat/historical significance. Loss of such a feature would not be seen

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:9: Negligible        of normal natural variation change to the extent        Change is within the normal range of natural variation.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:10:                               High        Medium       Low           Negligible   Negligible   Low          Medium        High

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:10:                               Moderate    Minor        Minor         Negligible   Negligible   Minor        Minor         Moderate

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:10:                  Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:10:                               Minor       Negligible   Negligible    Negligible   Negligible   Negligible   Negligible    Minor

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:17:grassland is concluded as being of negligible ecological value.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:17:negligible ecological value.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:17:scrub habitat is concluded as being of negligible ecological value.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:18:and ruderal habitat is concluded as being of negligible ecological value.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:18:metal structures, which have been assessed as being of negligible value for roosting bats due to the lack of

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:21: Wharf                            Negligible                          No

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:21: Buildings                        Negligible                          No

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:21: Notable Flora                    Negligible                          No

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:21: Badger                           Negligible                          No

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:21: Water vole                       Negligible                          No

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:22: Amphibians                     Negligible                         No

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:22: Reptiles                       Negligible                         No

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:23:impacts to foraging bats are considered to be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:23:included in the CEMP, and with the implementation of such measures, any impacts will be negligible in

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:23:Negligible impacts on water quality are anticipated during construction of the proposed scheme (Section

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:24:time otters are anticipated to spend in the area, an impact of negligible magnitude is anticipated. Given the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:25:assessed to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:25:With the implementation of the above measures, the residual impact is of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:25:be of local (grayling) and (dingy skipper) significance, and negligible importance within the footprint of the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf]]:24:                predicted to be of negligible significance, with the exception of the subtidal habitat creation

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf]]:24:                auditory injury to marine mammals from dredging has been assessed as negligible. The

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf]]:24:                assessment has concluded impacts of negligible significance to all marine mammals with regard

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf]]:24:                number of vessel movements in the area. A worst-case impact of negligible significance (not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf]]:26:                undertaken within the Tees, and is therefore expected to have a negligible effect on fish. The

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf]]:26:                resulted in a conclusion that there will be negligible impacts on both resident and migratory

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf]]:26:                use of quayside lighting, is predicted to have a negligible effect.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf]]:27:                impact is considered to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf]]:28:                of negligible significance to groundwater, moderate adverse to the Tees estuary and associated

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf]]:28:                operation are predicted to be minor beneficial to controlled waters and negligible to human

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf]]:28:                Business Parks would be negligible. No mitigation measures are required.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf]]:30:                negligible. No mitigation measures during the operational phase are required.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf]]:14: Dust soiling               High Risk                Medium Risk          Medium Risk            Negligible Risk

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf]]:14: Human health               Medium Risk              Low Risk             Low Risk               Negligible Risk

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf]]:14: Ecological effects         Medium Risk              Low Risk             Low Risk               Negligible Risk

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf]]:14:demolition, ‘medium risk’ for earthworks and construction, and ‘negligible risk’ for trackout. The impacts on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf]]:15:earthworks and construction and ‘negligible risk’ for trackout.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:5: Negligible / very

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:18:                                              0.0003 harbour porpoise                    Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:18:                                              0.000003 minke whale                       Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:18: dredging                                     0.00000024 grey seal                       Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:18:                                              0.0000009 harbour seal                     Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:18:The magnitude of the potential impact of PTS as a result of dredging noise is negligible / very low for harbour

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:18:seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.10).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:18:                    Harbour                             Negligible /                                            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:18:                                                                          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:18: Auditory injury                                        Negligible /                                            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:18: (PTS) from         Minke whale                                           Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:18:                                                        Negligible /                        required.           Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:18: SEL during         Grey seal                                             Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:18:                                                        Negligible /                                            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:18:                    Harbour seal                                          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:19:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:20:                                                                                       Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:20:                                              0.000003 minke whale                     Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:20: underwater noise                             0.00000024 grey seal                     Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:20:                                              0.0000009 harbour seal                   Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:20:The magnitude of the potential impact of TTS and fleeing response as a result of dredging noise, is negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:21:whale, grey seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.13).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:21:                   Harbour                         Negligible /                                     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:21:                                                                  Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:21: TTS or fleeing                                    Negligible /                                     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:21: response from     Minke whale                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:21:                                                   Negligible /                    required.        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:21: SEL during        Grey seal                                      Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:21:                                                   Negligible /                                     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:21:                   Harbour seal                                   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:21:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:22:                                                                                      Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:22:                                                                                      Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:22:    dredging (5% of                                                                   Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:22:                                         0.000005 harbour seal                        Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:22:of negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, the impact significance for any

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:22:potential increase in collision risk with vessels during dredging has been assessed as negligible (not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:23:                        Harbour                      Negligible /

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:23:                                      Low                           Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:23: Potential for          Minke                        Negligible /   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:23: collision risk from                                                                       required, other than   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:23: vessels during                                      Negligible /   Negligible             good practice.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:23:                        Harbour                      Negligible /   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:23:The residual impact would be of negligible significance for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:24:The magnitude of the impact of vessel disturbance to seal haul-out sites is defined as negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:24:resulting in an overall impact significance of negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:24:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:24:have a negligible impact on marine mammals.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:24:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:25:                                                                                  Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:25:                                                                                  Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:25: dredge area                                                                      Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:25:                                     0.0001 harbour seal                          Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:25:Taking into account the low receptor sensitivity, the negligible potential magnitude of the impact and the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:25:negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal (Table 10.17).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:25:                     Harbour                      Negligible /

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:25:                                    Low                           Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:25:                     Minke                        Negligible /    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:25: resource in                                                                                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:25:                                                  Negligible /    Negligible             required.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:25:                     Harbour                      Negligible /    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:25:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:26:10.5.1 and 10.5.2). The magnitude of effect in all species is assessed to be negligible / very low based on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:26:maintenance activities has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.10 and Table 10.13).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:26:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:26:10.5.3). The magnitude of effect in all species is assessed to be negligible / very low based on the maximum

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:26:has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.15).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:26:dredging activities. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:26:assessed as negligible (see Section 10.5.4).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:26:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:27:negligible (see Section 10.5.5).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:27:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:27:negligible (see Section 10.5.6).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:27:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:27:established vessel routes. The magnitude of effect in all species is assessed to be negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:27:for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal has been assessed as negligible (Table

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:27:would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf]]:8:The socio-economic impacts of the proposed scheme are identified as ‘beneficial’, ‘negligible’ or ‘adverse’

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf]]:8: Negligible                            No obvious significant effect to a receptor or environment.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf]]:8: Negligible                            Where no discernible effect is expected as a result of the proposed scheme on the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf]]:8:                         High                        Medium                    Low                       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf]]:8: High                    Substantial                 Moderate to               Minor to Moderate         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf]]:8: Medium                  Moderate to                 Moderate                  Minor                     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf]]:9: Low                   Minor to Moderate       Minor                    Negligible to Minor    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf]]:9: Negligible            Negligible              Negligible               Negligible             Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf]]:17:supply scenario forecasts only a negligible increase in employment during the plan period.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf]]:19:term) and negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf]]:19:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf]]:22:employment with the AOI and is therefore considered to correspond to a negligible magnitude of change.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf]]:22:a permanent and negligible impact.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf]]:22:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf]]:22:negligible magnitude of change. The receptor is considered to be of medium sensitivity by virtue of the fact

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf]]:23:a permanent and negligible impact.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf]]:23:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1107_Appendix 7_Land quality desk study.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1107_Appendix 7_Land quality desk study.pdf]]:14:     •     negligible ground dissolution.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1107_Appendix 7_Land quality desk study.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1107_Appendix 7_Land quality desk study.pdf]]:38:                                                                                                                buildings is negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:18:cumulative impact is predicted to be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:20:                                                                                             Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:20:                                                                                             Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:20: approach channel and Anglo                                                                  Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:20:                                                                                             Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:20:                                                                                             Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:20: Hartlepool approach                                                                         Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:21:                                                                                              Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:21:                                                                                              Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:21:                                                                                              Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:21:                                                                                              Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:21: Hartlepool approach                                                                          Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:21:                                                                                              Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:21:Harbour Facilities schemes, is negligible / very low for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:21:harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as negligible (Table 27.5).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:22:cumulative underwater noise impacts. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:22: TTS or fleeing    Harbour                        Negligible /

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:22: response from                                                   Negligible                         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:22: dredging at the                                  Negligible /

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:22:                   Minke whale                                   Negligible                         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:22: Hartlepool                                       Negligible /

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:22: approach          Grey seal                                     Negligible                         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:22: Harbour                                          Negligible /

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:22:                   Harbour seal                                  Negligible                         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:24:on waterbirds at North Tees Mudflat, and negligible impact further downstream (including at Vopak

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:25:supporting habitat was considered a negligible impact in the EIAs for both the Anglo American Harbour

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:25:(even in combination) would have a negligible impact, the cumulative effect with the proposed scheme would

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:26:driving activities (see Section 13.5.3 and 13.5.4). While there is anticipated to be negligible impact from

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:27:works, but the potential cumulative impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:27:impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:27:acceptable (from a navigation risk perspective), with all risks classified as negligible or low, with the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:27:impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:27:The primary assessment identifies that the proposed schemes traffic demand would result in a negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:28:with the proposed scheme are considered not significant and indicate negligible impact, at worst. Therefore,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:32:concludes that the disposal of dredged material will have a negligible impact on fisheries, marine ecology

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:32:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual cumulative impact of negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf]]:18: Lianhetech, Seal Sands   Proposed new buildings, plant upgrade, swale and associated       Approximately   Planning permission     / Ramsar site would be negligible. On this basis,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf]]:26:greater than approximately 200m from source (see Appendix 8). There would be negligible effects on fish

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf]]:28:would be negligible, therefore any effects on SPA / Ramsar site features would manifest as a direct

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf]]:34:negligible effect on feeding resources for terns. When this is considered alongside the localised increase

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf]]:6:                          likely to be negligible and therefore not necessary to be assessed.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf]]:15:and beyond. The impact is therefore predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf]]:15:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would remain of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf]]:18:considered to be very low, and the significance of the impact is negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf]]:19:Outside the migratory period, there would be a negligible impact on fish movement up- and downstream

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf]]:21:underwater noise of piling activities is therefore considered to have a negligible impact on migration up-

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf]]:21:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact remains negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf]]:22:negligible impact on fish species within the Tees.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf]]:24:the footprint of the works, and even if there was, the number of vessels/fishers affected would be negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf]]:24:and navigation within the Tees estuary is predicted to be negligible, given that works will be co-ordinated

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf]]:24:are predicted to be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf]]:24:remain negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf]]:24:in motorised vessel traffic is therefore considered to have a negligible impact on fish populations or

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf]]:24:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact will remain negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf]]:25:impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf]]:25:impact would be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf]]:3: MMO Scoping Opinion     negligible and therefore not necessary to be assessed.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf]]:9: Negligible                       Assets with no significant importance or archaeological/historical interest.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf]]:9: Negligible        The asset’s fabric and/or setting is changed in ways which do not materially affect its heritage significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf]]:10: Significance                    High                       Medium                          Low                      Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf]]:10: Low                            Moderate                      Minor                         Minor                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf]]:10: Negligible                      Minor                      Negligible                  Negligible                   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf]]:10: Negligible              No material change to heritage significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf]]:11:these from other non-significant (negligible) impacts as they may contribute to significant impacts

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-HIGHWAYS ENGLAND.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-HIGHWAYS ENGLAND.pdf]]:11:Impacts of negligible significance from the short term, local and reversible construction phase road traffic at the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-HIGHWAYS ENGLAND.pdf|R-2020-0685-ESM-HIGHWAYS ENGLAND.pdf]]:11:Predicted noise levels indicate negligible impact at human receptor locations. This is considered not significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0427-FFM/R-2019-0427-FFM-1 Appendix D1 Enviro Insight Report.PDF|R-2019-0427-FFM-1 Appendix D1 Enviro Insight Report.PDF]]:13:   9.1.3 Maximum Soluble Rocks hazard rating identified on the                                      Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0427-FFM/R-2019-0427-FFM-1 Appendix D1 Enviro Insight Report.PDF|R-2019-0427-FFM-1 Appendix D1 Enviro Insight Report.PDF]]:92:                                                  These are rock layers or drift deposits with low permeability that have negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0427-FFM/R-2019-0427-FFM-1 Appendix D1 Enviro Insight Report.PDF|R-2019-0427-FFM-1 Appendix D1 Enviro Insight Report.PDF]]:122:   Maximum Soluble Rocks* hazard rating identified on the study site                                                         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0427-FFM/R-2019-0427-FFM-1 Appendix C1 Enviro Insight Report.PDF|R-2019-0427-FFM-1 Appendix C1 Enviro Insight Report.PDF]]:13:   9.1.3 Maximum Soluble Rocks hazard rating identified on the                                      Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0427-FFM/R-2019-0427-FFM-1 Appendix C1 Enviro Insight Report.PDF|R-2019-0427-FFM-1 Appendix C1 Enviro Insight Report.PDF]]:70:                                                  These are rock layers or drift deposits with low permeability that have negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0427-FFM/R-2019-0427-FFM-1 Appendix C1 Enviro Insight Report.PDF|R-2019-0427-FFM-1 Appendix C1 Enviro Insight Report.PDF]]:70:                                                  These are rock layers or drift deposits with low permeability that have negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0427-FFM/R-2019-0427-FFM-1 Appendix C1 Enviro Insight Report.PDF|R-2019-0427-FFM-1 Appendix C1 Enviro Insight Report.PDF]]:88:  Maximum Soluble Rocks* hazard rating identified on the study site                                                          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0427-FFM/R-2019-0427-FFM-2 Appendix D2 Geo Insight Report.PDF|R-2019-0427-FFM-2 Appendix D2 Geo Insight Report.PDF]]:9:6.3 Ground Dissolution of Soluble Rocks              Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0427-FFM/R-2019-0427-FFM-2 Appendix D2 Geo Insight Report.PDF|R-2019-0427-FFM-2 Appendix D2 Geo Insight Report.PDF]]:43:2       0.0         On Site                            Negligible                     investigation required, and increased

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0427-FFM/R-2019-0427-FFM-2 Appendix D2 Geo Insight Report.PDF|R-2019-0427-FFM-2 Appendix D2 Geo Insight Report.PDF]]:43:5       0.0         On Site                            Negligible                     investigation required, and increased

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0427-FFM/R-2019-0427-FFM-2 Appendix D2 Geo Insight Report.PDF|R-2019-0427-FFM-2 Appendix D2 Geo Insight Report.PDF]]:45:1      0.0     On Site          Negligible          soluble rocks. No special ground investigation required, and increased

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0427-FFM/R-2019-0427-FFM-2 Appendix D2 Geo Insight Report.PDF|R-2019-0427-FFM-2 Appendix D2 Geo Insight Report.PDF]]:45:2      0.0     On Site          Negligible          soluble rocks. No special ground investigation required, and increased

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0427-FFM/R-2019-0427-FFM-2 Appendix D2 Geo Insight Report.PDF|R-2019-0427-FFM-2 Appendix D2 Geo Insight Report.PDF]]:45:1      0.0     On Site          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0427-FFM/R-2019-0427-FFM-2 Appendix D2 Geo Insight Report.PDF|R-2019-0427-FFM-2 Appendix D2 Geo Insight Report.PDF]]:45:3      0.0     On Site          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0427-FFM/R-2019-0427-FFM-2 Appendix D2 Geo Insight Report.PDF|R-2019-0427-FFM-2 Appendix D2 Geo Insight Report.PDF]]:45:6      0.0     On Site          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0427-FFM/R-2019-0427-FFM-2 Appendix D2 Geo Insight Report.PDF|R-2019-0427-FFM-2 Appendix D2 Geo Insight Report.PDF]]:46:     1     0.0      On Site         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0427-FFM/R-2019-0427-FFM-2 Appendix D2 Geo Insight Report.PDF|R-2019-0427-FFM-2 Appendix D2 Geo Insight Report.PDF]]:46:     2     0.0      On Site         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0427-FFM/R-2019-0427-FFM-2 Appendix D2 Geo Insight Report.PDF|R-2019-0427-FFM-2 Appendix D2 Geo Insight Report.PDF]]:46: 1         0.0         On Site        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0427-FFM/R-2019-0427-FFM-201920 Ecology report final.pdf|R-2019-0427-FFM-201920 Ecology report final.pdf]]:13:and with negligible ecological value.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0427-FFM/R-2019-0427-FFM-201920 Ecology report final.pdf|R-2019-0427-FFM-201920 Ecology report final.pdf]]:14:vegetation and negligible ecological interest.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0475-NM/R-2022-0475-NM-64764 LVIA Update 25-05-22.PDF|R-2022-0475-NM-64764 LVIA Update 25-05-22.PDF]]:3:             arising from the increased height parameter would be negligible when viewed within the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0475-NM/R-2022-0475-NM-64764 LVIA Update 25-05-22.PDF|R-2022-0475-NM-64764 LVIA Update 25-05-22.PDF]]:5:             an increased hight parameter would be negligible and as such the effect would remain

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0166-FFM/R-2021-0166-FFM-Archaeology - DBA.pdf|R-2021-0166-FFM-Archaeology - DBA.pdf]]:6:           •        Negligible – areas of extremely limited or no archaeological or historic interest. These

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0166-FFM/R-2021-0166-FFM-Archaeology - DBA.pdf|R-2021-0166-FFM-Archaeology - DBA.pdf]]:10:6.2.2      The South Steel Works was a later addition to the Cleveland Iron & Steel Works and is of negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0166-FFM/R-2021-0166-FFM-Archaeology - DBA.pdf|R-2021-0166-FFM-Archaeology - DBA.pdf]]:10:7.1.2      The South Steel Works, repurposed as the Torpedo Ladle Workshop, is of negligible archaeological

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0166-FFM/R-2021-0166-FFM-Officer Report 0166.pdf|R-2021-0166-FFM-Officer Report 0166.pdf]]:9:There are no roost sites and only a negligible amount of suitable foraging

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0166-FFM/R-2021-0166-FFM-Officer Report 0166.pdf|R-2021-0166-FFM-Officer Report 0166.pdf]]:9:negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0166-FFM/R-2021-0166-FFM-Officer Report 0166.pdf|R-2021-0166-FFM-Officer Report 0166.pdf]]:9:negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0166-FFM/R-2021-0166-FFM-Officer Report 0166.pdf|R-2021-0166-FFM-Officer Report 0166.pdf]]:9:The amount of suitable habitat for Hedgehog on the site is negligible therefore

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0166-FFM/R-2021-0166-FFM-Officer Report 0166.pdf|R-2021-0166-FFM-Officer Report 0166.pdf]]:9:impacts on Hedgehog are considered to be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0166-FFM/R-2021-0166-FFM-Officer Report 0166.pdf|R-2021-0166-FFM-Officer Report 0166.pdf]]:10:the site is considered to be of negligible importance for Common Toad.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0166-FFM/R-2021-0166-FFM-Officer Report 0166.pdf|R-2021-0166-FFM-Officer Report 0166.pdf]]:10:The only Valued Ecological Receptors which are other than of negligible value

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0166-FFM/R-2021-0166-FFM-Ecological Assessment.pdf|R-2021-0166-FFM-Ecological Assessment.pdf]]:12:7.9 There are no roost sites and only a negligible amount of suitable foraging habitat for bats on the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0166-FFM/R-2021-0166-FFM-Ecological Assessment.pdf|R-2021-0166-FFM-Ecological Assessment.pdf]]:12:site therefore impacts on bats are assessed as being negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0166-FFM/R-2021-0166-FFM-Ecological Assessment.pdf|R-2021-0166-FFM-Ecological Assessment.pdf]]:12:7.12 The amount of suitable habitat for Hedgehog on the site is negligible therefore impacts on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0166-FFM/R-2021-0166-FFM-Ecological Assessment.pdf|R-2021-0166-FFM-Ecological Assessment.pdf]]:12:Hedgehog are considered to be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0166-FFM/R-2021-0166-FFM-Ecological Assessment.pdf|R-2021-0166-FFM-Ecological Assessment.pdf]]:12:Brown Hare are considered to be negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0166-FFM/R-2021-0166-FFM-Ecological Assessment.pdf|R-2021-0166-FFM-Ecological Assessment.pdf]]:12:the site. Nevertheless the site is considered to be of negligible importance for Common Toad.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0166-FFM/R-2021-0166-FFM-Ecological Assessment.pdf|R-2021-0166-FFM-Ecological Assessment.pdf]]:13:habitats. The only species for which this has the potential to be other than a negligible effect are

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0166-FFM/R-2021-0166-FFM-Ecological Assessment.pdf|R-2021-0166-FFM-Ecological Assessment.pdf]]:14:negligible significance are:

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0166-FFM/R-2021-0166-FFM-Ecological Assessment.pdf|R-2021-0166-FFM-Ecological Assessment.pdf]]:15:11.3 The only Valued Ecological Receptors which are other than of negligible value are Dingy Skipper

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0166-FFM/R-2021-0166-FFM-Geotechnical Risk Assessment .pdf|R-2021-0166-FFM-Geotechnical Risk Assessment .pdf]]:13:is considered to be negligible and has not been considered further.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0494-FFM/R-2022-0494-FFM-Desk Based Heritage Assessment.pdf|R-2022-0494-FFM-Desk Based Heritage Assessment.pdf]]:6:            •       Negligible – areas of extremely limited or no archaeological or historic interest. These

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0205-SC/R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf|R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf]]:24: 4.4.3       Fencing, areas of bare ground and hardstanding were found to have negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0205-SC/R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf|R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf]]:84:                        the jetty. This habitat has negligible biodiversity value.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0205-SC/R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf|R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf]]:84:                        short concrete wall surrounding the perimeter. This habitat has negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0205-SC/R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf|R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf]]:85:                          of the bare ground. These habitats have negligible biodiversity value.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0205-SC/R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf|R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf]]:85:                          and along the access road where no vegetation is present that has negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0205-SC/R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf|R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf]]:85:                          negligible biodiversity value.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0205-SC/R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf|R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf]]:85:buildings B1 to B6, they are likely to have negligible suitability for roosting bats. Due to the minor suitable

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0205-SC/R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf|R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf]]:85:noise levels, this building is assessed as having low at best suitability to support roosting bats and negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0205-SC/R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf|R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf]]:86: Substation      features. This building has negligible suitability to support roosting bats.                affected, and the building

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0205-SC/R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf|R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf]]:86:                                                                                                             has negligible suitability to

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0205-SC/R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf|R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf]]:86: Sludge          roosting features and has negligible suitability to support roosting bats.                  demolished the building has

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0205-SC/R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf|R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf]]:86: storage                                                                                                     negligible suitability to

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0205-SC/R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf|R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf]]:86: Sludge          roosting features and has negligible suitability to support roosting bats.                  demolished the building has

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0205-SC/R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf|R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf]]:86: storage                                                                                                     negligible suitability to

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0205-SC/R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf|R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf]]:86: water tank      roosting features and has negligible suitability to support roosting bats.                  demolished the building has

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0205-SC/R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf|R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf]]:86:                                                                                                             negligible suitability to

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0205-SC/R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf|R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf]]:86:                 This building has negligible suitability to support roosting bats.                          negligible suitability to

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0205-SC/R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf|R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf]]:86: water tank      roosting features and has negligible suitability to support roosting bats.                  demolished the building has

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0205-SC/R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf|R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf]]:86:                                                                                                             negligible suitability to

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0205-SC/R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf|R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf]]:86:                 negligible suitability to support a maternity or hibernation roost.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0205-SC/R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf|R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf]]:106:              is negligible risk of hibernating reptiles/GCN being encountered, they may advise that such

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-Officer Report 1048.pdf|R-2021-1048-FFM-Officer Report 1048.pdf]]:19:local population are considered to be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-Officer Report 1048.pdf|R-2021-1048-FFM-Officer Report 1048.pdf]]:19:impact of the development is assessed as negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf]]:18:                                                                                                  permeability that have negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf]]:50:121    17.4      Collapsible deposits                                     Negligible (within 50m)

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf]]:50:123    17.6      Ground dissolution of soluble rocks                      Negligible (within 50m)

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf]]:115:                                                                                                     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf]]:159:                                                                                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf]]:159: On site       Negligible                                   Ground conditions predominantly non-plastic.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf]]:161:                                                                                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf]]:163:                                                                                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf]]:163: On site       Negligible      Compressible strata are not thought to occur.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf]]:165:                                                                                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf]]:165: On site       Negligible        Deposits with potential to collapse when loaded and saturated are believed not to be present.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf]]:166:                                                                                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf]]:167:                                                                                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf]]:167: On site       Negligible      Soluble rocks are either not thought to be present within the ground, or not prone to dissolution.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-SSI 1 Desk Study_final(2).pdf|R-2021-1048-FFM-SSI 1 Desk Study_final(2).pdf]]:27:There is a risk of minor fuel spills and oil leaks from vehicles but these are comparatively negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf|R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf]]:18:                                                                                                  permeability that have negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf|R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf]]:42:121    17.4      Collapsible deposits                                     Negligible (within 50m)

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf|R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf]]:42:123    17.6      Ground dissolution of soluble rocks                      Negligible (within 50m)

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf|R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf]]:107:                                                                                                     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf|R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf]]:151:                                                                                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf|R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf]]:151: On site       Negligible                                   Ground conditions predominantly non-plastic.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf|R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf]]:153:                                                                                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf|R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf]]:155:                                                                                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf|R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf]]:155: On site       Negligible      Compressible strata are not thought to occur.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf|R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf]]:157:                                                                                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf|R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf]]:157: On site       Negligible        Deposits with potential to collapse when loaded and saturated are believed not to be present.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf|R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf]]:158:                                                                                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf|R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf]]:159:                                                                                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf|R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf]]:159: On site       Negligible      Soluble rocks are either not thought to be present within the ground, or not prone to dissolution.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-EN010103-001131-NZT DCO 6.4.42 ES Vol III Appendix 18A Cultural Heritage Baseline Report.PDF|R-2021-1048-FFM-EN010103-001131-NZT DCO 6.4.42 ES Vol III Appendix 18A Cultural Heritage Baseline Report.PDF]]:6:               ‘medium’, ‘low’, ‘negligible’, or ‘unknown’. This rating is based on an

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-EN010103-001131-NZT DCO 6.4.42 ES Vol III Appendix 18A Cultural Heritage Baseline Report.PDF|R-2021-1048-FFM-EN010103-001131-NZT DCO 6.4.42 ES Vol III Appendix 18A Cultural Heritage Baseline Report.PDF]]:7:  Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-4339 Preliminary Onshore GI for NZT (Draft Report).pdf|R-2021-1048-FFM-4339 Preliminary Onshore GI for NZT (Draft Report).pdf]]:1308:influence zone of the cone tip measurement and the loss of meaningful resolution is negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-4339 Preliminary Onshore GI for NZT (Draft Report).pdf|R-2021-1048-FFM-4339 Preliminary Onshore GI for NZT (Draft Report).pdf]]:1402:    is large enough for end effects to be negligible allowing the test to be modelled as a plane strain

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-4339 Preliminary Onshore GI for NZT (Draft Report).pdf|R-2021-1048-FFM-4339 Preliminary Onshore GI for NZT (Draft Report).pdf]]:1419:two important assumptions about this output; that it is linear and that the hysteresis is negligible. The

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF|R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF]]:42:          negligible levels by an increased distance between the sensitive receptor(s) and the UXO.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF|R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF]]:99:                                                                                 Negligible      Minor        Moderate     Major    Severe

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF|R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF]]:102:      Negligible                    1         Safe for all equipment and personnel.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-2021-81 HRA NZT remediation.PDF|R-2021-1048-FFM-2021-81 HRA NZT remediation.PDF]]:6:generated by ground works rather than NOx is predicted to be negligible. Dust and particulates could

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf]]:18:                                                                                                  permeability that have negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf]]:42:121    17.4      Collapsible deposits                                     Negligible (within 50m)

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf]]:42:123    17.6      Ground dissolution of soluble rocks                      Negligible (within 50m)

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf]]:107:                                                                                                     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf]]:151:                                                                                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf]]:151: On site       Negligible                                   Ground conditions predominantly non-plastic.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf]]:153:                                                                                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf]]:155:                                                                                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf]]:155: On site       Negligible      Compressible strata are not thought to occur.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf]]:157:                                                                                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf]]:157: On site       Negligible        Deposits with potential to collapse when loaded and saturated are believed not to be present.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf]]:158:                                                                                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf]]:159:                                                                                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf]]:159: On site       Negligible      Soluble rocks are either not thought to be present within the ground, or not prone to dissolution.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-2021-83 EcIA NZT Remediation Rev A.PDF|R-2021-1048-FFM-2021-83 EcIA NZT Remediation Rev A.PDF]]:12:storage so there were mounds of tipped material. Vegetation cover was negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-2021-83 EcIA NZT Remediation Rev A.PDF|R-2021-1048-FFM-2021-83 EcIA NZT Remediation Rev A.PDF]]:13:was <5% and shrubs or invasive species were negligible. Hedge bedstraw and bird’s-foot trefoil were

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-2021-83 EcIA NZT Remediation Rev A.PDF|R-2021-1048-FFM-2021-83 EcIA NZT Remediation Rev A.PDF]]:16:adverse impacts on the local population are considered to be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-2021-83 EcIA NZT Remediation Rev A.PDF|R-2021-1048-FFM-2021-83 EcIA NZT Remediation Rev A.PDF]]:16:surrounding area so the impact of the development is assessed as negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-2021-83 EcIA NZT Remediation Rev A.PDF|R-2021-1048-FFM-2021-83 EcIA NZT Remediation Rev A.PDF]]:19:or negligible value.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-GEO_STDCO_GEOENVIRONMENTALSUMMARYREPORT(002)sm.pdf|R-2021-1048-FFM-GEO_STDCO_GEOENVIRONMENTALSUMMARYREPORT(002)sm.pdf]]:37:Negligible flow rates were reported from installations BH21, 23, 24, 26, 27, 28 and the deeper

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0100-CD/R-2021-0100-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0088-01-Prairie_Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2021-0100-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0088-01-Prairie_Risk Assessment.pdf]]:15:    Deposits                                      have negligible significance for water supply or river base flow. Based on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0100-CD/R-2021-0100-CD-STDC_HWY-ATK-HGT-PR-RP-CE-000001_C01.pdf|R-2021-0100-CD-STDC_HWY-ATK-HGT-PR-RP-CE-000001_C01.pdf]]:47: 1 to 4                               Negligible                         Could be ignored

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix H - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix H - July 2020.pdf]]:706:      drift of the glacio-lacustrine laminated clays as a “Non Aquifer” of “negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix H - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix H - July 2020.pdf]]:828:               as being negligible to low.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix H - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix H - July 2020.pdf]]:872:Oil and fuel       Lubricating oils,          Site Users           Direct contact,         Health hazard          Unlikely                                                                Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix H - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix H - July 2020.pdf]]:872:                                                                                           [[Mild]]                 migration. Negligible evidenc e of contamination detected in soil,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix H - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix H - July 2020.pdf]]:873:                                           G r o u n d w a t er (drift   Migration via           Pollution of           Unlikely                                                              Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix H - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix H - July 2020.pdf]]:892:Ground Conditions                                                                         assessed as being negligible to low.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix H - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix H - July 2020.pdf]]:895:                                                                    Groundwater      Low          Aquifer of negligible resource

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf]]:10:                                 construction works                           5) or soils of negligible nature conservation

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf]]:10:                                 negligible value                             Negligible potential for mineral reserves to

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf]]:12:                Negligible         Human Health: No measurable effects on         Impact of insufficient magnitude to

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf]]:12:                 Sensitivity/value of a                  High             Medium             Low                   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf]]:12:                 High                                    Substantial        Moderate         Minor                 Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf]]:12:                 Medium                                  Moderate           Minor            Negligible            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf]]:12:                 Low                                     Minor              Negligible       Negligible            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf]]:30:                significance is considered negligible and therefore not significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf]]:39:                high and the magnitude of impact following mitigation is negligible. There are likely to be

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf]]:39:                impacts of negligible significance after the implementation of mitigation measures. This is not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf]]:39:                impact following mitigation is negligible. Therefore, the impacts after the implementation of

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf]]:39:                mitigation measures are considered to be of negligible significance. This is not considered

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf]]:39:                construction phase is considered to be of negligible significance. This is not considered

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf]]:39:                and the magnitude of impact following mitigation is negligible. Therefore, following the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf]]:39:                implementation of mitigation measures impacts are of negligible significance. This is not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf]]:39:                impact following mitigation is negligible. Therefore, the impacts following mitigation are of

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf]]:39:                negligible significance. This is not considered significant in EIA terms.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf]]:39:                following mitigation is negligible. Therefore, the impacts are considered to be of negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf]]:40:                impacts identified is considered to be negligible following the implementation of the mitigation

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf]]:41:                     Moderate              A       P      D      LT        L        Such works will be undertaken taking into                                Negligible        A     T       D     ST      L

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf]]:41:                     Negligible            A       T      D      ST        L        appropriate EA guidance documents.            -                          Negligible        A     T       D     ST      L

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf]]:41:Management           Minor                 A       T      I      M         R                                                                                 Negligible        A      T      I     ST      L

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf]]:41:                     Minor                 A       T      D      M         L                                                      -                          Negligible        A     T       D     ST      L

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf]]:41:                     Minor                 A       T      D      ST        L                                                                                 Negligible        A     T       D     ST      L

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf]]:42:                    Moderate              A       P      D      LT      L                                                      -                       Negligible          A       T       D       ST      L

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf]]:5:                 reduced to negligible (not significant) once mitigation measures have been incorporated into a

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf]]:5:                 Biodiversity and Ecology                              Negligible effect on Teesmouth and Cleveland

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf]]:5:                 Water Management and Flooding                         Negligible to moderate beneficial impact (not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf]]:6:                                                              Negligible to minor beneficial impacts (not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf]]:6:                 Ground Conditions                            Negligible (not significant) effects are predicted on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf]]:6:                                                              term negligible (not significant).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf]]:6:                 Below Ground Heritage                        Negligible to neutral effects (not significant)

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf]]:6:                                                              Negligible effect predicted on pedestrian and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf]]:6:                 Biodiversity and Ecology                     Negligible effect on Teesmouth and Cleveland

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf]]:7:                                                              Negligible beneficial effects (not significant) on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf]]:7:                 Ground Conditions                            Negligible (not significant) effects are predicted on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf]]:7:                 Landscape and Visual Impact                  Effects will generally be negligible to minor

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf]]:8:                                                                 Negligible impacts are predicted on all other

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf]]:9:                effects of the development are either Neutral or Negligible and therefore these are not presented

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf]]:10:                RED – adverse effect; GREEN – beneficial effect; BLACK – unknown; ( ) – minor effect; - negligible/no

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf]]:17:                considered to be of negligible impact). There is potential for the onshore element to lead to loss

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf]]:17:                impacts considered as part of the proposed development are considered to be of negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf]]:19:                development and the development site due to the negligible connection between the surface

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf]]:19:                development and the development site due to the negligible connection between the surface

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf]]:20:                development and the development site due to the negligible connection between the surface

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf]]:20:                development and the development site due to the negligible connection between the surface

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf]]:20:                development and the development site due to the negligible connection between the surface

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf]]:20:                development and the development site due to the negligible connection between the surface

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf]]:21:                development and the development site due to the negligible connection between the surface

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf]]:21:                development and the development site due to the negligible connection between the surface

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf]]:23:                significant scale the overall landscape character will be negligible. Consequently there are not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf]]:23:                significant scale the overall landscape character will be negligible. Consequently there are not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix M - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix M - July 2020.pdf]]:8:            •       Negligible – areas of extremely limited or no archaeological or historic interest. These

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix M - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix M - July 2020.pdf]]:48:potential is negligible for the survival of the Eston Steel Works due to later development of the Cleveland Steelworks

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf]]:6:                 reduced to negligible levels.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf]]:19:F3.20            If the impact descriptor is negligible or slight, this is considered to not have a significant effect.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf]]:19:                                      Negligible Negligible         Slight                     Moderate

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf]]:19:                                      Negligible     Slight      Moderate                      Moderate

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf]]:19:                     negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf]]:19:                     <10% of hourly mean NO2 threshold                                Imperceptible    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf]]:20:                significant effect and a ‘negligible’ or ‘slight’ impact will not result in a significant effect in EIA

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf]]:29:                on human health and ecological designations should be negligible and the impacts would

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf]]:32:                predicted to result in a negligible impact and not significant in EIA terms.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf]]:32:                negligible impact from NO2 concentrations as a result of operational traffic. These are not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf]]:33:                 is predicted to result in a negligible impact and not significant in EIA terms.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf]]:33:                 negligible impact from PM10 concentrations as a result of operational traffic. These are not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf]]:33:                 is predicted to result in a negligible impact and not significant in EIA terms.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf]]:33:                 negligible impact from PM2.5 concentrations as a result of operational traffic and not significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf]]:33:F5.36            The magnitude of change for NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations is negligible at all receptors.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf]]:33:                 As stated in paragraph F3.24, where the impact is negligible or slight then the overall effect of

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf]]:34:                on human health and ecological designations should be negligible and the impacts would

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf]]:38:                measures suitable for medium risk sites in place, there is likely to be a negligible effect on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf]]:38:F8.6            The magnitude of change for NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations at all receptors is negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf]]:38:                  Residential receptors            Negligible effect         No mitigation measures     None.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf]]:38:                                                   Negligible effect         Dust management            None.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf]]:38:                  SSSI – Teesmouth and             Negligible effect         No mitigation measures     None.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf]]:38:                                                   Negligible effect         Dust management            None.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf]]:39:                   SPA – Teesmouth and           Negligible effect        No mitigation measures      None.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf]]:18:                                        Negligible flood risk.                      flood risk point of view.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf]]:20:                sub-divide the category of ‘Not Significant’, for example by use of the terms ‘Negligible’ in terms

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf]]:21:                                                                                                      Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf]]:21:                                                                                      Negligible      Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf]]:21:                                 Negligible               Negligible    Negligible    Negligible      Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf]]:36:                Culvert is low and the magnitude of change minor and so the effect would be negligible and not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf]]:37:                receptor, the lack of change means there is a neutral / negligible effect and so not significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf]]:37:                negligible, and not significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf]]:38:                Culvert, this would have a neutral / negligible effect and so not significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf]]:46:                will be minor, so the level of effect is therefore negligible, and not significant. Additional

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf]]:47:                gives an effect greater than minor or negligible, which is not significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf]]:47:                receptors, this would result in a negligible level of effect of pollution which would be deemed to

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf]]:47:                negligible beneficial effect for the other surface waterbodies (Holme Beck, Knitting wife,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf]]:47:                of the mitigation measures and so a substantial beneficial effect for the Tees and negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf]]:47:                will be minor, so the level of effect is therefore negligible, and not significant. Additional

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf]]:51:Other surface water          Increased runoff            Low           Negligible adverse    Implementation of water management and              No significant effect from

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf]]:51:Cleveland & Lackenby                                                                         from climate change.                                negligible beneficial impact.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf]]:52:Mercia Mudstone              Reduced infiltration        Low           Negligible adverse    No further mitigation is proposed.                    No significant effect from

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf]]:53:Superficial aquifer           Reduced infiltration        Low           Negligible adverse    No further mitigation proposed.                      No significant effect from

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf]]:53:Other surface water           Increased runoff            Very low      Negligible adverse     No additional mitigation measures are               No significant effect from

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf]]:53:                                                                                                                                                   negligible beneficial effect.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix C - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix C - July 2020.pdf]]:40:expected to be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix C - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix C - July 2020.pdf]]:40:generated by the development in this location is expected to be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf]]:9:                    Negligible                                Assets with very little or no surviving archaeological interest.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf]]:10:                    Negligible             Very minor changes to archaeological materials or setting.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf]]:11:           Magnitude of Change                  No Change     Negligible    Minor         Moderate      Substantial   No Change

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf]]:11:                          Medium                Neutral       Negligible    Minor         Moderate      Substantial   Medium

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf]]:11:                          Low                   Neutral       Negligible    Negligible    Minor         Moderate      Low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf]]:11:                          Negligible            Neutral       Negligible    Negligible    Negligible    Minor         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf]]:11:                the effect on the receptor will be Neutral, Negligible, Minor, Moderate or Substantial.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf]]:11:                  Negligible/neutral                The development satisfies the subject environmental objective but neither

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf]]:20:                offsets the negative effect to, in most cases, have a residual effect that is negligible or neutral.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf]]:20:                  Foundations of South Bank Iron Works        Low – Medium   Substantial            Negligible / Neutral

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf]]:20:                  Foundations of Antonien Works               Low            Substantial            Negligible / Neutral

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf]]:20:                  20th century Riverside Pumping House        Low            Substantial            Negligible / Neutral

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf]]:20:                  20th century Custom House                   Low            Substantial            Negligible / Neutral

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:13: R1                             19.1                    21.4                 21.8                 0.5                  Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:13: R2                             18.0                    20.2                 20.4                 0.2                  Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:13: R3                             17.8                    20.0                 20.2                 0.2                  Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:13: R4                             18.0                    20.3                 20.6                 0.3                  Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:13: R5                             17.9                    20.2                 20.6                 0.4                  Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:13: R6                             15.7                    17.9                 18.0                 0.1                  Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:13: R7                             15.3                    17.5                 17.6                 0.1                  Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:13: R8                             14.6                    16.9                 16.9                 0.1                  Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:13: R9                             15.6                    18.0                 18.1                 0.1                  Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:13: R10                            16.1                    18.6                 18.8                 0.2                  Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:13: R11                            14.3                    16.7                 16.7                 0.1                  Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:13: R12                            14.4                    16.8                 16.8                 0.1                  Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:13: R13                            15.8                    18.3                 18.4                 0.1                  Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:13: R14                            15.4                    17.9                 18.0                 0.1                  Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:13: E1                             18.6                    20.7                 20.8                 0.1                  Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:13: E2                             18.5                    20.7                 20.7                 0.1                  Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:13: R15                            26.3                    28.5                 28.6                 0.1                  Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:13: R16                            26.2                    28.4                 28.7                 0.3                  Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:13: R17                            22.3                    24.5                 24.6                 0.2                  Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:13: R18                            24.9                    27.1                 27.3                 0.2                  Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:13: R19                            28.5                    30.7                 31.2                 0.4                  Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:13: R20                            28.5                    30.7                 31.2                 0.4                  Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:13: R22                            23.6                    25.8                 26.1                 0.3                  Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:13: R23                            22.6                    24.8                 25.1                 0.3                  Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:14: R1                             12.1                    12.5                 12.6                  0.1                 Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:14: R2                             12.4                    12.8                 12.9                  < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:14: R3                             12.1                    12.5                 12.6                  < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:14: R4                             12.1                    12.5                 12.6                  < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:14: R5                             12.1                    12.6                 12.6                  0.1                 Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:14: R6                             11.9                    12.3                 12.4                  < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:14: R7                             11.8                    12.2                 12.3                  < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:14: R8                             13.5                    13.9                 13.9                  < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:14: R9                             13.7                    14.1                 14.1                  < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:14: R10                            12.2                    12.7                 12.7                  < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:14: R11                            12.1                    12.5                 12.5                  < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:14: R12                            12.1                    12.5                 12.5                  < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:14: R13                            12.3                    12.8                 12.8                  < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:14: R14                            12.3                    12.7                 12.7                  < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:14: E1                             10.6                    11.0                 11.1                  < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:14: E2                             10.6                    11.0                 11.0                  < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:14: R15                            15.2                    16.0                 16.0                  < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:14: R16                            15.4                    16.4                 16.5                  0.1                 Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:14: R17                            14.4                    15.6                 15.7                  0.1                 Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:14: R18                            15.1                    16.5                 16.6                  0.1                 Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:14: R19                            14.0                    14.3                 14.3                  0.1                 Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:14: R20                            14.0                    14.3                 14.3                  0.1                 Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:14: R21                            15.3                    13.8                 13.8                  0.1                 Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:14: R22                            13.1                    13.5                 13.6                  0.1                 Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:14: R23                            12.7                    13.1                 13.2                  0.1                 Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:15: R1                             7.9                   8.0                   8.0                   < 0.1                Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:15: R2                             8.1                   8.2                   8.2                   < 0.1                Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:15: R3                             7.8                   7.9                   7.9                   < 0.1                Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:15: R4                             7.8                   7.9                   8.0                   < 0.1                Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:15: R5                             7.8                   8.0                   8.0                   < 0.1                Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:15: R6                             7.7                   7.8                   7.8                   < 0.1                Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:15: R7                             7.7                   7.8                   7.8                   < 0.1                Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:15: R8                             8.0                   8.2                   8.2                   < 0.1                Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:15: R9                             8.1                   8.3                   8.3                   < 0.1                Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:15: R10                            7.7                   7.8                   7.8                   < 0.1                Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:15: R11                            7.6                   7.7                   7.7                   < 0.1                Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:15: R12                            7.6                   7.7                   7.7                   < 0.1                Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:15: R13                            7.7                   7.9                   7.9                   < 0.1                Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:15: R14                            7.7                   7.8                   7.9                   < 0.1                Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:15: E1                             7.1                   7.2                   7.2                   < 0.1                Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:15: E2                             7.1                   7.2                   7.2                   < 0.1                Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:15: R15                            9.5                   9.8                   9.8                   < 0.1                Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:15: R16                            9.9                   10.3                  10.4                  < 0.1                Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:15: R17                            9.0                   9.6                   9.6                   < 0.1                Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:15: R18                            9.7                   10.4                  10.5                  0.1                  Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:15: R19                            9.0                   9.0                   9.1                   0.1                  Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:15: R20                            9.0                   9.0                   9.1                   0.1                  Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:15: R21                            9.8                   8.7                   8.8                   < 0.1                Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:15: R22                            8.4                   8.5                   8.5                   < 0.1                Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF]]:15: R23                            8.2                   8.3                   8.4                   < 0.1                Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf]]:12:                 experience a negligible impact, or in the case of Smiths Dock Road, minor beneficial effects are

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf]]:13:                 negligible (and therefore not significant) impacts on the Teesmouth and Cleveland Coast SPA

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf]]:15:                 the implementation of best practice mitigation measures there is anticipated to be a negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf]]:15:                 a negligible impact from NO2 concentrations as a result of the proposed traffic. This is not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf]]:15:7.9              To ensure a negligible and non-significant impact is maintained during the construction stage of

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf]]:16:                 receptors is considered to be minor or negligible and therefore not significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf]]:17:                 (described below) this is expected to result in a negligible (and not significant) impact on human

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf]]:17:                 health. Previous studies undertaken suggest there would be a negligible impact on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf]]:17:                 however through the implementation of best practice measures negligible impacts are

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf]]:17:9.10             The implementation of these measures will result in negligible (and not significant) effects at all

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf]]:19:                 and as a result the impact is expected to be negligible and not significant on the remaining

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf]]:19:                 hardstanding areas it is anticipated that this will also have a nil or negligible impact on the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf]]:19:                 anticipated that the impacts are expected to be negligible (and not significant).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf]]:20:                 LCZs are considered to be minor or negligible in nature. There is the potential for a moderate

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf]]:20:                 considered to be minor or negligible in nature and are therefore not significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf]]:21:                 considered to be negligible and not significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf]]:22:                 of the ES can be secured and that the effects are negligible or kept to an absolute minimum. The

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Transport Assessment.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-Transport Assessment.pdf]]:38:expected to be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Transport Assessment.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-Transport Assessment.pdf]]:38:generated by the development in this location is expected to be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - July 2020.pdf]]:13:                     Negligible                                            Less than 3.0

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - July 2020.pdf]]:13:                     Negligible                                             Less than 1.0

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - July 2020.pdf]]:20:                a negligible increase in road traffic noise levels within the local area, therefore no significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - July 2020.pdf]]:26:                expected to be a negligible impact in the short term and a negligible impact in the long term.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf]]:5:   Low                          Medium risk site      Low risk site      Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf]]:5:   Low                          Low risk site         Low risk site      Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf]]:5:   Low                          Low risk site         Low risk site      Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf]]:5:   Medium                       Medium risk site      Low risk site      Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf]]:5:   Low                          Low risk site         Low risk site      Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf]]:25:R1                           20.0                    20.1                  20.6                  0.4                   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf]]:25:R2                           18.9                    19.0                  19.2                  0.2                   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf]]:25:R3                           18.5                    18.6                  18.8                  0.2                   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf]]:25:R4                           18.7                    18.9                  19.2                  0.3                   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf]]:25:R5                           18.2                    18.5                  18.9                  0.4                   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf]]:25:R6                           16.1                    16.2                  16.3                  0.1                   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf]]:25:R7                           15.6                    15.8                  15.9                  0.1                   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf]]:25:R8                           14.1                    14.3                  14.3                  0.1                   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf]]:25:R9                           15.1                    15.4                  15.5                  0.1                   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf]]:25:R10                          15.8                    16.2                  16.4                  0.2                   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf]]:25:R11                          13.9                    14.1                  14.2                  0.1                   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf]]:25:R12                          14.0                    14.2                  14.3                  0.1                   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf]]:25:R13                          15.4                    15.8                  15.9                  0.1                   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf]]:25:R14                          15.0                    15.4                  15.5                  0.1                   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf]]:25:E1                           18.9                    18.9                  19.0                  0.1                   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf]]:25:E2                           18.8                    18.8                  18.8                  0.1                   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf]]:25:R1                           12.5                     12.5                 12.6                  0.1                   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf]]:25:R2                           12.3                     12.3                 12.3                  < 0.1                 Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf]]:25:R3                           11.9                     11.9                 11.9                  < 0.1                 Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf]]:25:R4                           11.9                     11.9                 11.9                  < 0.1                 Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf]]:25:R5                           11.8                     11.9                 11.9                  0.1                   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf]]:25:R6                           11.6                     11.6                 11.7                  < 0.1                 Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf]]:25:R7                           11.5                     11.5                 11.6                  < 0.1                 Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf]]:25:R8                           13.2                     13.2                 13.2                  < 0.1                 Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf]]:25:R9                           13.4                     13.4                 13.4                  < 0.1                 Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf]]:26: R10                          12.1                     12.2                  12.2                 < 0.1              Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf]]:26: R11                          11.8                     11.8                  11.8                 < 0.1              Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf]]:26: R12                          11.8                     11.8                  11.8                 < 0.1              Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf]]:26: R13                          12.0                     12.1                  12.1                 < 0.1              Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf]]:26: R14                          12.0                     12.0                  12.0                 < 0.1              Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf]]:26: E1                           10.5                     10.5                  10.6                 < 0.1              Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf]]:26: E2                           10.5                     10.5                  10.5                 < 0.1              Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf]]:26: R1                           7.9                    7.9                   8.0                   < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf]]:26: R2                           7.9                    7.9                   8.0                   < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf]]:26: R3                           7.6                    7.6                   7.7                   < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf]]:26: R4                           7.6                    7.7                   7.7                   < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf]]:26: R5                           7.6                    7.7                   7.7                   < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf]]:26: R6                           7.5                    7.5                   7.5                   < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf]]:26: R7                           7.5                    7.5                   7.5                   < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf]]:26: R8                           7.9                    7.9                   7.9                   < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf]]:26: R9                           8.0                    8.0                   8.0                   < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf]]:26: R10                          7.6                    7.6                   7.6                   < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf]]:26: R11                          7.4                    7.5                   7.5                   < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf]]:26: R12                          7.4                    7.5                   7.5                   < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf]]:26: R13                          7.6                    7.6                   7.6                   < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf]]:26: R14                          7.5                    7.6                   7.6                   < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf]]:26: E1                           7.0                    7.0                   7.0                   < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf]]:26: E2                           7.0                    7.0                   7.0                   < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF]]:14:                experience a negligible impact, or in the case of Smiths Dock Road, minor beneficial effects are

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF]]:15:                are expected to be negligible (and therefore not significant) impacts on the Teesmouth and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF]]:17:                the implementation of best practice mitigation measures there is anticipated to be a negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF]]:17:                and ecological). It is concluded that all receptors are predicted to experience a negligible or

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF]]:17:                concluded that all receptors are predicted to experience a negligible impact from Fine

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF]]:17:7.9             To ensure a negligible and non-significant impact is maintained during the construction stage of

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF]]:18:                receptors is considered to be minor or negligible and therefore not significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF]]:19:                (described below) this is expected to result in a negligible (and not significant) impact on human

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF]]:19:                health. Previous studies undertaken suggest there would be a negligible impact on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF]]:19:                however through the implementation of best practice measures negligible impacts are

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF]]:20:9.10            The implementation of these measures will result in negligible (and not significant) effects at all

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF]]:21:                and as a result the impact is expected to be negligible and not significant on the remaining

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF]]:21:                hardstanding areas it is anticipated that this will also have a nil or negligible impact on the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF]]:21:                anticipated that the impacts are expected to be negligible (and not significant).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF]]:23:                LCZs are considered to be minor or negligible in nature. There is the potential for a moderate

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF]]:23:                considered to be minor or negligible in nature and are therefore not significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF]]:23:                considered to be negligible and not significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF]]:24:                of the ES can be secured and that the effects are negligible or kept to an absolute minimum. The

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf]]:8:                   vi.      Negligible – Nugatory effect on species or habitats present are anticipated.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf]]:10:                mostly limited to developed land of negligible ecological value (see Appendix D3).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf]]:14:                (Hypericum perforatum), and bird’s-foot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus). A negligible abundance of

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf]]:15:                 site, however bare ground cover is negligible outside this area. Grass is relatively rank, with

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf]]:15:D4.23            Due to this habitat generally being of negligible value for floral ecological features and not itself

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf]]:18:D4.43           Due to this habitat generally being of negligible value for ecological features, and the small size

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf]]:19:D4.47            Due to this habitat generally being of negligible value for ecological features and the lack of

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf]]:19:                 sided metal structures of negligible value for ecological features.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf]]:22:                sided metal structures of negligible value for roosting bats.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf]]:39: Teesmouth             Pollution of riverine          Indirect pollution as a result of sediment,    Major           Direction of sediments and contaminated      Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf]]:39:                       Increased light-spill          Illumination of River Tees by unshielded       Moderate        Directional lighting during construction     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf]]:39: Teesmouth             Pollution of riverine          Indirect pollution as a result of sediment,    Major           Direction of sediments and contaminated      Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf]]:39:                       Increased light-spill          Illumination of River Tees by unshielded       Moderate        Directional lighting during construction     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf]]:41:                       Potential harm to            Unmitigated removal of trees, scrub,          Moderate        Vegetation clearance undertaken outside          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf]]:42:                      Potential harm to             Unmitigated removal of wetland habitat          Moderate        Vegetation clearance undertaken outside            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf]]:42: Bats                 Loss of foraging and          Loss of woodland, scrub, grasslands, OMH,       Negligible      No mitigation proposed. No habitat                 Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf]]:42:                      Disturbance of species        Lighting columns have the potential to          Minor           Lighting used during construction and              Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf]]:42: Otter                Disturbance to otter          Noise and vibration originating from the        Minor           Screening of any construction works                Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf]]:43: Marine                Disturbance to marine        Noise and vibration originating from the     Minor           Screening of any construction works         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf]]:43: Migratory Fish        Potential harm of            Pollution of the River Tees as a result of   Minor           Employment of CEMP during construction      Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf]]:43: Hedgehog              Potential harm of            Uncovered dug trenches and excavations       Minor           Cover trenches overnight or include         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf]]:12:               Negligible            Materials are forecast (through trend analysis and other information) to be free from

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf]]:13:                 Negligible           The consumption of no individual material type would be equal to or greater than 1%

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf]]:14:                                                                            No change Negligible      Minor       Moderate        Major

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf]]:14:                                              Medium                        Neutral    Negligible /   Slight   Moderate           Moderate

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf]]:14:                                              Low                           Neutral    Negligible /   Negligible Slight           Minor /

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf]]:14:                                              Negligible                    Neutral    Nil            Negligible Negligible /     Slight

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf]]:19:J5.10           Therefore, the magnitude of the impact of demolition waste is considered to be negligible (<1%).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf]]:19:                that the overall significance of the potential effect is nil or negligible (not significant).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf]]:19:J5.16           Therefore, the magnitude of impact of excavation materials is considered to be negligible. This,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf]]:19:                overall significance of the potential effect is nil or negligible (not significant).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf]]:20:                the magnitude of the impact of construction waste is considered to be negligible (<1%). This,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf]]:20:                overall significance of the potential effect is nil or negligible (not significant).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf]]:21:                receptor, the overall significance of the effect is considered to be nil or negligible (not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf]]:21:                proposed development are considered to be negligible. Given the low sensitivity of the regional

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf]]:25:                remain as negligible or nil (not significant).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf]]:26:                be nil or negligible which is not considered significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - July 2020.pdf]]:12:I3.10           The socio-economic effects of the proposed development are identified as ‘beneficial’, ‘negligible’

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - July 2020.pdf]]:13:                 Negligible          No obvious significant effect to a receptor or environment.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - July 2020.pdf]]:13:                 Negligible          Where no discernible effect is expected as a result of the proposed development on the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - July 2020.pdf]]:13:                 change/effects High                Medium              Low                                Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - July 2020.pdf]]:13:                 High                   Substantial                    Moderate to   Minor to Moderate Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - July 2020.pdf]]:13:                 Medium                 Moderate to                    Moderate      Minor                 Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - July 2020.pdf]]:13:                 Low                    Minor to Moderate Minor                      Negligible to Minor   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - July 2020.pdf]]:13:                 Negligible             Negligible                     Negligible    Negligible            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - July 2020.pdf]]:22:                storage and post. Similarly, the labour supply scenario forecasts only a negligible increase in

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - July 2020.pdf]]:28:                of the significance criteria matrix. The effects are assessed as being beneficial, negligible or

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - July 2020.pdf]]:28:                negligible. An assessment of the likely effects in relation to each receptor is presented in Table

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf]]:9:                •     Negligible – effects which are unlikely to be perceptible to drivers, bus passengers or those

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf]]:9:                •     Negligible – effects which are unlikely to be perceptible and within the normal variation of

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf]]:19:                                      Medium         non-motorised users to cross at the                 Minor        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf]]:19:                                        High                                                           Negligible     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf]]:20:                       therefore considered to be negligible;

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf]]:20:                       negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf]]:20:                safety is expected to be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf]]:21:                be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf]]:25:                  A1085 Trunk            Minor adverse        Travel Planning measures, alongside a Servicing       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf]]:25:                  A66/Normanby           Minor adverse        Travel Planning measures to be introduced to          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf]]:27:                  A66/Tees Dock          Negligible effect on   None required                           Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf]]:28:                  A1085 Trunk            Minor adverse          Travel Planning measures, alongside   Negligible - the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf]]:28:                  A1053                  Negligible effect on   None required                         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf]]:28:                  A66/Old Station        Negligible effect on   None required                         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf]]:28:                  A66/Normanby           Minor adverse          Travel Planning measures to be        Negligible - the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf]]:28:                  A66/Eston              Negligible effect on   None required                         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf]]:37:                 would result in a negligible increase in road traffic noise within the local area. Noise emission

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf]]:38:                 through the modelling process was predicted to be negligible at all receptors. The overall effect

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf]]:44:                 facilities and the built environment and landscape will all be of negligible significance during

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf]]:47:                 waste from the proposed development are all considered to result in a negligible impact on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf]]:27:                4     Neutral/negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf]]:44:locations set out in the table range from negligible to moderate adverse.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf]]:45:The changes at these junctions are considered to range from negligible to

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf]]:46:summarised in Table C7.1 of the ES. The impacts range from negligible to

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf]]:53:is noted as ranging from negligible to major negative effect at county level.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf]]:60:movements, this is expected to be a negligible impact in the short term and a

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf]]:60:negligible impact in the long term.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf]]:67:place, there is likely to be a negligible effect on receptors from the dust-

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf]]:67:receptors is negligible. The overall effect of the proposed development on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf]]:74:significance is considered negligible and therefore not significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf]]:77:negligible. There are likely to be impacts of negligible significance after the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf]]:77:magnitude of impact following mitigation is negligible. Therefore, the impacts

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf]]:77:negligible significance. This is not considered significant in EIA terms.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf]]:77:negligible significance. This is not considered significant in EIA terms.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf]]:77:mitigation is negligible. Therefore, following the implementation of mitigation

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf]]:77:measures impacts are of negligible significance. This is not considered

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf]]:77:the magnitude of impact following mitigation is negligible. Therefore, the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf]]:77:impacts following mitigation are of negligible significance. This is not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf]]:78:the magnitude of impact following mitigation is negligible. Therefore, the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf]]:78:impacts are considered to be of negligible significance. This is not considered

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf]]:78:residual significance of the impacts identified is considered to be negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf]]:88:the proposed development is therefore considered to be negligible with the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf]]:89:development would be nil or negligible which is not considered significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf]]:96:negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf]]:97:negligible effect on the Industrial, Coast and Peninsula, Coatham Marsh,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf]]:97:ranging from negligible to a temporary, short-term minor to moderate adverse

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf]]:97:is noted that the significance of effect ranges from negligible to minor adverse

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf]]:98:7 and 8 are considered to be negligible and not significant in EIA terms.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf]]:98:landscape character zones and a temporary, short-term, negligible effect on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf]]:99:Other impacts upon specified LCZs are considered to be minor or negligible in

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf]]:99:to minor or negligible in nature.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf]]:99:minor to negligible adverse impacts. As stated above the site is allocated for

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf]]:102:negative effect to, in most cases, have a residual effect that is negligible or

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf]]:13:                  Negligible             The size and scale of change is considered very small due to the extent and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf]]:18:                    Negligible                     The proposed development is barely discernible within the landscape and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf]]:20:                  Neutral / negligible                Maintain the character of the receiving landscape.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf]]:20:                  Neutral / negligible                The proposed development would cause no discernible deterioration or

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf]]:20:                                                      improvement in a view. In most instances, a negligible effect will arise where

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf]]:20:                                                      negligible magnitude of change.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf]]:21:                EIA terms. Those classified as minor or negligible are likely to be not significant in EIA terms

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf]]:22:                                 Negligible                   Negligible            Negligible           Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf]]:45:                considered to be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf]]:45:                character zones and a temporary, short-term, negligible effect on the Industrial, Coast and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf]]:45:                negligible to a temporary, short-term minor to moderate adverse effect upon views and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf]]:46:                  All landscape and        Negligible to            Adverse                   Direct and short-      Implementation of

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf]]:46:                Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf]]:46:                  LCZ 1 - Industrial       Low                      Negligible                Moderate               Direct, Permanent

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf]]:48:                magnitude of change is therefore considered to be Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf]]:48:L5.28           Combining all of these criteria, it is considered that there will be a Negligible level of effect,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf]]:48:                  LCZ 4 – Coast and        Medium             Negligible      Negligible             Indirect,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf]]:48:                magnitude of change is therefore considered to be Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf]]:48:L5.33           Combining all of these criteria, it is considered that there will be a Negligible level of effect,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf]]:49:                  LCZ 5 – Coatham          Medium-High        Negligible       Negligible          Indirect,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf]]:49:                of the LCZ. The magnitude of change is therefore considered to be Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf]]:49:L5.43           Combining all of these criteria, it is considered that there will be a Negligible level of effect,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf]]:50:                  LCZ 7 – Salthouse        Medium-High        Negligible         Negligible             Indirect,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf]]:50:                of the LCZ. The magnitude of change is therefore considered to be Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf]]:50:L5.48           Combining all of these criteria, it is considered that there will be a Negligible level of effect,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf]]:50:                  LCZ 8 – Rural      Medium                Negligible          Negligible             Indirect, Permanent

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf]]:51:                  LCZ 1 - Industrial       Low                      Negligible        Moderate          Direct, Permanent

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf]]:51:                  LCZ 4 – Coast and        Medium                   Negligible        Negligible –      Indirect,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf]]:51:                  LCZ 5 – Coatham          Medium-High              Negligible        Negligible -      Indirect,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf]]:51:                  LCZ 7 – Salthouse        Medium-High              Negligible        Negligible –      Indirect,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf]]:51:                  LCZ 8 – Rural            Medium                   Negligible        Negligible –      Indirect,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf]]:55:L5.88           The assessment of the magnitude of change is therefore considered to be Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf]]:55:                  VP6                      Footpath Users       Negligible     Minor Adverse      Direct, Permanent

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf]]:55:L5.93           The assessment of the magnitude of change is therefore considered to be Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf]]:55:                  VP7                      Footpath Users       Negligible     Minor Adverse      Direct, Permanent

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf]]:59:                  VP6                      Footpath Users -     Negligible     Minor Adverse -   Direct, Permanent

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf]]:59:                  VP7                      Footpath Users -     Negligible     Minor Adverse -   Direct, Permanent

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf]]:61:                and 10. Construction effects upon views 6, 7 and 8 are considered to be negligible and not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf]]:61:                temporary, short-term, negligible effect on the Industrial, Coast and Peninsula, Coatham

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf]]:61:                  LCZ 1 - Industrial Low                            Negligible     Moderate           Direct, Permanent

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf]]:61:                  LCZ 4 – Coast and         Medium                  Negligible     Negligible –       Indirect,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf]]:61:                  LCZ 5 – Coatham           Medium-High             Negligible     Negligible -       Indirect,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf]]:61:                  LCZ 7 – Salthouse         Medium-High             Negligible     Negligible –       Indirect,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf]]:61:                  LCZ 8 – Rural             Medium                  Negligible     Negligible –       Indirect,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf]]:62:                  VP6                       Footpath Users -   Negligible       Minor Adverse -       Direct, Permanent

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf]]:62:                  VP7                       Footpath Users -   Negligible       Minor Adverse -       Direct, Permanent

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf]]:63:                considered to be minor or negligible in nature.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf]]:63:                Viewpoint 9. The effects upon other viewpoint are considered to minor or negligible in nature.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf]]:63:                  LCZ 4 – Coast and        Negligible –       Buildings to be articulated in a way       Negligible –

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf]]:63:                  LCZ 5 – Coatham          Negligible -       Buildings to be articulated in a way       Negligible -

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf]]:64:                  LCZ 7 – Salthouse        Negligible –     Buildings to be articulated in a way       Negligible –

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf]]:64:                  LCZ 8 – Rural            Negligible –     Buildings to be articulated in a way       Negligible –

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - July 2020.pdf|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - July 2020.pdf]]:18:                the annual emissions from Redcar and Cleveland as a whole. This is not a negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 3).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 3).PDF]]:183:                       development is negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 3).PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 3).PDF]]:193:                       negligible, and the results show that the network, overall, would likely operate

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF]]:12:                4     Neutral/negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF]]:23:                Greystones                High                Greatest increase in delay of 3            Negligible          Minor adverse

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF]]:23:                Riverside Park Road Medium                    Greatest increase in delay of 2            Negligible          Minor adverse

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF]]:23:                A171 Cargo Fleet          Medium              Greatest increase in delay of 2            Negligible          Minor adverse

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF]]:23:                Ormesby Road /            Medium              Greatest increase in delay of 6            Negligible          Minor adverse

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF]]:25:                Greystones              Minor, permanent            STDC transport strategy to outline    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF]]:25:                Riverside Park  Minor, permanent                    STDC transport strategy to outline    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF]]:26:                West Terrace /         Minor, permanent          STDC transport strategy to outline    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF]]:26:                A171 Cargo Fleet       Minor, permanent          STDC transport strategy to outline    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF]]:26:                A171 Cargo Fleet Minor, permanent                STDC transport strategy to outline    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF]]:27:                Ormesby Road /         Minor, permanent          STDC transport strategy to outline    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF]]:31:                include: international, national, regional, county, local or negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF]]:64:                predicted to result in negligible or slight adverse impacts and is not considered to be significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF]]:64:                negligible impact from NO2 concentrations as a result of operational traffic. This is not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF]]:64:                is predicted to result in a negligible impact and not considered to be significant in EIA terms.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF]]:64:                negligible impact from PM10 concentrations as a result of operational traffic. This is not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF]]:65:                is predicted to result in a negligible impact and not considered to be significant in EIA terms.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF]]:65:                negligible impact from PM2.5 concentrations as a result of operational traffic and not considered

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF]]:65:5.62            The magnitude of change for NO2 concentrations is predicted to be negligible or slight adverse

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF]]:65:                negligible at all receptors. As stated in Paragraph F3.24 of the July 2020 ES, where the impact is

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF]]:65:                predicted to be negligible or slight, then the overall effect of the proposed development on local

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF]]:66:5.70            The magnitude of change for NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations at all receptors is negligible or

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF]]:66:                Residential receptors          Negligible or slight          No mitigation measures are None.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF]]:70:                 Remains of the South Bank Iron Works blast furnaces             Medium       Substantial    Negligible /

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF]]:70:                 Foundations of South Bank Iron Works boiler house               Low –       Substantial     Negligible /

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF]]:70:                 Foundations of Antonien Works                                   Low         Substantial     Negligible /

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF]]:70:                 20th century Riverside Pumping House                            Low         Substantial     Negligible /

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF]]:70:                 20th century Custom House                                       Low         Substantial     Negligible /

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF]]:70:                 Prehistoric remains                                             Medium      Minor           Negligible /

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF]]:73:                out the residual effects of the development are either Neutral of Negligible and therefore these

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF|R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF]]:74:                RED – adverse effect; GREEN – beneficial effect; BLACK – unknown; ( ) – minor effect; - negligible/no effect anticipated; * -

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:44:            Negligible                  No Listed Importance

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:45:          Negligible                    No impact or no discernible impact.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:45:              •   Negligible: The impact is only very slightly detectable/noticeable or is

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:46:                                         Negligible (No

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:46:                                                          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:60:        Bats. The buildings surrounding the site were assessed as having negligible roosting

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:60:        ranges; however, the habitats present on site offer negligible opportunities for foraging

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:65:        negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:66:        negligible, however some minimal mitigation measures shall be put in place for reptiles,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:68:        reptiles are assessed as negligible from the operation of the facility.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:122:                          Negligible flood risk.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:124:        Significant’, for example by use of the terms ‘Slight’ and ‘Negligible’ in terms of the level

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:125:          Moderate            Large            Large             Moderate          Slight             Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:125:          Minor               Moderate         Moderate          Slight            Negligible         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:125:          No change           Negligible       Negligible        Negligible        Negligible         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:134:        also be subject to a level of effect that would be negligible, and not significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:135:        sensitivity receptor of Holme Beck, this would result in a negligible level of effect of

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:135:        sensitivity receptors, this would result in a negligible effect, which is not significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:135:        would be negligible and, therefore, not significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:136:              result in a negligible level of effect of pollution which would be deemed to be not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:136:              of very low, the level of effect is therefore negligible, and not significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:136:              determined to be negligible, and not significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:136:              sensitivity aquifer receptors, this would result in a negligible level of effect of pollution

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:137:        drainage system. As such, the magnitude of change for flow would be negligible and,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:137:        would be negligible, so that the level of effect would be negligible, and not significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:137:        water bodies) flows would be negligible and, for the very low sensitivity freshwater river

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:137:        discharges, the level of effect would be negligible, and not significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:137:        negligible and for the very low sensitivity freshwater river discharges, the level of effect

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:137:        would be negligible, and not significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:138:        negligible, and the level of effect on the low sensitivity groundwater receptors is

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:138:        negligible, and not significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:144:Other surface      Increased            Very low               Negligible      Implementation of Drainage Strategy to reduce         No significant effect

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:144:                   Mobilisation of                             Negligible      Implementation of Drainage Strategy to remove         No significant effect

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:144:Mercia             Reduced              Low                    Negligible      Few impermeable surfaces are proposed.                No significant effect

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:145:Superficial       Reduced              Low                    Negligible       Few impermeable surfaces are proposed.                No significant effect

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:146:                 Spillages and                               Negligible            It is expected that embedded mitigation measures      No significant effect

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:146:Other surface    Increased            Very low               Negligible            It is expected that embedded mitigation measures      No significant effect

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:147:Knitting Wife      Spillages and                               Negligible       It is expected that embedded mitigation measures       No significant effect

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:147:                   Pollution from                              Negligible       It is expected that embedded mitigation measures       No significant effect

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:147:                   Pollution from                              Negligible       It is expected that embedded mitigation measures       No significant effect

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:150:            Negligible    •   A water body not included in the above categories.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:170:            Negligible              Assets that have very limited or no archaeological, historical or

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:170:            Negligible /            No appreciable change to the asset or its setting.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:179:                                               Negligible or

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:190:        There would be negligible increases in employment in Middlesbrough and Stockton-on-

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:217:                  Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:218:        beneficial or negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:218:                Sensitivity              High          Moderate             Low           Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:218:                   High                 Major            Major           Moderate         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:218:                Moderate                Major          Moderate            Minor          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:218:                   Low                Moderate           Minor           Negligible       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:219:        considered to be “minor” or “negligible” are not considered to be significant in the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:229:         on severance is considered to be of negligible significance at the local level. The

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:229:         in terms of driver delay, will be of negligible significance at the local level. The potential

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:230:        is considered to be of negligible significance at the local level. The potential impact will

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:230:        amenity is considered to be of negligible significance at the local level. The potential

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:231:        negligible significance at the local level.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:231:        as negligible significance at the local level.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:231:        identified as negligible significance at the local level.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:231:        identified as negligible significance at the local level.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:232:        to an impact of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:232:        development phase was previously identified as being of negligible significance at the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:232:        development phase was previously identified as being of negligible significance at the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:232:        completed development phase was previously identified as being of negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:232:        completed development phase was previously identified as being of negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:232:        negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:233:                 •   A residual impact on severance of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:233:                 •   A residual impact on driver delay of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:233:                 •   A residual impact on pedestrian delay of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:233:                 •   A residual impact on pedestrian amenity of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:234: Driver Delay, Severance,             Minor adverse significance       Construction Environmental                 Negligible significance

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:234: Severance                            Negligible significance at the                       -                      Negligible significance

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:234: Driver Delay                         Negligible significance at the                       -                      Negligible significance

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:234: Pedestrian Delay                     Negligible significance at the   Provision of improved pedestrian links     Negligible significance

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf]]:234: Pedestrian Amenity                       Negligible significance                                                     Negligible significance

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:25:Where the impacts are negligible the overall significance is judged to be ‘not significant’.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:25:75% or less of AQAL                                 Negligible             Negligible       Slight             Moderate

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:25:76-94% of AQAL                                      Negligible             Slight           Moderate           Moderate

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:27:to be negligible. Where short-term impacts are considered, if the PC is less than 10% of the assessment level the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:27:impacts are considered negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:47:    Dust Soiling                       Low Risk                              Low Risk                              Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:47:    Human Health                       Low Risk                              Low Risk                              Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:48:– where the PC is less than 0.5% of the AQAL the impacts will be negligible, regardless of the location-specific

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:48:– where the PC is between 0.5% and 1.5% of the AQAL the impacts will be negligible, as long as the location-

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:48:– where the PC is between 1.5% and 5.5% of the AQAL the impacts will be negligible, as long as the location-

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:48:– non-negligible impacts descriptors are dependent on the matrix set out in Table 6 which is based on PC

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:48:Dust as PM2.5 a                                  25                      0.3%            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:48:HCl                                              20                      0.1%            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:48:HF                                               16                      0.1%            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:48:NH3                                              180                     0.1%            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:49:PAH as B(a)P                                        0.25                    <0.1%           Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:49:Dioxins and furans (PCCD/F)                         0.0000003               0.3%            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:49:Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)                    0.2                     <0.1%           Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:49:                             Thallium               1                       <0.1%           Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:49:Group 2 metals               Mercury                0.25                    0.1%            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:49:Group 3 metals               Antimony               5                       0.1%            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:49:                             Chromium(III)          5                       0.1%            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:49:                             Copper                 10                      0.1%            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:49:                             Vanadium               5                       0.1%            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:49:PM10                                     40                    0.1%                         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:50:Dioxins and furans                        0.0000003             0.2%                         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:50:PCBs                                      0.2                   <0.1%                        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:50:                    Cobalt                1                     0.3%                         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:50:                    Lead                  0.25                  0.4%                         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:50:All impacts are described as negligible and the PECs are all well below the AQAL. There is no risk of an exceedance

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:50:1-12                                 1.5 to 5.5%                         <75.5%                        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:50:13-39                                0.5 to 1.5%                         <75.5%                        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:50:40-41                                1.5 to 5.5%                         <75.5%                        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:50:42-52                                0.5 to 1.5%                         <75.5%                        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:50:1-12                                 1.5 to 5.5%                         <75.5%                        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:50:13-22                                0.5 to 1.5%                         <75.5%                        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:50:23                                   1.5 to 5.5%                         <75.5%                        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:50:24-39                                0.5 to 1.5%                         <75.5%                        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:50:40-41                                1.5 to 5.5%                         <75.5%                        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:51:42-52                               0.5 to 1.5%                       <75.5%                            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:51:VOCs is negligible based on the descriptors set out in Table 6.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:51:5              1.38          0.10          2.1%            1.48            29.7%          1.5 to        <75.5%        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:51:2.25           0.23          0.10          4.6%            0.33            14.9%          1.5 to        <75.5%        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:51:therefore described as negligible based on the descriptors set out in Table 6.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:51:0.25        0.17          0.002     0.9       0.172        68.9%               1.5 to 5.5%         <75.5%            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:52:described as negligible based on the descriptors set out in Table 6.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:52:5           0.63            0.21    4.2%      0.84         16.8%               1.5 to 5.5%     <75.5%          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:52:– antimony, chromium(III), copper and vanadium impacts are described as negligible based on their maximum

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:52:– At locations of relevant exposure the impacts of cobalt and lead can also be described as negligible based on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:52:negligible based on the maximum PC being less than 0.5% of the AQAL. As this represents the maximum likely

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:52:Manganese            0.15                 0.4%                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:52:Arsenic              0.003                0.3%                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:53:Chromium(VI)         0.0002               0.2%                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:53:Manganese            0.15                 0.1%                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:53:Arsenic              0.003                <0.1%                                   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:53:Chromium(VI)         0.0002               <0.1%                                   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:53:Manganese            0.15                 <0.1%                                   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:53:Nickel               0.02                 0.1%                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:53:be described as negligible based on the maximum PCs being less than 0.5% of the AQAL.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:53:the mean and minimum emission concentrations in Table 11, the impact is described as negligible. The PECs and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:53:metal can be described as negligible based on the maximum PCs being less than 0.5% of the AQAL.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:54:impact is negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:54:considered negligible, as shown in Table 36.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:55:20        0.24      0.16 0.8%        0.40      2.0%               0.5 to 1.5% <75.5%                  Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:55:20        1.24                       1.40      7.0%                                <75.5%             Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:55:20        1.16                       1.32      6.6%                                <75.5%             Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:55:20        1.25                       1.41      7.0%                                <75.5%             Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:55:20        2.40                       2.56      12.8%                               <75.5%             Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:55:20        18.33                      18.48 92.4%                                   <94.5%             Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:61:NO2                                         Negligible                                         Insignificant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:61:Dust as PM10 a                              Negligible                                         Insignificant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:61:Dust as PM2.5 a                             Negligible                                         -

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:61:VOC                                         Negligible                                         Insignificant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:61:HCl                                         Negligible                                         Insignificant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:61:HF                                          Negligible                                         Insignificant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:61:NH3                                         Negligible                                         Insignificant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:62:PAH as B(a)P                                  Negligible                                      -

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:62:Dioxins and furans (PCCD/F)                   Negligible                                      -

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:62:Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)              Negligible                                      Insignificant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:62:Group 1 metals            Cadmium             Negligible                                      -

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:62:                          Thallium            Negligible                                      Insignificant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:62:Group 2 metals            Mercury             Negligible                                      Insignificant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:62:Group 3 metals            Antimony            Negligible                                      Insignificant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:62:                          Arsenic             Negligible to Slight Adverse                    -

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:62:                          Chromium(III) Negligible                                            Insignificant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:62:                          Chromium(VI) Negligible to Moderate Adverse     Insignificant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:62:                          Cobalt              Negligible                                      Insignificant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:62:                          Copper              Negligible                                      Insignificant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:62:                          Lead                Negligible                                      -

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:62:                          Manganese           Negligible                                      Insignificant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:62:                          Nickel              Negligible                                      -

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:62:                          Vanadium            Negligible                                      Insignificant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:63:– the annual mean impacts of pollutant emissions in relation to the human health receptors are negligible based

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:63:   existing facilities, which are more likely, the impacts are descripted as negligible; and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:68:– the annual mean impacts of pollutant emissions in relation to the human health receptors are negligible based

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf]]:68:  existing facilities, which are more likely, the impacts are descripted as negligible; and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 Ecology Report.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 Ecology Report.pdf]]:2:may use the site for foraging likely impact on this species is assessed as negligible. Several

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf]]:6: Construction                 There is no view of the site from this location. It is presumed that     No change.      Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf]]:6: Operation (Year 0)           There is no view of the site from this location. It is presumed that     No change.      Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf]]:6: Residual effects with        No view.                                                                 No change.      Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf]]:7:Residual effects with      Views from Kirkeleatham Lane are likely to be screened in the long       Negligible.    Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf]]:8:Residual effects with   Partial views of Chimney stack and flue as vegetation within the         Negligible.     Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf]]:8:Construction            Barely perceptible glimpse views through gaps in vegetation to the       Negligible.     Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf]]:8:Operation (Year 0)      Barely perceptible glimpse views through gaps in vegetation to the       Negligible.     Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf]]:8:Residual effects with   Negligible change in view as vegetation along the bridleway              Negligible.     Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf]]:12:Residual effects with   Views are likely to be fully screened in the long term as vegetation at     Negligible.       Slight

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf]]:20:Construction            Mid-range views from this slightly elevated road location north of the     Negligible.        Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf]]:20:                        pylons cranes and towers. The change will be negligible from this

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf]]:20:Operation (Year 0)      Mid-range views from slightly elevated road location north of the          Negligible.        Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf]]:20:                        landscape, if at all. The change will be negligible from this location.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf]]:20:Residual effects with   Mid-range views from slightly elevated road location north of the          Negligible.        Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf]]:20:                        landscape, if at all. The change will be negligible from this location.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf]]:22:Construction            Long range views from this National Trail across open coastal areas        Negligible.      Negligi

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf]]:22:                        negligible from this location.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf]]:22:Operation (Year 0)      Long range views from this National Trail across open coastal areas        Negligible.      Negligi

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf]]:22:                        negligible from this location.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf]]:22:Residual effects with   Long range views from this National Trail across open coastal areas      Negligible.         Negligi

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf]]:22:                        negligible from this location.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf]]:23:Construction            Mid-range views from this elevated location within a woodland park,          Negligible.      Slight

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf]]:23:                        pylons cranes and towers. The change will be negligible from this

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf]]:23:Operation (Year 0)      Mid-range views from this elevated location within a woodland park,          Negligible.      Slight

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf]]:23:                        The change will be negligible from this location.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf]]:23:                        The change will be negligible from this location. As vegetation the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf]]:12:             demonstrate that there will be a negligible impact on those aspects of the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-BPM-JBAU-XX-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P01.01-HRA Report_Issued_2020303.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-BPM-JBAU-XX-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P01.01-HRA Report_Issued_2020303.pdf]]:21:           isolation are considered to be negligible. Where short-term impacts are considered, if the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-BPM-JBAU-XX-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P01.01-HRA Report_Issued_2020303.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-BPM-JBAU-XX-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P01.01-HRA Report_Issued_2020303.pdf]]:21:           PC is less than 10% of the assessment level the impacts are considered negligible. Where

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-Figure 7-1 Viewpoint Assessment Sheets.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-Figure 7-1 Viewpoint Assessment Sheets.pdf]]:2:                                                                                                                       existing farm dwelling at Stainsby Hall Farm.                                                                    The magnitude of change is no change and the overall effects within the field of view is Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-Figure 7-1 Viewpoint Assessment Sheets.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-Figure 7-1 Viewpoint Assessment Sheets.pdf]]:10:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    The magnitude of change is negligible and the overall effects Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-Figure 7-1 Viewpoint Assessment Sheets.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-Figure 7-1 Viewpoint Assessment Sheets.pdf]]:40:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        The magnitude of change is low and the overall effects are Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-Figure 7-1 Viewpoint Assessment Sheets.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-Figure 7-1 Viewpoint Assessment Sheets.pdf]]:44:      Proposed development location                          Viewpoint location                                                                                                                                                                           The magnitude of change is negligible and the overall effects are Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-Figure 7-1 Viewpoint Assessment Sheets.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-Figure 7-1 Viewpoint Assessment Sheets.pdf]]:46:                                                                                                                       limited screening from the heavy industry features beyond, however combined with the proliferation of         The magnitude of change is negligible and the overall effects are Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf]]:31:sensitive value or scale expressed from negligible to very high.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf]]:31:     Negligible: The impact is only very slightly detectable/noticeable or is

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf]]:37:Bats; The buildings surrounding the site were assessed as having negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf]]:38:negligible opportunities for foraging or resting and therefore Otters are unlikely

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf]]:40:       negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf]]:41:       to be negligible, however some minimal mitigation measures shall be

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf]]:43:impacts on reptiles are assessed as negligible from the operation of the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf]]:52:negligible level of effect of pollution which would be deemed to be not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf]]:67:dust emissions is low to negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf]]:68:negligible impact.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf]]:69:       human health receptors are negligible based on the location with the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf]]:69:       descripted as negligible; and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf]]:72:severance driver delay and pedestrian delay would be negligible. In terms of

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf]]:72:predicted to be negligible. The potential impact of the proposed development

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf]]:72:routes to and from the site will be reduced to an impact of negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf|R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf]]:72:phase is considered to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0224-CD/R-2023-0224-CD-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf|R-2023-0224-CD-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf]]:11:for foraging likely impact on this species was assessed to be negligible. Several of the ponds were tested for

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0224-CD/R-2023-0224-CD-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf|R-2023-0224-CD-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf]]:42:6.53   The revised modelling data show negligible change for hydrogen fluoride compared to the data presented in Table 17. It can therefore be assumed that there

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0224-CD/R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf|R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf]]:49:                  •     severity of the effect is described as qualitative descriptors; negligible, slight,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0224-CD/R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf|R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf]]:50:                    ≤75% of AQAL         Negligible          Negligible          Slight            Moderate

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0224-CD/R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf|R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf]]:50:                   76-94% of AQAL        Negligible            Slight          Moderate            Moderate

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0224-CD/R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf|R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf]]:82:                         85         2020             0.765                    1.91%                        25.57          64%            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0224-CD/R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf|R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf]]:82:                         90         2020             0.603                    1.51%                        25.40          64%            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0224-CD/R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf|R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf]]:82:      NO2                95         2020             0.486                    1.21%                        25.29          63%            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0224-CD/R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf|R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf]]:82:                         85         2020             0.109                    2.19%          0.326         0.435          9%             Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0224-CD/R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf|R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf]]:82:                         90         2020             0.0861                   1.72%          0.355         0.441          9%             Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0224-CD/R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf|R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf]]:82:     VOC                 95         2020             0.0694                   1.39%          0.355         0.424          8%             Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0224-CD/R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf|R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf]]:82: (annual mean)           100      NWP 2020           0.0564                   1.13%          0.358         0.414          8%             Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0224-CD/R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf|R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf]]:82:                         105      NWP 2020           0.0510                   1.02%          0.358         0.409          8%             Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0224-CD/R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf|R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf]]:82:                         110      NWP 2020         0.00000462                 1.85%                       0.000211        84%            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0224-CD/R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf|R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf]]:83:             classed as ‘negligible’ for stack heights of 85m to 95m (inclusive) and screens out at stack

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0224-CD/R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf|R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf]]:83:             ‘negligible’ for stack heights of 85m to 105m (inclusive) and screens out at stack heights of

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0224-CD/R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf|R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf]]:83:             heights of 85m to 105m (inclusive) and ‘negligible’ for stack heights of 110m.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0224-CD/R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (3 of 3).pdf|R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (3 of 3).pdf]]:23:negligible effect on the final reported results, non-bias adjusted results are shown

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0224-CD/R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (3 of 3).pdf|R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (3 of 3).pdf]]:96:6.53   The revised modelling data show negligible change for hydrogen fluoride compared to the data presented in Table 17. It can therefore be assumed that there

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0224-CD/R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (3 of 3).pdf|R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (3 of 3).pdf]]:137:4.49   The revised modelling data show negligible change for hydrogen fluoride compared to the data presented in Table 10. It can therefore be assumed that there

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0224-CD/R-2023-0224-CD-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie Air Quality Impacts on SSSI.pdf|R-2023-0224-CD-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie Air Quality Impacts on SSSI.pdf]]:20:4.49   The revised modelling data show negligible change for hydrogen fluoride compared to the data presented in Table 10. It can therefore be assumed that there

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0224-CD/R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (2 of 3).pdf|R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (2 of 3).pdf]]:15:             sensitive human receptor locations were classed as ‘negligible’. For PAH (as B[[a]]P), the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0224-CD/R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (2 of 3).pdf|R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (2 of 3).pdf]]:16:                                                 IAQM Impact Descriptor         Negligible                 n/a              n/a              n/a               n/a             n/a              n/a            n/a        n/a      Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0224-CD/R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (2 of 3).pdf|R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (2 of 3).pdf]]:42:             under abnormal operating conditions, would therefore be described as ‘negligible’.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0224-CD/R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (2 of 3).pdf|R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (2 of 3).pdf]]:59:             human receptor locations were classed as ‘negligible’. For PAH (as B[[a]]P), the human

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0224-CD/R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (2 of 3).pdf|R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (2 of 3).pdf]]:60:                              IAQM Impact Descriptor       Negligible     n/a        n/a        n/a        n/a        n/a       n/a         n/a       n/a       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf]]:24:        of change to the character area is expected to be negligible and neutral.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf]]:25:        change to the character area is expected to be negligible and neutral.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf]]:25:        industry its susceptibility to change is negligible. Therefore, its sensitivity to change

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf]]:25:        change to the character area is expected to be negligible and neutral.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf]]:25:        therefore considered that the proposals will create negligible to very minor impacts

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf]]:26:        low/negligible and neutral.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf]]:26:6.20    The proposals will create very minor to negligible impacts on the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf]]:26:6.23    The site is featureless, and its value is assessed as negligible and its susceptibility to

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf]]:26:        change negligible, in that it can easily accommodate large change. The overall

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf]]:26:        landscape sensitivity of the site is negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf]]:29:        the views that are barely visible across a negligible proportion of the field of view

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf]]:29:6.43    The magnitude of change is therefore considered to be negligible and neutral.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf]]:29:6.47    Therefore, the magnitude of change is therefore considered to be negligible and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf]]:30:6.51    The value of this receptor group is low to negligible as the views are from a

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf]]:30:        low/negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf]]:30:6.57    Therefore, the magnitude of change is therefore considered to be negligible and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf]]:31:        location. The magnitude of change is considered to be small/negligible and neutral.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf]]:34:        the resulting magnitude of change will be negligible and neither adverse nor

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf]]:34:        will be affected. Again, it was considered the magnitude of change will be negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf]]:34:        only minor to very minor or negligible impacts on their landscape/townscape

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf]]:34:                              Eston Hills broad landscape    Medium                 Negligible neutral

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf]]:34:                              Redcar Flats broad landscape   Medium / Low           Negligible neutral

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf]]:34:                              East Billingham to Teesmouth   Low                    Negligible neutral

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf]]:34:                              Industrial project level       Low / Negligible       Low neutral

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf]]:34:                              The site                       Negligible             Large beneficial

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf]]:35:                           A66                          Low                    Negligible neutral

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf]]:35:                           B1380, High Street           Low                    Negligible neutral

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf]]:35:                           Teesdale Way PROW            Low / Negligible       Small neutral

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf]]:35:                           NCN cycle route 1            Low                    Negligible neutral

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf]]:35:                           Bridleway 124/179/1, Eston   Medium / Low           Small / Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf]]:35:        Facility was considered to be small and neutral for five of them and small/negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf]]:35:        or just negligible for a further four of them. The effects were considered as neutral

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf]]:35:        and barely discernible for those considered negligible. In all cases it was

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf]]:36:        groups were assessed either as negligible neutral or small / negligible neutral.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf]]:36:        beneficial magnitudes of change would reduce to negligible neutral or small /

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf]]:36:        negligible neutral with the exception of the Teesdale Way receptor group which will

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf]]:58:      are judged as high, medium, low or negligible based on the criteria shown. There

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf]]:58:      judgement, and is defined in this report as high, medium, low or negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf]]:59:      judgement, and is defined in this appraisal as large, medium, small or negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf]]:60:      change and value are judged as high, medium, low or negligible based on the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf]]:60:      or negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf]]:61:      and is defined in this appraisal as large, medium, small or negligible. The GLVIA also

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf]]:63:  Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf]]:63:                          High                              Medium                               Low                               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf]]:63:                        Medium                          Medium / Low                             Low                           Low / Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf]]:63:         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf]]:63:                      Medium / Low                             Low                        Low / Negligible                         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf]]:64:                                                                           Large Large                                     Medium                                   Small                               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf]]:64:                                                                                                                                                                                                               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf]]:64:                                                                                                                                                                                              resources / elements or negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf]]:65:  Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf]]:65:                          High                              Medium                              Low                                Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf]]:65:                        Medium                          Medium / Low                            Low                            Low / Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf]]:65:         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf]]:65:                      Medium / Low                             Low                       Low / Negligible                          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf]]:66:                                                                           Large Large                                      Medium                                     Small                                Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf]]:66:                                                                                                                                                                                                                   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf]]:66:                                                                                                                                                                                            negligible proportion of the field of view.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Noise_Impact_Assessment.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Noise_Impact_Assessment.pdf]]:14:                                                                                            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Noise_Impact_Assessment.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Noise_Impact_Assessment.pdf]]:15:                                                                                             Negligible                 NOAEL

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Noise_Impact_Assessment.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Noise_Impact_Assessment.pdf]]:15:          < 1.0                                                               Negligible                        NOAEL

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Noise_Impact_Assessment.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Noise_Impact_Assessment.pdf]]:15:                                                                                                 Negligible               NOAEL

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Noise_Impact_Assessment.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Noise_Impact_Assessment.pdf]]:16:           Below 35-40 dB LAeq,T design range     Negligible                        NOAEL

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Noise_Impact_Assessment.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Noise_Impact_Assessment.pdf]]:23:        deemed to be negligible in the short term, to LA 1117. It is not expected that the additional HGV

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Noise_Impact_Assessment.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Noise_Impact_Assessment.pdf]]:31:        negligible change in noise level.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Contaminated_Land_Review.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Contaminated_Land_Review.pdf]]:13:    Glaciolacustrine       0.8 to 10.5         Unproductive             Strata with low permeability that have negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Contaminated_Land_Review.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Contaminated_Land_Review.pdf]]:20:                       preferential            thickness of lower permeability aquifers. As such, the risk of contaminant migration to the Principal Aquifer is considered to be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Contaminated_Land_Review.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Contaminated_Land_Review.pdf]]:39:                                                permeability, the risk to the Principal Aquifer is considered to be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf]]:16:          these measures, the residual impact of dust emissions will be negligible. As the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf]]:17:         negligible and not significant. While this assessment work suggests that no

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf]]:17:         be negligible and not significant. Therefore, the impact on air quality of the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf]]:18:         operational phase transport emissions is considered to be negligible and not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf]]:19:         be negligible in the short term. It is not expected that the additional HGV

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf]]:23:         negligible effects on severance, driver delay, pedestrian delay and pedestrian

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf]]:24:         as being of negligible importance to wildlife and scattered scrub is considered to

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf]]:26:         create only minor to very minor or negligible impacts on their landscape /

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf]]:26:         will be negligible and neither adverse nor beneficial, but instead just neutral. With

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf]]:26:         negligible and neutral.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf]]:26:         neutral for five of them and small / negligible or just negligible for a further four of

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf]]:27:         and barely discernible for those considered negligible. In all cases it was

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf]]:28:         phases of disturbance and clearance. A similar, low to negligible level of survival

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf]]:29:      and the quantities involved are likely to be negligible in relation to existing waste

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf]]:86:        so that the significance of effects will now be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf]]:86:        in the December 2019 ES. The construction effects will have negligible effect on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf]]:87:        proposed development so that the significance of effects will now be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf]]:87:        is operational will be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf]]:91:             be slight adverse prior to mitigation, as opposed to negligible adverse as

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf]]:91:         •   The potential impact to the River Tees Estuary is considered to be negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf]]:100:        discernible impact recognised on the negligible archaeological resource across

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf]]:107:      effects on employment in other areas and all other effects negligible and not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf]]:112:      human health can be described as ‘negligible’ at all areas of relevant exposure

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf]]:112:        •    All annual mean impacts are ‘negligible’ at all areas of relevant exposure

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf]]:112:        •    All short-term impacts are ‘negligible’ at all areas of relevant exposure, except

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf]]:112:      point of maximum impact could not be screened out as ‘negligible’ using a

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf]]:112:      described as ‘negligible’.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf]]:113:      areas of relevant exposure is ‘negligible’, except for short-term sulphur dioxide

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf]]:113:      quality assessment level (AQAL) and was described as ‘negligible’. Even if this

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf]]:113:      remains ‘negligible’, both alone and when added to process emissions.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf]]:114:      ‘negligible’. The assessment of construction phase dust emissions is unchanged,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf]]:114:      regard to human health are predicted to be ‘negligible’, except for short-term

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf]]:120:        •    A potential impact on severance of negligible significance

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf]]:120:        •    A potential impact on driver delay of negligible significance

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf]]:120:        •    A potential impact on pedestrian delay of negligible significance

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf]]:120:        •    A potential impact on pedestrian amenity of negligible significance

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf]]:121:             amenity, fear and intimidation, and accidents and safety of negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf]]:121:        •    A residual impact on severance of negligible significance

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf]]:121:        •    A residual impact on driver delay of negligible significance

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf]]:121:        •    A residual impact on pedestrian delay of negligible significance

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf]]:121:        •    A residual impact on pedestrian amenity of negligible significance

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf]]:134:      considered to be slight adverse and will now be negligible. The assessment of the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf]]:141:      not be described as ‘negligible’ irrespective of the total pollutant concentration. In

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf]]:144:      application operational phase are considered to be negligible due to the minimal

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Planning_and_Design_Statement.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Planning_and_Design_Statement.pdf]]:12:        negligible level of survival of archaeological features is therefore expected. The BA

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Planning_and_Design_Statement.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Planning_and_Design_Statement.pdf]]:42:       concluded that noise effects at noise sensitive receptors would be of negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Planning_and_Design_Statement.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Planning_and_Design_Statement.pdf]]:42:       be negligible. As the area around the proposed development is of ‘low sensitivity’

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Planning_and_Design_Statement.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Planning_and_Design_Statement.pdf]]:43:        transport emissions is deemed to be negligible and ‘not significant’, either alone or

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Planning_and_Design_Statement.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Planning_and_Design_Statement.pdf]]:43:       negligible, and potentially beneficial given the change from an empty brownfield

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Shadow_HRA.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Shadow_HRA.pdf]]:13:        negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Shadow_HRA.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Shadow_HRA.pdf]]:19:        the BA Facility site reaching the SPA/Ramsar is considered to be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Shadow_HRA.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Shadow_HRA.pdf]]:26:        assessment it has been assumed that negligible traffic from the proposed

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf]]:11:        •    Negligible Importance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf]]:17:          Bare ground                  Negligible      Does not contribute to biodiversity importance of

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf]]:17:          Buildings and                Negligible      There are no buildings or structures on site

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf]]:17:          Amphibians                   Negligible      Due to the barriers to dispersal to the site and the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf]]:18:          Badger                       Negligible   No records were returned from the local records

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf]]:18:          Bats                         Negligible   There are no trees or structures present on site

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf]]:18:          Hedgehog                     Negligible   There is limited habitat remaining on site that could

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf]]:18:          Otter                        Negligible   There is no suitable terrestrial habitat on site and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf]]:18:          Reptiles                     Negligible   No records were returned for reptiles within 2km of

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf]]:19:          Water Vole                   Negligible   There are three records of water vole in the vicinity

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf]]:20:        boundary; bare ground and scattered scrub. Bare ground is assessed as being of Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf]]:20:        There is only a small area of remaining habitat on site which is of negligible use to amphibians.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf]]:21:        as being of Negligible importance for bats and the development of the site would likely result in

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf]]:23:        The loss of habitat would have Negligible impact on badgers. It is however recognised that

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf]]:24:            Amphibians                 Negligible      Construction: No      Construction:

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf]]:25:          Bats                         Negligible   Construction: No      Construction:

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf]]:4:                 impact of dust emissions will be negligible. As the area around the Proposed Development is of ‘low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf]]:5:                 impact on air quality of the operational phase transport emissions is deemed to be negligible and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf]]:11:                 to determine whether the impact can be screened out as ‘negligible’, or whether a more detailed

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf]]:13:                 ‘negligible’.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf]]:15:                 Therefore, the impact of construction phase vehicle emissions has been screened out as ‘negligible’

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf]]:20:                 operational phase vehicle movements will be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf]]:20:                 residual risk of dust emissions will be ‘negligible’.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf]]:23:                 also predicted to be negligible and ‘not significant’.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf]]:33:                 ‘negligible’, no mitigation measures beyond those required by accepted best practice would be

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf]]:33:                     Low                    Low Risk                Low Risk               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf]]:33:                     Low                    Low Risk                Low Risk               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf]]:33:                     Low                    Low Risk                Low Risk               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf]]:33:                     Medium                 Medium Risk             Low Risk               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0247-OOM/R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf|R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf]]:33:                     Low                    Low Risk                Low Risk               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.pdf]]:11:                to a common list of criteria, including: Substantial, Moderate, Minor, Negligible or Neutral.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.pdf]]:15:                    Negligible                                             Less than 1.0

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:14:                                 Medium         although the HGV increase in the PM peak is       Negligible   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:15:       by 100% in the PM peak, the actual number of HGVs is 8, which is considered negligible. The effect on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:15:       pedestrian and cyclist amenity at this location is therefore considered to be Negligible. This is considered

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:15:       change is considered to be negligible as the traffic flow change is less than 30%. The change in traffic

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:15:       carriageway and the effect is considered to be of Negligible significance. This is considered Not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:15:       change is considered to be negligible as the arms predominantly affected already have signalised

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:15:       considered to be of Negligible significance. This is considered Not Significant; and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R1                                       19.2                   21.5                  22.5        1.0     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R2                                       18.0                   20.3                  21.1        0.8     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R3                                       17.9                   20.3                  21.6        1.3     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R4                                       18.1                   20.5                  22.0        1.5     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R5                                       18.0                   20.4                  22.1        1.7     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R6                                       15.7                   18.1                  18.9        0.8     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R7                                       15.3                   17.6                  18.3        0.7     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R8                                       14.6                   17.0                  17.2        0.2     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R9                                       15.6                   18.2                  18.6        0.4     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R10                                      16.2                   18.9                  20.2        1.3     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R11                                      14.4                   16.8                  17.2        0.4     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R12                                      14.4                   16.9                  17.3        0.4     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R13                                      15.8                   18.5                  19.1        0.6     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R14                                      15.4                   18.1                  18.6        0.5     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R15                                      31.4                   33.8                  34.2        0.4     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R21                                      25.8                   28.2                  28.6        0.4     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R22                                      23.7                   25.9                  26.5        0.6     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R23                                      22.7                   24.9                  25.6        0.7     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R25                                      15.4                   17.7                  19.3        1.6     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R26                                      15.2                   17.5                  18.6        1.1     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R28                                      15.4                   17.6                  18.0        0.4     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R29                                      18.1                   20.3                  21.0        0.7     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: E1                                       18.7                   20.8                  21.0        0.2     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: E2                                       18.6                   20.7                  20.8        0.1     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R1                                  12.1                 12.5                12.7                0.2        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R2                                  12.4                 12.9                13.0                0.1        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R3                                  12.1                 12.6                12.8                0.2        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R4                                  12.1                 12.6                12.8                0.2        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R5                                  12.1                 12.6                12.8                0.2        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R6                                  11.9                 12.4                12.5                0.1        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R7                                  11.8                 12.3                12.4                0.1        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R8                                  13.5                 13.9                14.0                0.1        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R9                                  13.7                 14.2                14.2                <0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R10                                 12.2                 12.7                13.0                0.3        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R11                                 12.1                 12.5                12.6                0.1        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R12                                 12.1                 12.6                12.6                <0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R13                                 12.3                 12.8                12.9                0.1        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R14                                 12.3                 12.7                12.8                0.1        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R15                                 16.4                 16.9                17.0                0.1        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R16                                 17.5                 18.0                18.2                0.2        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R17                                 16.5                 17.0                17.1                0.1        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R18                                 17.7                 18.3                18.4                0.1        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R19                                 13.9                 14.3                14.5                0.2        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R20                                 13.9                 14.3                14.5                0.2        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R21                                 13.4                 13.9                14.0                0.1        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R22                                 13.1                 13.6                13.7                0.1        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R23                                 12.7                 13.2                13.3                0.1        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R24                                 11.5                 11.9                12.4                0.5        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R25                                 11.4                 11.9                12.2                0.3        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R26                                 11.4                 11.8                12.0                0.2        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R27                                 11.6                 12.0                12.4                0.4        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R28                                 11.9                 12.3                12.3                <0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R29                                 12.0                 12.4                12.5                0.1        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: E1                                  10.6                 11.0                11.1                0.1        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: E2                              10.6                     11.0                11.1                0.1        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:21: R1                                  7.9                 8.0                  8.1                  0.1    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:21: R2                                  8.1                 8.2                  8.3                  0.1    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:21: R3                                  7.8                 7.9                  8.1                  0.2    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:21: R4                                  7.8                 8.0                  8.1                  0.1    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:21: R5                                  7.9                 8.0                  8.1                  0.1    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:21: R6                                  7.7                 7.8                  7.9                  0.1    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:21: R7                                  7.7                 7.8                  7.9                  0.1    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:21: R8                                  8.0                 8.2                  8.2                  <0.1   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:21: R9                                  8.1                 8.3                  8.3                  <0.1   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:21: R10                                 7.7                 7.8                  8.0                  0.2    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:21: R11                                 7.6                 7.7                  7.8                  0.1    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:21: R12                                 7.6                 7.8                  7.8                  <0.1   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:21: R13                                 7.7                 7.9                  8.0                  0.1    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:21: R14                                 7.7                 7.9                  7.9                  <0.1   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:21: R15                                10.1                 10.3                10.3                  <0.1   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:21: R16                                11.1                 11.3                11.4                  0.1    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:21: R17                                10.2                 10.4                10.4                  <0.1   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:21: R18                                11.2                 11.4                11.5                  0.1    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:21: R19                                 8.9                 9.1                  9.2                  0.1    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:21: R20                                 8.9                 9.1                  9.2                  0.1    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:21: R21                                 8.6                 8.8                  8.8                  <0.1   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:21: R22                                 8.4                 8.5                  8.6                  0.1    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:21: R23                                 8.2                 8.3                  8.4                  0.1    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:21: R24                                 7.5                 7.7                  7.9                  0.2    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:21: R25                                 7.5                 7.6                  7.8                  0.2    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:21: R26                                 7.5                 7.6                  7.7                  0.1    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:21: R27                                 7.6                 7.7                  8.0                  0.3    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:21: R28                                 7.5                 7.6                  7.7                  0.1    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:21: R29                                 7.8                 7.9                  8.0                  0.1    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:21: E1                                  7.1                 7.2                  7.2                  <0.1   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:21: E2                                  7.1                 7.2                  7.2                  <0.1   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:9:                 reduced to negligible and therefore non-significant levels.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:19:E3.40            If the impact descriptor is Negligible or Slight (Minor), this is considered to not have a

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:19:                 Moderate, Minor and Negligible/Neutral and reference to these terms are included in the below

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:19:                     75% or less of objective             Negligible       Negligible      Slight (Minor) Moderate

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:19:                     76-94% of objective                  Negligible       Slight (Minor) Moderate          Moderate

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:19:                     Note: Changes in pollutant concentrations of 0% i.e. <0.5% would be described as Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:19:                     <10% of hourly mean NO2 threshold                                Imperceptible    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:20:                significant effect and a ‘Negligible’ or ‘Slight’ (Minor) impact will not result in a significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:20:                such as those above. In this Chapter, where Negligible impacts are identified, a type of effect will

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:20:                or Negligible effect is likely to be felt.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:31:                 Negligible impact at all existing receptor locations and is considered to be Not Significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:31:                 Cleveland Coast SPA) included in this assessment were also found to experience a Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:31:                 Negligible impact at all existing receptor locations and is considered to be Not Significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:31:                 Cleveland Coast SPA) included in this assessment were also found to experience a Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:32:                Negligible impact at all existing receptor locations and is considered to be Not Significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:32:                Cleveland Coast SPA) included in this assessment were also found to experience a Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:32:E5.26           The magnitude of change for NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations is negligible at all receptors.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:32:                As stated in paragraph E3.44, where the impact is Negligible or Slight (Minor) then the overall

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:34:E7.2            The assessment has demonstrated that the effects will be Negligible and therefore Not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:34:                effects will be Negligible and Not Significant) for all receptors.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:35:                 practice mitigation measures suitable for high risk sites in place, there is likely to be a Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:35:E8.6             The magnitude of change for NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations at all receptors is Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:35:                   All sensitive Operational traffic impact Negligible and Not               None.            Negligible and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf]]:14:                  Negligible             The size and scale of change are considered very small due to the extent and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf]]:19:                   Negligible                                      The proposed development is barely discernible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf]]:20:                  Neutral / Negligible              Maintain the character of the receiving landscape.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf]]:21:                 Neutral / Negligible               The proposed development would cause no discernible deterioration or

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf]]:21:                                                    improvement in a view. In most instances, a negligible effect will arise

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf]]:21:                                                    experience a negligible magnitude of change.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf]]:22:                in EIA terms. Those classified as Minor or Negligible are likely to be Not Significant in EIA

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf]]:23:                   Change               Negligible           Negligible     Negligible             Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf]]:39:               whereas effects on all other Viewpoints are considered to be Negligible and Not Significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf]]:39:J5.8           The above aspects of the construction phase will have a Negligible effect on all LCZs due to the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf]]:39:               Negligible and Not Significant to a temporary, Moderate Adverse and Significant effect

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf]]:39:                 All LCZs               Negligible             -                   Direct and short-      None

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf]]:40:                  VP 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8,   Negligible            -              Direct and short-   Installation of

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf]]:41:               character of the LCZ. The magnitude of change is therefore considered to be Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf]]:41:J5.24          Combining all of these criteria, it is considered that there will be a Negligible level of effect,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf]]:42:                  LCZ 3 – Intertidal     Medium                Negligible     Negligible           Indirect,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf]]:42:                The magnitude of change is therefore considered to be Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf]]:42:J5.29           Combining all of these criteria, it is considered that there will be a Negligible level of effect,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf]]:42:                  LCZ 4 – Coast and      Medium                Negligible     Negligible            Indirect, Permanent

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf]]:42:                The magnitude of change is therefore considered to be Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf]]:42:J5.34           Combining all of these criteria, it is considered that there will be a Negligible level of effect,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf]]:44:                  LCZ 5 – Coatham        Medium-High           Negligible     Negligible            Indirect, Permanent

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf]]:44:                vicinity of the LCZ. The magnitude of change is therefore considered to be Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf]]:45:J5.44          Combining all of these criteria, it is considered that there will be a Negligible level of effect,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf]]:45:                 LCZ 7 – Saltholme       Medium-High           Negligible     Negligible                Indirect, Permanent

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf]]:45:               vicinity of the LCZ. The magnitude of change is therefore considered to be Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf]]:45:J5.48          Combining all of these criteria, it is considered that there will be a Negligible level of effect,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf]]:45:                 LCZ 8 – Rural           Medium                Negligible     Negligible                Indirect, Permanent

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf]]:50:                  VP6                        Footpath Users       Negligible     Negligible            Direct,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf]]:50:                  VP8                        Low                  Negligible     Negligible            Direct,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf]]:53:                VP6                   Footpath Users           Negligible          Negligible             Direct, Permanent

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf]]:53:                VP8                   Low                      Negligible          Negligible             Direct, Permanent

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf]]:55:J7.2           Construction of the proposed development will result in effects ranging from Negligible to a

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf]]:55:                LCZ 3 – Intertidal    Medium                   Negligible        Negligible - Not       Indirect, Permanent

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf]]:55:                LCZ 4 – Coast and Medium                       Negligible        Negligible –           Indirect, Permanent

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf]]:55:                LCZ 5 – Coatham       Medium-High              Negligible        Negligible -           Indirect, Permanent

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf]]:55:                LCZ 7 – Saltholme Medium-High                  Negligible        Negligible –           Indirect, Permanent

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf]]:55:                LCZ 8 – Rural         Medium                   Negligible        Negligible –           Indirect, Permanent

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf]]:56:                 VP6                     Footpath Users        Negligible   Negligible        Direct, Permanent

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf]]:56:                 VP8                     Low                   Negligible   Negligible        Direct, Permanent

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf]]:57:               and operation All other effects are anticipated to be Minor or Negligible (and Not Significant).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf]]:57:                 All LCZ      Impact of              Negligible – Not Significant   None                           Negligible -

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf]]:57:                 VP 2, 3, 4, 5, Impact of            Negligible - Not Significant   Installation of site           Negligible -

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf]]:58:                  LCZ 3 –         Impact of      Negligible - Not Significant    Buildings to be            Negligible -

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf]]:58:                  LCZ 4 –         Impact of      Negligible –                    Buildings to be            Negligible –

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf]]:58:                  LCZ 5 –         Impact of      Negligible -                    Buildings to be            Negligible -

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf]]:59:                 LCZ 7 –        Impact of            Negligible –                Buildings to be               Negligible –

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf]]:59:                 LCZ 8 –        Impact of      Negligible –                      Buildings to be               Negligible –

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF]]:12:                     be Negligible and Not Significant;

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF]]:12:                     construction and therefore the risk to the occupiers would be Negligible and Not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF]]:12:                     therefore the risk from new contamination would be Negligible and Not Significant. Where

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF]]:14:                                 construction works                           5) or soils of negligible nature conservation

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF]]:14:                                 be of negligible value                       Negligible potential for mineral reserves to

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF]]:16:              Negligible         Human Health: No measurable effects on         Impact of insufficient magnitude to

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF]]:16:            Sensitivity/value of High                                  Medium        Low             Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF]]:16:            High                       Substantial                     Moderate      Minor           Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF]]:16:            Medium                     Moderate                        Minor         Negligible      Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF]]:16:            Low                        Minor                           Negligible    Negligible      Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF]]:25:                layers or drift deposits with low permeability that have negligible significance for water supply

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF]]:32:                significance is considered Negligible and therefore Not Significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF]]:37:                outlined in Section G6.0 above, is negligible. Following the implementation of the additional

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF]]:37:                workers of Minor Adverse significance and impacts on nearby residents of Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF]]:37:                following additional mitigation, e.g. soil remediation, is negligible. Therefore, the impacts after

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF]]:37:                the implementation of mitigation measures are considered to be of Negligible significance. This

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF]]:37:                management facilities during the construction phase is considered to be of Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF]]:38:                significance of the impacts identified is considered to be Minor Adverse / Negligible and Not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF]]:38:                 Health        during earthworks. receptors and Significant  Statement                           Negligible off

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF]]:38:                 Surface       Potential leaching of Negligible and Not      Remediation /                       Negligible and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF]]:38:                 Built         Soil/materials        Minor Adverse and Not   Minimisation of waste               Negligible and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf]]:77:      drift of the glacio-lacustrine laminated clays as a “Non Aquifer” of “negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf]]:200:               as being negligible to low.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf]]:244:Oil and fuel       Lubricating oils,          Site Users           Direct contact,         Health hazard          Unlikely                                                                Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf]]:244:                                                                                           [[Mild]]                 migration. Negligible evidenc e of contamination detected in soil,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf]]:245:                                           G r o u n d w a t er (drift   Migration via           Pollution of           Unlikely                                                              Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf]]:265:Ground Conditions                                                                         assessed as being negligible to low.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf]]:268:                                                                    Groundwater      Low          Aquifer of negligible resource

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf]]:1596:is considered to be negligible and has not been considered further.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf]]:1893:133    17.6      Ground dissolution of soluble rocks                      Negligible (within 50m)

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf]]:1963: 2    On site      Unproductive             These are rock layers or drift deposits with low permeability that have negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf]]:1964: 3     134m W       Unproductive            These are rock layers or drift deposits with low permeability that have negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf]]:1981:                                                                                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf]]:2013:                                                                                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf]]:2014:                                                                                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf]]:2014: On site       Negligible      Running sand conditions are not thought to occur whatever the position of the water table. No

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf]]:2016:                                                                                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf]]:2018:                                                                                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf]]:2018: On site       Negligible        Deposits with potential to collapse when loaded and saturated are believed not to be present.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf]]:2019:                                                                                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf]]:2020:                                                                                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf]]:2020: On site       Negligible      Soluble rocks are either not thought to be present within the ground, or not prone to dissolution.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.pdf]]:22:                                   operation would be Negligible and Not Significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.pdf]]:22:                                   contamination with this tertiary mitigation in place, would be Negligible and Not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.pdf]]:22:                             Local significance; and nesting birds, which are of negligible significance even at a

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.pdf]]:30:             10 Neutral/negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Socio Economic - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Socio Economic - Dec 2020.PDF]]:13:               ‘Negligible’ or ‘Adverse’ (Table H3.2).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Socio Economic - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Socio Economic - Dec 2020.PDF]]:14:                Negligible           No obvious significant effect to a receptor or environment.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Socio Economic - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Socio Economic - Dec 2020.PDF]]:14:                Negligible   Where no discernible effect is expected as a result of the proposed development on the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Socio Economic - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Socio Economic - Dec 2020.PDF]]:14:                change/effects High                Medium              Low                             Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Socio Economic - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Socio Economic - Dec 2020.PDF]]:14:                High                    Substantial                Moderate to     Minor to Moderate Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Socio Economic - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Socio Economic - Dec 2020.PDF]]:14:                Medium                  Moderate to                Moderate        Minor               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Socio Economic - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Socio Economic - Dec 2020.PDF]]:15:                Low                   Minor to Moderate Minor               Negligible to Minor   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Socio Economic - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Socio Economic - Dec 2020.PDF]]:15:                Negligible            Negligible               Negligible   Negligible            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Socio Economic - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Socio Economic - Dec 2020.PDF]]:23:               storage and post. Similarly, the labour supply scenario forecasts only a negligible increase in

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Socio Economic - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Socio Economic - Dec 2020.PDF]]:30:                of the significance criteria matrix. The effects are assessed as being Beneficial, Negligible or

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Socio Economic - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Socio Economic - Dec 2020.PDF]]:30:                Negligible. An assessment of the likely effects in relation to each receptor is presented in Table

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf]]:40:                there will be negligible beneficial effects for the River Tees estuary during construction and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf]]:42:                negligible effect on receptors from the dust-generating activities onsite.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf]]:42:                through the modelling process was predicted to be negligible at all receptors. The overall effect

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf]]:44:                negligible and not significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf]]:47:                Tees Dock Road roundabout. All other effects will be reduced to minor or negligible and not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf]]:49:                groundwater, the built environment and landscape will all be of minor adverse / negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf]]:52:                all considered to result in a negligible impact on regional landfill capacity. In this respect there

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:13:Negligible            Materials are forecast (through trend analysis and other information) to be free from known issues

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:14:                                  Negligible             The consumption of no individual material type would be equal to or greater than 1%

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:14:                                                    No change Negligible         Minor          Moderate       Major

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:14:                                    Medium          Neutral         Negligible   Minor          Moderate       Moderate

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:14:                                    Low             Neutral         Negligible   Negligible     Negligible     Moderate

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:14:                                    Negligible Neutral              Neutral      Negligible     Negligible     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:21:                Negligible (Not Significant).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:21:                effects are likely to be no worse than Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:22:                receptor, the overall significance of the effect is considered to be Negligible (Not Significant).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:22:                proposed development are considered to be Negligible. Given the low sensitivity of the regional

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:22:                landfill capacity as a receptor, the overall significance of the effect is considered to be Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:26:                Negligible Adverse impact (Not Significant). Whilst mitigation will reduce any effects, the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:26:                remain as Negligible Adverse impact (Not Significant).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:27:                be Negligible Adverse (Not Significant).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:28:                arisings would account for 0.10% of the regional landfill capacity (Negligible Adverse), and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:28:                Operational waste arisings would account for 0.25% of the regional landfill capacity (Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:28:                regional landfill capacity. The impacts from this would be Negligible Adverse (construction and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:28:                tonnes, which equates to 1.32% (Negligible Adverse impact) of the regional material availability.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:28:                remain Negligible Adverse.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:28:                 Regional landfill   Reduction in               Negligible          Preparation of  Negligible Adverse and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:29:                 Regional materials       Depleting             Hardstanding:       Secondary           Negligible Adverse and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:29:                 availability             regional              Negligible          aggregates/         Not Significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:29:                                          114,027 tonnes worst Negligible           possible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:29:                                          materials not     than Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:29:                 Regional landfill        Reduction in       Negligible             Operational         Negligible Adverse and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-MGE04280 Nuisance 0820.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-MGE04280 Nuisance 0820.pdf]]:2:concentrations at all receptors is Negligible and that the overall effect of the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf]]:11:                a Negligible (and Not Significant) effect on pedestrian and cycle amenity at the A174 / Greystone

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf]]:13:                through the modelling process is predicted to be Negligible at all receptors. The overall effect of

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf]]:15:                potential effects on the surface water and groundwater receptors, are considered to be Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf]]:15:                These impacts are considered to be Negligible to Minor Adverse and Not Significant for all

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf]]:15:                groundwater through reduced infiltration (Negligible Adverse impacts) and pollution from

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf]]:15:                (Negligible Beneficial impacts) which are considered to be Not Significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf]]:15:                residual effects: for groundwater, the impacts on flows would remain Negligible Adverse and the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf]]:15:                Negligible Beneficial which would be Not Significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf]]:17:                impact on construction workers and a Negligible effect on off site human health receptors. Both

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf]]:17:                would be a Negligible impact (Not Significant) on environmental receptors with the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf]]:17:                Landfill site and this is considered to have a Negligible (but Not Significant) effect on waste

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf]]:17:8.18            The implementation of these measures will result in Minor Adverse or Negligible (and Not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf]]:21:11.7            During construction there will be a Negligible and Not Significant impact upon all Landscape

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf]]:21:                (Eston Hills). All other Viewpoints will be subject to a Negligible and Not Significant impact

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf]]:21:                effects ranging from Negligible to Minor Adverse/Minor Beneficial. There will be a Moderate

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf]]:21:                considered to be Not Significant, with effects ranging from Negligible to Minor Adverse.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf]]:23:                a result the impact is expected to be Negligible and Not Significant on remaining regional

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf]]:23:                hardstanding areas it is anticipated that this will also have a Negligible impact on the availability

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf]]:23:                anticipated that the impacts are expected to be Negligible and Not Significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf]]:25:                of the ES can be secured and that the effects are negligible or can be kept to an absolute

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF]]:15:I3.20           Professional judgement has then been employed to establish whether the effects are negligible,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF]]:12:                                 operation would be Negligible and Not Significant;

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF]]:12:                                 occupiers would be Negligible and Not Significant;

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF]]:12:                                 operate safely, therefore the risk from new contamination would be Negligible and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF]]:13:                     habitat and therefore only of Local significance; and nesting birds, which are of negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF]]:13:                     is considered negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF]]:30:                4     Neutral/negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:18: R1                             19.2                     19.4                 19.6                0.2         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:18: R2                             18.0                     18.2                 18.4                0.2         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:18: R3                             17.9                     18.2                 18.7                0.5         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:18: R4                             18.1                     18.4                 18.9                0.5         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:18: R5                             18.0                     18.3                 18.7                0.4         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:18: R6                             15.7                     16.0                 16.1                0.1         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:18: R7                             15.3                     15.5                 15.6                0.1         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:18: R8                             14.6                     14.9                 14.9                < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:18: R9                             15.6                     16.1                 16.1                < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:18: R10                            16.2                     16.8                 17.0                0.2         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:18: R11                            14.4                     14.7                 14.8                0.1         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:18: R12                            14.4                     14.8                 14.9                0.1         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:18: R13                            15.8                     16.4                 16.5                0.1         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:18: R14                            15.4                     16.0                 16.1                0.1         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:18: R15                            31.4                     31.7                 31.7                < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:18: R16                            35.1                     35.5                 35.6                0.1         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:18: R17                            31.1                     31.4                 31.5                0.1         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:18: R18                            36.1                     36.5                 36.6                0.1         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:18: R19                            27.8                     28.1                 28.2                0.1         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:18: R20                            27.8                     28.1                 28.2                0.1         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:18: R21                            25.8                     26.1                 26.1                < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:18: R22                            23.7                     23.8                 23.9                0.1         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:18: R23                            22.7                     22.8                 22.9                0.1         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:18: R24                            15.5                     15.6                 15.8                0.2         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:18: R25                            15.4                     15.6                 15.7                0.1         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:18: R26                            15.2                     15.4                 15.5                0.1         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:18: R27                            16.1                     16.2                 16.5                0.3         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:18: R28                            15.4                     15.5                 15.5                < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:18: E1                             18.7                     18.7                 18.7                < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:18: E2                             18.6                     18.6                 18.6                < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:19: R1                             12.1                     12.1                 12.1                 < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:19: R2                             12.4                     12.5                 12.5                 < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:19: R3                             12.1                     12.2                 12.2                 < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:19: R4                             12.1                     12.2                 12.3                 0.1                 Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:19: R5                             12.1                     12.2                 12.3                 0.1                 Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:19: R6                             11.9                     12.0                 12.0                 < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:19: R7                             11.8                     11.9                 11.9                 < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:19: R8                             13.5                     13.5                 13.5                 < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:19: R9                             13.7                     13.8                 13.8                 < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:19: R10                            12.2                     12.3                 12.4                 0.1                 Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:19: R11                            12.1                     12.1                 12.2                 0.1                 Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:19: R12                            12.1                     12.2                 12.2                 < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:19: R13                            12.3                     12.4                 12.4                 < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:19: R14                            12.3                     12.3                 12.4                 0.1                 Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:19: R15                            16.4                     16.5                 16.5                 < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:19: R16                            17.5                     17.6                 17.6                 < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:19: R17                            16.5                     16.6                 16.6                 < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:19: R18                            17.7                     17.9                 17.9                 < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:19: R19                            13.9                     13.9                 14.0                 0.1                 Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:19: R20                            13.9                     13.9                 14.0                 0.1                 Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:19: R21                            13.4                     13.5                 13.5                 < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:19: R22                            13.1                     13.2                 13.2                 < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:19: R23                            12.7                     12.8                 12.8                 < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:19: R24                            11.5                     11.5                 11.5                 < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:19: R25                            11.4                     11.5                 11.5                 < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:19: R26                            11.4                     11.4                 11.4                 < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:19: R27                            11.6                     11.6                 11.6                 < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:19: R28                            11.9                     11.9                 11.9                 < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:19: E1                             10.6                     10.6                 10.6                 < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:19: E2                             10.6                     10.6                 10.6                 < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:20: R1                              7.9                    7.9                   7.9                   < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:20: R2                              8.1                    8.1                   8.1                   < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:20: R3                              7.8                    7.8                   7.9                   0.1         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:20: R4                              7.8                    7.9                   7.9                   < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:20: R5                              7.9                    7.9                   7.9                   < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:20: R6                              7.7                    7.7                   7.8                   0.1         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:20: R7                              7.7                    7.7                   7.7                   < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:20: R8                              8.0                    8.1                   8.1                   < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:20: R9                              8.1                    8.2                   8.2                   < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:20: R10                             7.7                    7.7                   7.8                   0.1         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:20: R11                             7.6                    7.6                   7.7                   0.1         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:20: R12                             7.6                    7.7                   7.7                   < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:20: R13                             7.7                    7.8                   7.8                   < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:20: R14                             7.7                    7.8                   7.8                   < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:20: R15                             10.1                   10.2                  10.2                  < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:20: R16                             11.1                   11.2                  11.2                  < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:20: R17                             10.2                   10.3                  10.3                  < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:20: R18                             11.2                   11.3                  11.3                  < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:20: R19                             8.9                    9.0                   9.0                   < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:20: R20                             8.9                    9.0                   9.0                   < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:20: R21                             8.6                    8.7                   8.7                   < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:20: R22                             8.4                    8.4                   8.4                   < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:20: R23                             8.2                    8.2                   8.3                   0.1         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:20: R24                             7.5                    7.6                   7.6                   < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:20: R25                             7.5                    7.5                   7.6                   0.1         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:20: R26                             7.5                    7.5                   7.5                   < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:20: R27                             7.6                    7.6                   7.6                   < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:20: R28                             7.5                    7.5                   7.5                   < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:20: E1                              7.1                    7.1                   7.1                   < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf]]:20: E2                              7.1                    7.1                   7.1                   < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF]]:40:                                                   development scenario (albeit negligible), and best practice noise control

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF]]:41:                                                   The proposed development is anticipated to only have negligible impacts

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:20:                                       Negligible flood risk.                      Undeveloped or agricultural land from a

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:22:                 No/ Negligible        No perceptible change in the baseline        N/A

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:22:                terms ‘Negligible’ in terms of the level of effect. The use of the category of ‘Negligible’ may for

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:22:                'Minor' or ‘Negligible’ is referenced as a level of effect, this can be either Beneficial or Adverse.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:23:                                                                                                           Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:23:                                                                                              Negligible   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:23:                    No/ Negligible          Neutral/          Neutral/        Neutral/        Neutral/     Neutral/

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:23:                    Change                  Negligible        Negligible      Negligible      Negligible   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:43:                Culvert and Boundary Beck Culvert is very low and so the effect would be Negligible Adverse,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:43:                no/negligible change there would be a Negligible Adverse and Not Significant effect.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:44:                Negligible Adverse, and not significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:44:                and thus significant impacts. Thus there would be no/negligible magnitude of change and so

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:44:                there would be a Negligible Adverse and Not Significant effect.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:44:                Negligible Adverse and Not Significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:44:                category for the aquifer as low, the level of effect is therefore Negligible Adverse, and Not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:45:                low and so the effect would be Negligible Adverse, and Not Significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:45:                no/negligible magnitude of change and so there would be a Negligible Adverse and Not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:45:                Boundary Beck Culvert is very low and so the effect would be Negligible Adverse, and Not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:45:F5.23           The Tees estuary has a very high sensitivity, but there would be no/negligible magnitude of

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:45:                change and so there would be a Negligible Adverse and Not Significant effect.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:45:                receptors the level of effect is Negligible Adverse and Not Significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:45:                on the low sensitivity groundwater receptors is Negligible Beneficial and Not Significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:51:                to the current conditions would be Negligible Beneficial and Not Significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:51:                therefore the residual effect there would be no/negligible magnitude of change and so there

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:51:                would be a Negligible Adverse and Not Significant effect.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:51:                sensitivity rated very low and so the effect would be Negligible Beneficial, that is not significant,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:51:                no/negligible change and thus there would be a Negligible Beneficial and Not Significant effect.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:51:                of change will be minor, so the level of effect is therefore Negligible Adverse, and Not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:52:                sensitivity aquifer receptors, this would result in a Negligible Adverse level of effect of pollution

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:52:                low sensitivity receptor gives a Negligible effect, which is Not Significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:52:                effect would be Negligible Beneficial, and Not Significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:52:                therefore the residual effect there would be no/negligible magnitude of change and so there

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:52:                would be a Negligible Adverse and Not Significant effect.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:52:                and so the effect would be Negligible Beneficial and Not Significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:52:                no/negligible change and thus there would be a Negligible Beneficial and Not Significant effect.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:52:                Negligible Adverse, and Not Significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:54:                 River Tees Flows -              Negligible Adverse and      Implementation of the       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:55:                                 Water quality - Negligible Adverse and      The drainage design will        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:55:                                                 Negligible Adverse and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:55:                 Other       Flows -              Negligible Adverse and     The drainage design will        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:56:                                 Water Quality - Negligible Adverse and      Implementation of Drainage Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:56:                                 Water Quality - Negligible Adverse and      materials shall be sensitive

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:56:                 Mercia     Reduced               Negligible Adverse and     No further mitigation is       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:56:                                 Pollution from   Negligible Adverse and     Implementation of             Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:56:                                 pathways         Negligible Adverse and     would be ongoing, to

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:57:                 Superficial     Reduced          Negligible Adverse and      No further mitigation             Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:57:                                 Pollution from   Negligible Adverse and      Implementation of             Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:57:                                 pathways         Negligible Adverse and      would be ongoing, to

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:57:                 River Tees Flows -               Negligible Adverse and      A FRA, DIA and Surface            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:58:                                 Water Quality - Negligible Adverse and      The drainage design will not Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:58:                 Other       Flows -              Negligible Adverse and     An FRA, DIA and Surface           Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:59:                                 Water Quality - Minor Adverse and Not       Any Surface water channels      Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:60:                 Mercia          Reduced          Negligible Adverse and      No further mitigation         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:60:                                 Pollution from   Negligible Beneficial and   The SWMP and DIA will         Minor

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:60:                 Superficial     Reduced          Negligible Adverse and      No further mitigation         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:60:                                 Pollution from   Negligible Beneficial and   The SWMP and DIA will         Minor

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:60:                Negligible Beneficial effects for the River Tees estuary (WFD transitional water body) during

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf]]:10:                •    Negligible – effects which are unlikely to be perceptible to drivers, bus passengers or those

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf]]:10:                •    Negligible – effects which are unlikely to be perceptible and within the normal variation of

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf]]:20:                there is therefore considered to be a Negligible effect in severance. This is considered to be Not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf]]:21:                    Road                            Dock Road north of the access and therefore     Negligible   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf]]:21:                    of Tees                                                                         Negligible     Minor

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf]]:21:                                                                                                    Negligible   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf]]:21:                                                                                                    Negligible     Minor

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf]]:21:                •      Tees Dock Road has a Negligible adverse effect as vehicles will access Lackenby via an

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf]]:21:                •      A66 west of Tees Dock Road has a change in HGV flow that is considered negligible,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf]]:22:                     considered to be Negligible. This is considered to be Not Significant in EIA terms.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf]]:22:                be Negligible. This is considered to be Not Significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf]]:22:                safety is expected to be Negligible. This is considered to be Not Significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf]]:25:                  A174 /               Minor adverse         A series of footbridges are already provided over      Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf]]:27:                  A174 /      Minor adverse     Potential accidents  Travel Planning measures      Negligible – travel

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby EcIA Rev A.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby EcIA Rev A.pdf]]:13:8.9 There is a negligible amount of suitable habitat for bats on the proposed development site though

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby EcIA Rev A.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby EcIA Rev A.pdf]]:13:8.10 The buildings on the site are of negligible roosting potential for bats as they are either metal or

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby EcIA Rev A.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby EcIA Rev A.pdf]]:14:8.14 The amount of suitable habitat for Hedgehog on the site is negligible therefore Hedgehog is

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby EcIA Rev A.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby EcIA Rev A.pdf]]:14:Grayling therefore the site is assessed as being of negligible importance for this species.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby EcIA Rev A.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby EcIA Rev A.pdf]]:14:each assessed as being of negligible importance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby EcIA Rev A.pdf|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby EcIA Rev A.pdf]]:15:9.5 With the embedded mitigation in place the residual effects that are of greater than negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:6:                  Water Management and Flooding                            Negligible Beneficial (Not Significant) effect on:

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:6:                                                                           Negligible Adverse (Not Significant) effect on:

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:6:                                                                           Negligible Adverse (Not Significant) effects on:

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:7:                                                                           Negligible (Not Significant) effect for:

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:7:                 Waste and Materials Management                            Negligible Adverse (Not Significant) effect on:

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:7:                                                                           Negligible (Not Significant) effects on:

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:7:                 Air Quality                                               Negligible (Not Significant) effects on:

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:7:                                                                           Negligible Beneficial (Not Significant) effect on:

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:7:                                                                           Negligible Adverse (Not Significant) effects on:

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:8:                                                                           Negligible (Not Significant) effect on:

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:8:                     Waste and Materials Management                        Negligible Adverse (Not Significant) effect on:

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:10:                 reference is made to Minor or Negligible ‘insignificant’ residual effects where relevant. The EIA

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:10:                 predicted, the residual effects of the development are either Minor or Negligible Adverse and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:11:                RED - adverse effect; GREEN - beneficial effect; ( ) - Minor/Negligible non-significant effect; X no/neutral

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:11:                Negligible noise and air quality effects have been predicted for existing residents and therefore

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:24:                                                                                                                                                        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:29:                no or negligible cumulative effects, as a result of the Tier 1 schemes in Table L4.1 coming

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:29:                           are Negligible, there is anticipated to be no or at worst negligible cumulative effects on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:41:                both sites, the cumulative effects will therefore be Negligible Adverse and Not Significant for

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:41:L5.44           In terms of surface water, the mitigation measures are anticipated to have a Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:42:                 deemed to be Negligible Beneficial and Not Significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:47:                magnitude of change on a low sensitivity receptor, which is a Negligible effect (Not Significant).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:47:                considered to be minor. The overall significance is considered to be Negligible (Not Significant).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:47:                negligible magnitude of change on a low sensitivity receptor, which is a Negligible effect (Not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:48:                 no or negligible cumulative effects, as a result of the Tier 1 and Tier 2 schemes in Table L4.1

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:48:                      the proposed development will be negligible and therefore should be scoped out of the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:64:                 Negligible impact at most receptor locations and Slight (Minor) Adverse at five receptor

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:64:                 R20), the A1085 and Kirkleatham Lane respectively). Negligible and Slight (Minor Adverse)

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:65:                Negligible impact at all existing receptor locations and is considered to be Not Significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:66:                 Negligible impact at all existing receptor locations and is considered to be Not Significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:66:L5.154           The magnitude of change for NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations is Negligible at all receptors.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:66:                 Where the impact is Negligible or Slight (Minor Adverse) then the overall effect of the proposed

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:66:                 the cumulative magnitude of impact of the developments would be Negligible Beneficial and Not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:67:                watercourses draining to the Tees and the Tees itself would be Negligible Beneficial and Not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:69:                considered to be Minor. Consequently, the overall significance is considered to be Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:70:                 Negligible (Not Significant).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:70:                 Negligible (Not Significant).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:70:                 management Infrastructure during operation are expected to be Negligible (Not Significant).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0270-FFM/R-2020-0270-FFM-2020_05_29_STDC Eston Road EcIA_Issue.PDF|R-2020-0270-FFM-2020_05_29_STDC Eston Road EcIA_Issue.PDF]]:14:•      Negligible – No effect on species or habitats present are anticipated.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0432-FFM/R-2021-0432-FFM-19736928_1.PDF|R-2021-0432-FFM-19736928_1.PDF]]:11:    the risk associated with this source is negligible and does not require further assessment.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0432-FFM/R-2021-0432-FFM-19736928_1.PDF|R-2021-0432-FFM-19736928_1.PDF]]:16:The risks from tidal, groundwater, sewers and artificial sources are considered to be negligible or low.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0339-CD/R-2023-0339-CD-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2023-0339-CD-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf]]:16:2.7.1        Information provided by the BGS indicates that the Application Site is at very low or negligible risk

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0339-CD/R-2023-0339-CD-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2023-0339-CD-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf]]:50:99     17.4      Collapsible deposits                                     Negligible (within 50m)

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0339-CD/R-2023-0339-CD-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2023-0339-CD-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf]]:50:101    17.6      Ground dissolution of soluble rocks                      Negligible (within 50m)

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0339-CD/R-2023-0339-CD-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2023-0339-CD-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf]]:102: 1 in 30 year                                                   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0339-CD/R-2023-0339-CD-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2023-0339-CD-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf]]:103:                                                                                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0339-CD/R-2023-0339-CD-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2023-0339-CD-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf]]:140:                                                                                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0339-CD/R-2023-0339-CD-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2023-0339-CD-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf]]:141:                                                                                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0339-CD/R-2023-0339-CD-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2023-0339-CD-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf]]:142:                                                                                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0339-CD/R-2023-0339-CD-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2023-0339-CD-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf]]:143:                                                                                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0339-CD/R-2023-0339-CD-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2023-0339-CD-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf]]:143: On site       Negligible        Deposits with potential to collapse when loaded and saturated are believed not to be present.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0339-CD/R-2023-0339-CD-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2023-0339-CD-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf]]:144:                                                                                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0339-CD/R-2023-0339-CD-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2023-0339-CD-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf]]:145:                                                                                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0339-CD/R-2023-0339-CD-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2023-0339-CD-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf]]:145: On site       Negligible      Soluble rocks are either not thought to be present within the ground, or not prone to dissolution.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0339-CD/R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf|R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf]]:6:              Negligible            Receptor is of negligible value with no contribution to              •      Unproductive strata.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0339-CD/R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf|R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf]]:7:              Negligible            Very minor loss or detrimental alteration to one            Very minor temporary benefit to or

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0339-CD/R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf|R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf]]:7:                                    No Change             Negligible            Low                   Medium             High

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0339-CD/R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf|R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf]]:7:              Negligible            No change             Negligible            Negligible or         Negligible or      Minor

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0339-CD/R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf|R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf]]:7:              Low                   No change             Negligible or         Negligible or         Minor              Minor or

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0339-CD/R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf|R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf]]:7:              Medium                No change             Negligible or         Minor                 Moderate           Moderate or

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0339-CD/R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf|R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf]]:8:             •     Negligible: No effects or those that are beneath levels of perception, within normal bounds of

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0339-CD/R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf|R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf]]:12:9.3.28       Information provided by the BGS indicates that the Application Site is at very low or negligible risk

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0339-CD/R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf|R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf]]:14:             section 9.4, the magnitude of impact would be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0339-CD/R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf|R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf]]:15:             of impact would be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0339-CD/R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf|R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf]]:15:             CoCP to prevent surface water run-off, the magnitude of impact would be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0339-CD/R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf|R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf]]:17:             basis, the magnitude of impact would be negligible, and the level of effect is considered to be

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0339-CD/R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf|R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf]]:18:             materials to migrate to groundwater. The magnitude of impact would be negligible, and the level of

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0339-CD/R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf|R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf]]:18:             effect is considered to be negligible, which is not significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0339-CD/R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf|R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf]]:18:             contaminants. On this basis, the magnitude of impact would be negligible, and the level of effect is

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0339-CD/R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf|R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf]]:21:             extent; the magnitude of impact would be negligible to low and the significance of effects are

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0339-CD/R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf|R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf]]:21:             would be negligible to minor adverse, which is not significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0339-CD/R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf|R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf]]:23:                                                                                    CoCP, site                  Negligible     Minor adverse     Not significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0339-CD/R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf|R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf]]:23:                                                  Mobilisation of                   CoCP, site                  Negligible     Minor adverse     Not significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0339-CD/R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf|R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf]]:23:                                                  Direct damage to geology          CoCP, site                  Negligible     Minor adverse     Not significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0339-CD/R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf|R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf]]:24:                            Very High             Dermal exposure, vapours          Environmental permit Negligible            Minor adverse     Not significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0339-CD/R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf|R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf]]:24:Aquifer)                    Low                   chemicals or waste water                                Negligible           Negligible        Not significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0339-CD/R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf|R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf]]:24:Cleveland Coast             High                                                                          Negligible           Minor adverse     Not significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0253-RMM/R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf|R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf]]:49:                  •     severity of the effect is described as qualitative descriptors; negligible, slight,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0253-RMM/R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf|R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf]]:50:                    ≤75% of AQAL         Negligible          Negligible          Slight            Moderate

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0253-RMM/R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf|R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf]]:50:                   76-94% of AQAL        Negligible            Slight          Moderate            Moderate

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0253-RMM/R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf|R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf]]:82:                         85         2020             0.765                    1.91%                        25.57          64%            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0253-RMM/R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf|R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf]]:82:                         90         2020             0.603                    1.51%                        25.40          64%            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0253-RMM/R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf|R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf]]:82:      NO2                95         2020             0.486                    1.21%                        25.29          63%            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0253-RMM/R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf|R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf]]:82:                         85         2020             0.109                    2.19%          0.326         0.435          9%             Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0253-RMM/R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf|R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf]]:82:                         90         2020             0.0861                   1.72%          0.355         0.441          9%             Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0253-RMM/R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf|R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf]]:82:     VOC                 95         2020             0.0694                   1.39%          0.355         0.424          8%             Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0253-RMM/R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf|R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf]]:82: (annual mean)           100      NWP 2020           0.0564                   1.13%          0.358         0.414          8%             Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0253-RMM/R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf|R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf]]:82:                         105      NWP 2020           0.0510                   1.02%          0.358         0.409          8%             Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0253-RMM/R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf|R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf]]:82:                         110      NWP 2020         0.00000462                 1.85%                       0.000211        84%            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0253-RMM/R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf|R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf]]:83:             classed as ‘negligible’ for stack heights of 85m to 95m (inclusive) and screens out at stack

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0253-RMM/R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf|R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf]]:83:             ‘negligible’ for stack heights of 85m to 105m (inclusive) and screens out at stack heights of

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0253-RMM/R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf|R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf]]:83:             heights of 85m to 105m (inclusive) and ‘negligible’ for stack heights of 110m.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0253-RMM/R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf|R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf]]:107:             sensitive human receptor locations were classed as ‘negligible’. For PAH (as B[[a]]P), the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0253-RMM/R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf|R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf]]:108:                                                 IAQM Impact Descriptor         Negligible                 n/a              n/a              n/a               n/a             n/a              n/a            n/a        n/a      Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0253-RMM/R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf|R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf]]:134:             under abnormal operating conditions, would therefore be described as ‘negligible’.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0253-RMM/R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf|R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf]]:151:             human receptor locations were classed as ‘negligible’. For PAH (as B[[a]]P), the human

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0253-RMM/R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf|R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf]]:152:                              IAQM Impact Descriptor       Negligible     n/a        n/a        n/a        n/a        n/a       n/a         n/a       n/a       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0253-RMM/R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf|R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf]]:208:negligible effect on the final reported results, non-bias adjusted results are shown

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0253-RMM/R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf|R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf]]:281:6.53   The revised modelling data show negligible change for hydrogen fluoride compared to the data presented in Table 17. It can therefore be assumed that there

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0253-RMM/R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf|R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf]]:322:4.49   The revised modelling data show negligible change for hydrogen fluoride compared to the data presented in Table 10. It can therefore be assumed that there

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0253-RMM/R-2023-0253-RMM-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie Air Quality Impacts on SSSI.pdf|R-2023-0253-RMM-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie Air Quality Impacts on SSSI.pdf]]:20:4.49   The revised modelling data show negligible change for hydrogen fluoride compared to the data presented in Table 10. It can therefore be assumed that there

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0253-RMM/R-2023-0253-RMM-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf|R-2023-0253-RMM-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf]]:42:6.53   The revised modelling data show negligible change for hydrogen fluoride compared to the data presented in Table 17. It can therefore be assumed that there

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0253-RMM/R-2023-0253-RMM-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf|R-2023-0253-RMM-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf]]:11:for foraging likely impact on this species was assessed to be negligible. Several of the ponds were tested for

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0943-CD/R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf|R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf]]:28:injury to marine mammals from dredging has been assessed as negligible. The assessment has

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0943-CD/R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf|R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf]]:28:concluded impacts of negligible significance to all marine mammals with regard to potential for

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0943-CD/R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf|R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf]]:28:vessel movements in the area. A worst-case impact of negligible significance (not significant) is

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0943-CD/R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf|R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf]]:29:conclusion that there will be negligible impacts on both resident and migratory fish.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0943-CD/R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf|R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf]]:43:   geological sensitivity is considered to be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0943-CD/R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf|R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf]]:45:   It was concluded that the impact during the construction phase would be of negligible significance

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0943-CD/R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf|R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf]]:28:injury to marine mammals from dredging has been assessed as negligible. The assessment has

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0943-CD/R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf|R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf]]:28:concluded impacts of negligible significance to all marine mammals with regard to potential for

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0943-CD/R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf|R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf]]:28:vessel movements in the area. A worst-case impact of negligible significance (not significant) is

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0943-CD/R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf|R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf]]:29:conclusion that there will be negligible impacts on both resident and migratory fish.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0943-CD/R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf|R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf]]:43:   geological sensitivity is considered to be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0943-CD/R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf|R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf]]:45:   It was concluded that the impact during the construction phase would be of negligible significance

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0943-CD/R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-MS-WM-000001.pdf|R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-MS-WM-000001.pdf]]:3:                                                                                                 negligible significance and no additional mitigation is proposed.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0411-CD/R-2022-0411-CD-32435-HM-AC-RP-01_00 ISSUE.pdf|R-2022-0411-CD-32435-HM-AC-RP-01_00 ISSUE.pdf]]:16:      construction works are therefore predicted to be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0318-FFM/R-2020-0318-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0088-01-Prairie_Risk Assessment (1).pdf|R-2020-0318-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0088-01-Prairie_Risk Assessment (1).pdf]]:15:    Deposits                                      have negligible significance for water supply or river base flow. Based on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0318-FFM/R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation EcIA_Issue.PDF|R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation EcIA_Issue.PDF]]:15:•     Negligible – No effect on species or habitats present are anticipated.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0318-FFM/R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site, Desk Based Heritage Assessment.PDF|R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site, Desk Based Heritage Assessment.PDF]]:6:             •       Negligible – areas of extremely limited or no archaeological or historic interest. These

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0924-CD/R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf|R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf]]:16:             demonstrate that there will be a negligible impact on those aspects of the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 13 Climate Change and GHG.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 13 Climate Change and GHG.pdf]]:13:          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 13 Climate Change and GHG.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 13 Climate Change and GHG.pdf]]:13:                                       before 2050. A project with negligible effects provides GHG performance

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Green Lithium Appendix 10 - LVIA.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Green Lithium Appendix 10 - LVIA.pdf]]:4:  Negligible /                                               Barely perceptible changes to the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Green Lithium Appendix 10 - LVIA.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Green Lithium Appendix 10 - LVIA.pdf]]:4:    None         Negligible to no perceptible change         character area/receptor.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Green Lithium Appendix 10 - LVIA.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Green Lithium Appendix 10 - LVIA.pdf]]:5:  Negligible /    Barely perceptible or no change to the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Green Lithium Appendix 10 - LVIA.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Green Lithium Appendix 10 - LVIA.pdf]]:15: Surrounding        Low              Within the surrounding urban context, the new Green Lithium facility - comprising a low carbon lithium refinery,         Moderate       Minor- Adverse    Minor          Minor Adverse      Minor                Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Green Lithium Appendix 10 - LVIA.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Green Lithium Appendix 10 - LVIA.pdf]]:17:Recreational users of     Medium                  For recreational users of the England Coast Path long distance route, views of the Site vary depending           Minor          Minor Adverse     Minor          Minor Adverse     Negligible            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Green Lithium Appendix 10 - LVIA.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Green Lithium Appendix 10 - LVIA.pdf]]:17:Local road users to the   Low                     PVP 3 illustrates the view from the junction of the A66 and Eston Road, where intervening built form will        Minor          Minor Adverse     Minor          Minor Adverse     Negligible            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Green Lithium Appendix 10 - LVIA.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Green Lithium Appendix 10 - LVIA.pdf]]:18:Transient users of      Low                     Photoviewpoints 6 and 7 illustrate views on the approach to the Site along Teesport Road from the                Major          Moderate Adverse   Moderate       Minor-Moderate    Minor                 Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Green Lithium Appendix 10 - LVIA.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Green Lithium Appendix 10 - LVIA.pdf]]:18:Transient users of      Low                     For transient users of the A1085 Trunk Road and Public Retail Development users, the views towards               Minor          Minor Adverse      Minor          Minor Adverse     Negligible            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Green Lithium Appendix 10 - LVIA.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Green Lithium Appendix 10 - LVIA.pdf]]:19:Recreational users of   Medium to High          This view is representative of those from the Eston Nab Hill viewpoint. It is a local landmark, and is well    Minor          Moderate Adverse   Minor          Moderate Adverse   Negligible            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Green Lithium Appendix 10 - LVIA.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Green Lithium Appendix 10 - LVIA.pdf]]:19:Visitors to Coatham     Low to Medium           Distant views towards the Site are heavily filtered by intervening built form: cranes and industrial           Minor          Minor Adverse      Negligible     Negligible         Negligible            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Green Lithium Appendix 10 - LVIA.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Green Lithium Appendix 10 - LVIA.pdf]]:20:Residents to the south   Low to Medium           Viewpoint 5 is representative of views towards the Site from the residential properties within a              Minor          Minor Adverse     Negligible     Negligible        Negligible            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR Statement of Community Engagement Annex 1 - EIA Screening Response.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR Statement of Community Engagement Annex 1 - EIA Screening Response.pdf]]:4:       extant uses. While it is identified that “traffic would therefore be negligible and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf]]:5:         •      The potential effects have been given a significance of Negligible or Minor, Moderate or Major

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf]]:6:      Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf]]:7:          Minor                    Minor to Moderate                             Minor                        Negligible to Minor

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf]]:7:       Negligible                        Negligible                            Negligible                         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf]]:13:       considered to be Negligible to Minor Adverse for surface water drainage (low sensitivity receptor).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf]]:14:9.61. With these mitigation measures in place, it is considered that the residual effect would be Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf]]:15:9.68. With these mitigation measures in place, it is considered that the residual effect would be Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf]]:16:9.77. With these mitigation measures in place, it is considered that the residual effect would be Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf]]:17:9.86. With these mitigation measures in place, it is considered that the residual effects would be Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf]]:18:       effect would be Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf]]:19:9.103. With these mitigation measures in place, it is considered that the residual effects would be Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf]]:20:       water drainage would be Negligible to Minor Beneficial when compared to the existing scenario.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf]]:21:       risk from routine site drainage would be Negligible when compared to the existing Site use.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf]]:22:       Development is considered to be Negligible. Prior to mitigation, the effect significance is considered to

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf]]:22:       be Negligible for water supply and Infrastructure and no mitigation measures are required.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf]]:22:       considered to be negligible on Infrastructure. Prior to mitigation, the effect significance is considered to

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf]]:22:       be Negligible, and no mitigation measures are therefore required.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf]]:24:       ratings of the assessment and the resulting residual effects would remain Negligible to Minor Beneficial.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf]]:25:       Development with regard to water quality, water resources and flood risk is considered to be Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf]]:26:                       Low                            Negligible to   and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf]]:26:                                                                                                           Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf]]:26:                                                                                                           Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf]]:26:                                                                                                           Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf]]:26:                                        water and     Minor Adverse   tanks).                              Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf]]:26:                                                                                                           Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf]]:26:                                                                                                           Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf]]:26:  Control of           Low                            Negligible to                                        Negligible to

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf]]:26:  surface water        (surface water   Negligible    Minor           Water Drainage Strategy

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf]]:26:  waters from                           Negligible    Negligible                                           Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf]]:26:  Water demand                          Negligible    Negligible      - None required                      Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf]]:26:                                        Negligible    Negligible      - None required                      Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 14 Contaminated Lands.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 14 Contaminated Lands.pdf]]:6:         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 14 Contaminated Lands.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 14 Contaminated Lands.pdf]]:6:         Negligible/Neutral            Reversible                Site-wide                                Infrequent

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 14 Contaminated Lands.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 14 Contaminated Lands.pdf]]:6:       “Adverse”, “Neutral/Negligible” or “Beneficial”).           Where the predicted effects are significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 14 Contaminated Lands.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 14 Contaminated Lands.pdf]]:6:       Receptor                  Large                    Medium                Low                 Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 14 Contaminated Lands.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 14 Contaminated Lands.pdf]]:6:          Medium           Moderate/Major             Moderate           Minor/Moderate       Negligible/Minor

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 14 Contaminated Lands.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 14 Contaminated Lands.pdf]]:6:            Low               Moderate              Minor/Moderate       Negligible/Minor           Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 14 Contaminated Lands.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 14 Contaminated Lands.pdf]]:7:  Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 14 Contaminated Lands.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 14 Contaminated Lands.pdf]]:16:             aquifers only have a minor value and negligible significance for water supply to rivers lakes or

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 14 Contaminated Lands.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 14 Contaminated Lands.pdf]]:33: Completed development          Permanent             Minor Adverse    Site investigation and      Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 14 Contaminated Lands.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 14 Contaminated Lands.pdf]]:33: Completed development          Permanent             Insignificant    No specific mitigation      Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 14 Contaminated Lands.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 14 Contaminated Lands.pdf]]:33: Completed development          Permanent             Minor Adverse    Site investigation and      Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 14 Contaminated Lands.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 14 Contaminated Lands.pdf]]:33: Completed development          Permanent             Minor Adverse    Site investigation and      Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-PD Teeside Heritage Statement 0323.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-PD Teeside Heritage Statement 0323.pdf]]:11:           potential was high although modern remains are of negligible importance. The Assessment

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-PD Teeside Heritage Statement 0323.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-PD Teeside Heritage Statement 0323.pdf]]:20:           century development of the site and will have negligible heritage value.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-PD Teeside Heritage Statement 0323.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-PD Teeside Heritage Statement 0323.pdf]]:21:           are retained these hold negligible archaeological interest given late dating. Land to the south

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-PD Teeside Heritage Statement 0323.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-PD Teeside Heritage Statement 0323.pdf]]:21:           the position of the former track beds, these are of late dating and hold negligible interest.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 10 Landscape.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 10 Landscape.pdf]]:9:       – Moderate – Moderate / Minor – Minor – Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 10 Landscape.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 10 Landscape.pdf]]:9:  NEGLIGIBLE                NEGLIGIBLE          NEGLIGIBLE              NEGLIGIBLE

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 10 Landscape.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 10 Landscape.pdf]]:16:                  negligible effects.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf]]:2:       assessed as negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf]]:2:       Management Plan (CEMP), the residual impact would be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf]]:3:       Proposed Development is likely to have a Negligible impact to local air quality.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf]]:4:       Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf]]:5:15.33. The impacts of the Proposed Development are therefore considered to be Negligible in terms of waste

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf]]:5:       with the proposed noise levels demonstrating a negligible impact to this receptor as well as all others

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf]]:6:15.37. The effects due to operation of the Proposed Development will be negligible following appropriate

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf]]:6:       design, such that effects from sound levels pertaining to such sources remain negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf]]:7:15.47. The conclusion of the ES is that Proposed Development has an overall negligible impact, with none of

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf]]:8:                                      Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf]]:8:                                      Negligible                                                 No additional mitigation required

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf]]:8:   Point Source Emissions             Negligible                                                 No additional mitigation required

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf]]:8:                                      Negligible                                                 No additional mitigation required

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf]]:8:                                      Negligible                                                 No additional mitigation required

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf]]:8:  Other Neutral Grassland             Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf]]:8:   Species: Dingy Skipper             Negligible                                                 No additional mitigation required

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf]]:8:                                      Negligible                                                 No additional mitigation required

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf]]:8:                                      Negligible                                     Installation of drainage works and attenuation measures

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf]]:9:                                     Negligible                              Groundwater monitoring will be undertaken prior to construction

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf]]:9:    general construction             Negligible        Implementation of CEMP, Construction Vehicles properly maintained, Drainage will comply with BS6031:2009

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf]]:9:    External Flood Risk              Negligible                Groundwater monitoring will be undertaken prior to construction, Dewatering of excavations

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf]]:9:     Contamination to                Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf]]:9:    External Flood Risk              Negligible                               Groundwater monitoring to be undertaken prior to construction

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf]]:9:  Control of Surface Water      Negligible to Minor

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf]]:9:     Contamination of               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf]]:9:      Water Demand                   Negligible                                              No additional mitigation required

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf]]:9:   Foul Drainage Demand              Negligible                                              No additional mitigation required

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf]]:9:                                     Negligible                                              No additional mitigation required

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf]]:9:   Landscape Character               Negligible                                              No additional mitigation required

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf]]:9:      Visual Receptors               Negligible                                              No additional mitigation required

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf]]:9:                                     Negligible                                              No additional mitigation required

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf]]:10:    Landscape Character              Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf]]:10:      Visual Receptors               Negligible                                              No additional mitigation required

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf]]:10:                                     Negligible                                              No additional mitigation required

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf]]:10: through the construction            Negligible                                              No additional mitigation required

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf]]:10:                                     Negligible                                              No additional mitigation required

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf]]:10:                                Negligible to Minor

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf]]:10:                                     Negligible                            Implementation of Best Practicable Means to control noise emission

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf]]:10:   Construction vibration            Negligible                          Implementation of Best Practicable Means to control vibration emissions

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf]]:11:                                     Negligible                                             No additional mitigation required

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf]]:11:  Effects on human health            Negligible              Site Investigation and Remediation, use of engineering design (barriers and clean break layers).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf]]:11:     Contamination of                Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf]]:11:                                     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf]]:11:       from Ground                   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR Planning Statement.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR Planning Statement.pdf]]:71:      negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR Planning Statement.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR Planning Statement.pdf]]:72:5.27. The conclusion of the assessment is that there will be no negligible impact to the Teesmouth & Cleveland

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Appendix 14.1 A. Groundsure.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Appendix 14.1 A. Groundsure.pdf]]:8:114    17.4      Collapsible deposits                                     Negligible (within 50m)

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Appendix 14.1 A. Groundsure.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Appendix 14.1 A. Groundsure.pdf]]:8:116    17.6      Ground dissolution of soluble rocks                      Negligible (within 50m)

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Appendix 14.1 A. Groundsure.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Appendix 14.1 A. Groundsure.pdf]]:62: 3     211m SE      Unproductive            These are rock layers or drift deposits with low permeability that have negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Appendix 14.1 A. Groundsure.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Appendix 14.1 A. Groundsure.pdf]]:79:                                                                                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Appendix 14.1 A. Groundsure.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Appendix 14.1 A. Groundsure.pdf]]:113:                                                                                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Appendix 14.1 A. Groundsure.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Appendix 14.1 A. Groundsure.pdf]]:114:                                                                                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Appendix 14.1 A. Groundsure.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Appendix 14.1 A. Groundsure.pdf]]:115:                                                                                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Appendix 14.1 A. Groundsure.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Appendix 14.1 A. Groundsure.pdf]]:116:                                                                                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Appendix 14.1 A. Groundsure.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Appendix 14.1 A. Groundsure.pdf]]:116: On site       Negligible        Deposits with potential to collapse when loaded and saturated are believed not to be present.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Appendix 14.1 A. Groundsure.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Appendix 14.1 A. Groundsure.pdf]]:117:                                                                                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Appendix 14.1 A. Groundsure.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Appendix 14.1 A. Groundsure.pdf]]:118:                                                                                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Appendix 14.1 A. Groundsure.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Appendix 14.1 A. Groundsure.pdf]]:118: On site       Negligible      Soluble rocks are either not thought to be present within the ground, or not prone to dissolution.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Appendix 14.1 F. Geotechnical Risk Register.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Appendix 14.1 F. Geotechnical Risk Register.pdf]]:2: 1                                 Negligible                         < 1 in 100

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Appendix 14.1 F. Geotechnical Risk Register.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Appendix 14.1 F. Geotechnical Risk Register.pdf]]:3: 1                                   Negligible                                    < 1%

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Green Lithium Appendix 14 - Contaminated Lands.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Green Lithium Appendix 14 - Contaminated Lands.pdf]]:30:               Collapsible Ground – Negligible hazard rating

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Green Lithium Appendix 14 - Contaminated Lands.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Green Lithium Appendix 14 - Contaminated Lands.pdf]]:30:               Ground Dissolution – Negligible hazard rating

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Green Lithium Appendix 14 - Contaminated Lands.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Green Lithium Appendix 14 - Contaminated Lands.pdf]]:30:deposits. These aquifers only have a minor value and negligible significance for water supply to

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-Officer Letter_R20220675SCP.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-Officer Letter_R20220675SCP.pdf]]:3:       extant uses. While it is identified that “traffic would therefore be negligible and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 11 Waste.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 11 Waste.pdf]]:12:       considered to have a negligible effect.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 11 Waste.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 11 Waste.pdf]]:13:       effects are negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 11 Waste.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 11 Waste.pdf]]:13:       operational phase is Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:3:       to ensure the likelihood of effects remains Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:3:      Negligible         Receptors where noise is not likely to be a factor

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:4:                          Impact                                Negligible              Low                 Medium               High

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:7:                      Negligible                           < 0.3                               > 185.1

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:8:                  Significance                  Negligible             Minor           Moderate            Major

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:8:                             High              Negligible             Minor            Moderate           Major

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:8:                          Moderate             Negligible           Negligible           Minor          Moderate

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:8:                             Low               Negligible           Negligible         Negligible         Minor

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:8:                           Negligible          Negligible           Negligible         Negligible       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:13:         R1             Negligible        Negligible          Negligible        Negligible         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:13:         R2             Negligible          Negligible          Negligible         Negligible          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:13:         R3             Negligible          Negligible          Negligible         Negligible          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:13:         R4             Negligible          Negligible          Negligible         Negligible          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:13:         R5             Negligible          Negligible          Negligible         Negligible          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:13:         R6             Negligible          Negligible          Negligible         Negligible          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:13:         R1             Negligible          Negligible          Negligible         Negligible          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:13:         R2             Negligible          Negligible          Negligible         Negligible          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:13:         R3             Negligible          Negligible          Negligible         Negligible          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:13:         R4             Negligible          Negligible          Negligible         Negligible          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:13:         R5             Negligible          Negligible          Negligible         Negligible          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:13:         R6             Negligible          Negligible          Negligible         Negligible          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:14:         R1             Negligible         Negligible          Negligible        Negligible         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:14:        R2              Negligible          Negligible         Negligible        Negligible         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:14:        R3              Negligible          Negligible         Negligible        Negligible         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:14:        R4              Negligible          Negligible         Negligible        Negligible         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:14:        R5              Negligible          Negligible         Negligible        Negligible         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:14:        R6              Negligible          Negligible         Negligible        Negligible         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:14:        R1              Negligible          Negligible          Negligible       Negligible         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:14:        R2              Negligible          Negligible         Negligible        Negligible         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:14:        R3              Negligible          Negligible         Negligible        Negligible         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:14:        R4              Negligible          Negligible         Negligible        Negligible         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:14:        R5              Negligible          Negligible         Negligible        Negligible         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:14:        R6              Negligible          Negligible         Negligible        Negligible         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:14:12.47. The effect significance is classed as Negligible (not significant) during all construction activities. Whilst

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:14:       the calculated impact is Negligible, it is still prudent to employ mitigation measures to further minimise

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:15:         R1             Negligible         Negligible          Negligible       Negligible         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:15:        R2             Negligible           Negligible         Negligible       Negligible        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:15:        R3             Negligible           Negligible         Negligible       Negligible        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:15:        R4             Negligible           Negligible         Negligible       Negligible        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:15:        R5             Negligible           Negligible         Negligible       Negligible        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:15:        R6             Negligible           Negligible         Negligible       Negligible        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:15:        R1             Negligible           Negligible          Negligible      Negligible        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:15:        R2             Negligible           Negligible         Negligible       Negligible        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:15:        R3             Negligible           Negligible         Negligible       Negligible        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:15:        R4             Negligible           Negligible         Negligible       Negligible        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:15:        R5             Negligible           Negligible         Negligible       Negligible        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:15:        R6             Negligible           Negligible         Negligible       Negligible        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:15:         R1             Negligible         Negligible          Negligible       Negligible         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:15:        R2             Negligible           Negligible         Negligible       Negligible        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:15:        R3             Negligible           Negligible         Negligible       Negligible        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:15:        R4             Negligible           Negligible         Negligible       Negligible        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:15:        R5             Negligible           Negligible         Negligible       Negligible        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:15:        R6             Negligible           Negligible         Negligible       Negligible        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:15:        R1             Negligible           Negligible          Negligible      Negligible        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:15:        R2             Negligible           Negligible         Negligible       Negligible        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:15:        R3             Negligible           Negligible         Negligible       Negligible        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:15:        R4             Negligible           Negligible         Negligible       Negligible        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:15:        R5             Negligible           Negligible         Negligible       Negligible        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:15:        R6             Negligible           Negligible         Negligible       Negligible        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:16:12.50. The effect significance is classed as Negligible (not significant) at all receptor locations. Whilst the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:17:       plant would be negligible following specification and assessment of proposed items.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:17:12.60. Construction noise and vibration effects are calculated to be Negligible (not significant). BPM measures

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:17:       resulting effect is Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:18:12.64. With consideration to the calculated Negligible residual effects and intervening distance between the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:18:       Development would be Negligible. Accordingly, cumulative effects are identified as unlikely. As a

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:18:12.68. Construction noise and vibration effects are calculated to be Negligible (not significant) following

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:18:12.69. The effects due to operation of the Proposed Development will be Negligible following appropriate

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:18:       design, such that effects from sound levels pertaining to such sources remain Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:19:                                Short-Term           Negligible                             Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:19:      at surrounding            Short-Term           Negligible                             Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf]]:19:      at surrounding            Long-Term                 -                                 Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Appendix 14.1 E. PRA Methodology.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Appendix 14.1 E. PRA Methodology.pdf]]:3: Minor/ Negligible                Non-permanent health effects to human health (easily prevented by appropriate use of PPE). Minor pollution to

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Appendix 14.1 E. PRA Methodology.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Appendix 14.1 E. PRA Methodology.pdf]]:3:                                  Mild                 Moderate                 Moderate/Low             Low                       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Appendix 14.1 E. PRA Methodology.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Appendix 14.1 E. PRA Methodology.pdf]]:3:                                                       Moderate/Low             Low                      Negligible                Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Appendix 14.1 E. PRA Methodology.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Appendix 14.1 E. PRA Methodology.pdf]]:3:                                  Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Appendix 14.1 E. PRA Methodology.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Appendix 14.1 E. PRA Methodology.pdf]]:4: Negligible           Low likelihood that harm could arise to a receptor. Such harm unlikely to be any worse than mild.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Ecology.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Ecology.pdf]]:14:       roosting bats be other than negligible, the appropriate level of survey effort will be undertaken, in line

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 1 to 6.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 1 to 6.pdf]]:39:         •     Neutral / Negligible – no discernible improvement or deterioration to the existing environment.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR_DAS.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR_DAS.pdf]]:18:                                                           development will include the removal of some existing        negligible impact to the Teesmouth & Cleveland

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-PN 0291.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-PN 0291.pdf]]:2:(CEMP), the residual impact would be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR ES Vol 3 Exec Summary.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR ES Vol 3 Exec Summary.pdf]]:11:       be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR ES Vol 3 Exec Summary.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR ES Vol 3 Exec Summary.pdf]]:11:       contributions are assessed as negligible at all sensitive human receptor locations for all pollutants.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR ES Vol 3 Exec Summary.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR ES Vol 3 Exec Summary.pdf]]:13:       development with regard to water quality, water resources and flood risk is considered to be Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR ES Vol 3 Exec Summary.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR ES Vol 3 Exec Summary.pdf]]:15:8.9.   The impacts of the proposed development are therefore considered to be Negligible in terms of waste

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR ES Vol 3 Exec Summary.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR ES Vol 3 Exec Summary.pdf]]:17:       low likelihood of noise impacts associated with construction activities. Negligible effects are calculated

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR ES Vol 3 Exec Summary.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR ES Vol 3 Exec Summary.pdf]]:17:       adopted limits, such that the resulting effect is Negligible. Such consideration will be undertaken during

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR ES Vol 3 Exec Summary.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR ES Vol 3 Exec Summary.pdf]]:17:9.6.   Effects from fixed plant would be negligible following specification and assessment of proposed plant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR ES Vol 3 Exec Summary.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR ES Vol 3 Exec Summary.pdf]]:17:       is adequately controlled such that calculated effects remain Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR ES Vol 3 Exec Summary.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR ES Vol 3 Exec Summary.pdf]]:17:       considered to be Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR ES Vol 3 Exec Summary.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR ES Vol 3 Exec Summary.pdf]]:21:12.1. In summary the ES concludes that the Proposed Development has an overall negligible effect, when the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-20230328 Green Lithium TS_RG_RF.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-20230328 Green Lithium TS_RG_RF.pdf]]:18:         be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-20230328 Green Lithium TS_RG_RF.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-20230328 Green Lithium TS_RG_RF.pdf]]:20:       this existing industrial site for a Lithium Refining Facility would be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf]]:4:7.14. The risk of dust effects (negligible, low, medium or high) is determined by the scale (magnitude) and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf]]:7:          50m, the impact is negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf]]:8:          50m, the impact is negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf]]:9:            Low                    Medium Risk                      Low Risk                   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf]]:10:            Low                     Medium Risk               Low Risk                     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf]]:10:          Medium                  Medium Risk                 Low Risk                     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf]]:10:            Low                        Low Risk               Low Risk                     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf]]:16:                            Negligible               Negligible           Slight adverse        Moderate adverse

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf]]:17:   76-94% of AQAL              Negligible            Slight adverse         Moderate adverse         Moderate adverse

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf]]:17:       as negligible, regardless of existing air quality. Where the short-term process concentrations are 11-20%

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf]]:19:       represent negligible or zero risk to health, based on medical and scientific evidence reviewed by the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf]]:27:       that required by legislation. Where the risk is assessed as ‘negligible’ no additional mitigation is

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf]]:27:         Demolition                      Small                      Negligible               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf]]:28:       receptors, the impact is classed as negligible in accordance with the EPUK & IAQM significance criteria.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf]]:28:       negligible in accordance with the guidance provided by the EPUK & IAQM.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf]]:31:       negligible in accordance with the EPUK & IAQM significance criteria.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf]]:31:       negligible in accordance with the EPUK & IAQM significance criteria.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf]]:32:       described as negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf]]:33:       as negligible in accordance with the EPUK & IAQM significance criteria.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf]]:37:       of the Proposed Development with other committed developments is considered to remain negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf]]:38:       Circular Fuels Ltd on annual mean NO2 concentrations is considered to be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf]]:38:       Circular Fuels Ltd on annual mean PM10 concentrations is considered to be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf]]:39:       Circular Fuels Ltd on annual mean PM2.5 concentrations is considered to be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf]]:39:       assessment concluded that the emissions of dust and NOx from the proposed plant will be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf]]:39:       negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf]]:40:       the Redcar Energy Centre on annual mean NO2 concentrations is considered to be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf]]:40:       considered to remain negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf]]:42:7.156. The Proposed Development is predicted to have a negligible impact on local air quality during operation.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf]]:42:       emissions during construction of the Proposed Development would be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf]]:43:7.158. Emissions from the Proposed Development are predicted to have a negligible impact on local air quality

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf]]:43:       during operation. Therefore, the residual effects are considered to be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf]]:43:       Environmental Management Plan (CEMP), the residual impact would be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf]]:43:       by the Proposed Development would be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf]]:43:       contributions are assessed as negligible at all sensitive human receptor locations for all pollutants.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf]]:44:  during demolition/         Temporary                                                       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf]]:44:                             Temporary           Not significant          None               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf]]:44:                             Permanent           Not significant          None               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0291-ESM/R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf|R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf]]:44:                             Permanent           Not significant          None               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0799-CD/R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf|R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf]]:77:•     Negligible – No effect on species or habitats present are anticipated.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0608-PND/R-2021-0608-PND-210801_Ecolgy screening (EIA criteria) for Teesworks demolitions_INCA_RevA.pdf|R-2021-0608-PND-210801_Ecolgy screening (EIA criteria) for Teesworks demolitions_INCA_RevA.pdf]]:7:Destruction of bat roosts           Likely impact is negligible due to low suitability of buildings for

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0608-PND/R-2021-0608-PND-210801_Ecolgy screening (EIA criteria) for Teesworks demolitions_INCA_RevA.pdf|R-2021-0608-PND-210801_Ecolgy screening (EIA criteria) for Teesworks demolitions_INCA_RevA.pdf]]:7:                                    is negligible due to distance (over 1.9km).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0608-PND/R-2021-0608-PND-210801_Ecolgy screening (EIA criteria) for Teesworks demolitions_INCA_RevA.pdf|R-2021-0608-PND-210801_Ecolgy screening (EIA criteria) for Teesworks demolitions_INCA_RevA.pdf]]:8:                                    is negligible due to distance (over 1.9km).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0608-PND/R-2021-0608-PND-210801_Ecolgy screening (EIA criteria) for Teesworks demolitions_INCA_RevA.pdf|R-2021-0608-PND-210801_Ecolgy screening (EIA criteria) for Teesworks demolitions_INCA_RevA.pdf]]:8:Vibration                           Likely impact on sensitive species (roosting birds) is negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0608-PND/R-2021-0608-PND-210801_Ecolgy screening (EIA criteria) for Teesworks demolitions_INCA_RevA.pdf|R-2021-0608-PND-210801_Ecolgy screening (EIA criteria) for Teesworks demolitions_INCA_RevA.pdf]]:8:Disturbance by personnel            Likely impact on sensitive species (roosting birds) is negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0608-PND/R-2021-0608-PND-210801_Ecolgy screening (EIA criteria) for Teesworks demolitions_INCA_RevA.pdf|R-2021-0608-PND-210801_Ecolgy screening (EIA criteria) for Teesworks demolitions_INCA_RevA.pdf]]:16:majority of buildings on the site are assessed as being of negligible Bat Roost Potential

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/Consultations/20210119 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay CP advice + JPQC.pdf|20210119 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay CP advice + JPQC.pdf]]:3:    shows a greater number of minor or negligible outcomes relative to more significant categories

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/Consultations/20210115 MLA202000507 South Bank Quay-phase 2 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf|20210115 MLA202000507 South Bank Quay-phase 2 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf]]:8:    injury and/or temporary threshold shift (TTS) are considered negligible. I defer to Cefas underwater

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/Consultations/MLA202000506 & MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phases 1&2 UWN advice + JPQC.pdf|MLA202000506 & MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phases 1&2 UWN advice + JPQC.pdf]]:4:    a result of underwater noise has been assessed as negligible and the assessment concludes that no

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/Consultations/MLA202000506 & MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phases 1&2 UWN advice + JPQC.pdf|MLA202000506 & MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phases 1&2 UWN advice + JPQC.pdf]]:4:    periods of time sufficient to cause TTS or PTS. Disturbance has been assessed as negligible, although I

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf]]:13:It is concluded that the impact during the construction phase of the proposed scheme would be of negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf]]:13:are minor beneficial to controlled waters and negligible to human health.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf]]:13:with maintenance dredging. All operational phase impacts are predicted to be of negligible significance,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf]]:14:to marine mammals from dredging has been assessed as negligible. The assessment has concluded

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf]]:14:impacts of negligible significance to all marine mammals with regard to potential for temporary auditory

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf]]:14:movements in the area. A worst-case impact of negligible significance (not significant) is predicted.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf]]:15:Tees, and is therefore expected to have a negligible effect on fish. The removal of the existing wharf

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf]]:16:negligible impacts on both resident and migratory fish. Disturbance during the operational phase, either as

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf]]:16:a result of vessel calls to the new quay or the use of quayside lighting, is predicted to have a negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf]]:16:required by International Regulations to allow safe navigation. An impact of negligible significance on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf]]:16:determined to have minimal effect on the existing navigation profile. An impact of negligible significance is

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf]]:16:Environmental Assessment of Road Traffic), the impact is considered to be negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf]]:18:construction phase noise levels at the South Tees Business Parks would be negligible. No mitigation

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf]]:19:assessed as being permanent and negligible. No mitigation measures during the operational phase are

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf]]:20:disturbance and reductions in air quality are considered to be negligible during construction and operation.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf]]:20:It is therefore concluded that impacts to human health would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf]]:20:is predicted to have a negligible impact on fisheries, marine ecology and marine mammals, and no impact

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:48: High                     Major           Moderate           Moderate               Minor            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:48: Medium                  Moderate         Moderate             Minor                Minor            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:48: Low                      Minor               Minor            Minor              Negligible         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:48: Very low                 Minor           Negligible         Negligible           Negligible         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:48:Whilst mitigation for minor or negligible impacts may not be specifically defined as a matter of course,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:48:recognised that minor and negligible impacts could become significant when considered cumulatively with

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:112:3, the values are so low (<5mg/l) as to be negligible compared with background levels and, in all cases, the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:112:water quality sampling points during Stage 3 of the dredging and only negligible effects for a short duration

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:112:Stages 3 and 4 of the dredging, only negligible effects are noted, equivalent to variations within the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:118:as to be negligible in such a great depth of water in this deep water offshore area).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:122:enhancement is so small in magnitude and spatial extent as to be negligible in such a great depth of water

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:126:is negligible, whilst to the north it covers a similar zone to the sediment plume for this disposal event, which

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:126:0.1cm. Clearly these magnitudes are extremely low within the licenced disposal site, and negligible beyond.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:126:magnitudes, with negligible changes anticipated beyond the boundaries of the site.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:167:is considered to be medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:167:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:167:impact is of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:167:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:168:be medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:168:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:168:considered to be medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:168:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:174:                                                                                    negligible. As there are no designated

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:175:Negligible                             Is generally tolerant of physical or chemical changes

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:177:temporary change, indiscernible   •   negligible change to existing risk of exposure; or

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:178:                           Moderate       Minor            Minor         Negligible     Negligible    Minor         Minor          Moderate

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:178:                           Minor          Negligible       Negligible    Negligible     Negligible    Negligible    Negligible     Minor

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:178:(negligible) impacts as they may contribute to significant impacts cumulatively or through interactions.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:178:Negligible                            Very small changes in receptor condition (adverse or beneficial), which may be raised as local issues

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:180:the geological sensitivity is considered to be negligible. As there are no designated geological sites recorded

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:186:during construction is considered to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:186:No mitigation measures are required and residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:188:overall impact during construction is considered to be of negligible to minor adverse significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:188:negligible to minor adverse significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:189:very low. Thus, the impact to human receptors is of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:189:No additional mitigation measures required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:190:very low and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:212:impact of negligible significance is predicted.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:212:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:214:Given the above, an impact of negligible significance on marine species and habitats is predicted to arise

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:214:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:215:and tidal regime is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:215:No mitigation measures are required, and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:221: Negligible / very

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:234:                                              0.0003 harbour porpoise                    Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:234:                                              0.000003 minke whale                       Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:234: dredging                                     0.00000024 grey seal                       Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:234:                                              0.0000009 harbour seal                     Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:234:The magnitude of the potential impact of PTS as a result of dredging noise is negligible / very low for harbour

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:234:seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.10).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:234:                    Harbour                             Negligible /                                            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:234:                                                                          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:234: Auditory injury                                        Negligible /                                            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:234: (PTS) from         Minke whale                                           Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:234:                                                        Negligible /                        required.           Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:234: SEL during         Grey seal                                             Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:234:                                                        Negligible /                                            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:234:                    Harbour seal                                          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:235:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:236:                                                                                       Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:236:                                              0.000003 minke whale                     Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:236: underwater noise                             0.00000024 grey seal                     Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:236:                                              0.0000009 harbour seal                   Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:236:The magnitude of the potential impact of TTS and fleeing response as a result of dredging noise, is negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:237:whale, grey seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.13).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:237:                   Harbour                         Negligible /                                     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:237:                                                                  Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:237: TTS or fleeing                                    Negligible /                                     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:237: response from     Minke whale                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:237:                                                   Negligible /                    required.        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:237: SEL during        Grey seal                                      Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:237:                                                   Negligible /                                     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:237:                   Harbour seal                                   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:237:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:238:                                                                                      Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:238:                                                                                      Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:238:    dredging (5% of                                                                   Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:238:                                         0.000005 harbour seal                        Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:238:of negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, the impact significance for any

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:238:potential increase in collision risk with vessels during dredging has been assessed as negligible (not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:239:                        Harbour                      Negligible /

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:239:                                      Low                           Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:239: Potential for          Minke                        Negligible /   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:239: collision risk from                                                                       required, other than   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:239: vessels during                                      Negligible /   Negligible             good practice.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:239:                        Harbour                      Negligible /   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:239:The residual impact would be of negligible significance for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:240:The magnitude of the impact of vessel disturbance to seal haul-out sites is defined as negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:240:resulting in an overall impact significance of negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:240:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:240:have a negligible impact on marine mammals.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:240:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:241:                                                                                  Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:241:                                                                                  Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:241: dredge area                                                                      Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:241:                                     0.0001 harbour seal                          Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:241:Taking into account the low receptor sensitivity, the negligible potential magnitude of the impact and the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:241:negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal (Table 10.17).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:241:                     Harbour                      Negligible /

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:241:                                    Low                           Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:241:                     Minke                        Negligible /    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:241: resource in                                                                                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:241:                                                  Negligible /    Negligible             required.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:241:                     Harbour                      Negligible /    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:241:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:242:10.5.1 and 10.5.2). The magnitude of effect in all species is assessed to be negligible / very low based on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:242:maintenance activities has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.10 and Table 10.13).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:242:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:242:10.5.3). The magnitude of effect in all species is assessed to be negligible / very low based on the maximum

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:242:has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.15).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:242:dredging activities. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:242:assessed as negligible (see Section 10.5.4).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:242:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:243:negligible (see Section 10.5.5).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:243:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:243:negligible (see Section 10.5.6).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:243:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:243:established vessel routes. The magnitude of effect in all species is assessed to be negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:243:for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal has been assessed as negligible (Table

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:243:would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:251: Negligible           Commonplace feature of little or no habitat/historical significance. Loss of such a feature would not be seen

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:252: Negligible        of normal natural variation change to the extent        Change is within the normal range of natural variation.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:253:                               High        Medium       Low           Negligible   Negligible   Low          Medium        High

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:253:                               Moderate    Minor        Minor         Negligible   Negligible   Minor        Minor         Moderate

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:253:                  Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:253:                               Minor       Negligible   Negligible    Negligible   Negligible   Negligible   Negligible    Minor

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:260:grassland is concluded as being of negligible ecological value.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:260:negligible ecological value.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:260:scrub habitat is concluded as being of negligible ecological value.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:261:and ruderal habitat is concluded as being of negligible ecological value.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:261:metal structures, which have been assessed as being of negligible value for roosting bats due to the lack of

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:264: Wharf                            Negligible                          No

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:264: Buildings                        Negligible                          No

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:264: Notable Flora                    Negligible                          No

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:264: Badger                           Negligible                          No

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:264: Water vole                       Negligible                          No

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:265: Amphibians                     Negligible                         No

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:265: Reptiles                       Negligible                         No

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:266:impacts to foraging bats are considered to be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:266:included in the CEMP, and with the implementation of such measures, any impacts will be negligible in

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:266:Negligible impacts on water quality are anticipated during construction of the proposed scheme (Section

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:267:time otters are anticipated to spend in the area, an impact of negligible magnitude is anticipated. Given the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:268:assessed to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:268:With the implementation of the above measures, the residual impact is of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:268:be of local (grayling) and (dingy skipper) significance, and negligible importance within the footprint of the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:294:Both had a peak count of two, which represents a negligible proportion of the SPA / Ramsar site populations.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:296:would have a negligible impact on benthic prey species in the intertidal zone so consequent effects on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:298:of the effects of capital dredging and therefore a negligible impact is predicted on the waterbirds relying on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:298:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:301:minor adverse. A residual impact of negligible significance is predicted at the other sensitive intertidal

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:304:and localised disturbance to feeding resources will result in an impact of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:304:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:305:negligible, and any exceedances of the thresholds stated in Cutts et al. (2009) or Wright et al. (2010) would

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:305:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:305:negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:305:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:305:be negligible, therefore any effects on waterbirds and foraging terns would manifest as a direct behavioural

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:306:on foraging / roosting waterbirds and terns is predicted to be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:306:While impacts are anticipated to be negligible, the implication of best practice mitigation measures set out

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:306:water) will further reduce the impact on foraging / roosting waterbirds. The residual impact is negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:306:negligible impact on intertidal benthos (see Section 9.6.2) and would not adversely affect the availability of

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:306:result of hydrodynamic changes would be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:306:No mitigation measures are considered necessary, therefore the residual impact is negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:321:and beyond. The impact is therefore predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:321:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would remain of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:324:considered to be very low, and the significance of the impact is negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:325:Outside the migratory period, there would be a negligible impact on fish movement up- and downstream

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:327:underwater noise of piling activities is therefore considered to have a negligible impact on migration up-

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:327:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact remains negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:328:negligible impact on fish species within the Tees.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:330:the footprint of the works, and even if there was, the number of vessels/fishers affected would be negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:330:and navigation within the Tees estuary is predicted to be negligible, given that works will be co-ordinated

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:330:are predicted to be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:330:remain negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:330:in motorised vessel traffic is therefore considered to have a negligible impact on fish populations or

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:330:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact will remain negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:331:impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:331:impact would be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:336:receptor. The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible significance on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:336:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:336:receptor. The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible significance on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:337:scheme) and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:337:(human health/safety). The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:337:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:338:The impact of the proposed development’s construction traffic is therefore assessed as of negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:338:proposed schemes operational traffic is therefore assessed as negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:338:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:341: MMO Scoping Opinion     negligible and therefore not necessary to be assessed.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:347: Negligible                       Assets with no significant importance or archaeological/historical interest.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:347: Negligible        The asset’s fabric and/or setting is changed in ways which do not materially affect its heritage significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:348: Significance                    High                       Medium                          Low                      Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:348: Low                            Moderate                      Minor                         Minor                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:348: Negligible                      Minor                      Negligible                  Negligible                   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:348: Negligible              No material change to heritage significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:349:these from other non-significant (negligible) impacts as they may contribute to significant impacts

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:370: Negligible / very low                                                                 < 1.0

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:373: 1            69.7               69.8                      0.1                     Very low          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:373: 2            67.8               68.0                      0.2                     Very low          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:373: 3            70.3               70.5                      0.2                     Very low          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:373: 5            76.3               76.4                      0.1                     Very low          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:373:Predicted changes in BNL, displayed in Table 17.10, indicate impacts of negligible significance at worst

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:373:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:375: NSR1                       52.2 - 59.2                            Very low                            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:375:indicating negligible impact at human receptor locations. This is considered not significant and impact is

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:376:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:391: Dust soiling               High Risk                Medium Risk          Medium Risk            Negligible Risk

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:391: Human health               Medium Risk              Low Risk             Low Risk               Negligible Risk

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:391: Ecological effects         Medium Risk              Low Risk             Low Risk               Negligible Risk

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:391:demolition, ‘medium risk’ for earthworks and construction, and ‘negligible risk’ for trackout. The impacts on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:392:earthworks and construction and ‘negligible risk’ for trackout.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:406:the proposed scheme will have negligible influence on this character area and is not considered further..

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:408:industrial context of outward views, it is predicted that the proposed scheme will have negligible influence

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:411:negligible effect on the existing baseline.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:415:of those features will incur a low adverse magnitude of effect and a negligible overall significance of effect.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:415:magnitude and incur a minor negligible adverse significance of effect.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:415:negligible overall significance of effect.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:416:and the wider environs, the overall significance of effect is considered to be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:419:significance of effect in the view is minor negligible adverse and not significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:419:significance of effect in the view is minor negligible adverse. In terms of EIA these effects are not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:419:negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:434:negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:435:As a result, it is concluded that there would be a negligible impact as a result of the proposed scheme.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:435:a potential impact of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:436:effect on a low sensitivity receptor. Overall, a negligible impact is predicted.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:436:residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:444:The socio-economic impacts of the proposed scheme are identified as ‘beneficial’, ‘negligible’ or ‘adverse’

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:444: Negligible                            No obvious significant effect to a receptor or environment.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:444: Negligible                            Where no discernible effect is expected as a result of the proposed scheme on the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:444:                         High                        Medium                    Low                       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:444: High                    Substantial                 Moderate to               Minor to Moderate         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:444: Medium                  Moderate to                 Moderate                  Minor                     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:445: Low                   Minor to Moderate       Minor                    Negligible to Minor    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:445: Negligible            Negligible              Negligible               Negligible             Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:453:supply scenario forecasts only a negligible increase in employment during the plan period.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:455:term) and negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:455:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:458:employment with the AOI and is therefore considered to correspond to a negligible magnitude of change.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:458:a permanent and negligible impact.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:458:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:458:negligible magnitude of change. The receptor is considered to be of medium sensitivity by virtue of the fact

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:459:a permanent and negligible impact.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:459:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:476:that there would be impacts of negligible significance to the only NSR scoped into the assessment.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:476:would be negligible to minor adverse significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:477:noise and air quality disturbance would be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:477:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:477:negligible significance and not significant respectively. In addition, operational phase impacts to human

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:477:health as reported in Section 8 with regard to land quality are considered to be of negligible significance. It

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:477:and land quality would be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:477:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual impact of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:478:long period prior to this the enhancement is so small in magnitude and spatial extent as to be negligible in

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:479:deposition is predicted to be negligible beyond the boundaries of the Tees Bay C disposal site.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:479:that there would be negligible impact on fish or fisheries due to the proposed deposition of dredged material

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:479:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual impact of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:482:negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:482:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:484:operations). Overall, the potential impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:484:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:485:                                                                                          Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:485:                                              0.000003 minke whale                        Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:485: during offshore                              0.00004 grey seal                           Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:485:                                              0.0000003 harbour seal                      Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:486:dredged sediments is negligible / very low for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:486:negligible (Table 26.5).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:486:                   Harbour                         Negligible /                                     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:486: TTS or fleeing                                                   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:486: underwater                                        Negligible /                                     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:486:                   Minke whale                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:486: offshore                                          Negligible /                    required.        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:486: disposal of       Grey seal                                      Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:486: sediments                                         Negligible /                                     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:486:                   Harbour seal                                   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:486:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:487:                                                                                       Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:487: Potential                                                                             Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:487: of dredged                             0.002 grey seal                                Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:487:                                                                                       Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:487:of negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, the impact significance for any

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:487:assessed as negligible (not significant) for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:487:                        Harbour                       Negligible /

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:487:                                       Low                            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:487: increased              Minke                         Negligible /    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:487: vessels during                                                                               required, other than   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:487: offshore disposal                                    Negligible /    Negligible              good practice.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:487: sediments              Harbour                       Negligible /    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:487:would be of negligible significance for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:488:The magnitude of the impact of vessel disturbance to seal haul-out sites is defined as negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:488:This gives an overall impact significance of negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:488:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:488:relied upon solely. Therefore, any increases in suspended sediments will have a negligible impact on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:488:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:489:                                                                                    Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:489:                                                                                    Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:489: offshore disposal                    0.04 grey seal                                Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:489:                                                                                    Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:489:Taking into account the low receptor sensitivity, the negligible potential magnitude of the impact and the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:489:negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal (Table 26.9).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:489:                      Harbour                      Negligible /

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:489:                                     Low                           Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:489: Changes to prey      Minke                        Negligible /    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:489:                                                                                                                  Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:489: offshore disposal                                 Negligible /    Negligible              required.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:489:                      Harbour                      Negligible /    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:489:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:507:cumulative impact is predicted to be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:509:                                                                                             Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:509:                                                                                             Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:509: approach channel and Anglo                                                                  Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:509:                                                                                             Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:509:                                                                                             Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:509: Hartlepool approach                                                                         Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:510:                                                                                              Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:510:                                                                                              Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:510:                                                                                              Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:510:                                                                                              Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:510: Hartlepool approach                                                                          Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:510:                                                                                              Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:510:Harbour Facilities schemes, is negligible / very low for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:510:harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as negligible (Table 27.5).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:511:cumulative underwater noise impacts. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:511: TTS or fleeing    Harbour                        Negligible /

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:511: response from                                                   Negligible                         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:511: dredging at the                                  Negligible /

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:511:                   Minke whale                                   Negligible                         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:511: Hartlepool                                       Negligible /

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:511: approach          Grey seal                                     Negligible                         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:511: Harbour                                          Negligible /

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:511:                   Harbour seal                                  Negligible                         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:513:on waterbirds at North Tees Mudflat, and negligible impact further downstream (including at Vopak

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:514:supporting habitat was considered a negligible impact in the EIAs for both the Anglo American Harbour

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:514:(even in combination) would have a negligible impact, the cumulative effect with the proposed scheme would

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:515:driving activities (see Section 13.5.3 and 13.5.4). While there is anticipated to be negligible impact from

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:516:works, but the potential cumulative impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:516:impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:516:acceptable (from a navigation risk perspective), with all risks classified as negligible or low, with the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:516:impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:516:The primary assessment identifies that the proposed schemes traffic demand would result in a negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:517:with the proposed scheme are considered not significant and indicate negligible impact, at worst. Therefore,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:521:concludes that the disposal of dredged material will have a negligible impact on fisheries, marine ecology

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:521:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual cumulative impact of negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:568: Lianhetech, Seal Sands   Proposed new buildings, plant upgrade, swale and associated       Approximately   Planning permission     / Ramsar site would be negligible. On this basis,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:576:greater than approximately 200m from source (see Appendix 8). There would be negligible effects on fish

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:578:would be negligible, therefore any effects on SPA / Ramsar site features would manifest as a direct

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf]]:584:negligible effect on feeding resources for terns. When this is considered alongside the localised increase

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf]]:56:                          likely to be negligible and therefore not necessary to be assessed.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf]]:208:Deposition to the west and east of the disposal site is negligible, whilst to the south and north covers a

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf]]:260:     •     negligible ground dissolution.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf]]:284:                                                                                                                buildings is negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-10.pdf]]:2:locations across the disposal site, at relatively low magnitudes, with negligible changes anticipated beyond

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-10.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-10.pdf]]:11:     •         The reductions in baseline peak currents are negligible, typically less than 0.01m/s, and never

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:48: High                     Major           Moderate           Moderate               Minor            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:48: Medium                  Moderate         Moderate             Minor                Minor            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:48: Low                      Minor               Minor            Minor              Negligible         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:48: Very low                 Minor           Negligible         Negligible           Negligible         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:48:Whilst mitigation for minor or negligible impacts may not be specifically defined as a matter of course,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:48:recognised that minor and negligible impacts could become significant when considered cumulatively with

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:112:3, the values are so low (<5mg/l) as to be negligible compared with background levels and, in all cases, the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:112:water quality sampling points during Stage 3 of the dredging and only negligible effects for a short duration

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:112:Stages 3 and 4 of the dredging, only negligible effects are noted, equivalent to variations within the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:118:as to be negligible in such a great depth of water in this deep water offshore area).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:122:enhancement is so small in magnitude and spatial extent as to be negligible in such a great depth of water

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:126:is negligible, whilst to the north it covers a similar zone to the sediment plume for this disposal event, which

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:126:0.1cm. Clearly these magnitudes are extremely low within the licenced disposal site, and negligible beyond.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:126:magnitudes, with negligible changes anticipated beyond the boundaries of the site.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:167:is considered to be medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:167:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:167:impact is of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:167:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:168:be medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:168:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:168:considered to be medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:168:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:174:                                                                                    negligible. As there are no designated

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:175:Negligible                             Is generally tolerant of physical or chemical changes

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:177:temporary change, indiscernible   •   negligible change to existing risk of exposure; or

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:178:                           Moderate       Minor            Minor         Negligible     Negligible    Minor         Minor          Moderate

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:178:                           Minor          Negligible       Negligible    Negligible     Negligible    Negligible    Negligible     Minor

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:178:(negligible) impacts as they may contribute to significant impacts cumulatively or through interactions.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:178:Negligible                            Very small changes in receptor condition (adverse or beneficial), which may be raised as local issues

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:180:the geological sensitivity is considered to be negligible. As there are no designated geological sites recorded

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:186:during construction is considered to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:186:No mitigation measures are required and residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:188:overall impact during construction is considered to be of negligible to minor adverse significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:188:negligible to minor adverse significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:189:very low. Thus, the impact to human receptors is of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:189:No additional mitigation measures required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:190:very low and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:212:impact of negligible significance is predicted.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:212:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:214:Given the above, an impact of negligible significance on marine species and habitats is predicted to arise

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:214:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:215:and tidal regime is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:215:No mitigation measures are required, and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:221: Negligible / very

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:234:                                              0.0003 harbour porpoise                    Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:234:                                              0.000003 minke whale                       Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:234: dredging                                     0.00000024 grey seal                       Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:234:                                              0.0000009 harbour seal                     Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:234:The magnitude of the potential impact of PTS as a result of dredging noise is negligible / very low for harbour

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:234:seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.10).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:234:                    Harbour                             Negligible /                                            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:234:                                                                          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:234: Auditory injury                                        Negligible /                                            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:234: (PTS) from         Minke whale                                           Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:234:                                                        Negligible /                        required.           Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:234: SEL during         Grey seal                                             Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:234:                                                        Negligible /                                            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:234:                    Harbour seal                                          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:235:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:236:                                                                                       Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:236:                                              0.000003 minke whale                     Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:236: underwater noise                             0.00000024 grey seal                     Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:236:                                              0.0000009 harbour seal                   Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:236:The magnitude of the potential impact of TTS and fleeing response as a result of dredging noise, is negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:237:whale, grey seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.13).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:237:                   Harbour                         Negligible /                                     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:237:                                                                  Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:237: TTS or fleeing                                    Negligible /                                     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:237: response from     Minke whale                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:237:                                                   Negligible /                    required.        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:237: SEL during        Grey seal                                      Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:237:                                                   Negligible /                                     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:237:                   Harbour seal                                   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:237:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:238:                                                                                      Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:238:                                                                                      Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:238:    dredging (5% of                                                                   Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:238:                                         0.000005 harbour seal                        Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:238:of negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, the impact significance for any

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:238:potential increase in collision risk with vessels during dredging has been assessed as negligible (not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:239:                        Harbour                      Negligible /

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:239:                                      Low                           Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:239: Potential for          Minke                        Negligible /   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:239: collision risk from                                                                       required, other than   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:239: vessels during                                      Negligible /   Negligible             good practice.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:239:                        Harbour                      Negligible /   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:239:The residual impact would be of negligible significance for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:240:The magnitude of the impact of vessel disturbance to seal haul-out sites is defined as negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:240:resulting in an overall impact significance of negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:240:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:240:have a negligible impact on marine mammals.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:240:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:241:                                                                                  Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:241:                                                                                  Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:241: dredge area                                                                      Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:241:                                     0.0001 harbour seal                          Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:241:Taking into account the low receptor sensitivity, the negligible potential magnitude of the impact and the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:241:negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal (Table 10.17).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:241:                     Harbour                      Negligible /

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:241:                                    Low                           Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:241:                     Minke                        Negligible /    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:241: resource in                                                                                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:241:                                                  Negligible /    Negligible             required.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:241:                     Harbour                      Negligible /    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:241:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:242:10.5.1 and 10.5.2). The magnitude of effect in all species is assessed to be negligible / very low based on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:242:maintenance activities has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.10 and Table 10.13).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:242:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:242:10.5.3). The magnitude of effect in all species is assessed to be negligible / very low based on the maximum

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:242:has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.15).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:242:dredging activities. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:242:assessed as negligible (see Section 10.5.4).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:242:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:243:negligible (see Section 10.5.5).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:243:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:243:negligible (see Section 10.5.6).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:243:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:243:established vessel routes. The magnitude of effect in all species is assessed to be negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:243:for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal has been assessed as negligible (Table

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:243:would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:251: Negligible           Commonplace feature of little or no habitat/historical significance. Loss of such a feature would not be seen

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:252: Negligible        of normal natural variation change to the extent        Change is within the normal range of natural variation.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:253:                               High        Medium       Low           Negligible   Negligible   Low          Medium        High

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:253:                               Moderate    Minor        Minor         Negligible   Negligible   Minor        Minor         Moderate

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:253:                  Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:253:                               Minor       Negligible   Negligible    Negligible   Negligible   Negligible   Negligible    Minor

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:260:grassland is concluded as being of negligible ecological value.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:260:negligible ecological value.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:260:scrub habitat is concluded as being of negligible ecological value.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:261:and ruderal habitat is concluded as being of negligible ecological value.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:261:metal structures, which have been assessed as being of negligible value for roosting bats due to the lack of

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:264: Wharf                            Negligible                          No

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:264: Buildings                        Negligible                          No

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:264: Notable Flora                    Negligible                          No

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:264: Badger                           Negligible                          No

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:264: Water vole                       Negligible                          No

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:265: Amphibians                     Negligible                         No

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:265: Reptiles                       Negligible                         No

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:266:impacts to foraging bats are considered to be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:266:included in the CEMP, and with the implementation of such measures, any impacts will be negligible in

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:266:Negligible impacts on water quality are anticipated during construction of the proposed scheme (Section

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:267:time otters are anticipated to spend in the area, an impact of negligible magnitude is anticipated. Given the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:268:assessed to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:268:With the implementation of the above measures, the residual impact is of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:268:be of local (grayling) and (dingy skipper) significance, and negligible importance within the footprint of the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:294:Both had a peak count of two, which represents a negligible proportion of the SPA / Ramsar site populations.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:296:would have a negligible impact on benthic prey species in the intertidal zone so consequent effects on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:298:of the effects of capital dredging and therefore a negligible impact is predicted on the waterbirds relying on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:298:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:301:minor adverse. A residual impact of negligible significance is predicted at the other sensitive intertidal

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:304:and localised disturbance to feeding resources will result in an impact of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:304:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:305:negligible, and any exceedances of the thresholds stated in Cutts et al. (2009) or Wright et al. (2010) would

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:305:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:305:negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:305:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:305:be negligible, therefore any effects on waterbirds and foraging terns would manifest as a direct behavioural

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:306:on foraging / roosting waterbirds and terns is predicted to be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:306:While impacts are anticipated to be negligible, the implication of best practice mitigation measures set out

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:306:water) will further reduce the impact on foraging / roosting waterbirds. The residual impact is negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:306:negligible impact on intertidal benthos (see Section 9.6.2) and would not adversely affect the availability of

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:306:result of hydrodynamic changes would be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:306:No mitigation measures are considered necessary, therefore the residual impact is negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:321:and beyond. The impact is therefore predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:321:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would remain of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:324:considered to be very low, and the significance of the impact is negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:325:Outside the migratory period, there would be a negligible impact on fish movement up- and downstream

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:327:underwater noise of piling activities is therefore considered to have a negligible impact on migration up-

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:327:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact remains negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:328:negligible impact on fish species within the Tees.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:330:the footprint of the works, and even if there was, the number of vessels/fishers affected would be negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:330:and navigation within the Tees estuary is predicted to be negligible, given that works will be co-ordinated

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:330:are predicted to be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:330:remain negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:330:in motorised vessel traffic is therefore considered to have a negligible impact on fish populations or

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:330:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact will remain negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:331:impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:331:impact would be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:336:receptor. The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible significance on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:336:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:336:receptor. The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible significance on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:337:scheme) and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:337:(human health/safety). The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:337:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:338:The impact of the proposed development’s construction traffic is therefore assessed as of negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:338:proposed schemes operational traffic is therefore assessed as negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:338:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:341: MMO Scoping Opinion     negligible and therefore not necessary to be assessed.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:347: Negligible                       Assets with no significant importance or archaeological/historical interest.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:347: Negligible        The asset’s fabric and/or setting is changed in ways which do not materially affect its heritage significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:348: Significance                    High                       Medium                          Low                      Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:348: Low                            Moderate                      Minor                         Minor                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:348: Negligible                      Minor                      Negligible                  Negligible                   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:348: Negligible              No material change to heritage significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:349:these from other non-significant (negligible) impacts as they may contribute to significant impacts

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:370: Negligible / very low                                                                 < 1.0

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:373: 1            69.7               69.8                      0.1                     Very low          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:373: 2            67.8               68.0                      0.2                     Very low          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:373: 3            70.3               70.5                      0.2                     Very low          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:373: 5            76.3               76.4                      0.1                     Very low          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:373:Predicted changes in BNL, displayed in Table 17.10, indicate impacts of negligible significance at worst

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:373:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:375: NSR1                       52.2 - 59.2                            Very low                            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:375:indicating negligible impact at human receptor locations. This is considered not significant and impact is

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:376:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:391: Dust soiling               High Risk                Medium Risk          Medium Risk            Negligible Risk

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:391: Human health               Medium Risk              Low Risk             Low Risk               Negligible Risk

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:391: Ecological effects         Medium Risk              Low Risk             Low Risk               Negligible Risk

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:391:demolition, ‘medium risk’ for earthworks and construction, and ‘negligible risk’ for trackout. The impacts on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:392:earthworks and construction and ‘negligible risk’ for trackout.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:406:the proposed scheme will have negligible influence on this character area and is not considered further..

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:408:industrial context of outward views, it is predicted that the proposed scheme will have negligible influence

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:411:negligible effect on the existing baseline.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:415:of those features will incur a low adverse magnitude of effect and a negligible overall significance of effect.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:415:magnitude and incur a minor negligible adverse significance of effect.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:415:negligible overall significance of effect.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:416:and the wider environs, the overall significance of effect is considered to be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:419:significance of effect in the view is minor negligible adverse and not significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:419:significance of effect in the view is minor negligible adverse. In terms of EIA these effects are not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:419:negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:434:negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:435:As a result, it is concluded that there would be a negligible impact as a result of the proposed scheme.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:435:a potential impact of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:436:effect on a low sensitivity receptor. Overall, a negligible impact is predicted.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:436:residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:444:The socio-economic impacts of the proposed scheme are identified as ‘beneficial’, ‘negligible’ or ‘adverse’

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:444: Negligible                            No obvious significant effect to a receptor or environment.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:444: Negligible                            Where no discernible effect is expected as a result of the proposed scheme on the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:444:                         High                        Medium                    Low                       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:444: High                    Substantial                 Moderate to               Minor to Moderate         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:444: Medium                  Moderate to                 Moderate                  Minor                     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:445: Low                   Minor to Moderate       Minor                    Negligible to Minor    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:445: Negligible            Negligible              Negligible               Negligible             Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:453:supply scenario forecasts only a negligible increase in employment during the plan period.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:455:term) and negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:455:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:458:employment with the AOI and is therefore considered to correspond to a negligible magnitude of change.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:458:a permanent and negligible impact.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:458:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:458:negligible magnitude of change. The receptor is considered to be of medium sensitivity by virtue of the fact

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:459:a permanent and negligible impact.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:459:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:476:that there would be impacts of negligible significance to the only NSR scoped into the assessment.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:476:would be negligible to minor adverse significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:477:noise and air quality disturbance would be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:477:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:477:negligible significance and not significant respectively. In addition, operational phase impacts to human

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:477:health as reported in Section 8 with regard to land quality are considered to be of negligible significance. It

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:477:and land quality would be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:477:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual impact of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:478:long period prior to this the enhancement is so small in magnitude and spatial extent as to be negligible in

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:479:deposition is predicted to be negligible beyond the boundaries of the Tees Bay C disposal site.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:479:that there would be negligible impact on fish or fisheries due to the proposed deposition of dredged material

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:479:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual impact of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:482:negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:482:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:484:operations). Overall, the potential impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:484:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:485:                                                                                          Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:485:                                              0.000003 minke whale                        Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:485: during offshore                              0.00004 grey seal                           Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:485:                                              0.0000003 harbour seal                      Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:486:dredged sediments is negligible / very low for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:486:negligible (Table 26.5).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:486:                   Harbour                         Negligible /                                     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:486: TTS or fleeing                                                   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:486: underwater                                        Negligible /                                     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:486:                   Minke whale                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:486: offshore                                          Negligible /                    required.        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:486: disposal of       Grey seal                                      Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:486: sediments                                         Negligible /                                     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:486:                   Harbour seal                                   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:486:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:487:                                                                                       Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:487: Potential                                                                             Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:487: of dredged                             0.002 grey seal                                Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:487:                                                                                       Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:487:of negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, the impact significance for any

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:487:assessed as negligible (not significant) for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:487:                        Harbour                       Negligible /

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:487:                                       Low                            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:487: increased              Minke                         Negligible /    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:487: vessels during                                                                               required, other than   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:487: offshore disposal                                    Negligible /    Negligible              good practice.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:487: sediments              Harbour                       Negligible /    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:487:would be of negligible significance for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:488:The magnitude of the impact of vessel disturbance to seal haul-out sites is defined as negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:488:This gives an overall impact significance of negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:488:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:488:relied upon solely. Therefore, any increases in suspended sediments will have a negligible impact on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:488:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:489:                                                                                    Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:489:                                                                                    Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:489: offshore disposal                    0.04 grey seal                                Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:489:                                                                                    Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:489:Taking into account the low receptor sensitivity, the negligible potential magnitude of the impact and the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:489:negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal (Table 26.9).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:489:                      Harbour                      Negligible /

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:489:                                     Low                           Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:489: Changes to prey      Minke                        Negligible /    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:489:                                                                                                                  Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:489: offshore disposal                                 Negligible /    Negligible              required.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:489:                      Harbour                      Negligible /    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:489:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:507:cumulative impact is predicted to be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:509:                                                                                             Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:509:                                                                                             Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:509: approach channel and Anglo                                                                  Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:509:                                                                                             Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:509:                                                                                             Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:509: Hartlepool approach                                                                         Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:510:                                                                                              Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:510:                                                                                              Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:510:                                                                                              Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:510:                                                                                              Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:510: Hartlepool approach                                                                          Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:510:                                                                                              Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:510:Harbour Facilities schemes, is negligible / very low for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:510:harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as negligible (Table 27.5).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:511:cumulative underwater noise impacts. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:511: TTS or fleeing    Harbour                        Negligible /

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:511: response from                                                   Negligible                         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:511: dredging at the                                  Negligible /

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:511:                   Minke whale                                   Negligible                         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:511: Hartlepool                                       Negligible /

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:511: approach          Grey seal                                     Negligible                         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:511: Harbour                                          Negligible /

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:511:                   Harbour seal                                  Negligible                         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:513:on waterbirds at North Tees Mudflat, and negligible impact further downstream (including at Vopak

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:514:supporting habitat was considered a negligible impact in the EIAs for both the Anglo American Harbour

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:514:(even in combination) would have a negligible impact, the cumulative effect with the proposed scheme would

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:515:driving activities (see Section 13.5.3 and 13.5.4). While there is anticipated to be negligible impact from

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:516:works, but the potential cumulative impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:516:impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:516:acceptable (from a navigation risk perspective), with all risks classified as negligible or low, with the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:516:impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:516:The primary assessment identifies that the proposed schemes traffic demand would result in a negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:517:with the proposed scheme are considered not significant and indicate negligible impact, at worst. Therefore,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:521:concludes that the disposal of dredged material will have a negligible impact on fisheries, marine ecology

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:521:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual cumulative impact of negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:568: Lianhetech, Seal Sands   Proposed new buildings, plant upgrade, swale and associated       Approximately   Planning permission     / Ramsar site would be negligible. On this basis,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:576:greater than approximately 200m from source (see Appendix 8). There would be negligible effects on fish

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:578:would be negligible, therefore any effects on SPA / Ramsar site features would manifest as a direct

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf]]:584:negligible effect on feeding resources for terns. When this is considered alongside the localised increase

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:173:representing the final risk score for each hazard, between 0 (negligible) and 10 (high) (see Annex A),

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:173:Hazard risk scores were categorised as either negligible, low, As Low as Reasonably Practicable

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:173:              Negligible       The risk is acceptable and at level where operational safety is unaffected.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:174:construction phase was ‘Contact: Navigation Buoy’ which was scored as 0.72; negligible, driven by its

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:174:                      Negligible              Low                 ALARP             Significant      High

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:176:0.5; negligible, driven by its low consequence.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:176:                       Negligible              Low              ALARP             Significant   High

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:179:be acceptable with all scoring Negligible or Low, with the exception of the impact on ship contact risk,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:180:                                                      Unlikely          Minor           Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:180:                                                      Unlikely          Minor           Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:187:is extremely remote and consequence insignificant such that a risk can be said to be negligible. At the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:190: 1     Negligible           Negligible         Negligible                               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:192:    0 – 1.99               Negligible Risk           A level where operational safety is unaffected.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:192:the final risk score for each hazard, between 0 (negligible) and 10 (high) following which, the final risk

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:192:Hazard risk scores are categorised as either negligible, low, As Low as Reasonably Practicable (ALARP),

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:293:is ‘negligible’.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:296: Low                                  Medium Risk                    Low Risk                          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:296: Low                                    Low Risk                     Low Risk                          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:297: Low                                   Low Risk                  Low Risk                        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:297: Low                                  Medium Risk                Low Risk                        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:299:                             lower sections of proposed quayside features, although the change in the view will be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:301:Significance of Effect       Medium sensitivity x Low magnitude of effect = Minor negligible significance of effect.                                       Minor            Minor

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:301:                             Effects will be permanent during the operation of the proposed quayside and its use in support of the renewable energy        Negligible       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:304:                              Effects will be permanent during the operation of the proposed quayside and its use in support of the renewable energy          negligible     negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:305:                             Effects will be permanent during the operation of the proposed quayside and its use in support of the renewable energy        negligible      negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:306:Significance of Effect       Low sensitivity x Low medium magnitude of effect = Minor negligible significance of effect.                                   Minor              Minor

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:306:                             Effects will be permanent during the operation of the proposed quayside and its use in support of the renewable energy        Negligible         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:307:                              Future baseline: development of the SIZ landside site and associated large scale buildings will have negligible effect on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:308:Significance of Effect       Low sensitivity x Low magnitude of effect = Negligible significance of effect.                                                  Negligible         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:309:                             sections of cranes and stored components, although have negligible beneficial effects to views of taller proposed

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:310:                              Future baseline: development of the SIZ landside site and associated large scale buildings will have negligible effect on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:316:particular development is categorised as high, medium, low or negligible. In accordance with the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:316: Negligible        Size and/or scale: the extent and relative proportion of the existing landscape

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:319: Negligible      Size and Scale

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:320:receptor (high, medium to low) with the magnitude of effect (high to negligible). The evaluation is

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:320: Low medium               Minor negligible effect    Minor effect              Minor moderate effect

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:320: Low                      Negligible effect          Minor negligible effect   Minor effect

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf]]:320: Negligible               Negligible effect          Negligible effect         Minor negligible effect

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf]]:13:dredged material is predicted to have a negligible impact on fisheries, marine ecology

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf|MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf]]:13:No significant residual impacts are predicted. A worst case residual impact of negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:48: High                     Major           Moderate           Moderate               Minor            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:48: Medium                  Moderate         Moderate             Minor                Minor            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:48: Low                      Minor               Minor            Minor              Negligible         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:48: Very low                 Minor           Negligible         Negligible           Negligible         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:48:Whilst mitigation for minor or negligible impacts may not be specifically defined as a matter of course,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:48:recognised that minor and negligible impacts could become significant when considered cumulatively with

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:112:3, the values are so low (<5mg/l) as to be negligible compared with background levels and, in all cases, the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:112:water quality sampling points during Stage 3 of the dredging and only negligible effects for a short duration

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:112:Stages 3 and 4 of the dredging, only negligible effects are noted, equivalent to variations within the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:118:as to be negligible in such a great depth of water in this deep water offshore area).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:122:enhancement is so small in magnitude and spatial extent as to be negligible in such a great depth of water

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:126:is negligible, whilst to the north it covers a similar zone to the sediment plume for this disposal event, which

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:126:0.1cm. Clearly these magnitudes are extremely low within the licenced disposal site, and negligible beyond.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:126:magnitudes, with negligible changes anticipated beyond the boundaries of the site.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:167:is considered to be medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:167:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:167:impact is of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:167:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:168:be medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:168:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:168:considered to be medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:168:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:174:                                                                                    negligible. As there are no designated

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:175:Negligible                             Is generally tolerant of physical or chemical changes

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:177:temporary change, indiscernible   •   negligible change to existing risk of exposure; or

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:178:                           Moderate       Minor            Minor         Negligible     Negligible    Minor         Minor          Moderate

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:178:                           Minor          Negligible       Negligible    Negligible     Negligible    Negligible    Negligible     Minor

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:178:(negligible) impacts as they may contribute to significant impacts cumulatively or through interactions.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:178:Negligible                            Very small changes in receptor condition (adverse or beneficial), which may be raised as local issues

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:180:the geological sensitivity is considered to be negligible. As there are no designated geological sites recorded

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:186:during construction is considered to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:186:No mitigation measures are required and residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:188:overall impact during construction is considered to be of negligible to minor adverse significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:188:negligible to minor adverse significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:189:very low. Thus, the impact to human receptors is of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:189:No additional mitigation measures required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:190:very low and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:212:impact of negligible significance is predicted.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:212:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:214:Given the above, an impact of negligible significance on marine species and habitats is predicted to arise

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:214:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:215:and tidal regime is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:215:No mitigation measures are required, and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:221: Negligible / very

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:234:                                              0.0003 harbour porpoise                    Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:234:                                              0.000003 minke whale                       Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:234: dredging                                     0.00000024 grey seal                       Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:234:                                              0.0000009 harbour seal                     Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:234:The magnitude of the potential impact of PTS as a result of dredging noise is negligible / very low for harbour

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:234:seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.10).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:234:                    Harbour                             Negligible /                                            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:234:                                                                          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:234: Auditory injury                                        Negligible /                                            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:234: (PTS) from         Minke whale                                           Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:234:                                                        Negligible /                        required.           Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:234: SEL during         Grey seal                                             Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:234:                                                        Negligible /                                            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:234:                    Harbour seal                                          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:235:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:236:                                                                                       Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:236:                                              0.000003 minke whale                     Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:236: underwater noise                             0.00000024 grey seal                     Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:236:                                              0.0000009 harbour seal                   Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:236:The magnitude of the potential impact of TTS and fleeing response as a result of dredging noise, is negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:237:whale, grey seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.13).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:237:                   Harbour                         Negligible /                                     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:237:                                                                  Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:237: TTS or fleeing                                    Negligible /                                     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:237: response from     Minke whale                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:237:                                                   Negligible /                    required.        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:237: SEL during        Grey seal                                      Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:237:                                                   Negligible /                                     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:237:                   Harbour seal                                   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:237:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:238:                                                                                      Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:238:                                                                                      Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:238:    dredging (5% of                                                                   Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:238:                                         0.000005 harbour seal                        Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:238:of negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, the impact significance for any

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:238:potential increase in collision risk with vessels during dredging has been assessed as negligible (not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:239:                        Harbour                      Negligible /

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:239:                                      Low                           Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:239: Potential for          Minke                        Negligible /   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:239: collision risk from                                                                       required, other than   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:239: vessels during                                      Negligible /   Negligible             good practice.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:239:                        Harbour                      Negligible /   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:239:The residual impact would be of negligible significance for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:240:The magnitude of the impact of vessel disturbance to seal haul-out sites is defined as negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:240:resulting in an overall impact significance of negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:240:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:240:have a negligible impact on marine mammals.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:240:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:241:                                                                                  Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:241:                                                                                  Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:241: dredge area                                                                      Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:241:                                     0.0001 harbour seal                          Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:241:Taking into account the low receptor sensitivity, the negligible potential magnitude of the impact and the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:241:negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal (Table 10.17).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:241:                     Harbour                      Negligible /

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:241:                                    Low                           Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:241:                     Minke                        Negligible /    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:241: resource in                                                                                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:241:                                                  Negligible /    Negligible             required.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:241:                     Harbour                      Negligible /    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:241:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:242:10.5.1 and 10.5.2). The magnitude of effect in all species is assessed to be negligible / very low based on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:242:maintenance activities has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.10 and Table 10.13).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:242:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:242:10.5.3). The magnitude of effect in all species is assessed to be negligible / very low based on the maximum

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:242:has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.15).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:242:dredging activities. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:242:assessed as negligible (see Section 10.5.4).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:242:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:243:negligible (see Section 10.5.5).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:243:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:243:negligible (see Section 10.5.6).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:243:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:243:established vessel routes. The magnitude of effect in all species is assessed to be negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:243:for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal has been assessed as negligible (Table

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:243:would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:251: Negligible           Commonplace feature of little or no habitat/historical significance. Loss of such a feature would not be seen

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:252: Negligible        of normal natural variation change to the extent        Change is within the normal range of natural variation.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:253:                               High        Medium       Low           Negligible   Negligible   Low          Medium        High

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:253:                               Moderate    Minor        Minor         Negligible   Negligible   Minor        Minor         Moderate

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:253:                  Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:253:                               Minor       Negligible   Negligible    Negligible   Negligible   Negligible   Negligible    Minor

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:260:grassland is concluded as being of negligible ecological value.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:260:negligible ecological value.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:260:scrub habitat is concluded as being of negligible ecological value.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:261:and ruderal habitat is concluded as being of negligible ecological value.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:261:metal structures, which have been assessed as being of negligible value for roosting bats due to the lack of

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:264: Wharf                            Negligible                          No

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:264: Buildings                        Negligible                          No

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:264: Notable Flora                    Negligible                          No

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:264: Badger                           Negligible                          No

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:264: Water vole                       Negligible                          No

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:265: Amphibians                     Negligible                         No

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:265: Reptiles                       Negligible                         No

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:266:impacts to foraging bats are considered to be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:266:included in the CEMP, and with the implementation of such measures, any impacts will be negligible in

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:266:Negligible impacts on water quality are anticipated during construction of the proposed scheme (Section

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:267:time otters are anticipated to spend in the area, an impact of negligible magnitude is anticipated. Given the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:268:assessed to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:268:With the implementation of the above measures, the residual impact is of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:268:be of local (grayling) and (dingy skipper) significance, and negligible importance within the footprint of the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:294:Both had a peak count of two, which represents a negligible proportion of the SPA / Ramsar site populations.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:296:would have a negligible impact on benthic prey species in the intertidal zone so consequent effects on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:298:of the effects of capital dredging and therefore a negligible impact is predicted on the waterbirds relying on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:298:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:301:minor adverse. A residual impact of negligible significance is predicted at the other sensitive intertidal

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:304:and localised disturbance to feeding resources will result in an impact of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:304:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:305:negligible, and any exceedances of the thresholds stated in Cutts et al. (2009) or Wright et al. (2010) would

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:305:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:305:negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:305:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:305:be negligible, therefore any effects on waterbirds and foraging terns would manifest as a direct behavioural

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:306:on foraging / roosting waterbirds and terns is predicted to be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:306:While impacts are anticipated to be negligible, the implication of best practice mitigation measures set out

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:306:water) will further reduce the impact on foraging / roosting waterbirds. The residual impact is negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:306:negligible impact on intertidal benthos (see Section 9.6.2) and would not adversely affect the availability of

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:306:result of hydrodynamic changes would be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:306:No mitigation measures are considered necessary, therefore the residual impact is negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:321:and beyond. The impact is therefore predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:321:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would remain of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:324:considered to be very low, and the significance of the impact is negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:325:Outside the migratory period, there would be a negligible impact on fish movement up- and downstream

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:327:underwater noise of piling activities is therefore considered to have a negligible impact on migration up-

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:327:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact remains negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:328:negligible impact on fish species within the Tees.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:330:the footprint of the works, and even if there was, the number of vessels/fishers affected would be negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:330:and navigation within the Tees estuary is predicted to be negligible, given that works will be co-ordinated

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:330:are predicted to be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:330:remain negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:330:in motorised vessel traffic is therefore considered to have a negligible impact on fish populations or

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:330:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact will remain negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:331:impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:331:impact would be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:336:receptor. The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible significance on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:336:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:336:receptor. The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible significance on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:337:scheme) and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:337:(human health/safety). The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:337:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:338:The impact of the proposed development’s construction traffic is therefore assessed as of negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:338:proposed schemes operational traffic is therefore assessed as negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:338:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:341: MMO Scoping Opinion     negligible and therefore not necessary to be assessed.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:347: Negligible                       Assets with no significant importance or archaeological/historical interest.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:347: Negligible        The asset’s fabric and/or setting is changed in ways which do not materially affect its heritage significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:348: Significance                    High                       Medium                          Low                      Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:348: Low                            Moderate                      Minor                         Minor                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:348: Negligible                      Minor                      Negligible                  Negligible                   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:348: Negligible              No material change to heritage significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:349:these from other non-significant (negligible) impacts as they may contribute to significant impacts

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:370: Negligible / very low                                                                 < 1.0

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:373: 1            69.7               69.8                      0.1                     Very low          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:373: 2            67.8               68.0                      0.2                     Very low          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:373: 3            70.3               70.5                      0.2                     Very low          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:373: 5            76.3               76.4                      0.1                     Very low          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:373:Predicted changes in BNL, displayed in Table 17.10, indicate impacts of negligible significance at worst

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:373:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:375: NSR1                       52.2 - 59.2                            Very low                            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:375:indicating negligible impact at human receptor locations. This is considered not significant and impact is

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:376:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:391: Dust soiling               High Risk                Medium Risk          Medium Risk            Negligible Risk

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:391: Human health               Medium Risk              Low Risk             Low Risk               Negligible Risk

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:391: Ecological effects         Medium Risk              Low Risk             Low Risk               Negligible Risk

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:391:demolition, ‘medium risk’ for earthworks and construction, and ‘negligible risk’ for trackout. The impacts on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:392:earthworks and construction and ‘negligible risk’ for trackout.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:406:the proposed scheme will have negligible influence on this character area and is not considered further..

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:408:industrial context of outward views, it is predicted that the proposed scheme will have negligible influence

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:411:negligible effect on the existing baseline.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:415:of those features will incur a low adverse magnitude of effect and a negligible overall significance of effect.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:415:magnitude and incur a minor negligible adverse significance of effect.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:415:negligible overall significance of effect.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:416:and the wider environs, the overall significance of effect is considered to be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:419:significance of effect in the view is minor negligible adverse and not significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:419:significance of effect in the view is minor negligible adverse. In terms of EIA these effects are not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:419:negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:434:negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:435:As a result, it is concluded that there would be a negligible impact as a result of the proposed scheme.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:435:a potential impact of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:436:effect on a low sensitivity receptor. Overall, a negligible impact is predicted.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:436:residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:444:The socio-economic impacts of the proposed scheme are identified as ‘beneficial’, ‘negligible’ or ‘adverse’

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:444: Negligible                            No obvious significant effect to a receptor or environment.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:444: Negligible                            Where no discernible effect is expected as a result of the proposed scheme on the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:444:                         High                        Medium                    Low                       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:444: High                    Substantial                 Moderate to               Minor to Moderate         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:444: Medium                  Moderate to                 Moderate                  Minor                     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:445: Low                   Minor to Moderate       Minor                    Negligible to Minor    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:445: Negligible            Negligible              Negligible               Negligible             Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:453:supply scenario forecasts only a negligible increase in employment during the plan period.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:455:term) and negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:455:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:458:employment with the AOI and is therefore considered to correspond to a negligible magnitude of change.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:458:a permanent and negligible impact.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:458:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:458:negligible magnitude of change. The receptor is considered to be of medium sensitivity by virtue of the fact

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:459:a permanent and negligible impact.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:459:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:476:that there would be impacts of negligible significance to the only NSR scoped into the assessment.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:476:would be negligible to minor adverse significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:477:noise and air quality disturbance would be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:477:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:477:negligible significance and not significant respectively. In addition, operational phase impacts to human

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:477:health as reported in Section 8 with regard to land quality are considered to be of negligible significance. It

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:477:and land quality would be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:477:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual impact of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:478:long period prior to this the enhancement is so small in magnitude and spatial extent as to be negligible in

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:479:deposition is predicted to be negligible beyond the boundaries of the Tees Bay C disposal site.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:479:that there would be negligible impact on fish or fisheries due to the proposed deposition of dredged material

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:479:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual impact of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:482:negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:482:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:484:operations). Overall, the potential impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:484:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:485:                                                                                          Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:485:                                              0.000003 minke whale                        Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:485: during offshore                              0.00004 grey seal                           Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:485:                                              0.0000003 harbour seal                      Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:486:dredged sediments is negligible / very low for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:486:negligible (Table 26.5).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:486:                   Harbour                         Negligible /                                     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:486: TTS or fleeing                                                   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:486: underwater                                        Negligible /                                     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:486:                   Minke whale                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:486: offshore                                          Negligible /                    required.        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:486: disposal of       Grey seal                                      Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:486: sediments                                         Negligible /                                     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:486:                   Harbour seal                                   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:486:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:487:                                                                                       Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:487: Potential                                                                             Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:487: of dredged                             0.002 grey seal                                Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:487:                                                                                       Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:487:of negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, the impact significance for any

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:487:assessed as negligible (not significant) for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:487:                        Harbour                       Negligible /

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:487:                                       Low                            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:487: increased              Minke                         Negligible /    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:487: vessels during                                                                               required, other than   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:487: offshore disposal                                    Negligible /    Negligible              good practice.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:487: sediments              Harbour                       Negligible /    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:487:would be of negligible significance for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:488:The magnitude of the impact of vessel disturbance to seal haul-out sites is defined as negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:488:This gives an overall impact significance of negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:488:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:488:relied upon solely. Therefore, any increases in suspended sediments will have a negligible impact on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:488:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:489:                                                                                    Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:489:                                                                                    Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:489: offshore disposal                    0.04 grey seal                                Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:489:                                                                                    Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:489:Taking into account the low receptor sensitivity, the negligible potential magnitude of the impact and the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:489:negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal (Table 26.9).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:489:                      Harbour                      Negligible /

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:489:                                     Low                           Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:489: Changes to prey      Minke                        Negligible /    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:489:                                                                                                                  Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:489: offshore disposal                                 Negligible /    Negligible              required.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:489:                      Harbour                      Negligible /    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:489:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:507:cumulative impact is predicted to be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:509:                                                                                             Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:509:                                                                                             Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:509: approach channel and Anglo                                                                  Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:509:                                                                                             Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:509:                                                                                             Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:509: Hartlepool approach                                                                         Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:510:                                                                                              Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:510:                                                                                              Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:510:                                                                                              Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:510:                                                                                              Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:510: Hartlepool approach                                                                          Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:510:                                                                                              Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:510:Harbour Facilities schemes, is negligible / very low for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:510:harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as negligible (Table 27.5).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:511:cumulative underwater noise impacts. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:511: TTS or fleeing    Harbour                        Negligible /

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:511: response from                                                   Negligible                         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:511: dredging at the                                  Negligible /

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:511:                   Minke whale                                   Negligible                         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:511: Hartlepool                                       Negligible /

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:511: approach          Grey seal                                     Negligible                         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:511: Harbour                                          Negligible /

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:511:                   Harbour seal                                  Negligible                         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:513:on waterbirds at North Tees Mudflat, and negligible impact further downstream (including at Vopak

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:514:supporting habitat was considered a negligible impact in the EIAs for both the Anglo American Harbour

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:514:(even in combination) would have a negligible impact, the cumulative effect with the proposed scheme would

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:515:driving activities (see Section 13.5.3 and 13.5.4). While there is anticipated to be negligible impact from

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:516:works, but the potential cumulative impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:516:impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:516:acceptable (from a navigation risk perspective), with all risks classified as negligible or low, with the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:516:impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:516:The primary assessment identifies that the proposed schemes traffic demand would result in a negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:517:with the proposed scheme are considered not significant and indicate negligible impact, at worst. Therefore,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:521:concludes that the disposal of dredged material will have a negligible impact on fisheries, marine ecology

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:521:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual cumulative impact of negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:568: Lianhetech, Seal Sands   Proposed new buildings, plant upgrade, swale and associated       Approximately   Planning permission     / Ramsar site would be negligible. On this basis,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:576:greater than approximately 200m from source (see Appendix 8). There would be negligible effects on fish

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:578:would be negligible, therefore any effects on SPA / Ramsar site features would manifest as a direct

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf]]:584:negligible effect on feeding resources for terns. When this is considered alongside the localised increase

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf|R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf]]:6:                          likely to be negligible and therefore not necessary to be assessed.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 13_Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 13_Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology.pdf]]:5:particular development is categorised as high, medium, low or negligible. In accordance with the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 13_Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 13_Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology.pdf]]:5: Negligible        Size and/or scale: the extent and relative proportion of the existing landscape

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 13_Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 13_Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology.pdf]]:8: Negligible      Size and Scale

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 13_Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 13_Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology.pdf]]:9:receptor (high, medium to low) with the magnitude of effect (high to negligible). The evaluation is

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 13_Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 13_Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology.pdf]]:9: Low medium               Minor negligible effect    Minor effect              Minor moderate effect

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 13_Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 13_Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology.pdf]]:9: Low                      Negligible effect          Minor negligible effect   Minor effect

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 13_Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 13_Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology.pdf]]:9: Negligible               Negligible effect          Negligible effect         Minor negligible effect

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf]]:15:and beyond. The impact is therefore predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf]]:15:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would remain of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf]]:18:considered to be very low, and the significance of the impact is negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf]]:19:Outside the migratory period, there would be a negligible impact on fish movement up- and downstream

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf]]:21:underwater noise of piling activities is therefore considered to have a negligible impact on migration up-

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf]]:21:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact remains negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf]]:22:negligible impact on fish species within the Tees.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf]]:24:the footprint of the works, and even if there was, the number of vessels/fishers affected would be negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf]]:24:and navigation within the Tees estuary is predicted to be negligible, given that works will be co-ordinated

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf]]:24:are predicted to be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf]]:24:remain negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf]]:24:in motorised vessel traffic is therefore considered to have a negligible impact on fish populations or

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf]]:24:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact will remain negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf]]:25:impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf]]:25:impact would be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Response from applicant.PDF|R-2020-0684-ESM-Response from applicant.PDF]]:2:concluded that all impacts were assessed to be acceptable with all scoring negligible or low, with the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Response from applicant.PDF|R-2020-0684-ESM-Response from applicant.PDF]]:3:negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Response from applicant.PDF|R-2020-0684-ESM-Response from applicant.PDF]]:3:traffic is therefore clearly negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf]]:7: High                     Major           Moderate           Moderate               Minor            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf]]:7: Medium                  Moderate         Moderate             Minor                Minor            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf]]:7: Low                      Minor               Minor            Minor              Negligible         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf]]:7: Very low                 Minor           Negligible         Negligible           Negligible         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf]]:7:Whilst mitigation for minor or negligible impacts may not be specifically defined as a matter of course,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf]]:7:recognised that minor and negligible impacts could become significant when considered cumulatively with

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf]]:6:                          likely to be negligible and therefore not necessary to be assessed.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf]]:22:impact of negligible significance is predicted.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf]]:22:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf]]:24:Given the above, an impact of negligible significance on marine species and habitats is predicted to arise

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf]]:24:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf]]:25:and tidal regime is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf]]:25:No mitigation measures are required, and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf]]:13:It is concluded that the impact during the construction phase of the proposed scheme would be of negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf]]:13:are minor beneficial to controlled waters and negligible to human health.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf]]:13:with maintenance dredging. All operational phase impacts are predicted to be of negligible significance,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf]]:14:to marine mammals from dredging has been assessed as negligible. The assessment has concluded

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf]]:14:impacts of negligible significance to all marine mammals with regard to potential for temporary auditory

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf]]:14:movements in the area. A worst-case impact of negligible significance (not significant) is predicted.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf]]:15:Tees, and is therefore expected to have a negligible effect on fish. The removal of the existing wharf

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf]]:16:negligible impacts on both resident and migratory fish. Disturbance during the operational phase, either as

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf]]:16:a result of vessel calls to the new quay or the use of quayside lighting, is predicted to have a negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf]]:16:required by International Regulations to allow safe navigation. An impact of negligible significance on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf]]:16:determined to have minimal effect on the existing navigation profile. An impact of negligible significance is

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf]]:16:Environmental Assessment of Road Traffic), the impact is considered to be negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf]]:18:construction phase noise levels at the South Tees Business Parks would be negligible. No mitigation

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf]]:19:assessed as being permanent and negligible. No mitigation measures during the operational phase are

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf]]:20:disturbance and reductions in air quality are considered to be negligible during construction and operation.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf]]:20:It is therefore concluded that impacts to human health would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf]]:20:is predicted to have a negligible impact on fisheries, marine ecology and marine mammals, and no impact

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:18:cumulative impact is predicted to be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:20:                                                                                             Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:20:                                                                                             Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:20: approach channel and Anglo                                                                  Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:20:                                                                                             Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:20:                                                                                             Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:20: Hartlepool approach                                                                         Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:21:                                                                                              Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:21:                                                                                              Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:21:                                                                                              Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:21:                                                                                              Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:21: Hartlepool approach                                                                          Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:21:                                                                                              Negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:21:Harbour Facilities schemes, is negligible / very low for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:21:harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as negligible (Table 27.5).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:22:cumulative underwater noise impacts. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:22: TTS or fleeing    Harbour                        Negligible /

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:22: response from                                                   Negligible                         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:22: dredging at the                                  Negligible /

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:22:                   Minke whale                                   Negligible                         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:22: Hartlepool                                       Negligible /

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:22: approach          Grey seal                                     Negligible                         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:22: Harbour                                          Negligible /

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:22:                   Harbour seal                                  Negligible                         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:24:on waterbirds at North Tees Mudflat, and negligible impact further downstream (including at Vopak

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:25:supporting habitat was considered a negligible impact in the EIAs for both the Anglo American Harbour

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:25:(even in combination) would have a negligible impact, the cumulative effect with the proposed scheme would

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:26:driving activities (see Section 13.5.3 and 13.5.4). While there is anticipated to be negligible impact from

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:27:works, but the potential cumulative impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:27:impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:27:acceptable (from a navigation risk perspective), with all risks classified as negligible or low, with the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:27:impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:27:The primary assessment identifies that the proposed schemes traffic demand would result in a negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:28:with the proposed scheme are considered not significant and indicate negligible impact, at worst. Therefore,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:32:concludes that the disposal of dredged material will have a negligible impact on fisheries, marine ecology

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf]]:32:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual cumulative impact of negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf]]:8:The socio-economic impacts of the proposed scheme are identified as ‘beneficial’, ‘negligible’ or ‘adverse’

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf]]:8: Negligible                            No obvious significant effect to a receptor or environment.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf]]:8: Negligible                            Where no discernible effect is expected as a result of the proposed scheme on the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf]]:8:                         High                        Medium                    Low                       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf]]:8: High                    Substantial                 Moderate to               Minor to Moderate         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf]]:8: Medium                  Moderate to                 Moderate                  Minor                     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf]]:9: Low                   Minor to Moderate       Minor                    Negligible to Minor    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf]]:9: Negligible            Negligible              Negligible               Negligible             Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf]]:17:supply scenario forecasts only a negligible increase in employment during the plan period.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf]]:19:term) and negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf]]:19:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf]]:22:employment with the AOI and is therefore considered to correspond to a negligible magnitude of change.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf]]:22:a permanent and negligible impact.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf]]:22:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf]]:22:negligible magnitude of change. The receptor is considered to be of medium sensitivity by virtue of the fact

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf]]:23:a permanent and negligible impact.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf]]:23:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf]]:14:negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf]]:15:As a result, it is concluded that there would be a negligible impact as a result of the proposed scheme.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf]]:15:a potential impact of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf]]:16:effect on a low sensitivity receptor. Overall, a negligible impact is predicted.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf]]:16:residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf]]:1:                             lower sections of proposed quayside features, although the change in the view will be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf]]:3:Significance of Effect       Medium sensitivity x Low magnitude of effect = Minor negligible significance of effect.                                       Minor            Minor

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf]]:3:                             Effects will be permanent during the operation of the proposed quayside and its use in support of the renewable energy        Negligible       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf]]:6:                              Effects will be permanent during the operation of the proposed quayside and its use in support of the renewable energy          negligible     negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf]]:7:                             Effects will be permanent during the operation of the proposed quayside and its use in support of the renewable energy        negligible      negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf]]:8:Significance of Effect       Low sensitivity x Low medium magnitude of effect = Minor negligible significance of effect.                                   Minor              Minor

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf]]:8:                             Effects will be permanent during the operation of the proposed quayside and its use in support of the renewable energy        Negligible         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf]]:9:                              Future baseline: development of the SIZ landside site and associated large scale buildings will have negligible effect on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf]]:10:Significance of Effect       Low sensitivity x Low magnitude of effect = Negligible significance of effect.                                                  Negligible         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf]]:11:                             sections of cranes and stored components, although have negligible beneficial effects to views of taller proposed

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf]]:12:                              Future baseline: development of the SIZ landside site and associated large scale buildings will have negligible effect on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf]]:7:likely to be negligible, and therefore not necessary to be assessed.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-HIGHWAYS ENGLAND.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-HIGHWAYS ENGLAND.pdf]]:11:Impacts of negligible significance from the short term, local and reversible construction phase road traffic at the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-HIGHWAYS ENGLAND.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-HIGHWAYS ENGLAND.pdf]]:11:Predicted noise levels indicate negligible impact at human receptor locations. This is considered not significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf]]:6:                                                                                    negligible. As there are no designated

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf]]:7:Negligible                             Is generally tolerant of physical or chemical changes

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf]]:9:temporary change, indiscernible   •   negligible change to existing risk of exposure; or

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf]]:10:                           Moderate       Minor            Minor         Negligible     Negligible    Minor         Minor          Moderate

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf]]:10:                           Minor          Negligible       Negligible    Negligible     Negligible    Negligible    Negligible     Minor

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf]]:10:(negligible) impacts as they may contribute to significant impacts cumulatively or through interactions.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf]]:10:Negligible                            Very small changes in receptor condition (adverse or beneficial), which may be raised as local issues

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf]]:12:the geological sensitivity is considered to be negligible. As there are no designated geological sites recorded

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf]]:18:during construction is considered to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf]]:18:No mitigation measures are required and residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf]]:20:overall impact during construction is considered to be of negligible to minor adverse significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf]]:20:negligible to minor adverse significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf]]:21:very low. Thus, the impact to human receptors is of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf]]:21:No additional mitigation measures required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf]]:22:very low and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:8: Negligible           Commonplace feature of little or no habitat/historical significance. Loss of such a feature would not be seen

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:9: Negligible        of normal natural variation change to the extent        Change is within the normal range of natural variation.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:10:                               High        Medium       Low           Negligible   Negligible   Low          Medium        High

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:10:                               Moderate    Minor        Minor         Negligible   Negligible   Minor        Minor         Moderate

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:10:                  Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:10:                               Minor       Negligible   Negligible    Negligible   Negligible   Negligible   Negligible    Minor

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:17:grassland is concluded as being of negligible ecological value.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:17:negligible ecological value.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:17:scrub habitat is concluded as being of negligible ecological value.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:18:and ruderal habitat is concluded as being of negligible ecological value.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:18:metal structures, which have been assessed as being of negligible value for roosting bats due to the lack of

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:21: Wharf                            Negligible                          No

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:21: Buildings                        Negligible                          No

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:21: Notable Flora                    Negligible                          No

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:21: Badger                           Negligible                          No

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:21: Water vole                       Negligible                          No

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:22: Amphibians                     Negligible                         No

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:22: Reptiles                       Negligible                         No

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:23:impacts to foraging bats are considered to be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:23:included in the CEMP, and with the implementation of such measures, any impacts will be negligible in

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:23:Negligible impacts on water quality are anticipated during construction of the proposed scheme (Section

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:24:time otters are anticipated to spend in the area, an impact of negligible magnitude is anticipated. Given the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:25:assessed to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:25:With the implementation of the above measures, the residual impact is of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf]]:25:be of local (grayling) and (dingy skipper) significance, and negligible importance within the footprint of the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf]]:9: Negligible / very low                                                                 < 1.0

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf]]:12: 1            69.7               69.8                      0.1                     Very low          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf]]:12: 2            67.8               68.0                      0.2                     Very low          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf]]:12: 3            70.3               70.5                      0.2                     Very low          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf]]:12: 5            76.3               76.4                      0.1                     Very low          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf]]:12:Predicted changes in BNL, displayed in Table 17.10, indicate impacts of negligible significance at worst

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf]]:12:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf]]:14: NSR1                       52.2 - 59.2                            Very low                            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf]]:14:indicating negligible impact at human receptor locations. This is considered not significant and impact is

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf]]:15:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf]]:43:representing the final risk score for each hazard, between 0 (negligible) and 10 (high) (see Annex A),

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf]]:43:Hazard risk scores were categorised as either negligible, low, As Low as Reasonably Practicable

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf]]:43:              Negligible       The risk is acceptable and at level where operational safety is unaffected.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf]]:44:construction phase was ‘Contact: Navigation Buoy’ which was scored as 0.72; negligible, driven by its

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf]]:44:                      Negligible              Low                 ALARP             Significant      High

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf]]:46:0.5; negligible, driven by its low consequence.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf]]:46:                       Negligible              Low              ALARP             Significant   High

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf]]:49:be acceptable with all scoring Negligible or Low, with the exception of the impact on ship contact risk,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf]]:50:                                                      Unlikely          Minor           Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf]]:50:                                                      Unlikely          Minor           Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf]]:57:is extremely remote and consequence insignificant such that a risk can be said to be negligible. At the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf]]:60: 1     Negligible           Negligible         Negligible                               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf]]:62:    0 – 1.99               Negligible Risk           A level where operational safety is unaffected.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf]]:62:the final risk score for each hazard, between 0 (negligible) and 10 (high) following which, the final risk

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf]]:62:Hazard risk scores are categorised as either negligible, low, As Low as Reasonably Practicable (ALARP),

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf]]:78:Deposition to the west and east of the disposal site is negligible, whilst to the south and north covers a

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:21:impact is of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:21:is of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:22:overall impact is of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:22:medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:22:range between negligible and minor adverse significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:22:be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:24:negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:24:health is considered to be of negligible to minor adverse significance

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:25:negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:25:residual impact would be of negligible significance. It is acknowledged that a

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:26:considered to be of negligible to minor adverse significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:26:residual impact is therefore considered to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:26:suitable material selection, the residual impact would be of negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:30:sediment, an impact of negligible significance is predicted.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:31:regime is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:32:are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:32:affecting marine communities would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:34:this is that the significance to all receptors would be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:34:this is that the significance to all receptors would be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:34:significance to all receptors would be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:34:overall impact of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:34:negligible impact on marine mammals due to their prey detection methods

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:35:harbour seal is negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:35:residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:35:impact would be of negligible significance

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:35:residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:35:impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:35:practice. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:36:negligible to low.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:37:considered to be of negligible ecological value and therefore have not been

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:37:adverse significance), noise and vibration (negligible significance) emissions,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:38:negligible importance within the footprint of the proposed development. The

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:39:residual impact is of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:39:of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:39:implementation of the mitigation measures, the residual impact is of negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:39:measures, the residual impact is of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:43:and therefore a negligible impact is predicted on the waterbirds relying on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:43:from the operations is therefore considered to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:44:associated with the proposed scheme is assessed to be of negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:44:roosting waterbirds and terns is predicted to be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:44:not significant. The potential increase are considered to have a negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:44:hydrodynamic changes would be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:45:food resources and the residual impact is of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:45:impact is negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:45:impact is negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:45:While impacts are anticipated to be negligible, the implication of best practice

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:45:impact is therefore considered to be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:45:negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:48:is therefore predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:48:considered to be very low, and the significance of the impact is negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:49:therefore considered to have a negligible impact on migration up and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:49:considered to be a negligible impact on fish species within the Tees. With

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:49:therefore considered to be negligible. Consideration has also been given to

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:49:however any conflict is considered to be negligible when co-ordinated by the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:49:negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:49:in motorised vessel traffic is therefore considered to have a negligible impact

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:50:of the estuary as a whole predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:50:fish eggs. The residual impact would remain of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:50:activities. The residual impact remains negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:50:remain negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:51:residual impact will remain negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:51:impact would be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:52:proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:53:development is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:54:impact of negligible significance on navigation safety during the operational

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:54:impacts of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:54:impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:56:negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:57:traffic is therefore assessed as negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:57:considered to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:57:considered to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:63:between no impact and negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:63:would be a negligible impact on human receptor that would be not significant .

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:64:impact would be of negligible significance. With regard to on-site construction

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:64:noise no mitigation is proposed and the residual impact would be of negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:71:with a negligible overall significance of effect.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:72:adverse magnitude and incur a negligible overall significance of effect.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:73:significance of effect being considered to be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:74:significance of effect in the view is minor negligible adverse and not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:74:in the view is minor negligible adverse. In terms of EIA these effects are not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:74:existing, transitory views towards site will be low adverse or negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:75:The ES does conclude that there will be negligible impacts during the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:75:range between negligible to minor adverse. Many of the views considered

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:77:negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:78:negligible impact.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:78:negligible impact.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:79:locally generated waves. The residual impact would be of negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:83:therefore the likely requirement is expected to be low resulting in a negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:84:therefore considered to be result in a negligible impact.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:84:negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:90:receptors is considered to be negligible as set out within Chapter 17 of the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:90:human health would be negligible to minor adverse in significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:90:disturbance would be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:91:air quality disturbance is predicted to be of negligible significance and not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:91:be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:91:disturbance and land quality would be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:91:impacts of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:91:impacts of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:92:beyond, with seabed deposition predicted to be negligible beyond the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:92:would be negligible impact on fish or fisheries due to the proposed deposition

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:93:therefore concluded that the impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:93:disposal operations). Overall, the potential impact would be of negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:94:material, there are considered to be negligible impacts on marine mammals

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:94:would be a residual impact of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:94:would be a residual impact of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf]]:94:would be a residual impact of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf]]:5:receptor. The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible significance on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf]]:5:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf]]:5:receptor. The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible significance on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf]]:6:scheme) and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf]]:6:(human health/safety). The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf]]:6:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_15. Traffic and transport.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_15. Traffic and transport.pdf]]:1:The impact of the proposed development’s construction traffic is therefore assessed as of negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_15. Traffic and transport.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_15. Traffic and transport.pdf]]:1:proposed schemes operational traffic is therefore assessed as negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_15. Traffic and transport.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_15. Traffic and transport.pdf]]:1:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 11_Air quality assessment method.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 11_Air quality assessment method.pdf]]:1:is ‘negligible’.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 11_Air quality assessment method.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 11_Air quality assessment method.pdf]]:4: Low                                  Medium Risk                    Low Risk                          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 11_Air quality assessment method.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 11_Air quality assessment method.pdf]]:4: Low                                    Low Risk                     Low Risk                          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 11_Air quality assessment method.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 11_Air quality assessment method.pdf]]:5: Low                                   Low Risk                  Low Risk                        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 11_Air quality assessment method.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 11_Air quality assessment method.pdf]]:5: Low                                  Medium Risk                Low Risk                        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf]]:26:is considered to be medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf]]:26:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf]]:26:impact is of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf]]:26:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf]]:27:be medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf]]:27:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf]]:27:considered to be medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf]]:27:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf]]:18: Lianhetech, Seal Sands   Proposed new buildings, plant upgrade, swale and associated       Approximately   Planning permission     / Ramsar site would be negligible. On this basis,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf]]:26:greater than approximately 200m from source (see Appendix 8). There would be negligible effects on fish

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf]]:28:would be negligible, therefore any effects on SPA / Ramsar site features would manifest as a direct

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf]]:34:negligible effect on feeding resources for terns. When this is considered alongside the localised increase

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:1:long period prior to this the enhancement is so small in magnitude and spatial extent as to be negligible in

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:2:deposition is predicted to be negligible beyond the boundaries of the Tees Bay C disposal site.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:2:that there would be negligible impact on fish or fisheries due to the proposed deposition of dredged material

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:2:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual impact of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:5:negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:5:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:7:operations). Overall, the potential impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:7:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:8:                                                                                          Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:8:                                              0.000003 minke whale                        Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:8: during offshore                              0.00004 grey seal                           Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:8:                                              0.0000003 harbour seal                      Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:9:dredged sediments is negligible / very low for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:9:negligible (Table 26.5).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:9:                   Harbour                         Negligible /                                     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:9: TTS or fleeing                                                   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:9: underwater                                        Negligible /                                     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:9:                   Minke whale                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:9: offshore                                          Negligible /                    required.        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:9: disposal of       Grey seal                                      Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:9: sediments                                         Negligible /                                     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:9:                   Harbour seal                                   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:9:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:10:                                                                                       Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:10: Potential                                                                             Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:10: of dredged                             0.002 grey seal                                Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:10:                                                                                       Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:10:of negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, the impact significance for any

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:10:assessed as negligible (not significant) for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:10:                        Harbour                       Negligible /

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:10:                                       Low                            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:10: increased              Minke                         Negligible /    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:10: vessels during                                                                               required, other than   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:10: offshore disposal                                    Negligible /    Negligible              good practice.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:10: sediments              Harbour                       Negligible /    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:10:would be of negligible significance for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:11:The magnitude of the impact of vessel disturbance to seal haul-out sites is defined as negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:11:This gives an overall impact significance of negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:11:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:11:relied upon solely. Therefore, any increases in suspended sediments will have a negligible impact on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:11:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:12:                                                                                    Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:12:                                                                                    Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:12: offshore disposal                    0.04 grey seal                                Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:12:                                                                                    Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:12:Taking into account the low receptor sensitivity, the negligible potential magnitude of the impact and the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:12:negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal (Table 26.9).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:12:                      Harbour                      Negligible /

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:12:                                     Low                           Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:12: Changes to prey      Minke                        Negligible /    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:12:                                                                                                                  Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:12: offshore disposal                                 Negligible /    Negligible              required.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:12:                      Harbour                      Negligible /    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf]]:12:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf]]:25:Both had a peak count of two, which represents a negligible proportion of the SPA / Ramsar site populations.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf]]:27:would have a negligible impact on benthic prey species in the intertidal zone so consequent effects on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf]]:29:of the effects of capital dredging and therefore a negligible impact is predicted on the waterbirds relying on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf]]:29:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf]]:32:minor adverse. A residual impact of negligible significance is predicted at the other sensitive intertidal

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf]]:35:and localised disturbance to feeding resources will result in an impact of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf]]:35:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf]]:36:negligible, and any exceedances of the thresholds stated in Cutts et al. (2009) or Wright et al. (2010) would

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf]]:36:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf]]:36:negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf]]:36:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf]]:36:be negligible, therefore any effects on waterbirds and foraging terns would manifest as a direct behavioural

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf]]:37:on foraging / roosting waterbirds and terns is predicted to be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf]]:37:While impacts are anticipated to be negligible, the implication of best practice mitigation measures set out

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf]]:37:water) will further reduce the impact on foraging / roosting waterbirds. The residual impact is negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf]]:37:negligible impact on intertidal benthos (see Section 9.6.2) and would not adversely affect the availability of

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf]]:37:result of hydrodynamic changes would be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf]]:37:No mitigation measures are considered necessary, therefore the residual impact is negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1107_Appendix 7_Land quality desk study.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1107_Appendix 7_Land quality desk study.pdf]]:14:     •     negligible ground dissolution.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1107_Appendix 7_Land quality desk study.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1107_Appendix 7_Land quality desk study.pdf]]:38:                                                                                                                buildings is negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf]]:24:                predicted to be of negligible significance, with the exception of the subtidal habitat creation

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf]]:24:                auditory injury to marine mammals from dredging has been assessed as negligible. The

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf]]:24:                assessment has concluded impacts of negligible significance to all marine mammals with regard

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf]]:24:                number of vessel movements in the area. A worst-case impact of negligible significance (not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf]]:26:                undertaken within the Tees, and is therefore expected to have a negligible effect on fish. The

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf]]:26:                resulted in a conclusion that there will be negligible impacts on both resident and migratory

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf]]:26:                use of quayside lighting, is predicted to have a negligible effect.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf]]:27:                impact is considered to be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf]]:28:                of negligible significance to groundwater, moderate adverse to the Tees estuary and associated

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf]]:28:                operation are predicted to be minor beneficial to controlled waters and negligible to human

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf]]:28:                Business Parks would be negligible. No mitigation measures are required.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf]]:30:                negligible. No mitigation measures during the operational phase are required.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf]]:3: MMO Scoping Opinion     negligible and therefore not necessary to be assessed.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf]]:9: Negligible                       Assets with no significant importance or archaeological/historical interest.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf]]:9: Negligible        The asset’s fabric and/or setting is changed in ways which do not materially affect its heritage significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf]]:10: Significance                    High                       Medium                          Low                      Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf]]:10: Low                            Moderate                      Minor                         Minor                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf]]:10: Negligible                      Minor                      Negligible                  Negligible                   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf]]:10: Negligible              No material change to heritage significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf]]:11:these from other non-significant (negligible) impacts as they may contribute to significant impacts

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf]]:1:that there would be impacts of negligible significance to the only NSR scoped into the assessment.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf]]:1:would be negligible to minor adverse significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf]]:2:noise and air quality disturbance would be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf]]:2:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf]]:2:negligible significance and not significant respectively. In addition, operational phase impacts to human

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf]]:2:health as reported in Section 8 with regard to land quality are considered to be of negligible significance. It

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf]]:2:and land quality would be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf]]:2:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual impact of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:5: Negligible / very

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:18:                                              0.0003 harbour porpoise                    Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:18:                                              0.000003 minke whale                       Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:18: dredging                                     0.00000024 grey seal                       Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:18:                                              0.0000009 harbour seal                     Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:18:The magnitude of the potential impact of PTS as a result of dredging noise is negligible / very low for harbour

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:18:seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.10).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:18:                    Harbour                             Negligible /                                            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:18:                                                                          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:18: Auditory injury                                        Negligible /                                            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:18: (PTS) from         Minke whale                                           Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:18:                                                        Negligible /                        required.           Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:18: SEL during         Grey seal                                             Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:18:                                                        Negligible /                                            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:18:                    Harbour seal                                          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:19:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:20:                                                                                       Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:20:                                              0.000003 minke whale                     Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:20: underwater noise                             0.00000024 grey seal                     Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:20:                                              0.0000009 harbour seal                   Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:20:The magnitude of the potential impact of TTS and fleeing response as a result of dredging noise, is negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:21:whale, grey seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.13).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:21:                   Harbour                         Negligible /                                     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:21:                                                                  Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:21: TTS or fleeing                                    Negligible /                                     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:21: response from     Minke whale                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:21:                                                   Negligible /                    required.        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:21: SEL during        Grey seal                                      Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:21:                                                   Negligible /                                     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:21:                   Harbour seal                                   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:21:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:22:                                                                                      Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:22:                                                                                      Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:22:    dredging (5% of                                                                   Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:22:                                         0.000005 harbour seal                        Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:22:of negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, the impact significance for any

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:22:potential increase in collision risk with vessels during dredging has been assessed as negligible (not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:23:                        Harbour                      Negligible /

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:23:                                      Low                           Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:23: Potential for          Minke                        Negligible /   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:23: collision risk from                                                                       required, other than   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:23: vessels during                                      Negligible /   Negligible             good practice.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:23:                        Harbour                      Negligible /   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:23:The residual impact would be of negligible significance for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:24:The magnitude of the impact of vessel disturbance to seal haul-out sites is defined as negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:24:resulting in an overall impact significance of negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:24:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:24:have a negligible impact on marine mammals.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:24:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:25:                                                                                  Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:25:                                                                                  Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:25: dredge area                                                                      Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:25:                                     0.0001 harbour seal                          Negligible / very low magnitude

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:25:Taking into account the low receptor sensitivity, the negligible potential magnitude of the impact and the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:25:negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal (Table 10.17).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:25:                     Harbour                      Negligible /

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:25:                                    Low                           Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:25:                     Minke                        Negligible /    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:25: resource in                                                                                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:25:                                                  Negligible /    Negligible             required.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:25:                     Harbour                      Negligible /    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:25:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:26:10.5.1 and 10.5.2). The magnitude of effect in all species is assessed to be negligible / very low based on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:26:maintenance activities has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.10 and Table 10.13).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:26:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:26:10.5.3). The magnitude of effect in all species is assessed to be negligible / very low based on the maximum

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:26:has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.15).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:26:dredging activities. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:26:assessed as negligible (see Section 10.5.4).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:26:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:27:negligible (see Section 10.5.5).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:27:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:27:negligible (see Section 10.5.6).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:27:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:27:established vessel routes. The magnitude of effect in all species is assessed to be negligible / very low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:27:for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal has been assessed as negligible (Table

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf]]:27:would be of negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf]]:10:the proposed scheme will have negligible influence on this character area and is not considered further..

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf]]:12:industrial context of outward views, it is predicted that the proposed scheme will have negligible influence

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf]]:15:negligible effect on the existing baseline.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf]]:19:of those features will incur a low adverse magnitude of effect and a negligible overall significance of effect.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf]]:19:magnitude and incur a minor negligible adverse significance of effect.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf]]:19:negligible overall significance of effect.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf]]:20:and the wider environs, the overall significance of effect is considered to be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf]]:23:significance of effect in the view is minor negligible adverse and not significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf]]:23:significance of effect in the view is minor negligible adverse. In terms of EIA these effects are not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf]]:23:negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf]]:62:3, the values are so low (<5mg/l) as to be negligible compared with background levels and, in all cases, the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf]]:62:water quality sampling points during Stage 3 of the dredging and only negligible effects for a short duration

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf]]:62:Stages 3 and 4 of the dredging, only negligible effects are noted, equivalent to variations within the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf]]:68:as to be negligible in such a great depth of water in this deep water offshore area).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf]]:72:enhancement is so small in magnitude and spatial extent as to be negligible in such a great depth of water

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf]]:76:is negligible, whilst to the north it covers a similar zone to the sediment plume for this disposal event, which

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf]]:76:0.1cm. Clearly these magnitudes are extremely low within the licenced disposal site, and negligible beyond.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf]]:76:magnitudes, with negligible changes anticipated beyond the boundaries of the site.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf]]:14: Dust soiling               High Risk                Medium Risk          Medium Risk            Negligible Risk

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf]]:14: Human health               Medium Risk              Low Risk             Low Risk               Negligible Risk

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf]]:14: Ecological effects         Medium Risk              Low Risk             Low Risk               Negligible Risk

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf]]:14:demolition, ‘medium risk’ for earthworks and construction, and ‘negligible risk’ for trackout. The impacts on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf|R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf]]:15:earthworks and construction and ‘negligible risk’ for trackout.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0405-FFM/R-2021-0405-FFM-355679 - R_2021_0405_FFM Engineering operations associated with ground remediation and preparation at Land at South Bank South Industrial Zone Redcar - No Objs Sub Mit.pdf|R-2021-0405-FFM-355679 - R_2021_0405_FFM Engineering operations associated with ground remediation and preparation at Land at South Bank South Industrial Zone Redcar - No Objs Sub Mit.pdf]]:2:          likelihood of the aforementioned potential impacts remains negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0405-FFM/R-2021-0405-FFM-210512, EcIA for South Bank Site Remediation_INCA_RevA Final.PDF|R-2021-0405-FFM-210512, EcIA for South Bank Site Remediation_INCA_RevA Final.PDF]]:20:negligible value.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0405-FFM/R-2021-0405-FFM-210512, EcIA for South Bank Site Remediation_INCA_RevA Final.PDF|R-2021-0405-FFM-210512, EcIA for South Bank Site Remediation_INCA_RevA Final.PDF]]:21:8.13 There is negligible amount of suitable habitat for bats on the proposed development site though

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0405-FFM/R-2021-0405-FFM-210512, EcIA for South Bank Site Remediation_INCA_RevA Final.PDF|R-2021-0405-FFM-210512, EcIA for South Bank Site Remediation_INCA_RevA Final.PDF]]:21:station buildings were checked and are of negligible roosting potential for bats. Both buildings are

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0405-FFM/R-2021-0405-FFM-210512, EcIA for South Bank Site Remediation_INCA_RevA Final.PDF|R-2021-0405-FFM-210512, EcIA for South Bank Site Remediation_INCA_RevA Final.PDF]]:22:the likely presence of Priority species is assessed as negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0405-FFM/R-2021-0405-FFM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2021-0405-FFM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:12:There is negligible amount of suitable habitat for bats on the proposed

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0405-FFM/R-2021-0405-FFM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2021-0405-FFM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:12:checked and are of negligible roosting potential for bats. Both buildings are

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0405-FFM/R-2021-0405-FFM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf|R-2021-0405-FFM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf]]:14:habitats, the likely presence of Priority species is assessed as negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:5:       •   The impact on annual mean NO2 concentrations at all existing receptors modelled is negligible;

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:5:           classified as negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:17:                                Trackout             Medium Risk          Low Risk         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:17:          Low                   Demolition           Medium Risk          Low Risk         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:17:                                Earthworks           Low Risk             Low Risk         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:17:                                Construction         Low Risk             Low Risk         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:17:                                Trackout             Low Risk             Low Risk         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:20:          75% or less of AQAL                    Negligible       Negligible        Slight          Moderate

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:20:          76 – 94% of AQAL                       Negligible       Slight            Moderate        Moderate

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:20:          * Where the % change is <0.5% the change is described as ‘Negligible’ regardless of concentration

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:20:         negligible, slight, moderate or substantial, the significance of the overall effect is dependent on a

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:32:       negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:32:       traffic on hourly mean NO2 concentrations are negligible, therefore mitigation is not required.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:32:       the impacts on annual mean PM10 concentrations at existing receptors are negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:32:       scenarios. As a result, the impacts on daily mean PM10 concentrations are negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:33:       on annual mean PM2.5 concentrations at existing receptors are negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:37:        negligible at all existing and proposed receptor locations. On this basis, the effects are not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:38:       •   The impact on annual mean NO2 concentrations at all existing receptors modelled is negligible;

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:38:           classified as negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:48: E1                  17.8                    17.8                   0.0        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:48: E2                  16.2                    16.2                   0.0        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:48: E3                  16.9                    16.9                   0.0        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:48: E4                  16.5                    16.5                   0.0        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:48: E5                  16.4                    16.4                   0.0        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:48: E6                  15.7                    15.7                   0.0        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:48: E7                  15.8                    15.8                   0.0        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:48: E8                  15.0                    15.0                   0.0        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:48: E9                  14.5                    14.6                   0.1        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:48: E10                 14.1                    14.1                   0.0        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:48: E11                 14.3                    14.3                   0.0        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:48: E12                 14.9                    14.9                   0.0        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:48: E13                 26.9                    26.9                   0.0        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:48: E14                 26.1                    26.1                   0.0        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:48: E15                 15.5                    15.5                   0.0        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:48: E16                 15.0                    15.0                   0.0        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:48: E17                 15.3                    15.3                   0.0        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:48: E18                 19.0                    19.1                   0.1        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:48: E19                 15.1                    15.1                   0.0        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:48: P1                                          17.0                              Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:48: P2                                          17.0                              Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:48: P3                                          17.0                              Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:48: P4                                          14.8                              Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:48: P5                                          13.6                              Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:48: P6                                          15.0                              Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:48: P7                                          14.8                              Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:48: E1                  38.0                    38.0                   0.0        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:48: E2                  33.9                    33.9                   0.0        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:48: E3                  34.6                    34.6                   0.0        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:48: E4                  33.5                    33.6                   0.1        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:48: E5                  41.6                    41.6                   0.0        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:48: E6                  32.5                    32.5                   0.0        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:48: E7                  39.2                    39.2                   0.0        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:48: E8                  27.7                    27.7                   0.1        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:48: E9                  27.8                    27.8                   0.0        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:49: E10                 26.4                    26.5                   0.0        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:49: E11                 29.7                    29.7                   0.1        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:49: E12                 30.5                    30.6                   0.0        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:49: E13                 57.7                    57.8                   0.0        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:49: E14                 52.1                    52.1                   0.0        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:49: E15                 30.7                    30.7                   0.0        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:49: E16                 29.4                    29.4                   0.0        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:49: E17                 30.3                    30.4                   0.1        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:49: E18                 36.5                    36.5                   0.0        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:49: E19                 29.9                    30.0                   0.0        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:49: P1                                          30.8                              Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:49: P2                                          30.9                              Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:49: P3                                          31.0                              Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:49: P4                                          26.8                              Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:49: P5                                          25.2                              Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:49: P6                                          27.4                              Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:49: P7                                          26.8                              Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:49: E1                  12.0                    12.0                   0.0        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:49: E2                  12.1                    12.1                   0.0        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:49: E3                  12.4                    12.4                   0.0        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:49: E4                  12.1                    12.1                   0.0        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:49: E5                  12.1                    12.1                   0.0        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:49: E6                  12.2                    12.2                   0.0        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:49: E7                  12.1                    12.1                   0.0        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:49: E8                  12.0                    12.0                   0.0        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:49: E9                  11.7                    11.7                   0.0        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:49: E10                 13.5                    13.5                   0.0        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:49: E11                 12.3                    12.3                   0.0        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:49: E12                 12.4                    12.4                   0.0        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:49: E13                 14.4                    14.4                   0.0        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:49: E14                 16.0                    16.0                   0.0        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:49: E15                 12.0                    12.0                   0.0        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:49: E16                 11.5                    11.5                   0.0        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:49: E17                 11.6                    11.6                   0.0        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:49: E18                 10.8                    10.8                   0.0        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:49: E19                 11.4                    11.5                   0.1        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:49: P1                                          10.3                              Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:49: P2                                          10.3                              Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:49: P3                                          10.3                              Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:50: P4                                          10.5                              Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:50: P5                                          10.4                              Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:50: P6                                          10.5                              Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:50: P7                                          10.5                              Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:50: E1                  1                       1                      0          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:50: E2                  1                       1                      0          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:50: E3                  1                       1                      0          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:50: E4                  1                       1                      0          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:50: E5                  1                       1                      0          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:50: E6                  1                       1                      0          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:50: E7                  1                       1                      0          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:50: E8                  1                       1                      0          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:50: E9                  1                       1                      0          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:50: E10                 0                       0                      0          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:50: E11                 1                       1                      0          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:50: E12                 1                       1                      0          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:50: E13                 0                       0                      0          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:50: E14                 0                       0                      0          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:50: E15                 1                       1                      0          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:50: E16                 2                       2                      0          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:50: E17                 1                       1                      0          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:50: E18                 2                       2                      0          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:50: E19                 2                       2                      0          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:50: P1                                          3                                 Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:50: P2                                          3                                 Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:50: P3                                          3                                 Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:50: P4                                          3                                 Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:50: P5                                          3                                 Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:50: P6                                          3                                 Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:50: P7                                          3                                 Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:50: E1                  7.8                     7.8                    0.0        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:50: E2                  7.9                     7.9                    0.0        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:51:E3                  8.1                     8.1                    0.0        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:51:E4                  7.9                     7.9                    0.0        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:51:E5                  7.8                     7.8                    0.0        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:51:E6                  7.8                     7.8                    0.0        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:51:E7                  7.8                     7.8                    0.0        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:51:E8                  7.7                     7.7                    0.0        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:51:E9                  7.6                     7.6                    0.0        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:51:E10                 8.0                     8.0                    0.0        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:51:E11                 7.7                     7.7                    0.0        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:51:E12                 7.8                     7.8                    0.0        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:51:E13                 9.2                     9.2                    0.0        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:51:E14                 10.2                    10.2                   0.0        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:51:E15                 7.6                     7.6                    0.0        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:51:E16                 7.6                     7.6                    0.0        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:51:E17                 7.6                     7.6                    0.0        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:51:E18                 7.2                     7.2                    0.0        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:51:E19                 7.5                     7.5                    0.0        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:51:P1                                          6.9                               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:51:P2                                          6.9                               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:51:P3                                          6.9                               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:51:P4                                          7.0                               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:51:P5                                          7.0                               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:51:P6                                          7.0                               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf|R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf]]:51:P7                                          7.0                               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0755-CD/R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf|R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf]]:19:                                                                                                  permeability that have negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0755-CD/R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf|R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf]]:60:121    17.4      Collapsible deposits                                     Negligible (within 50m)

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0755-CD/R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf|R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf]]:60:123    17.6      Ground dissolution of soluble rocks                      Negligible (within 50m)

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0755-CD/R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf|R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf]]:125:                                                                                                     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0755-CD/R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf|R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf]]:169:                                                                                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0755-CD/R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf|R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf]]:169: On site       Negligible                                   Ground conditions predominantly non-plastic.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0755-CD/R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf|R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf]]:171:                                                                                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0755-CD/R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf|R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf]]:173:                                                                                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0755-CD/R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf|R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf]]:173: On site       Negligible      Compressible strata are not thought to occur.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0755-CD/R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf|R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf]]:175:                                                                                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0755-CD/R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf|R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf]]:175: On site       Negligible        Deposits with potential to collapse when loaded and saturated are believed not to be present.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0755-CD/R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf|R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf]]:176:                                                                                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0755-CD/R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf|R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf]]:177:                                                                                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0755-CD/R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf|R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf]]:177: On site       Negligible      Soluble rocks are either not thought to be present within the ground, or not prone to dissolution.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0755-CD/R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf]]:18:                                                                                                  permeability that have negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0755-CD/R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf]]:42:121    17.4      Collapsible deposits                                     Negligible (within 50m)

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0755-CD/R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf]]:42:123    17.6      Ground dissolution of soluble rocks                      Negligible (within 50m)

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0755-CD/R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf]]:107:                                                                                                     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0755-CD/R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf]]:151:                                                                                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0755-CD/R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf]]:151: On site       Negligible                                   Ground conditions predominantly non-plastic.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0755-CD/R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf]]:153:                                                                                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0755-CD/R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf]]:155:                                                                                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0755-CD/R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf]]:155: On site       Negligible      Compressible strata are not thought to occur.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0755-CD/R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf]]:157:                                                                                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0755-CD/R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf]]:157: On site       Negligible        Deposits with potential to collapse when loaded and saturated are believed not to be present.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0755-CD/R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf]]:158:                                                                                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0755-CD/R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf]]:159:                                                                                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2022-0755-CD/R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf]]:159: On site       Negligible      Soluble rocks are either not thought to be present within the ground, or not prone to dissolution.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0879-FF/R-2021-0879-FF-Prairie Site, Desk Based Heritage Assessment.PDF|R-2021-0879-FF-Prairie Site, Desk Based Heritage Assessment.PDF]]:6:             •       Negligible – areas of extremely limited or no archaeological or historic interest. These

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf]]:6:              Negligible            Receptor is of negligible value with no contribution to              •      Unproductive strata.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf]]:7:              Negligible            Very minor loss or detrimental alteration to one            Very minor temporary benefit to or

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf]]:7:                                    No Change             Negligible            Low                   Medium             High

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf]]:7:              Negligible            No change             Negligible            Negligible or         Negligible or      Minor

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf]]:7:              Low                   No change             Negligible or         Negligible or         Minor              Minor or

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf]]:7:              Medium                No change             Negligible or         Minor                 Moderate           Moderate or

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf]]:8:             •     Negligible: No effects or those that are beneath levels of perception, within normal bounds of

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf]]:12:9.3.28       Information provided by the BGS indicates that the Application Site is at very low or negligible risk

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf]]:14:             section 9.4, the magnitude of impact would be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf]]:15:             of impact would be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf]]:15:             CoCP to prevent surface water run-off, the magnitude of impact would be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf]]:17:             basis, the magnitude of impact would be negligible, and the level of effect is considered to be

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf]]:18:             materials to migrate to groundwater. The magnitude of impact would be negligible, and the level of

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf]]:18:             effect is considered to be negligible, which is not significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf]]:18:             contaminants. On this basis, the magnitude of impact would be negligible, and the level of effect is

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf]]:21:             extent; the magnitude of impact would be negligible to low and the significance of effects are

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf]]:21:             would be negligible to minor adverse, which is not significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf]]:23:                                                                                    CoCP, site                  Negligible     Minor adverse     Not significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf]]:23:                                                  Mobilisation of                   CoCP, site                  Negligible     Minor adverse     Not significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf]]:23:                                                  Direct damage to geology          CoCP, site                  Negligible     Minor adverse     Not significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf]]:24:                            Very High             Dermal exposure, vapours          Environmental permit Negligible            Minor adverse     Not significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf]]:24:Aquifer)                    Low                   chemicals or waste water                                Negligible           Negligible        Not significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf]]:24:Cleveland Coast             High                                                                          Negligible           Minor adverse     Not significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_Response to Anglo American_AS_S.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_Response to Anglo American_AS_S.pdf]]:2:         conclude that the cumulative impact on the local highway network would be negligible and would not result in

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_Response to Anglo American_AS_S.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_Response to Anglo American_AS_S.pdf]]:5:                   development which have been demonstrated to be negligible and therefore acceptable.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-SEC8563 Redcar EfW Outfall Pipe Phase 1 Note_Final_20.10.29(1).pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-SEC8563 Redcar EfW Outfall Pipe Phase 1 Note_Final_20.10.29(1).pdf]]:10:construction and operational phases is assessed to be neutral/negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 13.1 Archaeological Desk Based Assessment - Formatted.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 13.1 Archaeological Desk Based Assessment - Formatted.pdf]]:2:to have negligible potential for additional archaeological assets.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 13.1 Archaeological Desk Based Assessment - Formatted.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 13.1 Archaeological Desk Based Assessment - Formatted.pdf]]:11:4.5.3        The Application Site is considered to have negligible potential for Prehistoric and Roman period

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 13.1 Archaeological Desk Based Assessment - Formatted.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 13.1 Archaeological Desk Based Assessment - Formatted.pdf]]:12:4.6.3        The Application Site is considered to have negligible potential for further Early Medieval, Medieval

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 13.1 Archaeological Desk Based Assessment - Formatted.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 13.1 Archaeological Desk Based Assessment - Formatted.pdf]]:12:             negligible potential for the presence of significant archaeological remains of any date.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 13.1 Archaeological Desk Based Assessment - Formatted.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 13.1 Archaeological Desk Based Assessment - Formatted.pdf]]:14:5.3.2        The desk-based assessment above has established that the Application Site has a negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 13.1 Archaeological Desk Based Assessment - Formatted.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 13.1 Archaeological Desk Based Assessment - Formatted.pdf]]:15:             is considered to have negligible potential for additional archaeological assets.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:7:             phases of the REC, would very likely be negligible and effectively result in no change to the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:8:                   negligible and that for a potentially significant, moderate adverse effect to result (medium

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:9:              Negligible                  All other areas such as those used primarily for industrial or agricultural purposes.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:10:             Negligible       No disturbance                                                <502          Regular / Steady State

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:11:                                        Negligible                                                        <3.0

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:11:                                    No Change             Negligible            Low               Medium           High

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:11:                                                                                Negligible or     Negligible or            Page 12-11

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:11:              Negligible            None                  Negligible                                               Minor

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:11:                                                          Negligible or         Negligible or                      Minor or

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:11:                                                          Negligible or                                            Moderate or

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:14:             with impact and CFA piling would be of low and negligible magnitude respectively, with the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:16:             with would be of a negligible magnitude.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:16:12.5.12      Overall, it is predicted that a negligible impact on high sensitivity receptors would result in a minor

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:17:             would be negligible in comparison.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:19:             negligible). Furthermore, during the breeding season the sensitivity of the SPA and Ramsar site is

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:20:12.9.6       Predictions have shown that noise from operation of the REC would result in, at worst, a negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:20:12.2         A negligible impact on the high sensitivity receptor would result in a minor adverse effect, which is

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:20:12.3         Operational road traffic movements on the public highway are negligible compared to baseline and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf]]:21:Teesmouth and               High                  Disturbance from the              -                     Negligible     Minor adverse       Not significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 11 Air Quality.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 11 Air Quality.pdf]]:9:             •      Negligible: no effects or those that pose a very small risk in comparison to normal risks in

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 11 Air Quality.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 11 Air Quality.pdf]]:17:             causing negligible effects.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 11 Air Quality.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 11 Air Quality.pdf]]:23:              Dust Soiling            Negligible                 Low                       Low                      Low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 11 Air Quality.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 11 Air Quality.pdf]]:23:              Human Health            Negligible                 Low                       Low                      Low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 11 Air Quality.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 11 Air Quality.pdf]]:31:             pollutants considered would be of “negligible” significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 11 Air Quality.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 11 Air Quality.pdf]]:33: within 350 m of the                                                                    Medium-term     Risk - Medium       Negligible        Not significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 11 Air Quality.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 11 Air Quality.pdf]]:33:  km by 6 km with 60                                                                     Long-term          Small           Negligible        Not significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 11 Air Quality.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 11 Air Quality.pdf]]:33:                                  Medium                         Dust                    Long-term          Small           Negligible        Not significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf]]:15:             •     Negligible: No effects or those that are beneath levels of perception, within normal bounds of

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf]]:16:             Minor Adverse. There would also be direct effects of a Negligible Adverse significance upon the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf]]:16:             townscape indirectly effected, effects would range from Negligible to Adverse to No Change.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf]]:16:             vehicular traffic associated with the construction phase, resulting in a Negligible Adverse effect,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf]]:21:             would be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf]]:21:5.5.7        The assessments have calculated the REC development to result in negligible increase in traffic

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf]]:21:             been identified as low or negligible and the magnitudes of impacts have been identified to be

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf]]:21:             generally negligible. No significant environmental effects are predicted.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf]]:22:             would be of “negligible” significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf]]:22:             to negligible). Furthermore, during the breeding season (May to August inclusive) the sensitivity of

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf]]:22:             negligible compared to baseline and there would be no change in road traffic noise levels and as

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf]]:24:             is considered to have negligible potential for additional archaeological assets.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf]]:25:             concluded that the sensitivities of receptors to traffic were considered to be low or negligible and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf]]:25:             the level of effects were predicted to be negligible adverse.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf]]:25:             resultant environmental concentrations of all pollutants considered would be of “negligible”

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf]]:25:             Farm. Operational road traffic movements on the public highway are negligible compared to

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf]]:7:              Negligible                  Receptor is of negligible value with no contribution to local, regional or national

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf]]:8:              Negligible                  Very minor loss or detrimental alteration to one or more characteristics, features or

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf]]:9:                                    No Change             Negligible            Low              Medium          High

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf]]:9:              Negligible            No change             Negligible            Negligible or    Negligible or   Minor

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf]]:9:              Low                   No change             Negligible or         Negligible or    Minor           Minor or

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf]]:9:              Medium                No change             Negligible or         Minor            Moderate        Moderate or

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf]]:9:8.2.29       The overall significance of an effect is expressed as negligible, minor, moderate, major or

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf]]:9:             •      Negligible: No effects or those that are beneath levels of perception, within normal bounds of

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf]]:22:             therefore considered to be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf]]:26:                                                  Alteration of surface water        Designed in             Negligible        Minor Adverse     Not significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf]]:27:                                                                                     Decommissioning         Negligible        Minor Adverse     Not significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 13 - Other Environmental Effects.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 13 - Other Environmental Effects.pdf]]:2:             is considered to have negligible potential for additional archaeological assets.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 13 - Other Environmental Effects.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 13 - Other Environmental Effects.pdf]]:3:             concluded that the sensitivities of receptors to traffic were considered to be low or negligible and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 13 - Other Environmental Effects.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 13 - Other Environmental Effects.pdf]]:3:             the level of effects were predicted to be negligible adverse.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 13 - Other Environmental Effects.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 13 - Other Environmental Effects.pdf]]:3:             resultant environmental concentrations of all pollutants considered would be of “negligible”

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 13 - Other Environmental Effects.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 13 - Other Environmental Effects.pdf]]:3:             Farm. Operational road traffic movements on the public highway are negligible compared to

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 4 - EIA Methodology.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 4 - EIA Methodology.pdf]]:8:             •     Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 4 - EIA Methodology.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 4 - EIA Methodology.pdf]]:9:             •      Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 4 - EIA Methodology.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 4 - EIA Methodology.pdf]]:9:             •      Negligible: No effects or those that are beneath levels of perception, within normal bounds of

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 4 - EIA Methodology.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 4 - EIA Methodology.pdf]]:9:                                No Change           Negligible           Low                 Medium                High

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 4 - EIA Methodology.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 4 - EIA Methodology.pdf]]:9:              Negligible        No change           Negligible           Negligible or       Negligible or Minor   Minor

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 4 - EIA Methodology.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 4 - EIA Methodology.pdf]]:9:              Low               No change           Negligible or        Negligible or       Minor                 Minor or

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 4 - EIA Methodology.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 4 - EIA Methodology.pdf]]:10:                                No Change           Negligible           Low                 Medium               High

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 4 - EIA Methodology.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 4 - EIA Methodology.pdf]]:10:              Medium            No change           Negligible or        Minor               Moderate             Moderate or

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf]]:45:             and the surrounding area is considered to have negligible potential for archaeological assets given

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf]]:74:             any effects are expected to be negligible and temporary. At worst, this might cause the short-term

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf]]:76:             effects on the townscape to be no more than negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf]]:76:             surroundings are assessed to be negligible adverse during winter year 1 of the operation.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf]]:76:             character would remain as negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf]]:76:             be negligible given the dominant industrial nature of this townscape being considered to be of

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf]]:76:             negligible sensitivity to the type and scale of development where is it able to accommodate the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf]]:78:             there would be a negligible magnitude of impact due to the very slight change in baseline, whereby

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf]]:81:             Application Site is considered to have only negligible potential for Prehistoric and Roman, Early

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf]]:83:             2.20%, and as such it concludes the increases are negligible, and within the day to variances

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf]]:84:             •    the link assessments confirm that the impacts of REC are negligible during the AM and PM

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf]]:87:             during both the construction and operational phases of the REC, would very likely be negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf]]:87:             from the REC would be negligible in comparison.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf]]:89:             therefore considered to be negligible, and as such, the level of effect is assessed as minor

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf]]:92:             negligible. Furthermore, the level of effect is considered to be minor adverse, which is not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf]]:92:             would be negligible to minor adverse, which is not significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 11.3 - Detailed Construction Phase Dust Assessment Methodology.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 11.3 - Detailed Construction Phase Dust Assessment Methodology.pdf]]:8:             level of mitigation that should be applied. For those cases where the risk category is ‘negligible’,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 11.3 - Detailed Construction Phase Dust Assessment Methodology.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 11.3 - Detailed Construction Phase Dust Assessment Methodology.pdf]]:8:Low                                       Medium Risk                    Low Risk                       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 11.3 - Detailed Construction Phase Dust Assessment Methodology.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 11.3 - Detailed Construction Phase Dust Assessment Methodology.pdf]]:8:Low                                         Low Risk                         Low Risk                        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 11.3 - Detailed Construction Phase Dust Assessment Methodology.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 11.3 - Detailed Construction Phase Dust Assessment Methodology.pdf]]:9:Low                                         Low Risk                         Low Risk                        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 11.3 - Detailed Construction Phase Dust Assessment Methodology.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 11.3 - Detailed Construction Phase Dust Assessment Methodology.pdf]]:9:Medium                                      Medium Risk                     Low Risk                        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 11.3 - Detailed Construction Phase Dust Assessment Methodology.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 11.3 - Detailed Construction Phase Dust Assessment Methodology.pdf]]:9:Low                                         Low Risk                        Low Risk                        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 10.1 Transport Assessment.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 10.1 Transport Assessment.pdf]]:27:             are in the order of less than 1% and up to a maximum of 1.64%. These increases are negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 10.1 Transport Assessment.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 10.1 Transport Assessment.pdf]]:29:             are negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 10.1 Transport Assessment.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 10.1 Transport Assessment.pdf]]:29:7.5.2        The link assessments set out in this section demonstrate that the impacts of REC are negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 10.1 Transport Assessment.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 10.1 Transport Assessment.pdf]]:30:             increases are negligible, and within expected day-to-day variances in traffic flow. It is therefore

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 10.1 Transport Assessment.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 10.1 Transport Assessment.pdf]]:30:             concluded that the impact of the REC on the local highway network would be negligible, and would

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 10.1 Transport Assessment.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 10.1 Transport Assessment.pdf]]:44:                                cs                                                                                                                       traffic would be negligible and a detailed assessment of the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf]]:18:             significance of any effect is considered to be negligible. All other levels of significance will apply to

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf]]:29:             follows: International > National > County > District > Local > Site > Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf]]:36:             development is likely to be negligible. AADT are predicted to be just under 100 movements per

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf]]:38:             development is likely to be negligible. A significant noise impact as a result of an increase in traffic

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf]]:9:             negligible, minor, moderate or major. Effects could be either beneficial or adverse.;

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf]]:10:              Negligible                   Receptor has high capacity to accommodate physical or chemical changes or

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf]]:11:              Negligible                   Very minor loss or detrimental alteration to one or more characteristics, features or

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf]]:11:             described as negligible, minor, moderate or major. Effects are considered to be significant under

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf]]:11:7.2.53       Negligible effects are those that are beneath levels of perception, within normal bounds of

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf]]:12:                                    No Change             Negligible             Low               Medium              High

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf]]:12:              Negligible            No change             Negligible             Negligible or     Negligible or       Minor

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf]]:12:              Low                   No change             Negligible or          Negligible or     Minor               Minor or

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf]]:12:              Medium                No change             Negligible or          Minor             Moderate            Moderate or

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf]]:23:              bulk materials such as coal scrapings. The land has negligible ecological value and the potential

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf]]:24:             negligible magnitude of impact on the high sensitivity Teesmouth and Cleveland SPA/Ramsar and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf]]:26:             impact resulting from construction phase pollution is negligible on the high sensitivity Teesmouth

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf]]:27:               the magnitude of noise disturbance from the operational phase has a negligible magnitude on the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf]]:27:7.6.4          The magnitude of visual disturbance impacts during the operational phase is therefore negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf]]:29:             Cleveland Coast SPA/Ramsar are negligible and the level of effect is predicted to be minor

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf]]:30:               Northern Gateway Container                                           negligible in terms of noise and visual

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf]]:33:                                                             Pollution                                                                Negligible   Minor Adverse   Not Significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf]]:33:                                                                                Not Required                                          Negligible   Minor Adverse   Not Significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf]]:33:                                                                                Not Required                                          Negligible   Minor Adverse   Not Significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf]]:33:                                                                                Not required                                          Negligible   Minor Adverse   Not Significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf]]:34:                                                             Disturbance    non-breeding season for waterbirds when sensitivity   Negligible   Minor Adverse   Not Significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf]]:34:                                                             Pollution      As for construction                                   Negligible   Minor Adverse   Not Significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-411 nuisance.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-411 nuisance.pdf]]:1:construction and operational phases of the REC, would very likely be negligible and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf]]:3:             the changes in traffic resulting from REC would have negligible effects and there is no requirement

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf]]:6:              Negligible                   Receptors with low sensitivity to traffic flows and those sufficiently distant from

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf]]:6:              Negligible                   Very minor loss of capability for movement along and across transport corridors, very

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf]]:7:                                    Negligible                  Low                            Medium                High

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf]]:7:              Negligible            Negligible                  Negligible or minor            Negligible or minor   Minor

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf]]:7:              Low                   Negligible or minor         Negligible or minor            Minor                 Minor or moderate

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf]]:7:              Medium                Negligible or minor         Minor                          Moderate              Moderate or major

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf]]:10:              A1053 between A66 and A174                   Negligible                          Strategic Road Network subject to

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf]]:11:              A174 between the A1053 and A171 Negligible                                       Strategic Road Network

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf]]:11:             medium, low or negligible sensitivity are deemed as not being sensitive, in accordance with the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf]]:14:10.5.4       In accordance with the IEMA guidelines the sensitivity of receptors are considered to be negligible,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf]]:14:             delay, pedestrian amenity, accidents and safety and hazardous loads is deemed to be negligible,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf]]:14:             continuously and fully reversible. On that basis, the level of effect would be negligible adverse,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf]]:17:             between the A1085 and A174 junctions are considered to be negligible and the magnitude of

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf]]:17:             safety and hazardous loads is deemed to be negligible, of long-term duration, temporary in the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf]]:17:             is predicted to be negligible, which is not significant in EIA terms.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf]]:17:             accidents and safety and hazardous loads is deemed to be negligible, of long term duration,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf]]:17:             reversible. The level of effect is predicted to be negligible, which is not significant in EIA terms.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf]]:18:             accidents and safety and hazardous loads is deemed to be negligible, of long term duration,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf]]:18:             The level of effect is predicted to be of negligible, which is not significant in EIA terms.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf]]:18:             by climate change and neither would their assessment of sensitivity (i.e. negligible, low, medium or

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf]]:20:10.8.8       The sensitivities of receptors have been identified as low or negligible and the magnitudes of

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf]]:20:             impacts have been identified to be negligible. No significant environmental effects are predicted.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf]]:21:                                   Low             pedestrian amenity,                routeing of            Negligible     Negligible        Not significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf]]:21:A1085 Trunk Road                   Low             pedestrian amenity,                routeing of            Negligible     Negligible        Not significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf]]:21:                                   Negligible      pedestrian amenity,                routeing of            Negligible     Negligible        Not significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf]]:21:                                   Low             pedestrian amenity,                routeing of            Negligible     Negligible        Not significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf]]:21:                                   Medium          pedestrian amenity,                routeing of            Negligible     Negligible        Not significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf]]:21:junction with Normanby  Low                        pedestrian amenity,                routeing of            Negligible     Negligible        Not significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf]]:22:                                   Negligible      pedestrian amenity,                routeing of            Negligible     Negligible        Not significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf]]:22:Trunk Road and Waveney Low                         pedestrian amenity,                routeing of            Negligible     Negligible        Not significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf]]:22:between A1042 and                  Low             pedestrian amenity,                routeing of            Negligible     Negligible        Not significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf]]:22:                                   Low             pedestrian amenity,                                       Negligible     Negligible        Not significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf]]:22:A1085 Trunk Road                   Low             pedestrian amenity,                                       Negligible     Negligible        Not significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf]]:22:                                   Negligible      pedestrian amenity,                                       Negligible     Negligible        Not significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf]]:22:                                   Low             pedestrian delay,                                         Negligible     Negligible        Not significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf]]:23:                                   Medium          pedestrian amenity,                                Negligible     Negligible        Not significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf]]:23:junction with Normanby  Low                        pedestrian amenity,                                Negligible     Negligible        Not significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf]]:23:                                   Negligible      pedestrian amenity,                                Negligible     Negligible        Not significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf]]:23:Trunk Road and Waveney Low                         pedestrian amenity,                                Negligible     Negligible        Not significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf]]:23:between A1042 and                  Low             pedestrian amenity,                                Negligible     Negligible        Not significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf]]:16:2.7.1        Information provided by the BGS indicates that the Application Site is at very low or negligible risk

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf]]:50:99     17.4      Collapsible deposits                                     Negligible (within 50m)

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf]]:50:101    17.6      Ground dissolution of soluble rocks                      Negligible (within 50m)

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf]]:102: 1 in 30 year                                                   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf]]:103:                                                                                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf]]:140:                                                                                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf]]:141:                                                                                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf]]:142:                                                                                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf]]:143:                                                                                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf]]:143: On site       Negligible        Deposits with potential to collapse when loaded and saturated are believed not to be present.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf]]:144:                                                                                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf]]:145:                                                                                                    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf]]:145: On site       Negligible      Soluble rocks are either not thought to be present within the ground, or not prone to dissolution.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 7.2 Ecology PEA.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 7.2 Ecology PEA.pdf]]:8:Negligible       Negligible habitat features on site not likely to be         Negligible habitat features on site not likely to be

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf]]:4:             is classified on a five-point scale (negligible, low, medium, high and very high) as set out in Tables

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf]]:5:             (negligible, low, medium, high and very high) as set out in Table 6.2 below. Table 6.3 also sets out

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf]]:5:              Negligible         Absence of positive landscape characteristics.        Undesignated countryside and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf]]:6:              Negligible           Views from within and of undesignated             Observers in vehicles or people

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf]]:6:6.2.25       Magnitude of impact has been classified on a five-point scale (no change, negligible, low, medium,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf]]:7:               Negligible          Very minor loss or addition of or alteration   Very slight change in baseline i.e., pre-

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf]]:8:                                   No Change              Negligible         Low                Medium             High

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf]]:8:              Negligible           No change              Negligible         Negligible or      Negligible or      Minor

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf]]:8:              Low                  No change              Negligible or      Negligible or      Minor              Minor or

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf]]:8:              Medium               No change              Negligible or      Minor              Moderate           Moderate or

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf]]:8:             the six-point scale shown in the above matrix (substantial, major, moderate, minor, negligible or no

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf]]:8:                 Negligible          Where proposed changes would have an               Where proposed changes would have a

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf]]:19:             sensitivity of the Application Site itself is considered to be Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf]]:20:                              1 km and          features and visual receptors could experience medium/low to negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf]]:20:                              5 km              landscape and visual receptors would tend to experience a low to negligible or

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf]]:28:             landscape characteristics and is considered to have negligible sensitivity to the change arising

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf]]:28:             Tract, which is considered to be of negligible sensitivity to this type of development, resulting in a

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf]]:28:             negligible adverse significance of effect during construction. Proposed changes would have an

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf]]:29:             development, resulting in a negligible magnitude of impact and a negligible adverse significance

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf]]:29:             The temporary construction activities would cause a negligible magnitude of impact and no more

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf]]:29:             than a negligible adverse significance of effect upon the Tees Lowlands NCA.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf]]:31:             landscape characteristics and is considered to have negligible sensitivity to the type of

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf]]:31:             new landscape, the magnitude of impact would be low and an overall negligible adverse during

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf]]:31:             character would remain as negligible adverse.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf]]:31:             being considered to be of negligible sensitivity to the type and scale of development where is it

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf]]:32:             considered that the proposed development would cause a negligible magnitude of impact to the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf]]:32:             character of Redcar Industrial Townscape Tract, resulting in a negligible adverse significance

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf]]:32:6.6.15       Overall there would be the potential for negligible / negligible to no change magnitude of impact

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf]]:32:             a negligible adverse / no change significance of effect.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf]]:32:             inherent characteristics of this NCA. There would be a negligible magnitude of impact to the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf]]:32:             character area. Therefore, there would be no more than a negligible adverse significance of

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf]]:32:             (see Figure 6.9) by summer year 15, but the overall significance would remain at negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf]]:35:             There would be a negligible magnitude of impact and a negligible adverse significance of effect

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf]]:35:             There would be a Negligible magnitude of impact and a negligible adverse significance of effect

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf]]:36:             VP12 and VP13, there would be a negligible magnitude of impact due to the very slight change in

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf]]:36:             Overall, there would be a negligible magnitude of impact, resulting in a minor adverse

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf]]:36:             mostly unnoticed from these views from medium sensitivity receptors. There would be a negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf]]:36:             magnitude of impact and a negligible adverse significance of effect at winter year 1 and summer

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf]]:38:             development has concluded an effect above negligible have been considered in the cumulative

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf]]:45:                                   Negligible         Direct effects; demolition and              Temporary        Medium          Minor Adverse         Not Significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf]]:45:                                   Negligible         Direct effects: as above but                Temporary          Low         Negligible Adverse      Not Significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf]]:45:                                    Medium            Indirect effects: Addition of elements      Temporary        Negligible    Negligible Adverse      Not Significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf]]:45:Redcar Flats                        Medium            Indirect effects as preceding entry         Temporary        Negligible    Negligible Adverse      Not Significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf]]:46:Eston Hills Landscape               Medium            Indirect effects as above                  Temporary        Negligible    Negligible Adverse      Not Significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf]]:46:East Billingham to                    Low             Indirect effects as above                  Temporary        Negligible    Negligible Adverse      Not Significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf]]:46:Estuarine Landscape                   Low             Indirect effects as above                  Temporary        Negligible    Negligible Adverse      Not Significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf]]:46:Coastal Fringe                                        Indirect effects as above                  Temporary        Negligible    Negligible Adverse      Not Significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf]]:46:                                                      Large scale construction in an area        Temporary        Negligible    Negligible Adverse      Not Significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf]]:46:                                   Negligible         Direct effects. Introduction of new       Permanent           Low        Negligible Adverse.      Not Significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf]]:46:District Level                     Negligible         Direct effects. Lesser in magnitude       Permanent         Negligible    Negligible Adverse      Not Significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf]]:47:Redcar Residential                  Medium            Indirect effects; No loss, alteration or    Permanent     Negligible to No    Negligible Adverse      Not Significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf]]:47:                                    Medium            Indirect effects; very minor addition       Permanent        Negligible       Negligible Adverse      Not Significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf]]:47:Eston Hills Landscape               Medium            Indirect effects; No loss, alteration or    Permanent     Negligible to No    Negligible Adverse      Not Significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf]]:47:East Billingham to                    Low             Indirect effects No loss, alteration or     Permanent     Negligible to No       No Change            Not Significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf]]:47:Estuarine Landscape                   Low             Indirect effects No loss, alteration or     Permanent     Negligible to No       No Change            Not Significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf]]:47:Coastal Fringe                        Low             Indirect effects No loss, alteration or     Permanent     Negligible to No       No Change            Not Significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf]]:47:                                    Medium            Direct effects; large scale                 Permanent        Negligible       Negligible Adverse      Not Significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf]]:49:      VP6:                 Medium         Medium range, heavily filtered        As above      Negligible   Negligible Adverse   Not Significant   Reducing to No

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf]]:49:                                          Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf]]:49:    VP7: West                Low                                                As above      Negligible   Negligible Adverse   Not Significant   Greater vehicular

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf]]:50:  VP10: England              High         Long range, open view toward             As above      Negligible   Minor Adverse        Not Significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf]]:50:  VP11: Cowpen             Medium                                                  As above      Negligible   Negligible Adverse   Not Significant   By Summer Year 15,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf]]:50: VP12: Eston Nab             High         Long range, elevated view from           As above      Negligible   Minor Adverse        Not Significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf|R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf]]:50: VP13: Hartlepool          Medium         Long range, open view over sea.          As above      Negligible   Negligible Adverse   Not Significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0465-FFM/R-2021-0465-FFM-LM Wind - Transport Briefing Note_09-06-2021.pdf|R-2021-0465-FFM-LM Wind - Transport Briefing Note_09-06-2021.pdf]]:1:highway network is expected to be negligible as much of the additional area is for open space,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0152-CD/R-2021-0152-CD-Blast furnace RecordingWSIv4.PDF|R-2021-0152-CD-Blast furnace RecordingWSIv4.PDF]]:5:            2). The area to the east, south and west have negligible archaeological potential and the area to

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0152-CD/R-2021-0152-CD-Officer report _R20210152CD.pdf|R-2021-0152-CD-Officer report _R20210152CD.pdf]]:5:negligible archaeological potential and the areas to the south and west,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2021-0152-CD/R-2021-0152-CD-Blast furnace RecordingWSI revMar21.pdf|R-2021-0152-CD-Blast furnace RecordingWSI revMar21.pdf]]:6:            2). The area to the east now has negligible archaeological potential and the areas to the south

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0179-SCP/R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf|R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf]]:77:          • Negligible (common and widespread features that have very low value at the level

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0179-SCP/R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf|R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf]]:86:        would be negligible and a detailed assessment of the operational phase of the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0179-SCP/R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf|R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf]]:93:        Corridors would be negligible and a detailed assessment of the operational noise

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0179-SCP/R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf|R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf]]:108:            professional judgement) considered negligible in relation to the scale and nature

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0179-SCP/R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf|R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf]]:118:          assessment methodologies (major, moderate, minor and negligible). For the purpose

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0179-SCP/R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf|R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf]]:121:          • negligible – imperceptible effect to an environmental resource or receptor; or

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0179-SCP/R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf|R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf]]:125:          reception is considered negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf|R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf]]:12:                     be Negligible and Not Significant. This will primarily comprise remediation of Non Aqueous

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf|R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf]]:12:                     construction and therefore the risk to the occupiers would be Negligible and Not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf|R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf]]:13:                     safely, therefore the risk from new contamination would be Negligible and Not Significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf|R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf]]:14:               Commercial areas within >250 m of                   negligible nature conservation

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf|R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf]]:14:               Ecological and water features deemed to be          Negligible potential for mineral reserves to exist

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf|R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf]]:14:               of negligible value

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf|R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf]]:15:Negligible     Human Health: No measurable effects on humans                          Impact of insufficient magnitude to

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf|R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf]]:16:                Sensitivity/value of High                           Medium        Low          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf|R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf]]:16:                High                       Substantial              Moderate      Minor        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf|R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf]]:16:                Medium                     Moderate                 Minor         Negligible   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf|R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf]]:16:                Low                        Minor                    Negligible    Negligible   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf|R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf]]:28:               unit has low permeability with negligible significance for water suppl y or base river flow. The

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf|R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf]]:33:               concentrations were 1.3% v/v and 4.9% v/v. respectively, with flow rates negligible to low during

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf|R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf]]:38:               significance is considered Negligible and therefore Not Significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf|R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf]]:43:               magnitude of impact following mitigation identifie d in Section H6.0 is negligible. There are

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf|R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf]]:43:               likely to be impacts of Minor Adverse significance for construction workers and Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf|R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf]]:43:               following mitigation identified in Section H6.0 is negligible. Therefore , the impacts after the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf|R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf]]:43:               implementation of mitigation measures are considered to be of Negligible significance. This is

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf|R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf]]:43:               facilities during the construction phase is considered to be of Negligible significance. This is

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf|R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf]]:44:               significance of the impacts identified is considered to be Minor Adverse / Negligible and Not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF]]:22:                                   operation would be Negligible and Not Significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF]]:22:                                   contamination with this tertiary mitigation in place, would be Negligible and Not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF]]:22:                             Local significance; and nesting birds, which are of negligible significance even at a

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF]]:30:             10 Neutral/negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf]]:38:                considered to be of Local importance with the non-breeding bird assemblage of negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf]]:45:                risk sites in place, there is likely to be a negligible effect on receptors from the dust-generating

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf]]:45:                through the modelling process was predicted to be negligible at all receptors. The overall effect

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf]]:47:                negligible and not significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf]]:50:                Eston Road junction. All other effects will be reduced to minor or negligible and not significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf]]:53:                groundwater, the built environment and landscape will all be of minor adverse / negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf]]:56:                development are all considered to result in a negligible impact on regional landfill capacity.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R1                             19.2                     19.4                 19.6                0.2         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R2                             18.0                     18.2                 18.4                0.2         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R3                             17.9                     18.2                 18.7                0.5         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R4                             18.1                     18.4                 18.9                0.5         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R5                             18.0                     18.3                 18.7                0.4         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R6                             15.7                     16.0                 16.1                0.1         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R7                             15.3                     15.5                 15.6                0.1         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R8                             14.6                     14.9                 14.9                < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R9                             15.6                     16.1                 16.1                < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R10                            16.2                     16.8                 17.0                0.2         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R11                            14.4                     14.7                 14.8                0.1         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R12                            14.4                     14.8                 14.9                0.1         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R13                            15.8                     16.4                 16.5                0.1         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R14                            15.4                     16.0                 16.1                0.1         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R15                            31.4                     31.7                 31.7                < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R16                            35.1                     35.5                 35.6                0.1         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R17                            31.1                     31.4                 31.5                0.1         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R18                            36.1                     36.5                 36.6                0.1         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R19                            27.8                     28.1                 28.2                0.1         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R20                            27.8                     28.1                 28.2                0.1         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R21                            25.8                     26.1                 26.1                < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R22                            23.7                     23.8                 23.9                0.1         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R23                            22.7                     22.8                 22.9                0.1         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R24                            15.5                     15.6                 15.8                0.2         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R25                            15.4                     15.6                 15.7                0.1         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R26                            15.2                     15.4                 15.5                0.1         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R27                            16.1                     16.2                 16.5                0.3         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R28                            15.4                     15.5                 15.5                < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: E1                             18.7                     18.7                 18.7                < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: E2                             18.6                     18.6                 18.6                < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19: R1                             12.1                     12.1                 12.1                 < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19: R2                             12.4                     12.5                 12.5                 < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19: R3                             12.1                     12.2                 12.2                 < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19: R4                             12.1                     12.2                 12.3                 0.1                 Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19: R5                             12.1                     12.2                 12.3                 0.1                 Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19: R6                             11.9                     12.0                 12.0                 < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19: R7                             11.8                     11.9                 11.9                 < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19: R8                             13.5                     13.5                 13.5                 < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19: R9                             13.7                     13.8                 13.8                 < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19: R10                            12.2                     12.3                 12.4                 0.1                 Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19: R11                            12.1                     12.1                 12.2                 0.1                 Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19: R12                            12.1                     12.2                 12.2                 < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19: R13                            12.3                     12.4                 12.4                 < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19: R14                            12.3                     12.3                 12.4                 0.1                 Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19: R15                            16.4                     16.5                 16.5                 < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19: R16                            17.5                     17.6                 17.6                 < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19: R17                            16.5                     16.6                 16.6                 < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19: R18                            17.7                     17.9                 17.9                 < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19: R19                            13.9                     13.9                 14.0                 0.1                 Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19: R20                            13.9                     13.9                 14.0                 0.1                 Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19: R21                            13.4                     13.5                 13.5                 < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19: R22                            13.1                     13.2                 13.2                 < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19: R23                            12.7                     12.8                 12.8                 < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19: R24                            11.5                     11.5                 11.5                 < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19: R25                            11.4                     11.5                 11.5                 < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19: R26                            11.4                     11.4                 11.4                 < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19: R27                            11.6                     11.6                 11.6                 < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19: R28                            11.9                     11.9                 11.9                 < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19: E1                             10.6                     10.6                 10.6                 < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19: E2                             10.6                     10.6                 10.6                 < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R1                              7.9                    7.9                   7.9                   < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R2                              8.1                    8.1                   8.1                   < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R3                              7.8                    7.8                   7.9                   0.1         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R4                              7.8                    7.9                   7.9                   < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R5                              7.9                    7.9                   7.9                   < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R6                              7.7                    7.7                   7.8                   0.1         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R7                              7.7                    7.7                   7.7                   < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R8                              8.0                    8.1                   8.1                   < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R9                              8.1                    8.2                   8.2                   < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R10                             7.7                    7.7                   7.8                   0.1         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R11                             7.6                    7.6                   7.7                   0.1         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R12                             7.6                    7.7                   7.7                   < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R13                             7.7                    7.8                   7.8                   < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R14                             7.7                    7.8                   7.8                   < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R15                             10.1                   10.2                  10.2                  < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R16                             11.1                   11.2                  11.2                  < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R17                             10.2                   10.3                  10.3                  < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R18                             11.2                   11.3                  11.3                  < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R19                             8.9                    9.0                   9.0                   < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R20                             8.9                    9.0                   9.0                   < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R21                             8.6                    8.7                   8.7                   < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R22                             8.4                    8.4                   8.4                   < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R23                             8.2                    8.2                   8.3                   0.1         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R24                             7.5                    7.6                   7.6                   < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R25                             7.5                    7.5                   7.6                   0.1         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R26                             7.5                    7.5                   7.5                   < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R27                             7.6                    7.6                   7.6                   < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R28                             7.5                    7.5                   7.5                   < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: E1                              7.1                    7.1                   7.1                   < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: E2                              7.1                    7.1                   7.1                   < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF]]:13:J3.20          Professional judgement has then been employed to establish whether the effects are negligible,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020.PDF]]:12:                Negligible                                          Assets with very little or no surviving archaeological

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020.PDF]]:12:               Negligible                          Very minor changes to archaeological materials or setting.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020.PDF]]:13:               Magnitude of Change              No         Negligible   Minor         Moderate      Substantial   No Change

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020.PDF]]:13:                                Medium          Neutral    Negligible   Minor         Moderate      Substantial   Medium

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020.PDF]]:13:                                Low             Neutral    Negligible   Negligible    Minor         Moderate      Low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020.PDF]]:13:                                Negligible      Neutral    Negligible   Negligible    Negligible    Minor         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020.PDF]]:13:               the effect on the receptor will be Neutral, Negligible, Minor, Moderate or Substantial. Moderate

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020.PDF]]:13:               Negligible/neutral The development satisfies the subject environmental objective but neither

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020.PDF]]:22:               understanding offsets the negative effect to have a residual effect that is between Negligible and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020.PDF]]:22:                Open Hearth furnaces remains              Low                     Minor                   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020.PDF]]:22:                Cleveland Steel Works other remains                Low            Minor                   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020.PDF]]:23:                 Open         Substantial        Moderate Adverse        Archaeological      Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020.PDF]]:23:                 Cleveland    Substantial        Moderate Adverse        Archaeological      Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:9:                 reduced to negligible and therefore non-significant levels.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19:F3.40            If the impact descriptor is Negligible or Slight (Minor), this is considered to not have a

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19:                 Moderate, Minor and Negligible/Neutral and reference to these terms are included in the below

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19:                     75% or less of objective               Negligible        Negligible    Slight (Minor)   Moderate

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19:                     76-94% of objective                    Negligible      Slight (Minor)    Moderate       Moderate

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19:                     Note: Changes in pollutant concentrations of 0% i.e. <0.5% would be described as Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19:                     <10% of hourly mean NO2 threshold                                Imperceptible    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20:               significant effect and a ‘Negligible’ or ‘Slight’ (Minor) impact will not result in a significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20:               such as those above. In this Chapter, where Negligible impacts are identified, a type of effect will

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20:               or Negligible effect is likely to be felt.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:33:                 Negligible impact at all existing receptor locations and is considered to be Not Significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:33:                 Cleveland Coast SPA) included in this assessment were also found to experience a Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:33:                 Negligible impact at all existing receptor locations and is considered to be Not Significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:33:                 Cleveland Coast SPA) included in this assessment were also found to experience a Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:34:               Negligible impact at all existing receptor locations and is considered to be Not Significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:34:               Cleveland Coast SPA) included in this assessment were also found to experience a Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:34:F5.26          The magnitude of change for NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations is negligible at all receptors.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:34:               As stated in paragraph F3.44, where the impact is Negligible or Slight (Minor) then the overall

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:36:F7.2           The assessment has demonstrated that the effects will be Negligible and therefore Not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:36:               effects will be Negligible and Not Significant) for all receptors.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:37:                 practice mitigation measures suitable for high risk sites in place, there is likely to be a Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:37:F8.6             The magnitude of change for NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations at all receptors is Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:37:                   All sensitive Operational traffic impact Negligible and Not              None.            Negligible and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF]]:41:                                                   development scenario (albeit negligible). Best practice measures would be

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF]]:41:                                                   The proposed development is anticipated to only have negligible impacts

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:23:                                   operation would be Negligible and Not Significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:23:                                   contamination with this tertiary mitigation in place, would be Negligible and Not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:23:                             Local significance; and nesting birds, which are of negligible significance even at a

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:31:             10 Neutral/negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:40:                                 Medium         although the HGV increase in the PM peak is       Negligible   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:41:       by 100% in the PM peak, the actual number of HGVs is 8, which is considered negligible. The effect on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:41:       pedestrian and cyclist amenity at this location is therefore considered to be Negligible. This is considered

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:41:       change is considered to be negligible as the traffic flow change is less than 30%. The change in traffic

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:41:       carriageway and the effect is considered to be of Negligible significance. This is considered Not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:41:       change is considered to be negligible as the arms predominantly affected already have signalised

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:41:       considered to be of Negligible significance. This is considered Not Significant; and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:44: R1                                       19.2                   21.5                  22.5        1.0     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:44: R2                                       18.0                   20.3                  21.1        0.8     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:44: R3                                       17.9                   20.3                  21.6        1.3     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:44: R4                                       18.1                   20.5                  22.0        1.5     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:44: R5                                       18.0                   20.4                  22.1        1.7     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:44: R6                                       15.7                   18.1                  18.9        0.8     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:44: R7                                       15.3                   17.6                  18.3        0.7     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:44: R8                                       14.6                   17.0                  17.2        0.2     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:44: R9                                       15.6                   18.2                  18.6        0.4     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:44: R10                                      16.2                   18.9                  20.2        1.3     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:44: R11                                      14.4                   16.8                  17.2        0.4     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:44: R12                                      14.4                   16.9                  17.3        0.4     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:44: R13                                      15.8                   18.5                  19.1        0.6     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:44: R14                                      15.4                   18.1                  18.6        0.5     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:44: R15                                      31.4                   33.8                  34.2        0.4     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:44: R21                                      25.8                   28.2                  28.6        0.4     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:44: R22                                      23.7                   25.9                  26.5        0.6     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:44: R23                                      22.7                   24.9                  25.6        0.7     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:44: R25                                      15.4                   17.7                  19.3        1.6     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:44: R26                                      15.2                   17.5                  18.6        1.1     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:44: R28                                      15.4                   17.6                  18.0        0.4     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:44: R29                                      18.1                   20.3                  21.0        0.7     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:44: E1                                       18.7                   20.8                  21.0        0.2     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:44: E2                                       18.6                   20.7                  20.8        0.1     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:46: R1                                  12.1                 12.5                12.7                0.2        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:46: R2                                  12.4                 12.9                13.0                0.1        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:46: R3                                  12.1                 12.6                12.8                0.2        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:46: R4                                  12.1                 12.6                12.8                0.2        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:46: R5                                  12.1                 12.6                12.8                0.2        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:46: R6                                  11.9                 12.4                12.5                0.1        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:46: R7                                  11.8                 12.3                12.4                0.1        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:46: R8                                  13.5                 13.9                14.0                0.1        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:46: R9                                  13.7                 14.2                14.2                <0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:46: R10                                 12.2                 12.7                13.0                0.3        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:46: R11                                 12.1                 12.5                12.6                0.1        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:46: R12                                 12.1                 12.6                12.6                <0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:46: R13                                 12.3                 12.8                12.9                0.1        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:46: R14                                 12.3                 12.7                12.8                0.1        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:46: R15                                 16.4                 16.9                17.0                0.1        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:46: R16                                 17.5                 18.0                18.2                0.2        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:46: R17                                 16.5                 17.0                17.1                0.1        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:46: R18                                 17.7                 18.3                18.4                0.1        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:46: R19                                 13.9                 14.3                14.5                0.2        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:46: R20                                 13.9                 14.3                14.5                0.2        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:46: R21                                 13.4                 13.9                14.0                0.1        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:46: R22                                 13.1                 13.6                13.7                0.1        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:46: R23                                 12.7                 13.2                13.3                0.1        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:46: R24                                 11.5                 11.9                12.4                0.5        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:46: R25                                 11.4                 11.9                12.2                0.3        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:46: R26                                 11.4                 11.8                12.0                0.2        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:46: R27                                 11.6                 12.0                12.4                0.4        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:46: R28                                 11.9                 12.3                12.3                <0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:46: R29                                 12.0                 12.4                12.5                0.1        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:46: E1                                  10.6                 11.0                11.1                0.1        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:46: E2                              10.6                     11.0                11.1                0.1        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:47: R1                                  7.9                 8.0                  8.1                  0.1    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:47: R2                                  8.1                 8.2                  8.3                  0.1    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:47: R3                                  7.8                 7.9                  8.1                  0.2    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:47: R4                                  7.8                 8.0                  8.1                  0.1    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:47: R5                                  7.9                 8.0                  8.1                  0.1    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:47: R6                                  7.7                 7.8                  7.9                  0.1    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:47: R7                                  7.7                 7.8                  7.9                  0.1    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:47: R8                                  8.0                 8.2                  8.2                  <0.1   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:47: R9                                  8.1                 8.3                  8.3                  <0.1   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:47: R10                                 7.7                 7.8                  8.0                  0.2    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:47: R11                                 7.6                 7.7                  7.8                  0.1    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:47: R12                                 7.6                 7.8                  7.8                  <0.1   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:47: R13                                 7.7                 7.9                  8.0                  0.1    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:47: R14                                 7.7                 7.9                  7.9                  <0.1   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:47: R15                                10.1                 10.3                10.3                  <0.1   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:47: R16                                11.1                 11.3                11.4                  0.1    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:47: R17                                10.2                 10.4                10.4                  <0.1   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:47: R18                                11.2                 11.4                11.5                  0.1    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:47: R19                                 8.9                 9.1                  9.2                  0.1    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:47: R20                                 8.9                 9.1                  9.2                  0.1    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:47: R21                                 8.6                 8.8                  8.8                  <0.1   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:47: R22                                 8.4                 8.5                  8.6                  0.1    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:47: R23                                 8.2                 8.3                  8.4                  0.1    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:47: R24                                 7.5                 7.7                  7.9                  0.2    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:47: R25                                 7.5                 7.6                  7.8                  0.2    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:47: R26                                 7.5                 7.6                  7.7                  0.1    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:47: R27                                 7.6                 7.7                  8.0                  0.3    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:47: R28                                 7.5                 7.6                  7.7                  0.1    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:47: R29                                 7.8                 7.9                  8.0                  0.1    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:47: E1                                  7.1                 7.2                  7.2                  <0.1   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:47: E2                                  7.1                 7.2                  7.2                  <0.1   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:14:                  Negligible              The size and scale of change are considered very small due to the extent and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19:                   Negligible                    The proposed development is barely discernible within the landscape and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20:                  Neutral / Negligible                  Maintain the character of the receiving landscape.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:21:                Neutral / Negligible                   The proposed development would cause no discernible deterioration or

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:21:                                                       improvement in a view. In most instances, a negligible effect will arise

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:21:                                                       experience a negligible magnitude of change.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:22:                EIA terms. Those classified as Minor or Negligible are likely to be Not Significant in EIA terms.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:23:                   Change                  Negligible           Negligible          Negligible            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:38:                whereas effects on all other Viewpoints are considered to be Negligible and Not Significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:38:L5.8            The above aspects of the construction phase will have a Negligible effect on all LCZs due to the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:38:                Negligible (Not Significant) to a temporary, Moderate Adverse and Significant effect upon

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:38:                  All LCZ’s               Negligible               -                        Direct and short-   None

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:39:                VP 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8,    Negligible             -              Direct and short-    Installation of

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:40:                character of the LCZ. The magnitude of change is therefore considered to be Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:40:L5.24           Combining all of these criteria, it is considered that there will be a Negligible level of effect,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:40:                  LCZ 3 – Intertidal     Medium                Negligible     Negligible             Indirect, Permanent

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:41:               The magnitude of change is therefore considered to be Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:41:L5.29          Combining all of these criteria, it is considered that there will be a Negligible level of effect,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:41:                LCZ 4 – Coast and        Medium                Negligible     Negligible                Indirect, Permanent

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:41:               The magnitude of change is therefore considered to be Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:41:L5.34          Combining all of these criteria, it is considered that there will be a Negligible level of effect,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:42:                  LCZ 5 – Coatham        Medium-High           Negligible     Negligible            Indirect, Permanent

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:42:                vicinity of the LCZ. The magnitude of change is therefore considered to be Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:42:L5.44           Combining all of these criteria, it is considered that there will be a Negligible level of effect,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:43:                LCZ 7 – Saltholme        Medium-High           Negligible     Negligible                Indirect, Permanent

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:43:               vicinity of the LCZ. The magnitude of change is therefore considered to be Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:43:L5.48          Combining all of these criteria, it is considered that there will be a Negligible level of effect,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:43:                LCZ 8 – Rural            Medium                Negligible     Negligible                Indirect, Permanent

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:47:L5.90          Combining all of these criteria, it is considered that there will be a Negligible level of effect,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:48:                  VP6                        Footpath Users        Negligible     Negligible            Direct,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:48:L5.94           The assessment of the magnitude of change is therefore considered to be Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:48:L5.95           Combining all of these criteria, it is considered that there will be a Negligible level of effect,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:48:                  VP8                        Low                   Negligible     Negligible             Direct,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:50:L5.115          The assessment of the magnitude of change is therefore considered to be Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:50:L5.116          Combining all of these criteria, it is considered that there will be a Negligible level of effect,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:50:                  VP16                          Footpath Users -        Negligible           Negligible – Not      Direct.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:51:                VP6                  Footpath Users          Negligible       Negligible             Direct, Permanent

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:51:                VP8                  Low                     Negligible       Negligible             Direct, Permanent

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:51:                Vp15                 Footpath Users -        Negligible       Negligible             Direct. Permanent

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:53:L7.2           Construction of the proposed development will result in effects ranging from Negligible (Not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:53:                 LCZ 3 –         Medium                        Negligible       Negligible - Not      Indirect, Permanent

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:53:                 LCZ 4 – Coast   Medium                        Negligible       Negligible –          Indirect, Permanent

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:53:                 LCZ 5 – Coatham Medium-High                   Negligible       Negligible -          Indirect, Permanent

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:53:                 LCZ 7 –         Medium-High                   Negligible       Negligible –          Indirect, Permanent

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:53:                 LCZ 8 – Rural   Medium                        Negligible       Negligible –       Indirect, Permanent

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:54:                  VP6             Footpath Users      Negligible          Negligible        Direct, Permanent

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:54:                  VP8                    Low                 Negligible   Negligible        Direct, Permanent

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:54:                  VP15                   Footpath Users -    Negligible   Negligible        Direct. Permanent

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:55:               Negligible and Not Significant. There are not expected to be any major effects on landscape

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:55:                 All LCZ      Impact of              Negligible – Not Significant   None                           Negligible -

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:55:                 VP 2, 3, 4, 5, Impact of            Negligible - Not Significant   Installation of site           Negligible -

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:56:                  LCZ 3 –         Impact of      Negligible - Not Significant    Buildings to be            Negligible -

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:56:                  LCZ 4 –         Impact of      Negligible –                    Buildings to be            Negligible –

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:56:                  LCZ 5 –         Impact of      Negligible -                    Buildings to be            Negligible -

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:57:                 LCZ 7 –        Impact of            Negligible –                Buildings to be               Negligible –

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:57:                 LCZ 8 –        Impact of      Negligible –                      Buildings to be               Negligible –

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:58:                  VP6             Impact of          Negligible                  Buildings to be            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:59:                 VP8            Impact of            Negligible                  Buildings to be               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:59:                 VP15           Impact of            Negligible                  Buildings to be               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20:                                       Negligible flood risk.                      Undeveloped or agricultural land from a

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF]]:22:                terms ‘Negligible’ in terms of the level of effect. The use of the category of ‘Negligible’ may for

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF]]:22:                assessment of significance. Where 'Substantial', 'Moderate', 'Minor' or ‘Negligible’ is referenced

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF]]:23:                                                                                                                  Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF]]:23:                                                                                                Negligible        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF]]:23:                    No/ Negligible         Neutral/            Neutral/        Neutral/         Neutral/          Neutral/

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF]]:23:                    Change                 Negligible          Negligible      Negligible       Negligible        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF]]:42:                and so the effect would be Negligible Adverse, and Not Significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF]]:42:                considered to be no / negligible change and thus there would be a Negligible Adverse and Not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF]]:43:                low and so the effect would be Negligible Adverse, and not significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF]]:43:                and thus significant impacts. The no/negligible magnitude of change means there will be a

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF]]:43:                Negligible Adverse and Not Significant effect. .

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF]]:43:                Negligible Adverse and Not Significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF]]:43:                Negligible Adverse, and Not Significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF]]:44:                Beck Culvert and Knitting Wife Culvert is very low and so the effect would be Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF]]:44:                / negligible change and thus there would be a Negligible Adverse and Not Significant effect.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF]]:44:                the effect would be Negligible Adverse, and Not Significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF]]:44:                / negligible change and thus there would be a Negligible Adverse and Not Significant effect.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF]]:44:                groundwater receptors the level of effect is Negligible Adverse and Not Significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF]]:44:                on the low sensitivity groundwater receptors is Negligible Beneficial and Not Significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF]]:50:                current conditions would be Negligible Beneficial and Not Significant.The Tees estuary has a

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF]]:50:                very high sensitivity, but the magnitude of change is considered to be no / negligible change and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF]]:50:                thus there would be a Negligible Beneficial and Not Significant effect.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF]]:50:                have a very low and so the effect would be Negligible Beneficial, which is Not Significant, as

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF]]:50:                / negligible change and thus there would be a Negligible Beneficial and Not Significant effect.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF]]:50:                of change will be minor, so the level of effect is therefore Negligible Adverse, and Not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF]]:51:                sensitivity aquifer receptors, this would result in a Negligible Adverse level of effect of pollution

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF]]:51:                low sensitivity receptor gives a Negligible Adverse effect, which is Not Significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF]]:51:                Knitting Wife Culvert is very low and so the effect would be Negligible Beneficial, and Not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF]]:51:                / negligible change and thus there would be a Negligible Beneficial and Not Significant effect.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF]]:51:                Wife Culvert which have very low sensitivity and so the effect would be Negligible Beneficial and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF]]:51:                / negligible change and thus there would be a Negligible Beneficial and Not Significant effect.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF]]:51:                Negligible Adverse, and Not Significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF]]:52:                 River Tees Flows - Increased Negligible Adverse and Not           Implementation of a        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF]]:53:                                 Water quality -       Negligible Adverse and Not The drainage strategy will Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF]]:53:                                                       Negligible Adverse and Not poor weather conditions.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF]]:53:                 Other        Flows - Increased Negligible Adverse – Not           The drainage strategy will Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF]]:54:                                 Water Quality -       Negligible Adverse and Not Implementation of         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF]]:54:                                 Water Quality - Negligible Adverse and Not and re-placement of

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF]]:54:                 Mercia      Reduced                   Negligible Adverse and Not No further mitigation is   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF]]:54:                             Pollution from            Negligible Adverse and Not Implementation of          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF]]:54:                                 pathways              Negligible Adverse and Not would be ongoing, to

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF]]:55:                 Superficial     Reduced               Negligible Adverse and Not No further mitigation          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF]]:55:                                 Pollution from        Negligible Adverse and Not Groundwater monitoring Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF]]:55:                                 pathways              Negligible Adverse and Not of contaminants is likely,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF]]:55:                 River Tees Flows - Increased Negligible Adverse and Not A FRA, DIA and Surface Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF]]:55:                                 Water Quality - Negligible Adverse and Not        The drainage strategy will Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF]]:56:                 Other        Flows - Increased Negligible Adverse and Not A FRA, DIA and Surface Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF]]:57:                                 Water Quality - Minor Adverse and Not             Any Surface water        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF]]:58:                 Mercia      Reduced                   Negligible Adverse and Not No further mitigation     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF]]:58:                                 Pollution from        Negligible Beneficial and   The SWMP will include    Minor

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF]]:58:                 Superficial     Reduced               Negligible Adverse and Not No further mitigation     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF]]:58:                                 Pollution from        Negligible Beneficial and   The SWMP will include    Minor

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF]]:58:                Negligible Beneficial effects for the River Tees Estuary during construction and operation. The

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF]]:15:The buildings on the site are of negligible risk for supporting roosting bats. There are some limited

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF]]:11:                 to a common list of criteria, including: Substantial, Moderate, Minor, Negligible or Neutral.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF]]:15:                     Negligible                                      Less than 1.0

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf]]:12:               perceptible increase in traffic on two routes is identified to result in Negligible to Minor Adverse

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf]]:15:               through the modelling process is predicted to be Negligible at all receptors. The overall effect of

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf]]:17:               surface water and groundwater receptors, are considered to be Negligible Adverse and,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf]]:17:               These impacts are considered to be Negligible Adverse and Not Significant. There is also the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf]]:17:               groundwater arising from existing Made Ground (Negligible Beneficial impacts) which are

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf]]:17:               considered to be Negligible Beneficial which would be Not Significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf]]:19:               workers and a Negligible effect on off site human health receptors. These are considered Not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf]]:19:9.12           A Negligible and Not Significant effect on surface water and groundwater is considered likely

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf]]:19:               and this is considered to have a Negligible (but Not Significant) effect on waste management

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf]]:19:H1.4           The implementation of these measures will result in Minor Adverse or Negligible (and Not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf]]:23:12.7           During construction there will be a Negligible and Not Significant impact upon all Landscape

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf]]:23:               (Eston Hills). All other Viewpoints will be subject to a Negligible and Not Significant impact

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf]]:23:               effects ranging from Negligible to Minor Adverse/Minor Beneficial. There will be a Moderate

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf]]:23:               considered to be Not Significant, with effects ranging from Negligible to Minor Adverse.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf]]:25:               Eston Iron Works remains and Cleveland Steel Works blast furnace bases and a Negligible effect

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf]]:25:13.10          The implementation of these measures will result in Minor Adverse or Negligible (and Not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf]]:26:               a result the impact is expected to be Negligible and Not Significant on remaining regional

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf]]:26:               hardstanding areas it is anticipated that this will also have a Negligible impact on the availability

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf]]:26:               anticipated that the impacts are expected to be Negligible and Not Significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf]]:28:               of the ES can be secured and that the effects are negligible or can be kept to an absolute

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:13:                Negligible                  Materials are forecast (through trend analysis and other information) to be free

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:14:                Negligible                             The consumption of no individual material type would be equal to or greater than 1%

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:14:                                                          No change      Negligible     Minor            Moderate         Major

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:14:                                           Medium         Neutral        Negligible     Minor            Moderate         Moderate

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:14:                                           Low            Neutral        Negligible     Negligible       Negligible       Moderate

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:15:                        Negligible       Neutral           Neutral   Negligible      Negligible         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:21:                Negligible (Not Significant).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:21:                effects are likely to be no worse than Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:22:                within the proposed development would have a magnitude of impact of negligible on the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:22:                availability as a receptor, the overall significance of the effect is considered to be Negligible (Not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:22:                proposed development are considered to be negligible. Given the low sensitivity of the regional

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:22:                landfill capacity as a receptor, the overall significance of the effect is considered to be Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:26:                be Negligible Adverse impact (Not Significant). Whilst mitigation will reduce any effects, the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:26:                remain as Negligible Adverse impact (Not Significant).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:27:                be Negligible Adverse (Not Significant).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:28:                arisings would account for 0.18% of the regional landfill capacity (Negligible adverse), and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:28:                Operational waste arisings would account for 0. 04% of the regional landfill capacity (Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:28:                regional landfill capacity. The impacts from this would be Negligible Adverse (construction and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:28:                tonnes, which equates to 0.59% (Negligible Adverse effect) of the regional material availability.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:28:                annual material availability and therefore, the residual effects remain Negligible Adverse.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:28:                 Regional landfill   Reduction in              Negligible          Preparation of  Negligible Adverse and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:29:                 Regional materials       Depleting            Hardstanding:       Secondary           Negligible Adverse and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:29:                 availability             regional             Negligible          aggregates/         Not Significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:29:                                          50,740 tonnes of worst Negligible        possible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:29:                                          known but         than Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:29:                 Regional landfill        Reduction in       Negligible            Operational         Negligible Adverse and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:6:                  Water Management and             Negligible Beneficial (Not Significant) effects on:

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:7:                                                  Negligible Adverse (Not Significant) effects on:

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:7:                                                  Negligible Adverse (Not Significant) effects on:

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:7:                                                  Negligible Adverse (Not Significant) effects on:

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:7:                 Impact                           Negligible (Not Significant) effects on:

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:7:                 Waste and Materials              Negligible Adverse (Not Significant) effects on:

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:7:                                                  Negligible (Not Significant) effect on:

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:7:                 Air Quality                      Negligible Adverse (Not Significant) effects on:

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:8:                                                  Negligible Beneficial (Not Significant) effects on:

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:8:                                                  Negligible Adverse (Not Significant) effects on:

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:8:                                                  Negligible (Not Significant) effects on:

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:8:                    Waste and Materials           Negligible Adverse (Not Significant) effect on:

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:10:                reference is made to Minor or Negligible ‘insignificant’ residual effects where relevant. The EIA

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:10:                Minor or Negligible Adverse and Not Significant or Substantial Beneficial (Significant) or

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:11:                RED - adverse effect; GREEN - beneficial effect; ( ) - Minor/Negligible non-significant effect; X no/neutral

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:24:                                                                                                                                                            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:29:                no or negligible cumulative effects, as a result of the Tier 1 schemes in Table N4.1 coming

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:29:                           are Negligible, there is anticipated to be no or at worst negligible cumulative effects on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:30:                     Watercourse               Negligible and Not Significant   No change

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:43:                measures at both sites, the cumulative effects will therefore be Negligible Adverse and Not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:43:N5.51           In terms of surface water, the mitigation measures are anticipated to have a Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:43:                Estuary (WFD transitional water body) are deemed to be Negligible Beneficial and Not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:48:                magnitude of change on a low sensitivity receptor, which is a Negligible effect (Not Significant).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:49:                considered to be minor. The overall significance is considered to be Negligible (Not Significant).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:49:                negligible magnitude of change on a low sensitivity receptor, which is a Negligible effect (Not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:49:                no or negligible cumulative effects, as a result of the Tier 1 and Tier 2 schemes in Table N4.1

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:50:                      the proposed development will be negligible and therefore should be scoped out of the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:66:                Negligible impact at most receptor locations and Slight (Minor) Adverse at five receptor

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:66:                R20), the A1085 and Kirkleatham Lane respectively). Negligible and Slight (Minor Adverse)

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:67:                Negligible impact at all existing receptor locations and is considered to be Not Significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:68:                Negligible impact at all existing receptor locations and is considered to be Not Significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:68:N5.168          The magnitude of change for NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations is Negligible at all receptors.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:68:                Where the impact is Negligible or Slight (Minor) Adverse then the overall effect of the proposed

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:68:                the cumulative magnitude of impact of the developments would be Negligible Beneficial and Not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:69:                watercourses draining to the Tees and the Tees itself would be Negligible Beneficial and Not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:71:                considered to be Minor. Consequently, the overall significance is considered to be Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:71:                Negligible (Not Significant).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:72:                Negligible (Not Significant).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:72:                management Infrastructure during operation are expected to be Negligible (Not Significant).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF]]:10:                          vii Negligible – Populations of species; assemblages of species or habitats, which

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF]]:11:                 4     Negligible – effects on VERs of Site or Negligible importance and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF]]:11:                 considered to be significant, whilst Minor, Negligible and Neutral effects are considered to be

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF]]:11:                 type is affected, hence are included in the assessment. Effects on VERs of Site or Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20:               non-breeding bird assemblage is considered to be of Negligible importance and is scoped out of

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF]]:24:               Negligible importance and are scoped out for further assessment.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF]]:24:D4.66          All areas of bare substrate on the site are assessed as being of Negligible importance and are

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF]]:25:                    Bare Substrates                                Negligible importance only

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF]]:29:                 therefore the impact would be negligible at a local level, and EIA terms would be Negligible and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF]]:29:                  Watercourse (Holme Beck)                                     Negligible and Not Significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economic - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economic - Dec 2020.PDF]]:12:               ‘Negligible’ or ‘Adverse’ (Table I3.2).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economic - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economic - Dec 2020.PDF]]:13:                 Negligible          No obvious significant effect to a receptor or environment.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economic - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economic - Dec 2020.PDF]]:13:                 Negligible          Where no discernible effect is expected as a result of the proposed development on the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economic - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economic - Dec 2020.PDF]]:13:                 change/effects High                Medium              Low                             Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economic - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economic - Dec 2020.PDF]]:13:                 High                   Substantial                    Moderate to   Minor to Moderate Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economic - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economic - Dec 2020.PDF]]:13:                 Medium                 Moderate to                    Moderate      Minor              Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economic - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economic - Dec 2020.PDF]]:14:                Low                   Minor to Moderate Minor               Negligible to Minor   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economic - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economic - Dec 2020.PDF]]:14:                Negligible            Negligible            Negligible      Negligible            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economic - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economic - Dec 2020.PDF]]:22:               storage and post. Similarly, the labour supply scenario forecasts only a negligible increase in

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economic - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economic - Dec 2020.PDF]]:29:                of the significance criteria matrix. The effects are assessed as being beneficial, negligible or

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economic - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economic - Dec 2020.PDF]]:29:                negligible. An assessment of the likely effects in relation to each receptor is presented in Table

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF]]:10:               •    Negligible – effects which are unlikely to be perceptible to drivers, bus passengers or those

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF]]:10:               •    Negligible – effects which are unlikely to be perceptible and within the normal variation of

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF]]:21:                considered to be a Negligible effect in severance and therefore Not Significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF]]:22:                 Proposed site           Medium                                                   Minor           Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF]]:23:                    Road south       Medium                                                           Negligible   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF]]:23:                    Dock Road           High                                                          Negligible   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF]]:23:                                        High        parallel to the northbound carriageway of         Negligible   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF]]:23:                                     Medium         uncontrolled crossings (Wilton access road,       Negligible   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF]]:23:                                        High        on the footway that travels underneath the        Negligible   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF]]:24:                    which is considered negligible. The effect on pedestrian and cyclist amenity at this location

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF]]:24:                    is therefore considered to be Negligible. This is Not Significant;

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF]]:24:                    amenity at this location is therefore considered to be Negligible. This is Not Significant;

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF]]:24:                    magnitude of change is considered to be negligible as the traffic flow change is less than

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF]]:24:                    of Negligible significance. This is Not Significant;

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF]]:24:                    magnitude of change is considered to be negligible as the arms predominantly affected

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF]]:24:                    Overall therefore, the effect is considered to be of Negligible significance. This is Not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF]]:24:                    Negligible. This is Not Significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF]]:25:                be Negligible. This is not Significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF]]:25:                safety is expected to be Negligible. This is Not Significant in EIA terms.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF]]:27:                effects will be Minor or Negligible and Not Significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF]]:28:                 A66/Church            Minor adverse        Travel Planning measures to be introduced to             Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF]]:28:                 A66/Normanby          Minor adverse        Review of traffic signals to see if junction operation   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF]]:31:                  A66/Church Minor,            Potential accidents            Wider travel planning      Negligible –the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF]]:31:                  A66/Norma Minor,             Previous accident trend        Travel Planning measures Negligible - the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF]]:10:                                 operation would be Negligible and Not Significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF]]:10:                                 new contamination with this tertiary mitigation in place, would be Negligible and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF]]:28:                4     Neutral/negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020.PDF]]:9:           •       Negligible – areas of extremely limited or no archaeological or historic interest. These

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020.PDF]]:60:  survival would be negligible. The other sites have greater potential as follows:

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF]]:13:                Negligible            Materials are forecast (through trend analysis and other information) to be free from

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF]]:14:                Negligible              The consumption of no individual material type would be equal to or greater than 1%

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF]]:14:                                             No change Negligible        Minor           Moderate      Major

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF]]:15:                            Medium         Neutral       Negligible      Minor        Moderate        Moderate

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF]]:15:                            Low            Neutral       Negligible      Negligible   Negligible      Moderate

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF]]:15:                            Negligible Neutral           Neutral         Negligible   Negligible      Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF]]:21:                Negligible (Not Significant).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF]]:21:                effects are likely to be no worse than Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF]]:22:                within the proposed development would have a magnitude of impact of negligible on the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF]]:22:                availability as a receptor, the overall significance of the effect is considered to be Negligible (Not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF]]:22:                proposed development are considered to be Negligible. Given the low sensitivity of the regional

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF]]:22:                landfill capacity as a receptor, the overall significance of the effect is considered to be Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF]]:26:                Negligible Adverse impact (Not Significant). Whilst mitigation will reduce any effects, the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF]]:26:                residual effects would remain as Negligible Adverse impact (Not Significant).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF]]:27:                be Negligible Adverse (Not Significant).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF]]:28:                arisings would account for 0.22% of the regional landfill capacity (Negligible Adverse), and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF]]:28:                Operational waste arisings would account for 0.055% of the regional landfill capacity (Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF]]:28:                regional landfill capacity. The impacts from this would be Negligible Adverse (construction and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF]]:28:                tonnes, which equates to 0.61% (Negligible Adverse impact) of the regional material availability.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF]]:28:                Negligible Adverse.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF]]:28:                 Regional landfill   Reduction in               Negligible          Preparation of  Negligible Adverse and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF]]:29:                 Regional materials       Depleting             Hardstanding:       Secondary           Negligible Adverse and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF]]:29:                 availability             regional              Negligible          aggregates/         Not Significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF]]:29:                                          52,943 tonnes of worst Negligible         possible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF]]:29:                                          known but         than Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF]]:29:                 Regional landfill        Reduction in       Negligible             Operational         Negligible Adverse and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:6:                                                                             Negligible (Not Significant) effects on:

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:7:                 Water Management and Flooding                               Negligible Beneficial (Not Significant) effects on:

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:7:                                                                             Negligible Adverse (Not Significant) effects on:

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:7:                                                                             Negligible Adverse (Not Significant) effects on:

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:7:                                                                             Negligible Adverse (Not Significant) effects on:

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:8:                                                                             Negligible (Not Significant) effects on:

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:8:                  Waste and Materials Management                             Negligible Adverse (Not Significant) effects on:

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:8:                  Transport                                                  Negligible (Not Significant) effect on:

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:8:                  Air Quality                                                Negligible (Not Significant) effects on all receptors,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:8:                                                                             Negligible Beneficial (Not Significant) effects on:

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:9:                                                                             Negligible Adverse (Not Significant) effects on:

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:9:                                                                             Negligible (Not Significant) effects on:

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:9:                    Waste and Materials Management                           Negligible Adverse (Not Significant) effects on:

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:11:                reference is made to Minor or Negligible ‘insignificant’ residual effects where relevant. The EIA

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:11:                predicted, the residual effects of the development are either Minor or Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:12:                RED - adverse effect; GREEN - beneficial effect; ( ) - Minor/Negligible non-significant effect; X no/neutral

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:26:                                                                                                                                                          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:31:                no or negligible cumulative effects, as a result of the Tier 1 schemes in Table N4.1 coming

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:31:                           are Negligible, there is anticipated to be no or at worst negligible cumulative effects on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:32:                     Reptiles                  Negligible Adverse and Not            No change

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:32:                     Watercourses              Negligible Adverse and Not            No change

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:44:                mitigation measures at both sites, the cumulative effects will therefore be Negligible Adverse

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:44:N5.49           In terms of surface water, the mitigation measures are anticipated to have a Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:45:                Significant for groundwater pollution / contamination, and Negligible Adverse and Not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:45:                Tees and the River Tees Estuary (WFD transitional water body) are deemed to be Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:50:                magnitude of change on a low sensitivity receptor, which is a Negligible effect (Not Significant).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:50:                considered to be minor. The overall significance is considered to be Negligible (Not Significant).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:50:                negligible magnitude of change on a low sensitivity receptor, which is a Negligible effect (Not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:51:                no or negligible cumulative effects, as a result of the Tier 1 and Tier 2 schemes in Table N4.1

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:51:                     the proposed development will be negligible and therefore should be scoped out of the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:68:                Negligible impact at most receptor locations and Slight (Minor) Adverse at five receptor

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:68:                R20), the A1085 and Kirkleatham Lane respectively). Negligible and Slight (Minor Adverse)

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:69:                Negligible impact at all existing receptor locations and is considered to be Not Significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:70:                Negligible impact at all existing receptor locations and is considered to be Not Significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:70:N5.167          The magnitude of change for NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations is Negligible at all receptors.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:70:                Where the impact is Negligible or Slight (Minor Adverse) then the overall effect of the proposed

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:71:                the cumulative magnitude of impact of the developments would be Negligible Adverse and Not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:71:                surface water, the mitigation measures are anticipated to have a Negligible Beneficial and Not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:71:                be Negligible Adverse and Not Significant with the exception of Coatham Marsh where the effect

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:71:                Tees and the Tees itself would be Negligible Beneficial and Not Significant, with the exception of

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:74:                considered to be Minor. Consequently, the overall significance is considered to be Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:74:                Negligible (Not Significant).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:74:                Negligible (Not Significant).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF]]:74:                management Infrastructure during operation are expected to be Negligible (Not Significant).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:21:                                       Negligible flood risk.                      Undeveloped or agricultural land from a

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:23:                 No/ Negligible        No perceptible change in the baseline        N/A

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:23:                terms ‘Negligible’ in terms of the level of effect. The use of the category of ‘Negligible’ may for

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:24:                                                                                                                   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:24:                                                                                                Negligible         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:24:                    No/ Negligible         Neutral/              Neutral/      Neutral/         Neutral/           Neutral/

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:24:                    Change                 Negligible            Negligible    Negligible       Negligible         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:46:                Negligible Adverse and Not Significant. The receptor sensitivity for Dabholm Beck, Dabholm

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:46:                effect would be Negligible Adverse and Not Significant. The receptor sensitivity for Coatham

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:46:                considered to be no/negligible change and thus there would be a Negligible Adverse and Not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:47:                be Negligible Adverse and Not Significant. The receptor sensitivity of Dabholm Beck, Dabholm

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:47:G5.17           The receptor sensitivity of The Fleet is low and so the effect would be Negligible Adverse and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:47:                and thus significant impacts. The no/negligible magnitude of change means there will be a

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:47:                Negligible Adverse and Not Significant effect.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:47:                aquifers of low, the level of effect is therefore Negligible Adverse and Not Significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:47:                effect is therefore Negligible Adverse, and Not Significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:48:                of Ash Gill Beck, is very low and so the effect would be Negligible Adverse and Not Significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:48:                and so the effect would be Negligible Adverse and Not Significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:48:                no/negligible change and thus there would be a Negligible Adverse and Not Significant effect.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:48:                The receptor sensitivity of Ash Gill Beck, is very low and so the effect would be Negligible, and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:48:                Fleet is low and so the effect would be Negligible Adverse and Not Significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:48:                no/negligible change, given the distance between the receptor and the site and thus there would

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:48:                be a Negligible Adverse and Not Significant effect.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:48:                / Glacial Till), the level of effect is Negligible Adverse, and Not Significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:49:                on the low sensitivity groundwater receptors is Negligible Beneficial and Not Significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:57:                be beneficial; albeit negligible after additional mitigation. The receptor sensitivity of Ash Gill

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:57:                Negligible Beneficial and Not Significant. The receptor sensitivity of Dabholm Beck, Dabholm

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:57:                conditions would be Negligible Beneficial and Not Significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:57:G7.4            The receptor sensitivity of The Fleet is low and so the effect would be Negligible Beneficial and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:57:                no/negligible change and thus there would be a Negligible Beneficial and Not Significant effect.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:57:                residual effects is considered to be Negligible but beneficial, so for the receptors of Ash Gill Beck

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:57:                and Dabholm Beck, Dabholm Cut & Dabholm Gut the effect would be Negligible Beneficial, that

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:57:G7.9            The Fleet has a sensitivity rated low and so the effect would also be Negligible Beneficial and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:57:                no/negligible change and thus there would be a Negligible Beneficial and Not Significant effect.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:57:                Negligible Adverse, and Not Significant. As no additional mitigation is proposed, the residual

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:58:                residual effects is considered to be negligible but would have a beneficial impact to the current

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:58:                baseline conditions. The effect would be Negligible Beneficial and Not Significant for the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:58:G7.20           The Fleet has a low rated sensitivity receptor and so the effect would also be Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:58:                no/negligible change and thus the residual effect will be Negligible Beneficial and Not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:59:                residual effects is considered to be negligible for the receptors of Ash Gill Beck, Dabholm Beck,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:59:                Dabholm Cut & Dabholm Gut and so the effect would be Negligible Beneficial and Not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:59:G7.24           The receptor sensitivity of The Fleet is rated low and so the effect would be Negligible Beneficial

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:59:                no/negligible change and thus there would be a Negligible Beneficial and Not Significant effect.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:59:                the magnitude of the change will be minor, so the level of effect is therefore Negligible Adverse,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:60:                 River Tees Flows -                  Negligible Adverse and      Implementation of the       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:61:                                Water quality - Negligible Adverse and          The drainage strategy will     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:61:                                Water Quality - Negligible Adverse and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:61:                 Other          Flows -              -Fleet and Ash Gill Beck: The drainage strategy will      Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:61:                 surface        Increased            Negligible Adverse and    reduce runoff rates whilst      Beneficial and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:62:                                Water Quality - -Fleet and Ash Gill Beck: Implementation of Drainage Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:62:                                Mobilisation of Negligible Adverse and    Strategy to remove silt and Beneficial and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:62:                                leakages        Negligible Adverse and    conditions.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:62:                 Mudstone Reduced           Negligible Adverse and               No further mitigation is       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:63:                                Pollution from       Negligible Adverse and      Remediation Strategy             Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:63:                                Contaminant          Negligible Adverse and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:63:                 Superficial    Reduced              Negligible Adverse and      No further mitigation            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:63:                 / Glacial      Pollution from       Negligible Adverse and      Remediation Strategy             Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:63:                                Contaminant          Negligible Adverse and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:63:                 River Tees Flows -                  Negligible Adverse and      An FRA, DIA and Surface          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:64:                                Water Quality - Negligible Adverse and           The drainage strategy will    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:65:                 Other          Flows -              -The Fleet and Ash Gill     An FRA, DIA and Surface           Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:65:                 surface        Increased            Beck: Negligible Adverse    Water Management Plan,            Beneficial and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:65:                                Spillages and        Beck: Negligible Adverse    would be lined with a             Dabholm Beck,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:65:                                pollution            -Dabholm Beck, Dabholm      pollution pathway to the          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:65:                                                                                 protected.                        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:67:                 Mudstone Reduced                    Negligible Adverse and      No further mitigation          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:67:                            Pollution from           Negligible Beneficial and   Remediation strategy and     Minor

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:67:                 Superficial    Reduced              Negligible Adverse and      No further mitigation        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:67:                 / Glacial      Pollution from       Negligible Beneficial and   Remediation strategy and     Minor

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF]]:68:                Negligible Beneficial effects for the River Tees Estuary during construction and operation. The

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF]]:10:               •     Negligible – effects which are unlikely to be perceptible to drivers, bus passengers or those

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF]]:10:               •     Negligible – effects which are unlikely to be perceptible and within the normal variation of

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF]]:22:                                          Medium                                                 Minor       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF]]:22:                                          High                                                   Minor       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF]]:23:                    Corporation     Medium          Road is 24% increase in the AM peak and a        Negligible   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF]]:23:                    Greystone       High            low (less than 18 trips in the AM peak hour)     Negligible   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF]]:23:                    A174            High            AM peak hour on the A174 east of                 Negligible   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF]]:23:                    Coatham         Medium                                                           Negligible   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF]]:23:                    Kirkleatham     Medium                                                           Negligible   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF]]:23:C5.30           All other receptors are expected to have a Negligible and Not Significant impact.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF]]:24:               generated by the development in this location is expected to be Negligible. This is Not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF]]:24:               Negligible. This is Not Significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF]]:24:               effect of the increased traffic flow on accidents and safety is expected to be Negligible. This is

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF]]:26:                 A1085 Trunk              Negligible            N/A                                                 Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF]]:26:                 A1085 Steel              Negligible            N/A                                                 Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF]]:26:                 A1085 Trunk              Negligible            N/A                                                 Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF]]:27:                                         Negligible             N/A          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF]]:27:                                         Negligible             N/A          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF]]:27:                                         Negligible             N/A          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF]]:27:                                         Negligible             N/A          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF]]:27:                                         Negligible             N/A          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF]]:28:                 A1053           Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF]]:28:                 The A174        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF]]:28:                 West            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF]]:29:                  A1042       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF]]:29:                  A66         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF]]:29:                              Negligible on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF]]:29:                              Negligible on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF]]:29:                                                Potential accidents        Wider travel planning      Negligible –the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF]]:30:                 A1085       Negligible on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF]]:30:                 A1053       Negligible on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF]]:30:                             Negligible on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF]]:30:                 West        Negligible on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF]]:30:                 A1042       Negligible on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF]]:30:                             Negligible on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF]]:30:                             Negligible on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF]]:30:                             Negligible on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF]]:10:                     be Negligible and Not Significant;

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF]]:10:                     construction and therefore the risk to the occupiers would be Negligible and Not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF]]:11:                      Negligible and Not Significant. Where required, storage tanks will be located within

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF]]:12:                              construction works                           5) or soils of negligible nature conservation

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF]]:12:                              negligible value                             Negligible potential for mineral reserves to

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF]]:14:              Negligible         Human Health: No measurable effects on         Impact of insufficient magnitude to

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF]]:14:                Sensitivity/value of High                                   Medium        Low            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF]]:14:                High                        Substantial                     Moderate      Minor          Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF]]:14:                Medium                      Moderate                        Minor         Negligible     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF]]:14:                Low                         Minor                           Negligible    Negligible     Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF]]:24:H4.33           The Groundsure Insight Report for the site indicates the risk of shrink swell clays is negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF]]:24:                negligible and very low along the western boundary, and moderate across the rest of the site.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF]]:24:                The risk of collapsible deposits on the site is negligible. The landslide risk is classed as very low,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF]]:24:                and the risk of ground dissolution of soluble rocks is negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF]]:32:                significance is considered Negligible and therefore Not Significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF]]:37:                outlined in Section H6.0 above, is negligible. Following the implementation of the additional

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF]]:37:                workers of Minor Adverse significance and impacts on nearby residents of Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF]]:37:                impact following additional mitigation e.g. soil remediation is negligible. Therefore, the impacts

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF]]:37:                after the implementation of mitigation measures are considered to be of Negligible significance.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF]]:37:                management facilities during the construction phase is considered to be of Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF]]:38:                significance of the impacts identified is considered to be Minor Adverse / Negligible and Not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF]]:38:                 Offsite Human soils, asbestos    and at worst Moderate Contamination         and Negligible: off-site

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF]]:38:                 Surface Water Potential          Negligible and Not        Remediation /     Negligible and Not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF]]:39:                 Built            Soil/materials   Minor Adverse and Not       Minimisation of Negligible and Not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF]]:11:                 to a common list of criteria, including: Substantial, Moderate, Minor, Negligible or Neutral.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF]]:15:                     Negligible                                      Less than 1.0

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf]]:11:                roundabout). All other effects are expected to be Negligible and Not Significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf]]:16:                through the modelling process is predicted to be Negligible at all receptors. The overall effect of

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf]]:17:                to be Negligible Adverse and therefore Not Significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf]]:17:                These impacts are considered to be Negligible to Minor Adverse and Not Significant for surface

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf]]:18:                through reduced infiltration (Negligible Adverse impacts) and pollution from spillages and a

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf]]:18:                reduction in contamination of groundwater arising from existing Made Ground (Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf]]:18:                be Negligible Adverse to Neutral and Not Significant. For other groundwater receptors, the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf]]:18:                impacts on flows would remain Negligible Adverse and the impacts on groundwater quality are

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf]]:18:7.24            For surface water, the impacts on flows and quality are considered to be Negligible Beneficial

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf]]:20:                construction workers and a Negligible effect on off site human health receptors. These are

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf]]:20:8.13            A Negligible and Not Significant effect on surface water and groundwater is considered likely

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf]]:20:                Highfield Landfill site and this is considered to have a Negligible and Not Significant effect on

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf]]:20:8.19            As noted above, the implementation of these measures will result in Minor Adverse or Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf]]:24:11.6            During construction there will be a Negligible and Not Significant impact upon all Landscape

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf]]:24:                4, 10 and 11 during construction. All other Viewpoints will be subject to a Negligible impact

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf]]:24:                effects ranging from Negligible to Minor Adverse/Minor Beneficial. There will be a Moderate

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf]]:24:                Significant, with effects ranging from Negligible to Minor Adverse.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf]]:26:                Medieval salterns. It is expected that there will be a Negligible effect on the Duck Decoy, World

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf]]:27:                a result the impact is expected to be Negligible and Not Significant on remaining regional

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf]]:27:                hardstanding areas it is anticipated that this will also have a Negligible impact on the availability

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf]]:27:                anticipated that the impacts are expected to be Negligible and Not Significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf]]:29:                of the ES can be secured and that the effects are negligible or can be kept to an absolute

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:12:                Negligible                                            Assets with very little or no surviving archaeological

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:12:                Negligible                           Very minor changes to archaeological materials or setting.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:13:                Magnitude of Change                  No     Negligible Minor          Moderate       Substantial   No

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:13:                                      Medium         Neutral Negligible Minor         Moderate       Substantial   Medium

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:13:                                      Low            Neutral Negligible Negligible    Minor          Moderate      Low

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:13:                                      Negligible Neutral Negligible Negligible        Negligible     Minor         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:13:                the effect on the receptor will be Neutral, Negligible, Minor, Moderate or Substantial. Moderate

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:13:                Negligible/neutral         The development satisfies the subject environmental objective but neither

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:24:               offsets the negative effect, to have a residual effect that is between Negligible and Minor

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:24:                                                                          Minor                 Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:24:                Duck Decoy                                Low             Minor                 Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:24:                World War II defensive structures         Low             Minor                 Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:25:                 Other        Remediation and Moderate Adverse                    Monitoring during        Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:25:                 Duck Decoy Remediation and Minor Adverse                         Archaeological            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:25:                 World War Remediation and Minor Adverse                          Archaeological evaluation Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R1                             19.2                     19.4                 19.6                0.2         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R2                             18.0                     18.2                 18.4                0.2         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R3                             17.9                     18.2                 18.7                0.5         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R4                             18.1                     18.4                 18.9                0.5         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R5                             18.0                     18.3                 18.7                0.4         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R6                             15.7                     16.0                 16.1                0.1         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R7                             15.3                     15.5                 15.6                0.1         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R8                             14.6                     14.9                 14.9                < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R9                             15.6                     16.1                 16.1                < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R10                            16.2                     16.8                 17.0                0.2         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R11                            14.4                     14.7                 14.8                0.1         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R12                            14.4                     14.8                 14.9                0.1         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R13                            15.8                     16.4                 16.5                0.1         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R14                            15.4                     16.0                 16.1                0.1         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R15                            31.4                     31.7                 31.7                < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R16                            35.1                     35.5                 35.6                0.1         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R17                            31.1                     31.4                 31.5                0.1         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R18                            36.1                     36.5                 36.6                0.1         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R19                            27.8                     28.1                 28.2                0.1         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R20                            27.8                     28.1                 28.2                0.1         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R21                            25.8                     26.1                 26.1                < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R22                            23.7                     23.8                 23.9                0.1         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R23                            22.7                     22.8                 22.9                0.1         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R24                            15.5                     15.6                 15.8                0.2         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R25                            15.4                     15.6                 15.7                0.1         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R26                            15.2                     15.4                 15.5                0.1         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R27                            16.1                     16.2                 16.5                0.3         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: R28                            15.4                     15.5                 15.5                < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: E1                             18.7                     18.7                 18.7                < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:18: E2                             18.6                     18.6                 18.6                < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19: R1                             12.1                     12.1                 12.1                 < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19: R2                             12.4                     12.5                 12.5                 < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19: R3                             12.1                     12.2                 12.2                 < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19: R4                             12.1                     12.2                 12.3                 0.1                 Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19: R5                             12.1                     12.2                 12.3                 0.1                 Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19: R6                             11.9                     12.0                 12.0                 < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19: R7                             11.8                     11.9                 11.9                 < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19: R8                             13.5                     13.5                 13.5                 < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19: R9                             13.7                     13.8                 13.8                 < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19: R10                            12.2                     12.3                 12.4                 0.1                 Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19: R11                            12.1                     12.1                 12.2                 0.1                 Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19: R12                            12.1                     12.2                 12.2                 < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19: R13                            12.3                     12.4                 12.4                 < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19: R14                            12.3                     12.3                 12.4                 0.1                 Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19: R15                            16.4                     16.5                 16.5                 < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19: R16                            17.5                     17.6                 17.6                 < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19: R17                            16.5                     16.6                 16.6                 < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19: R18                            17.7                     17.9                 17.9                 < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19: R19                            13.9                     13.9                 14.0                 0.1                 Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19: R20                            13.9                     13.9                 14.0                 0.1                 Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19: R21                            13.4                     13.5                 13.5                 < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19: R22                            13.1                     13.2                 13.2                 < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19: R23                            12.7                     12.8                 12.8                 < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19: R24                            11.5                     11.5                 11.5                 < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19: R25                            11.4                     11.5                 11.5                 < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19: R26                            11.4                     11.4                 11.4                 < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19: R27                            11.6                     11.6                 11.6                 < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19: R28                            11.9                     11.9                 11.9                 < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19: E1                             10.6                     10.6                 10.6                 < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19: E2                             10.6                     10.6                 10.6                 < 0.1               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R1                              7.9                    7.9                   7.9                   < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R2                              8.1                    8.1                   8.1                   < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R3                              7.8                    7.8                   7.9                   0.1         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R4                              7.8                    7.9                   7.9                   < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R5                              7.9                    7.9                   7.9                   < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R6                              7.7                    7.7                   7.8                   0.1         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R7                              7.7                    7.7                   7.7                   < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R8                              8.0                    8.1                   8.1                   < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R9                              8.1                    8.2                   8.2                   < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R10                             7.7                    7.7                   7.8                   0.1         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R11                             7.6                    7.6                   7.7                   0.1         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R12                             7.6                    7.7                   7.7                   < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R13                             7.7                    7.8                   7.8                   < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R14                             7.7                    7.8                   7.8                   < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R15                             10.1                   10.2                  10.2                  < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R16                             11.1                   11.2                  11.2                  < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R17                             10.2                   10.3                  10.3                  < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R18                             11.2                   11.3                  11.3                  < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R19                             8.9                    9.0                   9.0                   < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R20                             8.9                    9.0                   9.0                   < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R21                             8.6                    8.7                   8.7                   < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R22                             8.4                    8.4                   8.4                   < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R23                             8.2                    8.2                   8.3                   0.1         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R24                             7.5                    7.6                   7.6                   < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R25                             7.5                    7.5                   7.6                   0.1         Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R26                             7.5                    7.5                   7.5                   < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R27                             7.6                    7.6                   7.6                   < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: R28                             7.5                    7.5                   7.5                   < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: E1                              7.1                    7.1                   7.1                   < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20: E2                              7.1                    7.1                   7.1                   < 0.1       Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF]]:22:                                   operation would be Negligible and Not Significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF]]:22:                                   contamination with this tertiary mitigation in place, would be Negligible and Not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF]]:22:                             Local significance; and nesting birds, which are of negligible significance even at a

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF]]:30:             10 Neutral/negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:15:                 Negligible              The size and scale of change are considered very small due to the extent and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19:                   Negligible                                      The proposed development is barely discernible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:21:                 Neutral / Negligible                    Maintain the character of the receiving landscape.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:21:                 Neutral / Negligible                    The proposed development would cause no discernible deterioration or

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:21:                                                         improvement in a view. In most instances, a negligible effect will arise

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:22:                                                    experience a negligible magnitude of change.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:22:                EIA terms. Those classified as Minor or Negligible are likely to be Not Significant in EIA terms

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:23:                   Change                  Negligible           Negligible                 Negligible            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:37:               and Significant, whereas effects on all other Viewpoints are considered to be Negligible (Not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:37:L5.10          The above aspects of the construction phase will have a Negligible effect on all LCZs due to the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:37:               Negligible (Not Significant) to a temporary, Moderate Adverse (Significant) effect upon

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:37:                 All LCZs                Negligible                                         Direct and short-     None

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:38:                  VP 6,7,9,12 and 13 Negligible                                   Direct and short-   Installation of

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:39:               character of the LCZ. The magnitude of change is therefore considered to be Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:39:L5.26          Combining all of these criteria, it is considered that there will be a Negligible level of effect,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:39:                 LCZ 3 – Intertidal Medium              Negligible     Negligible        Indirect,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:40:                The magnitude of change is therefore considered to be Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:40:L5.31           Combining all of these criteria, it is considered that there will be a Negligible level of effect,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:40:                  LCZ 4 – Coast          Medium           Negligible     Negligible        Indirect,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:41:               vicinity of the LCZ. The magnitude of change is therefore considered to be Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:41:L5.46          Combining all of these criteria, it is considered that there will be a Negligible level of effect,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:42:                  LCZ 7 –                Medium-High Negligible          Negligible        Indirect,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:42:                vicinity of the LCZ. The magnitude of change is therefore considered to be Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:42:L5.50           Combining all of these criteria, it is considered that there will be a Negligible level of effect,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:42:                  LCZ 8 – Rural          Medium           Negligible     Negligible        Indirect,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:44:                  VP6                     Footpath Users Negligible         Negligble         Direct,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:45:L5.81          The assessment of the magnitude of change is therefore considered to be Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:45:L5.82          Combining all of these criteria, it is considered that there will be a Negligible level of effect,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:46:                  VP9                     Footpath and           Negligible   Negligible      Direct,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:47:L5.96          The assessment of the magnitude of change is therefore considered to be Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:47:L5.97          Combining all of these criteria, it is considered that there will be a Negligible level of effect,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:47:                 VP13                     Footpath Users Negligible         Negligible          Direct,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:48:                  VP6                     Footpath Users       Negligible                Negligible            Direct, Permanent

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:48:                  VP9                     Footpath and Road Negligible                   Negligible            Direct, Permanent

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:48:                  Vp12                    Footpath Users       Negligible                Negligible            Direct, Permanent

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:50:L7.2            Construction of the proposed development will result in effects ranging from Negligible to a

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:50:                  LCZ 3 – Intertidal      Medium                     Negligible     Negligible - Not      Indirect, Permanent

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:50:                  LCZ 4 – Coast and       Medium                     Negligible     Negligible –          Indirect, Permanent

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:50:                  LCZ 5 – Coatham         Medium-High                Negligible     Negligible -          Indirect, Permanent

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:50:                  LCZ 7 – Saltholme       Medium-High                Negligible     Negligible –          Indirect, Permanent

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:50:                  LCZ 8 – Rural           Medium                     Negligible     Negligible –          Indirect, Permanent

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:50:                  VP6                     Footpath Users       Negligible           Negligible            Direct, Permanent

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:50:                  VP9                     Footpath and Road Negligible              Negligible            Direct, Permanent

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:51:                 VP12               Footpath Users               Negligible     Negligible              Direct, Permanent

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:52:                operation. All other effects are anticipated to be Minor or Negligible (and Not Significant). There

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:52:                  All LCZ      Impact of              Negligible – Not Significant   None                       Negligible -

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:52:                  VP 6,7,9,11 Impact of               Negligible - Not Significant   Installation of site       Negligible -

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:53:                 LCZ 3 –         Impact of      Negligible - Not Significant      Buildings to be               Negligible -

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:53:                 LCZ 4 –         Impact of      Negligible –                      Buildings to be               Negligible –

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:53:                 LCZ 5 –         Impact of      Negligible -                      Buildings to be               Negligible -

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:54:                  LCZ 7 –         Impact of           Negligible –                Buildings to be            Negligible –

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:54:                  LCZ 8 –         Impact of      Negligible –                     Buildings to be            Negligible –

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:55:                 VP7             Impact of            Negligible                  Buildings to be               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:55:                 VP9             Impact of            Negligible                  Buildings to be               Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF]]:56:                  VP12            Impact of           Negligible                  Buildings to be            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economics - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economics - Dec 2020.PDF]]:12:                ‘Negligible’ or ‘Adverse’ (Table I3.2).

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economics - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economics - Dec 2020.PDF]]:13:                 Negligible          No obvious significant effect to a receptor or environment.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economics - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economics - Dec 2020.PDF]]:13:                 Negligible          Where no discernible effect is expected as a result of the proposed development on the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economics - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economics - Dec 2020.PDF]]:13:                 change/effects High                Medium              Low                             Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economics - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economics - Dec 2020.PDF]]:13:                 High                   Substantial                    Moderate to   Minor to Moderate Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economics - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economics - Dec 2020.PDF]]:13:                 Medium                 Moderate to                    Moderate      Minor              Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economics - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economics - Dec 2020.PDF]]:14:                Low                    Minor to Moderate Minor               Negligible to Minor   Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economics - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economics - Dec 2020.PDF]]:14:                Negligible             Negligible               Negligible   Negligible            Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economics - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economics - Dec 2020.PDF]]:22:                storage and post. Similarly, the labour supply scenario forecasts only a negligible increase in

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economics - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economics - Dec 2020.PDF]]:30:                of the significance criteria matrix. The effects are assessed as being Beneficial, Negligible or

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economics - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economics - Dec 2020.PDF]]:30:                Negligible. An assessment of the likely effects in relation to each receptor is presented in Table

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF]]:39:                                                   development scenario (albeit negligible). Best practice measures would be

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF]]:40:                                                   The proposed development is anticipated to only have negligible impacts

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF]]:10:                                 operation would be Negligible and Not Significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF]]:10:                                 new contamination with this tertiary mitigation in place, would be Negligible and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF]]:28:                4     Neutral/negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:10:                           vii Negligible – Populations of species; assemblages of species or habitats, which

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:10:               4     Negligible – effects on VERs of Site or Negligible importance; and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:11:                 considered to be Significant, whilst Minor, Negligible and Neutral effects are considered to be

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:11:                 type is affected, hence are included in the assessment. Effects on VERs of Site or Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:20:               is therefore assessed as being of Negligible importance for Harvest Mouse and it is scoped out of

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:24:D4.76          All areas of bare substrate on the site are assessed as being of Negligible importance and are

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:25:                    Harvest Mouse                               Negligible importance only

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:25:                    Bare Substrates                             Negligible importance only

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:30:               prevent this. As a result, there will be a temporary Negligible Adverse effect on watercourses.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:30:                 Watercourses                                                Negligible Adverse and Not Significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:32:               will be Negligible and Not Significant. This will be achieved by the provision of a reptile

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:39:                  Reptiles            Harm due to       Not applicable   Moderate         A reptile        Negligible and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:39:                  Reptiles            Loss of habitat   Not applicable   Moderate         A reptile        Negligible and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF]]:39:                  Watercourses Realignment      Measures to     Negligible                                 Negligible and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:9:                 reduced to negligible and therefore non-significant levels.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19:F3.41            If the impact descriptor is Negligible or Slight (Minor), this is considered to not have a

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19:                 Moderate, Minor and Negligible/Neutral and reference to these terms are included in brackets

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19:                     75% or less of objective               Negligible         Negligible     Slight (Minor)  Moderate

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19:                     76-94% of objective                    Negligible       Slight (Minor)     Moderate      Moderate

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19:                     Note: Changes in pollutant concentrations of 0% i.e. <0.5% would be described as Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:19:                     <10% of hourly mean NO2 threshold                                Imperceptible    Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20:               significant effect and a ‘Negligible’ or ‘Slight’ (Minor) impact will not result in a significant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20:               such as those above. In this Chapter, where Negligible impacts are identified, a type of effect will

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:20:               or Negligible effect is likely to be felt.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:33:                 Negligible impact at all existing receptor locations and is considered to be Not Significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:33:                 Cleveland Coast SPA) included in this assessment were also found to experience a Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:33:                 Negligible impact at all existing receptor locations and is considered to be Not Significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:33:                 Cleveland Coast SPA) included in this assessment were also found to experience a Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:34:               Negligible impact at all existing receptor locations and is considered to be Not Significant.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:34:               Cleveland Coast SPA) included in this assessment were also found to experience a Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:34:F5.26          The magnitude of change for NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations is negligible at all receptors.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:34:               As stated in paragraph F3.3, where the impact is Negligible or Slight (Minor) then the overall

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:36:F7.2           The assessment has demonstrated that the effects will be Negligible and therefore Not

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:36:               effects will be Negligible and Not Significant) for all receptors.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:37:                 practice mitigation measures suitable for high risk sites in place, there is likely to be a Negligible

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:37:F8.6             The magnitude of change for NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations at all receptors is Negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF]]:37:                   All sensitive Operational traffic impact Negligible and Not             None.            Negligible and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF]]:12:                                  will be negligible when compared to other sources

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF|R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF]]:13:J3.20          Professional judgement has then been employed to establish whether the effects are negligible,

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0465-FFM/R-2020-0465-FFM-Officer report _R20200465FFM.pdf|R-2020-0465-FFM-Officer report _R20200465FFM.pdf]]:7:designated or undesignated heritage assets. There is negligible potential for

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0465-FFM/R-2020-0465-FFM-60722_01 - Cover Letter - 24.08.20.PDF|R-2020-0465-FFM-60722_01 - Cover Letter - 24.08.20.PDF]]:6:potential for any archaeological remains to survive or be affected development is negligible given the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0465-FFM/R-2020-0465-FFM-60722_01 - Cover Letter - 24.08.20.PDF|R-2020-0465-FFM-60722_01 - Cover Letter - 24.08.20.PDF]]:6:direct or indirect effects on any designated or undesignated heritage assets, that there is negligible potential

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0465-FFM/R-2020-0465-FFM-Archaeological Advice - R-2020- 0465-FFM, Land at metals recovery area .pdf|R-2020-0465-FFM-Archaeological Advice - R-2020- 0465-FFM, Land at metals recovery area .pdf]]:1:heritage assets. There is negligible potential for as yet unidentified archaeology to be present. No further

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0465-FFM/R-2020-0465-FFM-Metals Recovery Site, South Bank, Redcar DBA.PDF|R-2020-0465-FFM-Metals Recovery Site, South Bank, Redcar DBA.PDF]]:6:            •        Negligible – areas of extremely limited or no archaeological or historic interest. These

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0465-FFM/R-2020-0465-FFM-Metals Recovery Site, South Bank, Redcar DBA.PDF|R-2020-0465-FFM-Metals Recovery Site, South Bank, Redcar DBA.PDF]]:10:            negligible given the historical development of the Site and the depth of the modern dump deposits.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0465-FFM/R-2020-0465-FFM-Metals Recovery Site, South Bank, Redcar DBA.PDF|R-2020-0465-FFM-Metals Recovery Site, South Bank, Redcar DBA.PDF]]:10:            undesignated heritage assets. There is negligible potential for as yet unidentified archaeology to

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0465-FFM/R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF|R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF]]:15:•     Negligible – No effect on species or habitats present are anticipated.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0465-FFM/R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF|R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF]]:24:Due to this habitat generally being of negligible value for ecological features and

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0465-FFM/R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF|R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF]]:24:sealed and open-sided metal structures of negligible value for ecological features.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2020-0465-FFM/R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF|R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF]]:27:sealed and open sided metal structures of negligible value for roosting bats.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0227-CD/R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:5:                 results of the modelling and indicates where impacts can be screened out as ‘negligible’ or

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0227-CD/R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:11:                 this AQMA will be negligible. As the impact has been screened out, the AQMA has been excluded

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0227-CD/R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:27:                     75% or less of AQAL         Negligible      Negligible        Slight           Moderate

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0227-CD/R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:27:                     76-94% of AQAL              Negligible      Slight            Moderate         Moderate

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0227-CD/R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:27:                 a 1% change in concentration. For a change in concentration to be described as ‘negligible’

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0227-CD/R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:27:                 •     < 10% - negligible;

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0227-CD/R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:31:                 •   all annual mean impacts on human health can be described as ‘negligible’ when the total

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0227-CD/R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:31:                 •   all short-term impacts on human health can be described as ‘negligible’ or ‘insignificant’ if it is

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0227-CD/R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:31:                 Although short-term impacts do not screen out as ‘negligible’ for a stack height of 80 m if it is

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0227-CD/R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:31:                 dioxide and nitrogen dioxide, non-negligible impacts are only predicted to occur under the highly

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0227-CD/R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:35:                 Impacts that cannot be described as ‘negligible’ irrespective of the total concentration in

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0227-CD/R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:35:                 ‘as ‘negligible’ irrespective of the total concentration, further analysis has been undertaken.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0227-CD/R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:39:                 and less than 0.5 of the annual mean AQAL and can be screened out as ‘negligible’ irrespective of

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0227-CD/R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:39:                 ‘negligible’ irrespective of the total concentration. As shown in Figure 8, the PC is predicted to

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0227-CD/R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:40:                 therefore, the impact is described as ‘negligible’.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0227-CD/R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:41:                 2021 WHO guideline values, and is therefore ‘negligible’ irrespective of the total concentration.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0227-CD/R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:42:                 7 of the AQAL, the impact is described as ‘negligible’.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0227-CD/R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:43:                 is described as ‘negligible’.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0227-CD/R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:43:                 as ‘negligible’ irrespective of the total concentration.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0227-CD/R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:44:                 ‘negligible’ irrespective of the total concentration.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0227-CD/R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:44:                 cannot be screened out as ‘negligible’. In accordance with the guidance set out in section 5.7.1, the

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0227-CD/R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:44:                 ‘negligible’.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0227-CD/R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:45:                 Short-term impacts that cannot be described as ‘negligible’ at areas of relevant exposure are only

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0227-CD/R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:45:                 would be well below 10% of the AQAL and would be described as ‘negligible’.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0227-CD/R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:45:                 dioxide. These impacts are described as ‘negligible’.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0227-CD/R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:48:                 and is considered to be ‘negligible’.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0227-CD/R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:48:                 ‘negligible’. Under these more realistic scenarios the impact of the Proposed ERF on concentrations

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0227-CD/R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:48:                 concentrations of chromium (VI) is ‘negligible’.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0227-CD/R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:54:                 impacts from the Proposed ERF that cannot be described as ‘negligible’ are limited to areas in close

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0227-CD/R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:54:                 ‘negligible’ irrespective of the total concentration at areas of relevant exposure, the inclusion of

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0227-CD/R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:55:                 ‘negligible’ irrespective of the total concentration and therefore the inclusion of any other

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0227-CD/R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:56:                 ‘negligible’.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0227-CD/R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:57:                 AQAL and the cumulative PEC is less than 7 of the AQAL, the impact remains ‘negligible’.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0227-CD/R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:59:                 AQAL and the cumulative PEC is less than 7 of the AQAL, the impact remains ‘negligible’.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0227-CD/R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:66:                        ERF can be described as ‘negligible’ in accordance with IAQM criteria at all areas of relevant

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0227-CD/R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:66:                        Proposed ERF can be described as ‘negligible’ in accordance with IAQM screening criteria at

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0227-CD/R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:100: negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0227-CD/R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf|R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf]]:102:                 of maximum impact, terrain effects have a negligible effect on annual mean concentrations.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0227-CD/R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf|R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf]]:32:                                   quality                site predicted to be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0227-CD/R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf|R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf]]:32: Moors SAC                         quality                site predicted to be negligible.

[[this>Teesworks/Planning/R-2023-0227-CD/R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf|R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf]]:44:        has been assumed that negligible traffic from the ERF will travel along the

[[this>Teesworks/171019South-Tees-Master-Plan-19-Nov-17.pdf|171019South-Tees-Master-Plan-19-Nov-17.pdf]]:56:nature reserve by Tees Valley Wildlife Trust since 1982.       have negligible to low potential to support this species.