Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- mla-2015-00334 [2024/06/18 11:31] – [Programme of works] nefcadmin
+++ mla-2015-00334 [2024/07/16 16:43] (current) – [CEFAS (SEAL)] nefcadmin
@@ Line 68: / Line 68: @@
 |[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/Additional Documents/99A_211.pdf|99A_211.pdf]] 3 MB|02-Nov-2016|
 |[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/Additional Documents/MLA Volumes.xlsx|MLA Volumes.xlsx]] 31 KB|02-Nov-2016|
+====== Consultations ======
+===== Case Consulation Responses =====
+==== Natural England - 1 - Northumbria ====
+Consulted on 23 November 2017. Responded on 11 December 2017.
+The consultee was asked for their comments on an older version of this case (MLA/2015/00334/3). They responded: [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/Consultations/TERRC Basin.pdf|TERRC Basin.docx]]
+==== Environment Agency - North East Area ====
+Consulted on 23 November 2017. Responded on 13 December 2017.
+The consultee was asked for their comments on an older version of this case (MLA/2015/00334/3). They responded:
+Dear Sir/Madam, Please find attached Environment Agency response to application ref: MLA/2015/00334/03. If you have any questions regarding our comments, please do not hesitate to contact me using the details provided on the attached response. Regards, Louise Tait
+The consultee included the following files with their response: [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/Consultations/EA Response to app ref MLA201500334.pdf|EA Response to app ref MLA201500334.pdf]]
+==== Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science - SEAL ====
+Consulted on 23 November 2017. Responded on 24 November 2017.
+The consultee was asked for their comments on an older version of this case (MLA/2015/00334/3). They didn't have any comments.
+The consultee included the following files with their response:
+[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/Consultations/20171124 MLA201500334 Tees Bay, Seaton Port Berths, Holding Basin and Channel Marine Licence Final Advice Minute + QC.pdf|20171124 MLA201500334 Tees Bay, Seaton Port Berths, Holding Basin and Channel Marine Licence Final Advice Minute + QC.docx]]
+==== Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science - SEAL ====
+Consulted on 29 August 2018. Responded on 26 September 2018.
+The consultee was asked for their comments on an older version of this case (MLA/2015/00334/4). They responded:
+Please see attached.
+The consultee included the following files with their response:
+[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/Consultations/20180925 MLA201500334 Able Seaton Port Marine Licence Advice Minute + JL QC (003)+ CC QC.pdf|20180925 MLA201500334 Able Seaton Port Marine Licence Advice Minute + JL QC (003)+ CC QC.docx]]
+==== Environment Agency - North East Area ====
+Consulted on 29 August 2018. Responded on 21 September 2018.
+The consultee was asked for their comments on an older version of this case (MLA/2015/00334/4). They responded:
+Dear Sir/Madam,
+Please find attached response from the Environment Agency on application ref: MLA/2015/00334/4.
+If you have any questions in respect of the response, please do not hesitate to contact me.
+Regards,
+Louise Tait
+The consultee included the following files with their response:
+[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/Consultations/EA response to application ref MLA2015003344.pdf|EA response to application ref MLA2015003344.pdf]]
+==== Natural England - 1 - Northumbria ====
+Consulted on 29 August 2018. Responded on 26 September 2018.
+The consultee was asked for their comments on an older version of this case (MLA/2015/00334/4). They responded:
+Please find NE's attached response letter.
+Many thanks,
+Josh
+The consultee included the following files with their response:
+[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/Consultations/MLA201500334-4, NE Response to AA for ABLE Dredge Extension, 26.09.18, JP.pdf|MLA201500334-4, NE Response to AA for ABLE Dredge Extension, 26.09.18, JP.pdf]]
+===== Document Consulation Responses =====
+==== NE (1 - Northumbria) ====
+Variation 11 HRA.
+Consulted on 2 May 2023. Responded on 22 May 2023.
+The consultee was asked for their comments on 20230425_MLA201500334_Variation 11_HRA_v4.docx . They responded:
+Please find attached supporting document.
+The consultee included the following files with their response:
+[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/Consultations/431900 MLA_2015_00334 MMO_Consultation_Response Able Port Tees.pdf|431900 MLA_2015_00334 MMO_Consultation_Response Able Port Tees.pdf]]
+===== Return Consulation Responses =====
+==== CEFAS (SEAL) ====
+R6.2
+Consulted on 27 March 2020. Responded on 27 April 2020.
+The consultee was asked for their comments on these documents:
+  - [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/Consultations/MAR00562 Interim (003).xls|MAR00562 Interim (003).xls]]
+  - [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/Consultations/MAR00562.pdf|MAR00562.pdf]]
+  - [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/Consultations/MAR00562.xls|MAR00562.xls]]
+  - [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/Consultations/MMO_Results_Template  - MAR00562.xlsm|MMO_Results_Template - MAR00562.xlsm]]
+They responded:
+Please see my advice attached.
+The consultee included the following files with their response:
+[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/Consultations/20200427 MLA2015003344 Able Seaton L201700012 Mid-licence Marine Licence Advice Minute+sJB.pdf|20200427 MLA2015003344 Able Seaton L201700012 Mid-licence Marine Licence Advice Minute+sJB.docx]]
+====== Variations ======
 ===== MLA/2015/00334/1 =====
 Variation 1 - Submitted 15-Mar-2017
@@ Line 142: / Line 238: @@
 |[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/3/Additional Documents/20171110 SAM201700066A Able Seaton Port Berth 8  9 MMO Results Template(3).xlsm|20171110 SAM201700066A Able Seaton Port Berth 8 9 MMO Results Template.xlsm]]  //SAM/2017/00066/A Able Seaton Port Berth 8 & 9 02/10/2017// 544 KB|10-Nov-2017|
 |[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/3/Additional Documents/20171110 SAM201700066A Able Seaton Port Berth 8  9 MMO Results Template(4).xlsm|20171110 SAM201700066A Able Seaton Port Berth 8 9 MMO Results Template.xlsm]] //SAM/2017/00066/A Able Seaton Port Berth 8 & 9 02/10/2017// 544 KB|15-Nov-2017|
 ===== MLA/2015/00334/4 =====
 Variation 4 - Submitted 09-Feb-2018
@@ Line 215: / Line 312: @@
 === What would you like to vary about your current licence(s)/response(s)? ===
 Activity 1.1 – Licensed Activity
-Activity to be updated to include an additional 30,000 tonnes of clay to be removed from the holding basin. It should be noted that the Holding
+Activity to be updated to include an additional 30,000 tonnes of clay to be removed from the holding basin. It should be noted that the Holding Basin and Quays 10&11 are recognised under the same activity,
-Basin and Quays 10&11 are recognised under the same activity,
 therefore, only the additional quantities are to be revised.
 Schedule 5 – Dredge Location Scheduled Document
 Please find attached an updated plan (ASC-001-00009 Rev G) of dredge locations to include the area as noted in this application. This drawing shall replace the existing plan found in the Licence schedule. As the plan shows, Quay 10 now includes an area of the holding basin, which is to be dredged to -13.5mCD. The location is shown from points 13-16.
 Schedule 4 – Dredge Quantity Scheduled Document
 Please find attached an updated dredge quantity table, to include the additional material to be removed. An additional 30,000 tonnes of clay will be removed from the holding basin during a capital dredge.
@@ Line 298: / Line 396: @@
 === What would you like to vary about your current licence(s)/response(s)? ===
 ) Incorrect Coordinates
 Upon review, 6no coordinates on Licence Schedules (Able Seaton Port Holding basin and Channel) are to be amended correctly.
 Historically Seaton Channel has been dredged to a depth of up to - 5.8mCD and a width of up to 164m. Seaton Channel joins the River Tees at a location that is maintained by PD Ports at -11.7mCD (refer to Admiralty Chart for Tees and Hartlepool Bays). The intersection between Seaton Channel and the River Tees is formed by a slope falling (at around 1:3) from Seaton Channel to the River Tees. See attached drawing ASC002-00003 where the slope has been annotated. One of the original objectives of the MLA was to obtain consent for lowering Seaton Channel to -9.5mCD over a width of 85m up to its intersection with the River Tees.
 The coordinates for Seaton Channel in the original MLA were specified at the top of the slope connecting Seaton Channel to the River Tees. The substitute coordinates submitted in Variation 10 amends the coordinates so that they are located at the bottom of the slope.
 See attached of PDF table
 ) Incorrect Quantities
 Following a review of the Marine licence we request the following nonmaterial corrections in addition to the coordinate corrections:
-.Due to historic errors, the disposal tonnages are not consistent with the dredge volumes. In particular:
+  - Due to historic errors, the disposal tonnages are not consistent with the dredge volumes. In particular: a.V3 of the Licence permitted 1,212,000 wet tonnes of clay to be deposited but this have been 1.221,000T (555,000m3*2.2); b.V6 of the Licence increased the permitted capital dredge volume of clay in Activity 1.1 from 545,000m3 to 575,000m3 but there was no commensurate increase in the permitted disposal tonnage as there should have been; c.V8 of the Licence increased the permitted total capital dredge volume in Activity 1.1 by 145,000m3, but again there was no commensurate increase in the permitted disposal tonnage as there should have been. We request changes to the disposal tonnages so that they are consistent with the dredge volumes. A spreadsheet is attached to evidence the working. No new dredging is being requested. These are simply corrections to the disposal tonnages that have occurred due to historic drafting errors.
-a.V3 of the Licence permitted 1,212,000 wet tonnes of clay to be deposited but this have been 1.221,000T (555,000m3*2.2);
+  - We request a change to the volumes provided in Activity 1.2 as the volumes of silt and clay have been wrongly transposed from V6 of the Licence and both were incorrectly identified as silt in V7.
-b.V6 of the Licence increased the permitted capital dredge volume of clay in Activity 1.1 from 545,000m3 to 575,000m3 but there was no commensurate increase in the permitted disposal tonnage as there should have been;
+  - We request that where annual volumes are specifically stated for Site 2, these volumes can be carried over to subsequent years as dredging may not occur every year but silt will still accumulate.
-c.V8 of the Licence increased the permitted total capital dredge volume in Activity 1.1 by 145,000m3, but again there was no commensurate increase in the permitted disposal tonnage as there should have been.
+  - V8 allowed for Seaton Channel to be widened and a consequential additional capital dredge of 145,000m3 . We advised that this would be silts and clays. All of the material is expected to be dredged by BHD and will comprise silts/soft clays and stiff clay. We propose amending Activity 1.1 so that the whole of the additional dredging is classed as clay and that Activity 4.1 is amended to permit the anticipated 50,000m3 of silts/soft clays to be deposited in Tees Bay A.
-We request changes to the disposal tonnages so that they are consistent with the dredge volumes. A spreadsheet is attached to evidence the working. No new dredging is being requested. These are simply corrections to the disposal tonnages that have occurred due to historic drafting errors.
+  - A number of dredging methods are consented within the Licence but Activity 1.1 only describes backhoe dredging, we request that the methodology is extended to include TSHD which is consented for other Activities.
-.We request a change to the volumes provided in Activity 1.2 as the volumes of silt and clay have been wrongly transposed from V6 of the Licence and both were incorrectly identified as silt in V7.
+  - We request a change to the text describing the methodology of Activity 2.1 to remove reference to 30,000T of clay which is not in any event listed in the quantities for that Activity.
-.We request that where annual volumes are specifically stated for Site 2, these volumes can be carried over to subsequent years as dredging may not occur every year but silt will still accumulate.
+  - We request that Activity 2.3 is split into two Activities, one covering the capital works and the other the maintenance works.
-.V8 allowed for Seaton Channel to be widened and a consequential
+  - We request changes to the description and methodology of Activities 3.1 and 4.1 to remove inconsistencies in the current wording.
-additional capital dredge of 145,000m3 . We advised that this would be silts and clays. All of the material is expected to be dredged by BHD and will comprise silts/soft clays and stiff clay. We propose amending Activity
+  - We request corrections to the description of the source of material specified in Activity 3.1 and 4.1
-.1 so that the whole of the additional dredging is classed as clay and that Activity 4.1 is amended to permit the anticipated 50,000m3 of silts/soft clays to be deposited in Tees Bay A.
-.A number of dredging methods are consented within the Licence but Activity 1.1 only describes backhoe dredging, we request that the methodology is extended to include TSHD which is consented for other Activities.
-.We request a change to the text describing the methodology of Activity 2.1 to remove reference to 30,000T of clay which is not in any event listed in the quantities for that Activity.
-.We request that Activity 2.3 is split into two Activities, one covering the capital works and the other the maintenance works.
-.We request changes to the description and methodology of Activities 3.1 and 4.1 to remove inconsistencies in the current wording.
-.We request corrections to the description of the source of material specified in Activity 3.1 and 4.1
 All of our proposed textual changes to the Licence are included in the attached WORD document with the changes tracked for transparency.
 === Why would you like to vary your licence(s)/response(s) in this way? ===