North East File Collection - NEFC

{include:Teesworks - keywords - menu}

EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:27: the combustion gases from a typical CCGT plant contain negligible amounts of

EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:56: Therefore, it is considered that the effects of operational traffic would be negligible

EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:66:  negligible – imperceptible effect to an environmental resource or receptor; or

EN010103-002386-Environment Agency - Comments on any other information submitted at Deadline 10.pdf:4: analysis suggests that this will have a negligible impact on ambient DIN

EN010103-002421-NZT DCO 9.42 - Comments on D9 Submissions & Additional Submissions - Oct 2022 (D11).pdf:27: negligible and does not address the matters set powers sought and the extent of the Order

EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:39: Ramsar as a result of site plant and NRMM emissions is likely to be negligible and not

EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:49: are either not sensitive to nitrogen deposition or will be affected to a negligible

EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:50: therefore considered to have a negligible effect on air quality. Pollution from

EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:70: between negligible and potentially impactful projects and plans.

EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:100: dismiss atmospheric pollution impacts as negligible. Therefore, this impact pathway is screened in for Appropriate Assessment where the updated modelling

EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:112: c. Since the area around the Proposed Development is of negligible importance to The Wash and North Norfolk Coast harbour seal population, no in

EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:135: reaching the coast, then it can be concluded that there would be negligible risk of any

EN010103-002528-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:27: done at night in order to have a negligible impact on users of the surface land. Requirement

EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:41: Ramsar as a result of site plant and NRMM emissions is likely to be negligible and not

EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:52: be affected to a negligible degree Likely Significant Effects, LSEs on the Durham Coast

EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:52: therefore considered to have a negligible effect on air quality. Pollution from

EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:72: between negligible and potentially impactful projects and plans.

EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:100: dismiss atmospheric pollution impacts as negligible. Therefore, this impact pathway is screened in for Appropriate Assessment where the updated modelling

EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:112: c. Since the area around the Proposed Development is of negligible importance to The Wash and North Norfolk Coast harbour seal population, no in

EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:135: reaching the coast, then it can be concluded that there would be negligible risk of any

EN010103-002254-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:27: done at night in order to have a negligible impact on users of the surface land. Requirement

EN010103-002323-NZT DCO 9.36 - Nutrient Nitrogen Briefing Paper Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:24: made. Initial analysis suggests that this will have a negligible

EN010103-002323-NZT DCO 9.36 - Nutrient Nitrogen Briefing Paper Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:28: made. Initial analysis suggests that this will have a negligible

EN010103-000910-NZT DCO 6.2.18 ES Vol Chapter 18 Archaeology and Cultural Heritage.pdf:14:Negligible Assets whose values are compromised by poor

EN010103-000910-NZT DCO 6.2.18 ES Vol Chapter 18 Archaeology and Cultural Heritage.pdf:15:Low Moderate Minor Minor Negligible

EN010103-000910-NZT DCO 6.2.18 ES Vol Chapter 18 Archaeology and Cultural Heritage.pdf:15:Negligible Neutral Neutral Neutral Neutral

EN010103-000910-NZT DCO 6.2.18 ES Vol Chapter 18 Archaeology and Cultural Heritage.pdf:15: would be less than substantial. A minor or negligible (not significant) effect

EN010103-000910-NZT DCO 6.2.18 ES Vol Chapter 18 Archaeology and Cultural Heritage.pdf:17: therefore negligible due to its presumed poor level of preservation. It is

EN010103-000910-NZT DCO 6.2.18 ES Vol Chapter 18 Archaeology and Cultural Heritage.pdf:17: negligible as its value is limited by its poor preservation. It is assessed there

EN010103-000910-NZT DCO 6.2.18 ES Vol Chapter 18 Archaeology and Cultural Heritage.pdf:17: asset is assessed to be negligible as it is no longer extant. There would be

EN010103-000910-NZT DCO 6.2.18 ES Vol Chapter 18 Archaeology and Cultural Heritage.pdf:18: and their archaeological interest and value is assessed to be negligible.

EN010103-000910-NZT DCO 6.2.18 ES Vol Chapter 18 Archaeology and Cultural Heritage.pdf:18: but, as the sites no longer survive, they have negligible archaeological

EN010103-000910-NZT DCO 6.2.18 ES Vol Chapter 18 Archaeology and Cultural Heritage.pdf:18: interest and their value is negligible. There would be no impact to the assets’

EN010103-000910-NZT DCO 6.2.18 ES Vol Chapter 18 Archaeology and Cultural Heritage.pdf:19: understanding of the industrial heritage of the area, but they have negligible

EN010103-000910-NZT DCO 6.2.18 ES Vol Chapter 18 Archaeology and Cultural Heritage.pdf:19: archaeological interest and their value is negligible. There would be no

EN010103-001119-NZT DCO 6.4.20 ES Vol III Appendix 12C Preliminary Ecological Appraisal Part 1.pdf:12: • Negligible (common and widespread ecological features that have very

EN010103-001119-NZT DCO 6.4.20 ES Vol III Appendix 12C Preliminary Ecological Appraisal Part 1.pdf:19: therefore assessed as having negligible nature conservation value.

EN010103-001119-NZT DCO 6.4.20 ES Vol III Appendix 12C Preliminary Ecological Appraisal Part 1.pdf:20: substituted and of negligible nature conservation value, however where they

EN010103-001119-NZT DCO 6.4.20 ES Vol III Appendix 12C Preliminary Ecological Appraisal Part 1.pdf:22: therefore assessed as having negligible nature conservation value.

EN010103-001119-NZT DCO 6.4.20 ES Vol III Appendix 12C Preliminary Ecological Appraisal Part 1.pdf:22: assessed to be of negligible value.

EN010103-001117-NZT DCO 6.4.20 ES Vol III Appendix 12C Preliminary Ecological Appraisal Part 4.pdf:7:boarded up securely and has only negligible potential for bats. Amenity shrub and

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:94: negligible adverse effect for the Proposed Development in isolation. A

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:118: decommissioning are predicted to be negligible adverse and there will be no

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:119: greater than negligible adverse.

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:123: not lead to any breaches of national air ecological receptors are assessed as negligible and not significant.

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:123: site plant are also assessed as negligible and not significant.

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:124: proceed. Development are predicted to result in negligible adverse effects at all

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:134: negligible and therefore not of significance, while there will be no physical

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:138: connectivity of the green Infrastructure mineral resources considered is negligible (Chapter 10 ‘Geology and

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:138: plant available; containment of noise or negligible adverse or less. There would be a moderate/minor adverse effect

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:144: predicted to be negligible adverse (not significant).

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:144: while paragraph 2.2.6 notes that the and junctions are anticipated to be negligible and therefore not significant.

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:144: considered to be negligible (not significant).

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:144: therefore, anticipated to be negligible (not significant). A Decommissioning

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:153: options considered for installing the construction is considered negligible.

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:189: Plan Strategy transport network. be negligible given that only the CO2 Gathering Network and parts of the

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:191: Plan transport network. operational traffic will be negligible given that only the CO2 Gathering

EN010103-001735-Redcar & Cleveland Borough Council - EN010103-001527-NZT-ExQ1-editable-version.pdf:22: summarise potential impacts on tourism to be negligible adverse during the construction

EN010103-001735-Redcar & Cleveland Borough Council - EN010103-001527-NZT-ExQ1-editable-version.pdf:23: iv) Is the Applicants’ assessment that potential impacts on tourism would be negligible

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:27: deposits with low permeability that have negligible significance for water supply

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:88: negligible within the water bodies directly affected and are not significant to

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:89: Tees Estuary (S Bank) waterbody. However, this risk is considered negligible

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:97: surface water runoff, then a negligible impact is predicted to the Tees Coastal

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:99: considered to have a negligible impact, especially at the water body level.

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:100: of impact is predicted to be negligibleminor and highly localised, especially

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:100: therefore predicted to be negligibleminor and highly localised, especially at

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:100: of unfavourable conditions), and so a negligible impact on fish is expected.

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:106: considered to be minorminornegligible and localised, and not significant at

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:108: negligible.

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:109: deposition, then a negligible impact is considered appropriate for this

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:111: storage areas would be adequately bunded, negligible impacts on these

EN010103-002046-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:27: done at night in order to have a negligible impact on users of the surface land. Requirement

EN010103-001246-EA_NZT_OFFICIAL_171221_Redacted.pdf:9:intertidal habitats is considered to be negligible. However, the Applicant has failed

EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:25: negligible. EW confirmed that this is pending detailed modelling which is underway.

EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:103: far field. EW noted that this is considered to be negligible, if it is

EN010103-001604-NZT DCO 9.4 - APPENDIX 5 LATEST AUDITED ACCOUNTS – TOTAL GAS & POWER CHARTERING LIMITED.pdf:117:induced is likewise considered negligible.

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:43:negligible methane emissions, the question whether using a applies across the spectrum of hydrogen provenance and it

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:166: and operational impacts are negligible, then the GHG

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:167: negative or negligible

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:169: Negligible

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:169: effect. It is down to the practitioner to differentiate emissions, is assessed as having a negligible effect that is

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:170: ‘negligible’ non-significant effect conclusion does not and indicates exemplary performance where a project

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:170: adverse effects and beneficial effects are considered to be significant. Minor adverse and negligible effects are not

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:170: Negligible: the project’s GHG impacts would be reduced through measures that go well beyond existing and

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:170: achieved well before 2050. A project with negligible effects provides GHG performance that is well ‘ahead of the

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:174: into the assessment of additional mitigation and residual negligible / beneficial]”.

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:230:be considered and which are determined to have only a negligible effect on the environment. The

EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:12: Negligible (or Low for groundwater) and is dependent on the assessment

EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:14:Negligible No geological exposures, little / Geology e.g. significant depth of made

EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:14: Negligible is not applicable to Groundwater N/A

EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:17:Negligible Results in effect on attribute, but of Geology Very minor loss or detrimental

EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:18:Receptor No change Negligible Minor Moderate Major

EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:18:Negligible Neutral Neutral Neutral or Neutral or Slight

EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:35: impact from any loss is considered negligible.

EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:36: considered is negligible.

EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:37: Infrastructure is installed. However, the loss is likely to be negligible given

EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:45:Construction Geology Very High Foundations Negligible GI is required to confirm Baseline Slight P

EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:46:Construction Groundwater – Very High Changes to Hydrogeological Negligible GI and groundwater level and Slight P/T

EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:52:Operation Groundwater – Medium - Impacts on groundwater and Negligible Storage and handling of processed Slight P

EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:53:Decommissio Groundwater – Medium - Impacts on groundwater could Negligible Implementation of DEMP, SWMP, Slight T

EN010103-002077-NZT DCO 9.31 - Response to Examining Authority's Written Questions DLV1.7 ii August 2022 (D6).pdf:8: operation and opening would result in a very low impact and a negligible adverse

EN010103-002248-NZT DCO 9.36 - Nutrient Nitrogen Briefing Paper - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:22: made. Initial analysis suggests that this will have a negligible

EN010103-001060-NZT DCO 6.4.25 ES Vol III Appendix 12H Supplementary Habitat Information Report Coatham Sands Part 1.pdf:14: dune (less than 5 m wide and 1.5 m high) of very loose sand with negligible

EN010103-000904-NZT DCO 6.2.20 ES Vol I Chapter 20 Socio-economics.pdf:6:  negligible – an imperceptible effect on an impact area; or

EN010103-000904-NZT DCO 6.2.20 ES Vol I Chapter 20 Socio-economics.pdf:6: been classified as minor, moderate, major or negligible. The assessment of

EN010103-000904-NZT DCO 6.2.20 ES Vol I Chapter 20 Socio-economics.pdf:7: major (adverse or beneficial). Effects identified as being negligible or minor

EN010103-000904-NZT DCO 6.2.20 ES Vol I Chapter 20 Socio-economics.pdf:7: Medium Major Moderate Minor Negligible

EN010103-000904-NZT DCO 6.2.20 ES Vol I Chapter 20 Socio-economics.pdf:7: Low Moderate Minor Negligible Negligible

EN010103-000904-NZT DCO 6.2.20 ES Vol I Chapter 20 Socio-economics.pdf:7: Very Low Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible

EN010103-000904-NZT DCO 6.2.20 ES Vol I Chapter 20 Socio-economics.pdf:30: restrictions to access the resources. This results in a negligible (non-

EN010103-000904-NZT DCO 6.2.20 ES Vol I Chapter 20 Socio-economics.pdf:32: temporary diving restrictions are anticipated to be negligible.

EN010103-000904-NZT DCO 6.2.20 ES Vol I Chapter 20 Socio-economics.pdf:33: limited and temporary closure of PRoW routes. This results in a negligible

EN010103-000904-NZT DCO 6.2.20 ES Vol I Chapter 20 Socio-economics.pdf:35: Infrastructure is therefore required. This is assessed as a negligible (non-

EN010103-000904-NZT DCO 6.2.20 ES Vol I Chapter 20 Socio-economics.pdf:37:Tourism impact (including local Negligible effect Low sensitivity, low

EN010103-000904-NZT DCO 6.2.20 ES Vol I Chapter 20 Socio-economics.pdf:37:PRoW users Negligible adverse effect Low sensitivity, low

EN010103-000904-NZT DCO 6.2.20 ES Vol I Chapter 20 Socio-economics.pdf:37:Community disruption and Negligible adverse effect Limited migration to the

EN010103-001109-NZT DCO 6.4.21 ES Vol III Appendix 12D Bat Survey Report Part 1.pdf:6: • Negligible – unlikely to be used by roosting bats;

EN010103-001109-NZT DCO 6.4.21 ES Vol III Appendix 12D Bat Survey Report Part 1.pdf:13: No evidence of bats was found within B1a. It is assessed as having negligible

EN010103-001109-NZT DCO 6.4.21 ES Vol III Appendix 12D Bat Survey Report Part 1.pdf:15: No evidence of bats was found, and B1c is considered to have negligible bat

EN010103-001109-NZT DCO 6.4.21 ES Vol III Appendix 12D Bat Survey Report Part 1.pdf:15: Given the structure of B2, it is assessed as having negligible suitability for

EN010103-001109-NZT DCO 6.4.21 ES Vol III Appendix 12D Bat Survey Report Part 1.pdf:16: Structure B3 is assessed as having negligible suitability.

EN010103-001109-NZT DCO 6.4.21 ES Vol III Appendix 12D Bat Survey Report Part 1.pdf:16: having negligible suitability for used by roosting bats.

EN010103-001109-NZT DCO 6.4.21 ES Vol III Appendix 12D Bat Survey Report Part 1.pdf:16: The bridge is considered to be of negligible bat roost potential due to its

EN010103-001109-NZT DCO 6.4.21 ES Vol III Appendix 12D Bat Survey Report Part 1.pdf:17: The bridges are assessed as having negligible suitability for roosting bats.

EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:26: deposits with low permeability that have negligible significance for water supply

EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:77: negligible within the water bodies directly affected and are not significant to

EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:77: Tees Estuary (S Bank) waterbody. However, this risk is considered negligible

EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:85: surface water runoff, then a negligible impact is predicted to the Tees Coastal

EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:86: a negligible impact.

EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:87: to migratory species, and so a negligible impact on fish is expected.

EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:90: negligible.

EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:91: deposition, then a negligible impact is considered appropriate for this

EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:92: storage areas would be adequately bunded, negligible impacts on these

EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:134: limit of detection (LoD), indicating a negligible presence of sanitary pollutants

EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:157: to either minor adverse or less or negligible adverse or less. .

EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:626: increase in traffic flows and HGV flows and is expected to have a negligible impact.”

EN010103-002255-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:27: done at night in order to have a negligible impact on users of the surface land. Requirement

EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf:11: negligible, minor, moderate or major (adverse or beneficial).

EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf:11:Medium Major Moderate Minor Negligible

EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf:11:Low Moderate Minor Negligible Negligible

EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf:11:Very Low Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible

EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf:11: purposes of the EIA Regulations; minor and negligible effects are ‘not

EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf:25: would be negligible and a detailed assessment of the operational phase of

EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf:38: on the A1042 Kirkleatham Lane and negligible (not significant) on all other

EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf:38: negligible (not significant) on all other links.

EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf:38: minor (not significant) on the A1042 Kirkleatham Lane and negligible (not

EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf:39: Development on road links is negligible, the effect on highway safety is

EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf:39: considered negligible (not significant).

EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf:39: that the driver delay effect of the Proposed Development would be negligible

EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf:40: Port Clarence Road and negligible (not significant) on all other links.

EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf:40: and negligible (not significant) on all other links.

EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf:41: minor (not significant) on the A1046 Port Clarence Road and negligible (not

EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf:41: Development on road links is negligible, the effect on highway safety is

EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf:41: considered negligible (not significant).

EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf:42: overall effects during operation are therefore considered to be negligible

EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf:42: percentage increase in traffic due to decommissioning would be negligible,

EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf:43: and decommissioning phases are predicted to be negligible adverse (not

EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf:43: to be negligible and thus not significant. Notwithstanding, a number of traffic

EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf:43: negligible (not significant).

EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf:43: traffic and are, therefore, anticipated to be negligible (not significant)..

EN010103-001683-Marine Management Organisation - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ1.pdf:32: washing would rapidly disperse nitrogen deposits rendering any potential effects negligible.

EN010103-001683-Marine Management Organisation - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ1.pdf:66: summarise potential impacts on tourism to be negligible adverse during the construction

EN010103-001683-Marine Management Organisation - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ1.pdf:66: iv) Is the Applicants’ assessment that potential impacts on tourism would be negligible

EN010103-001683-Marine Management Organisation - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ1.pdf:66: indicate a negligible adverse effect on tourism during the construction phase only.

EN010103-001683-Marine Management Organisation - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ1.pdf:66: iv) Would the negligible adverse impact identified in paragraph 20.6.28 be on any

EN010103-001683-Marine Management Organisation - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ1.pdf:68: are ‘negligible adverse’. However, the effects during construction are described as ‘minor

EN010103-002321-NZT DCO 9.36 - Nutrient Nitrogen Briefing Paper (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:24: made. Initial analysis suggests that this will have a negligible

EN010103-002321-NZT DCO 9.36 - Nutrient Nitrogen Briefing Paper (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:28: made. Initial analysis suggests that this will have a negligible

EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf:9: • Negligible (common and widespread biodiversity features of such low

EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf:10: ES as outlined in Table 15-1. The category of ‘Negligible’ effects, defined in

EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf:67:airborne pollutant emissions. depend for foraging, breeding or impacts as negligible for ecological (‘Construction’).

EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf:74: exactly to the boundary of the PCC Site, affecting a negligible area of

EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf:74: a negligible effect on birds that is not significant (neutral) for all ornithological

EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf:75: Therefore, there will be a negligible impact on the species within Coatham

EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf:76: Coatham Dunes or Coatham Sands as this operation will cause negligible

EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf:83: feeding will be negligible in the context of the wider availability of habitats

EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf:87: negligible adverse and not significant for all ornithological receptors.

EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf:93: alone and a negligible increase in noise levels further away from the PCC

EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:59: assumption that only these Ornithology (APP-017), which concluded negligible magnitude of impact and therefore both species were not

EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:60: which concluded negligible magnitude of impact in relation to the potential for barrier effects. For auk species, the

EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:64: EIA should have given attention to Hornsea Four alone has been assessed as negligible. As such, the physical presence of Infrastructure from comparable

EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:65: variation meaning negligible. As such, the cumulative impact would remain to be not significant in EIA terms.

EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:91: electromagnetic field (EMF) from the cable, with the EMF rapidly attenuating horizontally and vertically away from the source to negligible levels

EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:93: either at ‘peak’ or during more typical or average times, is considered to be negligible.

EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:128: Chapter 8, Table 8.25), these noise levels are below the threshold of negligible impact.

EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:145: robust objection. Our client is extremely concerned that other potentially vehicle movement will be negligible.

EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:147: impact is negligible, and this is not significant in EIA terms.

EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:159: between Long Lane/Shepherds Est. Negligible Sub-station.

EN010103-002533-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons Tracked Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:79: typically be done at night where possible in order to have a negligible

EN010103-001197-NZT DCO 6.2.4 - ES Vol I Chapter 4 - Oct 2021.pdf:8: the gaseous fuel, the combustion gases from a CCGT contain negligible

EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:38: SPA/Ramsar as a result of site plant and NRMM emissions is likely to be negligible

EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:49: nitrogen deposition or will be affected to a negligible degree Likely Significant Effects

EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:49: therefore considered to have a negligible effect on air quality. Pollution from

EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:66: between negligible and potentially impactful projects and plans.

EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:92: dismiss atmospheric pollution impacts as negligible. Therefore, this impact pathway is screened in for Appropriate Assessment where the updated modelling

EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:104: c. Since the area around the Proposed Development is of negligible importance to The Wash and North Norfolk Coast harbour seal population, no in

EN010103-001466-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons - Apr 2022.pdf:77: typically be done at night where possible in order to have a negligible

EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:41: negligible.

EN010103-002000-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum - August 2022(D5) - Tracked.pdf:27: done at night in order to have a negligible impact on users of the surface land. Requirement

EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:223: caused to a number of heritage assets, ranging from negligible, slight or small to moderate in one instance (PR 5.7.259) and

EN010103-001469-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Tracked) - Apr 2022.pdf:31: also typically be done at night in order to have a negligible impact on users of the

EN010103-000825-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 2.pdf:213:risk exposure is considered to be negligible. Not shown in the table are the gross settlement amounts (inflows) for the receive leg of derivatives that

EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:24: negligible. EW confirmed that this is pending detailed modelling which is underway.

EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:102: far field. EW noted that this is considered to be negligible, if it is

EN010103-001142-NZT DCO 6.4.31 ES Vol III Appendix 14C Marine Mammal Baseline.pdf:6:14.2.4 If the risk of injury or significant disturbance cannot be reduced to negligible

EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:39: Ramsar as a result of site plant and NRMM emissions is likely to be negligible and not

EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:49: are either not sensitive to nitrogen deposition or will be affected to a negligible

EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:50: therefore considered to have a negligible effect on air quality. Pollution from

EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:68: between negligible and potentially impactful projects and plans.

EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:96: dismiss atmospheric pollution impacts as negligible. Therefore, this impact pathway is screened in for Appropriate Assessment where the updated modelling

EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:108: c. Since the area around the Proposed Development is of negligible importance to The Wash and North Norfolk Coast harbour seal population, no in

EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:130: reaching the coast, then it can be concluded that there would be negligible risk of any

EN010103-001994-NZT DCO 9.26 - Riparian Mammal Report - August 2022(D5).pdf:13: confluence with the River Tees, are comprised of small rocks affording negligible

EN010103-001994-NZT DCO 9.26 - Riparian Mammal Report - August 2022(D5).pdf:24: negligible, making it unlikely that otter will rest within these areas and there is no

EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:40: negligible.

EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:136:even when the physical health risks may be negligible.” PHE supports the inclusion of this

EN010103-000824-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons.pdf:73: have a negligible impact on users of the surface land.

EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:39: Ramsar as a result of site plant and NRMM emissions is likely to be negligible and not

EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:49: are either not sensitive to nitrogen deposition or will be affected to a negligible

EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:50: therefore considered to have a negligible effect on air quality. Pollution from

EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:71: between negligible and potentially impactful projects and plans.

EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:101: dismiss atmospheric pollution impacts as negligible. Therefore, this impact pathway is screened in for Appropriate Assessment where the updated modelling

EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:113: c. Since the area around the Proposed Development is of negligible importance to The Wash and North Norfolk Coast harbour seal population, no in

EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:136: reaching the coast, then it can be concluded that there would be negligible risk of any

EN010103-002532-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons Clean Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:77: typically be done at night where possible in order to have a negligible

EN010103-000898-NZT DCO 6.2.12 ES Vol I Chapter 12 Terrestrial Ecology.pdf:8:  Negligible (common and widespread biodiversity features of such low

EN010103-000898-NZT DCO 6.2.12 ES Vol I Chapter 12 Terrestrial Ecology.pdf:9: of ‘Negligible’ effects, defined in Chapter 2: Assessment Methodology (ES

EN010103-000898-NZT DCO 6.2.12 ES Vol I Chapter 12 Terrestrial Ecology.pdf:30: Cleveland. the negligible residual risk.

EN010103-000898-NZT DCO 6.2.12 ES Vol I Chapter 12 Terrestrial Ecology.pdf:45:12.6.44 There would be a negligible impact on bats and their habitats as a result of

EN010103-000898-NZT DCO 6.2.12 ES Vol I Chapter 12 Terrestrial Ecology.pdf:45:12.6.48 There would be a negligible impact on common lizards and its habitats as a

EN010103-001240-EN010103_Marine_Management_Organisation_Relevant_Representation_17122021_Redacted.pdf:11: negligible) within the application.

EN010103-001240-EN010103_Marine_Management_Organisation_Relevant_Representation_17122021_Redacted.pdf:11: concurrently or consecutively, the potential for cumulative impacts is negligible

EN010103-000903-NZT DCO 6.2.19 ES Vol I Chapter 19 Marine Heritage.pdf:9:Low Moderate Minor Minor Negligible

EN010103-000903-NZT DCO 6.2.19 ES Vol I Chapter 19 Marine Heritage.pdf:21: on these assets, resulting in a negligible effect.

EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:39: Ramsar as a result of site plant and NRMM emissions is likely to be negligible and not

EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:49: are either not sensitive to nitrogen deposition or will be affected to a negligible

EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:50: therefore considered to have a negligible effect on air quality. Pollution from

EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:70: between negligible and potentially impactful projects and plans.

EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:99: dismiss atmospheric pollution impacts as negligible. Therefore, this impact pathway is screened in for Appropriate Assessment where the updated modelling

EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:111: c. Since the area around the Proposed Development is of negligible importance to The Wash and North Norfolk Coast harbour seal population, no in

EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:134: reaching the coast, then it can be concluded that there would be negligible risk of any

EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf:33: considered to be negligible at all human receptors and the effect is therefore

EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf:36: the loss is likely to be negligible given the low quality of the existing soils

EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf:44: during operation are therefore considered to be negligible and not significant.

EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf:49:7.14.7 There is expected to be a negligible effect on community disruption and

EN010103-001738-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1b Preliminary Onshore Ground Investigation for GIR Report - June 2022.pdf:94: Insignificant 1 Would result in negligible delays or disruption

EN010103-001738-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1b Preliminary Onshore Ground Investigation for GIR Report - June 2022.pdf:253:deemed negligible and thus acceptable with regard to other contaminants identified within the CSM. However, it should

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:24:Very low Negligible <6

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:27: minor and negligible, and adverse, neutral or beneficial). Each effect has been

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:28:High Major Moderate Minor Negligible

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:28:Medium Moderate Minor Negligible Negligible

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:28:Low Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:29:  negligible – imperceptible effect of no significant consequence;

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:29:11.3.71 For the purposes of this assessment, negligible and minor effects are considered

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:36: vibration effects would be negligible.

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:50:NSR1 – 58 Daytime Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:50:Redcar Evening N/A2 N/A2 N/A2 Negligible Negligible Negligible

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:50: Night- N/A2 N/A2 N/A2 Negligible Negligible Negligible

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:50:NSR2 – 51 Daytime Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:50: Evening N/A2 N/A2 N/A2 Negligible Negligible Negligible

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:50: Night- N/A2 N/A2 N/A2 Negligible Negligible Negligible

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:50:NSR4 – Daytime Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:50: Evening N/A2 N/A2 N/A2 Minor Minor Negligible

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:50: Night- N/A2 N/A2 N/A2 Minor Minor Negligible

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:50: Site are predicted to be negligible adverse (not significant) during the daytime

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:51: for evening and weekend working indicate minor adverse or negligible effects at

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:51: negligible effects at all NSRs. Construction activities, particularly those taking

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:51:NSR1 – Daytime Negligible adverse Negligible adverse Negligible adverse Negligible adverse

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:51:Broadwa Evening Negligible adverse Negligible adverse Negligible adverse Negligible adverse

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:51:y West, Night- N/A2 Negligible adverse N/A2 Minor adverse

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:51:NSR2 – Daytime Negligible adverse Negligible adverse Negligible adverse N/A1

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:51:Road Evening Negligible adverse Negligible adverse Negligible adverse N/A1

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:51:Redcar Night- N/A2 Negligible adverse N/A2 N/A1

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:51:NSR3 - Daytime Negligible adverse N/A1 Negligible adverse Negligible adverse

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:51:Broadwa Evening Negligible adverse N/A1 Negligible adverse Negligible adverse

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:51:NSR4 - Daytime Negligible adverse Negligible adverse Negligible adverse Negligible adverse

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:51:House Evening Negligible adverse Negligible adverse Negligible adverse Negligible adverse

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:51: Daytime Negligible adverse N/A1 N/A1 N/A1

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:52:NSR5 - Evening Negligible adverse N/A1 N/A1 N/A1

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:52:NSR6 - Daytime Negligible adverse N/A1 N/A1 N/A1

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:52:Hill Evening Negligible adverse N/A1 N/A1 N/A1

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:52:NSR7 - All time Minor adverse N/A1 Minor adverse Negligible adverse

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:52:11.6.32 While daytime effects of construction noise are classified as negligible adverse,

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:52: CO2 Gathering Network Pipeline are predicted to be negligible adverse (not

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:53: as negligible. CO2 Gathering Network Pipeline construction will not generally

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:53: effects are predicted to be negligible adverse during the daytime and up to minor

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:53: Export Pipeline are predicted to be negligible adverse during the day and up to

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:54:A1085 Trunk Road, 16820 10.2% 70 17238 9.9% 70 +0.1 Negligible adverse

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:54:A1085 Trunk Road, 24677 12.9% 82 25999 12.6% 82 +0.2 Negligible adverse

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:54:A1042 Kirkleatham 14141 6.7% 52 14345 6.6% 52 0.0 Negligible adverse

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:54:A1085 Trunk Road, 25800 15.6% 83 27122 15.1% 83 +0.2 Negligible adverse

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:54:A1085 Broadway, 11382 6.9% 53 11712 6.7% 53 +0.1 Negligible adverse

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:54:A1380 High Street, 11624 9.8% 50 11668 9.7% 50 0.0 Negligible adverse

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:54:A66, 140m east of 28931 20.6% 66 29792 20.2% 66 +0.1 Negligible adverse

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:54:A1046 Port Clarence 9701 12.1% 47 9831 12.0% 47 0.0 Negligible adverse

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:55:A178 Seaton Carew 9920 14.3% 72 10050 14.2% 72 0.0 Negligible adverse

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:55:Unnamed Road, 5395 18.4% 59 5439 18.7% 59 +0.1 Negligible adverse

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:55:A1053 Greystone 23412 13.0% 97 23543 13.1% 97 0.0 Negligible adverse

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:55:A174 (west of 40520 7.6% 97 40605 7.7% 97 0.0 Negligible adverse

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:56: Development. This will result in negligible adverse effects (not significant/no

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:56: negligible (not significant).

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:56: receptors, vibration effects are likely to be negligible.

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:58: effects are therefore categorised as negligible (not significant) with no

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:59:Initial classification of effect Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Minor Minor

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:60: in negligible adverse effects during the daytime.

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:61:NSR1 – 58 Broadway West, 47 Negligible adverse

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:61:NSR2 – 51 York Road Redcar 51 Negligible adverse

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:61:NSR4 – Marsh House farm 60 Negligible adverse

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:63:Classification of NZT Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Minor Minor

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:63:Classification of Negligible Negligible Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible Minor Minor

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:63: negligible to minor adverse (not significant) with the addition of simultaneous

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:67:Construction Noise effects Negligible Further detailed Minor adverse or St, T, D

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:67:Construction Noise effects Negligible/ Further detailed Minor adverse or St, T, D

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:67:Construction Noise effects Negligible Further detailed Minor adverse or St, T, D

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:68:Construction Noise effects Negligible/minor Further detailed Minor adverse or St, T, D

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:68:Construction Noise effects Negligible Further detailed Minor adverse or St, T, D

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:68:Construction Noise effects Negligible Further detailed Negligible St, T, D

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:68:Decommissioning Noise effects Negligible Further detailed Negligible St, T, D

EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:69:Decommissioning Noise effects Negligible/ Further detailed Minor adverse or St, T, D

EN010103-000918-NZT DCO 6.2.25 ES Vol I Chapter 25 Summary of Significant Effects.pdf:2: (adverse or beneficial) or major (adverse or beneficial). Minor and negligible

EN010103-001470-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum - Apr 2022.pdf:31: also typically be done at night in order to have a negligible impact on users of the

EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:16: based on predicted impacts being negligible beyond approximately 2km from the

EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:24: also typically be done at night in order to have a negligible impact on users of the

EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:90: considered to be negligible”. This statement explains that intertidal

EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:98: negligible, being <0.06°C in all scenarios modelled, with the higher

EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:98: mouth of the Estuary and as there are only negligible increases in the

EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:106: for effects to intertidal habitats is considered to be negligible.

EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:245: addressed (or be shown to be negligible) within the protection will be undertaken post-DCO consent and will include appropriate

EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:246: the potential for cumulative impacts is negligible and cumulative effects is considered limited.

EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:25: negligible. EW confirmed that this is pending detailed modelling which is underway.

EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:103: far field. EW noted that this is considered to be negligible, if it is

EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:26: the combustion gases from a typical CCGT plant contain negligible amounts of

EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:55: Therefore, it is considered that the effects of operational traffic would be negligible

EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:65:  negligible – imperceptible effect to an environmental resource or receptor; or

EN010103-000820-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 6.pdf:53:(e.g. realized prices, costs per boe) and also negligible was the impact on depletion charges. Other oil companies may use different conversion rates.

EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:40: Ramsar as a result of site plant and NRMM emissions is likely to be negligible and not

EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:51: be affected to a negligible degree Likely Significant Effects, LSEs on the Durham Coast

EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:52: therefore considered to have a negligible effect on air quality. Pollution from

EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:72: between negligible and potentially impactful projects and plans.

EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:100: dismiss atmospheric pollution impacts as negligible. Therefore, this impact pathway is screened in for Appropriate Assessment where the updated modelling

EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:112: c. Since the area around the Proposed Development is of negligible importance to The Wash and North Norfolk Coast harbour seal population, no in

EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:135: reaching the coast, then it can be concluded that there would be negligible risk of any

EN010103-001603-NZT DCO 9.4 - APPENDIX 4 LATEST AUDITED ACCOUNTS – SHELL U.K. LIMITED.pdf:99:Under this approach, we reported Shell share of emissions from energy in other categories is negligible at present.

EN010103-001609-Redcar and Clevland Council Local Impact Report.pdf:13:given the magnitude of change is considered to be negligible where human receptors are

EN010103-001609-Redcar and Clevland Council Local Impact Report.pdf:14:therefore can be considered to be insignificant/ negligible.

EN010103-002360-NZT ISH6 S1.pdf:14:negligible.

EN010103-001023-NZT DCO 6.4.8 ES Vol III Appendix 8C Air Quality - Amine Degradation Assessment.pdf:6: would be negligible from gas fired plant, and therefore are considered to have

EN010103-001023-NZT DCO 6.4.8 ES Vol III Appendix 8C Air Quality - Amine Degradation Assessment.pdf:6: negligible effect on degradation of the solvent.

EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf:38: SPA/Ramsar as a result of site plant and NRMM emissions is likely to be negligible

EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf:49: nitrogen deposition or will be affected to a negligible degree Likely Significant Effects

EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf:49: therefore considered to have a negligible effect on air quality. Pollution from

EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf:67: between negligible and potentially impactful projects and plans.

EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf:93: dismiss atmospheric pollution impacts as negligible. Therefore, this impact pathway is screened in for Appropriate Assessment where the updated modelling

EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf:105: c. Since the area around the Proposed Development is of negligible importance to The Wash and North Norfolk Coast harbour seal population, no in

EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:37: critical loads) would be negligible.

EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:38: confidence that NRMM would have a negligible impact.

EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:38: to be either negligible adverse or insignificant at the receptor locations assessed

EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:38: at greater distance from those already assessed would have negligible effect on

EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:48: to be negligible and not significant.

EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:48: of the impact is considered to be negligible. Thus, the effect of artificial lighting

EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:53: negligible.

EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:62: negligible. effect on integrity is likely to arise. Paragraph 8.8.3 of Air Quality Appendix 8B

EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:93: the PCC Site (Viewpoints 1, 2, 6, 10 to 12) would be negligible. It is

EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:93: a number of different national and local LCAs as well as the North Yorkshire negligible effect, largely as a result of the intervening distance and

EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:113: and receptor would have negligible impact on the predicted noise levels.

EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:127: HBC 20.6.28 and Table 20-8 summarise potential impacts on tourism to be negligible

EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:127: be negligible adverse during the construction phase only reasonable?

EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:127: Paragraph 20.6.28 and Table 20-8 indicate a negligible adverse effect on section provides an assessment of amenities regardless of their proposed

EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:127: iv) Would the negligible adverse impact identified in paragraph 20.6.28 iii. The applicant can confirm there are no further receptors to be added.

EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:127: v) Have the effects on tourism and recreation (including PRoW users) in the assessment, where the negligible adverse impact refers to the

EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:130: therefore considered to constitute a negligible highway impact and

EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:132: transportation effects are ‘negligible adverse’. However, the effects during effects, from table 16-2 the impact is below 30% and can then be defined as

EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:133: How are these statements compatible? Kirkleatham Lane due to its high sensitivity (Ref table 16-1) and negligible on all

EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:133: purposes of the EIA Regulations; minor and negligible effects are ‘not

EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:133: both “negligible” and “minor-adverse” effects are not significant in EIA terms, the

EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:152: Additional traffic movements associated with this would be negligible and would

EN010103-002529-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:27: done at night in order to have a negligible impact on users of the surface land. Requirement

EN010103-000828-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum.pdf:30: also typically be done at night in order to have a negligible impact on users of the

EN010103-001744-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1a Factual Report Part 16 - June 2022.pdf:536:influence zone of the cone tip measurement and the loss of meaningful resolution is negligible.

EN010103-001744-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1a Factual Report Part 16 - June 2022.pdf:630: is large enough for end effects to be negligible allowing the test to be modelled as a plane strain

EN010103-001744-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1a Factual Report Part 16 - June 2022.pdf:647:two important assumptions about this output; that it is linear and that the hysteresis is negligible. The

EN010103-001836-Birketts LLP on behalf of Northumbrian Water Limited - Comments on responses to the ExA’s ExQ1.pdf:6:would be negligible and would have no impact on

EN010103-001108-NZT DCO 6.4.15 ES Vol III Appendix 10D Geotechnical Risk Register.pdf:4:Negligible 1 Very Low 1 No significant Negligible impact 1 to 4

EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:25: negligible. EW confirmed that this is pending detailed modelling which is underway.

EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:103: far field. EW noted that this is considered to be negligible, if it is

EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:71: negligible and that no deterioration would be caused. Does the EA also agree

EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:164:Increase Possible Air quality Construction Medium Increased Consequence is minimised through the measures Unlikely Low Low Negligible No None

EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:282: negligible due to the following reasons:

EN010103-002049-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:78: typically be done at night where possible in order to have a negligible

EN010103-001526-NZT-ExQ1.pdf:32: washing would rapidly disperse nitrogen deposits rendering any potential effects negligible.

EN010103-001526-NZT-ExQ1.pdf:65: summarise potential impacts on tourism to be negligible adverse during the construction

EN010103-001526-NZT-ExQ1.pdf:65: iv) Is the Applicants’ assessment that potential impacts on tourism would be negligible

EN010103-001526-NZT-ExQ1.pdf:65: indicate a negligible adverse effect on tourism during the construction phase only.

EN010103-001526-NZT-ExQ1.pdf:66: iv) Would the negligible adverse impact identified in paragraph 20.6.28 be on any

EN010103-001526-NZT-ExQ1.pdf:68: are ‘negligible adverse’. However, the effects during construction are described as ‘minor

EN010103-001022-NZT DCO 6.4.7 ES Vol III Appendix 8B Air Quality - Operation Phase.pdf:4: Development become negligible well within approximately 2 km and

EN010103-001022-NZT DCO 6.4.7 ES Vol III Appendix 8B Air Quality - Operation Phase.pdf:23: negligible at all receptor locations. In addition, in combination with the

EN010103-001022-NZT DCO 6.4.7 ES Vol III Appendix 8B Air Quality - Operation Phase.pdf:23: negligible at all receptor locations. In addition, in combination with the

EN010103-001022-NZT DCO 6.4.7 ES Vol III Appendix 8B Air Quality - Operation Phase.pdf:24: insignificant/ negligible.

EN010103-001022-NZT DCO 6.4.7 ES Vol III Appendix 8B Air Quality - Operation Phase.pdf:24: all locations and therefore can be considered to be insignificant/ negligible.

EN010103-001022-NZT DCO 6.4.7 ES Vol III Appendix 8B Air Quality - Operation Phase.pdf:39:negligible adverse.

EN010103-001022-NZT DCO 6.4.7 ES Vol III Appendix 8B Air Quality - Operation Phase.pdf:40:the cumulative impact of CO emissions from the developments assessed is negligible

EN010103-001022-NZT DCO 6.4.7 ES Vol III Appendix 8B Air Quality - Operation Phase.pdf:40:relevant AQALs and therefore can be considered to be insignificant/ negligible at all

EN010103-001022-NZT DCO 6.4.7 ES Vol III Appendix 8B Air Quality - Operation Phase.pdf:40:emissions on human health receptors from the developments assessed is negligible

EN010103-002347-0006-P1A4.5NTLIKC015-NTL SUBMISSIONS AND POSITION STATEMENT CAH3 ON BEHALF OF NORTH TEES GROUP 17.10.22.pdf:7:only very negligible and does not address the matters set in these submissions.

EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:39: Ramsar as a result of site plant and NRMM emissions is likely to be negligible and not

EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:49: are either not sensitive to nitrogen deposition or will be affected to a negligible

EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:50: therefore considered to have a negligible effect on air quality. Pollution from

EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:71: between negligible and potentially impactful projects and plans.

EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:101: dismiss atmospheric pollution impacts as negligible. Therefore, this impact pathway is screened in for Appropriate Assessment where the updated modelling

EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:113: c. Since the area around the Proposed Development is of negligible importance to The Wash and North Norfolk Coast harbour seal population, no in

EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:136: reaching the coast, then it can be concluded that there would be negligible risk of any

EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf:38: SPA/Ramsar as a result of site plant and NRMM emissions is likely to be negligible

EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf:49: nitrogen deposition or will be affected to a negligible degree Likely Significant Effects

EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf:49: therefore considered to have a negligible effect on air quality. Pollution from

EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf:66: between negligible and potentially impactful projects and plans.

EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf:92: dismiss atmospheric pollution impacts as negligible. Therefore, this impact pathway is screened in for Appropriate Assessment where the updated modelling

EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf:104: c. Since the area around the Proposed Development is of negligible importance to The Wash and North Norfolk Coast harbour seal population, no in

EN010103-001999-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum - August 2022(D5) - Clean.pdf:27: done at night in order to have a negligible impact on users of the surface land. Requirement

EN010103-000887-NZT DCO 6.2.2 ES Vol I Chapter 2 Assessment Methodology.pdf:6: moderate, minor and negligible, and adverse, neutral or beneficial). Each

EN010103-000887-NZT DCO 6.2.2 ES Vol I Chapter 2 Assessment Methodology.pdf:7: throughout this ES (major, moderate, minor and negligible), and effects are

EN010103-000887-NZT DCO 6.2.2 ES Vol I Chapter 2 Assessment Methodology.pdf:7: • negligible – imperceptible effect to an environmental resource or

EN010103-000887-NZT DCO 6.2.2 ES Vol I Chapter 2 Assessment Methodology.pdf:8:Medium Major Moderate Minor Negligible

EN010103-000887-NZT DCO 6.2.2 ES Vol I Chapter 2 Assessment Methodology.pdf:8:Low Moderate Minor Negligible Negligible

EN010103-000887-NZT DCO 6.2.2 ES Vol I Chapter 2 Assessment Methodology.pdf:8:Very Low Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible

EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:39: SPA/Ramsar as a result of site plant and NRMM emissions is likely to be negligible

EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:50: nitrogen deposition or will be affected to a negligible degree Likely Significant Effects

EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:50: therefore considered to have a negligible effect on air quality. Pollution from

EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:70: between negligible and potentially impactful projects and plans.

EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:97: dismiss atmospheric pollution impacts as negligible. Therefore, this impact pathway is screened in for Appropriate Assessment where the updated modelling

EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:109: c. Since the area around the Proposed Development is of negligible importance to The Wash and North Norfolk Coast harbour seal population, no in

EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:134: reaching the coast, then it can be concluded that there would be negligible risk of any

EN010103-002045-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:27: done at night in order to have a negligible impact on users of the surface land. Requirement

EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf:38: SPA/Ramsar as a result of site plant and NRMM emissions is likely to be negligible

EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf:48: nitrogen deposition or will be affected to a negligible degree Likely Significant Effects

EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf:49: therefore considered to have a negligible effect on air quality. Pollution from

EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf:66: between negligible and potentially impactful projects and plans.

EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf:92: dismiss atmospheric pollution impacts as negligible. Therefore, this impact pathway is screened in for Appropriate Assessment where the updated modelling

EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf:104: c. Since the area around the Proposed Development is of negligible importance to The Wash and North Norfolk Coast harbour seal population, no in

EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:39: SPA/Ramsar as a result of site plant and NRMM emissions is likely to be negligible

EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:50: nitrogen deposition or will be affected to a negligible degree Likely Significant Effects

EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:50: therefore considered to have a negligible effect on air quality. Pollution from

EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:68: between negligible and potentially impactful projects and plans.

EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:94: dismiss atmospheric pollution impacts as negligible. Therefore, this impact pathway is screened in for Appropriate Assessment where the updated modelling

EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:106: c. Since the area around the Proposed Development is of negligible importance to The Wash and North Norfolk Coast harbour seal population, no in

EN010103-001106-NZT DCO 6.4.19 ES Vol III Appendix 12B Ecological Impact Assessment Methods.pdf:6: • Negligible (common and widespread ecological features of such low

EN010103-001215-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:31: also typically be done at night in order to have a negligible impact on users of the

EN010103-001871-Hartlepool Borough Council.pdf:2:negligible adverse during the construction phase.

EN010103-001871-Hartlepool Borough Council.pdf:2: negligible adverse during the construction phase only reasonable? Should any

EN010103-001153-NZT DCO 5.9 - Statutory Nuisance Statement.pdf:16:3.2.4 The ES provides an assessment of the potential effects on receptors as negligible,

EN010103-001153-NZT DCO 5.9 - Statutory Nuisance Statement.pdf:17: scale, and negligible at a regional or national scale. The Proposed Development is

EN010103-001153-NZT DCO 5.9 - Statutory Nuisance Statement.pdf:18: with construction phase vehicle movements were concluded to be negligible

EN010103-001153-NZT DCO 5.9 - Statutory Nuisance Statement.pdf:19: Agency, 2016). However, in practice the predicted impacts become negligible at a

EN010103-001153-NZT DCO 5.9 - Statutory Nuisance Statement.pdf:19: Development are predicted to result in negligible adverse effects at all receptors

EN010103-001153-NZT DCO 5.9 - Statutory Nuisance Statement.pdf:20: emissions during construction has been determined as ‘negligible’ for earthworks

EN010103-001153-NZT DCO 5.9 - Statutory Nuisance Statement.pdf:21: Development would be negligible.

EN010103-001153-NZT DCO 5.9 - Statutory Nuisance Statement.pdf:24: negligible adverse effects relating to the following activities of the Proposed

EN010103-001766-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix PPL.1.3a - South Tees Regeneration Master Plan - June 2022.pdf:56: have negligible to low potential to support this species. 2.12.9 INVERTEBRATES

EN010103-002521-NZT DCO 9.48 - Applicants' Comments on D11 Submissons - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:14: that this will have a negligible impact on deposition at the Tees Coastal WFD

EN010103-001120-NZT DCO 6.4.36 ES Vol III Appendix 16A Transportation Assessment Part 1.pdf:52: would be negligible and a detailed assessment of the operational phase of

EN010103-001120-NZT DCO 6.4.36 ES Vol III Appendix 16A Transportation Assessment Part 1.pdf:92:Therefore, it is considered that the effects of operational traffic would be negligible and a detailed assessment of

EN010103-001779-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix BIO.1.39 Example Marine Pollution Contingency Plan - June 2022.pdf:19: the risk of encountering shallow hydrocarbon/gas at the proposed borehole location is negligible. Any

EN010103-001779-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix BIO.1.39 Example Marine Pollution Contingency Plan - June 2022.pdf:21: proposed NEP borehole location is negligible. Any potential hydrocarbon release risk is

EN010103-001779-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix BIO.1.39 Example Marine Pollution Contingency Plan - June 2022.pdf:74: hydrocarbon/gas at the proposed location is negligible.

EN010103-001121-NZT DCO 6.4.36 ES Vol III Appendix 16A Transportation Assessment Part 2.pdf:7:and are short-lived (approximately 3 months). Therefore, effects are considered negligible and a

EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:91: negligible adverse effect for the Proposed Development in isolation. A

EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:115: decommissioning are predicted to be negligible adverse and there will be no

EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:116: greater than negligible adverse.

EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:119: not lead to any breaches of national air ecological receptors are assessed as negligible and not significant.

EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:119: site plant are also assessed as negligible and not significant.

EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:120: proceed. Development are predicted to result in negligible adverse effects at all

EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:130: negligible and therefore not of significance, while there will be no physical

EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:134: connectivity of the green Infrastructure mineral resources considered is negligible (Chapter 10 ‘Geology and

EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:134: plant available; containment of noise or negligible adverse or less. There would be a moderate/minor adverse effect

EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:140: predicted to be negligible adverse (not significant).

EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:140: while paragraph 2.2.6 notes that the and junctions are anticipated to be negligible and therefore not significant.

EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:140: considered to be negligible (not significant).

EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:140: therefore, anticipated to be negligible (not significant). A Decommissioning

EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:149: options considered for installing the construction is considered negligible.

EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:185: Plan Strategy transport network. be negligible given that only the CO2 Gathering Network and parts of the

EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:187: Plan transport network. operational traffic will be negligible given that only the CO2 Gathering

EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:39: Ramsar as a result of site plant and NRMM emissions is likely to be negligible and not

EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:49: are either not sensitive to nitrogen deposition or will be affected to a negligible

EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:50: therefore considered to have a negligible effect on air quality. Pollution from

EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:70: between negligible and potentially impactful projects and plans.

EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:99: dismiss atmospheric pollution impacts as negligible. Therefore, this impact pathway is screened in for Appropriate Assessment where the updated modelling

EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:111: c. Since the area around the Proposed Development is of negligible importance to The Wash and North Norfolk Coast harbour seal population, no in

EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:134: reaching the coast, then it can be concluded that there would be negligible risk of any

EN010103-002006-NZT-ExQ2-FINAL.pdf:39: bodies from atmospheric deposition of nutrients would be negligible and that no deterioration

EN010103-000907-NZT DCO 6.2.23 ES Vol I Chapter 23 Population and Human Health.pdf:21: and decommissioning are predicted to be negligible adverse and there

EN010103-000907-NZT DCO 6.2.23 ES Vol I Chapter 23 Population and Human Health.pdf:22: no adverse effects predicted that are classified as greater than negligible

EN010103-000896-NZT DCO 6.2.4 ES Vol I Chapter 4 Proposed Development.pdf:8: the gaseous fuel, the combustion gases from a CCGT contain negligible

EN010103-002025-Environment Agency - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:8: be negligible and that no deterioration would be

EN010103-001920-Stockton on Tees Borough Council-ExQ1-editable-version.pdf:10: summarise potential impacts on tourism to be negligible adverse during the construction

EN010103-001920-Stockton on Tees Borough Council-ExQ1-editable-version.pdf:10: iv) Is the Applicants’ assessment that potential impacts on tourism would be negligible

EN010103-001017-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 3.pdf:22:even when the physical health risks may be negligible.” PHE supports the inclusion of this

EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:81: negligible adverse effect for the Proposed Development in isolation. A

EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:105: decommissioning are predicted to be negligible adverse and there will be no

EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:106: greater than negligible adverse.

EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:110: not lead to any breaches of national air ecological receptors are assessed as negligible and not significant.

EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:110: site plant are also assessed as negligible and not significant.

EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:111: proceed. Development are predicted to result in negligible adverse effects at all

EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:121: negligible and therefore not of significance, while there will be no physical

EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:125: connectivity of the green Infrastructure mineral resources considered is negligible (Chapter 10 ‘Geology and

EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:125: plant available; containment of noise or negligible adverse or less. There would be a moderate/minor adverse effect

EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:131: predicted to be negligible adverse (not significant).

EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:131: while paragraph 2.2.6 notes that the and junctions are anticipated to be negligible and therefore not significant.

EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:131: considered to be negligible (not significant).

EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:131: therefore, anticipated to be negligible (not significant). A Decommissioning

EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:140: options considered for installing the construction is considered negligible.

EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:175: Strategy transport network. be negligible given that only the CO2 Gathering Network and parts of the

EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:177: transport network. operational traffic will be negligible given that only the CO2 Gathering

EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:39: SPA/Ramsar as a result of site plant and NRMM emissions is likely to be negligible

EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:50: nitrogen deposition or will be affected to a negligible degree Likely Significant Effects

EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:50: therefore considered to have a negligible effect on air quality. Pollution from

EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:68: between negligible and potentially impactful projects and plans.

EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:94: dismiss atmospheric pollution impacts as negligible. Therefore, this impact pathway is screened in for Appropriate Assessment where the updated modelling

EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:106: c. Since the area around the Proposed Development is of negligible importance to The Wash and North Norfolk Coast harbour seal population, no in

EN010103-001021-NZT DCO 6.4.6 ES Vol III Appendix 8A Air Quality - Construction Phase.pdf:8:Low Low risk Low risk Negligible

EN010103-001021-NZT DCO 6.4.6 ES Vol III Appendix 8A Air Quality - Construction Phase.pdf:8:Low Low risk Low risk Negligible

EN010103-001021-NZT DCO 6.4.6 ES Vol III Appendix 8A Air Quality - Construction Phase.pdf:8:Medium Medium risk Low risk Negligible

EN010103-001021-NZT DCO 6.4.6 ES Vol III Appendix 8A Air Quality - Construction Phase.pdf:8:Low Low risk Low risk Negligible

EN010103-001021-NZT DCO 6.4.6 ES Vol III Appendix 8A Air Quality - Construction Phase.pdf:24: be considered negligible as both: the change between the Do Minimum and

EN010103-001021-NZT DCO 6.4.6 ES Vol III Appendix 8A Air Quality - Construction Phase.pdf:27: negligible where human receptors are present.

EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:7: • Negligible (common and widespread biodiversity features of such low

EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:8: ‘Negligible’ effects, defined in Chapter 2: Assessment Methodology (ES

EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:33: only considered to be negligible, and, in the very unlikely event of an incident

EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:33: on the species and communities they support will be negligible. In the unlikely

EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:35: (i.e. chemical spills) are considered to be negligible with the implementation

EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:35: There will be negligible impacts on habitat (i.e. from fine sediments) and

EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:36: impacts on water quality are considered to be negligible.

EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:38: potential impacts are considered to be negligible and the effects on aquatic

EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:38: 14 during operation will be negligible.

EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:38: Development on water quality of the watercourse would be negligible and the

EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:39: potential indirect impacts on aquatic habitats will be negligible, after

EN010103-002050-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:74: have a negligible impact on users of the surface land.

EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:40: outside, however recovery from the impact should have a negligible

EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:40: have a negligible long-term impact on the sites. The plants are located

EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:26: deposits with low permeability that have negligible significance for water supply

EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:85: negligible within the water bodies directly affected and are not significant to

EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:85: Tees Estuary (S Bank) waterbody. However, this risk is considered negligible

EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:94: surface water runoff, then a negligible impact is predicted to the Tees Coastal

EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:95: considered to have a negligible impact, especially at the water body level.

EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:95: of impact is predicted to be negligible and highly localised, especially at the

EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:96: outfall. The magnitude of impact is therefore predicted to be negligible and

EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:96: unfavourable conditions), and so a negligible impact on fish is expected.

EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:103: negligible.

EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:104: deposition, then a negligible impact is considered appropriate for this

EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:106: storage areas would be adequately bunded, negligible impacts on these

EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:40: Ramsar as a result of site plant and NRMM emissions is likely to be negligible and not

EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:50: are either not sensitive to nitrogen deposition or will be affected to a negligible

EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:51: therefore considered to have a negligible effect on air quality. Pollution from

EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:69: between negligible and potentially impactful projects and plans.

EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:97: dismiss atmospheric pollution impacts as negligible. Therefore, this impact pathway is screened in for Appropriate Assessment where the updated modelling

EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:109: c. Since the area around the Proposed Development is of negligible importance to The Wash and North Norfolk Coast harbour seal population, no in

EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:131: reaching the coast, then it can be concluded that there would be negligible risk of any

EN010103-002628-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 4 - Total - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:116:induced is likewise considered negligible.

EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:12: anticipated that any construction-phase effects would be short-term and negligible with any residual impacts being managed effectively through best-

EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:35: offshore schemes of available habitat is considered to be negligible and the

EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:35: SSC is predicted to be negligible and the effect would be not significant.

EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:36: is considered as negligible and the potential for cumulative effects is not

EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:37: negligible and as such the potential combined effect is considered to be not

EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:38: is considered to be negligible and the effect is considered to be not

EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:39: negligible effect. Specifically, the CO2 Export Corridor would be under the

EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:39: to occur concurrently, the effect on marine heritage would be negligible and

EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:25: negligible. EW confirmed that this is pending detailed modelling which is underway.

EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:103: far field. EW noted that this is considered to be negligible, if it is

EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:40: SPA/Ramsar as a result of site plant and NRMM emissions is likely to be negligible

EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:51: nitrogen deposition or will be affected to a negligible degree Likely Significant Effects

EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:51: therefore considered to have a negligible effect on air quality. Pollution from

EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:72: between negligible and potentially impactful projects and plans.

EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:99: dismiss atmospheric pollution impacts as negligible. Therefore, this impact pathway is screened in for Appropriate Assessment where the updated modelling

EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:111: c. Since the area around the Proposed Development is of negligible importance to The Wash and North Norfolk Coast harbour seal population, no in

EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:136: reaching the coast, then it can be concluded that there would be negligible risk of any

EN010103-000818-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 4.pdf:120:likewise considered negligible.

EN010103-001129-NZT DCO 6.4.40 ES Vol III Appendix 17B LVIA Proposed Methodology.pdf:7:Negligible The effects may influence the development site only.

EN010103-001129-NZT DCO 6.4.40 ES Vol III Appendix 17B LVIA Proposed Methodology.pdf:10:Negligible No discernible improvement or deterioration to the existing landscape character.

EN010103-001129-NZT DCO 6.4.40 ES Vol III Appendix 17B LVIA Proposed Methodology.pdf:15: occupy a negligible proportion of the view.

EN010103-001129-NZT DCO 6.4.40 ES Vol III Appendix 17B LVIA Proposed Methodology.pdf:16:Negligible No discernible improvement or deterioration in the existing view.

EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf:18: negligible because the material was largely granular in nature and has been

EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf:22: max. 0.2%) were measured and gas flow rates were negligible. Arcadis

EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf:38: non-agricultural soils giving the soils a negligible impact value.

EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf:38: soils are deemed to have a negligible impact value.

EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf:38: underlain by urban and non-agricultural soils giving the soils a negligible

EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf:38: categorised with a negligible impact valve. The Grade 4 and 5 soils fall

EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf:38: deemed to have a negligible impact value.

EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf:38:PCC Site Urban and non-agricultural Negligible

EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf:38:CO2 Export Pipeline Non-agricultural Negligible

EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf:38:Water Connection Corridors Urban and non-agricultural Negligible

EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf:38:CO2 Gathering Network and Natural Grades 4 and 5, Urban and Negligible to Low

EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf:38:Electrical Connection Corridor Urban and non-agricultural Negligible

EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf:75: permeability that have negligible significance for water supply or river base

EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf:259:Negligible 1 Very 1 No significant impact on Negligible impact on cost 1 to 4

EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:26:Negligible Results in effect on No risk identified to surface water quality or

EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:26: magnitude to affect the use Negligible change in peak flood level (≤+/- 10

EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:27:Negligible Neutral / Slight Neutral / Slight Slight Slight

EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:54: deposits with low permeability that have negligible significance for water

EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:80: is considered that there could be short term, localised and negligible adverse

EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:81: temporary negligible magnitude of impact would give a worst case Slight

EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:81: suspended sediment in runoff would be negligible with the mitigation

EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:83: further downstream, is considered to be negligible resulting in a Slight effect

EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:83: workers is considered to be negligible resulting in a Slight effect (not

EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:83: negligible magnitude of impact is predicted to construction workers resulting

EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:83: negligible to construction workers given the implementation of standard good

EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:83: considered to have a negligible effect on construction workers, which gives a

EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:87: quality monitoring) then a negligible impact is predicted to the North Sea at

EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:88: migratory routes for fish. In EIA terms the impact is therefore negligible, which

EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:88: Bay. As such, a negligible impact is predicted at this stage, with no changes

EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:89: magnitude of impact is expected to be negligible for all ponds within the Site

EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:90:9.6.61 Given the low level of enrichment of Pond 14 a negligible impact is predicted

EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:91: involving substantially less water, a negligible impact is predicted giving a

EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:91: negligible to Tees Bay, giving a Slight effect (not significant).

EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:91: Plant). Given that the proposed development is expected to have negligible

EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:92:9.6.77 It is considered that the Proposed Development would have a negligible

EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:92: operation is considered negligible. As such, the effect is Neutral (not

EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:98: Development and the above schemes will have negligible impact on flooding

EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:99:Surface Water Quality – Tees Estuary, Tees Tees Estuary: Negligible Tees Estuary: Negligible Further to the Tees Estuary: Neutral

EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:99: (Tees Bay): Negligible adverse (not significant) adverse (not-significant)

EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:99: Belasis Beck: Negligible adverse (not significant) during construction will be Belasis Beck: Slight

EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:99: (S Bank)): Negligible (not significant) The Fleet: Slight adverse

EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:99: Drain, ditches and ponds ponds: Negligible

EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:100: Tees Estuary: Low (for Tees Estuary: Negligible Tees Estuary: Neutral None proposed – Tees Estuary: Neutral

EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:100:Flooding from fluvial Flood Risk: Very High Negligible Slight (not significant) Implementation of Slight adverse (not

EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:100:Flooding from surface Flood Risk: Very High Negligible Slight (not significant) Implementation of Slight adverse (not

EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:100:Flooding from Flood Risk: Very High Negligible Slight (not significant) Implementation of Slight adverse (not

EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:101:Flooding from drainage Flood Risk: Very High Negligible Slight (not significant) None proposed. Slight adverse (not

EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:101:Potential Pollution of Tees Coastal Waterbody Negligible Tees Coastal Waterbody Implementation of Tees Coastal Waterbody

EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:101:Potential Impacts on Tees Coastal Waterbody Negligible (TBC) Slight adverse (not Implementation of Slight adverse (not

EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:101:Potential Impacts on Tees Coastal Waterbody Negligible Slight adverse (not Implementation of Slight adverse (not

EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:102:Pond 14: Water Quality Pond 14: Very High Ponds 14: Negligible Pond 14: Slight adverse None required. Pond 14: Slight adverse

EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:102:Potential impacts on Tees Coastal Waterbody Negligible Slight adverse (not Scour protection Slight adverse (not

EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:102:Increase in potable water Potable Water Supply: Negligible Neutral (not significant) Northumbrian Water Neutral (not significant)

EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:102:Foul water discharge Dabholm Gut (Tees Negligible Slight adverse (not Consultation to be Slight adverse (not

EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:102:Flooding from fluvial Flood Risk: Low to Very Negligible Slight adverse (not Implementation of the Slight adverse (not

EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:102:Flooding from pluvial Flood Risk: Low to Very Negligible Neutral (not significant) Implementation of the Neutral (not significant)

EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:103:Flooding from Flood Risk: Low Negligible Neutral (not significant) Implementation of the Neutral (not significant)

EN010103-001141-NZT DCO 6.4.30 ES Vol III Appendix 14B Fisheries and Fish Ecology Baseline Part 3.pdf:47: construction in Q3 2022), climate change is expected to have a negligible

EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf:13: Development become negligible well within 2 km and therefore sensitive

EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf:14: reduce potential impacts at receptors to insignificant or negligible; and

EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf:15: negligible. Emissions of SO2, CO, benzene, and 1,3-butadiene from road

EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf:19:75% or less of Negligible Negligible Negligible Minor Moderate

EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf:19:76-94% of Negligible Negligible Minor Moderate Moderate

EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf:19:95-102% of Negligible Minor Moderate Moderate Major

EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf:19:103-109% of Negligible Moderate Moderate Major Major

EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf:19:110% or more Negligible Moderate Major Major Major

EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf:20: ‘negligible’ impacts are likely to lead to effects that are ‘not significant’ and

EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf:20: emission may be considered insignificant (or negligible) where:

EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf:20:  PC ⇐10% of the AQAL represents an ‘insignificant’ (negligible) impact;

EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf:21:8.3.54 Where emissions are not screened as insignificant (negligible), the

EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf:21: for EIA purposes. Effects found to be ‘minor’ or ‘negligible’ are considered to

EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf:35:8.6.5 The impact at all human receptors can be considered negligible as both the

EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf:36:8.6.7 The significance of the effect of construction traffic is therefore negligible and

EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf:36: negligible with reference to the IAQM/EPUK screening criterion. The effect of

EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf:36: as a result of site plant and NRMM emissions is likely to be negligible and

EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf:36: or not. Where this cannot be screened as negligible, the predicted

EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf:38:Maximum NO2 hourly mean Negligible

EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf:38: Negligible

EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf:38:Maximum CO 1-hour mean Negligible

EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf:38:Maximum CO 8-hour rolling Negligible

EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf:38: Negligible

EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf:38: Negligible

EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf:38: Negligible

EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf:38:Maximum amines (as MEA) Negligible

EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf:38: Negligible

EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf:38: Negligible

EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf:39: Negligible

EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf:39:Maximum Formaldehyde Negligible

EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf:39: Negligible

EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf:39:Maximum Ketones Negligible

EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf:39: Negligible

EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf:39:Maximum amines Acetic Acid Negligible

EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf:40: Development are predicted to result in negligible adverse effects at all

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:15: Negligible No effect on designated sites, ecosystems,

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:47: be negligible. Thus, there is considered to be no pathway for impacts to

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:53: the area this would represent is considered to be negligible and the spatial

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:55: expected, although the area this represents is negligible. Overall, the

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:57: predicted to be negligible. The results from this modelling exercise support

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:59: construction is predicted to have a negligible effect on air quality. As such,

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:60: predicted to be negligible.

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:81: negligible.

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:86: in steaming distances would be negligible.

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:86: to be negligible and therefore the effect is Not Significant.

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:92: average), and therefore is considered to represent a negligible change in

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:93: from thermal discharge through the outfall is predicted to be negligible and the

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:95: communities in terms of abundance and diversity owing to the negligible

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:95: Estuary are negligible, being <0.06°C in all scenarios modelled, with the

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:95: as there are only negligible increases in the Estuary itself when considered

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:95:14.6.221 Thus, the magnitude of impact is predicted to be negligible and the effect

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:97: considered to be negligible and therefore the effects are predicted to be Not

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:98: negligible.

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:99: entanglement and obstruction to fishing gear would be negligible.

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:99: displacement of commercial fishing activities is concluded to be negligible. A

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:100: community structure of benthic habitat and species would be negligible.

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:103:14.9.9 For the purpose of this assessment, negligible impacts are not considered to

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:104: available habitat is considered to be negligible.

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:104: disturbance is considered to be negligible and therefore the effect is

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:105: increases in SSC is predicted to be negligible and therefore the effect is

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:105: cumulative impacts is negligible and therefore the effect is Not Significant.

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:106: to occur concurrently, the loss of fishing grounds would negligible and as such

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:107: is considered to be negligible. The area of temporary and permanent habitat

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:108: habitat is considered to be negligible given the homogenous nature of the

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:109: is considered to be negligible, meaning that in-combination with the effects of

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:112: demersal eggs and larvae) are predicted to be negligible.

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:113: negligible.

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:5: to construction dust (i.e. at more than negligible risk) and receptors

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:14:Neutral/ Negligible Where the combined effects of the Proposed Development upon an individual or

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:14:(adverse or collection of environmental receptors would result in a negligible and not

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:15: effects are assessed to be neutral/ negligible, it is considered that such

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:19: effects are assessed to be neutral/ negligible, it is considered that such

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:32:3 – Tees Combined Scoped in - significant cumulative effects are not considered for Negligible cumulative air NA No residual

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:32:16 – Grangetown Scoped in - significant cumulative effects are not considered for Negligible cumulative air NA No residual

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:34:68 – MGT Teesside Scoped in - significant cumulative effects are not considered for Negligible cumulative air NA No residual

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:34:77 – Redcar Scoped in - significant cumulative effects are not considered for Negligible cumulative air NA No residual

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:36: developments assessed is negligible adverse and would not result in a

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:37: threshold for short term impacts and is therefore considered to be negligible

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:37: from the developments assessed is negligible adverse.

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:37: insignificant/ negligible at all receptor locations. It is therefore considered that

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:37: developments assessed is negligible adverse and would not have a

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:38: ecological receptors would be negligible and the cumulative air quality effects

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:38: would therefore be negligible and not significant, during both construction

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:41:17 - HCA Scoped in – This is adjacent to a Construction: There would be negligible impact Mitigation as presented in Construction: All

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:44: developments would have a negligible impact on water quality and flooding

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:47: distance at which some noise cumulative construction noise effects at all cumulative effects Negligible adverse at

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:49: will have negligible noise effects upon all

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:51: would be negligible adverse. For NSR1 (58 Broadway West), NSR2 (51 York

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:51: the cumulative effect would be negligible adverse and for NSR7 (Bran Sands

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:52: increase from negligible to minor adverse (not significant) compared to the

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:54:3 – Tees CCPP Scoped in - point source combustion Negligible cumulative air quality effects upon NA No residual

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:54:16 – Scoped in - point source combustion Negligible cumulative air quality effects upon NA No residual

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:55:68 – MGT Scoped in - point source combustion Negligible cumulative air quality effects upon NA No residual

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:56:77 – Redcar Scoped in - point source combustion Negligible cumulative air quality effects upon No additional mitigation required for No residual

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:73: available habitat is considered to be of negligible significance.

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:73: disturbance would be negligible and would not result in a significant

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:74: increases in SSC is predicted to be negligible and the effect would be not

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:74: cumulative effects is negligible and therefore the effect is not significant.

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:75: loss of fishing grounds would be negligible and as such the potential for

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:76: alone and a negligible increase in noise levels further away from the PCC

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:77: therefore be negligible and not significant.

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:78: ZoI. Landscape receptors that have been assessed as having negligible

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:78: that the addition of a negligible adverse effect to the cumulative effects of

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:81: Opening (Year 1): As above for Coastal Fringe LCT. Very low Negligible

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:81: Operation (Year 15): As above for Coastal Fringe LCT. Very low Negligible

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:82:24.5.119 Visual receptors that have been assessed as having a negligible effect due

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:83: cumulative effects, as it is considered unlikely that the addition of a negligible

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:94: Proposed Development, ranging from negligible or minor (not significant) to

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:95: human health receptors is considered negligible with reference to the

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:96: negligible or not applicable and have therefore been excluded from any

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:96:24.6.11 There would be negligible adverse effects due to construction traffic noise

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:96: materials would be negligible. Hence any construction traffic and transport-

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:97: operational Proposed Development would result in negligible adverse

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:97: negligible.

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:97: operation due to the creation of employment. There would be a negligible

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:101: compared to a negligible adverse effect for the Proposed Development

EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:39: Ramsar as a result of site plant and NRMM emissions is likely to be negligible and not

EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:49: are either not sensitive to nitrogen deposition or will be affected to a negligible

EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:50: therefore considered to have a negligible effect on air quality. Pollution from

EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:70: between negligible and potentially impactful projects and plans.

EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:100: dismiss atmospheric pollution impacts as negligible. Therefore, this impact pathway is screened in for Appropriate Assessment where the updated modelling

EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:112: c. Since the area around the Proposed Development is of negligible importance to The Wash and North Norfolk Coast harbour seal population, no in

EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:135: reaching the coast, then it can be concluded that there would be negligible risk of any

EN010103-002322-NZT DCO 9.36 - Nutrient Nitrogen Briefing Paper Clean Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:19: made. Initial analysis suggests that this will have a negligible

EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf:70:NSR1 – 58 Broadway West, Redcar Daytime Negligible adverse

EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf:70: Evening Negligible adverse

EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf:70:NSR2 – 51 York Road Redcar Daytime Negligible adverse

EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf:70: Evening Negligible adverse

EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf:71:NSR3 - 131 Broadway West Daytime Negligible adverse

EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf:71: Evening Negligible adverse

EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf:71:NSR4 - Marsh House Farm Daytime Negligible adverse

EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf:71: Evening Negligible adverse

EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf:71:NSR5 - Billingham (Charlton Close) Daytime Negligible adverse

EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf:71: Evening Negligible adverse

EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf:71:NSR6 - Haverton Hill Daytime Negligible adverse

EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf:71: Evening Negligible adverse

EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf:71:NSR7 - Northumbrian Water site offices All time Negligible adverse

EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf:84: habitats and therefore this impact would be not significant (negligible

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:26: leakage rates will be negligible.

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:47: increase from negligible, minor or moderate to major.

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:47: from negligible or minor to moderate.

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:47: topic, to increase from negligible to minor.

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:47: Consequence Very low Negligible Negligible Minor

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:47: Low Negligible Minor Moderate

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:51:Increase Possible Air quality Medium Increased construction Consequence is Unlikely Low Low Negligible No None

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:61: Consequence Very low Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:61: Low Negligible Minor Minor Minor Minor

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:61: Medium Negligible Minor Moderate Moderate Moderate

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:61: High Negligible Minor Moderate Major Major

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:61: Very high Negligible Minor Moderate Major Major

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:64:Increase in Very Likely All receptors See-Increase See-Increase Very Unlikely Very low Negligible No None

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:64:Increase in Very Likely Construction Overheating of Detailed in Very Unlikely Very Low Negligible No None

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:64:Increase in Very Likely All receptors None None Very Unlikely Very low Negligible No None

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:64:Increase in Possible All receptors None None Very Unlikely Very low Negligible No None

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:65:Decrease in Likely All receptors None None Very Unlikely Very Low Negligible No None

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:67:Increase Possible All receptors None None Very Unlikely Very Low Negligible No None

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:67:Sea level rise Very Likely Assets, See- Increase See- Increase Very Unlikely Medium Negligible No None

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:68:Increase in Very Likely All receptors See-Increase See-Increase Very Unlikely Very low Negligible No None

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:70:Increase in Very Likely All receptors None None Very Unlikely Very low Negligible No None

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:70:Increase in Possible All receptors None None Very Unlikely Very low Negligible No None

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:75:Increase Possible All receptors See- Decrease See- Decrease Very Unlikely Very Low Negligible No None

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:75:Increase in Unlikely Marine assets Physical • All Very Unlikely Very High Negligible No None

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:75: Assets, Damage to •The FRA Very Unlikely Very High Negligible No None

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:76: Marine assets Physical • All Very Unlikely Very High Negligible No None

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:77:Increase in Very Likely All receptors See-Increase See-Increase Very Unlikely Very low Negligible No None

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:77:Increase in Very Likely Deco. plant Overheating of To be detailed Very Unlikely Very Low Negligible No None

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:77:Increase in Very Likely All receptors None None Very Unlikely Very low Negligible No None

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:77:Increase in Possible All receptors See-Increase See-Increase Very Unlikely Very low Negligible No None

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:77:Decrease in Likely All receptors None None Very Unlikely Very Low Negligible No None

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:78:Increase to Possible Deco. plant See-Increase See-Increase Very Unlikely Very Low Negligible No None

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:78:Increase Possible All receptors None None Very Unlikely Very Low Negligible No None

EN010103-002075-NZT DCO 9.29 - Cumulative GHG Onshore and Offshore Assessment August 2022 (D6).pdf:16: are considered to be significant. Minor adverse and negligible effects are not

EN010103-002075-NZT DCO 9.29 - Cumulative GHG Onshore and Offshore Assessment August 2022 (D6).pdf:16: Negligible The projects GHG impacts would be Not significant

EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf:7: Assessment (EIA) practice; while minor and negligible effects are considered

EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf:8: minor and negligible effects are considered to be ‘not significant’. Where

EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf:31: landscape character at a local scale and negligible at a regional or national

EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf:34:NCA 23: Tees Medium Construction activities associated with the Proposed Development will directly impact the Very low Negligible adverse

EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf:34:MCA 22 Tyne, Medium The Proposed Development lies within this MCA and will introduce views of construction Very low Negligible adverse

EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf:35:Rural Fringe LCT Medium The Proposed Development lies outside of this LCT but will introduce very limited views of Very Low Negligible adverse

EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf:36:NCA 23: Tees Medium The Proposed Development will introduce views of the PCC Site within the NCA. The existing Very low Negligible

EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf:36:MCA 22 Tyne, Medium The Proposed Development lies outside of this MCA but will introduce views of the PCC Site due to Very low Negligible

EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf:37:Estuarine LCT Medium The Proposed Development lies outside of this LCT but will introduce views of the PCC Site due to the Very low Negligible

EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf:37:Rural Fringe LCT Medium The Proposed Development lies outside of this LCT but will introduce limited views of the PCC Site Very low Negligible

EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf:38:NCA 23: Tees Medium The impacts during operation are anticipated to be similar to the opening assessment scenario. The Very low Negligible

EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf:38:MCA 22 Tyne, Tees Medium The impacts during operation are anticipated to be similar to the opening assessment scenario. The Very low Negligible

EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf:38:Estuarine LCT Medium The impacts during operation are anticipated to be similar to the opening assessment scenario. The Very low Negligible

EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf:38:Rural Fringe LCT Medium The impacts during operation are anticipated to be similar to the opening assessment scenario. The Very low Negligible

EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf:40:Significance of effect at construction Residential and PRoW users Negligible adverse

EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf:40:Significance of effect at opening Residential and recreational Negligible adverse

EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf:40:Significance of effect at operation Residential and recreational Negligible adverse

EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf:41:Significance of effect at opening Residential and recreational Negligible adverse

EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf:41:Significance of effect at operation Residential and recreational Negligible adverse

EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf:45:Significance of effect at construction Recreational Negligible adverse

EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf:45:Significance of effect at opening Recreational Negligible adverse

EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf:45:Significance of effect at operation Recreational Negligible adverse

EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf:49:Significance of effect at construction Recreational Negligible adverse

EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf:49:Significance of effect at opening Recreational Negligible adverse

EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf:49:Significance of effect at operation Recreational Negligible adverse

EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf:50:Significance of effect at construction Residential Negligible adverse

EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf:50:Significance of effect at opening Residential Negligible adverse

EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf:50:Significance of effect at operation Residential Negligible adverse

EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf:51:Significance of effect at construction Recreational Negligible adverse

EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf:51:Significance of effect at opening Recreational Negligible adverse

EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf:51:Significance of effect at operation Recreational Negligible adverse

EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf:53:1 High Albion Terrace, Hartlepool Residential and Negligible adverse Negligible adverse Negligible adverse

EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf:53:2 High The Cliff, Seaton Carew Residential and Minor adverse Negligible adverse Negligible adverse

EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf:53:6 High Cowpen Bewley Country Park Recreational Negligible adverse Negligible adverse Negligible adverse

EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf:53:10 High Eston Nab Recreational Negligible adverse Negligible adverse Negligible adverse

EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf:53:11 Medium Longbeck Lane Residential Negligible adverse Negligible adverse Negligible adverse

EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf:54:12 High Carpark off A1085 Coast Road, Recreational Negligible adverse Negligible adverse Negligible adverse

EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf:57: that have been assessed as having negligible adverse effects have not been

EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf:57: that the addition of a negligible adverse effect to the cumulative effects of other

EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf:59:Estuarine LCT Medium Very low Negligible

EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf:60:Estuarine LCT Medium assessed to remain at very low, the same as for the Proposed Very low Negligible adverse (not

EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf:62:17.9.10 Visual receptors that have been assessed as having a negligible effect due to

EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf:62: cumulative effects, as it is considered unlikely that the addition of a negligible

EN010103-001912-NZT DCO 9.17 - Hydrogeological Impact Assessment July 2022 (D4).pdf:26: Negligible Slight Slight Neutral/Slight Neutral/Slight

EN010103-001912-NZT DCO 9.17 - Hydrogeological Impact Assessment July 2022 (D4).pdf:30: conditions will have a negligible impact of neutral/slight significance.

EN010103-001912-NZT DCO 9.17 - Hydrogeological Impact Assessment July 2022 (D4).pdf:33: Localised dewatering of the Tidal Flat Deposits will have a negligible impact on the

EN010103-001912-NZT DCO 9.17 - Hydrogeological Impact Assessment July 2022 (D4).pdf:34: negligible with an impact of neutral significance.

EN010103-001912-NZT DCO 9.17 - Hydrogeological Impact Assessment July 2022 (D4).pdf:35: Development will be negligible with an impact significance of slight.

EN010103-001912-NZT DCO 9.17 - Hydrogeological Impact Assessment July 2022 (D4).pdf:35: decommissioning of the Proposed Development will be negligible with an impact

EN010103-001912-NZT DCO 9.17 - Hydrogeological Impact Assessment July 2022 (D4).pdf:37: CO2 Gathering Negligible Neutral/slight No change Neutral

EN010103-001912-NZT DCO 9.17 - Hydrogeological Impact Assessment July 2022 (D4).pdf:37: CO2 Export Negligible Slight No change Neutral

EN010103-001912-NZT DCO 9.17 - Hydrogeological Impact Assessment July 2022 (D4).pdf:37: Other No change Neutral Negligible Slight

EN010103-001912-NZT DCO 9.17 - Hydrogeological Impact Assessment July 2022 (D4).pdf:37: All elements No change Neutral Negligible Slight

EN010103-001912-NZT DCO 9.17 - Hydrogeological Impact Assessment July 2022 (D4).pdf:37: All elements No change Neutral Negligible Slight

EN010103-001131-NZT DCO 6.4.42 ES Vol III Appendix 18A Cultural Heritage Baseline Report.pdf:6: ‘medium’, ‘low’, ‘negligible’, or ‘unknown’. This rating is based on an

EN010103-001131-NZT DCO 6.4.42 ES Vol III Appendix 18A Cultural Heritage Baseline Report.pdf:7: Negligible

EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:44: can have on biodiversity, especially birds. Paragraph 2.7.2 requires the applicant concludes that the Site has negligible ecological value for habitats and species of flora and

EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:58: adverse effects are predicted in relation to ecology. The assessment concludes that the Site has negligible ecological

EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:62: adverse effects are predicted in relation to ecology. The assessment concludes that the Site has negligible ecological

EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:103:negligible.” PHE supports the inclusion of this information within EIAs as good

EN010082-000361-Appendix A - DCO 6.3.14_Tees CCPP_ES_Annex H_HRA_UPDATED 230418.pdf:27: a. Impacts from emissions during construction and decommissioning (such as from traffic) are considered negligible (see

EN010082-000361-Appendix A - DCO 6.3.14_Tees CCPP_ES_Annex H_HRA_UPDATED 230418.pdf:29: a. Impacts from emissions during construction and decommissioning (such as from traffic) are considered negligible (see

EN010082-000361-Appendix A - DCO 6.3.14_Tees CCPP_ES_Annex H_HRA_UPDATED 230418.pdf:31: a. Impacts from emissions during construction and decommissioning (such as from traffic) are considered negligible (see

EN010082-000361-Appendix A - DCO 6.3.14_Tees CCPP_ES_Annex H_HRA_UPDATED 230418.pdf:33: a. Impacts from emissions during construction and decommissioning (such as from traffic) are considered negligible (see

EN010082-000361-Appendix A - DCO 6.3.14_Tees CCPP_ES_Annex H_HRA_UPDATED 230418.pdf:34: a. Impacts from emissions during construction and decommissioning (such as from traffic) are considered negligible (see

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:37: of negligible ecological interest and that all protected species issues had

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:46: negligible due to the size of the site, the distance to sensitive receptors

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:47: Proposed Development would generate negligible impacts and this matter

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:47: impacts from dust, PM10 and PM2.5 during construction would be negligible

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:48: operational traffic would be negligible and this matter is not considered

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:51: mitigated to negligible residual impacts. The Applicant noted that the

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:53: stack height based on the knowledge that negligible impacts on sensitive

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:54: be limited and result in negligible change in impacts REP5-005. As with

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:60:4.10.7. The ES explains that the site is of negligible ecological value and that NE

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:65: negligible to minor adverse and therefore not significant.

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:79: whichconcludes that changes in total trafficwould be negligible.

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:82: negligible impact in terms of construction traffic and therefore will result

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:83: be negligible.

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:83: negligible.

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:122: change would be negligible. Any noise impacts of lateral movement

EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:19:having no impact or to be of negligible magnitude and will While the above provides a general framework for identifying impacts and assessing the significance of their effects, in practice the approaches and

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:4: hardstanding proposed for the Project is negligible, the risk associated with

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:4: this effect is also anticipated to be negligible.

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:14: and water quality to be assessed as large, medium, small or negligible.

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:16: Negligible A change well within the bounds of normal natural variation. No effect

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:18: Negligible A change within the bounds of natural variation and below assessment criteria

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:20: Negligible A change within the bounds of natural variation and below Freshwater EQS, no

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:21:6.46 Impacts of negligible magnitude always lead to an effect which is not

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:21: the site, and potential increase risk of flooding from the Project is negligible.

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:21:6.48 As the flood risk at the site has been assessed as negligible, no further

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:36: the resource value of groundwater at the Project site to be ‘negligible’.

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:43: new engineered industrial surface is considered to be a negligible change,

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:43: therefore any permanent soil loss will be negligible.

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:43: considered to be negligible in relation to topsoil and minor in relation to

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:46:Excavation of Construction Inhalation of Low High Small • Identification and Negligible Not

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:46:Excavation Construction Dermal Low High Small • Identification and Negligible Not

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:46:Traffic Construction Inhalation of Low High Small • Dust suppression using Negligible Not

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:47:Disturbance Potential to Spreading of Low High Medium • Identification and Negligible Not

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:47:Disturbance Potential to Migration of Low Medium Small • Ensure discharge of all Negligible Not

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:48:Disturbance Potential to erode Migration of Low Medium Small • Ensure discharge of all Negligible Not

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:49:Dewatering Discharge of Migration of Medium Medium Medium • Identification and Negligible Not

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:50:Increased Potential for Migration of Low Medium Small • Dust suppression using Negligible Not

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:50:Increased Potential for Migration of Low High Small • Dust suppression using Negligible Not

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:50:Use of plant Potential of Overland flow Medium Medium Medium • Storage, handling and Negligible Not

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:51:Use of plant Potential of Vertical Medium Low Medium • Storage, handling and Negligible Not

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:51:Use of plant Potential of Direct spill of Medium High Medium • Storage, handling and Negligible Not

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:52:Excavation, Potential for Creation or - Medium Medium • Ensure no large increase in Negligible Not

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:53: until the site is decommissioned, although the loss is likely to be negligible

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:55:Site Operational users, Inhalation, Low High Small • Storage and handling of Negligible Not

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:55:Permanent Permanent loss of - High Low Negligible • Where possible some small Negligible Not

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:55:Permanent Reduction in - High Low Medium • Water monitoring plan Negligible Not

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:55:Site activities Spills and leaks, e.g. Spill of Low Medium Medium • Storage and handling of Negligible Not

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:56:Site activities Spills and leaks of oil, Vertical Low Low Small • Storage and handling of Negligible Not

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:57:Site activities Accidental spillage Spill of Low Medium Small • Storage and handling of Negligible Not

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:57:Site activities Spills and leaks of oil, Direct spill of Low High Small • Storage and handling of Negligible Not

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:58:Footprint of Potential for Creation or Low Medium Small • The area of hardstanding / Negligible Not

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:62:Excavation of Demolition Inhalation, Low High Small • Identification and Negligible Not

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:62:Dewatering of Demolition Dermal Very Low High Small • Identification and Negligible Not

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:63:Removal of Demolition Inhalation of Low High Small • Development and Negligible Not

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:63:Traffic Demolition Inhalation of Low High Small • Development and Negligible Not

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:63:Decommissioning Potential of Overland Low Medium Small • Storage and handling Negligible Not

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:64:Decommissioning Potential of Vertical Medium Low Small • Storage and handling Negligible Not

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:64:Decommissioning Potential of Direct spill of Low High Small • Storage and handling Negligible Not

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:65:Increased traffic Potential for Migration of Low Medium Small • Dust suppression Negligible Not

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:65:Export, Potential to remove, Migration of Medium Medium Medium • Identification and Negligible Not

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:66:Export Potential to remove, Migration of High Low Medium • Identification and Negligible Not

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:66:Export, Potential to remove, Migration of Low High Medium • Identification and Negligible Not

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:66:Removal of Discharge of Migration of Low Medium Small • Minimise potential to Negligible Not

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:67:Removal of Change in the Migration of High Low Medium • Minimise potential to Negligible Not

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:67:Removal of Preferential Contaminated Medium Low Medium • Development and Negligible Not

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:67:Excavation, soil Potential for an Creation or - Medium Medium • Minimise potential to Negligible Not

EN010082-Advice-00011-1-Planning Inspectorate comments on draft NSER.pdf:8: supporting evidence (for example, where the footnotes refer to negligible

EN010082-000179-EN010082-6.2.8-ES-Chapter 8-Noise and Vibration-Final-November 2017.pdf:3: suggests changes will be negligible.

EN010082-000179-EN010082-6.2.8-ES-Chapter 8-Noise and Vibration-Final-November 2017.pdf:7:Council Environmental Health during construction as both have been considered as negligible. The assessment has shown that daytime noise DCO Requirement 20 details

EN010082-000185-EN010082-6.2.14-ES Chapter 14-Human Health-Final-November 2017.pdf:32: traffic is considered negligible (see Section 7.4.2).

EN010082-000185-EN010082-6.2.14-ES Chapter 14-Human Health-Final-November 2017.pdf:33: existing junctions, coupled with the negligible magnitude of change from the

EN010082-000185-EN010082-6.2.14-ES Chapter 14-Human Health-Final-November 2017.pdf:38: These effects will be appropriately managed and no greater than negligible

EN010082-000193-EN010082-6.3.3-ES Annex C-Flood Risk Assessment-Final-November 2017.pdf:16: the risk of failure is almost negligible.

EN010082-000193-EN010082-6.3.3-ES Annex C-Flood Risk Assessment-Final-November 2017.pdf:17: considered negligible.

EN010082-000193-EN010082-6.3.3-ES Annex C-Flood Risk Assessment-Final-November 2017.pdf:19: the risk of flooding from the Project is considered to be negligible.

EN010082-000184-EN010082-6.2.13-ES Chapter 13-Socio Economic Characteristics-Final-November 2017.pdf:18: Negligible • An impact that would not result in a variation beyond the baseline

EN010082-000184-EN010082-6.2.13-ES Chapter 13-Socio Economic Characteristics-Final-November 2017.pdf:42: negligible adverse effects are anticipated in respect of disruption to local

EN010082-000184-EN010082-6.2.13-ES Chapter 13-Socio Economic Characteristics-Final-November 2017.pdf:44: These effects are of negligible significance.

EN010082-000184-EN010082-6.2.13-ES Chapter 13-Socio Economic Characteristics-Final-November 2017.pdf:44: These effects are of negligible significance.

EN010082-000184-EN010082-6.2.13-ES Chapter 13-Socio Economic Characteristics-Final-November 2017.pdf:45: and traffic impacts are anticipated. The effect is therefore The effect is therefore negligible.

EN010082-000184-EN010082-6.2.13-ES Chapter 13-Socio Economic Characteristics-Final-November 2017.pdf:45: negligible.

EN010082-000184-EN010082-6.2.13-ES Chapter 13-Socio Economic Characteristics-Final-November 2017.pdf:45: These effects are of negligible significance. These effects are of negligible significance.

EN010082-000525-7.3 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with Redcar Cleveland - FINAL - 06.07.18.pdf:25:19.3 The Site has negligible ecological value for habitats and species of flora and fauna and taking account of

EN010082-000393-7 7 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with Historic England - DRAFT.pdf:7: be minimal to small with the overall level of effect considered to be negligible to minor adverse and

EN010082-000388-7 2 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with NE - Signed_Redacted.pdf:10: 2.11 The assessment confirms that the Project Site has negligible ecological value for habitats and species

EN010082-000396-8 5 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Comments on Relevant Reps - FINAL (2).pdf:12: 3.1.3. The project site currently supports habitats of negligible ecological interest and all

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:8: emissions from the short term use of auxiliary boilers are negligible and only operate on start-up of the Proposed Power Plant to supply either, or both of the following:

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:10: Quality Management (IAQM) guidance on the assessment of dust from a degree that residual impacts are negligible.

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:10: significance of effect prior to mitigation and as a residual effect (for negligible.

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:18: At distant nature conservation sites change would be negligible.

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:18: effectively negligible. The other structures in Works No. 1-4 relates only to buildings of less than 1/3rd stack height, there is

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:31: judged to be significant whereas minor and negligible impacts are considered “In predicting magnitude the effect of all the project mitigation in place (i.e. committed to by Sembcorp) will be taken into account.

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:42: have a localised effect and within the wider context of the NCA, it will represent a negligible magnitude of change. The Project does

EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:83: as negligible. The assessment has shown that daytime health, the assessment concludes that there are no

EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:296: having no impact or to be of negligible magnitude and will While the above provides a general framework for identifying impacts and assessing the significance of their effects, in practice the approaches and

EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:303: The Project Site itself is of negligible ecological importance and the

EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:327: considered as negligible and has assumed the installation of a 75m stack.

EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:327: considered as negligible. The assessment has shown that daytime noise

EN010082-000562-Report on the Implications for European Sites.pdf:32: considered negligible (see ES Chapter 7 Air Quality, Paragraphs 7.107 and 7.115 AS-020) and have been screened

EN010082-000202-EN010082-6.3.12-ES Annex G1-Effects of Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:11:(1) For South Gare & Coatham Sands SSSI, the PC/CL% is 1.02. This is a negligible increase over 1 and therefore the site has been included in the <1% category and is not considered to exceed the screening criteria. In practice, as the

EN010082-000202-EN010082-6.3.12-ES Annex G1-Effects of Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:24: by these sites, the contribution of the Project to the effects is negligible, for

EN010082-000206-EN010082-6.3.16-ES Annex I1-Transport Assessment-Final-November 2017.pdf:46: will be a negligible increase in trips and any significant increases in traffic will occur

EN010082-000206-EN010082-6.3.16-ES Annex I1-Transport Assessment-Final-November 2017.pdf:51: network peak’ periods. The impact during the network peak periods is negligible. The

EN010082-000206-EN010082-6.3.16-ES Annex I1-Transport Assessment-Final-November 2017.pdf:124: negligible increase in trips and any significant increases in traffic will occur outside of the

EN010082-000536-8.46 - Tees CCPP - Applicant's Response to ExA's Second WQs - Deadline 5 - FINAL - 07.08.18.pdf:10: assessed in the ES and what would be consented though the DCO. The There would be negligible change in impacts as these fine-tunings are marginal in comparison to the overall design.

EN010082-000181-EN010082-6.2.10-ES Chapter 10-Traffic and Transport-Final-November 2017.pdf:18: Negligible <30% No discernible change in conditions

EN010082-000181-EN010082-6.2.10-ES Chapter 10-Traffic and Transport-Final-November 2017.pdf:25: construction phase as operational vehicle movements are negligible. Changes

EN010082-000181-EN010082-6.2.10-ES Chapter 10-Traffic and Transport-Final-November 2017.pdf:29: negligible impact in terms of construction traffic (<30% increase in traffic and

EN010082-000181-EN010082-6.2.10-ES Chapter 10-Traffic and Transport-Final-November 2017.pdf:30: negligible impact in terms of operational traffic (<30% increase in traffic and

EN010082-000181-EN010082-6.2.10-ES Chapter 10-Traffic and Transport-Final-November 2017.pdf:31: change is considered to be negligible and therefore does not warrant further

EN010082-000181-EN010082-6.2.10-ES Chapter 10-Traffic and Transport-Final-November 2017.pdf:31: have a negligible environmental impact in terms of traffic for the

EN010082-000181-EN010082-6.2.10-ES Chapter 10-Traffic and Transport-Final-November 2017.pdf:32: that there will be a negligible increase in trips and any significant increases in

EN010082-000181-EN010082-6.2.10-ES Chapter 10-Traffic and Transport-Final-November 2017.pdf:33:Construction Increased traffic flows on All traffic to use the Strategic Road Network Negligible impacts.

EN010082-000181-EN010082-6.2.10-ES Chapter 10-Traffic and Transport-Final-November 2017.pdf:33:Construction Increased HGV traffic on A1053, A66, Construction Traffic Management Plan Negligible impacts.

EN010082-000181-EN010082-6.2.10-ES Chapter 10-Traffic and Transport-Final-November 2017.pdf:33:Abnormal Indivisible AILs on Tees Dock Road, A66, A1053. Abnormal load routing to be agreed through Negligible impacts.

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:37: of negligible ecological interest and that all protected species issues had

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:46: negligible due to the size of the site, the distance to sensitive receptors

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:47: Proposed Development would generate negligible impacts and this matter

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:47: impacts from dust, PM10 and PM2.5 during construction would be negligible

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:48: operational traffic would be negligible and this matter is not considered

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:51: mitigated to negligible residual impacts. The Applicant noted that the

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:53: stack height based on the knowledge that negligible impacts on sensitive

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:54: be limited and result in negligible change in impacts REP5-005. As with

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:60:4.10.7. The ES explains that the site is of negligible ecological value and that NE

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:65: negligible to minor adverse and therefore not significant.

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:79: whichconcludes that changes in total trafficwould be negligible.

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:82: negligible impact in terms of construction traffic and therefore will result

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:83: be negligible.

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:83: negligible.

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:122: change would be negligible. Any noise impacts of lateral movement

EN010082-000476-Applicant’s Comments on Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council’s Responses to the Examiner’s Written Questions D3.pdf:18: have been considered as negligible and has assumed the installation

EN010082-000476-Applicant’s Comments on Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council’s Responses to the Examiner’s Written Questions D3.pdf:18: have been considered as negligible. The assessment has shown that

EN010082-000350-Placeholder for ExA's Written Questions.pdf:3: term use of auxiliary boilers are negligible and only contribute 3% of the total oxides of nitrogen (NOx)

EN010082-000350-Placeholder for ExA's Written Questions.pdf:25: moderate impacts are judged to be significant whereas minor and negligible impacts are considered to

EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf:3: term use of the auxiliary boilers are negligible and have not been considered,

EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf:4: the construction phase of the Project are considered to be negligible.

EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf:4: the emissions arising from these are anticipated to be negligible and have

EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf:5: are anticipated to be negligible and have not been considered further (see

EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf:12: Council (PEIR response) State or factors which have been considered as negligible and has assumed the installation of a 75m stack. The described in this chapter and the

EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf:14: construction are negligible. Effects on sensitive ecological receptors primarily

EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf:20: emissions form the auxiliary boilers are negligible (~2% short term increase in

EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf:26: PEC 75% or less of AQS Negligible Negligible Slight Moderate

EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf:26: PEC 76% to 94% of AQS Negligible Slight Moderate Moderate

EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf:26: (not dependent on baseline Negligible Slight Moderate Substantial

EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf:27: Negligible.

EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf:38: considered negligible and have been screened out from further consideration.

EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf:52: negligible. However, it should be noted that due to the nature of dust

EN010082-000398-8 7 - Tees CCPP - Written Summary of Oral Case (ISH 10 04 18) - FINAL.pdf:17: protect human health. At distant nature conservation sites change would be negligible;

EN010082-000477-Applicant’s Comments on the Environment Agency’s Responses to the Examiner’s Written Questions D3.pdf:16: measure objectives. We would welcome any contributions by the applicant 1, Chapter 9 APP-051. The assessment concludes that the Site has negligible ecological

EN010082-000180-EN010082-6.2.9-ES Chapter 9-Ecology and Nature Conservation-Final-November 2017.pdf:4: surrounding area the Project Site is of negligible ecological sensitivity.

EN010082-000180-EN010082-6.2.9-ES Chapter 9-Ecology and Nature Conservation-Final-November 2017.pdf:18: of negligible ecological value (see Section 9.5), and NE agreed that detailed

EN010082-000180-EN010082-6.2.9-ES Chapter 9-Ecology and Nature Conservation-Final-November 2017.pdf:28: was in October 2016, which showed that the Project site was of negligible

EN010082-000180-EN010082-6.2.9-ES Chapter 9-Ecology and Nature Conservation-Final-November 2017.pdf:30:9.66 The habitats on the Project site are considered to be of negligible conservation

EN010082-000180-EN010082-6.2.9-ES Chapter 9-Ecology and Nature Conservation-Final-November 2017.pdf:32:9.81 The Project Site is of negligible ecological importance and no significant effects

EN010082-000180-EN010082-6.2.9-ES Chapter 9-Ecology and Nature Conservation-Final-November 2017.pdf:34:9.90 The Project site has negligible ecological value for habitats and species of flora

EN010082-000170-EN010082-6.1-ES Non Technical Summary-Final-November 2017.pdf:8:having no impact or to be of negligible magnitude and will While the above provides a general framework for identifying impacts and assessing the significance of their effects, in practice the approaches and

EN010082-000170-EN010082-6.1-ES Non Technical Summary-Final-November 2017.pdf:16:0.54 The Project Site itself is of negligible ecological importance and the

EN010082-000517-8.43 - Tees CCPP - Written Summary of Oral Case - Env Matters ISH - FINAL - 05.07.18.pdf:8: figures) as between the PEIR and ES; illustrating the negligible effect the building structures have on

EN010082-000517-8.43 - Tees CCPP - Written Summary of Oral Case - Env Matters ISH - FINAL - 05.07.18.pdf:8: effect is negligible. Substantially lowering the stack height to heights comparable with the tallest

EN010082-000517-8.43 - Tees CCPP - Written Summary of Oral Case - Env Matters ISH - FINAL - 05.07.18.pdf:9: ranges from negligible to medium and the significance of effects from not significant to minor. As can be

EN010082-000517-8.43 - Tees CCPP - Written Summary of Oral Case - Env Matters ISH - FINAL - 05.07.18.pdf:10: that negligible impacts on sensitive human and ecological receptors would occur. However, that this is

EN010082-000409-8.14 - Table 3.2 update.pdf:1: impacts are negligible”.

EN010082-000409-8.14 - Table 3.2 update.pdf:4: have a negligible impact in terms of construction traffic

EN010082-000196-EN010082-6.3.6-ES Annex D3-Site Condition Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:99:no risk to human health or the risk is negligible). For the ENVIRON GAC, all the SGV inputs

EN010082-000429-Copy of EXA Questions 1.pdf:33:negligible and has assumed the installation of a 75m stack. The design of the gas turbine will be such that it will be capable of meeting a 30mg/m3 emission limit,

EN010082-000429-Copy of EXA Questions 1.pdf:33:as negligible. The assessment has shown that daytime noise levels are predicted to be below the 65dB level for all noise sensitive receptors. The developer plans

EN010082-000389-7 3 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with Redcar Cleveland - DRAFT.pdf:25: The Site has negligible ecological value for habitats and species of flora and fauna and taking account of

EN010082-000387-7 1 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with TVWT - Signed_Redacted.pdf:9: the Site has negligible ecological value for habitats and species of flora and fauna, and no significant

EN010082-000387-7 1 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with TVWT - Signed_Redacted.pdf:9: 2.16 In specific regards to breeding birds, it is agreed that there will be negligible effect on bird species

EN010082-000203-EN010082-6.3.13-ES Annex G2-Ecological Appraisal_Final.pdf:11:The Project site is of negligible ecological value with no priority habitats and, in fact, very little

EN010082-000203-EN010082-6.3.13-ES Annex G2-Ecological Appraisal_Final.pdf:12:Of the other priority species, there is negligible suitable habitat on the Project site for any of

EN010082-000203-EN010082-6.3.13-ES Annex G2-Ecological Appraisal_Final.pdf:12:Project site is of negligible importance for that species.

EN010082-000203-EN010082-6.3.13-ES Annex G2-Ecological Appraisal_Final.pdf:12:habitat then the Project site is considered to be of negligible importance for both species.

EN010082-000203-EN010082-6.3.13-ES Annex G2-Ecological Appraisal_Final.pdf:12:This vegetation is of negligible ecological value being essentially a range of the typical “weed”

EN010082-000203-EN010082-6.3.13-ES Annex G2-Ecological Appraisal_Final.pdf:12:assessed as being negligible.

EN010082-000203-EN010082-6.3.13-ES Annex G2-Ecological Appraisal_Final.pdf:12:being negligible, including at a local scale.

EN010082-000203-EN010082-6.3.13-ES Annex G2-Ecological Appraisal_Final.pdf:13:surrounding area, eg large water bodies, roofs, etc, this impact is assessed as being negligible.

EN010082-000203-EN010082-6.3.13-ES Annex G2-Ecological Appraisal_Final.pdf:13:would be of negligible significance at a local scale.

EN010082-000203-EN010082-6.3.13-ES Annex G2-Ecological Appraisal_Final.pdf:13:assessed as being negligible.

EN010082-000203-EN010082-6.3.13-ES Annex G2-Ecological Appraisal_Final.pdf:13:The Project site negligible ecological value.

EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf:3: term use of the auxiliary boilers are negligible and have not been considered,

EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf:4: the construction phase of the Project are considered to be negligible.

EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf:4: the emissions arising from these are anticipated to be negligible and have

EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf:5: are anticipated to be negligible and have not been considered further (see

EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf:12:Council (PEIR response) State or factors which have been considered as negligible and has assumed the installation of a 75m stack. The described in this chapter and the

EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf:14: construction are negligible. Effects on sensitive ecological receptors primarily

EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf:20: emissions form the auxiliary boilers are negligible (~2% short term increase in

EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf:26: PEC 75% or less of AQS Negligible Negligible Slight Moderate

EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf:26: PEC 76% to 94% of AQS Negligible Slight Moderate Moderate

EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf:26: (not dependent on baseline Negligible Slight Moderate Substantial

EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf:27: Negligible.

EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf:38: considered negligible and have been screened out from further consideration.

EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf:52: negligible. However, it should be noted that due to the nature of dust

EN010082-000205-EN010082-6.3.15-ES Annex H-HRA-Final-November 2017.pdf:26: a. Impacts from emissions during construction and decommissioning (such as from traffic) are considered negligible (see Section 7.4.2 of

EN010082-000205-EN010082-6.3.15-ES Annex H-HRA-Final-November 2017.pdf:27: a. Impacts from emissions during construction and decommissioning (such as from traffic) are considered negligible and have been

EN010082-000205-EN010082-6.3.15-ES Annex H-HRA-Final-November 2017.pdf:28: a. Impacts from emissions during construction and decommissioning (such as from traffic) are considered negligible and have been

EN010082-000205-EN010082-6.3.15-ES Annex H-HRA-Final-November 2017.pdf:29: a. Impacts from emissions during construction and decommissioning (such as from traffic) are considered negligible and have been

EN010082-000205-EN010082-6.3.15-ES Annex H-HRA-Final-November 2017.pdf:30: a. Impacts from emissions during construction and decommissioning (such as from traffic) are considered negligible and have been

EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf:12: the EIA Regulations, whereas minor and negligible impacts are considered to

EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf:34: highly developed industrial be negligible. Plant and within the industrial

EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf:34: is negligible.

EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf:34: of the Project Site. be negligible. barely visible. to be

EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf:34: negligible.

EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf:34: Project Site form this area. be negligible. barely visible. to be

EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf:34: negligible.

EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf:34: Wilton) limited or no visibility of the be negligible. visible. to be

EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf:34: Project Site from this area. negligible.

EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf:34: Marske) buildings there is very be negligible. visible. to be

EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf:35: limited or no visibility of the negligible.

EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf:35: landscape unit from where be negligible. Project will be barely visible. to be

EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf:35: long distance views are negligible.

EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf:35: industrial development to be negligible. industrial buildings. to be

EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf:35: the north and northeast of negligible.

EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf:36: At night construction Negligible Not Small Minor

EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf:36: considered to be negligible. existing lighting around

EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf:36: Impacts due to lighting are Negligible Not footpath. Small Minor

EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf:36: At night construction Negligible Not Small Minor

EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf:37: negligible. more lighting during the

EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf:37:VP4- view High Views to site are restricted Negligible Not Views to site are Magnitude of Minor to

EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf:37: Negligible Not Minor

EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf:38:VP6- view Medium Views to the site are Negligible Not Intervening vegetation in Magnitude of Minor

EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf:38: Negligible

EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf:38:VP7-view High Views to site are restricted Negligible Not Intervening vegetation in Magnitude of Not Significant

EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf:38:park/Mille Infrastructure corridor. views of the Project. Negligible.

EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf:39: Negligible Not Magnitude of

EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf:39: considered to be negligible. be medium

EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf:39:VP9- View Medium Partial long medium Negligible Not The Project will be Magnitude of Minor

EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf:39:VP10- View Medium Long medium distance Negligible Not The Project will be visible Magnitude of Minor

EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf:40: the Wilton International Negligible. Project will be seen

EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf:40:VP11- View High Very limited long-medium Negligible Not The taller components of Magnitude of Not Significant

EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf:40: taller components of the skyline but will be negligible.

EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf:40:VP12- View High Given the distance and a Negligible Not It is unlikely that the Magnitude of Not Significant

EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf:40:m village of the Project site and to intervening vegetation. negligible.

EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf:40:VP13- View Medium Given the distance and Negligible Not Very limited long Magnitude of Not Significant

EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf:40:village Project site and from the village and foot negligible.

EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf:41:VP14- View Medium Given the distance and due Negligible Not Only the taller elements Magnitude of Not Significant

EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf:41:wn facilities, views of the due to existing negligible.

EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf:48: negligible owing to distance and the intervening areas of urban development

EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf:49: the magnitude of change is considered to be negligible and the cumulative

EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf:12: the EIA Regulations, whereas minor and negligible impacts are considered to

EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf:34: highly developed industrial be negligible. Plant and within the industrial

EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf:34: is negligible.

EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf:34: of the Project Site. be negligible. barely visible. to be

EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf:34: negligible.

EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf:34: Project Site form this area. be negligible. barely visible. to be

EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf:34: negligible.

EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf:34: Wilton) limited or no visibility of the be negligible. visible. to be

EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf:34: Project Site from this area. negligible.

EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf:34: Marske) buildings there is very be negligible. visible. to be

EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf:35: limited or no visibility of the negligible.

EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf:35: landscape unit from where be negligible. Project will be barely visible. to be

EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf:35: long distance views are negligible.

EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf:35: industrial development to be negligible. industrial buildings. to be

EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf:35: the north and northeast of negligible.

EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf:36: At night construction Negligible Not Small Minor

EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf:36: considered to be negligible. existing lighting around

EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf:36: Impacts due to lighting are Negligible Not footpath. Small Minor

EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf:36: At night construction Negligible Not Small Minor

EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf:37: negligible. more lighting during the

EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf:37:VP4- view High Views to site are restricted Negligible Not Views to site are Magnitude of Minor to

EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf:37: Negligible Not Minor

EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf:38:VP6- view Medium Views to the site are Negligible Not Intervening vegetation in Magnitude of Minor

EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf:38: Negligible

EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf:38:VP7-view High Views to site are restricted Negligible Not Intervening vegetation in Magnitude of Not Significant

EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf:38:park/Mille Infrastructure corridor. views of the Project. Negligible.

EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf:39: Negligible Not Magnitude of

EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf:39: considered to be negligible. be medium

EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf:39:VP9- View Medium Partial long medium Negligible Not The Project will be Magnitude of Minor

EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf:39:VP10- View Medium Long medium distance Negligible Not The Project will be visible Magnitude of Minor

EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf:40: the Wilton International Negligible. Project will be seen

EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf:40:VP11- View High Very limited long-medium Negligible Not The taller components of Magnitude of Not Significant

EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf:40: taller components of the skyline but will be negligible.

EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf:40:VP12- View High Given the distance and a Negligible Not It is unlikely that the Magnitude of Not Significant

EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf:40:m village of the Project site and to intervening vegetation. negligible.

EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf:40:VP13- View Medium Given the distance and Negligible Not Very limited long Magnitude of Not Significant

EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf:40:village Project site and from the village and foot negligible.

EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf:41:VP14- View Medium Given the distance and due Negligible Not Only the taller elements Magnitude of Not Significant

EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf:41:wn facilities, views of the due to existing negligible.

EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf:48: negligible owing to distance and the intervening areas of urban development

EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf:49: the magnitude of change is considered to be negligible and the cumulative

EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:44:having no impact or to be of negligible magnitude and will While the above provides a general framework for identifying impacts and assessing the sign

EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:52: from the site would be negligible.

EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:53: to have an impact on the Lovell Hill Pools is negligible.

EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:55: negligible.

EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:56:be of negligible magnitude.

EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:64:have negligible significance for water supply or river base flow. Records

EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:77: of above negligible magnitude are the potential disturbance to nesting birds

EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:78:numbers of Lepidopteran species, is considered to be negligible.

EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:89: example SO2, CO and PM10/PM2.5) will be negligible. The impacts of NO2 will

EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:111: impacts on land use will be negligible. This criterion will not therefore be

EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf:11: the EIA Regulations, whereas minor and negligible impacts are considered to

EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf:33: highly developed industrial be negligible. within the backdrop of a very industrial

EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf:33: negligible.

EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf:33: limited visibility of the be negligible. barely visible. to be

EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf:33: Project Site. negligible.

EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf:33: visibility of the Project Site be negligible. barely visible. to be

EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf:33: form this area. negligible.

EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf:33: Wilton) very limited or no visibility be negligible. visible. to be

EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf:33: of the Project Site from this negligible.

EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf:34: Redcar and Centre buildings there is be negligible. visible. to be

EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf:34: Marske) very limited or no visibility negligible.

EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf:34: ) landscape unit from where be negligible. Project will be barely visible. to be

EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf:34: long distance views are negligible.

EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf:34: industrial development to be negligible. to be

EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf:34: the north and northeast of negligible.

EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf:35: Negligible Not Minor

EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf:35: considered to be negligible. perceptible in the

EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf:36: Negligible Not and footpath. Small Minor

EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf:36: At night construction Negligible Not At night, operational and Small. Minor

EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf:36: be negligible. during construction, the

EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf:36:VP4- view High Views to site are restricted Negligible Not Views to site are restricted Magnitude of Minor to

EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf:37: Negligible Not Minor

EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf:37:VP6- view Medium Views to the site are Negligible Not Intervening vegetation in the Magnitude of Minor

EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf:37: Negligible upper portions of the HRSG

EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf:37:VP7-view High Views to site are restricted Negligible Not Intervening vegetation in the Magnitude of Not Significant

EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf:37:park/Mille Infrastructure corridor. Project. Negligible.

EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf:38: Negligible Not Magnitude of

EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf:38: considered to be negligible.

EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf:38:VP9- View Medium Partial long medium Negligible Not The Project will be partially Magnitude of Minor

EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf:38:VP10- View Medium Long medium distance Negligible Not The Project will be visible Magnitude of Minor

EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf:39: Area and along main Negligible. view, existing lighting

EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf:39:VP11- View High Very limited long-medium Negligible Not The taller components of the Magnitude of Not Significant

EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf:39:Castle the taller components of will be difficult to negligible.

EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf:39:VP12- View High Given the distance and a Negligible Not It is unlikely that the Project Magnitude of Not Significant

EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf:39:m village of the Project site and intervening vegetation. negligible.

EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf:39:VP13- View Medium Given the distance and Negligible Not Very limited long distance Magnitude of Not Significant

EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf:39:village Project site and foot path due to intervening negligible.

EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf:40:VP14- View Medium Given the distance and due Negligible Not Only the taller elements will Magnitude of Not Significant

EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf:40:wn facilities, views of the existing stacks/other negligible.

EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf:47: negligible owing to distance and the intervening areas of urban development

EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf:48: the magnitude of change is considered to be negligible and the cumulative

EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf:11: the EIA Regulations, whereas minor and negligible impacts are considered to

EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf:33: highly developed industrial be negligible. backdrop of a very large industrial

EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf:33: is negligible.

EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf:33: of the Project Site. be negligible. barely visible. to be

EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf:33: negligible.

EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf:33: Project Site form this area. be negligible. barely visible. to be

EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf:33: negligible.

EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf:33:Wilton) limited or no visibility of the be negligible. visible. to be

EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf:33: Project Site from this area. negligible.

EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf:33:Marske) buildings there is very be negligible. visible. to be

EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf:34: limited or no visibility of the negligible.

EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf:34: landscape unit from where be negligible. will be barely visible. to be

EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf:34: long distance views are negligible.

EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf:34: industrial development to be negligible. to be

EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf:34: the north and northeast of negligible.

EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf:35: At night construction Negligible Not hedgerows. Minor

EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf:35: considered to be negligible. perceptible in the

EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf:35: Impacts due to lighting are Negligible Not Small Minor

EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf:36: At night construction Negligible Not At night, operational and Small Minor

EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf:36: negligible. during construction, the

EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf:36:VP4- view High Views to site are restricted Negligible Not Views to site are restricted Magnitude of Minor to

EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf:37: Negligible Not A1053 and industrial area in background. Minor

EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf:37:VP6- view Medium Views to the site are Negligible Not Intervening vegetation in the Magnitude of Minor

EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf:37: Negligible upper portions of the HRSG

EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf:37:VP7-view High Views to site are restricted Negligible Not Intervening vegetation in the Magnitude of Not Significant

EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf:37:park/Mille Infrastructure corridor. Project. Negligible.

EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf:38: Negligible Not Magnitude of

EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf:38: considered to be negligible.

EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf:38:VP9- View Medium Partial long medium Negligible Not The Project will be partially Magnitude of Minor

EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf:38:VP10- View Medium Long medium distance Negligible Not The Project will be visible Magnitude of Minor

EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf:39: Area and along main Negligible. existing lighting within the

EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf:39:VP11- View High Very limited long-medium Negligible Not The taller components of the Magnitude of Not Significant

EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf:39: taller components of the be difficult to differentiate negligible.

EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf:39:VP12- View High Given the distance and a Negligible Not It is unlikely that the Project Magnitude of Not Significant

EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf:39:m village of the Project site and intervening vegetation. negligible.

EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf:39:VP13- View Medium Given the distance and Negligible Not Very limited long distance Magnitude of Not Significant

EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf:39:village Project site and foot path due to intervening negligible.

EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf:39:VP14- View Medium Given the distance and due Negligible Not Only the taller elements will Magnitude of Not Significant

EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf:39:wn facilities, views of the existing stacks/other negligible.

EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf:47: negligible owing to distance and the intervening areas of urban development

EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf:48: the magnitude of change is considered to be negligible and the cumulative

EN010082-000215-EN010082-5.9-Statutory Nuisance Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:8: negligible magnitude is deemed not to have a significant effect for the

EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:105:negligible.” PHE supports the inclusion of this information within EIAs as good

EN010082-000183-EN010082-6.2.12-ES Chapter 12-Cultural Heritage-Final-November 2017.pdf:15: been assessed on a five point scale of high, medium, low, negligible and

EN010082-000183-EN010082-6.2.12-ES Chapter 12-Cultural Heritage-Final-November 2017.pdf:16: Negligible Buildings of no architectural or historical note; buildings of an intrusive

EN010082-000183-EN010082-6.2.12-ES Chapter 12-Cultural Heritage-Final-November 2017.pdf:17: Table 12. 4. Four levels of effect are defined: negligible, minor, moderate and

EN010082-000183-EN010082-6.2.12-ES Chapter 12-Cultural Heritage-Final-November 2017.pdf:17: Medium Negligible Minor Minor to Moderate to

EN010082-000183-EN010082-6.2.12-ES Chapter 12-Cultural Heritage-Final-November 2017.pdf:17: Low Negligible Minor / Minor Minor to

EN010082-000183-EN010082-6.2.12-ES Chapter 12-Cultural Heritage-Final-November 2017.pdf:17: Negligible Moderate

EN010082-000183-EN010082-6.2.12-ES Chapter 12-Cultural Heritage-Final-November 2017.pdf:17: Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

EN010082-000183-EN010082-6.2.12-ES Chapter 12-Cultural Heritage-Final-November 2017.pdf:27: which the Project is located will be negligible.

EN010082-000183-EN010082-6.2.12-ES Chapter 12-Cultural Heritage-Final-November 2017.pdf:30: negligible and therefore not significant.

EN010082-000183-EN010082-6.2.12-ES Chapter 12-Cultural Heritage-Final-November 2017.pdf:32: to be negligible to minor adverse and therefore not significant.

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:37: of negligible ecological interest and that all protected species issues had

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:46: negligible due to the size of the site, the distance to sensitive receptors

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:47: Proposed Development would generate negligible impacts and this matter

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:47: impacts from dust, PM10 and PM2.5 during construction would be negligible

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:48: operational traffic would be negligible and this matter is not considered

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:51: mitigated to negligible residual impacts. The Applicant noted that the

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:53: stack height based on the knowledge that negligible impacts on sensitive

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:54: be limited and result in negligible change in impacts REP5-005. As with

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:60:4.10.7. The ES explains that the site is of negligible ecological value and that NE

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:65: negligible to minor adverse and therefore not significant.

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:79: whichconcludes that changes in total trafficwould be negligible.

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:82: negligible impact in terms of construction traffic and therefore will result

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:83: be negligible.

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:83: negligible.

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:122: change would be negligible. Any noise impacts of lateral movement

EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:3: term use of the auxiliary boilers are negligible and have not been considered,

EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:4: the construction phase of the Project are considered to be negligible.

EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:4: the emissions arising from these are anticipated to be negligible and have

EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:5: are anticipated to be negligible and have not been considered further (see

EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:12:Council (PEIR response) State or factors which have been considered as negligible and has assumed the installation of a 75m stack. The described in this chapter and the

EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:14: construction are negligible. Effects on sensitive ecological receptors primarily

EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:20: emissions form the auxiliary boilers are negligible (~2% short term increase in

EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:26: PEC 75% or less of AQS Negligible Negligible Slight Moderate

EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:26: PEC 76% to 94% of AQS Negligible Slight Moderate Moderate

EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:26: (not dependent on baseline Negligible Slight Moderate Substantial

EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:27: Negligible.

EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:38: considered negligible and have been screened out from further consideration.

EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:52: negligible. However, it should be noted that due to the nature of dust

EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:42:having no impact or to be of negligible magnitude and will While the above provides a general framework for identifying impacts and assessing the sign

EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:50: from the site would be negligible.

EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:51: to have an impact on the Lovell Hill Pools is negligible.

EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:53: negligible.

EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:54:be of negligible magnitude.

EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:62:have negligible significance for water supply or river base flow. Records

EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:75: of above negligible magnitude are the potential disturbance to nesting birds

EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:76:numbers of Lepidopteran species, is considered to be negligible.

EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:87: example SO2, CO and PM10/PM2.5) will be negligible. The impacts of NO2 will

EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:109: impacts on land use will be negligible. This criterion will not therefore be

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:37: of negligible ecological interest and that all protected species issues had

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:46: negligible due to the size of the site, the distance to sensitive receptors

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:47: Proposed Development would generate negligible impacts and this matter

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:47: impacts from dust, PM10 and PM2.5 during construction would be negligible

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:48: operational traffic would be negligible and this matter is not considered

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:51: mitigated to negligible residual impacts. The Applicant noted that the

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:53: stack height based on the knowledge that negligible impacts on sensitive

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:54: be limited and result in negligible change in impacts REP5-005. As with

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:60:4.10.7. The ES explains that the site is of negligible ecological value and that NE

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:65: negligible to minor adverse and therefore not significant.

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:79: whichconcludes that changes in total trafficwould be negligible.

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:82: negligible impact in terms of construction traffic and therefore will result

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:83: be negligible.

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:83: negligible.

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:122: change would be negligible. Any noise impacts of lateral movement

EN010082-000471-Copy of EXA Questions Updated.pdf:9: the assessment of construction noise was based on an even spread of negligible and has assumed the installation of a 75m stack. The design of the gas turbine will be such that it will be capable of meeting a 30mg/m3 emission limit,

EN010082-000471-Copy of EXA Questions Updated.pdf:9: as negligible. The assessment has shown that daytime noise levels are predicted to be below the 65dB level for all noise sensitive receptors. The developer plans

EN010082-000366-8.3 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Implication of Non-Mat Change - Final Issue.pdf:6: impacts at the viewpoints ranges from negligible to medium and the

EN010082-000366-8.3 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Implication of Non-Mat Change - Final Issue.pdf:8: background of the view. Existing Negligible

EN010082-000366-8.3 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Implication of Non-Mat Change - Final Issue.pdf:8: considered to be negligible. will be perceptible in the

EN010082-000366-8.3 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Implication of Non-Mat Change - Final Issue.pdf:9: Impacts due to lighting are Negligible

EN010082-000366-8.3 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Implication of Non-Mat Change - Final Issue.pdf:9: At night construction lighting Negligible At night, operational and security

EN010082-000366-8.3 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Implication of Non-Mat Change - Final Issue.pdf:9: negligible. the magnitude of change is

EN010082-000366-8.3 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Implication of Non-Mat Change - Final Issue.pdf:9: VP4- view High Views to site are restricted due to Negligible Not Significant Views to site are restricted due to

EN010082-000366-8.3 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Implication of Non-Mat Change - Final Issue.pdf:10: Impacts due to lighting are Negligible

EN010082-000366-8.3 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Implication of Non-Mat Change - Final Issue.pdf:10: VP6- view Medium Views to the site are restricted Negligible Not Significant Intervening vegetation in the gre

EN010082-000366-8.3 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Implication of Non-Mat Change - Final Issue.pdf:10: Impacts due to lighting are Negligible Not Significant

EN010082-000366-8.3 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Implication of Non-Mat Change - Final Issue.pdf:10: VP7-view High Views to site are restricted due to Negligible Not Significant Intervening vegetation in the gre

EN010082-000366-8.3 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Implication of Non-Mat Change - Final Issue.pdf:11: At night construction lighting Negligible At night, operational and security

EN010082-000366-8.3 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Implication of Non-Mat Change - Final Issue.pdf:11: negligible.

EN010082-000366-8.3 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Implication of Non-Mat Change - Final Issue.pdf:11: VP9- View Medium Partial long medium distance Negligible Not Significant The Project will be partially visib

EN010082-000366-8.3 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Implication of Non-Mat Change - Final Issue.pdf:11: VP10- View Medium Long medium distance views to Negligible Not Significant The Project will be visible

EN010082-000366-8.3 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Implication of Non-Mat Change - Final Issue.pdf:12: dominate in the views Negligible. view, existing lighting within the

EN010082-000366-8.3 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Implication of Non-Mat Change - Final Issue.pdf:12: VP11- View High Very limited long-medium Negligible Not Significant The taller components of the

EN010082-000366-8.3 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Implication of Non-Mat Change - Final Issue.pdf:12: VP12- View High Given the distance and a narrow Negligible Not Significant It is unlikely that the Project will

EN010082-000366-8.3 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Implication of Non-Mat Change - Final Issue.pdf:12: VP13- View Medium Given the distance and Negligible Not Significant Very limited long distance views

EN010082-000366-8.3 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Implication of Non-Mat Change - Final Issue.pdf:12: VP14- View Medium Given the distance and due to Negligible Not Significant Only the taller elements will be

EN010082-000510-CONSULTATION REPORT FOR NON-MATERIAL CHANGE.pdf:23: viewpoints ranges from negligible to medium and the

EN010082-000510-CONSULTATION REPORT FOR NON-MATERIAL CHANGE.pdf:26: within the original DCO application for the reasons outlined below. building downwash effects are negligible for both configurations.

TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:27: have a negligible impact on transport, and which were outside the ZOI of all other topics, were also

TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:52: be a negligible effect on local air quality and, therefore, a LSE is not predicted to arise in

TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:55: be a negligible effect on local air quality and, therefore, a LSE is not predicted to arise in

TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:56: the risk of a significant impact arising with respect to the SAC is considered to be negligible

TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:57: arising with respect to these interest features is considered to be negligible (i.e. a LSE is not

TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:59: SPA’s interest features is considered to be negligible (i.e. a LSE is not predicted).

TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:65:maximum height to tip, rotor diameter 112m on most species are considered to be negligible overall. The potential for collision impacts

TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:68: negligible. As such, no incombination effects are predicted.

TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:68: to the designated sites are reported to be negligible within the ecological assessment

TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:88: concentration is shown over the intertidal areas, leading to a prediction of negligible sediment being

TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:99: Tees estuary. This is predicted to be negligible, with no effect on the supply of sediment to intertidal

TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:100: within the designated sites, and sediment deposition onto the seabed would be negligible beyond the

TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:118: are predicted be negligible. There would continue to be some exceedence of critical load values for

TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:121: noise levels and, consequently, are considered to be of negligible significance. However, and in order

TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:128: on fish is, therefore, predicted to be negligible.

TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:128: potential cumulative impact is predicted to be negligible. The predicted footprints of sediment

TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:130: morphology, with the proposed scheme having a negligible effect on deposition of sediment in the berth

TR030002-000499-Section 17 App 17.1 Flood Risk Assessment.pdf:16: negligible.

TR030002-000499-Section 17 App 17.1 Flood Risk Assessment.pdf:21: and severe flood events. Changes in the spatial extent of flooding are likely to be negligible in narrower

TR030002-000499-Section 17 App 17.1 Flood Risk Assessment.pdf:23: known floodplain, but are not predicted to affect flood risk. The piers would have a negligible impact on

TR030002-000499-Section 17 App 17.1 Flood Risk Assessment.pdf:23: The piers to elevate the conveyor route would have a negligible impact on the surface area of the

TR030002-000499-Section 17 App 17.1 Flood Risk Assessment.pdf:24: negligible impact on the floodplain surface area, and not exacerbate flood risk.

TR030002-000499-Section 17 App 17.1 Flood Risk Assessment.pdf:26: a negligible impact on the flood plain surface area.

TR030002-000872-York Potash Ltd 1.pdf:24:error is negligible, until the pipeline changes direction, when the chance of an error returns.

TR030002-000872-York Potash Ltd 1.pdf:29:included in the analysis as this cause is already a negligible frequency when compared to other

TR030002-000872-York Potash Ltd 1.pdf:29:Deliberate violation of pipeline markers - negligible frequency compared to other causes

TR030002-000872-York Potash Ltd 1.pdf:29:Damage to pipeline Cathodic Protection system - negligible frequency compared to other causes

TR030002-000872-York Potash Ltd 1.pdf:29:Security issue leading to terrorist attack on pipeline - negligible frequency compared to other causes

TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf:9: High Major Moderate Moderate Minor Negligible

TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf:9: Medium Moderate Moderate Minor Minor Negligible

TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf:9: Low Minor Minor Minor Negligible Negligible

TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf:9: Very Low Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf:10:4.3.35 Whilst mitigation for minor or negligible impacts may not be specifically defined as a matter of course,

TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf:10: also recognised that minor and negligible impacts could become significant when considered

TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf:28: Amenity & Minor adverse to users of PROW and open Negligible/no effects Negligible/no effects

TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf:28: negligible/no effects.

TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf:28: Noise & vibration Negligible Negligible Negligible

TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf:28: Air quality Negligible with a slight adverse effect Negligible Negligible

TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf:28: Socio-economics Minor beneficial due to local employment and Major beneficial at local level and minor beneficial at a sub- Negligible/minor adverse

TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf:28: habitats; otherwise negligible or no effects beneficial effect on reptiles; otherwise no effects establishment of additional areas planting,

TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf:28: change/negligible effects to other receptors

TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf:28: Geology & Minor/moderate adverse Minor adverse Negligible

TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf:28: Hydrology & flood Negligible Largely negligible; minor adverse effects possible due to Negligible

TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf:28: Land uses and soils Minor adverse on soil degradation and loss Minor adverse due to land being taken out of existing use for Mainly negligible; minor adverse effects on

TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf:28: of soil resources; negligible effects on other farming; negligible effects on other receptors restrictions

TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf:28: minor adverse or negligible effects on all negligible effects on all other identified special qualities

TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf:29: recreation where the receptor is located upgrading of footpath; otherwise negligible/no impacts

TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf:29: Noise & vibration Negligible Negligible Negligible

TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf:29: Air quality Negligible Negligible Negligible

TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf:29: Socio-economics Minor beneficial due to local employment and Major beneficial at local level and minor beneficial at a sub- Negligible/minor adverse

TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf:29: Landscape & visual Lady Cross – mainly minor/moderate Lady Cross – minor adverse/negligible effects in Year 1 to No effects

TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf:29: adverse; otherwise negligible adverse/no minor/negligible beneficial effects in Year 15 as landscaping

TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf:29: Lockwood Beck – mainly major through to Lockwood Beck – minor moderate/negligible adverse effects in

TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf:29: minor adverse Year 1 to negligible adverse/no change by Year 15

TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf:29: Tocketts Lythe – mainly moderate/minor Tocketts Lythe – minor adverse/negligible effects in Year 1 to

TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf:29: adverse effects minor/negligible beneficial effects in Year 15

TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf:29: Cultural heritage Slight/negligible No effects No effects

TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf:29: Geology & Mainly negligible; some receptors with a Mainly negligible; some receptors with minor adverse effects at Negligible

TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf:29: Hydrology & flood Negligible Negligible/adverse Negligible

TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf:29: Land uses and soils Moderate adverse due to land being taken Minor adverse effects due to land being taken out of existing Mainly negligible or minor adverse effects

TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf:29: out of existing use; minor adverse on soil use; otherwise negligible effects

TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf:29: alteration to drainage systems; negligible

TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf:29: minor adverse or negligible effects on all negligible effects on all other identified special qualities

TR030002-000460-Section 3 App 3.1 Waste management.pdf:71: an oxidiser is negligible. Therefore, professional judgement confirms that further testing is not

TR030002-000460-Section 3 App 3.1 Waste management.pdf:79: so the likelihood of a hazard H15 arising by this route is negligible. However, there are a

TR030002-000502-Section 20 App 20.2 Landscape assessment.pdf:5:Magnitude of change is identified following consideration of several key criteria and is reported as being negligible, low, medium or high for each receptor. Intermediate values of low to medium and medium to

TR030002-000502-Section 20 App 20.2 Landscape assessment.pdf:5:Redcar LCA R4 (Coastal Marsh – Views from the LCA to the conveyor route and proposed Proposed structures are in keeping with the existing As above. No change or negligible

TR030002-000502-Section 20 App 20.2 Landscape assessment.pdf:5:Redcar LCA E2 (Escarpment) Larger scale features including the conveyor, shiploaders, Proposed structures are in keeping with the existing As above. Negligible adverse

TR030002-000502-Section 20 App 20.2 Landscape assessment.pdf:6:as being negligible, minor, minor moderate, moderate, moderate major or major and as being either beneficial or adverse. The following colour system is used to highlight significance values:

TR030002-000502-Section 20 App 20.2 Landscape assessment.pdf:6: Negligible beneficial/ no Negligible adverse/ no change

TR030002-000502-Section 20 App 20.2 Landscape assessment.pdf:6:Redcar LCA R4 (Coastal Marsh – Coatham Low No change/ No change/ negligible adverse Potential glimpsed views of tops of quay structures may be

TR030002-000502-Section 20 App 20.2 Landscape assessment.pdf:6:Marsh) Negligible adverse visible between steelworks buildings but would not have a

TR030002-000502-Section 20 App 20.2 Landscape assessment.pdf:6:Redcar LCA E2 (Escarpment) Low Negligible adverse Negligible adverse The proposed development would be barely perceptible as a

TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf:4:Magnitude of change is identified following consideration of several key criteria and is reported as being negligible, low, medium or high for each receptor. In addition positive changes are identified as being

TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf:4: east. Negligible to low

TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf:4: that lies between these properties and the Negligible adverse

TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf:5:102/2A/2 of southern are possible from 116/31/3 and the southern conveyor, including the northern transfer tower are industrial installations expected to last approximately 17 months. Negligible and low

TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf:5: of northern corridor between adjoin works and railway northwards. The conveyor structure and transfer tower Negligible and low

TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf:5: distances involved, from the northern end Negligible and low

TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf:5: of 116/31/3, and a negligible change in adverse

TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf:6:102/2/3 (Teesdale Way) and common embankment on north and west side the northern option transfer tower and would appear in keeping with the existing expected to last approximately 17 months. Negligible adverse

TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf:6: & 102/2/2). would be very small. Negligible adverse

TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf:6: locations being imperceptible. Negligible adverse

TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf:7:(Seaton Carew) west of quay across open farmland from northern would be difficult to discern within the shiploaders) are in keeping with existing expected to last approximately 17 months. Negligible/ low

TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf:7: installations are visible against the skyline would be visible during the operational Negligible/ low

TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf:7: mostly blocked and dominated by the Negligible/ low

TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf:7:(Bran Sands) of quay (to are available from areas of sand dunes and discern at the distance involved. with existing industrial Infrastructure within expected to last approximately 17 months. Negligible/ low

TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf:7: depending on tidal conditions, with Redcar views against the skyline amongst existing Negligible/ low

TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf:7: chimney/ flare stacks. (views 3 and 4) and would form a minor change to the Negligible/ low

TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf:7:South Gare Breakwater of quay are available from the marina west of difficult to discern at the distance involved. with existing industrial Infrastructure within expected to last approximately 17 months. Negligible/ low

TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf:7: forming a prominent detractor. the skyline amongst existing tall industrial/ Negligible/ low

TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf:7: Negligible/ low

TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf:8: east viewing point and is identified as such on structures would be barely perceptible at with adjoining large scale industrial expected to last approximately 17 months. Negligible adverse

TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf:8: north west over the Teesmouth industrial industrialised setting. approximately 17 months. Negligible adverse

TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf:8: Infrastructure with Wilton International in constitute a very minor change in view Negligible adverse

TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf:11:as being negligible, minor, minor moderate, moderate, moderate major or major and as being either beneficial or adverse. The following colour system is used to highlight significance values:

TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf:11: Negligible beneficial/ no Negligible adverse/ no change

TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf:11: Negligible to low adverse Minor adverse impacts during operational and decommissioning phases.

TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf:11: Decommissioning Negligible adverse structures would reduce prominence

TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf:11: Negligible adverse within available views.

TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf:11:Users of footpaths 116/31/3 Medium Negligible/ low adverse Negligible adverse and Effects relate to the conveyor structure. This would be seen

TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf:11:Users of footpaths 102/2/2 Medium Negligible adverse Negligible adverse Effects relate to taller quayside structures. These would be

TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf:12:Users of byways S1A and High Negligible/ low adverse Negligible/ minor adverse Effects relate to taller quayside structures, these would be

TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf:12:Visitors to Eston Nab High Negligible adverse Negligible adverse Taller quayside structures would be visible but would be

TR030002-000671-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 1 to 9.pdf:116: environment will be negligible. Get on with it ASAP! help to improve outweighs the

TR030002-000671-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 1 to 9.pdf:120:7119082 Supportive In favour No concerns great project for north yorkshire and the country. Yes In favour beneficial on all counts Support do not feel there will Supportive negligible and Yes The overall negligible Positive after construction

TR030002-000671-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 1 to 9.pdf:120: be any negative impact manageable impacts will impact phase negligible

TR030002-000671-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 1 to 9.pdf:120:7119092 Supportive In favour No concerns absolutely wholly in favour. fantastic both locally and nationally. Yes In favour Support negligible Supportive no concerns Yes no concerns The overall negligible Positive

TR030002-000671-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 1 to 9.pdf:148: The environmental effect on the York Moors is negligible compared to the support.

TR030002-000671-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 1 to 9.pdf:180: producer with negligible impacts across a wide range of criteria ‐

TR030002-000671-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 1 to 9.pdf:217: consequences of the project will be negligible. I strongly support the scheme temporary

TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:114:negligible.” PHE supports the inclusion of this information within EIAs as good

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:13: sediment concentration over the intertidal areas; hence a negligible quantity of sediment would be

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:17: 43 LAeq,5min 40 LAeq,5min No impact Negligible

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:17: 49 LAeq,5min 40 LAeq,5min No impact Negligible

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:17: 48 LAeq,5min 44 LAeq,5min No impact Negligible

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:18: 66 LAeq,5min 47 LAeq,5min No impact Negligible

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:18: 61 LAeq,5min 48 LAeq,5min No impact Negligible

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:18: 59 LAeq,5min 50 LAeq,5min Low Negligible

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:18: 42 LAeq,5min 35 LAeq,5min No impact Negligible

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:18: 49 LAeq,5min 45 LAeq,5min No impact Negligible

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:18: 48 LAeq,5min 41 LAeq,5min No impact Negligible

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:18: 40 LAeq,5min 36 LAeq,5min No impact Negligible

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:18: 42 LAeq,5min 35 LAeq,5min No impact Negligible

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:18: 44 LAeq,5min 40 LAeq,5min No impact Negligible

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:22: Tees estuary. This is predicted to be negligible, with no effect on the supply of sediment to intertidal

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:23: within the designated sites, and sediment deposition onto the seabed would be negligible beyond the

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:31: potential cumulative impact is predicted to be negligible. The predicted footprints of sediment

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:32: dredged as part of the Harbour facilities. As a result, there would be a negligible release of

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:33: morphology, with the proposed scheme having a negligible effect on the deposition of sediment in the

TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:10: shown that the proposed Harbour Facilities would have a negligible or

TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:10: development would result in a negligible impact on commercial

TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:10: during its construction and operation has been assessed as negligible.

TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:11:the scheme are anticipated to be negligible.

TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:64: there would be a negligible impact on commercial navigation during the

TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:64: navigation is predicated to be negligible.

TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:64: anticipated and the overall impact would be negligible.

TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:64:7.33 Due to the anticipated negligible construction and operational impacts

TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:66: impact of negligible significance on water abstraction points.

TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:90: measures will ensure that any effects would, however, be negligible;

TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:90: change and the effects of the proposed Harbour Facilities are negligible

TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:91: facilities, the development would result in a negligible impact on

TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:92: negligible.

TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:92:7.138 The overall effects arising are anticipated to be negligible provided that

TR030002-000253-Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening document (5).pdf:5:(ES Section 22 paragraph 22.3.5) and for benthic ecology the impacts would be negligible

TR030002-001854-Secretary of State’s Decision Letter and Statement of Reasons.pdf:6:impacts would be of negligible significance since the polyhalite is planned to be transported

TR030002-001854-Secretary of State’s Decision Letter and Statement of Reasons.pdf:6:surface waters and groundwater would be of negligible significance during construction and

TR030002-000453-ES Section 18 Infrastructure.pdf:15: sediments beneath. The enclosed grab would result in negligible losses of sediment to the water

TR030002-000453-ES Section 18 Infrastructure.pdf:16: magnitude of the effect is considered to be very low, and an impact of negligible significance is

TR030002-000453-ES Section 18 Infrastructure.pdf:20:Potential impact on High Very low Negligible None required. Control measures

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:26:  Negligible.

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:27: 4 Negligible the development, does not have either

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:32:5.3.5 The magnitude of change at this viewpoint due to the proposed works is predicted to be negligible, as

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:32: towards the overall levels of sky glow, although the level of contribution is considered to be negligible

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:32: Summer Months: Negligible No Effect No Effect

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:33: Winter Months: Negligible No Effect No Effect

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:34:5.4.5 The magnitude of change at this viewpoint is predicted to be negligible, as this viewpoint has no clear

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:34: towards the overall levels of sky glow, although the level of contribution is predicted to be negligible in

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:35: Summer Months: Negligible No Effect No Effect

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:35: Winter Months: Negligible No Effect No Effect

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:36:5.5.6 The magnitude of change at this viewpoint is predicted to be negligible, as this viewpoint has no clear

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:37: glow, although the level of contribution is predicted to be negligible in respect of the sky glow levels

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:37: Summer Months: Negligible No Effect No Effect

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:37: Winter Months: Negligible No Effect No Effect

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:39: Summer Months: No Effect Negligible Moderate Adverse

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:39: Winter Months: No Effect Negligible Moderate Adverse

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:39: Summer Months: No Effect Negligible Minor Adverse

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:39: Winter Months: No Effect Negligible Minor Adverse

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:42: Summer Months: Negligible Negligible Minor Adverse

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:42: Winter Months: Negligible Negligible Minor Adverse

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:42: Summer Months: No Effect Negligible Negligible

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:42: Winter Months: Negligible Negligible Minor Adverse

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:45: Summer Months: Negligible Negligible Minor Adverse

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:45: Winter Months: Negligible Negligible Minor Adverse

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:45: Summer Months: No Effect Negligible Negligible

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:45: Winter Months: Negligible Negligible Minor Adverse

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:48: Summer Months: Negligible Minor Adverse Minor Adverse

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:48: Winter Months: Negligible Minor Adverse Minor Adverse

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:48: Summer Months: Negligible Negligible Negligible

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:48: Winter Months: Negligible Minor Adverse Minor Adverse

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:50: Summer Months: Negligible Minor Adverse Minor Adverse

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:50: Winter Months: Negligible Minor Adverse Minor Adverse

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:51: Summer Months: Negligible Negligible Negligible

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:51: Winter Months: Negligible Minor Adverse Minor Adverse

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:54: Summer Months: No Effect Negligible Minor Adverse

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:54: Winter Months: No Effect Negligible Minor Adverse

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:54: have a negligible impact upon this viewpoint and its receptors in terms of luminaire intensity.

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:54: Summer Months: Negligible Negligible Negligible

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:54: Winter Months: Negligible Negligible Negligible

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:56: winter months would be negligible.

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:56: Summer Months: Negligible Negligible Negligible

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:56: Winter Months: Negligible Negligible Negligible

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:57: lighting is therefore predicted to have a negligible impact in terms of sky glow, light intrusion and

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:57: Summer Months: Negligible Negligible Negligible

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:57: Winter Months: Negligible Negligible Negligible

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:59: contribution is considered to be negligible in respect of the sky glow levels currently visible.

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:59: Summer Months: Negligible No Effect No Effect

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:59: Winter Months: Negligible No Effect No Effect

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:60:6.3 The proposed lighting for the Site is identified as having predominantly negligible effects, however as

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:60: Summer Months: No Effect Negligible Minor Adverse

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:60: Winter Months: No Effect Negligible Minor Adverse

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:61: Summer Months: No Effect Negligible Negligible

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:61: Winter Months: Negligible Negligible Minor Adverse

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:61: Summer Months: No Effect Negligible Negligible

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:61: Winter Months: Negligible Negligible Minor Adverse

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:61: Summer Months: Negligible Negligible Negligible

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:61: Winter Months: Negligible Minor Adverse Minor Adverse

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:61: Summer Months: Negligible Negligible Negligible

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:61: Winter Months: Negligible Minor Adverse Minor Adverse

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:61: Summer Months: No Effect Negligible Minor Adverse

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:61: Winter Months: No Effect Negligible Minor Adverse

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:61: Summer Months: Negligible Negligible Negligible

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:61: Winter Months: Negligible Negligible Negligible

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:62: Summer Months: Negligible No Effect No Effect

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:62: Winter Months: Negligible No Effect No Effect

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:62: Summer Months: Negligible No Effect No Effect

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:62: Winter Months: Negligible No Effect No Effect

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:62: Summer Months: Negligible No Effect No Effect

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:62: Winter Months: Negligible No Effect No Effect

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:62: Summer Months: Negligible Negligible Negligible

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:62: Winter Months: Negligible Negligible Negligible

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:62: Summer Months: Negligible Negligible Negligible

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:62: Winter Months: Negligible Negligible Negligible

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:62: Summer Months: Negligible No Effect No Effect

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:62: Winter Months: Negligible No Effect No Effect

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:62: characterise the long term (i.e. present for the life of the proposed scheme), would be of negligible

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:63:6.11 Therefore, the long term operational impacts of the proposed scheme are predicted to be negligible in

TR030002-000547-Doc 6.6 App 22.2 Representative viewpoint assessment.pdf:4:dryer stack becomes slightly more noticeable when the vapour plume is being emitted) and have negligible

TR030002-000547-Doc 6.6 App 22.2 Representative viewpoint assessment.pdf:14:Cumulative effect – negligible adverse (all features) (no cumulative change)

TR030002-000572-Doc 7.3 Appendix 4 - Economic Impact Report.pdf:46:negligible. be drawn from a wider labour maker of 295,000

TR030002-000572-Doc 7.3 Appendix 4 - Economic Impact Report.pdf:49: by a range of technical assessments undertaken or negligible after 1 year of operation; and negligible

TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf:8: x Negligible potential – no features present which could offer bats the opportunity to roost.

TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf:13: x Negligible: features of local (parish) importance or importance within the site and immediate

TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf:13: x the magnitude of the effect (e.g. high, medium, low, negligible);

TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf:14: Negligible Negligible impact on integrity and / or conservation status.

TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf:22: an impact of negligible significance is predicted.

TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf:22: as a result of the loss of these areas; which in turn result in an impact of negligible significance during

TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf:22: residual impact would be of negligible significance.

TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf:23: high sensitivity of bats, a low magnitude is predicted; resulting in an impact of negligible significance

TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf:23:10.5.13 The residual impact would remain of negligible significance.

TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf:23: the surveys to date, resulting in a predicted impact of negligible significance during construction.

TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf:23: The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf:24: magnitude is predicted, resulting in an impact of negligible significance during construction.

TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf:24:10.5.20 With these measures in place, the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf:24:10.6.2 Given this, a residual impact of negligible significance on habitats is predicted in the operational phase.

TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf:24: nesting habitat would have a negligible effect on the conservation status of the local bird populations

TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf:24: during operation and result in an impact of negligible significance.

TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf:24: bats. Given this, a residual impact of negligible significance on bats is predicted in the operational

TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf:26: potential impacts are predicted to be of negligible or minor beneficial significance.

TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf:26: Habitats Low Low Negligible Majority of habitats would be Negligible

TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf:26: Terrestrial High Low Negligible Any vegetation removal would be Negligible

TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf:26: Bats High Low Negligible Lighting proposals to consider BCT Negligible

TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf:26: Reptiles High Low Negligible Precautionary Method of Working Negligible

TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf:26: Otter High Low Negligible All trenches and excavations would Negligible

TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf:26: Habitats Low Low Negligible Reinstatement of habitats and Negligible

TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf:26: Terrestrial High Low Negligible Implementation of landscape Negligible

TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf:27:Bats High Low Negligible Implementation of landscape Minor beneficial

TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf:27:Reptiles High Low Negligible Implementation of landscape Minor beneficial

TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf:27:Otters High Low Negligible Creation of new shallows and Minor beneficial

TR030002-000736-Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council (Local Impact Report).pdf:17:on the predicted increases, an impact of negligible significance is predicted

TR030002-000736-Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council (Local Impact Report).pdf:17:measures have been suggested to reduce the impact to a negligible level.

TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf:6: High Major Moderate Minor Negligible

TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf:6: Medium Moderate Minor Minor Negligible

TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf:6: Low Minor Minor Negligible Negligible

TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf:6: Very low Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf:11: of the Teesdale Way, while an impact of negligible significance is anticipated with regard to the users

TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf:11:21.5.9 With the implementation of the above mitigation measures, a residual impact of negligible significance

TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf:11: Based on the above, an impact of negligible significance is anticipated with regard to users of the

TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf:12: Plan. A residual impact of negligible significance is predicted.

TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf:13: change relative to existing conditions. Based on the above, an impact of negligible significance is

TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf:14:21.6.5 No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf:14:21.6.7 The noise assessment presented in Section 14.6 has determined that an impact of negligible

TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf:14: to public rights of way and bridleways during the operational phase would range from negligible to

TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf:15: temporary closure), while an impact on negligible significance is anticipated with regard to the users of

TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf:15:21.7.6 With the implementation of the above mitigation measures, a residual impact of negligible significance

TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf:16: on recreation and amenity is predicted to be of negligible significance at worst.

TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf:17: associated with indirect disturbance during decommissioning is considered to be of negligible

TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf:18: combined footpath and traffic Negligible (Public

TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf:18:Direct disturbance to users of the cycle High (National Trail) Very low Negligible Non

TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf:18:Indirect disturbance to users of the High (National Trail) Very low Negligible Non

TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf:19: combined footpath and traffic Negligible (Public rights

TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf:26:11.5.15 With the implementation of the above mitigation measures, the residual impact would be of negligible

TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf:44: an impact of negligible significance during Phase 2 of the proposed scheme.

TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf:44: the navigation channel. The recovery in the operational phase is predicted to be of negligible (but

TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf:44: beneficial, but of very low magnitude. The potential impact is considered to be of negligible

TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf:45: residual impact would be of negligible significance.

TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf:45: negligible significance is anticipated.

TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf:45:11.6.6 No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf:46: occur during the operational phase, this is predicted to be of negligible significance due to the effect of

TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf:48:Potential impact High Very low Negligible (but Measures to mitigate the impacts to benthic co

TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf:48:Potential impacts High Very low Negligible None required.

TR030002-000253-Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening document.pdf:5:(ES Section 22 paragraph 22.3.5) and for benthic ecology the impacts would be negligible

TR030002-000722-York Potash Limited 4.pdf:8: controls in place – would be of negligible adverse significance (at worst), with the following

TR030002-000722-York Potash Limited 4.pdf:9: to be of negligible significance.

TR030002-000722-York Potash Limited 4.pdf:11: impacts are predicted to be negligible.

TR030002-000722-York Potash Limited 4.pdf:18: of the proposed scheme. All impacts are predicted to be of negligible significance, with the

TR030002-000452-ES Section 17 Coastal protection and flood defence.pdf:8: The Environment Agency confirmed that this order of impact would be considered negligible.

TR030002-000452-ES Section 17 Coastal protection and flood defence.pdf:13: a potential low magnitude of effect. Hence a negligible impact is predicted.

TR030002-000452-ES Section 17 Coastal protection and flood defence.pdf:13:17.4.19 No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance with

TR030002-000452-ES Section 17 Coastal protection and flood defence.pdf:14: supports for the conveyor system would have a negligible impact on the surface area of the floodplain.

TR030002-000452-ES Section 17 Coastal protection and flood defence.pdf:15: due to the proposed dredging and quay construction, an impact of negligible significance is anticipated

TR030002-000452-ES Section 17 Coastal protection and flood defence.pdf:15:17.5.17 No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

TR030002-000452-ES Section 17 Coastal protection and flood defence.pdf:15: significance of the potential impact is predicted to be negligible.

TR030002-000452-ES Section 17 Coastal protection and flood defence.pdf:16:17.6.3 No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance with

TR030002-000452-ES Section 17 Coastal protection and flood defence.pdf:16: increases in wave height, an impact of negligible significance is anticipated with regard to increased

TR030002-000452-ES Section 17 Coastal protection and flood defence.pdf:17:Flooding at and Low Low Negligible No mitigation required No residual

TR030002-000452-ES Section 17 Coastal protection and flood defence.pdf:17:Flooding at and Low Low Negligible Quay construction provides Minor beneficial

TR030002-000452-ES Section 17 Coastal protection and flood defence.pdf:17:Potential for Low Low Negligible No mitigation required Negligible

TR030002-000452-ES Section 17 Coastal protection and flood defence.pdf:17:Flooding at and Low Low Negligible No mitigation required Negligible

TR030002-000738-York Potash Limited 3.pdf:10: impacts are predicted to be negligible.

TR030002-000738-York Potash Limited 3.pdf:19: predicted to be of negligible or minor beneficial significance.

TR030002-000738-York Potash Limited 3.pdf:19:7.8. Although all potential impacts to terrestrial ecology were assessed as being of negligible or

TR030002-000450-ES Section 15 Archaeology and heritage.pdf:11: Low Moderate Minor Minor Negligible

TR030002-000450-ES Section 15 Archaeology and heritage.pdf:11: Very Low Minor Minor Negligible Negligible

TR030002-000450-ES Section 15 Archaeology and heritage.pdf:23: the significance of any residual impact would be reduced to negligible.

TR030002-000454-ES Section 19 Socioeconomics.pdf:5: x negligible;

TR030002-000454-ES Section 19 Socioeconomics.pdf:20: on the churn of the labour market would be of negligible significance.

TR030002-000454-ES Section 19 Socioeconomics.pdf:20:19.6.6 In this context, the impact of construction workers on temporary accommodation would be of negligible

TR030002-000454-ES Section 19 Socioeconomics.pdf:21: impact of negligible significance.

TR030002-000454-ES Section 19 Socioeconomics.pdf:22: districts and the LEP, resulting in a negligible to minor beneficial impact. As with indirect employment

TR030002-000454-ES Section 19 Socioeconomics.pdf:22: estimated but effects would be negligible or beneficial at a LEP level. At a UK level, the impact with

TR030002-000454-ES Section 19 Socioeconomics.pdf:22: respect to GVA would be negligible.

TR030002-000454-ES Section 19 Socioeconomics.pdf:23: would, therefore, be of negligible significance.

TR030002-000454-ES Section 19 Socioeconomics.pdf:24: of the size of the labour market, the magnitude of this impact would be negligible. YPL is committed to

TR030002-000454-ES Section 19 Socioeconomics.pdf:25: of the size of the labour market, the magnitude of this impact would be negligible. YPL is committed to

TR030002-000454-ES Section 19 Socioeconomics.pdf:25: districts and the LEP, resulting in a negligible to minor beneficial impact.

TR030002-000454-ES Section 19 Socioeconomics.pdf:25: whole, they would be negligible. However, inevitably, this would be true for any single project.

TR030002-000454-ES Section 19 Socioeconomics.pdf:27:Demand for temporary accommodation by N/A Negligible Not Significant None p

TR030002-000454-ES Section 19 Socioeconomics.pdf:27:Induced employment effects resulting from N/A Negligible to Minor Beneficial None p

TR030002-000454-ES Section 19 Socioeconomics.pdf:27:Increase in GDP resulting from N/A Negligible to Minor Beneficial None p

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:7: risk is ‘negligible’.

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:13: receptors can be controlled to ensure impacts are of negligible or of slight adverse significance at

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:14: High Slight Adverse Slight Adverse Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:14: Medium Slight Adverse Negligible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:14: Low Negligible Negligible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:14: Dust Soiling Slight Adverse Slight Adverse Slight Adverse Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:14: Human Health Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:14: considered to be negligible.

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:24: R1 26.18 26.28 0.10 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:24: R2 24.10 24.52 0.42 Small Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:24: R3 23.98 24.03 0.05 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:24: R4 25.85 25.91 0.06 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:24: R5 17.73 17.77 0.04 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:24: R6 18.42 18.49 0.07 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:24: R7 13.98 14.27 0.29 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:24: R8 15.85 16.36 0.51 Small Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:24: R9 20.96 21.93 0.97 Small Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:24: R10 20.54 21.42 0.88 Small Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:24: R11 26.85 28.47 1.62 Small Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:24: R12 25.32 26.72 1.40 Small Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:24: R13 26.88 27.77 0.89 Small Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:24: R14 24.56 25.15 0.59 Small Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:24: R15 25.35 25.95 0.60 Small Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:24: R16 26.46 26.95 0.49 Small Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:25: R17 24.61 24.98 0.37 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:25: R18 44.83 44.94 0.11 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:25: R19 45.46 45.57 0.11 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:25: R21 30.13 30.69 0.56 Small Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:25: R22 42.35 42.44 0.09 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:25: R23 37.80 37.88 0.08 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:25: R24 28.94 30.46 1.52 Small Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:25: R25 25.35 25.93 0.58 Small Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:25: R26 23.99 24.28 0.29 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:25: R27 21.38 21.59 0.21 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:25: R28 24.10 24.99 0.89 Small Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:25: R30 31.39 31.44 0.05 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:25: R31 27.30 27.34 0.04 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:25: R32 26.54 27.08 0.54 Small Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:25: R33 24.23 24.82 0.59 Small Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:25: R34 15.48 16.02 0.54 Small Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:25: R1 16.83 16.86 0.03 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:25: R2 15.89 15.91 0.02 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:26: R3 16.51 16.53 0.02 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:26: R4 17.74 17.76 0.02 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:26: R5 12.03 12.07 0.04 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:26: R6 12.42 12.47 0.05 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:26: R7 9.49 9.53 0.04 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:26: R8 11.12 11.17 0.05 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:26: R9 14.06 14.16 0.10 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:26: R10 13.89 13.92 0.03 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:26: R11 18.41 18.44 0.03 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:26: R12 17.50 17.52 0.02 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:26: R13 18.53 18.54 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:26: R14 16.45 16.49 0.04 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:26: R15 17.05 17.10 0.05 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:26: R16 17.91 17.95 0.04 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:26: R17 17.19 17.22 0.03 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:26: R18 28.60 28.62 0.02 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:26: R19 30.23 30.25 0.02 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:26: R20 24.79 24.84 0.05 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:26: R21 20.50 20.53 0.03 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:26: R22 28.12 28.14 0.02 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:26: R23 24.14 24.16 0.02 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:26: R24 19.28 19.40 0.12 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:26: R25 17.10 17.15 0.05 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:26: R26 16.42 16.49 0.07 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:26: R27 14.85 14.89 0.04 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:26: R28 16.63 16.65 0.02 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:27: R29 24.62 24.65 0.03 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:27: R30 21.19 21.20 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:27: R31 17.43 17.43 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:27: R32 17.56 17.60 0.04 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:27: R33 15.99 16.05 0.06 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:27: R34 10.54 10.59 0.05 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:27: R1 14.30 14.31 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:27: R2 13.75 13.76 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:27: R3 14.58 14.59 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:27: R4 15.61 15.62 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:27: R5 10.05 10.07 0.02 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:27: R6 10.30 10.33 0.03 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:27: R7 8.20 8.22 0.02 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:27: R8 9.83 9.85 0.02 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:27: R9 11.11 11.17 0.06 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:27: R10 11.32 11.34 0.02 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:27: R11 14.15 14.16 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:27: R12 13.61 13.62 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:27: R13 14.67 14.68 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:27: R14 13.35 13.38 0.03 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:28: R15 13.73 13.75 0.02 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:28: R16 14.07 14.09 0.02 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:28: R17 13.87 13.89 0.02 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:28: R18 21.38 21.39 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:28: R19 22.72 22.73 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:28: R20 20.10 20.12 0.02 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:28: R21 17.87 17.88 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:28: R22 21.44 21.45 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:28: R23 18.43 18.43 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:28: R24 14.64 14.71 0.07 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:28: R25 13.58 13.60 0.02 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:28: R26 13.18 13.23 0.05 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:28: R27 12.20 12.23 0.03 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:28: R28 13.37 13.38 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:28: R29 20.01 20.03 0.02 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:28: R30 17.00 17.00 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:28: R31 14.04 14.04 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:28: R32 15.11 15.13 0.02 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:28: R33 12.94 12.97 0.03 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:28: R34 9.05 9.07 0.02 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:29: R1 15.54 15.55 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:29: R2 15.01 15.04 0.03 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:29: R3 15.57 15.57 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:29: R4 18.24 18.24 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:29: R5 15.14 15.15 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:29: R6 15.21 15.22 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:29: R7 14.90 14.92 0.02 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:29: R8 14.95 15.00 0.05 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:29: R9 15.64 15.73 0.09 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:29: R10 15.74 15.81 0.07 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:29: R11 15.72 15.79 0.07 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:29: R12 15.58 15.64 0.06 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:29: R13 16.25 16.31 0.06 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:29: R14 15.43 15.48 0.05 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:29: R15 15.05 15.10 0.05 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:29: R16 15.80 15.84 0.04 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:29: R17 15.96 15.99 0.03 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:29: R18 19.11 19.13 0.02 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:29: R19 19.73 19.75 0.02 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:29: R20 18.50 18.56 0.06 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:29: R21 16.17 16.21 0.04 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:30: R22 19.28 19.29 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:30: R23 17.37 17.38 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:30: R24 16.52 16.63 0.11 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:30: R25 15.64 15.69 0.05 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:30: R26 15.55 15.58 0.03 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:30: R27 15.23 15.25 0.02 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:30: R28 15.35 15.41 0.06 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:30: R29 18.44 18.50 0.06 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:30: R30 17.40 17.40 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:30: R31 16.11 16.11 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:30: R32 15.48 15.52 0.04 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:30: R33 16.01 16.06 0.05 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:30: R34 15.27 15.32 0.05 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:30: R1 14.29 14.29 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:30: R2 13.82 13.83 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:30: R3 14.39 14.39 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:30: R4 16.95 16.95 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:30: R5 13.99 13.99 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:30: R6 14.04 14.05 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:30: R7 13.88 13.88 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:30: R8 13.82 13.83 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:31: R9 14.37 14.38 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:31: R10 14.51 14.52 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:31: R11 14.37 14.38 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:31: R12 14.28 14.28 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:31: R13 14.87 14.88 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:31: R14 14.08 14.09 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:31: R15 13.64 13.65 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:31: R16 14.35 14.35 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:31: R17 14.58 14.59 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:31: R18 17.03 17.03 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:31: R19 17.67 17.67 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:31: R20 16.76 16.77 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:31: R21 14.73 14.74 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:31: R22 17.36 17.36 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:31: R23 15.52 15.52 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:31: R24 15.15 15.17 0.02 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:31: R25 14.25 14.26 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:31: R26 14.26 14.28 0.02 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:31: R27 14.00 14.01 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:31: R28 14.07 14.07 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:31: R29 16.73 16.73 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:31: R30 15.82 15.82 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:31: R31 14.58 14.59 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:31: R32 14.20 14.21 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:31: R33 14.65 14.65 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:31: R34 14.16 14.17 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:32: R1 14.52 14.52 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:32: R2 13.82 13.82 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:32: R3 14.47 14.47 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:32: R4 17.31 17.31 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:32: R5 13.98 13.99 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:32: R6 14.04 14.05 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:32: R7 13.81 13.81 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:32: R8 13.75 13.76 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:32: R9 14.32 14.34 0.02 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:32: R10 14.48 14.49 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:32: R11 14.35 14.36 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:32: R12 14.26 14.26 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:32: R13 14.91 14.91 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:32: R14 14.05 14.06 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:32: R15 13.62 13.63 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:32: R16 14.36 14.36 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:32: R17 14.59 14.59 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:32: R18 17.18 17.19 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:32: R19 17.84 17.85 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:32: R20 16.92 16.93 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:32: R21 14.82 14.83 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:32: R22 17.54 17.54 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:33: R23 15.61 15.61 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:33: R24 15.16 15.18 0.02 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:33: R25 14.23 14.24 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:33: R26 14.26 14.27 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:33: R27 13.98 13.99 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:33: R28 14.07 14.07 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:33: R29 16.88 16.89 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:33: R30 15.89 15.89 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:33: R31 14.60 14.60 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:33: R32 14.23 14.24 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:33: R33 14.60 14.61 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:33: R34 14.09 14.10 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:33: R1 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:33: R2 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:33: R3 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:33: R4 2 2 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:33: R5 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:33: R6 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:33: R7 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:33: R8 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:34: R9 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:34: R10 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:34: R11 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:34: R12 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:34: R13 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:34: R14 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:34: R15 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:34: R16 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:34: R17 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:34: R18 2 2 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:34: R19 3 3 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:34: R20 2 2 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:34: R21 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:34: R22 3 3 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:34: R23 1 1 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:34: R24 1 1 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:34: R25 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:34: R26 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:34: R27 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:34: R28 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:34: R29 2 2 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:34: R30 1 1 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:34: R31 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:34: R32 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:34: R33 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:34: R34 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:35: R1 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:35: R2 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:35: R3 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:35: R4 1 1 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:35: R5 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:35: R6 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:35: R7 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:35: R8 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:35: R9 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:35: R10 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:35: R11 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:35: R12 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:35: R13 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:35: R14 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:35: R15 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:35: R16 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:35: R17 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:35: R18 1 1 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:35: R19 1 1 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:35: R20 1 1 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:35: R21 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:36: R22 1 1 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:36: R23 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:36: R24 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:36: R25 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:36: R26 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:36: R27 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:36: R28 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:36: R29 1 1 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:36: R30 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:36: R31 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:36: R32 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:36: R33 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:36: R34 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:36: R1 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:36: R2 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:36: R3 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:36: R4 1 1 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:36: R5 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:36: R6 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:36: R7 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:37: R8 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:37: R9 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:37: R10 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:37: R11 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:37: R12 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:37: R13 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:37: R14 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:37: R15 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:37: R16 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:37: R17 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:37: R18 1 1 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:37: R19 1 1 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:37: R20 1 1 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:37: R21 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:37: R22 1 1 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:37: R23 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:37: R24 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:37: R25 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:37: R26 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:37: R27 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:37: R28 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:37: R29 1 1 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:37: R30 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:37: R31 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:37: R32 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:37: R33 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:38: R34 0 0 0 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:38: R1 10.38 10.38 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:38: R2 10.29 10.31 0.02 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:38: R3 10.18 10.18 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:38: R4 11.33 11.33 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:38: R5 9.65 9.65 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:38: R6 9.69 9.70 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:38: R7 9.31 9.33 0.02 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:38: R8 9.69 9.72 0.03 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:38: R9 9.98 10.03 0.05 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:38: R10 10.11 10.15 0.04 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:38: R11 10.36 10.41 0.05 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:38: R12 10.27 10.31 0.04 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:38: R13 11.02 11.06 0.04 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:38: R14 10.34 10.37 0.03 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:38: R15 10.34 10.37 0.03 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:38: R16 10.76 10.79 0.03 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:38: R17 10.86 10.88 0.02 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:38: R18 12.54 12.55 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:39: R19 13.11 13.12 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:39: R20 12.54 12.57 0.03 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:39: R21 11.15 11.18 0.03 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:39: R22 12.80 12.81 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:39: R23 11.80 11.80 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:39: R24 10.62 10.69 0.07 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:39: R25 10.50 10.53 0.03 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:39: R26 10.40 10.42 0.02 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:39: R27 10.19 10.21 0.02 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:39: R28 10.37 10.40 0.03 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:39: R29 12.50 12.53 0.03 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:39: R30 11.59 11.60 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:39: R31 10.92 10.92 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:39: R32 10.60 10.63 0.03 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:39: R33 10.41 10.45 0.04 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:39: R34 9.64 9.67 0.03 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:40: R1 9.20 9.20 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:40: R2 9.21 9.22 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:40: R3 9.07 9.07 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:40: R4 10.17 10.18 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:40: R5 8.60 8.60 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:40: R6 8.63 8.63 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:40: R7 8.39 8.40 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:40: R8 8.66 8.66 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:40: R9 8.80 8.81 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:40: R10 8.96 8.97 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:40: R11 9.10 9.10 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:40: R12 9.05 9.05 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:40: R13 9.68 9.68 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:40: R14 9.09 9.10 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:40: R15 9.02 9.02 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:40: R16 9.37 9.37 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:40: R17 9.52 9.52 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:40: R18 10.53 10.53 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:40: R19 11.06 11.07 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:40: R20 10.82 10.83 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:40: R21 9.89 9.89 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:40: R22 10.92 10.92 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:41: R23 10.01 10.01 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:41: R24 9.32 9.33 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:41: R25 9.18 9.19 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:41: R26 9.18 9.19 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:41: R27 9.04 9.04 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:41: R28 9.15 9.15 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:41: R29 10.80 10.81 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:41: R30 10.08 10.09 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:41: R31 9.48 9.48 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:41: R32 9.45 9.45 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:41: R33 9.15 9.16 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:41: R34 8.65 8.65 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:41: R1 9.23 9.23 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:41: R2 9.14 9.14 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:41: R3 9.02 9.02 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:41: R4 10.24 10.24 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:41: R5 8.51 8.52 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:41: R6 8.54 8.55 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:41: R7 8.28 8.28 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:41: R8 8.55 8.55 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:42: R9 8.70 8.70 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:42: R10 8.86 8.87 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:42: R11 8.98 8.98 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:42: R12 8.93 8.93 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:42: R13 9.60 9.60 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:42: R14 8.99 8.99 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:42: R15 8.91 8.91 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:42: R16 9.27 9.27 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:42: R17 9.43 9.43 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:42: R18 10.47 10.48 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:42: R19 11.02 11.02 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:42: R20 10.79 10.79 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:42: R21 9.85 9.85 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:42: R22 10.88 10.88 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:42: R23 9.94 9.94 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:42: R24 9.23 9.24 0.01 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:42: R25 9.08 9.08 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:42: R26 9.09 9.09 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:42: R27 8.94 8.94 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:42: R28 9.05 9.05 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:42: R29 10.77 10.77 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:42: R30 10.01 10.01 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:42: R31 9.39 9.39 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:42: R32 9.38 9.38 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:42: R33 9.04 9.04 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:42: R34 8.54 8.54 0.00 Imperceptible Negligible

TR030002-000500-Section 19 App 19.1 Socio economic legislation_policy_guidance.pdf:50:negligible. be drawn from a wider labour maker of 295,000

TR030002-000500-Section 19 App 19.1 Socio economic legislation_policy_guidance.pdf:53: by a range of technical assessments undertaken or negligible after 1 year of operation; and negligible

TR030002-000732-DEA UK SNS Limited (Written Representation).pdf:17: 16 of the Environmental Statement “Commercial Navigation” which predicts negligible

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:36: level and the quay structures would have negligible significance in

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:49: negligible effect on human health. With regard to emissions from on-

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:49: negligible impact at a further 17 receptors. Increases of NO2 levels at

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:49: construction would be negligible.

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:53: negligible significance. With regard to the underwater noise and

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:53: negligible significance.

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:54: negligible. Visual disturbance could last over a longer period than

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:54: the ES concludes that the residual impact would be of negligible

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:54: after mitigation the impact would be of negligible significance. Screen

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:55: decommissioning are assessed as negligible if any.

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:55: assesses that there would be impact of negligible significance on

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:59: than a negligible impact with none of the works materially affecting

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:60: during the construction phase is assessed as have a negligible impact

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:60: would be of negligible significance. Overall, the document concludes

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:62: as of negligible significance, while the direct loss of fish, fish eggs and

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:62: impact of negligible significance.

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:63: predicted to be of negligible significance. EA subsequently confirmed

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:65: impact is assessed in the ES as negligible. As for the mooring

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:66: change/negligible impact to minor adverse. As detailed in section

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:73: be of negligible significance after mitigation. The mitigation measures

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:73: was regarded as likely to have negligible significance and de-

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:80: impact of negligible significance.

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:80: operational transport impact is regarded as of negligible significance.

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:83: surface waters and groundwater would be of negligible significance

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:83: groundwater it would remain negligible.

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:86: impacts of the scheme would be either negligible or minor adverse and

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:172: the scheme would be either negligible or only minor adverse and in all

TR030002-000455-ES Section 20 Landscape and visual environment.pdf:16: Redcar LCA R4 (Coastal Marsh – Coatham Marsh) No change/ negligible adverse

TR030002-000455-ES Section 20 Landscape and visual environment.pdf:16: Redcar LCA E2 (Escarpment) Negligible adverse

TR030002-000455-ES Section 20 Landscape and visual environment.pdf:17: Users of footpaths 102/2/2 and 102/2/3 (Teesdale Way) and Negligible adverse

TR030002-000455-ES Section 20 Landscape and visual environment.pdf:17: Users of byways S1A and S1B (Seaton Carew) Negligible/ minor adverse

TR030002-000455-ES Section 20 Landscape and visual environment.pdf:17: Visitors to Eston Nab Negligible adverse

TR030002-000455-ES Section 20 Landscape and visual environment.pdf:18: Redcar LCA R4 (Coastal Marsh – Coatham Marsh) No change/negligible adverse

TR030002-000455-ES Section 20 Landscape and visual environment.pdf:18: Redcar LCA E2 (Escarpment) Negligible adverse

TR030002-000455-ES Section 20 Landscape and visual environment.pdf:19:Users of footpaths 102/2/2 and 102/2/3 (Teesdale Way) and 102/2A/1 Negligible adverse

TR030002-000455-ES Section 20 Landscape and visual environment.pdf:19:Users of byways S1A and S1B (Seaton Carew) Negligible minor adverse

TR030002-000455-ES Section 20 Landscape and visual environment.pdf:19:Visitors to Eston Nab Negligible adverse

TR030002-000455-ES Section 20 Landscape and visual environment.pdf:20: Redcar LCA R4 (Coastal Marsh – Coatham Marsh) No change/negligible adverse

TR030002-000455-ES Section 20 Landscape and visual environment.pdf:20: Redcar LCA E2 (Escarpment) Negligible adverse

TR030002-000455-ES Section 20 Landscape and visual environment.pdf:21: Residents at Armitage Road, Dormanstown Negligible adverse

TR030002-000455-ES Section 20 Landscape and visual environment.pdf:21: Users of footpaths 102/2/2 and 102/2/3 (Teesdale Way) Negligible adverse

TR030002-000455-ES Section 20 Landscape and visual environment.pdf:21: Users of byways S1A and S1B (Seaton Carew) Negligible minor adverse

TR030002-000455-ES Section 20 Landscape and visual environment.pdf:21: Visitors to Eston Nab Negligible adverse

TR030002-000455-ES Section 20 Landscape and visual environment.pdf:25: phase, reducing to negligible adverse impact during the operational phase of the scheme.

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:71: predicted negligible sediment deposition at Seal Sands.

TR030002-000562-Doc 6.2 Section 79(1) of Environmental Protection Act 1990 Statement.pdf:7: of Section 14 of the ES. A negligible impact was identified at all

TR030002-000562-Doc 6.2 Section 79(1) of Environmental Protection Act 1990 Statement.pdf:7: residual impact has been determined to be negligible.

TR030002-000562-Doc 6.2 Section 79(1) of Environmental Protection Act 1990 Statement.pdf:7: predicted to be of negligible significance (see paragraph 14.5.29 of

TR030002-000562-Doc 6.2 Section 79(1) of Environmental Protection Act 1990 Statement.pdf:7: of construction traffic noise would be of negligible significance.

TR030002-000562-Doc 6.2 Section 79(1) of Environmental Protection Act 1990 Statement.pdf:8: negligible significance is predicted for all residential and ecological

TR030002-000562-Doc 6.2 Section 79(1) of Environmental Protection Act 1990 Statement.pdf:8: proposed scheme have been deemed to be negligible, (see paragraph

TR030002-000562-Doc 6.2 Section 79(1) of Environmental Protection Act 1990 Statement.pdf:9: mitigation suggested, an overall negligible to slight adverse effect has

TR030002-000562-Doc 6.2 Section 79(1) of Environmental Protection Act 1990 Statement.pdf:10: concludes there would be a negligible impact on local air quality.

TR030002-000562-Doc 6.2 Section 79(1) of Environmental Protection Act 1990 Statement.pdf:12: identified as having predominantly negligible effects given that the

TR030002-000562-Doc 6.2 Section 79(1) of Environmental Protection Act 1990 Statement.pdf:13: scheme) would be of negligible significance or have no effect in terms

TR030002-000741-Huntsman Polyurethanes (IK) Limited (2).pdf:14: 16 of the Environmental Statement “Commercial Navigation” which predicts negligible

TR030002-000253-Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening document (3).pdf:5:(ES Section 22 paragraph 22.3.5) and for benthic ecology the impacts would be negligible

TR030002-000451-ES Section 16 Commercial navigation.pdf:9: receptor. The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible significance on

TR030002-000451-ES Section 16 Commercial navigation.pdf:9:16.5.8 No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible

TR030002-000451-ES Section 16 Commercial navigation.pdf:11: on the above, it is anticipated that the proposed scheme would have an impact of negligible

TR030002-000451-ES Section 16 Commercial navigation.pdf:11:16.6.7 No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible

TR030002-000451-ES Section 16 Commercial navigation.pdf:11: using the impact assessment matrix presented in Section 4, an impact of negligible significance is

TR030002-000451-ES Section 16 Commercial navigation.pdf:11: measures are not required with regard to this impact and a residual impact of negligible significance is

TR030002-000451-ES Section 16 Commercial navigation.pdf:12:16.8.3 It is predicted that the proposed scheme would result in impacts of negligible significance on

TR030002-000451-ES Section 16 Commercial navigation.pdf:12:16.8.4 No mitigation measures are proposed for any of the impacts identified, given their negligible

TR030002-000451-ES Section 16 Commercial navigation.pdf:13:Interference with existing commercial Medium Very low Negligible None requ

TR030002-000451-ES Section 16 Commercial navigation.pdf:13:Interference with existing commercial Medium Very low Negligible None requ

TR030002-000451-ES Section 16 Commercial navigation.pdf:13:Potential impacts to navigational High Very low Negligible None requ

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:15: regarded as imperceptible and, therefore, of negligible significance. If there are no increases greater

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:19: to be negligible and, hence, have not been assessed in detail.

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:20:14.3.53 The negligible threshold at residential receptors used in this assessment applies to noise levels outside

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:20: noise; therefore on this basis the negligible threshold at residential receptors would produce an internal

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:20: Negligible Warehouses, light industry, car parks, agricultural land

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:21: High Major Major Moderate Minor Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:21: Medium Major Moderate Minor Negligible Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:21: Low Moderate Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:21: are expected to be negligible. The main noise sensitive receptors associated with the proposed

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:23: in this context is assessed as negligible.

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:37: levels are predicted to have an impact of negligible significance on all assessed ecological receptors.

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:45: P1 65 LAeq,5min 33 LAeq,5min No impact Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:45: P2 50 LAeq,5min 26 LAeq,5min No impact Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:45: P3 65 LAeq,5min 45 LAeq,5min No impact Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:45: P4 65 LAeq,5min 39 LAeq,5min No impact Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:46: P5 50 LAeq,5min 40 LAeq,5min No impact Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:46: P6 50 LAeq,5min 40 LAeq,5min No impact Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:46: P7 50 LAeq,5min 44 LAeq,5min No impact Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:46: P8 50 LAeq,5min 47 LAeq,5min No impact Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:46: P9 50 LAeq,5min 48 LAeq,5min No impact Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:46: P10 50 LAeq,5min 50 LAeq,5min Low Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:46: P11 65 LAeq,5min 45 LAeq,5min No impact Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:46: P1 50 LAeq,5min 33 LAeq,5min No impact Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:46: P2 50 LAeq,5min 26 LAeq,5min No impact Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:46: P3 50 LAeq,5min 45 LAeq,5min No impact Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:46: P4 50 LAeq,5min 39 LAeq,5min No impact Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:46: P5 50 LAeq,5min 40 LAeq,5min No impact Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:46: P6 50 LAeq,5min 40 LAeq,5min No impact Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:46: P7 50 LAeq,5min 44 LAeq,5min No impact Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:46: P8 50 LAeq,5min 47 LAeq,5min No impact Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:46: P9 50 LAeq,5min 48 LAeq,5min No impact Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:46: P10 50 LAeq,5min 50 LAeq,5min Low Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:46: P11 50 LAeq,5min 45 LAeq,5min No impact Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:46: P1 65 LAeq,5min 35 LAeq,5min No impact Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:46: P2 50 LAeq,5min 31 LAeq,5min No impact Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:47: P3 65 LAeq,5min 45 LAeq,5min No impact Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:47: P4 65 LAeq,5min 39 LAeq,5min No impact Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:47: P5 50 LAeq,5min 35 LAeq,5min No impact Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:47: P6 50 LAeq,5min 45 LAeq,5min No impact Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:47: P7 50 LAeq,5min 41 LAeq,5min No impact Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:47: P8 50 LAeq,5min 36 LAeq,5min No impact Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:47: P9 50 LAeq,5min 35 LAeq,5min No impact Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:47: P10 50 LAeq,5min 40 LAeq,5min No impact Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:47: P11 65 LAeq,5min 45 LAeq,5min No impact Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:47: P1 50 LAeq,5min 36 LAeq,5min No impact Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:47: P2 50 LAeq,5min 31 LAeq,5min No impact Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:47: P3 50 LAeq,5min 45 LAeq,5min No impact Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:47: P4 50 LAeq,5min 39 LAeq,5min No impact Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:47: P5 50 LAeq,5min 35 LAeq,5min No impact Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:47: P6 50 LAeq,5min 45 LAeq,5min No impact Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:47: P7 50 LAeq,5min 41 LAeq,5min No impact Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:47: P8 50 LAeq,5min 36 LAeq,5min No impact Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:47: P9 50 LAeq,5min 35 LAeq,5min No impact Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:47: P10 50 LAeq,5min 40 LAeq,5min No impact Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:47: P11 50 LAeq,5min 45 LAeq,5min No impact Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:49: and south conveyor options the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance in all

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:50: assessed as medium; on this basis, the resulting impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:50:14.5.31 The residual impact would remain of negligible significance.

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:51: low and the associated impact would be of negligible significance.

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:52:P1 39 16 -23 No impact / Very low Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:52:P2 43 21 -22 No impact / Very low Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:52:P3 45 20 -25 No impact / Very low Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:52:P4 38 16 -22 No impact / Very low Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:52:P5 43 40 -3 No impact / Very low Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:52:P6 43 43 0 No impact / Very low Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:52:P7 43 34 -9 No impact / Very low Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:52:P8 43 27 -16 No impact / Very low Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:52:P9 43 33 -10 No impact / Very low Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:52:P10 43 50 7 Low Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:52:P11 45 20 -25 No impact / Very low Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:53:P1 48 19 -29 No impact / Very low Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:53:P2 50 21 -29 No impact / Very low Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:53:P3 49 20 -29 No impact / Very low Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:53:P4 45 16 -29 No impact / Very low Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:53:P5 50 40 -10 No impact / Very low Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:53:P6 50 43 -7 No impact / Very low Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:53:P7 50 34 -16 No impact / Very low Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:53:P8 50 27 -23 No impact / Very low Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:53:P9 50 33 -17 No impact / Very low Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:53:P10 50 50 0 No impact / Very low Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:53:P11 49 20 -29 No impact / Very low Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:54:P1 39 14 -25 No impact / Very low Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:54:P2 43 19 -24 No impact / Very low Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:54:P3 45 19 -26 No impact / Very low Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:54:P4 38 15 -23 No impact / Very low Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:54:P5 43 34 -9 No impact / Very low Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:54:P6 43 42 -1 No impact / Very low Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:54:P7 43 31 -12 No impact / Very low Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:54:P8 43 23 -20 No impact / Very low Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:54:P9 43 30 -13 No impact / Very low Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:54:P10 43 46 3 No impact / Very low Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:54:P11 45 19 -26 No impact / Very low Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:54:P1 48 18 -30 No impact / Very low Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:54:P2 50 19 -31 No impact / Very low Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:54:P3 49 20 -29 No impact / Very low Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:54:P4 45 16 -29 No impact / Very low Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:54:P5 50 34 -16 No impact / Very low Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:54:P6 50 42 -8 No impact / Very low Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:54:P7 50 31 -19 No impact / Very low Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:54:P8 50 23 -27 No impact / Very low Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:54:P9 50 30 -20 No impact / Very low Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:54:P10 50 46 -4 No impact / Very low Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:54:P11 49 19 -30 No impact / Very low Negligible

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:55: hence an impact of negligible significance is predicted for all residential and ecological receptors.

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:56: associated impact would be of negligible significance.

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:58:areas 1 and 2) and No impact to Negligible to x Locating noisy static plant, such as diesel generators

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:59: Medium No impact Negligible None

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:59:at assessed Medium No impact Negligible None

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:59: Medium No impact Negligible None

TR030002-000482-Section 12 App 12.2 Transport Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:7:M/FP/0982/10/P Middlesbrough Discount as proposal is for a low traffic generator that would have negligible impact in Redcar No NONE

TR030002-000482-Section 12 App 12.2 Transport Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:7: development in the Redcar area would be negligible.

TR030002-000482-Section 12 App 12.2 Transport Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:7:M/FP/1046/11/P Middlesbrough Discount as proposal is for a low traffic generator that would have negligible impact in Redcar No TA

TR030002-000482-Section 12 App 12.2 Transport Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:7:M/FP/0220/11/P Middlesbrough Erection of 106no dwellinghouses and electricity substation with associated access and landscaping Discount as proposal is for a low traffic generator that would have negligible impact in Redcar No TA

TR030002-000482-Section 12 App 12.2 Transport Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:7:M/FP/0172/11/P Middlesbrough Erection of three storey Police Authority HQ with associated communications mast/vehicular access/parking & landscaping Discount as traffic generation associated with Police Station would be negligible in Redcar area. No TA

TR030002-000482-Section 12 App 12.2 Transport Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:7:M/FP/0261/14/P Middlesbrough Residential development comprising 164No dwellings Discount as proposal is for a low traffic generator that would have negligible impact in Redcar No TA

TR030002-000482-Section 12 App 12.2 Transport Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:8:R/2013/0860/F3M RCBC NEW BUILD TWO STOREY TEACHING BLOCK LINKED AT FIRST FLOOR LEVEL BACK TO EXISTING TEACHING WINGS Extension to existing college. Traffic impact negligible No TS

TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:44: of any related plume would be negligible compared with the dredging-related plume.

TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:81: vibration levels are expected to be negligible.

TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:84: these are anticipated to be negligible.

TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:95: negligible.

TR030002-000253-Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening document (4).pdf:5:(ES Section 22 paragraph 22.3.5) and for benthic ecology the impacts would be negligible

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:17: be controlled to ensure impacts are of negligible or of slight adverse significance at worst.

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:17: High Slight Adverse Slight Adverse Negligible

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:17: Medium Slight Adverse Negligible Negligible

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:17: Low Negligible Negligible Negligible

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:19: Negligible Slight Adverse Slight Adverse

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:19: Negligible Negligible Slight Adverse

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:19: Negligible Slight Beneficial Slight Beneficial

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:19: Negligible Negligible Slight Beneficial

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:19: Note: Well below Objective = < 75% of the Objective level. An ‘imperceptible’ change would be described as ‘negligible’.

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:25: Dust Soiling Slight Adverse Slight Adverse Slight Adverse Negligible

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:25: Human Health Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:25: Overall Effect Negligible – Slight Adverse

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:31: Imperceptible Negligible 15 34 34

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:31: Small Negligible 17 - -

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:31: concentrations. However, all identified receptors are predicted to experience a negligible impact on

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:32: a negligible impact on local air quality.

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:34: Imperceptible Negligible 34 34 34

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:34: negligible impact on NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations. The overall impact of road traffic emissions

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:39: Local Air Quality Small - Negligible –

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:40:of Operational Phase High Imperceptible Negligible Not required

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:40:of Decommissioning High construction phase Negligible Not required Not significant

TR030002-000569-Doc 7.3 Appendix 2a - MDT Planning Statement.pdf:39:  Officers considered that the impact of the development would be negligible in terms of the

TR030002-000569-Doc 7.3 Appendix 2a - MDT Planning Statement.pdf:75: operation; and negligible by 15 years, as plants designed for visual screening mature.

TR030002-000253-Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening document (2).pdf:5:(ES Section 22 paragraph 22.3.5) and for benthic ecology the impacts would be negligible

TR030002-000501-Section 20 App 20.1 LVIA methodology.pdf:10: Negligible Barely perceptible removal or addition of landscape features would occur and

TR030002-000501-Section 20 App 20.1 LVIA methodology.pdf:11: Negligible Only a very small part of the proposed development would be discernible, or

TR030002-000501-Section 20 App 20.1 LVIA methodology.pdf:12: Negligible

TR030002-000501-Section 20 App 20.1 LVIA methodology.pdf:12: Negligible

TR030002-000501-Section 20 App 20.1 LVIA methodology.pdf:12:  Negligible

TR030002-000501-Section 20 App 20.1 LVIA methodology.pdf:12: categories of minor negligible, minor moderate and moderate major will be used where the

TR030002-000501-Section 20 App 20.1 LVIA methodology.pdf:13: Negligible Insignificant changes in landscape or visual conditions, affecting

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:7:Negligible Negligible effect on integrity and / or conservation status.

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:23: would result in negligible loss of contaminated material. Dredging of sand and gravel, clay and

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:27: P5 43 LAeq,5min 40 LAeq,5min No impact Negligible

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:27: P6 49 LAeq,5min 40 LAeq,5min No impact Negligible

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:27: P7 48 LAeq,5min 44 LAeq,5min No impact Negligible

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:27: P8 66 LAeq,5min 47 LAeq,5min No impact Negligible

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:27: P9 61 LAeq,5min 48 LAeq,5min No impact Negligible

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:27: P10 59 LAeq,5min 50 LAeq,5min Low Negligible

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:28: P5 42 LAeq,5min 35 LAeq,5min No impact Negligible

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:28: P6 49 LAeq,5min 45 LAeq,5min No impact Negligible

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:28: P7 48 LAeq,5min 41 LAeq,5min No impact Negligible

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:28: P8 40 LAeq,5min 36 LAeq,5min No impact Negligible

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:28: P9 42 LAeq,5min 35 LAeq,5min No impact Negligible

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:28: P10 44 LAeq,5min 40 LAeq,5min No impact Negligible

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:31: negligible level.

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:33:9.5.32 It is anticipated that the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:35: and a negligible impact is predicted on balance.

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:35: negligible significance.

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:36: potential impact. Hence it is concluded that the impact would be of negligible significance.

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:36: generation (i.e. the ship loading operations). The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:39: Hence the potential impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:39: time of decommissioning. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:40: downstream section of Dabholm Gut, which is predicted to be of negligible significance given the low

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:43:Implication of the Very high Loss of Negligible None required

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:43:Noise disturbance to Very high Very low Negligible The potential impact is mitigated as far as possible in t

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:44:Noise and visual Very high Very low Negligible In addition to the embedded mitigation, a Decommissi

TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:50: potential dredging methods, leading to a prediction of negligible sediment being able to deposit on the

TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:50: be low. It is concluded that the potential impact would be of negligible significance.

TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:50: dredging are also of relevance to this impact. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible

TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:58: the magnitude of the effect would be very low. An impact of negligible significance is therefore

TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:58:8.6.3 No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:59: negligible significance.

TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:59: residual impact would be of negligible significance.

TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:61:suspended during Low Low Negligible Reduction of sediment plumes during backhoe dredgin

TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:62:disturbance to marine High Very low Negligible No mitigation measures are required.

TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:62:community following Low Low Negligible No mitigation measures are possible.

TR030002-000253-Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening document (1).pdf:5:(ES Section 22 paragraph 22.3.5) and for benthic ecology the impacts would be negligible

TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:14: bodies/surface water features as far as possible, predicted impacts range from those of negligible

TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:14: and hydrogeology are of minor adverse significance, with an impact of negligible significance predicted

TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:15: and sediment quality are predicted to be of negligible significance.

TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:16: methods to be used during construction; leading to the prediction that negligible sediment would

TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:17: With this mitigation in place, potential disturbance related impacts are predicted to be of negligible

TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:17: and disturbance related impacts during the operational phase are predicted to be of negligible

TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:18: terrestrial ecological receptors, however, all such impacts are predicted to be of negligible significance

TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:19: construction and operational phases are predicted to be of minor adverse and negligible significance

TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:20: Given this, the residual impact was predicted to be negligible.

TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:20: offsite construction road traffic were predicted to have impacts of negligible significance.

TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:21: was predicted to be of negligible significance for all receptors.

TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:22:2.13.3 It was predicted that the Harbour facilities would result in impacts of negligible significance on

TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:22: based on the predicted increases, an impact of negligible significance is predicted with regard to

TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:23: resulting in a negligible to minor beneficial impact.

TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:25: residual impact associated with indirect disturbance during decommissioning would be of negligible

TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:26: impact of negligible significance was therefore predicted.

TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:27: accommodation would be negligible.

TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:28: negligible significance. However, inevitably, this would be true for any single project. Moreover, the

TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:29: predicted to be negligible. There would be no deterioration in the status of the groundwater body.

TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:29: predicted to be of negligible significance.

TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:29:3.7.2 Cumulative impacts were assessed to be of negligible significance for the YPP and no deterioration in

TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:30: to protected species, were assessed as being of negligible and minor adverse significance respectively.

TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:30: the impact to a negligible level.

TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:32: populations as a result of this effect is predicted to be of negligible significance (because they would

TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:32: wider maintenance dredging programme in the Tees estuary was also predicted to be of negligible

TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:32: was predicted to be of negligible significance due to the low magnitude of the effect and its temporary

TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:32: cumulative impact would be of negligible significance. Operational phase cumulative impacts (i.e.

TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:32: implications for vessel traffic management) are also predicted to be of negligible significance and all

TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:37:  An impact of negligible significance on coastal protection and flood defence.

TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf:9: High Major Moderate Moderate Minor Negligible

TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf:9: Medium Moderate Moderate Minor Minor Negligible

TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf:9: Low Minor Minor Minor Negligible Negligible

TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf:9: Very Low Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf:41: water quality is therefore susceptible to impacts on groundwater but these are assessed as negligible

TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf:41: embankment but this would have a negligible impact on embankment permeability, therefore water

TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf:41: potential impact to surface water is predicted to be of negligible significance.

TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf:43: result the potential impact on groundwater, has been assessed as being of negligible significance.

TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf:44: the basis that there would be no effect); and the residual impact would be of negligible significance (for

TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf:44: be no effect). The residual impact is, therefore predicted to be of negligible significance (for all

TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf:44: the impact is, therefore, predicted to be of negligible significance.

TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf:45: significance of the impact is predicted to be negligible.

TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf:46: negligible. The sensitivity of site operatives is assessed to be low and the magnitude of the effect is

TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf:46: also considered to be low; therefore, the significance of the impact is predicted to be negligible.

TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf:46: effect is considered to be very low. The significance of the impact is predicted to be of negligible

TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf:46: considered to be very low. The potential impact is, therefore, predicted to be of negligible significance.

TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf:47: sensitivity), to be negligible. .

TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf:47: impact is, therefore, predicted to be of negligible significance.

TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf:47: considered to be very low. Therefore, the significance of the impact is predicted to be negligible.

TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf:47: the effect is considered to be very low. The potential impact is, therefore, predicted to be of negligible

TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf:47: considered to be very low; therefore, the significance of the impact is considered to be negligible.

TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf:48: predicted to be of negligible significance.

TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf:48: be very low; therefore, the significance of the impact is predicted to be negligible.

TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf:48: be of negligible significance.

TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf:48: Consequently, the significance of the potential impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf:50:Surface water High Very Low Negligible Detailed design would take account of seepage flow throu

TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf:50:Groundwater Very low – Very Low - Negligible Construction work including piling would be carried out in

TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf:50:Human Health Low - Very Low - Negligible – Implementation of an asbestos management strategy.

TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf:50:Groundwater Very Low - Very Low Negligible Physical controls would be in place in the form of enclosed

TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf:50:Human Health Low - Very Low - Negligible Implementation of an asbestos management strategy.

TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf:51:Groundwater Very Low - Low Negligible Construction work would be carried out in accordance with

TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf:51:Human Health Low - Very Low - Negligible Implementation of an asbestos management strategy.

TR030002-000674-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_1 of 2.pdf:55: predicted to have a negligible impact on transport, and which were outside the ZOI of all other topics,

TR030002-000674-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_1 of 2.pdf:72: there would be a negligible effect on local air quality and, therefore, a LSE is not

TR030002-000674-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_1 of 2.pdf:74: there would be a negligible effect on local air quality and, therefore, a LSE is not

TR030002-000674-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_1 of 2.pdf:75: respect to the SAC is considered to be negligible (i.e. a LSE is not predicted).

TR030002-000674-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_1 of 2.pdf:77: interest features is considered to be negligible (i.e. a LSE is not predicted).

TR030002-000674-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_1 of 2.pdf:78: to be negligible (i.e. a LSE is not predicted).

TR030002-000674-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_1 of 2.pdf:83:to tip, rotor diameter 112m species are considered to be negligible overall. The

TR030002-000674-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_1 of 2.pdf:85: lighting, traffic and air quality would be negligible.

TR030002-000674-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_1 of 2.pdf:85: sites are reported to be negligible within the

TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:42: of any related plume would be negligible compared with the dredging-related plume.

TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:79: vibration levels are expected to be negligible.

TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:82: these are anticipated to be negligible.

TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:93: negligible.

TR030002-000573-Doc 7.3 Appendix 5 - MHF Planning Statement.pdf:8: phase. Negligible or no impacts on heritage assets, including

TR030002-000573-Doc 7.3 Appendix 5 - MHF Planning Statement.pdf:8: negligible during the construction and operation phases;

TR030002-000573-Doc 7.3 Appendix 5 - MHF Planning Statement.pdf:8:  The proposal would result in a negligible impact on local air

TR030002-000573-Doc 7.3 Appendix 5 - MHF Planning Statement.pdf:9: the hydrology effects and risk of flooding are negligible.

TR030002-000573-Doc 7.3 Appendix 5 - MHF Planning Statement.pdf:55: channel. Negligible or no impacts on heritage assets, including their setting,

TR030002-000573-Doc 7.3 Appendix 5 - MHF Planning Statement.pdf:59: b) Noise impacts are predicted to be negligible; dust emissions will be

TR030002-000573-Doc 7.3 Appendix 5 - MHF Planning Statement.pdf:59: negligible; and there are no flooding risks (as above).

TR030002-000573-Doc 7.3 Appendix 5 - MHF Planning Statement.pdf:62: be “very low” and the associated impact would be negligible. The same

TR030002-000573-Doc 7.3 Appendix 5 - MHF Planning Statement.pdf:63:7.61 Overall, it is concluded that the proposal would result in a negligible impact on

TR030002-000573-Doc 7.3 Appendix 5 - MHF Planning Statement.pdf:64: where the hydrology effects and risk of flooding are negligible. The proposals

TR030002-000742-SABIC UK Petrochemicals Limited 2.pdf:14: 16 of the Environmental Statement “Commercial Navigation” which predicts negligible

TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:112:negligible.” PHE supports the inclusion of this information within EIAs as good

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:9: become negligible or beneficial.

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:10: delivering a predominately negligible or even beneficial impact on receptors

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:72: b) Noise impacts are predicted to be minor to negligible; dust emissions

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:72: will be slight-adverse to negligible; and there are no flooding risks (as

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:72: anticipated to be negligible, both during construction and operation.

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:74: negligible (see Policy Theme 5).

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:78: agricultural, fishing or mining past (SQ7) is predicted to be negligible.

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:78: negligible.

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:79: negligible impact on SQ9 is predicted.

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:80: be negligible. The level of visual intrusion associated with the Mine and

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:80: operational phase of the Project and consequently a negligible impact is

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:82: (1). Other impacts are negligible or minor adverse in nature. Of the

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:87: High Negligible Negligible

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:88: High Negligible Negligible

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:91: become negligible or beneficial.

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:95: Noise & Vibration Negligible Negligible Negligible

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:95: Air Quality Negligible with a Negligible Negligible

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:96: Socio-Economics Minor beneficial due Major beneficial at Negligible/minor

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:96: Geology & Minor/moderate Minor adverse Negligible

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:96: Hydrology & Flood Negligible Largely negligible; Negligible

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:96: Land Uses and Soils Minor adverse on soil Minor adverse due to Mainly negligible;

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:96: negligible effects on farming; negligible

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:96: Noise & Vibration Negligible Negligible Negligible

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:96: Air Quality Negligible Negligible Negligible

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:96: Socio-Economics Minor beneficial due Major beneficial at Negligible/minor

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:96: Cultural Heritage Slight/negligible No effects No effects

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:96: Geology & Mainly negligible; Mainly negligible; Negligible

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:96: Hydrology & Flood Negligible Negligible/adverse Negligible

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:96: Land Uses and Soils Moderate adverse Minor adverse Mainly negligible or

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:96: on soil degradation, otherwise negligible

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:96: systems; negligible

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:97: Noise & Vibration Negligible impact on Negligible impact on Negligible impact on

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:97: Air Quality Negligible impact on Negligible impact on Negligible impact on

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:97: Socio-Economics Short term, negligible Minor to major Adverse effects due

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:97: Geology and Minor adverse Negligible or no Negligible or no

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:97: negligible impact on

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:97: Hydrology and Flood Negligible impact on Negligible impact on Negligible impact on

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:97: predominately negligible or even beneficial impact on receptors during

TR030002-000457-ES Section 22 Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:6:22.3.9 Overall, the potential impact would be of negligible significance given that impact on marine ecology

TR030002-000570-Doc 7.3 Appendix 2b - MDT Planning Statement Appendices.pdf:20: be negligible in terms of the local economy. An assessment of the economic impact of the

TR030002-000570-Doc 7.3 Appendix 2b - MDT Planning Statement Appendices.pdf:81:decreased to agronomically negligible levels in many regions of the world, mainly due

TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:21: present above geological deposits. This method has been proposed as mitigation due to the negligible

TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:21: on suspended sediment concentrations (with the exception of an enclosed grab due to the negligible

TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:25: solids in the water column from any of the potential dredge methods is predicted to be of negligible

TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:26:7.5.22 The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:28: the above mitigation measures, it is considered that the residual impact would be of negligible

TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:28: a negligible effect on the overall import of fine sediment into the estuary (less than 0.5%). The effect of

TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:28: Therefore, it is predicted that there would be an impact of negligible significance on water quality due

TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:29:7.6.7 Mitigation is not required and, therefore, the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:30: quality is predicted to be of negligible significance.

TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:31: on marine water and sediment quality are predicted to be of negligible significance at worst.

TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:32:Re-suspension of sediment during Low Low Negligible None required. However controls would be imple

TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:32:Increased suspended sediment Low Low Negligible None required

TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:32:Impacts on existing land drainage Low Low Negligible None required

TR030002-000765-Document 8.4 Applicants Responses to Other Responses to ExA Q1.pdf:24:order to mitigate against the potential impacts of noise upon predicted residual impact of negligible significance.

TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:16: (negligible freshwater input through barrage) and “wet” (average 14 cumecs flow

TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:16: spring tide range of 4.6m). Freshwater discharge at the time was negligible. The model

TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:41: 50.0% 105 days negligible negligible

TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:41: 71% 110 days negligible negligible

TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:42: 50.0% 105 days negligible negligible

TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:42: 71% 110 days negligible negligible

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:1:Significance of change is reported as being negligible, minor, minor moderate, moderate,

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:1:Negligible beneficial/ no Negligible adverse/ no

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:2:N2 Distant forward glimpsed view of Negligible adverse 70.3 0:04

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:2: Negligible adverse

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:2: Negligible low adverse

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:2: Negligible low adverse

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:2: Negligible low adverse

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:2:N11 Glimpsed perpendicular distant Negligible adverse 40.6 0:02

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:2: Negligible adverse

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:3:E4 Long distance views of minehead Negligible adverse 103.6 0:06

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:3: Negligible adverse

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:3:E6 Long distance views of Minehead Negligible adverse 249.7 0:14

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:3: Negligible adverse

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:3:E7 Distant views of LCP winding Negligible adverse 285.1 0:17

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:3: Negligible adverse

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:3: Negligible to low

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:3: Negligible to low

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:3: Negligible to low

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:3: Negligible to low

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:4: Negligible to low (20 sec)

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:4: Negligible to low

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:5: Negligible to low adverse

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:5: Negligible to low adverse

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:5: Negligible to low adverse

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:5: Negligible to low adverse

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:5: Negligible to low

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:5: Negligible to low

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:5: Negligible to low

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:5: Negligible to low

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:6:W26 Very distant views to LB winding Negligible adverse 258.4 0:15

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:6: Negligible adverse

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:6:W28 Oblique very distant views to LB Negligible adverse 1743.0 1:44

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:6: Negligible adverse

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:6:W30 Oblique very distant views to LB Negligible adverse 1072.9 1:04

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:6: Negligible adverse

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:6:W32 Very distant forward views to LB Negligible adverse 681.7 0:40

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:6: Negligible adverse

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:6:W34 Very distant forward views to LB Negligible adverse 100.3 0:06

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:6: Negligible adverse

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:6:W36 Very distant oblique and forward Negligible adverse 2294.8 2:17

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:6: Negligible adverse

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:6: Negligible to low adverse

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:6: Negligible to low and low to

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:8: Negligible to low adverse

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:8: Negligible to low adverse

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:8: Negligible to low adverse

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:8: winding towers Negligible adverse

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:8: Negligible adverse

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:8: Negligible adverse Negligible adverse

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:8: Negligible (minehead and LCP)

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:8: Negligible to low adverse (LB)

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:8: Negligible to low adverse

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:8: Negligible to low adverse

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:8: Negligible to low adverse

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:8: Negligible to low adverse

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:8: Negligible to low adverse

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:8: Negligible to low adverse

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:8:19 Potential distant views to TL Negligible adverse 553.1 6:38

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:8: Negligible adverse

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:9:21 Potential distant views to TL Negligible adverse 318.4 3:49

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:9: Negligible adverse

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:10: Negligible to low adverse

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:10: to be negligible to low adverse.

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:12:2 Very distant views to minehead Negligible adverse 2260.9 6:46

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:12: Negligible adverse

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:12: Negligible to low adverse

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:12: Negligible to low adverse

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:12: Negligible to low adverse

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:12: Negligible to low adverse

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:12:16 Oblique filtered very distant views Negligible adverse 199.3 0:35

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:12: Negligible adverse

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:12: Negligible to low adverse

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:12: Negligible to low adverse

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:13: Negligible to low adverse

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:13: Negligible to low adverse

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:13: Negligible to low adverse

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:13: Negligible to low adverse

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:13: Negligible to low adverse

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:13: Negligible to low adverse

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:13: Negligible to low adverse

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:13: Negligible to low adverse

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:14: Negligible to low adverse

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:14: Negligible to low adverse

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:14:5 Very distant views to LB winding Negligible adverse 511.4 6:08

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:14: Negligible adverse

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:14: Negligible to low adverse

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:14: Negligible to low adverse

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:14: Negligible to low adverse

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:14: Negligible to low adverse

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:14: Negligible to low adverse

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:14: Negligible to low adverse

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:14: Negligible to low adverse

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:14: Negligible to low adverse

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:15: Negligible adverse and low

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:15:32 Filtered views of minehead ground Negligible adverse and minor 528.5 6:20

TR030002-000553-Doc 6.6 App 22.3 Sequential receptor assessment.pdf:15: Negligible adverse and low

TR030002-000447-ES Section 12 Traffic and transport.pdf:14: Medium Major Moderate Minor Negligible

TR030002-000447-ES Section 12 Traffic and transport.pdf:14: Low Moderate Minor Negligible Negligible

TR030002-000447-ES Section 12 Traffic and transport.pdf:31: therefore, the impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

TR030002-000447-ES Section 12 Traffic and transport.pdf:32: therefore, the impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

TR030002-000447-ES Section 12 Traffic and transport.pdf:32: therefore, the impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

TR030002-000447-ES Section 12 Traffic and transport.pdf:33: therefore, the impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

TR030002-000447-ES Section 12 Traffic and transport.pdf:33: Consequently, traffic impact associated with the operational phase is considered of negligible

TR030002-000447-ES Section 12 Traffic and transport.pdf:35: forecast as a worst case of minor adverse and negligible significance respectively.

TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:13: controls in place – would be of negligible adverse significance (at worst), with the following

TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:14: to be of negligible significance.

TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:16: impacts are predicted to be negligible.

TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:23: of the proposed scheme. All impacts are predicted to be of negligible significance, with the

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:29: Based on this, projects that were predicted to have a negligible impact on transport, and which were

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:62: effect would be negligible at other spatial scales.

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:62: would have a negligible impact at all spatial levels.

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:64:5.2.47 At a UK level, the impact with respect to GVA would be negligible.

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:65: beneficial effect which would be negligible in the context of the UK’s tax revenue but major in the

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:65: area, a c.0.2% increase, which would have a negligible impact at all spatial levels.

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:68: negligible at all spatial levels.

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:70: YPP with respect to crime and fear of crime is, therefore, predicted to be negligible at all spatial

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:75: A place of artistic scientific and literary inspiration; a Negligible to

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:80: impacts to minor or negligible effects.

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:80: pedestrian and driver delay and safety are assessed to be negligible or minor on all links.

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:81:5.3.48 The effects of the construction of the Mine with respect to these issues are predicted to be negligible or

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:81: or negligible significance, as mitigation in the form of green screening with vegetation matures. As this

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:83: impacts would be reduced to minor or negligible significance after 1 year of operation; and negligible to

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:84: construction phase and negligible during operation at a NYMNP level.

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:84: Ltd, the displacement effect is expected to be of negligible significance.

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:84: their significance would be negligible. However, inevitably, this would be true for any single project.

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:86: proposed Harbour development and forecasts worst case impacts of minor adverse and negligible

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:96: Medium Major Moderate Minor Negligible

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:132: of effect is assessed as very low; resulting in predicted impacts of minor adverse to negligible

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:133: assessed as low on low value receptors; resulting in the prediction of negligible impacts.

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:134: adverse to negligible significance. Table 6-18 identifies that no screened links are above GEART

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:134: the prediction of a negligible impact.

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:135: impacts of minor adverse to negligible significance.

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:136: receptors. Therefore the impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:141: therefore, the impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:141: therefore, the impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:142: therefore, the impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:143: therefore, the impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:146: predicted impact of negligible significance.

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:146: negligible impacts.

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:147: negligible impact.

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:147: negligible impacts.

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:148: adverse to negligible significance.

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:148: 3 505 321 538 591 Low Negligible

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:149: that the magnitude of the effect would be very low and result in an impact of negligible significance.

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:151: the impacts resultant from a Sunday scenario can be considered negligible. It is further noted that

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:154: operational impacts are assessed as negligible.

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:154: construction flows were assessed as having a negligible impact Driver Delay it is therefore the

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:154: maximum operational Driver Delay impact is also assessed as negligible.

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:154: assessed as negligible.

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:155:Driver delay Negligible

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:155:Severance Negligible

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:155:Pedestrian amenity Negligible

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:155:Fear and intimidation Negligible

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:155:Pedestrian delay Negligible

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:155:Highway safety Negligible

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:155:Driver delay Negligible

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:157: threshold limit and would be of negligible significance. Any potential intermittent audibility would be

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:158: measured baseline levels and have a very low magnitude (at worst). Hence an impact of negligible

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:158: Section 14, and are predicted to have a negligible impact at all residential and ecological receptors.

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:158: night periods in the vicinity of Dormanstown are also predicted to have a negligible impact, as

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:161: these potentially combined sources would be of negligible significance. Overall, potential cumulative

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:164: of negligible significance in ES Section 6 and, consequently, such effects are not assessed

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:164: Potential negligible to minor  Lockwood Beck Intermediate Shaft Site Tees Mercia Mudstone & Redcar

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:167: Chemical  MHF and MTS Portal - negligible The cumulative impact on groundwater None

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:167: contamination due  Harbour facilities - negligible in the bedrock mudstone (Secondary B)

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:167: to piling (groundwater and surface water) aquifer would be negligible.

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:167: Chemical Negligible to minor at: At the catchment-scale, the Tees Mercia None

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:167: extractive material  Tocketts Lythe Intermediate tolerant of the negligible or minor

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:167: contamination groundwater body would be negligible.

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:167: negligible.

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:167: body is also predicted to be negligible and would not result in deterioration of the status the

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:169: the different scheme components is, therefore, predicted to be of negligible significance and would not

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:188: would be 15. This would have a negligible effect with respect to employment and skills demand.

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:189:16.2.7 The creation of direct operational employment on the pipeline would be negligible

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:190: this effect would be negligible. Cumulatively with the YPP, the workforce could have minor beneficial

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:191: negligible.

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:192: be negligible or beneficial. Any population increase would be dispersed and small in the context of

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:199: P1 28 25 30 No impact Negligible

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:199: P2 27 23 29 No impact Negligible

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:199: P3 29 33 35 No impact Negligible

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:199: P4 28 25 30 No impact Negligible

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:199: P5 48 42 49 No impact Negligible

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:199: P6 49 41 50 Low Negligible

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:199: P7 43 43 46 No impact Negligible

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:199: P8 34 48 48 No impact Negligible

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:199: P9 39 49 49 No impact Negligible

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:199: P10 54 50 56 Low Negligible

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:199: P11 30 42 42 No impact Negligible

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:199: P1 16 <30 30 No impact Negligible

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:199: P2 21 <30 31 No impact Negligible

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:199: P3 20 <30 30 No impact Negligible

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:200: P4 16 <30 30 No impact Negligible

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:200: P5 44 54 54 Low Negligible

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:200: P6 43 47 49 No impact Negligible

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:200: P7 34 <30 36 No impact Negligible

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:200: P8 27 <30 32 No impact Negligible

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:200: P9 33 45 45 No impact Negligible

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:200: P10 50 47 52 Low Negligible

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:200: P11 20 <30 30 No impact Negligible

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:200: no impact / low and, consequently, a negligible impact at all residential and ecological receptors is

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:200: P1 28 30 32 No impact Negligible

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:200: P2 27 25 29 No impact Negligible

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:200: P3 29 30 33 No impact Negligible

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:201:P4 28 30 32 No impact Negligible

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:201:P5 48 40 49 No impact Negligible

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:201:P6 49 40 50 Low Negligible

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:201:P7 43 35 44 No impact Negligible

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:201:P8 34 35 38 No impact Negligible

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:201:P9 39 40 43 No impact Negligible

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:201:P10 54 40 54 Low Negligible

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:201:P11 30 35 36 No impact Negligible

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:201:P1 16 35 35 No impact Negligible

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:201:P2 21 30 31 No impact Negligible

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:201:P3 20 30 30 No impact Negligible

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:201:P4 16 30 30 No impact Negligible

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:201:P5 44 45 48 No impact Negligible

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:201:P6 43 50 51 Low Negligible

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:201:P7 34 50 50 Low Negligible

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:201:P8 27 45 45 No impact Negligible

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:201:P9 33 50 50 Low Negligible

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:201:P10 50 50 53 Low Negligible

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:201:P11 20 40 40 No impact Negligible

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:202: consequently, a negligible impact at all residential and ecological receptors is expected.

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:210:19.2.2 All of the above were predicted, after the implementation of appropriate mitigation, to be of negligible or

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:211: bedrock mudstone aquifer and, when combined with the negligible and minor impacts due to the YPP

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:211: for projects to adhere to environmental best practice, when combined with the negligible and minor

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:212: contaminants, but there was a negligible risk to deeper groundwater in the bedrock mudstone aquifer.

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:212: Harbour facilities combined with non-YPP developments) is predicted to be of negligible significance.

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:213: predicted to be of negligible significance (with a low risk of arising). Impacts associated with

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:213: contaminated runoff and leachates from the landfill have also been predicted to be of negligible

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:213: impact on the water quality in Bran Sands lagoon and Dabholm Gut is predicted to be of negligible

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:213: Section 9 as being of negligible significance. Using the same methodology, the cumulative effect of

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:213: negligible.

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:220: components at Wilton and the Harbour facilities are, therefore, predicted to be of negligible significance.

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:220: schemes is, therefore, also predicted to be negligible.

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:220: designs and, as such, are predicted to be of negligible significance. They would not, therefore,

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:220: negligible significance and would not result in deterioration of the status of any of the surface water

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:221: to be negligible. The cumulative impact would not result in deterioration of the status of any of the

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:226: However, all of the habitats are considered to be of negligible or low nature conservation value.

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:226: with respect to habitat loss are predicted to be of negligible significance.

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:226: residual cumulative impact of negligible significance is predicted.

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:229: between the YPP and non-YPP developments are, therefore, predicted to be of negligible significance

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:235: would include distant areas within the NYMNP where negligible or imperceptible impacts would be

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:235: winding towers from other areas of moorland would result in a negligible and minor adverse impact

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:237: these wider areas would range between negligible and minor adverse; with the winding towers

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:238: tower would be possible from the A169 at Goathland Moor, resulting in negligible to minor adverse

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:239:22.3.50 After passing the Lockwood Beck site, a range of no change, negligible adverse and minor adverse

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:240:22.3.63 Between Lady Cross and Freebrough Farm, intermittent negligible adverse and minor adverse

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:242: winding towers would result in negligible and minor adverse impacts.

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:246: resulting from the YPP, including the Harbour facilities, would have a negligible (if any) influence on this

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:249: negligible significance is predicted.

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:264: were predicted to be either zero or negligible. No means were identified by which the scheme could

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:271: dredging programme in the Tees estuary is, therefore, predicted to be of negligible significance.

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:274: of negligible significance.

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:274: communities would be of negligible significance.

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:274: effect of the projects in isolation and, therefore, a cumulative impact of negligible significance is

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:275: populations would be of negligible significance.

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:275: morphology, with the proposed scheme having a negligible effect on deposition of sediment in the berth

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:279: response in fish and, therefore, a cumulative impact of negligible significance is predicted on feeding

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:279: would be of negligible significance.

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:279: would be of negligible significance at all locations.

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:281: works, but the potential cumulative impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:281: the EIA concluded that that there would be an impact of negligible significance on existing and new

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:282: background movements and the cumulative impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:11: to the fact that there is negligible sediment release from an enclosed grab). The modelling used two

TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:11: is shown over the intertidal areas, leading to a prediction of negligible sediment being able to deposit on

TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:22: negligible effect on tidal propagation and water levels. Phase 2 would represent the maximum effect of

TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:32:5.6.24 The results for the post-development cases show a negligible effect on the overall import of fine

TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:34:operations. Negligible sediment is predicted to deposit on the intertidal areas.

TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:34: x A negligible effect on tidal propagation and water levels is predicted.

I&BPB6776R001F01_NGCT scoping document.pdf:8: proposed to revisit the construction traffic demand as the impacts were previously assessed as negligible.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:26: field in which the effects of the boundaries are negligible

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:49:Negligible The impact is not of concern

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:96: rotation in the North Sea, compared with a deviation to Felixstowe, are negligible.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:97: rotation in the North Sea, compared with a deviation to Felixstowe, are negligible.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:125: be negligible.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:125: would be negligible. This conclusion is based on the fact that, in order to make

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:125: considered to be negligible in terms of difference in potential environmental impact.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:129: of negligible significance associated with the re-suspension of contaminated

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:130: Risk to human Low Medium Negligible During construction workers will

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:130: Risk to deep Negligible Negligible Negligible Deep groundwater currently

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:131: Risk to Low Low Negligible Since neighbouring properties

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:132: to be negligible. Should the Bran Sands lagoon site be reclaimed using dredged

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:132: mitigate this potential impact to being of negligible significance. Once operational,

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:132: negligible changes are predicted to occur on the waterbird population of Seal Sands

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:132: predicted to have a negligible impact on waterbird populations.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:132: minor adverse significance. Impacts of negligible significance are predicted to occur

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:138: as of negligible significance.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:138: these are anticipated to be of negligible significance but in the case of sulphur

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:138: road. Overall cumulative impacts were found to be of negligible significance.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:139: on sensitive receptors is predicted to be of negligible significance.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:139: the container port will have a negligible impact on residential properties and hence

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:139: movements and the impact of increased rail travel was also found to be negligible in

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:141: tidal ranges is predicted to be negligible. However a minor adverse impact is

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:179: Climate Change To reduce the causes of adverse climate change There are negligible impacts associated with the proposed development, although the proposed -

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:179: Reduction in Waste To reduce the amount of waste produced and increase the amount The proposed development would have a negligible impact on overall levels of recycling in the -

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:180: Provision of Equitable To ensure that the housing needs and aspirations of the community There are negligible impacts associated with the proposed development, although the -

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:180: Provision of Equitable To raise educational achievement across the region There are negligible impacts associated with the proposed development, although the -

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:180: Crime Reduction To create safe communities There are negligible impacts associated with the proposed development, although the -

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:180: Promotion of a Healthy To provide opportunities for physical activity to promote healthy There are negligible impacts associated with the proposed development, although the -

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:181: To increase public involvement in decision making and civic activity There are negligible impacts associated with the proposed development. -

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:181: To maintain and improve the accessibility and quality of key services There are negligible impacts associated with the proposed development.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:181: To encourage in accessible locations the provision of sport, There are negligible impacts associated with the proposed development.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:181: Promotion of To provide reliable, efficient and convenient public transport in There are negligible impacts associated with the proposed development.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:182: Employment Base To diversify the economy of the rural areas There are negligible impacts associated with the proposed development. -

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:183: To promote the growth of tourism There are negligible impacts associated with the proposed development. -

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:211: Freshwater discharge at the time was negligible. The model was further

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:232: design changes are of very small magnitude and are considered negligible in

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:256: deemed to be of negligible significance.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:256: impact would be of negligible significance.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:257: Seal Sands is therefore predicted to be of negligible significance.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:257: impact would be of negligible significance.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:259: aquifer of negligible permeability. It is probable that shallow groundwater within

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:272: Negligible risk ƒ If contamination sources are present they are considered to be minor in

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:274: non-aquifer of negligible permeability, and which is likely to restrict the vertical

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:275: Risk to deep groundwater Negligible Any deep groundwater at the site is protected by the relatively

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:276: non-aquifer of negligible permeability, and which is likely to restrict the vertical

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:277: Risk to deep groundwater Negligible Any deep groundwater at the site is protected by the relatively

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:279: to negligible.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:279: be low to negligible.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:279: non-aquifer of negligible permeability, and which is likely to restrict the vertical

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:280: Risk to human health – Negligible Following redevelopment, the site will be entirely covered by hardstanding,

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:280: Risk to deep groundwater Negligible Any deep groundwater at the site is protected by the relatively impermeable

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:280: Risk to neighbouring Negligible Neighbouring properties are largely industrial and hence are considered to be

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:305: predicted to be of negligible significance.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:305: negligible significance.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:324: 5. Given the above, an impact of negligible significance on benthic community

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:324: 6. No mitigation is possible and the residual impact would be of negligible

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:324: negligible significance is predicted.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:324: 3. No mitigation is possible and the residual impact would be of negligible

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:325: negligible significance would arise, with no impact on these communities in

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:325: be of negligible significance.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:326: suspended sediment concentrations is considered to be of negligible

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:326: 5. No mitigation is required and the residual impact would be of negligible

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:328: negligible significance.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:328: negligible significance.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:330: of negligible significance.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:330: negligible significance.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:351: considered to be of negligible significance. It is considered that predicted

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:351: development, with an impact of negligible significance at North Tees mudflat.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:352: judged to be of negligible significance at worst.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:352: negligible significance.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:353: of negligible significance given that there is a reasonably high degree of

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:354: habitats for feeding waterbirds is predicted to be of negligible significance.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:355: residual impact of negligible significance (Seal Sands) and no residual

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:355: of negligible significance.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:355: negligible significance.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:356: assessed to be of negligible significance for North Gare Sands, Bran Sands

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:356: no other mitigation is possible. The residual impact would be of negligible

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:362: dredger is therefore predicted to be of negligible significance on breeding

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:362: negligible significance.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:363: of negligible significance.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:363: negligible significance.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:369: negligible significance.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:369: negligible significance.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:372: predicted to be of negligible significance.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:372: negligible significance is predicted.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:373: predicted to be of negligible significance.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:374: residual impact would be of negligible significance.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:378: 3. Overall, it is considered that there would be an impact of negligible

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:378: Harbour Master are required and the residual impact would be of negligible

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:384: negligible archaeological or heritage value. The site visit confirmed that these

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:388: activities are predicted to be of negligible significance.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:389: based recreation is expected to be of negligible significance, with no residual

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:392: potential impact of negligible significance.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:392: negligible significance.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:397: per year. It is concluded that this predicted impact is of negligible significance.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:397: 3. No mitigation is required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:402: accommodate this increased traffic, the impact is considered to be of negligible

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:402: 14. No mitigation is required and the residual impact will be of negligible

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:414: construction will have a negligible, short term and reversible impact during

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:417: negligible significance, particularly given the temporary nature of the effect.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:417: to be of negligible significance.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:417: Therefore, the residual impacts will be of negligible significance (Seal Sands)

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:419: negligible significance, with no overall effect on the estuarine populations of

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:419: would be of negligible significance.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:420: the proposed development is predicted to be of negligible significance.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:420: negligible significance.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:422: negligible impact on the nearest properties on Bolckow Road, when compared

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:422: 16. No mitigation measures are required therefore the impact remains at negligible.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:424: movements on the line past the Navigation Public House are negligible.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:424: to be negligible.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:424: 10. No mitigation measures are required therefore the impact remains at negligible.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:436: an impact of negligible significance is predicted.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:437: 5. Although the predicted impacts are negligible, dust emissions during demolition

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:437: 6. The residual impacts are predicted to be of negligible significance.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:438: involved is considered to be negligible in comparison to the existing traffic and

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:439: quality objective of 20µg.m-3, these impacts are considered to be of negligible

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:439: 50µg.m-3, these impacts are considered to be of negligible significance.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:440: objective of 50µg.m-3, these impacts are considered to be of negligible

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:440: of negligible significance.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:440: considered to be of negligible significance.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:440: 0.02kg.Ha-1; this is considered to be of negligible significance.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:440: scenario, is only 0.005keq.Ha-1; this is considered to be of negligible

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:444: achieved and the effect of the development on this is negligible for both the 70%

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:445: impacts are considered to be of negligible significance.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:445: considered to be of negligible significance.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:445: impacts are considered to be of negligible significance.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:445: considered to be of negligible significance.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:445: to be of negligible significance.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:446: considered to be of negligible significance.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:446: 0.02kg.Ha-1; this is considered to be of negligible significance.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:446: negligible significance. The impact for Phase 2 is lower than that of Phase 1

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:447: 40µg.m-3 and impact of the development was predicted to be negligible here.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:447: considered to be of negligible significance.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:447:Construction NO2 Short-term Adverse Negligible

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:447: PM10 Short-term Adverse Negligible

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:447: CO Short-term Adverse Negligible

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:447: Nitrogen Deposition Short-term Adverse Negligible

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:447: Acid Deposition Short-term Adverse Negligible

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:447: PM10 Long-term Adverse Negligible

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:447:Equipment & PM10 Long-term Adverse Negligible

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:447:Shipping SO2 Long-term Adverse Negligible

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:447: CO Long-term Adverse Negligible

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:447: Nitrogen Deposition Long-term Adverse Negligible

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:447: Acid Deposition Long-term Adverse Negligible

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:449: considered to be of negligible significance.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:449: are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:454: are considered to be of negligible significance and would not affect the

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:454: negligible significance.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:454: and show a similar negligible effect on water levels with the proposed

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:455: Section 22.3.2 and, therefore, the effect remains of negligible significance on

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:455: negligible significance.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:472: based jobs; the displacement of existing jobs, however, is negligible.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:488: of maintenance dredgings and there will be a negligible effect on suspended

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:488: 3. Overall, the potential impact would be of negligible significance given that

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:488: negligible significance.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:494:Impact of dispersion and Negligible None possible Negligible

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:494:Remobilisation, dispersion and Negligible None possible Negligible

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:496:Potential effects on water Negligible None required Negligible

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:497:Potential smothering effect Negligible None possible Negligible

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:497:Potential deposition of fine Negligible None possible Negligible

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:497:Potential smothering effect Negligible in the short term. No impact in the long term None possible Negligible in the short term.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:497:Implications for benthic intertidal Negligible None required Negligible

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:498:Potential impact on marine Negligible None required Negligible

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:498:Effect of increased supply of Negligible None required Negligible

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:499:habitats available to feeding development. Impact of negligible significance at North Tees downstream of the

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:499:effect on tidal prism negligible significance at

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:499:Effect of increased suspended Negligible None required Negligible

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:499:Loss of waterbird interest within Moderate adverse It is proposed that some of the Negligible to minor adverse

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:499:Potential effect on the Negligible impact is predicted for intertidal morphology and None required Negligible impact is predicted

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:499:Potential effect of increased Negligible None required Negligible

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:499:Potential disturbance to feeding An impact of negligible is predicted for North Gare Sands None possible An impact of negligible is

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:500:Potential for indirect effects on Negligible None possible Negligible

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:500:Direct loss of ecological interest Negligible None required Negligible

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:501:Direct uptake and disturbance Negligible None possible Negligible

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:501:Effect of construction light on Negligible Lighting will be directed away Negligible

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:501:Effect of lighting for the Negligible None required Negligible

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:502:Potential for delays due to Negligible None required Negligible

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:503:Potential impact on water-based Negligible significance is predicted for marine activities. No Notice to mariners will be Negligible significance is

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:503:Impact of construction traffic on Negligible None possible Negligible

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:504:Impacts of increased traffic Negligible None required Negligible

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:504:Potential for additional rail traffic Negligible None required Negligible

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:504:Impacts on ambient noise levels Negligible to no impact depending on location of sensitive No specific mitigation will be No impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:505:Impacts of piling on sites and Negligible to minor adverse depending on location of site None required. Negligible to minor adverse

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:505:Impacts associated with Negligible None required Negligible

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:505:Potential impacts on features of Negligible None required Negligible

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:505:Impact of increased operational Negligible None required No impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:505:Impact of increased rail traffic Negligible None required No impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:506:Generation of dust during Negligible A number of mitigation Negligible

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:506:Emission of pollutants from Negligible None required Negligible

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:506:Emission of pollutants from During phase 1 the impact is deemed to be of negligible The assessment has During phase 1 the impact is

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:506:construction plant: sulphur significance. During phase 2, the impact is deemed to be of considered the benefits deemed to be of negligible

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:506:Emission of pollutants from Negligible None required Negligible

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:507:Emission of pollutants from Negligible None required Negligible

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:507:Emission of pollutants from Negligible None required Negligible

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:507:Emission of pollutants due to Negligible None required Negligible

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:507:Emission of pollutants due to Negligible None required Negligible

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:507:Emission of pollutants due to Negligible None required Negligible

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:507:Emission of pollutants due to Negligible None required Negligible

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:507:Emission of pollutants due to Negligible None required Negligible

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:508:Impact on the visual character Negligible None required Negligible

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:508:Potential for effect on risk of Negligible None required Negligible

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:508:Consideration of the effect of Negligible None required Negligible

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:510:Implications for marine ecology Negligible None required Negligible

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:518:Shallow coastal Food availability Presence and abundance of prey The capital dredging is predicted to N/A None Negligible No effect

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:518: Extent and No decrease in extent from an The scheme is not predicted to result N/A None Negligible Strictly, the extent

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:522: Disturbance No significant reduction in It is considered that shipwash N/A None Negligible No effect

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:522: Extent and No decrease in extent from an The proposed scheme is not predicted N/A None Negligible No effect

20171212 MMO Letter with additional comments Teesport Scoping.pdf:3:vibration and air populations is expected to be of negligible significance, with no

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:39:negligible.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:40:concluded that any difference in environmental impact would be negligible. This conclusion is based on the

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:40:phase of 500m. A decrease of 200m in the first phase is considered to be negligible in terms of difference

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:53: High Major Moderate Moderate Minor Negligible

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:53: Medium Moderate Moderate Minor Minor Negligible

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:53: Low Minor Minor Minor Negligible Negligible

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:53: Very low Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:53:Whilst mitigation for minor or negligible impacts may not be specifically defined as a matter of course,

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:53:recognised that minor and negligible impacts could become significant when considered cumulatively with

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:93:is considered to be low and the potential impact is deemed to be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:95:The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:96:concluded that there would be an impact of negligible significance on water quality given that the overall

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:96:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:98:predicted to be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:98:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:129:negligible significance is predicted.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:129:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:130:Given the above, an impact of negligible significance on benthic community structure is predicted to arise

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:130:and redistribution). Consequently, an impact of negligible significance is predicted

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:130:of this potential impact, it is concluded that an overall impact of negligible significance would arise, with no

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:130:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance. Although

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:134:communities due to changes in the hydraulic regime is predicted to be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:134:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:135:negligible significance is predicted.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:135:No mitigation measures are required, and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:136:Enteromorpha colonisation. The overall impact of the scheme is predicted to be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:136:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:137:Based on the above, it is concluded that there would be an impact of negligible significance on the benthic

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:137:No mitigation measures are required, and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:138:negligible.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:138:No mitigation measures are required, and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:158:of the dredger would be negligible in terms of reductions in foraging ability, as the predicted increases in

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:160:be of negligible significance given the very small area of intertidal to be affected on certain states of the

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:160:intertidal areas downstream of the proposed scheme, and a residual impact of negligible significance at

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:162:construction related noise disturbance to waterbirds will be negligible.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:163:will result in an impact of negligible significance to feeding waterbirds.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:163:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:164:waterbirds is predicted to be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:165:No mitigation measures are possible and it is predicted that there would be a residual impact of negligible

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:165:consequently the potential impact on waterbird populations is considered to be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:165:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:165:Overall, the potential additional impact associated with the proposed scheme is assessed to be of negligible

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:166:residual impact would be of negligible significance for waterbirds at North Gare Sands, Bran Sands and

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:166:dredge frequency is predicted, an impact of negligible significance is predicted to the feeding resource of

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:166:that can be implemented. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:166:significance of the potential impact. Hence it is concluded that the impact would be of negligible

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:167:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:167:As a result, it is concluded that there would be an impact of negligible significance on feeding waterbirds

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:183: below 120m are negligible.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:183: size classes show huge negligible in the North Sea. hide from predators. The preference for sandy to April depending on spawning populations that mix during bivalves. Larger individuals feed on

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:184: becoming negligible beyond 70m bivalves and crustaceans, but the

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:186:negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:186:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:190:negligible.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:190:impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:190:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of negligible significance. However,

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:191:fishing activities. As discussed in Section 13.5, there would be an impact of negligible significance of

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:193:The recovery in the operational phase is predicted to be of negligible significance for the benthic community,

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:193:and consequently, an impact of negligible significance is predicted on the feeding resource for fish due to

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:193:elsewhere throughout the Tees estuary, an impact of negligible significance is predicted.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:193:would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:194:predicted to be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:194:pollution, no mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:194:due to noise disturbance would be very low; an impact of negligible significance is anticipated.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:194:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:199:receptor. The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible significance on

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:199:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:200:traffic as a result of the proposed scheme would be negligible.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:200:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:201:negligible significance. Therefore, the scope of the TS was confined to the operational phase of the

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:210:conflict between recreational vessels and the construction activities are predicted to be of negligible

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:210:for the construction phase of the works. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:219:negligible significance and would not affect the integrity of any flood defences at this location or throughout

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:220:are only very marginally affected by the input of river flows and show a similar negligible effect on water

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:220:not change the conclusions drawn above and, therefore, an effect of negligible significance is predicted on

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:220:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:226:negligible significance is predicted to both abstractions.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:226:intake and a residual impact of negligible significance at the Corus and Tees Bulk Handling abstractions.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:253:of maintenance dredged material and there will be a negligible effect on SSC outside of the boundary of the

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:256:negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:256:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:257:dredge disposal operations). Overall, the potential impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:257:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:272:therefore, is predicted to be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:273:impact is predicted to be negligible.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:274:cumulative impact of negligible significance is predicted on feeding waterbirds.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:274:operational noise impact will be of negligible significance at all locations.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:275:to significantly reduce noise levels to birds in Bran Sands lagoon (a residual impact of negligible significance

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:275:at worst is predicted for both schemes). The residual cumulative impact is considered to be of negligible

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:275:cumulative impact of negligible significance is predicted.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:276:works, but the potential cumulative impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:276:in the estuary. As detailed in Section 13, this impact is considered to be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:276:cumulative impact of negligible significance will arise. All vessel traffic in the Tees estuary and Tees Bay is

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:276:will have no impact on fisheries, a negligible impact on marine ecology and no impact on navigation; hence,

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:297:will result in an additional 191 vessel calls per year at the port terminal) will result in a negligible underwater

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:297:by ongoing shipping activity), it is concluded that the impact from NGCT will also be negligible. No effect is

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:298:of the dredger would be negligible in terms of reductions in foraging ability, as the predicted increases in

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:301:around noisy plant, with a predicted impact of negligible significance (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2017). Should

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:301:Facilities (which are closer to the lagoon than the site of the NGCT) and were predicted to have a negligible

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:303:resource for terns due to a change in water quality is predicted to be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:303:sediment or habitat change) and the conclusion of the NGCT assessment (i.e. negligible effect on feeding

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:329:vibration and air populations is expected to be of negligible significance, with no

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:361: Freshwater discharge at the time was negligible. The model was further

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:382: design changes are of very small magnitude and are considered negligible in

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:567: represent an impact of negligible significance. Therefore, the scope of this TS is confined to the

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:581: demand will have an impact of negligible significance. Therefore the scope of this TS was

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:638:scheme. An impact of negligible significance is predicted. The EIA Report concludes that proposed

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:638:spill and an impact of negligible significance is predicted. No further mitigation measures beyond those

20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:14:redistribution of suspended solids would lead residual impacts of negligible

20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:19:and effect of negligible significant for all other factors cumulatively and in-

20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:21:Based on the above, it was concluded that there would be an impact of negligible

20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:25:sediment would be negligible. The applicant also noted that the effect of the dredging

20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:26:is predicted to have an impact of negligible significance on commercial navigation

20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:26:negligible significance.

20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:27:minor/negligible without mitigation and negligible with mitigation.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:39:negligible.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:40:concluded that any difference in environmental impact would be negligible. This conclusion is based on the

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:40:phase of 500m. A decrease of 200m in the first phase is considered to be negligible in terms of difference

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:53: High Major Moderate Moderate Minor Negligible

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:53: Medium Moderate Moderate Minor Minor Negligible

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:53: Low Minor Minor Minor Negligible Negligible

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:53: Very low Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:53:Whilst mitigation for minor or negligible impacts may not be specifically defined as a matter of course,

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:53:recognised that minor and negligible impacts could become significant when considered cumulatively with

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:93:is considered to be low and the potential impact is deemed to be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:95:The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:96:concluded that there would be an impact of negligible significance on water quality given that the overall

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:96:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:98:predicted to be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:98:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:129:negligible significance is predicted.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:129:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:130:Given the above, an impact of negligible significance on benthic community structure is predicted to arise

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:130:and redistribution). Consequently, an impact of negligible significance is predicted

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:130:of this potential impact, it is concluded that an overall impact of negligible significance would arise, with no

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:130:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance. Although

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:134:communities due to changes in the hydraulic regime is predicted to be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:134:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:135:negligible significance is predicted.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:135:No mitigation measures are required, and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:136:Enteromorpha colonisation. The overall impact of the scheme is predicted to be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:136:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:137:Based on the above, it is concluded that there would be an impact of negligible significance on the benthic

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:137:No mitigation measures are required, and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:138:negligible.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:138:No mitigation measures are required, and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:158:of the dredger would be negligible in terms of reductions in foraging ability, as the predicted increases in

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:160:be of negligible significance given the very small area of intertidal to be affected on certain states of the

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:160:intertidal areas downstream of the proposed scheme, and a residual impact of negligible significance at

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:162:construction related noise disturbance to waterbirds will be negligible.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:163:will result in an impact of negligible significance to feeding waterbirds.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:163:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:164:waterbirds is predicted to be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:165:No mitigation measures are possible and it is predicted that there would be a residual impact of negligible

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:165:consequently the potential impact on waterbird populations is considered to be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:165:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:165:Overall, the potential additional impact associated with the proposed scheme is assessed to be of negligible

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:166:residual impact would be of negligible significance for waterbirds at North Gare Sands, Bran Sands and

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:166:dredge frequency is predicted, an impact of negligible significance is predicted to the feeding resource of

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:166:that can be implemented. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:166:significance of the potential impact. Hence it is concluded that the impact would be of negligible

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:167:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:167:As a result, it is concluded that there would be an impact of negligible significance on feeding waterbirds

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:183: below 120m are negligible.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:183: size classes show huge negligible in the North Sea. hide from predators. The preference for sandy to April depending on spawning populations that mix during bivalves. Larger individuals feed on

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:184: becoming negligible beyond 70m bivalves and crustaceans, but the

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:186:negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:186:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:190:negligible.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:190:impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:190:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of negligible significance. However,

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:191:fishing activities. As discussed in Section 13.5, there would be an impact of negligible significance of

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:193:The recovery in the operational phase is predicted to be of negligible significance for the benthic community,

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:193:and consequently, an impact of negligible significance is predicted on the feeding resource for fish due to

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:193:elsewhere throughout the Tees estuary, an impact of negligible significance is predicted.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:193:would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:194:predicted to be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:194:pollution, no mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:194:due to noise disturbance would be very low; an impact of negligible significance is anticipated.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:194:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:199:receptor. The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible significance on

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:199:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:200:traffic as a result of the proposed scheme would be negligible.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:200:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:201:negligible significance. Therefore, the scope of the TS was confined to the operational phase of the

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:210:conflict between recreational vessels and the construction activities are predicted to be of negligible

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:210:for the construction phase of the works. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:219:negligible significance and would not affect the integrity of any flood defences at this location or throughout

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:220:are only very marginally affected by the input of river flows and show a similar negligible effect on water

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:220:not change the conclusions drawn above and, therefore, an effect of negligible significance is predicted on

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:220:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:226:negligible significance is predicted to both abstractions.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:226:intake and a residual impact of negligible significance at the Corus and Tees Bulk Handling abstractions.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:253:of maintenance dredged material and there will be a negligible effect on SSC outside of the boundary of the

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:256:negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:256:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:257:dredge disposal operations). Overall, the potential impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:257:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:272:therefore, is predicted to be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:273:impact is predicted to be negligible.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:274:cumulative impact of negligible significance is predicted on feeding waterbirds.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:274:operational noise impact will be of negligible significance at all locations.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:275:to significantly reduce noise levels to birds in Bran Sands lagoon (a residual impact of negligible significance

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:275:at worst is predicted for both schemes). The residual cumulative impact is considered to be of negligible

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:275:cumulative impact of negligible significance is predicted.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:276:works, but the potential cumulative impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:276:in the estuary. As detailed in Section 13, this impact is considered to be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:276:cumulative impact of negligible significance will arise. All vessel traffic in the Tees estuary and Tees Bay is

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:276:will have no impact on fisheries, a negligible impact on marine ecology and no impact on navigation; hence,

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:297:will result in an additional 191 vessel calls per year at the port terminal) will result in a negligible underwater

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:297:by ongoing shipping activity), it is concluded that the impact from NGCT will also be negligible. No effect is

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:298:of the dredger would be negligible in terms of reductions in foraging ability, as the predicted increases in

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:301:around noisy plant, with a predicted impact of negligible significance (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2017). Should

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:301:Facilities (which are closer to the lagoon than the site of the NGCT) and were predicted to have a negligible

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:303:resource for terns due to a change in water quality is predicted to be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:303:sediment or habitat change) and the conclusion of the NGCT assessment (i.e. negligible effect on feeding

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:329:vibration and air populations is expected to be of negligible significance, with no

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:361: Freshwater discharge at the time was negligible. The model was further

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:382: design changes are of very small magnitude and are considered negligible in

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:567: represent an impact of negligible significance. Therefore, the scope of this TS is confined to the

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:581: demand will have an impact of negligible significance. Therefore the scope of this TS was

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:638:scheme. An impact of negligible significance is predicted. The EIA Report concludes that proposed

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:638:spill and an impact of negligible significance is predicted. No further mitigation measures beyond those

PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:8:concluded that any difference in environmental impact would be negligible. The phasing of the development

PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:11:All construction phase impacts are of minor adverse significance or negligible, with the exception of

PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:12:All of the above potential impacts have been assessed as either minor adverse, negligible or of no impact,

PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:13:All other potential impacts predicted to arise during the operational phase are of negligible significance or

PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:13:Impacts to fish as a result of direct uptake during dredging is considered to be of negligible significance, as

PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:13:Construction lighting is predicted to result in an impact of negligible significance to fish. No impact to fishing

PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:13:All potential impacts which could arise during the operational phase are of negligible significance.

PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:14:appropriate signals as required by International Regulations to allow safe navigation. An impact of negligible

PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:15:All impacts during construction and operation are predicted to be of negligible significance at worst.

PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:15:be an impact of negligible significance with regard to tidal flooding elsewhere in the estuary system.

PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:16:would be a worst case impact of negligible significance on surface water intakes in the Tees during capital

PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:17:activity. An impact of negligible significance is predicted on marine ecology due to smothering of existing

PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:17:Sands lagoon (a residual impact of negligible significance at worst is predicted for both schemes). The

PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:17:residual cumulative impact is considered to be of negligible significance.

PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:18:A cumulative impact of negligible significance is predicted to fish and fisheries and commercial navigation.

Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:14:redistribution of suspended solids would lead residual impacts of negligible

Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:19:and effect of negligible significant for all other factors cumulatively and in-

Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:21:Based on the above, it was concluded that there would be an impact of negligible

Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:25:sediment would be negligible. The applicant also noted that the effect of the dredging

Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:26:is predicted to have an impact of negligible significance on commercial navigation

Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:26:negligible significance.

Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:27:minor/negligible without mitigation and negligible with mitigation.

MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:26:from these activities are considered to be negligible and not considered further.

MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:26:from these activities are considered to be negligible and not considered further.

Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:16:exist and the tidal influence is negligible. The long distance upstream of the study area ensures

Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:40:is seen, a decrease of 0.003 %, which is negligible. The impacts on the hydrodynamic regime

Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:40:hydrodynamic regime are negligible.

Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:43:is a decrease of 13 %. At Pt 7 Teesport the figure is 0.01 % which is negligible. Again,

Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:43:negligible.

Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:51:for sand concentrations between the different scenarios are negligible.

Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:72:NC Negligible Concentration. Concentration below which the risk of the

Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:72: ecosystem is considered negligible (/20/).

Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:72: risk of the ecosystem is considered negligible.

Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:73:Table 8-2 Maximum Permissible Concentrations (MPC) and Negligible Concentrations

Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:73:Table 8-3 Maximum Permissible Concentrations (MPC) and Negligible Concentrations

Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:84: Permissible Concentrations and Negligible Concentrations for metals, tacking

Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:95:thresholds are given as Negligible Concentration (NC) and Maximum Permissible

Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:95:thresholds are given as Negligible Concentration (NC) and Maximum Permissible

Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:96:thresholds are given as Negligible Concentration (NC) and Maximum Permissible

Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:96:thresholds are given as Negligible Concentration (NC) and Maximum Permissible

Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:97:are given as Negligible Concentration (NC) and Maximum Permissible Concentration

Appendix 16.1d 2006-0416 V01 - Scenario 11 hydrodynamics.pdf:5:the channel floor. In Tees channel the differences are negligible.

3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:131:exist and the tidal influence is negligible. The long distance upstream of the study area ensures

3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:155:is seen, a decrease of 0.003 %, which is negligible. The impacts on the hydrodynamic regime

3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:155:hydrodynamic regime are negligible.

3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:158:is a decrease of 13 %. At Pt 7 Teesport the figure is 0.01 % which is negligible. Again,

3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:158:negligible.

3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:166:for sand concentrations between the different scenarios are negligible.

3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:187:NC Negligible Concentration. Concentration below which the risk of the

3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:187: ecosystem is considered negligible (/20/).

3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:187: risk of the ecosystem is considered negligible.

3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:188:Table 8-2 Maximum Permissible Concentrations (MPC) and Negligible Concentrations

3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:188:Table 8-3 Maximum Permissible Concentrations (MPC) and Negligible Concentrations

3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:199: Permissible Concentrations and Negligible Concentrations for metals, tacking

3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:210:thresholds are given as Negligible Concentration (NC) and Maximum Permissible

3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:210:thresholds are given as Negligible Concentration (NC) and Maximum Permissible

3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:211:thresholds are given as Negligible Concentration (NC) and Maximum Permissible

3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:211:thresholds are given as Negligible Concentration (NC) and Maximum Permissible

3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:212:are given as Negligible Concentration (NC) and Maximum Permissible Concentration

1911South-Tees-Master-Plan-Nov-19.2.pdf:56: have negligible to low potential to support this species. 2.12.9 INVERTEBRATES

20210119 MLA202000506 Tees South Bank Quay CP advice + JPQC.pdf:3: shows a greater number of minor or negligible outcomes relative to more significant categories

MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA phase 1 and 2.pdf:9: clarity is likely to be negligible and not sufficient to cause far-field

MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA phase 1 and 2.pdf:9: • Wigeon likely to be negligible and not sufficient to cause far-field effects on

MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA phase 1 and 2.pdf:10: changes in hydrodynamics and waves is likely to be negligible and

MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA phase 1 and 2.pdf:13: be negligible and not sufficient to cause far-field effects on the

MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA phase 1 and 2.pdf:15: The magnitude of changes in is likely to be negligible and not

MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA phase 1 and 2.pdf:19: likely to be negligible and not sufficient to cause far-field effects on

MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:9: clarity is likely to be negligible and not sufficient to cause far-field

MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:10: • Sanderling likely to be negligible and not sufficient to cause far-field effects on

MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:10: changes in hydrodynamics and waves is likely to be negligible and

MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:13: be negligible and not sufficient to cause far-field effects on the

MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:15: The magnitude of changes is negligible and not sufficient to cause

MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:19: likely to be negligible and not sufficient to cause far-field effects on

MLA202000506 & MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phases 1&2 UWN advice + JPQC.pdf:4: a result of underwater noise has been assessed as negligible and the assessment concludes that no

MLA202000506 & MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phases 1&2 UWN advice + JPQC.pdf:4: periods of time sufficient to cause TTS or PTS. Disturbance has been assessed as negligible, although I

20210115 MLA202000506 South Bank Quay-phase 1 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:8: injury and/or temporary threshold shift (TTS) are considered negligible. I defer to Cefas underwater

MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA.pdf:9: clarity is likely to be negligible and not sufficient to cause far-field

MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA.pdf:9: • Lapwing likely to be negligible and not sufficient to cause far-field effects on

MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA.pdf:10: changes in hydrodynamics and waves is likely to be negligible and

MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA.pdf:12: be negligible and not sufficient to cause far-field effects on the

MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA.pdf:15: The magnitude of changes is negligible and not sufficient to cause

MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA.pdf:18: likely to be negligible and not sufficient to cause far-field effects on

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:48: High Major Moderate Moderate Minor Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:48: Medium Moderate Moderate Minor Minor Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:48: Low Minor Minor Minor Negligible Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:48: Very low Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:48:Whilst mitigation for minor or negligible impacts may not be specifically defined as a matter of course,

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:48:recognised that minor and negligible impacts could become significant when considered cumulatively with

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:112:3, the values are so low (<5mg/l) as to be negligible compared with background levels and, in all cases, the

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:112:water quality sampling points during Stage 3 of the dredging and only negligible effects for a short duration

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:112:Stages 3 and 4 of the dredging, only negligible effects are noted, equivalent to variations within the

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:118:as to be negligible in such a great depth of water in this deep water offshore area).

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:122:enhancement is so small in magnitude and spatial extent as to be negligible in such a great depth of water

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:126:is negligible, whilst to the north it covers a similar zone to the sediment plume for this disposal event, which

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:126:0.1cm. Clearly these magnitudes are extremely low within the licenced disposal site, and negligible beyond.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:126:magnitudes, with negligible changes anticipated beyond the boundaries of the site.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:167:is considered to be medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:167:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:167:impact is of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:167:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:168:be medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:168:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:168:considered to be medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:168:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:174: negligible. As there are no designated

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:175:Negligible Is generally tolerant of physical or chemical changes

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:177:temporary change, indiscernible • negligible change to existing risk of exposure; or

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:178: Moderate Minor Minor Negligible Negligible Minor Minor Moderate

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:178: Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Minor

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:178:(negligible) impacts as they may contribute to significant impacts cumulatively or through interactions.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:178:Negligible Very small changes in receptor condition (adverse or beneficial), which may be raised as local issues

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:180:the geological sensitivity is considered to be negligible. As there are no designated geological sites recorded

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:186:during construction is considered to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:186:No mitigation measures are required and residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:188:overall impact during construction is considered to be of negligible to minor adverse significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:188:negligible to minor adverse significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:189:very low. Thus, the impact to human receptors is of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:189:No additional mitigation measures required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:190:very low and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:212:impact of negligible significance is predicted.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:212:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:214:Given the above, an impact of negligible significance on marine species and habitats is predicted to arise

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:214:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:215:and tidal regime is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:215:No mitigation measures are required, and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:221: Negligible / very

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:234: 0.0003 harbour porpoise Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:234: 0.000003 minke whale Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:234: dredging 0.00000024 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:234: 0.0000009 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:234:The magnitude of the potential impact of PTS as a result of dredging noise is negligible / very low for harbour

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:234:seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.10).

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:234: Harbour Negligible / Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:234: Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:234: Auditory injury Negligible / Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:234: (PTS) from Minke whale Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:234: Negligible / required. Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:234: SEL during Grey seal Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:234: Negligible / Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:234: Harbour seal Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:235:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:236: Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:236: 0.000003 minke whale Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:236: underwater noise 0.00000024 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:236: 0.0000009 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:236:The magnitude of the potential impact of TTS and fleeing response as a result of dredging noise, is negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:237:whale, grey seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.13).

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:237: Harbour Negligible / Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:237: Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:237: TTS or fleeing Negligible / Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:237: response from Minke whale Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:237: Negligible / required. Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:237: SEL during Grey seal Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:237: Negligible / Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:237: Harbour seal Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:237:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:238: Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:238: Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:238: dredging (5% of Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:238: 0.000005 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:238:of negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, the impact significance for any

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:238:potential increase in collision risk with vessels during dredging has been assessed as negligible (not

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:239: Harbour Negligible /

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:239: Low Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:239: Potential for Minke Negligible / Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:239: collision risk from required, other than Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:239: vessels during Negligible / Negligible good practice.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:239: Harbour Negligible / Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:239:The residual impact would be of negligible significance for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:240:The magnitude of the impact of vessel disturbance to seal haul-out sites is defined as negligible / very low

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:240:resulting in an overall impact significance of negligible.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:240:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:240:have a negligible impact on marine mammals.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:240:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:241: Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:241: Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:241: dredge area Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:241: 0.0001 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:241:Taking into account the low receptor sensitivity, the negligible potential magnitude of the impact and the

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:241:negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal (Table 10.17).

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:241: Harbour Negligible /

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:241: Low Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:241: Minke Negligible / Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:241: resource in Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:241: Negligible / Negligible required.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:241: Harbour Negligible / Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:241:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:242:10.5.1 and 10.5.2). The magnitude of effect in all species is assessed to be negligible / very low based on

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:242:maintenance activities has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.10 and Table 10.13).

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:242:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:242:10.5.3). The magnitude of effect in all species is assessed to be negligible / very low based on the maximum

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:242:has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.15).

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:242:dredging activities. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:242:assessed as negligible (see Section 10.5.4).

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:242:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:243:negligible (see Section 10.5.5).

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:243:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:243:negligible (see Section 10.5.6).

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:243:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:243:established vessel routes. The magnitude of effect in all species is assessed to be negligible / very low

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:243:for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal has been assessed as negligible (Table

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:243:would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:251: Negligible Commonplace feature of little or no habitat/historical significance. Loss of such a feature would not be seen

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:252: Negligible of normal natural variation change to the extent Change is within the normal range of natural variation.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:253: High Medium Low Negligible Negligible Low Medium High

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:253: Moderate Minor Minor Negligible Negligible Minor Minor Moderate

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:253: Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:253: Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Minor

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:260:grassland is concluded as being of negligible ecological value.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:260:negligible ecological value.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:260:scrub habitat is concluded as being of negligible ecological value.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:261:and ruderal habitat is concluded as being of negligible ecological value.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:261:metal structures, which have been assessed as being of negligible value for roosting bats due to the lack of

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:264: Wharf Negligible No

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:264: Buildings Negligible No

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:264: Notable Flora Negligible No

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:264: Badger Negligible No

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:264: Water vole Negligible No

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:265: Amphibians Negligible No

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:265: Reptiles Negligible No

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:266:impacts to foraging bats are considered to be negligible.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:266:included in the CEMP, and with the implementation of such measures, any impacts will be negligible in

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:266:Negligible impacts on water quality are anticipated during construction of the proposed scheme (Section

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:267:time otters are anticipated to spend in the area, an impact of negligible magnitude is anticipated. Given the

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:268:assessed to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:268:With the implementation of the above measures, the residual impact is of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:268:be of local (grayling) and (dingy skipper) significance, and negligible importance within the footprint of the

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:294:Both had a peak count of two, which represents a negligible proportion of the SPA / Ramsar site populations.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:296:would have a negligible impact on benthic prey species in the intertidal zone so consequent effects on

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:298:of the effects of capital dredging and therefore a negligible impact is predicted on the waterbirds relying on

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:298:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:301:minor adverse. A residual impact of negligible significance is predicted at the other sensitive intertidal

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:304:and localised disturbance to feeding resources will result in an impact of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:304:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:305:negligible, and any exceedances of the thresholds stated in Cutts et al. (2009) or Wright et al. (2010) would

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:305:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:305:negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:305:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:305:be negligible, therefore any effects on waterbirds and foraging terns would manifest as a direct behavioural

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:306:on foraging / roosting waterbirds and terns is predicted to be negligible.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:306:While impacts are anticipated to be negligible, the implication of best practice mitigation measures set out

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:306:water) will further reduce the impact on foraging / roosting waterbirds. The residual impact is negligible.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:306:negligible impact on intertidal benthos (see Section 9.6.2) and would not adversely affect the availability of

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:306:result of hydrodynamic changes would be negligible.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:306:No mitigation measures are considered necessary, therefore the residual impact is negligible.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:321:and beyond. The impact is therefore predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:321:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would remain of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:324:considered to be very low, and the significance of the impact is negligible.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:325:Outside the migratory period, there would be a negligible impact on fish movement up- and downstream

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:327:underwater noise of piling activities is therefore considered to have a negligible impact on migration up-

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:327:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact remains negligible.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:328:negligible impact on fish species within the Tees.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:330:the footprint of the works, and even if there was, the number of vessels/fishers affected would be negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:330:and navigation within the Tees estuary is predicted to be negligible, given that works will be co-ordinated

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:330:are predicted to be negligible.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:330:remain negligible.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:330:in motorised vessel traffic is therefore considered to have a negligible impact on fish populations or

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:330:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact will remain negligible.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:331:impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:331:impact would be negligible.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:336:receptor. The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible significance on

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:336:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:336:receptor. The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible significance on

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:337:scheme) and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:337:(human health/safety). The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:337:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:338:The impact of the proposed development’s construction traffic is therefore assessed as of negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:338:proposed schemes operational traffic is therefore assessed as negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:338:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:341: MMO Scoping Opinion negligible and therefore not necessary to be assessed.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:347: Negligible Assets with no significant importance or archaeological/historical interest.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:347: Negligible The asset’s fabric and/or setting is changed in ways which do not materially affect its heritage significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:348: Significance High Medium Low Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:348: Low Moderate Minor Minor Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:348: Negligible Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:348: Negligible No material change to heritage significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:349:these from other non-significant (negligible) impacts as they may contribute to significant impacts

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:370: Negligible / very low < 1.0

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:373: 1 69.7 69.8 0.1 Very low Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:373: 2 67.8 68.0 0.2 Very low Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:373: 3 70.3 70.5 0.2 Very low Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:373: 5 76.3 76.4 0.1 Very low Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:373:Predicted changes in BNL, displayed in Table 17.10, indicate impacts of negligible significance at worst

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:373:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:375: NSR1 52.2 - 59.2 Very low Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:375:indicating negligible impact at human receptor locations. This is considered not significant and impact is

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:376:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:391: Dust soiling High Risk Medium Risk Medium Risk Negligible Risk

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:391: Human health Medium Risk Low Risk Low Risk Negligible Risk

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:391: Ecological effects Medium Risk Low Risk Low Risk Negligible Risk

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:391:demolition, ‘medium risk’ for earthworks and construction, and ‘negligible risk’ for trackout. The impacts on

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:392:earthworks and construction and ‘negligible risk’ for trackout.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:406:the proposed scheme will have negligible influence on this character area and is not considered further..

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:408:industrial context of outward views, it is predicted that the proposed scheme will have negligible influence

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:411:negligible effect on the existing baseline.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:415:of those features will incur a low adverse magnitude of effect and a negligible overall significance of effect.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:415:magnitude and incur a minor negligible adverse significance of effect.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:415:negligible overall significance of effect.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:416:and the wider environs, the overall significance of effect is considered to be negligible.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:419:significance of effect in the view is minor negligible adverse and not significant.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:419:significance of effect in the view is minor negligible adverse. In terms of EIA these effects are not

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:419:negligible.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:434:negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:435:As a result, it is concluded that there would be a negligible impact as a result of the proposed scheme.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:435:a potential impact of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:436:effect on a low sensitivity receptor. Overall, a negligible impact is predicted.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:436:residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:444:The socio-economic impacts of the proposed scheme are identified as ‘beneficial’, ‘negligible’ or ‘adverse’

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:444: Negligible No obvious significant effect to a receptor or environment.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:444: Negligible Where no discernible effect is expected as a result of the proposed scheme on the

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:444: High Medium Low Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:444: High Substantial Moderate to Minor to Moderate Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:444: Medium Moderate to Moderate Minor Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:445: Low Minor to Moderate Minor Negligible to Minor Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:445: Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:453:supply scenario forecasts only a negligible increase in employment during the plan period.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:455:term) and negligible.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:455:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:458:employment with the AOI and is therefore considered to correspond to a negligible magnitude of change.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:458:a permanent and negligible impact.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:458:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:458:negligible magnitude of change. The receptor is considered to be of medium sensitivity by virtue of the fact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:459:a permanent and negligible impact.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:459:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:476:that there would be impacts of negligible significance to the only NSR scoped into the assessment.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:476:would be negligible to minor adverse significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:477:noise and air quality disturbance would be negligible.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:477:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:477:negligible significance and not significant respectively. In addition, operational phase impacts to human

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:477:health as reported in Section 8 with regard to land quality are considered to be of negligible significance. It

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:477:and land quality would be negligible.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:477:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual impact of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:478:long period prior to this the enhancement is so small in magnitude and spatial extent as to be negligible in

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:479:deposition is predicted to be negligible beyond the boundaries of the Tees Bay C disposal site.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:479:that there would be negligible impact on fish or fisheries due to the proposed deposition of dredged material

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:479:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual impact of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:482:negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:482:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:484:operations). Overall, the potential impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:484:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:485: Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:485: 0.000003 minke whale Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:485: during offshore 0.00004 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:485: 0.0000003 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:486:dredged sediments is negligible / very low for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal,

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:486:negligible (Table 26.5).

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:486: Harbour Negligible / Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:486: TTS or fleeing Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:486: underwater Negligible / Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:486: Minke whale Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:486: offshore Negligible / required. Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:486: disposal of Grey seal Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:486: sediments Negligible / Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:486: Harbour seal Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:486:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:487: Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:487: Potential Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:487: of dredged 0.002 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:487: Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:487:of negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, the impact significance for any

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:487:assessed as negligible (not significant) for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:487: Harbour Negligible /

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:487: Low Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:487: increased Minke Negligible / Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:487: vessels during required, other than Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:487: offshore disposal Negligible / Negligible good practice.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:487: sediments Harbour Negligible / Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:487:would be of negligible significance for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:488:The magnitude of the impact of vessel disturbance to seal haul-out sites is defined as negligible / very low

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:488:This gives an overall impact significance of negligible.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:488:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:488:relied upon solely. Therefore, any increases in suspended sediments will have a negligible impact on

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:488:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:489: Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:489: Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:489: offshore disposal 0.04 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:489: Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:489:Taking into account the low receptor sensitivity, the negligible potential magnitude of the impact and the

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:489:negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal (Table 26.9).

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:489: Harbour Negligible /

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:489: Low Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:489: Changes to prey Minke Negligible / Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:489: Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:489: offshore disposal Negligible / Negligible required.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:489: Harbour Negligible / Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:489:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:507:cumulative impact is predicted to be negligible.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:509: Negligible / very low

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:509: Negligible / very low

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:509: approach channel and Anglo Negligible / very low

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:509: Negligible / very low

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:509: Negligible / very low

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:509: Hartlepool approach Negligible / very low

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:510: Negligible / very low

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:510: Negligible / very low

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:510: Negligible / very low

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:510: Negligible / very low

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:510: Hartlepool approach Negligible / very low

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:510: Negligible / very low

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:510:Harbour Facilities schemes, is negligible / very low for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:510:harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as negligible (Table 27.5).

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:511:cumulative underwater noise impacts. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:511: TTS or fleeing Harbour Negligible /

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:511: response from Negligible Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:511: dredging at the Negligible /

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:511: Minke whale Negligible Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:511: Hartlepool Negligible /

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:511: approach Grey seal Negligible Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:511: Harbour Negligible /

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:511: Harbour seal Negligible Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:513:on waterbirds at North Tees Mudflat, and negligible impact further downstream (including at Vopak

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:514:supporting habitat was considered a negligible impact in the EIAs for both the Anglo American Harbour

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:514:(even in combination) would have a negligible impact, the cumulative effect with the proposed scheme would

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:515:driving activities (see Section 13.5.3 and 13.5.4). While there is anticipated to be negligible impact from

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:516:works, but the potential cumulative impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:516:impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:516:acceptable (from a navigation risk perspective), with all risks classified as negligible or low, with the

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:516:impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:516:The primary assessment identifies that the proposed schemes traffic demand would result in a negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:517:with the proposed scheme are considered not significant and indicate negligible impact, at worst. Therefore,

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:521:concludes that the disposal of dredged material will have a negligible impact on fisheries, marine ecology

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:521:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual cumulative impact of negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:568: Lianhetech, Seal Sands Proposed new buildings, plant upgrade, swale and associated Approximately Planning permission / Ramsar site would be negligible. On this basis,

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:576:greater than approximately 200m from source (see Appendix 8). There would be negligible effects on fish

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:578:would be negligible, therefore any effects on SPA / Ramsar site features would manifest as a direct

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:584:negligible effect on feeding resources for terns. When this is considered alongside the localised increase

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-34.pdf:2:locations across the disposal site, at relatively low magnitudes, with negligible changes anticipated beyond

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-34.pdf:11: • The reductions in baseline peak currents are negligible, typically less than 0.01m/s, and never

19Neurotoxicity of Polychlorinated Biphenyls and Related Organohalogens - nihms-1526851.pdf:35: whereas non-coplanar PCBs with one or more ortho chlorine substitution have negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-25.pdf:2:locations across the disposal site, at relatively low magnitudes, with negligible changes anticipated beyond

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-25.pdf:11: • The reductions in baseline peak currents are negligible, typically less than 0.01m/s, and never

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-EN-SB-ME-EV-1144-MLA.2022.00506.2 South Bank Quay FIR 20 Response.pdf:6:variation are sufficiently negligible”. I note from recent advice by Cefas Coastal Processes advisors

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:26:to the west and east of the disposal site is negligible, whilst to the south and north covers a similar zone to

MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:4:changes are sufficiently negligible for the conclusions of the EIA to remain valid, it would be useful to understand what proportion of this

MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:4:within the original EIA, in order for me to determine whether impacts from the proposed variation are sufficiently negligible. Please note that I

MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:5:determining whether impacts to fish receptors from the latest proposed variation are sufficiently negligible, it would be helpful if the Applicant

MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:6:to determine whether impacts from the proposed variation are sufficiently negligible. It would also be beneficial to fully understand how the

MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:8: would be negligible. The degree to which the increase in amount of material disposed at sea would affect shellfisheries is unclear and would

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:28:receptors from increased suspended sediments remains at negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:28:the EIA Report (which was assessed as negligible significance).

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:34: The negligible impact significant reported in the EIA Report was based on the fact that mobile individuals would

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:34: Negligible Negligible Negligible scope of the supplementary surveys reported in Section 4.2 and 4.3 was agreed with the Environment Agency

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:34:from dredging and (dredging); (dredging); negligible (dredging); negligible 4.2 and 4.3 confirms that the dominant species present in the Tees estuary remain unchanged to those reported

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:34:land-based piling negligible (piling) (piling) (piling) in the EIA Report. It is therefore concluded that there is no reason to amend the significance of this potential

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:34:from increased Negligible Negligible Negligible The findings of site-specific surveys presented in Section 4.2 and 4.3 reaffirmed the baseline data that was

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:34: Negligible Negligible Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:42:Effects of deposition it was concluded that there would be a negligible impact on food resources. Whilst the data from surveys presented in Section 5.2

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:42:on intertidal food Negligible Negligible Negligible provide evidence that the North Tees Mudflat offers foraging opportunities for a substantial number of waterbirds, this would have no

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:42: It is therefore concluded that the negligible significance impact reported in the EIA Report remains valid.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:43:Noise disturbances Negligible Negligible Negligible Mudflat supports a number of wintering waterbirds.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:43:increased vessel Negligible Negligible Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:43: The negligible impact significance detailed in the EIA Report was based around the fact that the habitats at South Bank are of low

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:43: Negligible Negligible Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:43: Given the above, the negligible impact significance reported in the EIA Report remains valid.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:43: Negligible Negligible Negligible impacts to intertidal habitat. Given that all assessments were based on the assumption that the North Tees Mudflat supports non-

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:43: breeding waterbirds, the negligible impact significance detailed in the EIA Report remains valid.

MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_Cefas_comments_for_action_RFI_19.pdf:3: me to determine whether impacts from the proposed variation are sufficiently negligible”. I note

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:48: High Major Moderate Moderate Minor Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:48: Medium Moderate Moderate Minor Minor Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:48: Low Minor Minor Minor Negligible Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:48: Very low Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:48:Whilst mitigation for minor or negligible impacts may not be specifically defined as a matter of course,

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:48:recognised that minor and negligible impacts could become significant when considered cumulatively with

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:112:3, the values are so low (<5mg/l) as to be negligible compared with background levels and, in all cases, the

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:112:water quality sampling points during Stage 3 of the dredging and only negligible effects for a short duration

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:112:Stages 3 and 4 of the dredging, only negligible effects are noted, equivalent to variations within the

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:118:as to be negligible in such a great depth of water in this deep water offshore area).

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:122:enhancement is so small in magnitude and spatial extent as to be negligible in such a great depth of water

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:126:is negligible, whilst to the north it covers a similar zone to the sediment plume for this disposal event, which

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:126:0.1cm. Clearly these magnitudes are extremely low within the licenced disposal site, and negligible beyond.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:126:magnitudes, with negligible changes anticipated beyond the boundaries of the site.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:167:is considered to be medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:167:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:167:impact is of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:167:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:168:be medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:168:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:168:considered to be medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:168:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:174: negligible. As there are no designated

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:175:Negligible Is generally tolerant of physical or chemical changes

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:177:temporary change, indiscernible • negligible change to existing risk of exposure; or

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:178: Moderate Minor Minor Negligible Negligible Minor Minor Moderate

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:178: Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Minor

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:178:(negligible) impacts as they may contribute to significant impacts cumulatively or through interactions.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:178:Negligible Very small changes in receptor condition (adverse or beneficial), which may be raised as local issues

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:180:the geological sensitivity is considered to be negligible. As there are no designated geological sites recorded

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:186:during construction is considered to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:186:No mitigation measures are required and residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:188:overall impact during construction is considered to be of negligible to minor adverse significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:188:negligible to minor adverse significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:189:very low. Thus, the impact to human receptors is of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:189:No additional mitigation measures required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:190:very low and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:212:impact of negligible significance is predicted.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:212:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:214:Given the above, an impact of negligible significance on marine species and habitats is predicted to arise

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:214:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:215:and tidal regime is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:215:No mitigation measures are required, and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:221: Negligible / very

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:234: 0.0003 harbour porpoise Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:234: 0.000003 minke whale Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:234: dredging 0.00000024 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:234: 0.0000009 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:234:The magnitude of the potential impact of PTS as a result of dredging noise is negligible / very low for harbour

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:234:seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.10).

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:234: Harbour Negligible / Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:234: Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:234: Auditory injury Negligible / Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:234: (PTS) from Minke whale Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:234: Negligible / required. Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:234: SEL during Grey seal Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:234: Negligible / Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:234: Harbour seal Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:235:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:236: Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:236: 0.000003 minke whale Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:236: underwater noise 0.00000024 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:236: 0.0000009 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:236:The magnitude of the potential impact of TTS and fleeing response as a result of dredging noise, is negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:237:whale, grey seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.13).

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:237: Harbour Negligible / Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:237: Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:237: TTS or fleeing Negligible / Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:237: response from Minke whale Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:237: Negligible / required. Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:237: SEL during Grey seal Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:237: Negligible / Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:237: Harbour seal Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:237:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:238: Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:238: Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:238: dredging (5% of Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:238: 0.000005 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:238:of negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, the impact significance for any

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:238:potential increase in collision risk with vessels during dredging has been assessed as negligible (not

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:239: Harbour Negligible /

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:239: Low Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:239: Potential for Minke Negligible / Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:239: collision risk from required, other than Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:239: vessels during Negligible / Negligible good practice.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:239: Harbour Negligible / Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:239:The residual impact would be of negligible significance for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:240:The magnitude of the impact of vessel disturbance to seal haul-out sites is defined as negligible / very low

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:240:resulting in an overall impact significance of negligible.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:240:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:240:have a negligible impact on marine mammals.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:240:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:241: Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:241: Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:241: dredge area Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:241: 0.0001 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:241:Taking into account the low receptor sensitivity, the negligible potential magnitude of the impact and the

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:241:negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal (Table 10.17).

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:241: Harbour Negligible /

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:241: Low Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:241: Minke Negligible / Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:241: resource in Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:241: Negligible / Negligible required.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:241: Harbour Negligible / Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:241:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:242:10.5.1 and 10.5.2). The magnitude of effect in all species is assessed to be negligible / very low based on

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:242:maintenance activities has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.10 and Table 10.13).

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:242:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:242:10.5.3). The magnitude of effect in all species is assessed to be negligible / very low based on the maximum

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:242:has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.15).

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:242:dredging activities. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:242:assessed as negligible (see Section 10.5.4).

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:242:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:243:negligible (see Section 10.5.5).

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:243:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:243:negligible (see Section 10.5.6).

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:243:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:243:established vessel routes. The magnitude of effect in all species is assessed to be negligible / very low

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:243:for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal has been assessed as negligible (Table

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:243:would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:251: Negligible Commonplace feature of little or no habitat/historical significance. Loss of such a feature would not be seen

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:252: Negligible of normal natural variation change to the extent Change is within the normal range of natural variation.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:253: High Medium Low Negligible Negligible Low Medium High

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:253: Moderate Minor Minor Negligible Negligible Minor Minor Moderate

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:253: Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:253: Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Minor

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:260:grassland is concluded as being of negligible ecological value.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:260:negligible ecological value.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:260:scrub habitat is concluded as being of negligible ecological value.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:261:and ruderal habitat is concluded as being of negligible ecological value.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:261:metal structures, which have been assessed as being of negligible value for roosting bats due to the lack of

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:264: Wharf Negligible No

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:264: Buildings Negligible No

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:264: Notable Flora Negligible No

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:264: Badger Negligible No

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:264: Water vole Negligible No

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:265: Amphibians Negligible No

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:265: Reptiles Negligible No

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:266:impacts to foraging bats are considered to be negligible.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:266:included in the CEMP, and with the implementation of such measures, any impacts will be negligible in

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:266:Negligible impacts on water quality are anticipated during construction of the proposed scheme (Section

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:267:time otters are anticipated to spend in the area, an impact of negligible magnitude is anticipated. Given the

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:268:assessed to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:268:With the implementation of the above measures, the residual impact is of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:268:be of local (grayling) and (dingy skipper) significance, and negligible importance within the footprint of the

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:294:Both had a peak count of two, which represents a negligible proportion of the SPA / Ramsar site populations.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:296:would have a negligible impact on benthic prey species in the intertidal zone so consequent effects on

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:298:of the effects of capital dredging and therefore a negligible impact is predicted on the waterbirds relying on

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:298:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:301:minor adverse. A residual impact of negligible significance is predicted at the other sensitive intertidal

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:304:and localised disturbance to feeding resources will result in an impact of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:304:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:305:negligible, and any exceedances of the thresholds stated in Cutts et al. (2009) or Wright et al. (2010) would

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:305:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:305:negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:305:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:305:be negligible, therefore any effects on waterbirds and foraging terns would manifest as a direct behavioural

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:306:on foraging / roosting waterbirds and terns is predicted to be negligible.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:306:While impacts are anticipated to be negligible, the implication of best practice mitigation measures set out

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:306:water) will further reduce the impact on foraging / roosting waterbirds. The residual impact is negligible.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:306:negligible impact on intertidal benthos (see Section 9.6.2) and would not adversely affect the availability of

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:306:result of hydrodynamic changes would be negligible.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:306:No mitigation measures are considered necessary, therefore the residual impact is negligible.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:321:and beyond. The impact is therefore predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:321:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would remain of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:324:considered to be very low, and the significance of the impact is negligible.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:325:Outside the migratory period, there would be a negligible impact on fish movement up- and downstream

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:327:underwater noise of piling activities is therefore considered to have a negligible impact on migration up-

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:327:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact remains negligible.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:328:negligible impact on fish species within the Tees.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:330:the footprint of the works, and even if there was, the number of vessels/fishers affected would be negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:330:and navigation within the Tees estuary is predicted to be negligible, given that works will be co-ordinated

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:330:are predicted to be negligible.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:330:remain negligible.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:330:in motorised vessel traffic is therefore considered to have a negligible impact on fish populations or

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:330:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact will remain negligible.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:331:impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:331:impact would be negligible.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:336:receptor. The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible significance on

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:336:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:336:receptor. The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible significance on

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:337:scheme) and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:337:(human health/safety). The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:337:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:338:The impact of the proposed development’s construction traffic is therefore assessed as of negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:338:proposed schemes operational traffic is therefore assessed as negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:338:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:341: MMO Scoping Opinion negligible and therefore not necessary to be assessed.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:347: Negligible Assets with no significant importance or archaeological/historical interest.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:347: Negligible The asset’s fabric and/or setting is changed in ways which do not materially affect its heritage significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:348: Significance High Medium Low Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:348: Low Moderate Minor Minor Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:348: Negligible Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:348: Negligible No material change to heritage significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:349:these from other non-significant (negligible) impacts as they may contribute to significant impacts

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:370: Negligible / very low < 1.0

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:373: 1 69.7 69.8 0.1 Very low Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:373: 2 67.8 68.0 0.2 Very low Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:373: 3 70.3 70.5 0.2 Very low Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:373: 5 76.3 76.4 0.1 Very low Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:373:Predicted changes in BNL, displayed in Table 17.10, indicate impacts of negligible significance at worst

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:373:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:375: NSR1 52.2 - 59.2 Very low Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:375:indicating negligible impact at human receptor locations. This is considered not significant and impact is

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:376:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:391: Dust soiling High Risk Medium Risk Medium Risk Negligible Risk

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:391: Human health Medium Risk Low Risk Low Risk Negligible Risk

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:391: Ecological effects Medium Risk Low Risk Low Risk Negligible Risk

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:391:demolition, ‘medium risk’ for earthworks and construction, and ‘negligible risk’ for trackout. The impacts on

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:392:earthworks and construction and ‘negligible risk’ for trackout.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:406:the proposed scheme will have negligible influence on this character area and is not considered further..

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:408:industrial context of outward views, it is predicted that the proposed scheme will have negligible influence

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:411:negligible effect on the existing baseline.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:415:of those features will incur a low adverse magnitude of effect and a negligible overall significance of effect.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:415:magnitude and incur a minor negligible adverse significance of effect.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:415:negligible overall significance of effect.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:416:and the wider environs, the overall significance of effect is considered to be negligible.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:419:significance of effect in the view is minor negligible adverse and not significant.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:419:significance of effect in the view is minor negligible adverse. In terms of EIA these effects are not

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:419:negligible.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:434:negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:435:As a result, it is concluded that there would be a negligible impact as a result of the proposed scheme.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:435:a potential impact of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:436:effect on a low sensitivity receptor. Overall, a negligible impact is predicted.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:436:residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:444:The socio-economic impacts of the proposed scheme are identified as ‘beneficial’, ‘negligible’ or ‘adverse’

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:444: Negligible No obvious significant effect to a receptor or environment.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:444: Negligible Where no discernible effect is expected as a result of the proposed scheme on the

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:444: High Medium Low Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:444: High Substantial Moderate to Minor to Moderate Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:444: Medium Moderate to Moderate Minor Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:445: Low Minor to Moderate Minor Negligible to Minor Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:445: Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:453:supply scenario forecasts only a negligible increase in employment during the plan period.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:455:term) and negligible.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:455:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:458:employment with the AOI and is therefore considered to correspond to a negligible magnitude of change.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:458:a permanent and negligible impact.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:458:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:458:negligible magnitude of change. The receptor is considered to be of medium sensitivity by virtue of the fact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:459:a permanent and negligible impact.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:459:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:476:that there would be impacts of negligible significance to the only NSR scoped into the assessment.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:476:would be negligible to minor adverse significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:477:noise and air quality disturbance would be negligible.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:477:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:477:negligible significance and not significant respectively. In addition, operational phase impacts to human

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:477:health as reported in Section 8 with regard to land quality are considered to be of negligible significance. It

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:477:and land quality would be negligible.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:477:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual impact of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:478:long period prior to this the enhancement is so small in magnitude and spatial extent as to be negligible in

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:479:deposition is predicted to be negligible beyond the boundaries of the Tees Bay C disposal site.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:479:that there would be negligible impact on fish or fisheries due to the proposed deposition of dredged material

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:479:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual impact of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:482:negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:482:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:484:operations). Overall, the potential impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:484:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:485: Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:485: 0.000003 minke whale Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:485: during offshore 0.00004 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:485: 0.0000003 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:486:dredged sediments is negligible / very low for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal,

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:486:negligible (Table 26.5).

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:486: Harbour Negligible / Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:486: TTS or fleeing Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:486: underwater Negligible / Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:486: Minke whale Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:486: offshore Negligible / required. Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:486: disposal of Grey seal Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:486: sediments Negligible / Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:486: Harbour seal Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:486:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:487: Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:487: Potential Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:487: of dredged 0.002 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:487: Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:487:of negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, the impact significance for any

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:487:assessed as negligible (not significant) for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:487: Harbour Negligible /

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:487: Low Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:487: increased Minke Negligible / Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:487: vessels during required, other than Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:487: offshore disposal Negligible / Negligible good practice.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:487: sediments Harbour Negligible / Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:487:would be of negligible significance for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:488:The magnitude of the impact of vessel disturbance to seal haul-out sites is defined as negligible / very low

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:488:This gives an overall impact significance of negligible.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:488:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:488:relied upon solely. Therefore, any increases in suspended sediments will have a negligible impact on

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:488:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:489: Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:489: Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:489: offshore disposal 0.04 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:489: Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:489:Taking into account the low receptor sensitivity, the negligible potential magnitude of the impact and the

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:489:negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal (Table 26.9).

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:489: Harbour Negligible /

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:489: Low Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:489: Changes to prey Minke Negligible / Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:489: Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:489: offshore disposal Negligible / Negligible required.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:489: Harbour Negligible / Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:489:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:507:cumulative impact is predicted to be negligible.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:509: Negligible / very low

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:509: Negligible / very low

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:509: approach channel and Anglo Negligible / very low

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:509: Negligible / very low

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:509: Negligible / very low

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:509: Hartlepool approach Negligible / very low

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:510: Negligible / very low

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:510: Negligible / very low

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:510: Negligible / very low

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:510: Negligible / very low

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:510: Hartlepool approach Negligible / very low

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:510: Negligible / very low

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:510:Harbour Facilities schemes, is negligible / very low for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:510:harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as negligible (Table 27.5).

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:511:cumulative underwater noise impacts. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:511: TTS or fleeing Harbour Negligible /

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:511: response from Negligible Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:511: dredging at the Negligible /

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:511: Minke whale Negligible Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:511: Hartlepool Negligible /

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:511: approach Grey seal Negligible Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:511: Harbour Negligible /

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:511: Harbour seal Negligible Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:513:on waterbirds at North Tees Mudflat, and negligible impact further downstream (including at Vopak

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:514:supporting habitat was considered a negligible impact in the EIAs for both the Anglo American Harbour

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:514:(even in combination) would have a negligible impact, the cumulative effect with the proposed scheme would

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:515:driving activities (see Section 13.5.3 and 13.5.4). While there is anticipated to be negligible impact from

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:516:works, but the potential cumulative impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:516:impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:516:acceptable (from a navigation risk perspective), with all risks classified as negligible or low, with the

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:516:impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:516:The primary assessment identifies that the proposed schemes traffic demand would result in a negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:517:with the proposed scheme are considered not significant and indicate negligible impact, at worst. Therefore,

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:521:concludes that the disposal of dredged material will have a negligible impact on fisheries, marine ecology

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:521:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual cumulative impact of negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:568: Lianhetech, Seal Sands Proposed new buildings, plant upgrade, swale and associated Approximately Planning permission / Ramsar site would be negligible. On this basis,

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:576:greater than approximately 200m from source (see Appendix 8). There would be negligible effects on fish

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:578:would be negligible, therefore any effects on SPA / Ramsar site features would manifest as a direct

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:584:negligible effect on feeding resources for terns. When this is considered alongside the localised increase

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:15:effect of negligible significance with regard to increased suspended sediment concentrations. Therefore,

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:15:concluding a negligible significant effect.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:15:Even without mitigation, the EIA Report concludes a negligible significance regarding the smothering of

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:16:remains negligible.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:16:In light of the above, an effect of negligible significance on marine species and habitats is predicted to

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:17: Benthic Negligible Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:17: Effects of smothering Negligible Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:17: Effects of increased SSC Negligible Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:17: Effects of smothering Negligible Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:56:to the west and east of the disposal site is negligible, whilst to the south and north covers a similar zone to

MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Final HRA .pdf:9: clarity is likely to be negligible and not sufficient to cause far-field

MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Final HRA .pdf:9: • Lapwing likely to be negligible and not sufficient to cause far-field effects on

MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Final HRA .pdf:10: changes in hydrodynamics and waves is likely to be negligible and

MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Final HRA .pdf:12: be negligible and not sufficient to cause far-field effects on the

MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Final HRA .pdf:15: The magnitude of changes is negligible and not sufficient to cause

MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Final HRA .pdf:18: likely to be negligible and not sufficient to cause far-field effects on

MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:13:dredged material is predicted to have a negligible impact on fisheries, marine ecology

MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:13:No significant residual impacts are predicted. A worst case residual impact of negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:13:It is concluded that the impact during the construction phase of the proposed scheme would be of negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:13:are minor beneficial to controlled waters and negligible to human health.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:13:with maintenance dredging. All operational phase impacts are predicted to be of negligible significance,

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:14:to marine mammals from dredging has been assessed as negligible. The assessment has concluded

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:14:impacts of negligible significance to all marine mammals with regard to potential for temporary auditory

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:14:movements in the area. A worst-case impact of negligible significance (not significant) is predicted.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:15:Tees, and is therefore expected to have a negligible effect on fish. The removal of the existing wharf

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:16:negligible impacts on both resident and migratory fish. Disturbance during the operational phase, either as

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:16:a result of vessel calls to the new quay or the use of quayside lighting, is predicted to have a negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:16:required by International Regulations to allow safe navigation. An impact of negligible significance on

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:16:determined to have minimal effect on the existing navigation profile. An impact of negligible significance is

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:16:Environmental Assessment of Road Traffic), the impact is considered to be negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:18:construction phase noise levels at the South Tees Business Parks would be negligible. No mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:19:assessed as being permanent and negligible. No mitigation measures during the operational phase are

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:20:disturbance and reductions in air quality are considered to be negligible during construction and operation.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:20:It is therefore concluded that impacts to human health would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:20:is predicted to have a negligible impact on fisheries, marine ecology and marine mammals, and no impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:56: likely to be negligible and therefore not necessary to be assessed.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:208:Deposition to the west and east of the disposal site is negligible, whilst to the south and north covers a

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:260: • negligible ground dissolution.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:284: buildings is negligible.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:173:representing the final risk score for each hazard, between 0 (negligible) and 10 (high) (see Annex A),

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:173:Hazard risk scores were categorised as either negligible, low, As Low as Reasonably Practicable

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:173: Negligible The risk is acceptable and at level where operational safety is unaffected.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:174:construction phase was ‘Contact: Navigation Buoy’ which was scored as 0.72; negligible, driven by its

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:174: Negligible Low ALARP Significant High

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:176:0.5; negligible, driven by its low consequence.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:176: Negligible Low ALARP Significant High

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:179:be acceptable with all scoring Negligible or Low, with the exception of the impact on ship contact risk,

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:180: Unlikely Minor Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:180: Unlikely Minor Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:187:is extremely remote and consequence insignificant such that a risk can be said to be negligible. At the

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:190: 1 Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:192: 0 – 1.99 Negligible Risk A level where operational safety is unaffected.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:192:the final risk score for each hazard, between 0 (negligible) and 10 (high) following which, the final risk

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:192:Hazard risk scores are categorised as either negligible, low, As Low as Reasonably Practicable (ALARP),

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:293:is ‘negligible’.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:296: Low Medium Risk Low Risk Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:296: Low Low Risk Low Risk Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:297: Low Low Risk Low Risk Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:297: Low Medium Risk Low Risk Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:299: lower sections of proposed quayside features, although the change in the view will be negligible.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:301:Significance of Effect Medium sensitivity x Low magnitude of effect = Minor negligible significance of effect. Minor Minor

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:301: Effects will be permanent during the operation of the proposed quayside and its use in support of the renewable energy Negligible Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:304: Effects will be permanent during the operation of the proposed quayside and its use in support of the renewable energy negligible negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:305: Effects will be permanent during the operation of the proposed quayside and its use in support of the renewable energy negligible negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:306:Significance of Effect Low sensitivity x Low medium magnitude of effect = Minor negligible significance of effect. Minor Minor

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:306: Effects will be permanent during the operation of the proposed quayside and its use in support of the renewable energy Negligible Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:307: Future baseline: development of the SIZ landside site and associated large scale buildings will have negligible effect on

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:308:Significance of Effect Low sensitivity x Low magnitude of effect = Negligible significance of effect. Negligible Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:309: sections of cranes and stored components, although have negligible beneficial effects to views of taller proposed

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:310: Future baseline: development of the SIZ landside site and associated large scale buildings will have negligible effect on

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:316:particular development is categorised as high, medium, low or negligible. In accordance with the

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:316: Negligible Size and/or scale: the extent and relative proportion of the existing landscape

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:319: Negligible Size and Scale

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:320:receptor (high, medium to low) with the magnitude of effect (high to negligible). The evaluation is

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:320: Low medium Minor negligible effect Minor effect Minor moderate effect

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:320: Low Negligible effect Minor negligible effect Minor effect

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:320: Negligible Negligible effect Negligible effect Minor negligible effect

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:28:receptors from increased suspended sediments remains at negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:28:the EIA Report (which was assessed as negligible significance).

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:34: The negligible impact significant reported in the EIA Report was based on the fact that mobile individuals would

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:34: Negligible Negligible Negligible scope of the supplementary surveys reported in Section 4.2 and 4.3 was agreed with the Environment Agency

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:34:from dredging and (dredging); (dredging); negligible (dredging); negligible 4.2 and 4.3 confirms that the dominant species present in the Tees estuary remain unchanged to those reported

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:34:land-based piling negligible (piling) (piling) (piling) in the EIA Report. It is therefore concluded that there is no reason to amend the significance of this potential

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:34:from increased Negligible Negligible Negligible The findings of site-specific surveys presented in Section 4.2 and 4.3 reaffirmed the baseline data that was

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:34: Negligible Negligible Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:42:Effects of deposition it was concluded that there would be a negligible impact on food resources. Whilst the data from surveys presented in Section 5.2

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:42:on intertidal food Negligible Negligible Negligible provide evidence that the North Tees Mudflat offers foraging opportunities for a substantial number of waterbirds, this would have no

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:42: It is therefore concluded that the negligible significance impact reported in the EIA Report remains valid.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:43:Noise disturbances Negligible Negligible Negligible Mudflat supports a number of wintering waterbirds.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:43:increased vessel Negligible Negligible Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:43: The negligible impact significance detailed in the EIA Report was based around the fact that the habitats at South Bank are of low

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:43: Negligible Negligible Negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:43: Given the above, the negligible impact significance reported in the EIA Report remains valid.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:43: Negligible Negligible Negligible impacts to intertidal habitat. Given that all assessments were based on the assumption that the North Tees Mudflat supports non-

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:43: breeding waterbirds, the negligible impact significance detailed in the EIA Report remains valid.

R-2021-0754-FFM-INCA2021-67 South Bank access road - Ecology report.pdf:4:location and is of negligible ecological value. A further area of approximately 0.1ha of neutral

R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf:9: • Negligible – effects which are unlikely to be perceptible to drivers, bus passengers or those

R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf:9: • Negligible – effects which are unlikely to be perceptible and within the normal variation of

R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf:19: Medium non-motorised users to cross at the Minor Negligible

R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf:19: High Negligible Negligible

R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf:20: therefore considered to be negligible;

R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf:20: negligible.

R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf:20: safety is expected to be negligible.

R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf:21: be negligible.

R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf:25: A1085 Trunk Minor adverse Travel Planning measures, alongside a Servicing Negligible

R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf:25: A66/Normanby Minor adverse Travel Planning measures to be introduced to Negligible

R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf:27: A66/Tees Dock Negligible effect on None required Negligible

R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf:28: A1085 Trunk Minor adverse Travel Planning measures, alongside Negligible - the

R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf:28: A1053 Negligible effect on None required Negligible

R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf:28: A66/Old Station Negligible effect on None required Negligible

R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf:28: A66/Normanby Minor adverse Travel Planning measures to be Negligible - the

R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf:28: A66/Eston Negligible effect on None required Negligible

R-2021-0754-FFM-63455 01 LM Wind Access Road - Cover Letter 18.08.21.pdf:2:would be negligible and kept to a minimum.

R-2021-0754-FFM-63455 01 LM Wind Access Road - Cover Letter 18.08.21.pdf:3:negligible impact and would not affect the conclusions of the aforementioned environmental statement.

R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Supplementary Environmental Statement September 2020 Volume 3 Technical Appendices Section 3 Transport.PDF:183: development is negligible.

R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Supplementary Environmental Statement September 2020 Volume 3 Technical Appendices Section 3 Transport.PDF:193: negligible, and the results show that the network, overall, would likely operate

Environmental Statement, Chapter G Water Management and Flooding Section 7 Residual effects.pdf:1: will be minor, so the level of effect is therefore negligible, and not significant. Additional

Environmental Statement, Chapter G Water Management and Flooding Section 7 Residual effects.pdf:2: gives an effect greater than minor or negligible, which is not significant.

Environmental Statement, Chapter G Water Management and Flooding Section 7 Residual effects.pdf:2: receptors, this would result in a negligible level of effect of pollution which would be deemed to

Environmental Statement, Chapter G Water Management and Flooding Section 7 Residual effects.pdf:2: negligible beneficial effect for the other surface waterbodies (Holme Beck, Knitting wife,

Environmental Statement, Chapter G Water Management and Flooding Section 7 Residual effects.pdf:2: of the mitigation measures and so a substantial beneficial effect for the Tees and negligible

Environmental Statement, Chapter G Water Management and Flooding Section 7 Residual effects.pdf:2: will be minor, so the level of effect is therefore negligible, and not significant. Additional

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:16: demonstrate that there will be a negligible impact on those aspects of the

R-2022-0342-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0395-03-GE Plot.pdf:35:likely to be negligible in these strata and as such has not been modelled. Therefore, settlements have been

R-2022-0342-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0395-03-GE Plot.pdf:37:in the Glaciolacustrine Deposits due to imposed loadings on the floor slab are likely to be negligible and therefore

R-2022-0342-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0395-03-GE Plot.pdf:698: consolidation proportionally negligible and any further consolidation will take

R-2022-0342-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0395-03-GE Plot.pdf:701:increase in the Glaciolacustrine deposits due to imposed loadings on the floor slab are likely to be negligible

R-2022-0342-CD-L05858-CLK-XX-XX-RP-GT-0002 Pile Risk Assessment .pdf:8: lateral migration will be negligible

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:33: quality site predicted to be negligible.

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:33: Moors SAC quality site predicted to be negligible.

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:45: has been assumed that negligible traffic from the ERF will travel along the

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Preliminary_Ecological_Appraisal.pdf:9: • Negligible Importance.

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Preliminary_Ecological_Appraisal.pdf:14: Bare ground Negligible Does not contribute to biodiversity importance of the site.

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Preliminary_Ecological_Appraisal.pdf:17: The extended Phase 1 habitat survey confirmed that the site is of negligible nature conservation

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:46: so that the significance of effects will now be negligible.

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:46: in the December 2019 ES. The construction effects will have negligible effect on

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:47: proposed development so that the significance of effects will now be negligible.

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:47: is operational will be negligible.

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:51: be slight adverse prior to mitigation, as opposed to negligible adverse as

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:51: • The potential impact to the River Tees Estuary is considered to be negligible

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:60: discernible impact recognised on the negligible archaeological resource across

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:67: effects on employment in other areas and all other effects negligible and not

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:72: human health can be described as ‘negligible’ at all areas of relevant exposure

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:72: • All annual mean impacts are ‘negligible’ at all areas of relevant exposure

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:72: • All short-term impacts are ‘negligible’ at all areas of relevant exposure, except

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:72: point of maximum impact could not be screened out as ‘negligible’ using a

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:72: described as ‘negligible’.

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:73: areas of relevant exposure is ‘negligible’, except for short-term sulphur dioxide

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:73: quality assessment level (AQAL) and was described as ‘negligible’. Even if this

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:73: remains ‘negligible’, both alone and when added to process emissions.

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:74: ‘negligible’. The assessment of construction phase dust emissions is unchanged,

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:74: regard to human health are predicted to be ‘negligible’, except for short-term

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:80: • A potential impact on severance of negligible significance

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:80: • A potential impact on driver delay of negligible significance

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:80: • A potential impact on pedestrian delay of negligible significance

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:80: • A potential impact on pedestrian amenity of negligible significance

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:81: amenity, fear and intimidation, and accidents and safety of negligible

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:81: • A residual impact on severance of negligible significance

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:81: • A residual impact on driver delay of negligible significance

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:81: • A residual impact on pedestrian delay of negligible significance

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:81: • A residual impact on pedestrian amenity of negligible significance

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:94: considered to be slight adverse and will now be negligible. The assessment of the

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:101: not be described as ‘negligible’ irrespective of the total pollutant concentration. In

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:104: application operational phase are considered to be negligible due to the minimal

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:5: results of the modelling and indicates where impacts can be screened out as ‘negligible’ or

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:11: this AQMA will be negligible. As the impact has been screened out, the AQMA has been excluded

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:27: 75% or less of AQAL Negligible Negligible Slight Moderate

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:27: 76-94% of AQAL Negligible Slight Moderate Moderate

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:27: a 1% change in concentration. For a change in concentration to be described as ‘negligible’

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:27: • < 10% - negligible;

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:31: • all annual mean impacts on human health can be described as ‘negligible’ when the total

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:31: • all short-term impacts on human health can be described as ‘negligible’ or ‘insignificant’ if it is

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:31: Although short-term impacts do not screen out as ‘negligible’ for a stack height of 80 m if it is

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:31: dioxide and nitrogen dioxide, non-negligible impacts are only predicted to occur under the highly

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:35: Impacts that cannot be described as ‘negligible’ irrespective of the total concentration in

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:35: ‘as ‘negligible’ irrespective of the total concentration, further analysis has been undertaken.

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:39: and less than 0.5 of the annual mean AQAL and can be screened out as ‘negligible’ irrespective of

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:39: ‘negligible’ irrespective of the total concentration. As shown in Figure 8, the PC is predicted to

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:40: therefore, the impact is described as ‘negligible’.

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:41: 2021 WHO guideline values, and is therefore ‘negligible’ irrespective of the total concentration.

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:42: 7 of the AQAL, the impact is described as ‘negligible’.

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:43: is described as ‘negligible’.

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:43: as ‘negligible’ irrespective of the total concentration.

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:44: ‘negligible’ irrespective of the total concentration.

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:44: cannot be screened out as ‘negligible’. In accordance with the guidance set out in section 5.7.1, the

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:44: ‘negligible’.

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:45: Short-term impacts that cannot be described as ‘negligible’ at areas of relevant exposure are only

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:45: would be well below 10% of the AQAL and would be described as ‘negligible’.

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:45: dioxide. These impacts are described as ‘negligible’.

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:48: and is considered to be ‘negligible’.

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:48: ‘negligible’. Under these more realistic scenarios the impact of the Proposed ERF on concentrations

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:48: concentrations of chromium (VI) is ‘negligible’.

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:54: impacts from the Proposed ERF that cannot be described as ‘negligible’ are limited to areas in close

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:54: ‘negligible’ irrespective of the total concentration at areas of relevant exposure, the inclusion of

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:55: ‘negligible’ irrespective of the total concentration and therefore the inclusion of any other

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:56: ‘negligible’.

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:57: AQAL and the cumulative PEC is less than 7 of the AQAL, the impact remains ‘negligible’.

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:59: AQAL and the cumulative PEC is less than 7 of the AQAL, the impact remains ‘negligible’.

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:66: ERF can be described as ‘negligible’ in accordance with IAQM criteria at all areas of relevant

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:66: Proposed ERF can be described as ‘negligible’ in accordance with IAQM screening criteria at

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:100: negligible.

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:102: of maximum impact, terrain effects have a negligible effect on annual mean concentrations.

R-2023-0246-RMM-MGE05035 Nuisance.pdf:1:Both reports state there will be negligible impact on nearby receptors and the

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Noise_and_Vibration_Impact_Assessment.pdf:13: Negligible

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Noise_and_Vibration_Impact_Assessment.pdf:14: Negligible NOAEL

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Noise_and_Vibration_Impact_Assessment.pdf:14: < 1.0 Negligible NOAEL

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Noise_and_Vibration_Impact_Assessment.pdf:14: Negligible NOAEL

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Noise_and_Vibration_Impact_Assessment.pdf:15: Below 35-40 dB LAeq,T design range Negligible NOAEL

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Noise_and_Vibration_Impact_Assessment.pdf:23: deemed to be negligible in the short and long term, to LA 1117. It is not expected that the additional

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Noise_and_Vibration_Impact_Assessment.pdf:29: considered to be negligible as the background noise levels at receptor R1 are typically 22dB below

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Flood_Risk_Assessment.pdf:11: through the outline site and surrounding area. Two negligible areas at ‘Medium’ risk are present in

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Flood_Risk_Assessment.pdf:13: two negligible areas of medium risk. Therefore,

R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:77:• Negligible – No effect on species or habitats present are anticipated.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:7: High Major Moderate Moderate Minor Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:7: Medium Moderate Moderate Minor Minor Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:7: Low Minor Minor Minor Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:7: Very low Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:7:Whilst mitigation for minor or negligible impacts may not be specifically defined as a matter of course,

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:7:recognised that minor and negligible impacts could become significant when considered cumulatively with

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf:1: lower sections of proposed quayside features, although the change in the view will be negligible.

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf:3:Significance of Effect Medium sensitivity x Low magnitude of effect = Minor negligible significance of effect. Minor Minor

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf:3: Effects will be permanent during the operation of the proposed quayside and its use in support of the renewable energy Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf:6: Effects will be permanent during the operation of the proposed quayside and its use in support of the renewable energy negligible negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf:7: Effects will be permanent during the operation of the proposed quayside and its use in support of the renewable energy negligible negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf:8:Significance of Effect Low sensitivity x Low medium magnitude of effect = Minor negligible significance of effect. Minor Minor

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf:8: Effects will be permanent during the operation of the proposed quayside and its use in support of the renewable energy Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf:9: Future baseline: development of the SIZ landside site and associated large scale buildings will have negligible effect on

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf:10:Significance of Effect Low sensitivity x Low magnitude of effect = Negligible significance of effect. Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf:11: sections of cranes and stored components, although have negligible beneficial effects to views of taller proposed

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf:12: Future baseline: development of the SIZ landside site and associated large scale buildings will have negligible effect on

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf:9: Negligible / very low < 1.0

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf:12: 1 69.7 69.8 0.1 Very low Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf:12: 2 67.8 68.0 0.2 Very low Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf:12: 3 70.3 70.5 0.2 Very low Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf:12: 5 76.3 76.4 0.1 Very low Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf:12:Predicted changes in BNL, displayed in Table 17.10, indicate impacts of negligible significance at worst

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf:12:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf:14: NSR1 52.2 - 59.2 Very low Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf:14:indicating negligible impact at human receptor locations. This is considered not significant and impact is

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf:15:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:13:It is concluded that the impact during the construction phase of the proposed scheme would be of negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:13:are minor beneficial to controlled waters and negligible to human health.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:13:with maintenance dredging. All operational phase impacts are predicted to be of negligible significance,

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:14:to marine mammals from dredging has been assessed as negligible. The assessment has concluded

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:14:impacts of negligible significance to all marine mammals with regard to potential for temporary auditory

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:14:movements in the area. A worst-case impact of negligible significance (not significant) is predicted.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:15:Tees, and is therefore expected to have a negligible effect on fish. The removal of the existing wharf

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:16:negligible impacts on both resident and migratory fish. Disturbance during the operational phase, either as

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:16:a result of vessel calls to the new quay or the use of quayside lighting, is predicted to have a negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:16:required by International Regulations to allow safe navigation. An impact of negligible significance on

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:16:determined to have minimal effect on the existing navigation profile. An impact of negligible significance is

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:16:Environmental Assessment of Road Traffic), the impact is considered to be negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:18:construction phase noise levels at the South Tees Business Parks would be negligible. No mitigation

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:19:assessed as being permanent and negligible. No mitigation measures during the operational phase are

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:20:disturbance and reductions in air quality are considered to be negligible during construction and operation.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:20:It is therefore concluded that impacts to human health would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:20:is predicted to have a negligible impact on fisheries, marine ecology and marine mammals, and no impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:26:is considered to be medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:26:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:26:impact is of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:26:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:27:be medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:27:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:27:considered to be medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:27:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf:10:the proposed scheme will have negligible influence on this character area and is not considered further..

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf:12:industrial context of outward views, it is predicted that the proposed scheme will have negligible influence

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf:15:negligible effect on the existing baseline.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf:19:of those features will incur a low adverse magnitude of effect and a negligible overall significance of effect.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf:19:magnitude and incur a minor negligible adverse significance of effect.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf:19:negligible overall significance of effect.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf:20:and the wider environs, the overall significance of effect is considered to be negligible.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf:23:significance of effect in the view is minor negligible adverse and not significant.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf:23:significance of effect in the view is minor negligible adverse. In terms of EIA these effects are not

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf:23:negligible.

R-2020-0685-ESM-Response from applicant.PDF:2:concluded that all impacts were assessed to be acceptable with all scoring negligible or low, with the

R-2020-0685-ESM-Response from applicant.PDF:3:negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-Response from applicant.PDF:3:traffic is therefore clearly negligible.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf:5:receptor. The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible significance on

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf:5:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf:5:receptor. The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible significance on

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf:6:scheme) and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf:6:(human health/safety). The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf:6:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:1:long period prior to this the enhancement is so small in magnitude and spatial extent as to be negligible in

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:2:deposition is predicted to be negligible beyond the boundaries of the Tees Bay C disposal site.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:2:that there would be negligible impact on fish or fisheries due to the proposed deposition of dredged material

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:2:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual impact of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:5:negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:5:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:7:operations). Overall, the potential impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:7:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:8: Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:8: 0.000003 minke whale Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:8: during offshore 0.00004 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:8: 0.0000003 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:9:dredged sediments is negligible / very low for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal,

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:9:negligible (Table 26.5).

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:9: Harbour Negligible / Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:9: TTS or fleeing Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:9: underwater Negligible / Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:9: Minke whale Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:9: offshore Negligible / required. Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:9: disposal of Grey seal Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:9: sediments Negligible / Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:9: Harbour seal Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:9:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:10: Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:10: Potential Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:10: of dredged 0.002 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:10: Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:10:of negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, the impact significance for any

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:10:assessed as negligible (not significant) for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:10: Harbour Negligible /

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:10: Low Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:10: increased Minke Negligible / Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:10: vessels during required, other than Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:10: offshore disposal Negligible / Negligible good practice.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:10: sediments Harbour Negligible / Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:10:would be of negligible significance for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:11:The magnitude of the impact of vessel disturbance to seal haul-out sites is defined as negligible / very low

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:11:This gives an overall impact significance of negligible.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:11:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:11:relied upon solely. Therefore, any increases in suspended sediments will have a negligible impact on

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:11:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:12: Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:12: Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:12: offshore disposal 0.04 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:12: Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:12:Taking into account the low receptor sensitivity, the negligible potential magnitude of the impact and the

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:12:negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal (Table 26.9).

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:12: Harbour Negligible /

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:12: Low Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:12: Changes to prey Minke Negligible / Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:12: Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:12: offshore disposal Negligible / Negligible required.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:12: Harbour Negligible / Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:12:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:21:impact is of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:21:is of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:22:overall impact is of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:22:medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:22:range between negligible and minor adverse significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:22:be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:24:negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:24:health is considered to be of negligible to minor adverse significance

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:25:negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:26:residual impact would be of negligible significance. It is acknowledged that a

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:26:considered to be of negligible to minor adverse significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:26:residual impact is therefore considered to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:26:suitable material selection, the residual impact would be of negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:30:sediment, an impact of negligible significance is predicted.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:31:regime is predicted to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:32:are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:32:affecting marine communities would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:34:this is that the significance to all receptors would be negligible.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:34:this is that the significance to all receptors would be negligible.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:34:significance to all receptors would be negligible.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:35:overall impact of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:35:negligible impact on marine mammals due to their prey detection methods

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:35:harbour seal is negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:35:residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:35:impact would be of negligible significance

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:36:residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:36:impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:36:practice. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:37:negligible to low.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:37:considered to be of negligible ecological value and therefore have not been

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:38:adverse significance), noise and vibration (negligible significance) emissions,

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:38:negligible importance within the footprint of the proposed development. The

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:39:residual impact is of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:39:of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:39:implementation of the mitigation measures, the residual impact is of negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:39:measures, the residual impact is of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:43:and therefore a negligible impact is predicted on the waterbirds relying on

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:43:from the operations is therefore considered to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:44:associated with the proposed scheme is assessed to be of negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:44:roosting waterbirds and terns is predicted to be negligible.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:44:not significant. The potential increase are considered to have a negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:44:hydrodynamic changes would be negligible.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:45:food resources and the residual impact is of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:45:impact is negligible.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:45:impact is negligible.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:45:While impacts are anticipated to be negligible, the implication of best practice

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:45:impact is therefore considered to be negligible.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:45:negligible.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:48:is therefore predicted to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:48:considered to be very low, and the significance of the impact is negligible.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:49:therefore considered to have a negligible impact on migration up and

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:49:considered to be a negligible impact on fish species within the Tees. With

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:49:therefore considered to be negligible. Consideration has also been given to

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:49:however any conflict is considered to be negligible when co-ordinated by the

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:49:negligible.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:50:in motorised vessel traffic is therefore considered to have a negligible impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:50:of the estuary as a whole predicted to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:50:fish eggs. The residual impact would remain of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:50:activities. The residual impact remains negligible.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:51:remain negligible.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:51:residual impact will remain negligible.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:51:impact would be negligible.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:53:proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:54:development is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:54:impact of negligible significance on navigation safety during the operational

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:54:impacts of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:55:impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:56:negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:57:traffic is therefore assessed as negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:57:considered to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:57:considered to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:63:between no impact and negligible.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:63:would be a negligible impact on human receptor that would be not significant .

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:64:impact would be of negligible significance. With regard to on-site construction

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:64:noise no mitigation is proposed and the residual impact would be of negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:71:with a negligible overall significance of effect.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:72:adverse magnitude and incur a negligible overall significance of effect.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:73:significance of effect being considered to be negligible.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:74:significance of effect in the view is minor negligible adverse and not

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:74:in the view is minor negligible adverse. In terms of EIA these effects are not

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:74:existing, transitory views towards site will be low adverse or negligible.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:75:The ES does conclude that there will be negligible impacts during the

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:75:range between negligible to minor adverse. Many of the views considered

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:77:negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:78:negligible impact.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:78:negligible impact.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:79:locally generated waves. The residual impact would be of negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:83:therefore the likely requirement is expected to be low resulting in a negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:84:therefore considered to be result in a negligible impact.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:84:negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:90:receptors is considered to be negligible as set out within Chapter 17 of the

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:90:human health would be negligible to minor adverse in significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:90:disturbance would be negligible.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:91:air quality disturbance is predicted to be of negligible significance and not

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:91:be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:91:disturbance and land quality would be negligible.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:91:impacts of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:91:impacts of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:92:beyond, with seabed deposition predicted to be negligible beyond the

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:92:would be negligible impact on fish or fisheries due to the proposed deposition

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:93:therefore concluded that the impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:93:disposal operations). Overall, the potential impact would be of negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:94:material, there are considered to be negligible impacts on marine mammals

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:94:would be a residual impact of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:94:would be a residual impact of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:94:would be a residual impact of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 11_Air quality assessment method.pdf:1:is ‘negligible’.

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 11_Air quality assessment method.pdf:4: Low Medium Risk Low Risk Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 11_Air quality assessment method.pdf:4: Low Low Risk Low Risk Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 11_Air quality assessment method.pdf:5: Low Low Risk Low Risk Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 11_Air quality assessment method.pdf:5: Low Medium Risk Low Risk Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:7:likely to be negligible, and therefore not necessary to be assessed.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:6: negligible. As there are no designated

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:7:Negligible Is generally tolerant of physical or chemical changes

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:9:temporary change, indiscernible • negligible change to existing risk of exposure; or

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:10: Moderate Minor Minor Negligible Negligible Minor Minor Moderate

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:10: Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Minor

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:10:(negligible) impacts as they may contribute to significant impacts cumulatively or through interactions.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:10:Negligible Very small changes in receptor condition (adverse or beneficial), which may be raised as local issues

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:12:the geological sensitivity is considered to be negligible. As there are no designated geological sites recorded

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:18:during construction is considered to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:18:No mitigation measures are required and residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:20:overall impact during construction is considered to be of negligible to minor adverse significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:20:negligible to minor adverse significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:21:very low. Thus, the impact to human receptors is of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:21:No additional mitigation measures required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:22:very low and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:78:Deposition to the west and east of the disposal site is negligible, whilst to the south and north covers a

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 13_Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology.pdf:5:particular development is categorised as high, medium, low or negligible. In accordance with the

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 13_Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology.pdf:5: Negligible Size and/or scale: the extent and relative proportion of the existing landscape

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 13_Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology.pdf:8: Negligible Size and Scale

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 13_Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology.pdf:9:receptor (high, medium to low) with the magnitude of effect (high to negligible). The evaluation is

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 13_Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology.pdf:9: Low medium Minor negligible effect Minor effect Minor moderate effect

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 13_Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology.pdf:9: Low Negligible effect Minor negligible effect Minor effect

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 13_Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology.pdf:9: Negligible Negligible effect Negligible effect Minor negligible effect

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:14:negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:15:As a result, it is concluded that there would be a negligible impact as a result of the proposed scheme.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:15:a potential impact of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:16:effect on a low sensitivity receptor. Overall, a negligible impact is predicted.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:16:residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:22:impact of negligible significance is predicted.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:22:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:24:Given the above, an impact of negligible significance on marine species and habitats is predicted to arise

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:24:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:25:and tidal regime is predicted to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:25:No mitigation measures are required, and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:43:representing the final risk score for each hazard, between 0 (negligible) and 10 (high) (see Annex A),

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:43:Hazard risk scores were categorised as either negligible, low, As Low as Reasonably Practicable

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:43: Negligible The risk is acceptable and at level where operational safety is unaffected.

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:44:construction phase was ‘Contact: Navigation Buoy’ which was scored as 0.72; negligible, driven by its

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:44: Negligible Low ALARP Significant High

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:46:0.5; negligible, driven by its low consequence.

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:46: Negligible Low ALARP Significant High

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:49:be acceptable with all scoring Negligible or Low, with the exception of the impact on ship contact risk,

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:50: Unlikely Minor Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:50: Unlikely Minor Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:57:is extremely remote and consequence insignificant such that a risk can be said to be negligible. At the

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:60: 1 Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:62: 0 – 1.99 Negligible Risk A level where operational safety is unaffected.

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:62:the final risk score for each hazard, between 0 (negligible) and 10 (high) following which, the final risk

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:62:Hazard risk scores are categorised as either negligible, low, As Low as Reasonably Practicable (ALARP),

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:62:3, the values are so low (<5mg/l) as to be negligible compared with background levels and, in all cases, the

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:62:water quality sampling points during Stage 3 of the dredging and only negligible effects for a short duration

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:62:Stages 3 and 4 of the dredging, only negligible effects are noted, equivalent to variations within the

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:68:as to be negligible in such a great depth of water in this deep water offshore area).

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:72:enhancement is so small in magnitude and spatial extent as to be negligible in such a great depth of water

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:76:is negligible, whilst to the north it covers a similar zone to the sediment plume for this disposal event, which

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:76:0.1cm. Clearly these magnitudes are extremely low within the licenced disposal site, and negligible beyond.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:76:magnitudes, with negligible changes anticipated beyond the boundaries of the site.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:25:Both had a peak count of two, which represents a negligible proportion of the SPA / Ramsar site populations.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:27:would have a negligible impact on benthic prey species in the intertidal zone so consequent effects on

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:29:of the effects of capital dredging and therefore a negligible impact is predicted on the waterbirds relying on

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:29:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:32:minor adverse. A residual impact of negligible significance is predicted at the other sensitive intertidal

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:35:and localised disturbance to feeding resources will result in an impact of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:35:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:36:negligible, and any exceedances of the thresholds stated in Cutts et al. (2009) or Wright et al. (2010) would

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:36:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:36:negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:36:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:36:be negligible, therefore any effects on waterbirds and foraging terns would manifest as a direct behavioural

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:37:on foraging / roosting waterbirds and terns is predicted to be negligible.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:37:While impacts are anticipated to be negligible, the implication of best practice mitigation measures set out

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:37:water) will further reduce the impact on foraging / roosting waterbirds. The residual impact is negligible.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:37:negligible impact on intertidal benthos (see Section 9.6.2) and would not adversely affect the availability of

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:37:result of hydrodynamic changes would be negligible.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:37:No mitigation measures are considered necessary, therefore the residual impact is negligible.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf:1:that there would be impacts of negligible significance to the only NSR scoped into the assessment.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf:1:would be negligible to minor adverse significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf:2:noise and air quality disturbance would be negligible.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf:2:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf:2:negligible significance and not significant respectively. In addition, operational phase impacts to human

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf:2:health as reported in Section 8 with regard to land quality are considered to be of negligible significance. It

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf:2:and land quality would be negligible.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf:2:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual impact of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_15. Traffic and transport.pdf:1:The impact of the proposed development’s construction traffic is therefore assessed as of negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_15. Traffic and transport.pdf:1:proposed schemes operational traffic is therefore assessed as negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_15. Traffic and transport.pdf:1:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:8: Negligible Commonplace feature of little or no habitat/historical significance. Loss of such a feature would not be seen

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:9: Negligible of normal natural variation change to the extent Change is within the normal range of natural variation.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:10: High Medium Low Negligible Negligible Low Medium High

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:10: Moderate Minor Minor Negligible Negligible Minor Minor Moderate

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:10: Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:10: Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Minor

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:17:grassland is concluded as being of negligible ecological value.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:17:negligible ecological value.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:17:scrub habitat is concluded as being of negligible ecological value.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:18:and ruderal habitat is concluded as being of negligible ecological value.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:18:metal structures, which have been assessed as being of negligible value for roosting bats due to the lack of

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:21: Wharf Negligible No

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:21: Buildings Negligible No

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:21: Notable Flora Negligible No

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:21: Badger Negligible No

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:21: Water vole Negligible No

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:22: Amphibians Negligible No

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:22: Reptiles Negligible No

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:23:impacts to foraging bats are considered to be negligible.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:23:included in the CEMP, and with the implementation of such measures, any impacts will be negligible in

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:23:Negligible impacts on water quality are anticipated during construction of the proposed scheme (Section

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:24:time otters are anticipated to spend in the area, an impact of negligible magnitude is anticipated. Given the

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:25:assessed to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:25:With the implementation of the above measures, the residual impact is of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:25:be of local (grayling) and (dingy skipper) significance, and negligible importance within the footprint of the

R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:24: predicted to be of negligible significance, with the exception of the subtidal habitat creation

R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:24: auditory injury to marine mammals from dredging has been assessed as negligible. The

R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:24: assessment has concluded impacts of negligible significance to all marine mammals with regard

R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:24: number of vessel movements in the area. A worst-case impact of negligible significance (not

R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:26: undertaken within the Tees, and is therefore expected to have a negligible effect on fish. The

R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:26: resulted in a conclusion that there will be negligible impacts on both resident and migratory

R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:26: use of quayside lighting, is predicted to have a negligible effect.

R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:27: impact is considered to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:28: of negligible significance to groundwater, moderate adverse to the Tees estuary and associated

R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:28: operation are predicted to be minor beneficial to controlled waters and negligible to human

R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:28: Business Parks would be negligible. No mitigation measures are required.

R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:30: negligible. No mitigation measures during the operational phase are required.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:14: Dust soiling High Risk Medium Risk Medium Risk Negligible Risk

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:14: Human health Medium Risk Low Risk Low Risk Negligible Risk

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:14: Ecological effects Medium Risk Low Risk Low Risk Negligible Risk

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:14:demolition, ‘medium risk’ for earthworks and construction, and ‘negligible risk’ for trackout. The impacts on

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:15:earthworks and construction and ‘negligible risk’ for trackout.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:5: Negligible / very

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:18: 0.0003 harbour porpoise Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:18: 0.000003 minke whale Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:18: dredging 0.00000024 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:18: 0.0000009 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:18:The magnitude of the potential impact of PTS as a result of dredging noise is negligible / very low for harbour

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:18:seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.10).

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:18: Harbour Negligible / Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:18: Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:18: Auditory injury Negligible / Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:18: (PTS) from Minke whale Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:18: Negligible / required. Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:18: SEL during Grey seal Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:18: Negligible / Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:18: Harbour seal Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:19:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:20: Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:20: 0.000003 minke whale Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:20: underwater noise 0.00000024 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:20: 0.0000009 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:20:The magnitude of the potential impact of TTS and fleeing response as a result of dredging noise, is negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:21:whale, grey seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.13).

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:21: Harbour Negligible / Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:21: Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:21: TTS or fleeing Negligible / Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:21: response from Minke whale Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:21: Negligible / required. Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:21: SEL during Grey seal Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:21: Negligible / Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:21: Harbour seal Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:21:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:22: Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:22: Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:22: dredging (5% of Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:22: 0.000005 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:22:of negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, the impact significance for any

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:22:potential increase in collision risk with vessels during dredging has been assessed as negligible (not

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:23: Harbour Negligible /

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:23: Low Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:23: Potential for Minke Negligible / Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:23: collision risk from required, other than Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:23: vessels during Negligible / Negligible good practice.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:23: Harbour Negligible / Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:23:The residual impact would be of negligible significance for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:24:The magnitude of the impact of vessel disturbance to seal haul-out sites is defined as negligible / very low

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:24:resulting in an overall impact significance of negligible.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:24:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:24:have a negligible impact on marine mammals.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:24:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:25: Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:25: Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:25: dredge area Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:25: 0.0001 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:25:Taking into account the low receptor sensitivity, the negligible potential magnitude of the impact and the

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:25:negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal (Table 10.17).

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:25: Harbour Negligible /

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:25: Low Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:25: Minke Negligible / Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:25: resource in Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:25: Negligible / Negligible required.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:25: Harbour Negligible / Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:25:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:26:10.5.1 and 10.5.2). The magnitude of effect in all species is assessed to be negligible / very low based on

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:26:maintenance activities has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.10 and Table 10.13).

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:26:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:26:10.5.3). The magnitude of effect in all species is assessed to be negligible / very low based on the maximum

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:26:has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.15).

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:26:dredging activities. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:26:assessed as negligible (see Section 10.5.4).

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:26:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:27:negligible (see Section 10.5.5).

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:27:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:27:negligible (see Section 10.5.6).

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:27:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:27:established vessel routes. The magnitude of effect in all species is assessed to be negligible / very low

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:27:for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal has been assessed as negligible (Table

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:27:would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:8:The socio-economic impacts of the proposed scheme are identified as ‘beneficial’, ‘negligible’ or ‘adverse’

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:8: Negligible No obvious significant effect to a receptor or environment.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:8: Negligible Where no discernible effect is expected as a result of the proposed scheme on the

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:8: High Medium Low Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:8: High Substantial Moderate to Minor to Moderate Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:8: Medium Moderate to Moderate Minor Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:9: Low Minor to Moderate Minor Negligible to Minor Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:9: Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:17:supply scenario forecasts only a negligible increase in employment during the plan period.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:19:term) and negligible.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:19:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:22:employment with the AOI and is therefore considered to correspond to a negligible magnitude of change.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:22:a permanent and negligible impact.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:22:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:22:negligible magnitude of change. The receptor is considered to be of medium sensitivity by virtue of the fact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:23:a permanent and negligible impact.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:23:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1107_Appendix 7_Land quality desk study.pdf:14: • negligible ground dissolution.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1107_Appendix 7_Land quality desk study.pdf:38: buildings is negligible.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:18:cumulative impact is predicted to be negligible.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:20: Negligible / very low

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:20: Negligible / very low

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:20: approach channel and Anglo Negligible / very low

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:20: Negligible / very low

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:20: Negligible / very low

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:20: Hartlepool approach Negligible / very low

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:21: Negligible / very low

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:21: Negligible / very low

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:21: Negligible / very low

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:21: Negligible / very low

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:21: Hartlepool approach Negligible / very low

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:21: Negligible / very low

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:21:Harbour Facilities schemes, is negligible / very low for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:21:harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as negligible (Table 27.5).

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:22:cumulative underwater noise impacts. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:22: TTS or fleeing Harbour Negligible /

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:22: response from Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:22: dredging at the Negligible /

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:22: Minke whale Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:22: Hartlepool Negligible /

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:22: approach Grey seal Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:22: Harbour Negligible /

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:22: Harbour seal Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:24:on waterbirds at North Tees Mudflat, and negligible impact further downstream (including at Vopak

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:25:supporting habitat was considered a negligible impact in the EIAs for both the Anglo American Harbour

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:25:(even in combination) would have a negligible impact, the cumulative effect with the proposed scheme would

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:26:driving activities (see Section 13.5.3 and 13.5.4). While there is anticipated to be negligible impact from

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:27:works, but the potential cumulative impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:27:impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:27:acceptable (from a navigation risk perspective), with all risks classified as negligible or low, with the

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:27:impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:27:The primary assessment identifies that the proposed schemes traffic demand would result in a negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:28:with the proposed scheme are considered not significant and indicate negligible impact, at worst. Therefore,

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:32:concludes that the disposal of dredged material will have a negligible impact on fisheries, marine ecology

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:32:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual cumulative impact of negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:18: Lianhetech, Seal Sands Proposed new buildings, plant upgrade, swale and associated Approximately Planning permission / Ramsar site would be negligible. On this basis,

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:26:greater than approximately 200m from source (see Appendix 8). There would be negligible effects on fish

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:28:would be negligible, therefore any effects on SPA / Ramsar site features would manifest as a direct

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:34:negligible effect on feeding resources for terns. When this is considered alongside the localised increase

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:6: likely to be negligible and therefore not necessary to be assessed.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:15:and beyond. The impact is therefore predicted to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:15:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would remain of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:18:considered to be very low, and the significance of the impact is negligible.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:19:Outside the migratory period, there would be a negligible impact on fish movement up- and downstream

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:21:underwater noise of piling activities is therefore considered to have a negligible impact on migration up-

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:21:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact remains negligible.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:22:negligible impact on fish species within the Tees.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:24:the footprint of the works, and even if there was, the number of vessels/fishers affected would be negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:24:and navigation within the Tees estuary is predicted to be negligible, given that works will be co-ordinated

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:24:are predicted to be negligible.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:24:remain negligible.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:24:in motorised vessel traffic is therefore considered to have a negligible impact on fish populations or

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:24:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact will remain negligible.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:25:impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:25:impact would be negligible.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:3: MMO Scoping Opinion negligible and therefore not necessary to be assessed.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:9: Negligible Assets with no significant importance or archaeological/historical interest.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:9: Negligible The asset’s fabric and/or setting is changed in ways which do not materially affect its heritage significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:10: Significance High Medium Low Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:10: Low Moderate Minor Minor Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:10: Negligible Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:10: Negligible No material change to heritage significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:11:these from other non-significant (negligible) impacts as they may contribute to significant impacts

R-2020-0685-ESM-HIGHWAYS ENGLAND.pdf:11:Impacts of negligible significance from the short term, local and reversible construction phase road traffic at the

R-2020-0685-ESM-HIGHWAYS ENGLAND.pdf:11:Predicted noise levels indicate negligible impact at human receptor locations. This is considered not significant

R-2019-0427-FFM-1 Appendix D1 Enviro Insight Report.PDF:13: 9.1.3 Maximum Soluble Rocks hazard rating identified on the Negligible

R-2019-0427-FFM-1 Appendix D1 Enviro Insight Report.PDF:92: These are rock layers or drift deposits with low permeability that have negligible

R-2019-0427-FFM-1 Appendix D1 Enviro Insight Report.PDF:122: Maximum Soluble Rocks* hazard rating identified on the study site Negligible

R-2019-0427-FFM-1 Appendix C1 Enviro Insight Report.PDF:13: 9.1.3 Maximum Soluble Rocks hazard rating identified on the Negligible

R-2019-0427-FFM-1 Appendix C1 Enviro Insight Report.PDF:70: These are rock layers or drift deposits with low permeability that have negligible

R-2019-0427-FFM-1 Appendix C1 Enviro Insight Report.PDF:70: These are rock layers or drift deposits with low permeability that have negligible

R-2019-0427-FFM-1 Appendix C1 Enviro Insight Report.PDF:88: Maximum Soluble Rocks* hazard rating identified on the study site Negligible

R-2019-0427-FFM-2 Appendix D2 Geo Insight Report.PDF:9:6.3 Ground Dissolution of Soluble Rocks Negligible

R-2019-0427-FFM-2 Appendix D2 Geo Insight Report.PDF:43:2 0.0 On Site Negligible investigation required, and increased

R-2019-0427-FFM-2 Appendix D2 Geo Insight Report.PDF:43:5 0.0 On Site Negligible investigation required, and increased

R-2019-0427-FFM-2 Appendix D2 Geo Insight Report.PDF:45:1 0.0 On Site Negligible soluble rocks. No special ground investigation required, and increased

R-2019-0427-FFM-2 Appendix D2 Geo Insight Report.PDF:45:2 0.0 On Site Negligible soluble rocks. No special ground investigation required, and increased

R-2019-0427-FFM-2 Appendix D2 Geo Insight Report.PDF:45:1 0.0 On Site Negligible

R-2019-0427-FFM-2 Appendix D2 Geo Insight Report.PDF:45:3 0.0 On Site Negligible

R-2019-0427-FFM-2 Appendix D2 Geo Insight Report.PDF:45:6 0.0 On Site Negligible

R-2019-0427-FFM-2 Appendix D2 Geo Insight Report.PDF:46: 1 0.0 On Site Negligible

R-2019-0427-FFM-2 Appendix D2 Geo Insight Report.PDF:46: 2 0.0 On Site Negligible

R-2019-0427-FFM-2 Appendix D2 Geo Insight Report.PDF:46: 1 0.0 On Site Negligible

R-2019-0427-FFM-201920 Ecology report final.pdf:13:and with negligible ecological value.

R-2019-0427-FFM-201920 Ecology report final.pdf:14:vegetation and negligible ecological interest.

R-2022-0475-NM-64764 LVIA Update 25-05-22.PDF:3: arising from the increased height parameter would be negligible when viewed within the

R-2022-0475-NM-64764 LVIA Update 25-05-22.PDF:5: an increased hight parameter would be negligible and as such the effect would remain

R-2021-0166-FFM-Archaeology - DBA.pdf:6: • Negligible – areas of extremely limited or no archaeological or historic interest. These

R-2021-0166-FFM-Archaeology - DBA.pdf:10:6.2.2 The South Steel Works was a later addition to the Cleveland Iron & Steel Works and is of negligible

R-2021-0166-FFM-Archaeology - DBA.pdf:10:7.1.2 The South Steel Works, repurposed as the Torpedo Ladle Workshop, is of negligible archaeological

R-2021-0166-FFM-Officer Report 0166.pdf:9:There are no roost sites and only a negligible amount of suitable foraging

R-2021-0166-FFM-Officer Report 0166.pdf:9:negligible.

R-2021-0166-FFM-Officer Report 0166.pdf:9:negligible

R-2021-0166-FFM-Officer Report 0166.pdf:9:The amount of suitable habitat for Hedgehog on the site is negligible therefore

R-2021-0166-FFM-Officer Report 0166.pdf:9:impacts on Hedgehog are considered to be negligible.

R-2021-0166-FFM-Officer Report 0166.pdf:10:the site is considered to be of negligible importance for Common Toad.

R-2021-0166-FFM-Officer Report 0166.pdf:10:The only Valued Ecological Receptors which are other than of negligible value

R-2021-0166-FFM-Ecological Assessment.pdf:12:7.9 There are no roost sites and only a negligible amount of suitable foraging habitat for bats on the

R-2021-0166-FFM-Ecological Assessment.pdf:12:site therefore impacts on bats are assessed as being negligible.

R-2021-0166-FFM-Ecological Assessment.pdf:12:7.12 The amount of suitable habitat for Hedgehog on the site is negligible therefore impacts on

R-2021-0166-FFM-Ecological Assessment.pdf:12:Hedgehog are considered to be negligible.

R-2021-0166-FFM-Ecological Assessment.pdf:12:Brown Hare are considered to be negligible

R-2021-0166-FFM-Ecological Assessment.pdf:12:the site. Nevertheless the site is considered to be of negligible importance for Common Toad.

R-2021-0166-FFM-Ecological Assessment.pdf:13:habitats. The only species for which this has the potential to be other than a negligible effect are

R-2021-0166-FFM-Ecological Assessment.pdf:14:negligible significance are:

R-2021-0166-FFM-Ecological Assessment.pdf:15:11.3 The only Valued Ecological Receptors which are other than of negligible value are Dingy Skipper

R-2021-0166-FFM-Geotechnical Risk Assessment .pdf:13:is considered to be negligible and has not been considered further.

R-2022-0494-FFM-Desk Based Heritage Assessment.pdf:6: • Negligible – areas of extremely limited or no archaeological or historic interest. These

R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:24: 4.4.3 Fencing, areas of bare ground and hardstanding were found to have negligible

R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:84: the jetty. This habitat has negligible biodiversity value.

R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:84: short concrete wall surrounding the perimeter. This habitat has negligible

R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:85: of the bare ground. These habitats have negligible biodiversity value.

R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:85: and along the access road where no vegetation is present that has negligible

R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:85: negligible biodiversity value.

R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:85:buildings B1 to B6, they are likely to have negligible suitability for roosting bats. Due to the minor suitable

R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:85:noise levels, this building is assessed as having low at best suitability to support roosting bats and negligible

R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:86: Substation features. This building has negligible suitability to support roosting bats. affected, and the building

R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:86: has negligible suitability to

R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:86: Sludge roosting features and has negligible suitability to support roosting bats. demolished the building has

R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:86: storage negligible suitability to

R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:86: Sludge roosting features and has negligible suitability to support roosting bats. demolished the building has

R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:86: storage negligible suitability to

R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:86: water tank roosting features and has negligible suitability to support roosting bats. demolished the building has

R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:86: negligible suitability to

R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:86: This building has negligible suitability to support roosting bats. negligible suitability to

R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:86: water tank roosting features and has negligible suitability to support roosting bats. demolished the building has

R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:86: negligible suitability to

R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:86: negligible suitability to support a maternity or hibernation roost.

R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:106: is negligible risk of hibernating reptiles/GCN being encountered, they may advise that such

R-2021-1048-FFM-Officer Report 1048.pdf:19:local population are considered to be negligible.

R-2021-1048-FFM-Officer Report 1048.pdf:19:impact of the development is assessed as negligible

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:18: permeability that have negligible

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:50:121 17.4 Collapsible deposits Negligible (within 50m)

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:50:123 17.6 Ground dissolution of soluble rocks Negligible (within 50m)

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:115: Negligible

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:159: Negligible

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:159: On site Negligible Ground conditions predominantly non-plastic.

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:161: Negligible

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:163: Negligible

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:163: On site Negligible Compressible strata are not thought to occur.

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:165: Negligible

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:165: On site Negligible Deposits with potential to collapse when loaded and saturated are believed not to be present.

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:166: Negligible

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:167: Negligible

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:167: On site Negligible Soluble rocks are either not thought to be present within the ground, or not prone to dissolution.

R-2021-1048-FFM-SSI 1 Desk Study_final(2).pdf:27:There is a risk of minor fuel spills and oil leaks from vehicles but these are comparatively negligible.

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf:18: permeability that have negligible

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf:42:121 17.4 Collapsible deposits Negligible (within 50m)

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf:42:123 17.6 Ground dissolution of soluble rocks Negligible (within 50m)

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf:107: Negligible

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf:151: Negligible

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf:151: On site Negligible Ground conditions predominantly non-plastic.

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf:153: Negligible

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf:155: Negligible

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf:155: On site Negligible Compressible strata are not thought to occur.

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf:157: Negligible

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf:157: On site Negligible Deposits with potential to collapse when loaded and saturated are believed not to be present.

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf:158: Negligible

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf:159: Negligible

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf:159: On site Negligible Soluble rocks are either not thought to be present within the ground, or not prone to dissolution.

R-2021-1048-FFM-EN010103-001131-NZT DCO 6.4.42 ES Vol III Appendix 18A Cultural Heritage Baseline Report.PDF:6: ‘medium’, ‘low’, ‘negligible’, or ‘unknown’. This rating is based on an

R-2021-1048-FFM-EN010103-001131-NZT DCO 6.4.42 ES Vol III Appendix 18A Cultural Heritage Baseline Report.PDF:7: Negligible

R-2021-1048-FFM-4339 Preliminary Onshore GI for NZT (Draft Report).pdf:1308:influence zone of the cone tip measurement and the loss of meaningful resolution is negligible.

R-2021-1048-FFM-4339 Preliminary Onshore GI for NZT (Draft Report).pdf:1402: is large enough for end effects to be negligible allowing the test to be modelled as a plane strain

R-2021-1048-FFM-4339 Preliminary Onshore GI for NZT (Draft Report).pdf:1419:two important assumptions about this output; that it is linear and that the hysteresis is negligible. The

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:42: negligible levels by an increased distance between the sensitive receptor(s) and the UXO.

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:99: Negligible Minor Moderate Major Severe

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:102: Negligible 1 Safe for all equipment and personnel.

R-2021-1048-FFM-2021-81 HRA NZT remediation.PDF:6:generated by ground works rather than NOx is predicted to be negligible. Dust and particulates could

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:18: permeability that have negligible

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:42:121 17.4 Collapsible deposits Negligible (within 50m)

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:42:123 17.6 Ground dissolution of soluble rocks Negligible (within 50m)

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:107: Negligible

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:151: Negligible

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:151: On site Negligible Ground conditions predominantly non-plastic.

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:153: Negligible

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:155: Negligible

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:155: On site Negligible Compressible strata are not thought to occur.

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:157: Negligible

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:157: On site Negligible Deposits with potential to collapse when loaded and saturated are believed not to be present.

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:158: Negligible

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:159: Negligible

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:159: On site Negligible Soluble rocks are either not thought to be present within the ground, or not prone to dissolution.

R-2021-1048-FFM-2021-83 EcIA NZT Remediation Rev A.PDF:12:storage so there were mounds of tipped material. Vegetation cover was negligible.

R-2021-1048-FFM-2021-83 EcIA NZT Remediation Rev A.PDF:13:was <5% and shrubs or invasive species were negligible. Hedge bedstraw and bird’s-foot trefoil were

R-2021-1048-FFM-2021-83 EcIA NZT Remediation Rev A.PDF:16:adverse impacts on the local population are considered to be negligible.

R-2021-1048-FFM-2021-83 EcIA NZT Remediation Rev A.PDF:16:surrounding area so the impact of the development is assessed as negligible

R-2021-1048-FFM-2021-83 EcIA NZT Remediation Rev A.PDF:19:or negligible value.

R-2021-1048-FFM-GEO_STDCO_GEOENVIRONMENTALSUMMARYREPORT(002)sm.pdf:37:Negligible flow rates were reported from installations BH21, 23, 24, 26, 27, 28 and the deeper

R-2021-0100-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0088-01-Prairie_Risk Assessment.pdf:15: Deposits have negligible significance for water supply or river base flow. Based on

R-2021-0100-CD-STDC_HWY-ATK-HGT-PR-RP-CE-000001_C01.pdf:47: 1 to 4 Negligible Could be ignored

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix H - July 2020.pdf:706: drift of the glacio-lacustrine laminated clays as a “Non Aquifer” of “negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix H - July 2020.pdf:828: as being negligible to low.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix H - July 2020.pdf:872:Oil and fuel Lubricating oils, Site Users Direct contact, Health hazard Unlikely Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix H - July 2020.pdf:872: Mild migration. Negligible evidenc e of contamination detected in soil,

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix H - July 2020.pdf:873: G r o u n d w a t er (drift Migration via Pollution of Unlikely Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix H - July 2020.pdf:892:Ground Conditions assessed as being negligible to low.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix H - July 2020.pdf:895: Groundwater Low Aquifer of negligible resource

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:10: construction works 5) or soils of negligible nature conservation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:10: negligible value Negligible potential for mineral reserves to

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:12: Negligible Human Health: No measurable effects on Impact of insufficient magnitude to

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:12: Sensitivity/value of a High Medium Low Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:12: High Substantial Moderate Minor Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:12: Medium Moderate Minor Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:12: Low Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:30: significance is considered negligible and therefore not significant.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:39: high and the magnitude of impact following mitigation is negligible. There are likely to be

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:39: impacts of negligible significance after the implementation of mitigation measures. This is not

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:39: impact following mitigation is negligible. Therefore, the impacts after the implementation of

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:39: mitigation measures are considered to be of negligible significance. This is not considered

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:39: construction phase is considered to be of negligible significance. This is not considered

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:39: and the magnitude of impact following mitigation is negligible. Therefore, following the

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:39: implementation of mitigation measures impacts are of negligible significance. This is not

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:39: impact following mitigation is negligible. Therefore, the impacts following mitigation are of

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:39: negligible significance. This is not considered significant in EIA terms.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:39: following mitigation is negligible. Therefore, the impacts are considered to be of negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:40: impacts identified is considered to be negligible following the implementation of the mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:41: Moderate A P D LT L Such works will be undertaken taking into Negligible A T D ST L

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:41: Negligible A T D ST L appropriate EA guidance documents. - Negligible A T D ST L

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:41:Management Minor A T I M R Negligible A T I ST L

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:41: Minor A T D M L - Negligible A T D ST L

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:41: Minor A T D ST L Negligible A T D ST L

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:42: Moderate A P D LT L - Negligible A T D ST L

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:5: reduced to negligible (not significant) once mitigation measures have been incorporated into a

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:5: Biodiversity and Ecology Negligible effect on Teesmouth and Cleveland

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:5: Water Management and Flooding Negligible to moderate beneficial impact (not

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:6: Negligible to minor beneficial impacts (not

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:6: Ground Conditions Negligible (not significant) effects are predicted on

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:6: term negligible (not significant).

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:6: Below Ground Heritage Negligible to neutral effects (not significant)

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:6: Negligible effect predicted on pedestrian and

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:6: Biodiversity and Ecology Negligible effect on Teesmouth and Cleveland

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:7: Negligible beneficial effects (not significant) on

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:7: Ground Conditions Negligible (not significant) effects are predicted on

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:7: Landscape and Visual Impact Effects will generally be negligible to minor

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:8: Negligible impacts are predicted on all other

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:9: effects of the development are either Neutral or Negligible and therefore these are not presented

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:10: RED – adverse effect; GREEN – beneficial effect; BLACK – unknown; ( ) – minor effect; - negligible/no

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:17: considered to be of negligible impact). There is potential for the onshore element to lead to loss

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:17: impacts considered as part of the proposed development are considered to be of negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:19: development and the development site due to the negligible connection between the surface

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:19: development and the development site due to the negligible connection between the surface

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:20: development and the development site due to the negligible connection between the surface

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:20: development and the development site due to the negligible connection between the surface

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:20: development and the development site due to the negligible connection between the surface

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:20: development and the development site due to the negligible connection between the surface

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:21: development and the development site due to the negligible connection between the surface

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:21: development and the development site due to the negligible connection between the surface

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:23: significant scale the overall landscape character will be negligible. Consequently there are not

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:23: significant scale the overall landscape character will be negligible. Consequently there are not

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix M - July 2020.pdf:8: • Negligible – areas of extremely limited or no archaeological or historic interest. These

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix M - July 2020.pdf:48:potential is negligible for the survival of the Eston Steel Works due to later development of the Cleveland Steelworks

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:6: reduced to negligible levels.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:19:F3.20 If the impact descriptor is negligible or slight, this is considered to not have a significant effect.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:19: Negligible Negligible Slight Moderate

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:19: Negligible Slight Moderate Moderate

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:19: negligible.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:19: <10% of hourly mean NO2 threshold Imperceptible Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:20: significant effect and a ‘negligible’ or ‘slight’ impact will not result in a significant effect in EIA

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:29: on human health and ecological designations should be negligible and the impacts would

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:32: predicted to result in a negligible impact and not significant in EIA terms.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:32: negligible impact from NO2 concentrations as a result of operational traffic. These are not

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:33: is predicted to result in a negligible impact and not significant in EIA terms.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:33: negligible impact from PM10 concentrations as a result of operational traffic. These are not

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:33: is predicted to result in a negligible impact and not significant in EIA terms.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:33: negligible impact from PM2.5 concentrations as a result of operational traffic and not significant

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:33:F5.36 The magnitude of change for NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations is negligible at all receptors.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:33: As stated in paragraph F3.24, where the impact is negligible or slight then the overall effect of

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:34: on human health and ecological designations should be negligible and the impacts would

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:38: measures suitable for medium risk sites in place, there is likely to be a negligible effect on

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:38:F8.6 The magnitude of change for NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations at all receptors is negligible.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:38: Residential receptors Negligible effect No mitigation measures None.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:38: Negligible effect Dust management None.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:38: SSSI – Teesmouth and Negligible effect No mitigation measures None.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:38: Negligible effect Dust management None.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:39: SPA – Teesmouth and Negligible effect No mitigation measures None.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:18: Negligible flood risk. flood risk point of view.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:20: sub-divide the category of ‘Not Significant’, for example by use of the terms ‘Negligible’ in terms

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:21: Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:21: Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:21: Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:36: Culvert is low and the magnitude of change minor and so the effect would be negligible and not

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:37: receptor, the lack of change means there is a neutral / negligible effect and so not significant.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:37: negligible, and not significant.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:38: Culvert, this would have a neutral / negligible effect and so not significant.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:46: will be minor, so the level of effect is therefore negligible, and not significant. Additional

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:47: gives an effect greater than minor or negligible, which is not significant.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:47: receptors, this would result in a negligible level of effect of pollution which would be deemed to

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:47: negligible beneficial effect for the other surface waterbodies (Holme Beck, Knitting wife,

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:47: of the mitigation measures and so a substantial beneficial effect for the Tees and negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:47: will be minor, so the level of effect is therefore negligible, and not significant. Additional

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:51:Other surface water Increased runoff Low Negligible adverse Implementation of water management and No significant effect from

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:51:Cleveland & Lackenby from climate change. negligible beneficial impact.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:52:Mercia Mudstone Reduced infiltration Low Negligible adverse No further mitigation is proposed. No significant effect from

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:53:Superficial aquifer Reduced infiltration Low Negligible adverse No further mitigation proposed. No significant effect from

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:53:Other surface water Increased runoff Very low Negligible adverse No additional mitigation measures are No significant effect from

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:53: negligible beneficial effect.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix C - July 2020.pdf:40:expected to be negligible.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix C - July 2020.pdf:40:generated by the development in this location is expected to be negligible.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf:9: Negligible Assets with very little or no surviving archaeological interest.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf:10: Negligible Very minor changes to archaeological materials or setting.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf:11: Magnitude of Change No Change Negligible Minor Moderate Substantial No Change

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf:11: Medium Neutral Negligible Minor Moderate Substantial Medium

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf:11: Low Neutral Negligible Negligible Minor Moderate Low

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf:11: Negligible Neutral Negligible Negligible Negligible Minor Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf:11: the effect on the receptor will be Neutral, Negligible, Minor, Moderate or Substantial.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf:11: Negligible/neutral The development satisfies the subject environmental objective but neither

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf:20: offsets the negative effect to, in most cases, have a residual effect that is negligible or neutral.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf:20: Foundations of South Bank Iron Works Low – Medium Substantial Negligible / Neutral

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf:20: Foundations of Antonien Works Low Substantial Negligible / Neutral

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf:20: 20th century Riverside Pumping House Low Substantial Negligible / Neutral

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf:20: 20th century Custom House Low Substantial Negligible / Neutral

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:13: R1 19.1 21.4 21.8 0.5 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:13: R2 18.0 20.2 20.4 0.2 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:13: R3 17.8 20.0 20.2 0.2 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:13: R4 18.0 20.3 20.6 0.3 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:13: R5 17.9 20.2 20.6 0.4 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:13: R6 15.7 17.9 18.0 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:13: R7 15.3 17.5 17.6 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:13: R8 14.6 16.9 16.9 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:13: R9 15.6 18.0 18.1 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:13: R10 16.1 18.6 18.8 0.2 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:13: R11 14.3 16.7 16.7 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:13: R12 14.4 16.8 16.8 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:13: R13 15.8 18.3 18.4 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:13: R14 15.4 17.9 18.0 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:13: E1 18.6 20.7 20.8 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:13: E2 18.5 20.7 20.7 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:13: R15 26.3 28.5 28.6 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:13: R16 26.2 28.4 28.7 0.3 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:13: R17 22.3 24.5 24.6 0.2 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:13: R18 24.9 27.1 27.3 0.2 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:13: R19 28.5 30.7 31.2 0.4 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:13: R20 28.5 30.7 31.2 0.4 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:13: R22 23.6 25.8 26.1 0.3 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:13: R23 22.6 24.8 25.1 0.3 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:14: R1 12.1 12.5 12.6 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:14: R2 12.4 12.8 12.9 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:14: R3 12.1 12.5 12.6 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:14: R4 12.1 12.5 12.6 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:14: R5 12.1 12.6 12.6 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:14: R6 11.9 12.3 12.4 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:14: R7 11.8 12.2 12.3 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:14: R8 13.5 13.9 13.9 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:14: R9 13.7 14.1 14.1 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:14: R10 12.2 12.7 12.7 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:14: R11 12.1 12.5 12.5 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:14: R12 12.1 12.5 12.5 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:14: R13 12.3 12.8 12.8 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:14: R14 12.3 12.7 12.7 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:14: E1 10.6 11.0 11.1 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:14: E2 10.6 11.0 11.0 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:14: R15 15.2 16.0 16.0 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:14: R16 15.4 16.4 16.5 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:14: R17 14.4 15.6 15.7 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:14: R18 15.1 16.5 16.6 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:14: R19 14.0 14.3 14.3 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:14: R20 14.0 14.3 14.3 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:14: R21 15.3 13.8 13.8 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:14: R22 13.1 13.5 13.6 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:14: R23 12.7 13.1 13.2 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:15: R1 7.9 8.0 8.0 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:15: R2 8.1 8.2 8.2 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:15: R3 7.8 7.9 7.9 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:15: R4 7.8 7.9 8.0 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:15: R5 7.8 8.0 8.0 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:15: R6 7.7 7.8 7.8 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:15: R7 7.7 7.8 7.8 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:15: R8 8.0 8.2 8.2 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:15: R9 8.1 8.3 8.3 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:15: R10 7.7 7.8 7.8 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:15: R11 7.6 7.7 7.7 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:15: R12 7.6 7.7 7.7 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:15: R13 7.7 7.9 7.9 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:15: R14 7.7 7.8 7.9 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:15: E1 7.1 7.2 7.2 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:15: E2 7.1 7.2 7.2 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:15: R15 9.5 9.8 9.8 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:15: R16 9.9 10.3 10.4 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:15: R17 9.0 9.6 9.6 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:15: R18 9.7 10.4 10.5 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:15: R19 9.0 9.0 9.1 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:15: R20 9.0 9.0 9.1 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:15: R21 9.8 8.7 8.8 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:15: R22 8.4 8.5 8.5 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:15: R23 8.2 8.3 8.4 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:12: experience a negligible impact, or in the case of Smiths Dock Road, minor beneficial effects are

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:13: negligible (and therefore not significant) impacts on the Teesmouth and Cleveland Coast SPA

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:15: the implementation of best practice mitigation measures there is anticipated to be a negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:15: a negligible impact from NO2 concentrations as a result of the proposed traffic. This is not

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:15:7.9 To ensure a negligible and non-significant impact is maintained during the construction stage of

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:16: receptors is considered to be minor or negligible and therefore not significant.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:17: (described below) this is expected to result in a negligible (and not significant) impact on human

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:17: health. Previous studies undertaken suggest there would be a negligible impact on

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:17: however through the implementation of best practice measures negligible impacts are

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:17:9.10 The implementation of these measures will result in negligible (and not significant) effects at all

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:19: and as a result the impact is expected to be negligible and not significant on the remaining

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:19: hardstanding areas it is anticipated that this will also have a nil or negligible impact on the

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:19: anticipated that the impacts are expected to be negligible (and not significant).

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:20: LCZs are considered to be minor or negligible in nature. There is the potential for a moderate

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:20: considered to be minor or negligible in nature and are therefore not significant.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:21: considered to be negligible and not significant.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:22: of the ES can be secured and that the effects are negligible or kept to an absolute minimum. The

R-2020-0357-OOM-Transport Assessment.pdf:38:expected to be negligible.

R-2020-0357-OOM-Transport Assessment.pdf:38:generated by the development in this location is expected to be negligible.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - July 2020.pdf:13: Negligible Less than 3.0

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - July 2020.pdf:13: Negligible Less than 1.0

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - July 2020.pdf:20: a negligible increase in road traffic noise levels within the local area, therefore no significant

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - July 2020.pdf:26: expected to be a negligible impact in the short term and a negligible impact in the long term.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:5: Low Medium risk site Low risk site Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:5: Low Low risk site Low risk site Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:5: Low Low risk site Low risk site Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:5: Medium Medium risk site Low risk site Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:5: Low Low risk site Low risk site Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:25:R1 20.0 20.1 20.6 0.4 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:25:R2 18.9 19.0 19.2 0.2 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:25:R3 18.5 18.6 18.8 0.2 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:25:R4 18.7 18.9 19.2 0.3 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:25:R5 18.2 18.5 18.9 0.4 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:25:R6 16.1 16.2 16.3 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:25:R7 15.6 15.8 15.9 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:25:R8 14.1 14.3 14.3 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:25:R9 15.1 15.4 15.5 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:25:R10 15.8 16.2 16.4 0.2 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:25:R11 13.9 14.1 14.2 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:25:R12 14.0 14.2 14.3 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:25:R13 15.4 15.8 15.9 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:25:R14 15.0 15.4 15.5 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:25:E1 18.9 18.9 19.0 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:25:E2 18.8 18.8 18.8 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:25:R1 12.5 12.5 12.6 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:25:R2 12.3 12.3 12.3 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:25:R3 11.9 11.9 11.9 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:25:R4 11.9 11.9 11.9 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:25:R5 11.8 11.9 11.9 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:25:R6 11.6 11.6 11.7 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:25:R7 11.5 11.5 11.6 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:25:R8 13.2 13.2 13.2 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:25:R9 13.4 13.4 13.4 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:26: R10 12.1 12.2 12.2 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:26: R11 11.8 11.8 11.8 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:26: R12 11.8 11.8 11.8 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:26: R13 12.0 12.1 12.1 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:26: R14 12.0 12.0 12.0 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:26: E1 10.5 10.5 10.6 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:26: E2 10.5 10.5 10.5 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:26: R1 7.9 7.9 8.0 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:26: R2 7.9 7.9 8.0 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:26: R3 7.6 7.6 7.7 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:26: R4 7.6 7.7 7.7 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:26: R5 7.6 7.7 7.7 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:26: R6 7.5 7.5 7.5 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:26: R7 7.5 7.5 7.5 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:26: R8 7.9 7.9 7.9 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:26: R9 8.0 8.0 8.0 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:26: R10 7.6 7.6 7.6 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:26: R11 7.4 7.5 7.5 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:26: R12 7.4 7.5 7.5 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:26: R13 7.6 7.6 7.6 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:26: R14 7.5 7.6 7.6 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:26: E1 7.0 7.0 7.0 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:26: E2 7.0 7.0 7.0 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:14: experience a negligible impact, or in the case of Smiths Dock Road, minor beneficial effects are

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:15: are expected to be negligible (and therefore not significant) impacts on the Teesmouth and

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:17: the implementation of best practice mitigation measures there is anticipated to be a negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:17: and ecological). It is concluded that all receptors are predicted to experience a negligible or

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:17: concluded that all receptors are predicted to experience a negligible impact from Fine

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:17:7.9 To ensure a negligible and non-significant impact is maintained during the construction stage of

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:18: receptors is considered to be minor or negligible and therefore not significant.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:19: (described below) this is expected to result in a negligible (and not significant) impact on human

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:19: health. Previous studies undertaken suggest there would be a negligible impact on

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:19: however through the implementation of best practice measures negligible impacts are

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:20:9.10 The implementation of these measures will result in negligible (and not significant) effects at all

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:21: and as a result the impact is expected to be negligible and not significant on the remaining

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:21: hardstanding areas it is anticipated that this will also have a nil or negligible impact on the

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:21: anticipated that the impacts are expected to be negligible (and not significant).

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:23: LCZs are considered to be minor or negligible in nature. There is the potential for a moderate

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:23: considered to be minor or negligible in nature and are therefore not significant.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:23: considered to be negligible and not significant.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:24: of the ES can be secured and that the effects are negligible or kept to an absolute minimum. The

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:8: vi. Negligible – Nugatory effect on species or habitats present are anticipated.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:10: mostly limited to developed land of negligible ecological value (see Appendix D3).

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:14: (Hypericum perforatum), and bird’s-foot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus). A negligible abundance of

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:15: site, however bare ground cover is negligible outside this area. Grass is relatively rank, with

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:15:D4.23 Due to this habitat generally being of negligible value for floral ecological features and not itself

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:18:D4.43 Due to this habitat generally being of negligible value for ecological features, and the small size

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:19:D4.47 Due to this habitat generally being of negligible value for ecological features and the lack of

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:19: sided metal structures of negligible value for ecological features.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:22: sided metal structures of negligible value for roosting bats.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:39: Teesmouth Pollution of riverine Indirect pollution as a result of sediment, Major Direction of sediments and contaminated Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:39: Increased light-spill Illumination of River Tees by unshielded Moderate Directional lighting during construction Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:39: Teesmouth Pollution of riverine Indirect pollution as a result of sediment, Major Direction of sediments and contaminated Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:39: Increased light-spill Illumination of River Tees by unshielded Moderate Directional lighting during construction Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:41: Potential harm to Unmitigated removal of trees, scrub, Moderate Vegetation clearance undertaken outside Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:42: Potential harm to Unmitigated removal of wetland habitat Moderate Vegetation clearance undertaken outside Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:42: Bats Loss of foraging and Loss of woodland, scrub, grasslands, OMH, Negligible No mitigation proposed. No habitat Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:42: Disturbance of species Lighting columns have the potential to Minor Lighting used during construction and Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:42: Otter Disturbance to otter Noise and vibration originating from the Minor Screening of any construction works Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:43: Marine Disturbance to marine Noise and vibration originating from the Minor Screening of any construction works Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:43: Migratory Fish Potential harm of Pollution of the River Tees as a result of Minor Employment of CEMP during construction Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:43: Hedgehog Potential harm of Uncovered dug trenches and excavations Minor Cover trenches overnight or include Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf:12: Negligible Materials are forecast (through trend analysis and other information) to be free from

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf:13: Negligible The consumption of no individual material type would be equal to or greater than 1%

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf:14: No change Negligible Minor Moderate Major

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf:14: Medium Neutral Negligible / Slight Moderate Moderate

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf:14: Low Neutral Negligible / Negligible Slight Minor /

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf:14: Negligible Neutral Nil Negligible Negligible / Slight

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf:19:J5.10 Therefore, the magnitude of the impact of demolition waste is considered to be negligible (<1%).

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf:19: that the overall significance of the potential effect is nil or negligible (not significant).

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf:19:J5.16 Therefore, the magnitude of impact of excavation materials is considered to be negligible. This,

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf:19: overall significance of the potential effect is nil or negligible (not significant).

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf:20: the magnitude of the impact of construction waste is considered to be negligible (<1%). This,

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf:20: overall significance of the potential effect is nil or negligible (not significant).

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf:21: receptor, the overall significance of the effect is considered to be nil or negligible (not

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf:21: proposed development are considered to be negligible. Given the low sensitivity of the regional

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf:25: remain as negligible or nil (not significant).

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf:26: be nil or negligible which is not considered significant.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - July 2020.pdf:12:I3.10 The socio-economic effects of the proposed development are identified as ‘beneficial’, ‘negligible’

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - July 2020.pdf:13: Negligible No obvious significant effect to a receptor or environment.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - July 2020.pdf:13: Negligible Where no discernible effect is expected as a result of the proposed development on the

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - July 2020.pdf:13: change/effects High Medium Low Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - July 2020.pdf:13: High Substantial Moderate to Minor to Moderate Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - July 2020.pdf:13: Medium Moderate to Moderate Minor Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - July 2020.pdf:13: Low Minor to Moderate Minor Negligible to Minor Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - July 2020.pdf:13: Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - July 2020.pdf:22: storage and post. Similarly, the labour supply scenario forecasts only a negligible increase in

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - July 2020.pdf:28: of the significance criteria matrix. The effects are assessed as being beneficial, negligible or

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - July 2020.pdf:28: negligible. An assessment of the likely effects in relation to each receptor is presented in Table

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf:9: • Negligible – effects which are unlikely to be perceptible to drivers, bus passengers or those

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf:9: • Negligible – effects which are unlikely to be perceptible and within the normal variation of

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf:19: Medium non-motorised users to cross at the Minor Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf:19: High Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf:20: therefore considered to be negligible;

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf:20: negligible.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf:20: safety is expected to be negligible.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf:21: be negligible.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf:25: A1085 Trunk Minor adverse Travel Planning measures, alongside a Servicing Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf:25: A66/Normanby Minor adverse Travel Planning measures to be introduced to Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf:27: A66/Tees Dock Negligible effect on None required Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf:28: A1085 Trunk Minor adverse Travel Planning measures, alongside Negligible - the

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf:28: A1053 Negligible effect on None required Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf:28: A66/Old Station Negligible effect on None required Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf:28: A66/Normanby Minor adverse Travel Planning measures to be Negligible - the

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf:28: A66/Eston Negligible effect on None required Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf:37: would result in a negligible increase in road traffic noise within the local area. Noise emission

R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf:38: through the modelling process was predicted to be negligible at all receptors. The overall effect

R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf:44: facilities and the built environment and landscape will all be of negligible significance during

R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf:47: waste from the proposed development are all considered to result in a negligible impact on

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:27: 4 Neutral/negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:44:locations set out in the table range from negligible to moderate adverse.

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:45:The changes at these junctions are considered to range from negligible to

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:46:summarised in Table C7.1 of the ES. The impacts range from negligible to

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:53:is noted as ranging from negligible to major negative effect at county level.

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:60:movements, this is expected to be a negligible impact in the short term and a

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:60:negligible impact in the long term.

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:67:place, there is likely to be a negligible effect on receptors from the dust-

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:67:receptors is negligible. The overall effect of the proposed development on

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:74:significance is considered negligible and therefore not significant.

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:77:negligible. There are likely to be impacts of negligible significance after the

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:77:magnitude of impact following mitigation is negligible. Therefore, the impacts

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:77:negligible significance. This is not considered significant in EIA terms.

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:77:negligible significance. This is not considered significant in EIA terms.

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:77:mitigation is negligible. Therefore, following the implementation of mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:77:measures impacts are of negligible significance. This is not considered

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:77:the magnitude of impact following mitigation is negligible. Therefore, the

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:77:impacts following mitigation are of negligible significance. This is not

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:78:the magnitude of impact following mitigation is negligible. Therefore, the

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:78:impacts are considered to be of negligible significance. This is not considered

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:78:residual significance of the impacts identified is considered to be negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:88:the proposed development is therefore considered to be negligible with the

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:89:development would be nil or negligible which is not considered significant.

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:96:negligible.

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:97:negligible effect on the Industrial, Coast and Peninsula, Coatham Marsh,

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:97:ranging from negligible to a temporary, short-term minor to moderate adverse

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:97:is noted that the significance of effect ranges from negligible to minor adverse

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:98:7 and 8 are considered to be negligible and not significant in EIA terms.

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:98:landscape character zones and a temporary, short-term, negligible effect on

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:99:Other impacts upon specified LCZs are considered to be minor or negligible in

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:99:to minor or negligible in nature.

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:99:minor to negligible adverse impacts. As stated above the site is allocated for

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:102:negative effect to, in most cases, have a residual effect that is negligible or

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:13: Negligible The size and scale of change is considered very small due to the extent and

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:18: Negligible The proposed development is barely discernible within the landscape and

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:20: Neutral / negligible Maintain the character of the receiving landscape.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:20: Neutral / negligible The proposed development would cause no discernible deterioration or

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:20: improvement in a view. In most instances, a negligible effect will arise where

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:20: negligible magnitude of change.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:21: EIA terms. Those classified as minor or negligible are likely to be not significant in EIA terms

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:22: Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:45: considered to be negligible.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:45: character zones and a temporary, short-term, negligible effect on the Industrial, Coast and

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:45: negligible to a temporary, short-term minor to moderate adverse effect upon views and

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:46: All landscape and Negligible to Adverse Direct and short- Implementation of

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:46: Negligible.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:46: LCZ 1 - Industrial Low Negligible Moderate Direct, Permanent

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:48: magnitude of change is therefore considered to be Negligible.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:48:L5.28 Combining all of these criteria, it is considered that there will be a Negligible level of effect,

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:48: LCZ 4 – Coast and Medium Negligible Negligible Indirect,

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:48: magnitude of change is therefore considered to be Negligible.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:48:L5.33 Combining all of these criteria, it is considered that there will be a Negligible level of effect,

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:49: LCZ 5 – Coatham Medium-High Negligible Negligible Indirect,

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:49: of the LCZ. The magnitude of change is therefore considered to be Negligible.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:49:L5.43 Combining all of these criteria, it is considered that there will be a Negligible level of effect,

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:50: LCZ 7 – Salthouse Medium-High Negligible Negligible Indirect,

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:50: of the LCZ. The magnitude of change is therefore considered to be Negligible.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:50:L5.48 Combining all of these criteria, it is considered that there will be a Negligible level of effect,

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:50: LCZ 8 – Rural Medium Negligible Negligible Indirect, Permanent

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:51: LCZ 1 - Industrial Low Negligible Moderate Direct, Permanent

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:51: LCZ 4 – Coast and Medium Negligible Negligible – Indirect,

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:51: LCZ 5 – Coatham Medium-High Negligible Negligible - Indirect,

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:51: LCZ 7 – Salthouse Medium-High Negligible Negligible – Indirect,

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:51: LCZ 8 – Rural Medium Negligible Negligible – Indirect,

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:55:L5.88 The assessment of the magnitude of change is therefore considered to be Negligible.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:55: VP6 Footpath Users Negligible Minor Adverse Direct, Permanent

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:55:L5.93 The assessment of the magnitude of change is therefore considered to be Negligible.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:55: VP7 Footpath Users Negligible Minor Adverse Direct, Permanent

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:59: VP6 Footpath Users - Negligible Minor Adverse - Direct, Permanent

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:59: VP7 Footpath Users - Negligible Minor Adverse - Direct, Permanent

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:61: and 10. Construction effects upon views 6, 7 and 8 are considered to be negligible and not

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:61: temporary, short-term, negligible effect on the Industrial, Coast and Peninsula, Coatham

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:61: LCZ 1 - Industrial Low Negligible Moderate Direct, Permanent

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:61: LCZ 4 – Coast and Medium Negligible Negligible – Indirect,

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:61: LCZ 5 – Coatham Medium-High Negligible Negligible - Indirect,

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:61: LCZ 7 – Salthouse Medium-High Negligible Negligible – Indirect,

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:61: LCZ 8 – Rural Medium Negligible Negligible – Indirect,

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:62: VP6 Footpath Users - Negligible Minor Adverse - Direct, Permanent

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:62: VP7 Footpath Users - Negligible Minor Adverse - Direct, Permanent

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:63: considered to be minor or negligible in nature.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:63: Viewpoint 9. The effects upon other viewpoint are considered to minor or negligible in nature.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:63: LCZ 4 – Coast and Negligible – Buildings to be articulated in a way Negligible –

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:63: LCZ 5 – Coatham Negligible - Buildings to be articulated in a way Negligible -

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:64: LCZ 7 – Salthouse Negligible – Buildings to be articulated in a way Negligible –

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:64: LCZ 8 – Rural Negligible – Buildings to be articulated in a way Negligible –

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - July 2020.pdf:18: the annual emissions from Redcar and Cleveland as a whole. This is not a negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 3).PDF:183: development is negligible.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 3).PDF:193: negligible, and the results show that the network, overall, would likely operate

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:12: 4 Neutral/negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:23: Greystones High Greatest increase in delay of 3 Negligible Minor adverse

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:23: Riverside Park Road Medium Greatest increase in delay of 2 Negligible Minor adverse

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:23: A171 Cargo Fleet Medium Greatest increase in delay of 2 Negligible Minor adverse

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:23: Ormesby Road / Medium Greatest increase in delay of 6 Negligible Minor adverse

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:25: Greystones Minor, permanent STDC transport strategy to outline Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:25: Riverside Park Minor, permanent STDC transport strategy to outline Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:26: West Terrace / Minor, permanent STDC transport strategy to outline Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:26: A171 Cargo Fleet Minor, permanent STDC transport strategy to outline Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:26: A171 Cargo Fleet Minor, permanent STDC transport strategy to outline Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:27: Ormesby Road / Minor, permanent STDC transport strategy to outline Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:31: include: international, national, regional, county, local or negligible.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:64: predicted to result in negligible or slight adverse impacts and is not considered to be significant

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:64: negligible impact from NO2 concentrations as a result of operational traffic. This is not

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:64: is predicted to result in a negligible impact and not considered to be significant in EIA terms.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:64: negligible impact from PM10 concentrations as a result of operational traffic. This is not

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:65: is predicted to result in a negligible impact and not considered to be significant in EIA terms.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:65: negligible impact from PM2.5 concentrations as a result of operational traffic and not considered

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:65:5.62 The magnitude of change for NO2 concentrations is predicted to be negligible or slight adverse

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:65: negligible at all receptors. As stated in Paragraph F3.24 of the July 2020 ES, where the impact is

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:65: predicted to be negligible or slight, then the overall effect of the proposed development on local

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:66:5.70 The magnitude of change for NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations at all receptors is negligible or

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:66: Residential receptors Negligible or slight No mitigation measures are None.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:70: Remains of the South Bank Iron Works blast furnaces Medium Substantial Negligible /

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:70: Foundations of South Bank Iron Works boiler house Low – Substantial Negligible /

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:70: Foundations of Antonien Works Low Substantial Negligible /

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:70: 20th century Riverside Pumping House Low Substantial Negligible /

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:70: 20th century Custom House Low Substantial Negligible /

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:70: Prehistoric remains Medium Minor Negligible /

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:73: out the residual effects of the development are either Neutral of Negligible and therefore these

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:74: RED – adverse effect; GREEN – beneficial effect; BLACK – unknown; ( ) – minor effect; - negligible/no effect anticipated; * -

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:44: Negligible No Listed Importance

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:45: Negligible No impact or no discernible impact.

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:45: • Negligible: The impact is only very slightly detectable/noticeable or is

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:46: Negligible (No

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:46: Negligible

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:60: Bats. The buildings surrounding the site were assessed as having negligible roosting

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:60: ranges; however, the habitats present on site offer negligible opportunities for foraging

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:65: negligible.

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:66: negligible, however some minimal mitigation measures shall be put in place for reptiles,

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:68: reptiles are assessed as negligible from the operation of the facility.

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:122: Negligible flood risk.

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:124: Significant’, for example by use of the terms ‘Slight’ and ‘Negligible’ in terms of the level

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:125: Moderate Large Large Moderate Slight Negligible

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:125: Minor Moderate Moderate Slight Negligible Negligible

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:125: No change Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:134: also be subject to a level of effect that would be negligible, and not significant.

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:135: sensitivity receptor of Holme Beck, this would result in a negligible level of effect of

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:135: sensitivity receptors, this would result in a negligible effect, which is not significant.

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:135: would be negligible and, therefore, not significant.

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:136: result in a negligible level of effect of pollution which would be deemed to be not

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:136: of very low, the level of effect is therefore negligible, and not significant.

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:136: determined to be negligible, and not significant.

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:136: sensitivity aquifer receptors, this would result in a negligible level of effect of pollution

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:137: drainage system. As such, the magnitude of change for flow would be negligible and,

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:137: would be negligible, so that the level of effect would be negligible, and not significant.

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:137: water bodies) flows would be negligible and, for the very low sensitivity freshwater river

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:137: discharges, the level of effect would be negligible, and not significant.

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:137: negligible and for the very low sensitivity freshwater river discharges, the level of effect

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:137: would be negligible, and not significant.

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:138: negligible, and the level of effect on the low sensitivity groundwater receptors is

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:138: negligible, and not significant.

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:144:Other surface Increased Very low Negligible Implementation of Drainage Strategy to reduce No significant effect

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:144: Mobilisation of Negligible Implementation of Drainage Strategy to remove No significant effect

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:144:Mercia Reduced Low Negligible Few impermeable surfaces are proposed. No significant effect

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:145:Superficial Reduced Low Negligible Few impermeable surfaces are proposed. No significant effect

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:146: Spillages and Negligible It is expected that embedded mitigation measures No significant effect

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:146:Other surface Increased Very low Negligible It is expected that embedded mitigation measures No significant effect

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:147:Knitting Wife Spillages and Negligible It is expected that embedded mitigation measures No significant effect

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:147: Pollution from Negligible It is expected that embedded mitigation measures No significant effect

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:147: Pollution from Negligible It is expected that embedded mitigation measures No significant effect

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:150: Negligible • A water body not included in the above categories.

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:170: Negligible Assets that have very limited or no archaeological, historical or

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:170: Negligible / No appreciable change to the asset or its setting.

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:179: Negligible or

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:190: There would be negligible increases in employment in Middlesbrough and Stockton-on-

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:217: Negligible

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:218: beneficial or negligible.

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:218: Sensitivity High Moderate Low Negligible

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:218: High Major Major Moderate Negligible

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:218: Moderate Major Moderate Minor Negligible

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:218: Low Moderate Minor Negligible Negligible

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:219: considered to be “minor” or “negligible” are not considered to be significant in the

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:229: on severance is considered to be of negligible significance at the local level. The

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:229: in terms of driver delay, will be of negligible significance at the local level. The potential

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:230: is considered to be of negligible significance at the local level. The potential impact will

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:230: amenity is considered to be of negligible significance at the local level. The potential

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:231: negligible significance at the local level.

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:231: as negligible significance at the local level.

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:231: identified as negligible significance at the local level.

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:231: identified as negligible significance at the local level.

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:232: to an impact of negligible significance.

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:232: development phase was previously identified as being of negligible significance at the

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:232: development phase was previously identified as being of negligible significance at the

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:232: completed development phase was previously identified as being of negligible

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:232: completed development phase was previously identified as being of negligible

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:232: negligible significance.

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:233: • A residual impact on severance of negligible significance.

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:233: • A residual impact on driver delay of negligible significance.

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:233: • A residual impact on pedestrian delay of negligible significance.

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:233: • A residual impact on pedestrian amenity of negligible significance.

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:234: Driver Delay, Severance, Minor adverse significance Construction Environmental Negligible significance

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:234: Severance Negligible significance at the - Negligible significance

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:234: Driver Delay Negligible significance at the - Negligible significance

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:234: Pedestrian Delay Negligible significance at the Provision of improved pedestrian links Negligible significance

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:234: Pedestrian Amenity Negligible significance Negligible significance

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:25:Where the impacts are negligible the overall significance is judged to be ‘not significant’.

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:25:75% or less of AQAL Negligible Negligible Slight Moderate

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:25:76-94% of AQAL Negligible Slight Moderate Moderate

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:27:to be negligible. Where short-term impacts are considered, if the PC is less than 10% of the assessment level the

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:27:impacts are considered negligible.

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:47: Dust Soiling Low Risk Low Risk Negligible

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:47: Human Health Low Risk Low Risk Negligible

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:48:– where the PC is less than 0.5% of the AQAL the impacts will be negligible, regardless of the location-specific

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:48:– where the PC is between 0.5% and 1.5% of the AQAL the impacts will be negligible, as long as the location-

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:48:– where the PC is between 1.5% and 5.5% of the AQAL the impacts will be negligible, as long as the location-

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:48:– non-negligible impacts descriptors are dependent on the matrix set out in Table 6 which is based on PC

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:48:Dust as PM2.5 a 25 0.3% Negligible

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:48:HCl 20 0.1% Negligible

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:48:HF 16 0.1% Negligible

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:48:NH3 180 0.1% Negligible

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:49:PAH as B(a)P 0.25 <0.1% Negligible

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:49:Dioxins and furans (PCCD/F) 0.0000003 0.3% Negligible

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:49:Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) 0.2 <0.1% Negligible

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:49: Thallium 1 <0.1% Negligible

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:49:Group 2 metals Mercury 0.25 0.1% Negligible

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:49:Group 3 metals Antimony 5 0.1% Negligible

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:49: Chromium(III) 5 0.1% Negligible

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:49: Copper 10 0.1% Negligible

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:49: Vanadium 5 0.1% Negligible

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:49:PM10 40 0.1% Negligible

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:50:Dioxins and furans 0.0000003 0.2% Negligible

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:50:PCBs 0.2 <0.1% Negligible

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:50: Cobalt 1 0.3% Negligible

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:50: Lead 0.25 0.4% Negligible

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:50:All impacts are described as negligible and the PECs are all well below the AQAL. There is no risk of an exceedance

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:50:1-12 1.5 to 5.5% <75.5% Negligible

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:50:13-39 0.5 to 1.5% <75.5% Negligible

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:50:40-41 1.5 to 5.5% <75.5% Negligible

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:50:42-52 0.5 to 1.5% <75.5% Negligible

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:50:1-12 1.5 to 5.5% <75.5% Negligible

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:50:13-22 0.5 to 1.5% <75.5% Negligible

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:50:23 1.5 to 5.5% <75.5% Negligible

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:50:24-39 0.5 to 1.5% <75.5% Negligible

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:50:40-41 1.5 to 5.5% <75.5% Negligible

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:51:42-52 0.5 to 1.5% <75.5% Negligible

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:51:VOCs is negligible based on the descriptors set out in Table 6.

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:51:5 1.38 0.10 2.1% 1.48 29.7% 1.5 to <75.5% Negligible

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:51:2.25 0.23 0.10 4.6% 0.33 14.9% 1.5 to <75.5% Negligible

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:51:therefore described as negligible based on the descriptors set out in Table 6.

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:51:0.25 0.17 0.002 0.9 0.172 68.9% 1.5 to 5.5% <75.5% Negligible

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:52:described as negligible based on the descriptors set out in Table 6.

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:52:5 0.63 0.21 4.2% 0.84 16.8% 1.5 to 5.5% <75.5% Negligible

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:52:– antimony, chromium(III), copper and vanadium impacts are described as negligible based on their maximum

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:52:– At locations of relevant exposure the impacts of cobalt and lead can also be described as negligible based on

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:52:negligible based on the maximum PC being less than 0.5% of the AQAL. As this represents the maximum likely

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:52:Manganese 0.15 0.4% Negligible

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:52:Arsenic 0.003 0.3% Negligible

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:53:Chromium(VI) 0.0002 0.2% Negligible

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:53:Manganese 0.15 0.1% Negligible

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:53:Arsenic 0.003 <0.1% Negligible

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:53:Chromium(VI) 0.0002 <0.1% Negligible

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:53:Manganese 0.15 <0.1% Negligible

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:53:Nickel 0.02 0.1% Negligible

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:53:be described as negligible based on the maximum PCs being less than 0.5% of the AQAL.

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:53:the mean and minimum emission concentrations in Table 11, the impact is described as negligible. The PECs and

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:53:metal can be described as negligible based on the maximum PCs being less than 0.5% of the AQAL.

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:54:impact is negligible.

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:54:considered negligible, as shown in Table 36.

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:55:20 0.24 0.16 0.8% 0.40 2.0% 0.5 to 1.5% <75.5% Negligible

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:55:20 1.24 1.40 7.0% <75.5% Negligible

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:55:20 1.16 1.32 6.6% <75.5% Negligible

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:55:20 1.25 1.41 7.0% <75.5% Negligible

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:55:20 2.40 2.56 12.8% <75.5% Negligible

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:55:20 18.33 18.48 92.4% <94.5% Negligible

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:61:NO2 Negligible Insignificant

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:61:Dust as PM10 a Negligible Insignificant

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:61:Dust as PM2.5 a Negligible -

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:61:VOC Negligible Insignificant

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:61:HCl Negligible Insignificant

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:61:HF Negligible Insignificant

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:61:NH3 Negligible Insignificant

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:62:PAH as B(a)P Negligible -

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:62:Dioxins and furans (PCCD/F) Negligible -

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:62:Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) Negligible Insignificant

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:62:Group 1 metals Cadmium Negligible -

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:62: Thallium Negligible Insignificant

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:62:Group 2 metals Mercury Negligible Insignificant

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:62:Group 3 metals Antimony Negligible Insignificant

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:62: Arsenic Negligible to Slight Adverse -

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:62: Chromium(III) Negligible Insignificant

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:62: Chromium(VI) Negligible to Moderate Adverse Insignificant

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:62: Cobalt Negligible Insignificant

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:62: Copper Negligible Insignificant

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:62: Lead Negligible -

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:62: Manganese Negligible Insignificant

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:62: Nickel Negligible -

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:62: Vanadium Negligible Insignificant

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:63:– the annual mean impacts of pollutant emissions in relation to the human health receptors are negligible based

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:63: existing facilities, which are more likely, the impacts are descripted as negligible; and

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:68:– the annual mean impacts of pollutant emissions in relation to the human health receptors are negligible based

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:68: existing facilities, which are more likely, the impacts are descripted as negligible; and

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 Ecology Report.pdf:2:may use the site for foraging likely impact on this species is assessed as negligible. Several

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:6: Construction There is no view of the site from this location. It is presumed that No change. Negligible.

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:6: Operation (Year 0) There is no view of the site from this location. It is presumed that No change. Negligible.

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:6: Residual effects with No view. No change. Negligible.

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:7:Residual effects with Views from Kirkeleatham Lane are likely to be screened in the long Negligible. Negligible.

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:8:Residual effects with Partial views of Chimney stack and flue as vegetation within the Negligible. Negligible.

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:8:Construction Barely perceptible glimpse views through gaps in vegetation to the Negligible. Negligible.

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:8:Operation (Year 0) Barely perceptible glimpse views through gaps in vegetation to the Negligible. Negligible.

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:8:Residual effects with Negligible change in view as vegetation along the bridleway Negligible. Negligible.

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:12:Residual effects with Views are likely to be fully screened in the long term as vegetation at Negligible. Slight

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:20:Construction Mid-range views from this slightly elevated road location north of the Negligible. Negligible.

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:20: pylons cranes and towers. The change will be negligible from this

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:20:Operation (Year 0) Mid-range views from slightly elevated road location north of the Negligible. Negligible.

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:20: landscape, if at all. The change will be negligible from this location.

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:20:Residual effects with Mid-range views from slightly elevated road location north of the Negligible. Negligible.

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:20: landscape, if at all. The change will be negligible from this location.

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:22:Construction Long range views from this National Trail across open coastal areas Negligible. Negligi

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:22: negligible from this location.

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:22:Operation (Year 0) Long range views from this National Trail across open coastal areas Negligible. Negligi

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:22: negligible from this location.

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:22:Residual effects with Long range views from this National Trail across open coastal areas Negligible. Negligi

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:22: negligible from this location.

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:23:Construction Mid-range views from this elevated location within a woodland park, Negligible. Slight

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:23: pylons cranes and towers. The change will be negligible from this

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:23:Operation (Year 0) Mid-range views from this elevated location within a woodland park, Negligible. Slight

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:23: The change will be negligible from this location.

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:23: The change will be negligible from this location. As vegetation the

R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:12: demonstrate that there will be a negligible impact on those aspects of the

R-2019-0767-OOM-BPM-JBAU-XX-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P01.01-HRA Report_Issued_2020303.pdf:21: isolation are considered to be negligible. Where short-term impacts are considered, if the

R-2019-0767-OOM-BPM-JBAU-XX-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P01.01-HRA Report_Issued_2020303.pdf:21: PC is less than 10% of the assessment level the impacts are considered negligible. Where

R-2019-0767-OOM-Figure 7-1 Viewpoint Assessment Sheets.pdf:2: existing farm dwelling at Stainsby Hall Farm. The magnitude of change is no change and the overall effects within the field of view is Negligible.

R-2019-0767-OOM-Figure 7-1 Viewpoint Assessment Sheets.pdf:10: The magnitude of change is negligible and the overall effects Negligible.

R-2019-0767-OOM-Figure 7-1 Viewpoint Assessment Sheets.pdf:40: The magnitude of change is low and the overall effects are Negligible.

R-2019-0767-OOM-Figure 7-1 Viewpoint Assessment Sheets.pdf:44: Proposed development location Viewpoint location The magnitude of change is negligible and the overall effects are Negligible.

R-2019-0767-OOM-Figure 7-1 Viewpoint Assessment Sheets.pdf:46: limited screening from the heavy industry features beyond, however combined with the proliferation of The magnitude of change is negligible and the overall effects are Negligible.

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:31:sensitive value or scale expressed from negligible to very high.

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:31: Negligible: The impact is only very slightly detectable/noticeable or is

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:37:Bats; The buildings surrounding the site were assessed as having negligible

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:38:negligible opportunities for foraging or resting and therefore Otters are unlikely

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:40: negligible.

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:41: to be negligible, however some minimal mitigation measures shall be

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:43:impacts on reptiles are assessed as negligible from the operation of the

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:52:negligible level of effect of pollution which would be deemed to be not

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:67:dust emissions is low to negligible.

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:68:negligible impact.

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:69: human health receptors are negligible based on the location with the

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:69: descripted as negligible; and

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:72:severance driver delay and pedestrian delay would be negligible. In terms of

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:72:predicted to be negligible. The potential impact of the proposed development

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:72:routes to and from the site will be reduced to an impact of negligible

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:72:phase is considered to be of negligible significance.

R-2023-0224-CD-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:11:for foraging likely impact on this species was assessed to be negligible. Several of the ponds were tested for

R-2023-0224-CD-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf:42:6.53 The revised modelling data show negligible change for hydrogen fluoride compared to the data presented in Table 17. It can therefore be assumed that there

R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:49: • severity of the effect is described as qualitative descriptors; negligible, slight,

R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:50: ≤75% of AQAL Negligible Negligible Slight Moderate

R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:50: 76-94% of AQAL Negligible Slight Moderate Moderate

R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:82: 85 2020 0.765 1.91% 25.57 64% Negligible

R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:82: 90 2020 0.603 1.51% 25.40 64% Negligible

R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:82: NO2 95 2020 0.486 1.21% 25.29 63% Negligible

R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:82: 85 2020 0.109 2.19% 0.326 0.435 9% Negligible

R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:82: 90 2020 0.0861 1.72% 0.355 0.441 9% Negligible

R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:82: VOC 95 2020 0.0694 1.39% 0.355 0.424 8% Negligible

R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:82: (annual mean) 100 NWP 2020 0.0564 1.13% 0.358 0.414 8% Negligible

R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:82: 105 NWP 2020 0.0510 1.02% 0.358 0.409 8% Negligible

R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:82: 110 NWP 2020 0.00000462 1.85% 0.000211 84% Negligible

R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:83: classed as ‘negligible’ for stack heights of 85m to 95m (inclusive) and screens out at stack

R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:83: ‘negligible’ for stack heights of 85m to 105m (inclusive) and screens out at stack heights of

R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:83: heights of 85m to 105m (inclusive) and ‘negligible’ for stack heights of 110m.

R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (3 of 3).pdf:23:negligible effect on the final reported results, non-bias adjusted results are shown

R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (3 of 3).pdf:96:6.53 The revised modelling data show negligible change for hydrogen fluoride compared to the data presented in Table 17. It can therefore be assumed that there

R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (3 of 3).pdf:137:4.49 The revised modelling data show negligible change for hydrogen fluoride compared to the data presented in Table 10. It can therefore be assumed that there

R-2023-0224-CD-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie Air Quality Impacts on SSSI.pdf:20:4.49 The revised modelling data show negligible change for hydrogen fluoride compared to the data presented in Table 10. It can therefore be assumed that there

R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (2 of 3).pdf:15: sensitive human receptor locations were classed as ‘negligible’. For PAH (as BaP), the

R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (2 of 3).pdf:16: IAQM Impact Descriptor Negligible n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Negligible

R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (2 of 3).pdf:42: under abnormal operating conditions, would therefore be described as ‘negligible’.

R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (2 of 3).pdf:59: human receptor locations were classed as ‘negligible’. For PAH (as BaP), the human

R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (2 of 3).pdf:60: IAQM Impact Descriptor Negligible n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Negligible

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:24: of change to the character area is expected to be negligible and neutral.

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:25: change to the character area is expected to be negligible and neutral.

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:25: industry its susceptibility to change is negligible. Therefore, its sensitivity to change

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:25: change to the character area is expected to be negligible and neutral.

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:25: therefore considered that the proposals will create negligible to very minor impacts

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:26: low/negligible and neutral.

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:26:6.20 The proposals will create very minor to negligible impacts on the

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:26:6.23 The site is featureless, and its value is assessed as negligible and its susceptibility to

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:26: change negligible, in that it can easily accommodate large change. The overall

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:26: landscape sensitivity of the site is negligible.

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:29: the views that are barely visible across a negligible proportion of the field of view

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:29:6.43 The magnitude of change is therefore considered to be negligible and neutral.

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:29:6.47 Therefore, the magnitude of change is therefore considered to be negligible and

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:30:6.51 The value of this receptor group is low to negligible as the views are from a

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:30: low/negligible.

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:30:6.57 Therefore, the magnitude of change is therefore considered to be negligible and

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:31: location. The magnitude of change is considered to be small/negligible and neutral.

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:34: the resulting magnitude of change will be negligible and neither adverse nor

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:34: will be affected. Again, it was considered the magnitude of change will be negligible

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:34: only minor to very minor or negligible impacts on their landscape/townscape

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:34: Eston Hills broad landscape Medium Negligible neutral

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:34: Redcar Flats broad landscape Medium / Low Negligible neutral

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:34: East Billingham to Teesmouth Low Negligible neutral

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:34: Industrial project level Low / Negligible Low neutral

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:34: The site Negligible Large beneficial

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:35: A66 Low Negligible neutral

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:35: B1380, High Street Low Negligible neutral

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:35: Teesdale Way PROW Low / Negligible Small neutral

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:35: NCN cycle route 1 Low Negligible neutral

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:35: Bridleway 124/179/1, Eston Medium / Low Small / Negligible

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:35: Facility was considered to be small and neutral for five of them and small/negligible

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:35: or just negligible for a further four of them. The effects were considered as neutral

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:35: and barely discernible for those considered negligible. In all cases it was

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:36: groups were assessed either as negligible neutral or small / negligible neutral.

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:36: beneficial magnitudes of change would reduce to negligible neutral or small /

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:36: negligible neutral with the exception of the Teesdale Way receptor group which will

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:58: are judged as high, medium, low or negligible based on the criteria shown. There

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:58: judgement, and is defined in this report as high, medium, low or negligible.

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:59: judgement, and is defined in this appraisal as large, medium, small or negligible.

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:60: change and value are judged as high, medium, low or negligible based on the

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:60: or negligible.

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:61: and is defined in this appraisal as large, medium, small or negligible. The GLVIA also

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:63: Negligible

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:63: High Medium Low Negligible

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:63: Medium Medium / Low Low Low / Negligible

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:63: Negligible

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:63: Medium / Low Low Low / Negligible Negligible

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:64: Large Large Medium Small Negligible

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:64: Negligible

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:64: resources / elements or negligible

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:65: Negligible

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:65: High Medium Low Negligible

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:65: Medium Medium / Low Low Low / Negligible

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:65: Negligible

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:65: Medium / Low Low Low / Negligible Negligible

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:66: Large Large Medium Small Negligible

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:66: Negligible

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:66: negligible proportion of the field of view.

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Noise_Impact_Assessment.pdf:14: Negligible

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Noise_Impact_Assessment.pdf:15: Negligible NOAEL

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Noise_Impact_Assessment.pdf:15: < 1.0 Negligible NOAEL

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Noise_Impact_Assessment.pdf:15: Negligible NOAEL

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Noise_Impact_Assessment.pdf:16: Below 35-40 dB LAeq,T design range Negligible NOAEL

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Noise_Impact_Assessment.pdf:23: deemed to be negligible in the short term, to LA 1117. It is not expected that the additional HGV

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Noise_Impact_Assessment.pdf:31: negligible change in noise level.

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Contaminated_Land_Review.pdf:13: Glaciolacustrine 0.8 to 10.5 Unproductive Strata with low permeability that have negligible

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Contaminated_Land_Review.pdf:20: preferential thickness of lower permeability aquifers. As such, the risk of contaminant migration to the Principal Aquifer is considered to be negligible.

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Contaminated_Land_Review.pdf:39: permeability, the risk to the Principal Aquifer is considered to be negligible.

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:16: these measures, the residual impact of dust emissions will be negligible. As the

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:17: negligible and not significant. While this assessment work suggests that no

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:17: be negligible and not significant. Therefore, the impact on air quality of the

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:18: operational phase transport emissions is considered to be negligible and not

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:19: be negligible in the short term. It is not expected that the additional HGV

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:23: negligible effects on severance, driver delay, pedestrian delay and pedestrian

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:24: as being of negligible importance to wildlife and scattered scrub is considered to

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:26: create only minor to very minor or negligible impacts on their landscape /

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:26: will be negligible and neither adverse nor beneficial, but instead just neutral. With

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:26: negligible and neutral.

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:26: neutral for five of them and small / negligible or just negligible for a further four of

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:27: and barely discernible for those considered negligible. In all cases it was

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:28: phases of disturbance and clearance. A similar, low to negligible level of survival

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:29: and the quantities involved are likely to be negligible in relation to existing waste

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:86: so that the significance of effects will now be negligible.

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:86: in the December 2019 ES. The construction effects will have negligible effect on

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:87: proposed development so that the significance of effects will now be negligible.

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:87: is operational will be negligible.

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:91: be slight adverse prior to mitigation, as opposed to negligible adverse as

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:91: • The potential impact to the River Tees Estuary is considered to be negligible

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:100: discernible impact recognised on the negligible archaeological resource across

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:107: effects on employment in other areas and all other effects negligible and not

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:112: human health can be described as ‘negligible’ at all areas of relevant exposure

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:112: • All annual mean impacts are ‘negligible’ at all areas of relevant exposure

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:112: • All short-term impacts are ‘negligible’ at all areas of relevant exposure, except

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:112: point of maximum impact could not be screened out as ‘negligible’ using a

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:112: described as ‘negligible’.

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:113: areas of relevant exposure is ‘negligible’, except for short-term sulphur dioxide

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:113: quality assessment level (AQAL) and was described as ‘negligible’. Even if this

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:113: remains ‘negligible’, both alone and when added to process emissions.

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:114: ‘negligible’. The assessment of construction phase dust emissions is unchanged,

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:114: regard to human health are predicted to be ‘negligible’, except for short-term

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:120: • A potential impact on severance of negligible significance

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:120: • A potential impact on driver delay of negligible significance

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:120: • A potential impact on pedestrian delay of negligible significance

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:120: • A potential impact on pedestrian amenity of negligible significance

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:121: amenity, fear and intimidation, and accidents and safety of negligible

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:121: • A residual impact on severance of negligible significance

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:121: • A residual impact on driver delay of negligible significance

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:121: • A residual impact on pedestrian delay of negligible significance

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:121: • A residual impact on pedestrian amenity of negligible significance

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:134: considered to be slight adverse and will now be negligible. The assessment of the

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:141: not be described as ‘negligible’ irrespective of the total pollutant concentration. In

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:144: application operational phase are considered to be negligible due to the minimal

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Planning_and_Design_Statement.pdf:12: negligible level of survival of archaeological features is therefore expected. The BA

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Planning_and_Design_Statement.pdf:42: concluded that noise effects at noise sensitive receptors would be of negligible

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Planning_and_Design_Statement.pdf:42: be negligible. As the area around the proposed development is of ‘low sensitivity’

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Planning_and_Design_Statement.pdf:43: transport emissions is deemed to be negligible and ‘not significant’, either alone or

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Planning_and_Design_Statement.pdf:43: negligible, and potentially beneficial given the change from an empty brownfield

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:13: negligible.

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:19: the BA Facility site reaching the SPA/Ramsar is considered to be negligible.

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:26: assessment it has been assumed that negligible traffic from the proposed

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf:11: • Negligible Importance.

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf:17: Bare ground Negligible Does not contribute to biodiversity importance of

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf:17: Buildings and Negligible There are no buildings or structures on site

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf:17: Amphibians Negligible Due to the barriers to dispersal to the site and the

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf:18: Badger Negligible No records were returned from the local records

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf:18: Bats Negligible There are no trees or structures present on site

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf:18: Hedgehog Negligible There is limited habitat remaining on site that could

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf:18: Otter Negligible There is no suitable terrestrial habitat on site and

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf:18: Reptiles Negligible No records were returned for reptiles within 2km of

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf:19: Water Vole Negligible There are three records of water vole in the vicinity

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf:20: boundary; bare ground and scattered scrub. Bare ground is assessed as being of Negligible

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf:20: There is only a small area of remaining habitat on site which is of negligible use to amphibians.

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf:21: as being of Negligible importance for bats and the development of the site would likely result in

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf:23: The loss of habitat would have Negligible impact on badgers. It is however recognised that

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf:24: Amphibians Negligible Construction: No Construction:

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf:25: Bats Negligible Construction: No Construction:

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf:4: impact of dust emissions will be negligible. As the area around the Proposed Development is of ‘low

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf:5: impact on air quality of the operational phase transport emissions is deemed to be negligible and

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf:11: to determine whether the impact can be screened out as ‘negligible’, or whether a more detailed

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf:13: ‘negligible’.

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf:15: Therefore, the impact of construction phase vehicle emissions has been screened out as ‘negligible’

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf:20: operational phase vehicle movements will be negligible.

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf:20: residual risk of dust emissions will be ‘negligible’.

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf:23: also predicted to be negligible and ‘not significant’.

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf:33: ‘negligible’, no mitigation measures beyond those required by accepted best practice would be

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf:33: Low Low Risk Low Risk Negligible

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf:33: Low Low Risk Low Risk Negligible

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf:33: Low Low Risk Low Risk Negligible

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf:33: Medium Medium Risk Low Risk Negligible

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf:33: Low Low Risk Low Risk Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.pdf:11: to a common list of criteria, including: Substantial, Moderate, Minor, Negligible or Neutral.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.pdf:15: Negligible Less than 1.0

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:14: Medium although the HGV increase in the PM peak is Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:15: by 100% in the PM peak, the actual number of HGVs is 8, which is considered negligible. The effect on

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:15: pedestrian and cyclist amenity at this location is therefore considered to be Negligible. This is considered

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:15: change is considered to be negligible as the traffic flow change is less than 30%. The change in traffic

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:15: carriageway and the effect is considered to be of Negligible significance. This is considered Not

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:15: change is considered to be negligible as the arms predominantly affected already have signalised

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:15: considered to be of Negligible significance. This is considered Not Significant; and

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R1 19.2 21.5 22.5 1.0 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R2 18.0 20.3 21.1 0.8 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R3 17.9 20.3 21.6 1.3 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R4 18.1 20.5 22.0 1.5 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R5 18.0 20.4 22.1 1.7 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R6 15.7 18.1 18.9 0.8 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R7 15.3 17.6 18.3 0.7 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R8 14.6 17.0 17.2 0.2 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R9 15.6 18.2 18.6 0.4 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R10 16.2 18.9 20.2 1.3 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R11 14.4 16.8 17.2 0.4 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R12 14.4 16.9 17.3 0.4 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R13 15.8 18.5 19.1 0.6 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R14 15.4 18.1 18.6 0.5 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R15 31.4 33.8 34.2 0.4 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R21 25.8 28.2 28.6 0.4 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R22 23.7 25.9 26.5 0.6 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R23 22.7 24.9 25.6 0.7 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R25 15.4 17.7 19.3 1.6 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R26 15.2 17.5 18.6 1.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R28 15.4 17.6 18.0 0.4 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R29 18.1 20.3 21.0 0.7 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:18: E1 18.7 20.8 21.0 0.2 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:18: E2 18.6 20.7 20.8 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R1 12.1 12.5 12.7 0.2 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R2 12.4 12.9 13.0 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R3 12.1 12.6 12.8 0.2 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R4 12.1 12.6 12.8 0.2 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R5 12.1 12.6 12.8 0.2 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R6 11.9 12.4 12.5 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R7 11.8 12.3 12.4 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R8 13.5 13.9 14.0 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R9 13.7 14.2 14.2 <0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R10 12.2 12.7 13.0 0.3 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R11 12.1 12.5 12.6 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R12 12.1 12.6 12.6 <0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R13 12.3 12.8 12.9 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R14 12.3 12.7 12.8 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R15 16.4 16.9 17.0 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R16 17.5 18.0 18.2 0.2 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R17 16.5 17.0 17.1 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R18 17.7 18.3 18.4 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R19 13.9 14.3 14.5 0.2 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R20 13.9 14.3 14.5 0.2 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R21 13.4 13.9 14.0 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R22 13.1 13.6 13.7 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R23 12.7 13.2 13.3 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R24 11.5 11.9 12.4 0.5 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R25 11.4 11.9 12.2 0.3 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R26 11.4 11.8 12.0 0.2 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R27 11.6 12.0 12.4 0.4 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R28 11.9 12.3 12.3 <0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R29 12.0 12.4 12.5 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:20: E1 10.6 11.0 11.1 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:20: E2 10.6 11.0 11.1 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:21: R1 7.9 8.0 8.1 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:21: R2 8.1 8.2 8.3 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:21: R3 7.8 7.9 8.1 0.2 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:21: R4 7.8 8.0 8.1 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:21: R5 7.9 8.0 8.1 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:21: R6 7.7 7.8 7.9 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:21: R7 7.7 7.8 7.9 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:21: R8 8.0 8.2 8.2 <0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:21: R9 8.1 8.3 8.3 <0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:21: R10 7.7 7.8 8.0 0.2 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:21: R11 7.6 7.7 7.8 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:21: R12 7.6 7.8 7.8 <0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:21: R13 7.7 7.9 8.0 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:21: R14 7.7 7.9 7.9 <0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:21: R15 10.1 10.3 10.3 <0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:21: R16 11.1 11.3 11.4 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:21: R17 10.2 10.4 10.4 <0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:21: R18 11.2 11.4 11.5 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:21: R19 8.9 9.1 9.2 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:21: R20 8.9 9.1 9.2 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:21: R21 8.6 8.8 8.8 <0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:21: R22 8.4 8.5 8.6 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:21: R23 8.2 8.3 8.4 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:21: R24 7.5 7.7 7.9 0.2 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:21: R25 7.5 7.6 7.8 0.2 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:21: R26 7.5 7.6 7.7 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:21: R27 7.6 7.7 8.0 0.3 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:21: R28 7.5 7.6 7.7 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:21: R29 7.8 7.9 8.0 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:21: E1 7.1 7.2 7.2 <0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:21: E2 7.1 7.2 7.2 <0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:9: reduced to negligible and therefore non-significant levels.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19:E3.40 If the impact descriptor is Negligible or Slight (Minor), this is considered to not have a

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: Moderate, Minor and Negligible/Neutral and reference to these terms are included in the below

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: 75% or less of objective Negligible Negligible Slight (Minor) Moderate

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: 76-94% of objective Negligible Slight (Minor) Moderate Moderate

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: Note: Changes in pollutant concentrations of 0% i.e. <0.5% would be described as Negligible.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: <10% of hourly mean NO2 threshold Imperceptible Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:20: significant effect and a ‘Negligible’ or ‘Slight’ (Minor) impact will not result in a significant

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:20: such as those above. In this Chapter, where Negligible impacts are identified, a type of effect will

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:20: or Negligible effect is likely to be felt.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:31: Negligible impact at all existing receptor locations and is considered to be Not Significant.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:31: Cleveland Coast SPA) included in this assessment were also found to experience a Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:31: Negligible impact at all existing receptor locations and is considered to be Not Significant.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:31: Cleveland Coast SPA) included in this assessment were also found to experience a Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:32: Negligible impact at all existing receptor locations and is considered to be Not Significant.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:32: Cleveland Coast SPA) included in this assessment were also found to experience a Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:32:E5.26 The magnitude of change for NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations is negligible at all receptors.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:32: As stated in paragraph E3.44, where the impact is Negligible or Slight (Minor) then the overall

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:34:E7.2 The assessment has demonstrated that the effects will be Negligible and therefore Not

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:34: effects will be Negligible and Not Significant) for all receptors.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:35: practice mitigation measures suitable for high risk sites in place, there is likely to be a Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:35:E8.6 The magnitude of change for NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations at all receptors is Negligible.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:35: All sensitive Operational traffic impact Negligible and Not None. Negligible and

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:14: Negligible The size and scale of change are considered very small due to the extent and

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:19: Negligible The proposed development is barely discernible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:20: Neutral / Negligible Maintain the character of the receiving landscape.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:21: Neutral / Negligible The proposed development would cause no discernible deterioration or

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:21: improvement in a view. In most instances, a negligible effect will arise

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:21: experience a negligible magnitude of change.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:22: in EIA terms. Those classified as Minor or Negligible are likely to be Not Significant in EIA

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:23: Change Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:39: whereas effects on all other Viewpoints are considered to be Negligible and Not Significant.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:39:J5.8 The above aspects of the construction phase will have a Negligible effect on all LCZs due to the

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:39: Negligible and Not Significant to a temporary, Moderate Adverse and Significant effect

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:39: All LCZs Negligible - Direct and short- None

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:40: VP 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, Negligible - Direct and short- Installation of

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:41: character of the LCZ. The magnitude of change is therefore considered to be Negligible.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:41:J5.24 Combining all of these criteria, it is considered that there will be a Negligible level of effect,

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:42: LCZ 3 – Intertidal Medium Negligible Negligible Indirect,

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:42: The magnitude of change is therefore considered to be Negligible.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:42:J5.29 Combining all of these criteria, it is considered that there will be a Negligible level of effect,

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:42: LCZ 4 – Coast and Medium Negligible Negligible Indirect, Permanent

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:42: The magnitude of change is therefore considered to be Negligible.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:42:J5.34 Combining all of these criteria, it is considered that there will be a Negligible level of effect,

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:44: LCZ 5 – Coatham Medium-High Negligible Negligible Indirect, Permanent

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:44: vicinity of the LCZ. The magnitude of change is therefore considered to be Negligible.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:45:J5.44 Combining all of these criteria, it is considered that there will be a Negligible level of effect,

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:45: LCZ 7 – Saltholme Medium-High Negligible Negligible Indirect, Permanent

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:45: vicinity of the LCZ. The magnitude of change is therefore considered to be Negligible.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:45:J5.48 Combining all of these criteria, it is considered that there will be a Negligible level of effect,

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:45: LCZ 8 – Rural Medium Negligible Negligible Indirect, Permanent

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:50: VP6 Footpath Users Negligible Negligible Direct,

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:50: VP8 Low Negligible Negligible Direct,

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:53: VP6 Footpath Users Negligible Negligible Direct, Permanent

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:53: VP8 Low Negligible Negligible Direct, Permanent

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:55:J7.2 Construction of the proposed development will result in effects ranging from Negligible to a

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:55: LCZ 3 – Intertidal Medium Negligible Negligible - Not Indirect, Permanent

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:55: LCZ 4 – Coast and Medium Negligible Negligible – Indirect, Permanent

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:55: LCZ 5 – Coatham Medium-High Negligible Negligible - Indirect, Permanent

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:55: LCZ 7 – Saltholme Medium-High Negligible Negligible – Indirect, Permanent

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:55: LCZ 8 – Rural Medium Negligible Negligible – Indirect, Permanent

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:56: VP6 Footpath Users Negligible Negligible Direct, Permanent

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:56: VP8 Low Negligible Negligible Direct, Permanent

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:57: and operation All other effects are anticipated to be Minor or Negligible (and Not Significant).

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:57: All LCZ Impact of Negligible – Not Significant None Negligible -

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:57: VP 2, 3, 4, 5, Impact of Negligible - Not Significant Installation of site Negligible -

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:58: LCZ 3 – Impact of Negligible - Not Significant Buildings to be Negligible -

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:58: LCZ 4 – Impact of Negligible – Buildings to be Negligible –

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:58: LCZ 5 – Impact of Negligible - Buildings to be Negligible -

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:59: LCZ 7 – Impact of Negligible – Buildings to be Negligible –

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:59: LCZ 8 – Impact of Negligible – Buildings to be Negligible –

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:12: be Negligible and Not Significant;

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:12: construction and therefore the risk to the occupiers would be Negligible and Not

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:12: therefore the risk from new contamination would be Negligible and Not Significant. Where

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:14: construction works 5) or soils of negligible nature conservation

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:14: be of negligible value Negligible potential for mineral reserves to

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:16: Negligible Human Health: No measurable effects on Impact of insufficient magnitude to

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:16: Sensitivity/value of High Medium Low Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:16: High Substantial Moderate Minor Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:16: Medium Moderate Minor Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:16: Low Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:25: layers or drift deposits with low permeability that have negligible significance for water supply

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:32: significance is considered Negligible and therefore Not Significant.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:37: outlined in Section G6.0 above, is negligible. Following the implementation of the additional

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:37: workers of Minor Adverse significance and impacts on nearby residents of Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:37: following additional mitigation, e.g. soil remediation, is negligible. Therefore, the impacts after

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:37: the implementation of mitigation measures are considered to be of Negligible significance. This

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:37: management facilities during the construction phase is considered to be of Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:38: significance of the impacts identified is considered to be Minor Adverse / Negligible and Not

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:38: Health during earthworks. receptors and Significant Statement Negligible off

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:38: Surface Potential leaching of Negligible and Not Remediation / Negligible and

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:38: Built Soil/materials Minor Adverse and Not Minimisation of waste Negligible and

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:77: drift of the glacio-lacustrine laminated clays as a “Non Aquifer” of “negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:200: as being negligible to low.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:244:Oil and fuel Lubricating oils, Site Users Direct contact, Health hazard Unlikely Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:244: Mild migration. Negligible evidenc e of contamination detected in soil,

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:245: G r o u n d w a t er (drift Migration via Pollution of Unlikely Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:265:Ground Conditions assessed as being negligible to low.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:268: Groundwater Low Aquifer of negligible resource

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:1596:is considered to be negligible and has not been considered further.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:1893:133 17.6 Ground dissolution of soluble rocks Negligible (within 50m)

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:1963: 2 On site Unproductive These are rock layers or drift deposits with low permeability that have negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:1964: 3 134m W Unproductive These are rock layers or drift deposits with low permeability that have negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:1981: Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:2013: Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:2014: Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:2014: On site Negligible Running sand conditions are not thought to occur whatever the position of the water table. No

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:2016: Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:2018: Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:2018: On site Negligible Deposits with potential to collapse when loaded and saturated are believed not to be present.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:2019: Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:2020: Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:2020: On site Negligible Soluble rocks are either not thought to be present within the ground, or not prone to dissolution.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.pdf:22: operation would be Negligible and Not Significant.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.pdf:22: contamination with this tertiary mitigation in place, would be Negligible and Not

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.pdf:22: Local significance; and nesting birds, which are of negligible significance even at a

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.pdf:30: 10 Neutral/negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Socio Economic - Dec 2020.PDF:13: ‘Negligible’ or ‘Adverse’ (Table H3.2).

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Socio Economic - Dec 2020.PDF:14: Negligible No obvious significant effect to a receptor or environment.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Socio Economic - Dec 2020.PDF:14: Negligible Where no discernible effect is expected as a result of the proposed development on the

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Socio Economic - Dec 2020.PDF:14: change/effects High Medium Low Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Socio Economic - Dec 2020.PDF:14: High Substantial Moderate to Minor to Moderate Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Socio Economic - Dec 2020.PDF:14: Medium Moderate to Moderate Minor Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Socio Economic - Dec 2020.PDF:15: Low Minor to Moderate Minor Negligible to Minor Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Socio Economic - Dec 2020.PDF:15: Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Socio Economic - Dec 2020.PDF:23: storage and post. Similarly, the labour supply scenario forecasts only a negligible increase in

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Socio Economic - Dec 2020.PDF:30: of the significance criteria matrix. The effects are assessed as being Beneficial, Negligible or

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Socio Economic - Dec 2020.PDF:30: Negligible. An assessment of the likely effects in relation to each receptor is presented in Table

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:40: there will be negligible beneficial effects for the River Tees estuary during construction and

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:42: negligible effect on receptors from the dust-generating activities onsite.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:42: through the modelling process was predicted to be negligible at all receptors. The overall effect

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:44: negligible and not significant.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:47: Tees Dock Road roundabout. All other effects will be reduced to minor or negligible and not

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:49: groundwater, the built environment and landscape will all be of minor adverse / negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:52: all considered to result in a negligible impact on regional landfill capacity. In this respect there

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF:13:Negligible Materials are forecast (through trend analysis and other information) to be free from known issues

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF:14: Negligible The consumption of no individual material type would be equal to or greater than 1%

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF:14: No change Negligible Minor Moderate Major

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF:14: Medium Neutral Negligible Minor Moderate Moderate

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF:14: Low Neutral Negligible Negligible Negligible Moderate

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF:14: Negligible Neutral Neutral Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF:21: Negligible (Not Significant).

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF:21: effects are likely to be no worse than Negligible.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF:22: receptor, the overall significance of the effect is considered to be Negligible (Not Significant).

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF:22: proposed development are considered to be Negligible. Given the low sensitivity of the regional

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF:22: landfill capacity as a receptor, the overall significance of the effect is considered to be Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF:26: Negligible Adverse impact (Not Significant). Whilst mitigation will reduce any effects, the

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF:26: remain as Negligible Adverse impact (Not Significant).

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF:27: be Negligible Adverse (Not Significant).

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF:28: arisings would account for 0.10% of the regional landfill capacity (Negligible Adverse), and

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF:28: Operational waste arisings would account for 0.25% of the regional landfill capacity (Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF:28: regional landfill capacity. The impacts from this would be Negligible Adverse (construction and

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF:28: tonnes, which equates to 1.32% (Negligible Adverse impact) of the regional material availability.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF:28: remain Negligible Adverse.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF:28: Regional landfill Reduction in Negligible Preparation of Negligible Adverse and

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF:29: Regional materials Depleting Hardstanding: Secondary Negligible Adverse and

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF:29: availability regional Negligible aggregates/ Not Significant

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF:29: 114,027 tonnes worst Negligible possible.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF:29: materials not than Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF:29: Regional landfill Reduction in Negligible Operational Negligible Adverse and

R-2020-0820-ESM-MGE04280 Nuisance 0820.pdf:2:concentrations at all receptors is Negligible and that the overall effect of the

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:11: a Negligible (and Not Significant) effect on pedestrian and cycle amenity at the A174 / Greystone

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:13: through the modelling process is predicted to be Negligible at all receptors. The overall effect of

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:15: potential effects on the surface water and groundwater receptors, are considered to be Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:15: These impacts are considered to be Negligible to Minor Adverse and Not Significant for all

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:15: groundwater through reduced infiltration (Negligible Adverse impacts) and pollution from

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:15: (Negligible Beneficial impacts) which are considered to be Not Significant.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:15: residual effects: for groundwater, the impacts on flows would remain Negligible Adverse and the

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:15: Negligible Beneficial which would be Not Significant.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:17: impact on construction workers and a Negligible effect on off site human health receptors. Both

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:17: would be a Negligible impact (Not Significant) on environmental receptors with the

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:17: Landfill site and this is considered to have a Negligible (but Not Significant) effect on waste

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:17:8.18 The implementation of these measures will result in Minor Adverse or Negligible (and Not

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:21:11.7 During construction there will be a Negligible and Not Significant impact upon all Landscape

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:21: (Eston Hills). All other Viewpoints will be subject to a Negligible and Not Significant impact

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:21: effects ranging from Negligible to Minor Adverse/Minor Beneficial. There will be a Moderate

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:21: considered to be Not Significant, with effects ranging from Negligible to Minor Adverse.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:23: a result the impact is expected to be Negligible and Not Significant on remaining regional

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:23: hardstanding areas it is anticipated that this will also have a Negligible impact on the availability

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:23: anticipated that the impacts are expected to be Negligible and Not Significant.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:25: of the ES can be secured and that the effects are negligible or can be kept to an absolute

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:15:I3.20 Professional judgement has then been employed to establish whether the effects are negligible,

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:12: operation would be Negligible and Not Significant;

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:12: occupiers would be Negligible and Not Significant;

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:12: operate safely, therefore the risk from new contamination would be Negligible and

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:13: habitat and therefore only of Local significance; and nesting birds, which are of negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:13: is considered negligible.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:30: 4 Neutral/negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:18: R1 19.2 19.4 19.6 0.2 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:18: R2 18.0 18.2 18.4 0.2 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:18: R3 17.9 18.2 18.7 0.5 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:18: R4 18.1 18.4 18.9 0.5 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:18: R5 18.0 18.3 18.7 0.4 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:18: R6 15.7 16.0 16.1 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:18: R7 15.3 15.5 15.6 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:18: R8 14.6 14.9 14.9 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:18: R9 15.6 16.1 16.1 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:18: R10 16.2 16.8 17.0 0.2 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:18: R11 14.4 14.7 14.8 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:18: R12 14.4 14.8 14.9 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:18: R13 15.8 16.4 16.5 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:18: R14 15.4 16.0 16.1 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:18: R15 31.4 31.7 31.7 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:18: R16 35.1 35.5 35.6 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:18: R17 31.1 31.4 31.5 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:18: R18 36.1 36.5 36.6 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:18: R19 27.8 28.1 28.2 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:18: R20 27.8 28.1 28.2 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:18: R21 25.8 26.1 26.1 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:18: R22 23.7 23.8 23.9 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:18: R23 22.7 22.8 22.9 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:18: R24 15.5 15.6 15.8 0.2 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:18: R25 15.4 15.6 15.7 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:18: R26 15.2 15.4 15.5 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:18: R27 16.1 16.2 16.5 0.3 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:18: R28 15.4 15.5 15.5 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:18: E1 18.7 18.7 18.7 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:18: E2 18.6 18.6 18.6 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: R1 12.1 12.1 12.1 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: R2 12.4 12.5 12.5 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: R3 12.1 12.2 12.2 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: R4 12.1 12.2 12.3 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: R5 12.1 12.2 12.3 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: R6 11.9 12.0 12.0 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: R7 11.8 11.9 11.9 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: R8 13.5 13.5 13.5 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: R9 13.7 13.8 13.8 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: R10 12.2 12.3 12.4 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: R11 12.1 12.1 12.2 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: R12 12.1 12.2 12.2 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: R13 12.3 12.4 12.4 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: R14 12.3 12.3 12.4 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: R15 16.4 16.5 16.5 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: R16 17.5 17.6 17.6 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: R17 16.5 16.6 16.6 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: R18 17.7 17.9 17.9 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: R19 13.9 13.9 14.0 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: R20 13.9 13.9 14.0 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: R21 13.4 13.5 13.5 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: R22 13.1 13.2 13.2 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: R23 12.7 12.8 12.8 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: R24 11.5 11.5 11.5 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: R25 11.4 11.5 11.5 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: R26 11.4 11.4 11.4 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: R27 11.6 11.6 11.6 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: R28 11.9 11.9 11.9 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: E1 10.6 10.6 10.6 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: E2 10.6 10.6 10.6 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:20: R1 7.9 7.9 7.9 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:20: R2 8.1 8.1 8.1 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:20: R3 7.8 7.8 7.9 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:20: R4 7.8 7.9 7.9 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:20: R5 7.9 7.9 7.9 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:20: R6 7.7 7.7 7.8 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:20: R7 7.7 7.7 7.7 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:20: R8 8.0 8.1 8.1 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:20: R9 8.1 8.2 8.2 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:20: R10 7.7 7.7 7.8 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:20: R11 7.6 7.6 7.7 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:20: R12 7.6 7.7 7.7 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:20: R13 7.7 7.8 7.8 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:20: R14 7.7 7.8 7.8 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:20: R15 10.1 10.2 10.2 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:20: R16 11.1 11.2 11.2 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:20: R17 10.2 10.3 10.3 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:20: R18 11.2 11.3 11.3 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:20: R19 8.9 9.0 9.0 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:20: R20 8.9 9.0 9.0 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:20: R21 8.6 8.7 8.7 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:20: R22 8.4 8.4 8.4 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:20: R23 8.2 8.2 8.3 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:20: R24 7.5 7.6 7.6 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:20: R25 7.5 7.5 7.6 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:20: R26 7.5 7.5 7.5 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:20: R27 7.6 7.6 7.6 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:20: R28 7.5 7.5 7.5 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:20: E1 7.1 7.1 7.1 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:20: E2 7.1 7.1 7.1 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:40: development scenario (albeit negligible), and best practice noise control

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:41: The proposed development is anticipated to only have negligible impacts

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:20: Negligible flood risk. Undeveloped or agricultural land from a

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:22: No/ Negligible No perceptible change in the baseline N/A

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:22: terms ‘Negligible’ in terms of the level of effect. The use of the category of ‘Negligible’ may for

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:22: 'Minor' or ‘Negligible’ is referenced as a level of effect, this can be either Beneficial or Adverse.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:23: Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:23: Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:23: No/ Negligible Neutral/ Neutral/ Neutral/ Neutral/ Neutral/

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:23: Change Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:43: Culvert and Boundary Beck Culvert is very low and so the effect would be Negligible Adverse,

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:43: no/negligible change there would be a Negligible Adverse and Not Significant effect.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:44: Negligible Adverse, and not significant.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:44: and thus significant impacts. Thus there would be no/negligible magnitude of change and so

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:44: there would be a Negligible Adverse and Not Significant effect.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:44: Negligible Adverse and Not Significant.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:44: category for the aquifer as low, the level of effect is therefore Negligible Adverse, and Not

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:45: low and so the effect would be Negligible Adverse, and Not Significant.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:45: no/negligible magnitude of change and so there would be a Negligible Adverse and Not

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:45: Boundary Beck Culvert is very low and so the effect would be Negligible Adverse, and Not

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:45:F5.23 The Tees estuary has a very high sensitivity, but there would be no/negligible magnitude of

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:45: change and so there would be a Negligible Adverse and Not Significant effect.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:45: receptors the level of effect is Negligible Adverse and Not Significant.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:45: on the low sensitivity groundwater receptors is Negligible Beneficial and Not Significant.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:51: to the current conditions would be Negligible Beneficial and Not Significant

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:51: therefore the residual effect there would be no/negligible magnitude of change and so there

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:51: would be a Negligible Adverse and Not Significant effect.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:51: sensitivity rated very low and so the effect would be Negligible Beneficial, that is not significant,

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:51: no/negligible change and thus there would be a Negligible Beneficial and Not Significant effect.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:51: of change will be minor, so the level of effect is therefore Negligible Adverse, and Not

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:52: sensitivity aquifer receptors, this would result in a Negligible Adverse level of effect of pollution

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:52: low sensitivity receptor gives a Negligible effect, which is Not Significant.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:52: effect would be Negligible Beneficial, and Not Significant.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:52: therefore the residual effect there would be no/negligible magnitude of change and so there

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:52: would be a Negligible Adverse and Not Significant effect.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:52: and so the effect would be Negligible Beneficial and Not Significant.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:52: no/negligible change and thus there would be a Negligible Beneficial and Not Significant effect.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:52: Negligible Adverse, and Not Significant.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:54: River Tees Flows - Negligible Adverse and Implementation of the Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:55: Water quality - Negligible Adverse and The drainage design will Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:55: Negligible Adverse and

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:55: Other Flows - Negligible Adverse and The drainage design will Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:56: Water Quality - Negligible Adverse and Implementation of Drainage Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:56: Water Quality - Negligible Adverse and materials shall be sensitive

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:56: Mercia Reduced Negligible Adverse and No further mitigation is Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:56: Pollution from Negligible Adverse and Implementation of Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:56: pathways Negligible Adverse and would be ongoing, to

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:57: Superficial Reduced Negligible Adverse and No further mitigation Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:57: Pollution from Negligible Adverse and Implementation of Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:57: pathways Negligible Adverse and would be ongoing, to

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:57: River Tees Flows - Negligible Adverse and A FRA, DIA and Surface Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:58: Water Quality - Negligible Adverse and The drainage design will not Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:58: Other Flows - Negligible Adverse and An FRA, DIA and Surface Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:59: Water Quality - Minor Adverse and Not Any Surface water channels Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:60: Mercia Reduced Negligible Adverse and No further mitigation Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:60: Pollution from Negligible Beneficial and The SWMP and DIA will Minor

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:60: Superficial Reduced Negligible Adverse and No further mitigation Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:60: Pollution from Negligible Beneficial and The SWMP and DIA will Minor

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:60: Negligible Beneficial effects for the River Tees estuary (WFD transitional water body) during

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:10: • Negligible – effects which are unlikely to be perceptible to drivers, bus passengers or those

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:10: • Negligible – effects which are unlikely to be perceptible and within the normal variation of

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:20: there is therefore considered to be a Negligible effect in severance. This is considered to be Not

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:21: Road Dock Road north of the access and therefore Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:21: of Tees Negligible Minor

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:21: Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:21: Negligible Minor

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:21: • Tees Dock Road has a Negligible adverse effect as vehicles will access Lackenby via an

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:21: • A66 west of Tees Dock Road has a change in HGV flow that is considered negligible,

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:22: considered to be Negligible. This is considered to be Not Significant in EIA terms.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:22: be Negligible. This is considered to be Not Significant.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:22: safety is expected to be Negligible. This is considered to be Not Significant.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:25: A174 / Minor adverse A series of footbridges are already provided over Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:27: A174 / Minor adverse Potential accidents Travel Planning measures Negligible – travel

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby EcIA Rev A.pdf:13:8.9 There is a negligible amount of suitable habitat for bats on the proposed development site though

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby EcIA Rev A.pdf:13:8.10 The buildings on the site are of negligible roosting potential for bats as they are either metal or

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby EcIA Rev A.pdf:14:8.14 The amount of suitable habitat for Hedgehog on the site is negligible therefore Hedgehog is

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby EcIA Rev A.pdf:14:Grayling therefore the site is assessed as being of negligible importance for this species.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby EcIA Rev A.pdf:14:each assessed as being of negligible importance.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby EcIA Rev A.pdf:15:9.5 With the embedded mitigation in place the residual effects that are of greater than negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:6: Water Management and Flooding Negligible Beneficial (Not Significant) effect on:

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:6: Negligible Adverse (Not Significant) effect on:

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:6: Negligible Adverse (Not Significant) effects on:

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:7: Negligible (Not Significant) effect for:

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:7: Waste and Materials Management Negligible Adverse (Not Significant) effect on:

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:7: Negligible (Not Significant) effects on:

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:7: Air Quality Negligible (Not Significant) effects on:

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:7: Negligible Beneficial (Not Significant) effect on:

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:7: Negligible Adverse (Not Significant) effects on:

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:8: Negligible (Not Significant) effect on:

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:8: Waste and Materials Management Negligible Adverse (Not Significant) effect on:

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:10: reference is made to Minor or Negligible ‘insignificant’ residual effects where relevant. The EIA

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:10: predicted, the residual effects of the development are either Minor or Negligible Adverse and

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:11: RED - adverse effect; GREEN - beneficial effect; ( ) - Minor/Negligible non-significant effect; X no/neutral

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:11: Negligible noise and air quality effects have been predicted for existing residents and therefore

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:24: Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:29: no or negligible cumulative effects, as a result of the Tier 1 schemes in Table L4.1 coming

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:29: are Negligible, there is anticipated to be no or at worst negligible cumulative effects on

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:41: both sites, the cumulative effects will therefore be Negligible Adverse and Not Significant for

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:41:L5.44 In terms of surface water, the mitigation measures are anticipated to have a Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:42: deemed to be Negligible Beneficial and Not Significant.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:47: magnitude of change on a low sensitivity receptor, which is a Negligible effect (Not Significant).

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:47: considered to be minor. The overall significance is considered to be Negligible (Not Significant).

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:47: negligible magnitude of change on a low sensitivity receptor, which is a Negligible effect (Not

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:48: no or negligible cumulative effects, as a result of the Tier 1 and Tier 2 schemes in Table L4.1

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:48: the proposed development will be negligible and therefore should be scoped out of the

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:64: Negligible impact at most receptor locations and Slight (Minor) Adverse at five receptor

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:64: R20), the A1085 and Kirkleatham Lane respectively). Negligible and Slight (Minor Adverse)

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:65: Negligible impact at all existing receptor locations and is considered to be Not Significant.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:66: Negligible impact at all existing receptor locations and is considered to be Not Significant.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:66:L5.154 The magnitude of change for NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations is Negligible at all receptors.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:66: Where the impact is Negligible or Slight (Minor Adverse) then the overall effect of the proposed

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:66: the cumulative magnitude of impact of the developments would be Negligible Beneficial and Not

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:67: watercourses draining to the Tees and the Tees itself would be Negligible Beneficial and Not

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:69: considered to be Minor. Consequently, the overall significance is considered to be Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:70: Negligible (Not Significant).

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:70: Negligible (Not Significant).

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:70: management Infrastructure during operation are expected to be Negligible (Not Significant).

R-2020-0270-FFM-2020_05_29_STDC Eston Road EcIA_Issue.PDF:14:• Negligible – No effect on species or habitats present are anticipated.

R-2021-0432-FFM-19736928_1.PDF:11: the risk associated with this source is negligible and does not require further assessment.

R-2021-0432-FFM-19736928_1.PDF:16:The risks from tidal, groundwater, sewers and artificial sources are considered to be negligible or low.

R-2023-0339-CD-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf:16:2.7.1 Information provided by the BGS indicates that the Application Site is at very low or negligible risk

R-2023-0339-CD-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf:50:99 17.4 Collapsible deposits Negligible (within 50m)

R-2023-0339-CD-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf:50:101 17.6 Ground dissolution of soluble rocks Negligible (within 50m)

R-2023-0339-CD-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf:102: 1 in 30 year Negligible

R-2023-0339-CD-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf:103: Negligible

R-2023-0339-CD-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf:140: Negligible

R-2023-0339-CD-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf:141: Negligible

R-2023-0339-CD-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf:142: Negligible

R-2023-0339-CD-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf:143: Negligible

R-2023-0339-CD-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf:143: On site Negligible Deposits with potential to collapse when loaded and saturated are believed not to be present.

R-2023-0339-CD-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf:144: Negligible

R-2023-0339-CD-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf:145: Negligible

R-2023-0339-CD-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf:145: On site Negligible Soluble rocks are either not thought to be present within the ground, or not prone to dissolution.

R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:6: Negligible Receptor is of negligible value with no contribution to • Unproductive strata.

R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:7: Negligible Very minor loss or detrimental alteration to one Very minor temporary benefit to or

R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:7: No Change Negligible Low Medium High

R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:7: Negligible No change Negligible Negligible or Negligible or Minor

R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:7: Low No change Negligible or Negligible or Minor Minor or

R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:7: Medium No change Negligible or Minor Moderate Moderate or

R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:8: • Negligible: No effects or those that are beneath levels of perception, within normal bounds of

R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:12:9.3.28 Information provided by the BGS indicates that the Application Site is at very low or negligible risk

R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:14: section 9.4, the magnitude of impact would be negligible.

R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:15: of impact would be negligible.

R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:15: CoCP to prevent surface water run-off, the magnitude of impact would be negligible.

R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:17: basis, the magnitude of impact would be negligible, and the level of effect is considered to be

R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:18: materials to migrate to groundwater. The magnitude of impact would be negligible, and the level of

R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:18: effect is considered to be negligible, which is not significant.

R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:18: contaminants. On this basis, the magnitude of impact would be negligible, and the level of effect is

R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:21: extent; the magnitude of impact would be negligible to low and the significance of effects are

R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:21: would be negligible to minor adverse, which is not significant.

R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:23: CoCP, site Negligible Minor adverse Not significant

R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:23: Mobilisation of CoCP, site Negligible Minor adverse Not significant

R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:23: Direct damage to geology CoCP, site Negligible Minor adverse Not significant

R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:24: Very High Dermal exposure, vapours Environmental permit Negligible Minor adverse Not significant

R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:24:Aquifer) Low chemicals or waste water Negligible Negligible Not significant

R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:24:Cleveland Coast High Negligible Minor adverse Not significant

R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:49: • severity of the effect is described as qualitative descriptors; negligible, slight,

R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:50: ≤75% of AQAL Negligible Negligible Slight Moderate

R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:50: 76-94% of AQAL Negligible Slight Moderate Moderate

R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:82: 85 2020 0.765 1.91% 25.57 64% Negligible

R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:82: 90 2020 0.603 1.51% 25.40 64% Negligible

R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:82: NO2 95 2020 0.486 1.21% 25.29 63% Negligible

R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:82: 85 2020 0.109 2.19% 0.326 0.435 9% Negligible

R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:82: 90 2020 0.0861 1.72% 0.355 0.441 9% Negligible

R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:82: VOC 95 2020 0.0694 1.39% 0.355 0.424 8% Negligible

R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:82: (annual mean) 100 NWP 2020 0.0564 1.13% 0.358 0.414 8% Negligible

R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:82: 105 NWP 2020 0.0510 1.02% 0.358 0.409 8% Negligible

R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:82: 110 NWP 2020 0.00000462 1.85% 0.000211 84% Negligible

R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:83: classed as ‘negligible’ for stack heights of 85m to 95m (inclusive) and screens out at stack

R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:83: ‘negligible’ for stack heights of 85m to 105m (inclusive) and screens out at stack heights of

R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:83: heights of 85m to 105m (inclusive) and ‘negligible’ for stack heights of 110m.

R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:107: sensitive human receptor locations were classed as ‘negligible’. For PAH (as BaP), the

R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:108: IAQM Impact Descriptor Negligible n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Negligible

R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:134: under abnormal operating conditions, would therefore be described as ‘negligible’.

R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:151: human receptor locations were classed as ‘negligible’. For PAH (as BaP), the human

R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:152: IAQM Impact Descriptor Negligible n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Negligible

R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:208:negligible effect on the final reported results, non-bias adjusted results are shown

R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:281:6.53 The revised modelling data show negligible change for hydrogen fluoride compared to the data presented in Table 17. It can therefore be assumed that there

R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:322:4.49 The revised modelling data show negligible change for hydrogen fluoride compared to the data presented in Table 10. It can therefore be assumed that there

R-2023-0253-RMM-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie Air Quality Impacts on SSSI.pdf:20:4.49 The revised modelling data show negligible change for hydrogen fluoride compared to the data presented in Table 10. It can therefore be assumed that there

R-2023-0253-RMM-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf:42:6.53 The revised modelling data show negligible change for hydrogen fluoride compared to the data presented in Table 17. It can therefore be assumed that there

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:11:for foraging likely impact on this species was assessed to be negligible. Several of the ponds were tested for

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:28:injury to marine mammals from dredging has been assessed as negligible. The assessment has

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:28:concluded impacts of negligible significance to all marine mammals with regard to potential for

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:28:vessel movements in the area. A worst-case impact of negligible significance (not significant) is

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:29:conclusion that there will be negligible impacts on both resident and migratory fish.

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:43: geological sensitivity is considered to be negligible.

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:45: It was concluded that the impact during the construction phase would be of negligible significance

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:28:injury to marine mammals from dredging has been assessed as negligible. The assessment has

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:28:concluded impacts of negligible significance to all marine mammals with regard to potential for

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:28:vessel movements in the area. A worst-case impact of negligible significance (not significant) is

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:29:conclusion that there will be negligible impacts on both resident and migratory fish.

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:43: geological sensitivity is considered to be negligible.

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:45: It was concluded that the impact during the construction phase would be of negligible significance

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-MS-WM-000001.pdf:3: negligible significance and no additional mitigation is proposed.

R-2022-0411-CD-32435-HM-AC-RP-01_00 ISSUE.pdf:16: construction works are therefore predicted to be negligible.

R-2020-0318-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0088-01-Prairie_Risk Assessment (1).pdf:15: Deposits have negligible significance for water supply or river base flow. Based on

R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation EcIA_Issue.PDF:15:• Negligible – No effect on species or habitats present are anticipated.

R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site, Desk Based Heritage Assessment.PDF:6: • Negligible – areas of extremely limited or no archaeological or historic interest. These

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:16: demonstrate that there will be a negligible impact on those aspects of the

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 13 Climate Change and GHG.pdf:13: Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 13 Climate Change and GHG.pdf:13: before 2050. A project with negligible effects provides GHG performance

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Green Lithium Appendix 10 - LVIA.pdf:4: Negligible / Barely perceptible changes to the

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Green Lithium Appendix 10 - LVIA.pdf:4: None Negligible to no perceptible change character area/receptor.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Green Lithium Appendix 10 - LVIA.pdf:5: Negligible / Barely perceptible or no change to the

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Green Lithium Appendix 10 - LVIA.pdf:15: Surrounding Low Within the surrounding urban context, the new Green Lithium facility - comprising a low carbon lithium refinery, Moderate Minor- Adverse Minor Minor Adverse Minor Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Green Lithium Appendix 10 - LVIA.pdf:17:Recreational users of Medium For recreational users of the England Coast Path long distance route, views of the Site vary depending Minor Minor Adverse Minor Minor Adverse Negligible Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Green Lithium Appendix 10 - LVIA.pdf:17:Local road users to the Low PVP 3 illustrates the view from the junction of the A66 and Eston Road, where intervening built form will Minor Minor Adverse Minor Minor Adverse Negligible Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Green Lithium Appendix 10 - LVIA.pdf:18:Transient users of Low Photoviewpoints 6 and 7 illustrate views on the approach to the Site along Teesport Road from the Major Moderate Adverse Moderate Minor-Moderate Minor Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Green Lithium Appendix 10 - LVIA.pdf:18:Transient users of Low For transient users of the A1085 Trunk Road and Public Retail Development users, the views towards Minor Minor Adverse Minor Minor Adverse Negligible Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Green Lithium Appendix 10 - LVIA.pdf:19:Recreational users of Medium to High This view is representative of those from the Eston Nab Hill viewpoint. It is a local landmark, and is well Minor Moderate Adverse Minor Moderate Adverse Negligible Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Green Lithium Appendix 10 - LVIA.pdf:19:Visitors to Coatham Low to Medium Distant views towards the Site are heavily filtered by intervening built form: cranes and industrial Minor Minor Adverse Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Green Lithium Appendix 10 - LVIA.pdf:20:Residents to the south Low to Medium Viewpoint 5 is representative of views towards the Site from the residential properties within a Minor Minor Adverse Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR Statement of Community Engagement Annex 1 - EIA Screening Response.pdf:4: extant uses. While it is identified that “traffic would therefore be negligible and

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:5: • The potential effects have been given a significance of Negligible or Minor, Moderate or Major

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:6: Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:7: Minor Minor to Moderate Minor Negligible to Minor

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:7: Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:13: considered to be Negligible to Minor Adverse for surface water drainage (low sensitivity receptor).

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:14:9.61. With these mitigation measures in place, it is considered that the residual effect would be Negligible.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:15:9.68. With these mitigation measures in place, it is considered that the residual effect would be Negligible.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:16:9.77. With these mitigation measures in place, it is considered that the residual effect would be Negligible.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:17:9.86. With these mitigation measures in place, it is considered that the residual effects would be Negligible.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:18: effect would be Negligible.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:19:9.103. With these mitigation measures in place, it is considered that the residual effects would be Negligible.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:20: water drainage would be Negligible to Minor Beneficial when compared to the existing scenario.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:21: risk from routine site drainage would be Negligible when compared to the existing Site use.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:22: Development is considered to be Negligible. Prior to mitigation, the effect significance is considered to

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:22: be Negligible for water supply and Infrastructure and no mitigation measures are required.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:22: considered to be negligible on Infrastructure. Prior to mitigation, the effect significance is considered to

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:22: be Negligible, and no mitigation measures are therefore required.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:24: ratings of the assessment and the resulting residual effects would remain Negligible to Minor Beneficial.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:25: Development with regard to water quality, water resources and flood risk is considered to be Negligible.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:26: Low Negligible to and

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:26: Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:26: Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:26: Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:26: water and Minor Adverse tanks). Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:26: Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:26: Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:26: Control of Low Negligible to Negligible to

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:26: surface water (surface water Negligible Minor Water Drainage Strategy

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:26: waters from Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:26: Water demand Negligible Negligible - None required Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:26: Negligible Negligible - None required Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 14 Contaminated Lands.pdf:6: Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 14 Contaminated Lands.pdf:6: Negligible/Neutral Reversible Site-wide Infrequent

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 14 Contaminated Lands.pdf:6: “Adverse”, “Neutral/Negligible” or “Beneficial”). Where the predicted effects are significant

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 14 Contaminated Lands.pdf:6: Receptor Large Medium Low Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 14 Contaminated Lands.pdf:6: Medium Moderate/Major Moderate Minor/Moderate Negligible/Minor

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 14 Contaminated Lands.pdf:6: Low Moderate Minor/Moderate Negligible/Minor Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 14 Contaminated Lands.pdf:7: Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 14 Contaminated Lands.pdf:16: aquifers only have a minor value and negligible significance for water supply to rivers lakes or

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 14 Contaminated Lands.pdf:33: Completed development Permanent Minor Adverse Site investigation and Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 14 Contaminated Lands.pdf:33: Completed development Permanent Insignificant No specific mitigation Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 14 Contaminated Lands.pdf:33: Completed development Permanent Minor Adverse Site investigation and Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 14 Contaminated Lands.pdf:33: Completed development Permanent Minor Adverse Site investigation and Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-PD Teeside Heritage Statement 0323.pdf:11: potential was high although modern remains are of negligible importance. The Assessment

R-2023-0291-ESM-PD Teeside Heritage Statement 0323.pdf:20: century development of the site and will have negligible heritage value.

R-2023-0291-ESM-PD Teeside Heritage Statement 0323.pdf:21: are retained these hold negligible archaeological interest given late dating. Land to the south

R-2023-0291-ESM-PD Teeside Heritage Statement 0323.pdf:21: the position of the former track beds, these are of late dating and hold negligible interest.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 10 Landscape.pdf:9: – Moderate – Moderate / Minor – Minor – Negligible.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 10 Landscape.pdf:9: NEGLIGIBLE NEGLIGIBLE NEGLIGIBLE NEGLIGIBLE

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 10 Landscape.pdf:16: negligible effects.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:2: assessed as negligible.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:2: Management Plan (CEMP), the residual impact would be negligible.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:3: Proposed Development is likely to have a Negligible impact to local air quality.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:4: Negligible.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:5:15.33. The impacts of the Proposed Development are therefore considered to be Negligible in terms of waste

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:5: with the proposed noise levels demonstrating a negligible impact to this receptor as well as all others

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:6:15.37. The effects due to operation of the Proposed Development will be negligible following appropriate

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:6: design, such that effects from sound levels pertaining to such sources remain negligible.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:7:15.47. The conclusion of the ES is that Proposed Development has an overall negligible impact, with none of

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:8: Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:8: Negligible No additional mitigation required

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:8: Point Source Emissions Negligible No additional mitigation required

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:8: Negligible No additional mitigation required

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:8: Negligible No additional mitigation required

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:8: Other Neutral Grassland Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:8: Species: Dingy Skipper Negligible No additional mitigation required

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:8: Negligible No additional mitigation required

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:8: Negligible Installation of drainage works and attenuation measures

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:9: Negligible Groundwater monitoring will be undertaken prior to construction

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:9: general construction Negligible Implementation of CEMP, Construction Vehicles properly maintained, Drainage will comply with BS6031:2009

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:9: External Flood Risk Negligible Groundwater monitoring will be undertaken prior to construction, Dewatering of excavations

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:9: Contamination to Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:9: External Flood Risk Negligible Groundwater monitoring to be undertaken prior to construction

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:9: Control of Surface Water Negligible to Minor

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:9: Contamination of Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:9: Water Demand Negligible No additional mitigation required

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:9: Foul Drainage Demand Negligible No additional mitigation required

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:9: Negligible No additional mitigation required

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:9: Landscape Character Negligible No additional mitigation required

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:9: Visual Receptors Negligible No additional mitigation required

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:9: Negligible No additional mitigation required

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:10: Landscape Character Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:10: Visual Receptors Negligible No additional mitigation required

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:10: Negligible No additional mitigation required

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:10: through the construction Negligible No additional mitigation required

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:10: Negligible No additional mitigation required

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:10: Negligible to Minor

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:10: Negligible Implementation of Best Practicable Means to control noise emission

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:10: Construction vibration Negligible Implementation of Best Practicable Means to control vibration emissions

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:11: Negligible No additional mitigation required

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:11: Effects on human health Negligible Site Investigation and Remediation, use of engineering design (barriers and clean break layers).

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:11: Contamination of Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:11: Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:11: from Ground Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR Planning Statement.pdf:71: negligible.

R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR Planning Statement.pdf:72:5.27. The conclusion of the assessment is that there will be no negligible impact to the Teesmouth & Cleveland

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Appendix 14.1 A. Groundsure.pdf:8:114 17.4 Collapsible deposits Negligible (within 50m)

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Appendix 14.1 A. Groundsure.pdf:8:116 17.6 Ground dissolution of soluble rocks Negligible (within 50m)

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Appendix 14.1 A. Groundsure.pdf:62: 3 211m SE Unproductive These are rock layers or drift deposits with low permeability that have negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Appendix 14.1 A. Groundsure.pdf:79: Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Appendix 14.1 A. Groundsure.pdf:113: Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Appendix 14.1 A. Groundsure.pdf:114: Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Appendix 14.1 A. Groundsure.pdf:115: Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Appendix 14.1 A. Groundsure.pdf:116: Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Appendix 14.1 A. Groundsure.pdf:116: On site Negligible Deposits with potential to collapse when loaded and saturated are believed not to be present.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Appendix 14.1 A. Groundsure.pdf:117: Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Appendix 14.1 A. Groundsure.pdf:118: Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Appendix 14.1 A. Groundsure.pdf:118: On site Negligible Soluble rocks are either not thought to be present within the ground, or not prone to dissolution.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Appendix 14.1 F. Geotechnical Risk Register.pdf:2: 1 Negligible < 1 in 100

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Appendix 14.1 F. Geotechnical Risk Register.pdf:3: 1 Negligible < 1%

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Green Lithium Appendix 14 - Contaminated Lands.pdf:30:  Collapsible Ground – Negligible hazard rating

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Green Lithium Appendix 14 - Contaminated Lands.pdf:30:  Ground Dissolution – Negligible hazard rating

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Green Lithium Appendix 14 - Contaminated Lands.pdf:30:deposits. These aquifers only have a minor value and negligible significance for water supply to

R-2023-0291-ESM-Officer Letter_R20220675SCP.pdf:3: extant uses. While it is identified that “traffic would therefore be negligible and

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 11 Waste.pdf:12: considered to have a negligible effect.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 11 Waste.pdf:13: effects are negligible.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 11 Waste.pdf:13: operational phase is Negligible.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:3: to ensure the likelihood of effects remains Negligible.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:3: Negligible Receptors where noise is not likely to be a factor

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:4: Impact Negligible Low Medium High

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:7: Negligible < 0.3 > 185.1

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:8: Significance Negligible Minor Moderate Major

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:8: High Negligible Minor Moderate Major

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:8: Moderate Negligible Negligible Minor Moderate

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:8: Low Negligible Negligible Negligible Minor

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:8: Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:13: R1 Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:13: R2 Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:13: R3 Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:13: R4 Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:13: R5 Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:13: R6 Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:13: R1 Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:13: R2 Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:13: R3 Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:13: R4 Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:13: R5 Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:13: R6 Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:14: R1 Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:14: R2 Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:14: R3 Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:14: R4 Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:14: R5 Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:14: R6 Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:14: R1 Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:14: R2 Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:14: R3 Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:14: R4 Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:14: R5 Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:14: R6 Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:14:12.47. The effect significance is classed as Negligible (not significant) during all construction activities. Whilst

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:14: the calculated impact is Negligible, it is still prudent to employ mitigation measures to further minimise

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:15: R1 Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:15: R2 Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:15: R3 Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:15: R4 Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:15: R5 Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:15: R6 Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:15: R1 Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:15: R2 Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:15: R3 Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:15: R4 Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:15: R5 Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:15: R6 Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:15: R1 Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:15: R2 Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:15: R3 Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:15: R4 Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:15: R5 Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:15: R6 Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:15: R1 Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:15: R2 Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:15: R3 Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:15: R4 Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:15: R5 Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:15: R6 Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:16:12.50. The effect significance is classed as Negligible (not significant) at all receptor locations. Whilst the

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:17: plant would be negligible following specification and assessment of proposed items.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:17:12.60. Construction noise and vibration effects are calculated to be Negligible (not significant). BPM measures

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:17: resulting effect is Negligible.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:18:12.64. With consideration to the calculated Negligible residual effects and intervening distance between the

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:18: Development would be Negligible. Accordingly, cumulative effects are identified as unlikely. As a

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:18:12.68. Construction noise and vibration effects are calculated to be Negligible (not significant) following

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:18:12.69. The effects due to operation of the Proposed Development will be Negligible following appropriate

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:18: design, such that effects from sound levels pertaining to such sources remain Negligible.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:19: Short-Term Negligible Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:19: at surrounding Short-Term Negligible Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:19: at surrounding Long-Term - Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Appendix 14.1 E. PRA Methodology.pdf:3: Minor/ Negligible Non-permanent health effects to human health (easily prevented by appropriate use of PPE). Minor pollution to

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Appendix 14.1 E. PRA Methodology.pdf:3: Mild Moderate Moderate/Low Low Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Appendix 14.1 E. PRA Methodology.pdf:3: Moderate/Low Low Negligible Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Appendix 14.1 E. PRA Methodology.pdf:3: Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Appendix 14.1 E. PRA Methodology.pdf:4: Negligible Low likelihood that harm could arise to a receptor. Such harm unlikely to be any worse than mild.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Ecology.pdf:14: roosting bats be other than negligible, the appropriate level of survey effort will be undertaken, in line

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 1 to 6.pdf:39: • Neutral / Negligible – no discernible improvement or deterioration to the existing environment.

R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR_DAS.pdf:18: development will include the removal of some existing negligible impact to the Teesmouth & Cleveland

R-2023-0291-ESM-PN 0291.pdf:2:(CEMP), the residual impact would be negligible.

R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR ES Vol 3 Exec Summary.pdf:11: be negligible.

R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR ES Vol 3 Exec Summary.pdf:11: contributions are assessed as negligible at all sensitive human receptor locations for all pollutants.

R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR ES Vol 3 Exec Summary.pdf:13: development with regard to water quality, water resources and flood risk is considered to be Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR ES Vol 3 Exec Summary.pdf:15:8.9. The impacts of the proposed development are therefore considered to be Negligible in terms of waste

R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR ES Vol 3 Exec Summary.pdf:17: low likelihood of noise impacts associated with construction activities. Negligible effects are calculated

R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR ES Vol 3 Exec Summary.pdf:17: adopted limits, such that the resulting effect is Negligible. Such consideration will be undertaken during

R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR ES Vol 3 Exec Summary.pdf:17:9.6. Effects from fixed plant would be negligible following specification and assessment of proposed plant

R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR ES Vol 3 Exec Summary.pdf:17: is adequately controlled such that calculated effects remain Negligible.

R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR ES Vol 3 Exec Summary.pdf:17: considered to be Negligible.

R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR ES Vol 3 Exec Summary.pdf:21:12.1. In summary the ES concludes that the Proposed Development has an overall negligible effect, when the

R-2023-0291-ESM-20230328 Green Lithium TS_RG_RF.pdf:18: be negligible.

R-2023-0291-ESM-20230328 Green Lithium TS_RG_RF.pdf:20: this existing industrial site for a Lithium Refining Facility would be negligible.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf:4:7.14. The risk of dust effects (negligible, low, medium or high) is determined by the scale (magnitude) and

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf:7: 50m, the impact is negligible.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf:8: 50m, the impact is negligible.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf:9: Low Medium Risk Low Risk Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf:10: Low Medium Risk Low Risk Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf:10: Medium Medium Risk Low Risk Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf:10: Low Low Risk Low Risk Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf:16: Negligible Negligible Slight adverse Moderate adverse

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf:17: 76-94% of AQAL Negligible Slight adverse Moderate adverse Moderate adverse

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf:17: as negligible, regardless of existing air quality. Where the short-term process concentrations are 11-20%

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf:19: represent negligible or zero risk to health, based on medical and scientific evidence reviewed by the

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf:27: that required by legislation. Where the risk is assessed as ‘negligible’ no additional mitigation is

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf:27: Demolition Small Negligible Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf:28: receptors, the impact is classed as negligible in accordance with the EPUK & IAQM significance criteria.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf:28: negligible in accordance with the guidance provided by the EPUK & IAQM.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf:31: negligible in accordance with the EPUK & IAQM significance criteria.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf:31: negligible in accordance with the EPUK & IAQM significance criteria.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf:32: described as negligible.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf:33: as negligible in accordance with the EPUK & IAQM significance criteria.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf:37: of the Proposed Development with other committed developments is considered to remain negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf:38: Circular Fuels Ltd on annual mean NO2 concentrations is considered to be negligible.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf:38: Circular Fuels Ltd on annual mean PM10 concentrations is considered to be negligible.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf:39: Circular Fuels Ltd on annual mean PM2.5 concentrations is considered to be negligible.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf:39: assessment concluded that the emissions of dust and NOx from the proposed plant will be negligible.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf:39: negligible.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf:40: the Redcar Energy Centre on annual mean NO2 concentrations is considered to be negligible.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf:40: considered to remain negligible.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf:42:7.156. The Proposed Development is predicted to have a negligible impact on local air quality during operation.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf:42: emissions during construction of the Proposed Development would be negligible.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf:43:7.158. Emissions from the Proposed Development are predicted to have a negligible impact on local air quality

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf:43: during operation. Therefore, the residual effects are considered to be negligible.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf:43: Environmental Management Plan (CEMP), the residual impact would be negligible.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf:43: by the Proposed Development would be negligible.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf:43: contributions are assessed as negligible at all sensitive human receptor locations for all pollutants.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf:44: during demolition/ Temporary Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf:44: Temporary Not significant None Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf:44: Permanent Not significant None Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf:44: Permanent Not significant None Negligible

R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:77:• Negligible – No effect on species or habitats present are anticipated.

R-2021-0608-PND-210801_Ecolgy screening (EIA criteria) for Teesworks demolitions_INCA_RevA.pdf:7:Destruction of bat roosts Likely impact is negligible due to low suitability of buildings for

R-2021-0608-PND-210801_Ecolgy screening (EIA criteria) for Teesworks demolitions_INCA_RevA.pdf:7: is negligible due to distance (over 1.9km).

R-2021-0608-PND-210801_Ecolgy screening (EIA criteria) for Teesworks demolitions_INCA_RevA.pdf:8: is negligible due to distance (over 1.9km).

R-2021-0608-PND-210801_Ecolgy screening (EIA criteria) for Teesworks demolitions_INCA_RevA.pdf:8:Vibration Likely impact on sensitive species (roosting birds) is negligible

R-2021-0608-PND-210801_Ecolgy screening (EIA criteria) for Teesworks demolitions_INCA_RevA.pdf:8:Disturbance by personnel Likely impact on sensitive species (roosting birds) is negligible

R-2021-0608-PND-210801_Ecolgy screening (EIA criteria) for Teesworks demolitions_INCA_RevA.pdf:16:majority of buildings on the site are assessed as being of negligible Bat Roost Potential

20210119 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay CP advice + JPQC.pdf:3: shows a greater number of minor or negligible outcomes relative to more significant categories

20210115 MLA202000507 South Bank Quay-phase 2 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:8: injury and/or temporary threshold shift (TTS) are considered negligible. I defer to Cefas underwater

MLA202000506 & MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phases 1&2 UWN advice + JPQC.pdf:4: a result of underwater noise has been assessed as negligible and the assessment concludes that no

MLA202000506 & MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phases 1&2 UWN advice + JPQC.pdf:4: periods of time sufficient to cause TTS or PTS. Disturbance has been assessed as negligible, although I

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:13:It is concluded that the impact during the construction phase of the proposed scheme would be of negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:13:are minor beneficial to controlled waters and negligible to human health.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:13:with maintenance dredging. All operational phase impacts are predicted to be of negligible significance,

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:14:to marine mammals from dredging has been assessed as negligible. The assessment has concluded

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:14:impacts of negligible significance to all marine mammals with regard to potential for temporary auditory

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:14:movements in the area. A worst-case impact of negligible significance (not significant) is predicted.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:15:Tees, and is therefore expected to have a negligible effect on fish. The removal of the existing wharf

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:16:negligible impacts on both resident and migratory fish. Disturbance during the operational phase, either as

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:16:a result of vessel calls to the new quay or the use of quayside lighting, is predicted to have a negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:16:required by International Regulations to allow safe navigation. An impact of negligible significance on

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:16:determined to have minimal effect on the existing navigation profile. An impact of negligible significance is

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:16:Environmental Assessment of Road Traffic), the impact is considered to be negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:18:construction phase noise levels at the South Tees Business Parks would be negligible. No mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:19:assessed as being permanent and negligible. No mitigation measures during the operational phase are

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:20:disturbance and reductions in air quality are considered to be negligible during construction and operation.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:20:It is therefore concluded that impacts to human health would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:20:is predicted to have a negligible impact on fisheries, marine ecology and marine mammals, and no impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:48: High Major Moderate Moderate Minor Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:48: Medium Moderate Moderate Minor Minor Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:48: Low Minor Minor Minor Negligible Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:48: Very low Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:48:Whilst mitigation for minor or negligible impacts may not be specifically defined as a matter of course,

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:48:recognised that minor and negligible impacts could become significant when considered cumulatively with

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:112:3, the values are so low (<5mg/l) as to be negligible compared with background levels and, in all cases, the

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:112:water quality sampling points during Stage 3 of the dredging and only negligible effects for a short duration

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:112:Stages 3 and 4 of the dredging, only negligible effects are noted, equivalent to variations within the

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:118:as to be negligible in such a great depth of water in this deep water offshore area).

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:122:enhancement is so small in magnitude and spatial extent as to be negligible in such a great depth of water

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:126:is negligible, whilst to the north it covers a similar zone to the sediment plume for this disposal event, which

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:126:0.1cm. Clearly these magnitudes are extremely low within the licenced disposal site, and negligible beyond.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:126:magnitudes, with negligible changes anticipated beyond the boundaries of the site.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:167:is considered to be medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:167:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:167:impact is of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:167:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:168:be medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:168:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:168:considered to be medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:168:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:174: negligible. As there are no designated

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:175:Negligible Is generally tolerant of physical or chemical changes

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:177:temporary change, indiscernible • negligible change to existing risk of exposure; or

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:178: Moderate Minor Minor Negligible Negligible Minor Minor Moderate

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:178: Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Minor

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:178:(negligible) impacts as they may contribute to significant impacts cumulatively or through interactions.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:178:Negligible Very small changes in receptor condition (adverse or beneficial), which may be raised as local issues

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:180:the geological sensitivity is considered to be negligible. As there are no designated geological sites recorded

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:186:during construction is considered to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:186:No mitigation measures are required and residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:188:overall impact during construction is considered to be of negligible to minor adverse significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:188:negligible to minor adverse significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:189:very low. Thus, the impact to human receptors is of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:189:No additional mitigation measures required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:190:very low and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:212:impact of negligible significance is predicted.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:212:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:214:Given the above, an impact of negligible significance on marine species and habitats is predicted to arise

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:214:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:215:and tidal regime is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:215:No mitigation measures are required, and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:221: Negligible / very

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:234: 0.0003 harbour porpoise Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:234: 0.000003 minke whale Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:234: dredging 0.00000024 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:234: 0.0000009 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:234:The magnitude of the potential impact of PTS as a result of dredging noise is negligible / very low for harbour

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:234:seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.10).

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:234: Harbour Negligible / Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:234: Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:234: Auditory injury Negligible / Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:234: (PTS) from Minke whale Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:234: Negligible / required. Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:234: SEL during Grey seal Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:234: Negligible / Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:234: Harbour seal Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:235:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:236: Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:236: 0.000003 minke whale Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:236: underwater noise 0.00000024 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:236: 0.0000009 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:236:The magnitude of the potential impact of TTS and fleeing response as a result of dredging noise, is negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:237:whale, grey seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.13).

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:237: Harbour Negligible / Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:237: Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:237: TTS or fleeing Negligible / Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:237: response from Minke whale Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:237: Negligible / required. Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:237: SEL during Grey seal Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:237: Negligible / Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:237: Harbour seal Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:237:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:238: Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:238: Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:238: dredging (5% of Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:238: 0.000005 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:238:of negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, the impact significance for any

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:238:potential increase in collision risk with vessels during dredging has been assessed as negligible (not

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:239: Harbour Negligible /

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:239: Low Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:239: Potential for Minke Negligible / Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:239: collision risk from required, other than Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:239: vessels during Negligible / Negligible good practice.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:239: Harbour Negligible / Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:239:The residual impact would be of negligible significance for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:240:The magnitude of the impact of vessel disturbance to seal haul-out sites is defined as negligible / very low

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:240:resulting in an overall impact significance of negligible.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:240:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:240:have a negligible impact on marine mammals.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:240:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:241: Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:241: Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:241: dredge area Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:241: 0.0001 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:241:Taking into account the low receptor sensitivity, the negligible potential magnitude of the impact and the

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:241:negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal (Table 10.17).

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:241: Harbour Negligible /

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:241: Low Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:241: Minke Negligible / Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:241: resource in Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:241: Negligible / Negligible required.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:241: Harbour Negligible / Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:241:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:242:10.5.1 and 10.5.2). The magnitude of effect in all species is assessed to be negligible / very low based on

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:242:maintenance activities has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.10 and Table 10.13).

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:242:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:242:10.5.3). The magnitude of effect in all species is assessed to be negligible / very low based on the maximum

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:242:has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.15).

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:242:dredging activities. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:242:assessed as negligible (see Section 10.5.4).

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:242:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:243:negligible (see Section 10.5.5).

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:243:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:243:negligible (see Section 10.5.6).

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:243:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:243:established vessel routes. The magnitude of effect in all species is assessed to be negligible / very low

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:243:for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal has been assessed as negligible (Table

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:243:would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:251: Negligible Commonplace feature of little or no habitat/historical significance. Loss of such a feature would not be seen

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:252: Negligible of normal natural variation change to the extent Change is within the normal range of natural variation.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:253: High Medium Low Negligible Negligible Low Medium High

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:253: Moderate Minor Minor Negligible Negligible Minor Minor Moderate

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:253: Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:253: Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Minor

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:260:grassland is concluded as being of negligible ecological value.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:260:negligible ecological value.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:260:scrub habitat is concluded as being of negligible ecological value.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:261:and ruderal habitat is concluded as being of negligible ecological value.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:261:metal structures, which have been assessed as being of negligible value for roosting bats due to the lack of

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:264: Wharf Negligible No

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:264: Buildings Negligible No

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:264: Notable Flora Negligible No

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:264: Badger Negligible No

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:264: Water vole Negligible No

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:265: Amphibians Negligible No

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:265: Reptiles Negligible No

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:266:impacts to foraging bats are considered to be negligible.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:266:included in the CEMP, and with the implementation of such measures, any impacts will be negligible in

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:266:Negligible impacts on water quality are anticipated during construction of the proposed scheme (Section

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:267:time otters are anticipated to spend in the area, an impact of negligible magnitude is anticipated. Given the

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:268:assessed to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:268:With the implementation of the above measures, the residual impact is of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:268:be of local (grayling) and (dingy skipper) significance, and negligible importance within the footprint of the

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:294:Both had a peak count of two, which represents a negligible proportion of the SPA / Ramsar site populations.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:296:would have a negligible impact on benthic prey species in the intertidal zone so consequent effects on

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:298:of the effects of capital dredging and therefore a negligible impact is predicted on the waterbirds relying on

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:298:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:301:minor adverse. A residual impact of negligible significance is predicted at the other sensitive intertidal

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:304:and localised disturbance to feeding resources will result in an impact of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:304:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:305:negligible, and any exceedances of the thresholds stated in Cutts et al. (2009) or Wright et al. (2010) would

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:305:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:305:negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:305:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:305:be negligible, therefore any effects on waterbirds and foraging terns would manifest as a direct behavioural

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:306:on foraging / roosting waterbirds and terns is predicted to be negligible.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:306:While impacts are anticipated to be negligible, the implication of best practice mitigation measures set out

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:306:water) will further reduce the impact on foraging / roosting waterbirds. The residual impact is negligible.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:306:negligible impact on intertidal benthos (see Section 9.6.2) and would not adversely affect the availability of

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:306:result of hydrodynamic changes would be negligible.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:306:No mitigation measures are considered necessary, therefore the residual impact is negligible.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:321:and beyond. The impact is therefore predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:321:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would remain of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:324:considered to be very low, and the significance of the impact is negligible.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:325:Outside the migratory period, there would be a negligible impact on fish movement up- and downstream

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:327:underwater noise of piling activities is therefore considered to have a negligible impact on migration up-

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:327:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact remains negligible.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:328:negligible impact on fish species within the Tees.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:330:the footprint of the works, and even if there was, the number of vessels/fishers affected would be negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:330:and navigation within the Tees estuary is predicted to be negligible, given that works will be co-ordinated

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:330:are predicted to be negligible.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:330:remain negligible.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:330:in motorised vessel traffic is therefore considered to have a negligible impact on fish populations or

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:330:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact will remain negligible.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:331:impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:331:impact would be negligible.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:336:receptor. The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible significance on

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:336:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:336:receptor. The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible significance on

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:337:scheme) and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:337:(human health/safety). The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:337:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:338:The impact of the proposed development’s construction traffic is therefore assessed as of negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:338:proposed schemes operational traffic is therefore assessed as negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:338:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:341: MMO Scoping Opinion negligible and therefore not necessary to be assessed.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:347: Negligible Assets with no significant importance or archaeological/historical interest.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:347: Negligible The asset’s fabric and/or setting is changed in ways which do not materially affect its heritage significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:348: Significance High Medium Low Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:348: Low Moderate Minor Minor Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:348: Negligible Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:348: Negligible No material change to heritage significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:349:these from other non-significant (negligible) impacts as they may contribute to significant impacts

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:370: Negligible / very low < 1.0

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:373: 1 69.7 69.8 0.1 Very low Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:373: 2 67.8 68.0 0.2 Very low Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:373: 3 70.3 70.5 0.2 Very low Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:373: 5 76.3 76.4 0.1 Very low Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:373:Predicted changes in BNL, displayed in Table 17.10, indicate impacts of negligible significance at worst

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:373:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:375: NSR1 52.2 - 59.2 Very low Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:375:indicating negligible impact at human receptor locations. This is considered not significant and impact is

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:376:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:391: Dust soiling High Risk Medium Risk Medium Risk Negligible Risk

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:391: Human health Medium Risk Low Risk Low Risk Negligible Risk

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:391: Ecological effects Medium Risk Low Risk Low Risk Negligible Risk

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:391:demolition, ‘medium risk’ for earthworks and construction, and ‘negligible risk’ for trackout. The impacts on

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:392:earthworks and construction and ‘negligible risk’ for trackout.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:406:the proposed scheme will have negligible influence on this character area and is not considered further..

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:408:industrial context of outward views, it is predicted that the proposed scheme will have negligible influence

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:411:negligible effect on the existing baseline.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:415:of those features will incur a low adverse magnitude of effect and a negligible overall significance of effect.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:415:magnitude and incur a minor negligible adverse significance of effect.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:415:negligible overall significance of effect.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:416:and the wider environs, the overall significance of effect is considered to be negligible.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:419:significance of effect in the view is minor negligible adverse and not significant.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:419:significance of effect in the view is minor negligible adverse. In terms of EIA these effects are not

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:419:negligible.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:434:negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:435:As a result, it is concluded that there would be a negligible impact as a result of the proposed scheme.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:435:a potential impact of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:436:effect on a low sensitivity receptor. Overall, a negligible impact is predicted.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:436:residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:444:The socio-economic impacts of the proposed scheme are identified as ‘beneficial’, ‘negligible’ or ‘adverse’

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:444: Negligible No obvious significant effect to a receptor or environment.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:444: Negligible Where no discernible effect is expected as a result of the proposed scheme on the

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:444: High Medium Low Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:444: High Substantial Moderate to Minor to Moderate Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:444: Medium Moderate to Moderate Minor Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:445: Low Minor to Moderate Minor Negligible to Minor Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:445: Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:453:supply scenario forecasts only a negligible increase in employment during the plan period.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:455:term) and negligible.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:455:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:458:employment with the AOI and is therefore considered to correspond to a negligible magnitude of change.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:458:a permanent and negligible impact.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:458:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:458:negligible magnitude of change. The receptor is considered to be of medium sensitivity by virtue of the fact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:459:a permanent and negligible impact.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:459:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:476:that there would be impacts of negligible significance to the only NSR scoped into the assessment.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:476:would be negligible to minor adverse significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:477:noise and air quality disturbance would be negligible.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:477:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:477:negligible significance and not significant respectively. In addition, operational phase impacts to human

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:477:health as reported in Section 8 with regard to land quality are considered to be of negligible significance. It

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:477:and land quality would be negligible.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:477:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual impact of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:478:long period prior to this the enhancement is so small in magnitude and spatial extent as to be negligible in

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:479:deposition is predicted to be negligible beyond the boundaries of the Tees Bay C disposal site.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:479:that there would be negligible impact on fish or fisheries due to the proposed deposition of dredged material

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:479:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual impact of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:482:negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:482:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:484:operations). Overall, the potential impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:484:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:485: Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:485: 0.000003 minke whale Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:485: during offshore 0.00004 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:485: 0.0000003 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:486:dredged sediments is negligible / very low for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal,

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:486:negligible (Table 26.5).

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:486: Harbour Negligible / Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:486: TTS or fleeing Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:486: underwater Negligible / Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:486: Minke whale Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:486: offshore Negligible / required. Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:486: disposal of Grey seal Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:486: sediments Negligible / Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:486: Harbour seal Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:486:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:487: Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:487: Potential Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:487: of dredged 0.002 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:487: Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:487:of negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, the impact significance for any

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:487:assessed as negligible (not significant) for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:487: Harbour Negligible /

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:487: Low Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:487: increased Minke Negligible / Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:487: vessels during required, other than Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:487: offshore disposal Negligible / Negligible good practice.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:487: sediments Harbour Negligible / Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:487:would be of negligible significance for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:488:The magnitude of the impact of vessel disturbance to seal haul-out sites is defined as negligible / very low

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:488:This gives an overall impact significance of negligible.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:488:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:488:relied upon solely. Therefore, any increases in suspended sediments will have a negligible impact on

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:488:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:489: Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:489: Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:489: offshore disposal 0.04 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:489: Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:489:Taking into account the low receptor sensitivity, the negligible potential magnitude of the impact and the

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:489:negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal (Table 26.9).

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:489: Harbour Negligible /

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:489: Low Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:489: Changes to prey Minke Negligible / Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:489: Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:489: offshore disposal Negligible / Negligible required.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:489: Harbour Negligible / Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:489:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:507:cumulative impact is predicted to be negligible.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:509: Negligible / very low

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:509: Negligible / very low

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:509: approach channel and Anglo Negligible / very low

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:509: Negligible / very low

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:509: Negligible / very low

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:509: Hartlepool approach Negligible / very low

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:510: Negligible / very low

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:510: Negligible / very low

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:510: Negligible / very low

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:510: Negligible / very low

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:510: Hartlepool approach Negligible / very low

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:510: Negligible / very low

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:510:Harbour Facilities schemes, is negligible / very low for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:510:harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as negligible (Table 27.5).

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:511:cumulative underwater noise impacts. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:511: TTS or fleeing Harbour Negligible /

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:511: response from Negligible Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:511: dredging at the Negligible /

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:511: Minke whale Negligible Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:511: Hartlepool Negligible /

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:511: approach Grey seal Negligible Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:511: Harbour Negligible /

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:511: Harbour seal Negligible Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:513:on waterbirds at North Tees Mudflat, and negligible impact further downstream (including at Vopak

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:514:supporting habitat was considered a negligible impact in the EIAs for both the Anglo American Harbour

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:514:(even in combination) would have a negligible impact, the cumulative effect with the proposed scheme would

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:515:driving activities (see Section 13.5.3 and 13.5.4). While there is anticipated to be negligible impact from

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:516:works, but the potential cumulative impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:516:impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:516:acceptable (from a navigation risk perspective), with all risks classified as negligible or low, with the

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:516:impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:516:The primary assessment identifies that the proposed schemes traffic demand would result in a negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:517:with the proposed scheme are considered not significant and indicate negligible impact, at worst. Therefore,

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:521:concludes that the disposal of dredged material will have a negligible impact on fisheries, marine ecology

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:521:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual cumulative impact of negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:568: Lianhetech, Seal Sands Proposed new buildings, plant upgrade, swale and associated Approximately Planning permission / Ramsar site would be negligible. On this basis,

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:576:greater than approximately 200m from source (see Appendix 8). There would be negligible effects on fish

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:578:would be negligible, therefore any effects on SPA / Ramsar site features would manifest as a direct

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:584:negligible effect on feeding resources for terns. When this is considered alongside the localised increase

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:56: likely to be negligible and therefore not necessary to be assessed.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:208:Deposition to the west and east of the disposal site is negligible, whilst to the south and north covers a

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:260: • negligible ground dissolution.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:284: buildings is negligible.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-10.pdf:2:locations across the disposal site, at relatively low magnitudes, with negligible changes anticipated beyond

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-10.pdf:11: • The reductions in baseline peak currents are negligible, typically less than 0.01m/s, and never

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:48: High Major Moderate Moderate Minor Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:48: Medium Moderate Moderate Minor Minor Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:48: Low Minor Minor Minor Negligible Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:48: Very low Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:48:Whilst mitigation for minor or negligible impacts may not be specifically defined as a matter of course,

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:48:recognised that minor and negligible impacts could become significant when considered cumulatively with

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:112:3, the values are so low (<5mg/l) as to be negligible compared with background levels and, in all cases, the

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:112:water quality sampling points during Stage 3 of the dredging and only negligible effects for a short duration

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:112:Stages 3 and 4 of the dredging, only negligible effects are noted, equivalent to variations within the

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:118:as to be negligible in such a great depth of water in this deep water offshore area).

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:122:enhancement is so small in magnitude and spatial extent as to be negligible in such a great depth of water

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:126:is negligible, whilst to the north it covers a similar zone to the sediment plume for this disposal event, which

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:126:0.1cm. Clearly these magnitudes are extremely low within the licenced disposal site, and negligible beyond.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:126:magnitudes, with negligible changes anticipated beyond the boundaries of the site.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:167:is considered to be medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:167:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:167:impact is of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:167:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:168:be medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:168:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:168:considered to be medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:168:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:174: negligible. As there are no designated

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:175:Negligible Is generally tolerant of physical or chemical changes

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:177:temporary change, indiscernible • negligible change to existing risk of exposure; or

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:178: Moderate Minor Minor Negligible Negligible Minor Minor Moderate

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:178: Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Minor

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:178:(negligible) impacts as they may contribute to significant impacts cumulatively or through interactions.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:178:Negligible Very small changes in receptor condition (adverse or beneficial), which may be raised as local issues

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:180:the geological sensitivity is considered to be negligible. As there are no designated geological sites recorded

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:186:during construction is considered to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:186:No mitigation measures are required and residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:188:overall impact during construction is considered to be of negligible to minor adverse significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:188:negligible to minor adverse significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:189:very low. Thus, the impact to human receptors is of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:189:No additional mitigation measures required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:190:very low and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:212:impact of negligible significance is predicted.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:212:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:214:Given the above, an impact of negligible significance on marine species and habitats is predicted to arise

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:214:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:215:and tidal regime is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:215:No mitigation measures are required, and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:221: Negligible / very

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:234: 0.0003 harbour porpoise Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:234: 0.000003 minke whale Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:234: dredging 0.00000024 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:234: 0.0000009 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:234:The magnitude of the potential impact of PTS as a result of dredging noise is negligible / very low for harbour

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:234:seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.10).

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:234: Harbour Negligible / Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:234: Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:234: Auditory injury Negligible / Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:234: (PTS) from Minke whale Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:234: Negligible / required. Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:234: SEL during Grey seal Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:234: Negligible / Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:234: Harbour seal Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:235:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:236: Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:236: 0.000003 minke whale Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:236: underwater noise 0.00000024 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:236: 0.0000009 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:236:The magnitude of the potential impact of TTS and fleeing response as a result of dredging noise, is negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:237:whale, grey seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.13).

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:237: Harbour Negligible / Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:237: Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:237: TTS or fleeing Negligible / Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:237: response from Minke whale Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:237: Negligible / required. Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:237: SEL during Grey seal Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:237: Negligible / Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:237: Harbour seal Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:237:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:238: Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:238: Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:238: dredging (5% of Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:238: 0.000005 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:238:of negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, the impact significance for any

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:238:potential increase in collision risk with vessels during dredging has been assessed as negligible (not

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:239: Harbour Negligible /

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:239: Low Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:239: Potential for Minke Negligible / Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:239: collision risk from required, other than Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:239: vessels during Negligible / Negligible good practice.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:239: Harbour Negligible / Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:239:The residual impact would be of negligible significance for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:240:The magnitude of the impact of vessel disturbance to seal haul-out sites is defined as negligible / very low

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:240:resulting in an overall impact significance of negligible.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:240:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:240:have a negligible impact on marine mammals.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:240:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:241: Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:241: Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:241: dredge area Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:241: 0.0001 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:241:Taking into account the low receptor sensitivity, the negligible potential magnitude of the impact and the

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:241:negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal (Table 10.17).

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:241: Harbour Negligible /

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:241: Low Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:241: Minke Negligible / Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:241: resource in Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:241: Negligible / Negligible required.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:241: Harbour Negligible / Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:241:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:242:10.5.1 and 10.5.2). The magnitude of effect in all species is assessed to be negligible / very low based on

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:242:maintenance activities has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.10 and Table 10.13).

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:242:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:242:10.5.3). The magnitude of effect in all species is assessed to be negligible / very low based on the maximum

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:242:has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.15).

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:242:dredging activities. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:242:assessed as negligible (see Section 10.5.4).

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:242:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:243:negligible (see Section 10.5.5).

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:243:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:243:negligible (see Section 10.5.6).

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:243:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:243:established vessel routes. The magnitude of effect in all species is assessed to be negligible / very low

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:243:for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal has been assessed as negligible (Table

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:243:would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:251: Negligible Commonplace feature of little or no habitat/historical significance. Loss of such a feature would not be seen

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:252: Negligible of normal natural variation change to the extent Change is within the normal range of natural variation.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:253: High Medium Low Negligible Negligible Low Medium High

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:253: Moderate Minor Minor Negligible Negligible Minor Minor Moderate

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:253: Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:253: Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Minor

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:260:grassland is concluded as being of negligible ecological value.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:260:negligible ecological value.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:260:scrub habitat is concluded as being of negligible ecological value.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:261:and ruderal habitat is concluded as being of negligible ecological value.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:261:metal structures, which have been assessed as being of negligible value for roosting bats due to the lack of

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:264: Wharf Negligible No

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:264: Buildings Negligible No

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:264: Notable Flora Negligible No

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:264: Badger Negligible No

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:264: Water vole Negligible No

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:265: Amphibians Negligible No

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:265: Reptiles Negligible No

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:266:impacts to foraging bats are considered to be negligible.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:266:included in the CEMP, and with the implementation of such measures, any impacts will be negligible in

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:266:Negligible impacts on water quality are anticipated during construction of the proposed scheme (Section

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:267:time otters are anticipated to spend in the area, an impact of negligible magnitude is anticipated. Given the

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:268:assessed to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:268:With the implementation of the above measures, the residual impact is of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:268:be of local (grayling) and (dingy skipper) significance, and negligible importance within the footprint of the

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:294:Both had a peak count of two, which represents a negligible proportion of the SPA / Ramsar site populations.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:296:would have a negligible impact on benthic prey species in the intertidal zone so consequent effects on

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:298:of the effects of capital dredging and therefore a negligible impact is predicted on the waterbirds relying on

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:298:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:301:minor adverse. A residual impact of negligible significance is predicted at the other sensitive intertidal

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:304:and localised disturbance to feeding resources will result in an impact of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:304:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:305:negligible, and any exceedances of the thresholds stated in Cutts et al. (2009) or Wright et al. (2010) would

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:305:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:305:negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:305:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:305:be negligible, therefore any effects on waterbirds and foraging terns would manifest as a direct behavioural

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:306:on foraging / roosting waterbirds and terns is predicted to be negligible.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:306:While impacts are anticipated to be negligible, the implication of best practice mitigation measures set out

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:306:water) will further reduce the impact on foraging / roosting waterbirds. The residual impact is negligible.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:306:negligible impact on intertidal benthos (see Section 9.6.2) and would not adversely affect the availability of

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:306:result of hydrodynamic changes would be negligible.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:306:No mitigation measures are considered necessary, therefore the residual impact is negligible.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:321:and beyond. The impact is therefore predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:321:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would remain of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:324:considered to be very low, and the significance of the impact is negligible.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:325:Outside the migratory period, there would be a negligible impact on fish movement up- and downstream

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:327:underwater noise of piling activities is therefore considered to have a negligible impact on migration up-

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:327:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact remains negligible.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:328:negligible impact on fish species within the Tees.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:330:the footprint of the works, and even if there was, the number of vessels/fishers affected would be negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:330:and navigation within the Tees estuary is predicted to be negligible, given that works will be co-ordinated

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:330:are predicted to be negligible.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:330:remain negligible.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:330:in motorised vessel traffic is therefore considered to have a negligible impact on fish populations or

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:330:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact will remain negligible.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:331:impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:331:impact would be negligible.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:336:receptor. The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible significance on

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:336:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:336:receptor. The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible significance on

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:337:scheme) and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:337:(human health/safety). The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:337:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:338:The impact of the proposed development’s construction traffic is therefore assessed as of negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:338:proposed schemes operational traffic is therefore assessed as negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:338:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:341: MMO Scoping Opinion negligible and therefore not necessary to be assessed.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:347: Negligible Assets with no significant importance or archaeological/historical interest.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:347: Negligible The asset’s fabric and/or setting is changed in ways which do not materially affect its heritage significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:348: Significance High Medium Low Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:348: Low Moderate Minor Minor Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:348: Negligible Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:348: Negligible No material change to heritage significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:349:these from other non-significant (negligible) impacts as they may contribute to significant impacts

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:370: Negligible / very low < 1.0

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:373: 1 69.7 69.8 0.1 Very low Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:373: 2 67.8 68.0 0.2 Very low Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:373: 3 70.3 70.5 0.2 Very low Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:373: 5 76.3 76.4 0.1 Very low Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:373:Predicted changes in BNL, displayed in Table 17.10, indicate impacts of negligible significance at worst

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:373:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:375: NSR1 52.2 - 59.2 Very low Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:375:indicating negligible impact at human receptor locations. This is considered not significant and impact is

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:376:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:391: Dust soiling High Risk Medium Risk Medium Risk Negligible Risk

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:391: Human health Medium Risk Low Risk Low Risk Negligible Risk

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:391: Ecological effects Medium Risk Low Risk Low Risk Negligible Risk

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:391:demolition, ‘medium risk’ for earthworks and construction, and ‘negligible risk’ for trackout. The impacts on

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:392:earthworks and construction and ‘negligible risk’ for trackout.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:406:the proposed scheme will have negligible influence on this character area and is not considered further..

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:408:industrial context of outward views, it is predicted that the proposed scheme will have negligible influence

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:411:negligible effect on the existing baseline.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:415:of those features will incur a low adverse magnitude of effect and a negligible overall significance of effect.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:415:magnitude and incur a minor negligible adverse significance of effect.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:415:negligible overall significance of effect.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:416:and the wider environs, the overall significance of effect is considered to be negligible.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:419:significance of effect in the view is minor negligible adverse and not significant.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:419:significance of effect in the view is minor negligible adverse. In terms of EIA these effects are not

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:419:negligible.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:434:negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:435:As a result, it is concluded that there would be a negligible impact as a result of the proposed scheme.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:435:a potential impact of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:436:effect on a low sensitivity receptor. Overall, a negligible impact is predicted.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:436:residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:444:The socio-economic impacts of the proposed scheme are identified as ‘beneficial’, ‘negligible’ or ‘adverse’

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:444: Negligible No obvious significant effect to a receptor or environment.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:444: Negligible Where no discernible effect is expected as a result of the proposed scheme on the

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:444: High Medium Low Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:444: High Substantial Moderate to Minor to Moderate Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:444: Medium Moderate to Moderate Minor Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:445: Low Minor to Moderate Minor Negligible to Minor Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:445: Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:453:supply scenario forecasts only a negligible increase in employment during the plan period.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:455:term) and negligible.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:455:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:458:employment with the AOI and is therefore considered to correspond to a negligible magnitude of change.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:458:a permanent and negligible impact.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:458:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:458:negligible magnitude of change. The receptor is considered to be of medium sensitivity by virtue of the fact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:459:a permanent and negligible impact.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:459:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:476:that there would be impacts of negligible significance to the only NSR scoped into the assessment.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:476:would be negligible to minor adverse significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:477:noise and air quality disturbance would be negligible.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:477:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:477:negligible significance and not significant respectively. In addition, operational phase impacts to human

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:477:health as reported in Section 8 with regard to land quality are considered to be of negligible significance. It

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:477:and land quality would be negligible.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:477:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual impact of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:478:long period prior to this the enhancement is so small in magnitude and spatial extent as to be negligible in

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:479:deposition is predicted to be negligible beyond the boundaries of the Tees Bay C disposal site.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:479:that there would be negligible impact on fish or fisheries due to the proposed deposition of dredged material

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:479:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual impact of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:482:negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:482:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:484:operations). Overall, the potential impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:484:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:485: Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:485: 0.000003 minke whale Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:485: during offshore 0.00004 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:485: 0.0000003 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:486:dredged sediments is negligible / very low for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal,

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:486:negligible (Table 26.5).

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:486: Harbour Negligible / Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:486: TTS or fleeing Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:486: underwater Negligible / Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:486: Minke whale Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:486: offshore Negligible / required. Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:486: disposal of Grey seal Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:486: sediments Negligible / Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:486: Harbour seal Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:486:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:487: Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:487: Potential Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:487: of dredged 0.002 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:487: Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:487:of negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, the impact significance for any

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:487:assessed as negligible (not significant) for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:487: Harbour Negligible /

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:487: Low Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:487: increased Minke Negligible / Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:487: vessels during required, other than Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:487: offshore disposal Negligible / Negligible good practice.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:487: sediments Harbour Negligible / Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:487:would be of negligible significance for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:488:The magnitude of the impact of vessel disturbance to seal haul-out sites is defined as negligible / very low

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:488:This gives an overall impact significance of negligible.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:488:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:488:relied upon solely. Therefore, any increases in suspended sediments will have a negligible impact on

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:488:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:489: Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:489: Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:489: offshore disposal 0.04 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:489: Negligible / very low magnitude

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:489:Taking into account the low receptor sensitivity, the negligible potential magnitude of the impact and the

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:489:negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal (Table 26.9).

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:489: Harbour Negligible /

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:489: Low Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:489: Changes to prey Minke Negligible / Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:489: Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:489: offshore disposal Negligible / Negligible required.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:489: Harbour Negligible / Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:489:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:507:cumulative impact is predicted to be negligible.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:509: Negligible / very low

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:509: Negligible / very low

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:509: approach channel and Anglo Negligible / very low

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:509: Negligible / very low

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:509: Negligible / very low

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:509: Hartlepool approach Negligible / very low

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:510: Negligible / very low

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:510: Negligible / very low

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:510: Negligible / very low

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:510: Negligible / very low

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:510: Hartlepool approach Negligible / very low

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:510: Negligible / very low

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:510:Harbour Facilities schemes, is negligible / very low for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:510:harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as negligible (Table 27.5).

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:511:cumulative underwater noise impacts. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:511: TTS or fleeing Harbour Negligible /

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:511: response from Negligible Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:511: dredging at the Negligible /

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:511: Minke whale Negligible Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:511: Hartlepool Negligible /

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:511: approach Grey seal Negligible Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:511: Harbour Negligible /

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:511: Harbour seal Negligible Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:513:on waterbirds at North Tees Mudflat, and negligible impact further downstream (including at Vopak

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:514:supporting habitat was considered a negligible impact in the EIAs for both the Anglo American Harbour

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:514:(even in combination) would have a negligible impact, the cumulative effect with the proposed scheme would

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:515:driving activities (see Section 13.5.3 and 13.5.4). While there is anticipated to be negligible impact from

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:516:works, but the potential cumulative impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:516:impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:516:acceptable (from a navigation risk perspective), with all risks classified as negligible or low, with the

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:516:impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:516:The primary assessment identifies that the proposed schemes traffic demand would result in a negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:517:with the proposed scheme are considered not significant and indicate negligible impact, at worst. Therefore,

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:521:concludes that the disposal of dredged material will have a negligible impact on fisheries, marine ecology

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:521:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual cumulative impact of negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:568: Lianhetech, Seal Sands Proposed new buildings, plant upgrade, swale and associated Approximately Planning permission / Ramsar site would be negligible. On this basis,

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:576:greater than approximately 200m from source (see Appendix 8). There would be negligible effects on fish

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:578:would be negligible, therefore any effects on SPA / Ramsar site features would manifest as a direct

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:584:negligible effect on feeding resources for terns. When this is considered alongside the localised increase

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:173:representing the final risk score for each hazard, between 0 (negligible) and 10 (high) (see Annex A),

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:173:Hazard risk scores were categorised as either negligible, low, As Low as Reasonably Practicable

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:173: Negligible The risk is acceptable and at level where operational safety is unaffected.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:174:construction phase was ‘Contact: Navigation Buoy’ which was scored as 0.72; negligible, driven by its

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:174: Negligible Low ALARP Significant High

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:176:0.5; negligible, driven by its low consequence.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:176: Negligible Low ALARP Significant High

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:179:be acceptable with all scoring Negligible or Low, with the exception of the impact on ship contact risk,

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:180: Unlikely Minor Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:180: Unlikely Minor Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:187:is extremely remote and consequence insignificant such that a risk can be said to be negligible. At the

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:190: 1 Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:192: 0 – 1.99 Negligible Risk A level where operational safety is unaffected.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:192:the final risk score for each hazard, between 0 (negligible) and 10 (high) following which, the final risk

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:192:Hazard risk scores are categorised as either negligible, low, As Low as Reasonably Practicable (ALARP),

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:293:is ‘negligible’.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:296: Low Medium Risk Low Risk Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:296: Low Low Risk Low Risk Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:297: Low Low Risk Low Risk Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:297: Low Medium Risk Low Risk Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:299: lower sections of proposed quayside features, although the change in the view will be negligible.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:301:Significance of Effect Medium sensitivity x Low magnitude of effect = Minor negligible significance of effect. Minor Minor

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:301: Effects will be permanent during the operation of the proposed quayside and its use in support of the renewable energy Negligible Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:304: Effects will be permanent during the operation of the proposed quayside and its use in support of the renewable energy negligible negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:305: Effects will be permanent during the operation of the proposed quayside and its use in support of the renewable energy negligible negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:306:Significance of Effect Low sensitivity x Low medium magnitude of effect = Minor negligible significance of effect. Minor Minor

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:306: Effects will be permanent during the operation of the proposed quayside and its use in support of the renewable energy Negligible Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:307: Future baseline: development of the SIZ landside site and associated large scale buildings will have negligible effect on

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:308:Significance of Effect Low sensitivity x Low magnitude of effect = Negligible significance of effect. Negligible Negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:309: sections of cranes and stored components, although have negligible beneficial effects to views of taller proposed

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:310: Future baseline: development of the SIZ landside site and associated large scale buildings will have negligible effect on

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:316:particular development is categorised as high, medium, low or negligible. In accordance with the

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:316: Negligible Size and/or scale: the extent and relative proportion of the existing landscape

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:319: Negligible Size and Scale

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:320:receptor (high, medium to low) with the magnitude of effect (high to negligible). The evaluation is

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:320: Low medium Minor negligible effect Minor effect Minor moderate effect

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:320: Low Negligible effect Minor negligible effect Minor effect

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:320: Negligible Negligible effect Negligible effect Minor negligible effect

MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:13:dredged material is predicted to have a negligible impact on fisheries, marine ecology

MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:13:No significant residual impacts are predicted. A worst case residual impact of negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:48: High Major Moderate Moderate Minor Negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:48: Medium Moderate Moderate Minor Minor Negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:48: Low Minor Minor Minor Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:48: Very low Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:48:Whilst mitigation for minor or negligible impacts may not be specifically defined as a matter of course,

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:48:recognised that minor and negligible impacts could become significant when considered cumulatively with

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:112:3, the values are so low (<5mg/l) as to be negligible compared with background levels and, in all cases, the

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:112:water quality sampling points during Stage 3 of the dredging and only negligible effects for a short duration

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:112:Stages 3 and 4 of the dredging, only negligible effects are noted, equivalent to variations within the

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:118:as to be negligible in such a great depth of water in this deep water offshore area).

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:122:enhancement is so small in magnitude and spatial extent as to be negligible in such a great depth of water

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:126:is negligible, whilst to the north it covers a similar zone to the sediment plume for this disposal event, which

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:126:0.1cm. Clearly these magnitudes are extremely low within the licenced disposal site, and negligible beyond.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:126:magnitudes, with negligible changes anticipated beyond the boundaries of the site.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:167:is considered to be medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:167:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:167:impact is of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:167:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:168:be medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:168:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:168:considered to be medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:168:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:174: negligible. As there are no designated

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:175:Negligible Is generally tolerant of physical or chemical changes

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:177:temporary change, indiscernible • negligible change to existing risk of exposure; or

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:178: Moderate Minor Minor Negligible Negligible Minor Minor Moderate

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:178: Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Minor

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:178:(negligible) impacts as they may contribute to significant impacts cumulatively or through interactions.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:178:Negligible Very small changes in receptor condition (adverse or beneficial), which may be raised as local issues

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:180:the geological sensitivity is considered to be negligible. As there are no designated geological sites recorded

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:186:during construction is considered to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:186:No mitigation measures are required and residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:188:overall impact during construction is considered to be of negligible to minor adverse significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:188:negligible to minor adverse significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:189:very low. Thus, the impact to human receptors is of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:189:No additional mitigation measures required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:190:very low and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:212:impact of negligible significance is predicted.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:212:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:214:Given the above, an impact of negligible significance on marine species and habitats is predicted to arise

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:214:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:215:and tidal regime is predicted to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:215:No mitigation measures are required, and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:221: Negligible / very

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:234: 0.0003 harbour porpoise Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:234: 0.000003 minke whale Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:234: dredging 0.00000024 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:234: 0.0000009 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:234:The magnitude of the potential impact of PTS as a result of dredging noise is negligible / very low for harbour

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:234:seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.10).

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:234: Harbour Negligible / Negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:234: Negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:234: Auditory injury Negligible / Negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:234: (PTS) from Minke whale Negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:234: Negligible / required. Negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:234: SEL during Grey seal Negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:234: Negligible / Negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:234: Harbour seal Negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:235:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:236: Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:236: 0.000003 minke whale Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:236: underwater noise 0.00000024 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:236: 0.0000009 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:236:The magnitude of the potential impact of TTS and fleeing response as a result of dredging noise, is negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:237:whale, grey seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.13).

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:237: Harbour Negligible / Negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:237: Negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:237: TTS or fleeing Negligible / Negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:237: response from Minke whale Negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:237: Negligible / required. Negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:237: SEL during Grey seal Negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:237: Negligible / Negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:237: Harbour seal Negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:237:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:238: Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:238: Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:238: dredging (5% of Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:238: 0.000005 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:238:of negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, the impact significance for any

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:238:potential increase in collision risk with vessels during dredging has been assessed as negligible (not

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:239: Harbour Negligible /

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:239: Low Negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:239: Potential for Minke Negligible / Negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:239: collision risk from required, other than Negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:239: vessels during Negligible / Negligible good practice.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:239: Harbour Negligible / Negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:239:The residual impact would be of negligible significance for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:240:The magnitude of the impact of vessel disturbance to seal haul-out sites is defined as negligible / very low

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:240:resulting in an overall impact significance of negligible.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:240:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:240:have a negligible impact on marine mammals.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:240:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:241: Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:241: Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:241: dredge area Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:241: 0.0001 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:241:Taking into account the low receptor sensitivity, the negligible potential magnitude of the impact and the

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:241:negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal (Table 10.17).

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:241: Harbour Negligible /

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:241: Low Negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:241: Minke Negligible / Negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:241: resource in Negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:241: Negligible / Negligible required.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:241: Harbour Negligible / Negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:241:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:242:10.5.1 and 10.5.2). The magnitude of effect in all species is assessed to be negligible / very low based on

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:242:maintenance activities has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.10 and Table 10.13).

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:242:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:242:10.5.3). The magnitude of effect in all species is assessed to be negligible / very low based on the maximum

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:242:has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.15).

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:242:dredging activities. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:242:assessed as negligible (see Section 10.5.4).

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:242:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:243:negligible (see Section 10.5.5).

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:243:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:243:negligible (see Section 10.5.6).

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:243:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:243:established vessel routes. The magnitude of effect in all species is assessed to be negligible / very low

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:243:for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal has been assessed as negligible (Table

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:243:would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:251: Negligible Commonplace feature of little or no habitat/historical significance. Loss of such a feature would not be seen

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:252: Negligible of normal natural variation change to the extent Change is within the normal range of natural variation.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:253: High Medium Low Negligible Negligible Low Medium High

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:253: Moderate Minor Minor Negligible Negligible Minor Minor Moderate

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:253: Negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:253: Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Minor

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:260:grassland is concluded as being of negligible ecological value.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:260:negligible ecological value.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:260:scrub habitat is concluded as being of negligible ecological value.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:261:and ruderal habitat is concluded as being of negligible ecological value.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:261:metal structures, which have been assessed as being of negligible value for roosting bats due to the lack of

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:264: Wharf Negligible No

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:264: Buildings Negligible No

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:264: Notable Flora Negligible No

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:264: Badger Negligible No

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:264: Water vole Negligible No

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:265: Amphibians Negligible No

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:265: Reptiles Negligible No

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:266:impacts to foraging bats are considered to be negligible.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:266:included in the CEMP, and with the implementation of such measures, any impacts will be negligible in

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:266:Negligible impacts on water quality are anticipated during construction of the proposed scheme (Section

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:267:time otters are anticipated to spend in the area, an impact of negligible magnitude is anticipated. Given the

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:268:assessed to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:268:With the implementation of the above measures, the residual impact is of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:268:be of local (grayling) and (dingy skipper) significance, and negligible importance within the footprint of the

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:294:Both had a peak count of two, which represents a negligible proportion of the SPA / Ramsar site populations.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:296:would have a negligible impact on benthic prey species in the intertidal zone so consequent effects on

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:298:of the effects of capital dredging and therefore a negligible impact is predicted on the waterbirds relying on

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:298:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:301:minor adverse. A residual impact of negligible significance is predicted at the other sensitive intertidal

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:304:and localised disturbance to feeding resources will result in an impact of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:304:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:305:negligible, and any exceedances of the thresholds stated in Cutts et al. (2009) or Wright et al. (2010) would

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:305:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:305:negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:305:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:305:be negligible, therefore any effects on waterbirds and foraging terns would manifest as a direct behavioural

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:306:on foraging / roosting waterbirds and terns is predicted to be negligible.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:306:While impacts are anticipated to be negligible, the implication of best practice mitigation measures set out

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:306:water) will further reduce the impact on foraging / roosting waterbirds. The residual impact is negligible.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:306:negligible impact on intertidal benthos (see Section 9.6.2) and would not adversely affect the availability of

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:306:result of hydrodynamic changes would be negligible.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:306:No mitigation measures are considered necessary, therefore the residual impact is negligible.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:321:and beyond. The impact is therefore predicted to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:321:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would remain of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:324:considered to be very low, and the significance of the impact is negligible.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:325:Outside the migratory period, there would be a negligible impact on fish movement up- and downstream

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:327:underwater noise of piling activities is therefore considered to have a negligible impact on migration up-

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:327:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact remains negligible.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:328:negligible impact on fish species within the Tees.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:330:the footprint of the works, and even if there was, the number of vessels/fishers affected would be negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:330:and navigation within the Tees estuary is predicted to be negligible, given that works will be co-ordinated

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:330:are predicted to be negligible.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:330:remain negligible.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:330:in motorised vessel traffic is therefore considered to have a negligible impact on fish populations or

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:330:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact will remain negligible.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:331:impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:331:impact would be negligible.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:336:receptor. The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible significance on

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:336:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:336:receptor. The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible significance on

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:337:scheme) and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:337:(human health/safety). The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:337:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:338:The impact of the proposed development’s construction traffic is therefore assessed as of negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:338:proposed schemes operational traffic is therefore assessed as negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:338:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:341: MMO Scoping Opinion negligible and therefore not necessary to be assessed.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:347: Negligible Assets with no significant importance or archaeological/historical interest.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:347: Negligible The asset’s fabric and/or setting is changed in ways which do not materially affect its heritage significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:348: Significance High Medium Low Negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:348: Low Moderate Minor Minor Negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:348: Negligible Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:348: Negligible No material change to heritage significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:349:these from other non-significant (negligible) impacts as they may contribute to significant impacts

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:370: Negligible / very low < 1.0

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:373: 1 69.7 69.8 0.1 Very low Negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:373: 2 67.8 68.0 0.2 Very low Negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:373: 3 70.3 70.5 0.2 Very low Negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:373: 5 76.3 76.4 0.1 Very low Negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:373:Predicted changes in BNL, displayed in Table 17.10, indicate impacts of negligible significance at worst

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:373:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:375: NSR1 52.2 - 59.2 Very low Negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:375:indicating negligible impact at human receptor locations. This is considered not significant and impact is

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:376:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:391: Dust soiling High Risk Medium Risk Medium Risk Negligible Risk

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:391: Human health Medium Risk Low Risk Low Risk Negligible Risk

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:391: Ecological effects Medium Risk Low Risk Low Risk Negligible Risk

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:391:demolition, ‘medium risk’ for earthworks and construction, and ‘negligible risk’ for trackout. The impacts on

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:392:earthworks and construction and ‘negligible risk’ for trackout.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:406:the proposed scheme will have negligible influence on this character area and is not considered further..

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:408:industrial context of outward views, it is predicted that the proposed scheme will have negligible influence

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:411:negligible effect on the existing baseline.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:415:of those features will incur a low adverse magnitude of effect and a negligible overall significance of effect.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:415:magnitude and incur a minor negligible adverse significance of effect.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:415:negligible overall significance of effect.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:416:and the wider environs, the overall significance of effect is considered to be negligible.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:419:significance of effect in the view is minor negligible adverse and not significant.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:419:significance of effect in the view is minor negligible adverse. In terms of EIA these effects are not

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:419:negligible.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:434:negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:435:As a result, it is concluded that there would be a negligible impact as a result of the proposed scheme.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:435:a potential impact of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:436:effect on a low sensitivity receptor. Overall, a negligible impact is predicted.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:436:residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:444:The socio-economic impacts of the proposed scheme are identified as ‘beneficial’, ‘negligible’ or ‘adverse’

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:444: Negligible No obvious significant effect to a receptor or environment.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:444: Negligible Where no discernible effect is expected as a result of the proposed scheme on the

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:444: High Medium Low Negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:444: High Substantial Moderate to Minor to Moderate Negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:444: Medium Moderate to Moderate Minor Negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:445: Low Minor to Moderate Minor Negligible to Minor Negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:445: Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:453:supply scenario forecasts only a negligible increase in employment during the plan period.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:455:term) and negligible.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:455:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:458:employment with the AOI and is therefore considered to correspond to a negligible magnitude of change.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:458:a permanent and negligible impact.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:458:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:458:negligible magnitude of change. The receptor is considered to be of medium sensitivity by virtue of the fact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:459:a permanent and negligible impact.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:459:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:476:that there would be impacts of negligible significance to the only NSR scoped into the assessment.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:476:would be negligible to minor adverse significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:477:noise and air quality disturbance would be negligible.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:477:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:477:negligible significance and not significant respectively. In addition, operational phase impacts to human

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:477:health as reported in Section 8 with regard to land quality are considered to be of negligible significance. It

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:477:and land quality would be negligible.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:477:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual impact of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:478:long period prior to this the enhancement is so small in magnitude and spatial extent as to be negligible in

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:479:deposition is predicted to be negligible beyond the boundaries of the Tees Bay C disposal site.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:479:that there would be negligible impact on fish or fisheries due to the proposed deposition of dredged material

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:479:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual impact of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:482:negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:482:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:484:operations). Overall, the potential impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:484:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:485: Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:485: 0.000003 minke whale Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:485: during offshore 0.00004 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:485: 0.0000003 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:486:dredged sediments is negligible / very low for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal,

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:486:negligible (Table 26.5).

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:486: Harbour Negligible / Negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:486: TTS or fleeing Negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:486: underwater Negligible / Negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:486: Minke whale Negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:486: offshore Negligible / required. Negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:486: disposal of Grey seal Negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:486: sediments Negligible / Negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:486: Harbour seal Negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:486:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:487: Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:487: Potential Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:487: of dredged 0.002 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:487: Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:487:of negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, the impact significance for any

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:487:assessed as negligible (not significant) for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:487: Harbour Negligible /

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:487: Low Negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:487: increased Minke Negligible / Negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:487: vessels during required, other than Negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:487: offshore disposal Negligible / Negligible good practice.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:487: sediments Harbour Negligible / Negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:487:would be of negligible significance for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:488:The magnitude of the impact of vessel disturbance to seal haul-out sites is defined as negligible / very low

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:488:This gives an overall impact significance of negligible.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:488:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:488:relied upon solely. Therefore, any increases in suspended sediments will have a negligible impact on

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:488:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:489: Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:489: Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:489: offshore disposal 0.04 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:489: Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:489:Taking into account the low receptor sensitivity, the negligible potential magnitude of the impact and the

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:489:negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal (Table 26.9).

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:489: Harbour Negligible /

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:489: Low Negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:489: Changes to prey Minke Negligible / Negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:489: Negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:489: offshore disposal Negligible / Negligible required.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:489: Harbour Negligible / Negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:489:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:507:cumulative impact is predicted to be negligible.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:509: Negligible / very low

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:509: Negligible / very low

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:509: approach channel and Anglo Negligible / very low

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:509: Negligible / very low

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:509: Negligible / very low

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:509: Hartlepool approach Negligible / very low

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:510: Negligible / very low

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:510: Negligible / very low

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:510: Negligible / very low

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:510: Negligible / very low

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:510: Hartlepool approach Negligible / very low

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:510: Negligible / very low

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:510:Harbour Facilities schemes, is negligible / very low for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:510:harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as negligible (Table 27.5).

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:511:cumulative underwater noise impacts. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:511: TTS or fleeing Harbour Negligible /

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:511: response from Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:511: dredging at the Negligible /

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:511: Minke whale Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:511: Hartlepool Negligible /

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:511: approach Grey seal Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:511: Harbour Negligible /

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:511: Harbour seal Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:513:on waterbirds at North Tees Mudflat, and negligible impact further downstream (including at Vopak

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:514:supporting habitat was considered a negligible impact in the EIAs for both the Anglo American Harbour

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:514:(even in combination) would have a negligible impact, the cumulative effect with the proposed scheme would

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:515:driving activities (see Section 13.5.3 and 13.5.4). While there is anticipated to be negligible impact from

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:516:works, but the potential cumulative impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:516:impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:516:acceptable (from a navigation risk perspective), with all risks classified as negligible or low, with the

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:516:impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:516:The primary assessment identifies that the proposed schemes traffic demand would result in a negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:517:with the proposed scheme are considered not significant and indicate negligible impact, at worst. Therefore,

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:521:concludes that the disposal of dredged material will have a negligible impact on fisheries, marine ecology

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:521:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual cumulative impact of negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:568: Lianhetech, Seal Sands Proposed new buildings, plant upgrade, swale and associated Approximately Planning permission / Ramsar site would be negligible. On this basis,

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:576:greater than approximately 200m from source (see Appendix 8). There would be negligible effects on fish

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:578:would be negligible, therefore any effects on SPA / Ramsar site features would manifest as a direct

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:584:negligible effect on feeding resources for terns. When this is considered alongside the localised increase

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:6: likely to be negligible and therefore not necessary to be assessed.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 13_Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology.pdf:5:particular development is categorised as high, medium, low or negligible. In accordance with the

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 13_Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology.pdf:5: Negligible Size and/or scale: the extent and relative proportion of the existing landscape

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 13_Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology.pdf:8: Negligible Size and Scale

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 13_Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology.pdf:9:receptor (high, medium to low) with the magnitude of effect (high to negligible). The evaluation is

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 13_Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology.pdf:9: Low medium Minor negligible effect Minor effect Minor moderate effect

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 13_Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology.pdf:9: Low Negligible effect Minor negligible effect Minor effect

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 13_Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology.pdf:9: Negligible Negligible effect Negligible effect Minor negligible effect

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:15:and beyond. The impact is therefore predicted to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:15:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would remain of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:18:considered to be very low, and the significance of the impact is negligible.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:19:Outside the migratory period, there would be a negligible impact on fish movement up- and downstream

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:21:underwater noise of piling activities is therefore considered to have a negligible impact on migration up-

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:21:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact remains negligible.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:22:negligible impact on fish species within the Tees.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:24:the footprint of the works, and even if there was, the number of vessels/fishers affected would be negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:24:and navigation within the Tees estuary is predicted to be negligible, given that works will be co-ordinated

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:24:are predicted to be negligible.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:24:remain negligible.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:24:in motorised vessel traffic is therefore considered to have a negligible impact on fish populations or

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:24:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact will remain negligible.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:25:impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:25:impact would be negligible.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Response from applicant.PDF:2:concluded that all impacts were assessed to be acceptable with all scoring negligible or low, with the

R-2020-0684-ESM-Response from applicant.PDF:3:negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Response from applicant.PDF:3:traffic is therefore clearly negligible.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:7: High Major Moderate Moderate Minor Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:7: Medium Moderate Moderate Minor Minor Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:7: Low Minor Minor Minor Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:7: Very low Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:7:Whilst mitigation for minor or negligible impacts may not be specifically defined as a matter of course,

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:7:recognised that minor and negligible impacts could become significant when considered cumulatively with

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:6: likely to be negligible and therefore not necessary to be assessed.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:22:impact of negligible significance is predicted.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:22:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:24:Given the above, an impact of negligible significance on marine species and habitats is predicted to arise

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:24:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:25:and tidal regime is predicted to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:25:No mitigation measures are required, and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:13:It is concluded that the impact during the construction phase of the proposed scheme would be of negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:13:are minor beneficial to controlled waters and negligible to human health.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:13:with maintenance dredging. All operational phase impacts are predicted to be of negligible significance,

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:14:to marine mammals from dredging has been assessed as negligible. The assessment has concluded

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:14:impacts of negligible significance to all marine mammals with regard to potential for temporary auditory

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:14:movements in the area. A worst-case impact of negligible significance (not significant) is predicted.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:15:Tees, and is therefore expected to have a negligible effect on fish. The removal of the existing wharf

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:16:negligible impacts on both resident and migratory fish. Disturbance during the operational phase, either as

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:16:a result of vessel calls to the new quay or the use of quayside lighting, is predicted to have a negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:16:required by International Regulations to allow safe navigation. An impact of negligible significance on

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:16:determined to have minimal effect on the existing navigation profile. An impact of negligible significance is

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:16:Environmental Assessment of Road Traffic), the impact is considered to be negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:18:construction phase noise levels at the South Tees Business Parks would be negligible. No mitigation

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:19:assessed as being permanent and negligible. No mitigation measures during the operational phase are

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:20:disturbance and reductions in air quality are considered to be negligible during construction and operation.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:20:It is therefore concluded that impacts to human health would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:20:is predicted to have a negligible impact on fisheries, marine ecology and marine mammals, and no impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:18:cumulative impact is predicted to be negligible.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:20: Negligible / very low

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:20: Negligible / very low

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:20: approach channel and Anglo Negligible / very low

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:20: Negligible / very low

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:20: Negligible / very low

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:20: Hartlepool approach Negligible / very low

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:21: Negligible / very low

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:21: Negligible / very low

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:21: Negligible / very low

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:21: Negligible / very low

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:21: Hartlepool approach Negligible / very low

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:21: Negligible / very low

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:21:Harbour Facilities schemes, is negligible / very low for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:21:harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as negligible (Table 27.5).

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:22:cumulative underwater noise impacts. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:22: TTS or fleeing Harbour Negligible /

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:22: response from Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:22: dredging at the Negligible /

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:22: Minke whale Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:22: Hartlepool Negligible /

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:22: approach Grey seal Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:22: Harbour Negligible /

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:22: Harbour seal Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:24:on waterbirds at North Tees Mudflat, and negligible impact further downstream (including at Vopak

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:25:supporting habitat was considered a negligible impact in the EIAs for both the Anglo American Harbour

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:25:(even in combination) would have a negligible impact, the cumulative effect with the proposed scheme would

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:26:driving activities (see Section 13.5.3 and 13.5.4). While there is anticipated to be negligible impact from

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:27:works, but the potential cumulative impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:27:impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:27:acceptable (from a navigation risk perspective), with all risks classified as negligible or low, with the

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:27:impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:27:The primary assessment identifies that the proposed schemes traffic demand would result in a negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:28:with the proposed scheme are considered not significant and indicate negligible impact, at worst. Therefore,

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:32:concludes that the disposal of dredged material will have a negligible impact on fisheries, marine ecology

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:32:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual cumulative impact of negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:8:The socio-economic impacts of the proposed scheme are identified as ‘beneficial’, ‘negligible’ or ‘adverse’

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:8: Negligible No obvious significant effect to a receptor or environment.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:8: Negligible Where no discernible effect is expected as a result of the proposed scheme on the

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:8: High Medium Low Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:8: High Substantial Moderate to Minor to Moderate Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:8: Medium Moderate to Moderate Minor Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:9: Low Minor to Moderate Minor Negligible to Minor Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:9: Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:17:supply scenario forecasts only a negligible increase in employment during the plan period.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:19:term) and negligible.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:19:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:22:employment with the AOI and is therefore considered to correspond to a negligible magnitude of change.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:22:a permanent and negligible impact.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:22:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:22:negligible magnitude of change. The receptor is considered to be of medium sensitivity by virtue of the fact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:23:a permanent and negligible impact.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:23:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:14:negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:15:As a result, it is concluded that there would be a negligible impact as a result of the proposed scheme.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:15:a potential impact of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:16:effect on a low sensitivity receptor. Overall, a negligible impact is predicted.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:16:residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf:1: lower sections of proposed quayside features, although the change in the view will be negligible.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf:3:Significance of Effect Medium sensitivity x Low magnitude of effect = Minor negligible significance of effect. Minor Minor

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf:3: Effects will be permanent during the operation of the proposed quayside and its use in support of the renewable energy Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf:6: Effects will be permanent during the operation of the proposed quayside and its use in support of the renewable energy negligible negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf:7: Effects will be permanent during the operation of the proposed quayside and its use in support of the renewable energy negligible negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf:8:Significance of Effect Low sensitivity x Low medium magnitude of effect = Minor negligible significance of effect. Minor Minor

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf:8: Effects will be permanent during the operation of the proposed quayside and its use in support of the renewable energy Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf:9: Future baseline: development of the SIZ landside site and associated large scale buildings will have negligible effect on

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf:10:Significance of Effect Low sensitivity x Low magnitude of effect = Negligible significance of effect. Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf:11: sections of cranes and stored components, although have negligible beneficial effects to views of taller proposed

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 12_Representative viewpoint analysis tables.pdf:12: Future baseline: development of the SIZ landside site and associated large scale buildings will have negligible effect on

R-2020-0684-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:7:likely to be negligible, and therefore not necessary to be assessed.

R-2020-0684-ESM-HIGHWAYS ENGLAND.pdf:11:Impacts of negligible significance from the short term, local and reversible construction phase road traffic at the

R-2020-0684-ESM-HIGHWAYS ENGLAND.pdf:11:Predicted noise levels indicate negligible impact at human receptor locations. This is considered not significant

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:6: negligible. As there are no designated

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:7:Negligible Is generally tolerant of physical or chemical changes

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:9:temporary change, indiscernible • negligible change to existing risk of exposure; or

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:10: Moderate Minor Minor Negligible Negligible Minor Minor Moderate

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:10: Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Minor

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:10:(negligible) impacts as they may contribute to significant impacts cumulatively or through interactions.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:10:Negligible Very small changes in receptor condition (adverse or beneficial), which may be raised as local issues

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:12:the geological sensitivity is considered to be negligible. As there are no designated geological sites recorded

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:18:during construction is considered to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:18:No mitigation measures are required and residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:20:overall impact during construction is considered to be of negligible to minor adverse significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:20:negligible to minor adverse significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:21:very low. Thus, the impact to human receptors is of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:21:No additional mitigation measures required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:22:very low and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:8: Negligible Commonplace feature of little or no habitat/historical significance. Loss of such a feature would not be seen

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:9: Negligible of normal natural variation change to the extent Change is within the normal range of natural variation.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:10: High Medium Low Negligible Negligible Low Medium High

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:10: Moderate Minor Minor Negligible Negligible Minor Minor Moderate

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:10: Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:10: Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Minor

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:17:grassland is concluded as being of negligible ecological value.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:17:negligible ecological value.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:17:scrub habitat is concluded as being of negligible ecological value.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:18:and ruderal habitat is concluded as being of negligible ecological value.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:18:metal structures, which have been assessed as being of negligible value for roosting bats due to the lack of

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:21: Wharf Negligible No

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:21: Buildings Negligible No

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:21: Notable Flora Negligible No

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:21: Badger Negligible No

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:21: Water vole Negligible No

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:22: Amphibians Negligible No

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:22: Reptiles Negligible No

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:23:impacts to foraging bats are considered to be negligible.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:23:included in the CEMP, and with the implementation of such measures, any impacts will be negligible in

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:23:Negligible impacts on water quality are anticipated during construction of the proposed scheme (Section

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:24:time otters are anticipated to spend in the area, an impact of negligible magnitude is anticipated. Given the

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:25:assessed to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:25:With the implementation of the above measures, the residual impact is of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:25:be of local (grayling) and (dingy skipper) significance, and negligible importance within the footprint of the

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf:9: Negligible / very low < 1.0

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf:12: 1 69.7 69.8 0.1 Very low Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf:12: 2 67.8 68.0 0.2 Very low Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf:12: 3 70.3 70.5 0.2 Very low Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf:12: 5 76.3 76.4 0.1 Very low Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf:12:Predicted changes in BNL, displayed in Table 17.10, indicate impacts of negligible significance at worst

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf:12:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf:14: NSR1 52.2 - 59.2 Very low Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf:14:indicating negligible impact at human receptor locations. This is considered not significant and impact is

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf:15:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:43:representing the final risk score for each hazard, between 0 (negligible) and 10 (high) (see Annex A),

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:43:Hazard risk scores were categorised as either negligible, low, As Low as Reasonably Practicable

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:43: Negligible The risk is acceptable and at level where operational safety is unaffected.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:44:construction phase was ‘Contact: Navigation Buoy’ which was scored as 0.72; negligible, driven by its

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:44: Negligible Low ALARP Significant High

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:46:0.5; negligible, driven by its low consequence.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:46: Negligible Low ALARP Significant High

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:49:be acceptable with all scoring Negligible or Low, with the exception of the impact on ship contact risk,

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:50: Unlikely Minor Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:50: Unlikely Minor Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:57:is extremely remote and consequence insignificant such that a risk can be said to be negligible. At the

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:60: 1 Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:62: 0 – 1.99 Negligible Risk A level where operational safety is unaffected.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:62:the final risk score for each hazard, between 0 (negligible) and 10 (high) following which, the final risk

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:62:Hazard risk scores are categorised as either negligible, low, As Low as Reasonably Practicable (ALARP),

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:78:Deposition to the west and east of the disposal site is negligible, whilst to the south and north covers a

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:21:impact is of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:21:is of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:22:overall impact is of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:22:medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:22:range between negligible and minor adverse significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:22:be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:24:negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:24:health is considered to be of negligible to minor adverse significance

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:25:negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:25:residual impact would be of negligible significance. It is acknowledged that a

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:26:considered to be of negligible to minor adverse significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:26:residual impact is therefore considered to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:26:suitable material selection, the residual impact would be of negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:30:sediment, an impact of negligible significance is predicted.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:31:regime is predicted to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:32:are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:32:affecting marine communities would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:34:this is that the significance to all receptors would be negligible.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:34:this is that the significance to all receptors would be negligible.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:34:significance to all receptors would be negligible.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:34:overall impact of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:34:negligible impact on marine mammals due to their prey detection methods

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:35:harbour seal is negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:35:residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:35:impact would be of negligible significance

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:35:residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:35:impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:35:practice. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:36:negligible to low.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:37:considered to be of negligible ecological value and therefore have not been

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:37:adverse significance), noise and vibration (negligible significance) emissions,

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:38:negligible importance within the footprint of the proposed development. The

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:39:residual impact is of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:39:of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:39:implementation of the mitigation measures, the residual impact is of negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:39:measures, the residual impact is of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:43:and therefore a negligible impact is predicted on the waterbirds relying on

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:43:from the operations is therefore considered to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:44:associated with the proposed scheme is assessed to be of negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:44:roosting waterbirds and terns is predicted to be negligible.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:44:not significant. The potential increase are considered to have a negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:44:hydrodynamic changes would be negligible.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:45:food resources and the residual impact is of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:45:impact is negligible.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:45:impact is negligible.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:45:While impacts are anticipated to be negligible, the implication of best practice

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:45:impact is therefore considered to be negligible.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:45:negligible.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:48:is therefore predicted to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:48:considered to be very low, and the significance of the impact is negligible.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:49:therefore considered to have a negligible impact on migration up and

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:49:considered to be a negligible impact on fish species within the Tees. With

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:49:therefore considered to be negligible. Consideration has also been given to

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:49:however any conflict is considered to be negligible when co-ordinated by the

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:49:negligible.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:49:in motorised vessel traffic is therefore considered to have a negligible impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:50:of the estuary as a whole predicted to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:50:fish eggs. The residual impact would remain of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:50:activities. The residual impact remains negligible.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:50:remain negligible.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:51:residual impact will remain negligible.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:51:impact would be negligible.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:52:proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:53:development is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:54:impact of negligible significance on navigation safety during the operational

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:54:impacts of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:54:impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:56:negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:57:traffic is therefore assessed as negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:57:considered to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:57:considered to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:63:between no impact and negligible.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:63:would be a negligible impact on human receptor that would be not significant .

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:64:impact would be of negligible significance. With regard to on-site construction

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:64:noise no mitigation is proposed and the residual impact would be of negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:71:with a negligible overall significance of effect.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:72:adverse magnitude and incur a negligible overall significance of effect.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:73:significance of effect being considered to be negligible.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:74:significance of effect in the view is minor negligible adverse and not

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:74:in the view is minor negligible adverse. In terms of EIA these effects are not

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:74:existing, transitory views towards site will be low adverse or negligible.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:75:The ES does conclude that there will be negligible impacts during the

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:75:range between negligible to minor adverse. Many of the views considered

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:77:negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:78:negligible impact.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:78:negligible impact.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:79:locally generated waves. The residual impact would be of negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:83:therefore the likely requirement is expected to be low resulting in a negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:84:therefore considered to be result in a negligible impact.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:84:negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:90:receptors is considered to be negligible as set out within Chapter 17 of the

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:90:human health would be negligible to minor adverse in significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:90:disturbance would be negligible.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:91:air quality disturbance is predicted to be of negligible significance and not

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:91:be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:91:disturbance and land quality would be negligible.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:91:impacts of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:91:impacts of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:92:beyond, with seabed deposition predicted to be negligible beyond the

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:92:would be negligible impact on fish or fisheries due to the proposed deposition

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:93:therefore concluded that the impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:93:disposal operations). Overall, the potential impact would be of negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:94:material, there are considered to be negligible impacts on marine mammals

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:94:would be a residual impact of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:94:would be a residual impact of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:94:would be a residual impact of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf:5:receptor. The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible significance on

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf:5:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf:5:receptor. The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible significance on

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf:6:scheme) and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf:6:(human health/safety). The proposed scheme is, therefore, predicted to have an impact of negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf:6:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_15. Traffic and transport.pdf:1:The impact of the proposed development’s construction traffic is therefore assessed as of negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_15. Traffic and transport.pdf:1:proposed schemes operational traffic is therefore assessed as negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_15. Traffic and transport.pdf:1:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 11_Air quality assessment method.pdf:1:is ‘negligible’.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 11_Air quality assessment method.pdf:4: Low Medium Risk Low Risk Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 11_Air quality assessment method.pdf:4: Low Low Risk Low Risk Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 11_Air quality assessment method.pdf:5: Low Low Risk Low Risk Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 11_Air quality assessment method.pdf:5: Low Medium Risk Low Risk Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:26:is considered to be medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:26:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:26:impact is of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:26:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:27:be medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:27:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:27:considered to be medium, the overall impact is of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:27:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:18: Lianhetech, Seal Sands Proposed new buildings, plant upgrade, swale and associated Approximately Planning permission / Ramsar site would be negligible. On this basis,

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:26:greater than approximately 200m from source (see Appendix 8). There would be negligible effects on fish

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:28:would be negligible, therefore any effects on SPA / Ramsar site features would manifest as a direct

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:34:negligible effect on feeding resources for terns. When this is considered alongside the localised increase

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:1:long period prior to this the enhancement is so small in magnitude and spatial extent as to be negligible in

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:2:deposition is predicted to be negligible beyond the boundaries of the Tees Bay C disposal site.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:2:that there would be negligible impact on fish or fisheries due to the proposed deposition of dredged material

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:2:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual impact of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:5:negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:5:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:7:operations). Overall, the potential impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:7:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:8: Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:8: 0.000003 minke whale Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:8: during offshore 0.00004 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:8: 0.0000003 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:9:dredged sediments is negligible / very low for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal,

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:9:negligible (Table 26.5).

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:9: Harbour Negligible / Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:9: TTS or fleeing Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:9: underwater Negligible / Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:9: Minke whale Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:9: offshore Negligible / required. Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:9: disposal of Grey seal Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:9: sediments Negligible / Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:9: Harbour seal Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:9:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:10: Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:10: Potential Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:10: of dredged 0.002 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:10: Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:10:of negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, the impact significance for any

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:10:assessed as negligible (not significant) for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:10: Harbour Negligible /

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:10: Low Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:10: increased Minke Negligible / Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:10: vessels during required, other than Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:10: offshore disposal Negligible / Negligible good practice.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:10: sediments Harbour Negligible / Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:10:would be of negligible significance for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:11:The magnitude of the impact of vessel disturbance to seal haul-out sites is defined as negligible / very low

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:11:This gives an overall impact significance of negligible.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:11:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:11:relied upon solely. Therefore, any increases in suspended sediments will have a negligible impact on

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:11:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:12: Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:12: Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:12: offshore disposal 0.04 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:12: Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:12:Taking into account the low receptor sensitivity, the negligible potential magnitude of the impact and the

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:12:negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal (Table 26.9).

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:12: Harbour Negligible /

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:12: Low Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:12: Changes to prey Minke Negligible / Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:12: Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:12: offshore disposal Negligible / Negligible required.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:12: Harbour Negligible / Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:12:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:25:Both had a peak count of two, which represents a negligible proportion of the SPA / Ramsar site populations.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:27:would have a negligible impact on benthic prey species in the intertidal zone so consequent effects on

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:29:of the effects of capital dredging and therefore a negligible impact is predicted on the waterbirds relying on

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:29:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:32:minor adverse. A residual impact of negligible significance is predicted at the other sensitive intertidal

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:35:and localised disturbance to feeding resources will result in an impact of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:35:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:36:negligible, and any exceedances of the thresholds stated in Cutts et al. (2009) or Wright et al. (2010) would

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:36:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:36:negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:36:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:36:be negligible, therefore any effects on waterbirds and foraging terns would manifest as a direct behavioural

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:37:on foraging / roosting waterbirds and terns is predicted to be negligible.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:37:While impacts are anticipated to be negligible, the implication of best practice mitigation measures set out

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:37:water) will further reduce the impact on foraging / roosting waterbirds. The residual impact is negligible.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:37:negligible impact on intertidal benthos (see Section 9.6.2) and would not adversely affect the availability of

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:37:result of hydrodynamic changes would be negligible.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:37:No mitigation measures are considered necessary, therefore the residual impact is negligible.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1107_Appendix 7_Land quality desk study.pdf:14: • negligible ground dissolution.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1107_Appendix 7_Land quality desk study.pdf:38: buildings is negligible.

R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:24: predicted to be of negligible significance, with the exception of the subtidal habitat creation

R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:24: auditory injury to marine mammals from dredging has been assessed as negligible. The

R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:24: assessment has concluded impacts of negligible significance to all marine mammals with regard

R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:24: number of vessel movements in the area. A worst-case impact of negligible significance (not

R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:26: undertaken within the Tees, and is therefore expected to have a negligible effect on fish. The

R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:26: resulted in a conclusion that there will be negligible impacts on both resident and migratory

R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:26: use of quayside lighting, is predicted to have a negligible effect.

R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:27: impact is considered to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:28: of negligible significance to groundwater, moderate adverse to the Tees estuary and associated

R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:28: operation are predicted to be minor beneficial to controlled waters and negligible to human

R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:28: Business Parks would be negligible. No mitigation measures are required.

R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:30: negligible. No mitigation measures during the operational phase are required.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:3: MMO Scoping Opinion negligible and therefore not necessary to be assessed.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:9: Negligible Assets with no significant importance or archaeological/historical interest.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:9: Negligible The asset’s fabric and/or setting is changed in ways which do not materially affect its heritage significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:10: Significance High Medium Low Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:10: Low Moderate Minor Minor Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:10: Negligible Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:10: Negligible No material change to heritage significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:11:these from other non-significant (negligible) impacts as they may contribute to significant impacts

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf:1:that there would be impacts of negligible significance to the only NSR scoped into the assessment.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf:1:would be negligible to minor adverse significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf:2:noise and air quality disturbance would be negligible.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf:2:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf:2:negligible significance and not significant respectively. In addition, operational phase impacts to human

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf:2:health as reported in Section 8 with regard to land quality are considered to be of negligible significance. It

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf:2:and land quality would be negligible.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf:2:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual impact of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:5: Negligible / very

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:18: 0.0003 harbour porpoise Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:18: 0.000003 minke whale Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:18: dredging 0.00000024 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:18: 0.0000009 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:18:The magnitude of the potential impact of PTS as a result of dredging noise is negligible / very low for harbour

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:18:seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.10).

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:18: Harbour Negligible / Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:18: Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:18: Auditory injury Negligible / Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:18: (PTS) from Minke whale Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:18: Negligible / required. Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:18: SEL during Grey seal Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:18: Negligible / Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:18: Harbour seal Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:19:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:20: Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:20: 0.000003 minke whale Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:20: underwater noise 0.00000024 grey seal Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:20: 0.0000009 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:20:The magnitude of the potential impact of TTS and fleeing response as a result of dredging noise, is negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:21:whale, grey seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.13).

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:21: Harbour Negligible / Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:21: Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:21: TTS or fleeing Negligible / Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:21: response from Minke whale Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:21: Negligible / required. Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:21: SEL during Grey seal Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:21: Negligible / Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:21: Harbour seal Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:21:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:22: Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:22: Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:22: dredging (5% of Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:22: 0.000005 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:22:of negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, the impact significance for any

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:22:potential increase in collision risk with vessels during dredging has been assessed as negligible (not

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:23: Harbour Negligible /

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:23: Low Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:23: Potential for Minke Negligible / Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:23: collision risk from required, other than Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:23: vessels during Negligible / Negligible good practice.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:23: Harbour Negligible / Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:23:The residual impact would be of negligible significance for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:24:The magnitude of the impact of vessel disturbance to seal haul-out sites is defined as negligible / very low

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:24:resulting in an overall impact significance of negligible.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:24:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:24:have a negligible impact on marine mammals.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:24:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:25: Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:25: Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:25: dredge area Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:25: 0.0001 harbour seal Negligible / very low magnitude

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:25:Taking into account the low receptor sensitivity, the negligible potential magnitude of the impact and the

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:25:negligible for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal (Table 10.17).

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:25: Harbour Negligible /

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:25: Low Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:25: Minke Negligible / Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:25: resource in Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:25: Negligible / Negligible required.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:25: Harbour Negligible / Negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:25:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:26:10.5.1 and 10.5.2). The magnitude of effect in all species is assessed to be negligible / very low based on

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:26:maintenance activities has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.10 and Table 10.13).

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:26:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:26:10.5.3). The magnitude of effect in all species is assessed to be negligible / very low based on the maximum

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:26:has been assessed as negligible (Table 10.15).

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:26:dredging activities. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:26:assessed as negligible (see Section 10.5.4).

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:26:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:27:negligible (see Section 10.5.5).

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:27:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:27:negligible (see Section 10.5.6).

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:27:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:27:established vessel routes. The magnitude of effect in all species is assessed to be negligible / very low

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:27:for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal has been assessed as negligible (Table

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:27:would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf:10:the proposed scheme will have negligible influence on this character area and is not considered further..

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf:12:industrial context of outward views, it is predicted that the proposed scheme will have negligible influence

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf:15:negligible effect on the existing baseline.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf:19:of those features will incur a low adverse magnitude of effect and a negligible overall significance of effect.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf:19:magnitude and incur a minor negligible adverse significance of effect.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf:19:negligible overall significance of effect.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf:20:and the wider environs, the overall significance of effect is considered to be negligible.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf:23:significance of effect in the view is minor negligible adverse and not significant.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf:23:significance of effect in the view is minor negligible adverse. In terms of EIA these effects are not

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf:23:negligible.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:62:3, the values are so low (<5mg/l) as to be negligible compared with background levels and, in all cases, the

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:62:water quality sampling points during Stage 3 of the dredging and only negligible effects for a short duration

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:62:Stages 3 and 4 of the dredging, only negligible effects are noted, equivalent to variations within the

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:68:as to be negligible in such a great depth of water in this deep water offshore area).

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:72:enhancement is so small in magnitude and spatial extent as to be negligible in such a great depth of water

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:76:is negligible, whilst to the north it covers a similar zone to the sediment plume for this disposal event, which

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:76:0.1cm. Clearly these magnitudes are extremely low within the licenced disposal site, and negligible beyond.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:76:magnitudes, with negligible changes anticipated beyond the boundaries of the site.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:14: Dust soiling High Risk Medium Risk Medium Risk Negligible Risk

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:14: Human health Medium Risk Low Risk Low Risk Negligible Risk

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:14: Ecological effects Medium Risk Low Risk Low Risk Negligible Risk

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:14:demolition, ‘medium risk’ for earthworks and construction, and ‘negligible risk’ for trackout. The impacts on

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:15:earthworks and construction and ‘negligible risk’ for trackout.

R-2021-0405-FFM-355679 - R_2021_0405_FFM Engineering operations associated with ground remediation and preparation at Land at South Bank South Industrial Zone Redcar - No Objs Sub Mit.pdf:2: likelihood of the aforementioned potential impacts remains negligible.

R-2021-0405-FFM-210512, EcIA for South Bank Site Remediation_INCA_RevA Final.PDF:20:negligible value.

R-2021-0405-FFM-210512, EcIA for South Bank Site Remediation_INCA_RevA Final.PDF:21:8.13 There is negligible amount of suitable habitat for bats on the proposed development site though

R-2021-0405-FFM-210512, EcIA for South Bank Site Remediation_INCA_RevA Final.PDF:21:station buildings were checked and are of negligible roosting potential for bats. Both buildings are

R-2021-0405-FFM-210512, EcIA for South Bank Site Remediation_INCA_RevA Final.PDF:22:the likely presence of Priority species is assessed as negligible.

R-2021-0405-FFM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:12:There is negligible amount of suitable habitat for bats on the proposed

R-2021-0405-FFM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:12:checked and are of negligible roosting potential for bats. Both buildings are

R-2021-0405-FFM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:14:habitats, the likely presence of Priority species is assessed as negligible.

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:5: • The impact on annual mean NO2 concentrations at all existing receptors modelled is negligible;

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:5: classified as negligible.

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:17: Trackout Medium Risk Low Risk Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:17: Low Demolition Medium Risk Low Risk Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:17: Earthworks Low Risk Low Risk Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:17: Construction Low Risk Low Risk Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:17: Trackout Low Risk Low Risk Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:20: 75% or less of AQAL Negligible Negligible Slight Moderate

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:20: 76 – 94% of AQAL Negligible Slight Moderate Moderate

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:20: * Where the % change is <0.5% the change is described as ‘Negligible’ regardless of concentration

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:20: negligible, slight, moderate or substantial, the significance of the overall effect is dependent on a

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:32: negligible.

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:32: traffic on hourly mean NO2 concentrations are negligible, therefore mitigation is not required.

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:32: the impacts on annual mean PM10 concentrations at existing receptors are negligible.

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:32: scenarios. As a result, the impacts on daily mean PM10 concentrations are negligible.

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:33: on annual mean PM2.5 concentrations at existing receptors are negligible.

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:37: negligible at all existing and proposed receptor locations. On this basis, the effects are not

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:38: • The impact on annual mean NO2 concentrations at all existing receptors modelled is negligible;

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:38: classified as negligible.

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: E1 17.8 17.8 0.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: E2 16.2 16.2 0.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: E3 16.9 16.9 0.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: E4 16.5 16.5 0.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: E5 16.4 16.4 0.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: E6 15.7 15.7 0.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: E7 15.8 15.8 0.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: E8 15.0 15.0 0.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: E9 14.5 14.6 0.1 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: E10 14.1 14.1 0.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: E11 14.3 14.3 0.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: E12 14.9 14.9 0.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: E13 26.9 26.9 0.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: E14 26.1 26.1 0.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: E15 15.5 15.5 0.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: E16 15.0 15.0 0.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: E17 15.3 15.3 0.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: E18 19.0 19.1 0.1 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: E19 15.1 15.1 0.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: P1 17.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: P2 17.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: P3 17.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: P4 14.8 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: P5 13.6 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: P6 15.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: P7 14.8 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: E1 38.0 38.0 0.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: E2 33.9 33.9 0.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: E3 34.6 34.6 0.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: E4 33.5 33.6 0.1 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: E5 41.6 41.6 0.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: E6 32.5 32.5 0.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: E7 39.2 39.2 0.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: E8 27.7 27.7 0.1 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:48: E9 27.8 27.8 0.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: E10 26.4 26.5 0.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: E11 29.7 29.7 0.1 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: E12 30.5 30.6 0.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: E13 57.7 57.8 0.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: E14 52.1 52.1 0.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: E15 30.7 30.7 0.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: E16 29.4 29.4 0.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: E17 30.3 30.4 0.1 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: E18 36.5 36.5 0.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: E19 29.9 30.0 0.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: P1 30.8 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: P2 30.9 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: P3 31.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: P4 26.8 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: P5 25.2 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: P6 27.4 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: P7 26.8 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: E1 12.0 12.0 0.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: E2 12.1 12.1 0.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: E3 12.4 12.4 0.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: E4 12.1 12.1 0.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: E5 12.1 12.1 0.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: E6 12.2 12.2 0.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: E7 12.1 12.1 0.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: E8 12.0 12.0 0.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: E9 11.7 11.7 0.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: E10 13.5 13.5 0.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: E11 12.3 12.3 0.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: E12 12.4 12.4 0.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: E13 14.4 14.4 0.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: E14 16.0 16.0 0.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: E15 12.0 12.0 0.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: E16 11.5 11.5 0.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: E17 11.6 11.6 0.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: E18 10.8 10.8 0.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: E19 11.4 11.5 0.1 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: P1 10.3 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: P2 10.3 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:49: P3 10.3 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:50: P4 10.5 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:50: P5 10.4 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:50: P6 10.5 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:50: P7 10.5 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:50: E1 1 1 0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:50: E2 1 1 0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:50: E3 1 1 0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:50: E4 1 1 0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:50: E5 1 1 0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:50: E6 1 1 0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:50: E7 1 1 0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:50: E8 1 1 0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:50: E9 1 1 0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:50: E10 0 0 0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:50: E11 1 1 0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:50: E12 1 1 0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:50: E13 0 0 0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:50: E14 0 0 0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:50: E15 1 1 0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:50: E16 2 2 0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:50: E17 1 1 0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:50: E18 2 2 0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:50: E19 2 2 0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:50: P1 3 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:50: P2 3 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:50: P3 3 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:50: P4 3 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:50: P5 3 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:50: P6 3 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:50: P7 3 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:50: E1 7.8 7.8 0.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:50: E2 7.9 7.9 0.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:51:E3 8.1 8.1 0.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:51:E4 7.9 7.9 0.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:51:E5 7.8 7.8 0.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:51:E6 7.8 7.8 0.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:51:E7 7.8 7.8 0.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:51:E8 7.7 7.7 0.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:51:E9 7.6 7.6 0.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:51:E10 8.0 8.0 0.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:51:E11 7.7 7.7 0.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:51:E12 7.8 7.8 0.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:51:E13 9.2 9.2 0.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:51:E14 10.2 10.2 0.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:51:E15 7.6 7.6 0.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:51:E16 7.6 7.6 0.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:51:E17 7.6 7.6 0.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:51:E18 7.2 7.2 0.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:51:E19 7.5 7.5 0.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:51:P1 6.9 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:51:P2 6.9 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:51:P3 6.9 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:51:P4 7.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:51:P5 7.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:51:P6 7.0 Negligible

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:51:P7 7.0 Negligible

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf:19: permeability that have negligible

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf:60:121 17.4 Collapsible deposits Negligible (within 50m)

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf:60:123 17.6 Ground dissolution of soluble rocks Negligible (within 50m)

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf:125: Negligible

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf:169: Negligible

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf:169: On site Negligible Ground conditions predominantly non-plastic.

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf:171: Negligible

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf:173: Negligible

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf:173: On site Negligible Compressible strata are not thought to occur.

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf:175: Negligible

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf:175: On site Negligible Deposits with potential to collapse when loaded and saturated are believed not to be present.

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf:176: Negligible

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf:177: Negligible

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf:177: On site Negligible Soluble rocks are either not thought to be present within the ground, or not prone to dissolution.

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:18: permeability that have negligible

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:42:121 17.4 Collapsible deposits Negligible (within 50m)

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:42:123 17.6 Ground dissolution of soluble rocks Negligible (within 50m)

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:107: Negligible

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:151: Negligible

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:151: On site Negligible Ground conditions predominantly non-plastic.

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:153: Negligible

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:155: Negligible

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:155: On site Negligible Compressible strata are not thought to occur.

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:157: Negligible

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:157: On site Negligible Deposits with potential to collapse when loaded and saturated are believed not to be present.

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:158: Negligible

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:159: Negligible

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:159: On site Negligible Soluble rocks are either not thought to be present within the ground, or not prone to dissolution.

R-2021-0879-FF-Prairie Site, Desk Based Heritage Assessment.PDF:6: • Negligible – areas of extremely limited or no archaeological or historic interest. These

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:6: Negligible Receptor is of negligible value with no contribution to • Unproductive strata.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:7: Negligible Very minor loss or detrimental alteration to one Very minor temporary benefit to or

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:7: No Change Negligible Low Medium High

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:7: Negligible No change Negligible Negligible or Negligible or Minor

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:7: Low No change Negligible or Negligible or Minor Minor or

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:7: Medium No change Negligible or Minor Moderate Moderate or

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:8: • Negligible: No effects or those that are beneath levels of perception, within normal bounds of

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:12:9.3.28 Information provided by the BGS indicates that the Application Site is at very low or negligible risk

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:14: section 9.4, the magnitude of impact would be negligible.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:15: of impact would be negligible.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:15: CoCP to prevent surface water run-off, the magnitude of impact would be negligible.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:17: basis, the magnitude of impact would be negligible, and the level of effect is considered to be

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:18: materials to migrate to groundwater. The magnitude of impact would be negligible, and the level of

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:18: effect is considered to be negligible, which is not significant.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:18: contaminants. On this basis, the magnitude of impact would be negligible, and the level of effect is

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:21: extent; the magnitude of impact would be negligible to low and the significance of effects are

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:21: would be negligible to minor adverse, which is not significant.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:23: CoCP, site Negligible Minor adverse Not significant

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:23: Mobilisation of CoCP, site Negligible Minor adverse Not significant

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:23: Direct damage to geology CoCP, site Negligible Minor adverse Not significant

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:24: Very High Dermal exposure, vapours Environmental permit Negligible Minor adverse Not significant

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:24:Aquifer) Low chemicals or waste water Negligible Negligible Not significant

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:24:Cleveland Coast High Negligible Minor adverse Not significant

R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_Response to Anglo American_AS_S.pdf:2: conclude that the cumulative impact on the local highway network would be negligible and would not result in

R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_Response to Anglo American_AS_S.pdf:5: development which have been demonstrated to be negligible and therefore acceptable.

R-2020-0411-FFM-SEC8563 Redcar EfW Outfall Pipe Phase 1 Note_Final_20.10.29(1).pdf:10:construction and operational phases is assessed to be neutral/negligible.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 13.1 Archaeological Desk Based Assessment - Formatted.pdf:2:to have negligible potential for additional archaeological assets.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 13.1 Archaeological Desk Based Assessment - Formatted.pdf:11:4.5.3 The Application Site is considered to have negligible potential for Prehistoric and Roman period

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 13.1 Archaeological Desk Based Assessment - Formatted.pdf:12:4.6.3 The Application Site is considered to have negligible potential for further Early Medieval, Medieval

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 13.1 Archaeological Desk Based Assessment - Formatted.pdf:12: negligible potential for the presence of significant archaeological remains of any date.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 13.1 Archaeological Desk Based Assessment - Formatted.pdf:14:5.3.2 The desk-based assessment above has established that the Application Site has a negligible

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 13.1 Archaeological Desk Based Assessment - Formatted.pdf:15: is considered to have negligible potential for additional archaeological assets.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf:7: phases of the REC, would very likely be negligible and effectively result in no change to the

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf:8: negligible and that for a potentially significant, moderate adverse effect to result (medium

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf:9: Negligible All other areas such as those used primarily for industrial or agricultural purposes.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf:10: Negligible No disturbance <502 Regular / Steady State

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf:11: Negligible <3.0

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf:11: No Change Negligible Low Medium High

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf:11: Negligible or Negligible or Page 12-11

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf:11: Negligible None Negligible Minor

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf:11: Negligible or Negligible or Minor or

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf:11: Negligible or Moderate or

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf:14: with impact and CFA piling would be of low and negligible magnitude respectively, with the

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf:16: with would be of a negligible magnitude.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf:16:12.5.12 Overall, it is predicted that a negligible impact on high sensitivity receptors would result in a minor

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf:17: would be negligible in comparison.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf:19: negligible). Furthermore, during the breeding season the sensitivity of the SPA and Ramsar site is

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf:20:12.9.6 Predictions have shown that noise from operation of the REC would result in, at worst, a negligible

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf:20:12.2 A negligible impact on the high sensitivity receptor would result in a minor adverse effect, which is

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf:20:12.3 Operational road traffic movements on the public highway are negligible compared to baseline and

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf:21:Teesmouth and High Disturbance from the - Negligible Minor adverse Not significant

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 11 Air Quality.pdf:9: • Negligible: no effects or those that pose a very small risk in comparison to normal risks in

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 11 Air Quality.pdf:17: causing negligible effects.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 11 Air Quality.pdf:23: Dust Soiling Negligible Low Low Low

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 11 Air Quality.pdf:23: Human Health Negligible Low Low Low

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 11 Air Quality.pdf:31: pollutants considered would be of “negligible” significance.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 11 Air Quality.pdf:33: within 350 m of the Medium-term Risk - Medium Negligible Not significant

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 11 Air Quality.pdf:33: km by 6 km with 60 Long-term Small Negligible Not significant

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 11 Air Quality.pdf:33: Medium Dust Long-term Small Negligible Not significant

R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf:15: • Negligible: No effects or those that are beneath levels of perception, within normal bounds of

R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf:16: Minor Adverse. There would also be direct effects of a Negligible Adverse significance upon the

R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf:16: townscape indirectly effected, effects would range from Negligible to Adverse to No Change.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf:16: vehicular traffic associated with the construction phase, resulting in a Negligible Adverse effect,

R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf:21: would be negligible.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf:21:5.5.7 The assessments have calculated the REC development to result in negligible increase in traffic

R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf:21: been identified as low or negligible and the magnitudes of impacts have been identified to be

R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf:21: generally negligible. No significant environmental effects are predicted.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf:22: would be of “negligible” significance.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf:22: to negligible). Furthermore, during the breeding season (May to August inclusive) the sensitivity of

R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf:22: negligible compared to baseline and there would be no change in road traffic noise levels and as

R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf:24: is considered to have negligible potential for additional archaeological assets.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf:25: concluded that the sensitivities of receptors to traffic were considered to be low or negligible and

R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf:25: the level of effects were predicted to be negligible adverse.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf:25: resultant environmental concentrations of all pollutants considered would be of “negligible”

R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf:25: Farm. Operational road traffic movements on the public highway are negligible compared to

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf:7: Negligible Receptor is of negligible value with no contribution to local, regional or national

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf:8: Negligible Very minor loss or detrimental alteration to one or more characteristics, features or

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf:9: No Change Negligible Low Medium High

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf:9: Negligible No change Negligible Negligible or Negligible or Minor

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf:9: Low No change Negligible or Negligible or Minor Minor or

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf:9: Medium No change Negligible or Minor Moderate Moderate or

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf:9:8.2.29 The overall significance of an effect is expressed as negligible, minor, moderate, major or

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf:9: • Negligible: No effects or those that are beneath levels of perception, within normal bounds of

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf:22: therefore considered to be negligible.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf:26: Alteration of surface water Designed in Negligible Minor Adverse Not significant

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf:27: Decommissioning Negligible Minor Adverse Not significant

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 13 - Other Environmental Effects.pdf:2: is considered to have negligible potential for additional archaeological assets.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 13 - Other Environmental Effects.pdf:3: concluded that the sensitivities of receptors to traffic were considered to be low or negligible and

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 13 - Other Environmental Effects.pdf:3: the level of effects were predicted to be negligible adverse.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 13 - Other Environmental Effects.pdf:3: resultant environmental concentrations of all pollutants considered would be of “negligible”

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 13 - Other Environmental Effects.pdf:3: Farm. Operational road traffic movements on the public highway are negligible compared to

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 4 - EIA Methodology.pdf:8: • Negligible.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 4 - EIA Methodology.pdf:9: • Negligible.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 4 - EIA Methodology.pdf:9: • Negligible: No effects or those that are beneath levels of perception, within normal bounds of

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 4 - EIA Methodology.pdf:9: No Change Negligible Low Medium High

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 4 - EIA Methodology.pdf:9: Negligible No change Negligible Negligible or Negligible or Minor Minor

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 4 - EIA Methodology.pdf:9: Low No change Negligible or Negligible or Minor Minor or

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 4 - EIA Methodology.pdf:10: No Change Negligible Low Medium High

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 4 - EIA Methodology.pdf:10: Medium No change Negligible or Minor Moderate Moderate or

R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf:45: and the surrounding area is considered to have negligible potential for archaeological assets given

R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf:74: any effects are expected to be negligible and temporary. At worst, this might cause the short-term

R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf:76: effects on the townscape to be no more than negligible.

R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf:76: surroundings are assessed to be negligible adverse during winter year 1 of the operation.

R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf:76: character would remain as negligible.

R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf:76: be negligible given the dominant industrial nature of this townscape being considered to be of

R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf:76: negligible sensitivity to the type and scale of development where is it able to accommodate the

R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf:78: there would be a negligible magnitude of impact due to the very slight change in baseline, whereby

R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf:81: Application Site is considered to have only negligible potential for Prehistoric and Roman, Early

R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf:83: 2.20%, and as such it concludes the increases are negligible, and within the day to variances

R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf:84: • the link assessments confirm that the impacts of REC are negligible during the AM and PM

R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf:87: during both the construction and operational phases of the REC, would very likely be negligible

R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf:87: from the REC would be negligible in comparison.

R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf:89: therefore considered to be negligible, and as such, the level of effect is assessed as minor

R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf:92: negligible. Furthermore, the level of effect is considered to be minor adverse, which is not

R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf:92: would be negligible to minor adverse, which is not significant.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 11.3 - Detailed Construction Phase Dust Assessment Methodology.pdf:8: level of mitigation that should be applied. For those cases where the risk category is ‘negligible’,

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 11.3 - Detailed Construction Phase Dust Assessment Methodology.pdf:8:Low Medium Risk Low Risk Negligible

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 11.3 - Detailed Construction Phase Dust Assessment Methodology.pdf:8:Low Low Risk Low Risk Negligible

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 11.3 - Detailed Construction Phase Dust Assessment Methodology.pdf:9:Low Low Risk Low Risk Negligible

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 11.3 - Detailed Construction Phase Dust Assessment Methodology.pdf:9:Medium Medium Risk Low Risk Negligible

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 11.3 - Detailed Construction Phase Dust Assessment Methodology.pdf:9:Low Low Risk Low Risk Negligible

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 10.1 Transport Assessment.pdf:27: are in the order of less than 1% and up to a maximum of 1.64%. These increases are negligible

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 10.1 Transport Assessment.pdf:29: are negligible.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 10.1 Transport Assessment.pdf:29:7.5.2 The link assessments set out in this section demonstrate that the impacts of REC are negligible

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 10.1 Transport Assessment.pdf:30: increases are negligible, and within expected day-to-day variances in traffic flow. It is therefore

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 10.1 Transport Assessment.pdf:30: concluded that the impact of the REC on the local highway network would be negligible, and would

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 10.1 Transport Assessment.pdf:44: cs traffic would be negligible and a detailed assessment of the

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:18: significance of any effect is considered to be negligible. All other levels of significance will apply to

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:29: follows: International > National > County > District > Local > Site > Negligible.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:36: development is likely to be negligible. AADT are predicted to be just under 100 movements per

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:38: development is likely to be negligible. A significant noise impact as a result of an increase in traffic

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:9: negligible, minor, moderate or major. Effects could be either beneficial or adverse.;

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:10: Negligible Receptor has high capacity to accommodate physical or chemical changes or

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:11: Negligible Very minor loss or detrimental alteration to one or more characteristics, features or

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:11: described as negligible, minor, moderate or major. Effects are considered to be significant under

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:11:7.2.53 Negligible effects are those that are beneath levels of perception, within normal bounds of

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:12: No Change Negligible Low Medium High

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:12: Negligible No change Negligible Negligible or Negligible or Minor

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:12: Low No change Negligible or Negligible or Minor Minor or

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:12: Medium No change Negligible or Minor Moderate Moderate or

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:23: bulk materials such as coal scrapings. The land has negligible ecological value and the potential

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:24: negligible magnitude of impact on the high sensitivity Teesmouth and Cleveland SPA/Ramsar and

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:26: impact resulting from construction phase pollution is negligible on the high sensitivity Teesmouth

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:27: the magnitude of noise disturbance from the operational phase has a negligible magnitude on the

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:27:7.6.4 The magnitude of visual disturbance impacts during the operational phase is therefore negligible

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:29: Cleveland Coast SPA/Ramsar are negligible and the level of effect is predicted to be minor

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:30: Northern Gateway Container negligible in terms of noise and visual

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:33: Pollution Negligible Minor Adverse Not Significant

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:33: Not Required Negligible Minor Adverse Not Significant

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:33: Not Required Negligible Minor Adverse Not Significant

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:33: Not required Negligible Minor Adverse Not Significant

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:34: Disturbance non-breeding season for waterbirds when sensitivity Negligible Minor Adverse Not Significant

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:34: Pollution As for construction Negligible Minor Adverse Not Significant

R-2020-0411-FFM-411 nuisance.pdf:1:construction and operational phases of the REC, would very likely be negligible and

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:3: the changes in traffic resulting from REC would have negligible effects and there is no requirement

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:6: Negligible Receptors with low sensitivity to traffic flows and those sufficiently distant from

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:6: Negligible Very minor loss of capability for movement along and across transport corridors, very

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:7: Negligible Low Medium High

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:7: Negligible Negligible Negligible or minor Negligible or minor Minor

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:7: Low Negligible or minor Negligible or minor Minor Minor or moderate

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:7: Medium Negligible or minor Minor Moderate Moderate or major

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:10: A1053 between A66 and A174 Negligible Strategic Road Network subject to

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:11: A174 between the A1053 and A171 Negligible Strategic Road Network

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:11: medium, low or negligible sensitivity are deemed as not being sensitive, in accordance with the

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:14:10.5.4 In accordance with the IEMA guidelines the sensitivity of receptors are considered to be negligible,

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:14: delay, pedestrian amenity, accidents and safety and hazardous loads is deemed to be negligible,

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:14: continuously and fully reversible. On that basis, the level of effect would be negligible adverse,

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:17: between the A1085 and A174 junctions are considered to be negligible and the magnitude of

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:17: safety and hazardous loads is deemed to be negligible, of long-term duration, temporary in the

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:17: is predicted to be negligible, which is not significant in EIA terms.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:17: accidents and safety and hazardous loads is deemed to be negligible, of long term duration,

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:17: reversible. The level of effect is predicted to be negligible, which is not significant in EIA terms.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:18: accidents and safety and hazardous loads is deemed to be negligible, of long term duration,

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:18: The level of effect is predicted to be of negligible, which is not significant in EIA terms.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:18: by climate change and neither would their assessment of sensitivity (i.e. negligible, low, medium or

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:20:10.8.8 The sensitivities of receptors have been identified as low or negligible and the magnitudes of

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:20: impacts have been identified to be negligible. No significant environmental effects are predicted.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:21: Low pedestrian amenity, routeing of Negligible Negligible Not significant

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:21:A1085 Trunk Road Low pedestrian amenity, routeing of Negligible Negligible Not significant

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:21: Negligible pedestrian amenity, routeing of Negligible Negligible Not significant

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:21: Low pedestrian amenity, routeing of Negligible Negligible Not significant

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:21: Medium pedestrian amenity, routeing of Negligible Negligible Not significant

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:21:junction with Normanby Low pedestrian amenity, routeing of Negligible Negligible Not significant

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:22: Negligible pedestrian amenity, routeing of Negligible Negligible Not significant

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:22:Trunk Road and Waveney Low pedestrian amenity, routeing of Negligible Negligible Not significant

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:22:between A1042 and Low pedestrian amenity, routeing of Negligible Negligible Not significant

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:22: Low pedestrian amenity, Negligible Negligible Not significant

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:22:A1085 Trunk Road Low pedestrian amenity, Negligible Negligible Not significant

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:22: Negligible pedestrian amenity, Negligible Negligible Not significant

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:22: Low pedestrian delay, Negligible Negligible Not significant

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:23: Medium pedestrian amenity, Negligible Negligible Not significant

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:23:junction with Normanby Low pedestrian amenity, Negligible Negligible Not significant

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:23: Negligible pedestrian amenity, Negligible Negligible Not significant

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:23:Trunk Road and Waveney Low pedestrian amenity, Negligible Negligible Not significant

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:23:between A1042 and Low pedestrian amenity, Negligible Negligible Not significant

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf:16:2.7.1 Information provided by the BGS indicates that the Application Site is at very low or negligible risk

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf:50:99 17.4 Collapsible deposits Negligible (within 50m)

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf:50:101 17.6 Ground dissolution of soluble rocks Negligible (within 50m)

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf:102: 1 in 30 year Negligible

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf:103: Negligible

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf:140: Negligible

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf:141: Negligible

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf:142: Negligible

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf:143: Negligible

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf:143: On site Negligible Deposits with potential to collapse when loaded and saturated are believed not to be present.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf:144: Negligible

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf:145: Negligible

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf:145: On site Negligible Soluble rocks are either not thought to be present within the ground, or not prone to dissolution.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 7.2 Ecology PEA.pdf:8:Negligible Negligible habitat features on site not likely to be Negligible habitat features on site not likely to be

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:4: is classified on a five-point scale (negligible, low, medium, high and very high) as set out in Tables

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:5: (negligible, low, medium, high and very high) as set out in Table 6.2 below. Table 6.3 also sets out

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:5: Negligible Absence of positive landscape characteristics. Undesignated countryside and

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:6: Negligible Views from within and of undesignated Observers in vehicles or people

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:6:6.2.25 Magnitude of impact has been classified on a five-point scale (no change, negligible, low, medium,

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:7: Negligible Very minor loss or addition of or alteration Very slight change in baseline i.e., pre-

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:8: No Change Negligible Low Medium High

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:8: Negligible No change Negligible Negligible or Negligible or Minor

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:8: Low No change Negligible or Negligible or Minor Minor or

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:8: Medium No change Negligible or Minor Moderate Moderate or

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:8: the six-point scale shown in the above matrix (substantial, major, moderate, minor, negligible or no

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:8: Negligible Where proposed changes would have an Where proposed changes would have a

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:19: sensitivity of the Application Site itself is considered to be Negligible.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:20: 1 km and features and visual receptors could experience medium/low to negligible

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:20: 5 km landscape and visual receptors would tend to experience a low to negligible or

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:28: landscape characteristics and is considered to have negligible sensitivity to the change arising

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:28: Tract, which is considered to be of negligible sensitivity to this type of development, resulting in a

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:28: negligible adverse significance of effect during construction. Proposed changes would have an

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:29: development, resulting in a negligible magnitude of impact and a negligible adverse significance

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:29: The temporary construction activities would cause a negligible magnitude of impact and no more

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:29: than a negligible adverse significance of effect upon the Tees Lowlands NCA.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:31: landscape characteristics and is considered to have negligible sensitivity to the type of

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:31: new landscape, the magnitude of impact would be low and an overall negligible adverse during

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:31: character would remain as negligible adverse.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:31: being considered to be of negligible sensitivity to the type and scale of development where is it

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:32: considered that the proposed development would cause a negligible magnitude of impact to the

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:32: character of Redcar Industrial Townscape Tract, resulting in a negligible adverse significance

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:32:6.6.15 Overall there would be the potential for negligible / negligible to no change magnitude of impact

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:32: a negligible adverse / no change significance of effect.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:32: inherent characteristics of this NCA. There would be a negligible magnitude of impact to the

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:32: character area. Therefore, there would be no more than a negligible adverse significance of

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:32: (see Figure 6.9) by summer year 15, but the overall significance would remain at negligible

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:35: There would be a negligible magnitude of impact and a negligible adverse significance of effect

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:35: There would be a Negligible magnitude of impact and a negligible adverse significance of effect

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:36: VP12 and VP13, there would be a negligible magnitude of impact due to the very slight change in

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:36: Overall, there would be a negligible magnitude of impact, resulting in a minor adverse

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:36: mostly unnoticed from these views from medium sensitivity receptors. There would be a negligible

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:36: magnitude of impact and a negligible adverse significance of effect at winter year 1 and summer

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:38: development has concluded an effect above negligible have been considered in the cumulative

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:45: Negligible Direct effects; demolition and Temporary Medium Minor Adverse Not Significant

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:45: Negligible Direct effects: as above but Temporary Low Negligible Adverse Not Significant

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:45: Medium Indirect effects: Addition of elements Temporary Negligible Negligible Adverse Not Significant

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:45:Redcar Flats Medium Indirect effects as preceding entry Temporary Negligible Negligible Adverse Not Significant

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:46:Eston Hills Landscape Medium Indirect effects as above Temporary Negligible Negligible Adverse Not Significant

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:46:East Billingham to Low Indirect effects as above Temporary Negligible Negligible Adverse Not Significant

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:46:Estuarine Landscape Low Indirect effects as above Temporary Negligible Negligible Adverse Not Significant

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:46:Coastal Fringe Indirect effects as above Temporary Negligible Negligible Adverse Not Significant

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:46: Large scale construction in an area Temporary Negligible Negligible Adverse Not Significant

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:46: Negligible Direct effects. Introduction of new Permanent Low Negligible Adverse. Not Significant

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:46:District Level Negligible Direct effects. Lesser in magnitude Permanent Negligible Negligible Adverse Not Significant

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:47:Redcar Residential Medium Indirect effects; No loss, alteration or Permanent Negligible to No Negligible Adverse Not Significant

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:47: Medium Indirect effects; very minor addition Permanent Negligible Negligible Adverse Not Significant

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:47:Eston Hills Landscape Medium Indirect effects; No loss, alteration or Permanent Negligible to No Negligible Adverse Not Significant

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:47:East Billingham to Low Indirect effects No loss, alteration or Permanent Negligible to No No Change Not Significant

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:47:Estuarine Landscape Low Indirect effects No loss, alteration or Permanent Negligible to No No Change Not Significant

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:47:Coastal Fringe Low Indirect effects No loss, alteration or Permanent Negligible to No No Change Not Significant

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:47: Medium Direct effects; large scale Permanent Negligible Negligible Adverse Not Significant

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:49: VP6: Medium Medium range, heavily filtered As above Negligible Negligible Adverse Not Significant Reducing to No

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:49: Negligible.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:49: VP7: West Low As above Negligible Negligible Adverse Not Significant Greater vehicular

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:50: VP10: England High Long range, open view toward As above Negligible Minor Adverse Not Significant

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:50: VP11: Cowpen Medium As above Negligible Negligible Adverse Not Significant By Summer Year 15,

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:50: VP12: Eston Nab High Long range, elevated view from As above Negligible Minor Adverse Not Significant

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:50: VP13: Hartlepool Medium Long range, open view over sea. As above Negligible Negligible Adverse Not Significant

R-2021-0465-FFM-LM Wind - Transport Briefing Note_09-06-2021.pdf:1:highway network is expected to be negligible as much of the additional area is for open space,

R-2021-0152-CD-Blast furnace RecordingWSIv4.PDF:5: 2). The area to the east, south and west have negligible archaeological potential and the area to

R-2021-0152-CD-Officer report _R20210152CD.pdf:5:negligible archaeological potential and the areas to the south and west,

R-2021-0152-CD-Blast furnace RecordingWSI revMar21.pdf:6: 2). The area to the east now has negligible archaeological potential and the areas to the south

R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:77: • Negligible (common and widespread features that have very low value at the level

R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:86: would be negligible and a detailed assessment of the operational phase of the

R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:93: Corridors would be negligible and a detailed assessment of the operational noise

R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:108: professional judgement) considered negligible in relation to the scale and nature

R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:118: assessment methodologies (major, moderate, minor and negligible). For the purpose

R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:121: • negligible – imperceptible effect to an environmental resource or receptor; or

R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:125: reception is considered negligible.

R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:12: be Negligible and Not Significant. This will primarily comprise remediation of Non Aqueous

R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:12: construction and therefore the risk to the occupiers would be Negligible and Not

R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:13: safely, therefore the risk from new contamination would be Negligible and Not Significant.

R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:14: Commercial areas within >250 m of negligible nature conservation

R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:14: Ecological and water features deemed to be Negligible potential for mineral reserves to exist

R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:14: of negligible value

R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:15:Negligible Human Health: No measurable effects on humans Impact of insufficient magnitude to

R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:16: Sensitivity/value of High Medium Low Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:16: High Substantial Moderate Minor Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:16: Medium Moderate Minor Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:16: Low Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:28: unit has low permeability with negligible significance for water suppl y or base river flow. The

R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:33: concentrations were 1.3% v/v and 4.9% v/v. respectively, with flow rates negligible to low during

R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:38: significance is considered Negligible and therefore Not Significant.

R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:43: magnitude of impact following mitigation identifie d in Section H6.0 is negligible. There are

R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:43: likely to be impacts of Minor Adverse significance for construction workers and Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:43: following mitigation identified in Section H6.0 is negligible. Therefore , the impacts after the

R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:43: implementation of mitigation measures are considered to be of Negligible significance. This is

R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:43: facilities during the construction phase is considered to be of Negligible significance. This is

R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:44: significance of the impacts identified is considered to be Minor Adverse / Negligible and Not

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:22: operation would be Negligible and Not Significant.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:22: contamination with this tertiary mitigation in place, would be Negligible and Not

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:22: Local significance; and nesting birds, which are of negligible significance even at a

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:30: 10 Neutral/negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:38: considered to be of Local importance with the non-breeding bird assemblage of negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:45: risk sites in place, there is likely to be a negligible effect on receptors from the dust-generating

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:45: through the modelling process was predicted to be negligible at all receptors. The overall effect

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:47: negligible and not significant.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:50: Eston Road junction. All other effects will be reduced to minor or negligible and not significant.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:53: groundwater, the built environment and landscape will all be of minor adverse / negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:56: development are all considered to result in a negligible impact on regional landfill capacity.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R1 19.2 19.4 19.6 0.2 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R2 18.0 18.2 18.4 0.2 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R3 17.9 18.2 18.7 0.5 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R4 18.1 18.4 18.9 0.5 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R5 18.0 18.3 18.7 0.4 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R6 15.7 16.0 16.1 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R7 15.3 15.5 15.6 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R8 14.6 14.9 14.9 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R9 15.6 16.1 16.1 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R10 16.2 16.8 17.0 0.2 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R11 14.4 14.7 14.8 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R12 14.4 14.8 14.9 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R13 15.8 16.4 16.5 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R14 15.4 16.0 16.1 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R15 31.4 31.7 31.7 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R16 35.1 35.5 35.6 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R17 31.1 31.4 31.5 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R18 36.1 36.5 36.6 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R19 27.8 28.1 28.2 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R20 27.8 28.1 28.2 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R21 25.8 26.1 26.1 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R22 23.7 23.8 23.9 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R23 22.7 22.8 22.9 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R24 15.5 15.6 15.8 0.2 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R25 15.4 15.6 15.7 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R26 15.2 15.4 15.5 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R27 16.1 16.2 16.5 0.3 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R28 15.4 15.5 15.5 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:18: E1 18.7 18.7 18.7 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:18: E2 18.6 18.6 18.6 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: R1 12.1 12.1 12.1 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: R2 12.4 12.5 12.5 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: R3 12.1 12.2 12.2 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: R4 12.1 12.2 12.3 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: R5 12.1 12.2 12.3 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: R6 11.9 12.0 12.0 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: R7 11.8 11.9 11.9 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: R8 13.5 13.5 13.5 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: R9 13.7 13.8 13.8 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: R10 12.2 12.3 12.4 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: R11 12.1 12.1 12.2 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: R12 12.1 12.2 12.2 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: R13 12.3 12.4 12.4 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: R14 12.3 12.3 12.4 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: R15 16.4 16.5 16.5 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: R16 17.5 17.6 17.6 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: R17 16.5 16.6 16.6 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: R18 17.7 17.9 17.9 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: R19 13.9 13.9 14.0 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: R20 13.9 13.9 14.0 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: R21 13.4 13.5 13.5 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: R22 13.1 13.2 13.2 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: R23 12.7 12.8 12.8 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: R24 11.5 11.5 11.5 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: R25 11.4 11.5 11.5 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: R26 11.4 11.4 11.4 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: R27 11.6 11.6 11.6 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: R28 11.9 11.9 11.9 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: E1 10.6 10.6 10.6 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: E2 10.6 10.6 10.6 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R1 7.9 7.9 7.9 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R2 8.1 8.1 8.1 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R3 7.8 7.8 7.9 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R4 7.8 7.9 7.9 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R5 7.9 7.9 7.9 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R6 7.7 7.7 7.8 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R7 7.7 7.7 7.7 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R8 8.0 8.1 8.1 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R9 8.1 8.2 8.2 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R10 7.7 7.7 7.8 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R11 7.6 7.6 7.7 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R12 7.6 7.7 7.7 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R13 7.7 7.8 7.8 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R14 7.7 7.8 7.8 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R15 10.1 10.2 10.2 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R16 11.1 11.2 11.2 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R17 10.2 10.3 10.3 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R18 11.2 11.3 11.3 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R19 8.9 9.0 9.0 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R20 8.9 9.0 9.0 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R21 8.6 8.7 8.7 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R22 8.4 8.4 8.4 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R23 8.2 8.2 8.3 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R24 7.5 7.6 7.6 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R25 7.5 7.5 7.6 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R26 7.5 7.5 7.5 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R27 7.6 7.6 7.6 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R28 7.5 7.5 7.5 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:20: E1 7.1 7.1 7.1 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:20: E2 7.1 7.1 7.1 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:13:J3.20 Professional judgement has then been employed to establish whether the effects are negligible,

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020.PDF:12: Negligible Assets with very little or no surviving archaeological

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020.PDF:12: Negligible Very minor changes to archaeological materials or setting.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020.PDF:13: Magnitude of Change No Negligible Minor Moderate Substantial No Change

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020.PDF:13: Medium Neutral Negligible Minor Moderate Substantial Medium

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020.PDF:13: Low Neutral Negligible Negligible Minor Moderate Low

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020.PDF:13: Negligible Neutral Negligible Negligible Negligible Minor Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020.PDF:13: the effect on the receptor will be Neutral, Negligible, Minor, Moderate or Substantial. Moderate

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020.PDF:13: Negligible/neutral The development satisfies the subject environmental objective but neither

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020.PDF:22: understanding offsets the negative effect to have a residual effect that is between Negligible and

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020.PDF:22: Open Hearth furnaces remains Low Minor Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020.PDF:22: Cleveland Steel Works other remains Low Minor Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020.PDF:23: Open Substantial Moderate Adverse Archaeological Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020.PDF:23: Cleveland Substantial Moderate Adverse Archaeological Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:9: reduced to negligible and therefore non-significant levels.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19:F3.40 If the impact descriptor is Negligible or Slight (Minor), this is considered to not have a

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: Moderate, Minor and Negligible/Neutral and reference to these terms are included in the below

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: 75% or less of objective Negligible Negligible Slight (Minor) Moderate

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: 76-94% of objective Negligible Slight (Minor) Moderate Moderate

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: Note: Changes in pollutant concentrations of 0% i.e. <0.5% would be described as Negligible.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: <10% of hourly mean NO2 threshold Imperceptible Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:20: significant effect and a ‘Negligible’ or ‘Slight’ (Minor) impact will not result in a significant

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:20: such as those above. In this Chapter, where Negligible impacts are identified, a type of effect will

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:20: or Negligible effect is likely to be felt.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:33: Negligible impact at all existing receptor locations and is considered to be Not Significant.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:33: Cleveland Coast SPA) included in this assessment were also found to experience a Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:33: Negligible impact at all existing receptor locations and is considered to be Not Significant.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:33: Cleveland Coast SPA) included in this assessment were also found to experience a Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:34: Negligible impact at all existing receptor locations and is considered to be Not Significant.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:34: Cleveland Coast SPA) included in this assessment were also found to experience a Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:34:F5.26 The magnitude of change for NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations is negligible at all receptors.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:34: As stated in paragraph F3.44, where the impact is Negligible or Slight (Minor) then the overall

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:36:F7.2 The assessment has demonstrated that the effects will be Negligible and therefore Not

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:36: effects will be Negligible and Not Significant) for all receptors.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:37: practice mitigation measures suitable for high risk sites in place, there is likely to be a Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:37:F8.6 The magnitude of change for NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations at all receptors is Negligible.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:37: All sensitive Operational traffic impact Negligible and Not None. Negligible and

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:41: development scenario (albeit negligible). Best practice measures would be

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:41: The proposed development is anticipated to only have negligible impacts

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:23: operation would be Negligible and Not Significant.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:23: contamination with this tertiary mitigation in place, would be Negligible and Not

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:23: Local significance; and nesting birds, which are of negligible significance even at a

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:31: 10 Neutral/negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:40: Medium although the HGV increase in the PM peak is Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:41: by 100% in the PM peak, the actual number of HGVs is 8, which is considered negligible. The effect on

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:41: pedestrian and cyclist amenity at this location is therefore considered to be Negligible. This is considered

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:41: change is considered to be negligible as the traffic flow change is less than 30%. The change in traffic

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:41: carriageway and the effect is considered to be of Negligible significance. This is considered Not

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:41: change is considered to be negligible as the arms predominantly affected already have signalised

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:41: considered to be of Negligible significance. This is considered Not Significant; and

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:44: R1 19.2 21.5 22.5 1.0 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:44: R2 18.0 20.3 21.1 0.8 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:44: R3 17.9 20.3 21.6 1.3 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:44: R4 18.1 20.5 22.0 1.5 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:44: R5 18.0 20.4 22.1 1.7 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:44: R6 15.7 18.1 18.9 0.8 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:44: R7 15.3 17.6 18.3 0.7 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:44: R8 14.6 17.0 17.2 0.2 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:44: R9 15.6 18.2 18.6 0.4 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:44: R10 16.2 18.9 20.2 1.3 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:44: R11 14.4 16.8 17.2 0.4 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:44: R12 14.4 16.9 17.3 0.4 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:44: R13 15.8 18.5 19.1 0.6 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:44: R14 15.4 18.1 18.6 0.5 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:44: R15 31.4 33.8 34.2 0.4 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:44: R21 25.8 28.2 28.6 0.4 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:44: R22 23.7 25.9 26.5 0.6 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:44: R23 22.7 24.9 25.6 0.7 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:44: R25 15.4 17.7 19.3 1.6 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:44: R26 15.2 17.5 18.6 1.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:44: R28 15.4 17.6 18.0 0.4 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:44: R29 18.1 20.3 21.0 0.7 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:44: E1 18.7 20.8 21.0 0.2 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:44: E2 18.6 20.7 20.8 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:46: R1 12.1 12.5 12.7 0.2 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:46: R2 12.4 12.9 13.0 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:46: R3 12.1 12.6 12.8 0.2 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:46: R4 12.1 12.6 12.8 0.2 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:46: R5 12.1 12.6 12.8 0.2 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:46: R6 11.9 12.4 12.5 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:46: R7 11.8 12.3 12.4 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:46: R8 13.5 13.9 14.0 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:46: R9 13.7 14.2 14.2 <0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:46: R10 12.2 12.7 13.0 0.3 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:46: R11 12.1 12.5 12.6 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:46: R12 12.1 12.6 12.6 <0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:46: R13 12.3 12.8 12.9 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:46: R14 12.3 12.7 12.8 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:46: R15 16.4 16.9 17.0 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:46: R16 17.5 18.0 18.2 0.2 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:46: R17 16.5 17.0 17.1 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:46: R18 17.7 18.3 18.4 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:46: R19 13.9 14.3 14.5 0.2 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:46: R20 13.9 14.3 14.5 0.2 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:46: R21 13.4 13.9 14.0 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:46: R22 13.1 13.6 13.7 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:46: R23 12.7 13.2 13.3 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:46: R24 11.5 11.9 12.4 0.5 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:46: R25 11.4 11.9 12.2 0.3 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:46: R26 11.4 11.8 12.0 0.2 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:46: R27 11.6 12.0 12.4 0.4 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:46: R28 11.9 12.3 12.3 <0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:46: R29 12.0 12.4 12.5 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:46: E1 10.6 11.0 11.1 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:46: E2 10.6 11.0 11.1 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:47: R1 7.9 8.0 8.1 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:47: R2 8.1 8.2 8.3 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:47: R3 7.8 7.9 8.1 0.2 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:47: R4 7.8 8.0 8.1 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:47: R5 7.9 8.0 8.1 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:47: R6 7.7 7.8 7.9 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:47: R7 7.7 7.8 7.9 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:47: R8 8.0 8.2 8.2 <0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:47: R9 8.1 8.3 8.3 <0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:47: R10 7.7 7.8 8.0 0.2 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:47: R11 7.6 7.7 7.8 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:47: R12 7.6 7.8 7.8 <0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:47: R13 7.7 7.9 8.0 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:47: R14 7.7 7.9 7.9 <0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:47: R15 10.1 10.3 10.3 <0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:47: R16 11.1 11.3 11.4 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:47: R17 10.2 10.4 10.4 <0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:47: R18 11.2 11.4 11.5 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:47: R19 8.9 9.1 9.2 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:47: R20 8.9 9.1 9.2 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:47: R21 8.6 8.8 8.8 <0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:47: R22 8.4 8.5 8.6 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:47: R23 8.2 8.3 8.4 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:47: R24 7.5 7.7 7.9 0.2 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:47: R25 7.5 7.6 7.8 0.2 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:47: R26 7.5 7.6 7.7 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:47: R27 7.6 7.7 8.0 0.3 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:47: R28 7.5 7.6 7.7 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:47: R29 7.8 7.9 8.0 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:47: E1 7.1 7.2 7.2 <0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:47: E2 7.1 7.2 7.2 <0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:14: Negligible The size and scale of change are considered very small due to the extent and

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:19: Negligible The proposed development is barely discernible within the landscape and

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:20: Neutral / Negligible Maintain the character of the receiving landscape.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:21: Neutral / Negligible The proposed development would cause no discernible deterioration or

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:21: improvement in a view. In most instances, a negligible effect will arise

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:21: experience a negligible magnitude of change.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:22: EIA terms. Those classified as Minor or Negligible are likely to be Not Significant in EIA terms.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:23: Change Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:38: whereas effects on all other Viewpoints are considered to be Negligible and Not Significant.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:38:L5.8 The above aspects of the construction phase will have a Negligible effect on all LCZs due to the

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:38: Negligible (Not Significant) to a temporary, Moderate Adverse and Significant effect upon

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:38: All LCZ’s Negligible - Direct and short- None

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:39: VP 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, Negligible - Direct and short- Installation of

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:40: character of the LCZ. The magnitude of change is therefore considered to be Negligible.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:40:L5.24 Combining all of these criteria, it is considered that there will be a Negligible level of effect,

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:40: LCZ 3 – Intertidal Medium Negligible Negligible Indirect, Permanent

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:41: The magnitude of change is therefore considered to be Negligible.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:41:L5.29 Combining all of these criteria, it is considered that there will be a Negligible level of effect,

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:41: LCZ 4 – Coast and Medium Negligible Negligible Indirect, Permanent

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:41: The magnitude of change is therefore considered to be Negligible.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:41:L5.34 Combining all of these criteria, it is considered that there will be a Negligible level of effect,

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:42: LCZ 5 – Coatham Medium-High Negligible Negligible Indirect, Permanent

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:42: vicinity of the LCZ. The magnitude of change is therefore considered to be Negligible.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:42:L5.44 Combining all of these criteria, it is considered that there will be a Negligible level of effect,

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:43: LCZ 7 – Saltholme Medium-High Negligible Negligible Indirect, Permanent

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:43: vicinity of the LCZ. The magnitude of change is therefore considered to be Negligible.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:43:L5.48 Combining all of these criteria, it is considered that there will be a Negligible level of effect,

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:43: LCZ 8 – Rural Medium Negligible Negligible Indirect, Permanent

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:47:L5.90 Combining all of these criteria, it is considered that there will be a Negligible level of effect,

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:48: VP6 Footpath Users Negligible Negligible Direct,

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:48:L5.94 The assessment of the magnitude of change is therefore considered to be Negligible.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:48:L5.95 Combining all of these criteria, it is considered that there will be a Negligible level of effect,

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:48: VP8 Low Negligible Negligible Direct,

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:50:L5.115 The assessment of the magnitude of change is therefore considered to be Negligible.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:50:L5.116 Combining all of these criteria, it is considered that there will be a Negligible level of effect,

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:50: VP16 Footpath Users - Negligible Negligible – Not Direct.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:51: VP6 Footpath Users Negligible Negligible Direct, Permanent

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:51: VP8 Low Negligible Negligible Direct, Permanent

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:51: Vp15 Footpath Users - Negligible Negligible Direct. Permanent

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:53:L7.2 Construction of the proposed development will result in effects ranging from Negligible (Not

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:53: LCZ 3 – Medium Negligible Negligible - Not Indirect, Permanent

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:53: LCZ 4 – Coast Medium Negligible Negligible – Indirect, Permanent

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:53: LCZ 5 – Coatham Medium-High Negligible Negligible - Indirect, Permanent

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:53: LCZ 7 – Medium-High Negligible Negligible – Indirect, Permanent

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:53: LCZ 8 – Rural Medium Negligible Negligible – Indirect, Permanent

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:54: VP6 Footpath Users Negligible Negligible Direct, Permanent

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:54: VP8 Low Negligible Negligible Direct, Permanent

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:54: VP15 Footpath Users - Negligible Negligible Direct. Permanent

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:55: Negligible and Not Significant. There are not expected to be any major effects on landscape

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:55: All LCZ Impact of Negligible – Not Significant None Negligible -

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:55: VP 2, 3, 4, 5, Impact of Negligible - Not Significant Installation of site Negligible -

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:56: LCZ 3 – Impact of Negligible - Not Significant Buildings to be Negligible -

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:56: LCZ 4 – Impact of Negligible – Buildings to be Negligible –

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:56: LCZ 5 – Impact of Negligible - Buildings to be Negligible -

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:57: LCZ 7 – Impact of Negligible – Buildings to be Negligible –

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:57: LCZ 8 – Impact of Negligible – Buildings to be Negligible –

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:58: VP6 Impact of Negligible Buildings to be Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:59: VP8 Impact of Negligible Buildings to be Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:59: VP15 Impact of Negligible Buildings to be Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:20: Negligible flood risk. Undeveloped or agricultural land from a

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:22: terms ‘Negligible’ in terms of the level of effect. The use of the category of ‘Negligible’ may for

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:22: assessment of significance. Where 'Substantial', 'Moderate', 'Minor' or ‘Negligible’ is referenced

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:23: Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:23: Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:23: No/ Negligible Neutral/ Neutral/ Neutral/ Neutral/ Neutral/

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:23: Change Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:42: and so the effect would be Negligible Adverse, and Not Significant.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:42: considered to be no / negligible change and thus there would be a Negligible Adverse and Not

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:43: low and so the effect would be Negligible Adverse, and not significant.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:43: and thus significant impacts. The no/negligible magnitude of change means there will be a

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:43: Negligible Adverse and Not Significant effect. .

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:43: Negligible Adverse and Not Significant.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:43: Negligible Adverse, and Not Significant.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:44: Beck Culvert and Knitting Wife Culvert is very low and so the effect would be Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:44: / negligible change and thus there would be a Negligible Adverse and Not Significant effect.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:44: the effect would be Negligible Adverse, and Not Significant.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:44: / negligible change and thus there would be a Negligible Adverse and Not Significant effect.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:44: groundwater receptors the level of effect is Negligible Adverse and Not Significant.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:44: on the low sensitivity groundwater receptors is Negligible Beneficial and Not Significant

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:50: current conditions would be Negligible Beneficial and Not Significant.The Tees estuary has a

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:50: very high sensitivity, but the magnitude of change is considered to be no / negligible change and

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:50: thus there would be a Negligible Beneficial and Not Significant effect.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:50: have a very low and so the effect would be Negligible Beneficial, which is Not Significant, as

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:50: / negligible change and thus there would be a Negligible Beneficial and Not Significant effect.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:50: of change will be minor, so the level of effect is therefore Negligible Adverse, and Not

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:51: sensitivity aquifer receptors, this would result in a Negligible Adverse level of effect of pollution

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:51: low sensitivity receptor gives a Negligible Adverse effect, which is Not Significant.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:51: Knitting Wife Culvert is very low and so the effect would be Negligible Beneficial, and Not

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:51: / negligible change and thus there would be a Negligible Beneficial and Not Significant effect.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:51: Wife Culvert which have very low sensitivity and so the effect would be Negligible Beneficial and

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:51: / negligible change and thus there would be a Negligible Beneficial and Not Significant effect.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:51: Negligible Adverse, and Not Significant.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:52: River Tees Flows - Increased Negligible Adverse and Not Implementation of a Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:53: Water quality - Negligible Adverse and Not The drainage strategy will Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:53: Negligible Adverse and Not poor weather conditions.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:53: Other Flows - Increased Negligible Adverse – Not The drainage strategy will Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:54: Water Quality - Negligible Adverse and Not Implementation of Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:54: Water Quality - Negligible Adverse and Not and re-placement of

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:54: Mercia Reduced Negligible Adverse and Not No further mitigation is Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:54: Pollution from Negligible Adverse and Not Implementation of Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:54: pathways Negligible Adverse and Not would be ongoing, to

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:55: Superficial Reduced Negligible Adverse and Not No further mitigation Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:55: Pollution from Negligible Adverse and Not Groundwater monitoring Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:55: pathways Negligible Adverse and Not of contaminants is likely,

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:55: River Tees Flows - Increased Negligible Adverse and Not A FRA, DIA and Surface Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:55: Water Quality - Negligible Adverse and Not The drainage strategy will Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:56: Other Flows - Increased Negligible Adverse and Not A FRA, DIA and Surface Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:57: Water Quality - Minor Adverse and Not Any Surface water Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:58: Mercia Reduced Negligible Adverse and Not No further mitigation Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:58: Pollution from Negligible Beneficial and The SWMP will include Minor

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:58: Superficial Reduced Negligible Adverse and Not No further mitigation Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:58: Pollution from Negligible Beneficial and The SWMP will include Minor

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:58: Negligible Beneficial effects for the River Tees Estuary during construction and operation. The

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:15:The buildings on the site are of negligible risk for supporting roosting bats. There are some limited

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:11: to a common list of criteria, including: Substantial, Moderate, Minor, Negligible or Neutral.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:15: Negligible Less than 1.0

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:12: perceptible increase in traffic on two routes is identified to result in Negligible to Minor Adverse

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:15: through the modelling process is predicted to be Negligible at all receptors. The overall effect of

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:17: surface water and groundwater receptors, are considered to be Negligible Adverse and,

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:17: These impacts are considered to be Negligible Adverse and Not Significant. There is also the

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:17: groundwater arising from existing Made Ground (Negligible Beneficial impacts) which are

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:17: considered to be Negligible Beneficial which would be Not Significant.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:19: workers and a Negligible effect on off site human health receptors. These are considered Not

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:19:9.12 A Negligible and Not Significant effect on surface water and groundwater is considered likely

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:19: and this is considered to have a Negligible (but Not Significant) effect on waste management

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:19:H1.4 The implementation of these measures will result in Minor Adverse or Negligible (and Not

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:23:12.7 During construction there will be a Negligible and Not Significant impact upon all Landscape

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:23: (Eston Hills). All other Viewpoints will be subject to a Negligible and Not Significant impact

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:23: effects ranging from Negligible to Minor Adverse/Minor Beneficial. There will be a Moderate

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:23: considered to be Not Significant, with effects ranging from Negligible to Minor Adverse.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:25: Eston Iron Works remains and Cleveland Steel Works blast furnace bases and a Negligible effect

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:25:13.10 The implementation of these measures will result in Minor Adverse or Negligible (and Not

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:26: a result the impact is expected to be Negligible and Not Significant on remaining regional

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:26: hardstanding areas it is anticipated that this will also have a Negligible impact on the availability

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:26: anticipated that the impacts are expected to be Negligible and Not Significant.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:28: of the ES can be secured and that the effects are negligible or can be kept to an absolute

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:13: Negligible Materials are forecast (through trend analysis and other information) to be free

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:14: Negligible The consumption of no individual material type would be equal to or greater than 1%

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:14: No change Negligible Minor Moderate Major

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:14: Medium Neutral Negligible Minor Moderate Moderate

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:14: Low Neutral Negligible Negligible Negligible Moderate

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:15: Negligible Neutral Neutral Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:21: Negligible (Not Significant).

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:21: effects are likely to be no worse than Negligible.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:22: within the proposed development would have a magnitude of impact of negligible on the

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:22: availability as a receptor, the overall significance of the effect is considered to be Negligible (Not

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:22: proposed development are considered to be negligible. Given the low sensitivity of the regional

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:22: landfill capacity as a receptor, the overall significance of the effect is considered to be Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:26: be Negligible Adverse impact (Not Significant). Whilst mitigation will reduce any effects, the

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:26: remain as Negligible Adverse impact (Not Significant).

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:27: be Negligible Adverse (Not Significant).

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:28: arisings would account for 0.18% of the regional landfill capacity (Negligible adverse), and

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:28: Operational waste arisings would account for 0. 04% of the regional landfill capacity (Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:28: regional landfill capacity. The impacts from this would be Negligible Adverse (construction and

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:28: tonnes, which equates to 0.59% (Negligible Adverse effect) of the regional material availability.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:28: annual material availability and therefore, the residual effects remain Negligible Adverse.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:28: Regional landfill Reduction in Negligible Preparation of Negligible Adverse and

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:29: Regional materials Depleting Hardstanding: Secondary Negligible Adverse and

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:29: availability regional Negligible aggregates/ Not Significant

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:29: 50,740 tonnes of worst Negligible possible.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:29: known but than Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:29: Regional landfill Reduction in Negligible Operational Negligible Adverse and

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:6: Water Management and Negligible Beneficial (Not Significant) effects on:

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:7: Negligible Adverse (Not Significant) effects on:

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:7: Negligible Adverse (Not Significant) effects on:

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:7: Negligible Adverse (Not Significant) effects on:

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:7: Impact Negligible (Not Significant) effects on:

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:7: Waste and Materials Negligible Adverse (Not Significant) effects on:

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:7: Negligible (Not Significant) effect on:

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:7: Air Quality Negligible Adverse (Not Significant) effects on:

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:8: Negligible Beneficial (Not Significant) effects on:

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:8: Negligible Adverse (Not Significant) effects on:

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:8: Negligible (Not Significant) effects on:

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:8: Waste and Materials Negligible Adverse (Not Significant) effect on:

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:10: reference is made to Minor or Negligible ‘insignificant’ residual effects where relevant. The EIA

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:10: Minor or Negligible Adverse and Not Significant or Substantial Beneficial (Significant) or

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:11: RED - adverse effect; GREEN - beneficial effect; ( ) - Minor/Negligible non-significant effect; X no/neutral

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:24: Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:29: no or negligible cumulative effects, as a result of the Tier 1 schemes in Table N4.1 coming

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:29: are Negligible, there is anticipated to be no or at worst negligible cumulative effects on

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:30: Watercourse Negligible and Not Significant No change

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:43: measures at both sites, the cumulative effects will therefore be Negligible Adverse and Not

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:43:N5.51 In terms of surface water, the mitigation measures are anticipated to have a Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:43: Estuary (WFD transitional water body) are deemed to be Negligible Beneficial and Not

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:48: magnitude of change on a low sensitivity receptor, which is a Negligible effect (Not Significant).

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:49: considered to be minor. The overall significance is considered to be Negligible (Not Significant).

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:49: negligible magnitude of change on a low sensitivity receptor, which is a Negligible effect (Not

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:49: no or negligible cumulative effects, as a result of the Tier 1 and Tier 2 schemes in Table N4.1

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:50: the proposed development will be negligible and therefore should be scoped out of the

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:66: Negligible impact at most receptor locations and Slight (Minor) Adverse at five receptor

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:66: R20), the A1085 and Kirkleatham Lane respectively). Negligible and Slight (Minor Adverse)

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:67: Negligible impact at all existing receptor locations and is considered to be Not Significant.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:68: Negligible impact at all existing receptor locations and is considered to be Not Significant.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:68:N5.168 The magnitude of change for NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations is Negligible at all receptors.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:68: Where the impact is Negligible or Slight (Minor) Adverse then the overall effect of the proposed

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:68: the cumulative magnitude of impact of the developments would be Negligible Beneficial and Not

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:69: watercourses draining to the Tees and the Tees itself would be Negligible Beneficial and Not

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:71: considered to be Minor. Consequently, the overall significance is considered to be Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:71: Negligible (Not Significant).

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:72: Negligible (Not Significant).

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:72: management Infrastructure during operation are expected to be Negligible (Not Significant).

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:10: vii Negligible – Populations of species; assemblages of species or habitats, which

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:11: 4 Negligible – effects on VERs of Site or Negligible importance and

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:11: considered to be significant, whilst Minor, Negligible and Neutral effects are considered to be

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:11: type is affected, hence are included in the assessment. Effects on VERs of Site or Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:20: non-breeding bird assemblage is considered to be of Negligible importance and is scoped out of

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:24: Negligible importance and are scoped out for further assessment.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:24:D4.66 All areas of bare substrate on the site are assessed as being of Negligible importance and are

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:25: Bare Substrates Negligible importance only

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:29: therefore the impact would be negligible at a local level, and EIA terms would be Negligible and

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:29: Watercourse (Holme Beck) Negligible and Not Significant

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economic - Dec 2020.PDF:12: ‘Negligible’ or ‘Adverse’ (Table I3.2).

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economic - Dec 2020.PDF:13: Negligible No obvious significant effect to a receptor or environment.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economic - Dec 2020.PDF:13: Negligible Where no discernible effect is expected as a result of the proposed development on the

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economic - Dec 2020.PDF:13: change/effects High Medium Low Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economic - Dec 2020.PDF:13: High Substantial Moderate to Minor to Moderate Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economic - Dec 2020.PDF:13: Medium Moderate to Moderate Minor Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economic - Dec 2020.PDF:14: Low Minor to Moderate Minor Negligible to Minor Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economic - Dec 2020.PDF:14: Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economic - Dec 2020.PDF:22: storage and post. Similarly, the labour supply scenario forecasts only a negligible increase in

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economic - Dec 2020.PDF:29: of the significance criteria matrix. The effects are assessed as being beneficial, negligible or

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economic - Dec 2020.PDF:29: negligible. An assessment of the likely effects in relation to each receptor is presented in Table

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:10: • Negligible – effects which are unlikely to be perceptible to drivers, bus passengers or those

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:10: • Negligible – effects which are unlikely to be perceptible and within the normal variation of

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:21: considered to be a Negligible effect in severance and therefore Not Significant.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:22: Proposed site Medium Minor Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:23: Road south Medium Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:23: Dock Road High Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:23: High parallel to the northbound carriageway of Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:23: Medium uncontrolled crossings (Wilton access road, Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:23: High on the footway that travels underneath the Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:24: which is considered negligible. The effect on pedestrian and cyclist amenity at this location

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:24: is therefore considered to be Negligible. This is Not Significant;

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:24: amenity at this location is therefore considered to be Negligible. This is Not Significant;

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:24: magnitude of change is considered to be negligible as the traffic flow change is less than

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:24: of Negligible significance. This is Not Significant;

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:24: magnitude of change is considered to be negligible as the arms predominantly affected

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:24: Overall therefore, the effect is considered to be of Negligible significance. This is Not

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:24: Negligible. This is Not Significant.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:25: be Negligible. This is not Significant.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:25: safety is expected to be Negligible. This is Not Significant in EIA terms.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:27: effects will be Minor or Negligible and Not Significant.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:28: A66/Church Minor adverse Travel Planning measures to be introduced to Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:28: A66/Normanby Minor adverse Review of traffic signals to see if junction operation Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:31: A66/Church Minor, Potential accidents Wider travel planning Negligible –the

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:31: A66/Norma Minor, Previous accident trend Travel Planning measures Negligible - the

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:10: operation would be Negligible and Not Significant.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:10: new contamination with this tertiary mitigation in place, would be Negligible and

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:28: 4 Neutral/negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020.PDF:9: • Negligible – areas of extremely limited or no archaeological or historic interest. These

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020.PDF:60: survival would be negligible. The other sites have greater potential as follows:

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF:13: Negligible Materials are forecast (through trend analysis and other information) to be free from

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF:14: Negligible The consumption of no individual material type would be equal to or greater than 1%

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF:14: No change Negligible Minor Moderate Major

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF:15: Medium Neutral Negligible Minor Moderate Moderate

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF:15: Low Neutral Negligible Negligible Negligible Moderate

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF:15: Negligible Neutral Neutral Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF:21: Negligible (Not Significant).

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF:21: effects are likely to be no worse than Negligible.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF:22: within the proposed development would have a magnitude of impact of negligible on the

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF:22: availability as a receptor, the overall significance of the effect is considered to be Negligible (Not

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF:22: proposed development are considered to be Negligible. Given the low sensitivity of the regional

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF:22: landfill capacity as a receptor, the overall significance of the effect is considered to be Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF:26: Negligible Adverse impact (Not Significant). Whilst mitigation will reduce any effects, the

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF:26: residual effects would remain as Negligible Adverse impact (Not Significant).

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF:27: be Negligible Adverse (Not Significant).

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF:28: arisings would account for 0.22% of the regional landfill capacity (Negligible Adverse), and

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF:28: Operational waste arisings would account for 0.055% of the regional landfill capacity (Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF:28: regional landfill capacity. The impacts from this would be Negligible Adverse (construction and

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF:28: tonnes, which equates to 0.61% (Negligible Adverse impact) of the regional material availability.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF:28: Negligible Adverse.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF:28: Regional landfill Reduction in Negligible Preparation of Negligible Adverse and

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF:29: Regional materials Depleting Hardstanding: Secondary Negligible Adverse and

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF:29: availability regional Negligible aggregates/ Not Significant

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF:29: 52,943 tonnes of worst Negligible possible.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF:29: known but than Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF:29: Regional landfill Reduction in Negligible Operational Negligible Adverse and

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:6: Negligible (Not Significant) effects on:

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:7: Water Management and Flooding Negligible Beneficial (Not Significant) effects on:

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:7: Negligible Adverse (Not Significant) effects on:

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:7: Negligible Adverse (Not Significant) effects on:

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:7: Negligible Adverse (Not Significant) effects on:

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:8: Negligible (Not Significant) effects on:

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:8: Waste and Materials Management Negligible Adverse (Not Significant) effects on:

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:8: Transport Negligible (Not Significant) effect on:

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:8: Air Quality Negligible (Not Significant) effects on all receptors,

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:8: Negligible Beneficial (Not Significant) effects on:

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:9: Negligible Adverse (Not Significant) effects on:

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:9: Negligible (Not Significant) effects on:

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:9: Waste and Materials Management Negligible Adverse (Not Significant) effects on:

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:11: reference is made to Minor or Negligible ‘insignificant’ residual effects where relevant. The EIA

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:11: predicted, the residual effects of the development are either Minor or Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:12: RED - adverse effect; GREEN - beneficial effect; ( ) - Minor/Negligible non-significant effect; X no/neutral

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:26: Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:31: no or negligible cumulative effects, as a result of the Tier 1 schemes in Table N4.1 coming

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:31: are Negligible, there is anticipated to be no or at worst negligible cumulative effects on

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:32: Reptiles Negligible Adverse and Not No change

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:32: Watercourses Negligible Adverse and Not No change

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:44: mitigation measures at both sites, the cumulative effects will therefore be Negligible Adverse

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:44:N5.49 In terms of surface water, the mitigation measures are anticipated to have a Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:45: Significant for groundwater pollution / contamination, and Negligible Adverse and Not

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:45: Tees and the River Tees Estuary (WFD transitional water body) are deemed to be Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:50: magnitude of change on a low sensitivity receptor, which is a Negligible effect (Not Significant).

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:50: considered to be minor. The overall significance is considered to be Negligible (Not Significant).

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:50: negligible magnitude of change on a low sensitivity receptor, which is a Negligible effect (Not

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:51: no or negligible cumulative effects, as a result of the Tier 1 and Tier 2 schemes in Table N4.1

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:51: the proposed development will be negligible and therefore should be scoped out of the

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:68: Negligible impact at most receptor locations and Slight (Minor) Adverse at five receptor

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:68: R20), the A1085 and Kirkleatham Lane respectively). Negligible and Slight (Minor Adverse)

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:69: Negligible impact at all existing receptor locations and is considered to be Not Significant.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:70: Negligible impact at all existing receptor locations and is considered to be Not Significant.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:70:N5.167 The magnitude of change for NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations is Negligible at all receptors.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:70: Where the impact is Negligible or Slight (Minor Adverse) then the overall effect of the proposed

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:71: the cumulative magnitude of impact of the developments would be Negligible Adverse and Not

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:71: surface water, the mitigation measures are anticipated to have a Negligible Beneficial and Not

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:71: be Negligible Adverse and Not Significant with the exception of Coatham Marsh where the effect

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:71: Tees and the Tees itself would be Negligible Beneficial and Not Significant, with the exception of

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:74: considered to be Minor. Consequently, the overall significance is considered to be Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:74: Negligible (Not Significant).

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:74: Negligible (Not Significant).

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:74: management Infrastructure during operation are expected to be Negligible (Not Significant).

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:21: Negligible flood risk. Undeveloped or agricultural land from a

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:23: No/ Negligible No perceptible change in the baseline N/A

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:23: terms ‘Negligible’ in terms of the level of effect. The use of the category of ‘Negligible’ may for

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:24: Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:24: Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:24: No/ Negligible Neutral/ Neutral/ Neutral/ Neutral/ Neutral/

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:24: Change Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:46: Negligible Adverse and Not Significant. The receptor sensitivity for Dabholm Beck, Dabholm

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:46: effect would be Negligible Adverse and Not Significant. The receptor sensitivity for Coatham

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:46: considered to be no/negligible change and thus there would be a Negligible Adverse and Not

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:47: be Negligible Adverse and Not Significant. The receptor sensitivity of Dabholm Beck, Dabholm

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:47:G5.17 The receptor sensitivity of The Fleet is low and so the effect would be Negligible Adverse and

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:47: and thus significant impacts. The no/negligible magnitude of change means there will be a

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:47: Negligible Adverse and Not Significant effect.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:47: aquifers of low, the level of effect is therefore Negligible Adverse and Not Significant.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:47: effect is therefore Negligible Adverse, and Not Significant.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:48: of Ash Gill Beck, is very low and so the effect would be Negligible Adverse and Not Significant.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:48: and so the effect would be Negligible Adverse and Not Significant.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:48: no/negligible change and thus there would be a Negligible Adverse and Not Significant effect.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:48: The receptor sensitivity of Ash Gill Beck, is very low and so the effect would be Negligible, and

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:48: Fleet is low and so the effect would be Negligible Adverse and Not Significant.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:48: no/negligible change, given the distance between the receptor and the site and thus there would

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:48: be a Negligible Adverse and Not Significant effect.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:48: / Glacial Till), the level of effect is Negligible Adverse, and Not Significant.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:49: on the low sensitivity groundwater receptors is Negligible Beneficial and Not Significant.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:57: be beneficial; albeit negligible after additional mitigation. The receptor sensitivity of Ash Gill

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:57: Negligible Beneficial and Not Significant. The receptor sensitivity of Dabholm Beck, Dabholm

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:57: conditions would be Negligible Beneficial and Not Significant.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:57:G7.4 The receptor sensitivity of The Fleet is low and so the effect would be Negligible Beneficial and

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:57: no/negligible change and thus there would be a Negligible Beneficial and Not Significant effect.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:57: residual effects is considered to be Negligible but beneficial, so for the receptors of Ash Gill Beck

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:57: and Dabholm Beck, Dabholm Cut & Dabholm Gut the effect would be Negligible Beneficial, that

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:57:G7.9 The Fleet has a sensitivity rated low and so the effect would also be Negligible Beneficial and

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:57: no/negligible change and thus there would be a Negligible Beneficial and Not Significant effect.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:57: Negligible Adverse, and Not Significant. As no additional mitigation is proposed, the residual

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:58: residual effects is considered to be negligible but would have a beneficial impact to the current

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:58: baseline conditions. The effect would be Negligible Beneficial and Not Significant for the

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:58:G7.20 The Fleet has a low rated sensitivity receptor and so the effect would also be Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:58: no/negligible change and thus the residual effect will be Negligible Beneficial and Not

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:59: residual effects is considered to be negligible for the receptors of Ash Gill Beck, Dabholm Beck,

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:59: Dabholm Cut & Dabholm Gut and so the effect would be Negligible Beneficial and Not

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:59:G7.24 The receptor sensitivity of The Fleet is rated low and so the effect would be Negligible Beneficial

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:59: no/negligible change and thus there would be a Negligible Beneficial and Not Significant effect.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:59: the magnitude of the change will be minor, so the level of effect is therefore Negligible Adverse,

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:60: River Tees Flows - Negligible Adverse and Implementation of the Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:61: Water quality - Negligible Adverse and The drainage strategy will Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:61: Water Quality - Negligible Adverse and

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:61: Other Flows - -Fleet and Ash Gill Beck: The drainage strategy will Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:61: surface Increased Negligible Adverse and reduce runoff rates whilst Beneficial and

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:62: Water Quality - -Fleet and Ash Gill Beck: Implementation of Drainage Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:62: Mobilisation of Negligible Adverse and Strategy to remove silt and Beneficial and

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:62: leakages Negligible Adverse and conditions.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:62: Mudstone Reduced Negligible Adverse and No further mitigation is Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:63: Pollution from Negligible Adverse and Remediation Strategy Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:63: Contaminant Negligible Adverse and

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:63: Superficial Reduced Negligible Adverse and No further mitigation Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:63: / Glacial Pollution from Negligible Adverse and Remediation Strategy Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:63: Contaminant Negligible Adverse and

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:63: River Tees Flows - Negligible Adverse and An FRA, DIA and Surface Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:64: Water Quality - Negligible Adverse and The drainage strategy will Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:65: Other Flows - -The Fleet and Ash Gill An FRA, DIA and Surface Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:65: surface Increased Beck: Negligible Adverse Water Management Plan, Beneficial and

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:65: Spillages and Beck: Negligible Adverse would be lined with a Dabholm Beck,

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:65: pollution -Dabholm Beck, Dabholm pollution pathway to the Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:65: protected. Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:67: Mudstone Reduced Negligible Adverse and No further mitigation Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:67: Pollution from Negligible Beneficial and Remediation strategy and Minor

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:67: Superficial Reduced Negligible Adverse and No further mitigation Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:67: / Glacial Pollution from Negligible Beneficial and Remediation strategy and Minor

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:68: Negligible Beneficial effects for the River Tees Estuary during construction and operation. The

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:10: • Negligible – effects which are unlikely to be perceptible to drivers, bus passengers or those

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:10: • Negligible – effects which are unlikely to be perceptible and within the normal variation of

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:22: Medium Minor Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:22: High Minor Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:23: Corporation Medium Road is 24% increase in the AM peak and a Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:23: Greystone High low (less than 18 trips in the AM peak hour) Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:23: A174 High AM peak hour on the A174 east of Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:23: Coatham Medium Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:23: Kirkleatham Medium Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:23:C5.30 All other receptors are expected to have a Negligible and Not Significant impact.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:24: generated by the development in this location is expected to be Negligible. This is Not

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:24: Negligible. This is Not Significant.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:24: effect of the increased traffic flow on accidents and safety is expected to be Negligible. This is

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:26: A1085 Trunk Negligible N/A Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:26: A1085 Steel Negligible N/A Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:26: A1085 Trunk Negligible N/A Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:27: Negligible N/A Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:27: Negligible N/A Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:27: Negligible N/A Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:27: Negligible N/A Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:27: Negligible N/A Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:28: A1053 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:28: The A174 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:28: West Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:29: A1042 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:29: A66 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:29: Negligible on

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:29: Negligible on

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:29: Potential accidents Wider travel planning Negligible –the

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:30: A1085 Negligible on

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:30: A1053 Negligible on

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:30: Negligible on

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:30: West Negligible on

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:30: A1042 Negligible on

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:30: Negligible on

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:30: Negligible on

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:30: Negligible on

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:10: be Negligible and Not Significant;

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:10: construction and therefore the risk to the occupiers would be Negligible and Not

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:11: Negligible and Not Significant. Where required, storage tanks will be located within

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:12: construction works 5) or soils of negligible nature conservation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:12: negligible value Negligible potential for mineral reserves to

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:14: Negligible Human Health: No measurable effects on Impact of insufficient magnitude to

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:14: Sensitivity/value of High Medium Low Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:14: High Substantial Moderate Minor Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:14: Medium Moderate Minor Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:14: Low Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:24:H4.33 The Groundsure Insight Report for the site indicates the risk of shrink swell clays is negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:24: negligible and very low along the western boundary, and moderate across the rest of the site.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:24: The risk of collapsible deposits on the site is negligible. The landslide risk is classed as very low,

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:24: and the risk of ground dissolution of soluble rocks is negligible.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:32: significance is considered Negligible and therefore Not Significant.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:37: outlined in Section H6.0 above, is negligible. Following the implementation of the additional

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:37: workers of Minor Adverse significance and impacts on nearby residents of Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:37: impact following additional mitigation e.g. soil remediation is negligible. Therefore, the impacts

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:37: after the implementation of mitigation measures are considered to be of Negligible significance.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:37: management facilities during the construction phase is considered to be of Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:38: significance of the impacts identified is considered to be Minor Adverse / Negligible and Not

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:38: Offsite Human soils, asbestos and at worst Moderate Contamination and Negligible: off-site

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:38: Surface Water Potential Negligible and Not Remediation / Negligible and Not

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:39: Built Soil/materials Minor Adverse and Not Minimisation of Negligible and Not

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:11: to a common list of criteria, including: Substantial, Moderate, Minor, Negligible or Neutral.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:15: Negligible Less than 1.0

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:11: roundabout). All other effects are expected to be Negligible and Not Significant.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:16: through the modelling process is predicted to be Negligible at all receptors. The overall effect of

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:17: to be Negligible Adverse and therefore Not Significant.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:17: These impacts are considered to be Negligible to Minor Adverse and Not Significant for surface

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:18: through reduced infiltration (Negligible Adverse impacts) and pollution from spillages and a

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:18: reduction in contamination of groundwater arising from existing Made Ground (Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:18: be Negligible Adverse to Neutral and Not Significant. For other groundwater receptors, the

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:18: impacts on flows would remain Negligible Adverse and the impacts on groundwater quality are

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:18:7.24 For surface water, the impacts on flows and quality are considered to be Negligible Beneficial

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:20: construction workers and a Negligible effect on off site human health receptors. These are

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:20:8.13 A Negligible and Not Significant effect on surface water and groundwater is considered likely

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:20: Highfield Landfill site and this is considered to have a Negligible and Not Significant effect on

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:20:8.19 As noted above, the implementation of these measures will result in Minor Adverse or Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:24:11.6 During construction there will be a Negligible and Not Significant impact upon all Landscape

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:24: 4, 10 and 11 during construction. All other Viewpoints will be subject to a Negligible impact

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:24: effects ranging from Negligible to Minor Adverse/Minor Beneficial. There will be a Moderate

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:24: Significant, with effects ranging from Negligible to Minor Adverse.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:26: Medieval salterns. It is expected that there will be a Negligible effect on the Duck Decoy, World

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:27: a result the impact is expected to be Negligible and Not Significant on remaining regional

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:27: hardstanding areas it is anticipated that this will also have a Negligible impact on the availability

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:27: anticipated that the impacts are expected to be Negligible and Not Significant.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:29: of the ES can be secured and that the effects are negligible or can be kept to an absolute

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020(1).PDF:12: Negligible Assets with very little or no surviving archaeological

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020(1).PDF:12: Negligible Very minor changes to archaeological materials or setting.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020(1).PDF:13: Magnitude of Change No Negligible Minor Moderate Substantial No

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020(1).PDF:13: Medium Neutral Negligible Minor Moderate Substantial Medium

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020(1).PDF:13: Low Neutral Negligible Negligible Minor Moderate Low

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020(1).PDF:13: Negligible Neutral Negligible Negligible Negligible Minor Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020(1).PDF:13: the effect on the receptor will be Neutral, Negligible, Minor, Moderate or Substantial. Moderate

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020(1).PDF:13: Negligible/neutral The development satisfies the subject environmental objective but neither

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020(1).PDF:24: offsets the negative effect, to have a residual effect that is between Negligible and Minor

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020(1).PDF:24: Minor Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020(1).PDF:24: Duck Decoy Low Minor Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020(1).PDF:24: World War II defensive structures Low Minor Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020(1).PDF:25: Other Remediation and Moderate Adverse Monitoring during Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020(1).PDF:25: Duck Decoy Remediation and Minor Adverse Archaeological Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020(1).PDF:25: World War Remediation and Minor Adverse Archaeological evaluation Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R1 19.2 19.4 19.6 0.2 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R2 18.0 18.2 18.4 0.2 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R3 17.9 18.2 18.7 0.5 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R4 18.1 18.4 18.9 0.5 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R5 18.0 18.3 18.7 0.4 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R6 15.7 16.0 16.1 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R7 15.3 15.5 15.6 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R8 14.6 14.9 14.9 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R9 15.6 16.1 16.1 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R10 16.2 16.8 17.0 0.2 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R11 14.4 14.7 14.8 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R12 14.4 14.8 14.9 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R13 15.8 16.4 16.5 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R14 15.4 16.0 16.1 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R15 31.4 31.7 31.7 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R16 35.1 35.5 35.6 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R17 31.1 31.4 31.5 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R18 36.1 36.5 36.6 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R19 27.8 28.1 28.2 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R20 27.8 28.1 28.2 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R21 25.8 26.1 26.1 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R22 23.7 23.8 23.9 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R23 22.7 22.8 22.9 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R24 15.5 15.6 15.8 0.2 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R25 15.4 15.6 15.7 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R26 15.2 15.4 15.5 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R27 16.1 16.2 16.5 0.3 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:18: R28 15.4 15.5 15.5 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:18: E1 18.7 18.7 18.7 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:18: E2 18.6 18.6 18.6 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: R1 12.1 12.1 12.1 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: R2 12.4 12.5 12.5 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: R3 12.1 12.2 12.2 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: R4 12.1 12.2 12.3 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: R5 12.1 12.2 12.3 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: R6 11.9 12.0 12.0 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: R7 11.8 11.9 11.9 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: R8 13.5 13.5 13.5 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: R9 13.7 13.8 13.8 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: R10 12.2 12.3 12.4 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: R11 12.1 12.1 12.2 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: R12 12.1 12.2 12.2 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: R13 12.3 12.4 12.4 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: R14 12.3 12.3 12.4 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: R15 16.4 16.5 16.5 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: R16 17.5 17.6 17.6 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: R17 16.5 16.6 16.6 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: R18 17.7 17.9 17.9 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: R19 13.9 13.9 14.0 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: R20 13.9 13.9 14.0 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: R21 13.4 13.5 13.5 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: R22 13.1 13.2 13.2 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: R23 12.7 12.8 12.8 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: R24 11.5 11.5 11.5 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: R25 11.4 11.5 11.5 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: R26 11.4 11.4 11.4 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: R27 11.6 11.6 11.6 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: R28 11.9 11.9 11.9 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: E1 10.6 10.6 10.6 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: E2 10.6 10.6 10.6 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R1 7.9 7.9 7.9 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R2 8.1 8.1 8.1 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R3 7.8 7.8 7.9 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R4 7.8 7.9 7.9 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R5 7.9 7.9 7.9 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R6 7.7 7.7 7.8 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R7 7.7 7.7 7.7 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R8 8.0 8.1 8.1 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R9 8.1 8.2 8.2 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R10 7.7 7.7 7.8 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R11 7.6 7.6 7.7 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R12 7.6 7.7 7.7 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R13 7.7 7.8 7.8 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R14 7.7 7.8 7.8 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R15 10.1 10.2 10.2 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R16 11.1 11.2 11.2 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R17 10.2 10.3 10.3 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R18 11.2 11.3 11.3 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R19 8.9 9.0 9.0 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R20 8.9 9.0 9.0 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R21 8.6 8.7 8.7 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R22 8.4 8.4 8.4 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R23 8.2 8.2 8.3 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R24 7.5 7.6 7.6 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R25 7.5 7.5 7.6 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R26 7.5 7.5 7.5 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R27 7.6 7.6 7.6 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:20: R28 7.5 7.5 7.5 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:20: E1 7.1 7.1 7.1 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:20: E2 7.1 7.1 7.1 < 0.1 Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:22: operation would be Negligible and Not Significant.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:22: contamination with this tertiary mitigation in place, would be Negligible and Not

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:22: Local significance; and nesting birds, which are of negligible significance even at a

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:30: 10 Neutral/negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:15: Negligible The size and scale of change are considered very small due to the extent and

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:19: Negligible The proposed development is barely discernible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:21: Neutral / Negligible Maintain the character of the receiving landscape.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:21: Neutral / Negligible The proposed development would cause no discernible deterioration or

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:21: improvement in a view. In most instances, a negligible effect will arise

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:22: experience a negligible magnitude of change.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:22: EIA terms. Those classified as Minor or Negligible are likely to be Not Significant in EIA terms

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:23: Change Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:37: and Significant, whereas effects on all other Viewpoints are considered to be Negligible (Not

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:37:L5.10 The above aspects of the construction phase will have a Negligible effect on all LCZs due to the

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:37: Negligible (Not Significant) to a temporary, Moderate Adverse (Significant) effect upon

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:37: All LCZs Negligible Direct and short- None

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:38: VP 6,7,9,12 and 13 Negligible Direct and short- Installation of

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:39: character of the LCZ. The magnitude of change is therefore considered to be Negligible.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:39:L5.26 Combining all of these criteria, it is considered that there will be a Negligible level of effect,

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:39: LCZ 3 – Intertidal Medium Negligible Negligible Indirect,

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:40: The magnitude of change is therefore considered to be Negligible.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:40:L5.31 Combining all of these criteria, it is considered that there will be a Negligible level of effect,

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:40: LCZ 4 – Coast Medium Negligible Negligible Indirect,

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:41: vicinity of the LCZ. The magnitude of change is therefore considered to be Negligible.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:41:L5.46 Combining all of these criteria, it is considered that there will be a Negligible level of effect,

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:42: LCZ 7 – Medium-High Negligible Negligible Indirect,

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:42: vicinity of the LCZ. The magnitude of change is therefore considered to be Negligible.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:42:L5.50 Combining all of these criteria, it is considered that there will be a Negligible level of effect,

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:42: LCZ 8 – Rural Medium Negligible Negligible Indirect,

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:44: VP6 Footpath Users Negligible Negligble Direct,

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:45:L5.81 The assessment of the magnitude of change is therefore considered to be Negligible.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:45:L5.82 Combining all of these criteria, it is considered that there will be a Negligible level of effect,

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:46: VP9 Footpath and Negligible Negligible Direct,

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:47:L5.96 The assessment of the magnitude of change is therefore considered to be Negligible.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:47:L5.97 Combining all of these criteria, it is considered that there will be a Negligible level of effect,

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:47: VP13 Footpath Users Negligible Negligible Direct,

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:48: VP6 Footpath Users Negligible Negligible Direct, Permanent

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:48: VP9 Footpath and Road Negligible Negligible Direct, Permanent

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:48: Vp12 Footpath Users Negligible Negligible Direct, Permanent

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:50:L7.2 Construction of the proposed development will result in effects ranging from Negligible to a

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:50: LCZ 3 – Intertidal Medium Negligible Negligible - Not Indirect, Permanent

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:50: LCZ 4 – Coast and Medium Negligible Negligible – Indirect, Permanent

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:50: LCZ 5 – Coatham Medium-High Negligible Negligible - Indirect, Permanent

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:50: LCZ 7 – Saltholme Medium-High Negligible Negligible – Indirect, Permanent

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:50: LCZ 8 – Rural Medium Negligible Negligible – Indirect, Permanent

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:50: VP6 Footpath Users Negligible Negligible Direct, Permanent

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:50: VP9 Footpath and Road Negligible Negligible Direct, Permanent

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:51: VP12 Footpath Users Negligible Negligible Direct, Permanent

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:52: operation. All other effects are anticipated to be Minor or Negligible (and Not Significant). There

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:52: All LCZ Impact of Negligible – Not Significant None Negligible -

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:52: VP 6,7,9,11 Impact of Negligible - Not Significant Installation of site Negligible -

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:53: LCZ 3 – Impact of Negligible - Not Significant Buildings to be Negligible -

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:53: LCZ 4 – Impact of Negligible – Buildings to be Negligible –

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:53: LCZ 5 – Impact of Negligible - Buildings to be Negligible -

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:54: LCZ 7 – Impact of Negligible – Buildings to be Negligible –

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:54: LCZ 8 – Impact of Negligible – Buildings to be Negligible –

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:55: VP7 Impact of Negligible Buildings to be Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:55: VP9 Impact of Negligible Buildings to be Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:56: VP12 Impact of Negligible Buildings to be Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economics - Dec 2020.PDF:12: ‘Negligible’ or ‘Adverse’ (Table I3.2).

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economics - Dec 2020.PDF:13: Negligible No obvious significant effect to a receptor or environment.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economics - Dec 2020.PDF:13: Negligible Where no discernible effect is expected as a result of the proposed development on the

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economics - Dec 2020.PDF:13: change/effects High Medium Low Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economics - Dec 2020.PDF:13: High Substantial Moderate to Minor to Moderate Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economics - Dec 2020.PDF:13: Medium Moderate to Moderate Minor Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economics - Dec 2020.PDF:14: Low Minor to Moderate Minor Negligible to Minor Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economics - Dec 2020.PDF:14: Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economics - Dec 2020.PDF:22: storage and post. Similarly, the labour supply scenario forecasts only a negligible increase in

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economics - Dec 2020.PDF:30: of the significance criteria matrix. The effects are assessed as being Beneficial, Negligible or

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economics - Dec 2020.PDF:30: Negligible. An assessment of the likely effects in relation to each receptor is presented in Table

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:39: development scenario (albeit negligible). Best practice measures would be

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:40: The proposed development is anticipated to only have negligible impacts

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:10: operation would be Negligible and Not Significant.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:10: new contamination with this tertiary mitigation in place, would be Negligible and

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:28: 4 Neutral/negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:10: vii Negligible – Populations of species; assemblages of species or habitats, which

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:10: 4 Negligible – effects on VERs of Site or Negligible importance; and

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:11: considered to be Significant, whilst Minor, Negligible and Neutral effects are considered to be

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:11: type is affected, hence are included in the assessment. Effects on VERs of Site or Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:20: is therefore assessed as being of Negligible importance for Harvest Mouse and it is scoped out of

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:24:D4.76 All areas of bare substrate on the site are assessed as being of Negligible importance and are

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:25: Harvest Mouse Negligible importance only

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:25: Bare Substrates Negligible importance only

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:30: prevent this. As a result, there will be a temporary Negligible Adverse effect on watercourses.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:30: Watercourses Negligible Adverse and Not Significant

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:32: will be Negligible and Not Significant. This will be achieved by the provision of a reptile

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:39: Reptiles Harm due to Not applicable Moderate A reptile Negligible and

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:39: Reptiles Loss of habitat Not applicable Moderate A reptile Negligible and

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:39: Watercourses Realignment Measures to Negligible Negligible and

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:9: reduced to negligible and therefore non-significant levels.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19:F3.41 If the impact descriptor is Negligible or Slight (Minor), this is considered to not have a

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: Moderate, Minor and Negligible/Neutral and reference to these terms are included in brackets

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: 75% or less of objective Negligible Negligible Slight (Minor) Moderate

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: 76-94% of objective Negligible Slight (Minor) Moderate Moderate

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: Note: Changes in pollutant concentrations of 0% i.e. <0.5% would be described as Negligible.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: <10% of hourly mean NO2 threshold Imperceptible Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:20: significant effect and a ‘Negligible’ or ‘Slight’ (Minor) impact will not result in a significant

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:20: such as those above. In this Chapter, where Negligible impacts are identified, a type of effect will

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:20: or Negligible effect is likely to be felt.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:33: Negligible impact at all existing receptor locations and is considered to be Not Significant.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:33: Cleveland Coast SPA) included in this assessment were also found to experience a Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:33: Negligible impact at all existing receptor locations and is considered to be Not Significant.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:33: Cleveland Coast SPA) included in this assessment were also found to experience a Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:34: Negligible impact at all existing receptor locations and is considered to be Not Significant.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:34: Cleveland Coast SPA) included in this assessment were also found to experience a Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:34:F5.26 The magnitude of change for NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations is negligible at all receptors.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:34: As stated in paragraph F3.3, where the impact is Negligible or Slight (Minor) then the overall

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:36:F7.2 The assessment has demonstrated that the effects will be Negligible and therefore Not

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:36: effects will be Negligible and Not Significant) for all receptors.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:37: practice mitigation measures suitable for high risk sites in place, there is likely to be a Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:37:F8.6 The magnitude of change for NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations at all receptors is Negligible.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:37: All sensitive Operational traffic impact Negligible and Not None. Negligible and

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:12: will be negligible when compared to other sources

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:13:J3.20 Professional judgement has then been employed to establish whether the effects are negligible,

R-2020-0465-FFM-Officer report _R20200465FFM.pdf:7:designated or undesignated heritage assets. There is negligible potential for

R-2020-0465-FFM-60722_01 - Cover Letter - 24.08.20.PDF:6:potential for any archaeological remains to survive or be affected development is negligible given the

R-2020-0465-FFM-60722_01 - Cover Letter - 24.08.20.PDF:6:direct or indirect effects on any designated or undesignated heritage assets, that there is negligible potential

R-2020-0465-FFM-Archaeological Advice - R-2020- 0465-FFM, Land at metals recovery area .pdf:1:heritage assets. There is negligible potential for as yet unidentified archaeology to be present. No further

R-2020-0465-FFM-Metals Recovery Site, South Bank, Redcar DBA.PDF:6: • Negligible – areas of extremely limited or no archaeological or historic interest. These

R-2020-0465-FFM-Metals Recovery Site, South Bank, Redcar DBA.PDF:10: negligible given the historical development of the Site and the depth of the modern dump deposits.

R-2020-0465-FFM-Metals Recovery Site, South Bank, Redcar DBA.PDF:10: undesignated heritage assets. There is negligible potential for as yet unidentified archaeology to

R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:15:• Negligible – No effect on species or habitats present are anticipated.

R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:24:Due to this habitat generally being of negligible value for ecological features and

R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:24:sealed and open-sided metal structures of negligible value for ecological features.

R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:27:sealed and open sided metal structures of negligible value for roosting bats.

R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:5: results of the modelling and indicates where impacts can be screened out as ‘negligible’ or

R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:11: this AQMA will be negligible. As the impact has been screened out, the AQMA has been excluded

R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:27: 75% or less of AQAL Negligible Negligible Slight Moderate

R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:27: 76-94% of AQAL Negligible Slight Moderate Moderate

R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:27: a 1% change in concentration. For a change in concentration to be described as ‘negligible’

R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:27: • < 10% - negligible;

R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:31: • all annual mean impacts on human health can be described as ‘negligible’ when the total

R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:31: • all short-term impacts on human health can be described as ‘negligible’ or ‘insignificant’ if it is

R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:31: Although short-term impacts do not screen out as ‘negligible’ for a stack height of 80 m if it is

R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:31: dioxide and nitrogen dioxide, non-negligible impacts are only predicted to occur under the highly

R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:35: Impacts that cannot be described as ‘negligible’ irrespective of the total concentration in

R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:35: ‘as ‘negligible’ irrespective of the total concentration, further analysis has been undertaken.

R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:39: and less than 0.5 of the annual mean AQAL and can be screened out as ‘negligible’ irrespective of

R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:39: ‘negligible’ irrespective of the total concentration. As shown in Figure 8, the PC is predicted to

R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:40: therefore, the impact is described as ‘negligible’.

R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:41: 2021 WHO guideline values, and is therefore ‘negligible’ irrespective of the total concentration.

R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:42: 7 of the AQAL, the impact is described as ‘negligible’.

R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:43: is described as ‘negligible’.

R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:43: as ‘negligible’ irrespective of the total concentration.

R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:44: ‘negligible’ irrespective of the total concentration.

R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:44: cannot be screened out as ‘negligible’. In accordance with the guidance set out in section 5.7.1, the

R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:44: ‘negligible’.

R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:45: Short-term impacts that cannot be described as ‘negligible’ at areas of relevant exposure are only

R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:45: would be well below 10% of the AQAL and would be described as ‘negligible’.

R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:45: dioxide. These impacts are described as ‘negligible’.

R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:48: and is considered to be ‘negligible’.

R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:48: ‘negligible’. Under these more realistic scenarios the impact of the Proposed ERF on concentrations

R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:48: concentrations of chromium (VI) is ‘negligible’.

R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:54: impacts from the Proposed ERF that cannot be described as ‘negligible’ are limited to areas in close

R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:54: ‘negligible’ irrespective of the total concentration at areas of relevant exposure, the inclusion of

R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:55: ‘negligible’ irrespective of the total concentration and therefore the inclusion of any other

R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:56: ‘negligible’.

R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:57: AQAL and the cumulative PEC is less than 7 of the AQAL, the impact remains ‘negligible’.

R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:59: AQAL and the cumulative PEC is less than 7 of the AQAL, the impact remains ‘negligible’.

R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:66: ERF can be described as ‘negligible’ in accordance with IAQM criteria at all areas of relevant

R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:66: Proposed ERF can be described as ‘negligible’ in accordance with IAQM screening criteria at

R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:100: negligible.

R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Air_Quality_Emissions_Modelling_Report.pdf:102: of maximum impact, terrain effects have a negligible effect on annual mean concentrations.

R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:32: quality site predicted to be negligible.

R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:32: Moors SAC quality site predicted to be negligible.

R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:44: has been assumed that negligible traffic from the ERF will travel along the

171019South-Tees-Master-Plan-19-Nov-17.pdf:56:nature reserve by Tees Valley Wildlife Trust since 1982. have negligible to low potential to support this species.