1606Tees_Valley_Opportunity_Unlimited.pdf:9: agenda, recognising the significance of the river corridor and enabling
1606Tees_Valley_Opportunity_Unlimited.pdf:85: agenda, recognising the significance of the river corridor and enabling
1606Tees_Valley_Opportunity_Unlimited.pdf:86:10.1.5 Tees Valley hosts public art of national significance, such as Claes Oldenburg’s
1606Tees_Valley_Opportunity_Unlimited.pdf:86: of genuine global significance and uniqueness. Critically, this vision of a linked set
1606Tees_Valley_Opportunity_Unlimited.pdf:89: natural environment agenda, recognising the significance of the river corridor
1606Tees_Valley_Opportunity_Unlimited.pdf:89: Devolution Deal, should recognise the scale and significance of the Tees
171019South-Tees-Master-Plan-19-Nov-17.pdf:82:the STDC Area, including a second access to Teesport add value and drive up the quality and significance of create the sense of a single, high quality destination. certainly in part, into an area of public parkland.
1911South-Tees-Master-Plan-Nov-19.2.pdf:6:reviewed and assessed in terms of their significance to and influence on the Master Plan proposals. Feedback was received across a wide range of subject matters, including:
1911South-Tees-Master-Plan-Nov-19.2.pdf:82:the river and port access, with Teesport, Redcar Bulk • facilitates easy connectivity between the different and drive up the quality and significance of the themes and zones, with the structure and layout
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:42: • The generic approach taken to assess potential impacts, including the evaluation of significance
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:43: • Impact identification and the evaluation of significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:43: • The identification of mitigation measures (where required) to reduce the significance of, or avoid,
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:43: • The evaluation of impacts, post-mitigation, to determine the significance of residual impacts.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:46:the effect-receptor interactions, impact pathways, and potential impact significance. The conceptual
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:46: interaction and the significance of the resulting impact; and,
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:47:The determination and qualification of impact significance
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:47:The significance of an impact is determined by combining the predicted magnitude of the effect with the
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:47:significance (as defined above); albeit that appropriate mitigation, where available, should be sought for all
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:48:Where further mitigation measures are identified, the significance of the residual environmental impact (i.e.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:51:significance of such changes or effects have not been defined in this section as ‘impacts’. This is because
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:51:of its magnitude, it is not appropriate to predict the significance of an impact on the physical process. The
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:51:significance of this change is nevertheless assessed with respect to those environmental receptors that
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:59: generated wind waves that are of more significance at the proposed scheme. To demonstrate this
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:147:The methodology used to assess the significance of the potential environmental impacts on marine sediment
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:152:there are no formal OSPAR assessment values developed with which to assess status. The significance of
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:162:impact is of minor adverse significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:162:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of minor adverse significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:163:minor adverse significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:163:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of minor adverse significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:166:considered to be medium, the overall impact is of minor adverse significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:166:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of minor adverse significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:167:is considered to be medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:167:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:167:overall impact is of minor adverse significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:167:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of minor adverse significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:167:impact is of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:167:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:168:be medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:168:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:168:considered to be medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:168:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:175:The criteria for determining the significance of environmental impacts is a two-stage process that involves
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:175:used to define the sensitivity, magnitude and overall significance are based on those outlined in Section 5.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:178:Impact significance
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:178:The impact significance assessment combines receptor sensitivity with magnitude of effect as shown in
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:178:Table 8.6. Assessment of impact significance is qualitative and reliant on professional experience,
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:178:Table 8.6 Impact significance matrix
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:178:Table 8.7 Impact significance definitions
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:178:Impact significance (level) Definition
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:186:and likely saline intrusion, the significance of risk to groundwater is moderate to low and Wood concluded
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:186:during construction is considered to be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:186:No mitigation measures are required and residual impact would be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:187:overall impact during construction works is therefore considered to be of moderate adverse significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:188:overall impact during construction is considered to be of negligible to minor adverse significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:188:negligible to minor adverse significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:189:beneficial significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:189:No additional mitigation measures required. The residual impact would be of minor beneficial significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:189:very low. Thus, the impact to human receptors is of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:189:No additional mitigation measures required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:189:significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:190:very low and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:207:in an impact significance of minor adverse.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:209:as a result of habitat loss caused by dredging would be of moderate adverse significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:209:significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:210:minor adverse significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:212:impact of negligible significance is predicted.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:212:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:214:Given the above, an impact of negligible significance on marine species and habitats is predicted to arise
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:214:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:214:beneficial significance on the intertidal and benthic communities from the installation of the quay wall and
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:214:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of minor beneficial significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:215:and tidal regime is predicted to be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:215:No mitigation measures are required, and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:234:significance for any auditory injury as a result of underwater noise on harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:234:Table 10.10 Assessment of impact significance for any PTS in marine mammals from underwater noise
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:234: Receptor Sensitivity Magnitude Significance Mitigation
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:235:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:237:magnitude of the effect, along with the temporary nature of the disturbance, the impact significance for any
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:237:Table 10.13 Assessment of impact significance for underwater noise on marine mammals during
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:237: Receptor Sensitivity Magnitude Significance Mitigation
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:237:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:238:of negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, the impact significance for any
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:239:Table 10.15 Assessment of impact significance for increased collision risk from vessels during dredging
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:239: Receptor Sensitivity Magnitude Significance Mitigation
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:239:The residual impact would be of negligible significance for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:240:resulting in an overall impact significance of negligible.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:240:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:240:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:241:temporary nature of any changes to prey resources, the impact significance has been assessed as
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:241:Table 10.17 Assessment of impact significance for any changes in prey resources for marine mammals
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:241: Receptor Sensitivity Magnitude Significance Mitigation
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:241:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:242:works. The impact significance for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal during
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:242:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:242:significance for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal during maintenance dredging
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:242:dredging activities. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:242:impact significance for any disturbance at seal haul-out sites during maintenance dredging has been
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:242:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:243:impact significance for any changes to water quality during maintenance dredging has been assessed as
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:243:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:243:impact significance for any changes to prey resources during maintenance dredging has been assessed as
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:243:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:243:based on the maximum number of animals that could be at increased collision risk. The impact significance
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:243:would be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:250:The approach to determining the significance of an impact follows a systematic process for all impacts. This
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:250:the significance of each potential impact has been determined. Each of these steps is set out in the
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:250:The EcIA has used professional judgement to ensure the assessed significance level is appropriate for each
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:250:possible, as per the CIEEM guidelines. As a result, the assessed significance level may not always be
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:251: Negligible Commonplace feature of little or no habitat/historical significance. Loss of such a feature would not be seen
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:252:11.3.7 Impact significance
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:252:the significance of the impact. Ecologically significant impacts are defined as:
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:253:CIEEM recommends that the following factors are taken into account when determining significance for
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:253:Following the identification of receptor importance and magnitude of effect, the significance of the impact
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:253:For the purposes of this assessment, any effects with a significance level of minor or less have been
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:253:Table 11.8 Matrix used for the assessment of the significance of the effect
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:254:the assessment presented in Section 8, 9, 10 and 12 should be made to fully understand the significance
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:264:Studies undertaken as part of the adjacent landside EIA record habitats of regional significance for dingy
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:264:skipper and local significance for grayling in areas that overlap with the proposed scheme footprint. The
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:265:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is of minor adverse significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:266:significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:266:significance, temporary, short term and local and there is not anticipated to be a significant impact to
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:266:of no adverse significance following embedded mitigation of development of a Marine Pollution Contingency
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:267:unlikeliness of the impact occurring, an impact of minor significance is predicted on prey resource.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:267:impact of moderate adverse significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:268:assessed to be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:268:adverse significance is anticipated on breeding birds.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:268:With the implementation of the above measures, the residual impact is of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:268:be of local (grayling) and (dingy skipper) significance, and negligible importance within the footprint of the
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:268:long term (permanently). Overall, the impact significance of loss of habitat and breeding resource is
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:268:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is of minor adverse significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:268:impact is considered to be minor adverse in significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:269:anticipated to be of minor - moderate adverse significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:269:minor adverse significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:296:be of minor adverse significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:298:implementation of this measure, the residual impact is predicted to be of minor adverse significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:298:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:300:(INCA, 2020). As such, impacts on tern species are considered to be of less significance than impacts on
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:300:roosting waterbirds. The significance of the potential impact of noise disturbance due to the proposed
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:301:minor adverse. A residual impact of negligible significance is predicted at the other sensitive intertidal
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:304:and localised disturbance to feeding resources will result in an impact of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:305:negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:321:and beyond. The impact is therefore predicted to be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:321:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would remain of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:324:considered to be very low, and the significance of the impact is negligible.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:325:dredging campaign. As such, the significance of a potential barrier effects on migratory species caused by
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:331:impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:336:receptor. The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible significance on
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:336:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:336:receptor. The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible significance on
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:337:scheme) and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:337:significance on navigation safety during the operational phase.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:337:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:338:significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:338:proposed schemes operational traffic is therefore assessed as negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:338:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:339: significance of the heritage assets affected by the proposed
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:339: development and the contribution of their setting to that significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:339: potential impact of the proposal on the significance of the heritage
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:339: proposed development on the significance of any heritage assets
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:340:appropriate to their significance” (Paragraph 184). Account has been taken of the policies set out in the
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:340:which states that “In considering the significance of heritage assets and their setting, the marine plan
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:340:conservation of that significance and any proposals for development”. In addition, Section 2.6.6.8 of the
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:340:conserve and enhance elements contributing to the significance of heritage assets will be supported.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:340:Proposals unable to conserve and enhance elements contributing to the significance of heritage assets will
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:340:c) mitigate harm to those elements contributing to the significance of heritage assets
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:340: harm to the significance of heritage assets”.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:340:the potential for harm to elements that contribute to their significance”.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:341:heritage assets, nor non-designated heritage assets that are demonstrably of equivalent significance, which
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:341: • preserves or enhances its significance as a designated heritage asset;
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:341: • the harm or loss of significance is necessary to achieve public benefits that outweigh that harm or
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:342: The proposal to mitigate the loss of relatively low significance industrial archaeology
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:346:scheme and assesses the level of any resulting benefit, harm or loss to their significance. The assessment
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:346:assessment of the significance of any identified impact is largely a product of the heritage significance
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:346: • The heritage significance (importance) of any heritage assets identified as being affected;
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:346: • The significance of any identified impacts upon those assets and their settings; and
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:346: • The level of any harm (or benefit) and loss of heritage significance (importance).
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:346:The criteria for determining the heritage significance of assets is set out in Table 16.3.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:347:Table 16.3 Criteria for determining heritage significance
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:347: Heritage significance Definition/example assets
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:347: significance is lost or severely compromised.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:347: Medium Elements of the asset’s fabric and/or setting which contribute to its significance are affected, but to a more
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:347: adverse limited extent, resulting in an appreciable but partial loss of the asset’s heritage significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:347: Elements of the asset’s fabric and/or setting which contribute to its heritage significance are affected, resulting
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:347: in a slight loss of heritage significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:347: Negligible The asset’s fabric and/or setting is changed in ways which do not materially affect its heritage significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:347: Low beneficial significance, are preserved in situ; or
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:347: Elements of the asset’s setting are improved, slightly enhancing its cultural significance; or
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:348: of cultural significance, are preserved in situ; or
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:348: Medium Elements of the asset’s setting are considerably improved, appreciably enhancing its cultural significance; or
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:348: High significance, are preserved in situ; or
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:348: cultural significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:348: No Impact No change to the assets fabric or setting which affects its heritage significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:348:The significance of any identified impact, expressed as a product of the heritage significance (importance)
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:348:significance matrix presented in Table 16.5. The impact significance categories are divided as shown in
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:348:narrative description of the level of harm and/or benefit to heritage significance of identified assets.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:348:Table 16.5 Impact significance matrix
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:348: Significance High Medium Low Negligible
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:348:Table 16.6 Significance of effect definitions
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:348: Significance of
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:348: Change in heritage significance, both adverse or beneficial, which are likely to be important
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:348: Change in heritage significance, both adverse and beneficial, which are likely to be important
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:348: Change in heritage significance, both adverse or beneficial, which may be raised as local issues but are
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:348: Negligible No material change to heritage significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:348: No effect No change to heritage significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:349:further investigation is required to establish the significance of an asset) or the magnitude of the impact is
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:352:20th century heritage assets of low heritage significance in accordance with the definitions in Table 16.3
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:355:The heritage significance of such remains is unknown, and would be established on a case by case basis if
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:355:such a discovery should occur. However, such remains could be of high significance, particularly so given
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:357:significance of an asset, may affect the ability to appreciate that significance or may be neutral. This
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:357: • Step 3: assess the effect of the proposed development on the significance of those assets as a
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:358:The effect of the proposed development on the significance of the bridge as a result of changes to setting
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:358:significance. However, due to the proposed destruction of these structures, in accordance with the
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:359:As the significance of potential archaeological remains cannot be known until such remains are
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:359:high heritage significance (as a worst case).
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:359:predicted to be of minor adverse significance. It is proposed that this protocol would be formalised in a
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:365: adjacent to road networks. It also provides guideline significance criteria
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:373:Predicted changes in BNL, displayed in Table 17.10, indicate impacts of negligible significance at worst
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:373:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:376:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:383:In assessing the significance of construction dust and particulate matter impacts using the IAQM guidance
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:383:of impacts prior to mitigation. Once appropriate mitigation measures were identified, the significance of
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:400: • Determining the significance of effect for each landscape and visual receptor assessed and whether
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:414:This section describes the significance of landscape and visual effects on baseline conditions during the
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:414:construction and operational phases of the proposed scheme. The significance of landscape and visual
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:415:of those features will incur a low adverse magnitude of effect and a negligible overall significance of effect.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:415:magnitude and incur a minor negligible adverse significance of effect.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:415:negligible overall significance of effect.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:416:and the wider environs, the overall significance of effect is considered to be negligible.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:418:The overall assessment of the significance of effect in views from residential property to the south of the
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:418:The overall assessment of the significance of effect in views from recreational routes to the south of the site
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:418:The predicted magnitude of change in the view is low adverse. The assessment of the significance of effect
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:419:medium adverse. The assessment of the significance of effect in the views is minor moderate adverse.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:419:significance of effect in the view is minor negligible adverse and not significant.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:419:significance of effect in the view is minor negligible adverse. In terms of EIA these effects are not
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:425: • Drainage that does not discharge to sites of any significance or sensitivity to flood risk; or
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:433:significance of potential impacts to construction workers, a worst case scenario is assumed. In this case,
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:433:major adverse significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:433:adverse significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:434:negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:435:magnitude of approximately 0.05m to 0.15m. The swell waves of any significance (>1.5-2.0m) only reach
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:435:a potential impact of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:435:The wave model results show that locally generated waves under extreme wind are of more significance at
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:436:residual impact would be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:442:significance. Opportunities for the mitigation of any adverse effects and the enhancement of positive effects
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:443:21.2.3 Significance criteria
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:443:Since there are no generally accepted criteria for assessing the significance of socio-economic impacts,
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:444:The terms presented in Table 21.3 are used to define the significance of the impacts identified.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:444:Table 21.3 Definition of the significance of impacts
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:444: Significance Definition
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:444: duration or magnitude) or of a more than local significance on the existing population,
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:444:A matrix identifying the significance of the potential effects is set out in Table 21.4. Any impacts assessed
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:444:Table 21.4 Matrix for determining the significance of impacts
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:455:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of minor beneficial significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:455:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:456:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of minor beneficial significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:458:likely to be in the order of 8 direct FTE jobs. The potential significance of this impact is confirmed below.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:458:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:459:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:464:significance criteria.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:465:GHG emissions sources considered in the assessment, emission factors and significance criteria. No
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:470:22.3.6 Significance criteria
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:470:There is no single preferred method to evaluate the significance of GHG emissions arising from a ‘project’.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:476:that there would be impacts of negligible significance to the only NSR scoped into the assessment.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:476:would be negligible to minor adverse significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:477:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:477:negligible significance and not significant respectively. In addition, operational phase impacts to human
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:477:health as reported in Section 8 with regard to land quality are considered to be of negligible significance. It
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:477:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual impact of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:479:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual impact of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:482:negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:482:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:484:operations). Overall, the potential impact would be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:484:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:486:magnitude of the effect, along with the temporary nature of the disturbance, the impact significance for any
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:486:Table 26.5 Assessment of impact significance for underwater noise during offshore disposal of dredged
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:486: Receptor Sensitivity Magnitude Significance Mitigation
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:486:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:487:of negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, the impact significance for any
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:487:Table 26.7 Assessment of impact significance for increased collision risk from vessels at the offshore
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:487: Receptor Sensitivity Magnitude Significance Mitigation
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:487:would be of negligible significance for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:488:This gives an overall impact significance of negligible.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:488:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:488:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:489:temporary nature of any changes to prey resources, the impact significance has been assessed as
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:489:Table 26.9 Assessment of impact significance for any changes in prey resources for marine mammals
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:489: Receptor Sensitivity Magnitude Significance Mitigation
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:489:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:490: • generate their own residual impacts of at least minor significance;
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:500:assessment of the significance of such impacts and recommendation of appropriate mitigation measures
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:507:pocket. The significance of this impact is reported to be minor adverse due to the low value nature of the
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:510:magnitude of the effect, along with the temporary nature of the disturbance, the impact significance for
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:511:cumulative underwater noise impacts. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:511:Table 27.5 Assessment of impact significance for cumulative underwater noise impacts from piling and
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:511: Receptor Sensitivity Magnitude Significance Mitigation
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:511:worse than minor adverse in significance when considered cumulatively with the other projects.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:512:cause an impact of greater significance to that already assessed within the much larger footprint of the
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:512:worse than minor adverse in significance when considered cumulatively with the landside EIA.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:512:impacts worse than minor adverse in significance when considered cumulatively with the other projects.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:516:works, but the potential cumulative impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:516:impact would be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:516:impact would be of negligible significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:519:approach does, however, provide a broad indication of the magnitude and significance of cumulative
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:519:following anticipated environmental impacts and their significance:
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:521:significance to fisheries, marine ecology and marine mammals, and no residual cumulative impact to
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:552:It is Natural England’s role to advise the competent authority on the potential significance of effects on
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:576:significance only. There would be no reduction in the number of fish within the estuary as a result of injurious
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body.pdf:593:Assessment Guide to Assessing Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Evaluating their Significance
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South_Bank_Quay_supplementary_report1_.pdf:17:impact of minor adverse significance. 2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South_Bank_Quay_supplementary_report1_.pdf:17:impact is predicted to be of minor adverse significance.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South_Bank_Quay_supplementary_report1_.pdf:27:loss caused by capital dredging would be of minor adverse significance. 2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South_Bank_Quay_supplementary_report1_.pdf:28:As the magnitude of this impact is predicted to be very low, the significance of the potential impact on benthic
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South_Bank_Quay_supplementary_report1_.pdf:28:receptors from increased suspended sediments remains at negligible significance. 2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South_Bank_Quay_supplementary_report1_.pdf:28:and the upgraded sensitivity score, an impact significance of minor adverse is concluded for effects on
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South_Bank_Quay_supplementary_report1_.pdf:28:marine ecological receptors from smothering. This is a higher impact significance than that reported within 2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South_Bank_Quay_supplementary_report1_.pdf:28:the EIA Report (which was assessed as negligible significance).
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South_Bank_Quay_supplementary_report1_.pdf:29:The residual impact will be of minor adverse significance. 2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South_Bank_Quay_supplementary_report1_.pdf:33:Table 4.3 provides a summary of the significance of residual impacts on fish and shellfish resources that
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South_Bank_Quay_supplementary_report1_.pdf:34: Impact Significance of Impact significance 2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South_Bank_Quay_supplementary_report1_.pdf:34: significance in residual impact in based on the Rationale
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South_Bank_Quay_supplementary_report1_.pdf:34:land-based piling negligible (piling) (piling) (piling) in the EIA Report. It is therefore concluded that there is no reason to amend the significance of this potential 2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South_Bank_Quay_supplementary_report1_.pdf:34:Direct loss / (loss of sheltering / significance was based on an assumption that the existing wharf structure was of value to sheltering juvenile
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South_Bank_Quay_supplementary_report1_.pdf:41:Table 5.3 provides a summary of the significance of impacts on non-breeding waterbirds that were assessed 2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South_Bank_Quay_supplementary_report1_.pdf:42: Significance Significance
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South_Bank_Quay_supplementary_report1_.pdf:42:Impact significance Rationale 2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South_Bank_Quay_supplementary_report1_.pdf:42: The impact significance reported in the EIA Report was based on the fact that the habitat anticipated to be lost, namely the intertidal
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South_Bank_Quay_supplementary_report1_.pdf:42: with the use of the North Tees Mudflats by the same species. As such, the impact significance detailed in the EIA Report is considered 2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South_Bank_Quay_supplementary_report1_.pdf:42:water quality overwintering period, there is no additional information on the usage of the area by terns, therefore the impact significance detailed
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South_Bank_Quay_supplementary_report1_.pdf:42: It is therefore concluded that the negligible significance impact reported in the EIA Report remains valid. 2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South_Bank_Quay_supplementary_report1_.pdf:43: Significance Significance
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South_Bank_Quay_supplementary_report1_.pdf:43:Impact significance Rationale 2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South_Bank_Quay_supplementary_report1_.pdf:43: The impact significance detailed in the EIA Report was based on the fact that the magnitude of vessel traffic increase would be very
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South_Bank_Quay_supplementary_report1_.pdf:43: supports non-breeding waterbirds, the impact significance detailed in the EIA Report remains valid. 2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South_Bank_Quay_supplementary_report1_.pdf:43: The negligible impact significance detailed in the EIA Report was based around the fact that the habitats at South Bank are of low
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South_Bank_Quay_supplementary_report1_.pdf:43: Given the above, the negligible impact significance reported in the EIA Report remains valid. 2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South_Bank_Quay_supplementary_report1_.pdf:43: breeding waterbirds, the negligible impact significance detailed in the EIA Report remains valid.
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South_Bank_Quay_supplementary_report1_.pdf:251: were not considered to be of significance based on the analysis of the individual sample’s 2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South_Bank_Quay_supplementary_report1_.pdf:316: significance and decline (OSPAR, 2009c). Mudflats are highly productive areas which,
2207SouthQuayMMO/PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South_Bank_Quay_supplementary_report__1_.pdf:325: Folk, R.L., & Ward, W.C. (1957). Brazos River bar (Texas); a study in the significance of grain
2207SouthQuayMMO/MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:13:the significance of the risks and evidence to show why these risks cannot be avoided or further mitigated. (max. 2000
2207SouthQuayMMO/MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:13:significance is predicted.
2207SouthQuayMMO/MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:17: the significance of the risks and evidence to show why these risks cannot be avoided or further mitigated. (max. 2000
2207SouthQuayMMO/MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:19:the significance of the risks and evidence to show why these risks cannot be avoided or further mitigated. (max. 2000
2207SouthQuayMMO/MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:23:the significance of the risks and evidence to show why these risks cannot be avoided or further mitigated. (max. 2000
2207SouthQuayMMO/MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:25:the significance of the risks and evidence to show why these risks cannot be avoided or further mitigated. (max. 2000
2207SouthQuayMMO/MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:13:the significance of the risks and evidence to show why these risks cannot be avoided or further mitigated. (max. 2000
2207SouthQuayMMO/MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:13:significance is predicted.
2207SouthQuayMMO/MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:16:the significance of the risks and evidence to show why these risks cannot be avoided or further mitigated. (max. 2000
2207SouthQuayMMO/MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:18:the significance of the risks and evidence to show why these risks cannot be avoided or further mitigated. (max. 2000
2207SouthQuayMMO/MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:22:the significance of the risks and evidence to show why these risks cannot be avoided or further mitigated. (max. 2000
MMO/MLA_2013_00363/MLA_2013_00363-Seaton Port wintering birds -Final report.pdf:19:JNCC (1995) for determining national significance, and JNCC (1999) and Ramsar (1971, as
MMO/MLA_2013_00363/MLA_2013_00363-Seaton Port wintering birds -Final report.pdf:19:amended) for significance in relation to SPA and Ramsar populations respectively.
MMO/MLA_2013_00363/MLA_2013_00363-Supporting Statement MASTER.pdf:8: RASAR site and Special Protection Area. These are also of national conservation significance
MMO/MLA_2013_00363/MLA_2013_00363-Supporting Statement MASTER.pdf:11: significance within 1km of the proposed development site using Digimap and English Heritage
MMO/MLA_2013_00363/MLA_2013_00363-Supporting Statement MASTER.pdf:13: particular significance including those protected under environmental legislation or designated
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:28:3.3.2 Where an impact is quantified, thresholds are applied to determine the level of significance of
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:28: significance.
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:28: Defining Significance
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:28: been assessed using a technique which considers the significance of the impact as being
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:29:3.3.4 The definition of significance involves consideration, through data analysis, consultation and
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:30: Calculating Significance
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:30:3.3.12 Following on from the above and in order to portray better the identified significance of a
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:30: project on specified parameters and receptors, a consistent set of significance levels have
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:30:3.3.13 To calculate the level of significance, the following formula was utilised:
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:30: Table 1.2: Significance of Effect
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:30: Significance = Magnitude of Impact x Value and Sensitivity of the
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:30:3.3.14 The levels of significance applied are shown below in Table 1.2.
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:30: Table 1.2 Definition of Significance
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:30: Significance Definition
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:30: Minor Beneficial The impact is small scale and of slight significance, providing some
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:30: environment and the magnitude of the effect increases, so the significance of the effect
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:30: Table 1.3 Dependence of Significance on Magnitude and Sensitivity
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:80: magnitude of potential impacts arising from proposed activities is evaluated. The significance
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:80: significance and have been designated a National Nature Reserve (NNR) (Teesmouth NNR).
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:86: an impact significance of ‘critical negative’. Table 14.3 lists a nine-point scale (from major
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:86: negative to major positive) of impact significance for the different magnitude of impacts on
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:88: Table 14.3. Impact Significance Criteria
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:88: significance
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:88: • a locally significant population of a species of regional / county significance
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:89: significance
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:91: significance.
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:97: grassland, an impact that is considered to be of minor negative significance.
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:97: neutral to minor/moderate negative impact of neutral to moderate significance.
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:97: of minor / moderate significance. With the implementation of mitigation measures designed to
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:98: and aquatic habitats and species is expected to be minor / moderate significance arising
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:99: Impact Area/Phase Site/SPA/SS Importance of Magnitude of Significance of
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:100: TERRC dock proposals shows their significance to be neutral to minor/moderate negative
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:100: (Table 14.5). While the significance level is generally low it is recommended that a series of
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:102: influence citation term significance long term
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:108: any contaminants. A full discussion of the environmental significance of alien species and
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:119: power station foreshore protection works; the significance of which is discussed in this
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:137: impact significance. Site-specific information and understanding of the process being
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:138: loss of habitat is localised and only a small percentage of the whole, the significance of the
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:138: species richness, because the loss of habitat is local, the significance of the impact overall is
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:146: significance modelled by DNV.
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:147: ADVERSE to NEUTRAL due to the impact significance modelled by DNV and the extent of
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:157: and extend out into the estuary and possibly Tees Bay. The significance of the effect will
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:157:16.3.99 In many cases the noise may cause an effect which is of no environmental significance. For
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:158: significance is therefore considered to be MODERATE ADVERSE however due to the
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:158: insignificance of the migration route in relation to the Tees it is considered that the impact is
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:160:16.4.8 The significance of habitat loss in terms of the SSSI is discussed in EIS section 17 and the
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:160:16.5.1 No effects of “Major Adverse” significance have been identified so long as an ecological
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:160: Noise impacts have been identified as potentially affecting fish. The significance of this is
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:184: ecological significance of the area such that a major-negative impact magnitude on a site of
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:184: International importance will have an impact significance of ‘critical negative’. Table 17.9 lists
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:184: a nine-point scale (from major negative to major positive) of impact significance for the
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:185: Table 17.9 Impact Significance Criteria
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:185: significance
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:186: significance
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:186: • a locally significant population of a species of regional / county significance
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:188: significance of this impact on birds through the food chain is considered to be minor
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:193: in the area. Therefore the overall significance of the impact from chemical pollution on birds
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:194:17.5.33 The overall significance of this impact on birds is considered to be neutral.
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:194: habitat quality are long-term and of minor to moderate negative significance, the impact from
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:195: significance.
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:195: birds is not expected to be greater than the highest impact significance of the individual
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:196:Impact Area/Phase SPA citation Importance Trend2 Magnitude of Significance of
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:196: proposals shows their significance to be minor/moderate negative (Table 17.11). While the
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:196: significance level is low, the fact that the Seal Sands SSSI is in ‘unfavourable condition’
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:198: (metres) risk significance of assuming mitigation
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:199: and significance the Guidelines for Ecological Impact Assessment developed by the Institute
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:200: disassembly the impacts expected to be of a minor negative significance.
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:211: and extend out into the estuary and possibly Tees Bay. The significance of the effect will
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:212:18.3.12 In many cases the noise may cause an effect which is of no environmental significance. For
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:213: investigated. Many chlorinated pesticides are also included in this group. The significance of
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:216: Impact Significance
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:217: live captured animals, the significance of these concentrations for the health and ultimate
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:219: baseline it is suggested that the significance of the airborne noise impact will be “MAJOR
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:221: become invasive and will take note of the significance of shipping as a vector. The report will
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:262: • Assess the significance of the impacts proposed on the local environment.
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:270:21.4 Impacts and Significance
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:272: as the rest of the Tees Estuary. Therefore, significance of this impact is deemed MINOR
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:273:21.4.24 The overall significance of the impact is therefore deemed MINOR.
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS Part 1.pdf:274: overall significance of the impact from chemical pollution on wildlife and birds is likely to be of
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (1).pdf:11: sites of particular significance including those protected under environmental
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (1).pdf:20:3.6 The significance of an effect is evaluated on the basis of the scale of the impact and
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (1).pdf:20: significance of effects, for ease of comparison. The terms used where applicable are:
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (1).pdf:23: Seaton Port’s national significance improving the UK’s capabilities to service key
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (1).pdf:33: Assessing Impact Significance
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (1).pdf:33:9.6 Determining the significance of impacts depends on a number of factors:
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (1).pdf:33:9.7 Table 9.1 defines the classification for the significance of potential impacts. Impacts
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (1).pdf:54:9.64 Behavioural responses to noise may increase in significance at more critical times,
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (1).pdf:54: significance of such impacts on the harbour seal population, especially during the
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (1).pdf:56: estuarine ecology are expected to be of neutral significance; therefore no mitigation
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (1).pdf:57:9.83 Noise impacts have been identified as potentially affecting seals. The significance of
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (1).pdf:61: impact magnitude and significance of effect are applied as set out in tables 17.8 –
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (1).pdf:76: changes the magnitude or significance of any impacts predicted.
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (1).pdf:77: negative significance the numbers of designated site species utilising the dry dock
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (1).pdf:79: adjacent SSSI units of Seal Sands and Greenabella Marsh and the SPA significance
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (1).pdf:81: effects of minor negative significance in the worst case scenario. This assessment
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (1).pdf:82: to PAH’s) on waterbirds, assessed that the overall significance of the impact from
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (1).pdf:83: being of minimal negative significance.
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (1).pdf:84: summarise the impacts to waterbirds and their associated significance of effects on
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (1).pdf:85: Impact Zone of Impact Significance Mitigation Residual
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (1).pdf:85: influence magnitude of effect proposed significance
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (1).pdf:85: change to habitats is of minimal negative significance and is unchanged from the
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (1).pdf:108:15.1 Appropriate mitigation can assist in reducing the significance of environmental impacts asso
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (1).pdf:108: Once mitigation is in place, it is therefore necessary to identify what the significance of im
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-Licence schedule two.pdf:11: sites of particular significance including those protected under environmental
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-Licence schedule two.pdf:20:3.6 The significance of an effect is evaluated on the basis of the scale of the impact and
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-Licence schedule two.pdf:20: significance of effects, for ease of comparison. The terms used where applicable are:
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-Licence schedule two.pdf:23: Seaton Port’s national significance improving the UK’s capabilities to service key
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-Licence schedule two.pdf:33: Assessing Impact Significance
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-Licence schedule two.pdf:33:9.6 Determining the significance of impacts depends on a number of factors:
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-Licence schedule two.pdf:33:9.7 Table 9.1 defines the classification for the significance of potential impacts. Impacts
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-Licence schedule two.pdf:54:9.64 Behavioural responses to noise may increase in significance at more critical times,
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-Licence schedule two.pdf:54: significance of such impacts on the harbour seal population, especially during the
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-Licence schedule two.pdf:56: estuarine ecology are expected to be of neutral significance; therefore no mitigation
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-Licence schedule two.pdf:57:9.83 Noise impacts have been identified as potentially affecting seals. The significance of
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-Licence schedule two.pdf:61: impact magnitude and significance of effect are applied as set out in tables 17.8 –
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-Licence schedule two.pdf:76: changes the magnitude or significance of any impacts predicted.
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-Licence schedule two.pdf:77: negative significance the numbers of designated site species utilising the dry dock
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-Licence schedule two.pdf:79: adjacent SSSI units of Seal Sands and Greenabella Marsh and the SPA significance
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-Licence schedule two.pdf:81: effects of minor negative significance in the worst case scenario. This assessment
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-Licence schedule two.pdf:82: to PAH’s) on waterbirds, assessed that the overall significance of the impact from
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-Licence schedule two.pdf:83: being of minimal negative significance.
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-Licence schedule two.pdf:84: summarise the impacts to waterbirds and their associated significance of effects on
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-Licence schedule two.pdf:85: Impact Zone of Impact Significance Mitigation Residual
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-Licence schedule two.pdf:85: influence magnitude of effect proposed significance
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-Licence schedule two.pdf:85: change to habitats is of minimal negative significance and is unchanged from the
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-Licence schedule two.pdf:108:15.1 Appropriate mitigation can assist in reducing the significance of environmental impacts asso
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-Licence schedule two.pdf:108: Once mitigation is in place, it is therefore necessary to identify what the significance of im
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (7).pdf:11: sites of particular significance including those protected under environmental
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (7).pdf:20:3.6 The significance of an effect is evaluated on the basis of the scale of the impact and
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (7).pdf:20: significance of effects, for ease of comparison. The terms used where applicable are:
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (7).pdf:23: Seaton Port’s national significance improving the UK’s capabilities to service key
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (7).pdf:33: Assessing Impact Significance
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (7).pdf:33:9.6 Determining the significance of impacts depends on a number of factors:
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (7).pdf:33:9.7 Table 9.1 defines the classification for the significance of potential impacts. Impacts
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (7).pdf:54:9.64 Behavioural responses to noise may increase in significance at more critical times,
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (7).pdf:54: significance of such impacts on the harbour seal population, especially during the
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (7).pdf:56: estuarine ecology are expected to be of neutral significance; therefore no mitigation
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (7).pdf:57:9.83 Noise impacts have been identified as potentially affecting seals. The significance of
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (7).pdf:61: impact magnitude and significance of effect are applied as set out in tables 17.8 –
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (7).pdf:76: changes the magnitude or significance of any impacts predicted.
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (7).pdf:77: negative significance the numbers of designated site species utilising the dry dock
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (7).pdf:79: adjacent SSSI units of Seal Sands and Greenabella Marsh and the SPA significance
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (7).pdf:81: effects of minor negative significance in the worst case scenario. This assessment
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (7).pdf:82: to PAH’s) on waterbirds, assessed that the overall significance of the impact from
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (7).pdf:83: being of minimal negative significance.
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (7).pdf:84: summarise the impacts to waterbirds and their associated significance of effects on
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (7).pdf:85: Impact Zone of Impact Significance Mitigation Residual
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (7).pdf:85: influence magnitude of effect proposed significance
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (7).pdf:85: change to habitats is of minimal negative significance and is unchanged from the
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (7).pdf:108:15.1 Appropriate mitigation can assist in reducing the significance of environmental impacts asso
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (7).pdf:108: Once mitigation is in place, it is therefore necessary to identify what the significance of im
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (3).pdf:11: sites of particular significance including those protected under environmental
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (3).pdf:20:3.6 The significance of an effect is evaluated on the basis of the scale of the impact and
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (3).pdf:20: significance of effects, for ease of comparison. The terms used where applicable are:
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (3).pdf:23: Seaton Port’s national significance improving the UK’s capabilities to service key
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (3).pdf:33: Assessing Impact Significance
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (3).pdf:33:9.6 Determining the significance of impacts depends on a number of factors:
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (3).pdf:33:9.7 Table 9.1 defines the classification for the significance of potential impacts. Impacts
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (3).pdf:54:9.64 Behavioural responses to noise may increase in significance at more critical times,
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (3).pdf:54: significance of such impacts on the harbour seal population, especially during the
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (3).pdf:56: estuarine ecology are expected to be of neutral significance; therefore no mitigation
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (3).pdf:57:9.83 Noise impacts have been identified as potentially affecting seals. The significance of
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (3).pdf:61: impact magnitude and significance of effect are applied as set out in tables 17.8 –
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (3).pdf:76: changes the magnitude or significance of any impacts predicted.
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (3).pdf:77: negative significance the numbers of designated site species utilising the dry dock
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (3).pdf:79: adjacent SSSI units of Seal Sands and Greenabella Marsh and the SPA significance
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (3).pdf:81: effects of minor negative significance in the worst case scenario. This assessment
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (3).pdf:82: to PAH’s) on waterbirds, assessed that the overall significance of the impact from
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (3).pdf:83: being of minimal negative significance.
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (3).pdf:84: summarise the impacts to waterbirds and their associated significance of effects on
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (3).pdf:85: Impact Zone of Impact Significance Mitigation Residual
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (3).pdf:85: influence magnitude of effect proposed significance
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (3).pdf:85: change to habitats is of minimal negative significance and is unchanged from the
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (3).pdf:108:15.1 Appropriate mitigation can assist in reducing the significance of environmental impacts asso
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (3).pdf:108: Once mitigation is in place, it is therefore necessary to identify what the significance of im
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (12).pdf:11: sites of particular significance including those protected under environmental
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (12).pdf:20:3.6 The significance of an effect is evaluated on the basis of the scale of the impact and
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (12).pdf:20: significance of effects, for ease of comparison. The terms used where applicable are:
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (12).pdf:23: Seaton Port’s national significance improving the UK’s capabilities to service key
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (12).pdf:33: Assessing Impact Significance
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (12).pdf:33:9.6 Determining the significance of impacts depends on a number of factors:
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (12).pdf:33:9.7 Table 9.1 defines the classification for the significance of potential impacts. Impacts
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (12).pdf:54:9.64 Behavioural responses to noise may increase in significance at more critical times,
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (12).pdf:54: significance of such impacts on the harbour seal population, especially during the
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (12).pdf:56: estuarine ecology are expected to be of neutral significance; therefore no mitigation
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (12).pdf:57:9.83 Noise impacts have been identified as potentially affecting seals. The significance of
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (12).pdf:61: impact magnitude and significance of effect are applied as set out in tables 17.8 –
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (12).pdf:76: changes the magnitude or significance of any impacts predicted.
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (12).pdf:77: negative significance the numbers of designated site species utilising the dry dock
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (12).pdf:79: adjacent SSSI units of Seal Sands and Greenabella Marsh and the SPA significance
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (12).pdf:81: effects of minor negative significance in the worst case scenario. This assessment
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (12).pdf:82: to PAH’s) on waterbirds, assessed that the overall significance of the impact from
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (12).pdf:83: being of minimal negative significance.
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (12).pdf:84: summarise the impacts to waterbirds and their associated significance of effects on
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (12).pdf:85: Impact Zone of Impact Significance Mitigation Residual
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (12).pdf:85: influence magnitude of effect proposed significance
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (12).pdf:85: change to habitats is of minimal negative significance and is unchanged from the
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (12).pdf:108:15.1 Appropriate mitigation can assist in reducing the significance of environmental impacts asso
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (12).pdf:108: Once mitigation is in place, it is therefore necessary to identify what the significance of im
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (5).pdf:11: sites of particular significance including those protected under environmental
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (5).pdf:20:3.6 The significance of an effect is evaluated on the basis of the scale of the impact and
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (5).pdf:20: significance of effects, for ease of comparison. The terms used where applicable are:
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (5).pdf:23: Seaton Port’s national significance improving the UK’s capabilities to service key
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (5).pdf:33: Assessing Impact Significance
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (5).pdf:33:9.6 Determining the significance of impacts depends on a number of factors:
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (5).pdf:33:9.7 Table 9.1 defines the classification for the significance of potential impacts. Impacts
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (5).pdf:54:9.64 Behavioural responses to noise may increase in significance at more critical times,
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (5).pdf:54: significance of such impacts on the harbour seal population, especially during the
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (5).pdf:56: estuarine ecology are expected to be of neutral significance; therefore no mitigation
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (5).pdf:57:9.83 Noise impacts have been identified as potentially affecting seals. The significance of
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (5).pdf:61: impact magnitude and significance of effect are applied as set out in tables 17.8 –
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (5).pdf:76: changes the magnitude or significance of any impacts predicted.
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (5).pdf:77: negative significance the numbers of designated site species utilising the dry dock
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (5).pdf:79: adjacent SSSI units of Seal Sands and Greenabella Marsh and the SPA significance
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (5).pdf:81: effects of minor negative significance in the worst case scenario. This assessment
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (5).pdf:82: to PAH’s) on waterbirds, assessed that the overall significance of the impact from
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (5).pdf:83: being of minimal negative significance.
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (5).pdf:84: summarise the impacts to waterbirds and their associated significance of effects on
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (5).pdf:85: Impact Zone of Impact Significance Mitigation Residual
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (5).pdf:85: influence magnitude of effect proposed significance
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (5).pdf:85: change to habitats is of minimal negative significance and is unchanged from the
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (5).pdf:108:15.1 Appropriate mitigation can assist in reducing the significance of environmental impacts asso
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (5).pdf:108: Once mitigation is in place, it is therefore necessary to identify what the significance of im
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-20160608 EIA Consent Decision Able Seaton ARC.pdf:7:TERRC proposals shows their significance to be minor/moderate negative (Table
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-20160608 EIA Consent Decision Able Seaton ARC.pdf:7:17.11). While the significance level is low, the fact that the Seal Sands SSSI is in
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (8).pdf:11: sites of particular significance including those protected under environmental
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (8).pdf:20:3.6 The significance of an effect is evaluated on the basis of the scale of the impact and
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (8).pdf:20: significance of effects, for ease of comparison. The terms used where applicable are:
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (8).pdf:23: Seaton Port’s national significance improving the UK’s capabilities to service key
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (8).pdf:33: Assessing Impact Significance
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (8).pdf:33:9.6 Determining the significance of impacts depends on a number of factors:
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (8).pdf:33:9.7 Table 9.1 defines the classification for the significance of potential impacts. Impacts
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (8).pdf:54:9.64 Behavioural responses to noise may increase in significance at more critical times,
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (8).pdf:54: significance of such impacts on the harbour seal population, especially during the
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (8).pdf:56: estuarine ecology are expected to be of neutral significance; therefore no mitigation
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (8).pdf:57:9.83 Noise impacts have been identified as potentially affecting seals. The significance of
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (8).pdf:61: impact magnitude and significance of effect are applied as set out in tables 17.8 –
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (8).pdf:76: changes the magnitude or significance of any impacts predicted.
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (8).pdf:77: negative significance the numbers of designated site species utilising the dry dock
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (8).pdf:79: adjacent SSSI units of Seal Sands and Greenabella Marsh and the SPA significance
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (8).pdf:81: effects of minor negative significance in the worst case scenario. This assessment
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (8).pdf:82: to PAH’s) on waterbirds, assessed that the overall significance of the impact from
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (8).pdf:83: being of minimal negative significance.
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (8).pdf:84: summarise the impacts to waterbirds and their associated significance of effects on
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (8).pdf:85: Impact Zone of Impact Significance Mitigation Residual
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (8).pdf:85: influence magnitude of effect proposed significance
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (8).pdf:85: change to habitats is of minimal negative significance and is unchanged from the
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (8).pdf:108:15.1 Appropriate mitigation can assist in reducing the significance of environmental impacts asso
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (8).pdf:108: Once mitigation is in place, it is therefore necessary to identify what the significance of im
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (9).pdf:11: sites of particular significance including those protected under environmental
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (9).pdf:20:3.6 The significance of an effect is evaluated on the basis of the scale of the impact and
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (9).pdf:20: significance of effects, for ease of comparison. The terms used where applicable are:
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (9).pdf:23: Seaton Port’s national significance improving the UK’s capabilities to service key
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (9).pdf:33: Assessing Impact Significance
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (9).pdf:33:9.6 Determining the significance of impacts depends on a number of factors:
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (9).pdf:33:9.7 Table 9.1 defines the classification for the significance of potential impacts. Impacts
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (9).pdf:54:9.64 Behavioural responses to noise may increase in significance at more critical times,
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (9).pdf:54: significance of such impacts on the harbour seal population, especially during the
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (9).pdf:56: estuarine ecology are expected to be of neutral significance; therefore no mitigation
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (9).pdf:57:9.83 Noise impacts have been identified as potentially affecting seals. The significance of
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (9).pdf:61: impact magnitude and significance of effect are applied as set out in tables 17.8 –
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (9).pdf:76: changes the magnitude or significance of any impacts predicted.
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (9).pdf:77: negative significance the numbers of designated site species utilising the dry dock
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (9).pdf:79: adjacent SSSI units of Seal Sands and Greenabella Marsh and the SPA significance
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (9).pdf:81: effects of minor negative significance in the worst case scenario. This assessment
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (9).pdf:82: to PAH’s) on waterbirds, assessed that the overall significance of the impact from
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (9).pdf:83: being of minimal negative significance.
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (9).pdf:84: summarise the impacts to waterbirds and their associated significance of effects on
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (9).pdf:85: Impact Zone of Impact Significance Mitigation Residual
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (9).pdf:85: influence magnitude of effect proposed significance
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (9).pdf:85: change to habitats is of minimal negative significance and is unchanged from the
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (9).pdf:108:15.1 Appropriate mitigation can assist in reducing the significance of environmental impacts asso
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (9).pdf:108: Once mitigation is in place, it is therefore necessary to identify what the significance of im
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS - Non-Technical Summary - Section 37.pdf:12: status of the ecological features the assessment of the overall significance of the impacts is
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS - Non-Technical Summary - Section 37.pdf:13: significance of the impacts will be reduced to a neutral or minor negative residual impact.
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS - Non-Technical Summary - Section 37.pdf:13: levels found on Seal Sands and therefore of minor significance.
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS - Non-Technical Summary - Section 37.pdf:14: magnitude and significance, the Guidelines for Ecological Impact Assessment developed by
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS - Non-Technical Summary - Section 37.pdf:14: 11 there are low numbers of feeding birds there and its loss will have very limited significance
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-TERRC EIS - Non-Technical Summary - Section 37.pdf:14: construction/disassembly the impact is expected to be of a minor negative significance, but
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (11).pdf:11: sites of particular significance including those protected under environmental
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (11).pdf:20:3.6 The significance of an effect is evaluated on the basis of the scale of the impact and
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (11).pdf:20: significance of effects, for ease of comparison. The terms used where applicable are:
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (11).pdf:23: Seaton Port’s national significance improving the UK’s capabilities to service key
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (11).pdf:33: Assessing Impact Significance
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (11).pdf:33:9.6 Determining the significance of impacts depends on a number of factors:
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (11).pdf:33:9.7 Table 9.1 defines the classification for the significance of potential impacts. Impacts
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (11).pdf:54:9.64 Behavioural responses to noise may increase in significance at more critical times,
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (11).pdf:54: significance of such impacts on the harbour seal population, especially during the
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (11).pdf:56: estuarine ecology are expected to be of neutral significance; therefore no mitigation
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (11).pdf:57:9.83 Noise impacts have been identified as potentially affecting seals. The significance of
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (11).pdf:61: impact magnitude and significance of effect are applied as set out in tables 17.8 –
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (11).pdf:76: changes the magnitude or significance of any impacts predicted.
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (11).pdf:77: negative significance the numbers of designated site species utilising the dry dock
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (11).pdf:79: adjacent SSSI units of Seal Sands and Greenabella Marsh and the SPA significance
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (11).pdf:81: effects of minor negative significance in the worst case scenario. This assessment
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (11).pdf:82: to PAH’s) on waterbirds, assessed that the overall significance of the impact from
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (11).pdf:83: being of minimal negative significance.
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (11).pdf:84: summarise the impacts to waterbirds and their associated significance of effects on
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (11).pdf:85: Impact Zone of Impact Significance Mitigation Residual
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (11).pdf:85: influence magnitude of effect proposed significance
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (11).pdf:85: change to habitats is of minimal negative significance and is unchanged from the
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (11).pdf:108:15.1 Appropriate mitigation can assist in reducing the significance of environmental impacts asso
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (11).pdf:108: Once mitigation is in place, it is therefore necessary to identify what the significance of im
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-502 - NTS 09.02.16 (1).pdf:9: being of minimal negative significance.
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-502 - NTS 09.02.16 (1).pdf:10: Impact Zone of Impact Significance Mitigation Residual
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-502 - NTS 09.02.16 (1).pdf:10: influence magnitude of effect proposed significance
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (6).pdf:11: sites of particular significance including those protected under environmental
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (6).pdf:20:3.6 The significance of an effect is evaluated on the basis of the scale of the impact and
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (6).pdf:20: significance of effects, for ease of comparison. The terms used where applicable are:
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (6).pdf:23: Seaton Port’s national significance improving the UK’s capabilities to service key
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (6).pdf:33: Assessing Impact Significance
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (6).pdf:33:9.6 Determining the significance of impacts depends on a number of factors:
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (6).pdf:33:9.7 Table 9.1 defines the classification for the significance of potential impacts. Impacts
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (6).pdf:54:9.64 Behavioural responses to noise may increase in significance at more critical times,
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (6).pdf:54: significance of such impacts on the harbour seal population, especially during the
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (6).pdf:56: estuarine ecology are expected to be of neutral significance; therefore no mitigation
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (6).pdf:57:9.83 Noise impacts have been identified as potentially affecting seals. The significance of
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (6).pdf:61: impact magnitude and significance of effect are applied as set out in tables 17.8 –
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (6).pdf:76: changes the magnitude or significance of any impacts predicted.
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (6).pdf:77: negative significance the numbers of designated site species utilising the dry dock
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (6).pdf:79: adjacent SSSI units of Seal Sands and Greenabella Marsh and the SPA significance
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (6).pdf:81: effects of minor negative significance in the worst case scenario. This assessment
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (6).pdf:82: to PAH’s) on waterbirds, assessed that the overall significance of the impact from
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (6).pdf:83: being of minimal negative significance.
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (6).pdf:84: summarise the impacts to waterbirds and their associated significance of effects on
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (6).pdf:85: Impact Zone of Impact Significance Mitigation Residual
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (6).pdf:85: influence magnitude of effect proposed significance
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (6).pdf:85: change to habitats is of minimal negative significance and is unchanged from the
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (6).pdf:108:15.1 Appropriate mitigation can assist in reducing the significance of environmental impacts asso
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (6).pdf:108: Once mitigation is in place, it is therefore necessary to identify what the significance of im
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (4).pdf:11: sites of particular significance including those protected under environmental
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (4).pdf:20:3.6 The significance of an effect is evaluated on the basis of the scale of the impact and
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (4).pdf:20: significance of effects, for ease of comparison. The terms used where applicable are:
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (4).pdf:23: Seaton Port’s national significance improving the UK’s capabilities to service key
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (4).pdf:33: Assessing Impact Significance
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (4).pdf:33:9.6 Determining the significance of impacts depends on a number of factors:
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (4).pdf:33:9.7 Table 9.1 defines the classification for the significance of potential impacts. Impacts
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (4).pdf:54:9.64 Behavioural responses to noise may increase in significance at more critical times,
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (4).pdf:54: significance of such impacts on the harbour seal population, especially during the
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (4).pdf:56: estuarine ecology are expected to be of neutral significance; therefore no mitigation
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (4).pdf:57:9.83 Noise impacts have been identified as potentially affecting seals. The significance of
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (4).pdf:61: impact magnitude and significance of effect are applied as set out in tables 17.8 –
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (4).pdf:76: changes the magnitude or significance of any impacts predicted.
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (4).pdf:77: negative significance the numbers of designated site species utilising the dry dock
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (4).pdf:79: adjacent SSSI units of Seal Sands and Greenabella Marsh and the SPA significance
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (4).pdf:81: effects of minor negative significance in the worst case scenario. This assessment
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (4).pdf:82: to PAH’s) on waterbirds, assessed that the overall significance of the impact from
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (4).pdf:83: being of minimal negative significance.
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (4).pdf:84: summarise the impacts to waterbirds and their associated significance of effects on
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (4).pdf:85: Impact Zone of Impact Significance Mitigation Residual
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (4).pdf:85: influence magnitude of effect proposed significance
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (4).pdf:85: change to habitats is of minimal negative significance and is unchanged from the
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (4).pdf:108:15.1 Appropriate mitigation can assist in reducing the significance of environmental impacts asso
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (4).pdf:108: Once mitigation is in place, it is therefore necessary to identify what the significance of im
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (2).pdf:11: sites of particular significance including those protected under environmental
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (2).pdf:20:3.6 The significance of an effect is evaluated on the basis of the scale of the impact and
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (2).pdf:20: significance of effects, for ease of comparison. The terms used where applicable are:
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (2).pdf:23: Seaton Port’s national significance improving the UK’s capabilities to service key
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (2).pdf:33: Assessing Impact Significance
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (2).pdf:33:9.6 Determining the significance of impacts depends on a number of factors:
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (2).pdf:33:9.7 Table 9.1 defines the classification for the significance of potential impacts. Impacts
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (2).pdf:54:9.64 Behavioural responses to noise may increase in significance at more critical times,
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (2).pdf:54: significance of such impacts on the harbour seal population, especially during the
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (2).pdf:56: estuarine ecology are expected to be of neutral significance; therefore no mitigation
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (2).pdf:57:9.83 Noise impacts have been identified as potentially affecting seals. The significance of
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (2).pdf:61: impact magnitude and significance of effect are applied as set out in tables 17.8 –
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (2).pdf:76: changes the magnitude or significance of any impacts predicted.
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (2).pdf:77: negative significance the numbers of designated site species utilising the dry dock
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (2).pdf:79: adjacent SSSI units of Seal Sands and Greenabella Marsh and the SPA significance
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (2).pdf:81: effects of minor negative significance in the worst case scenario. This assessment
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (2).pdf:82: to PAH’s) on waterbirds, assessed that the overall significance of the impact from
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (2).pdf:83: being of minimal negative significance.
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (2).pdf:84: summarise the impacts to waterbirds and their associated significance of effects on
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (2).pdf:85: Impact Zone of Impact Significance Mitigation Residual
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (2).pdf:85: influence magnitude of effect proposed significance
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (2).pdf:85: change to habitats is of minimal negative significance and is unchanged from the
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (2).pdf:108:15.1 Appropriate mitigation can assist in reducing the significance of environmental impacts asso
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (2).pdf:108: Once mitigation is in place, it is therefore necessary to identify what the significance of im
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16.pdf:11: sites of particular significance including those protected under environmental
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16.pdf:20:3.6 The significance of an effect is evaluated on the basis of the scale of the impact and
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16.pdf:20: significance of effects, for ease of comparison. The terms used where applicable are:
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16.pdf:23: Seaton Port’s national significance improving the UK’s capabilities to service key
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16.pdf:33: Assessing Impact Significance
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16.pdf:33:9.6 Determining the significance of impacts depends on a number of factors:
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16.pdf:33:9.7 Table 9.1 defines the classification for the significance of potential impacts. Impacts
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16.pdf:54:9.64 Behavioural responses to noise may increase in significance at more critical times,
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16.pdf:54: significance of such impacts on the harbour seal population, especially during the
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16.pdf:56: estuarine ecology are expected to be of neutral significance; therefore no mitigation
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16.pdf:57:9.83 Noise impacts have been identified as potentially affecting seals. The significance of
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16.pdf:61: impact magnitude and significance of effect are applied as set out in tables 17.8 –
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16.pdf:76: changes the magnitude or significance of any impacts predicted.
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16.pdf:77: negative significance the numbers of designated site species utilising the dry dock
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16.pdf:79: adjacent SSSI units of Seal Sands and Greenabella Marsh and the SPA significance
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16.pdf:81: effects of minor negative significance in the worst case scenario. This assessment
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16.pdf:82: to PAH’s) on waterbirds, assessed that the overall significance of the impact from
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16.pdf:83: being of minimal negative significance.
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16.pdf:84: summarise the impacts to waterbirds and their associated significance of effects on
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16.pdf:85: Impact Zone of Impact Significance Mitigation Residual
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16.pdf:85: influence magnitude of effect proposed significance
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16.pdf:85: change to habitats is of minimal negative significance and is unchanged from the
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16.pdf:108:15.1 Appropriate mitigation can assist in reducing the significance of environmental impacts asso
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16.pdf:108: Once mitigation is in place, it is therefore necessary to identify what the significance of im
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:12: receptors is not considered of potential significance.
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:12: receptors is not considered to be of potential significance from metal generation.
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:15: deposition, the concentration of asbestos is anticipated to be of no significance at the
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:15: surroundings outside the site boundaries is not commonly considered of significance due to
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:16: especially for off-site receptors is not considered of potential significance. This is especially
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:17: significance at the location of any of the identified receptors.
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:20: site was not anticipated to be of potential significance due to the low sensitivity of the site for
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:53: of current or proposed noise action levels. To reduce the significance of this potential
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:53: vibration. To reduce the significance of this potential exposure a range of vibration
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:75:30.10 Significance of Predicted Impacts
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:75:30.10.1 The assessment of the significance of the impacts of the proposals is based on the scale and
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:75: accommodate change and any mitigation measures proposed. Significance is graded the
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:92:30.24 Assessment of Significance
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:92:30.24.1 The assessment of significance is derived from the importance of the landscape, its capacity
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:92: to accommodate change and the nature of the impact. The level of significance will be higher
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:92: capacity to accommodate change. The assessment of significance for each landscape
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:93: significance of the impact of the site on the surrounding elements and views is also the low
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:93:Table 30.4 Assessment of Significance
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:93: Landscape Element/ Importance Capacity to Nature of Impact Significance
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:94: Landscape Element/ Importance Capacity to Nature of Impact Significance of
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:94: surrounding elements and majority of receptors is of minor significance.
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:94: the surrounding area the significance of these are determined as being minor. Moderate
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:94: to its close proximity to the site. These reduce to minor significance at the operational phase.
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:94:30.25.3 The only impact of major significance relates to those on views currently available from the
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:94: development. Although this constitutes an impact of major significance during construction, it
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:95: uses of the site, this will constitute an impact of minor significance on the landscape and
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:95: reduce to minor significance once the operational phase is reached.
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:119: species to smothering it suggests that the significance of the impact will be “Minor Adverse”.
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:127: the overall significance of the impact from chemical pollution on wildlife and birds is likely to
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:134: highest impact significance of the individual impacts, that is “minor/moderate negative”
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:140: TERRC dock proposals shows their significance to be neutral to minor/moderate negative
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:140: (Table 14.5). While the significance level is generally low it is recommended that a series of
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:141: influence citation term significance long term
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:143: proposals shows their significance to be minor/moderate negative (Table 17.11). While the
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:143: significance level is low, the fact that the Seal Sands SSSI is in ‘unfavourable condition’
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:145: (metres) risk significance of assuming mitigation
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:148: vibration. To reduce the significance of this potential exposure a range of vibration
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:155: significance at
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:166: status of the ecological features the assessment of the overall significance of the impacts is
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:167: significance of the impacts will be reduced to a neutral or minor negative residual impact.
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:167: levels found on Seal Sands and therefore of minor significance.
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:168: magnitude and significance, the Guidelines for Ecological Impact Assessment developed by
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:168: 11 there are low numbers of feeding birds there and its loss will have very limited significance
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-EIS Part 2.pdf:168: construction/disassembly the impact is expected to be of a minor negative significance, but
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-502 - NTS 09.02.16.pdf:9: being of minimal negative significance.
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-502 - NTS 09.02.16.pdf:10: Impact Zone of Impact Significance Mitigation Residual
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-502 - NTS 09.02.16.pdf:10: influence magnitude of effect proposed significance
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (10).pdf:11: sites of particular significance including those protected under environmental
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (10).pdf:20:3.6 The significance of an effect is evaluated on the basis of the scale of the impact and
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (10).pdf:20: significance of effects, for ease of comparison. The terms used where applicable are:
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (10).pdf:23: Seaton Port’s national significance improving the UK’s capabilities to service key
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (10).pdf:33: Assessing Impact Significance
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (10).pdf:33:9.6 Determining the significance of impacts depends on a number of factors:
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (10).pdf:33:9.7 Table 9.1 defines the classification for the significance of potential impacts. Impacts
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (10).pdf:54:9.64 Behavioural responses to noise may increase in significance at more critical times,
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (10).pdf:54: significance of such impacts on the harbour seal population, especially during the
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (10).pdf:56: estuarine ecology are expected to be of neutral significance; therefore no mitigation
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (10).pdf:57:9.83 Noise impacts have been identified as potentially affecting seals. The significance of
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (10).pdf:61: impact magnitude and significance of effect are applied as set out in tables 17.8 –
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (10).pdf:76: changes the magnitude or significance of any impacts predicted.
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (10).pdf:77: negative significance the numbers of designated site species utilising the dry dock
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (10).pdf:79: adjacent SSSI units of Seal Sands and Greenabella Marsh and the SPA significance
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (10).pdf:81: effects of minor negative significance in the worst case scenario. This assessment
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (10).pdf:82: to PAH’s) on waterbirds, assessed that the overall significance of the impact from
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (10).pdf:83: being of minimal negative significance.
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (10).pdf:84: summarise the impacts to waterbirds and their associated significance of effects on
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (10).pdf:85: Impact Zone of Impact Significance Mitigation Residual
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (10).pdf:85: influence magnitude of effect proposed significance
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (10).pdf:85: change to habitats is of minimal negative significance and is unchanged from the
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (10).pdf:108:15.1 Appropriate mitigation can assist in reducing the significance of environmental impacts asso
MMO/MLA_2015_00433/MLA_2015_00433-501 - MMO ES Addendum 04.03.16 (10).pdf:108: Once mitigation is in place, it is therefore necessary to identify what the significance of im
MMO/MLA_2022_00248/MLA_2022_00248-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:14: the significance of the risks and evidence to show why these risks cannot be avoided or further mitigated. (max. 2000