Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- mla-2015-00334 [2024/06/18 13:17] – [MLA/2015/00334/10] nefcadmin
+++ mla-2015-00334 [2024/07/16 16:43] (current) – [CEFAS (SEAL)] nefcadmin
@@ Line 68: / Line 68: @@
 |[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/Additional Documents/99A_211.pdf|99A_211.pdf]] 3 MB|02-Nov-2016|
 |[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/Additional Documents/MLA Volumes.xlsx|MLA Volumes.xlsx]] 31 KB|02-Nov-2016|
+====== Consultations ======
+===== Case Consulation Responses =====
+==== Natural England - 1 - Northumbria ====
+Consulted on 23 November 2017. Responded on 11 December 2017.
+The consultee was asked for their comments on an older version of this case (MLA/2015/00334/3). They responded: [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/Consultations/TERRC Basin.pdf|TERRC Basin.docx]]
+==== Environment Agency - North East Area ====
+Consulted on 23 November 2017. Responded on 13 December 2017.
+The consultee was asked for their comments on an older version of this case (MLA/2015/00334/3). They responded:
+Dear Sir/Madam, Please find attached Environment Agency response to application ref: MLA/2015/00334/03. If you have any questions regarding our comments, please do not hesitate to contact me using the details provided on the attached response. Regards, Louise Tait
+The consultee included the following files with their response: [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/Consultations/EA Response to app ref MLA201500334.pdf|EA Response to app ref MLA201500334.pdf]]
+==== Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science - SEAL ====
+Consulted on 23 November 2017. Responded on 24 November 2017.
+The consultee was asked for their comments on an older version of this case (MLA/2015/00334/3). They didn't have any comments.
+The consultee included the following files with their response:
+[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/Consultations/20171124 MLA201500334 Tees Bay, Seaton Port Berths, Holding Basin and Channel Marine Licence Final Advice Minute + QC.pdf|20171124 MLA201500334 Tees Bay, Seaton Port Berths, Holding Basin and Channel Marine Licence Final Advice Minute + QC.docx]]
+==== Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science - SEAL ====
+Consulted on 29 August 2018. Responded on 26 September 2018.
+The consultee was asked for their comments on an older version of this case (MLA/2015/00334/4). They responded:
+Please see attached.
+The consultee included the following files with their response:
+[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/Consultations/20180925 MLA201500334 Able Seaton Port Marine Licence Advice Minute + JL QC (003)+ CC QC.pdf|20180925 MLA201500334 Able Seaton Port Marine Licence Advice Minute + JL QC (003)+ CC QC.docx]]
+==== Environment Agency - North East Area ====
+Consulted on 29 August 2018. Responded on 21 September 2018.
+The consultee was asked for their comments on an older version of this case (MLA/2015/00334/4). They responded:
+Dear Sir/Madam,
+Please find attached response from the Environment Agency on application ref: MLA/2015/00334/4.
+If you have any questions in respect of the response, please do not hesitate to contact me.
+Regards,
+Louise Tait
+The consultee included the following files with their response:
+[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/Consultations/EA response to application ref MLA2015003344.pdf|EA response to application ref MLA2015003344.pdf]]
+==== Natural England - 1 - Northumbria ====
+Consulted on 29 August 2018. Responded on 26 September 2018.
+The consultee was asked for their comments on an older version of this case (MLA/2015/00334/4). They responded:
+Please find NE's attached response letter.
+Many thanks,
+Josh
+The consultee included the following files with their response:
+[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/Consultations/MLA201500334-4, NE Response to AA for ABLE Dredge Extension, 26.09.18, JP.pdf|MLA201500334-4, NE Response to AA for ABLE Dredge Extension, 26.09.18, JP.pdf]]
+===== Document Consulation Responses =====
+==== NE (1 - Northumbria) ====
+Variation 11 HRA.
+Consulted on 2 May 2023. Responded on 22 May 2023.
+The consultee was asked for their comments on 20230425_MLA201500334_Variation 11_HRA_v4.docx . They responded:
+Please find attached supporting document.
+The consultee included the following files with their response:
+[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/Consultations/431900 MLA_2015_00334 MMO_Consultation_Response Able Port Tees.pdf|431900 MLA_2015_00334 MMO_Consultation_Response Able Port Tees.pdf]]
+===== Return Consulation Responses =====
+==== CEFAS (SEAL) ====
+R6.2
+Consulted on 27 March 2020. Responded on 27 April 2020.
+The consultee was asked for their comments on these documents:
+  - [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/Consultations/MAR00562 Interim (003).xls|MAR00562 Interim (003).xls]]
+  - [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/Consultations/MAR00562.pdf|MAR00562.pdf]]
+  - [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/Consultations/MAR00562.xls|MAR00562.xls]]
+  - [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/Consultations/MMO_Results_Template  - MAR00562.xlsm|MMO_Results_Template - MAR00562.xlsm]]
+They responded:
+Please see my advice attached.
+The consultee included the following files with their response:
+[[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/Consultations/20200427 MLA2015003344 Able Seaton L201700012 Mid-licence Marine Licence Advice Minute+sJB.pdf|20200427 MLA2015003344 Able Seaton L201700012 Mid-licence Marine Licence Advice Minute+sJB.docx]]
+====== Variations ======
 ===== MLA/2015/00334/1 =====
 Variation 1 - Submitted 15-Mar-2017
@@ Line 311: / Line 407: @@
 Following a review of the Marine licence we request the following nonmaterial corrections in addition to the coordinate corrections:
-  - Due to historic errors, the disposal tonnages are not consistent with the dredge volumes. In particular:
+  - Due to historic errors, the disposal tonnages are not consistent with the dredge volumes. In particular: a.V3 of the Licence permitted 1,212,000 wet tonnes of clay to be deposited but this have been 1.221,000T (555,000m3*2.2); b.V6 of the Licence increased the permitted capital dredge volume of clay in Activity 1.1 from 545,000m3 to 575,000m3 but there was no commensurate increase in the permitted disposal tonnage as there should have been; c.V8 of the Licence increased the permitted total capital dredge volume in Activity 1.1 by 145,000m3, but again there was no commensurate increase in the permitted disposal tonnage as there should have been. We request changes to the disposal tonnages so that they are consistent with the dredge volumes. A spreadsheet is attached to evidence the working. No new dredging is being requested. These are simply corrections to the disposal tonnages that have occurred due to historic drafting errors.
-a.V3 of the Licence permitted 1,212,000 wet tonnes of clay to be deposited but this have been 1.221,000T (555,000m3*2.2);
-b.V6 of the Licence increased the permitted capital dredge volume of clay in Activity 1.1 from 545,000m3 to 575,000m3 but there was no commensurate increase in the permitted disposal tonnage as there should have been;
-c.V8 of the Licence increased the permitted total capital dredge volume in Activity 1.1 by 145,000m3, but again there was no commensurate increase in the permitted disposal tonnage as there should have been.
-We request changes to the disposal tonnages so that they are consistent with the dredge volumes. A spreadsheet is attached to evidence the working. No new dredging is being requested. These are simply corrections to the disposal tonnages that have occurred due to historic drafting errors.
   - We request a change to the volumes provided in Activity 1.2 as the volumes of silt and clay have been wrongly transposed from V6 of the Licence and both were incorrectly identified as silt in V7.
   - We request that where annual volumes are specifically stated for Site 2, these volumes can be carried over to subsequent years as dredging may not occur every year but silt will still accumulate.
- - V8 allowed for Seaton Channel to be widened and a consequential
+  - V8 allowed for Seaton Channel to be widened and a consequential additional capital dredge of 145,000m3 . We advised that this would be silts and clays. All of the material is expected to be dredged by BHD and will comprise silts/soft clays and stiff clay. We propose amending Activity 1.1 so that the whole of the additional dredging is classed as clay and that Activity 4.1 is amended to permit the anticipated 50,000m3 of silts/soft clays to be deposited in Tees Bay A.
-additional capital dredge of 145,000m3 . We advised that this would be silts and clays. All of the material is expected to be dredged by BHD and will comprise silts/soft clays and stiff clay. We propose amending Activity 1.1 so that the whole of the additional dredging is classed as clay and that Activity 4.1 is amended to permit the anticipated 50,000m3 of silts/soft clays to be deposited in Tees Bay A.
   - A number of dredging methods are consented within the Licence but Activity 1.1 only describes backhoe dredging, we request that the methodology is extended to include TSHD which is consented for other Activities.
   - We request a change to the text describing the methodology of Activity 2.1 to remove reference to 30,000T of clay which is not in any event listed in the quantities for that Activity.