171019South-Tees-Master-Plan-19-Nov-17.pdf:56:nature reserve by Tees Valley Wildlife Trust since 1982. have negligible to low potential to support this species.
1911South-Tees-Master-Plan-Nov-19.2.pdf:56: have negligible to low potential to support this species. 2.12.9 INVERTEBRATES
2010-TVCA-Retain-Redcar-Blast-Furnace-Reports.pdf:4:only negligible displacement with existing provision, such as Kirkleatham Museum), a
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:48: High Major Moderate Moderate Minor Negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:48: Medium Moderate Moderate Minor Minor Negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:48: Low Minor Minor Minor Negligible Negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:48: Very low Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:48:Whilst mitigation for minor or negligible impacts may not be specifically defined as a matter of course,
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:48:recognised that minor and negligible impacts could become significant when considered cumulatively with
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:112:3, the values are so low (<5mg/l) as to be negligible compared with background levels and, in all cases, the
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:112:water quality sampling points during Stage 3 of the dredging and only negligible effects for a short duration
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:112:Stages 3 and 4 of the dredging, only negligible effects are noted, equivalent to variations within the
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:118:as to be negligible in such a great depth of water in this deep water offshore area).
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:122:enhancement is so small in magnitude and spatial extent as to be negligible in such a great depth of water
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:126:is negligible, whilst to the north it covers a similar zone to the sediment plume for this disposal event, which
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:126:0.1cm. Clearly these magnitudes are extremely low within the licenced disposal site, and negligible beyond.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:126:magnitudes, with negligible changes anticipated beyond the boundaries of the site.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:167:is considered to be medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:167:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:167:impact is of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:167:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:168:be medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:168:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:168:considered to be medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:168:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:174: negligible. As there are no designated
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:175:Negligible Is generally tolerant of physical or chemical changes
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:177:temporary change, indiscernible • negligible change to existing risk of exposure; or
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:178: Moderate Minor Minor Negligible Negligible Minor Minor Moderate
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:178: Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Minor
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:178:(negligible) impacts as they may contribute to significant impacts cumulatively or through interactions.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:178:Negligible Very small changes in receptor condition (adverse or beneficial), which may be raised as local issues
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:180:the geological sensitivity is considered to be negligible. As there are no designated geological sites recorded
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:186:during construction is considered to be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:186:No mitigation measures are required and residual impact would be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:188:overall impact during construction is considered to be of negligible to minor adverse significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:188:negligible to minor adverse significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:189:very low. Thus, the impact to human receptors is of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:189:No additional mitigation measures required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:190:very low and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:212:impact of negligible significance is predicted.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:212:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:214:Given the above, an impact of negligible significance on marine species and habitats is predicted to arise
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:214:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:215:and tidal regime is predicted to be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:215:No mitigation measures are required, and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:221: Negligible / very
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:234: 0.0003 harbour porpoise Negligible / very low magnitude
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:234: 0.000003 minke whale Negligible / very low magnitude
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:234: dredging 0.00000024 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:234: 0.0000009 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:234:The magnitude of the potential impact of PTS as a result of dredging noise is negligible / very low for harbour
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:234:seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.10).
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:234: Harbour Negligible / Negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:234: Negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:234: Auditory injury Negligible / Negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:234: (PTS) from Minke whale Negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:234: Negligible / required. Negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:234: SEL during Grey seal Negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:234: Negligible / Negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:234: Harbour seal Negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:235:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:236: Negligible / very low magnitude
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:236: 0.000003 minke whale Negligible / very low magnitude
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:236: underwater noise 0.00000024 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:236: 0.0000009 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:236:The magnitude of the potential impact of TTS and fleeing response as a result of dredging noise, is negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:237:whale, grey seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.13).
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:237: Harbour Negligible / Negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:237: Negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:237: TTS or fleeing Negligible / Negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:237: response from Minke whale Negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:237: Negligible / required. Negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:237: SEL during Grey seal Negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:237: Negligible / Negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:237: Harbour seal Negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:237:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:238: Negligible / very low magnitude
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:238: Negligible / very low magnitude
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:238: dredging (5% of Negligible / very low magnitude
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:238: 0.000005 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:238:of negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, the impact significance for any
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:238:potential increase in collision risk with vessels during dredging has been assessed as negligible (not
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:239: Harbour Negligible /
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:239: Low Negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:239: Potential for Minke Negligible / Negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:239: collision risk from required, other than Negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:239: vessels during Negligible / Negligible good practice.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:239: Harbour Negligible / Negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:239:The residual impact would be of negligible significance for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:240:The magnitude of the impact of vessel disturbance to seal haul-out sites is defined as negligible / very low
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:240:resulting in an overall impact significance of negligible.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:240:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:240:have a negligible impact on marine mammals.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:240:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:241: Negligible / very low magnitude
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:241: Negligible / very low magnitude
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:241: dredge area Negligible / very low magnitude
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:241: 0.0001 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:241:Taking into account the low receptor sensitivity, the negligible potential magnitude of the impact and the
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:241:negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal (Table 10.17).
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:241: Harbour Negligible /
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:241: Low Negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:241: Minke Negligible / Negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:241: resource in Negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:241: Negligible / Negligible required.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:241: Harbour Negligible / Negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:241:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:242:10.5.1 and 10.5.2). The magnitude of effect in all species is assessed to be negligible / very low based on
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:242:maintenance activities has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.10 and Table 10.13).
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:242:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:242:10.5.3). The magnitude of effect in all species is assessed to be negligible / very low based on the maximum
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:242:has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.15).
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:242:dredging activities. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:242:assessed as negligible (see Section 10.5.4).
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:242:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:243:negligible (see Section 10.5.5).
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:243:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:243:negligible (see Section 10.5.6).
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:243:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:243:established vessel routes. The magnitude of effect in all species is assessed to be negligible / very low
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:243:for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal has been assessed as negligible (Table
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:243:would be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:251: Negligible Commonplace feature of little or no habitat/historical significance. Loss of such a feature would not be seen
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:252: Negligible of normal natural variation change to the extent Change is within the normal range of natural variation.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:253: High Medium Low Negligible Negligible Low Medium High
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:253: Moderate Minor Minor Negligible Negligible Minor Minor Moderate
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:253: Importance Negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:253: Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Minor
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:260:grassland is concluded as being of negligible ecological value.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:260:negligible ecological value.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:260:scrub habitat is concluded as being of negligible ecological value.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:261:and ruderal habitat is concluded as being of negligible ecological value.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:261:metal structures, which have been assessed as being of negligible value for roosting bats due to the lack of
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:264: Wharf Negligible No
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:264: Buildings Negligible No
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:264: Notable Flora Negligible No
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:264: Badger Negligible No
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:264: Water vole Negligible No
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:265: Amphibians Negligible No
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:265: Reptiles Negligible No
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:266:impacts to foraging bats are considered to be negligible.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:266:included in the CEMP, and with the implementation of such measures, any impacts will be negligible in
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:266:Negligible impacts on water quality are anticipated during construction of the proposed scheme (Section
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:267:time otters are anticipated to spend in the area, an impact of negligible magnitude is anticipated. Given the
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:268:assessed to be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:268:With the implementation of the above measures, the residual impact is of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:268:be of local (grayling) and (dingy skipper) significance, and negligible importance within the footprint of the
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:294:Both had a peak count of two, which represents a negligible proportion of the SPA / Ramsar site populations.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:296:would have a negligible impact on benthic prey species in the intertidal zone so consequent effects on
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:298:of the effects of capital dredging and therefore a negligible impact is predicted on the waterbirds relying on
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:298:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:301:minor adverse. A residual impact of negligible significance is predicted at the other sensitive intertidal
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:304:and localised disturbance to feeding resources will result in an impact of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:304:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:305:negligible, and any exceedances of the thresholds stated in Cutts et al. (2009) or Wright et al. (2010) would
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:305:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:305:negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:305:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:305:be negligible, therefore any effects on waterbirds and foraging terns would manifest as a direct behavioural
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:306:on foraging / roosting waterbirds and terns is predicted to be negligible.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:306:While impacts are anticipated to be negligible, the implication of best practice mitigation measures set out
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:306:water) will further reduce the impact on foraging / roosting waterbirds. The residual impact is negligible.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:306:negligible impact on intertidal benthos (see Section 9.6.2) and would not adversely affect the availability of
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:306:result of hydrodynamic changes would be negligible.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:306:No mitigation measures are considered necessary, therefore the residual impact is negligible.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:321:and beyond. The impact is therefore predicted to be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:321:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would remain of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:324:considered to be very low, and the significance of the impact is negligible.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:325:Outside the migratory period, there would be a negligible impact on fish movement up- and downstream
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:327:underwater noise of piling activities is therefore considered to have a negligible impact on migration up-
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:327:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact remains negligible.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:328:negligible impact on fish species within the Tees.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:330:the footprint of the works, and even if there was, the number of vessels/fishers affected would be negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:330:and navigation within the Tees estuary is predicted to be negligible, given that works will be co-ordinated
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:330:are predicted to be negligible.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:330:remain negligible.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:330:in motorised vessel traffic is therefore considered to have a negligible impact on fish populations or
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:330:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact will remain negligible.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:331:impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:331:impact would be negligible.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:336:receptor. The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible significance on
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:336:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:336:receptor. The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible significance on
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:337:scheme) and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:337:(human health/safety). The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:337:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:338:The impact of the proposed development’s construction traffic is therefore assessed as of negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:338:proposed schemes operational traffic is therefore assessed as negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:338:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:341: MMO Scoping Opinion negligible and therefore not necessary to be assessed.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:347: Negligible Assets with no significant importance or archaeological/historical interest.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:347: Negligible The asset’s fabric and/or setting is changed in ways which do not materially affect its heritage significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:348: Significance High Medium Low Negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:348: Low Moderate Minor Minor Negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:348: Negligible Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:348: Negligible No material change to heritage significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:349:these from other non-significant (negligible) impacts as they may contribute to significant impacts
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:370: Negligible / very low < 1.0
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:373: 1 69.7 69.8 0.1 Very low Negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:373: 2 67.8 68.0 0.2 Very low Negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:373: 3 70.3 70.5 0.2 Very low Negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:373: 5 76.3 76.4 0.1 Very low Negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:373:Predicted changes in BNL, displayed in Table 17.10, indicate impacts of negligible significance at worst
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:373:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:375: NSR1 52.2 - 59.2 Very low Negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:375:indicating negligible impact at human receptor locations. This is considered not significant and impact is
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:376:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:391: Dust soiling High Risk Medium Risk Medium Risk Negligible Risk
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:391: Human health Medium Risk Low Risk Low Risk Negligible Risk
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:391: Ecological effects Medium Risk Low Risk Low Risk Negligible Risk
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:391:demolition, ‘medium risk’ for earthworks and construction, and ‘negligible risk’ for trackout. The impacts on
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:392:earthworks and construction and ‘negligible risk’ for trackout.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:406:the proposed scheme will have negligible influence on this character area and is not considered further..
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:408:industrial context of outward views, it is predicted that the proposed scheme will have negligible influence
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:411:negligible effect on the existing baseline.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:415:of those features will incur a low adverse magnitude of effect and a negligible overall significance of effect.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:415:magnitude and incur a minor negligible adverse significance of effect.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:415:negligible overall significance of effect.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:416:and the wider environs, the overall significance of effect is considered to be negligible.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:419:significance of effect in the view is minor negligible adverse and not significant.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:419:significance of effect in the view is minor negligible adverse. In terms of EIA these effects are not
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:419:negligible.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:434:negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:435:As a result, it is concluded that there would be a negligible impact as a result of the proposed scheme.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:435:a potential impact of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:436:effect on a low sensitivity receptor. Overall, a negligible impact is predicted.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:436:residual impact would be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:444:The socio-economic impacts of the proposed scheme are identified as ‘beneficial’, ‘negligible’ or ‘adverse’
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:444: Negligible No obvious significant effect to a receptor or environment.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:444: Negligible Where no discernible effect is expected as a result of the proposed scheme on the
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:444: High Medium Low Negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:444: High Substantial Moderate to Minor to Moderate Negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:444: Medium Moderate to Moderate Minor Negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:445: Low Minor to Moderate Minor Negligible to Minor Negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:445: Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:453:supply scenario forecasts only a negligible increase in employment during the plan period.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:455:term) and negligible.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:455:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:458:employment with the AOI and is therefore considered to correspond to a negligible magnitude of change.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:458:a permanent and negligible impact.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:458:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:458:negligible magnitude of change. The receptor is considered to be of medium sensitivity by virtue of the fact
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:459:a permanent and negligible impact.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:459:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:476:that there would be impacts of negligible significance to the only NSR scoped into the assessment.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:476:would be negligible to minor adverse significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:477:noise and air quality disturbance would be negligible.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:477:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:477:negligible significance and not significant respectively. In addition, operational phase impacts to human
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:477:health as reported in Section 8 with regard to land quality are considered to be of negligible significance. It
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:477:and land quality would be negligible.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:477:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual impact of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:478:long period prior to this the enhancement is so small in magnitude and spatial extent as to be negligible in
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:479:deposition is predicted to be negligible beyond the boundaries of the Tees Bay C disposal site.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:479:that there would be negligible impact on fish or fisheries due to the proposed deposition of dredged material
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:479:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual impact of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:482:negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:482:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:484:operations). Overall, the potential impact would be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:484:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:485: Negligible / very low magnitude
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:485: 0.000003 minke whale Negligible / very low magnitude
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:485: during offshore 0.00004 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:485: 0.0000003 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:486:dredged sediments is negligible / very low for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal,
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:486:negligible (Table 26.5).
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:486: Harbour Negligible / Negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:486: TTS or fleeing Negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:486: underwater Negligible / Negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:486: Minke whale Negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:486: offshore Negligible / required. Negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:486: disposal of Grey seal Negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:486: sediments Negligible / Negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:486: Harbour seal Negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:486:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:487: Negligible / very low magnitude
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:487: Potential Negligible / very low magnitude
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:487: of dredged 0.002 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:487: Negligible / very low magnitude
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:487:of negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, the impact significance for any
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:487:assessed as negligible (not significant) for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:487: Harbour Negligible /
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:487: Low Negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:487: increased Minke Negligible / Negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:487: vessels during required, other than Negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:487: offshore disposal Negligible / Negligible good practice.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:487: sediments Harbour Negligible / Negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:487:would be of negligible significance for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:488:The magnitude of the impact of vessel disturbance to seal haul-out sites is defined as negligible / very low
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:488:This gives an overall impact significance of negligible.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:488:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:488:relied upon solely. Therefore, any increases in suspended sediments will have a negligible impact on
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:488:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:489: Negligible / very low magnitude
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:489: Negligible / very low magnitude
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:489: offshore disposal 0.04 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:489: Negligible / very low magnitude
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:489:Taking into account the low receptor sensitivity, the negligible potential magnitude of the impact and the
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:489:negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal (Table 26.9).
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:489: Harbour Negligible /
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:489: Low Negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:489: Changes to prey Minke Negligible / Negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:489: Negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:489: offshore disposal Negligible / Negligible required.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:489: Harbour Negligible / Negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:489:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:507:cumulative impact is predicted to be negligible.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:509: Negligible / very low
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:509: Negligible / very low
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:509: approach channel and Anglo Negligible / very low
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:509: Negligible / very low
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:509: Negligible / very low
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:509: Hartlepool approach Negligible / very low
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:510: Negligible / very low
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:510: Negligible / very low
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:510: Negligible / very low
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:510: Negligible / very low
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:510: Hartlepool approach Negligible / very low
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:510: Negligible / very low
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:510:Harbour Facilities schemes, is negligible / very low for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:510:harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as negligible (Table 27.5).
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:511:cumulative underwater noise impacts. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:511: TTS or fleeing Harbour Negligible /
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:511: response from Negligible Negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:511: dredging at the Negligible /
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:511: Minke whale Negligible Negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:511: Hartlepool Negligible /
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:511: approach Grey seal Negligible Negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:511: Harbour Negligible /
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:511: Harbour seal Negligible Negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:513:on waterbirds at North Tees Mudflat, and negligible impact further downstream (including at Vopak
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:514:supporting habitat was considered a negligible impact in the EIAs for both the Anglo American Harbour
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:514:(even in combination) would have a negligible impact, the cumulative effect with the proposed scheme would
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:515:driving activities (see Section 13.5.3 and 13.5.4). While there is anticipated to be negligible impact from
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:516:works, but the potential cumulative impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:516:impact would be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:516:acceptable (from a navigation risk perspective), with all risks classified as negligible or low, with the
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:516:impact would be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:516:The primary assessment identifies that the proposed schemes traffic demand would result in a negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:517:with the proposed scheme are considered not significant and indicate negligible impact, at worst. Therefore,
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:521:concludes that the disposal of dredged material will have a negligible impact on fisheries, marine ecology
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:521:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual cumulative impact of negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:568: Lianhetech, Seal Sands Proposed new buildings, plant upgrade, swale and associated Approximately Planning permission / Ramsar site would be negligible. On this basis,
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:576:greater than approximately 200m from source (see Appendix 8). There would be negligible effects on fish
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:578:would be negligible, therefore any effects on SPA / Ramsar site features would manifest as a direct
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:584:negligible effect on feeding resources for terns. When this is considered alongside the localised increase
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South_Bank_Quay_supplementary_report1_.pdf:28:receptors from increased suspended sediments remains at negligible significance. 2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South_Bank_Quay_supplementary_report1_.pdf:28:the EIA Report (which was assessed as negligible significance).
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South_Bank_Quay_supplementary_report1_.pdf:34: The negligible impact significant reported in the EIA Report was based on the fact that mobile individuals would 2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South_Bank_Quay_supplementary_report1_.pdf:34: Negligible Negligible Negligible scope of the supplementary surveys reported in Section 4.2 and 4.3 was agreed with the Environment Agency
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South_Bank_Quay_supplementary_report1_.pdf:34:from dredging and (dredging); (dredging); negligible (dredging); negligible 4.2 and 4.3 confirms that the dominant species present in the Tees estuary remain unchanged to those reported 2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South_Bank_Quay_supplementary_report1_.pdf:34:land-based piling negligible (piling) (piling) (piling) in the EIA Report. It is therefore concluded that there is no reason to amend the significance of this potential
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South_Bank_Quay_supplementary_report1_.pdf:34:from increased Negligible Negligible Negligible The findings of site-specific surveys presented in Section 4.2 and 4.3 reaffirmed the baseline data that was 2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South_Bank_Quay_supplementary_report1_.pdf:34: Negligible Negligible Negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South_Bank_Quay_supplementary_report1_.pdf:42:Effects of deposition it was concluded that there would be a negligible impact on food resources. Whilst the data from surveys presented in Section 5.2 2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South_Bank_Quay_supplementary_report1_.pdf:42:on intertidal food Negligible Negligible Negligible provide evidence that the North Tees Mudflat offers foraging opportunities for a substantial number of waterbirds, this would have no
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South_Bank_Quay_supplementary_report1_.pdf:42: It is therefore concluded that the negligible significance impact reported in the EIA Report remains valid. 2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South_Bank_Quay_supplementary_report1_.pdf:43:Noise disturbances Negligible Negligible Negligible Mudflat supports a number of wintering waterbirds.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South_Bank_Quay_supplementary_report1_.pdf:43:increased vessel Negligible Negligible Negligible 2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South_Bank_Quay_supplementary_report1_.pdf:43: The negligible impact significance detailed in the EIA Report was based around the fact that the habitats at South Bank are of low
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South_Bank_Quay_supplementary_report1_.pdf:43: Negligible Negligible Negligible 2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South_Bank_Quay_supplementary_report1_.pdf:43: Given the above, the negligible impact significance reported in the EIA Report remains valid.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South_Bank_Quay_supplementary_report1_.pdf:43: Negligible Negligible Negligible impacts to intertidal habitat. Given that all assessments were based on the assumption that the North Tees Mudflat supports non- 2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South_Bank_Quay_supplementary_report1_.pdf:43: breeding waterbirds, the negligible impact significance detailed in the EIA Report remains valid.
2207SouthQuayMMO/MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:13:dredged material is predicted to have a negligible impact on fisheries, marine ecology
2207SouthQuayMMO/MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:13:No significant residual impacts are predicted. A worst case residual impact of negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:13:dredged material is predicted to have a negligible impact on fisheries, marine ecology
2207SouthQuayMMO/MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:13:No significant residual impacts are predicted. A worst case residual impact of negligible
MMO/MLA_2013_00363/MLA_2013_00363-Seaton Port wintering birds -Final report.pdf:23:negligible.
MMO/MLA_2013_00363/MLA_2013_00363-Seaton Port wintering birds -Final report.pdf:23:changes in hydrological flow are likely to be negligible as very little feeding activity
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:30: Negligible Minor/No Impact Minor/Moderate Minor/Moderate
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:89: • Any impact on a species / habitat of negligible value
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:89: • Any impact creating a feature of negligible value
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:97: levels for a few days but this should have negligible impact on terrestrial or aquatic habitats or
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:97:14.2.46 There should be negligible impact on the terrestrial habitats or notable species on site or in
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:131: dredging on fish spawning areas are considered as negligible.
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:132: spawning areas is considered as negligible.
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:155: northern margin as negligible if proper mooring is provided. It must be assumed that proper
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:186: • Any impact on a species / habitat of negligible value
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:186: • Any impact creating a feature of negligible value
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:233: records exist and tidal influence is negligible. The long distance upstream of the study area
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:236: negligible.
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:242: Changes outside Seaton Channel are negligible.
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:244: to be negligible.
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (1).pdf:20: • Negligible adverse / beneficial; and
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (1).pdf:78: guide to where negligible effects on bird behaviour can be anticipated. The report
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (1).pdf:89: changes, which have a negligible effect on the wider channel catchment, have not
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (1).pdf:92: minor negligible hydrodynamic impacts as the dock basin will now be subject to tidal
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (1).pdf:94: minor negligible hydrodynamic impacts, as the dock basin will be subject to tidal
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (1).pdf:94:11.32 It was demonstrated in the 2007 ES that there would be negligible change as a result
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (1).pdf:94: temporary removal and replacement of the cofferdam will result in negligible,
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (1).pdf:98:12.15 Chapter 11 of this ES Addendum demonstrates that there would be negligible
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-Licence schedule two.pdf:20: • Negligible adverse / beneficial; and
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-Licence schedule two.pdf:78: guide to where negligible effects on bird behaviour can be anticipated. The report
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-Licence schedule two.pdf:89: changes, which have a negligible effect on the wider channel catchment, have not
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-Licence schedule two.pdf:92: minor negligible hydrodynamic impacts as the dock basin will now be subject to tidal
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-Licence schedule two.pdf:94: minor negligible hydrodynamic impacts, as the dock basin will be subject to tidal
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-Licence schedule two.pdf:94:11.32 It was demonstrated in the 2007 ES that there would be negligible change as a result
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-Licence schedule two.pdf:94: temporary removal and replacement of the cofferdam will result in negligible,
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-Licence schedule two.pdf:98:12.15 Chapter 11 of this ES Addendum demonstrates that there would be negligible
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (7).pdf:20: • Negligible adverse / beneficial; and
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (7).pdf:78: guide to where negligible effects on bird behaviour can be anticipated. The report
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (7).pdf:89: changes, which have a negligible effect on the wider channel catchment, have not
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (7).pdf:92: minor negligible hydrodynamic impacts as the dock basin will now be subject to tidal
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (7).pdf:94: minor negligible hydrodynamic impacts, as the dock basin will be subject to tidal
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (7).pdf:94:11.32 It was demonstrated in the 2007 ES that there would be negligible change as a result
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (7).pdf:94: temporary removal and replacement of the cofferdam will result in negligible,
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (7).pdf:98:12.15 Chapter 11 of this ES Addendum demonstrates that there would be negligible
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (3).pdf:20: • Negligible adverse / beneficial; and
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (3).pdf:78: guide to where negligible effects on bird behaviour can be anticipated. The report
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (3).pdf:89: changes, which have a negligible effect on the wider channel catchment, have not
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (3).pdf:92: minor negligible hydrodynamic impacts as the dock basin will now be subject to tidal
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (3).pdf:94: minor negligible hydrodynamic impacts, as the dock basin will be subject to tidal
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (3).pdf:94:11.32 It was demonstrated in the 2007 ES that there would be negligible change as a result
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (3).pdf:94: temporary removal and replacement of the cofferdam will result in negligible,
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (3).pdf:98:12.15 Chapter 11 of this ES Addendum demonstrates that there would be negligible
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (12).pdf:20: • Negligible adverse / beneficial; and
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (12).pdf:78: guide to where negligible effects on bird behaviour can be anticipated. The report
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (12).pdf:89: changes, which have a negligible effect on the wider channel catchment, have not
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (12).pdf:92: minor negligible hydrodynamic impacts as the dock basin will now be subject to tidal
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (12).pdf:94: minor negligible hydrodynamic impacts, as the dock basin will be subject to tidal
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (12).pdf:94:11.32 It was demonstrated in the 2007 ES that there would be negligible change as a result
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (12).pdf:94: temporary removal and replacement of the cofferdam will result in negligible,
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (12).pdf:98:12.15 Chapter 11 of this ES Addendum demonstrates that there would be negligible
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (5).pdf:20: • Negligible adverse / beneficial; and
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (5).pdf:78: guide to where negligible effects on bird behaviour can be anticipated. The report
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (5).pdf:89: changes, which have a negligible effect on the wider channel catchment, have not
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (5).pdf:92: minor negligible hydrodynamic impacts as the dock basin will now be subject to tidal
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (5).pdf:94: minor negligible hydrodynamic impacts, as the dock basin will be subject to tidal
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (5).pdf:94:11.32 It was demonstrated in the 2007 ES that there would be negligible change as a result
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (5).pdf:94: temporary removal and replacement of the cofferdam will result in negligible,
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (5).pdf:98:12.15 Chapter 11 of this ES Addendum demonstrates that there would be negligible
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (8).pdf:20: • Negligible adverse / beneficial; and
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (8).pdf:78: guide to where negligible effects on bird behaviour can be anticipated. The report
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (8).pdf:89: changes, which have a negligible effect on the wider channel catchment, have not
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (8).pdf:92: minor negligible hydrodynamic impacts as the dock basin will now be subject to tidal
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (8).pdf:94: minor negligible hydrodynamic impacts, as the dock basin will be subject to tidal
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (8).pdf:94:11.32 It was demonstrated in the 2007 ES that there would be negligible change as a result
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (8).pdf:94: temporary removal and replacement of the cofferdam will result in negligible,
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (8).pdf:98:12.15 Chapter 11 of this ES Addendum demonstrates that there would be negligible
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (9).pdf:20: • Negligible adverse / beneficial; and
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (9).pdf:78: guide to where negligible effects on bird behaviour can be anticipated. The report
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (9).pdf:89: changes, which have a negligible effect on the wider channel catchment, have not
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (9).pdf:92: minor negligible hydrodynamic impacts as the dock basin will now be subject to tidal
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (9).pdf:94: minor negligible hydrodynamic impacts, as the dock basin will be subject to tidal
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (9).pdf:94:11.32 It was demonstrated in the 2007 ES that there would be negligible change as a result
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (9).pdf:94: temporary removal and replacement of the cofferdam will result in negligible,
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (9).pdf:98:12.15 Chapter 11 of this ES Addendum demonstrates that there would be negligible
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (11).pdf:20: • Negligible adverse / beneficial; and
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (11).pdf:78: guide to where negligible effects on bird behaviour can be anticipated. The report
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (11).pdf:89: changes, which have a negligible effect on the wider channel catchment, have not
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (11).pdf:92: minor negligible hydrodynamic impacts as the dock basin will now be subject to tidal
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (11).pdf:94: minor negligible hydrodynamic impacts, as the dock basin will be subject to tidal
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (11).pdf:94:11.32 It was demonstrated in the 2007 ES that there would be negligible change as a result
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (11).pdf:94: temporary removal and replacement of the cofferdam will result in negligible,
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (11).pdf:98:12.15 Chapter 11 of this ES Addendum demonstrates that there would be negligible
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-502 - NTS 09.02.16 (1).pdf:11: sheet pile walls have been removed there may be minor negligible hydrodynamic
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (6).pdf:20: • Negligible adverse / beneficial; and
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (6).pdf:78: guide to where negligible effects on bird behaviour can be anticipated. The report
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (6).pdf:89: changes, which have a negligible effect on the wider channel catchment, have not
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (6).pdf:92: minor negligible hydrodynamic impacts as the dock basin will now be subject to tidal
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (6).pdf:94: minor negligible hydrodynamic impacts, as the dock basin will be subject to tidal
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (6).pdf:94:11.32 It was demonstrated in the 2007 ES that there would be negligible change as a result
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (6).pdf:94: temporary removal and replacement of the cofferdam will result in negligible,
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (6).pdf:98:12.15 Chapter 11 of this ES Addendum demonstrates that there would be negligible
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (4).pdf:20: • Negligible adverse / beneficial; and
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (4).pdf:78: guide to where negligible effects on bird behaviour can be anticipated. The report
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (4).pdf:89: changes, which have a negligible effect on the wider channel catchment, have not
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (4).pdf:92: minor negligible hydrodynamic impacts as the dock basin will now be subject to tidal
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (4).pdf:94: minor negligible hydrodynamic impacts, as the dock basin will be subject to tidal
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (4).pdf:94:11.32 It was demonstrated in the 2007 ES that there would be negligible change as a result
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (4).pdf:94: temporary removal and replacement of the cofferdam will result in negligible,
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (4).pdf:98:12.15 Chapter 11 of this ES Addendum demonstrates that there would be negligible
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (2).pdf:20: • Negligible adverse / beneficial; and
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (2).pdf:78: guide to where negligible effects on bird behaviour can be anticipated. The report
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (2).pdf:89: changes, which have a negligible effect on the wider channel catchment, have not
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (2).pdf:92: minor negligible hydrodynamic impacts as the dock basin will now be subject to tidal
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (2).pdf:94: minor negligible hydrodynamic impacts, as the dock basin will be subject to tidal
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (2).pdf:94:11.32 It was demonstrated in the 2007 ES that there would be negligible change as a result
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (2).pdf:94: temporary removal and replacement of the cofferdam will result in negligible,
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (2).pdf:98:12.15 Chapter 11 of this ES Addendum demonstrates that there would be negligible
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16.pdf:20: • Negligible adverse / beneficial; and
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16.pdf:78: guide to where negligible effects on bird behaviour can be anticipated. The report
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16.pdf:89: changes, which have a negligible effect on the wider channel catchment, have not
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16.pdf:92: minor negligible hydrodynamic impacts as the dock basin will now be subject to tidal
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16.pdf:94: minor negligible hydrodynamic impacts, as the dock basin will be subject to tidal
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16.pdf:94:11.32 It was demonstrated in the 2007 ES that there would be negligible change as a result
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16.pdf:94: temporary removal and replacement of the cofferdam will result in negligible,
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16.pdf:98:12.15 Chapter 11 of this ES Addendum demonstrates that there would be negligible
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:3: form PCBs represent negligible risk to human health. Liquid PCBs are rarely encountered,
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:10: negative air pressure so that dispersal of fibre into the atmosphere will be negligible.
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:27: effluent discharge is considered to be negligible
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:32: the dismantling pad or dry dock floor. Accordingly, the ships will contribute a negligible
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:74: • Major • Moderate • Minor • Negligible
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:75: Negligible - No change
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:92:30.23.5 At the construction phase of the development the proposed works will have a negligible or
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:92: on the surrounding area is rated as minor or negligible. This is due to the existing industrial
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:93: Negligible, Negligible
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:93: Negligible Operational:
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:93: Negligible
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:93: NegligibleOperational Negligible
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:93: Negligible Operational:
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:93: Negligible
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:94: NegligibleOperational: Negligible
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:94: Negligible
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:94: Negligible
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:94: Negligible, short-term Negligible
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:94: Negligible, long-term Operational:
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:94: Negligible
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:124: discharge is considered to be negligible.
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:125:35.3.35a The EIS clearly states that any increase in organic load will be negligible due to the
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:125: increase on the growth of Enteromorpha of Seal Sands is considered to be negligible
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:125:35.3.35d The impact in combination with the Tioxide outfall is assessed as negligible. The
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:146: of paint particles will be negligible. Most dust will arise from the passage of vehicles across
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:155:Landscape and locations in negligible or term moderate
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:155: Marsh and negligible or
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-502 - NTS 09.02.16.pdf:11: sheet pile walls have been removed there may be minor negligible hydrodynamic
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (10).pdf:20: • Negligible adverse / beneficial; and
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (10).pdf:78: guide to where negligible effects on bird behaviour can be anticipated. The report
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (10).pdf:89: changes, which have a negligible effect on the wider channel catchment, have not
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (10).pdf:92: minor negligible hydrodynamic impacts as the dock basin will now be subject to tidal
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (10).pdf:94: minor negligible hydrodynamic impacts, as the dock basin will be subject to tidal
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (10).pdf:94:11.32 It was demonstrated in the 2007 ES that there would be negligible change as a result
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (10).pdf:94: temporary removal and replacement of the cofferdam will result in negligible,
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (10).pdf:98:12.15 Chapter 11 of this ES Addendum demonstrates that there would be negligible
MMO/MLA_2022_00248/Additional Documents/Environmental Statement, Chapter G Water Management and Flooding Section 7 Residual effects.pdf:1: will be minor, so the level of effect is therefore negligible, and not significant. Additional
MMO/MLA_2022_00248/Additional Documents/Environmental Statement, Chapter G Water Management and Flooding Section 7 Residual effects.pdf:2: gives an effect greater than minor or negligible, which is not significant.
MMO/MLA_2022_00248/Additional Documents/Environmental Statement, Chapter G Water Management and Flooding Section 7 Residual effects.pdf:2: receptors, this would result in a negligible level of effect of pollution which would be deemed to
MMO/MLA_2022_00248/Additional Documents/Environmental Statement, Chapter G Water Management and Flooding Section 7 Residual effects.pdf:2: negligible beneficial effect for the other surface waterbodies (Holme Beck, Knitting wife,
MMO/MLA_2022_00248/Additional Documents/Environmental Statement, Chapter G Water Management and Flooding Section 7 Residual effects.pdf:2: of the mitigation measures and so a substantial beneficial effect for the Tees and negligible
MMO/MLA_2022_00248/Additional Documents/Environmental Statement, Chapter G Water Management and Flooding Section 7 Residual effects.pdf:2: will be minor, so the level of effect is therefore negligible, and not significant. Additional
MMO/MLA_2022_00248/Additional Documents/CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:16: demonstrate that there will be a negligible impact on those aspects of the
MMO/MLA_2015_00334/MLA_2015_00334-Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:16:exist and the tidal influence is negligible. The long distance upstream of the study area ensures
MMO/MLA_2015_00334/MLA_2015_00334-Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:40:is seen, a decrease of 0.003 %, which is negligible. The impacts on the hydrodynamic regime
MMO/MLA_2015_00334/MLA_2015_00334-Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:40:hydrodynamic regime are negligible.
MMO/MLA_2015_00334/MLA_2015_00334-Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:43:is a decrease of 13 %. At Pt 7 Teesport the figure is 0.01 % which is negligible. Again,
MMO/MLA_2015_00334/MLA_2015_00334-Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:43:negligible.
MMO/MLA_2015_00334/MLA_2015_00334-Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:51:for sand concentrations between the different scenarios are negligible.
MMO/MLA_2015_00334/MLA_2015_00334-Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:72:NC Negligible Concentration. Concentration below which the risk of the
MMO/MLA_2015_00334/MLA_2015_00334-Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:72: ecosystem is considered negligible (/20/).
MMO/MLA_2015_00334/MLA_2015_00334-Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:72: risk of the ecosystem is considered negligible.
MMO/MLA_2015_00334/MLA_2015_00334-Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:73:Table 8-2 Maximum Permissible Concentrations (MPC) and Negligible Concentrations
MMO/MLA_2015_00334/MLA_2015_00334-Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:73:Table 8-3 Maximum Permissible Concentrations (MPC) and Negligible Concentrations
MMO/MLA_2015_00334/MLA_2015_00334-Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:84: Permissible Concentrations and Negligible Concentrations for metals, tacking
MMO/MLA_2015_00334/MLA_2015_00334-Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:95:thresholds are given as Negligible Concentration (NC) and Maximum Permissible
MMO/MLA_2015_00334/MLA_2015_00334-Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:95:thresholds are given as Negligible Concentration (NC) and Maximum Permissible
MMO/MLA_2015_00334/MLA_2015_00334-Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:96:thresholds are given as Negligible Concentration (NC) and Maximum Permissible
MMO/MLA_2015_00334/MLA_2015_00334-Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:96:thresholds are given as Negligible Concentration (NC) and Maximum Permissible
MMO/MLA_2015_00334/MLA_2015_00334-Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:97:are given as Negligible Concentration (NC) and Maximum Permissible Concentration
MMO/MLA_2015_00334/MLA_2015_00334-3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:131:exist and the tidal influence is negligible. The long distance upstream of the study area ensures
MMO/MLA_2015_00334/MLA_2015_00334-3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:155:is seen, a decrease of 0.003 %, which is negligible. The impacts on the hydrodynamic regime
MMO/MLA_2015_00334/MLA_2015_00334-3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:155:hydrodynamic regime are negligible.
MMO/MLA_2015_00334/MLA_2015_00334-3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:158:is a decrease of 13 %. At Pt 7 Teesport the figure is 0.01 % which is negligible. Again,
MMO/MLA_2015_00334/MLA_2015_00334-3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:158:negligible.
MMO/MLA_2015_00334/MLA_2015_00334-3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:166:for sand concentrations between the different scenarios are negligible.
MMO/MLA_2015_00334/MLA_2015_00334-3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:187:NC Negligible Concentration. Concentration below which the risk of the
MMO/MLA_2015_00334/MLA_2015_00334-3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:187: ecosystem is considered negligible (/20/).
MMO/MLA_2015_00334/MLA_2015_00334-3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:187: risk of the ecosystem is considered negligible.
MMO/MLA_2015_00334/MLA_2015_00334-3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:188:Table 8-2 Maximum Permissible Concentrations (MPC) and Negligible Concentrations
MMO/MLA_2015_00334/MLA_2015_00334-3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:188:Table 8-3 Maximum Permissible Concentrations (MPC) and Negligible Concentrations
MMO/MLA_2015_00334/MLA_2015_00334-3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:199: Permissible Concentrations and Negligible Concentrations for metals, tacking
MMO/MLA_2015_00334/MLA_2015_00334-3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:210:thresholds are given as Negligible Concentration (NC) and Maximum Permissible
MMO/MLA_2015_00334/MLA_2015_00334-3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:210:thresholds are given as Negligible Concentration (NC) and Maximum Permissible
MMO/MLA_2015_00334/MLA_2015_00334-3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:211:thresholds are given as Negligible Concentration (NC) and Maximum Permissible
MMO/MLA_2015_00334/MLA_2015_00334-3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:211:thresholds are given as Negligible Concentration (NC) and Maximum Permissible
MMO/MLA_2015_00334/MLA_2015_00334-3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:212:are given as Negligible Concentration (NC) and Maximum Permissible Concentration
MMO/MLA_2015_00334/MLA_2015_00334-Appendix 16.1d 2006-0416 V01 - Scenario 11 hydrodynamics.pdf:5:the channel floor. In Tees channel the differences are negligible.
MMO/EIA_2019_00017/EIA_2019_00017-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:7:likely to be negligible, and therefore not necessary to be assessed.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:48: High Major Moderate Moderate Minor Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:48: Medium Moderate Moderate Minor Minor Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:48: Low Minor Minor Minor Negligible Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:48: Very low Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:48:Whilst mitigation for minor or negligible impacts may not be specifically defined as a matter of course,
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:48:recognised that minor and negligible impacts could become significant when considered cumulatively with
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:112:3, the values are so low (<5mg/l) as to be negligible compared with background levels and, in all cases, the
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:112:water quality sampling points during Stage 3 of the dredging and only negligible effects for a short duration
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:112:Stages 3 and 4 of the dredging, only negligible effects are noted, equivalent to variations within the
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:118:as to be negligible in such a great depth of water in this deep water offshore area).
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:122:enhancement is so small in magnitude and spatial extent as to be negligible in such a great depth of water
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:126:is negligible, whilst to the north it covers a similar zone to the sediment plume for this disposal event, which
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:126:0.1cm. Clearly these magnitudes are extremely low within the licenced disposal site, and negligible beyond.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:126:magnitudes, with negligible changes anticipated beyond the boundaries of the site.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:167:is considered to be medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:167:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:167:impact is of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:167:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:168:be medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:168:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:168:considered to be medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:168:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:174: negligible. As there are no designated
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:175:Negligible Is generally tolerant of physical or chemical changes
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:177:temporary change, indiscernible • negligible change to existing risk of exposure; or
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:178: Moderate Minor Minor Negligible Negligible Minor Minor Moderate
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:178: Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Minor
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:178:(negligible) impacts as they may contribute to significant impacts cumulatively or through interactions.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:178:Negligible Very small changes in receptor condition (adverse or beneficial), which may be raised as local issues
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:180:the geological sensitivity is considered to be negligible. As there are no designated geological sites recorded
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:186:during construction is considered to be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:186:No mitigation measures are required and residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:188:overall impact during construction is considered to be of negligible to minor adverse significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:188:negligible to minor adverse significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:189:very low. Thus, the impact to human receptors is of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:189:No additional mitigation measures required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:190:very low and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:212:impact of negligible significance is predicted.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:212:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:214:Given the above, an impact of negligible significance on marine species and habitats is predicted to arise
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:214:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:215:and tidal regime is predicted to be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:215:No mitigation measures are required, and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:221: Negligible / very
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:234: 0.0003 harbour porpoise Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:234: 0.000003 minke whale Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:234: dredging 0.00000024 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:234: 0.0000009 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:234:The magnitude of the potential impact of PTS as a result of dredging noise is negligible / very low for harbour
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:234:seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.10).
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:234: Harbour Negligible / Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:234: Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:234: Auditory injury Negligible / Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:234: (PTS) from Minke whale Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:234: Negligible / required. Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:234: SEL during Grey seal Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:234: Negligible / Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:234: Harbour seal Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:235:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:236: Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:236: 0.000003 minke whale Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:236: underwater noise 0.00000024 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:236: 0.0000009 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:236:The magnitude of the potential impact of TTS and fleeing response as a result of dredging noise, is negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:237:whale, grey seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.13).
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:237: Harbour Negligible / Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:237: Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:237: TTS or fleeing Negligible / Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:237: response from Minke whale Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:237: Negligible / required. Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:237: SEL during Grey seal Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:237: Negligible / Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:237: Harbour seal Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:237:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:238: Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:238: Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:238: dredging (5% of Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:238: 0.000005 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:238:of negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, the impact significance for any
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:238:potential increase in collision risk with vessels during dredging has been assessed as negligible (not
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:239: Harbour Negligible /
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:239: Low Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:239: Potential for Minke Negligible / Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:239: collision risk from required, other than Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:239: vessels during Negligible / Negligible good practice.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:239: Harbour Negligible / Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:239:The residual impact would be of negligible significance for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:240:The magnitude of the impact of vessel disturbance to seal haul-out sites is defined as negligible / very low
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:240:resulting in an overall impact significance of negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:240:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:240:have a negligible impact on marine mammals.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:240:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:241: Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:241: Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:241: dredge area Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:241: 0.0001 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:241:Taking into account the low receptor sensitivity, the negligible potential magnitude of the impact and the
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:241:negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal (Table 10.17).
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:241: Harbour Negligible /
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:241: Low Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:241: Minke Negligible / Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:241: resource in Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:241: Negligible / Negligible required.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:241: Harbour Negligible / Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:241:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:242:10.5.1 and 10.5.2). The magnitude of effect in all species is assessed to be negligible / very low based on
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:242:maintenance activities has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.10 and Table 10.13).
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:242:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:242:10.5.3). The magnitude of effect in all species is assessed to be negligible / very low based on the maximum
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:242:has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.15).
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:242:dredging activities. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:242:assessed as negligible (see Section 10.5.4).
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:242:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:243:negligible (see Section 10.5.5).
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:243:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:243:negligible (see Section 10.5.6).
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:243:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:243:established vessel routes. The magnitude of effect in all species is assessed to be negligible / very low
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:243:for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal has been assessed as negligible (Table
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:243:would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:251: Negligible Commonplace feature of little or no habitat/historical significance. Loss of such a feature would not be seen
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:252: Negligible of normal natural variation change to the extent Change is within the normal range of natural variation.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:253: High Medium Low Negligible Negligible Low Medium High
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:253: Moderate Minor Minor Negligible Negligible Minor Minor Moderate
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:253: Importance Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:253: Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Minor
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:260:grassland is concluded as being of negligible ecological value.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:260:negligible ecological value.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:260:scrub habitat is concluded as being of negligible ecological value.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:261:and ruderal habitat is concluded as being of negligible ecological value.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:261:metal structures, which have been assessed as being of negligible value for roosting bats due to the lack of
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:264: Wharf Negligible No
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:264: Buildings Negligible No
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:264: Notable Flora Negligible No
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:264: Badger Negligible No
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:264: Water vole Negligible No
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:265: Amphibians Negligible No
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:265: Reptiles Negligible No
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:266:impacts to foraging bats are considered to be negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:266:included in the CEMP, and with the implementation of such measures, any impacts will be negligible in
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:266:Negligible impacts on water quality are anticipated during construction of the proposed scheme (Section
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:267:time otters are anticipated to spend in the area, an impact of negligible magnitude is anticipated. Given the
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:268:assessed to be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:268:With the implementation of the above measures, the residual impact is of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:268:be of local (grayling) and (dingy skipper) significance, and negligible importance within the footprint of the
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:294:Both had a peak count of two, which represents a negligible proportion of the SPA / Ramsar site populations.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:296:would have a negligible impact on benthic prey species in the intertidal zone so consequent effects on
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:298:of the effects of capital dredging and therefore a negligible impact is predicted on the waterbirds relying on
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:298:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:301:minor adverse. A residual impact of negligible significance is predicted at the other sensitive intertidal
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:304:and localised disturbance to feeding resources will result in an impact of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:304:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:305:negligible, and any exceedances of the thresholds stated in Cutts et al. (2009) or Wright et al. (2010) would
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:305:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:305:negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:305:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:305:be negligible, therefore any effects on waterbirds and foraging terns would manifest as a direct behavioural
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:306:on foraging / roosting waterbirds and terns is predicted to be negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:306:While impacts are anticipated to be negligible, the implication of best practice mitigation measures set out
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:306:water) will further reduce the impact on foraging / roosting waterbirds. The residual impact is negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:306:negligible impact on intertidal benthos (see Section 9.6.2) and would not adversely affect the availability of
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:306:result of hydrodynamic changes would be negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:306:No mitigation measures are considered necessary, therefore the residual impact is negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:321:and beyond. The impact is therefore predicted to be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:321:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would remain of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:324:considered to be very low, and the significance of the impact is negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:325:Outside the migratory period, there would be a negligible impact on fish movement up- and downstream
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:327:underwater noise of piling activities is therefore considered to have a negligible impact on migration up-
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:327:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact remains negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:328:negligible impact on fish species within the Tees.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:330:the footprint of the works, and even if there was, the number of vessels/fishers affected would be negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:330:and navigation within the Tees estuary is predicted to be negligible, given that works will be co-ordinated
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:330:are predicted to be negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:330:remain negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:330:in motorised vessel traffic is therefore considered to have a negligible impact on fish populations or
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:330:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact will remain negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:331:impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:331:impact would be negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:336:receptor. The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible significance on
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:336:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:336:receptor. The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible significance on
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:337:scheme) and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:337:(human health/safety). The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:337:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:338:The impact of the proposed development’s construction traffic is therefore assessed as of negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:338:proposed schemes operational traffic is therefore assessed as negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:338:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:341: MMO Scoping Opinion negligible and therefore not necessary to be assessed.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:347: Negligible Assets with no significant importance or archaeological/historical interest.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:347: Negligible The asset’s fabric and/or setting is changed in ways which do not materially affect its heritage significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:348: Significance High Medium Low Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:348: Low Moderate Minor Minor Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:348: Negligible Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:348: Negligible No material change to heritage significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:349:these from other non-significant (negligible) impacts as they may contribute to significant impacts
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:370: Negligible / very low < 1.0
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:373: 1 69.7 69.8 0.1 Very low Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:373: 2 67.8 68.0 0.2 Very low Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:373: 3 70.3 70.5 0.2 Very low Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:373: 5 76.3 76.4 0.1 Very low Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:373:Predicted changes in BNL, displayed in Table 17.10, indicate impacts of negligible significance at worst
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:373:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:375: NSR1 52.2 - 59.2 Very low Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:375:indicating negligible impact at human receptor locations. This is considered not significant and impact is
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:376:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:391: Dust soiling High Risk Medium Risk Medium Risk Negligible Risk
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:391: Human health Medium Risk Low Risk Low Risk Negligible Risk
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:391: Ecological effects Medium Risk Low Risk Low Risk Negligible Risk
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:391:demolition, ‘medium risk’ for earthworks and construction, and ‘negligible risk’ for trackout. The impacts on
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:392:earthworks and construction and ‘negligible risk’ for trackout.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:406:the proposed scheme will have negligible influence on this character area and is not considered further..
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:408:industrial context of outward views, it is predicted that the proposed scheme will have negligible influence
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:411:negligible effect on the existing baseline.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:415:of those features will incur a low adverse magnitude of effect and a negligible overall significance of effect.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:415:magnitude and incur a minor negligible adverse significance of effect.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:415:negligible overall significance of effect.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:416:and the wider environs, the overall significance of effect is considered to be negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:419:significance of effect in the view is minor negligible adverse and not significant.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:419:significance of effect in the view is minor negligible adverse. In terms of EIA these effects are not
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:419:negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:434:negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:435:As a result, it is concluded that there would be a negligible impact as a result of the proposed scheme.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:435:a potential impact of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:436:effect on a low sensitivity receptor. Overall, a negligible impact is predicted.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:436:residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:444:The socio-economic impacts of the proposed scheme are identified as ‘beneficial’, ‘negligible’ or ‘adverse’
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:444: Negligible No obvious significant effect to a receptor or environment.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:444: Negligible Where no discernible effect is expected as a result of the proposed scheme on the
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:444: High Medium Low Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:444: High Substantial Moderate to Minor to Moderate Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:444: Medium Moderate to Moderate Minor Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:445: Low Minor to Moderate Minor Negligible to Minor Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:445: Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:453:supply scenario forecasts only a negligible increase in employment during the plan period.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:455:term) and negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:455:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:458:employment with the AOI and is therefore considered to correspond to a negligible magnitude of change.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:458:a permanent and negligible impact.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:458:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:458:negligible magnitude of change. The receptor is considered to be of medium sensitivity by virtue of the fact
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:459:a permanent and negligible impact.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:459:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:476:that there would be impacts of negligible significance to the only NSR scoped into the assessment.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:476:would be negligible to minor adverse significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:477:noise and air quality disturbance would be negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:477:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:477:negligible significance and not significant respectively. In addition, operational phase impacts to human
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:477:health as reported in Section 8 with regard to land quality are considered to be of negligible significance. It
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:477:and land quality would be negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:477:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual impact of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:478:long period prior to this the enhancement is so small in magnitude and spatial extent as to be negligible in
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:479:deposition is predicted to be negligible beyond the boundaries of the Tees Bay C disposal site.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:479:that there would be negligible impact on fish or fisheries due to the proposed deposition of dredged material
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:479:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual impact of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:482:negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:482:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:484:operations). Overall, the potential impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:484:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:485: Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:485: 0.000003 minke whale Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:485: during offshore 0.00004 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:485: 0.0000003 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:486:dredged sediments is negligible / very low for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal,
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:486:negligible (Table 26.5).
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:486: Harbour Negligible / Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:486: TTS or fleeing Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:486: underwater Negligible / Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:486: Minke whale Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:486: offshore Negligible / required. Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:486: disposal of Grey seal Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:486: sediments Negligible / Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:486: Harbour seal Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:486:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:487: Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:487: Potential Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:487: of dredged 0.002 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:487: Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:487:of negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, the impact significance for any
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:487:assessed as negligible (not significant) for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:487: Harbour Negligible /
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:487: Low Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:487: increased Minke Negligible / Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:487: vessels during required, other than Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:487: offshore disposal Negligible / Negligible good practice.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:487: sediments Harbour Negligible / Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:487:would be of negligible significance for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:488:The magnitude of the impact of vessel disturbance to seal haul-out sites is defined as negligible / very low
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:488:This gives an overall impact significance of negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:488:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:488:relied upon solely. Therefore, any increases in suspended sediments will have a negligible impact on
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:488:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:489: Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:489: Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:489: offshore disposal 0.04 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:489: Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:489:Taking into account the low receptor sensitivity, the negligible potential magnitude of the impact and the
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:489:negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal (Table 26.9).
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:489: Harbour Negligible /
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:489: Low Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:489: Changes to prey Minke Negligible / Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:489: Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:489: offshore disposal Negligible / Negligible required.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:489: Harbour Negligible / Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:489:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:507:cumulative impact is predicted to be negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:509: Negligible / very low
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:509: Negligible / very low
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:509: approach channel and Anglo Negligible / very low
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:509: Negligible / very low
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:509: Negligible / very low
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:509: Hartlepool approach Negligible / very low
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:510: Negligible / very low
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:510: Negligible / very low
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:510: Negligible / very low
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:510: Negligible / very low
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:510: Hartlepool approach Negligible / very low
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:510: Negligible / very low
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:510:Harbour Facilities schemes, is negligible / very low for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:510:harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as negligible (Table 27.5).
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:511:cumulative underwater noise impacts. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:511: TTS or fleeing Harbour Negligible /
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:511: response from Negligible Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:511: dredging at the Negligible /
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:511: Minke whale Negligible Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:511: Hartlepool Negligible /
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:511: approach Grey seal Negligible Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:511: Harbour Negligible /
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:511: Harbour seal Negligible Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:513:on waterbirds at North Tees Mudflat, and negligible impact further downstream (including at Vopak
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:514:supporting habitat was considered a negligible impact in the EIAs for both the Anglo American Harbour
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:514:(even in combination) would have a negligible impact, the cumulative effect with the proposed scheme would
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:515:driving activities (see Section 13.5.3 and 13.5.4). While there is anticipated to be negligible impact from
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:516:works, but the potential cumulative impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:516:impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:516:acceptable (from a navigation risk perspective), with all risks classified as negligible or low, with the
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:516:impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:516:The primary assessment identifies that the proposed schemes traffic demand would result in a negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:517:with the proposed scheme are considered not significant and indicate negligible impact, at worst. Therefore,
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:521:concludes that the disposal of dredged material will have a negligible impact on fisheries, marine ecology
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:521:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual cumulative impact of negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:568: Lianhetech, Seal Sands Proposed new buildings, plant upgrade, swale and associated Approximately Planning permission / Ramsar site would be negligible. On this basis,
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:576:greater than approximately 200m from source (see Appendix 8). There would be negligible effects on fish
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:578:would be negligible, therefore any effects on SPA / Ramsar site features would manifest as a direct
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:584:negligible effect on feeding resources for terns. When this is considered alongside the localised increase
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:26:to the west and east of the disposal site is negligible, whilst to the south and north covers a similar zone to
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/Consultations/20210115 MLA202000506 South Bank Quay-phase 1 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:8: injury and/or temporary threshold shift (TTS) are considered negligible. I defer to Cefas underwater
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/Consultations/MLA202000506 & MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phases 1&2 UWN advice + JPQC.pdf:4: a result of underwater noise has been assessed as negligible and the assessment concludes that no
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/Consultations/MLA202000506 & MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phases 1&2 UWN advice + JPQC.pdf:4: periods of time sufficient to cause TTS or PTS. Disturbance has been assessed as negligible, although I
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/Consultations/MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA.pdf:9: clarity is likely to be negligible and not sufficient to cause far-field
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/Consultations/MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA.pdf:9: • Lapwing likely to be negligible and not sufficient to cause far-field effects on
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/Consultations/MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA.pdf:10: changes in hydrodynamics and waves is likely to be negligible and
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/Consultations/MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA.pdf:12: be negligible and not sufficient to cause far-field effects on the
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/Consultations/MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA.pdf:15: The magnitude of changes is negligible and not sufficient to cause
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/Consultations/MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA.pdf:18: likely to be negligible and not sufficient to cause far-field effects on
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/Consultations/MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA phase 1 and 2.pdf:9: clarity is likely to be negligible and not sufficient to cause far-field
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/Consultations/MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA phase 1 and 2.pdf:9: • Wigeon likely to be negligible and not sufficient to cause far-field effects on
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/Consultations/MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA phase 1 and 2.pdf:10: changes in hydrodynamics and waves is likely to be negligible and
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/Consultations/MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA phase 1 and 2.pdf:13: be negligible and not sufficient to cause far-field effects on the
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/Consultations/MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA phase 1 and 2.pdf:15: The magnitude of changes in is likely to be negligible and not
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/Consultations/MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA phase 1 and 2.pdf:19: likely to be negligible and not sufficient to cause far-field effects on
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/Consultations/MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:9: clarity is likely to be negligible and not sufficient to cause far-field
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/Consultations/MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:10: • Sanderling likely to be negligible and not sufficient to cause far-field effects on
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/Consultations/MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:10: changes in hydrodynamics and waves is likely to be negligible and
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/Consultations/MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:13: be negligible and not sufficient to cause far-field effects on the
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/Consultations/MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:15: The magnitude of changes is negligible and not sufficient to cause
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/Consultations/MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:19: likely to be negligible and not sufficient to cause far-field effects on
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/Consultations/20210119 MLA202000506 Tees South Bank Quay CP advice + JPQC.pdf:3: shows a greater number of minor or negligible outcomes relative to more significant categories
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:48: High Major Moderate Moderate Minor Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:48: Medium Moderate Moderate Minor Minor Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:48: Low Minor Minor Minor Negligible Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:48: Very low Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:48:Whilst mitigation for minor or negligible impacts may not be specifically defined as a matter of course,
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:48:recognised that minor and negligible impacts could become significant when considered cumulatively with
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:112:3, the values are so low (<5mg/l) as to be negligible compared with background levels and, in all cases, the
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:112:water quality sampling points during Stage 3 of the dredging and only negligible effects for a short duration
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:112:Stages 3 and 4 of the dredging, only negligible effects are noted, equivalent to variations within the
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:118:as to be negligible in such a great depth of water in this deep water offshore area).
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:122:enhancement is so small in magnitude and spatial extent as to be negligible in such a great depth of water
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:126:is negligible, whilst to the north it covers a similar zone to the sediment plume for this disposal event, which
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:126:0.1cm. Clearly these magnitudes are extremely low within the licenced disposal site, and negligible beyond.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:126:magnitudes, with negligible changes anticipated beyond the boundaries of the site.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:167:is considered to be medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:167:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:167:impact is of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:167:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:168:be medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:168:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:168:considered to be medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:168:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:174: negligible. As there are no designated
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:175:Negligible Is generally tolerant of physical or chemical changes
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:177:temporary change, indiscernible • negligible change to existing risk of exposure; or
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:178: Moderate Minor Minor Negligible Negligible Minor Minor Moderate
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:178: Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Minor
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:178:(negligible) impacts as they may contribute to significant impacts cumulatively or through interactions.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:178:Negligible Very small changes in receptor condition (adverse or beneficial), which may be raised as local issues
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:180:the geological sensitivity is considered to be negligible. As there are no designated geological sites recorded
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:186:during construction is considered to be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:186:No mitigation measures are required and residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:188:overall impact during construction is considered to be of negligible to minor adverse significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:188:negligible to minor adverse significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:189:very low. Thus, the impact to human receptors is of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:189:No additional mitigation measures required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:190:very low and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:212:impact of negligible significance is predicted.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:212:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:214:Given the above, an impact of negligible significance on marine species and habitats is predicted to arise
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:214:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:215:and tidal regime is predicted to be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:215:No mitigation measures are required, and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:221: Negligible / very
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:234: 0.0003 harbour porpoise Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:234: 0.000003 minke whale Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:234: dredging 0.00000024 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:234: 0.0000009 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:234:The magnitude of the potential impact of PTS as a result of dredging noise is negligible / very low for harbour
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:234:seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.10).
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:234: Harbour Negligible / Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:234: Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:234: Auditory injury Negligible / Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:234: (PTS) from Minke whale Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:234: Negligible / required. Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:234: SEL during Grey seal Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:234: Negligible / Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:234: Harbour seal Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:235:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:236: Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:236: 0.000003 minke whale Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:236: underwater noise 0.00000024 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:236: 0.0000009 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:236:The magnitude of the potential impact of TTS and fleeing response as a result of dredging noise, is negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:237:whale, grey seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.13).
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:237: Harbour Negligible / Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:237: Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:237: TTS or fleeing Negligible / Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:237: response from Minke whale Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:237: Negligible / required. Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:237: SEL during Grey seal Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:237: Negligible / Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:237: Harbour seal Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:237:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:238: Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:238: Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:238: dredging (5% of Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:238: 0.000005 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:238:of negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, the impact significance for any
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:238:potential increase in collision risk with vessels during dredging has been assessed as negligible (not
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:239: Harbour Negligible /
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:239: Low Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:239: Potential for Minke Negligible / Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:239: collision risk from required, other than Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:239: vessels during Negligible / Negligible good practice.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:239: Harbour Negligible / Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:239:The residual impact would be of negligible significance for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:240:The magnitude of the impact of vessel disturbance to seal haul-out sites is defined as negligible / very low
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:240:resulting in an overall impact significance of negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:240:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:240:have a negligible impact on marine mammals.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:240:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:241: Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:241: Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:241: dredge area Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:241: 0.0001 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:241:Taking into account the low receptor sensitivity, the negligible potential magnitude of the impact and the
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:241:negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal (Table 10.17).
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:241: Harbour Negligible /
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:241: Low Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:241: Minke Negligible / Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:241: resource in Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:241: Negligible / Negligible required.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:241: Harbour Negligible / Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:241:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:242:10.5.1 and 10.5.2). The magnitude of effect in all species is assessed to be negligible / very low based on
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:242:maintenance activities has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.10 and Table 10.13).
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:242:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:242:10.5.3). The magnitude of effect in all species is assessed to be negligible / very low based on the maximum
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:242:has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.15).
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:242:dredging activities. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:242:assessed as negligible (see Section 10.5.4).
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:242:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:243:negligible (see Section 10.5.5).
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:243:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:243:negligible (see Section 10.5.6).
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:243:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:243:established vessel routes. The magnitude of effect in all species is assessed to be negligible / very low
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:243:for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal has been assessed as negligible (Table
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:243:would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:251: Negligible Commonplace feature of little or no habitat/historical significance. Loss of such a feature would not be seen
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:252: Negligible of normal natural variation change to the extent Change is within the normal range of natural variation.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:253: High Medium Low Negligible Negligible Low Medium High
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:253: Moderate Minor Minor Negligible Negligible Minor Minor Moderate
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:253: Importance Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:253: Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Minor
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:260:grassland is concluded as being of negligible ecological value.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:260:negligible ecological value.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:260:scrub habitat is concluded as being of negligible ecological value.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:261:and ruderal habitat is concluded as being of negligible ecological value.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:261:metal structures, which have been assessed as being of negligible value for roosting bats due to the lack of
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:264: Wharf Negligible No
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:264: Buildings Negligible No
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:264: Notable Flora Negligible No
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:264: Badger Negligible No
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:264: Water vole Negligible No
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:265: Amphibians Negligible No
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:265: Reptiles Negligible No
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:266:impacts to foraging bats are considered to be negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:266:included in the CEMP, and with the implementation of such measures, any impacts will be negligible in
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:266:Negligible impacts on water quality are anticipated during construction of the proposed scheme (Section
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:267:time otters are anticipated to spend in the area, an impact of negligible magnitude is anticipated. Given the
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:268:assessed to be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:268:With the implementation of the above measures, the residual impact is of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:268:be of local (grayling) and (dingy skipper) significance, and negligible importance within the footprint of the
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:294:Both had a peak count of two, which represents a negligible proportion of the SPA / Ramsar site populations.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:296:would have a negligible impact on benthic prey species in the intertidal zone so consequent effects on
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:298:of the effects of capital dredging and therefore a negligible impact is predicted on the waterbirds relying on
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:298:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:301:minor adverse. A residual impact of negligible significance is predicted at the other sensitive intertidal
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:304:and localised disturbance to feeding resources will result in an impact of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:304:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:305:negligible, and any exceedances of the thresholds stated in Cutts et al. (2009) or Wright et al. (2010) would
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:305:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:305:negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:305:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:305:be negligible, therefore any effects on waterbirds and foraging terns would manifest as a direct behavioural
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:306:on foraging / roosting waterbirds and terns is predicted to be negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:306:While impacts are anticipated to be negligible, the implication of best practice mitigation measures set out
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:306:water) will further reduce the impact on foraging / roosting waterbirds. The residual impact is negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:306:negligible impact on intertidal benthos (see Section 9.6.2) and would not adversely affect the availability of
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:306:result of hydrodynamic changes would be negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:306:No mitigation measures are considered necessary, therefore the residual impact is negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:321:and beyond. The impact is therefore predicted to be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:321:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would remain of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:324:considered to be very low, and the significance of the impact is negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:325:Outside the migratory period, there would be a negligible impact on fish movement up- and downstream
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:327:underwater noise of piling activities is therefore considered to have a negligible impact on migration up-
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:327:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact remains negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:328:negligible impact on fish species within the Tees.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:330:the footprint of the works, and even if there was, the number of vessels/fishers affected would be negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:330:and navigation within the Tees estuary is predicted to be negligible, given that works will be co-ordinated
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:330:are predicted to be negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:330:remain negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:330:in motorised vessel traffic is therefore considered to have a negligible impact on fish populations or
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:330:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact will remain negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:331:impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:331:impact would be negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:336:receptor. The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible significance on
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:336:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:336:receptor. The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible significance on
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:337:scheme) and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:337:(human health/safety). The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:337:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:338:The impact of the proposed development’s construction traffic is therefore assessed as of negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:338:proposed schemes operational traffic is therefore assessed as negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:338:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:341: MMO Scoping Opinion negligible and therefore not necessary to be assessed.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:347: Negligible Assets with no significant importance or archaeological/historical interest.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:347: Negligible The asset’s fabric and/or setting is changed in ways which do not materially affect its heritage significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:348: Significance High Medium Low Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:348: Low Moderate Minor Minor Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:348: Negligible Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:348: Negligible No material change to heritage significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:349:these from other non-significant (negligible) impacts as they may contribute to significant impacts
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:370: Negligible / very low < 1.0
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:373: 1 69.7 69.8 0.1 Very low Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:373: 2 67.8 68.0 0.2 Very low Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:373: 3 70.3 70.5 0.2 Very low Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:373: 5 76.3 76.4 0.1 Very low Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:373:Predicted changes in BNL, displayed in Table 17.10, indicate impacts of negligible significance at worst
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:373:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:375: NSR1 52.2 - 59.2 Very low Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:375:indicating negligible impact at human receptor locations. This is considered not significant and impact is
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:376:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:391: Dust soiling High Risk Medium Risk Medium Risk Negligible Risk
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:391: Human health Medium Risk Low Risk Low Risk Negligible Risk
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:391: Ecological effects Medium Risk Low Risk Low Risk Negligible Risk
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:391:demolition, ‘medium risk’ for earthworks and construction, and ‘negligible risk’ for trackout. The impacts on
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:392:earthworks and construction and ‘negligible risk’ for trackout.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:406:the proposed scheme will have negligible influence on this character area and is not considered further..
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:408:industrial context of outward views, it is predicted that the proposed scheme will have negligible influence
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:411:negligible effect on the existing baseline.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:415:of those features will incur a low adverse magnitude of effect and a negligible overall significance of effect.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:415:magnitude and incur a minor negligible adverse significance of effect.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:415:negligible overall significance of effect.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:416:and the wider environs, the overall significance of effect is considered to be negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:419:significance of effect in the view is minor negligible adverse and not significant.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:419:significance of effect in the view is minor negligible adverse. In terms of EIA these effects are not
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:419:negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:434:negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:435:As a result, it is concluded that there would be a negligible impact as a result of the proposed scheme.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:435:a potential impact of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:436:effect on a low sensitivity receptor. Overall, a negligible impact is predicted.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:436:residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:444:The socio-economic impacts of the proposed scheme are identified as ‘beneficial’, ‘negligible’ or ‘adverse’
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:444: Negligible No obvious significant effect to a receptor or environment.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:444: Negligible Where no discernible effect is expected as a result of the proposed scheme on the
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:444: High Medium Low Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:444: High Substantial Moderate to Minor to Moderate Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:444: Medium Moderate to Moderate Minor Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:445: Low Minor to Moderate Minor Negligible to Minor Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:445: Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:453:supply scenario forecasts only a negligible increase in employment during the plan period.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:455:term) and negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:455:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:458:employment with the AOI and is therefore considered to correspond to a negligible magnitude of change.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:458:a permanent and negligible impact.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:458:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:458:negligible magnitude of change. The receptor is considered to be of medium sensitivity by virtue of the fact
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:459:a permanent and negligible impact.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:459:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:476:that there would be impacts of negligible significance to the only NSR scoped into the assessment.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:476:would be negligible to minor adverse significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:477:noise and air quality disturbance would be negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:477:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:477:negligible significance and not significant respectively. In addition, operational phase impacts to human
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:477:health as reported in Section 8 with regard to land quality are considered to be of negligible significance. It
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:477:and land quality would be negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:477:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual impact of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:478:long period prior to this the enhancement is so small in magnitude and spatial extent as to be negligible in
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:479:deposition is predicted to be negligible beyond the boundaries of the Tees Bay C disposal site.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:479:that there would be negligible impact on fish or fisheries due to the proposed deposition of dredged material
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:479:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual impact of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:482:negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:482:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:484:operations). Overall, the potential impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:484:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:485: Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:485: 0.000003 minke whale Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:485: during offshore 0.00004 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:485: 0.0000003 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:486:dredged sediments is negligible / very low for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal,
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:486:negligible (Table 26.5).
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:486: Harbour Negligible / Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:486: TTS or fleeing Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:486: underwater Negligible / Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:486: Minke whale Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:486: offshore Negligible / required. Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:486: disposal of Grey seal Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:486: sediments Negligible / Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:486: Harbour seal Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:486:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:487: Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:487: Potential Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:487: of dredged 0.002 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:487: Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:487:of negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, the impact significance for any
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:487:assessed as negligible (not significant) for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:487: Harbour Negligible /
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:487: Low Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:487: increased Minke Negligible / Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:487: vessels during required, other than Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:487: offshore disposal Negligible / Negligible good practice.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:487: sediments Harbour Negligible / Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:487:would be of negligible significance for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:488:The magnitude of the impact of vessel disturbance to seal haul-out sites is defined as negligible / very low
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:488:This gives an overall impact significance of negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:488:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:488:relied upon solely. Therefore, any increases in suspended sediments will have a negligible impact on
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:488:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:489: Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:489: Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:489: offshore disposal 0.04 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:489: Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:489:Taking into account the low receptor sensitivity, the negligible potential magnitude of the impact and the
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:489:negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal (Table 26.9).
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:489: Harbour Negligible /
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:489: Low Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:489: Changes to prey Minke Negligible / Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:489: Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:489: offshore disposal Negligible / Negligible required.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:489: Harbour Negligible / Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:489:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:507:cumulative impact is predicted to be negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:509: Negligible / very low
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:509: Negligible / very low
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:509: approach channel and Anglo Negligible / very low
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:509: Negligible / very low
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:509: Negligible / very low
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:509: Hartlepool approach Negligible / very low
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:510: Negligible / very low
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:510: Negligible / very low
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:510: Negligible / very low
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:510: Negligible / very low
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:510: Hartlepool approach Negligible / very low
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:510: Negligible / very low
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:510:Harbour Facilities schemes, is negligible / very low for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:510:harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as negligible (Table 27.5).
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:511:cumulative underwater noise impacts. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:511: TTS or fleeing Harbour Negligible /
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:511: response from Negligible Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:511: dredging at the Negligible /
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:511: Minke whale Negligible Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:511: Hartlepool Negligible /
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:511: approach Grey seal Negligible Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:511: Harbour Negligible /
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:511: Harbour seal Negligible Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:513:on waterbirds at North Tees Mudflat, and negligible impact further downstream (including at Vopak
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:514:supporting habitat was considered a negligible impact in the EIAs for both the Anglo American Harbour
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:514:(even in combination) would have a negligible impact, the cumulative effect with the proposed scheme would
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:515:driving activities (see Section 13.5.3 and 13.5.4). While there is anticipated to be negligible impact from
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:516:works, but the potential cumulative impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:516:impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:516:acceptable (from a navigation risk perspective), with all risks classified as negligible or low, with the
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:516:impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:516:The primary assessment identifies that the proposed schemes traffic demand would result in a negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:517:with the proposed scheme are considered not significant and indicate negligible impact, at worst. Therefore,
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:521:concludes that the disposal of dredged material will have a negligible impact on fisheries, marine ecology
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:521:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual cumulative impact of negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:568: Lianhetech, Seal Sands Proposed new buildings, plant upgrade, swale and associated Approximately Planning permission / Ramsar site would be negligible. On this basis,
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:576:greater than approximately 200m from source (see Appendix 8). There would be negligible effects on fish
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:578:would be negligible, therefore any effects on SPA / Ramsar site features would manifest as a direct
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:584:negligible effect on feeding resources for terns. When this is considered alongside the localised increase
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:13:It is concluded that the impact during the construction phase of the proposed scheme would be of negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:13:are minor beneficial to controlled waters and negligible to human health.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:13:with maintenance dredging. All operational phase impacts are predicted to be of negligible significance,
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:14:to marine mammals from dredging has been assessed as negligible. The assessment has concluded
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:14:impacts of negligible significance to all marine mammals with regard to potential for temporary auditory
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:14:movements in the area. A worst-case impact of negligible significance (not significant) is predicted.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:15:Tees, and is therefore expected to have a negligible effect on fish. The removal of the existing wharf
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:16:negligible impacts on both resident and migratory fish. Disturbance during the operational phase, either as
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:16:a result of vessel calls to the new quay or the use of quayside lighting, is predicted to have a negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:16:required by International Regulations to allow safe navigation. An impact of negligible significance on
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:16:determined to have minimal effect on the existing navigation profile. An impact of negligible significance is
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:16:Environmental Assessment of Road Traffic), the impact is considered to be negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:18:construction phase noise levels at the South Tees Business Parks would be negligible. No mitigation
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:19:assessed as being permanent and negligible. No mitigation measures during the operational phase are
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:20:disturbance and reductions in air quality are considered to be negligible during construction and operation.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:20:It is therefore concluded that impacts to human health would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:20:is predicted to have a negligible impact on fisheries, marine ecology and marine mammals, and no impact
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:13:dredged material is predicted to have a negligible impact on fisheries, marine ecology
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:13:No significant residual impacts are predicted. A worst case residual impact of negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:173:representing the final risk score for each hazard, between 0 (negligible) and 10 (high) (see Annex A),
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:173:Hazard risk scores were categorised as either negligible, low, As Low as Reasonably Practicable
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:173: Negligible The risk is acceptable and at level where operational safety is unaffected.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:174:construction phase was ‘Contact: Navigation Buoy’ which was scored as 0.72; negligible, driven by its
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:174: Negligible Low ALARP Significant High
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:176:0.5; negligible, driven by its low consequence.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:176: Negligible Low ALARP Significant High
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:179:be acceptable with all scoring Negligible or Low, with the exception of the impact on ship contact risk,
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:180: Unlikely Minor Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:180: Unlikely Minor Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:187:is extremely remote and consequence insignificant such that a risk can be said to be negligible. At the
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:190: 1 Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:192: 0 – 1.99 Negligible Risk A level where operational safety is unaffected.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:192:the final risk score for each hazard, between 0 (negligible) and 10 (high) following which, the final risk
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:192:Hazard risk scores are categorised as either negligible, low, As Low as Reasonably Practicable (ALARP),
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:293:is ‘negligible’.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:296: Low Medium Risk Low Risk Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:296: Low Low Risk Low Risk Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:297: Low Low Risk Low Risk Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:297: Low Medium Risk Low Risk Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:299: lower sections of proposed quayside features, although the change in the view will be negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:301:Significance of Effect Medium sensitivity x Low magnitude of effect = Minor negligible significance of effect. Minor Minor
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:301: Effects will be permanent during the operation of the proposed quayside and its use in support of the renewable energy Negligible Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:304: Effects will be permanent during the operation of the proposed quayside and its use in support of the renewable energy negligible negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:305: Effects will be permanent during the operation of the proposed quayside and its use in support of the renewable energy negligible negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:306: Significance of Effect Low sensitivity x Low medium magnitude of effect = Minor negligible significance of effect. Minor Minor
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:306: Effects will be permanent during the operation of the proposed quayside and its use in support of the renewable energy Negligible Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:307: Future baseline: development of the SIZ landside site and associated large scale buildings will have negligible effect on
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:308: Significance of Effect Low sensitivity x Low magnitude of effect = Negligible significance of effect. Negligible Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:309: sections of cranes and stored components, although have negligible beneficial effects to views of taller proposed
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:310: Future baseline: development of the SIZ landside site and associated large scale buildings will have negligible effect on
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:316:particular development is categorised as high, medium, low or negligible. In accordance with the
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:316: Negligible Size and/or scale: the extent and relative proportion of the existing landscape
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:319: Negligible Size and Scale
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:320:receptor (high, medium to low) with the magnitude of effect (high to negligible). The evaluation is
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:320: Low medium Minor negligible effect Minor effect Minor moderate effect
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:320: Low Negligible effect Minor negligible effect Minor effect
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:320: Negligible Negligible effect Negligible effect Minor negligible effect
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:28:receptors from increased suspended sediments remains at negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:28:the EIA Report (which was assessed as negligible significance).
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:34: The negligible impact significant reported in the EIA Report was based on the fact that mobile individuals would
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:34: Negligible Negligible Negligible scope of the supplementary surveys reported in Section 4.2 and 4.3 was agreed with the Environment Agency
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:34:from dredging and (dredging); (dredging); negligible (dredging); negligible 4.2 and 4.3 confirms that the dominant species present in the Tees estuary remain unchanged to those reported
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:34:land-based piling negligible (piling) (piling) (piling) in the EIA Report. It is therefore concluded that there is no reason to amend the significance of this potential
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:34:from increased Negligible Negligible Negligible The findings of site-specific surveys presented in Section 4.2 and 4.3 reaffirmed the baseline data that was
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:34: Negligible Negligible Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:42:Effects of deposition it was concluded that there would be a negligible impact on food resources. Whilst the data from surveys presented in Section 5.2
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:42:on intertidal food Negligible Negligible Negligible provide evidence that the North Tees Mudflat offers foraging opportunities for a substantial number of waterbirds, this would have no
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:42: It is therefore concluded that the negligible significance impact reported in the EIA Report remains valid.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:43:Noise disturbances Negligible Negligible Negligible Mudflat supports a number of wintering waterbirds.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:43:increased vessel Negligible Negligible Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:43: The negligible impact significance detailed in the EIA Report was based around the fact that the habitats at South Bank are of low
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:43: Negligible Negligible Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:43: Given the above, the negligible impact significance reported in the EIA Report remains valid.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:43: Negligible Negligible Negligible impacts to intertidal habitat. Given that all assessments were based on the assumption that the North Tees Mudflat supports non-
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:43: breeding waterbirds, the negligible impact significance detailed in the EIA Report remains valid.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:28:receptors from increased suspended sediments remains at negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:28:the EIA Report (which was assessed as negligible significance).
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:34: The negligible impact significant reported in the EIA Report was based on the fact that mobile individuals would
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:34: Negligible Negligible Negligible scope of the supplementary surveys reported in Section 4.2 and 4.3 was agreed with the Environment Agency
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:34:from dredging and (dredging); (dredging); negligible (dredging); negligible 4.2 and 4.3 confirms that the dominant species present in the Tees estuary remain unchanged to those reported
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:34:land-based piling negligible (piling) (piling) (piling) in the EIA Report. It is therefore concluded that there is no reason to amend the significance of this potential
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:34:from increased Negligible Negligible Negligible The findings of site-specific surveys presented in Section 4.2 and 4.3 reaffirmed the baseline data that was
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:34: Negligible Negligible Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:42:Effects of deposition it was concluded that there would be a negligible impact on food resources. Whilst the data from surveys presented in Section 5.2
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:42:on intertidal food Negligible Negligible Negligible provide evidence that the North Tees Mudflat offers foraging opportunities for a substantial number of waterbirds, this would have no
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:42: It is therefore concluded that the negligible significance impact reported in the EIA Report remains valid.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:43:Noise disturbances Negligible Negligible Negligible Mudflat supports a number of wintering waterbirds.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:43:increased vessel Negligible Negligible Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:43: The negligible impact significance detailed in the EIA Report was based around the fact that the habitats at South Bank are of low
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:43: Negligible Negligible Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:43: Given the above, the negligible impact significance reported in the EIA Report remains valid.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:43: Negligible Negligible Negligible impacts to intertidal habitat. Given that all assessments were based on the assumption that the North Tees Mudflat supports non-
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:43: breeding waterbirds, the negligible impact significance detailed in the EIA Report remains valid.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-34.pdf:2:locations across the disposal site, at relatively low magnitudes, with negligible changes anticipated beyond
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-34.pdf:11: • The reductions in baseline peak currents are negligible, typically less than 0.01m/s, and never
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-25.pdf:2:locations across the disposal site, at relatively low magnitudes, with negligible changes anticipated beyond
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-25.pdf:11: • The reductions in baseline peak currents are negligible, typically less than 0.01m/s, and never
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:56: likely to be negligible and therefore not necessary to be assessed.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:208:Deposition to the west and east of the disposal site is negligible, whilst to the south and north covers a
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:260: • negligible ground dissolution.
MMO/MLA_2020_00506/MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:284: buildings is negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:48: High Major Moderate Moderate Minor Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:48: Medium Moderate Moderate Minor Minor Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:48: Low Minor Minor Minor Negligible Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:48: Very low Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:48:Whilst mitigation for minor or negligible impacts may not be specifically defined as a matter of course,
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:48:recognised that minor and negligible impacts could become significant when considered cumulatively with
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:112:3, the values are so low (<5mg/l) as to be negligible compared with background levels and, in all cases, the
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:112:water quality sampling points during Stage 3 of the dredging and only negligible effects for a short duration
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:112:Stages 3 and 4 of the dredging, only negligible effects are noted, equivalent to variations within the
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:118:as to be negligible in such a great depth of water in this deep water offshore area).
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:122:enhancement is so small in magnitude and spatial extent as to be negligible in such a great depth of water
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:126:is negligible, whilst to the north it covers a similar zone to the sediment plume for this disposal event, which
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:126:0.1cm. Clearly these magnitudes are extremely low within the licenced disposal site, and negligible beyond.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:126:magnitudes, with negligible changes anticipated beyond the boundaries of the site.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:167:is considered to be medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:167:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:167:impact is of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:167:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:168:be medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:168:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:168:considered to be medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:168:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:174: negligible. As there are no designated
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:175:Negligible Is generally tolerant of physical or chemical changes
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:177:temporary change, indiscernible • negligible change to existing risk of exposure; or
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:178: Moderate Minor Minor Negligible Negligible Minor Minor Moderate
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:178: Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Minor
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:178:(negligible) impacts as they may contribute to significant impacts cumulatively or through interactions.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:178:Negligible Very small changes in receptor condition (adverse or beneficial), which may be raised as local issues
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:180:the geological sensitivity is considered to be negligible. As there are no designated geological sites recorded
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:186:during construction is considered to be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:186:No mitigation measures are required and residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:188:overall impact during construction is considered to be of negligible to minor adverse significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:188:negligible to minor adverse significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:189:very low. Thus, the impact to human receptors is of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:189:No additional mitigation measures required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:190:very low and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:212:impact of negligible significance is predicted.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:212:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:214:Given the above, an impact of negligible significance on marine species and habitats is predicted to arise
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:214:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:215:and tidal regime is predicted to be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:215:No mitigation measures are required, and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:221: Negligible / very
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:234: 0.0003 harbour porpoise Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:234: 0.000003 minke whale Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:234: dredging 0.00000024 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:234: 0.0000009 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:234:The magnitude of the potential impact of PTS as a result of dredging noise is negligible / very low for harbour
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:234:seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.10).
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:234: Harbour Negligible / Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:234: Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:234: Auditory injury Negligible / Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:234: (PTS) from Minke whale Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:234: Negligible / required. Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:234: SEL during Grey seal Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:234: Negligible / Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:234: Harbour seal Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:235:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:236: Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:236: 0.000003 minke whale Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:236: underwater noise 0.00000024 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:236: 0.0000009 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:236:The magnitude of the potential impact of TTS and fleeing response as a result of dredging noise, is negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:237:whale, grey seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.13).
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:237: Harbour Negligible / Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:237: Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:237: TTS or fleeing Negligible / Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:237: response from Minke whale Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:237: Negligible / required. Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:237: SEL during Grey seal Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:237: Negligible / Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:237: Harbour seal Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:237:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:238: Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:238: Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:238: dredging (5% of Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:238: 0.000005 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:238:of negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, the impact significance for any
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:238:potential increase in collision risk with vessels during dredging has been assessed as negligible (not
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:239: Harbour Negligible /
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:239: Low Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:239: Potential for Minke Negligible / Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:239: collision risk from required, other than Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:239: vessels during Negligible / Negligible good practice.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:239: Harbour Negligible / Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:239:The residual impact would be of negligible significance for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:240:The magnitude of the impact of vessel disturbance to seal haul-out sites is defined as negligible / very low
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:240:resulting in an overall impact significance of negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:240:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:240:have a negligible impact on marine mammals.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:240:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:241: Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:241: Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:241: dredge area Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:241: 0.0001 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:241:Taking into account the low receptor sensitivity, the negligible potential magnitude of the impact and the
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:241:negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal (Table 10.17).
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:241: Harbour Negligible /
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:241: Low Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:241: Minke Negligible / Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:241: resource in Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:241: Negligible / Negligible required.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:241: Harbour Negligible / Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:241:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:242:10.5.1 and 10.5.2). The magnitude of effect in all species is assessed to be negligible / very low based on
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:242:maintenance activities has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.10 and Table 10.13).
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:242:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:242:10.5.3). The magnitude of effect in all species is assessed to be negligible / very low based on the maximum
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:242:has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.15).
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:242:dredging activities. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:242:assessed as negligible (see Section 10.5.4).
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:242:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:243:negligible (see Section 10.5.5).
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:243:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:243:negligible (see Section 10.5.6).
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:243:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:243:established vessel routes. The magnitude of effect in all species is assessed to be negligible / very low
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:243:for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal has been assessed as negligible (Table
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:243:would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:251: Negligible Commonplace feature of little or no habitat/historical significance. Loss of such a feature would not be seen
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:252: Negligible of normal natural variation change to the extent Change is within the normal range of natural variation.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:253: High Medium Low Negligible Negligible Low Medium High
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:253: Moderate Minor Minor Negligible Negligible Minor Minor Moderate
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:253: Importance Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:253: Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Minor
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:260:grassland is concluded as being of negligible ecological value.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:260:negligible ecological value.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:260:scrub habitat is concluded as being of negligible ecological value.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:261:and ruderal habitat is concluded as being of negligible ecological value.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:261:metal structures, which have been assessed as being of negligible value for roosting bats due to the lack of
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:264: Wharf Negligible No
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:264: Buildings Negligible No
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:264: Notable Flora Negligible No
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:264: Badger Negligible No
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:264: Water vole Negligible No
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:265: Amphibians Negligible No
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:265: Reptiles Negligible No
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:266:impacts to foraging bats are considered to be negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:266:included in the CEMP, and with the implementation of such measures, any impacts will be negligible in
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:266:Negligible impacts on water quality are anticipated during construction of the proposed scheme (Section
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:267:time otters are anticipated to spend in the area, an impact of negligible magnitude is anticipated. Given the
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:268:assessed to be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:268:With the implementation of the above measures, the residual impact is of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:268:be of local (grayling) and (dingy skipper) significance, and negligible importance within the footprint of the
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:294:Both had a peak count of two, which represents a negligible proportion of the SPA / Ramsar site populations.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:296:would have a negligible impact on benthic prey species in the intertidal zone so consequent effects on
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:298:of the effects of capital dredging and therefore a negligible impact is predicted on the waterbirds relying on
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:298:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:301:minor adverse. A residual impact of negligible significance is predicted at the other sensitive intertidal
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:304:and localised disturbance to feeding resources will result in an impact of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:304:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:305:negligible, and any exceedances of the thresholds stated in Cutts et al. (2009) or Wright et al. (2010) would
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:305:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:305:negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:305:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:305:be negligible, therefore any effects on waterbirds and foraging terns would manifest as a direct behavioural
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:306:on foraging / roosting waterbirds and terns is predicted to be negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:306:While impacts are anticipated to be negligible, the implication of best practice mitigation measures set out
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:306:water) will further reduce the impact on foraging / roosting waterbirds. The residual impact is negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:306:negligible impact on intertidal benthos (see Section 9.6.2) and would not adversely affect the availability of
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:306:result of hydrodynamic changes would be negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:306:No mitigation measures are considered necessary, therefore the residual impact is negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:321:and beyond. The impact is therefore predicted to be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:321:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would remain of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:324:considered to be very low, and the significance of the impact is negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:325:Outside the migratory period, there would be a negligible impact on fish movement up- and downstream
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:327:underwater noise of piling activities is therefore considered to have a negligible impact on migration up-
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:327:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact remains negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:328:negligible impact on fish species within the Tees.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:330:the footprint of the works, and even if there was, the number of vessels/fishers affected would be negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:330:and navigation within the Tees estuary is predicted to be negligible, given that works will be co-ordinated
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:330:are predicted to be negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:330:remain negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:330:in motorised vessel traffic is therefore considered to have a negligible impact on fish populations or
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:330:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact will remain negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:331:impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:331:impact would be negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:336:receptor. The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible significance on
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:336:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:336:receptor. The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible significance on
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:337:scheme) and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:337:(human health/safety). The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:337:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:338:The impact of the proposed development’s construction traffic is therefore assessed as of negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:338:proposed schemes operational traffic is therefore assessed as negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:338:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:341: MMO Scoping Opinion negligible and therefore not necessary to be assessed.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:347: Negligible Assets with no significant importance or archaeological/historical interest.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:347: Negligible The asset’s fabric and/or setting is changed in ways which do not materially affect its heritage significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:348: Significance High Medium Low Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:348: Low Moderate Minor Minor Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:348: Negligible Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:348: Negligible No material change to heritage significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:349:these from other non-significant (negligible) impacts as they may contribute to significant impacts
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:370: Negligible / very low < 1.0
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:373: 1 69.7 69.8 0.1 Very low Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:373: 2 67.8 68.0 0.2 Very low Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:373: 3 70.3 70.5 0.2 Very low Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:373: 5 76.3 76.4 0.1 Very low Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:373:Predicted changes in BNL, displayed in Table 17.10, indicate impacts of negligible significance at worst
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:373:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:375: NSR1 52.2 - 59.2 Very low Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:375:indicating negligible impact at human receptor locations. This is considered not significant and impact is
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:376:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:391: Dust soiling High Risk Medium Risk Medium Risk Negligible Risk
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:391: Human health Medium Risk Low Risk Low Risk Negligible Risk
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:391: Ecological effects Medium Risk Low Risk Low Risk Negligible Risk
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:391:demolition, ‘medium risk’ for earthworks and construction, and ‘negligible risk’ for trackout. The impacts on
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:392:earthworks and construction and ‘negligible risk’ for trackout.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:406:the proposed scheme will have negligible influence on this character area and is not considered further..
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:408:industrial context of outward views, it is predicted that the proposed scheme will have negligible influence
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:411:negligible effect on the existing baseline.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:415:of those features will incur a low adverse magnitude of effect and a negligible overall significance of effect.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:415:magnitude and incur a minor negligible adverse significance of effect.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:415:negligible overall significance of effect.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:416:and the wider environs, the overall significance of effect is considered to be negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:419:significance of effect in the view is minor negligible adverse and not significant.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:419:significance of effect in the view is minor negligible adverse. In terms of EIA these effects are not
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:419:negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:434:negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:435:As a result, it is concluded that there would be a negligible impact as a result of the proposed scheme.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:435:a potential impact of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:436:effect on a low sensitivity receptor. Overall, a negligible impact is predicted.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:436:residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:444:The socio-economic impacts of the proposed scheme are identified as ‘beneficial’, ‘negligible’ or ‘adverse’
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:444: Negligible No obvious significant effect to a receptor or environment.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:444: Negligible Where no discernible effect is expected as a result of the proposed scheme on the
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:444: High Medium Low Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:444: High Substantial Moderate to Minor to Moderate Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:444: Medium Moderate to Moderate Minor Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:445: Low Minor to Moderate Minor Negligible to Minor Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:445: Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:453:supply scenario forecasts only a negligible increase in employment during the plan period.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:455:term) and negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:455:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:458:employment with the AOI and is therefore considered to correspond to a negligible magnitude of change.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:458:a permanent and negligible impact.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:458:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:458:negligible magnitude of change. The receptor is considered to be of medium sensitivity by virtue of the fact
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:459:a permanent and negligible impact.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:459:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:476:that there would be impacts of negligible significance to the only NSR scoped into the assessment.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:476:would be negligible to minor adverse significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:477:noise and air quality disturbance would be negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:477:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:477:negligible significance and not significant respectively. In addition, operational phase impacts to human
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:477:health as reported in Section 8 with regard to land quality are considered to be of negligible significance. It
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:477:and land quality would be negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:477:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual impact of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:478:long period prior to this the enhancement is so small in magnitude and spatial extent as to be negligible in
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:479:deposition is predicted to be negligible beyond the boundaries of the Tees Bay C disposal site.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:479:that there would be negligible impact on fish or fisheries due to the proposed deposition of dredged material
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:479:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual impact of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:482:negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:482:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:484:operations). Overall, the potential impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:484:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:485: Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:485: 0.000003 minke whale Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:485: during offshore 0.00004 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:485: 0.0000003 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:486:dredged sediments is negligible / very low for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal,
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:486:negligible (Table 26.5).
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:486: Harbour Negligible / Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:486: TTS or fleeing Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:486: underwater Negligible / Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:486: Minke whale Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:486: offshore Negligible / required. Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:486: disposal of Grey seal Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:486: sediments Negligible / Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:486: Harbour seal Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:486:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:487: Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:487: Potential Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:487: of dredged 0.002 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:487: Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:487:of negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, the impact significance for any
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:487:assessed as negligible (not significant) for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:487: Harbour Negligible /
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:487: Low Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:487: increased Minke Negligible / Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:487: vessels during required, other than Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:487: offshore disposal Negligible / Negligible good practice.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:487: sediments Harbour Negligible / Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:487:would be of negligible significance for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:488:The magnitude of the impact of vessel disturbance to seal haul-out sites is defined as negligible / very low
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:488:This gives an overall impact significance of negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:488:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:488:relied upon solely. Therefore, any increases in suspended sediments will have a negligible impact on
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:488:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:489: Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:489: Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:489: offshore disposal 0.04 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:489: Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:489:Taking into account the low receptor sensitivity, the negligible potential magnitude of the impact and the
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:489:negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal (Table 26.9).
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:489: Harbour Negligible /
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:489: Low Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:489: Changes to prey Minke Negligible / Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:489: Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:489: offshore disposal Negligible / Negligible required.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:489: Harbour Negligible / Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:489:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:507:cumulative impact is predicted to be negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:509: Negligible / very low
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:509: Negligible / very low
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:509: approach channel and Anglo Negligible / very low
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:509: Negligible / very low
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:509: Negligible / very low
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:509: Hartlepool approach Negligible / very low
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:510: Negligible / very low
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:510: Negligible / very low
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:510: Negligible / very low
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:510: Negligible / very low
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:510: Hartlepool approach Negligible / very low
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:510: Negligible / very low
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:510:Harbour Facilities schemes, is negligible / very low for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:510:harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as negligible (Table 27.5).
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:511:cumulative underwater noise impacts. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:511: TTS or fleeing Harbour Negligible /
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:511: response from Negligible Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:511: dredging at the Negligible /
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:511: Minke whale Negligible Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:511: Hartlepool Negligible /
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:511: approach Grey seal Negligible Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:511: Harbour Negligible /
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:511: Harbour seal Negligible Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:513:on waterbirds at North Tees Mudflat, and negligible impact further downstream (including at Vopak
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:514:supporting habitat was considered a negligible impact in the EIAs for both the Anglo American Harbour
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:514:(even in combination) would have a negligible impact, the cumulative effect with the proposed scheme would
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:515:driving activities (see Section 13.5.3 and 13.5.4). While there is anticipated to be negligible impact from
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:516:works, but the potential cumulative impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:516:impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:516:acceptable (from a navigation risk perspective), with all risks classified as negligible or low, with the
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:516:impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:516:The primary assessment identifies that the proposed schemes traffic demand would result in a negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:517:with the proposed scheme are considered not significant and indicate negligible impact, at worst. Therefore,
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:521:concludes that the disposal of dredged material will have a negligible impact on fisheries, marine ecology
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:521:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual cumulative impact of negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:568: Lianhetech, Seal Sands Proposed new buildings, plant upgrade, swale and associated Approximately Planning permission / Ramsar site would be negligible. On this basis,
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:576:greater than approximately 200m from source (see Appendix 8). There would be negligible effects on fish
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:578:would be negligible, therefore any effects on SPA / Ramsar site features would manifest as a direct
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:584:negligible effect on feeding resources for terns. When this is considered alongside the localised increase
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:173:representing the final risk score for each hazard, between 0 (negligible) and 10 (high) (see Annex A),
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:173:Hazard risk scores were categorised as either negligible, low, As Low as Reasonably Practicable
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:173: Negligible The risk is acceptable and at level where operational safety is unaffected.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:174:construction phase was ‘Contact: Navigation Buoy’ which was scored as 0.72; negligible, driven by its
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:174: Negligible Low ALARP Significant High
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:176:0.5; negligible, driven by its low consequence.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:176: Negligible Low ALARP Significant High
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:179:be acceptable with all scoring Negligible or Low, with the exception of the impact on ship contact risk,
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:180: Unlikely Minor Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:180: Unlikely Minor Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:187:is extremely remote and consequence insignificant such that a risk can be said to be negligible. At the
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:190: 1 Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:192: 0 – 1.99 Negligible Risk A level where operational safety is unaffected.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:192:the final risk score for each hazard, between 0 (negligible) and 10 (high) following which, the final risk
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:192:Hazard risk scores are categorised as either negligible, low, As Low as Reasonably Practicable (ALARP),
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:293:is ‘negligible’.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:296: Low Medium Risk Low Risk Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:296: Low Low Risk Low Risk Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:297: Low Low Risk Low Risk Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:297: Low Medium Risk Low Risk Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:299: lower sections of proposed quayside features, although the change in the view will be negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:301:Significance of Effect Medium sensitivity x Low magnitude of effect = Minor negligible significance of effect. Minor Minor
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:301: Effects will be permanent during the operation of the proposed quayside and its use in support of the renewable energy Negligible Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:304: Effects will be permanent during the operation of the proposed quayside and its use in support of the renewable energy negligible negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:305: Effects will be permanent during the operation of the proposed quayside and its use in support of the renewable energy negligible negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:306: Significance of Effect Low sensitivity x Low medium magnitude of effect = Minor negligible significance of effect. Minor Minor
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:306: Effects will be permanent during the operation of the proposed quayside and its use in support of the renewable energy Negligible Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:307: Future baseline: development of the SIZ landside site and associated large scale buildings will have negligible effect on
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:308: Significance of Effect Low sensitivity x Low magnitude of effect = Negligible significance of effect. Negligible Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:309: sections of cranes and stored components, although have negligible beneficial effects to views of taller proposed
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:310: Future baseline: development of the SIZ landside site and associated large scale buildings will have negligible effect on
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:316:particular development is categorised as high, medium, low or negligible. In accordance with the
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:316: Negligible Size and/or scale: the extent and relative proportion of the existing landscape
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:319: Negligible Size and Scale
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:320:receptor (high, medium to low) with the magnitude of effect (high to negligible). The evaluation is
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:320: Low medium Minor negligible effect Minor effect Minor moderate effect
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:320: Low Negligible effect Minor negligible effect Minor effect
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:320: Negligible Negligible effect Negligible effect Minor negligible effect
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/Consultations/MLA202000506 & MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phases 1&2 UWN advice + JPQC.pdf:4: a result of underwater noise has been assessed as negligible and the assessment concludes that no
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/Consultations/MLA202000506 & MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phases 1&2 UWN advice + JPQC.pdf:4: periods of time sufficient to cause TTS or PTS. Disturbance has been assessed as negligible, although I
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/Consultations/20210115 MLA202000507 South Bank Quay-phase 2 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:8: injury and/or temporary threshold shift (TTS) are considered negligible. I defer to Cefas underwater
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/Consultations/20210119 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay CP advice + JPQC.pdf:3: shows a greater number of minor or negligible outcomes relative to more significant categories
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:48: High Major Moderate Moderate Minor Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:48: Medium Moderate Moderate Minor Minor Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:48: Low Minor Minor Minor Negligible Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:48: Very low Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:48:Whilst mitigation for minor or negligible impacts may not be specifically defined as a matter of course,
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:48:recognised that minor and negligible impacts could become significant when considered cumulatively with
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:112:3, the values are so low (<5mg/l) as to be negligible compared with background levels and, in all cases, the
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:112:water quality sampling points during Stage 3 of the dredging and only negligible effects for a short duration
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:112:Stages 3 and 4 of the dredging, only negligible effects are noted, equivalent to variations within the
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:118:as to be negligible in such a great depth of water in this deep water offshore area).
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:122:enhancement is so small in magnitude and spatial extent as to be negligible in such a great depth of water
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:126:is negligible, whilst to the north it covers a similar zone to the sediment plume for this disposal event, which
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:126:0.1cm. Clearly these magnitudes are extremely low within the licenced disposal site, and negligible beyond.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:126:magnitudes, with negligible changes anticipated beyond the boundaries of the site.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:167:is considered to be medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:167:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:167:impact is of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:167:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:168:be medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:168:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:168:considered to be medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:168:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:174: negligible. As there are no designated
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:175:Negligible Is generally tolerant of physical or chemical changes
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:177:temporary change, indiscernible • negligible change to existing risk of exposure; or
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:178: Moderate Minor Minor Negligible Negligible Minor Minor Moderate
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:178: Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Minor
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:178:(negligible) impacts as they may contribute to significant impacts cumulatively or through interactions.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:178:Negligible Very small changes in receptor condition (adverse or beneficial), which may be raised as local issues
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:180:the geological sensitivity is considered to be negligible. As there are no designated geological sites recorded
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:186:during construction is considered to be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:186:No mitigation measures are required and residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:188:overall impact during construction is considered to be of negligible to minor adverse significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:188:negligible to minor adverse significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:189:very low. Thus, the impact to human receptors is of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:189:No additional mitigation measures required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:190:very low and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:212:impact of negligible significance is predicted.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:212:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:214:Given the above, an impact of negligible significance on marine species and habitats is predicted to arise
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:214:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:215:and tidal regime is predicted to be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:215:No mitigation measures are required, and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:221: Negligible / very
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:234: 0.0003 harbour porpoise Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:234: 0.000003 minke whale Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:234: dredging 0.00000024 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:234: 0.0000009 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:234:The magnitude of the potential impact of PTS as a result of dredging noise is negligible / very low for harbour
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:234:seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.10).
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:234: Harbour Negligible / Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:234: Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:234: Auditory injury Negligible / Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:234: (PTS) from Minke whale Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:234: Negligible / required. Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:234: SEL during Grey seal Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:234: Negligible / Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:234: Harbour seal Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:235:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:236: Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:236: 0.000003 minke whale Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:236: underwater noise 0.00000024 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:236: 0.0000009 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:236:The magnitude of the potential impact of TTS and fleeing response as a result of dredging noise, is negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:237:whale, grey seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.13).
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:237: Harbour Negligible / Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:237: Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:237: TTS or fleeing Negligible / Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:237: response from Minke whale Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:237: Negligible / required. Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:237: SEL during Grey seal Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:237: Negligible / Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:237: Harbour seal Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:237:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:238: Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:238: Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:238: dredging (5% of Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:238: 0.000005 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:238:of negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, the impact significance for any
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:238:potential increase in collision risk with vessels during dredging has been assessed as negligible (not
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:239: Harbour Negligible /
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:239: Low Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:239: Potential for Minke Negligible / Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:239: collision risk from required, other than Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:239: vessels during Negligible / Negligible good practice.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:239: Harbour Negligible / Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:239:The residual impact would be of negligible significance for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:240:The magnitude of the impact of vessel disturbance to seal haul-out sites is defined as negligible / very low
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:240:resulting in an overall impact significance of negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:240:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:240:have a negligible impact on marine mammals.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:240:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:241: Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:241: Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:241: dredge area Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:241: 0.0001 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:241:Taking into account the low receptor sensitivity, the negligible potential magnitude of the impact and the
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:241:negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal (Table 10.17).
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:241: Harbour Negligible /
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:241: Low Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:241: Minke Negligible / Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:241: resource in Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:241: Negligible / Negligible required.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:241: Harbour Negligible / Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:241:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:242:10.5.1 and 10.5.2). The magnitude of effect in all species is assessed to be negligible / very low based on
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:242:maintenance activities has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.10 and Table 10.13).
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:242:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:242:10.5.3). The magnitude of effect in all species is assessed to be negligible / very low based on the maximum
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:242:has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.15).
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:242:dredging activities. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:242:assessed as negligible (see Section 10.5.4).
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:242:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:243:negligible (see Section 10.5.5).
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:243:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:243:negligible (see Section 10.5.6).
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:243:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:243:established vessel routes. The magnitude of effect in all species is assessed to be negligible / very low
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:243:for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal has been assessed as negligible (Table
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:243:would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:251: Negligible Commonplace feature of little or no habitat/historical significance. Loss of such a feature would not be seen
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:252: Negligible of normal natural variation change to the extent Change is within the normal range of natural variation.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:253: High Medium Low Negligible Negligible Low Medium High
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:253: Moderate Minor Minor Negligible Negligible Minor Minor Moderate
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:253: Importance Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:253: Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Minor
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:260:grassland is concluded as being of negligible ecological value.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:260:negligible ecological value.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:260:scrub habitat is concluded as being of negligible ecological value.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:261:and ruderal habitat is concluded as being of negligible ecological value.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:261:metal structures, which have been assessed as being of negligible value for roosting bats due to the lack of
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:264: Wharf Negligible No
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:264: Buildings Negligible No
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:264: Notable Flora Negligible No
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:264: Badger Negligible No
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:264: Water vole Negligible No
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:265: Amphibians Negligible No
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:265: Reptiles Negligible No
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:266:impacts to foraging bats are considered to be negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:266:included in the CEMP, and with the implementation of such measures, any impacts will be negligible in
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:266:Negligible impacts on water quality are anticipated during construction of the proposed scheme (Section
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:267:time otters are anticipated to spend in the area, an impact of negligible magnitude is anticipated. Given the
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:268:assessed to be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:268:With the implementation of the above measures, the residual impact is of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:268:be of local (grayling) and (dingy skipper) significance, and negligible importance within the footprint of the
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:294:Both had a peak count of two, which represents a negligible proportion of the SPA / Ramsar site populations.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:296:would have a negligible impact on benthic prey species in the intertidal zone so consequent effects on
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:298:of the effects of capital dredging and therefore a negligible impact is predicted on the waterbirds relying on
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:298:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:301:minor adverse. A residual impact of negligible significance is predicted at the other sensitive intertidal
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:304:and localised disturbance to feeding resources will result in an impact of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:304:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:305:negligible, and any exceedances of the thresholds stated in Cutts et al. (2009) or Wright et al. (2010) would
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:305:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:305:negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:305:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:305:be negligible, therefore any effects on waterbirds and foraging terns would manifest as a direct behavioural
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:306:on foraging / roosting waterbirds and terns is predicted to be negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:306:While impacts are anticipated to be negligible, the implication of best practice mitigation measures set out
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:306:water) will further reduce the impact on foraging / roosting waterbirds. The residual impact is negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:306:negligible impact on intertidal benthos (see Section 9.6.2) and would not adversely affect the availability of
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:306:result of hydrodynamic changes would be negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:306:No mitigation measures are considered necessary, therefore the residual impact is negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:321:and beyond. The impact is therefore predicted to be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:321:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would remain of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:324:considered to be very low, and the significance of the impact is negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:325:Outside the migratory period, there would be a negligible impact on fish movement up- and downstream
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:327:underwater noise of piling activities is therefore considered to have a negligible impact on migration up-
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:327:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact remains negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:328:negligible impact on fish species within the Tees.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:330:the footprint of the works, and even if there was, the number of vessels/fishers affected would be negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:330:and navigation within the Tees estuary is predicted to be negligible, given that works will be co-ordinated
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:330:are predicted to be negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:330:remain negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:330:in motorised vessel traffic is therefore considered to have a negligible impact on fish populations or
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:330:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact will remain negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:331:impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:331:impact would be negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:336:receptor. The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible significance on
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:336:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:336:receptor. The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible significance on
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:337:scheme) and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:337:(human health/safety). The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:337:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:338:The impact of the proposed development’s construction traffic is therefore assessed as of negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:338:proposed schemes operational traffic is therefore assessed as negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:338:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:341: MMO Scoping Opinion negligible and therefore not necessary to be assessed.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:347: Negligible Assets with no significant importance or archaeological/historical interest.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:347: Negligible The asset’s fabric and/or setting is changed in ways which do not materially affect its heritage significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:348: Significance High Medium Low Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:348: Low Moderate Minor Minor Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:348: Negligible Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:348: Negligible No material change to heritage significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:349:these from other non-significant (negligible) impacts as they may contribute to significant impacts
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:370: Negligible / very low < 1.0
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:373: 1 69.7 69.8 0.1 Very low Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:373: 2 67.8 68.0 0.2 Very low Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:373: 3 70.3 70.5 0.2 Very low Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:373: 5 76.3 76.4 0.1 Very low Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:373:Predicted changes in BNL, displayed in Table 17.10, indicate impacts of negligible significance at worst
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:373:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:375: NSR1 52.2 - 59.2 Very low Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:375:indicating negligible impact at human receptor locations. This is considered not significant and impact is
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:376:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:391: Dust soiling High Risk Medium Risk Medium Risk Negligible Risk
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:391: Human health Medium Risk Low Risk Low Risk Negligible Risk
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:391: Ecological effects Medium Risk Low Risk Low Risk Negligible Risk
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:391:demolition, ‘medium risk’ for earthworks and construction, and ‘negligible risk’ for trackout. The impacts on
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:392:earthworks and construction and ‘negligible risk’ for trackout.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:406:the proposed scheme will have negligible influence on this character area and is not considered further..
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:408:industrial context of outward views, it is predicted that the proposed scheme will have negligible influence
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:411:negligible effect on the existing baseline.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:415:of those features will incur a low adverse magnitude of effect and a negligible overall significance of effect.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:415:magnitude and incur a minor negligible adverse significance of effect.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:415:negligible overall significance of effect.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:416:and the wider environs, the overall significance of effect is considered to be negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:419:significance of effect in the view is minor negligible adverse and not significant.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:419:significance of effect in the view is minor negligible adverse. In terms of EIA these effects are not
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:419:negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:434:negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:435:As a result, it is concluded that there would be a negligible impact as a result of the proposed scheme.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:435:a potential impact of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:436:effect on a low sensitivity receptor. Overall, a negligible impact is predicted.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:436:residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:444:The socio-economic impacts of the proposed scheme are identified as ‘beneficial’, ‘negligible’ or ‘adverse’
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:444: Negligible No obvious significant effect to a receptor or environment.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:444: Negligible Where no discernible effect is expected as a result of the proposed scheme on the
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:444: High Medium Low Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:444: High Substantial Moderate to Minor to Moderate Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:444: Medium Moderate to Moderate Minor Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:445: Low Minor to Moderate Minor Negligible to Minor Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:445: Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:453:supply scenario forecasts only a negligible increase in employment during the plan period.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:455:term) and negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:455:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:458:employment with the AOI and is therefore considered to correspond to a negligible magnitude of change.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:458:a permanent and negligible impact.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:458:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:458:negligible magnitude of change. The receptor is considered to be of medium sensitivity by virtue of the fact
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:459:a permanent and negligible impact.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:459:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:476:that there would be impacts of negligible significance to the only NSR scoped into the assessment.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:476:would be negligible to minor adverse significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:477:noise and air quality disturbance would be negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:477:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:477:negligible significance and not significant respectively. In addition, operational phase impacts to human
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:477:health as reported in Section 8 with regard to land quality are considered to be of negligible significance. It
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:477:and land quality would be negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:477:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual impact of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:478:long period prior to this the enhancement is so small in magnitude and spatial extent as to be negligible in
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:479:deposition is predicted to be negligible beyond the boundaries of the Tees Bay C disposal site.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:479:that there would be negligible impact on fish or fisheries due to the proposed deposition of dredged material
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:479:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual impact of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:482:negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:482:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:484:operations). Overall, the potential impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:484:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:485: Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:485: 0.000003 minke whale Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:485: during offshore 0.00004 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:485: 0.0000003 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:486:dredged sediments is negligible / very low for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal,
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:486:negligible (Table 26.5).
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:486: Harbour Negligible / Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:486: TTS or fleeing Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:486: underwater Negligible / Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:486: Minke whale Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:486: offshore Negligible / required. Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:486: disposal of Grey seal Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:486: sediments Negligible / Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:486: Harbour seal Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:486:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:487: Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:487: Potential Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:487: of dredged 0.002 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:487: Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:487:of negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, the impact significance for any
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:487:assessed as negligible (not significant) for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:487: Harbour Negligible /
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:487: Low Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:487: increased Minke Negligible / Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:487: vessels during required, other than Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:487: offshore disposal Negligible / Negligible good practice.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:487: sediments Harbour Negligible / Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:487:would be of negligible significance for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:488:The magnitude of the impact of vessel disturbance to seal haul-out sites is defined as negligible / very low
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:488:This gives an overall impact significance of negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:488:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:488:relied upon solely. Therefore, any increases in suspended sediments will have a negligible impact on
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:488:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:489: Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:489: Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:489: offshore disposal 0.04 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:489: Negligible / very low magnitude
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:489:Taking into account the low receptor sensitivity, the negligible potential magnitude of the impact and the
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:489:negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal (Table 26.9).
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:489: Harbour Negligible /
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:489: Low Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:489: Changes to prey Minke Negligible / Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:489: Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:489: offshore disposal Negligible / Negligible required.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:489: Harbour Negligible / Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:489:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:507:cumulative impact is predicted to be negligible.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:509: Negligible / very low
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:509: Negligible / very low
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:509: approach channel and Anglo Negligible / very low
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:509: Negligible / very low
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:509: Negligible / very low
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:509: Hartlepool approach Negligible / very low
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:510: Negligible / very low
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:510: Negligible / very low
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:510: Negligible / very low
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:510: Negligible / very low
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:510: Hartlepool approach Negligible / very low
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:510: Negligible / very low
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:510:Harbour Facilities schemes, is negligible / very low for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:510:harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as negligible (Table 27.5).
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:511:cumulative underwater noise impacts. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:511: TTS or fleeing Harbour Negligible /
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:511: response from Negligible Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:511: dredging at the Negligible /
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:511: Minke whale Negligible Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:511: Hartlepool Negligible /
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:511: approach Grey seal Negligible Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:511: Harbour Negligible /
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:511: Harbour seal Negligible Negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:513:on waterbirds at North Tees Mudflat, and negligible impact further downstream (including at Vopak
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:514:supporting habitat was considered a negligible impact in the EIAs for both the Anglo American Harbour
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:514:(even in combination) would have a negligible impact, the cumulative effect with the proposed scheme would
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:515:driving activities (see Section 13.5.3 and 13.5.4). While there is anticipated to be negligible impact from
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:516:works, but the potential cumulative impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:516:impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:516:acceptable (from a navigation risk perspective), with all risks classified as negligible or low, with the
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:516:impact would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:516:The primary assessment identifies that the proposed schemes traffic demand would result in a negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:517:with the proposed scheme are considered not significant and indicate negligible impact, at worst. Therefore,
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:521:concludes that the disposal of dredged material will have a negligible impact on fisheries, marine ecology
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:521:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual cumulative impact of negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:568: Lianhetech, Seal Sands Proposed new buildings, plant upgrade, swale and associated Approximately Planning permission / Ramsar site would be negligible. On this basis,
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:576:greater than approximately 200m from source (see Appendix 8). There would be negligible effects on fish
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:578:would be negligible, therefore any effects on SPA / Ramsar site features would manifest as a direct
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:584:negligible effect on feeding resources for terns. When this is considered alongside the localised increase
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:13:dredged material is predicted to have a negligible impact on fisheries, marine ecology
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:13:No significant residual impacts are predicted. A worst case residual impact of negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:13:It is concluded that the impact during the construction phase of the proposed scheme would be of negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:13:are minor beneficial to controlled waters and negligible to human health.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:13:with maintenance dredging. All operational phase impacts are predicted to be of negligible significance,
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:14:to marine mammals from dredging has been assessed as negligible. The assessment has concluded
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:14:impacts of negligible significance to all marine mammals with regard to potential for temporary auditory
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:14:movements in the area. A worst-case impact of negligible significance (not significant) is predicted.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:15:Tees, and is therefore expected to have a negligible effect on fish. The removal of the existing wharf
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:16:negligible impacts on both resident and migratory fish. Disturbance during the operational phase, either as
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:16:a result of vessel calls to the new quay or the use of quayside lighting, is predicted to have a negligible
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:16:required by International Regulations to allow safe navigation. An impact of negligible significance on
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:16:determined to have minimal effect on the existing navigation profile. An impact of negligible significance is
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:16:Environmental Assessment of Road Traffic), the impact is considered to be negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:18:construction phase noise levels at the South Tees Business Parks would be negligible. No mitigation
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:19:assessed as being permanent and negligible. No mitigation measures during the operational phase are
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:20:disturbance and reductions in air quality are considered to be negligible during construction and operation.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:20:It is therefore concluded that impacts to human health would be of negligible significance.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:20:is predicted to have a negligible impact on fisheries, marine ecology and marine mammals, and no impact
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-10.pdf:2:locations across the disposal site, at relatively low magnitudes, with negligible changes anticipated beyond
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-10.pdf:11: • The reductions in baseline peak currents are negligible, typically less than 0.01m/s, and never
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:56: likely to be negligible and therefore not necessary to be assessed.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:208:Deposition to the west and east of the disposal site is negligible, whilst to the south and north covers a
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:260: • negligible ground dissolution.
MMO/MLA_2020_00507/MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:284: buildings is negligible.
MMO/MLA_2019_00286/MLA_2019_00286-South Bank Whard WFD Scoping (1).pdf:7: The impact of the works on fish will be negligible
MMO/MLA_2019_00286/MLA_2019_00286-South Bank Whard WFD Scoping.pdf:7: The impact of the works on fish will be negligible
Planning/b/R-2020-0799-CD/R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:77:• Negligible – No effect on species or habitats present are anticipated.
Planning/b/R-2020-0800-CD/R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:77:• Negligible – No effect on species or habitats present are anticipated.
Planning/b/R-2021-0100-CD/R-2021-0100-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0088-01-Prairie_Risk Assessment.pdf:15: Deposits have negligible significance for water supply or river base flow. Based on
Planning/b/R-2021-0100-CD/R-2021-0100-CD-STDC_HWY-ATK-HGT-PR-RP-CE-000001_C01.pdf:47: 1 to 4 Negligible Could be ignored
Planning/b/R-2021-0608-PND/R-2021-0608-PND-210801_Ecolgy screening (EIA criteria) for Teesworks demolitions_INCA_RevA.pdf:7:Destruction of bat roosts Likely impact is negligible due to low suitability of buildings for
Planning/b/R-2021-0608-PND/R-2021-0608-PND-210801_Ecolgy screening (EIA criteria) for Teesworks demolitions_INCA_RevA.pdf:7: is negligible due to distance (over 1.9km).
Planning/b/R-2021-0608-PND/R-2021-0608-PND-210801_Ecolgy screening (EIA criteria) for Teesworks demolitions_INCA_RevA.pdf:8: is negligible due to distance (over 1.9km).
Planning/b/R-2021-0608-PND/R-2021-0608-PND-210801_Ecolgy screening (EIA criteria) for Teesworks demolitions_INCA_RevA.pdf:8:Vibration Likely impact on sensitive species (roosting birds) is negligible
Planning/b/R-2021-0608-PND/R-2021-0608-PND-210801_Ecolgy screening (EIA criteria) for Teesworks demolitions_INCA_RevA.pdf:8:Disturbance by personnel Likely impact on sensitive species (roosting birds) is negligible
Planning/b/R-2021-0608-PND/R-2021-0608-PND-210801_Ecolgy screening (EIA criteria) for Teesworks demolitions_INCA_RevA.pdf:16:majority of buildings on the site are assessed as being of negligible Bat Roost Potential
Planning/b/R-2021-0152-CD/R-2021-0152-CD-Blast furnace RecordingWSI revMar21.pdf:6: 2). The area to the east now has negligible archaeological potential and the areas to the south
Planning/b/R-2021-0152-CD/R-2021-0152-CD-Officer report _R20210152CD.pdf:5:negligible archaeological potential and the areas to the south and west,
Planning/R-2021-0754-FFM/R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf:9: • Negligible – effects which are unlikely to be perceptible to drivers, bus passengers or those
Planning/R-2021-0754-FFM/R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf:9: • Negligible – effects which are unlikely to be perceptible and within the normal variation of
Planning/R-2021-0754-FFM/R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf:19: Medium non-motorised users to cross at the Minor Negligible
Planning/R-2021-0754-FFM/R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf:19: High Negligible Negligible
Planning/R-2021-0754-FFM/R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf:20: therefore considered to be negligible;
Planning/R-2021-0754-FFM/R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf:20: negligible.
Planning/R-2021-0754-FFM/R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf:20: safety is expected to be negligible.
Planning/R-2021-0754-FFM/R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf:21: be negligible.
Planning/R-2021-0754-FFM/R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf:25: A1085 Trunk Minor adverse Travel Planning measures, alongside a Servicing Negligible
Planning/R-2021-0754-FFM/R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf:25: A66/Normanby Minor adverse Travel Planning measures to be introduced to Negligible
Planning/R-2021-0754-FFM/R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf:27: A66/Tees Dock Negligible effect on None required Negligible
Planning/R-2021-0754-FFM/R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf:28: A1085 Trunk Minor adverse Travel Planning measures, alongside Negligible - the
Planning/R-2021-0754-FFM/R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf:28: A1053 Negligible effect on None required Negligible
Planning/R-2021-0754-FFM/R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf:28: A66/Old Station Negligible effect on None required Negligible
Planning/R-2021-0754-FFM/R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf:28: A66/Normanby Minor adverse Travel Planning measures to be Negligible - the
Planning/R-2021-0754-FFM/R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf:28: A66/Eston Negligible effect on None required Negligible
Planning/R-2021-0754-FFM/R-2021-0754-FFM-INCA2021-67 South Bank access road - Ecology report.pdf:4:location and is of negligible ecological value. A further area of approximately 0.1ha of neutral
Planning/R-2021-0754-FFM/R-2021-0754-FFM-63455 01 LM Wind Access Road - Cover Letter 18.08.21.pdf:2:would be negligible and kept to a minimum.
Planning/R-2021-0754-FFM/R-2021-0754-FFM-63455 01 LM Wind Access Road - Cover Letter 18.08.21.pdf:3:negligible impact and would not affect the conclusions of the aforementioned environmental statement.
Planning/OfficerReports/b/R-2021-0405-FFM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:12:There is negligible amount of suitable habitat for bats on the proposed
Planning/OfficerReports/b/R-2021-0405-FFM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:12:checked and are of negligible roosting potential for bats. Both buildings are
Planning/OfficerReports/b/R-2021-0405-FFM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:14:habitats, the likely presence of Priority species is assessed as negligible.
Planning/OfficerReports/pdfs/R-2021-0405-FFM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:12:There is negligible amount of suitable habitat for bats on the proposed
Planning/OfficerReports/pdfs/R-2021-0405-FFM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:12:checked and are of negligible roosting potential for bats. Both buildings are
Planning/OfficerReports/pdfs/R-2021-0405-FFM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:14:habitats, the likely presence of Priority species is assessed as negligible.
Planning/OfficerReports/pdfs/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:44:locations set out in the table range from negligible to moderate adverse.
Planning/OfficerReports/pdfs/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:45:The changes at these junctions are considered to range from negligible to
Planning/OfficerReports/pdfs/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:46:summarised in Table C7.1 of the ES. The impacts range from negligible to
Planning/OfficerReports/pdfs/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:53:is noted as ranging from negligible to major negative effect at county level.
Planning/OfficerReports/pdfs/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:60:movements, this is expected to be a negligible impact in the short term and a
Planning/OfficerReports/pdfs/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:60:negligible impact in the long term.
Planning/OfficerReports/pdfs/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:67:place, there is likely to be a negligible effect on receptors from the dust-
Planning/OfficerReports/pdfs/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:67:receptors is negligible. The overall effect of the proposed development on
Planning/OfficerReports/pdfs/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:74:significance is considered negligible and therefore not significant.
Planning/OfficerReports/pdfs/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:77:negligible. There are likely to be impacts of negligible significance after the
Planning/OfficerReports/pdfs/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:77:magnitude of impact following mitigation is negligible. Therefore, the impacts
Planning/OfficerReports/pdfs/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:77:negligible significance. This is not considered significant in EIA terms.
Planning/OfficerReports/pdfs/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:77:negligible significance. This is not considered significant in EIA terms.
Planning/OfficerReports/pdfs/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:77:mitigation is negligible. Therefore, following the implementation of mitigation
Planning/OfficerReports/pdfs/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:77:measures impacts are of negligible significance. This is not considered
Planning/OfficerReports/pdfs/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:77:the magnitude of impact following mitigation is negligible. Therefore, the
Planning/OfficerReports/pdfs/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:77:impacts following mitigation are of negligible significance. This is not
Planning/OfficerReports/pdfs/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:78:the magnitude of impact following mitigation is negligible. Therefore, the
Planning/OfficerReports/pdfs/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:78:impacts are considered to be of negligible significance. This is not considered
Planning/OfficerReports/pdfs/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:78:residual significance of the impacts identified is considered to be negligible
Planning/OfficerReports/pdfs/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:88:the proposed development is therefore considered to be negligible with the
Planning/OfficerReports/pdfs/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:89:development would be nil or negligible which is not considered significant.
Planning/OfficerReports/pdfs/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:96:negligible.
Planning/OfficerReports/pdfs/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:97:negligible effect on the Industrial, Coast and Peninsula, Coatham Marsh,
Planning/OfficerReports/pdfs/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:97:ranging from negligible to a temporary, short-term minor to moderate adverse
Planning/OfficerReports/pdfs/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:97:is noted that the significance of effect ranges from negligible to minor adverse
Planning/OfficerReports/pdfs/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:98:7 and 8 are considered to be negligible and not significant in EIA terms.
Planning/OfficerReports/pdfs/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:98:landscape character zones and a temporary, short-term, negligible effect on
Planning/OfficerReports/pdfs/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:99:Other impacts upon specified LCZs are considered to be minor or negligible in
Planning/OfficerReports/pdfs/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:99:to minor or negligible in nature.
Planning/OfficerReports/pdfs/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:99:minor to negligible adverse impacts. As stated above the site is allocated for
Planning/OfficerReports/pdfs/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:102:negative effect to, in most cases, have a residual effect that is negligible or
Planning/OfficerReports/pdfs/R-2020-0465-FFM-Officer report _R20200465FFM.pdf:7:designated or undesignated heritage assets. There is negligible potential for
Planning/OfficerReports/pdfs/R-2021-1048-FFM-Officer Report 1048.pdf:19:local population are considered to be negligible.
Planning/OfficerReports/pdfs/R-2021-1048-FFM-Officer Report 1048.pdf:19:impact of the development is assessed as negligible
Planning/OfficerReports/pdfs/R-2021-0152-CD-Officer report _R20210152CD.pdf:5:negligible archaeological potential and the areas to the south and west,
Planning/OfficerReports/pdfs/R-2021-0166-FFM-Officer Report 0166.pdf:9:There are no roost sites and only a negligible amount of suitable foraging
Planning/OfficerReports/pdfs/R-2021-0166-FFM-Officer Report 0166.pdf:9:negligible.
Planning/OfficerReports/pdfs/R-2021-0166-FFM-Officer Report 0166.pdf:9:negligible
Planning/OfficerReports/pdfs/R-2021-0166-FFM-Officer Report 0166.pdf:9:The amount of suitable habitat for Hedgehog on the site is negligible therefore
Planning/OfficerReports/pdfs/R-2021-0166-FFM-Officer Report 0166.pdf:9:impacts on Hedgehog are considered to be negligible.
Planning/OfficerReports/pdfs/R-2021-0166-FFM-Officer Report 0166.pdf:10:the site is considered to be of negligible importance for Common Toad.
Planning/OfficerReports/pdfs/R-2021-0166-FFM-Officer Report 0166.pdf:10:The only Valued Ecological Receptors which are other than of negligible value
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:13: Negligible The size and scale of change is considered very small due to the extent and
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:18: Negligible The proposed development is barely discernible within the landscape and
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:20: Neutral / negligible Maintain the character of the receiving landscape.
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:20: Neutral / negligible The proposed development would cause no discernible deterioration or
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:20: improvement in a view. In most instances, a negligible effect will arise where
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:20: negligible magnitude of change.
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:21: EIA terms. Those classified as minor or negligible are likely to be not significant in EIA terms
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:22: Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:45: considered to be negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:45: character zones and a temporary, short-term, negligible effect on the Industrial, Coast and
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:45: negligible to a temporary, short-term minor to moderate adverse effect upon views and
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:46: All landscape and Negligible to Adverse Direct and short- Implementation of
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:46: Negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:46: LCZ 1 - Industrial Low Negligible Moderate Direct, Permanent
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:48: magnitude of change is therefore considered to be Negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:48:L5.28 Combining all of these criteria, it is considered that there will be a Negligible level of effect,
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:48: LCZ 4 – Coast and Medium Negligible Negligible Indirect,
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:48: magnitude of change is therefore considered to be Negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:48:L5.33 Combining all of these criteria, it is considered that there will be a Negligible level of effect,
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:49: LCZ 5 – Coatham Medium-High Negligible Negligible Indirect,
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:49: of the LCZ. The magnitude of change is therefore considered to be Negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:49:L5.43 Combining all of these criteria, it is considered that there will be a Negligible level of effect,
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:50: LCZ 7 – Salthouse Medium-High Negligible Negligible Indirect,
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:50: of the LCZ. The magnitude of change is therefore considered to be Negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:50:L5.48 Combining all of these criteria, it is considered that there will be a Negligible level of effect,
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:50: LCZ 8 – Rural Medium Negligible Negligible Indirect, Permanent
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:51: LCZ 1 - Industrial Low Negligible Moderate Direct, Permanent
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:51: LCZ 4 – Coast and Medium Negligible Negligible – Indirect,
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:51: LCZ 5 – Coatham Medium-High Negligible Negligible - Indirect,
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:51: LCZ 7 – Salthouse Medium-High Negligible Negligible – Indirect,
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:51: LCZ 8 – Rural Medium Negligible Negligible – Indirect,
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:55:L5.88 The assessment of the magnitude of change is therefore considered to be Negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:55: VP6 Footpath Users Negligible Minor Adverse Direct, Permanent
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:55:L5.93 The assessment of the magnitude of change is therefore considered to be Negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:55: VP7 Footpath Users Negligible Minor Adverse Direct, Permanent
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:59: VP6 Footpath Users - Negligible Minor Adverse - Direct, Permanent
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:59: VP7 Footpath Users - Negligible Minor Adverse - Direct, Permanent
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:61: and 10. Construction effects upon views 6, 7 and 8 are considered to be negligible and not
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:61: temporary, short-term, negligible effect on the Industrial, Coast and Peninsula, Coatham
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:61: LCZ 1 - Industrial Low Negligible Moderate Direct, Permanent
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:61: LCZ 4 – Coast and Medium Negligible Negligible – Indirect,
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:61: LCZ 5 – Coatham Medium-High Negligible Negligible - Indirect,
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:61: LCZ 7 – Salthouse Medium-High Negligible Negligible – Indirect,
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:61: LCZ 8 – Rural Medium Negligible Negligible – Indirect,
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:62: VP6 Footpath Users - Negligible Minor Adverse - Direct, Permanent
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:62: VP7 Footpath Users - Negligible Minor Adverse - Direct, Permanent
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:63: considered to be minor or negligible in nature.
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:63: Viewpoint 9. The effects upon other viewpoint are considered to minor or negligible in nature.
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:63: LCZ 4 – Coast and Negligible – Buildings to be articulated in a way Negligible –
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:63: LCZ 5 – Coatham Negligible - Buildings to be articulated in a way Negligible -
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:64: LCZ 7 – Salthouse Negligible – Buildings to be articulated in a way Negligible –
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:64: LCZ 8 – Rural Negligible – Buildings to be articulated in a way Negligible –
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:5: reduced to negligible (not significant) once mitigation measures have been incorporated into a
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:5: Biodiversity and Ecology Negligible effect on Teesmouth and Cleveland
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:5: Water Management and Flooding Negligible to moderate beneficial impact (not
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:6: Negligible to minor beneficial impacts (not
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:6: Ground Conditions Negligible (not significant) effects are predicted on
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:6: term negligible (not significant).
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:6: Below Ground Heritage Negligible to neutral effects (not significant)
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:6: Negligible effect predicted on pedestrian and
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:6: Biodiversity and Ecology Negligible effect on Teesmouth and Cleveland
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:7: Negligible beneficial effects (not significant) on
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:7: Ground Conditions Negligible (not significant) effects are predicted on
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:7: Landscape and Visual Impact Effects will generally be negligible to minor
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:8: Negligible impacts are predicted on all other
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:9: effects of the development are either Neutral or Negligible and therefore these are not presented
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:10: RED – adverse effect; GREEN – beneficial effect; BLACK – unknown; ( ) – minor effect; - negligible/no
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:17: considered to be of negligible impact). There is potential for the onshore element to lead to loss
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:17: impacts considered as part of the proposed development are considered to be of negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:19: development and the development site due to the negligible connection between the surface
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:19: development and the development site due to the negligible connection between the surface
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:20: development and the development site due to the negligible connection between the surface
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:20: development and the development site due to the negligible connection between the surface
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:20: development and the development site due to the negligible connection between the surface
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:20: development and the development site due to the negligible connection between the surface
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:21: development and the development site due to the negligible connection between the surface
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:21: development and the development site due to the negligible connection between the surface
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:23: significant scale the overall landscape character will be negligible. Consequently there are not
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:23: significant scale the overall landscape character will be negligible. Consequently there are not
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:44:locations set out in the table range from negligible to moderate adverse.
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:45:The changes at these junctions are considered to range from negligible to
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:46:summarised in Table C7.1 of the ES. The impacts range from negligible to
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:53:is noted as ranging from negligible to major negative effect at county level.
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:60:movements, this is expected to be a negligible impact in the short term and a
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:60:negligible impact in the long term.
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:67:place, there is likely to be a negligible effect on receptors from the dust-
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:67:receptors is negligible. The overall effect of the proposed development on
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:74:significance is considered negligible and therefore not significant.
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:77:negligible. There are likely to be impacts of negligible significance after the
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:77:magnitude of impact following mitigation is negligible. Therefore, the impacts
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:77:negligible significance. This is not considered significant in EIA terms.
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:77:negligible significance. This is not considered significant in EIA terms.
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:77:mitigation is negligible. Therefore, following the implementation of mitigation
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:77:measures impacts are of negligible significance. This is not considered
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:77:the magnitude of impact following mitigation is negligible. Therefore, the
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:77:impacts following mitigation are of negligible significance. This is not
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:78:the magnitude of impact following mitigation is negligible. Therefore, the
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:78:impacts are considered to be of negligible significance. This is not considered
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:78:residual significance of the impacts identified is considered to be negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:88:the proposed development is therefore considered to be negligible with the
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:89:development would be nil or negligible which is not considered significant.
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:96:negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:97:negligible effect on the Industrial, Coast and Peninsula, Coatham Marsh,
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:97:ranging from negligible to a temporary, short-term minor to moderate adverse
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:97:is noted that the significance of effect ranges from negligible to minor adverse
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:98:7 and 8 are considered to be negligible and not significant in EIA terms.
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:98:landscape character zones and a temporary, short-term, negligible effect on
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:99:Other impacts upon specified LCZs are considered to be minor or negligible in
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:99:to minor or negligible in nature.
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:99:minor to negligible adverse impacts. As stated above the site is allocated for
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:102:negative effect to, in most cases, have a residual effect that is negligible or
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf:9: Negligible Assets with very little or no surviving archaeological interest.
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf:10: Negligible Very minor changes to archaeological materials or setting.
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf:11: Magnitude of Change No Change Negligible Minor Moderate Substantial No Change
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf:11: Medium Neutral Negligible Minor Moderate Substantial Medium
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf:11: Low Neutral Negligible Negligible Minor Moderate Low
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf:11: Negligible Neutral Negligible Negligible Negligible Minor Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf:11: the effect on the receptor will be Neutral, Negligible, Minor, Moderate or Substantial.
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf:11: Negligible/neutral The development satisfies the subject environmental objective but neither
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf:20: offsets the negative effect to, in most cases, have a residual effect that is negligible or neutral.
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf:20: Foundations of South Bank Iron Works Low – Medium Substantial Negligible / Neutral
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf:20: Foundations of Antonien Works Low Substantial Negligible / Neutral
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf:20: 20th century Riverside Pumping House Low Substantial Negligible / Neutral
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf:20: 20th century Custom House Low Substantial Negligible / Neutral
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - July 2020.pdf:12:I3.10 The socio-economic effects of the proposed development are identified as ‘beneficial’, ‘negligible’
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - July 2020.pdf:13: Negligible No obvious significant effect to a receptor or environment.
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - July 2020.pdf:13: Negligible Where no discernible effect is expected as a result of the proposed development on the
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - July 2020.pdf:13: change/effects High Medium Low Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - July 2020.pdf:13: High Substantial Moderate to Minor to Moderate Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - July 2020.pdf:13: Medium Moderate to Moderate Minor Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - July 2020.pdf:13: Low Minor to Moderate Minor Negligible to Minor Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - July 2020.pdf:13: Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - July 2020.pdf:22: storage and post. Similarly, the labour supply scenario forecasts only a negligible increase in
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - July 2020.pdf:28: of the significance criteria matrix. The effects are assessed as being beneficial, negligible or
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - July 2020.pdf:28: negligible. An assessment of the likely effects in relation to each receptor is presented in Table
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix H - July 2020.pdf:706: drift of the glacio-lacustrine laminated clays as a “Non Aquifer” of “negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix H - July 2020.pdf:828: as being negligible to low.
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix H - July 2020.pdf:872:Oil and fuel Lubricating oils, Site Users Direct contact, Health hazard Unlikely Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix H - July 2020.pdf:872: Mild migration. Negligible evidenc e of contamination detected in soil,
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix H - July 2020.pdf:873: G r o u n d w a t er (drift Migration via Pollution of Unlikely Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix H - July 2020.pdf:892:Ground Conditions assessed as being negligible to low.
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix H - July 2020.pdf:895: Groundwater Low Aquifer of negligible resource
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - July 2020.pdf:18: the annual emissions from Redcar and Cleveland as a whole. This is not a negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf:12: Negligible Materials are forecast (through trend analysis and other information) to be free from
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf:13: Negligible The consumption of no individual material type would be equal to or greater than 1%
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf:14: No change Negligible Minor Moderate Major
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf:14: Medium Neutral Negligible / Slight Moderate Moderate
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf:14: Low Neutral Negligible / Negligible Slight Minor /
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf:14: Negligible Neutral Nil Negligible Negligible / Slight
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf:19:J5.10 Therefore, the magnitude of the impact of demolition waste is considered to be negligible (<1%).
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf:19: that the overall significance of the potential effect is nil or negligible (not significant).
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf:19:J5.16 Therefore, the magnitude of impact of excavation materials is considered to be negligible. This,
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf:19: overall significance of the potential effect is nil or negligible (not significant).
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf:20: the magnitude of the impact of construction waste is considered to be negligible (<1%). This,
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf:20: overall significance of the potential effect is nil or negligible (not significant).
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf:21: receptor, the overall significance of the effect is considered to be nil or negligible (not
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf:21: proposed development are considered to be negligible. Given the low sensitivity of the regional
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf:25: remain as negligible or nil (not significant).
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf:26: be nil or negligible which is not considered significant.
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:5: Low Medium risk site Low risk site Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:5: Low Low risk site Low risk site Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:5: Low Low risk site Low risk site Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:5: Medium Medium risk site Low risk site Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:5: Low Low risk site Low risk site Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:25:R1 20.0 20.1 20.6 0.4 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:25:R2 18.9 19.0 19.2 0.2 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:25:R3 18.5 18.6 18.8 0.2 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:25:R4 18.7 18.9 19.2 0.3 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:25:R5 18.2 18.5 18.9 0.4 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:25:R6 16.1 16.2 16.3 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:25:R7 15.6 15.8 15.9 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:25:R8 14.1 14.3 14.3 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:25:R9 15.1 15.4 15.5 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:25:R10 15.8 16.2 16.4 0.2 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:25:R11 13.9 14.1 14.2 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:25:R12 14.0 14.2 14.3 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:25:R13 15.4 15.8 15.9 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:25:R14 15.0 15.4 15.5 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:25:E1 18.9 18.9 19.0 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:25:E2 18.8 18.8 18.8 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:25:R1 12.5 12.5 12.6 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:25:R2 12.3 12.3 12.3 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:25:R3 11.9 11.9 11.9 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:25:R4 11.9 11.9 11.9 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:25:R5 11.8 11.9 11.9 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:25:R6 11.6 11.6 11.7 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:25:R7 11.5 11.5 11.6 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:25:R8 13.2 13.2 13.2 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:25:R9 13.4 13.4 13.4 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:26: R10 12.1 12.2 12.2 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:26: R11 11.8 11.8 11.8 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:26: R12 11.8 11.8 11.8 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:26: R13 12.0 12.1 12.1 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:26: R14 12.0 12.0 12.0 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:26: E1 10.5 10.5 10.6 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:26: E2 10.5 10.5 10.5 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:26: R1 7.9 7.9 8.0 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:26: R2 7.9 7.9 8.0 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:26: R3 7.6 7.6 7.7 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:26: R4 7.6 7.7 7.7 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:26: R5 7.6 7.7 7.7 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:26: R6 7.5 7.5 7.5 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:26: R7 7.5 7.5 7.5 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:26: R8 7.9 7.9 7.9 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:26: R9 8.0 8.0 8.0 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:26: R10 7.6 7.6 7.6 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:26: R11 7.4 7.5 7.5 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:26: R12 7.4 7.5 7.5 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:26: R13 7.6 7.6 7.6 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:26: R14 7.5 7.6 7.6 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:26: E1 7.0 7.0 7.0 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:26: E2 7.0 7.0 7.0 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:8: vi. Negligible – Nugatory effect on species or habitats present are anticipated.
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:10: mostly limited to developed land of negligible ecological value (see Appendix D3).
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:14: (Hypericum perforatum), and bird’s-foot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus). A negligible abundance of
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:15: site, however bare ground cover is negligible outside this area. Grass is relatively rank, with
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:15:D4.23 Due to this habitat generally being of negligible value for floral ecological features and not itself
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:18:D4.43 Due to this habitat generally being of negligible value for ecological features, and the small size
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:19:D4.47 Due to this habitat generally being of negligible value for ecological features and the lack of
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:19: sided metal structures of negligible value for ecological features.
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:22: sided metal structures of negligible value for roosting bats.
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:39: Teesmouth Pollution of riverine Indirect pollution as a result of sediment, Major Direction of sediments and contaminated Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:39: Increased light-spill Illumination of River Tees by unshielded Moderate Directional lighting during construction Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:39: Teesmouth Pollution of riverine Indirect pollution as a result of sediment, Major Direction of sediments and contaminated Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:39: Increased light-spill Illumination of River Tees by unshielded Moderate Directional lighting during construction Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:41: Potential harm to Unmitigated removal of trees, scrub, Moderate Vegetation clearance undertaken outside Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:42: Potential harm to Unmitigated removal of wetland habitat Moderate Vegetation clearance undertaken outside Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:42: Bats Loss of foraging and Loss of woodland, scrub, grasslands, OMH, Negligible No mitigation proposed. No habitat Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:42: Disturbance of species Lighting columns have the potential to Minor Lighting used during construction and Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:42: Otter Disturbance to otter Noise and vibration originating from the Minor Screening of any construction works Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:43: Marine Disturbance to marine Noise and vibration originating from the Minor Screening of any construction works Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:43: Migratory Fish Potential harm of Pollution of the River Tees as a result of Minor Employment of CEMP during construction Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:43: Hedgehog Potential harm of Uncovered dug trenches and excavations Minor Cover trenches overnight or include Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:10: construction works 5) or soils of negligible nature conservation
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:10: negligible value Negligible potential for mineral reserves to
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:12: Negligible Human Health: No measurable effects on Impact of insufficient magnitude to
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:12: Sensitivity/value of a High Medium Low Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:12: High Substantial Moderate Minor Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:12: Medium Moderate Minor Negligible Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:12: Low Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:30: significance is considered negligible and therefore not significant.
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:39: high and the magnitude of impact following mitigation is negligible. There are likely to be
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:39: impacts of negligible significance after the implementation of mitigation measures. This is not
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:39: impact following mitigation is negligible. Therefore, the impacts after the implementation of
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:39: mitigation measures are considered to be of negligible significance. This is not considered
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:39: construction phase is considered to be of negligible significance. This is not considered
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:39: and the magnitude of impact following mitigation is negligible. Therefore, following the
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:39: implementation of mitigation measures impacts are of negligible significance. This is not
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:39: impact following mitigation is negligible. Therefore, the impacts following mitigation are of
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:39: negligible significance. This is not considered significant in EIA terms.
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:39: following mitigation is negligible. Therefore, the impacts are considered to be of negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:40: impacts identified is considered to be negligible following the implementation of the mitigation
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:41: Moderate A P D LT L Such works will be undertaken taking into Negligible A T D ST L
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:41: Negligible A T D ST L appropriate EA guidance documents. - Negligible A T D ST L
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:41:Management Minor A T I M R Negligible A T I ST L
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:41: Minor A T D M L - Negligible A T D ST L
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:41: Minor A T D ST L Negligible A T D ST L
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:42: Moderate A P D LT L - Negligible A T D ST L
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf:37: would result in a negligible increase in road traffic noise within the local area. Noise emission
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf:38: through the modelling process was predicted to be negligible at all receptors. The overall effect
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf:44: facilities and the built environment and landscape will all be of negligible significance during
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf:47: waste from the proposed development are all considered to result in a negligible impact on
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - July 2020.pdf:13: Negligible Less than 3.0
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - July 2020.pdf:13: Negligible Less than 1.0
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - July 2020.pdf:20: a negligible increase in road traffic noise levels within the local area, therefore no significant
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - July 2020.pdf:26: expected to be a negligible impact in the short term and a negligible impact in the long term.
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:6: reduced to negligible levels.
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:19:F3.20 If the impact descriptor is negligible or slight, this is considered to not have a significant effect.
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:19: Negligible Negligible Slight Moderate
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:19: Negligible Slight Moderate Moderate
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:19: negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:19: <10% of hourly mean NO2 threshold Imperceptible Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:20: significant effect and a ‘negligible’ or ‘slight’ impact will not result in a significant effect in EIA
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:29: on human health and ecological designations should be negligible and the impacts would
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:32: predicted to result in a negligible impact and not significant in EIA terms.
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:32: negligible impact from NO2 concentrations as a result of operational traffic. These are not
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:33: is predicted to result in a negligible impact and not significant in EIA terms.
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:33: negligible impact from PM10 concentrations as a result of operational traffic. These are not
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:33: is predicted to result in a negligible impact and not significant in EIA terms.
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:33: negligible impact from PM2.5 concentrations as a result of operational traffic and not significant
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:33:F5.36 The magnitude of change for NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations is negligible at all receptors.
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:33: As stated in paragraph F3.24, where the impact is negligible or slight then the overall effect of
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:34: on human health and ecological designations should be negligible and the impacts would
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:38: measures suitable for medium risk sites in place, there is likely to be a negligible effect on
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:38:F8.6 The magnitude of change for NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations at all receptors is negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:38: Residential receptors Negligible effect No mitigation measures None.
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:38: Negligible effect Dust management None.
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:38: SSSI – Teesmouth and Negligible effect No mitigation measures None.
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:38: Negligible effect Dust management None.
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:39: SPA – Teesmouth and Negligible effect No mitigation measures None.
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix M - July 2020.pdf:8: • Negligible – areas of extremely limited or no archaeological or historic interest. These
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix M - July 2020.pdf:48:potential is negligible for the survival of the Eston Steel Works due to later development of the Cleveland Steelworks
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:18: Negligible flood risk. flood risk point of view.
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:20: sub-divide the category of ‘Not Significant’, for example by use of the terms ‘Negligible’ in terms
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:21: Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:21: Negligible Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:21: Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:36: Culvert is low and the magnitude of change minor and so the effect would be negligible and not
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:37: receptor, the lack of change means there is a neutral / negligible effect and so not significant.
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:37: negligible, and not significant.
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:38: Culvert, this would have a neutral / negligible effect and so not significant.
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:46: will be minor, so the level of effect is therefore negligible, and not significant. Additional
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:47: gives an effect greater than minor or negligible, which is not significant.
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:47: receptors, this would result in a negligible level of effect of pollution which would be deemed to
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:47: negligible beneficial effect for the other surface waterbodies (Holme Beck, Knitting wife,
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:47: of the mitigation measures and so a substantial beneficial effect for the Tees and negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:47: will be minor, so the level of effect is therefore negligible, and not significant. Additional
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:51:Other surface water Increased runoff Low Negligible adverse Implementation of water management and No significant effect from
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:51:Cleveland & Lackenby from climate change. negligible beneficial impact.
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:52:Mercia Mudstone Reduced infiltration Low Negligible adverse No further mitigation is proposed. No significant effect from
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:53:Superficial aquifer Reduced infiltration Low Negligible adverse No further mitigation proposed. No significant effect from
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:53:Other surface water Increased runoff Very low Negligible adverse No additional mitigation measures are No significant effect from
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:53: negligible beneficial effect.
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf:9: • Negligible – effects which are unlikely to be perceptible to drivers, bus passengers or those
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf:9: • Negligible – effects which are unlikely to be perceptible and within the normal variation of
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf:19: Medium non-motorised users to cross at the Minor Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf:19: High Negligible Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf:20: therefore considered to be negligible;
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf:20: negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf:20: safety is expected to be negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf:21: be negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf:25: A1085 Trunk Minor adverse Travel Planning measures, alongside a Servicing Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf:25: A66/Normanby Minor adverse Travel Planning measures to be introduced to Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf:27: A66/Tees Dock Negligible effect on None required Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf:28: A1085 Trunk Minor adverse Travel Planning measures, alongside Negligible - the
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf:28: A1053 Negligible effect on None required Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf:28: A66/Old Station Negligible effect on None required Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf:28: A66/Normanby Minor adverse Travel Planning measures to be Negligible - the
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf:28: A66/Eston Negligible effect on None required Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:27: 4 Neutral/negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Transport Assessment.pdf:38:expected to be negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-Transport Assessment.pdf:38:generated by the development in this location is expected to be negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix C - July 2020.pdf:40:expected to be negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix C - July 2020.pdf:40:generated by the development in this location is expected to be negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:12: experience a negligible impact, or in the case of Smiths Dock Road, minor beneficial effects are
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:13: negligible (and therefore not significant) impacts on the Teesmouth and Cleveland Coast SPA
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:15: the implementation of best practice mitigation measures there is anticipated to be a negligible
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:15: a negligible impact from NO2 concentrations as a result of the proposed traffic. This is not
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:15:7.9 To ensure a negligible and non-significant impact is maintained during the construction stage of
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:16: receptors is considered to be minor or negligible and therefore not significant.
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:17: (described below) this is expected to result in a negligible (and not significant) impact on human
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:17: health. Previous studies undertaken suggest there would be a negligible impact on
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:17: however through the implementation of best practice measures negligible impacts are
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:17:9.10 The implementation of these measures will result in negligible (and not significant) effects at all
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:19: and as a result the impact is expected to be negligible and not significant on the remaining
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:19: hardstanding areas it is anticipated that this will also have a nil or negligible impact on the
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:19: anticipated that the impacts are expected to be negligible (and not significant).
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:20: LCZs are considered to be minor or negligible in nature. There is the potential for a moderate
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:20: considered to be minor or negligible in nature and are therefore not significant.
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:21: considered to be negligible and not significant.
Planning/R-2020-0357-OOM/R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:22: of the ES can be secured and that the effects are negligible or kept to an absolute minimum. The
Planning/R-2020-0465-FFM/R-2020-0465-FFM-Archaeological Advice - R-2020- 0465-FFM, Land at metals recovery area .pdf:1:heritage assets. There is negligible potential for as yet unidentified archaeology to be present. No further
Planning/R-2020-0465-FFM/R-2020-0465-FFM-Officer report _R20200465FFM.pdf:7:designated or undesignated heritage assets. There is negligible potential for
Planning/R-2020-0799-CD/R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:77:• Negligible – No effect on species or habitats present are anticipated.
Planning/R-2022-0494-FFM/R-2022-0494-FFM-Desk Based Heritage Assessment.pdf:6: • Negligible – areas of extremely limited or no archaeological or historic interest. These
Planning/R-2020-0318-FFM/R-2020-0318-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0088-01-Prairie_Risk Assessment (1).pdf:15: Deposits have negligible significance for water supply or river base flow. Based on
Planning/R-2022-0411-CD/R-2022-0411-CD-32435-HM-AC-RP-01_00 ISSUE.pdf:16: construction works are therefore predicted to be negligible.
Planning/R-2022-0342-CD/R-2022-0342-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0395-03-GE Plot.pdf:35:likely to be negligible in these strata and as such has not been modelled. Therefore, settlements have been
Planning/R-2022-0342-CD/R-2022-0342-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0395-03-GE Plot.pdf:37:in the Glaciolacustrine Deposits due to imposed loadings on the floor slab are likely to be negligible and therefore
Planning/R-2022-0342-CD/R-2022-0342-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0395-03-GE Plot.pdf:698: consolidation proportionally negligible and any further consolidation will take
Planning/R-2022-0342-CD/R-2022-0342-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0395-03-GE Plot.pdf:701:increase in the Glaciolacustrine deposits due to imposed loadings on the floor slab are likely to be negligible
Planning/R-2022-0342-CD/R-2022-0342-CD-L05858-CLK-XX-XX-RP-GT-0002 Pile Risk Assessment .pdf:8: lateral migration will be negligible
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:48: High Major Moderate Moderate Minor Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:48: Medium Moderate Moderate Minor Minor Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:48: Low Minor Minor Minor Negligible Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:48: Very low Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:48:Whilst mitigation for minor or negligible impacts may not be specifically defined as a matter of course,
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:48:recognised that minor and negligible impacts could become significant when considered cumulatively with
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:112:3, the values are so low (<5mg/l) as to be negligible compared with background levels and, in all cases, the
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:112:water quality sampling points during Stage 3 of the dredging and only negligible effects for a short duration
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:112:Stages 3 and 4 of the dredging, only negligible effects are noted, equivalent to variations within the
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:118:as to be negligible in such a great depth of water in this deep water offshore area).
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:122:enhancement is so small in magnitude and spatial extent as to be negligible in such a great depth of water
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:126:is negligible, whilst to the north it covers a similar zone to the sediment plume for this disposal event, which
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:126:0.1cm. Clearly these magnitudes are extremely low within the licenced disposal site, and negligible beyond.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:126:magnitudes, with negligible changes anticipated beyond the boundaries of the site.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:167:is considered to be medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:167:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:167:impact is of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:167:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:168:be medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:168:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:168:considered to be medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:168:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:174: negligible. As there are no designated
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:175:Negligible Is generally tolerant of physical or chemical changes
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:177:temporary change, indiscernible • negligible change to existing risk of exposure; or
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:178: Moderate Minor Minor Negligible Negligible Minor Minor Moderate
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:178: Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Minor
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:178:(negligible) impacts as they may contribute to significant impacts cumulatively or through interactions.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:178:Negligible Very small changes in receptor condition (adverse or beneficial), which may be raised as local issues
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:180:the geological sensitivity is considered to be negligible. As there are no designated geological sites recorded
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:186:during construction is considered to be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:186:No mitigation measures are required and residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:188:overall impact during construction is considered to be of negligible to minor adverse significance.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:188:negligible to minor adverse significance.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:189:very low. Thus, the impact to human receptors is of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:189:No additional mitigation measures required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:190:very low and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:212:impact of negligible significance is predicted.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:212:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:214:Given the above, an impact of negligible significance on marine species and habitats is predicted to arise
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:214:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:215:and tidal regime is predicted to be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:215:No mitigation measures are required, and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:221: Negligible / very
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:234: 0.0003 harbour porpoise Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:234: 0.000003 minke whale Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:234: dredging 0.00000024 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:234: 0.0000009 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:234:The magnitude of the potential impact of PTS as a result of dredging noise is negligible / very low for harbour
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:234:seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.10).
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:234: Harbour Negligible / Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:234: Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:234: Auditory injury Negligible / Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:234: (PTS) from Minke whale Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:234: Negligible / required. Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:234: SEL during Grey seal Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:234: Negligible / Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:234: Harbour seal Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:235:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:236: Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:236: 0.000003 minke whale Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:236: underwater noise 0.00000024 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:236: 0.0000009 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:236:The magnitude of the potential impact of TTS and fleeing response as a result of dredging noise, is negligible
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:237:whale, grey seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.13).
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:237: Harbour Negligible / Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:237: Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:237: TTS or fleeing Negligible / Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:237: response from Minke whale Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:237: Negligible / required. Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:237: SEL during Grey seal Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:237: Negligible / Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:237: Harbour seal Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:237:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:238: Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:238: Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:238: dredging (5% of Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:238: 0.000005 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:238:of negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, the impact significance for any
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:238:potential increase in collision risk with vessels during dredging has been assessed as negligible (not
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:239: Harbour Negligible /
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:239: Low Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:239: Potential for Minke Negligible / Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:239: collision risk from required, other than Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:239: vessels during Negligible / Negligible good practice.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:239: Harbour Negligible / Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:239:The residual impact would be of negligible significance for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:240:The magnitude of the impact of vessel disturbance to seal haul-out sites is defined as negligible / very low
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:240:resulting in an overall impact significance of negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:240:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:240:have a negligible impact on marine mammals.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:240:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:241: Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:241: Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:241: dredge area Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:241: 0.0001 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:241:Taking into account the low receptor sensitivity, the negligible potential magnitude of the impact and the
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:241:negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal (Table 10.17).
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:241: Harbour Negligible /
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:241: Low Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:241: Minke Negligible / Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:241: resource in Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:241: Negligible / Negligible required.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:241: Harbour Negligible / Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:241:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:242:10.5.1 and 10.5.2). The magnitude of effect in all species is assessed to be negligible / very low based on
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:242:maintenance activities has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.10 and Table 10.13).
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:242:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:242:10.5.3). The magnitude of effect in all species is assessed to be negligible / very low based on the maximum
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:242:has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.15).
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:242:dredging activities. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:242:assessed as negligible (see Section 10.5.4).
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:242:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:243:negligible (see Section 10.5.5).
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:243:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:243:negligible (see Section 10.5.6).
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:243:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:243:established vessel routes. The magnitude of effect in all species is assessed to be negligible / very low
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:243:for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal has been assessed as negligible (Table
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:243:would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:251: Negligible Commonplace feature of little or no habitat/historical significance. Loss of such a feature would not be seen
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:252: Negligible of normal natural variation change to the extent Change is within the normal range of natural variation.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:253: High Medium Low Negligible Negligible Low Medium High
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:253: Moderate Minor Minor Negligible Negligible Minor Minor Moderate
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:253: Importance Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:253: Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Minor
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:260:grassland is concluded as being of negligible ecological value.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:260:negligible ecological value.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:260:scrub habitat is concluded as being of negligible ecological value.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:261:and ruderal habitat is concluded as being of negligible ecological value.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:261:metal structures, which have been assessed as being of negligible value for roosting bats due to the lack of
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:264: Wharf Negligible No
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:264: Buildings Negligible No
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:264: Notable Flora Negligible No
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:264: Badger Negligible No
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:264: Water vole Negligible No
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:265: Amphibians Negligible No
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:265: Reptiles Negligible No
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:266:impacts to foraging bats are considered to be negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:266:included in the CEMP, and with the implementation of such measures, any impacts will be negligible in
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:266:Negligible impacts on water quality are anticipated during construction of the proposed scheme (Section
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:267:time otters are anticipated to spend in the area, an impact of negligible magnitude is anticipated. Given the
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:268:assessed to be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:268:With the implementation of the above measures, the residual impact is of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:268:be of local (grayling) and (dingy skipper) significance, and negligible importance within the footprint of the
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:294:Both had a peak count of two, which represents a negligible proportion of the SPA / Ramsar site populations.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:296:would have a negligible impact on benthic prey species in the intertidal zone so consequent effects on
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:298:of the effects of capital dredging and therefore a negligible impact is predicted on the waterbirds relying on
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:298:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:301:minor adverse. A residual impact of negligible significance is predicted at the other sensitive intertidal
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:304:and localised disturbance to feeding resources will result in an impact of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:304:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:305:negligible, and any exceedances of the thresholds stated in Cutts et al. (2009) or Wright et al. (2010) would
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:305:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:305:negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:305:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:305:be negligible, therefore any effects on waterbirds and foraging terns would manifest as a direct behavioural
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:306:on foraging / roosting waterbirds and terns is predicted to be negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:306:While impacts are anticipated to be negligible, the implication of best practice mitigation measures set out
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:306:water) will further reduce the impact on foraging / roosting waterbirds. The residual impact is negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:306:negligible impact on intertidal benthos (see Section 9.6.2) and would not adversely affect the availability of
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:306:result of hydrodynamic changes would be negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:306:No mitigation measures are considered necessary, therefore the residual impact is negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:321:and beyond. The impact is therefore predicted to be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:321:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would remain of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:324:considered to be very low, and the significance of the impact is negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:325:Outside the migratory period, there would be a negligible impact on fish movement up- and downstream
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:327:underwater noise of piling activities is therefore considered to have a negligible impact on migration up-
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:327:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact remains negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:328:negligible impact on fish species within the Tees.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:330:the footprint of the works, and even if there was, the number of vessels/fishers affected would be negligible
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:330:and navigation within the Tees estuary is predicted to be negligible, given that works will be co-ordinated
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:330:are predicted to be negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:330:remain negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:330:in motorised vessel traffic is therefore considered to have a negligible impact on fish populations or
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:330:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact will remain negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:331:impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:331:impact would be negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:336:receptor. The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible significance on
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:336:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:336:receptor. The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible significance on
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:337:scheme) and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:337:(human health/safety). The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:337:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:338:The impact of the proposed development’s construction traffic is therefore assessed as of negligible
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:338:proposed schemes operational traffic is therefore assessed as negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:338:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:341: MMO Scoping Opinion negligible and therefore not necessary to be assessed.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:347: Negligible Assets with no significant importance or archaeological/historical interest.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:347: Negligible The asset’s fabric and/or setting is changed in ways which do not materially affect its heritage significance.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:348: Significance High Medium Low Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:348: Low Moderate Minor Minor Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:348: Negligible Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:348: Negligible No material change to heritage significance.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:349:these from other non-significant (negligible) impacts as they may contribute to significant impacts
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:370: Negligible / very low < 1.0
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:373: 1 69.7 69.8 0.1 Very low Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:373: 2 67.8 68.0 0.2 Very low Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:373: 3 70.3 70.5 0.2 Very low Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:373: 5 76.3 76.4 0.1 Very low Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:373:Predicted changes in BNL, displayed in Table 17.10, indicate impacts of negligible significance at worst
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:373:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:375: NSR1 52.2 - 59.2 Very low Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:375:indicating negligible impact at human receptor locations. This is considered not significant and impact is
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:376:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:391: Dust soiling High Risk Medium Risk Medium Risk Negligible Risk
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:391: Human health Medium Risk Low Risk Low Risk Negligible Risk
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:391: Ecological effects Medium Risk Low Risk Low Risk Negligible Risk
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:391:demolition, ‘medium risk’ for earthworks and construction, and ‘negligible risk’ for trackout. The impacts on
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:392:earthworks and construction and ‘negligible risk’ for trackout.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:406:the proposed scheme will have negligible influence on this character area and is not considered further..
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:408:industrial context of outward views, it is predicted that the proposed scheme will have negligible influence
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:411:negligible effect on the existing baseline.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:415:of those features will incur a low adverse magnitude of effect and a negligible overall significance of effect.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:415:magnitude and incur a minor negligible adverse significance of effect.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:415:negligible overall significance of effect.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:416:and the wider environs, the overall significance of effect is considered to be negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:419:significance of effect in the view is minor negligible adverse and not significant.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:419:significance of effect in the view is minor negligible adverse. In terms of EIA these effects are not
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:419:negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:434:negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:435:As a result, it is concluded that there would be a negligible impact as a result of the proposed scheme.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:435:a potential impact of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:436:effect on a low sensitivity receptor. Overall, a negligible impact is predicted.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:436:residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:444:The socio-economic impacts of the proposed scheme are identified as ‘beneficial’, ‘negligible’ or ‘adverse’
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:444: Negligible No obvious significant effect to a receptor or environment.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:444: Negligible Where no discernible effect is expected as a result of the proposed scheme on the
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:444: High Medium Low Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:444: High Substantial Moderate to Minor to Moderate Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:444: Medium Moderate to Moderate Minor Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:445: Low Minor to Moderate Minor Negligible to Minor Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:445: Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:453:supply scenario forecasts only a negligible increase in employment during the plan period.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:455:term) and negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:455:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:458:employment with the AOI and is therefore considered to correspond to a negligible magnitude of change.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:458:a permanent and negligible impact.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:458:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:458:negligible magnitude of change. The receptor is considered to be of medium sensitivity by virtue of the fact
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:459:a permanent and negligible impact.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:459:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:476:that there would be impacts of negligible significance to the only NSR scoped into the assessment.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:476:would be negligible to minor adverse significance.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:477:noise and air quality disturbance would be negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:477:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:477:negligible significance and not significant respectively. In addition, operational phase impacts to human
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:477:health as reported in Section 8 with regard to land quality are considered to be of negligible significance. It
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:477:and land quality would be negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:477:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual impact of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:478:long period prior to this the enhancement is so small in magnitude and spatial extent as to be negligible in
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:479:deposition is predicted to be negligible beyond the boundaries of the Tees Bay C disposal site.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:479:that there would be negligible impact on fish or fisheries due to the proposed deposition of dredged material
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:479:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual impact of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:482:negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:482:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:484:operations). Overall, the potential impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:484:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:485: Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:485: 0.000003 minke whale Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:485: during offshore 0.00004 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:485: 0.0000003 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:486:dredged sediments is negligible / very low for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal,
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:486:negligible (Table 26.5).
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:486: Harbour Negligible / Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:486: TTS or fleeing Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:486: underwater Negligible / Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:486: Minke whale Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:486: offshore Negligible / required. Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:486: disposal of Grey seal Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:486: sediments Negligible / Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:486: Harbour seal Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:486:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:487: Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:487: Potential Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:487: of dredged 0.002 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:487: Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:487:of negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, the impact significance for any
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:487:assessed as negligible (not significant) for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:487: Harbour Negligible /
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:487: Low Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:487: increased Minke Negligible / Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:487: vessels during required, other than Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:487: offshore disposal Negligible / Negligible good practice.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:487: sediments Harbour Negligible / Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:487:would be of negligible significance for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:488:The magnitude of the impact of vessel disturbance to seal haul-out sites is defined as negligible / very low
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:488:This gives an overall impact significance of negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:488:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:488:relied upon solely. Therefore, any increases in suspended sediments will have a negligible impact on
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:488:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:489: Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:489: Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:489: offshore disposal 0.04 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:489: Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:489:Taking into account the low receptor sensitivity, the negligible potential magnitude of the impact and the
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:489:negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal (Table 26.9).
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:489: Harbour Negligible /
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:489: Low Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:489: Changes to prey Minke Negligible / Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:489: Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:489: offshore disposal Negligible / Negligible required.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:489: Harbour Negligible / Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:489:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:507:cumulative impact is predicted to be negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:509: Negligible / very low
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:509: Negligible / very low
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:509: approach channel and Anglo Negligible / very low
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:509: Negligible / very low
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:509: Negligible / very low
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:509: Hartlepool approach Negligible / very low
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:510: Negligible / very low
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:510: Negligible / very low
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:510: Negligible / very low
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:510: Negligible / very low
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:510: Hartlepool approach Negligible / very low
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:510: Negligible / very low
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:510:Harbour Facilities schemes, is negligible / very low for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:510:harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as negligible (Table 27.5).
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:511:cumulative underwater noise impacts. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:511: TTS or fleeing Harbour Negligible /
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:511: response from Negligible Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:511: dredging at the Negligible /
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:511: Minke whale Negligible Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:511: Hartlepool Negligible /
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:511: approach Grey seal Negligible Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:511: Harbour Negligible /
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:511: Harbour seal Negligible Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:513:on waterbirds at North Tees Mudflat, and negligible impact further downstream (including at Vopak
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:514:supporting habitat was considered a negligible impact in the EIAs for both the Anglo American Harbour
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:514:(even in combination) would have a negligible impact, the cumulative effect with the proposed scheme would
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:515:driving activities (see Section 13.5.3 and 13.5.4). While there is anticipated to be negligible impact from
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:516:works, but the potential cumulative impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:516:impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:516:acceptable (from a navigation risk perspective), with all risks classified as negligible or low, with the
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:516:impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:516:The primary assessment identifies that the proposed schemes traffic demand would result in a negligible
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:517:with the proposed scheme are considered not significant and indicate negligible impact, at worst. Therefore,
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:521:concludes that the disposal of dredged material will have a negligible impact on fisheries, marine ecology
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:521:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual cumulative impact of negligible
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:568: Lianhetech, Seal Sands Proposed new buildings, plant upgrade, swale and associated Approximately Planning permission / Ramsar site would be negligible. On this basis,
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:576:greater than approximately 200m from source (see Appendix 8). There would be negligible effects on fish
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:578:would be negligible, therefore any effects on SPA / Ramsar site features would manifest as a direct
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:584:negligible effect on feeding resources for terns. When this is considered alongside the localised increase
Planning/R-2020-0371-SCP/R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:6: likely to be negligible and therefore not necessary to be assessed.
Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:18: permeability that have negligible
Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:42:121 17.4 Collapsible deposits Negligible (within 50m)
Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:42:123 17.6 Ground dissolution of soluble rocks Negligible (within 50m)
Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:107: Negligible
Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:151: Negligible
Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:151: On site Negligible Ground conditions predominantly non-plastic.
Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:153: Negligible
Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:155: Negligible
Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:155: On site Negligible Compressible strata are not thought to occur.
Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:157: Negligible
Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:157: On site Negligible Deposits with potential to collapse when loaded and saturated are believed not to be present.
Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:158: Negligible
Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:159: Negligible
Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:159: On site Negligible Soluble rocks are either not thought to be present within the ground, or not prone to dissolution.
Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-SSI 1 Desk Study_final(2).pdf:27:There is a risk of minor fuel spills and oil leaks from vehicles but these are comparatively negligible.
Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-GEO_STDCO_GEOENVIRONMENTALSUMMARYREPORT(002)sm.pdf:37:Negligible flow rates were reported from installations BH21, 23, 24, 26, 27, 28 and the deeper
Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf:18: permeability that have negligible
Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf:42:121 17.4 Collapsible deposits Negligible (within 50m)
Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf:42:123 17.6 Ground dissolution of soluble rocks Negligible (within 50m)
Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf:107: Negligible
Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf:151: Negligible
Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf:151: On site Negligible Ground conditions predominantly non-plastic.
Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf:153: Negligible
Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf:155: Negligible
Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf:155: On site Negligible Compressible strata are not thought to occur.
Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf:157: Negligible
Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf:157: On site Negligible Deposits with potential to collapse when loaded and saturated are believed not to be present.
Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf:158: Negligible
Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf:159: Negligible
Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf:159: On site Negligible Soluble rocks are either not thought to be present within the ground, or not prone to dissolution.
Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-4339 Preliminary Onshore GI for NZT (Draft Report).pdf:1308:influence zone of the cone tip measurement and the loss of meaningful resolution is negligible.
Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-4339 Preliminary Onshore GI for NZT (Draft Report).pdf:1402: is large enough for end effects to be negligible allowing the test to be modelled as a plane strain
Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-4339 Preliminary Onshore GI for NZT (Draft Report).pdf:1419:two important assumptions about this output; that it is linear and that the hysteresis is negligible. The
Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-Officer Report 1048.pdf:19:local population are considered to be negligible.
Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-Officer Report 1048.pdf:19:impact of the development is assessed as negligible
Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:18: permeability that have negligible
Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:50:121 17.4 Collapsible deposits Negligible (within 50m)
Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:50:123 17.6 Ground dissolution of soluble rocks Negligible (within 50m)
Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:115: Negligible
Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:159: Negligible
Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:159: On site Negligible Ground conditions predominantly non-plastic.
Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:161: Negligible
Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:163: Negligible
Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:163: On site Negligible Compressible strata are not thought to occur.
Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:165: Negligible
Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:165: On site Negligible Deposits with potential to collapse when loaded and saturated are believed not to be present.
Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:166: Negligible
Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:167: Negligible
Planning/R-2021-1048-FFM/R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:167: On site Negligible Soluble rocks are either not thought to be present within the ground, or not prone to dissolution.
Planning/R-2021-0405-FFM/R-2021-0405-FFM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:12:There is negligible amount of suitable habitat for bats on the proposed
Planning/R-2021-0405-FFM/R-2021-0405-FFM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:12:checked and are of negligible roosting potential for bats. Both buildings are
Planning/R-2021-0405-FFM/R-2021-0405-FFM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:14:habitats, the likely presence of Priority species is assessed as negligible.
Planning/R-2021-0405-FFM/R-2021-0405-FFM-355679 - R_2021_0405_FFM Engineering operations associated with ground remediation and preparation at Land at South Bank South Industrial Zone Redcar - No Objs Sub Mit.pdf:2: likelihood of the aforementioned potential impacts remains negligible.
Planning/south-tees-area-spd/South Tees Area SPD SEA Post Adoption Statement.pdf:18: objective or the relationship is negligible.
Planning/south-tees-area-spd/South Tees Area SPD Statement of Consultation.pdf:13: our opinion, a negligible benefit. We would therefore urge the authority to consider
Planning/south-tees-area-spd/South Tees Area SPD Environmental Report.pdf:32: objective or the relationship is negligible.
Planning/south-tees-area-spd/South Tees Area SPD Environmental Report.pdf:140: negligible.
Planning/south-tees-area-spd/South Tees Area SPD Environmental Report.pdf:188: negligible.
Planning/south-tees-area-spd/South Tees Area SPD Environmental Report Non-Technical Summary.pdf:15: objective or the relationship is negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:62:3, the values are so low (<5mg/l) as to be negligible compared with background levels and, in all cases, the
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:62:water quality sampling points during Stage 3 of the dredging and only negligible effects for a short duration
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:62:Stages 3 and 4 of the dredging, only negligible effects are noted, equivalent to variations within the
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:68:as to be negligible in such a great depth of water in this deep water offshore area).
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:72:enhancement is so small in magnitude and spatial extent as to be negligible in such a great depth of water
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:76:is negligible, whilst to the north it covers a similar zone to the sediment plume for this disposal event, which
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:76:0.1cm. Clearly these magnitudes are extremely low within the licenced disposal site, and negligible beyond.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:76:magnitudes, with negligible changes anticipated beyond the boundaries of the site.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:43:representing the final risk score for each hazard, between 0 (negligible) and 10 (high) (see Annex A),
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:43:Hazard risk scores were categorised as either negligible, low, As Low as Reasonably Practicable
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:43: Negligible The risk is acceptable and at level where operational safety is unaffected.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:44:construction phase was ‘Contact: Navigation Buoy’ which was scored as 0.72; negligible, driven by its
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:44: Negligible Low ALARP Significant High
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:46:0.5; negligible, driven by its low consequence.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:46: Negligible Low ALARP Significant High
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:49:be acceptable with all scoring Negligible or Low, with the exception of the impact on ship contact risk,
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:50: Unlikely Minor Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:50: Unlikely Minor Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:57:is extremely remote and consequence insignificant such that a risk can be said to be negligible. At the
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:60: 1 Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:62: 0 – 1.99 Negligible Risk A level where operational safety is unaffected.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:62:the final risk score for each hazard, between 0 (negligible) and 10 (high) following which, the final risk
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:62:Hazard risk scores are categorised as either negligible, low, As Low as Reasonably Practicable (ALARP),
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 13_Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology.pdf:5:particular development is categorised as high, medium, low or negligible. In accordance with the
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 13_Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology.pdf:5: Negligible Size and/or scale: the extent and relative proportion of the existing landscape
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 13_Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology.pdf:8: Negligible Size and Scale
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 13_Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology.pdf:9:receptor (high, medium to low) with the magnitude of effect (high to negligible). The evaluation is
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 13_Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology.pdf:9: Low medium Minor negligible effect Minor effect Minor moderate effect
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 13_Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology.pdf:9: Low Negligible effect Minor negligible effect Minor effect
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 13_Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology.pdf:9: Negligible Negligible effect Negligible effect Minor negligible effect
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 11_Air quality assessment method.pdf:1:is ‘negligible’.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 11_Air quality assessment method.pdf:4: Low Medium Risk Low Risk Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 11_Air quality assessment method.pdf:4: Low Low Risk Low Risk Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 11_Air quality assessment method.pdf:5: Low Low Risk Low Risk Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 11_Air quality assessment method.pdf:5: Low Medium Risk Low Risk Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:7:likely to be negligible, and therefore not necessary to be assessed.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-HIGHWAYS ENGLAND.pdf:11:Impacts of negligible significance from the short term, local and reversible construction phase road traffic at the
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-HIGHWAYS ENGLAND.pdf:11:Predicted noise levels indicate negligible impact at human receptor locations. This is considered not significant
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf:5:receptor. The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible significance on
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf:5:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf:5:receptor. The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible significance on
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf:6:scheme) and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf:6:(human health/safety). The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf:6:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:5: Negligible / very
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:18: 0.0003 harbour porpoise Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:18: 0.000003 minke whale Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:18: dredging 0.00000024 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:18: 0.0000009 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:18:The magnitude of the potential impact of PTS as a result of dredging noise is negligible / very low for harbour
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:18:seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.10).
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:18: Harbour Negligible / Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:18: Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:18: Auditory injury Negligible / Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:18: (PTS) from Minke whale Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:18: Negligible / required. Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:18: SEL during Grey seal Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:18: Negligible / Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:18: Harbour seal Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:19:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:20: Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:20: 0.000003 minke whale Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:20: underwater noise 0.00000024 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:20: 0.0000009 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:20:The magnitude of the potential impact of TTS and fleeing response as a result of dredging noise, is negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:21:whale, grey seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.13).
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:21: Harbour Negligible / Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:21: Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:21: TTS or fleeing Negligible / Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:21: response from Minke whale Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:21: Negligible / required. Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:21: SEL during Grey seal Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:21: Negligible / Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:21: Harbour seal Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:21:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:22: Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:22: Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:22: dredging (5% of Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:22: 0.000005 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:22:of negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, the impact significance for any
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:22:potential increase in collision risk with vessels during dredging has been assessed as negligible (not
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:23: Harbour Negligible /
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:23: Low Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:23: Potential for Minke Negligible / Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:23: collision risk from required, other than Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:23: vessels during Negligible / Negligible good practice.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:23: Harbour Negligible / Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:23:The residual impact would be of negligible significance for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:24:The magnitude of the impact of vessel disturbance to seal haul-out sites is defined as negligible / very low
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:24:resulting in an overall impact significance of negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:24:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:24:have a negligible impact on marine mammals.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:24:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:25: Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:25: Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:25: dredge area Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:25: 0.0001 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:25:Taking into account the low receptor sensitivity, the negligible potential magnitude of the impact and the
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:25:negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal (Table 10.17).
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:25: Harbour Negligible /
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:25: Low Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:25: Minke Negligible / Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:25: resource in Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:25: Negligible / Negligible required.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:25: Harbour Negligible / Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:25:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:26:10.5.1 and 10.5.2). The magnitude of effect in all species is assessed to be negligible / very low based on
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:26:maintenance activities has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.10 and Table 10.13).
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:26:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:26:10.5.3). The magnitude of effect in all species is assessed to be negligible / very low based on the maximum
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:26:has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.15).
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:26:dredging activities. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:26:assessed as negligible (see Section 10.5.4).
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:26:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:27:negligible (see Section 10.5.5).
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:27:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:27:negligible (see Section 10.5.6).
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:27:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:27:established vessel routes. The magnitude of effect in all species is assessed to be negligible / very low
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:27:for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal has been assessed as negligible (Table
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:27:would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:6: likely to be negligible and therefore not necessary to be assessed.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:14:negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:15:As a result, it is concluded that there would be a negligible impact as a result of the proposed scheme.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:15:a potential impact of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:16:effect on a low sensitivity receptor. Overall, a negligible impact is predicted.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:16:residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:22:impact of negligible significance is predicted.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:22:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:24:Given the above, an impact of negligible significance on marine species and habitats is predicted to arise
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:24:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:25:and tidal regime is predicted to be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:25:No mitigation measures are required, and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_15. Traffic and transport.pdf:1:The impact of the proposed development’s construction traffic is therefore assessed as of negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_15. Traffic and transport.pdf:1:proposed schemes operational traffic is therefore assessed as negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_15. Traffic and transport.pdf:1:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf:1:that there would be impacts of negligible significance to the only NSR scoped into the assessment.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf:1:would be negligible to minor adverse significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf:2:noise and air quality disturbance would be negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf:2:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf:2:negligible significance and not significant respectively. In addition, operational phase impacts to human
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf:2:health as reported in Section 8 with regard to land quality are considered to be of negligible significance. It
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf:2:and land quality would be negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf:2:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual impact of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:8: Negligible Commonplace feature of little or no habitat/historical significance. Loss of such a feature would not be seen
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:9: Negligible of normal natural variation change to the extent Change is within the normal range of natural variation.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:10: High Medium Low Negligible Negligible Low Medium High
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:10: Moderate Minor Minor Negligible Negligible Minor Minor Moderate
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:10: Importance Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:10: Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Minor
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:17:grassland is concluded as being of negligible ecological value.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:17:negligible ecological value.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:17:scrub habitat is concluded as being of negligible ecological value.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:18:and ruderal habitat is concluded as being of negligible ecological value.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:18:metal structures, which have been assessed as being of negligible value for roosting bats due to the lack of
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:21: Wharf Negligible No
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:21: Buildings Negligible No
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:21: Notable Flora Negligible No
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:21: Badger Negligible No
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:21: Water vole Negligible No
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:22: Amphibians Negligible No
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:22: Reptiles Negligible No
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:23:impacts to foraging bats are considered to be negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:23:included in the CEMP, and with the implementation of such measures, any impacts will be negligible in
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:23:Negligible impacts on water quality are anticipated during construction of the proposed scheme (Section
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:24:time otters are anticipated to spend in the area, an impact of negligible magnitude is anticipated. Given the
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:25:assessed to be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:25:With the implementation of the above measures, the residual impact is of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:25:be of local (grayling) and (dingy skipper) significance, and negligible importance within the footprint of the
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf:10:the proposed scheme will have negligible influence on this character area and is not considered further..
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf:12:industrial context of outward views, it is predicted that the proposed scheme will have negligible influence
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf:15:negligible effect on the existing baseline.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf:19:of those features will incur a low adverse magnitude of effect and a negligible overall significance of effect.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf:19:magnitude and incur a minor negligible adverse significance of effect.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf:19:negligible overall significance of effect.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf:20:and the wider environs, the overall significance of effect is considered to be negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf:23:significance of effect in the view is minor negligible adverse and not significant.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf:23:significance of effect in the view is minor negligible adverse. In terms of EIA these effects are not
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf:23:negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:18: Lianhetech, Seal Sands Proposed new buildings, plant upgrade, swale and associated Approximately Planning permission / Ramsar site would be negligible. On this basis,
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:26:greater than approximately 200m from source (see Appendix 8). There would be negligible effects on fish
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:28:would be negligible, therefore any effects on SPA / Ramsar site features would manifest as a direct
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:34:negligible effect on feeding resources for terns. When this is considered alongside the localised increase
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf:9: Negligible / very low < 1.0
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf:12: 1 69.7 69.8 0.1 Very low Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf:12: 2 67.8 68.0 0.2 Very low Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf:12: 3 70.3 70.5 0.2 Very low Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf:12: 5 76.3 76.4 0.1 Very low Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf:12:Predicted changes in BNL, displayed in Table 17.10, indicate impacts of negligible significance at worst
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf:12:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf:14: NSR1 52.2 - 59.2 Very low Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf:14:indicating negligible impact at human receptor locations. This is considered not significant and impact is
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf:15:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:13:It is concluded that the impact during the construction phase of the proposed scheme would be of negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:13:are minor beneficial to controlled waters and negligible to human health.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:13:with maintenance dredging. All operational phase impacts are predicted to be of negligible significance,
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:14:to marine mammals from dredging has been assessed as negligible. The assessment has concluded
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:14:impacts of negligible significance to all marine mammals with regard to potential for temporary auditory
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:14:movements in the area. A worst-case impact of negligible significance (not significant) is predicted.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:15:Tees, and is therefore expected to have a negligible effect on fish. The removal of the existing wharf
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:16:negligible impacts on both resident and migratory fish. Disturbance during the operational phase, either as
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:16:a result of vessel calls to the new quay or the use of quayside lighting, is predicted to have a negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:16:required by International Regulations to allow safe navigation. An impact of negligible significance on
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:16:determined to have minimal effect on the existing navigation profile. An impact of negligible significance is
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:16:Environmental Assessment of Road Traffic), the impact is considered to be negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:18:construction phase noise levels at the South Tees Business Parks would be negligible. No mitigation
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:19:assessed as being permanent and negligible. No mitigation measures during the operational phase are
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:20:disturbance and reductions in air quality are considered to be negligible during construction and operation.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:20:It is therefore concluded that impacts to human health would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:20:is predicted to have a negligible impact on fisheries, marine ecology and marine mammals, and no impact
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1107_Appendix 7_Land quality desk study.pdf:14: • negligible ground dissolution.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1107_Appendix 7_Land quality desk study.pdf:38: buildings is negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:18:cumulative impact is predicted to be negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:20: Negligible / very low
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:20: Negligible / very low
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:20: approach channel and Anglo Negligible / very low
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:20: Negligible / very low
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:20: Negligible / very low
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:20: Hartlepool approach Negligible / very low
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:21: Negligible / very low
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:21: Negligible / very low
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:21: Negligible / very low
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:21: Negligible / very low
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:21: Hartlepool approach Negligible / very low
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:21: Negligible / very low
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:21:Harbour Facilities schemes, is negligible / very low for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:21:harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as negligible (Table 27.5).
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:22:cumulative underwater noise impacts. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:22: TTS or fleeing Harbour Negligible /
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:22: response from Negligible Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:22: dredging at the Negligible /
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:22: Minke whale Negligible Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:22: Hartlepool Negligible /
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:22: approach Grey seal Negligible Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:22: Harbour Negligible /
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:22: Harbour seal Negligible Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:24:on waterbirds at North Tees Mudflat, and negligible impact further downstream (including at Vopak
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:25:supporting habitat was considered a negligible impact in the EIAs for both the Anglo American Harbour
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:25:(even in combination) would have a negligible impact, the cumulative effect with the proposed scheme would
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:26:driving activities (see Section 13.5.3 and 13.5.4). While there is anticipated to be negligible impact from
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:27:works, but the potential cumulative impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:27:impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:27:acceptable (from a navigation risk perspective), with all risks classified as negligible or low, with the
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:27:impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:27:The primary assessment identifies that the proposed schemes traffic demand would result in a negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:28:with the proposed scheme are considered not significant and indicate negligible impact, at worst. Therefore,
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:32:concludes that the disposal of dredged material will have a negligible impact on fisheries, marine ecology
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:32:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual cumulative impact of negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:7: High Major Moderate Moderate Minor Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:7: Medium Moderate Moderate Minor Minor Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:7: Low Minor Minor Minor Negligible Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:7: Very low Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:7:Whilst mitigation for minor or negligible impacts may not be specifically defined as a matter of course,
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:7:recognised that minor and negligible impacts could become significant when considered cumulatively with
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:24: predicted to be of negligible significance, with the exception of the subtidal habitat creation
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:24: auditory injury to marine mammals from dredging has been assessed as negligible. The
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:24: assessment has concluded impacts of negligible significance to all marine mammals with regard
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:24: number of vessel movements in the area. A worst-case impact of negligible significance (not
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:26: undertaken within the Tees, and is therefore expected to have a negligible effect on fish. The
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:26: resulted in a conclusion that there will be negligible impacts on both resident and migratory
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:26: use of quayside lighting, is predicted to have a negligible effect.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:27: impact is considered to be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:28: of negligible significance to groundwater, moderate adverse to the Tees estuary and associated
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:28: operation are predicted to be minor beneficial to controlled waters and negligible to human
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:28: Business Parks would be negligible. No mitigation measures are required.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:30: negligible. No mitigation measures during the operational phase are required.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:14: Dust soiling High Risk Medium Risk Medium Risk Negligible Risk
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:14: Human health Medium Risk Low Risk Low Risk Negligible Risk
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:14: Ecological effects Medium Risk Low Risk Low Risk Negligible Risk
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:14:demolition, ‘medium risk’ for earthworks and construction, and ‘negligible risk’ for trackout. The impacts on
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:15:earthworks and construction and ‘negligible risk’ for trackout.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:15:and beyond. The impact is therefore predicted to be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:15:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would remain of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:18:considered to be very low, and the significance of the impact is negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:19:Outside the migratory period, there would be a negligible impact on fish movement up- and downstream
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:21:underwater noise of piling activities is therefore considered to have a negligible impact on migration up-
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:21:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact remains negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:22:negligible impact on fish species within the Tees.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:24:the footprint of the works, and even if there was, the number of vessels/fishers affected would be negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:24:and navigation within the Tees estuary is predicted to be negligible, given that works will be co-ordinated
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:24:are predicted to be negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:24:remain negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:24:in motorised vessel traffic is therefore considered to have a negligible impact on fish populations or
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:24:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact will remain negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:25:impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:25:impact would be negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:21:impact is of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:21:is of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:22:overall impact is of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:22:medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:22:range between negligible and minor adverse significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:22:be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:24:negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:24:health is considered to be of negligible to minor adverse significance
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:25:negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:26:residual impact would be of negligible significance. It is acknowledged that a
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:26:considered to be of negligible to minor adverse significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:26:residual impact is therefore considered to be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:26:suitable material selection, the residual impact would be of negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:30:sediment, an impact of negligible significance is predicted.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:31:regime is predicted to be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:32:are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:32:affecting marine communities would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:34:this is that the significance to all receptors would be negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:34:this is that the significance to all receptors would be negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:34:significance to all receptors would be negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:35:overall impact of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:35:negligible impact on marine mammals due to their prey detection methods
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:35:harbour seal is negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:35:residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:35:impact would be of negligible significance
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:36:residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:36:impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:36:practice. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:37:negligible to low.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:37:considered to be of negligible ecological value and therefore have not been
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:38:adverse significance), noise and vibration (negligible significance) emissions,
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:38:negligible importance within the footprint of the proposed development. The
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:39:residual impact is of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:39:of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:39:implementation of the mitigation measures, the residual impact is of negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:39:measures, the residual impact is of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:43:and therefore a negligible impact is predicted on the waterbirds relying on
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:43:from the operations is therefore considered to be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:44:associated with the proposed scheme is assessed to be of negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:44:roosting waterbirds and terns is predicted to be negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:44:not significant. The potential increase are considered to have a negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:44:hydrodynamic changes would be negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:45:food resources and the residual impact is of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:45:impact is negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:45:impact is negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:45:While impacts are anticipated to be negligible, the implication of best practice
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:45:impact is therefore considered to be negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:45:negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:48:is therefore predicted to be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:48:considered to be very low, and the significance of the impact is negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:49:therefore considered to have a negligible impact on migration up and
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:49:considered to be a negligible impact on fish species within the Tees. With
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:49:therefore considered to be negligible. Consideration has also been given to
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:49:however any conflict is considered to be negligible when co-ordinated by the
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:49:negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:50:in motorised vessel traffic is therefore considered to have a negligible impact
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:50:of the estuary as a whole predicted to be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:50:fish eggs. The residual impact would remain of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:50:activities. The residual impact remains negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:51:remain negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:51:residual impact will remain negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:51:impact would be negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:53:proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:54:development is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:54:impact of negligible significance on navigation safety during the operational
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:54:impacts of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:55:impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:56:negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:57:traffic is therefore assessed as negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:57:considered to be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:57:considered to be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:63:between no impact and negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:63:would be a negligible impact on human receptor that would be not significant .
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:64:impact would be of negligible significance. With regard to on-site construction
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:64:noise no mitigation is proposed and the residual impact would be of negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:71:with a negligible overall significance of effect.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:72:adverse magnitude and incur a negligible overall significance of effect.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:73:significance of effect being considered to be negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:74:significance of effect in the view is minor negligible adverse and not
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:74:in the view is minor negligible adverse. In terms of EIA these effects are not
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:74:existing, transitory views towards site will be low adverse or negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:75:The ES does conclude that there will be negligible impacts during the
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:75:range between negligible to minor adverse. Many of the views considered
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:77:negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:78:negligible impact.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:78:negligible impact.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:79:locally generated waves. The residual impact would be of negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:83:therefore the likely requirement is expected to be low resulting in a negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:84:therefore considered to be result in a negligible impact.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:84:negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:90:receptors is considered to be negligible as set out within Chapter 17 of the
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:90:human health would be negligible to minor adverse in significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:90:disturbance would be negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:91:air quality disturbance is predicted to be of negligible significance and not
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:91:be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:91:disturbance and land quality would be negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:91:impacts of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:91:impacts of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:92:beyond, with seabed deposition predicted to be negligible beyond the
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:92:would be negligible impact on fish or fisheries due to the proposed deposition
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:93:therefore concluded that the impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:93:disposal operations). Overall, the potential impact would be of negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:94:material, there are considered to be negligible impacts on marine mammals
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:94:would be a residual impact of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:94:would be a residual impact of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:94:would be a residual impact of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:8:The socio-economic impacts of the proposed scheme are identified as ‘beneficial’, ‘negligible’ or ‘adverse’
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:8: Negligible No obvious significant effect to a receptor or environment.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:8: Negligible Where no discernible effect is expected as a result of the proposed scheme on the
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:8: High Medium Low Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:8: High Substantial Moderate to Minor to Moderate Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:8: Medium Moderate to Moderate Minor Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:9: Low Minor to Moderate Minor Negligible to Minor Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:9: Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:17:supply scenario forecasts only a negligible increase in employment during the plan period.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:19:term) and negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:19:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:22:employment with the AOI and is therefore considered to correspond to a negligible magnitude of change.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:22:a permanent and negligible impact.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:22:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:22:negligible magnitude of change. The receptor is considered to be of medium sensitivity by virtue of the fact
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:23:a permanent and negligible impact.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:23:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:26:is considered to be medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:26:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:26:impact is of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:26:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:27:be medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:27:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:27:considered to be medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:27:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:78:Deposition to the west and east of the disposal site is negligible, whilst to the south and north covers a
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf:1: lower sections of proposed quayside features, although the change in the view will be negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf:3:Significance of Effect Medium sensitivity x Low magnitude of effect = Minor negligible significance of effect. Minor Minor
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf:3: Effects will be permanent during the operation of the proposed quayside and its use in support of the renewable energy Negligible Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf:6: Effects will be permanent during the operation of the proposed quayside and its use in support of the renewable energy negligible negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf:7: Effects will be permanent during the operation of the proposed quayside and its use in support of the renewable energy negligible negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf:8: Significance of Effect Low sensitivity x Low medium magnitude of effect = Minor negligible significance of effect. Minor Minor
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf:8: Effects will be permanent during the operation of the proposed quayside and its use in support of the renewable energy Negligible Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf:9: Future baseline: development of the SIZ landside site and associated large scale buildings will have negligible effect on
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf:10: Significance of Effect Low sensitivity x Low magnitude of effect = Negligible significance of effect. Negligible Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf:11: sections of cranes and stored components, although have negligible beneficial effects to views of taller proposed
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf:12: Future baseline: development of the SIZ landside site and associated large scale buildings will have negligible effect on
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:3: MMO Scoping Opinion negligible and therefore not necessary to be assessed.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:9: Negligible Assets with no significant importance or archaeological/historical interest.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:9: Negligible The asset’s fabric and/or setting is changed in ways which do not materially affect its heritage significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:10: Significance High Medium Low Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:10: Low Moderate Minor Minor Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:10: Negligible Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:10: Negligible No material change to heritage significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:11:these from other non-significant (negligible) impacts as they may contribute to significant impacts
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:6: negligible. As there are no designated
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:7:Negligible Is generally tolerant of physical or chemical changes
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:9:temporary change, indiscernible • negligible change to existing risk of exposure; or
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:10: Moderate Minor Minor Negligible Negligible Minor Minor Moderate
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:10: Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Minor
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:10:(negligible) impacts as they may contribute to significant impacts cumulatively or through interactions.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:10:Negligible Very small changes in receptor condition (adverse or beneficial), which may be raised as local issues
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:12:the geological sensitivity is considered to be negligible. As there are no designated geological sites recorded
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:18:during construction is considered to be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:18:No mitigation measures are required and residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:20:overall impact during construction is considered to be of negligible to minor adverse significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:20:negligible to minor adverse significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:21:very low. Thus, the impact to human receptors is of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:21:No additional mitigation measures required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:22:very low and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:25:Both had a peak count of two, which represents a negligible proportion of the SPA / Ramsar site populations.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:27:would have a negligible impact on benthic prey species in the intertidal zone so consequent effects on
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:29:of the effects of capital dredging and therefore a negligible impact is predicted on the waterbirds relying on
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:29:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:32:minor adverse. A residual impact of negligible significance is predicted at the other sensitive intertidal
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:35:and localised disturbance to feeding resources will result in an impact of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:35:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:36:negligible, and any exceedances of the thresholds stated in Cutts et al. (2009) or Wright et al. (2010) would
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:36:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:36:negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:36:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:36:be negligible, therefore any effects on waterbirds and foraging terns would manifest as a direct behavioural
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:37:on foraging / roosting waterbirds and terns is predicted to be negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:37:While impacts are anticipated to be negligible, the implication of best practice mitigation measures set out
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:37:water) will further reduce the impact on foraging / roosting waterbirds. The residual impact is negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:37:negligible impact on intertidal benthos (see Section 9.6.2) and would not adversely affect the availability of
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:37:result of hydrodynamic changes would be negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:37:No mitigation measures are considered necessary, therefore the residual impact is negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:1:long period prior to this the enhancement is so small in magnitude and spatial extent as to be negligible in
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:2:deposition is predicted to be negligible beyond the boundaries of the Tees Bay C disposal site.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:2:that there would be negligible impact on fish or fisheries due to the proposed deposition of dredged material
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:2:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual impact of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:5:negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:5:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:7:operations). Overall, the potential impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:7:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:8: Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:8: 0.000003 minke whale Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:8: during offshore 0.00004 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:8: 0.0000003 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:9:dredged sediments is negligible / very low for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal,
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:9:negligible (Table 26.5).
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:9: Harbour Negligible / Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:9: TTS or fleeing Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:9: underwater Negligible / Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:9: Minke whale Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:9: offshore Negligible / required. Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:9: disposal of Grey seal Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:9: sediments Negligible / Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:9: Harbour seal Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:9:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:10: Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:10: Potential Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:10: of dredged 0.002 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:10: Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:10:of negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, the impact significance for any
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:10:assessed as negligible (not significant) for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:10: Harbour Negligible /
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:10: Low Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:10: increased Minke Negligible / Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:10: vessels during required, other than Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:10: offshore disposal Negligible / Negligible good practice.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:10: sediments Harbour Negligible / Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:10:would be of negligible significance for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:11:The magnitude of the impact of vessel disturbance to seal haul-out sites is defined as negligible / very low
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:11:This gives an overall impact significance of negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:11:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:11:relied upon solely. Therefore, any increases in suspended sediments will have a negligible impact on
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:11:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:12: Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:12: Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:12: offshore disposal 0.04 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:12: Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:12:Taking into account the low receptor sensitivity, the negligible potential magnitude of the impact and the
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:12:negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal (Table 26.9).
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:12: Harbour Negligible /
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:12: Low Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:12: Changes to prey Minke Negligible / Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:12: Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:12: offshore disposal Negligible / Negligible required.
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:12: Harbour Negligible / Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0685-ESM/R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:12:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.pdf:11: to a common list of criteria, including: Substantial, Moderate, Minor, Negligible or Neutral.
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.pdf:15: Negligible Less than 1.0
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:9: reduced to negligible and therefore non-significant levels.
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19:E3.40 If the impact descriptor is Negligible or Slight (Minor), this is considered to not have a
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: Moderate, Minor and Negligible/Neutral and reference to these terms are included in the below
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: 75% or less of objective Negligible Negligible Slight (Minor) Moderate
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: 76-94% of objective Negligible Slight (Minor) Moderate Moderate
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: Note: Changes in pollutant concentrations of 0% i.e. <0.5% would be described as Negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: <10% of hourly mean NO2 threshold Imperceptible Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:20: significant effect and a ‘Negligible’ or ‘Slight’ (Minor) impact will not result in a significant
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:20: such as those above. In this Chapter, where Negligible impacts are identified, a type of effect will
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:20: or Negligible effect is likely to be felt.
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:31: Negligible impact at all existing receptor locations and is considered to be Not Significant.
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:31: Cleveland Coast SPA) included in this assessment were also found to experience a Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:31: Negligible impact at all existing receptor locations and is considered to be Not Significant.
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:31: Cleveland Coast SPA) included in this assessment were also found to experience a Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:32: Negligible impact at all existing receptor locations and is considered to be Not Significant.
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:32: Cleveland Coast SPA) included in this assessment were also found to experience a Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:32:E5.26 The magnitude of change for NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations is negligible at all receptors.
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:32: As stated in paragraph E3.44, where the impact is Negligible or Slight (Minor) then the overall
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:34:E7.2 The assessment has demonstrated that the effects will be Negligible and therefore Not
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:34: effects will be Negligible and Not Significant) for all receptors.
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:35: practice mitigation measures suitable for high risk sites in place, there is likely to be a Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:35:E8.6 The magnitude of change for NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations at all receptors is Negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:35: All sensitive Operational traffic impact Negligible and Not None. Negligible and
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:11: a Negligible (and Not Significant) effect on pedestrian and cycle amenity at the A174 / Greystone
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:13: through the modelling process is predicted to be Negligible at all receptors. The overall effect of
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:15: potential effects on the surface water and groundwater receptors, are considered to be Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:15: These impacts are considered to be Negligible to Minor Adverse and Not Significant for all
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:15: groundwater through reduced infiltration (Negligible Adverse impacts) and pollution from
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:15: (Negligible Beneficial impacts) which are considered to be Not Significant.
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:15: residual effects: for groundwater, the impacts on flows would remain Negligible Adverse and the
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:15: Negligible Beneficial which would be Not Significant.
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:17: impact on construction workers and a Negligible effect on off site human health receptors. Both
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:17: would be a Negligible impact (Not Significant) on environmental receptors with the
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:17: Landfill site and this is considered to have a Negligible (but Not Significant) effect on waste
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:17:8.18 The implementation of these measures will result in Minor Adverse or Negligible (and Not
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:21:11.7 During construction there will be a Negligible and Not Significant impact upon all Landscape
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:21: (Eston Hills). All other Viewpoints will be subject to a Negligible and Not Significant impact
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:21: effects ranging from Negligible to Minor Adverse/Minor Beneficial. There will be a Moderate
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:21: considered to be Not Significant, with effects ranging from Negligible to Minor Adverse.
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:23: a result the impact is expected to be Negligible and Not Significant on remaining regional
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:23: hardstanding areas it is anticipated that this will also have a Negligible impact on the availability
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:23: anticipated that the impacts are expected to be Negligible and Not Significant.
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:25: of the ES can be secured and that the effects are negligible or can be kept to an absolute
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.pdf:22: operation would be Negligible and Not Significant.
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.pdf:22: contamination with this tertiary mitigation in place, would be Negligible and Not
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.pdf:22: Local significance; and nesting birds, which are of negligible significance even at a
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.pdf:30: 10 Neutral/negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:10: • Negligible – effects which are unlikely to be perceptible to drivers, bus passengers or those
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:10: • Negligible – effects which are unlikely to be perceptible and within the normal variation of
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:20: there is therefore considered to be a Negligible effect in severance. This is considered to be Not
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:21: Road Dock Road north of the access and therefore Negligible Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:21: of Tees Negligible Minor
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:21: Negligible Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:21: Negligible Minor
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:21: • Tees Dock Road has a Negligible adverse effect as vehicles will access Lackenby via an
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:21: • A66 west of Tees Dock Road has a change in HGV flow that is considered negligible,
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:22: considered to be Negligible. This is considered to be Not Significant in EIA terms.
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:22: be Negligible. This is considered to be Not Significant.
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:22: safety is expected to be Negligible. This is considered to be Not Significant.
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:25: A174 / Minor adverse A series of footbridges are already provided over Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:27: A174 / Minor adverse Potential accidents Travel Planning measures Negligible – travel
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:18: R1 19.2 19.4 19.6 0.2 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:18: R2 18.0 18.2 18.4 0.2 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:18: R3 17.9 18.2 18.7 0.5 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:18: R4 18.1 18.4 18.9 0.5 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:18: R5 18.0 18.3 18.7 0.4 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:18: R6 15.7 16.0 16.1 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:18: R7 15.3 15.5 15.6 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:18: R8 14.6 14.9 14.9 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:18: R9 15.6 16.1 16.1 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:18: R10 16.2 16.8 17.0 0.2 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:18: R11 14.4 14.7 14.8 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:18: R12 14.4 14.8 14.9 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:18: R13 15.8 16.4 16.5 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:18: R14 15.4 16.0 16.1 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:18: R15 31.4 31.7 31.7 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:18: R16 35.1 35.5 35.6 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:18: R17 31.1 31.4 31.5 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:18: R18 36.1 36.5 36.6 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:18: R19 27.8 28.1 28.2 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:18: R20 27.8 28.1 28.2 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:18: R21 25.8 26.1 26.1 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:18: R22 23.7 23.8 23.9 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:18: R23 22.7 22.8 22.9 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:18: R24 15.5 15.6 15.8 0.2 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:18: R25 15.4 15.6 15.7 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:18: R26 15.2 15.4 15.5 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:18: R27 16.1 16.2 16.5 0.3 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:18: R28 15.4 15.5 15.5 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:18: E1 18.7 18.7 18.7 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:18: E2 18.6 18.6 18.6 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: R1 12.1 12.1 12.1 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: R2 12.4 12.5 12.5 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: R3 12.1 12.2 12.2 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: R4 12.1 12.2 12.3 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: R5 12.1 12.2 12.3 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: R6 11.9 12.0 12.0 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: R7 11.8 11.9 11.9 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: R8 13.5 13.5 13.5 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: R9 13.7 13.8 13.8 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: R10 12.2 12.3 12.4 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: R11 12.1 12.1 12.2 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: R12 12.1 12.2 12.2 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: R13 12.3 12.4 12.4 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: R14 12.3 12.3 12.4 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: R15 16.4 16.5 16.5 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: R16 17.5 17.6 17.6 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: R17 16.5 16.6 16.6 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: R18 17.7 17.9 17.9 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: R19 13.9 13.9 14.0 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: R20 13.9 13.9 14.0 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: R21 13.4 13.5 13.5 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: R22 13.1 13.2 13.2 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: R23 12.7 12.8 12.8 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: R24 11.5 11.5 11.5 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: R25 11.4 11.5 11.5 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: R26 11.4 11.4 11.4 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: R27 11.6 11.6 11.6 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: R28 11.9 11.9 11.9 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: E1 10.6 10.6 10.6 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: E2 10.6 10.6 10.6 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:20: R1 7.9 7.9 7.9 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:20: R2 8.1 8.1 8.1 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:20: R3 7.8 7.8 7.9 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:20: R4 7.8 7.9 7.9 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:20: R5 7.9 7.9 7.9 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:20: R6 7.7 7.7 7.8 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:20: R7 7.7 7.7 7.7 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:20: R8 8.0 8.1 8.1 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:20: R9 8.1 8.2 8.2 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:20: R10 7.7 7.7 7.8 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:20: R11 7.6 7.6 7.7 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:20: R12 7.6 7.7 7.7 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:20: R13 7.7 7.8 7.8 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:20: R14 7.7 7.8 7.8 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:20: R15 10.1 10.2 10.2 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:20: R16 11.1 11.2 11.2 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:20: R17 10.2 10.3 10.3 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:20: R18 11.2 11.3 11.3 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:20: R19 8.9 9.0 9.0 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:20: R20 8.9 9.0 9.0 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:20: R21 8.6 8.7 8.7 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:20: R22 8.4 8.4 8.4 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:20: R23 8.2 8.2 8.3 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:20: R24 7.5 7.6 7.6 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:20: R25 7.5 7.5 7.6 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:20: R26 7.5 7.5 7.5 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:20: R27 7.6 7.6 7.6 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:20: R28 7.5 7.5 7.5 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:20: E1 7.1 7.1 7.1 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:20: E2 7.1 7.1 7.1 < 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:77: drift of the glacio-lacustrine laminated clays as a “Non Aquifer” of “negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:200: as being negligible to low.
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:244:Oil and fuel Lubricating oils, Site Users Direct contact, Health hazard Unlikely Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:244: Mild migration. Negligible evidenc e of contamination detected in soil,
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:245: G r o u n d w a t er (drift Migration via Pollution of Unlikely Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:265:Ground Conditions assessed as being negligible to low.
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:268: Groundwater Low Aquifer of negligible resource
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:1596:is considered to be negligible and has not been considered further.
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:1893:133 17.6 Ground dissolution of soluble rocks Negligible (within 50m)
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:1963: 2 On site Unproductive These are rock layers or drift deposits with low permeability that have negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:1964: 3 134m W Unproductive These are rock layers or drift deposits with low permeability that have negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:1981: Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:2013: Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:2014: Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:2014: On site Negligible Running sand conditions are not thought to occur whatever the position of the water table. No
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:2016: Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:2018: Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:2018: On site Negligible Deposits with potential to collapse when loaded and saturated are believed not to be present.
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:2019: Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:2020: Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:2020: On site Negligible Soluble rocks are either not thought to be present within the ground, or not prone to dissolution.
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby EcIA Rev A.pdf:13:8.9 There is a negligible amount of suitable habitat for bats on the proposed development site though
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby EcIA Rev A.pdf:13:8.10 The buildings on the site are of negligible roosting potential for bats as they are either metal or
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby EcIA Rev A.pdf:14:8.14 The amount of suitable habitat for Hedgehog on the site is negligible therefore Hedgehog is
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby EcIA Rev A.pdf:14:Grayling therefore the site is assessed as being of negligible importance for this species.
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby EcIA Rev A.pdf:14:each assessed as being of negligible importance.
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby EcIA Rev A.pdf:15:9.5 With the embedded mitigation in place the residual effects that are of greater than negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:14: Negligible The size and scale of change are considered very small due to the extent and
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:19: Negligible The proposed development is barely discernible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:20: Neutral / Negligible Maintain the character of the receiving landscape.
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:21: Neutral / Negligible The proposed development would cause no discernible deterioration or
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:21: improvement in a view. In most instances, a negligible effect will arise
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:21: experience a negligible magnitude of change.
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:22: in EIA terms. Those classified as Minor or Negligible are likely to be Not Significant in EIA
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:23: Change Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:39: whereas effects on all other Viewpoints are considered to be Negligible and Not Significant.
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:39:J5.8 The above aspects of the construction phase will have a Negligible effect on all LCZs due to the
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:39: Negligible and Not Significant to a temporary, Moderate Adverse and Significant effect
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:39: All LCZs Negligible - Direct and short- None
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:40: VP 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, Negligible - Direct and short- Installation of
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:41: character of the LCZ. The magnitude of change is therefore considered to be Negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:41:J5.24 Combining all of these criteria, it is considered that there will be a Negligible level of effect,
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:42: LCZ 3 – Intertidal Medium Negligible Negligible Indirect,
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:42: The magnitude of change is therefore considered to be Negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:42:J5.29 Combining all of these criteria, it is considered that there will be a Negligible level of effect,
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:42: LCZ 4 – Coast and Medium Negligible Negligible Indirect, Permanent
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:42: The magnitude of change is therefore considered to be Negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:42:J5.34 Combining all of these criteria, it is considered that there will be a Negligible level of effect,
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:44: LCZ 5 – Coatham Medium-High Negligible Negligible Indirect, Permanent
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:44: vicinity of the LCZ. The magnitude of change is therefore considered to be Negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:45:J5.44 Combining all of these criteria, it is considered that there will be a Negligible level of effect,
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:45: LCZ 7 – Saltholme Medium-High Negligible Negligible Indirect, Permanent
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:45: vicinity of the LCZ. The magnitude of change is therefore considered to be Negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:45:J5.48 Combining all of these criteria, it is considered that there will be a Negligible level of effect,
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:45: LCZ 8 – Rural Medium Negligible Negligible Indirect, Permanent
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:50: VP6 Footpath Users Negligible Negligible Direct,
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:50: VP8 Low Negligible Negligible Direct,
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:53: VP6 Footpath Users Negligible Negligible Direct, Permanent
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:53: VP8 Low Negligible Negligible Direct, Permanent
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:55:J7.2 Construction of the proposed development will result in effects ranging from Negligible to a
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:55: LCZ 3 – Intertidal Medium Negligible Negligible - Not Indirect, Permanent
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:55: LCZ 4 – Coast and Medium Negligible Negligible – Indirect, Permanent
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:55: LCZ 5 – Coatham Medium-High Negligible Negligible - Indirect, Permanent
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:55: LCZ 7 – Saltholme Medium-High Negligible Negligible – Indirect, Permanent
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:55: LCZ 8 – Rural Medium Negligible Negligible – Indirect, Permanent
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:56: VP6 Footpath Users Negligible Negligible Direct, Permanent
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:56: VP8 Low Negligible Negligible Direct, Permanent
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:57: and operation All other effects are anticipated to be Minor or Negligible (and Not Significant).
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:57: All LCZ Impact of Negligible – Not Significant None Negligible -
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:57: VP 2, 3, 4, 5, Impact of Negligible - Not Significant Installation of site Negligible -
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:58: LCZ 3 – Impact of Negligible - Not Significant Buildings to be Negligible -
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:58: LCZ 4 – Impact of Negligible – Buildings to be Negligible –
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:58: LCZ 5 – Impact of Negligible - Buildings to be Negligible -
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:59: LCZ 7 – Impact of Negligible – Buildings to be Negligible –
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:59: LCZ 8 – Impact of Negligible – Buildings to be Negligible –
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:40: there will be negligible beneficial effects for the River Tees estuary during construction and
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:42: negligible effect on receptors from the dust-generating activities onsite.
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:42: through the modelling process was predicted to be negligible at all receptors. The overall effect
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:44: negligible and not significant.
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:47: Tees Dock Road roundabout. All other effects will be reduced to minor or negligible and not
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:49: groundwater, the built environment and landscape will all be of minor adverse / negligible
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:52: all considered to result in a negligible impact on regional landfill capacity. In this respect there
Planning/R-2020-0820-ESM/R-2020-0820-ESM-MGE04280 Nuisance 0820.pdf:2:concentrations at all receptors is Negligible and that the overall effect of the
Planning/R-2020-0800-CD/R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:77:• Negligible – No effect on species or habitats present are anticipated.
Planning/R-2021-0166-FFM/R-2021-0166-FFM-Archaeology - DBA.pdf:6: • Negligible – areas of extremely limited or no archaeological or historic interest. These
Planning/R-2021-0166-FFM/R-2021-0166-FFM-Archaeology - DBA.pdf:10:6.2.2 The South Steel Works was a later addition to the Cleveland Iron & Steel Works and is of negligible
Planning/R-2021-0166-FFM/R-2021-0166-FFM-Archaeology - DBA.pdf:10:7.1.2 The South Steel Works, repurposed as the Torpedo Ladle Workshop, is of negligible archaeological
Planning/R-2021-0166-FFM/R-2021-0166-FFM-Ecological Assessment.pdf:12:7.9 There are no roost sites and only a negligible amount of suitable foraging habitat for bats on the
Planning/R-2021-0166-FFM/R-2021-0166-FFM-Ecological Assessment.pdf:12:site therefore impacts on bats are assessed as being negligible.
Planning/R-2021-0166-FFM/R-2021-0166-FFM-Ecological Assessment.pdf:12:7.12 The amount of suitable habitat for Hedgehog on the site is negligible therefore impacts on
Planning/R-2021-0166-FFM/R-2021-0166-FFM-Ecological Assessment.pdf:12:Hedgehog are considered to be negligible.
Planning/R-2021-0166-FFM/R-2021-0166-FFM-Ecological Assessment.pdf:12:Brown Hare are considered to be negligible
Planning/R-2021-0166-FFM/R-2021-0166-FFM-Ecological Assessment.pdf:12:the site. Nevertheless the site is considered to be of negligible importance for Common Toad.
Planning/R-2021-0166-FFM/R-2021-0166-FFM-Ecological Assessment.pdf:13:habitats. The only species for which this has the potential to be other than a negligible effect are
Planning/R-2021-0166-FFM/R-2021-0166-FFM-Ecological Assessment.pdf:14:negligible significance are:
Planning/R-2021-0166-FFM/R-2021-0166-FFM-Ecological Assessment.pdf:15:11.3 The only Valued Ecological Receptors which are other than of negligible value are Dingy Skipper
Planning/R-2021-0166-FFM/R-2021-0166-FFM-Geotechnical Risk Assessment .pdf:13:is considered to be negligible and has not been considered further.
Planning/R-2021-0166-FFM/R-2021-0166-FFM-Officer Report 0166.pdf:9:There are no roost sites and only a negligible amount of suitable foraging
Planning/R-2021-0166-FFM/R-2021-0166-FFM-Officer Report 0166.pdf:9:negligible.
Planning/R-2021-0166-FFM/R-2021-0166-FFM-Officer Report 0166.pdf:9:negligible
Planning/R-2021-0166-FFM/R-2021-0166-FFM-Officer Report 0166.pdf:9:The amount of suitable habitat for Hedgehog on the site is negligible therefore
Planning/R-2021-0166-FFM/R-2021-0166-FFM-Officer Report 0166.pdf:9:impacts on Hedgehog are considered to be negligible.
Planning/R-2021-0166-FFM/R-2021-0166-FFM-Officer Report 0166.pdf:10:the site is considered to be of negligible importance for Common Toad.
Planning/R-2021-0166-FFM/R-2021-0166-FFM-Officer Report 0166.pdf:10:The only Valued Ecological Receptors which are other than of negligible value
Planning/R-2021-0924-CD/R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:16: demonstrate that there will be a negligible impact on those aspects of the
Planning/R-2021-0100-CD/b/10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0088-01-Prairie_Risk Assessment.pdf:15: Deposits have negligible significance for water supply or river base flow. Based on
Planning/R-2021-0100-CD/b/STDC_HWY-ATK-HGT-PR-RP-CE-000001_C01.pdf:47: 1 to 4 Negligible Could be ignored
Planning/R-2021-0100-CD/R-2021-0100-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0088-01-Prairie_Risk Assessment.pdf:15: Deposits have negligible significance for water supply or river base flow. Based on
Planning/R-2021-0100-CD/R-2021-0100-CD-STDC_HWY-ATK-HGT-PR-RP-CE-000001_C01.pdf:47: 1 to 4 Negligible Could be ignored
Planning/R-2021-0465-FFM/R-2021-0465-FFM-LM Wind - Transport Briefing Note_09-06-2021.pdf:1:highway network is expected to be negligible as much of the additional area is for open space,
Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:38: considered to be of Local importance with the non-breeding bird assemblage of negligible
Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:45: risk sites in place, there is likely to be a negligible effect on receptors from the dust-generating
Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:45: through the modelling process was predicted to be negligible at all receptors. The overall effect
Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:47: negligible and not significant.
Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:50: Eston Road junction. All other effects will be reduced to minor or negligible and not significant.
Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:53: groundwater, the built environment and landscape will all be of minor adverse / negligible
Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:56: development are all considered to result in a negligible impact on regional landfill capacity.
Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:12: be Negligible and Not Significant. This will primarily comprise remediation of Non Aqueous
Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:12: construction and therefore the risk to the occupiers would be Negligible and Not
Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:13: safely, therefore the risk from new contamination would be Negligible and Not Significant.
Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:14: Commercial areas within >250 m of negligible nature conservation
Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:14: Ecological and water features deemed to be Negligible potential for mineral reserves to exist
Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:14: of negligible value
Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:15:Negligible Human Health: No measurable effects on humans Impact of insufficient magnitude to
Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:16: Sensitivity/value of High Medium Low Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:16: High Substantial Moderate Minor Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:16: Medium Moderate Minor Negligible Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:16: Low Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:28: unit has low permeability with negligible significance for water suppl y or base river flow. The
Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:33: concentrations were 1.3% v/v and 4.9% v/v. respectively, with flow rates negligible to low during
Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:38: significance is considered Negligible and therefore Not Significant.
Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:43: magnitude of impact following mitigation identifie d in Section H6.0 is negligible. There are
Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:43: likely to be impacts of Minor Adverse significance for construction workers and Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:43: following mitigation identified in Section H6.0 is negligible. Therefore , the impacts after the
Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:43: implementation of mitigation measures are considered to be of Negligible significance. This is
Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:43: facilities during the construction phase is considered to be of Negligible significance. This is
Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:44: significance of the impacts identified is considered to be Minor Adverse / Negligible and Not
Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:12: perceptible increase in traffic on two routes is identified to result in Negligible to Minor Adverse
Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:15: through the modelling process is predicted to be Negligible at all receptors. The overall effect of
Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:17: surface water and groundwater receptors, are considered to be Negligible Adverse and,
Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:17: These impacts are considered to be Negligible Adverse and Not Significant. There is also the
Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:17: groundwater arising from existing Made Ground (Negligible Beneficial impacts) which are
Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:17: considered to be Negligible Beneficial which would be Not Significant.
Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:19: workers and a Negligible effect on off site human health receptors. These are considered Not
Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:19:9.12 A Negligible and Not Significant effect on surface water and groundwater is considered likely
Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:19: and this is considered to have a Negligible (but Not Significant) effect on waste management
Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:19:H1.4 The implementation of these measures will result in Minor Adverse or Negligible (and Not
Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:23:12.7 During construction there will be a Negligible and Not Significant impact upon all Landscape
Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:23: (Eston Hills). All other Viewpoints will be subject to a Negligible and Not Significant impact
Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:23: effects ranging from Negligible to Minor Adverse/Minor Beneficial. There will be a Moderate
Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:23: considered to be Not Significant, with effects ranging from Negligible to Minor Adverse.
Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:25: Eston Iron Works remains and Cleveland Steel Works blast furnace bases and a Negligible effect
Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:25:13.10 The implementation of these measures will result in Minor Adverse or Negligible (and Not
Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:26: a result the impact is expected to be Negligible and Not Significant on remaining regional
Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:26: hardstanding areas it is anticipated that this will also have a Negligible impact on the availability
Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:26: anticipated that the impacts are expected to be Negligible and Not Significant.
Planning/R-2020-0819-ESM/R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:28: of the ES can be secured and that the effects are negligible or can be kept to an absolute
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 7.2 Ecology PEA.pdf:8: Negligible Negligible habitat features on site not likely to be Negligible habitat features on site not likely to be
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:18: significance of any effect is considered to be negligible. All other levels of significance will apply to
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:29: follows: International > National > County > District > Local > Site > Negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:36: development is likely to be negligible. AADT are predicted to be just under 100 movements per
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:38: development is likely to be negligible. A significant noise impact as a result of an increase in traffic
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-SEC8563 Redcar EfW Outfall Pipe Phase 1 Note_Final_20.10.29(1).pdf:10:construction and operational phases is assessed to be neutral/negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 11.3 - Detailed Construction Phase Dust Assessment Methodology.pdf:8: level of mitigation that should be applied. For those cases where the risk category is ‘negligible’,
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 11.3 - Detailed Construction Phase Dust Assessment Methodology.pdf:8: Low Medium Risk Low Risk Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 11.3 - Detailed Construction Phase Dust Assessment Methodology.pdf:8: Low Low Risk Low Risk Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 11.3 - Detailed Construction Phase Dust Assessment Methodology.pdf:9: Low Low Risk Low Risk Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 11.3 - Detailed Construction Phase Dust Assessment Methodology.pdf:9: Medium Medium Risk Low Risk Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 11.3 - Detailed Construction Phase Dust Assessment Methodology.pdf:9: Low Low Risk Low Risk Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 11 Air Quality.pdf:9: • Negligible: no effects or those that pose a very small risk in comparison to normal risks in
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 11 Air Quality.pdf:17: causing negligible effects.
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 11 Air Quality.pdf:23: Dust Soiling Negligible Low Low Low
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 11 Air Quality.pdf:23: Human Health Negligible Low Low Low
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 11 Air Quality.pdf:31: pollutants considered would be of “negligible” significance.
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 11 Air Quality.pdf:33: within 350 m of the Medium-term Risk - Medium Negligible Not significant
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 11 Air Quality.pdf:33: km by 6 km with 60 Long-term Small Negligible Not significant
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 11 Air Quality.pdf:33: Medium Dust Long-term Small Negligible Not significant
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 10.1 Transport Assessment.pdf:27: are in the order of less than 1% and up to a maximum of 1.64%. These increases are negligible
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 10.1 Transport Assessment.pdf:29: are negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 10.1 Transport Assessment.pdf:29:7.5.2 The link assessments set out in this section demonstrate that the impacts of REC are negligible
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 10.1 Transport Assessment.pdf:30: increases are negligible, and within expected day-to-day variances in traffic flow. It is therefore
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 10.1 Transport Assessment.pdf:30: concluded that the impact of the REC on the local highway network would be negligible, and would
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 10.1 Transport Assessment.pdf:44: cs traffic would be negligible and a detailed assessment of the
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-411 nuisance.pdf:1:construction and operational phases of the REC, would very likely be negligible and
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf:7: phases of the REC, would very likely be negligible and effectively result in no change to the
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf:8: negligible and that for a potentially significant, moderate adverse effect to result (medium
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf:9: Negligible All other areas such as those used primarily for industrial or agricultural purposes.
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf:10: Negligible No disturbance <502 Regular / Steady State
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf:11: Negligible <3.0
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf:11: No Change Negligible Low Medium High
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf:11: Negligible or Negligible or Page 12-11
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf:11: Negligible None Negligible Minor
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf:11: Negligible or Negligible or Minor or
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf:11: Negligible or Moderate or
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf:14: with impact and CFA piling would be of low and negligible magnitude respectively, with the
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf:16: with would be of a negligible magnitude.
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf:16:12.5.12 Overall, it is predicted that a negligible impact on high sensitivity receptors would result in a minor
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf:17: would be negligible in comparison.
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf:19: negligible). Furthermore, during the breeding season the sensitivity of the SPA and Ramsar site is
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf:20:12.9.6 Predictions have shown that noise from operation of the REC would result in, at worst, a negligible
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf:20:12.2 A negligible impact on the high sensitivity receptor would result in a minor adverse effect, which is
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf:20:12.3 Operational road traffic movements on the public highway are negligible compared to baseline and
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf:21: Teesmouth and High Disturbance from the - Negligible Minor adverse Not significant
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:3: the changes in traffic resulting from REC would have negligible effects and there is no requirement
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:6: Negligible Receptors with low sensitivity to traffic flows and those sufficiently distant from
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:6: Negligible Very minor loss of capability for movement along and across transport corridors, very
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:7: Negligible Low Medium High
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:7: Negligible Negligible Negligible or minor Negligible or minor Minor
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:7: Low Negligible or minor Negligible or minor Minor Minor or moderate
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:7: Medium Negligible or minor Minor Moderate Moderate or major
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:10: A1053 between A66 and A174 Negligible Strategic Road Network subject to
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:11: A174 between the A1053 and A171 Negligible Strategic Road Network
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:11: medium, low or negligible sensitivity are deemed as not being sensitive, in accordance with the
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:14:10.5.4 In accordance with the IEMA guidelines the sensitivity of receptors are considered to be negligible,
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:14: delay, pedestrian amenity, accidents and safety and hazardous loads is deemed to be negligible,
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:14: continuously and fully reversible. On that basis, the level of effect would be negligible adverse,
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:17: between the A1085 and A174 junctions are considered to be negligible and the magnitude of
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:17: safety and hazardous loads is deemed to be negligible, of long-term duration, temporary in the
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:17: is predicted to be negligible, which is not significant in EIA terms.
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:17: accidents and safety and hazardous loads is deemed to be negligible, of long term duration,
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:17: reversible. The level of effect is predicted to be negligible, which is not significant in EIA terms.
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:18: accidents and safety and hazardous loads is deemed to be negligible, of long term duration,
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:18: The level of effect is predicted to be of negligible, which is not significant in EIA terms.
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:18: by climate change and neither would their assessment of sensitivity (i.e. negligible, low, medium or
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:20:10.8.8 The sensitivities of receptors have been identified as low or negligible and the magnitudes of
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:20: impacts have been identified to be negligible. No significant environmental effects are predicted.
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:21: Low pedestrian amenity, routeing of Negligible Negligible Not significant
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:21: A1085 Trunk Road Low pedestrian amenity, routeing of Negligible Negligible Not significant
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:21: Negligible pedestrian amenity, routeing of Negligible Negligible Not significant
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:21: Low pedestrian amenity, routeing of Negligible Negligible Not significant
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:21: Medium pedestrian amenity, routeing of Negligible Negligible Not significant
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:21: junction with Normanby Low pedestrian amenity, routeing of Negligible Negligible Not significant
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:22: Negligible pedestrian amenity, routeing of Negligible Negligible Not significant
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:22: Trunk Road and Waveney Low pedestrian amenity, routeing of Negligible Negligible Not significant
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:22: between A1042 and Low pedestrian amenity, routeing of Negligible Negligible Not significant
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:22: Low pedestrian amenity, Negligible Negligible Not significant
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:22: A1085 Trunk Road Low pedestrian amenity, Negligible Negligible Not significant
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:22: Negligible pedestrian amenity, Negligible Negligible Not significant
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:22: Low pedestrian delay, Negligible Negligible Not significant
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:23: Medium pedestrian amenity, Negligible Negligible Not significant
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:23: junction with Normanby Low pedestrian amenity, Negligible Negligible Not significant
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:23: Negligible pedestrian amenity, Negligible Negligible Not significant
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:23: Trunk Road and Waveney Low pedestrian amenity, Negligible Negligible Not significant
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:23: between A1042 and Low pedestrian amenity, Negligible Negligible Not significant
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:4: is classified on a five-point scale (negligible, low, medium, high and very high) as set out in Tables
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:5: (negligible, low, medium, high and very high) as set out in Table 6.2 below. Table 6.3 also sets out
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:5: Negligible Absence of positive landscape characteristics. Undesignated countryside and
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:6: Negligible Views from within and of undesignated Observers in vehicles or people
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:6:6.2.25 Magnitude of impact has been classified on a five-point scale (no change, negligible, low, medium,
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:7: Negligible Very minor loss or addition of or alteration Very slight change in baseline i.e., pre-
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:8: No Change Negligible Low Medium High
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:8: Negligible No change Negligible Negligible or Negligible or Minor
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:8: Low No change Negligible or Negligible or Minor Minor or
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:8: Medium No change Negligible or Minor Moderate Moderate or
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:8: the six-point scale shown in the above matrix (substantial, major, moderate, minor, negligible or no
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:8: Negligible Where proposed changes would have an Where proposed changes would have a
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:19: sensitivity of the Application Site itself is considered to be Negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:20: 1 km and features and visual receptors could experience medium/low to negligible
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:20: 5 km landscape and visual receptors would tend to experience a low to negligible or
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:28: landscape characteristics and is considered to have negligible sensitivity to the change arising
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:28: Tract, which is considered to be of negligible sensitivity to this type of development, resulting in a
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:28: negligible adverse significance of effect during construction. Proposed changes would have an
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:29: development, resulting in a negligible magnitude of impact and a negligible adverse significance
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:29: The temporary construction activities would cause a negligible magnitude of impact and no more
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:29: than a negligible adverse significance of effect upon the Tees Lowlands NCA.
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:31: landscape characteristics and is considered to have negligible sensitivity to the type of
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:31: new landscape, the magnitude of impact would be low and an overall negligible adverse during
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:31: character would remain as negligible adverse.
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:31: being considered to be of negligible sensitivity to the type and scale of development where is it
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:32: considered that the proposed development would cause a negligible magnitude of impact to the
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:32: character of Redcar Industrial Townscape Tract, resulting in a negligible adverse significance
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:32:6.6.15 Overall there would be the potential for negligible / negligible to no change magnitude of impact
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:32: a negligible adverse / no change significance of effect.
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:32: inherent characteristics of this NCA. There would be a negligible magnitude of impact to the
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:32: character area. Therefore, there would be no more than a negligible adverse significance of
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:32: (see Figure 6.9) by summer year 15, but the overall significance would remain at negligible
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:35: There would be a negligible magnitude of impact and a negligible adverse significance of effect
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:35: There would be a Negligible magnitude of impact and a negligible adverse significance of effect
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:36: VP12 and VP13, there would be a negligible magnitude of impact due to the very slight change in
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:36: Overall, there would be a negligible magnitude of impact, resulting in a minor adverse
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:36: mostly unnoticed from these views from medium sensitivity receptors. There would be a negligible
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:36: magnitude of impact and a negligible adverse significance of effect at winter year 1 and summer
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:38: development has concluded an effect above negligible have been considered in the cumulative
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:45: Negligible Direct effects; demolition and Temporary Medium Minor Adverse Not Significant
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:45: Negligible Direct effects: as above but Temporary Low Negligible Adverse Not Significant
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:45: Medium Indirect effects: Addition of elements Temporary Negligible Negligible Adverse Not Significant
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:45: Redcar Flats Medium Indirect effects as preceding entry Temporary Negligible Negligible Adverse Not Significant
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:46: Eston Hills Landscape Medium Indirect effects as above Temporary Negligible Negligible Adverse Not Significant
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:46: East Billingham to Low Indirect effects as above Temporary Negligible Negligible Adverse Not Significant
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:46: Estuarine Landscape Low Indirect effects as above Temporary Negligible Negligible Adverse Not Significant
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:46: Coastal Fringe Indirect effects as above Temporary Negligible Negligible Adverse Not Significant
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:46: Large scale construction in an area Temporary Negligible Negligible Adverse Not Significant
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:46: Negligible Direct effects. Introduction of new Permanent Low Negligible Adverse. Not Significant
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:46: District Level Negligible Direct effects. Lesser in magnitude Permanent Negligible Negligible Adverse Not Significant
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:47: Redcar Residential Medium Indirect effects; No loss, alteration or Permanent Negligible to No Negligible Adverse Not Significant
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:47: Medium Indirect effects; very minor addition Permanent Negligible Negligible Adverse Not Significant
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:47: Eston Hills Landscape Medium Indirect effects; No loss, alteration or Permanent Negligible to No Negligible Adverse Not Significant
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:47: East Billingham to Low Indirect effects No loss, alteration or Permanent Negligible to No No Change Not Significant
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:47: Estuarine Landscape Low Indirect effects No loss, alteration or Permanent Negligible to No No Change Not Significant
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:47: Coastal Fringe Low Indirect effects No loss, alteration or Permanent Negligible to No No Change Not Significant
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:47: Medium Direct effects; large scale Permanent Negligible Negligible Adverse Not Significant
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:49: VP6: Medium Medium range, heavily filtered As above Negligible Negligible Adverse Not Significant Reducing to No
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:49: Negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:49: VP7: West Low As above Negligible Negligible Adverse Not Significant Greater vehicular
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:50: VP10: England High Long range, open view toward As above Negligible Minor Adverse Not Significant
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:50: VP11: Cowpen Medium As above Negligible Negligible Adverse Not Significant By Summer Year 15,
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:50: VP12: Eston Nab High Long range, elevated view from As above Negligible Minor Adverse Not Significant
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:50: VP13: Hartlepool Medium Long range, open view over sea. As above Negligible Negligible Adverse Not Significant
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf:7: Negligible Receptor is of negligible value with no contribution to local, regional or national
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf:8: Negligible Very minor loss or detrimental alteration to one or more characteristics, features or
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf:9: No Change Negligible Low Medium High
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf:9: Negligible No change Negligible Negligible or Negligible or Minor
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf:9: Low No change Negligible or Negligible or Minor Minor or
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf:9: Medium No change Negligible or Minor Moderate Moderate or
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf:9:8.2.29 The overall significance of an effect is expressed as negligible, minor, moderate, major or
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf:9: • Negligible: No effects or those that are beneath levels of perception, within normal bounds of
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf:22: therefore considered to be negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf:26: Alteration of surface water Designed in Negligible Minor Adverse Not significant
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf:27: Decommissioning Negligible Minor Adverse Not significant
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf:45: and the surrounding area is considered to have negligible potential for archaeological assets given
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf:74: any effects are expected to be negligible and temporary. At worst, this might cause the short-term
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf:76: effects on the townscape to be no more than negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf:76: surroundings are assessed to be negligible adverse during winter year 1 of the operation.
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf:76: character would remain as negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf:76: be negligible given the dominant industrial nature of this townscape being considered to be of
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf:76: negligible sensitivity to the type and scale of development where is it able to accommodate the
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf:78: there would be a negligible magnitude of impact due to the very slight change in baseline, whereby
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf:81: Application Site is considered to have only negligible potential for Prehistoric and Roman, Early
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf:83: 2.20%, and as such it concludes the increases are negligible, and within the day to variances
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf:84: • the link assessments confirm that the impacts of REC are negligible during the AM and PM
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf:87: during both the construction and operational phases of the REC, would very likely be negligible
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf:87: from the REC would be negligible in comparison.
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf:89: therefore considered to be negligible, and as such, the level of effect is assessed as minor
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf:92: negligible. Furthermore, the level of effect is considered to be minor adverse, which is not
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf:92: would be negligible to minor adverse, which is not significant.
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_Response to Anglo American_AS_S.pdf:2: conclude that the cumulative impact on the local highway network would be negligible and would not result in
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_Response to Anglo American_AS_S.pdf:5: development which have been demonstrated to be negligible and therefore acceptable.
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 13 - Other Environmental Effects.pdf:2: is considered to have negligible potential for additional archaeological assets.
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 13 - Other Environmental Effects.pdf:3: concluded that the sensitivities of receptors to traffic were considered to be low or negligible and
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 13 - Other Environmental Effects.pdf:3: the level of effects were predicted to be negligible adverse.
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 13 - Other Environmental Effects.pdf:3: resultant environmental concentrations of all pollutants considered would be of “negligible”
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 13 - Other Environmental Effects.pdf:3: Farm. Operational road traffic movements on the public highway are negligible compared to
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 4 - EIA Methodology.pdf:8: • Negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 4 - EIA Methodology.pdf:9: • Negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 4 - EIA Methodology.pdf:9: • Negligible: No effects or those that are beneath levels of perception, within normal bounds of
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 4 - EIA Methodology.pdf:9: No Change Negligible Low Medium High
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 4 - EIA Methodology.pdf:9: Negligible No change Negligible Negligible or Negligible or Minor Minor
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 4 - EIA Methodology.pdf:9: Low No change Negligible or Negligible or Minor Minor or
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 4 - EIA Methodology.pdf:10: No Change Negligible Low Medium High
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 4 - EIA Methodology.pdf:10: Medium No change Negligible or Minor Moderate Moderate or
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:9: negligible, minor, moderate or major. Effects could be either beneficial or adverse.;
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:10: Negligible Receptor has high capacity to accommodate physical or chemical changes or
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:11: Negligible Very minor loss or detrimental alteration to one or more characteristics, features or
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:11: described as negligible, minor, moderate or major. Effects are considered to be significant under
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:11:7.2.53 Negligible effects are those that are beneath levels of perception, within normal bounds of
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:12: No Change Negligible Low Medium High
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:12: Negligible No change Negligible Negligible or Negligible or Minor
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:12: Low No change Negligible or Negligible or Minor Minor or
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:12: Medium No change Negligible or Minor Moderate Moderate or
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:23: bulk materials such as coal scrapings. The land has negligible ecological value and the potential
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:24: negligible magnitude of impact on the high sensitivity Teesmouth and Cleveland SPA/Ramsar and
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:26: impact resulting from construction phase pollution is negligible on the high sensitivity Teesmouth
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:27: the magnitude of noise disturbance from the operational phase has a negligible magnitude on the
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:27:7.6.4 The magnitude of visual disturbance impacts during the operational phase is therefore negligible
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:29: Cleveland Coast SPA/Ramsar are negligible and the level of effect is predicted to be minor
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:30: Northern Gateway Container negligible in terms of noise and visual
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:33: Pollution Negligible Minor Adverse Not Significant
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:33: Not Required Negligible Minor Adverse Not Significant
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:33: Not Required Negligible Minor Adverse Not Significant
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:33: Not required Negligible Minor Adverse Not Significant
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:34: Disturbance non-breeding season for waterbirds when sensitivity Negligible Minor Adverse Not Significant
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:34: Pollution As for construction Negligible Minor Adverse Not Significant
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:6: Negligible Receptor is of negligible value with no contribution to • Unproductive strata.
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:7: Negligible Very minor loss or detrimental alteration to one Very minor temporary benefit to or
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:7: No Change Negligible Low Medium High
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:7: Negligible No change Negligible Negligible or Negligible or Minor
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:7: Low No change Negligible or Negligible or Minor Minor or
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:7: Medium No change Negligible or Minor Moderate Moderate or
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:8: • Negligible: No effects or those that are beneath levels of perception, within normal bounds of
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:12:9.3.28 Information provided by the BGS indicates that the Application Site is at very low or negligible risk
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:14: section 9.4, the magnitude of impact would be negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:15: of impact would be negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:15: CoCP to prevent surface water run-off, the magnitude of impact would be negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:17: basis, the magnitude of impact would be negligible, and the level of effect is considered to be
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:18: materials to migrate to groundwater. The magnitude of impact would be negligible, and the level of
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:18: effect is considered to be negligible, which is not significant.
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:18: contaminants. On this basis, the magnitude of impact would be negligible, and the level of effect is
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:21: extent; the magnitude of impact would be negligible to low and the significance of effects are
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:21: would be negligible to minor adverse, which is not significant.
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:23: CoCP, site Negligible Minor adverse Not significant
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:23: Mobilisation of CoCP, site Negligible Minor adverse Not significant
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:23: Direct damage to geology CoCP, site Negligible Minor adverse Not significant
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:24: Very High Dermal exposure, vapours Environmental permit Negligible Minor adverse Not significant
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:24: Aquifer) Low chemicals or waste water Negligible Negligible Not significant
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:24: Cleveland Coast High Negligible Minor adverse Not significant
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf:15: • Negligible: No effects or those that are beneath levels of perception, within normal bounds of
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf:16: Minor Adverse. There would also be direct effects of a Negligible Adverse significance upon the
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf:16: townscape indirectly effected, effects would range from Negligible to Adverse to No Change.
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf:16: vehicular traffic associated with the construction phase, resulting in a Negligible Adverse effect,
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf:21: would be negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf:21:5.5.7 The assessments have calculated the REC development to result in negligible increase in traffic
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf:21: been identified as low or negligible and the magnitudes of impacts have been identified to be
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf:21: generally negligible. No significant environmental effects are predicted.
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf:22: would be of “negligible” significance.
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf:22: to negligible). Furthermore, during the breeding season (May to August inclusive) the sensitivity of
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf:22: negligible compared to baseline and there would be no change in road traffic noise levels and as
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf:24: is considered to have negligible potential for additional archaeological assets.
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf:25: concluded that the sensitivities of receptors to traffic were considered to be low or negligible and
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf:25: the level of effects were predicted to be negligible adverse.
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf:25: resultant environmental concentrations of all pollutants considered would be of “negligible”
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf:25: Farm. Operational road traffic movements on the public highway are negligible compared to
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 13.1 Archaeological Desk Based Assessment - Formatted.pdf:2:to have negligible potential for additional archaeological assets.
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 13.1 Archaeological Desk Based Assessment - Formatted.pdf:11:4.5.3 The Application Site is considered to have negligible potential for Prehistoric and Roman period
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 13.1 Archaeological Desk Based Assessment - Formatted.pdf:12:4.6.3 The Application Site is considered to have negligible potential for further Early Medieval, Medieval
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 13.1 Archaeological Desk Based Assessment - Formatted.pdf:12: negligible potential for the presence of significant archaeological remains of any date.
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 13.1 Archaeological Desk Based Assessment - Formatted.pdf:14:5.3.2 The desk-based assessment above has established that the Application Site has a negligible
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 13.1 Archaeological Desk Based Assessment - Formatted.pdf:15: is considered to have negligible potential for additional archaeological assets.
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf:16:2.7.1 Information provided by the BGS indicates that the Application Site is at very low or negligible risk
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf:50:99 17.4 Collapsible deposits Negligible (within 50m)
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf:50:101 17.6 Ground dissolution of soluble rocks Negligible (within 50m)
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf:102: 1 in 30 year Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf:103: Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf:140: Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf:141: Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf:142: Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf:143: Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf:143: On site Negligible Deposits with potential to collapse when loaded and saturated are believed not to be present.
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf:144: Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf:145: Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0411-FFM/R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf:145: On site Negligible Soluble rocks are either not thought to be present within the ground, or not prone to dissolution.
Planning/R-2021-0608-PND/R-2021-0608-PND-210801_Ecolgy screening (EIA criteria) for Teesworks demolitions_INCA_RevA.pdf:7:Destruction of bat roosts Likely impact is negligible due to low suitability of buildings for
Planning/R-2021-0608-PND/R-2021-0608-PND-210801_Ecolgy screening (EIA criteria) for Teesworks demolitions_INCA_RevA.pdf:7: is negligible due to distance (over 1.9km).
Planning/R-2021-0608-PND/R-2021-0608-PND-210801_Ecolgy screening (EIA criteria) for Teesworks demolitions_INCA_RevA.pdf:8: is negligible due to distance (over 1.9km).
Planning/R-2021-0608-PND/R-2021-0608-PND-210801_Ecolgy screening (EIA criteria) for Teesworks demolitions_INCA_RevA.pdf:8:Vibration Likely impact on sensitive species (roosting birds) is negligible
Planning/R-2021-0608-PND/R-2021-0608-PND-210801_Ecolgy screening (EIA criteria) for Teesworks demolitions_INCA_RevA.pdf:8:Disturbance by personnel Likely impact on sensitive species (roosting birds) is negligible
Planning/R-2021-0608-PND/R-2021-0608-PND-210801_Ecolgy screening (EIA criteria) for Teesworks demolitions_INCA_RevA.pdf:16:majority of buildings on the site are assessed as being of negligible Bat Roost Potential
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:22:impact of negligible significance is predicted.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:22:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:24:Given the above, an impact of negligible significance on marine species and habitats is predicted to arise
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:24:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:25:and tidal regime is predicted to be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:25:No mitigation measures are required, and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:24: predicted to be of negligible significance, with the exception of the subtidal habitat creation
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:24: auditory injury to marine mammals from dredging has been assessed as negligible. The
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:24: assessment has concluded impacts of negligible significance to all marine mammals with regard
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:24: number of vessel movements in the area. A worst-case impact of negligible significance (not
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:26: undertaken within the Tees, and is therefore expected to have a negligible effect on fish. The
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:26: resulted in a conclusion that there will be negligible impacts on both resident and migratory
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:26: use of quayside lighting, is predicted to have a negligible effect.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:27: impact is considered to be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:28: of negligible significance to groundwater, moderate adverse to the Tees estuary and associated
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:28: operation are predicted to be minor beneficial to controlled waters and negligible to human
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:28: Business Parks would be negligible. No mitigation measures are required.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:30: negligible. No mitigation measures during the operational phase are required.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:18:cumulative impact is predicted to be negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:20: Negligible / very low
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:20: Negligible / very low
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:20: approach channel and Anglo Negligible / very low
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:20: Negligible / very low
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:20: Negligible / very low
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:20: Hartlepool approach Negligible / very low
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:21: Negligible / very low
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:21: Negligible / very low
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:21: Negligible / very low
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:21: Negligible / very low
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:21: Hartlepool approach Negligible / very low
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:21: Negligible / very low
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:21:Harbour Facilities schemes, is negligible / very low for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:21:harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as negligible (Table 27.5).
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:22:cumulative underwater noise impacts. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:22: TTS or fleeing Harbour Negligible /
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:22: response from Negligible Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:22: dredging at the Negligible /
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:22: Minke whale Negligible Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:22: Hartlepool Negligible /
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:22: approach Grey seal Negligible Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:22: Harbour Negligible /
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:22: Harbour seal Negligible Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:24:on waterbirds at North Tees Mudflat, and negligible impact further downstream (including at Vopak
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:25:supporting habitat was considered a negligible impact in the EIAs for both the Anglo American Harbour
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:25:(even in combination) would have a negligible impact, the cumulative effect with the proposed scheme would
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:26:driving activities (see Section 13.5.3 and 13.5.4). While there is anticipated to be negligible impact from
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:27:works, but the potential cumulative impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:27:impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:27:acceptable (from a navigation risk perspective), with all risks classified as negligible or low, with the
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:27:impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:27:The primary assessment identifies that the proposed schemes traffic demand would result in a negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:28:with the proposed scheme are considered not significant and indicate negligible impact, at worst. Therefore,
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:32:concludes that the disposal of dredged material will have a negligible impact on fisheries, marine ecology
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:32:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual cumulative impact of negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:21:impact is of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:21:is of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:22:overall impact is of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:22:medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:22:range between negligible and minor adverse significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:22:be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:24:negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:24:health is considered to be of negligible to minor adverse significance
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:25:negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:25:residual impact would be of negligible significance. It is acknowledged that a
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:26:considered to be of negligible to minor adverse significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:26:residual impact is therefore considered to be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:26:suitable material selection, the residual impact would be of negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:30:sediment, an impact of negligible significance is predicted.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:31:regime is predicted to be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:32:are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:32:affecting marine communities would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:34:this is that the significance to all receptors would be negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:34:this is that the significance to all receptors would be negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:34:significance to all receptors would be negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:34:overall impact of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:34:negligible impact on marine mammals due to their prey detection methods
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:35:harbour seal is negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:35:residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:35:impact would be of negligible significance
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:35:residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:35:impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:35:practice. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:36:negligible to low.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:37:considered to be of negligible ecological value and therefore have not been
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:37:adverse significance), noise and vibration (negligible significance) emissions,
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:38:negligible importance within the footprint of the proposed development. The
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:39:residual impact is of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:39:of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:39:implementation of the mitigation measures, the residual impact is of negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:39:measures, the residual impact is of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:43:and therefore a negligible impact is predicted on the waterbirds relying on
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:43:from the operations is therefore considered to be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:44:associated with the proposed scheme is assessed to be of negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:44:roosting waterbirds and terns is predicted to be negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:44:not significant. The potential increase are considered to have a negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:44:hydrodynamic changes would be negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:45:food resources and the residual impact is of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:45:impact is negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:45:impact is negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:45:While impacts are anticipated to be negligible, the implication of best practice
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:45:impact is therefore considered to be negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:45:negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:48:is therefore predicted to be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:48:considered to be very low, and the significance of the impact is negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:49:therefore considered to have a negligible impact on migration up and
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:49:considered to be a negligible impact on fish species within the Tees. With
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:49:therefore considered to be negligible. Consideration has also been given to
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:49:however any conflict is considered to be negligible when co-ordinated by the
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:49:negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:49:in motorised vessel traffic is therefore considered to have a negligible impact
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:50:of the estuary as a whole predicted to be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:50:fish eggs. The residual impact would remain of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:50:activities. The residual impact remains negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:50:remain negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:51:residual impact will remain negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:51:impact would be negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:52:proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:53:development is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:54:impact of negligible significance on navigation safety during the operational
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:54:impacts of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:54:impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:56:negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:57:traffic is therefore assessed as negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:57:considered to be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:57:considered to be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:63:between no impact and negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:63:would be a negligible impact on human receptor that would be not significant .
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:64:impact would be of negligible significance. With regard to on-site construction
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:64:noise no mitigation is proposed and the residual impact would be of negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:71:with a negligible overall significance of effect.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:72:adverse magnitude and incur a negligible overall significance of effect.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:73:significance of effect being considered to be negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:74:significance of effect in the view is minor negligible adverse and not
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:74:in the view is minor negligible adverse. In terms of EIA these effects are not
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:74:existing, transitory views towards site will be low adverse or negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:75:The ES does conclude that there will be negligible impacts during the
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:75:range between negligible to minor adverse. Many of the views considered
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:77:negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:78:negligible impact.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:78:negligible impact.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:79:locally generated waves. The residual impact would be of negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:83:therefore the likely requirement is expected to be low resulting in a negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:84:therefore considered to be result in a negligible impact.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:84:negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:90:receptors is considered to be negligible as set out within Chapter 17 of the
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:90:human health would be negligible to minor adverse in significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:90:disturbance would be negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:91:air quality disturbance is predicted to be of negligible significance and not
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:91:be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:91:disturbance and land quality would be negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:91:impacts of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:91:impacts of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:92:beyond, with seabed deposition predicted to be negligible beyond the
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:92:would be negligible impact on fish or fisheries due to the proposed deposition
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:93:therefore concluded that the impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:93:disposal operations). Overall, the potential impact would be of negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:94:material, there are considered to be negligible impacts on marine mammals
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:94:would be a residual impact of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:94:would be a residual impact of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:94:would be a residual impact of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:3: MMO Scoping Opinion negligible and therefore not necessary to be assessed.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:9: Negligible Assets with no significant importance or archaeological/historical interest.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:9: Negligible The asset’s fabric and/or setting is changed in ways which do not materially affect its heritage significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:10: Significance High Medium Low Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:10: Low Moderate Minor Minor Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:10: Negligible Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:10: Negligible No material change to heritage significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:11:these from other non-significant (negligible) impacts as they may contribute to significant impacts
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-HIGHWAYS ENGLAND.pdf:11:Impacts of negligible significance from the short term, local and reversible construction phase road traffic at the
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-HIGHWAYS ENGLAND.pdf:11:Predicted noise levels indicate negligible impact at human receptor locations. This is considered not significant
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:25:Both had a peak count of two, which represents a negligible proportion of the SPA / Ramsar site populations.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:27:would have a negligible impact on benthic prey species in the intertidal zone so consequent effects on
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:29:of the effects of capital dredging and therefore a negligible impact is predicted on the waterbirds relying on
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:29:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:32:minor adverse. A residual impact of negligible significance is predicted at the other sensitive intertidal
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:35:and localised disturbance to feeding resources will result in an impact of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:35:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:36:negligible, and any exceedances of the thresholds stated in Cutts et al. (2009) or Wright et al. (2010) would
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:36:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:36:negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:36:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:36:be negligible, therefore any effects on waterbirds and foraging terns would manifest as a direct behavioural
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:37:on foraging / roosting waterbirds and terns is predicted to be negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:37:While impacts are anticipated to be negligible, the implication of best practice mitigation measures set out
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:37:water) will further reduce the impact on foraging / roosting waterbirds. The residual impact is negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:37:negligible impact on intertidal benthos (see Section 9.6.2) and would not adversely affect the availability of
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:37:result of hydrodynamic changes would be negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:37:No mitigation measures are considered necessary, therefore the residual impact is negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:15:and beyond. The impact is therefore predicted to be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:15:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would remain of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:18:considered to be very low, and the significance of the impact is negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:19:Outside the migratory period, there would be a negligible impact on fish movement up- and downstream
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:21:underwater noise of piling activities is therefore considered to have a negligible impact on migration up-
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:21:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact remains negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:22:negligible impact on fish species within the Tees.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:24:the footprint of the works, and even if there was, the number of vessels/fishers affected would be negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:24:and navigation within the Tees estuary is predicted to be negligible, given that works will be co-ordinated
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:24:are predicted to be negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:24:remain negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:24:in motorised vessel traffic is therefore considered to have a negligible impact on fish populations or
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:24:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact will remain negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:25:impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:25:impact would be negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf:1: lower sections of proposed quayside features, although the change in the view will be negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf:3:Significance of Effect Medium sensitivity x Low magnitude of effect = Minor negligible significance of effect. Minor Minor
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf:3: Effects will be permanent during the operation of the proposed quayside and its use in support of the renewable energy Negligible Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf:6: Effects will be permanent during the operation of the proposed quayside and its use in support of the renewable energy negligible negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf:7: Effects will be permanent during the operation of the proposed quayside and its use in support of the renewable energy negligible negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf:8: Significance of Effect Low sensitivity x Low medium magnitude of effect = Minor negligible significance of effect. Minor Minor
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf:8: Effects will be permanent during the operation of the proposed quayside and its use in support of the renewable energy Negligible Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf:9: Future baseline: development of the SIZ landside site and associated large scale buildings will have negligible effect on
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf:10: Significance of Effect Low sensitivity x Low magnitude of effect = Negligible significance of effect. Negligible Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf:11: sections of cranes and stored components, although have negligible beneficial effects to views of taller proposed
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf:12: Future baseline: development of the SIZ landside site and associated large scale buildings will have negligible effect on
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 11_Air quality assessment method.pdf:1:is ‘negligible’.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 11_Air quality assessment method.pdf:4: Low Medium Risk Low Risk Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 11_Air quality assessment method.pdf:4: Low Low Risk Low Risk Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 11_Air quality assessment method.pdf:5: Low Low Risk Low Risk Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 11_Air quality assessment method.pdf:5: Low Medium Risk Low Risk Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:62:3, the values are so low (<5mg/l) as to be negligible compared with background levels and, in all cases, the
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:62:water quality sampling points during Stage 3 of the dredging and only negligible effects for a short duration
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:62:Stages 3 and 4 of the dredging, only negligible effects are noted, equivalent to variations within the
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:68:as to be negligible in such a great depth of water in this deep water offshore area).
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:72:enhancement is so small in magnitude and spatial extent as to be negligible in such a great depth of water
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:76:is negligible, whilst to the north it covers a similar zone to the sediment plume for this disposal event, which
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:76:0.1cm. Clearly these magnitudes are extremely low within the licenced disposal site, and negligible beyond.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:76:magnitudes, with negligible changes anticipated beyond the boundaries of the site.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:18: Lianhetech, Seal Sands Proposed new buildings, plant upgrade, swale and associated Approximately Planning permission / Ramsar site would be negligible. On this basis,
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:26:greater than approximately 200m from source (see Appendix 8). There would be negligible effects on fish
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:28:would be negligible, therefore any effects on SPA / Ramsar site features would manifest as a direct
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:34:negligible effect on feeding resources for terns. When this is considered alongside the localised increase
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 13_Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology.pdf:5:particular development is categorised as high, medium, low or negligible. In accordance with the
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 13_Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology.pdf:5: Negligible Size and/or scale: the extent and relative proportion of the existing landscape
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 13_Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology.pdf:8: Negligible Size and Scale
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 13_Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology.pdf:9:receptor (high, medium to low) with the magnitude of effect (high to negligible). The evaluation is
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 13_Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology.pdf:9: Low medium Minor negligible effect Minor effect Minor moderate effect
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 13_Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology.pdf:9: Low Negligible effect Minor negligible effect Minor effect
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 13_Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology.pdf:9: Negligible Negligible effect Negligible effect Minor negligible effect
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:6: likely to be negligible and therefore not necessary to be assessed.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:8:The socio-economic impacts of the proposed scheme are identified as ‘beneficial’, ‘negligible’ or ‘adverse’
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:8: Negligible No obvious significant effect to a receptor or environment.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:8: Negligible Where no discernible effect is expected as a result of the proposed scheme on the
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:8: High Medium Low Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:8: High Substantial Moderate to Minor to Moderate Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:8: Medium Moderate to Moderate Minor Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:9: Low Minor to Moderate Minor Negligible to Minor Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:9: Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:17:supply scenario forecasts only a negligible increase in employment during the plan period.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:19:term) and negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:19:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:22:employment with the AOI and is therefore considered to correspond to a negligible magnitude of change.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:22:a permanent and negligible impact.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:22:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:22:negligible magnitude of change. The receptor is considered to be of medium sensitivity by virtue of the fact
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:23:a permanent and negligible impact.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:23:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:7:likely to be negligible, and therefore not necessary to be assessed.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:26:is considered to be medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:26:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:26:impact is of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:26:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:27:be medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:27:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:27:considered to be medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:27:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:1:long period prior to this the enhancement is so small in magnitude and spatial extent as to be negligible in
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:2:deposition is predicted to be negligible beyond the boundaries of the Tees Bay C disposal site.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:2:that there would be negligible impact on fish or fisheries due to the proposed deposition of dredged material
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:2:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual impact of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:5:negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:5:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:7:operations). Overall, the potential impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:7:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:8: Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:8: 0.000003 minke whale Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:8: during offshore 0.00004 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:8: 0.0000003 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:9:dredged sediments is negligible / very low for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal,
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:9:negligible (Table 26.5).
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:9: Harbour Negligible / Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:9: TTS or fleeing Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:9: underwater Negligible / Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:9: Minke whale Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:9: offshore Negligible / required. Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:9: disposal of Grey seal Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:9: sediments Negligible / Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:9: Harbour seal Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:9:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:10: Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:10: Potential Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:10: of dredged 0.002 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:10: Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:10:of negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, the impact significance for any
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:10:assessed as negligible (not significant) for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:10: Harbour Negligible /
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:10: Low Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:10: increased Minke Negligible / Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:10: vessels during required, other than Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:10: offshore disposal Negligible / Negligible good practice.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:10: sediments Harbour Negligible / Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:10:would be of negligible significance for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:11:The magnitude of the impact of vessel disturbance to seal haul-out sites is defined as negligible / very low
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:11:This gives an overall impact significance of negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:11:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:11:relied upon solely. Therefore, any increases in suspended sediments will have a negligible impact on
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:11:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:12: Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:12: Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:12: offshore disposal 0.04 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:12: Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:12:Taking into account the low receptor sensitivity, the negligible potential magnitude of the impact and the
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:12:negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal (Table 26.9).
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:12: Harbour Negligible /
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:12: Low Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:12: Changes to prey Minke Negligible / Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:12: Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:12: offshore disposal Negligible / Negligible required.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:12: Harbour Negligible / Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:12:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:5: Negligible / very
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:18: 0.0003 harbour porpoise Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:18: 0.000003 minke whale Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:18: dredging 0.00000024 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:18: 0.0000009 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:18:The magnitude of the potential impact of PTS as a result of dredging noise is negligible / very low for harbour
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:18:seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.10).
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:18: Harbour Negligible / Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:18: Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:18: Auditory injury Negligible / Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:18: (PTS) from Minke whale Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:18: Negligible / required. Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:18: SEL during Grey seal Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:18: Negligible / Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:18: Harbour seal Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:19:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:20: Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:20: 0.000003 minke whale Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:20: underwater noise 0.00000024 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:20: 0.0000009 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:20:The magnitude of the potential impact of TTS and fleeing response as a result of dredging noise, is negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:21:whale, grey seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.13).
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:21: Harbour Negligible / Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:21: Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:21: TTS or fleeing Negligible / Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:21: response from Minke whale Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:21: Negligible / required. Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:21: SEL during Grey seal Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:21: Negligible / Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:21: Harbour seal Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:21:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:22: Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:22: Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:22: dredging (5% of Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:22: 0.000005 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:22:of negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, the impact significance for any
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:22:potential increase in collision risk with vessels during dredging has been assessed as negligible (not
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:23: Harbour Negligible /
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:23: Low Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:23: Potential for Minke Negligible / Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:23: collision risk from required, other than Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:23: vessels during Negligible / Negligible good practice.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:23: Harbour Negligible / Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:23:The residual impact would be of negligible significance for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:24:The magnitude of the impact of vessel disturbance to seal haul-out sites is defined as negligible / very low
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:24:resulting in an overall impact significance of negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:24:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:24:have a negligible impact on marine mammals.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:24:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:25: Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:25: Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:25: dredge area Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:25: 0.0001 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:25:Taking into account the low receptor sensitivity, the negligible potential magnitude of the impact and the
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:25:negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal (Table 10.17).
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:25: Harbour Negligible /
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:25: Low Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:25: Minke Negligible / Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:25: resource in Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:25: Negligible / Negligible required.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:25: Harbour Negligible / Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:25:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:26:10.5.1 and 10.5.2). The magnitude of effect in all species is assessed to be negligible / very low based on
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:26:maintenance activities has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.10 and Table 10.13).
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:26:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:26:10.5.3). The magnitude of effect in all species is assessed to be negligible / very low based on the maximum
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:26:has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.15).
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:26:dredging activities. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:26:assessed as negligible (see Section 10.5.4).
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:26:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:27:negligible (see Section 10.5.5).
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:27:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:27:negligible (see Section 10.5.6).
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:27:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:27:established vessel routes. The magnitude of effect in all species is assessed to be negligible / very low
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:27:for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal has been assessed as negligible (Table
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:27:would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf:5:receptor. The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible significance on
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf:5:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf:5:receptor. The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible significance on
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf:6:scheme) and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf:6:(human health/safety). The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf:6:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1107_Appendix 7_Land quality desk study.pdf:14: • negligible ground dissolution.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1107_Appendix 7_Land quality desk study.pdf:38: buildings is negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf:1:that there would be impacts of negligible significance to the only NSR scoped into the assessment.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf:1:would be negligible to minor adverse significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf:2:noise and air quality disturbance would be negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf:2:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf:2:negligible significance and not significant respectively. In addition, operational phase impacts to human
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf:2:health as reported in Section 8 with regard to land quality are considered to be of negligible significance. It
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf:2:and land quality would be negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf:2:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual impact of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:43:representing the final risk score for each hazard, between 0 (negligible) and 10 (high) (see Annex A),
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:43:Hazard risk scores were categorised as either negligible, low, As Low as Reasonably Practicable
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:43: Negligible The risk is acceptable and at level where operational safety is unaffected.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:44:construction phase was ‘Contact: Navigation Buoy’ which was scored as 0.72; negligible, driven by its
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:44: Negligible Low ALARP Significant High
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:46:0.5; negligible, driven by its low consequence.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:46: Negligible Low ALARP Significant High
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:49:be acceptable with all scoring Negligible or Low, with the exception of the impact on ship contact risk,
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:50: Unlikely Minor Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:50: Unlikely Minor Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:57:is extremely remote and consequence insignificant such that a risk can be said to be negligible. At the
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:60: 1 Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:62: 0 – 1.99 Negligible Risk A level where operational safety is unaffected.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:62:the final risk score for each hazard, between 0 (negligible) and 10 (high) following which, the final risk
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:62:Hazard risk scores are categorised as either negligible, low, As Low as Reasonably Practicable (ALARP),
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:78:Deposition to the west and east of the disposal site is negligible, whilst to the south and north covers a
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf:9: Negligible / very low < 1.0
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf:12: 1 69.7 69.8 0.1 Very low Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf:12: 2 67.8 68.0 0.2 Very low Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf:12: 3 70.3 70.5 0.2 Very low Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf:12: 5 76.3 76.4 0.1 Very low Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf:12:Predicted changes in BNL, displayed in Table 17.10, indicate impacts of negligible significance at worst
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf:12:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf:14: NSR1 52.2 - 59.2 Very low Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf:14:indicating negligible impact at human receptor locations. This is considered not significant and impact is
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf:15:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:7: High Major Moderate Moderate Minor Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:7: Medium Moderate Moderate Minor Minor Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:7: Low Minor Minor Minor Negligible Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:7: Very low Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:7:Whilst mitigation for minor or negligible impacts may not be specifically defined as a matter of course,
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:7:recognised that minor and negligible impacts could become significant when considered cumulatively with
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_15. Traffic and transport.pdf:1:The impact of the proposed development’s construction traffic is therefore assessed as of negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_15. Traffic and transport.pdf:1:proposed schemes operational traffic is therefore assessed as negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_15. Traffic and transport.pdf:1:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:6: negligible. As there are no designated
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:7:Negligible Is generally tolerant of physical or chemical changes
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:9:temporary change, indiscernible • negligible change to existing risk of exposure; or
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:10: Moderate Minor Minor Negligible Negligible Minor Minor Moderate
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:10: Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Minor
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:10:(negligible) impacts as they may contribute to significant impacts cumulatively or through interactions.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:10:Negligible Very small changes in receptor condition (adverse or beneficial), which may be raised as local issues
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:12:the geological sensitivity is considered to be negligible. As there are no designated geological sites recorded
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:18:during construction is considered to be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:18:No mitigation measures are required and residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:20:overall impact during construction is considered to be of negligible to minor adverse significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:20:negligible to minor adverse significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:21:very low. Thus, the impact to human receptors is of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:21:No additional mitigation measures required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:22:very low and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:14: Dust soiling High Risk Medium Risk Medium Risk Negligible Risk
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:14: Human health Medium Risk Low Risk Low Risk Negligible Risk
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:14: Ecological effects Medium Risk Low Risk Low Risk Negligible Risk
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:14:demolition, ‘medium risk’ for earthworks and construction, and ‘negligible risk’ for trackout. The impacts on
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:15:earthworks and construction and ‘negligible risk’ for trackout.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:14:negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:15:As a result, it is concluded that there would be a negligible impact as a result of the proposed scheme.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:15:a potential impact of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:16:effect on a low sensitivity receptor. Overall, a negligible impact is predicted.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:16:residual impact would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:8: Negligible Commonplace feature of little or no habitat/historical significance. Loss of such a feature would not be seen
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:9: Negligible of normal natural variation change to the extent Change is within the normal range of natural variation.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:10: High Medium Low Negligible Negligible Low Medium High
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:10: Moderate Minor Minor Negligible Negligible Minor Minor Moderate
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:10: Importance Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:10: Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Minor
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:17:grassland is concluded as being of negligible ecological value.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:17:negligible ecological value.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:17:scrub habitat is concluded as being of negligible ecological value.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:18:and ruderal habitat is concluded as being of negligible ecological value.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:18:metal structures, which have been assessed as being of negligible value for roosting bats due to the lack of
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:21: Wharf Negligible No
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:21: Buildings Negligible No
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:21: Notable Flora Negligible No
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:21: Badger Negligible No
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:21: Water vole Negligible No
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:22: Amphibians Negligible No
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:22: Reptiles Negligible No
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:23:impacts to foraging bats are considered to be negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:23:included in the CEMP, and with the implementation of such measures, any impacts will be negligible in
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:23:Negligible impacts on water quality are anticipated during construction of the proposed scheme (Section
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:24:time otters are anticipated to spend in the area, an impact of negligible magnitude is anticipated. Given the
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:25:assessed to be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:25:With the implementation of the above measures, the residual impact is of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:25:be of local (grayling) and (dingy skipper) significance, and negligible importance within the footprint of the
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf:10:the proposed scheme will have negligible influence on this character area and is not considered further..
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf:12:industrial context of outward views, it is predicted that the proposed scheme will have negligible influence
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf:15:negligible effect on the existing baseline.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf:19:of those features will incur a low adverse magnitude of effect and a negligible overall significance of effect.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf:19:magnitude and incur a minor negligible adverse significance of effect.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf:19:negligible overall significance of effect.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf:20:and the wider environs, the overall significance of effect is considered to be negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf:23:significance of effect in the view is minor negligible adverse and not significant.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf:23:significance of effect in the view is minor negligible adverse. In terms of EIA these effects are not
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf:23:negligible.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:13:It is concluded that the impact during the construction phase of the proposed scheme would be of negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:13:are minor beneficial to controlled waters and negligible to human health.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:13:with maintenance dredging. All operational phase impacts are predicted to be of negligible significance,
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:14:to marine mammals from dredging has been assessed as negligible. The assessment has concluded
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:14:impacts of negligible significance to all marine mammals with regard to potential for temporary auditory
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:14:movements in the area. A worst-case impact of negligible significance (not significant) is predicted.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:15:Tees, and is therefore expected to have a negligible effect on fish. The removal of the existing wharf
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:16:negligible impacts on both resident and migratory fish. Disturbance during the operational phase, either as
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:16:a result of vessel calls to the new quay or the use of quayside lighting, is predicted to have a negligible
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:16:required by International Regulations to allow safe navigation. An impact of negligible significance on
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:16:determined to have minimal effect on the existing navigation profile. An impact of negligible significance is
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:16:Environmental Assessment of Road Traffic), the impact is considered to be negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:18:construction phase noise levels at the South Tees Business Parks would be negligible. No mitigation
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:19:assessed as being permanent and negligible. No mitigation measures during the operational phase are
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:20:disturbance and reductions in air quality are considered to be negligible during construction and operation.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:20:It is therefore concluded that impacts to human health would be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2020-0684-ESM/R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:20:is predicted to have a negligible impact on fisheries, marine ecology and marine mammals, and no impact
Planning/R-2019-0427-FFM/R-2019-0427-FFM-201920 Ecology report final.pdf:13:and with negligible ecological value.
Planning/R-2019-0427-FFM/R-2019-0427-FFM-201920 Ecology report final.pdf:14:vegetation and negligible ecological interest.
Planning/R-2022-0205-SC/R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:24: 4.4.3 Fencing, areas of bare ground and hardstanding were found to have negligible
Planning/R-2022-0205-SC/R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:84: the jetty. This habitat has negligible biodiversity value.
Planning/R-2022-0205-SC/R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:84: short concrete wall surrounding the perimeter. This habitat has negligible
Planning/R-2022-0205-SC/R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:85: of the bare ground. These habitats have negligible biodiversity value.
Planning/R-2022-0205-SC/R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:85: and along the access road where no vegetation is present that has negligible
Planning/R-2022-0205-SC/R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:85: negligible biodiversity value.
Planning/R-2022-0205-SC/R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:85:buildings B1 to B6, they are likely to have negligible suitability for roosting bats. Due to the minor suitable
Planning/R-2022-0205-SC/R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:85:noise levels, this building is assessed as having low at best suitability to support roosting bats and negligible
Planning/R-2022-0205-SC/R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:86: Substation features. This building has negligible suitability to support roosting bats. affected, and the building
Planning/R-2022-0205-SC/R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:86: has negligible suitability to
Planning/R-2022-0205-SC/R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:86: Sludge roosting features and has negligible suitability to support roosting bats. demolished the building has
Planning/R-2022-0205-SC/R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:86: storage negligible suitability to
Planning/R-2022-0205-SC/R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:86: Sludge roosting features and has negligible suitability to support roosting bats. demolished the building has
Planning/R-2022-0205-SC/R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:86: storage negligible suitability to
Planning/R-2022-0205-SC/R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:86: water tank roosting features and has negligible suitability to support roosting bats. demolished the building has
Planning/R-2022-0205-SC/R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:86: negligible suitability to
Planning/R-2022-0205-SC/R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:86: This building has negligible suitability to support roosting bats. negligible suitability to
Planning/R-2022-0205-SC/R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:86: water tank roosting features and has negligible suitability to support roosting bats. demolished the building has
Planning/R-2022-0205-SC/R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:86: negligible suitability to
Planning/R-2022-0205-SC/R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:86: negligible suitability to support a maternity or hibernation roost.
Planning/R-2022-0205-SC/R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:106: is negligible risk of hibernating reptiles/GCN being encountered, they may advise that such
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/Figure 7-1 Viewpoint Assessment Sheets.pdf:2: existing farm dwelling at Stainsby Hall Farm. The magnitude of change is no change and the overall effects within the field of view is Negligible.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/Figure 7-1 Viewpoint Assessment Sheets.pdf:10: The magnitude of change is negligible and the overall effects Negligible.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/Figure 7-1 Viewpoint Assessment Sheets.pdf:40: The magnitude of change is low and the overall effects are Negligible.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/Figure 7-1 Viewpoint Assessment Sheets.pdf:44: Proposed development location Viewpoint location The magnitude of change is negligible and the overall effects are Negligible.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/Figure 7-1 Viewpoint Assessment Sheets.pdf:46: limited screening from the heavy industry features beyond, however combined with the proliferation of The magnitude of change is negligible and the overall effects are Negligible.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:44: Negligible No Listed Importance
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:45: Negligible No impact or no discernible impact.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:45: • Negligible: The impact is only very slightly detectable/noticeable or is
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:46: Negligible (No
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:46: Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:60: Bats. The buildings surrounding the site were assessed as having negligible roosting
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:60: ranges; however, the habitats present on site offer negligible opportunities for foraging
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:65: negligible.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:66: negligible, however some minimal mitigation measures shall be put in place for reptiles,
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:68: reptiles are assessed as negligible from the operation of the facility.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:122: Negligible flood risk.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:124: Significant’, for example by use of the terms ‘Slight’ and ‘Negligible’ in terms of the level
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:125: Moderate Large Large Moderate Slight Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:125: Minor Moderate Moderate Slight Negligible Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:125: No change Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:134: also be subject to a level of effect that would be negligible, and not significant.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:135: sensitivity receptor of Holme Beck, this would result in a negligible level of effect of
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:135: sensitivity receptors, this would result in a negligible effect, which is not significant.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:135: would be negligible and, therefore, not significant.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:136: result in a negligible level of effect of pollution which would be deemed to be not
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:136: of very low, the level of effect is therefore negligible, and not significant.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:136: determined to be negligible, and not significant.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:136: sensitivity aquifer receptors, this would result in a negligible level of effect of pollution
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:137: drainage system. As such, the magnitude of change for flow would be negligible and,
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:137: would be negligible, so that the level of effect would be negligible, and not significant.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:137: water bodies) flows would be negligible and, for the very low sensitivity freshwater river
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:137: discharges, the level of effect would be negligible, and not significant.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:137: negligible and for the very low sensitivity freshwater river discharges, the level of effect
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:137: would be negligible, and not significant.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:138: negligible, and the level of effect on the low sensitivity groundwater receptors is
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:138: negligible, and not significant.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:144:Other surface Increased Very low Negligible Implementation of Drainage Strategy to reduce No significant effect
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:144: Mobilisation of Negligible Implementation of Drainage Strategy to remove No significant effect
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:144:Mercia Reduced Low Negligible Few impermeable surfaces are proposed. No significant effect
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:145:Superficial Reduced Low Negligible Few impermeable surfaces are proposed. No significant effect
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:146: Spillages and Negligible It is expected that embedded mitigation measures No significant effect
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:146:Other surface Increased Very low Negligible It is expected that embedded mitigation measures No significant effect
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:147:Knitting Wife Spillages and Negligible It is expected that embedded mitigation measures No significant effect
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:147: Pollution from Negligible It is expected that embedded mitigation measures No significant effect
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:147: Pollution from Negligible It is expected that embedded mitigation measures No significant effect
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:150: Negligible • A water body not included in the above categories.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:170: Negligible Assets that have very limited or no archaeological, historical or
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:170: Negligible / No appreciable change to the asset or its setting.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:179: Negligible or
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:190: There would be negligible increases in employment in Middlesbrough and Stockton-on-
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:217: Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:218: beneficial or negligible.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:218: Sensitivity High Moderate Low Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:218: High Major Major Moderate Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:218: Moderate Major Moderate Minor Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:218: Low Moderate Minor Negligible Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:219: considered to be “minor” or “negligible” are not considered to be significant in the
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:229: on severance is considered to be of negligible significance at the local level. The
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:229: in terms of driver delay, will be of negligible significance at the local level. The potential
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:230: is considered to be of negligible significance at the local level. The potential impact will
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:230: amenity is considered to be of negligible significance at the local level. The potential
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:231: negligible significance at the local level.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:231: as negligible significance at the local level.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:231: identified as negligible significance at the local level.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:231: identified as negligible significance at the local level.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:232: to an impact of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:232: development phase was previously identified as being of negligible significance at the
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:232: development phase was previously identified as being of negligible significance at the
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:232: completed development phase was previously identified as being of negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:232: completed development phase was previously identified as being of negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:232: negligible significance.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:233: • A residual impact on severance of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:233: • A residual impact on driver delay of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:233: • A residual impact on pedestrian delay of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:233: • A residual impact on pedestrian amenity of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:234: Driver Delay, Severance, Minor adverse significance Construction Environmental Negligible significance
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:234: Severance Negligible significance at the - Negligible significance
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:234: Driver Delay Negligible significance at the - Negligible significance
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:234: Pedestrian Delay Negligible significance at the Provision of improved pedestrian links Negligible significance
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:234: Pedestrian Amenity Negligible significance Negligible significance
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:6: Construction There is no view of the site from this location. It is presumed that No change. Negligible.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:6: Operation (Year 0) There is no view of the site from this location. It is presumed that No change. Negligible.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:6: Residual effects with No view. No change. Negligible.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:7:Residual effects with Views from Kirkeleatham Lane are likely to be screened in the long Negligible. Negligible.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:8:Residual effects with Partial views of Chimney stack and flue as vegetation within the Negligible. Negligible.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:8:Construction Barely perceptible glimpse views through gaps in vegetation to the Negligible. Negligible.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:8:Operation (Year 0) Barely perceptible glimpse views through gaps in vegetation to the Negligible. Negligible.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:8:Residual effects with Negligible change in view as vegetation along the bridleway Negligible. Negligible.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:12:Residual effects with Views are likely to be fully screened in the long term as vegetation at Negligible. Slight
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:20:Construction Mid-range views from this slightly elevated road location north of the Negligible. Negligible.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:20: pylons cranes and towers. The change will be negligible from this
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:20:Operation (Year 0) Mid-range views from slightly elevated road location north of the Negligible. Negligible.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:20: landscape, if at all. The change will be negligible from this location.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:20:Residual effects with Mid-range views from slightly elevated road location north of the Negligible. Negligible.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:20: landscape, if at all. The change will be negligible from this location.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:22:Construction Long range views from this National Trail across open coastal areas Negligible. Negligi
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:22: negligible from this location.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:22:Operation (Year 0) Long range views from this National Trail across open coastal areas Negligible. Negligi
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:22: negligible from this location.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:22:Residual effects with Long range views from this National Trail across open coastal areas Negligible. Negligi
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:22: negligible from this location.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:23:Construction Mid-range views from this elevated location within a woodland park, Negligible. Slight
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:23: pylons cranes and towers. The change will be negligible from this
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:23:Operation (Year 0) Mid-range views from this elevated location within a woodland park, Negligible. Slight
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:23: The change will be negligible from this location.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:23: The change will be negligible from this location. As vegetation the
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/officer report.pdf:31:sensitive value or scale expressed from negligible to very high.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/officer report.pdf:31: Negligible: The impact is only very slightly detectable/noticeable or is
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/officer report.pdf:37:Bats; The buildings surrounding the site were assessed as having negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/officer report.pdf:38:negligible opportunities for foraging or resting and therefore Otters are unlikely
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/officer report.pdf:40: negligible.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/officer report.pdf:41: to be negligible, however some minimal mitigation measures shall be
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/officer report.pdf:43:impacts on reptiles are assessed as negligible from the operation of the
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/officer report.pdf:52:negligible level of effect of pollution which would be deemed to be not
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/officer report.pdf:67:dust emissions is low to negligible.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/officer report.pdf:68:negligible impact.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/officer report.pdf:69: human health receptors are negligible based on the location with the
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/officer report.pdf:69: descripted as negligible; and
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/officer report.pdf:72:severance driver delay and pedestrian delay would be negligible. In terms of
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/officer report.pdf:72:predicted to be negligible. The potential impact of the proposed development
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/officer report.pdf:72:routes to and from the site will be reduced to an impact of negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/officer report.pdf:72:phase is considered to be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/2019s0951 Ecology Report.pdf:2:may use the site for foraging likely impact on this species is assessed as negligible. Several
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/BPM-JBAU-XX-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P01.01-HRA Report_Issued_2020303.pdf:21: isolation are considered to be negligible. Where short-term impacts are considered, if the
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/BPM-JBAU-XX-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P01.01-HRA Report_Issued_2020303.pdf:21: PC is less than 10% of the assessment level the impacts are considered negligible. Where
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:25:Where the impacts are negligible the overall significance is judged to be ‘not significant’.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:25: 75% or less of AQAL Negligible Negligible Slight Moderate
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:25: 76-94% of AQAL Negligible Slight Moderate Moderate
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:27:to be negligible. Where short-term impacts are considered, if the PC is less than 10% of the assessment level the
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:27:impacts are considered negligible.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:47: Dust Soiling Low Risk Low Risk Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:47: Human Health Low Risk Low Risk Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:48:– where the PC is less than 0.5% of the AQAL the impacts will be negligible, regardless of the location-specific
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:48:– where the PC is between 0.5% and 1.5% of the AQAL the impacts will be negligible, as long as the location-
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:48:– where the PC is between 1.5% and 5.5% of the AQAL the impacts will be negligible, as long as the location-
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:48:– non-negligible impacts descriptors are dependent on the matrix set out in Table 6 which is based on PC
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:48: Dust as PM2.5 a 25 0.3% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:48: HCl 20 0.1% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:48: HF 16 0.1% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:48: NH3 180 0.1% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:49: PAH as B(a)P 0.25 <0.1% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:49: Dioxins and furans (PCCD/F) 0.0000003 0.3% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:49: Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) 0.2 <0.1% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:49: Thallium 1 <0.1% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:49: Group 2 metals Mercury 0.25 0.1% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:49: Group 3 metals Antimony 5 0.1% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:49: Chromium(III) 5 0.1% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:49: Copper 10 0.1% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:49: Vanadium 5 0.1% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:49: PM10 40 0.1% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:50: Dioxins and furans 0.0000003 0.2% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:50: PCBs 0.2 <0.1% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:50: Cobalt 1 0.3% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:50: Lead 0.25 0.4% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:50:All impacts are described as negligible and the PECs are all well below the AQAL. There is no risk of an exceedance
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:50: 1-12 1.5 to 5.5% <75.5% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:50: 13-39 0.5 to 1.5% <75.5% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:50: 40-41 1.5 to 5.5% <75.5% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:50: 42-52 0.5 to 1.5% <75.5% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:50: 1-12 1.5 to 5.5% <75.5% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:50: 13-22 0.5 to 1.5% <75.5% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:50: 23 1.5 to 5.5% <75.5% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:50: 24-39 0.5 to 1.5% <75.5% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:50: 40-41 1.5 to 5.5% <75.5% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:51: 42-52 0.5 to 1.5% <75.5% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:51:VOCs is negligible based on the descriptors set out in Table 6.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:51: 5 1.38 0.10 2.1% 1.48 29.7% 1.5 to <75.5% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:51: 2.25 0.23 0.10 4.6% 0.33 14.9% 1.5 to <75.5% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:51:therefore described as negligible based on the descriptors set out in Table 6.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:51: 0.25 0.17 0.002 0.9 0.172 68.9% 1.5 to 5.5% <75.5% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:52:described as negligible based on the descriptors set out in Table 6.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:52: 5 0.63 0.21 4.2% 0.84 16.8% 1.5 to 5.5% <75.5% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:52:– antimony, chromium(III), copper and vanadium impacts are described as negligible based on their maximum
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:52:– At locations of relevant exposure the impacts of cobalt and lead can also be described as negligible based on
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:52:negligible based on the maximum PC being less than 0.5% of the AQAL. As this represents the maximum likely
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:52: Manganese 0.15 0.4% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:52: Arsenic 0.003 0.3% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:53: Chromium(VI) 0.0002 0.2% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:53: Manganese 0.15 0.1% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:53: Arsenic 0.003 <0.1% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:53: Chromium(VI) 0.0002 <0.1% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:53: Manganese 0.15 <0.1% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:53: Nickel 0.02 0.1% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:53:be described as negligible based on the maximum PCs being less than 0.5% of the AQAL.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:53:the mean and minimum emission concentrations in Table 11, the impact is described as negligible. The PECs and
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:53:metal can be described as negligible based on the maximum PCs being less than 0.5% of the AQAL.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:54:impact is negligible.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:54:considered negligible, as shown in Table 36.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:55: 20 0.24 0.16 0.8% 0.40 2.0% 0.5 to 1.5% <75.5% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:55: 20 1.24 1.40 7.0% <75.5% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:55: 20 1.16 1.32 6.6% <75.5% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:55: 20 1.25 1.41 7.0% <75.5% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:55: 20 2.40 2.56 12.8% <75.5% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:55: 20 18.33 18.48 92.4% <94.5% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:61: NO2 Negligible Insignificant
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:61: Dust as PM10 a Negligible Insignificant
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:61: Dust as PM2.5 a Negligible -
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:61: VOC Negligible Insignificant
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:61: HCl Negligible Insignificant
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:61: HF Negligible Insignificant
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:61: NH3 Negligible Insignificant
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:62: PAH as B(a)P Negligible -
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:62: Dioxins and furans (PCCD/F) Negligible -
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:62: Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) Negligible Insignificant
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:62: Group 1 metals Cadmium Negligible -
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:62: Thallium Negligible Insignificant
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:62: Group 2 metals Mercury Negligible Insignificant
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:62: Group 3 metals Antimony Negligible Insignificant
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:62: Arsenic Negligible to Slight Adverse -
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:62: Chromium(III) Negligible Insignificant
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:62: Chromium(VI) Negligible to Moderate Adverse Insignificant
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:62: Cobalt Negligible Insignificant
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:62: Copper Negligible Insignificant
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:62: Lead Negligible -
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:62: Manganese Negligible Insignificant
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:62: Nickel Negligible -
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:62: Vanadium Negligible Insignificant
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:63:– the annual mean impacts of pollutant emissions in relation to the human health receptors are negligible based
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:63: existing facilities, which are more likely, the impacts are descripted as negligible; and
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:68:– the annual mean impacts of pollutant emissions in relation to the human health receptors are negligible based
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:68: existing facilities, which are more likely, the impacts are descripted as negligible; and
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/b/Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:12: demonstrate that there will be a negligible impact on those aspects of the
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:12: demonstrate that there will be a negligible impact on those aspects of the
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:6: Construction There is no view of the site from this location. It is presumed that No change. Negligible.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:6: Operation (Year 0) There is no view of the site from this location. It is presumed that No change. Negligible.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:6: Residual effects with No view. No change. Negligible.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:7:Residual effects with Views from Kirkeleatham Lane are likely to be screened in the long Negligible. Negligible.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:8:Residual effects with Partial views of Chimney stack and flue as vegetation within the Negligible. Negligible.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:8:Construction Barely perceptible glimpse views through gaps in vegetation to the Negligible. Negligible.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:8:Operation (Year 0) Barely perceptible glimpse views through gaps in vegetation to the Negligible. Negligible.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:8:Residual effects with Negligible change in view as vegetation along the bridleway Negligible. Negligible.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:12:Residual effects with Views are likely to be fully screened in the long term as vegetation at Negligible. Slight
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:20:Construction Mid-range views from this slightly elevated road location north of the Negligible. Negligible.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:20: pylons cranes and towers. The change will be negligible from this
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:20:Operation (Year 0) Mid-range views from slightly elevated road location north of the Negligible. Negligible.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:20: landscape, if at all. The change will be negligible from this location.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:20:Residual effects with Mid-range views from slightly elevated road location north of the Negligible. Negligible.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:20: landscape, if at all. The change will be negligible from this location.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:22:Construction Long range views from this National Trail across open coastal areas Negligible. Negligi
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:22: negligible from this location.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:22:Operation (Year 0) Long range views from this National Trail across open coastal areas Negligible. Negligi
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:22: negligible from this location.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:22:Residual effects with Long range views from this National Trail across open coastal areas Negligible. Negligi
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:22: negligible from this location.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:23:Construction Mid-range views from this elevated location within a woodland park, Negligible. Slight
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:23: pylons cranes and towers. The change will be negligible from this
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:23:Operation (Year 0) Mid-range views from this elevated location within a woodland park, Negligible. Slight
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:23: The change will be negligible from this location.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:23: The change will be negligible from this location. As vegetation the
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:44: Negligible No Listed Importance
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:45: Negligible No impact or no discernible impact.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:45: • Negligible: The impact is only very slightly detectable/noticeable or is
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:46: Negligible (No
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:46: Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:60: Bats. The buildings surrounding the site were assessed as having negligible roosting
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:60: ranges; however, the habitats present on site offer negligible opportunities for foraging
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:65: negligible.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:66: negligible, however some minimal mitigation measures shall be put in place for reptiles,
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:68: reptiles are assessed as negligible from the operation of the facility.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:122: Negligible flood risk.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:124: Significant’, for example by use of the terms ‘Slight’ and ‘Negligible’ in terms of the level
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:125: Moderate Large Large Moderate Slight Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:125: Minor Moderate Moderate Slight Negligible Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:125: No change Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:134: also be subject to a level of effect that would be negligible, and not significant.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:135: sensitivity receptor of Holme Beck, this would result in a negligible level of effect of
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:135: sensitivity receptors, this would result in a negligible effect, which is not significant.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:135: would be negligible and, therefore, not significant.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:136: result in a negligible level of effect of pollution which would be deemed to be not
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:136: of very low, the level of effect is therefore negligible, and not significant.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:136: determined to be negligible, and not significant.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:136: sensitivity aquifer receptors, this would result in a negligible level of effect of pollution
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:137: drainage system. As such, the magnitude of change for flow would be negligible and,
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:137: would be negligible, so that the level of effect would be negligible, and not significant.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:137: water bodies) flows would be negligible and, for the very low sensitivity freshwater river
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:137: discharges, the level of effect would be negligible, and not significant.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:137: negligible and for the very low sensitivity freshwater river discharges, the level of effect
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:137: would be negligible, and not significant.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:138: negligible, and the level of effect on the low sensitivity groundwater receptors is
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:138: negligible, and not significant.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:144:Other surface Increased Very low Negligible Implementation of Drainage Strategy to reduce No significant effect
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:144: Mobilisation of Negligible Implementation of Drainage Strategy to remove No significant effect
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:144:Mercia Reduced Low Negligible Few impermeable surfaces are proposed. No significant effect
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:145:Superficial Reduced Low Negligible Few impermeable surfaces are proposed. No significant effect
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:146: Spillages and Negligible It is expected that embedded mitigation measures No significant effect
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:146:Other surface Increased Very low Negligible It is expected that embedded mitigation measures No significant effect
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:147:Knitting Wife Spillages and Negligible It is expected that embedded mitigation measures No significant effect
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:147: Pollution from Negligible It is expected that embedded mitigation measures No significant effect
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:147: Pollution from Negligible It is expected that embedded mitigation measures No significant effect
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:150: Negligible • A water body not included in the above categories.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:170: Negligible Assets that have very limited or no archaeological, historical or
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:170: Negligible / No appreciable change to the asset or its setting.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:179: Negligible or
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:190: There would be negligible increases in employment in Middlesbrough and Stockton-on-
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:217: Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:218: beneficial or negligible.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:218: Sensitivity High Moderate Low Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:218: High Major Major Moderate Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:218: Moderate Major Moderate Minor Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:218: Low Moderate Minor Negligible Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:219: considered to be “minor” or “negligible” are not considered to be significant in the
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:229: on severance is considered to be of negligible significance at the local level. The
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:229: in terms of driver delay, will be of negligible significance at the local level. The potential
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:230: is considered to be of negligible significance at the local level. The potential impact will
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:230: amenity is considered to be of negligible significance at the local level. The potential
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:231: negligible significance at the local level.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:231: as negligible significance at the local level.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:231: identified as negligible significance at the local level.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:231: identified as negligible significance at the local level.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:232: to an impact of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:232: development phase was previously identified as being of negligible significance at the
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:232: development phase was previously identified as being of negligible significance at the
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:232: completed development phase was previously identified as being of negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:232: completed development phase was previously identified as being of negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:232: negligible significance.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:233: • A residual impact on severance of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:233: • A residual impact on driver delay of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:233: • A residual impact on pedestrian delay of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:233: • A residual impact on pedestrian amenity of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:234: Driver Delay, Severance, Minor adverse significance Construction Environmental Negligible significance
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:234: Severance Negligible significance at the - Negligible significance
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:234: Driver Delay Negligible significance at the - Negligible significance
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:234: Pedestrian Delay Negligible significance at the Provision of improved pedestrian links Negligible significance
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:234: Pedestrian Amenity Negligible significance Negligible significance
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-BPM-JBAU-XX-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P01.01-HRA Report_Issued_2020303.pdf:21: isolation are considered to be negligible. Where short-term impacts are considered, if the
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-BPM-JBAU-XX-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P01.01-HRA Report_Issued_2020303.pdf:21: PC is less than 10% of the assessment level the impacts are considered negligible. Where
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-Figure 7-1 Viewpoint Assessment Sheets.pdf:2: existing farm dwelling at Stainsby Hall Farm. The magnitude of change is no change and the overall effects within the field of view is Negligible.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-Figure 7-1 Viewpoint Assessment Sheets.pdf:10: The magnitude of change is negligible and the overall effects Negligible.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-Figure 7-1 Viewpoint Assessment Sheets.pdf:40: The magnitude of change is low and the overall effects are Negligible.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-Figure 7-1 Viewpoint Assessment Sheets.pdf:44: Proposed development location Viewpoint location The magnitude of change is negligible and the overall effects are Negligible.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-Figure 7-1 Viewpoint Assessment Sheets.pdf:46: limited screening from the heavy industry features beyond, however combined with the proliferation of The magnitude of change is negligible and the overall effects are Negligible.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:25:Where the impacts are negligible the overall significance is judged to be ‘not significant’.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:25: 75% or less of AQAL Negligible Negligible Slight Moderate
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:25: 76-94% of AQAL Negligible Slight Moderate Moderate
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:27:to be negligible. Where short-term impacts are considered, if the PC is less than 10% of the assessment level the
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:27:impacts are considered negligible.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:47: Dust Soiling Low Risk Low Risk Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:47: Human Health Low Risk Low Risk Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:48:– where the PC is less than 0.5% of the AQAL the impacts will be negligible, regardless of the location-specific
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:48:– where the PC is between 0.5% and 1.5% of the AQAL the impacts will be negligible, as long as the location-
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:48:– where the PC is between 1.5% and 5.5% of the AQAL the impacts will be negligible, as long as the location-
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:48:– non-negligible impacts descriptors are dependent on the matrix set out in Table 6 which is based on PC
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:48: Dust as PM2.5 a 25 0.3% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:48: HCl 20 0.1% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:48: HF 16 0.1% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:48: NH3 180 0.1% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:49: PAH as B(a)P 0.25 <0.1% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:49: Dioxins and furans (PCCD/F) 0.0000003 0.3% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:49: Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) 0.2 <0.1% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:49: Thallium 1 <0.1% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:49: Group 2 metals Mercury 0.25 0.1% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:49: Group 3 metals Antimony 5 0.1% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:49: Chromium(III) 5 0.1% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:49: Copper 10 0.1% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:49: Vanadium 5 0.1% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:49: PM10 40 0.1% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:50: Dioxins and furans 0.0000003 0.2% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:50: PCBs 0.2 <0.1% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:50: Cobalt 1 0.3% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:50: Lead 0.25 0.4% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:50:All impacts are described as negligible and the PECs are all well below the AQAL. There is no risk of an exceedance
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:50: 1-12 1.5 to 5.5% <75.5% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:50: 13-39 0.5 to 1.5% <75.5% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:50: 40-41 1.5 to 5.5% <75.5% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:50: 42-52 0.5 to 1.5% <75.5% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:50: 1-12 1.5 to 5.5% <75.5% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:50: 13-22 0.5 to 1.5% <75.5% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:50: 23 1.5 to 5.5% <75.5% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:50: 24-39 0.5 to 1.5% <75.5% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:50: 40-41 1.5 to 5.5% <75.5% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:51: 42-52 0.5 to 1.5% <75.5% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:51:VOCs is negligible based on the descriptors set out in Table 6.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:51: 5 1.38 0.10 2.1% 1.48 29.7% 1.5 to <75.5% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:51: 2.25 0.23 0.10 4.6% 0.33 14.9% 1.5 to <75.5% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:51:therefore described as negligible based on the descriptors set out in Table 6.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:51: 0.25 0.17 0.002 0.9 0.172 68.9% 1.5 to 5.5% <75.5% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:52:described as negligible based on the descriptors set out in Table 6.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:52: 5 0.63 0.21 4.2% 0.84 16.8% 1.5 to 5.5% <75.5% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:52:– antimony, chromium(III), copper and vanadium impacts are described as negligible based on their maximum
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:52:– At locations of relevant exposure the impacts of cobalt and lead can also be described as negligible based on
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:52:negligible based on the maximum PC being less than 0.5% of the AQAL. As this represents the maximum likely
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:52: Manganese 0.15 0.4% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:52: Arsenic 0.003 0.3% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:53: Chromium(VI) 0.0002 0.2% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:53: Manganese 0.15 0.1% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:53: Arsenic 0.003 <0.1% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:53: Chromium(VI) 0.0002 <0.1% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:53: Manganese 0.15 <0.1% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:53: Nickel 0.02 0.1% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:53:be described as negligible based on the maximum PCs being less than 0.5% of the AQAL.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:53:the mean and minimum emission concentrations in Table 11, the impact is described as negligible. The PECs and
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:53:metal can be described as negligible based on the maximum PCs being less than 0.5% of the AQAL.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:54:impact is negligible.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:54:considered negligible, as shown in Table 36.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:55: 20 0.24 0.16 0.8% 0.40 2.0% 0.5 to 1.5% <75.5% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:55: 20 1.24 1.40 7.0% <75.5% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:55: 20 1.16 1.32 6.6% <75.5% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:55: 20 1.25 1.41 7.0% <75.5% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:55: 20 2.40 2.56 12.8% <75.5% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:55: 20 18.33 18.48 92.4% <94.5% Negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:61: NO2 Negligible Insignificant
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:61: Dust as PM10 a Negligible Insignificant
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:61: Dust as PM2.5 a Negligible -
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:61: VOC Negligible Insignificant
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:61: HCl Negligible Insignificant
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:61: HF Negligible Insignificant
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:61: NH3 Negligible Insignificant
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:62: PAH as B(a)P Negligible -
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:62: Dioxins and furans (PCCD/F) Negligible -
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:62: Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) Negligible Insignificant
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:62: Group 1 metals Cadmium Negligible -
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:62: Thallium Negligible Insignificant
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:62: Group 2 metals Mercury Negligible Insignificant
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:62: Group 3 metals Antimony Negligible Insignificant
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:62: Arsenic Negligible to Slight Adverse -
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:62: Chromium(III) Negligible Insignificant
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:62: Chromium(VI) Negligible to Moderate Adverse Insignificant
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:62: Cobalt Negligible Insignificant
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:62: Copper Negligible Insignificant
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:62: Lead Negligible -
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:62: Manganese Negligible Insignificant
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:62: Nickel Negligible -
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:62: Vanadium Negligible Insignificant
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:63:– the annual mean impacts of pollutant emissions in relation to the human health receptors are negligible based
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:63: existing facilities, which are more likely, the impacts are descripted as negligible; and
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:68:– the annual mean impacts of pollutant emissions in relation to the human health receptors are negligible based
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:68: existing facilities, which are more likely, the impacts are descripted as negligible; and
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 Ecology Report.pdf:2:may use the site for foraging likely impact on this species is assessed as negligible. Several
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:31:sensitive value or scale expressed from negligible to very high.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:31: Negligible: The impact is only very slightly detectable/noticeable or is
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:37:Bats; The buildings surrounding the site were assessed as having negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:38:negligible opportunities for foraging or resting and therefore Otters are unlikely
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:40: negligible.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:41: to be negligible, however some minimal mitigation measures shall be
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:43:impacts on reptiles are assessed as negligible from the operation of the
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:52:negligible level of effect of pollution which would be deemed to be not
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:67:dust emissions is low to negligible.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:68:negligible impact.
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:69: human health receptors are negligible based on the location with the
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:69: descripted as negligible; and
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:72:severance driver delay and pedestrian delay would be negligible. In terms of
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:72:predicted to be negligible. The potential impact of the proposed development
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:72:routes to and from the site will be reduced to an impact of negligible
Planning/R-2019-0767-OOM/R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:72:phase is considered to be of negligible significance.
Planning/R-2021-0152-CD/R-2021-0152-CD-Blast furnace RecordingWSI revMar21.pdf:6: 2). The area to the east now has negligible archaeological potential and the areas to the south
Planning/R-2021-0152-CD/R-2021-0152-CD-Officer report _R20210152CD.pdf:5:negligible archaeological potential and the areas to the south and west,
Planning/R-2021-0943-CD/R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:28:injury to marine mammals from dredging has been assessed as negligible. The assessment has
Planning/R-2021-0943-CD/R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:28:concluded impacts of negligible significance to all marine mammals with regard to potential for
Planning/R-2021-0943-CD/R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:28:vessel movements in the area. A worst-case impact of negligible significance (not significant) is
Planning/R-2021-0943-CD/R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:29:conclusion that there will be negligible impacts on both resident and migratory fish.
Planning/R-2021-0943-CD/R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:43: geological sensitivity is considered to be negligible.
Planning/R-2021-0943-CD/R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:45: It was concluded that the impact during the construction phase would be of negligible significance
Planning/R-2021-0943-CD/R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-MS-WM-000001.pdf:3: negligible significance and no additional mitigation is proposed.
Planning/R-2021-0943-CD/R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:28:injury to marine mammals from dredging has been assessed as negligible. The assessment has
Planning/R-2021-0943-CD/R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:28:concluded impacts of negligible significance to all marine mammals with regard to potential for
Planning/R-2021-0943-CD/R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:28:vessel movements in the area. A worst-case impact of negligible significance (not significant) is
Planning/R-2021-0943-CD/R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:29:conclusion that there will be negligible impacts on both resident and migratory fish.
Planning/R-2021-0943-CD/R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:43: geological sensitivity is considered to be negligible.
Planning/R-2021-0943-CD/R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:45: It was concluded that the impact during the construction phase would be of negligible significance
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:5: • The impact on annual mean NO2 concentrations at all existing receptors modelled is negligible;
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:5: classified as negligible.
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:17: Trackout Medium Risk Low Risk Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:17: Low Demolition Medium Risk Low Risk Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:17: Earthworks Low Risk Low Risk Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:17: Construction Low Risk Low Risk Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:17: Trackout Low Risk Low Risk Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:20: 75% or less of AQAL Negligible Negligible Slight Moderate
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:20: 76 – 94% of AQAL Negligible Slight Moderate Moderate
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:20: * Where the % change is <0.5% the change is described as ‘Negligible’ regardless of concentration
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:20: negligible, slight, moderate or substantial, the significance of the overall effect is dependent on a
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:32: negligible.
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:32: traffic on hourly mean NO2 concentrations are negligible, therefore mitigation is not required.
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:32: the impacts on annual mean PM10 concentrations at existing receptors are negligible.
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:32: scenarios. As a result, the impacts on daily mean PM10 concentrations are negligible.
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:33: on annual mean PM2.5 concentrations at existing receptors are negligible.
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:37: negligible at all existing and proposed receptor locations. On this basis, the effects are not
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:38: • The impact on annual mean NO2 concentrations at all existing receptors modelled is negligible;
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:38: classified as negligible.
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: E1 17.8 17.8 0.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: E2 16.2 16.2 0.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: E3 16.9 16.9 0.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: E4 16.5 16.5 0.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: E5 16.4 16.4 0.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: E6 15.7 15.7 0.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: E7 15.8 15.8 0.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: E8 15.0 15.0 0.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: E9 14.5 14.6 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: E10 14.1 14.1 0.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: E11 14.3 14.3 0.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: E12 14.9 14.9 0.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: E13 26.9 26.9 0.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: E14 26.1 26.1 0.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: E15 15.5 15.5 0.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: E16 15.0 15.0 0.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: E17 15.3 15.3 0.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: E18 19.0 19.1 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: E19 15.1 15.1 0.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: P1 17.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: P2 17.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: P3 17.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: P4 14.8 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: P5 13.6 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: P6 15.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: P7 14.8 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: E1 38.0 38.0 0.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: E2 33.9 33.9 0.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: E3 34.6 34.6 0.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: E4 33.5 33.6 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: E5 41.6 41.6 0.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: E6 32.5 32.5 0.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: E7 39.2 39.2 0.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: E8 27.7 27.7 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: E9 27.8 27.8 0.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: E10 26.4 26.5 0.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: E11 29.7 29.7 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: E12 30.5 30.6 0.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: E13 57.7 57.8 0.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: E14 52.1 52.1 0.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: E15 30.7 30.7 0.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: E16 29.4 29.4 0.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: E17 30.3 30.4 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: E18 36.5 36.5 0.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: E19 29.9 30.0 0.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: P1 30.8 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: P2 30.9 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: P3 31.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: P4 26.8 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: P5 25.2 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: P6 27.4 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: P7 26.8 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: E1 12.0 12.0 0.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: E2 12.1 12.1 0.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: E3 12.4 12.4 0.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: E4 12.1 12.1 0.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: E5 12.1 12.1 0.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: E6 12.2 12.2 0.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: E7 12.1 12.1 0.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: E8 12.0 12.0 0.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: E9 11.7 11.7 0.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: E10 13.5 13.5 0.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: E11 12.3 12.3 0.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: E12 12.4 12.4 0.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: E13 14.4 14.4 0.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: E14 16.0 16.0 0.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: E15 12.0 12.0 0.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: E16 11.5 11.5 0.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: E17 11.6 11.6 0.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: E18 10.8 10.8 0.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: E19 11.4 11.5 0.1 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: P1 10.3 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: P2 10.3 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: P3 10.3 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:50: P4 10.5 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:50: P5 10.4 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:50: P6 10.5 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:50: P7 10.5 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:50: E1 1 1 0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:50: E2 1 1 0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:50: E3 1 1 0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:50: E4 1 1 0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:50: E5 1 1 0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:50: E6 1 1 0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:50: E7 1 1 0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:50: E8 1 1 0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:50: E9 1 1 0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:50: E10 0 0 0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:50: E11 1 1 0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:50: E12 1 1 0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:50: E13 0 0 0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:50: E14 0 0 0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:50: E15 1 1 0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:50: E16 2 2 0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:50: E17 1 1 0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:50: E18 2 2 0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:50: E19 2 2 0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:50: P1 3 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:50: P2 3 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:50: P3 3 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:50: P4 3 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:50: P5 3 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:50: P6 3 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:50: P7 3 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:50: E1 7.8 7.8 0.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:50: E2 7.9 7.9 0.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:51:E3 8.1 8.1 0.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:51:E4 7.9 7.9 0.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:51:E5 7.8 7.8 0.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:51:E6 7.8 7.8 0.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:51:E7 7.8 7.8 0.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:51:E8 7.7 7.7 0.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:51:E9 7.6 7.6 0.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:51:E10 8.0 8.0 0.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:51:E11 7.7 7.7 0.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:51:E12 7.8 7.8 0.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:51:E13 9.2 9.2 0.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:51:E14 10.2 10.2 0.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:51:E15 7.6 7.6 0.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:51:E16 7.6 7.6 0.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:51:E17 7.6 7.6 0.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:51:E18 7.2 7.2 0.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:51:E19 7.5 7.5 0.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:51:P1 6.9 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:51:P2 6.9 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:51:P3 6.9 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:51:P4 7.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:51:P5 7.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:51:P6 7.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0526-CD/R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:51:P7 7.0 Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0755-CD/R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:18: permeability that have negligible
Planning/R-2022-0755-CD/R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:42:121 17.4 Collapsible deposits Negligible (within 50m)
Planning/R-2022-0755-CD/R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:42:123 17.6 Ground dissolution of soluble rocks Negligible (within 50m)
Planning/R-2022-0755-CD/R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:107: Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0755-CD/R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:151: Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0755-CD/R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:151: On site Negligible Ground conditions predominantly non-plastic.
Planning/R-2022-0755-CD/R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:153: Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0755-CD/R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:155: Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0755-CD/R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:155: On site Negligible Compressible strata are not thought to occur.
Planning/R-2022-0755-CD/R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:157: Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0755-CD/R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:157: On site Negligible Deposits with potential to collapse when loaded and saturated are believed not to be present.
Planning/R-2022-0755-CD/R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:158: Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0755-CD/R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:159: Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0755-CD/R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:159: On site Negligible Soluble rocks are either not thought to be present within the ground, or not prone to dissolution.
Planning/R-2022-0755-CD/R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf:19: permeability that have negligible
Planning/R-2022-0755-CD/R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf:60:121 17.4 Collapsible deposits Negligible (within 50m)
Planning/R-2022-0755-CD/R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf:60:123 17.6 Ground dissolution of soluble rocks Negligible (within 50m)
Planning/R-2022-0755-CD/R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf:125: Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0755-CD/R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf:169: Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0755-CD/R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf:169: On site Negligible Ground conditions predominantly non-plastic.
Planning/R-2022-0755-CD/R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf:171: Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0755-CD/R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf:173: Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0755-CD/R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf:173: On site Negligible Compressible strata are not thought to occur.
Planning/R-2022-0755-CD/R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf:175: Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0755-CD/R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf:175: On site Negligible Deposits with potential to collapse when loaded and saturated are believed not to be present.
Planning/R-2022-0755-CD/R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf:176: Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0755-CD/R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf:177: Negligible
Planning/R-2022-0755-CD/R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf:177: On site Negligible Soluble rocks are either not thought to be present within the ground, or not prone to dissolution.
Planning/RefDocuments/R-2021-1048-FFM-CorusTeesside - Volume 3.pdf:2:Ground Conditions assessed as being negligible to low.
Planning/RefDocuments/R-2021-1048-FFM-CorusTeesside - Volume 3.pdf:5: Groundwater Low Aquifer of negligible resource
Planning/RefDocuments/R-2021-1048-FFM-CorusDraftInterpretive - Volume 2.pdf:24: as being negligible to low.
Planning/RefDocuments/R-2021-1048-FFM-CorusDraftInterpretive - Volume 2.pdf:68:Oil and fuel Lubricating oils, Site Users Direct contact, Health hazard Unlikely Negligible
Planning/RefDocuments/R-2021-1048-FFM-CorusDraftInterpretive - Volume 2.pdf:68: Mild migration. Negligible evidenc e of contamination detected in soil,
Planning/RefDocuments/R-2021-1048-FFM-CorusDraftInterpretive - Volume 2.pdf:69: G r o u n d w a t er (drift Migration via Pollution of Unlikely Negligible
Planning/RefDocuments/R-2021-1048-FFM-Corusteessidefactual2 - Volume 1.pdf:72: drift of the glacio-lacustrine laminated clays as a “Non Aquifer” of “negligible
Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:11: roundabout). All other effects are expected to be Negligible and Not Significant.
Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:16: through the modelling process is predicted to be Negligible at all receptors. The overall effect of
Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:17: to be Negligible Adverse and therefore Not Significant.
Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:17: These impacts are considered to be Negligible to Minor Adverse and Not Significant for surface
Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:18: through reduced infiltration (Negligible Adverse impacts) and pollution from spillages and a
Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:18: reduction in contamination of groundwater arising from existing Made Ground (Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:18: be Negligible Adverse to Neutral and Not Significant. For other groundwater receptors, the
Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:18: impacts on flows would remain Negligible Adverse and the impacts on groundwater quality are
Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:18:7.24 For surface water, the impacts on flows and quality are considered to be Negligible Beneficial
Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:20: construction workers and a Negligible effect on off site human health receptors. These are
Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:20:8.13 A Negligible and Not Significant effect on surface water and groundwater is considered likely
Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:20: Highfield Landfill site and this is considered to have a Negligible and Not Significant effect on
Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:20:8.19 As noted above, the implementation of these measures will result in Minor Adverse or Negligible
Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:24:11.6 During construction there will be a Negligible and Not Significant impact upon all Landscape
Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:24: 4, 10 and 11 during construction. All other Viewpoints will be subject to a Negligible impact
Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:24: effects ranging from Negligible to Minor Adverse/Minor Beneficial. There will be a Moderate
Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:24: Significant, with effects ranging from Negligible to Minor Adverse.
Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:26: Medieval salterns. It is expected that there will be a Negligible effect on the Duck Decoy, World
Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:27: a result the impact is expected to be Negligible and Not Significant on remaining regional
Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:27: hardstanding areas it is anticipated that this will also have a Negligible impact on the availability
Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:27: anticipated that the impacts are expected to be Negligible and Not Significant.
Planning/R-2020-0822-ESM/R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:29: of the ES can be secured and that the effects are negligible or can be kept to an absolute