{include:Teesworks - twitter - menu}
{html}
<blockquote class=“twitter-tweet”><p lang=“en” dir=“ltr”>1 Hasn't Teesside been sold short? <a href=“https://twitter.com/TeesworksUK?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw”>@TeesworksUK</a> being done too cheaply, too quickly, too carelessly when compared to "one of the most ambitious and effective remediation projects"<a href=“https://t.co/n6spHURJnZ”>https://t.co/n6spHURJnZ</a><a href=“https://twitter.com/hashtag/toxictees?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw”>#toxictees</a> <a href=“https://twitter.com/hashtag/saveoursea?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw”>#saveoursea</a> <a href=“https://twitter.com/hashtag/pausethedredge?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw”>#pausethedredge</a> <a href=“https://twitter.com/DefraGovUK?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw”>@defragovuk</a> <a href=“https://twitter.com/BenHouchen?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw”>@benhouchen</a> <a href=“https://twitter.com/RishiSunak?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw”>@rishisunak</a> <a href=“https://t.co/2MZwK2Dj8l”>pic.twitter.com/2MZwK2Dj8l</a></p>— Simon R Gibbon (@simonrg) <a href=“https://twitter.com/simonrg/status/1618777532748431360?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw”>January 27, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src=“https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js” charset=“utf-8”></script>
{/html}
{html}
<blockquote class=“twitter-tweet”><p lang=“en” dir=“ltr”>2The Avenue site highly contaminated just like <a href=“https://twitter.com/TeesworksUK?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw”>@TeesworksUK</a>, but a tenth the size and <a href=“https://twitter.com/TeesworksUK?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw”>@TeesworksUK</a> only appears to have double the money. <a href=“https://twitter.com/TeesworksUK?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw”>@TeesworksUK</a> given impossible task, surely something had to give? Why not redevelop 20% of site as that was all the money <a href=“https://twitter.com/RishiSunak?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw”>@RishiSunak</a> gave? <a href=“https://t.co/uUc1LyuNIj”>pic.twitter.com/uUc1LyuNIj</a></p>— Simon R Gibbon (@simonrg) <a href=“https://twitter.com/simonrg/status/1618779142887186437?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw”>January 27, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src=“https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js” charset=“utf-8”></script>
{/html}
{html}
<blockquote class=“twitter-tweet”><p lang=“en” dir=“ltr”>3<a href=“https://t.co/e6pHn9J0Eu”>https://t.co/e6pHn9J0Eu</a> promises to "Deliver redevelopment in a way that reduces pollution, contributes to habitat protection and long term sustainability, and that encourages bio-diversity." Avenue delivered, but <a href=“https://twitter.com/TeesworksUK?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw”>@TeesworksUK</a> cheaply and quickly?????<a href=“https://t.co/BlIMIx8d56”>https://t.co/BlIMIx8d56</a></p>— Simon R Gibbon (@simonrg) <a href=“https://twitter.com/simonrg/status/1618779928010555393?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw”>January 27, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src=“https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js” charset=“utf-8”></script>
{/html}
{html}
<blockquote class=“twitter-tweet”><p lang=“en” dir=“ltr”>4<br>Why environment so high?<br>That's what the people asked for, so <a href=“https://twitter.com/TeesworksUK?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw”>@TeesworksUK</a> promised jobs, environment and heritage.<br>Heritage blown up too expensive, so is it any wonder "activists" are upset if environment is sacrificed.<br>Nobody signed up to jobs, no heritage and no environment. <a href=“https://t.co/CwYLskUWZT”>pic.twitter.com/CwYLskUWZT</a></p>— Simon R Gibbon (@simonrg) <a href=“https://twitter.com/simonrg/status/1618781022182866945?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw”>January 27, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src=“https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js” charset=“utf-8”></script>
{/html}
{html}
<blockquote class=“twitter-tweet”><p lang=“en” dir=“ltr”>5 The Avenue remediated! <a href=“https://twitter.com/TeesworksUK?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw”>@TeesworksUK</a> remediate no, just redevelop? Avenue contamination gone, <a href=“https://twitter.com/TeesworksUK?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw”>@TeesworksUK</a> contamination under layer of soil. <a href=“https://twitter.com/TeesworksUK?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw”>@TeesworksUK</a> one big landfill, a problem for the future?<a href=“https://twitter.com/hashtag/toxictees?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw”>#toxictees</a> <a href=“https://twitter.com/hashtag/saveoursea?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw”>#saveoursea</a> <a href=“https://twitter.com/hashtag/pausethedredge?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw”>#pausethedredge</a> <a href=“https://twitter.com/DefraGovUK?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw”>@defragovuk</a> <a href=“https://twitter.com/BenHouchen?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw”>@benhouchen</a> <a href=“https://twitter.com/RishiSunak?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw”>@rishisunak</a> <a href=“https://t.co/CpNZtiSXpD”>pic.twitter.com/CpNZtiSXpD</a></p>— Simon R Gibbon (@simonrg) <a href=“https://twitter.com/simonrg/status/1618782095714975744?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw”>January 27, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src=“https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js” charset=“utf-8”></script>
{/html}
{html}
<blockquote class=“twitter-tweet”><p lang=“en” dir=“ltr”>6 <a href=“https://twitter.com/TeesworksUK?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw”>@TeesworksUK</a> isn't this just cheap and dangerous? Dumping at 100,000s m3 of land at sea. Excavating requires soil to be tested before reuse, dredging doesn't require further testing before dumping. <a href=“https://t.co/6hpg5anBFz”>https://t.co/6hpg5anBFz</a> <a href=“https://t.co/LNi3xobdfM”>pic.twitter.com/LNi3xobdfM</a></p>— Simon R Gibbon (@simonrg) <a href=“https://twitter.com/simonrg/status/1618786044488597505?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw”>January 27, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src=“https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js” charset=“utf-8”></script>
{/html}
{html}
<blockquote class=“twitter-tweet”><p lang=“en” dir=“ltr”>7 <a href=“https://twitter.com/TeesworksUK?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw”>@TeesworksUK</a> how isn't this poor practice? It is known that the site contains non-aqueous phase liquids - hydrocarbons, on land these have to be treated, in the river it looks like they are just allowed to float away. This could be easily stopped with a boom - good practice! <a href=“https://t.co/tXWdVbq7xy”>pic.twitter.com/tXWdVbq7xy</a></p>— Simon R Gibbon (@simonrg) <a href=“https://twitter.com/simonrg/status/1618786869021659136?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw”>January 27, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src=“https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js” charset=“utf-8”></script>
{/html}
{html}
<blockquote class=“twitter-tweet”><p lang=“en” dir=“ltr”>8 <a href=“https://twitter.com/TeesworksUK?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw”>@TeesworksUK</a> how isn't this cheap? While the Masterplan stressed heritage and nature, the planning applications have removed nature and @TeeworksUK has blown up the heritage, fewest jobs method of demolition too.<a href=“https://t.co/1rHBAJ5Too”>https://t.co/1rHBAJ5Too</a></p>— Simon R Gibbon (@simonrg) <a href=“https://twitter.com/simonrg/status/1618787568845479938?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw”>January 27, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src=“https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js” charset=“utf-8”></script>
{/html}
{html}
<blockquote class=“twitter-tweet”><p lang=“en” dir=“ltr”>9 <a href=“https://twitter.com/TeesworksUK?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw”>@TeesworksUK</a> how isn't this poor practise and environmentally damaging?<br>Image from MLA-2020-506 - Vibrating in oily ground is going to disperse oil phase into the river - so why aren't you doing this behind a cofferdam?<br>Is cost more important than the River Tees / North Sea? <a href=“https://t.co/pFDKQncu1L”>pic.twitter.com/pFDKQncu1L</a></p>— Simon R Gibbon (@simonrg) <a href=“https://twitter.com/simonrg/status/1618789240783134722?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw”>January 27, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src=“https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js” charset=“utf-8”></script>
{/html}
{html}
<blockquote class=“twitter-tweet”><p lang=“en” dir=“ltr”>10 <a href=“https://twitter.com/TeesworksUK?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw”>@TeesworksUK</a> I can't see where your conceptual site model for safety considers digging away at the riverbank as you are doing now or demolishing by explosion? Don't these create pathways for environmental damage that just aren't taken into account? <a href=“https://t.co/cOUdDqt6rd”>pic.twitter.com/cOUdDqt6rd</a></p>— Simon R Gibbon (@simonrg) <a href=“https://twitter.com/simonrg/status/1618792171452391424?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw”>January 27, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src=“https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js” charset=“utf-8”></script>
{/html}
{html}
<blockquote class=“twitter-tweet”><p lang=“en” dir=“ltr”>11 <a href=“https://twitter.com/TeesworksUK?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw”>@TeesworksUK</a> advertised as most contaminated brownfield site in UK.<br>But according to the conceptual site model it presents virtually no risks to the natural environment.<br>Not surprising if risks ruled out by assumptions, acquifer is brackish, nothing gets in the river, … <a href=“https://t.co/pBxQhPmruW”>pic.twitter.com/pBxQhPmruW</a></p>— Simon R Gibbon (@simonrg) <a href=“https://twitter.com/simonrg/status/1618793455144296450?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw”>January 27, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src=“https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js” charset=“utf-8”></script>
{/html}
{html}
<blockquote class=“twitter-tweet”><p lang=“en” dir=“ltr”>12 Having read 1000's of pages of planning application documents there are systematic failings in the approach taken, water courses don't connect, despite historical use clean samples meant everything ok - so please sign <a href=“https://t.co/o7YyYB3XpE”>https://t.co/o7YyYB3XpE</a><a href=“https://twitter.com/hashtag/toxictees?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw”>#toxictees</a> <a href=“https://twitter.com/hashtag/pausethedredge?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw”>#pausethedredge</a></p>— Simon R Gibbon (@simonrg) <a href=“https://twitter.com/simonrg/status/1618794064744443905?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw”>January 27, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src=“https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js” charset=“utf-8”></script>
{/html}