{include:Teesworks - keywords - menu}
20210119 MLA202000506 Tees South Bank Quay CP advice + JPQC.pdf:1:MARINE WORKS (ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT) REGULATIONS 2007 (AS
20210119 MLA202000506 Tees South Bank Quay CP advice + JPQC.pdf:1: phase may vary, and the Environmental Impact Assessment is conducted assuming that the
20210119 MLA202000506 Tees South Bank Quay CP advice + JPQC.pdf:3:21. The ES indicates that (coastal process) effects and impact assessment is carried out by ‘Expert
20210119 MLA202000506 Tees South Bank Quay CP advice + JPQC.pdf:5:29. A ‘standard’ discussion of cumulative impact assessment (CIA) is provided i.e., indicating that
PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1127 MLA.2020.00506.R8 Response to Consultation Comments on Scheme of Monitoring.pdf:6: modelling that was undertaken as part of the Environmental Impact Assessment
MLA 2020 00506 South Bank Phase 1 MLA 2020 00507 Phase 2.pdf:1:has been subject to an Environmental Impact Assessment which included assessment of the
PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1124 Updated Scheme of Monitoring - May 2022.pdf:1:The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020) predicted that during
20210121 MLA202000506 Tees South Bank Quay Phase I Benthic ecology + JPQC.pdf:1:9. The above cited reports represent the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and associated
20210121 MLA202000506 Tees South Bank Quay Phase I Benthic ecology + JPQC.pdf:3:20. Yes, the EIA clearly sets out the impact assessment methodology: it uses a well-established
MLA202000506 & MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phases 1&2 UWN advice + JPQC.pdf:1:MARINE WORKS (ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT) REGULATIONS (AMENDED)
20210115 MLA202000506 South Bank Quay-phase 1 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:1:1. With reference to the above request to review the Environmental Impact Assessment report for the
20210115 MLA202000506 South Bank Quay-phase 1 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:3: Barrage fish counter, information collated and compiled from previous impact assessments for
20210115 MLA202000506 South Bank Quay-phase 1 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:5: cumulative impact assessment (Section 27.5.9) along with the Anglo-American Harbour facilities
20210115 MLA202000506 South Bank Quay-phase 1 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:11: and impact assessment for fish and fish ecology, which is standard practice for an application of
PC1084-RHD-SB-XX-NT-Z-0001-South Bank SSC monitoring plan V3.pdf:2:The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020) predicted that during
PC1084-RHD-SB-XX-NT-Z-0001-South Bank SSC monitoring plan V3.pdf:4:The Cumulative Impact Assessment (CIA) of the EIA report then considers the potential cumulative effects
PC1084-RHD-SB-XX-NT-Z-0001-South Bank SSC monitoring plan V3.pdf:11: 6. Royal HaskoningDHV (2020) South Bank Quay Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Report
20220518 MLA202000506 L2021003331Tees South Bank (phase 1) Monitoring Plan Fisheries advice FINAL.pdf:3: the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) (see Figure 1)
20210201 MLA202000506 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Phases 1 and 2 - EIA Licence Advice Minute - SEAL Advice v2+SJB.pdf:4: assessment. The NGCT was taken forward for cumulative impact assessment (CIA) and this
20210201 MLA202000506 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Phases 1 and 2 - EIA Licence Advice Minute - SEAL Advice v2+SJB.pdf:5: impact assessment.
20210201 MLA202000506 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Phases 1 and 2 - EIA Licence Advice Minute - SEAL Advice v2+SJB.pdf:6: Quay, and recommend that the applicant provides a more detailed impact assessment
20210603 MLA2020005067 Tees South Bank Quay Supplementary Report Review Fisheries advice MG GE + JP.pdf:1:6. The fisheries assessment presented in the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) report was
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:3:4.4 Environmental Impact Assessment Directive 28
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:7:27 CUMULATIVE IMPACT ASSESSMENT 482
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:8:13 Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:8:14 Landscape and visual impact assessment figures
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:9:Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in support of a marine licence application to the Marine
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:9:The study area is shown on Figure 1.2. Landscape and visual impact assessment has been detailed
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:9: impact assessment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:36:4.4 Environmental Impact Assessment Directive
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:36:in this instance, The Marine Works (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2007 (as amended)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:36:and the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 are applicable
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:36:required under the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017, as
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:43:(Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2007, as amended. In addition, RCBC issued a Scoping
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:43:(Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2007, as amended, and the Town and Country Planning
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:43:(Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017, without submitting a formal EIA Screening Request.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:45:a description of the approach taken to the specific impact assessment for each environmental topic is
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:48:Table 5.3 Impact assessment matrix
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:49:5.1.6 Cumulative Impact Assessment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:50:There is no legislation that outlines how cumulative impact assessments (CIAs) should be undertaken.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:60:6.3.6 Impact assessment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:192: therefore the impact assessment presented within
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:209:‘medium’ has been assigned for the purposes of this impact assessment, taking in to account the fragmented
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:210:As such, the impact assessment presented within this section focuses on the potential impacts to marine
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:220:To inform the impact assessment of works during the proposed scheme for marine mammal species,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:220:In addition to the methodology for the impact assessment outlined in Section 5, the magnitude of effect on
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:230:Table 10.5 Reference populations and density estimates to inform the impact assessment for marine
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:231:The underwater noise impact assessments for marine mammal species for the proposed scheme has been
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:245:The ecological impact assessment presented below has been based upon the following guidance and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:246: for Ecological Impact Assessment in the UK and Ireland: Terrestrial, Freshwater and Coastal;
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:246:To inform this Ecological Impact Assessment (EcIA), Tees Valley Combined Authority has undertaken
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:270:the baseline environment on which the impact assessment can be based.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:279:follows a matrix approach to inform the impact assessment, using best practice, best available scientific
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:279:understanding and relevant guidance (e.g. CIEEM Guidelines for Ecological Impact Assessment in the UK
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:291:across the full winter period, the assumption made for the purposes of impact assessment is that North Tees
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:295:sources in the Tees estuary, receptors included in the following impact assessments are as follows:
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:329:While the loss of such habitat is considered to be insignificant (in terms of impact assessment) for the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:342: and Visual Impact Assessment’ to determine the likely impact of the Section 19
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:346:16.3.3 Impact assessment methodology
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:346:The general method for impact assessment is set out in Section 5. The specific approach to the assessment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:346:The impact assessment defines heritage assets, and their settings, likely to be impacted by the proposed
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:346:Specifically, therefore, the impact assessment will present:
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:365:England. Noise Sensitive Receptor (NSR) locations and the methodology for the impact assessment were
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:370:17.3.4 Impact assessment methodology
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:373:Table 17.10 Construction road traffic noise impact assessment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:375:Table 17.13 On-site construction phase noise impact assessment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:377:Table 17.15 Operational phase noise impact assessment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:394:considered as not significant. A detailed impact assessment of road traffic exhaust emissions was
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:397:This section of the EIA Report presents the findings of a Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (LVIA)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:400:Institute in the third edition of its ‘Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment’ (GLVIA3, 2013).
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:465:22.3.5 Impact assessment methodology
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:474:Schedule 3 of The Marine Works (Environmental Impact Assessment) (Amendment) Regulations 2017
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:474:Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:476:The Marine Works (Environmental Impact Assessment) (Amendments) Regulations 2017 and the Town and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:476:Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) 2017 brought in a requirement to consider the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:476:document (Appendix 2), this health impact assessment is therefore a concise assessment which relies on
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:476:undertake a full human health impact assessment.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:490:27 CUMULATIVE IMPACT ASSESSMENT
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:490:Works (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2007 (as amended) and the Town and Country
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:490:Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 require an assessment of its potential
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:490:The IEMA ‘Guidelines for Environmental Impact Assessment’ (IEMA, 2004) define cumulative impacts as:
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:491:this report and summarised in Table 1.1). Landscape and visual impact assessment has been detailed
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:511:Of the proposed projects which have been screened into the cumulative impact assessment, all have
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:516:from the projects and plans screened in for cumulative impact assessment will not, therefore, also occur
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:583:cumulative noise impact assessment of the NGCT, Dogger Bank Teesside A & Sofia project and the Harbour
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:589:for Ecological Impact Assessment in the UK and Ireland: Terrestrial, Freshwater, Coastal and Marine.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:598:Royal HaskoningDHV (2018). Hartlepool Approach Channel: Environmental Impact Assessment Report.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-34.pdf:15:A cumulative impact assessment (CIA) is presented in Section 27 of the EIA Report. Section 27.5.2
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-34.pdf:17:the impact assessment updated where required within a supplementary report, and it is assumed the MMO
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-25.pdf:15:A cumulative impact assessment (CIA) is presented in Section 27 of the EIA Report. Section 27.5.2
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-25.pdf:17:the impact assessment updated where required within a supplementary report, and it is assumed the MMO
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:5:numerical modelling exercise to inform the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) that was prepared as
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:5:to Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) under the Marine Works (Environmental Impact Assessment)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:5:Regulations 2007 (as amended) and the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:5:presented within this supplementary report, along with additional impact assessment where this is
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:24:the results presented in the EIA report, which the impact assessment was based on, remain valid.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:24:update of the impact assessment in relation to these is presented in the sections below.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:47:The survey results have been reviewed and the impact assessment updated where required within this
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:47:of the previously reported impact assessment. The only additional mitigation measure required following
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:329: Environmental Impact Assessment. Chapter 8 Marine Ecology.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:3:4.4 Environmental Impact Assessment Directive 28
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:7:27 CUMULATIVE IMPACT ASSESSMENT 482
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:8:13 Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:8:14 Landscape and visual impact assessment figures
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:9:Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in support of a marine licence application to the Marine
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:9:The study area is shown on Figure 1.2. Landscape and visual impact assessment has been detailed
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:9: impact assessment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:36:4.4 Environmental Impact Assessment Directive
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:36:in this instance, The Marine Works (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2007 (as amended)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:36:and the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 are applicable
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:36:required under the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017, as
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:43:(Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2007, as amended. In addition, RCBC issued a Scoping
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:43:(Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2007, as amended, and the Town and Country Planning
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:43:(Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017, without submitting a formal EIA Screening Request.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:45:a description of the approach taken to the specific impact assessment for each environmental topic is
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:48:Table 5.3 Impact assessment matrix
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:49:5.1.6 Cumulative Impact Assessment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:50:There is no legislation that outlines how cumulative impact assessments (CIAs) should be undertaken.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:60:6.3.6 Impact assessment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:192: therefore the impact assessment presented within
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:209:‘medium’ has been assigned for the purposes of this impact assessment, taking in to account the fragmented
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:210:As such, the impact assessment presented within this section focuses on the potential impacts to marine
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:220:To inform the impact assessment of works during the proposed scheme for marine mammal species,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:220:In addition to the methodology for the impact assessment outlined in Section 5, the magnitude of effect on
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:230:Table 10.5 Reference populations and density estimates to inform the impact assessment for marine
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:231:The underwater noise impact assessments for marine mammal species for the proposed scheme has been
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:245:The ecological impact assessment presented below has been based upon the following guidance and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:246: for Ecological Impact Assessment in the UK and Ireland: Terrestrial, Freshwater and Coastal;
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:246:To inform this Ecological Impact Assessment (EcIA), Tees Valley Combined Authority has undertaken
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:270:the baseline environment on which the impact assessment can be based.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:279:follows a matrix approach to inform the impact assessment, using best practice, best available scientific
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:279:understanding and relevant guidance (e.g. CIEEM Guidelines for Ecological Impact Assessment in the UK
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:291:across the full winter period, the assumption made for the purposes of impact assessment is that North Tees
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:295:sources in the Tees estuary, receptors included in the following impact assessments are as follows:
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:329:While the loss of such habitat is considered to be insignificant (in terms of impact assessment) for the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:342: and Visual Impact Assessment’ to determine the likely impact of the Section 19
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:346:16.3.3 Impact assessment methodology
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:346:The general method for impact assessment is set out in Section 5. The specific approach to the assessment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:346:The impact assessment defines heritage assets, and their settings, likely to be impacted by the proposed
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:346:Specifically, therefore, the impact assessment will present:
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:365:England. Noise Sensitive Receptor (NSR) locations and the methodology for the impact assessment were
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:370:17.3.4 Impact assessment methodology
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:373:Table 17.10 Construction road traffic noise impact assessment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:375:Table 17.13 On-site construction phase noise impact assessment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:377:Table 17.15 Operational phase noise impact assessment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:394:considered as not significant. A detailed impact assessment of road traffic exhaust emissions was
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:397:This section of the EIA Report presents the findings of a Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (LVIA)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:400:Institute in the third edition of its ‘Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment’ (GLVIA3, 2013).
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:465:22.3.5 Impact assessment methodology
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:474:Schedule 3 of The Marine Works (Environmental Impact Assessment) (Amendment) Regulations 2017
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:474:Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:476:The Marine Works (Environmental Impact Assessment) (Amendments) Regulations 2017 and the Town and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:476:Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) 2017 brought in a requirement to consider the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:476:document (Appendix 2), this health impact assessment is therefore a concise assessment which relies on
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:476:undertake a full human health impact assessment.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:490:27 CUMULATIVE IMPACT ASSESSMENT
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:490:Works (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2007 (as amended) and the Town and Country
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:490:Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 require an assessment of its potential
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:490:The IEMA ‘Guidelines for Environmental Impact Assessment’ (IEMA, 2004) define cumulative impacts as:
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:491:this report and summarised in Table 1.1). Landscape and visual impact assessment has been detailed
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:511:Of the proposed projects which have been screened into the cumulative impact assessment, all have
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:516:from the projects and plans screened in for cumulative impact assessment will not, therefore, also occur
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:583:cumulative noise impact assessment of the NGCT, Dogger Bank Teesside A & Sofia project and the Harbour
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:589:for Ecological Impact Assessment in the UK and Ireland: Terrestrial, Freshwater, Coastal and Marine.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:598:Royal HaskoningDHV (2018). Hartlepool Approach Channel: Environmental Impact Assessment Report.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1137-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay Marine Licence Variation 2 RFI 17-66.pdf:3:the Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020) that in turn supported the
PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1123 Written Scheme of Investigation.pdf:4:The MLAs were supported by an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020)
PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1123 Written Scheme of Investigation.pdf:7:as set out in the Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment undertaken for the EIA Report (Royal
PC1084-RHD-SB-XX-NT-Z-0001-South Bank SSC monitoring plan V3.pdf:2:The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020) predicted that during
PC1084-RHD-SB-XX-NT-Z-0001-South Bank SSC monitoring plan V3.pdf:4:The Cumulative Impact Assessment (CIA) of the EIA report then considers the potential cumulative effects
PC1084-RHD-SB-XX-NT-Z-0001-South Bank SSC monitoring plan V3.pdf:11: 6. Royal HaskoningDHV (2020) South Bank Quay Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Report
MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:2:environments and requires Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in support of a
MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:7:Environmental impact assessment
MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:21:inform the impact assessment. Sediment quality data from the proposed dredge
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:4:8 CUMULATIVE IMPACT ASSESSMENT 16
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:5:The proposed scheme has been subject to an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) which has assessed
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:18:The landscape and visual impact assessment (LVIA) establishes that operational effects of the proposed
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:20:8 CUMULATIVE IMPACT ASSESSMENT
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:5:to as the proposed scheme). This report accompanies the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:51:Subject: South Bank port facility – Environmental Impact Assessment scoping review
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:51:Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in support of a marine licence application to the Marine
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:52:Marine Works (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2007 as amended, and the Town and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:52:Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 respectively. This document has
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:54: • Landscape and visual impact assessment.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:57: Views of the Grade II* Transporter Bridge should be assessed in the ‘Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment’ to determine the likely impact of the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:58: for disposal to sea (and to inform the impact assessment). Any material to be dredged and disposed of within licenced disposal areas at-sea must not
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:58: Regulation 4(4) of the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 requires the assessment of significant effects
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:63:proposed quay infrastructure, drawing from the findings of the landscape and visual impact assessment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:63:construction and operational phases; outputs from the modelling will inform the impact assessment (for
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:64:A detailed cumulative impact assessment with the wider onshore development (or other planned or
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:64:A Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (LVIA) will be undertaken as part of the EIA. This will involve
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:64:Impact Assessment, 3rd edition.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:65: 4.20. Cumulative impact assessment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:66:A cumulative impact assessment will be undertaken, taking into account any relevant consented - but as
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:75:Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for this development.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:77:associated with the site. Any Environmental Impact Assessment should include details of the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:80: environments and will require Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in support of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:80: Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:81: Impact Assessment scoping review) on environmental assessment requirements in
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:81: Impact Assessment scoping review) on environmental assessment requirements in
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:139:modelling exercise to inform the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) that is being prepared as part of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:143:area is of most interest in terms of the hydrodynamic outputs for the Environmental Impact Assessment.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:253: Impact Assessment (EIA) for Geology and Ground Conditions.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:120: Underwater Noise Impact Assessment – South Bank, Tees Estuary
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:121: Underwater Noise Impact Assessment – South Bank, Tees Estuary
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:122: Underwater Noise Impact Assessment – South Bank, Tees Estuary
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:122:impact assessment. As the measurement or receiver point moves away from the source, the sound
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:123: Underwater Noise Impact Assessment – South Bank, Tees Estuary
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:124: Underwater Noise Impact Assessment – South Bank, Tees Estuary
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:124:3 A Collett, T Mason (2014). York Potash Project Harbour Facilities: Underwater Noise Impact Assessment.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:125: Underwater Noise Impact Assessment – South Bank, Tees Estuary
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:126: Underwater Noise Impact Assessment – South Bank, Tees Estuary
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:127: Underwater Noise Impact Assessment – South Bank, Tees Estuary
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:128: Underwater Noise Impact Assessment – South Bank, Tees Estuary
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:129: Underwater Noise Impact Assessment – South Bank, Tees Estuary
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:129: Report title Underwater Noise Impact Assessment – South
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:135: Cumulative Impact Assessment …………………………………………………………………………… 41
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:137:Table 16: Cumulative Impact Assessment ……………………………………………………………………………….. 42
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:138: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:141: Marine Works EIA (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations governing EIA’s for
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:179: CUMULATIVE IMPACT ASSESSMENT
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:179:The cumulative impact assessment was assessed to be a factor of the likelihood of the impact
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:179:The results of the cumulative impact assessment are given in Table 16. All impacts were assessed to
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:180:Table 16: Cumulative Impact Assessment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:313:The purpose of the Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (LVIA) is to identify the potential
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:313:LVIA is either carried out formally as part of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) process or
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:313:▪ ‘Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment’ (GLVIA), Third Edition Landscape
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:350:The proposed scheme is defined in full within the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Report (Royal
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:5:to Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) under the Marine Works (Environmental Impact Assessment)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:5:Regulations 2007 (as amended) and the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:5:presented within this supplementary report, along with additional impact assessment where this is
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:24:the results presented in the EIA report, which the impact assessment was based on, remain valid.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:24:update of the impact assessment in relation to these is presented in the sections below.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:47:The survey results have been reviewed and the impact assessment updated where required within this
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:47:of the previously reported impact assessment. The only additional mitigation measure required following
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:329: Environmental Impact Assessment. Chapter 8 Marine Ecology.
R-2021-0830-CD-63262 - Covering Letter - 29.09.21.pdf:1:Distinctiveness in Table 4 of the Arup Ecological Impact Assessment, 24 June 2020) within the site and / or
R-2021-0830-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:12: Arup Ecological Impact Assessment, 24 June 2020) within the site and / or off-site, and the
R-2022-0816-FFM-Teesworks Arboricortural Constraints Survey and Tree Protection Plan.pdf:1: Impact Assessment, Protection
R-2022-0816-FFM-Steel House PandR Cover Letter(1).pdf:6:An Ecological Impact Assessment is submitted with the application which assesses the impact on
R-2022-0816-FFM-Steel House PandR Cover Letter(1).pdf:8:An Ecological Impact Assessment prepared by INCA accompanies this planning application which
R-2022-0816-FFM-Steel House PandR Cover Letter(1).pdf:10:(Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (as amended) (hereafter ‘the EIA Regulations
R-2022-0816-FFM-Steel House PandR Cover Letter(1).pdf:10:• Ecological Impact Assessment (ref: INCA 2022-42), prepared by INCA;
R-2022-0816-FFM-INCA2022-42 EcIA Steel House Park and Ride.pdf:1: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2022-0816-FFM-INCA2022-42 EcIA Steel House Park and Ride.pdf:3:Environmental Management (CIEEM) guidelines for Ecological Impact Assessment (EcIA) i.
R-2022-0816-FFM-INCA2022-42 EcIA Steel House Park and Ride.pdf:18:i. CIEEM (2016) Guidelines for Ecological Impact Assessment in the UK and Ireland:
R-2022-0515-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:3: and the conclusions of the Environmental Impact Assessment that the
R-2021-0754-FFM-Officer Report 0754.pdf:9:Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017
R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf:8:C3.1 The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) has been carried out in accordance with the EIA
R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf:8: • Environmental Impact Assessment: A Guide to Procedures 9; and
R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf:8: • Guidelines for Environmental Impact Assessment 10.
R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf:29: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf:30: 1 Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017
R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf:30: Impact Assessment: A Guide to Procedures.
R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf:30: Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2021-0754-FFM-371465 Natural England Response Letter REF R.2021.0754.FF Land East of Dockside Road, South Bank.pdf:3:impacts of development are likely to be significant, a Landscape & Visual Impact Assessment should be
R-2021-0754-FFM-371465 Natural England Response Letter REF R.2021.0754.FF Land East of Dockside Road, South Bank.pdf:3:Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment for further guidance.
R-2021-0754-FFM-63455 01 LM Wind Access Road - Cover Letter 18.08.21.pdf:2:(Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017. The scheme falls within Paragraph 10F of Schedule 2
R-2021-0754-FFM-63455 01 LM Wind Access Road - Cover Letter 18.08.21.pdf:2:of The Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 which relates to
R-2021-0754-FFM-63455 01 LM Wind Access Road - Cover Letter 18.08.21.pdf:3:Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017, we note that the Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council are required
Environmental Statement, Chapter G Water Management and Flooding Section 7 Residual effects.pdf:1: residual impact assessment has been carried out on the assumption that the above mitigation
CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:5:This WFD assessment has three stages: screening, scoping and impact assessment.
CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:6:Impact assessment – to describe how any
CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:7:2.4 Impact Assessment 6
CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:7:6 WFD Impact Assessment 34
CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:7:6.2 Impact Assessment – TEES transitional water body 34
CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:8:6.3 Impact Assessment – Area not within a WFD water body 40
CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:8:6.4 Impact Assessment – Protected sites 47
CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:14: through the scoping or impact assessment stages.
CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:15:2.4 Impact Assessment
CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:15: Screening and Scoping Assessments, is to undertake an Impact Assessment to
CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:15: necessary mitigation measures. An impact assessment must be carried out for each
CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:15: The Impact Assessment describes how any identified impacts from the proposed
CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:43: 6 WFD Impact Assessment
CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:43: potentially be at risk from the proposed works. An Impact Assessment is therefore
CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:43: The Impact Assessment needs to consider if there is a pathway linking the pressure
CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:43:6.2 Impact Assessment – TEES transitional water body
CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:49:6.3 Impact Assessment – Area not within a WFD water body
CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:56:6.4 Impact Assessment – Protected sites
CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:58: The impact assessment determines whether the proposed works outlined in Section
MLA_2022_00248-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:6:Environmental impact assessment
R-2021-0422-CD-Decision Notice (1).pdf:3: and the conclusions of the Environmental Impact Assessment that the
R-2021-0610-PND-Officer Report 0610.pdf:2:Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017.
R-2022-0342-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:3: and the conclusions of the Environmental Impact Assessment that the
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:4: Appendix C – Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:62:Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:63: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:64: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:64: 4.5 Ecological Impact Assessment 10
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:65: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:66: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:66:Development Corporation (STDC) to complete an Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:67: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:68: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:68:Development Corporation (STDC) to complete an Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:69: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:70: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:71: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:72: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:73: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:74: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:75: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:75:4.5 Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:75:Ecological Impact Assessment in the UK and Ireland: Terrestrial, Freshwater, Coastal and
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:76: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:76:The impact assessment process involves:
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:77: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:77:A cumulative impact assessment has been undertaken which considers whether
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:77:Developments included in the cumulative impact assessment comprise the
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:78: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:79: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:80: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:81: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:82: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:83: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:83:5.3.1 Important Habitats (Ecological Impact Assessment)
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:84: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:85: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:86: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:87: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:88: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:89: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:90: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:91: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:92: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:93: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:94: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:95: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:96: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:97: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:98: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:99: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:100: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:101: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:102: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:103: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:104: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:105: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:106: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:107: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:108: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:109: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:110: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:111: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:112: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:113: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:114: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:115: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:116: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:117: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:118: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:119: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:120: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:121: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:123: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:125: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:128: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:129: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:130: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:131: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:132: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:133: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:134: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:136: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:137: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:138: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:139: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:140: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:141: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:142: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2022-0354-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:3: and the conclusions of the Environmental Impact Assessment that the
R-2020-0302-PND-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:3:Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017, but the
R-2022-0779-CD-COMPLIANCE OFFICER REPORT.pdf:1: out in the Ecological Impact Assessment, INCA,, dated 26 February 2021
R-2022-0779-CD-Sep 22 - CEMP - Steel House Park and Ride Relocation of stockpile mounds.pdf:20:Steel House Mound Ecological Impact Assessment and Biodiversity Assessment dated May 2022,
R-2022-0779-CD-Sep 22 - CEMP - Steel House Park and Ride Relocation of stockpile mounds.pdf:21:As highlighted in the STDC Steel House Mound Ecological Impact Assessment and Biodiversity
R-2022-0779-CD-DOC (CEMP) Covering Letter September 2022.pdf:1:shall demonstrate how the mitigation measures set out in the Ecological Impact Assessment, INCA,
R-2021-0832-CD-63262 - Covering Letter - 29.09.21.pdf:1:Distinctiveness in Table 4 of the Arup Ecological Impact Assessment, 24 June 2020) within the site and / or
R-2021-0832-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:12: Arup Ecological Impact Assessment, 24 June 2020) within the site and / or off-site, and the
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_23. Use of natural resources.pdf:1:Schedule 3 of The Marine Works (Environmental Impact Assessment) (Amendment) Regulations 2017
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_23. Use of natural resources.pdf:1:Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:2:(Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2007, as amended. In addition, RCBC issued a Scoping
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:2:(Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2007, as amended, and the Town and Country Planning
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:2:(Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017, without submitting a formal EIA Screening Request.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:4:a description of the approach taken to the specific impact assessment for each environmental topic is
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:7:Table 5.3 Impact assessment matrix
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:8:5.1.6 Cumulative Impact Assessment
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:9:There is no legislation that outlines how cumulative impact assessments (CIAs) should be undertaken.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_4. Legislative framework.pdf:2:4.4 Environmental Impact Assessment Directive
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_4. Legislative framework.pdf:2:in this instance, The Marine Works (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2007 (as amended)
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_4. Legislative framework.pdf:2:and the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 are applicable
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_4. Legislative framework.pdf:2:required under the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017, as
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf:4:England. Noise Sensitive Receptor (NSR) locations and the methodology for the impact assessment were
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf:9:17.3.4 Impact assessment methodology
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf:12:Table 17.10 Construction road traffic noise impact assessment
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf:14:Table 17.13 On-site construction phase noise impact assessment
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf:16:Table 17.15 Operational phase noise impact assessment
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:4:8 CUMULATIVE IMPACT ASSESSMENT 16
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:5:The proposed scheme has been subject to an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) which has assessed
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:18:The landscape and visual impact assessment (LVIA) establishes that operational effects of the proposed
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:20:8 CUMULATIVE IMPACT ASSESSMENT
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 8_Underwater noise assessment.pdf:2: Underwater Noise Impact Assessment – South Bank, Tees Estuary
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 8_Underwater noise assessment.pdf:3: Underwater Noise Impact Assessment – South Bank, Tees Estuary
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 8_Underwater noise assessment.pdf:4: Underwater Noise Impact Assessment – South Bank, Tees Estuary
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 8_Underwater noise assessment.pdf:4:impact assessment. As the measurement or receiver point moves away from the source, the sound
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 8_Underwater noise assessment.pdf:5: Underwater Noise Impact Assessment – South Bank, Tees Estuary
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 8_Underwater noise assessment.pdf:6: Underwater Noise Impact Assessment – South Bank, Tees Estuary
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 8_Underwater noise assessment.pdf:6:3 A Collett, T Mason (2014). York Potash Project Harbour Facilities: Underwater Noise Impact Assessment.
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 8_Underwater noise assessment.pdf:7: Underwater Noise Impact Assessment – South Bank, Tees Estuary
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 8_Underwater noise assessment.pdf:8: Underwater Noise Impact Assessment – South Bank, Tees Estuary
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 8_Underwater noise assessment.pdf:9: Underwater Noise Impact Assessment – South Bank, Tees Estuary
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 8_Underwater noise assessment.pdf:10: Underwater Noise Impact Assessment – South Bank, Tees Estuary
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 8_Underwater noise assessment.pdf:11: Underwater Noise Impact Assessment – South Bank, Tees Estuary
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 8_Underwater noise assessment.pdf:11: Report title Underwater Noise Impact Assessment – South
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf:1:This section of the EIA Report presents the findings of a Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (LVIA)
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf:4:Institute in the third edition of its ‘Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment’ (GLVIA3, 2013).
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:4:Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:4:Works (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2007 (the MWR), as
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:5:(Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:70:Impact Assessment (LVIA). The chapter considers the following potential
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:70:development, a Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (LVIA) has been
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:88:As required by both the Marine Works (Environmental Impact Assessment)
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:88:(Environmental Impact Assessment) 2017 consideration is required to be
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:89:As required by both the Marine Works (Environmental Impact Assessment)
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:89:(Environmental Impact Assessment) 2017 consideration has been given to
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:90:necessary to undertake a full human health impact assessment a point that
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:95:Cumulative Impact Assessment
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:95:A cumulative impact assessment was carried out to consider the potential for
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:96:supported by an Environmental Impact Assessment as Schedule 1
R-2020-0685-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:1:Marine Works (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2007 (as
R-2020-0685-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:1:3 Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) …………………………………………………… 3
R-2020-0685-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:3:3 Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)
R-2020-0685-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:3:The Marine Works (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2007 (as
R-2020-0685-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:4: Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment;
R-2020-0685-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:8:Visual’ impact assessment” to determine the likely impact of the crane and other tall
R-2020-0685-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:11:sea (and to inform the impact assessment). Any material to be dredged and
R-2020-0685-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:13:for environmental impact assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 57
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:9:modelling exercise to inform the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) that is being prepared as part of
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:13:area is of most interest in terms of the hydrodynamic outputs for the Environmental Impact Assessment.
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 13_Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology.pdf:2:The purpose of the Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (LVIA) is to identify the potential
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 13_Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology.pdf:2:LVIA is either carried out formally as part of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) process or
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 13_Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology.pdf:2:▪ ‘Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment’ (GLVIA), Third Edition Landscape
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:2: therefore the impact assessment presented within
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:19:‘medium’ has been assigned for the purposes of this impact assessment, taking in to account the fragmented
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:20:As such, the impact assessment presented within this section focuses on the potential impacts to marine
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1111_Appendix 1_Waste Report.pdf:4:to as the proposed scheme). This report accompanies the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:5: Cumulative Impact Assessment …………………………………………………………………………… 41
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:7:Table 16: Cumulative Impact Assessment ……………………………………………………………………………….. 42
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:8: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:11: Marine Works EIA (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations governing EIA’s for
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:49: CUMULATIVE IMPACT ASSESSMENT
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:49:The cumulative impact assessment was assessed to be a factor of the likelihood of the impact
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:49:The results of the cumulative impact assessment are given in Table 16. All impacts were assessed to
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:50:Table 16: Cumulative Impact Assessment
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:10:6.3.6 Impact assessment
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1109_Appendix 15_Flood Risk Assessment.pdf:8:The proposed scheme is defined in full within the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Report (Royal
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:1:the baseline environment on which the impact assessment can be based.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:10:follows a matrix approach to inform the impact assessment, using best practice, best available scientific
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:10:understanding and relevant guidance (e.g. CIEEM Guidelines for Ecological Impact Assessment in the UK
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:22:across the full winter period, the assumption made for the purposes of impact assessment is that North Tees
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:26:sources in the Tees estuary, receptors included in the following impact assessments are as follows:
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf:1:The Marine Works (Environmental Impact Assessment) (Amendments) Regulations 2017 and the Town and
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf:1:Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) 2017 brought in a requirement to consider the
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf:1:document (Appendix 2), this health impact assessment is therefore a concise assessment which relies on
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf:1:undertake a full human health impact assessment.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:2:The ecological impact assessment presented below has been based upon the following guidance and
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:3: for Ecological Impact Assessment in the UK and Ireland: Terrestrial, Freshwater and Coastal;
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:3:To inform this Ecological Impact Assessment (EcIA), Tees Valley Combined Authority has undertaken
R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:3: Environmental Impact Assessment 19
R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:6: Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:6: the need for Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’).
R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:6: Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017, without
R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:23: through the Environmental Impact Assessment which accompanies the application. The South
R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:23: Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:23: Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the EIA Regulations) as updated by The Town and
R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:23: Country Planning and Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment)
R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:29:5.58 The landscape and visual impact assessment (LVIA) establishes that operational effects of the
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:17:considered as not significant. A detailed impact assessment of road traffic exhaust emissions was
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:4:To inform the impact assessment of works during the proposed scheme for marine mammal species,
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:4:In addition to the methodology for the impact assessment outlined in Section 5, the magnitude of effect on
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:14:Table 10.5 Reference populations and density estimates to inform the impact assessment for marine
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:15:The underwater noise impact assessments for marine mammal species for the proposed scheme has been
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_1. Introduction.pdf:3:4.4 Environmental Impact Assessment Directive 28
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_1. Introduction.pdf:7:27 CUMULATIVE IMPACT ASSESSMENT 482
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_1. Introduction.pdf:8:13 Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_1. Introduction.pdf:8:14 Landscape and visual impact assessment figures
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_1. Introduction.pdf:9:Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in support of a marine licence application to the Marine
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_1. Introduction.pdf:9:The study area is shown on Figure 1.2. Landscape and visual impact assessment has been detailed
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_1. Introduction.pdf:9: impact assessment
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1107_Appendix 7_Land quality desk study.pdf:7: Impact Assessment (EIA) for Geology and Ground Conditions.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_30. References.pdf:2:for Ecological Impact Assessment in the UK and Ireland: Terrestrial, Freshwater, Coastal and Marine.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_30. References.pdf:11:Royal HaskoningDHV (2018). Hartlepool Approach Channel: Environmental Impact Assessment Report.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:1:27 CUMULATIVE IMPACT ASSESSMENT
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:1:Works (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2007 (as amended) and the Town and Country
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:1:Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 require an assessment of its potential
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:1:The IEMA ‘Guidelines for Environmental Impact Assessment’ (IEMA, 2004) define cumulative impacts as:
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:2:this report and summarised in Table 1.1). Landscape and visual impact assessment has been detailed
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:22:Of the proposed projects which have been screened into the cumulative impact assessment, all have
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:27:from the projects and plans screened in for cumulative impact assessment will not, therefore, also occur
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:33:cumulative noise impact assessment of the NGCT, Dogger Bank Teesside A & Sofia project and the Harbour
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:1:Subject: South Bank port facility – Environmental Impact Assessment scoping review
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:1:Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in support of a marine licence application to the Marine
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:2:Marine Works (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2007 as amended, and the Town and
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:2:Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 respectively. This document has
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:4: • Landscape and visual impact assessment.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:7: Views of the Grade II* Transporter Bridge should be assessed in the ‘Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment’ to determine the likely impact of the
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:8: for disposal to sea (and to inform the impact assessment). Any material to be dredged and disposed of within licenced disposal areas at-sea must not
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:8: Regulation 4(4) of the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 requires the assessment of significant effects
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:13:proposed quay infrastructure, drawing from the findings of the landscape and visual impact assessment
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:13:construction and operational phases; outputs from the modelling will inform the impact assessment (for
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:14:A detailed cumulative impact assessment with the wider onshore development (or other planned or
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:14:A Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (LVIA) will be undertaken as part of the EIA. This will involve
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:14:Impact Assessment, 3rd edition.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:15: 4.20. Cumulative impact assessment
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:16:A cumulative impact assessment will be undertaken, taking into account any relevant consented - but as
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 3_Scoping consultation.pdf:2:Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for this development.
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 3_Scoping consultation.pdf:4:associated with the site. Any Environmental Impact Assessment should include details of the
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 3_Scoping consultation.pdf:7: environments and will require Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in support of
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 3_Scoping consultation.pdf:7: Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017.
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 3_Scoping consultation.pdf:8: Impact Assessment scoping review) on environmental assessment requirements in
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 3_Scoping consultation.pdf:8: Impact Assessment scoping review) on environmental assessment requirements in
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_22. Climate change.pdf:6:22.3.5 Impact assessment methodology
R-2020-0685-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:1: •Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment;
R-2020-0685-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:4:Regulation 4(4) of the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment)
R-2020-0685-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:4:HSE responses to Environmental Impact Assessment consultations will be limited to our role
R-2020-0685-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:8:the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for this development.
R-2020-0685-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:8:Schedule 4 of the Town & Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations
R-2020-0685-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:9:for Ecological Impact Assessment (EcIA) have been developed by the Chartered Institute of
R-2020-0685-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:11:protected species populations in the wider area, to assist in the impact assessment.
R-2020-0685-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:11:for relevant species and the survey results, impact assessments and appropriate
R-2020-0685-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:11:decisions’. Natural England therefore advises that survey, impact assessment and mitigation
R-2020-0685-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:13:universally used for landscape and visual impact assessment.
R-2020-0685-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:13:local materials. The Environmental Impact Assessment process should detail the measures
R-2020-0685-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:13:advises that the cumulative impact assessment should include other proposals currently at
R-2020-0685-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:14:The ES should include an impact assessment to identify, describe and evaluate the effects
R-2020-0685-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:16:I would advise and/or expect that any future Environmental Impact Assessment is
R-2020-0685-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:17:accordance with the Town & Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment)
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:23:While the loss of such habitat is considered to be insignificant (in terms of impact assessment) for the
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:4: and Visual Impact Assessment’ to determine the likely impact of the Section 19
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:8:16.3.3 Impact assessment methodology
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:8:The general method for impact assessment is set out in Section 5. The specific approach to the assessment
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:8:The impact assessment defines heritage assets, and their settings, likely to be impacted by the proposed
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:8:Specifically, therefore, the impact assessment will present:
R-2020-0685-ESM-336540 R_2020_0685_ESM - Demolition of existing quay, capital dredge and development of new quay at South Bank Wharf, Grangetown, Redcar - Phase 2.pdf:3:& Visual Impact Assessment should be provided with the proposal to inform decision making. We
R-2020-0685-ESM-336540 R_2020_0685_ESM - Demolition of existing quay, capital dredge and development of new quay at South Bank Wharf, Grangetown, Redcar - Phase 2.pdf:3:refer you to the Landscape Institute Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment for
R-2020-0685-ESM-HIGHWAYS ENGLAND.pdf:10:An Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) has been produced (by Royal HaskoningDHV) in support of the
R-2019-0427-FFM-R_2019_0427_FFM - Natural England.pdf:3: & Visual Impact Assessment should be provided with the proposal to inform decision making. We
R-2019-0427-FFM-R_2019_0427_FFM - Natural England.pdf:3: refer you to the Landscape Institute Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment for
R-2019-0427-FFM-201920 Ecology report final.pdf:3:This report does not provide a detailed Ecological Impact Assessment as the works will be phased
R-2019-0427-FFM-201920 Ecology report final.pdf:12:Peak Ecology (2013) Ecological Impact Assessment: Technical Report Dogger Bank Teesside A & B.
R-2021-0473-ESM-LM Wind Reserved Matters Application Form(1).pdf:2:was an environment impact assessment application and, if so, confirm that an environmental statement was submitted to the planning
R-2021-0473-ESM-LM Wind Reserved Matters Application Form(1).pdf:2: The outline planning application was an Environment Impact Assessment application and the necessary Environmental Statement was submitted to the Planning
R-2021-0473-ESM-LM Wind ES Compliance Statement 26.05.21.pdf:12: Planning and Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) (Amendment)
R-2021-0676-FF-210518_Bravo10 Ecology report_ RevA_INCA.pdf:8:i. CIEEM (2016) Guidelines for Ecological Impact Assessment in the UK and Ireland: Terrestrial,
R-2021-0624-NM-19944173_1(1).pdf:1:Impact Assessment for the South Industrial Zone, where LM Wind would be located, has assumed
R-2021-0624-NM-Decision Notice 0357.pdf:3: and the conclusions of the Environmental Impact Assessment that the
R-2022-0186-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:3: and the conclusions of the Environmental Impact Assessment that the
R-2021-0166-FFM-Officer Report 0166.pdf:2:Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2021-0166-FFM-Officer Report 0166.pdf:8:The application is supported by an Ecological Impact Assessment l as a
R-2021-0166-FFM-Officer Report 0166.pdf:9:As part of the submitted Ecological Impact Assessment consideration has
R-2021-0166-FFM-Officer Report 0166.pdf:10:Within the Ecological Impact Assessment the following summary has been
R-2021-0166-FFM-Ecological Assessment.pdf:1: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2021-0166-FFM-Ecological Assessment.pdf:3:Environmental Management (‘CIEEM’) guidelines for Ecological Impact Assessment (‘EcIA’) i.
R-2021-0166-FFM-Ecological Assessment.pdf:15:i. CIEEM (2016) Guidelines for Ecological Impact Assessment in the UK and Ireland: Terrestrial,
R-2021-0166-FFM-Ecological Assessment.pdf:15:ix. Peak Ecology (2013) Ecological Impact Assessment: Technical Report Dogger Bank Teesside A & B
R-2021-0166-FFM-347902 - R_2021_0166_FFM Engineering operations associated with ground remediation and preparation of the site at Phase 4 Grangetown Prairie - No Obj.pdf:3:Where the impacts of development are likely to be significant, a Landscape & Visual Impact Assessment
R-2021-0166-FFM-347902 - R_2021_0166_FFM Engineering operations associated with ground remediation and preparation of the site at Phase 4 Grangetown Prairie - No Obj.pdf:3:Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment for further guidance.
R-2021-0166-FFM-Phase 4 covering letter.pdf:5:An Ecological Impact Assessment prepared by INCA accompanies this planning application which
R-2021-0166-FFM-Phase 4 covering letter.pdf:6:• Ecological Impact Assessment, prepared by INCA;
R-2021-0166-FFM-Decision Notice 0166.pdf:2: out in the Ecological Impact Assessment, INCA, dated 26 February 2021 have
R-2022-0494-FFM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:2: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2022-0494-FFM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:4:undertaken as advised within the Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2022-0494-FFM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:9:The application is supported by an Ecological Impact Assessment, as well as
R-2022-0494-FFM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:10:As part of the submitted Ecological Impact Assessment consideration has
R-2022-0494-FFM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:11:Within the Ecological Impact Assessment the following summary has been
R-2022-0494-FFM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:13: mitigation measures set out in the Ecological Impact Assessment, INCA,,
R-2022-0494-FFM-Consultee Response - Natural Heritage Manager.pdf:1:within the Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2022-0494-FFM-395561 - R_2022_0494_FFM - Engineering operations - removal of mounds - Land north of Teesworks area Redcar.pdf:3: Landscape & Visual Impact Assessment should be provided with the proposal to inform decision
R-2022-0494-FFM-DECISION NOTICE.pdf:2: out in the Ecological Impact Assessment, INCA,, dated 26 February 2021 have
R-2022-0494-FFM-19293141_1.pdf:6:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2022-0494-FFM-19293141_1.pdf:7: Impact Assessment (EIA) for the outline planning application for one of the sites within the
R-2022-0494-FFM-Ecological Impact Assessment.pdf:1:Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2022-0494-FFM-Ecological Impact Assessment.pdf:3:Environmental Management (CIEEM) guidelines for Ecological Impact Assessment (EcIA)
R-2022-0494-FFM-Ecological Impact Assessment.pdf:21:i. CIEEM (2016) Guidelines for Ecological Impact Assessment in the UK and Ireland:
R-2022-0494-FFM-Covering Letter.pdf:7:An Ecological Impact Assessment prepared by INCA accompanies this planning application which
R-2022-0494-FFM-Covering Letter.pdf:9: Ecological Impact Assessment, prepared by INCA
R-2020-0281-PND-officer report 0281.pdf:3:Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017, but the
R-2022-0205-SC-Screening Opinion Response.pdf:1:TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING (ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT)
R-2022-0205-SC-Screening Opinion Response.pdf:1:It is considered that an Environmental Impact Assessment is not required for the following
R-2022-0205-SC-Screening Opinion Report.pdf:1:The Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) (England and
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:3:purpose of providing an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Screening Request to Redcar and
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:7: seeking to determine if the works would constitute an Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:8: accordance with the Town and County Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment)
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:8:2 The Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 online. Available at:
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:8:3 The Marine Works (Environmental Impact Assessment) (Amendment) Regulations 2017 online. Available at:
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:68: of the Ecological Impact Assessment (EcIA) process used to support some planning
R-2021-1048-FFM-Decision Notice 1048(1).pdf:2: out in the Ecological Impact Assessment, INCA, dated November 2021 have
R-2021-1048-FFM-Officer Report 1048.pdf:2: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2021-1048-FFM-Officer Report 1048.pdf:17:The application is supported by an Ecological Impact Assessment (EIA) and a
R-2021-1048-FFM-Officer Report 1048.pdf:18:of the submitted Ecological Impact Assessment.
R-2021-1048-FFM-Officer Report 1048.pdf:18:As part of the submitted Ecological Impact Assessment consideration has
R-2021-1048-FFM-Officer Report 1048.pdf:20:Within the Ecological Impact Assessment a summary has been provided with
R-2021-1048-FFM-377862 - R_2021_1048_FFM Ground remediation works at Former Redcar Steelworks Site - No Objection Subject to Mitigation.pdf:2:We note within the Ecological Impact Assessment that a baseline habitat survey was completed in
R-2021-1048-FFM-377862 - R_2021_1048_FFM Ground remediation works at Former Redcar Steelworks Site - No Objection Subject to Mitigation.pdf:4:impacts of development are likely to be significant, a Landscape & Visual Impact Assessment should be
R-2021-1048-FFM-377862 - R_2021_1048_FFM Ground remediation works at Former Redcar Steelworks Site - No Objection Subject to Mitigation.pdf:4:Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment for further guidance.
R-2021-1048-FFM-TW-SIZ-XX-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S1-P02-NZT_FRA.pdf:6:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2021-0878-ESM-ApplicationFormRedacted.pdf:3:impact assessment application and, if so, confirm that an environmental statement was submitted to the planning authority at that time
R-2021-0878-ESM-ApplicationFormRedacted.pdf:3:Initial outline application was an environment impact assessment application. This was submitted to the planning authority as part of the application.
R-2021-0878-ESM-Natural England.pdf:3:impacts of development are likely to be significant, a Landscape & Visual Impact Assessment should be
R-2021-0878-ESM-Natural England.pdf:3:Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment for further guidance.
R-2021-0269-CD-Decision Notice.pdf:3: and the conclusions of the Environmental Impact Assessment that the
R-2021-0067-CD-Jan 20212366 CEMP Metals Recovery Processing Area.pdf:21:Metals Recovery Site Ecological Impact Assessment and Biodiversity Assessment dated 14th
R-2021-0067-CD-Jan 20212366 CEMP Metals Recovery Processing Area.pdf:22:As highlighted in the Ecological Impact Assessment and Biodiversity Net Gain Assessment, Arup,
R-2021-0753-FFM-Arcadis - South Bank Strategy.pdf:8: • South Bank Site Remediation, Ecological Impact Assessment Revision A Final, dated May
R-2021-0753-FFM-Arcadis - South Bank Strategy.pdf:12:Appropriate Assessment Revision A Final INCA 2021 and Ecological Impact Assessment Revision A
R-2020-0357-OOM-Consultee Response - MMO.pdf:2:Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0357-OOM-Consultee Response - MMO.pdf:2:2011/92/EU) is transposed into UK law by the Marine Works (Environmental Impact Assessment)
R-2020-0357-OOM-Consultee Response - MMO.pdf:2:the MWR and The Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations
R-2020-0357-OOM-322735 R_2020_0357_OOM - Remediation of land at Southern Industrial Zone STDC South Bank (1).pdf:4:& Visual Impact Assessment should be provided with the proposal to inform decision making. We
R-2020-0357-OOM-322735 R_2020_0357_OOM - Remediation of land at Southern Industrial Zone STDC South Bank (1).pdf:4:refer you to the Landscape Institute Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment for
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:4: including the preparation of Environmental Statements for Environmental Impact Assessments
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:4: support Environmental Impact Assessments in addition to providing support and guidance in
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:8: by Arcadis, and successfully applied to other Environmental Impact Assessments. The
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:3: judgement of those undertaking the Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) as well as topic
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:11: Impact Assessment” (2004) and the EC’s “Guidelines for the Assessment of Indirect and
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:11: Planning Practice Guidance (Environmental Impact Assessment) which states that:
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:26: 3 EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:27: 1 Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:3:O1.2 Schedule 4, Part 7 of the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment)
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:19: 6 EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:20: 1 Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:4: scale Environmental Impact Assessments (EIA).
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:40: 15 EIA: Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:24: h Drainage proposals and a Drainage Impact Assessment will be included as part of the
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:24: in this aspect. Therefore, a soils impact assessment has not been carried out.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:46: residual impact assessment has been carried out on the assumption that the above mitigation
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:56: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:57: GOV.UK (2020). Environmental Impact Assessment guidance. online GOV.UK.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - July 2020.pdf:3: have formed the basis of this Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’), and considers the
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - July 2020.pdf:38: 9 EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix C - July 2020.pdf:4:6 Development Impact Assessment 26
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix C - July 2020.pdf:4: 6.1 Sustainable Transport Network Impact Assessment 26
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix C - July 2020.pdf:4: 6.2 Highway Impact Assessment 26
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix C - July 2020.pdf:31:6 Development Impact Assessment
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix C - July 2020.pdf:31:on a worst-case scenario for the purpose of the highway impact assessment
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix C - July 2020.pdf:31:6.2 Highway Impact Assessment
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix C - July 2020.pdf:33:6.2.3 Cumulative Impact Assessment
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix C - July 2020.pdf:51:6 Development Impact Assessment 11
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix C - July 2020.pdf:51: 6.1 Scope of Highway Impact Assessment 11
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix C - July 2020.pdf:51: 6.2 Environmental Impact Assessment 12
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix C - July 2020.pdf:104:Development Impact Assessment
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix C - July 2020.pdf:104:Scope of Highways Impact Assessment
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix C - July 2020.pdf:104:necessary as a result of the comments made within this TM (and any resultant impact assessment
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix C - July 2020.pdf:104:Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix C - July 2020.pdf:105: Impact Assessment assessment need of assessment at the SRN is
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix C - July 2020.pdf:128:scenario for the purpose of highway impact assessment (assuming that 82% of people working on
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf:10: Impact Assessment
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf:11: Impact Assessment Definition
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix L - July 2020.pdf:38:Impact Assessment to support an outline planning application for the South Industrial Zone, South
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:3: out the findings of an Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) that is being submitted to
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:3: Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (as amended) Part 10(a) relates
R-2020-0357-OOM-Transport Assessment.pdf:2:6 Development Impact Assessment 26
R-2020-0357-OOM-Transport Assessment.pdf:2: 6.1 Sustainable Transport Network Impact Assessment 26
R-2020-0357-OOM-Transport Assessment.pdf:2: 6.2 Highway Impact Assessment 26
R-2020-0357-OOM-Transport Assessment.pdf:26:the transport impact assessment it will be assumed that 82% of employees will
R-2020-0357-OOM-Transport Assessment.pdf:29:6 Development Impact Assessment
R-2020-0357-OOM-Transport Assessment.pdf:29:on a worst-case scenario for the purpose of the highway impact assessment
R-2020-0357-OOM-Transport Assessment.pdf:29:6.2 Highway Impact Assessment
R-2020-0357-OOM-Transport Assessment.pdf:31:6.2.3 Cumulative Impact Assessment
R-2020-0357-OOM-Transport Assessment.pdf:49:6 Development Impact Assessment 11
R-2020-0357-OOM-Transport Assessment.pdf:49: 6.1 Scope of Highway Impact Assessment 11
R-2020-0357-OOM-Transport Assessment.pdf:49: 6.2 Environmental Impact Assessment 12
R-2020-0357-OOM-Transport Assessment.pdf:58:the transport impact assessment, it will be assumed that 82% of employees will
R-2020-0357-OOM-Transport Assessment.pdf:60: highway impact assessment;
R-2020-0357-OOM-Transport Assessment.pdf:61:6 Development Impact Assessment
R-2020-0357-OOM-Transport Assessment.pdf:61:6.1 Scope of Highway Impact Assessment
R-2020-0357-OOM-Transport Assessment.pdf:62:6.2 Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0357-OOM-Transport Assessment.pdf:62:Statement (ES). The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) will be carried out
R-2020-0357-OOM-Transport Assessment.pdf:62: Environmental Impact Assessment: A Guide to Procedures (Department of the
R-2020-0357-OOM-Transport Assessment.pdf:62: Guidelines for Environmental Impact Assessment (Institute of Environmental
R-2020-0357-OOM-Transport Assessment.pdf:63: The scope of the junction impact assessments for the TA;
R-2020-0357-OOM-Transport Assessment.pdf:102:Development Impact Assessment
R-2020-0357-OOM-Transport Assessment.pdf:102:Scope of Highways Impact Assessment
R-2020-0357-OOM-Transport Assessment.pdf:102:necessary as a result of the comments made within this TM (and any resultant impact assessment
R-2020-0357-OOM-Transport Assessment.pdf:102:Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0357-OOM-Transport Assessment.pdf:103: Impact Assessment assessment need of assessment at the SRN is
R-2020-0357-OOM-Transport Assessment.pdf:126:scenario for the purpose of highway impact assessment (assuming that 82% of people working on
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - July 2020.pdf:3:E1.5 The author has extensive experience in acoustics survey, impact assessment, and providing
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - July 2020.pdf:4: Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Regulations 1. The following summarises relevant
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - July 2020.pdf:9: (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2009 15 and has been undertaken according
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - July 2020.pdf:30: 1 The Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - July 2020.pdf:30: 15 Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2009
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:17:The Town And Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 Energy From
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:3:D1.5 The author has extensive experience in ecological survey, impact assessment, and providing
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:7:D3.17 The impact assessment process involves:
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:51: available to inform the impact assessment due to timing of the application.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:52: 11 EcIA Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:55:25 CIEEM (2016) Guidelines for Ecological Impact Assessment in the UK and Ireland: Terrestrial, Freshwater
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf:3:J1.5 Atkins demonstrates competence in environmental impact assessment through registration to
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf:3: experience in environmental consulting/ environmental impact assessment/ waste
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf:10:J3.3 According to the IEMA guidance (Materials and Waste in Environmental Impact Assessment,
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf:14: Environmental Impact Assessment, 2020) was sought. The response included general
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf:30: i IEMA guide to: Materials and Waste in Environmental Impact Assessment -
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - July 2020.pdf:4: preparing Socio-Economic Assessment in an Environmental Impact Assessment context. It has
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf:8:C3.1 The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) has been carried out in accordance with the EIA
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf:8: • Environmental Impact Assessment: A Guide to Procedures 9; and
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf:8: • Guidelines for Environmental Impact Assessment 10.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf:29: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf:30: 1 Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf:30: Impact Assessment: A Guide to Procedures.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf:30: Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix G - July 2020.pdf:27:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf:2: Environmental Impact Assessment 27
R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf:3: the need for Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’). Whilst a formal screening request was
R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf:11:2.36 RCBC issued an Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) Scoping Opinion (reference.
R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf:29: 1 Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf:29: Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf:29: Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the EIA Regulations) as updated by The Town and
R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf:29: Country Planning and Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment)
R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf:31:5.22 The Ecological Impact Assessment concluded that it is not practically possible for direct
R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf:36: 4 Drainage proposals and a Drainage Impact Assessment will be included as part of the STDC
R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf:39: timescales for construction. The visual impact assessment is based on a ‘massing plan’ of the
R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf:39: visual impact assessment for the proposed site:
R-2020-0357-OOM-Decision Notice.pdf:3: and the conclusions of the Environmental Impact Assessment that the
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:3: Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) of proposals for a general industry and storage or distribution
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:6: (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (Ref 4) which came into force on 16 May
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:6: (Environmental Impact Assessment) (Amendment) Regulations 2018 (Ref 5), which came into
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:12: Visual Impact Assessment RCBC on the scope of the
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:32: 2 EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:32: 9 LVIA Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:33: 4 Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:33: and Environmental Impact Assessment) (England) (Coronavirus) (Amendment)
R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:71:construction. The residual impact assessment has been carried out on the
R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:109:supported by an Environmental Impact Assessment as Schedule 1
R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:111: processes and the conclusions of the Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix A - July 2020.pdf:5:In accordance with Regulation 18(5) of the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment)
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:4:L2.9 The following policies are relevant to landscape and visual impact assessment for the proposed
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:6: 1 Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (Third Edition) published by the
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:6:L3.4 The Guidelines for Visual Impact Assessment Third Edition (GLVIA3) acknowledges that LVIA
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:14: Visual Impact Assessment Criteria
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:14:L3.30 The visual impact assessment draws from an identification of the sensitivity of receptors
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:14:L3.31 The impact assessment describes the current visual context from important viewpoints within
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:14: townscape and visual impact assessments in urban settings. Although this assessment is of
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:17: as timescales for construction. The visual impact assessment is based on a ‘massing plan’ of
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:17: visual impact assessment takes these factors into account and the AVRs should not be viewed in
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:17: isolation from the visual impact assessment.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:18:L3.52 Magnitude of change within views is an important element of visual impact assessment. For
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:66: 2 GLVIA – Guidance for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:66: 5 LVIA – Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:67: 1 Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (Third Edition) published by the
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - July 2020.pdf:3: Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Regulations (as amended) Ref 2 he has led on the
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - July 2020.pdf:4: The Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment)
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - July 2020.pdf:4: Ref 3, identifies the important role that the Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) process
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - July 2020.pdf:24: 8 EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - July 2020.pdf:25: 2 Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (as
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - July 2020.pdf:25: Impact Assessment) (Amendment) Regulations 2018)
R-2020-0357-OOM-322735 R_2020_0357_OOM - Remediation of land at Southern Industrial Zone STDC South Bank.pdf:4:& Visual Impact Assessment should be provided with the proposal to inform decision making. We
R-2020-0357-OOM-322735 R_2020_0357_OOM - Remediation of land at Southern Industrial Zone STDC South Bank.pdf:4:refer you to the Landscape Institute Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment for
R-2020-0357-OOM-Habitats Regulation Assessment.pdf:46:site was not available to inform the impact assessment due to timing of the
2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:1:Impact Assessment)
2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:5:5.1.3 Impact Assessments 31
2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:6:6.3.2 Impact Assessment 39
2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:7:7.5 Impact Assessment 92
2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:8:10.3.3 Impact Assessment Methodology 156
2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:12:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:14: the Scheme. It also documents the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)
2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:14: • The Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment)
2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:38: (Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and Environmental Management), Della
2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:39: Guidelines for Ecological Impact Assessment (EcIA) have been developed
2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:43: consenting requirements. Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is widely recognised
2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:44:5.1.3 Impact Assessments
2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:44: The general approach of the Impact Assessment is to determine the significance of
2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:52:6.3.2 Impact Assessment
2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:52: The ecological impact assessment is based on guidance provided by the Chartered
2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:52: Advice Note 130/10, Ecology and Nature Conservation: Criteria for Impact Assessment,
2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:52: the ecological impact assessment on the receptors of highest importance. The
2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:53: The impact assessment process involves:
2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:54: Criteria for Impact Assessment.
2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:62: APIS website does provide habitat-specific critical loads for use in impact assessment.
2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:86: This chapter presents the Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (LVIA) for the
2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:87: • Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment, 3rd edition (GLVIA3).
2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:89: Visual Impact Assessment, produced by the Landscape Institute and the
2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:89: and visual impact assessment.
2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:89: using local materials. The Environmental Impact Assessment process
2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:95: resource of the area. It does not form part of an Environment Impact Assessment (EIA).
2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:105:7.5 Impact Assessment
2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:116: almost 5km away. The Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (LVIA), in Chapter 7
2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:126: Therefore, a soils impact assessment has not been carried out.
2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:141: The impact assessment has been carried out on the assumption that the above
2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:148: Stand-alone Flood Risk Assessment (FRA), including Drainage Impact assessment (DIA)
2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:149: The general approach of the impact assessment to determine the significance of
2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:169:10.3.3 Impact Assessment Methodology
2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:179: A social impact assessment has been undertaken to assess the development proposals
2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:196: A social impact assessment has been undertaken to determine the likelihood of any
2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:219: context of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Regulations. In line with Part 7
Appendix B Scoping Letter Request.pdf:1:Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment)
Appendix B Scoping Letter Request.pdf:3:(Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017. We propose that the
Appendix B Scoping Letter Request.pdf:3: impact assessment.
Appendix B Scoping Letter Request.pdf:7:impact assessments. A desk study of current and previous planning
Environmental Statement ES Volume 2.pdf:1:Impact Assessment)
Environmental Statement ES Volume 2.pdf:6:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
Chapter 13 Grangetown Prairie Transport Statement.pdf:44:Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017.
Chapter 13 Grangetown Prairie Transport Statement.pdf:48:In relation to the protection of the railway, any Environmental Impact Assessment for the site should
Chapter 13 Grangetown Prairie Transport Statement.pdf:48:Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for this development.
Chapter 13 Grangetown Prairie Transport Statement.pdf:49:Schedule 4 of the Town & Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017,
Chapter 13 Grangetown Prairie Transport Statement.pdf:50:Impact Assessment (EcIA) have been developed by the Chartered Institute of Ecology and
Chapter 13 Grangetown Prairie Transport Statement.pdf:51:results, impact assessments and appropriate accompanying mitigation strategies included as part of
Chapter 13 Grangetown Prairie Transport Statement.pdf:52:therefore advises that survey, impact assessment and mitigation proposals for Habitats and Species
Chapter 13 Grangetown Prairie Transport Statement.pdf:53:Natural England supports the publication Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment,
Chapter 13 Grangetown Prairie Transport Statement.pdf:53:impact assessment.
Chapter 13 Grangetown Prairie Transport Statement.pdf:53:Environmental Impact Assessment process should detail the measures to be taken to ensure the
Chapter 13 Grangetown Prairie Transport Statement.pdf:55:The ES should include an impact assessment to identify, describe and evaluate the effects that are
REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:3: EU Limit Value Impact Assessment 63
REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:7:(Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 which were last updated in March 2019.
REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:23:critical loads. However, the APIS website does provide habitat-specific critical loads for use in impact assessment.
REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:46:Proposed Development. Based on the impact assessment, appropriate mitigation has been identified.
REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:63: EU Limit Value Impact Assessment
Decision Notice_R20190767OOM(4).pdf:2: conclusions of the Environmental Impact Assessment and Air Quality
Decision Notice_R20190767OOM(4).pdf:2: Environmental Impact Assessment December 2019 and Chapter 7 (Mitigation)
Appendix B Scoping Response.pdf:1:Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017.
Appendix B Scoping Response.pdf:5:In relation to the protection of the railway, any Environmental Impact Assessment for the site should
Appendix B Screening.pdf:1:Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2011 and now
Appendix B Screening.pdf:1:Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017. Energy from Waste Plant (EFW) Plant,
Appendix B Screening.pdf:1:confirmation of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Screening.
Appendix B Screening.pdf:1:(Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017. The process comprises a series
Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:3:2.4 Impact Assessment …………………………………………………………………………………………… 5
Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:4:6 WFD Impact Assessment …………………………………………………………………. 21
Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:4:6.2 Impact assessment …………………………………………………………………………………………..21
Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:10: through the scoping or impact assessment stages.
Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:11:2.4 Impact Assessment
Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:11: and Scoping Assessments, is to undertake an Impact Assessment to consider the
Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:11: measures. An impact assessment must be carried out for each receptor identified
Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:11: The Impact Assessment describes how any identified impacts from the proposed
Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:27:6 WFD Impact Assessment
Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:27: potentially be at risk from the proposed works. An Impact Assessment is therefore
Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:27: The Impact Assessment needs to consider if there is a pathway linking the pressure to
Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:27:6.2 Impact assessment
officer report.pdf:27:Visual Impact Assessment (LVIA); Flood Risk; Water Framework Directive;
officer report.pdf:33:on the assessment of impacts on specific species. The impact assessment is
officer report.pdf:33:130/10, Ecology and Nature Conservation: Criteria for Impact Assessment,
officer report.pdf:34: The impact assessment process involves:
officer report.pdf:38:The impact assessment covers an area of 10km as a zone of influence (ZoI)
officer report.pdf:50:The Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment has concluded that the
officer report.pdf:54:A Flood Risk Assessment (FRA), including Drainage Impact Assessment
officer report.pdf:55:The general approach of the impact assessment to determine the significance
officer report.pdf:75:supported by an Environmental Impact Assessment as Schedule 1
officer report.pdf:77: Impact Assessment and Air Quality Assessment that the development
officer report.pdf:78: 1 of the submitted Environmental Impact Assessment December 2019
Non Technical Summary_Final.pdf:2:The Environmental Statement provides the summary of the Environmental Impact Assessment
Non Technical Summary_Final.pdf:2:been submitted to support the Outline Planning application. Impact Assessment aims to determine
Non Technical Summary_Final.pdf:2:areas will have their own assessment guidelines for impact assessment. Impacts and mitigation are
Non Technical Summary_Final.pdf:11:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
20191201 ERF Planning DAS_Issued.pdf:6:3 Environmental Impact Assessment -5-
20191201 ERF Planning DAS_Issued.pdf:6:12.3 Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (LVIA) - 29 -
20191201 ERF Planning DAS_Issued.pdf:7:LVIA Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment
20191201 ERF Planning DAS_Issued.pdf:12:3 Environmental Impact Assessment
20191201 ERF Planning DAS_Issued.pdf:12: The Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations govern the
20191201 ERF Planning DAS_Issued.pdf:12: Regulations has been to transpose the 2014 amended Environmental Impact Assessment Directive
20191201 ERF Planning DAS_Issued.pdf:24: in attendance with Dorian Latham, Technical Director (Environmental Impact Assessment and
20191201 ERF Planning DAS_Issued.pdf:36:12.3 Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (LVIA)
20191201 ERF Planning DAS_Issued.pdf:36: A Landscape Visual Impact Assessment has been undertaken. It concluded that the site is situated
20191201 ERF Planning DAS_Issued.pdf:37: Screening, Scoping and Impact Assessment were all undertaken as part of this work. It was
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:1:Impact Assessment)
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:5:5.1.3 Impact Assessments 31
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:6:6.3.2 Impact Assessment 39
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:7:7.5 Impact Assessment 92
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:8:10.3.3 Impact Assessment Methodology 156
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:12:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:14: the Scheme. It also documents the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:14: • The Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment)
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:38: (Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and Environmental Management), Della
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:39: Guidelines for Ecological Impact Assessment (EcIA) have been developed
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:43: consenting requirements. Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is widely recognised
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:44:5.1.3 Impact Assessments
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:44: The general approach of the Impact Assessment is to determine the significance of
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:52:6.3.2 Impact Assessment
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:52: The ecological impact assessment is based on guidance provided by the Chartered
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:52: Advice Note 130/10, Ecology and Nature Conservation: Criteria for Impact Assessment,
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:52: the ecological impact assessment on the receptors of highest importance. The
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:53: The impact assessment process involves:
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:54: Criteria for Impact Assessment.
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:62: APIS website does provide habitat-specific critical loads for use in impact assessment.
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:86: This chapter presents the Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (LVIA) for the
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:87: • Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment, 3rd edition (GLVIA3).
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:89: Visual Impact Assessment, produced by the Landscape Institute and the
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:89: and visual impact assessment.
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:89: using local materials. The Environmental Impact Assessment process
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:95: resource of the area. It does not form part of an Environment Impact Assessment (EIA).
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:105:7.5 Impact Assessment
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:116: almost 5km away. The Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (LVIA), in Chapter 7
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:126: Therefore, a soils impact assessment has not been carried out.
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:141: The impact assessment has been carried out on the assumption that the above
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:148: Stand-alone Flood Risk Assessment (FRA), including Drainage Impact assessment (DIA)
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:149: The general approach of the impact assessment to determine the significance of
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:169:10.3.3 Impact Assessment Methodology
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:179: A social impact assessment has been undertaken to assess the development proposals
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:196: A social impact assessment has been undertaken to determine the likelihood of any
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:219: context of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Regulations. In line with Part 7
R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:3: EU Limit Value Impact Assessment 63
R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:7:(Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 which were last updated in March 2019.
R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:23:critical loads. However, the APIS website does provide habitat-specific critical loads for use in impact assessment.
R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:46:Proposed Development. Based on the impact assessment, appropriate mitigation has been identified.
R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:63: EU Limit Value Impact Assessment
R-2019-0767-OOM-Environmental Statement ES Volume 2.pdf:1:Impact Assessment)
R-2019-0767-OOM-Environmental Statement ES Volume 2.pdf:6:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:3:2.4 Impact Assessment …………………………………………………………………………………………… 5
R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:4:6 WFD Impact Assessment …………………………………………………………………. 21
R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:4:6.2 Impact assessment …………………………………………………………………………………………..21
R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:10: through the scoping or impact assessment stages.
R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:11:2.4 Impact Assessment
R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:11: and Scoping Assessments, is to undertake an Impact Assessment to consider the
R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:11: measures. An impact assessment must be carried out for each receptor identified
R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:11: The Impact Assessment describes how any identified impacts from the proposed
R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:27:6 WFD Impact Assessment
R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:27: potentially be at risk from the proposed works. An Impact Assessment is therefore
R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:27: The Impact Assessment needs to consider if there is a pathway linking the pressure to
R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:27:6.2 Impact assessment
R-2019-0767-OOM-20191201 ERF Planning DAS_Issued.pdf:6:3 Environmental Impact Assessment -5-
R-2019-0767-OOM-20191201 ERF Planning DAS_Issued.pdf:6:12.3 Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (LVIA) - 29 -
R-2019-0767-OOM-20191201 ERF Planning DAS_Issued.pdf:7:LVIA Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment
R-2019-0767-OOM-20191201 ERF Planning DAS_Issued.pdf:12:3 Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2019-0767-OOM-20191201 ERF Planning DAS_Issued.pdf:12: The Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations govern the
R-2019-0767-OOM-20191201 ERF Planning DAS_Issued.pdf:12: Regulations has been to transpose the 2014 amended Environmental Impact Assessment Directive
R-2019-0767-OOM-20191201 ERF Planning DAS_Issued.pdf:24: in attendance with Dorian Latham, Technical Director (Environmental Impact Assessment and
R-2019-0767-OOM-20191201 ERF Planning DAS_Issued.pdf:36:12.3 Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (LVIA)
R-2019-0767-OOM-20191201 ERF Planning DAS_Issued.pdf:36: A Landscape Visual Impact Assessment has been undertaken. It concluded that the site is situated
R-2019-0767-OOM-20191201 ERF Planning DAS_Issued.pdf:37: Screening, Scoping and Impact Assessment were all undertaken as part of this work. It was
R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix B Scoping Response.pdf:1:Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017.
R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix B Scoping Response.pdf:5:In relation to the protection of the railway, any Environmental Impact Assessment for the site should
R-2019-0767-OOM-Non Technical Summary_Final.pdf:2:The Environmental Statement provides the summary of the Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2019-0767-OOM-Non Technical Summary_Final.pdf:2:been submitted to support the Outline Planning application. Impact Assessment aims to determine
R-2019-0767-OOM-Non Technical Summary_Final.pdf:2:areas will have their own assessment guidelines for impact assessment. Impacts and mitigation are
R-2019-0767-OOM-Non Technical Summary_Final.pdf:11:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix B Screening.pdf:1:Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2011 and now
R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix B Screening.pdf:1:Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017. Energy from Waste Plant (EFW) Plant,
R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix B Screening.pdf:1:confirmation of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Screening.
R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix B Screening.pdf:1:(Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017. The process comprises a series
R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 13 Grangetown Prairie Transport Statement.pdf:44:Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017.
R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 13 Grangetown Prairie Transport Statement.pdf:48:In relation to the protection of the railway, any Environmental Impact Assessment for the site should
R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 13 Grangetown Prairie Transport Statement.pdf:48:Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for this development.
R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 13 Grangetown Prairie Transport Statement.pdf:49:Schedule 4 of the Town & Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017,
R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 13 Grangetown Prairie Transport Statement.pdf:50:Impact Assessment (EcIA) have been developed by the Chartered Institute of Ecology and
R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 13 Grangetown Prairie Transport Statement.pdf:51:results, impact assessments and appropriate accompanying mitigation strategies included as part of
R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 13 Grangetown Prairie Transport Statement.pdf:52:therefore advises that survey, impact assessment and mitigation proposals for Habitats and Species
R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 13 Grangetown Prairie Transport Statement.pdf:53:Natural England supports the publication Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment,
R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 13 Grangetown Prairie Transport Statement.pdf:53:impact assessment.
R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 13 Grangetown Prairie Transport Statement.pdf:53:Environmental Impact Assessment process should detail the measures to be taken to ensure the
R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 13 Grangetown Prairie Transport Statement.pdf:55:The ES should include an impact assessment to identify, describe and evaluate the effects that are
R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:27:Visual Impact Assessment (LVIA); Flood Risk; Water Framework Directive;
R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:33:on the assessment of impacts on specific species. The impact assessment is
R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:33:130/10, Ecology and Nature Conservation: Criteria for Impact Assessment,
R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:34: The impact assessment process involves:
R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:38:The impact assessment covers an area of 10km as a zone of influence (ZoI)
R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:50:The Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment has concluded that the
R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:54:A Flood Risk Assessment (FRA), including Drainage Impact Assessment
R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:55:The general approach of the impact assessment to determine the significance
R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:75:supported by an Environmental Impact Assessment as Schedule 1
R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:77: Impact Assessment and Air Quality Assessment that the development
R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:78: 1 of the submitted Environmental Impact Assessment December 2019
R-2019-0767-OOM-Decision Notice_R20190767OOM(4).pdf:2: conclusions of the Environmental Impact Assessment and Air Quality
R-2019-0767-OOM-Decision Notice_R20190767OOM(4).pdf:2: Environmental Impact Assessment December 2019 and Chapter 7 (Mitigation)
R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix B Scoping Letter Request.pdf:1:Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment)
R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix B Scoping Letter Request.pdf:3:(Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017. We propose that the
R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix B Scoping Letter Request.pdf:3: impact assessment.
R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix B Scoping Letter Request.pdf:7:impact assessments. A desk study of current and previous planning
R-2021-0831-CD-63262 - Covering Letter - 29.09.21.pdf:1:Distinctiveness in Table 4 of the Arup Ecological Impact Assessment, 24 June 2020) within the site and / or
R-2021-0831-CD-393340-R_2021_0831_CD-NE_Response.pdf:2:impacts of development are likely to be significant, a Landscape & Visual Impact Assessment should be
R-2021-0831-CD-393340-R_2021_0831_CD-NE_Response.pdf:2:Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment for further guidance.
R-2021-0831-CD-DECISION NOTICE 0357.pdf:3: and the conclusions of the Environmental Impact Assessment that the
R-2021-0831-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:12: Arup Ecological Impact Assessment, 24 June 2020) within the site and / or off-site, and the
R-2020-0743-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0181-MPA_ROA and Strategy.pdf:8: • Metals Recovery Site Ecological Impact Assessment and Biodiversity Net Gain Assessment
R-2020-0743-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0181-MPA_ROA and Strategy.pdf:14:An Ecological Impact Assessment and Biodiversity Net Gain Assessment was undertaken by ARUP
R-2020-0743-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0181-MPA_ROA and Strategy.pdf:14:The Ecological Impact Assessment identified a number of breeding and wintering bird species most
R-2020-0743-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0181-MPA_ROA and Strategy.pdf:14:The Ecological Impact Assessment and Biodiversity Net Gain Assessment (ARUP 2020) did not record
R-2020-0743-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0181-MPA_ROA and Strategy.pdf:14:The Ecological Impact Assessment and Biodiversity Net Gain Assessment (ARUP 2020) document
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.pdf:6: Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Regulations 1. The following summarises relevant
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.pdf:10: is therefore inherently a cumulative impact assessment.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.pdf:11: professionals in Environmental Impact Assessments.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.pdf:16:D3.56 The temporary construction impact assessment is based on the assumption that construction
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.pdf:33: the noise impact assessment. It was agreed that the existing noise environment around the site
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.pdf:38: 1 The Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.pdf:38: 15 Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2009
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:5: development scale Environmental Impact Assessments (‘EIA’).
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:36: 16 EIA: Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:5: are relevant to Landscape and Visual Impact assessment. More general information on the
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:5:J2.9 The following policies are relevant to landscape and visual impact assessment for the proposed
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:7: 1 Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (Third Edition) published by the
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:7:J3.4 The Guidelines for Visual Impact Assessment Third Edition (GLVIA3) acknowledges that LVIA
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:15: Visual Impact Assessment Criteria
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:15:J3.29 The visual impact assessment draws from an identification of the sensitivity of receptors
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:15:J3.30 The impact assessment describes the current visual context from important viewpoints within
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:15: townscape and visual impact assessments in urban settings. Although this assessment is of
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:18: visual impact assessment takes these factors into account and the AVRs should not be viewed in
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:18: isolation from the visual impact assessment.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:18:J3.50 The magnitude of change within views is an important element of visual impact assessment. For
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:36: criteria are then applied in the visual impact assessment. Appendix J2 illustrates the location
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:36: impact assessment. To enable an accurate assessment of cumulative visual effects the Verified
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:36: development can be observed are included within the visual impact assessment.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:38: as timescales for construction. The visual impact assessment is based on a ‘massing plan’ of
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:39: plan is used to inform both the landscape and visual impact assessments as the likely worst case
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:62: 2 GLVIA – Guidance for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:62: 5 LVIA – Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:63: 1 Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (Third Edition) published by the
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.pdf:6:Subject STDC Outline Applications: Environmental Impact Assessments
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.pdf:6: Projects) of Schedule 2 of the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment)
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.pdf:7: is considered that all five of the proposed developments are Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.pdf:32:sites, the outline planning applications and the proposed scope of the Environmental Impact Assessments (‘EIA’).
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.pdf:32:Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.pdf:35:In accordance with Regulation 18(5) of the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment)
R-2020-0820-ESM-341100 R_2020_0820_ESM - Natural England.pdf:3:& Visual Impact Assessment should be provided with the proposal to inform decision making. We
R-2020-0820-ESM-341100 R_2020_0820_ESM - Natural England.pdf:3:refer you to the Landscape Institute Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment for
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:43:Subject: RE: Teesworks Outline Planning Applications - Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:44:Subject: Teesworks Outline Planning Applications - Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020.pdf:34:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:4: Environmental Impact Assessment 28
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:5: Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (as amended) Part 10(a) relates
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:32: 1 Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:32: Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:32: Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the EIA Regulations) as updated by The Town and
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:32: Country Planning and Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment)
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:39: 2 A Surface Water Management Plan, drainage proposals and a Drainage Impact Assessment
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:40: the noise impact assessment. It was agreed that the existing noise environment around the site
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:43: timescales for construction. The visual impact assessment is based on a ‘massing plan’ of the
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:43: visual impact assessment for the proposed site:
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:5:6 Sustainable Transport Network Impact Assessment 25
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:5:7 Highway Impact Assessment 26
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:5: 7.3 Cumulative Impact Assessment 28
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:5: 7.5 Strategic Road Network Impact Assessment 45
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:32:7 Highway Impact Assessment
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:34:7.3 Cumulative Impact Assessment
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:51:7.5 Strategic Road Network Impact Assessment
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:61:To account for the bus service, the highway impact assessment has assumed only
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:67:6 Development Impact Assessment 13
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:67: 6.1 Scope of Highway Impact Assessment 13
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:67: 6.2 Environmental Impact Assessment 14
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:68:Environmental Impact Assessment.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:73:junction impact assessments. Access is expected to also be permitted via the
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:80:6 Development Impact Assessment
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:80:6.1 Scope of Highway Impact Assessment
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:80:Table 7 Junctions Impact Assessments
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:81:6.2 Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:81:Statement (ES) for each development. The Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:81: Environmental Impact Assessment: A Guide to Procedures (Department of the
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:81: Guidelines for Environmental Impact Assessment (Institute of Environmental
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:81: The scope of the junction impact assessments for the TA’s;
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:89:Development Impact Assessment
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:89:Scope of Highway Impact Assessment
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:89:Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:96: Development impact assessment made need of assessment at the SRN is
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:263:6 Development Impact Assessment 13
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:263: 6.1 Scope of Highway Impact Assessment 13
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:263: 6.2 Environmental Impact Assessment 14
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:264:Environmental Impact Assessment.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:269:junction impact assessments. Access is expected to also be permitted via the
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:276:6 Development Impact Assessment
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:276:6.1 Scope of Highway Impact Assessment
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:276:Table 7 Junctions Impact Assessments
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:277:6.2 Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:277:Statement (ES) for each development. The Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:277: Environmental Impact Assessment: A Guide to Procedures (Department of the
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:277: Guidelines for Environmental Impact Assessment (Institute of Environmental
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:277: The scope of the junction impact assessments for the TA’s;
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:285:Development Impact Assessment
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:285:Scope of Highway Impact Assessment
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:285:Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:292: Development impact assessment made need of assessment at the SRN is
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:3: out the findings of an Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) that has been submitted to
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:3: Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (as amended). Part 10(a)
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:15: • A detailed FRA and Drainage Impact Assessment (DIA) with drainage strategy (for both foul
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:20:11.1 A Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment has been undertaken by BDP to assess the
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:25: occupier), a detailed Flood Risk Assessment, Drainage Impact Assessment with drainage
R-2020-0820-ESM-2022 03 08 (Lakenby 0820) Conds.pdf:3:accompanied by a transport impact assessment setting out the predicted peak hour
R-2020-0820-ESM-2022 03 08 (Lakenby 0820) Conds.pdf:3:28. All traffic impact assessments submitted to the Local Planning Authority pursuant
R-2020-0820-ESM-2022 03 08 (Lakenby 0820) Conds.pdf:4:Condition 29 unless a transport impact assessment has been submitted to and
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter I - Climate Change - Dec 2020.pdf:15: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0820-ESM-Decision Notice 0820.pdf:8: must be accompanied by a transport impact assessment setting out the
R-2020-0820-ESM-Decision Notice 0820.pdf:8:26. All traffic impact assessments submitted to the Local Planning Authority
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter D - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.pdf:11:Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 Energy From Waste Plant (Efw)
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:9:C3.1 The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) has been carried out in accordance with the EIA
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:9: 1 Environmental Impact Assessment: A Guide to Procedures 9;
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:9: 2 Guidelines for Environmental Impact Assessment 10; and
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:29: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:30: 1 Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:30: Impact Assessment: A Guide to Procedures.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:30: Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby EcIA Rev A.pdf:1:Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby EcIA Rev A.pdf:3:Environmental Management (‘CIEEM’) guidelines for Ecological Impact Assessment (‘EcIA’) i.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby EcIA Rev A.pdf:17:i. CIEEM (2016) Guidelines for Ecological Impact Assessment in the UK and Ireland: Terrestrial,
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby EcIA Rev A.pdf:17:ix. Peak Ecology (2013) Ecological Impact Assessment: Technical Report Dogger Bank Teesside A & B
R-2020-0270-FFM-319577 Response Letter.pdf:4:development are likely to be significant, a Landscape & Visual Impact Assessment should be provided
R-2020-0270-FFM-319577 Response Letter.pdf:4:Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment for further guidance.
R-2020-0270-FFM-Officer Report 0270.pdf:2: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0270-FFM-Officer Report 0270.pdf:11:The application is supported by an Ecological Impact Assessment and
R-2020-0724-PND-Officer Report.pdf:2:(Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017, but the demolition is
R-2022-0355-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0271-02-South Bank Priority Strategy.pdf:8: South Bank Site Remediation, Ecological Impact Assessment Revision A Final, dated May
R-2022-0355-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0271-02-South Bank Priority Strategy.pdf:16:Appropriate Assessment Revision A Final INCA 2021 and Ecological Impact Assessment Revision A
R-2022-0355-FFM-20857612_1.pdf:2:Impact Assessment that the development will not give rise to significant adverse impacts on the
R-2022-0355-FFM-CFB03707 Nuisance.pdf:2:- Provide a noise impact assessment, to be carried out by a competent person in
R-2022-0355-FFM-64764 SeAH Detailed Application Covering Letter March 2022(1).pdf:2:Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2022-0355-FFM-Officer report.pdf:7: Provide a noise impact assessment, to be carried out by a competent
R-2022-0355-FFM-Officer report.pdf:10:a Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment that was based on the
R-2022-0355-FFM-390614 - Erection of Industrial Facility. Land at South Bank, Off Tees Dock Road, South Bank - No Objection.pdf:3:impacts of development are likely to be significant, a Landscape & Visual Impact Assessment should be
R-2022-0355-FFM-390614 - Erection of Industrial Facility. Land at South Bank, Off Tees Dock Road, South Bank - No Objection.pdf:3:Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment for further guidance.
R-2021-0846-FFM-Arcadis - South Bank Strategy.pdf:8: • South Bank Site Remediation, Ecological Impact Assessment Revision A Final, dated May
R-2021-0846-FFM-Arcadis - South Bank Strategy.pdf:12:Appropriate Assessment Revision A Final INCA 2021 and Ecological Impact Assessment Revision A
R-2021-0439-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:3: and the conclusions of the Environmental Impact Assessment that the
R-2021-0439-CD-South Bank Quay Strategy Rev. 1.pdf:8: South Bank Site Remediation, Ecological Impact Assessment Revision A Final, dated May
R-2021-0439-CD-South Bank Quay Strategy Rev. 1.pdf:14:Appropriate Assessment Revision A Final INCA 2021 and Ecological Impact Assessment Revision A
R-2021-0943-CD-Natural England.pdf:3:impacts of development are likely to be significant, a Landscape & Visual Impact Assessment should be
R-2021-0943-CD-Natural England.pdf:3:Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment for further guidance.
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:72: Summary of EIA Noise Impact Assessment
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:162:The planning applications were supported by an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Report (Royal
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:168:Gateway Container Terminal (NGCT) Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). The 2019 NGCT survey
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:72: Summary of EIA Noise Impact Assessment
R-2021-0397-PND-officer report.pdf:2:Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017.
R-2022-0411-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:3: and the conclusions of the Environmental Impact Assessment that the
R-2021-1077-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:3: and the conclusions of the Environmental Impact Assessment that the
R-2020-0318-FFM-322582 R_2020_0318_FFM - Ground remediation works at Grangetown Prairie, STDC land, Redcar.pdf:3:& Visual Impact Assessment should be provided with the proposal to inform decision making. We
R-2020-0318-FFM-322582 R_2020_0318_FFM - Ground remediation works at Grangetown Prairie, STDC land, Redcar.pdf:3:refer you to the Landscape Institute Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment for
R-2020-0318-FFM-MMO response.pdf:2:Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0318-FFM-MMO response.pdf:2:2011/92/EU) is transposed into UK law by the Marine Works (Environmental Impact Assessment)
R-2020-0318-FFM-MMO response.pdf:2:the MWR and The Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations
R-2020-0318-FFM-officer report.pdf:2: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0318-FFM-officer report.pdf:14:The application is supported by an Ecological Impact Assessment which
R-2020-0318-FFM-officer report.pdf:18:As part of the submitted Ecological Impact Assessment a data search with
R-2020-0318-FFM-officer report.pdf:19:Impact Assessment. All species listed within the Ecological Impact
R-2020-0318-FFM-officer report.pdf:21:Within the Ecological Impact Assessment the following summary has been
R-2020-0318-FFM-officer report.pdf:24: Ecological Impact Assessment, 24 June 2020) within the site and / or off-
R-2020-0318-FFM-EA R_2020_0318_FFM 20 August 2020 OFFICIAL_.pdf:2:In reference to page 5 of the Ecological Impact Assessment, Arup, 24 June 2020,
R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:5:This WFD assessment has three stages: screening, scoping and impact assessment.
R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:6:Impact assessment – to describe how any
R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:7:2.4 Impact Assessment 6
R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:7:6 WFD Impact Assessment 34
R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:7:6.2 Impact Assessment – TEES transitional water body 34
R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:8:6.3 Impact Assessment – Area not within a WFD water body 40
R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:8:6.4 Impact Assessment – Protected sites 47
R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:14: through the scoping or impact assessment stages.
R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:15:2.4 Impact Assessment
R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:15: Screening and Scoping Assessments, is to undertake an Impact Assessment to
R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:15: necessary mitigation measures. An impact assessment must be carried out for each
R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:15: The Impact Assessment describes how any identified impacts from the proposed
R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:43: 6 WFD Impact Assessment
R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:43: potentially be at risk from the proposed works. An Impact Assessment is therefore
R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:43: The Impact Assessment needs to consider if there is a pathway linking the pressure
R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:43:6.2 Impact Assessment – TEES transitional water body
R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:49:6.3 Impact Assessment – Area not within a WFD water body
R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:56:6.4 Impact Assessment – Protected sites
R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:58: The impact assessment determines whether the proposed works outlined in Section
R-2021-0924-CD-Decision Notice 0357.pdf:3: and the conclusions of the Environmental Impact Assessment that the
R-2021-0729-CD-Decision Notice.pdf:3: and the conclusions of the Environmental Impact Assessment that the
R-2021-0729-CD-South Bank Condition 6 Covering Letter 19.08.21.pdf:1:detail of the development and its processes and the conclusions of the Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2021-0729-CD-COMPLIANCE DECISION NOTICE.pdf:2: and the conclusions of the Environmental Impact Assessment that the
R-2021-0729-CD-INCA2021-59 HRA - South Bank reserved matters.pdf:2:Impact Assessment that the development will not give rise to significant adverse impacts on the
R-2021-0905-CD-Decision Notice.pdf:3: and the conclusions of the Environmental Impact Assessment that the
R-2020-0799-CD-Nov 2020 - 2383 - CEMP - Prairie Phase 2 Works Prairie Rev 2 (1).pdf:19:STDC Prairie Site Remediation Ecological Impact Assessment dated 24th June 2020 operatives
R-2020-0799-CD-Nov 2020 - 2383 - CEMP - Prairie Phase 2 Works Prairie Rev 2 (1).pdf:20:Impact Assessment dated 24th June 2020 and its disturbed nature, there is the potential for
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:4: Appendix C – Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:62:Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:63: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:64: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:64: 4.5 Ecological Impact Assessment 10
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:65: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:66: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:66:Development Corporation (STDC) to complete an Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:67: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:68: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:68:Development Corporation (STDC) to complete an Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:69: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:70: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:71: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:72: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:73: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:74: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:75: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:75:4.5 Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:75:Ecological Impact Assessment in the UK and Ireland: Terrestrial, Freshwater, Coastal and
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:76: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:76:The impact assessment process involves:
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:77: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:77:A cumulative impact assessment has been undertaken which considers whether
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:77:Developments included in the cumulative impact assessment comprise the
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:78: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:79: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:80: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:81: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:82: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:83: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:83:5.3.1 Important Habitats (Ecological Impact Assessment)
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:84: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:85: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:86: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:87: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:88: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:89: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:90: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:91: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:92: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:93: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:94: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:95: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:96: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:97: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:98: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:99: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:100: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:101: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:102: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:103: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:104: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:105: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:106: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:107: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:108: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:109: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:110: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:111: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:112: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:113: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:114: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:115: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:116: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:117: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:118: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:119: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:120: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:121: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:123: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:125: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:128: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:129: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:130: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:131: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:132: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:133: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:134: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:136: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:137: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:138: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:139: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:140: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:141: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:142: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2022-0746-CD-406263 response.pdf:2:development are likely to be significant, a Landscape & Visual Impact Assessment should be provided with
R-2022-0746-CD-406263 response.pdf:2:and Visual Impact Assessment for further guidance.
R-2022-0746-CD-Decision Notice (4).pdf:3: and the conclusions of the Environmental Impact Assessment that the
R-2022-0096-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0408-02-Rem_Strat_South_Bank_West_Rev01 (Part 1).pdf:9: South Bank Site Remediation, Ecological Impact Assessment Revision A Final, dated May
R-2022-0096-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0408-02-Rem_Strat_South_Bank_West_Rev01 (Part 1).pdf:17:Assessment Revision A Final INCA 2021 and Ecological Impact Assessment Revision A Final, Report
R-2022-0096-CD-Decision Notice.pdf:3: and the conclusions of the Environmental Impact Assessment that the
R-2022-0237-CD-Decision Notice R 2021 0166 FFM.pdf:2: out in the Ecological Impact Assessment, INCA, dated 26 February 2021 have
R-2021-0713-CD-Arcadis - South Bank Strategy.pdf:8: • South Bank Site Remediation, Ecological Impact Assessment Revision A Final, dated May
R-2021-0713-CD-Arcadis - South Bank Strategy.pdf:12:Appropriate Assessment Revision A Final INCA 2021 and Ecological Impact Assessment Revision A
R-2021-0608-PND-Officer Report 0608.pdf:2:Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations
R-2021-0608-PND-210801_Ecolgy screening (EIA criteria) for Teesworks demolitions_INCA_RevA.pdf:3:ecology, based on the requirements of an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), to
R-2021-0608-PND-210801_Ecolgy screening (EIA criteria) for Teesworks demolitions_INCA_RevA.pdf:11:The Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017.
R-2021-0608-PND-363937 - R_2021_0608_PND Prior Notification for demolition of structures at Former Redcar Steel Works Site (Teesworks), Redcar.pdf:3:Where the impacts of development are likely to be significant, a Landscape & Visual Impact Assessment
R-2021-0608-PND-363937 - R_2021_0608_PND Prior Notification for demolition of structures at Former Redcar Steel Works Site (Teesworks), Redcar.pdf:3:Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment for further guidance.
MLA 2020 00506 South Bank Phase 1 MLA 2020 00507 Phase 2.pdf:1:has been subject to an Environmental Impact Assessment which included assessment of the
20210121 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phase II Benthic ecology JPQC.pdf:1:9. The above cited reports represent the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and associated
20210121 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phase II Benthic ecology JPQC.pdf:3:20. Yes, the EIA clearly sets out the impact assessment methodology: it uses a well-established
20210119 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay CP advice + JPQC.pdf:1:MARINE WORKS (ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT) REGULATIONS 2007 (AS
20210119 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay CP advice + JPQC.pdf:1: phase may vary, and the Environmental Impact Assessment is conducted assuming that the
20210119 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay CP advice + JPQC.pdf:3:21. The ES indicates that (coastal process) effects and impact assessment is carried out by ‘Expert
20210119 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay CP advice + JPQC.pdf:5:29. A ‘standard’ discussion of cumulative impact assessment (CIA) is provided i.e., indicating that
20210115 MLA202000507 South Bank Quay-phase 2 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:1:1. With reference to the above request to review the Environmental Impact Assessment report for the
20210115 MLA202000507 South Bank Quay-phase 2 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:3: Barrage fish counter, information collated and compiled from previous impact assessments for
20210115 MLA202000507 South Bank Quay-phase 2 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:5: cumulative impact assessment (Section 27.5.9) along with the Anglo-American Harbour facilities
20210115 MLA202000507 South Bank Quay-phase 2 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:11: and impact assessment for fish and fish ecology, which is standard practice for an application of
MLA202000506 & MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phases 1&2 UWN advice + JPQC.pdf:1:MARINE WORKS (ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT) REGULATIONS (AMENDED)
20210201 MLA202000506 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Phases 1 and 2 - EIA Licence Advice Minute - SEAL Advice v2+SJB.pdf:4: assessment. The NGCT was taken forward for cumulative impact assessment (CIA) and this
20210201 MLA202000506 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Phases 1 and 2 - EIA Licence Advice Minute - SEAL Advice v2+SJB.pdf:5: impact assessment.
20210201 MLA202000506 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Phases 1 and 2 - EIA Licence Advice Minute - SEAL Advice v2+SJB.pdf:6: Quay, and recommend that the applicant provides a more detailed impact assessment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:4:8 CUMULATIVE IMPACT ASSESSMENT 16
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:5:The proposed scheme has been subject to an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) which has assessed
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:18:The landscape and visual impact assessment (LVIA) establishes that operational effects of the proposed
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:20:8 CUMULATIVE IMPACT ASSESSMENT
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:3:4.4 Environmental Impact Assessment Directive 28
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:7:27 CUMULATIVE IMPACT ASSESSMENT 482
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:8:13 Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:8:14 Landscape and visual impact assessment figures
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:9:Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in support of a marine licence application to the Marine
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:9:The study area is shown on Figure 1.2. Landscape and visual impact assessment has been detailed
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:9: impact assessment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:36:4.4 Environmental Impact Assessment Directive
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:36:in this instance, The Marine Works (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2007 (as amended)
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:36:and the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 are applicable
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:36:required under the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017, as
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:43:(Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2007, as amended. In addition, RCBC issued a Scoping
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:43:(Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2007, as amended, and the Town and Country Planning
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:43:(Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017, without submitting a formal EIA Screening Request.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:45:a description of the approach taken to the specific impact assessment for each environmental topic is
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:48:Table 5.3 Impact assessment matrix
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:49:5.1.6 Cumulative Impact Assessment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:50:There is no legislation that outlines how cumulative impact assessments (CIAs) should be undertaken.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:60:6.3.6 Impact assessment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:192: therefore the impact assessment presented within
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:209:‘medium’ has been assigned for the purposes of this impact assessment, taking in to account the fragmented
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:210:As such, the impact assessment presented within this section focuses on the potential impacts to marine
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:220:To inform the impact assessment of works during the proposed scheme for marine mammal species,
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:220:In addition to the methodology for the impact assessment outlined in Section 5, the magnitude of effect on
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:230:Table 10.5 Reference populations and density estimates to inform the impact assessment for marine
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:231:The underwater noise impact assessments for marine mammal species for the proposed scheme has been
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:245:The ecological impact assessment presented below has been based upon the following guidance and
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:246: for Ecological Impact Assessment in the UK and Ireland: Terrestrial, Freshwater and Coastal;
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:246:To inform this Ecological Impact Assessment (EcIA), Tees Valley Combined Authority has undertaken
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:270:the baseline environment on which the impact assessment can be based.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:279:follows a matrix approach to inform the impact assessment, using best practice, best available scientific
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:279:understanding and relevant guidance (e.g. CIEEM Guidelines for Ecological Impact Assessment in the UK
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:291:across the full winter period, the assumption made for the purposes of impact assessment is that North Tees
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:295:sources in the Tees estuary, receptors included in the following impact assessments are as follows:
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:329:While the loss of such habitat is considered to be insignificant (in terms of impact assessment) for the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:342: and Visual Impact Assessment’ to determine the likely impact of the Section 19
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:346:16.3.3 Impact assessment methodology
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:346:The general method for impact assessment is set out in Section 5. The specific approach to the assessment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:346:The impact assessment defines heritage assets, and their settings, likely to be impacted by the proposed
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:346:Specifically, therefore, the impact assessment will present:
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:365:England. Noise Sensitive Receptor (NSR) locations and the methodology for the impact assessment were
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:370:17.3.4 Impact assessment methodology
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:373:Table 17.10 Construction road traffic noise impact assessment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:375:Table 17.13 On-site construction phase noise impact assessment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:377:Table 17.15 Operational phase noise impact assessment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:394:considered as not significant. A detailed impact assessment of road traffic exhaust emissions was
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:397:This section of the EIA Report presents the findings of a Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (LVIA)
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:400:Institute in the third edition of its ‘Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment’ (GLVIA3, 2013).
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:465:22.3.5 Impact assessment methodology
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:474:Schedule 3 of The Marine Works (Environmental Impact Assessment) (Amendment) Regulations 2017
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:474:Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:476:The Marine Works (Environmental Impact Assessment) (Amendments) Regulations 2017 and the Town and
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:476:Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) 2017 brought in a requirement to consider the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:476:document (Appendix 2), this health impact assessment is therefore a concise assessment which relies on
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:476:undertake a full human health impact assessment.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:490:27 CUMULATIVE IMPACT ASSESSMENT
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:490:Works (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2007 (as amended) and the Town and Country
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:490:Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 require an assessment of its potential
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:490:The IEMA ‘Guidelines for Environmental Impact Assessment’ (IEMA, 2004) define cumulative impacts as:
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:491:this report and summarised in Table 1.1). Landscape and visual impact assessment has been detailed
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:511:Of the proposed projects which have been screened into the cumulative impact assessment, all have
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:516:from the projects and plans screened in for cumulative impact assessment will not, therefore, also occur
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:583:cumulative noise impact assessment of the NGCT, Dogger Bank Teesside A & Sofia project and the Harbour
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:589:for Ecological Impact Assessment in the UK and Ireland: Terrestrial, Freshwater, Coastal and Marine.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:598:Royal HaskoningDHV (2018). Hartlepool Approach Channel: Environmental Impact Assessment Report.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:5:to as the proposed scheme). This report accompanies the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:51:Subject: South Bank port facility – Environmental Impact Assessment scoping review
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:51:Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in support of a marine licence application to the Marine
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:52:Marine Works (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2007 as amended, and the Town and
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:52:Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 respectively. This document has
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:54: • Landscape and visual impact assessment.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:57: Views of the Grade II* Transporter Bridge should be assessed in the ‘Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment’ to determine the likely impact of the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:58: for disposal to sea (and to inform the impact assessment). Any material to be dredged and disposed of within licenced disposal areas at-sea must not
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:58: Regulation 4(4) of the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 requires the assessment of significant effects
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:63:proposed quay infrastructure, drawing from the findings of the landscape and visual impact assessment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:63:construction and operational phases; outputs from the modelling will inform the impact assessment (for
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:64:A detailed cumulative impact assessment with the wider onshore development (or other planned or
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:64:A Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (LVIA) will be undertaken as part of the EIA. This will involve
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:64:Impact Assessment, 3rd edition.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:65: 4.20. Cumulative impact assessment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:66:A cumulative impact assessment will be undertaken, taking into account any relevant consented - but as
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:75:Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for this development.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:77:associated with the site. Any Environmental Impact Assessment should include details of the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:80: environments and will require Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in support of
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:80: Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:81: Impact Assessment scoping review) on environmental assessment requirements in
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:81: Impact Assessment scoping review) on environmental assessment requirements in
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:139:modelling exercise to inform the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) that is being prepared as part of
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:143:area is of most interest in terms of the hydrodynamic outputs for the Environmental Impact Assessment.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:253: Impact Assessment (EIA) for Geology and Ground Conditions.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-10.pdf:15:A cumulative impact assessment (CIA) is presented in Section 27 of the EIA Report. Section 27.5.2
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-10.pdf:17:the impact assessment updated where required within a supplementary report, and it is assumed the MMO
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:3:4.4 Environmental Impact Assessment Directive 28
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:7:27 CUMULATIVE IMPACT ASSESSMENT 482
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:8:13 Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:8:14 Landscape and visual impact assessment figures
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:9:Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in support of a marine licence application to the Marine
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:9:The study area is shown on Figure 1.2. Landscape and visual impact assessment has been detailed
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:9: impact assessment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:36:4.4 Environmental Impact Assessment Directive
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:36:in this instance, The Marine Works (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2007 (as amended)
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:36:and the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 are applicable
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:36:required under the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017, as
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:43:(Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2007, as amended. In addition, RCBC issued a Scoping
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:43:(Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2007, as amended, and the Town and Country Planning
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:43:(Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017, without submitting a formal EIA Screening Request.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:45:a description of the approach taken to the specific impact assessment for each environmental topic is
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:48:Table 5.3 Impact assessment matrix
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:49:5.1.6 Cumulative Impact Assessment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:50:There is no legislation that outlines how cumulative impact assessments (CIAs) should be undertaken.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:60:6.3.6 Impact assessment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:192: therefore the impact assessment presented within
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:209:‘medium’ has been assigned for the purposes of this impact assessment, taking in to account the fragmented
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:210:As such, the impact assessment presented within this section focuses on the potential impacts to marine
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:220:To inform the impact assessment of works during the proposed scheme for marine mammal species,
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:220:In addition to the methodology for the impact assessment outlined in Section 5, the magnitude of effect on
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:230:Table 10.5 Reference populations and density estimates to inform the impact assessment for marine
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:231:The underwater noise impact assessments for marine mammal species for the proposed scheme has been
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:245:The ecological impact assessment presented below has been based upon the following guidance and
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:246: for Ecological Impact Assessment in the UK and Ireland: Terrestrial, Freshwater and Coastal;
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:246:To inform this Ecological Impact Assessment (EcIA), Tees Valley Combined Authority has undertaken
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:270:the baseline environment on which the impact assessment can be based.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:279:follows a matrix approach to inform the impact assessment, using best practice, best available scientific
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:279:understanding and relevant guidance (e.g. CIEEM Guidelines for Ecological Impact Assessment in the UK
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:291:across the full winter period, the assumption made for the purposes of impact assessment is that North Tees
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:295:sources in the Tees estuary, receptors included in the following impact assessments are as follows:
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:329:While the loss of such habitat is considered to be insignificant (in terms of impact assessment) for the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:342: and Visual Impact Assessment’ to determine the likely impact of the Section 19
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:346:16.3.3 Impact assessment methodology
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:346:The general method for impact assessment is set out in Section 5. The specific approach to the assessment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:346:The impact assessment defines heritage assets, and their settings, likely to be impacted by the proposed
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:346:Specifically, therefore, the impact assessment will present:
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:365:England. Noise Sensitive Receptor (NSR) locations and the methodology for the impact assessment were
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:370:17.3.4 Impact assessment methodology
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:373:Table 17.10 Construction road traffic noise impact assessment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:375:Table 17.13 On-site construction phase noise impact assessment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:377:Table 17.15 Operational phase noise impact assessment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:394:considered as not significant. A detailed impact assessment of road traffic exhaust emissions was
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:397:This section of the EIA Report presents the findings of a Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (LVIA)
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:400:Institute in the third edition of its ‘Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment’ (GLVIA3, 2013).
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:465:22.3.5 Impact assessment methodology
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:474:Schedule 3 of The Marine Works (Environmental Impact Assessment) (Amendment) Regulations 2017
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:474:Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:476:The Marine Works (Environmental Impact Assessment) (Amendments) Regulations 2017 and the Town and
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:476:Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) 2017 brought in a requirement to consider the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:476:document (Appendix 2), this health impact assessment is therefore a concise assessment which relies on
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:476:undertake a full human health impact assessment.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:490:27 CUMULATIVE IMPACT ASSESSMENT
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:490:Works (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2007 (as amended) and the Town and Country
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:490:Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 require an assessment of its potential
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:490:The IEMA ‘Guidelines for Environmental Impact Assessment’ (IEMA, 2004) define cumulative impacts as:
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:491:this report and summarised in Table 1.1). Landscape and visual impact assessment has been detailed
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:511:Of the proposed projects which have been screened into the cumulative impact assessment, all have
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:516:from the projects and plans screened in for cumulative impact assessment will not, therefore, also occur
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:583:cumulative noise impact assessment of the NGCT, Dogger Bank Teesside A & Sofia project and the Harbour
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:589:for Ecological Impact Assessment in the UK and Ireland: Terrestrial, Freshwater, Coastal and Marine.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:598:Royal HaskoningDHV (2018). Hartlepool Approach Channel: Environmental Impact Assessment Report.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:120: Underwater Noise Impact Assessment – South Bank, Tees Estuary
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:121: Underwater Noise Impact Assessment – South Bank, Tees Estuary
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:122: Underwater Noise Impact Assessment – South Bank, Tees Estuary
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:122:impact assessment. As the measurement or receiver point moves away from the source, the sound
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:123: Underwater Noise Impact Assessment – South Bank, Tees Estuary
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:124: Underwater Noise Impact Assessment – South Bank, Tees Estuary
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:124:3 A Collett, T Mason (2014). York Potash Project Harbour Facilities: Underwater Noise Impact Assessment.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:125: Underwater Noise Impact Assessment – South Bank, Tees Estuary
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:126: Underwater Noise Impact Assessment – South Bank, Tees Estuary
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:127: Underwater Noise Impact Assessment – South Bank, Tees Estuary
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:128: Underwater Noise Impact Assessment – South Bank, Tees Estuary
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:129: Underwater Noise Impact Assessment – South Bank, Tees Estuary
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:129: Report title Underwater Noise Impact Assessment – South
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:135: Cumulative Impact Assessment …………………………………………………………………………… 41
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:137:Table 16: Cumulative Impact Assessment ……………………………………………………………………………….. 42
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:138: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:141: Marine Works EIA (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations governing EIA’s for
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:179: CUMULATIVE IMPACT ASSESSMENT
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:179:The cumulative impact assessment was assessed to be a factor of the likelihood of the impact
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:179:The results of the cumulative impact assessment are given in Table 16. All impacts were assessed to
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:180:Table 16: Cumulative Impact Assessment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:313:The purpose of the Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (LVIA) is to identify the potential
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:313:LVIA is either carried out formally as part of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) process or
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:313:▪ ‘Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment’ (GLVIA), Third Edition Landscape
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:350:The proposed scheme is defined in full within the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Report (Royal
MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:2:environments and requires Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in support of a
MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:7:Environmental impact assessment
MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:20:inform the impact assessment. Sediment quality data from the proposed dredge
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:3:4.4 Environmental Impact Assessment Directive 28
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:7:27 CUMULATIVE IMPACT ASSESSMENT 482
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:8:13 Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:8:14 Landscape and visual impact assessment figures
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:9:Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in support of a marine licence application to the Marine
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:9:The study area is shown on Figure 1.2. Landscape and visual impact assessment has been detailed
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:9: impact assessment
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:36:4.4 Environmental Impact Assessment Directive
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:36:in this instance, The Marine Works (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2007 (as amended)
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:36:and the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 are applicable
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:36:required under the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017, as
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:43:(Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2007, as amended. In addition, RCBC issued a Scoping
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:43:(Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2007, as amended, and the Town and Country Planning
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:43:(Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017, without submitting a formal EIA Screening Request.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:45:a description of the approach taken to the specific impact assessment for each environmental topic is
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:48:Table 5.3 Impact assessment matrix
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:49:5.1.6 Cumulative Impact Assessment
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:50:There is no legislation that outlines how cumulative impact assessments (CIAs) should be undertaken.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:60:6.3.6 Impact assessment
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:192: therefore the impact assessment presented within
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:209:‘medium’ has been assigned for the purposes of this impact assessment, taking in to account the fragmented
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:210:As such, the impact assessment presented within this section focuses on the potential impacts to marine
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:220:To inform the impact assessment of works during the proposed scheme for marine mammal species,
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:220:In addition to the methodology for the impact assessment outlined in Section 5, the magnitude of effect on
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:230:Table 10.5 Reference populations and density estimates to inform the impact assessment for marine
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:231:The underwater noise impact assessments for marine mammal species for the proposed scheme has been
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:245:The ecological impact assessment presented below has been based upon the following guidance and
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:246: for Ecological Impact Assessment in the UK and Ireland: Terrestrial, Freshwater and Coastal;
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:246:To inform this Ecological Impact Assessment (EcIA), Tees Valley Combined Authority has undertaken
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:270:the baseline environment on which the impact assessment can be based.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:279:follows a matrix approach to inform the impact assessment, using best practice, best available scientific
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:279:understanding and relevant guidance (e.g. CIEEM Guidelines for Ecological Impact Assessment in the UK
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:291:across the full winter period, the assumption made for the purposes of impact assessment is that North Tees
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:295:sources in the Tees estuary, receptors included in the following impact assessments are as follows:
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:329:While the loss of such habitat is considered to be insignificant (in terms of impact assessment) for the
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:342: and Visual Impact Assessment’ to determine the likely impact of the Section 19
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:346:16.3.3 Impact assessment methodology
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:346:The general method for impact assessment is set out in Section 5. The specific approach to the assessment
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:346:The impact assessment defines heritage assets, and their settings, likely to be impacted by the proposed
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:346:Specifically, therefore, the impact assessment will present:
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:365:England. Noise Sensitive Receptor (NSR) locations and the methodology for the impact assessment were
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:370:17.3.4 Impact assessment methodology
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:373:Table 17.10 Construction road traffic noise impact assessment
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:375:Table 17.13 On-site construction phase noise impact assessment
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:377:Table 17.15 Operational phase noise impact assessment
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:394:considered as not significant. A detailed impact assessment of road traffic exhaust emissions was
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:397:This section of the EIA Report presents the findings of a Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (LVIA)
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:400:Institute in the third edition of its ‘Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment’ (GLVIA3, 2013).
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:465:22.3.5 Impact assessment methodology
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:474:Schedule 3 of The Marine Works (Environmental Impact Assessment) (Amendment) Regulations 2017
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:474:Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:476:The Marine Works (Environmental Impact Assessment) (Amendments) Regulations 2017 and the Town and
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:476:Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) 2017 brought in a requirement to consider the
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:476:document (Appendix 2), this health impact assessment is therefore a concise assessment which relies on
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:476:undertake a full human health impact assessment.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:490:27 CUMULATIVE IMPACT ASSESSMENT
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:490:Works (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2007 (as amended) and the Town and Country
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:490:Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 require an assessment of its potential
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:490:The IEMA ‘Guidelines for Environmental Impact Assessment’ (IEMA, 2004) define cumulative impacts as:
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:491:this report and summarised in Table 1.1). Landscape and visual impact assessment has been detailed
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:511:Of the proposed projects which have been screened into the cumulative impact assessment, all have
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:516:from the projects and plans screened in for cumulative impact assessment will not, therefore, also occur
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:583:cumulative noise impact assessment of the NGCT, Dogger Bank Teesside A & Sofia project and the Harbour
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:589:for Ecological Impact Assessment in the UK and Ireland: Terrestrial, Freshwater, Coastal and Marine.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:598:Royal HaskoningDHV (2018). Hartlepool Approach Channel: Environmental Impact Assessment Report.
R-2020-0371-SCP-EA R_2020_0371_SCP 14 August 2020 OFFICIAL.pdf:1:Environmental Impact Assessment scoping review, Royal Haskoning DHV, 15 July
R-2020-0371-SCP-EA R_2020_0371_SCP 14 August 2020 OFFICIAL.pdf:8:Cumulative Impact Assessment.
R-2020-0371-SCP-EA R_2020_0371_SCP 14 August 2020 OFFICIAL.pdf:8:cumulative impact assessment. We are in agreement with this.
R-2020-0371-SCP-NETWORK RAIL.pdf:1:Environmental Impact Assessment should include details of the haulage routes in the Transport Assessment and a
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:1:Subject: South Bank port facility – Environmental Impact Assessment scoping review
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:1:Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in support of a marine licence application to the Marine
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:2:Marine Works (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2007 as amended, and the Town and
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:2:Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 respectively. This document has
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:4: • Landscape and visual impact assessment.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:7: Views of the Grade II* Transporter Bridge should be assessed in the ‘Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment’ to determine the likely impact of the
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:8: for disposal to sea (and to inform the impact assessment). Any material to be dredged and disposed of within licenced disposal areas at-sea must not
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:8: Regulation 4(4) of the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 requires the assessment of significant effects
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:13:proposed quay infrastructure, drawing from the findings of the landscape and visual impact assessment
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:13:construction and operational phases; outputs from the modelling will inform the impact assessment (for
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:14:A detailed cumulative impact assessment with the wider onshore development (or other planned or
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:14:A Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (LVIA) will be undertaken as part of the EIA. This will involve
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:14:Impact Assessment, 3rd edition.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:15: 4.20. Cumulative impact assessment
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:16:A cumulative impact assessment will be undertaken, taking into account any relevant consented - but as
R-2020-0371-SCP-NEAR.pdf:1:Impact Assessment scoping review’ (Reference PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106), proposes the
R-2020-0371-SCP-NEAR.pdf:1:quay infrastructure, drawing from the findings of the landscape and visual impact assessment (LVIA) (detailed in
R-2020-0371-SCP-323395 R_2020_0371_SCP - Natural England.pdf:1:Environmental Impact Assessment Scoping consultation (Regulation 15 (4) of the EIA
R-2020-0371-SCP-323395 R_2020_0371_SCP - Natural England.pdf:1:Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for this development.
R-2020-0371-SCP-323395 R_2020_0371_SCP - Natural England.pdf:1: 2 Note on Environmental Impact Assessment Directive for Local Planning Authorities Office of the Deputy Prime
R-2020-0371-SCP-323395 R_2020_0371_SCP - Natural England.pdf:2:Schedule 4 of the Town & Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017,
R-2020-0371-SCP-323395 R_2020_0371_SCP - Natural England.pdf:2:Ecological Impact Assessment (EcIA) have been developed by the Chartered Institute of Ecology
R-2020-0371-SCP-323395 R_2020_0371_SCP - Natural England.pdf:4:results, impact assessments and appropriate accompanying mitigation strategies included as part of
R-2020-0371-SCP-323395 R_2020_0371_SCP - Natural England.pdf:4:therefore advises that survey, impact assessment and mitigation proposals for Habitats and Species
R-2020-0371-SCP-323395 R_2020_0371_SCP - Natural England.pdf:5:Natural England supports the publication Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment,
R-2020-0371-SCP-323395 R_2020_0371_SCP - Natural England.pdf:5:landscape and visual impact assessment.
R-2020-0371-SCP-323395 R_2020_0371_SCP - Natural England.pdf:5:Environmental Impact Assessment process should detail the measures to be taken to ensure the
R-2020-0371-SCP-323395 R_2020_0371_SCP - Natural England.pdf:5:cumulative impact assessment should include other proposals currently at Scoping stage. Due to
R-2020-0371-SCP-323395 R_2020_0371_SCP - Natural England.pdf:6:The ES should include an impact assessment to identify, describe and evaluate the effects that are
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 13_Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology.pdf:2:The purpose of the Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (LVIA) is to identify the potential
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 13_Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology.pdf:2:LVIA is either carried out formally as part of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) process or
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 13_Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology.pdf:2:▪ ‘Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment’ (GLVIA), Third Edition Landscape
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:23:While the loss of such habitat is considered to be insignificant (in terms of impact assessment) for the
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:2:(Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2007, as amended. In addition, RCBC issued a Scoping
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:2:(Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2007, as amended, and the Town and Country Planning
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:2:(Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017, without submitting a formal EIA Screening Request.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:4:a description of the approach taken to the specific impact assessment for each environmental topic is
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:7:Table 5.3 Impact assessment matrix
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:8:5.1.6 Cumulative Impact Assessment
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:9:There is no legislation that outlines how cumulative impact assessments (CIAs) should be undertaken.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:1:Subject: South Bank port facility – Environmental Impact Assessment scoping review
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:1:Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in support of a marine licence application to the Marine
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:2:Marine Works (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2007 as amended, and the Town and
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:2:Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 respectively. This document has
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:4: • Landscape and visual impact assessment.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:7: Views of the Grade II* Transporter Bridge should be assessed in the ‘Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment’ to determine the likely impact of the
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:8: for disposal to sea (and to inform the impact assessment). Any material to be dredged and disposed of within licenced disposal areas at-sea must not
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:8: Regulation 4(4) of the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 requires the assessment of significant effects
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:13:proposed quay infrastructure, drawing from the findings of the landscape and visual impact assessment
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:13:construction and operational phases; outputs from the modelling will inform the impact assessment (for
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:14:A detailed cumulative impact assessment with the wider onshore development (or other planned or
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:14:A Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (LVIA) will be undertaken as part of the EIA. This will involve
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:14:Impact Assessment, 3rd edition.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:15: 4.20. Cumulative impact assessment
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:16:A cumulative impact assessment will be undertaken, taking into account any relevant consented - but as
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:2: therefore the impact assessment presented within
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:19:‘medium’ has been assigned for the purposes of this impact assessment, taking in to account the fragmented
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:20:As such, the impact assessment presented within this section focuses on the potential impacts to marine
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:4:8 CUMULATIVE IMPACT ASSESSMENT 16
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:5:The proposed scheme has been subject to an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) which has assessed
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:18:The landscape and visual impact assessment (LVIA) establishes that operational effects of the proposed
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:20:8 CUMULATIVE IMPACT ASSESSMENT
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:1:27 CUMULATIVE IMPACT ASSESSMENT
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:1:Works (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2007 (as amended) and the Town and Country
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:1:Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 require an assessment of its potential
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:1:The IEMA ‘Guidelines for Environmental Impact Assessment’ (IEMA, 2004) define cumulative impacts as:
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:2:this report and summarised in Table 1.1). Landscape and visual impact assessment has been detailed
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:22:Of the proposed projects which have been screened into the cumulative impact assessment, all have
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:27:from the projects and plans screened in for cumulative impact assessment will not, therefore, also occur
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_1. Introduction.pdf:3:4.4 Environmental Impact Assessment Directive 28
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_1. Introduction.pdf:7:27 CUMULATIVE IMPACT ASSESSMENT 482
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_1. Introduction.pdf:8:13 Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_1. Introduction.pdf:8:14 Landscape and visual impact assessment figures
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_1. Introduction.pdf:9:Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in support of a marine licence application to the Marine
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_1. Introduction.pdf:9:The study area is shown on Figure 1.2. Landscape and visual impact assessment has been detailed
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_1. Introduction.pdf:9: impact assessment
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 8_Underwater noise assessment.pdf:2: Underwater Noise Impact Assessment – South Bank, Tees Estuary
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 8_Underwater noise assessment.pdf:3: Underwater Noise Impact Assessment – South Bank, Tees Estuary
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 8_Underwater noise assessment.pdf:4: Underwater Noise Impact Assessment – South Bank, Tees Estuary
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 8_Underwater noise assessment.pdf:4:impact assessment. As the measurement or receiver point moves away from the source, the sound
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 8_Underwater noise assessment.pdf:5: Underwater Noise Impact Assessment – South Bank, Tees Estuary
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 8_Underwater noise assessment.pdf:6: Underwater Noise Impact Assessment – South Bank, Tees Estuary
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 8_Underwater noise assessment.pdf:6:3 A Collett, T Mason (2014). York Potash Project Harbour Facilities: Underwater Noise Impact Assessment.
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 8_Underwater noise assessment.pdf:7: Underwater Noise Impact Assessment – South Bank, Tees Estuary
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 8_Underwater noise assessment.pdf:8: Underwater Noise Impact Assessment – South Bank, Tees Estuary
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 8_Underwater noise assessment.pdf:9: Underwater Noise Impact Assessment – South Bank, Tees Estuary
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 8_Underwater noise assessment.pdf:10: Underwater Noise Impact Assessment – South Bank, Tees Estuary
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 8_Underwater noise assessment.pdf:11: Underwater Noise Impact Assessment – South Bank, Tees Estuary
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 8_Underwater noise assessment.pdf:11: Report title Underwater Noise Impact Assessment – South
R-2020-0684-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:1:Marine Works (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2007 (as
R-2020-0684-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:1:3 Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) …………………………………………………… 3
R-2020-0684-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:3:3 Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)
R-2020-0684-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:3:The Marine Works (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2007 (as
R-2020-0684-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:4: Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment;
R-2020-0684-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:8:Visual’ impact assessment” to determine the likely impact of the crane and other tall
R-2020-0684-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:11:sea (and to inform the impact assessment). Any material to be dredged and
R-2020-0684-ESM-HIGHWAYS ENGLAND.pdf:10:An Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) has been produced (by Royal HaskoningDHV) in support of the
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:2:The ecological impact assessment presented below has been based upon the following guidance and
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:3: for Ecological Impact Assessment in the UK and Ireland: Terrestrial, Freshwater and Coastal;
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:3:To inform this Ecological Impact Assessment (EcIA), Tees Valley Combined Authority has undertaken
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1111_Appendix 1_Waste Report.pdf:4:to as the proposed scheme). This report accompanies the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf:4:England. Noise Sensitive Receptor (NSR) locations and the methodology for the impact assessment were
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf:9:17.3.4 Impact assessment methodology
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf:12:Table 17.10 Construction road traffic noise impact assessment
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf:14:Table 17.13 On-site construction phase noise impact assessment
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf:16:Table 17.15 Operational phase noise impact assessment
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_4. Legislative framework.pdf:2:4.4 Environmental Impact Assessment Directive
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_4. Legislative framework.pdf:2:in this instance, The Marine Works (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2007 (as amended)
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_4. Legislative framework.pdf:2:and the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 are applicable
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_4. Legislative framework.pdf:2:required under the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017, as
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:5: Cumulative Impact Assessment …………………………………………………………………………… 41
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:7:Table 16: Cumulative Impact Assessment ……………………………………………………………………………….. 42
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:8: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:11: Marine Works EIA (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations governing EIA’s for
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:49: CUMULATIVE IMPACT ASSESSMENT
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:49:The cumulative impact assessment was assessed to be a factor of the likelihood of the impact
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:49:The results of the cumulative impact assessment are given in Table 16. All impacts were assessed to
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:50:Table 16: Cumulative Impact Assessment
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:9:modelling exercise to inform the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) that is being prepared as part of
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:13:area is of most interest in terms of the hydrodynamic outputs for the Environmental Impact Assessment.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_22. Climate change.pdf:6:22.3.5 Impact assessment methodology
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:4:Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:5:Works (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2007 (the MWR), as
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:5:(Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:70:Impact Assessment (LVIA). The chapter considers the following potential
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:70:development, a Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (LVIA) has been
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:88:As required by both the Marine Works (Environmental Impact Assessment)
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:88:(Environmental Impact Assessment) 2017 consideration is required to be
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:89:As required by both the Marine Works (Environmental Impact Assessment)
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:89:(Environmental Impact Assessment) 2017 consideration has been given to
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:90:necessary to undertake a full human health impact assessment a point that
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:95:Cumulative Impact Assessment
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:95:A cumulative impact assessment was carried out to consider the potential for
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:96:supported by an Environmental Impact Assessment as Schedule 1
R-2020-0684-ESM-CONSULTATION MMO 0684.pdf:2:Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0684-ESM-CONSULTATION MMO 0684.pdf:2:2011/92/EU) is transposed into UK law by the Marine Works (Environmental Impact Assessment)
R-2020-0684-ESM-CONSULTATION MMO 0684.pdf:2:the MWR and The Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:33:cumulative noise impact assessment of the NGCT, Dogger Bank Teesside A & Sofia project and the Harbour
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1109_Appendix 15_Flood Risk Assessment.pdf:8:The proposed scheme is defined in full within the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Report (Royal
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_30. References.pdf:2:for Ecological Impact Assessment in the UK and Ireland: Terrestrial, Freshwater, Coastal and Marine.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_30. References.pdf:11:Royal HaskoningDHV (2018). Hartlepool Approach Channel: Environmental Impact Assessment Report.
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 3_Scoping consultation.pdf:2:Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for this development.
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 3_Scoping consultation.pdf:4:associated with the site. Any Environmental Impact Assessment should include details of the
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 3_Scoping consultation.pdf:7: environments and will require Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in support of
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 3_Scoping consultation.pdf:7: Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017.
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 3_Scoping consultation.pdf:8: Impact Assessment scoping review) on environmental assessment requirements in
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 3_Scoping consultation.pdf:8: Impact Assessment scoping review) on environmental assessment requirements in
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:1:the baseline environment on which the impact assessment can be based.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:10:follows a matrix approach to inform the impact assessment, using best practice, best available scientific
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:10:understanding and relevant guidance (e.g. CIEEM Guidelines for Ecological Impact Assessment in the UK
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:22:across the full winter period, the assumption made for the purposes of impact assessment is that North Tees
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:26:sources in the Tees estuary, receptors included in the following impact assessments are as follows:
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1107_Appendix 7_Land quality desk study.pdf:7: Impact Assessment (EIA) for Geology and Ground Conditions.
R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:3: Environmental Impact Assessment 19
R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:6: Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:6: the need for Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’).
R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:6: Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017, without
R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:23: through the Environmental Impact Assessment which accompanies the application. The South
R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:23: Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:23: Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the EIA Regulations) as updated by The Town and
R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:23: Country Planning and Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment)
R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:29:5.58 The landscape and visual impact assessment (LVIA) establishes that operational effects of the
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:4: and Visual Impact Assessment’ to determine the likely impact of the Section 19
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:8:16.3.3 Impact assessment methodology
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:8:The general method for impact assessment is set out in Section 5. The specific approach to the assessment
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:8:The impact assessment defines heritage assets, and their settings, likely to be impacted by the proposed
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:8:Specifically, therefore, the impact assessment will present:
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf:1:The Marine Works (Environmental Impact Assessment) (Amendments) Regulations 2017 and the Town and
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf:1:Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) 2017 brought in a requirement to consider the
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf:1:document (Appendix 2), this health impact assessment is therefore a concise assessment which relies on
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf:1:undertake a full human health impact assessment.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:4:To inform the impact assessment of works during the proposed scheme for marine mammal species,
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:4:In addition to the methodology for the impact assessment outlined in Section 5, the magnitude of effect on
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:14:Table 10.5 Reference populations and density estimates to inform the impact assessment for marine
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:15:The underwater noise impact assessments for marine mammal species for the proposed scheme has been
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf:1:This section of the EIA Report presents the findings of a Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (LVIA)
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf:4:Institute in the third edition of its ‘Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment’ (GLVIA3, 2013).
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:10:6.3.6 Impact assessment
R-2020-0684-ESM-336521 R_2020_0684_ESM - Demolition of existing quay, capital dredge and development of new quay at South Bank Wharf, Grangetown, Redcar - Phase 1.pdf:3:& Visual Impact Assessment should be provided with the proposal to inform decision making. We
R-2020-0684-ESM-336521 R_2020_0684_ESM - Demolition of existing quay, capital dredge and development of new quay at South Bank Wharf, Grangetown, Redcar - Phase 1.pdf:3:refer you to the Landscape Institute Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment for
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:17:considered as not significant. A detailed impact assessment of road traffic exhaust emissions was
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_23. Use of natural resources.pdf:1:Schedule 3 of The Marine Works (Environmental Impact Assessment) (Amendment) Regulations 2017
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_23. Use of natural resources.pdf:1:Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017.
R-2020-0684-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:1: •Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment;
R-2020-0684-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:4:Regulation 4(4) of the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment)
R-2020-0684-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:4:HSE responses to Environmental Impact Assessment consultations will be limited to our role
R-2020-0684-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:8:the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for this development.
R-2020-0684-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:8:Schedule 4 of the Town & Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations
R-2020-0684-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:9:for Ecological Impact Assessment (EcIA) have been developed by the Chartered Institute of
R-2020-0684-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:11:protected species populations in the wider area, to assist in the impact assessment.
R-2020-0684-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:11:for relevant species and the survey results, impact assessments and appropriate
R-2020-0684-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:11:decisions’. Natural England therefore advises that survey, impact assessment and mitigation
R-2020-0684-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:13:universally used for landscape and visual impact assessment.
R-2020-0684-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:13:local materials. The Environmental Impact Assessment process should detail the measures
R-2020-0684-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:13:advises that the cumulative impact assessment should include other proposals currently at
R-2020-0684-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:14:The ES should include an impact assessment to identify, describe and evaluate the effects
R-2020-0684-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:16:I would advise and/or expect that any future Environmental Impact Assessment is
R-2020-0684-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:17:accordance with the Town & Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment)
R-2021-0405-FFM-DECISION NOTICE.pdf:2: out in the Ecological Impact Assessment, INCA,, dated May 2021 have been
R-2021-0405-FFM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:3: Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2021-0405-FFM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:11:The application is supported by an Ecological Impact Assessment and a
R-2021-0405-FFM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:12:of the submitted Ecological Impact Assessment.
R-2021-0405-FFM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:12:sites are set out in Table 3 of the submitted Ecological Impact Assessment.
R-2021-0405-FFM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:12:As part of the submitted Ecological Impact Assessment consideration has
R-2021-0405-FFM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:14:Within the Ecological Impact Assessment a summary has been provided with
R-2021-0268-CD-Decision Notice.pdf:3: and the conclusions of the Environmental Impact Assessment that the
R-2022-0526-CD-COMPLIANCE OFFICER REPORT.pdf:1:Air Quality Impact Assessment (10 June 2022 – Ref 32435-RP-IE-001)
R-2022-0526-CD-COMPLIANCE OFFICER REPORT.pdf:2:provision of an Air Quality Impact Assessment relating to construction activities
R-2022-0526-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:3: and the conclusions of the Environmental Impact Assessment that the
R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:1:Air Quality Impact Assessment
R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:2: REPORT NAME: Air Quality Impact Assessment
R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:3: Air Quality Impact Assessment
R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:4: Air Quality Impact Assessment
R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:5: Air Quality Impact Assessment
R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:5: Hilson Moran has been instructed by K2 and SeHa to undertake an Air Quality Impact Assessment
R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:6: Air Quality Impact Assessment
R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:6: Hilson Moran has been instructed by K2 and SeHa to undertake an Air Quality Impact Assessment
R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:7: Air Quality Impact Assessment
R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:8: Air Quality Impact Assessment
R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:9: Air Quality Impact Assessment
R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:10: Air Quality Impact Assessment
R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:11: Air Quality Impact Assessment
R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:12: Air Quality Impact Assessment
R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:13: Air Quality Impact Assessment
R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:14: Air Quality Impact Assessment
R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:15: Air Quality Impact Assessment
R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:16: Air Quality Impact Assessment
R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:17: Air Quality Impact Assessment
R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:18: Air Quality Impact Assessment
R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:19: Air Quality Impact Assessment
R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:20: Air Quality Impact Assessment
R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:21: Air Quality Impact Assessment
R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:22: Air Quality Impact Assessment
R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:23: Air Quality Impact Assessment
R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:24: Air Quality Impact Assessment
R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:25: Air Quality Impact Assessment
R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:26: Air Quality Impact Assessment
R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:27: Air Quality Impact Assessment
R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:28: Air Quality Impact Assessment
R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:29: Air Quality Impact Assessment
R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:30: Air Quality Impact Assessment
R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:31: Air Quality Impact Assessment
R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:31:5.1.3.1. Impact Assessment
R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:32: Air Quality Impact Assessment
R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:33: Air Quality Impact Assessment
R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:34: Air Quality Impact Assessment
R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:35: Air Quality Impact Assessment
R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:36: Air Quality Impact Assessment
R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:37: Air Quality Impact Assessment
R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:38: Air Quality Impact Assessment
R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:39: Air Quality Impact Assessment
R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:40: Air Quality Impact Assessment
R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:41: Air Quality Impact Assessment
R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:42: Air Quality Impact Assessment
R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:43: Air Quality Impact Assessment
R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:44: Air Quality Impact Assessment
R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:45: Air Quality Impact Assessment
R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:46: Air Quality Impact Assessment
R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:47: Air Quality Impact Assessment
R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: Air Quality Impact Assessment
R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: Air Quality Impact Assessment
R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:50: Air Quality Impact Assessment
R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:51: Air Quality Impact Assessment
R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:52: Air Quality Impact Assessment
R-2020-0539-PND-Officer report _R20200539PND.pdf:3:(Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017, but the demolition is
R-2022-0755-CD-Aug 22 - CEMP - Land West of Warrenby - Site Preparation Remediation Works.pdf:20:Metals Recovery Site Ecological Impact Assessment and Biodiversity Assessment dated 14 th
R-2022-0755-CD-Aug 22 - CEMP - Land West of Warrenby - Site Preparation Remediation Works.pdf:22:As highlighted in the Ecological Impact Assessment and Biodiversity Net Gain Assessment, Arup,
R-2022-0755-CD-63262 Covering Letter NZT DoC 13.09.22.pdf:1:shall demonstrate how the mitigation measures set out in the Ecological Impact Assessment, INCA,
R-2022-0435-CD-Compliance Decision Notice 0435(1).pdf:2: and the conclusions of the Environmental Impact Assessment that the
R-2022-0435-CD-395126 - R_2022_0435_CD Partial discharge of Condition 6. Land at South Tees Development Corporation, South Bank - No Objections.pdf:3:impacts of development are likely to be significant, a Landscape & Visual Impact Assessment should be
R-2022-0435-CD-395126 - R_2022_0435_CD Partial discharge of Condition 6. Land at South Tees Development Corporation, South Bank - No Objections.pdf:3:Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment for further guidance.
R-2022-0435-CD-391845-R20220435CD.pdf:2:impacts of development are likely to be significant, a Landscape & Visual Impact Assessment should be
R-2022-0435-CD-391845-R20220435CD.pdf:2:Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment for further guidance.
R-2022-0435-CD-INCA2022-12 HRA - SeAH South Bank Rev 1.pdf:2:Impact Assessment that the development will not give rise to significant adverse impacts on the
R-2022-0435-CD-64764_01 Covering Letter 03.05.2022(1).pdf:1:Impact Assessment that the development will not give rise to significant adverse impacts on the
R-2020-0283-PND-Officer report.pdf:2:Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017, but the
R-2019-0331-SCP-Archaeological Advice R-2019-0331-SCP South Bank Wharf _.pdf:1:accordance with the Town & Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations
R-2019-0331-SCP-284160 R_2019_0331_SCP - EIA Scoping, South Bank Wharf Redevelopment, South Bank, Middlesbrough.pdf:1:Environmental Impact Assessment Scoping consultation (Regulation 15 (4) of the EIA
R-2019-0331-SCP-284160 R_2019_0331_SCP - EIA Scoping, South Bank Wharf Redevelopment, South Bank, Middlesbrough.pdf:1:Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for this development.
R-2019-0331-SCP-284160 R_2019_0331_SCP - EIA Scoping, South Bank Wharf Redevelopment, South Bank, Middlesbrough.pdf:1: 2 Note on Environmental Impact Assessment Directive for Local Planning Authorities Office of the Deputy Prime
R-2019-0331-SCP-284160 R_2019_0331_SCP - EIA Scoping, South Bank Wharf Redevelopment, South Bank, Middlesbrough.pdf:2:Schedule 4 of the Town & Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017,
R-2019-0331-SCP-284160 R_2019_0331_SCP - EIA Scoping, South Bank Wharf Redevelopment, South Bank, Middlesbrough.pdf:2:Ecological Impact Assessment (EcIA) have been developed by the Chartered Institute of Ecology
R-2019-0331-SCP-284160 R_2019_0331_SCP - EIA Scoping, South Bank Wharf Redevelopment, South Bank, Middlesbrough.pdf:4:results, impact assessments and appropriate accompanying mitigation strategies included as part of
R-2019-0331-SCP-284160 R_2019_0331_SCP - EIA Scoping, South Bank Wharf Redevelopment, South Bank, Middlesbrough.pdf:4:therefore advises that survey, impact assessment and mitigation proposals for Habitats and Species
R-2019-0331-SCP-284160 R_2019_0331_SCP - EIA Scoping, South Bank Wharf Redevelopment, South Bank, Middlesbrough.pdf:5:Natural England supports the publication Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment,
R-2019-0331-SCP-284160 R_2019_0331_SCP - EIA Scoping, South Bank Wharf Redevelopment, South Bank, Middlesbrough.pdf:5:landscape and visual impact assessment.
R-2019-0331-SCP-284160 R_2019_0331_SCP - EIA Scoping, South Bank Wharf Redevelopment, South Bank, Middlesbrough.pdf:5:Environmental Impact Assessment process should detail the measures to be taken to ensure the
R-2019-0331-SCP-284160 R_2019_0331_SCP - EIA Scoping, South Bank Wharf Redevelopment, South Bank, Middlesbrough.pdf:5:cumulative impact assessment should include other proposals currently at Scoping stage. Due to
R-2019-0331-SCP-284160 R_2019_0331_SCP - EIA Scoping, South Bank Wharf Redevelopment, South Bank, Middlesbrough.pdf:6:The ES should include an impact assessment to identify, describe and evaluate the effects that are
R-2019-0331-SCP-Letter to RCBC 19.05.20 Scoping Request FINAL.pdf:1: Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017
R-2019-0331-SCP-Letter to RCBC 19.05.20 Scoping Request FINAL.pdf:1: 1 development under the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Regulations, by reason of the size
R-2019-0331-SCP-Letter to RCBC 19.05.20 Scoping Request FINAL.pdf:14: Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017. The ES will provide all the
R-2019-0331-SCP-Letter to RCBC 19.05.20 Scoping Request FINAL.pdf:15: • Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment;
R-2019-0331-SCP-Letter to RCBC 19.05.20 Scoping Request FINAL.pdf:15: Throughout the environmental impact assessment, each environmental discipline specialist will liaise
R-2019-0331-SCP-Officer Letter_R20190331SCP.pdf:1: •Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment;
R-2019-0331-SCP-Officer Letter_R20190331SCP.pdf:4:Regulation 4(4) of the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment)
R-2019-0331-SCP-Officer Letter_R20190331SCP.pdf:4:HSE responses to Environmental Impact Assessment consultations will be limited to our role
R-2019-0331-SCP-Officer Letter_R20190331SCP.pdf:8:the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for this development.
R-2019-0331-SCP-Officer Letter_R20190331SCP.pdf:8:Schedule 4 of the Town & Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations
R-2019-0331-SCP-Officer Letter_R20190331SCP.pdf:9:for Ecological Impact Assessment (EcIA) have been developed by the Chartered Institute of
R-2019-0331-SCP-Officer Letter_R20190331SCP.pdf:11:protected species populations in the wider area, to assist in the impact assessment.
R-2019-0331-SCP-Officer Letter_R20190331SCP.pdf:11:for relevant species and the survey results, impact assessments and appropriate
R-2019-0331-SCP-Officer Letter_R20190331SCP.pdf:11:decisions’. Natural England therefore advises that survey, impact assessment and mitigation
R-2019-0331-SCP-Officer Letter_R20190331SCP.pdf:13:universally used for landscape and visual impact assessment.
R-2019-0331-SCP-Officer Letter_R20190331SCP.pdf:13:local materials. The Environmental Impact Assessment process should detail the measures
R-2019-0331-SCP-Officer Letter_R20190331SCP.pdf:13:advises that the cumulative impact assessment should include other proposals currently at
R-2019-0331-SCP-Officer Letter_R20190331SCP.pdf:14:The ES should include an impact assessment to identify, describe and evaluate the effects
R-2019-0331-SCP-Officer Letter_R20190331SCP.pdf:16:I would advise and/or expect that any future Environmental Impact Assessment is
R-2019-0331-SCP-Officer Letter_R20190331SCP.pdf:17:accordance with the Town & Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment)
R-2019-0331-SCP-HSE.pdf:1:Regulation 4(4) of the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 requires
R-2019-0331-SCP-HSE.pdf:1:HSE responses to Environmental Impact Assessment consultations will be limited to our role in the land use planning
R-2019-0331-SCP-NHM.pdf:1:I would advise and/or expect that any future Environmental Impact Assessment is comprehensive, covering all
R-2020-0679-PND-Officer Report.pdf:2:Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017, but the demolition is not considered to
R-2021-0879-FF-63262 01 Dorman Long Training Centre Cover Letter 14.10.21.pdf:5:Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2021-0879-FF-63262 01 Dorman Long Training Centre Cover Letter 14.10.21.pdf:5:Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (as amended) (“the Regulations”). The site
R-2021-0879-FF-63262 01 Dorman Long Training Centre Cover Letter 14.10.21.pdf:5:therefore, is not subject to an Environmental Impact Assessment.
R-2021-0589-PND-Officer Report 0589.pdf:2:Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017.
R-2022-0343-ESM-64764 SeAH EIA Compliance Statement (2) May 2022 pdf.pdf:11: Planning and Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) (Amendment)
R-2022-0343-ESM-ApplicationFormRedacted.pdf:4:environment impact assessment application and, if so, confirm that an environmental statement was submitted to the planning authority at that time
R-2022-0343-ESM-64764 SeAH EIA Compliance Statement April 2022.pdf:11: Planning and Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) (Amendment)
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 1.2 Statement of Expertise - formatted.pdf:3: Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Quality Mark. This means that RPS adheres to the
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 1.2 Statement of Expertise - formatted.pdf:4: Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 1.2 Statement of Expertise - formatted.pdf:4: Visual Impact Assessments (LVIAs) for major development projects. She has worked on many
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 1.2 Statement of Expertise - formatted.pdf:5: projects and she has project managed numerous landscape and visual impact assessments for
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 1.2 Statement of Expertise - formatted.pdf:5: Assessment and Environmental Impact Assessment.
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 1.2 Statement of Expertise - formatted.pdf:6: experience of transport planning and environmental impact assessment. Joanna’s experience has
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 1.2 Statement of Expertise - formatted.pdf:6: undertaking highway capacity assessments, undertaking environmental impact assessments and
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 1.2 Statement of Expertise - formatted.pdf:6: engineering and environmental impact assessment. David has a particular expertise in preparing
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 1.2 Statement of Expertise - formatted.pdf:7: environmental noise and vibration impact assessments for major developments. He is an expert in
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 1.1 Information Required with an ES.pdf:1:Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:4: environmental impact assessment process. This involves considering how the impacts of
R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_Response to Anglo American_AS_S.pdf:2: transport impacts is required within the submitted Environmental Impact Assessment. As above, it is
R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_Response to Anglo American_AS_S.pdf:2: cumulative impact assessment.
R-2020-0411-FFM-EA R_2020_0411_FFM v2 10 November 2020 OFFICIAL .pdf:2:Prior to the installation of the surface water outfall a scour impact assessment and
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 1 Introduction.pdf:1: Impact Assessment (EIA) process and accompanies the planning application for the proposed
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 1 Introduction.pdf:1: and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 as amended. These
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.3 WFD.pdf:2:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.3 WFD.pdf:3: 4.4 Stage 3: Impact Assessment ……………………………………………………………………………………. 13
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.3 WFD.pdf:4: (Environment Impact Assessment) (EIA) Regulations 2017 (as amended) for the proposed
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.3 WFD.pdf:5: • impact assessment – considers the potential impacts of your activity, identifies ways to avoid
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.3 WFD.pdf:13:Receptor Potential Note the risk issue(s) for impact assessment
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.3 WFD.pdf:14:Receptor Potential Note the risk issue(s) for impact assessment
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.3 WFD.pdf:14: Receptors scoped out of Stage 3 Impact Assessment
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.3 WFD.pdf:16:4.4 Stage 3: Impact Assessment
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.3 WFD.pdf:16:4.4.1 Based on the outcomes of the Stage 2 scoping assessment, this impact assessment establishes
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.3 WFD.pdf:23: impact assessments and mitigation strategies proposed (documented in Chapter 2: Project
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.3 WFD.pdf:26:Could impact on the hydromorphology (for Impact assessment not No. The waterbody is already heavily modified and the outfall will be
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.3 WFD.pdf:26:Could significantly impact the hydromorphology Impact assessment not Outfall proposed in a location of the Tees Estuary that is already affected
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.3 WFD.pdf:26:Is in a water body that is heavily modified for the Impact assessment not Not modified for the same activity
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.3 WFD.pdf:29:Is in a water body with a phytoplankton status of Impact assessment not No: Phytoplankton classification of the Tees Estuary is Good
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.3 WFD.pdf:29:Is in a water body with a history of harmful algae Impact assessment not Not monitored. The water body contains several high quality bathing
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.3 WFD.pdf:30:It disturbs sediment with contaminants above Cefas Impact assessment not There will be no disturbance of sediment within the Tees Estuary. Where
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.3 WFD.pdf:31: The chemicals released are on the Environmental Impact assessment not There will be no direct discharges of chemicals into the water body.
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.3 WFD.pdf:31: Carry out your impact assessment using the Environment Agency’s surface water pollution risk assessment guidance, part of Environmental Permitting Regulations guidance.
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.3 WFD.pdf:33:Receptor Potential risk to Note the risk issue(s) for impact assessment
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.3 WFD.pdf:34:Receptor Potential risk to Note the risk issue(s) for impact assessment
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.3 WFD.pdf:34:If you haven’t identified any receptors at risk during scoping, you don’t need to continue to the impact assessment stage and your WFD assessment is complete.
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.3 WFD.pdf:34:If you’ve identified one or more receptors at risk during scoping, you should continue to the impact assessment stage.
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf:1: Impact Assessment (EIA) undertaken to consider the noise and vibration effects of the
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 5 Planning Policy.pdf:1: explicit requirement in the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment)
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 11 Air Quality.pdf:9: terms of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Regulations.
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 11 Air Quality.pdf:10: that are likely to be subject to dust impact assessment means that it is not possible to be
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 11 Air Quality.pdf:25:11.5.14 In accordance with the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment)
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 2 Project Description.pdf:18:2.5.27 The Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 require
R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf:2: 5.1 Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment ………………………………………………………………………14
R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf:3: Environmental Impact Assessment has been undertaken in accordance with UK legal
R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf:8:2.2.31 The Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (as
R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf:13:3.2.4 The findings of the Environmental Impact Assessment process have influenced the iterative design
R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf:13: Environmental Impact Assessment process, including the following
R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf:14: Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment
R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf:16:5.1 Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment
R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf:16:5.1.1 The landscape and visual impact assessment identifies and addresses the existing landscape and
R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf:16: which is not significant in terms of Environmental Impact Assessment.
R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf:21:5.5.6 Environmental impact assessments determined that the effects of driver delay, severance,
R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf:23: significant effects are not considered likely in terms of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)
R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf:25: assessment in the form of an additional chapter or Health Impact Assessment is not considered
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf:7: Impact Assessment Methodology.
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 3 Needs and Alternatives - formatted.pdf:9: Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (2017 SI
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 13 - Other Environmental Effects.pdf:1: considered likely in terms of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Regulations, including
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 13 - Other Environmental Effects.pdf:3: assessment in the form of an additional chapter or Health Impact Assessment is not considered
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 4 - EIA Methodology.pdf:1: Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) of the project. The chapter also includes details of the
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 4 - EIA Methodology.pdf:5: Impact Assessment;
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 4 - EIA Methodology.pdf:5: Impact Assessment Practice in the UK. Special Report;
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 4 - EIA Methodology.pdf:12: Impact Assessment.
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 4 - EIA Methodology.pdf:12: Impact Assessment Practice in the UK. Special Report.
R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf:28:3.1.92 The Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 require
R-2020-0411-FFM-Pre-App Consultation Report 14-07-2020 Final (1).pdf:5:Impact Assessment Report to be submitted to RCBC, and informed the technical studies of the EIA.
R-2020-0411-FFM-Pre-App Consultation Report 14-07-2020 Final (1).pdf:5:by the technical work supporting the planning application and Environmental Impact assessment
R-2020-0411-FFM-Pre-App Consultation Report 14-07-2020 Final (1).pdf:11:Impact Assessment Report to be submitted to Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council, and informed
R-2020-0411-FFM-Pre-App Consultation Report 14-07-2020 Final (1).pdf:18:As part of the Environmental Impact Assessment which will support the planning
R-2020-0411-FFM-Pre-App Consultation Report 14-07-2020 Final (1).pdf:20:main issues to be considered in the Environmental Impact Assessment process,
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 10.1 Transport Assessment.pdf:3:Annex N REC Traffic Impact Assessment
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 10.1 Transport Assessment.pdf:3:Annex P Cumulative Impact Assessment
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 10.1 Transport Assessment.pdf:28: attached at Annex O. The impact assessment is attached at Annex P and summarised in Table
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 10.1 Transport Assessment.pdf:94: REC Traffic Impact Assessment
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 10.1 Transport Assessment.pdf:102: Cumulative Impact Assessment
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:4: Requirement for Environmental Impact Assessment …………………………………………………………………….7
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:6:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:7: (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017, as amended (hereafter referred to as ‘the
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:13: Requirement for Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:15: Impact Assessment;
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:15: Impact Assessment Practice in the UK. Special Report;
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:15: Impact Assessment: A Primer for a Proportional Approach.
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:27:5.10 The Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (LVIA) undertaken as part of the Landscape and
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:27: • Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment: Third Edition (GLVIA) (Landscape
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:27: cumulative impact assessment will be undertaken of the developments within the Landscape and
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:29: accordance with the ecological impact assessment guidelines published by the Chartered Institute
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:33:5.59 The Environmental Impact Assessment would be undertaken with reference to published guidance
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:35:5.77 An impact assessment of the development traffic on each highway link will be undertaken. As the
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:39: Impact Assessment
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:39: Impact Assessment Practice in the UK
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:39: for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment: Third Edition
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:49: (ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT) REGULATIONS 2017
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:50:Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for this development.
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:55:however I would question the need for these within a cumulative impact assessment as these are not
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:55:these within a cumulative impact assessment as these again are not committed developments.
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:1: • Town & Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (as
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:4: • Guidelines for Ecological Impact Assessment in the UK and Ireland: Terrestrial, Freshwater
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:5: are considered in further detail within Chapter 11 and within the impact assessment section of this
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:7: 7 May 2020 (Pre- Natural England’s Discretionary Advice The Impact Assessment Section of this
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:21: into the impact assessment when assigning a significance of effect although not explicitly
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:30: R/2019/0427/FFM 1.96 km No detailed ecological impact assessment
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:30: R/2018/0364/NID 5.18 km Detailed impact assessment not available,
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:35: CIEEM (2018) Guidelines for Ecological Impact Assessment in the UK and Ireland: Terrestrial,
R-2020-0411-FFM-Letter on behalf of Anglo American.pdf:1:within the submitted Environmental Impact Assessment.
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:7: considered to be not significant in Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) terms.
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:10:10.3.22 Receptors to be considered within the impact assessment were selected based upon the access
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf:7: associated Environmental Impact Assessment in relation to the proposed development of REC.
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 7.2 Ecology PEA.pdf:19:CIEEM (2016). Guidelines for Ecological Impact Assessment in the UK and Ireland: Terrestrial, Freshwater
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:1:6 LANDSCAPE AND VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:2: guidance on landscape and visual impact assessment (LVIA) described in the following
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:2: • Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment, 3rd Edition (GLVIA3) (Landscape
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:3: Table 6.1: Consultation Responses Relevant to Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:44: Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment, 3rd Edition.
R-2021-0728-PND-Officer Report(1).pdf:2:environmental impact assessments.
R-2021-0728-PND-Officer Report(1).pdf:2:Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017.
R-2021-0728-PND-Cover Letter.pdf:2:Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2021-0728-PND-Cover Letter.pdf:2:Assessment Directive, and can therefore be subject to Environmental Impact Assessment. Local planning
R-2021-0465-FFM-356907 - R_2021_0465_FFM - Erection of 3396sqm of B2_B8 floorspace. Tees Dock Road. Grangetown.pdf:4:Where the impacts of development are likely to be significant, a Landscape & Visual Impact Assessment
R-2021-0465-FFM-356907 - R_2021_0465_FFM - Erection of 3396sqm of B2_B8 floorspace. Tees Dock Road. Grangetown.pdf:4:Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment for further guidance.
R-2021-0465-FFM-Officer Report 0465.pdf:6:a Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment that was based on the
R-2021-0465-FFM-LM Wind Detailed Applicaiton Covering Letter 28.05.21.pdf:3:Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2021-0465-FFM-LM Wind Detailed Applicaiton Covering Letter 28.05.21.pdf:3:(Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (EIA Regulations) (as amended), which relates to
R-2021-0465-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0271-02-South Bank Priority Strategy.pdf:8: South Bank Site Remediation, Ecological Impact Assessment Revision A Final, dated May
R-2021-0465-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0271-02-South Bank Priority Strategy.pdf:16:Appropriate Assessment Revision A Final INCA 2021 and Ecological Impact Assessment Revision A
R-2021-0152-CD-Compliance Decision.pdf:2: Environmental Impact Assessment December 2019 and Chapter 7 (Mitigation)
R-2023-0179-SCP-230306 - HyGreen - EIA Scoping Opinion Request Letter - Final.pdf:1:THE TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING (ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT) REGULATIONS
R-2023-0179-SCP-230306 - HyGreen - EIA Scoping Opinion Request Letter - Final.pdf:1:Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Scoping Opinion from Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council
R-2023-0179-SCP-230306 - HyGreen - EIA Scoping Opinion Request Letter - Final.pdf:3: Impact Assessment (EIA)
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:1:Application for an Environmental Impact Assessment Scoping Opinion
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:1:The Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 –
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:3: EcIA Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:3: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:3: GLVIA3 Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (third edition)
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:4: LVIA Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:7:7.0 Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Process ………………………………………….. 118
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:7:A-8 Other Developments to be Considered in the Cumulative Impact Assessment ………. 137
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:8: Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (herein referred to as the ‘EIA Regulations’).
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:11: • Section 7 – Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Process: provides an overview
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:56:6.1.27 An impact assessment will be undertaken to assess the potential effects on the water
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:56: adverse impacts. Therefore, a qualitative impact assessment shall be undertaken to
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:57: purposes of the impact assessment for the Proposed Development. If there is
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:65: contaminated land topic is scoped into the future impact assessment.
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:65: the ecological impact assessment (EcIA). The approach taken is described below.
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:66: reflects standard guidance for air quality impact assessment during operation of an
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:66: further air quality impact assessment of operation is scoped out. Accordingly, the
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:66: purposes of the final ecological impact assessment.
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:66: standard guidance for air quality impact assessment and also other good practice
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:66: purposes of the final ecological impact assessment with reference to the sub-section
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:70: ecological impact assessment.
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:71: Ecological Impact Assessment (EcIA) and for purposes of the BNG assessment.
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:72: inform impact assessment cannot be obtained from third parties. Development Site boundary.
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:76: nature conservation is scoped into the future impact assessment. Marine ecology
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:79: the future impact assessment.
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:79:6.1.119 The proposed method of landscape and visual impact assessment has been devised
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:79: • ‘Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment’ third edition (GLVIA3)
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:83: operation is scoped into future impact assessment.
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:86: the future impact assessment.
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:87: • cumulative impact assessment; and
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:90: future impact assessment. These emission sources are summarised in the following
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:93: impact assessment. The scope of the noise and vibration assessment will comprise:
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:98: impact assessment. The approach to assessing the socio-economics effects will be
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:114: into the future impact assessment.
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:118:7.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA) PROCESS
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:122: of the impact assessments chapters. The limitations presented by this uncertainty
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:127: Guidelines for Ecological Impact Assessment in the UK and Ireland. (Version 1.2 –
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:131: Materials and waste in Environmental Impact Assessment, Guidance for a
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:131: Effective Scoping of Human Health in Environmental Impact Assessment online.
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:131: Determining Significance for Human Health in Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:131: Principles of Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment in the UK online. Available at:
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:132: visual impact assessment, Advice Note 01/11 online. Available at:
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:132: Assessment, (2013). Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment. 3rd
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:135: • The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:137:A-8 Other Developments to be Considered in the Cumulative Impact Assessment
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:145: 1:25,000 @ A3 in the Cumulative Impact Assessment
R-2023-0179-SCP-Figure A-8 - Other Developments to be Considered in the Cumulative Impact Assessment.pdf:1: 1:25,000 @ A3 in the Cumulative Impact Assessment
R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:6: Environmental Impact Assessments (EIA) and other regulatory, permitting and planning
R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:6: Environmental Statements to support Environmental Impact Assessments in addition to
R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:10: by Arcadis, and successfully applied to other Environmental Impact Assessments. The
R-2020-0819-ESM-341083 R_2020_0819_ESM - Outline permission for development of general industrial, storage and distribution facilities at Dorman Point for Teesworks, Redcar.pdf:3:& Visual Impact Assessment should be provided with the proposal to inform decision making. We
R-2020-0819-ESM-341083 R_2020_0819_ESM - Outline permission for development of general industrial, storage and distribution facilities at Dorman Point for Teesworks, Redcar.pdf:3:refer you to the Landscape Institute Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment for
R-2020-0819-ESM-2022 03 08 (Dorman Point 0819) Conds.pdf:3:accompanied by a transport impact assessment setting out the predicted peak hour
R-2020-0819-ESM-2022 03 08 (Dorman Point 0819) Conds.pdf:3:28. All traffic impact assessments submitted to the Local Planning Authority pursuant
R-2020-0819-ESM-2022 03 08 (Dorman Point 0819) Conds.pdf:4:Condition 29 unless a transport impact assessment has been submitted to and
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:4: Environmental Impact Assessment 32
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:5: Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (as amended). Part 10(a)
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:35: 1 Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:36: Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:36: Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the EIA Regulations) as updated by The Town and
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:36: Country Planning and Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment)
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:38:5.20 The Ecological Impact Assessment concluded that it is not practically possible for direct
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:42: 2 Drainage proposals and a Drainage Impact Assessment will be included as part of the STDC
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:43: the noise impact assessment. It was agreed that the existing noise environment around the site
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:46: timescales for construction. The visual impact assessment is based on a ‘massing plan’ of the
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:46: visual impact assessment for the proposed site:
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:3: out the findings of an Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) that has been submitted to
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:3: Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (as amended). Part 10(a)
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:17: • A detailed FRA and Drainage Impact Assessment (DIA) with drainage strategy (for both foul
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:23:12.1 A Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment has been undertaken by BDP to assess the
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:28: occupier), a detailed Flood Risk Assessment, Drainage Impact Assessment with drainage
R-2020-0819-ESM-Decision Notice 0819.pdf:9: must be accompanied by a transport impact assessment setting out the
R-2020-0819-ESM-Decision Notice 0819.pdf:9:29. All traffic impact assessments submitted to the Local Planning Authority
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:3: out the findings of an Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) that has been submitted to
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:3: Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (as amended) Part 10(a) relates
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:18: • A detailed FRA and Drainage Impact Assessment (DIA) with drainage strategy (for both foul
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:24:11.1 A Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment has been undertaken by BDP to assess the
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:29: occupier), a detailed Flood Risk Assessment, Drainage Impact Assessment with drainage
R-2020-0465-FFM-Officer report _R20200465FFM.pdf:3: • Ecological Impact Assessment
R-2020-0465-FFM-Officer report _R20200465FFM.pdf:11:The application is supported by an Ecological Impact Assessment which
R-2020-0465-FFM-Officer report _R20200465FFM.pdf:17:Within the Ecological Impact Assessment the following summary has been