teesworks_-_keywords_-_eia
{include:Teesworks - keywords - menu}
EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:1:Appendix 1A: EIA Scoping Report
EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:6: EIA Methodology and Reporting …………………………………………………………………… 63
EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:6: Items Proposed for Scoping Out of EIA …………………………………………………………. 69
EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:8: UK Ltd (AECOM) to prepare this Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Scoping
EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:9:1.8 This EIA Scoping Report covers the on-shore works associated with the Proposed
EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:9: EIA. The interrelation of the onshore and offshore works is discussed further in this
EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:11: Statement (ES), where a development is considered to be ‘EIA development’ under
EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:11: (EIA Regulations).
EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:11:1.19 Regulation 3(1) of the EIA Regulations defines the meaning of ‘EIA development’
EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:11: (with reference to Schedules 1 and 2 to the EIA Regulations). Schedule 1 to the EIA
EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:11: assessment (EIA) is necessary, includes “thermal power stations, and other
EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:11: more.” EIA is compulsory for Schedule 1 developments given the type and/ or the
EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:11: Development will therefore be ‘EIA development’ and consequently a formal EIA
EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:11:1.21 In accordance with Regulation 8(1)(b) of the EIA Regulations, the Applicant notifies
EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:11: development consent, that will present the details of the EIA of the Proposed
EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:11: Development, in accordance with Regulation 10(1) of the EIA Regulations, the
EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:12:1.23 The scoping phase of the EIA process provides a framework for identifying likely
EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:12: environmental impacts for inclusion and consideration within the EIA. The scoping
EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:12: EIA.
EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:12: scoping opinion, as prescribed by Regulation 10(3) of the EIA Regulations and as set
EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:12: information required for an EIA screening request (noting that, as per
EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:13: the form of a Scoping Report that includes the information required by the EIA
EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:14: methodologies, guidance and best practice to be adopted for the EIA of the
EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:32: addressed through separate consent supported by a separate EIA.
EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:33:4.1 The EIA Regulations require that an ES should include an outline of the main
EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:33: impacts of each alternative. Under the EIA Regulations there is no requirement to
EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:33: to be included within the EIA and presented in the ES will consider and assess the
EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:35: account in terms of defining the scope of the EIA.
EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:36: terms of scoping the EIA.
EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:38:5.23 Policies of particular relevance to the scope of the EIA include promoting sustainable
EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:41: part of the EIA. The methodology and assessment criteria that will be used to assess
EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:45:Marine Management Organisation as the EIA/DCO application progresses.
EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:48: potential mineral deposits will be undertaken as part of the EIA, including the
EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:48:6.52 As appropriate, the EIA will inform the design as to where mitigation measures may
EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:49: considered unlikely, although they will still be considered as part of the EIA.
EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:53: ecological survey likely to be required to inform the EIA/EcIA. Once the results of the
EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:58:6.112 The EIA process requires that a clear distinction is drawn between landscape and
EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:60: adequate baseline assessment for the EIA. Further archaeological evaluation such
EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:60:6.128 The purpose of the EIA will be to assess the potential impacts of the Proposed
EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:60: heritage assets will then be quantified and expressed within the EIA. This will
EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:61: standard EIA guidance and will involve:
EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:62: the EIA.
EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:64: EIA Methodology and Reporting
EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:64:7.1 The ES will set out the process followed during the EIA including the methods used
EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:64:7.2 The EIA process is designed to be capable of, and sensitive to, changes that occur
EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:64: incorporated during the EIA. This will be particularly important for the Proposed
EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:64:7.3 The EIA is based on a number of related activities, as follows:
EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:64: and legislation relevant to EIA;
EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:65: issues and findings of the EIA in non-technical language.
EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:65: Volume I: Environmental Statement: This will contain the full text of the EIA with
EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:65: environmental studies conducted during the EIA including relevant data tables,
EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:66: studies undertaken as part of the EIA, and thereby enable comparison between
EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:67:7.16 As indicated above, for the purpose of this EIA moderate and major effects will be
EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:68:7.25 In accordance with the EIA Regulations, consideration will also be given to the
EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:68: scoping opinion, PINS will, in accordance with Regulation 10(6) of the EIA
EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:70: following specialist assessments for inclusion in the EIA are proposed:
EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:70: Items Proposed for Scoping Out of EIA
EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:72: EIA. However, accidental events such as the potential for fuel spillages and
EN010103-001137-NZT DCO 6.4.46 ES Vol III Appendix 24A Planned Development and Development Allocations.pdf:11: parking and associated Infrastructure works all matters assessment within this EIA it is assumed that these
EN010103-002421-NZT DCO 9.42 - Comments on D9 Submissions & Additional Submissions - Oct 2022 (D11).pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:12: Impact Assessment (EIA) process.
EN010103-002080-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with (D5) August 2022) - August 2022 (D6).pdf:167: planning permission ref 14/1454/EIA granted by Stockton-on-Tee Borough Council to be
EN010103-002528-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:3: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - the assessment of the likely
EN010103-002528-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:3: in accordance with the EIA Regulations
EN010103-002528-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:3: EIA Regulations Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment)
EN010103-002528-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:3: ES Environmental Statement, documenting the findings of the EIA
EN010103-002528-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:4: with the EIA and does not result in unacceptable impacts
EN010103-002528-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:14: assessment ('EIA').
EN010103-002528-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:38: station of up to 860 MW, tying the authorised development to the scope of the EIA carried
EN010103-002528-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:40: Tying the EIA into the Order
EN010103-001899-NZT DCO 8.12 - Northumbrian Water Ltd SoCG (Tracked) July 2022 (D4).pdf:3: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - the
EN010103-001899-NZT DCO 8.12 - Northumbrian Water Ltd SoCG (Tracked) July 2022 (D4).pdf:3: accordance with the EIA Regulations
EN010103-001899-NZT DCO 8.12 - Northumbrian Water Ltd SoCG (Tracked) July 2022 (D4).pdf:3: EIA Regulations Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
EN010103-001899-NZT DCO 8.12 - Northumbrian Water Ltd SoCG (Tracked) July 2022 (D4).pdf:3: findings of the EIA
EN010103-001899-NZT DCO 8.12 - Northumbrian Water Ltd SoCG (Tracked) July 2022 (D4).pdf:4: that it accords with the EIA and does not result in
EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:12: Impact Assessment (EIA) process.
EN010103-000886-NZT DCO 6.2.1 ES Vol I Chapter 1 Introduction.pdf:2: (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (‘the EIA
EN010103-000886-NZT DCO 6.2.1 ES Vol I Chapter 1 Introduction.pdf:5: The EIA Scoping Process
EN010103-000886-NZT DCO 6.2.1 ES Vol I Chapter 1 Introduction.pdf:5: the EIA Regulations that it intended to provide an ES in respect of the
EN010103-000886-NZT DCO 6.2.1 ES Vol I Chapter 1 Introduction.pdf:5: Proposed Development. The Proposed Development is therefore ‘EIA
EN010103-000886-NZT DCO 6.2.1 ES Vol I Chapter 1 Introduction.pdf:5: development’ for the purposes of the EIA Regulations and an ES will form
EN010103-000886-NZT DCO 6.2.1 ES Vol I Chapter 1 Introduction.pdf:5:1.5.2 The purpose of the EIA Scoping process is to determine which topics should
EN010103-000886-NZT DCO 6.2.1 ES Vol I Chapter 1 Introduction.pdf:5: be included in the EIA, and the level of detail to which they should be
EN010103-000886-NZT DCO 6.2.1 ES Vol I Chapter 1 Introduction.pdf:5: assessed. An EIA Scoping Report and a request for an EIA Scoping Opinion
EN010103-000886-NZT DCO 6.2.1 ES Vol I Chapter 1 Introduction.pdf:5: pursuant to Regulation 10 of the EIA Regulations was submitted to PINS on
EN010103-000886-NZT DCO 6.2.1 ES Vol I Chapter 1 Introduction.pdf:5:1.5.3 The EIA Scoping Report (Appendix 1A in ES Volume III, Document Ref. 6.4)
EN010103-000886-NZT DCO 6.2.1 ES Vol I Chapter 1 Introduction.pdf:5: was informed by the EIA team's experience of working on a number of similar
EN010103-000886-NZT DCO 6.2.1 ES Vol I Chapter 1 Introduction.pdf:5:1.5.4 The EIA Scoping Report sets out:
EN010103-000886-NZT DCO 6.2.1 ES Vol I Chapter 1 Introduction.pdf:5: • a description of the matters to be scoped in and out of the EIA;
EN010103-000886-NZT DCO 6.2.1 ES Vol I Chapter 1 Introduction.pdf:5: details on the EIA Scoping Opinion are set out in Chapter 2: Assessment
EN010103-000886-NZT DCO 6.2.1 ES Vol I Chapter 1 Introduction.pdf:6:1.5.6 Following the completion of an EIA Scoping Report and publication of the
EN010103-000886-NZT DCO 6.2.1 ES Vol I Chapter 1 Introduction.pdf:6: SoS's Scoping Opinion, the EIA for a DCO is reported in two stages:
EN010103-000886-NZT DCO 6.2.1 ES Vol I Chapter 1 Introduction.pdf:6: of the EIA Regulations. In accordance with Regulation 12(2)(b), the PEI
EN010103-000886-NZT DCO 6.2.1 ES Vol I Chapter 1 Introduction.pdf:6: of the EIA Regulations. The information to be included in an ES is set out in
EN010103-000886-NZT DCO 6.2.1 ES Vol I Chapter 1 Introduction.pdf:8:1.6.2 The format of this ES reflects that proposed at the EIA scoping stage and set
EN010103-000886-NZT DCO 6.2.1 ES Vol I Chapter 1 Introduction.pdf:8: the EIA Scoping process.
EN010103-000886-NZT DCO 6.2.1 ES Vol I Chapter 1 Introduction.pdf:8: • Chapters 1 and 2 – an introduction to the ES and EIA approach;
EN010103-000886-NZT DCO 6.2.1 ES Vol I Chapter 1 Introduction.pdf:8: into the EIA;
EN010103-000886-NZT DCO 6.2.1 ES Vol I Chapter 1 Introduction.pdf:8:1.7.1 Consultation is integral to the preparation of DCO applications and to the EIA
EN010103-000886-NZT DCO 6.2.1 ES Vol I Chapter 1 Introduction.pdf:9: submission of the EIA Scoping Report.
EN010103-000886-NZT DCO 6.2.1 ES Vol I Chapter 1 Introduction.pdf:9: Development and the EIA, is set out where relevant, within each of the topic
EN010103-000886-NZT DCO 6.2.1 ES Vol I Chapter 1 Introduction.pdf:9: separate section on EIA related consultation as recommended within PINS
EN010103-000886-NZT DCO 6.2.1 ES Vol I Chapter 1 Introduction.pdf:9: contributors to the ES is required by Regulation 14(4)(b) of the EIA
EN010103-002551-NZT DCO 5.4 - DAS (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:3: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - a term used for the assessment of
EN010103-002551-NZT DCO 5.4 - DAS (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:7: the purposes of the Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) of the Proposed
EN010103-002551-NZT DCO 5.4 - DAS (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:44: Assessment (‘EIA’), the Applicants have therefore adopted the principles of the
EN010103-002551-NZT DCO 5.4 - DAS (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:44: ‘Rochdale Envelope’ approach and assessed (as part of the EIA) fixed maximum
EN010103-002551-NZT DCO 5.4 - DAS (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:66: detailed design will be in accordance with the design parameters upon which the EIA
EN010103-002551-NZT DCO 5.4 - DAS (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:69: Applicants have defined design parameters upon which to base the EIA to ensure
EN010103-001787-NZT DCO 8.7 - Historic England SoCG - June 2022.pdf:3: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - the
EN010103-001787-NZT DCO 8.7 - Historic England SoCG - June 2022.pdf:3: accordance with the EIA Regulations
EN010103-001787-NZT DCO 8.7 - Historic England SoCG - June 2022.pdf:3: EIA Regulations Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
EN010103-001787-NZT DCO 8.7 - Historic England SoCG - June 2022.pdf:3: findings of the EIA
EN010103-001787-NZT DCO 8.7 - Historic England SoCG - June 2022.pdf:4: that it accords with the EIA and does not result in
EN010103-002254-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:3: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - the assessment of the likely
EN010103-002254-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:3: in accordance with the EIA Regulations
EN010103-002254-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:3: EIA Regulations Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment)
EN010103-002254-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:3: ES Environmental Statement, documenting the findings of the EIA
EN010103-002254-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:4: with the EIA and does not result in unacceptable impacts
EN010103-002254-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:14: assessment ('EIA').
EN010103-002254-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:38: station of up to 860 MW, tying the authorised development to the scope of the EIA carried
EN010103-002254-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:40: Tying the EIA into the Order
EN010103-002631-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 1 (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:3: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment. The
EN010103-002631-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 1 (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:3: accordance with the EIA Regulations
EN010103-002631-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 1 (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:3: EIA Regulations The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental
EN010103-001858-9.11 - Applicants' Comments on Deadline 2 Submissions - June 2022(D3).pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-000910-NZT DCO 6.2.18 ES Vol Chapter 18 Archaeology and Cultural Heritage.pdf:3: the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) methodology forms part of a
EN010103-000910-NZT DCO 6.2.18 ES Vol Chapter 18 Archaeology and Cultural Heritage.pdf:9: commenced at the EIA Scoping Stage with the preparation of the EIA Scoping
EN010103-000910-NZT DCO 6.2.18 ES Vol Chapter 18 Archaeology and Cultural Heritage.pdf:9: design evolution of the Proposed Development and the EIA is set out where
EN010103-000910-NZT DCO 6.2.18 ES Vol Chapter 18 Archaeology and Cultural Heritage.pdf:15:18.3.21 The ES details the significance of effect in accordance with EIA methodology,
EN010103-002178-NZT DCO 8.30 - NTG SoCG - Sept 2022(D7) (Clean).pdf:3: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment – the
EN010103-002178-NZT DCO 8.30 - NTG SoCG - Sept 2022(D7) (Clean).pdf:3: accordance with the EIA Regulations
EN010103-002178-NZT DCO 8.30 - NTG SoCG - Sept 2022(D7) (Clean).pdf:3: EIA Regulations Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
EN010103-002178-NZT DCO 8.30 - NTG SoCG - Sept 2022(D7) (Clean).pdf:3: findings of the EIA
EN010103-002178-NZT DCO 8.30 - NTG SoCG - Sept 2022(D7) (Clean).pdf:4: that it accords with the EIA and does not result in
EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:4: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - a term used
EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:4: EIA Regulations The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental
EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:13: effects/impacts, taking account of the EIA that has been undertaken. Where relevant
EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:25:2.6.6 The Proposed Development represents an Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’)
EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:25: (‘ES’) (Document Refs. 6.1 - 6.4) that reports the findings of the EIA that has been
EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:25: accommodate this flexibility and ensure a robust EIA of the Proposed Development,
EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:26: its construction and operation to ensure that it remains within the scope of the EIA
EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:39: (the ‘EIA Regulations’).
EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:90: operation in order to ensure that it accords with the EIA carried out and does not
EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:90: the EIA, has identified some effects that require mitigation. However, the necessary
EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:91:6.2.166.2.17 EN-1 (paragraph 4.2.1) states that NSIPs that are subject to the European EIA
EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:91: Directive (to be read now as referring to the EIA Regulations) must be accompanied
EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:91: by the Proposed Development. It highlights that the European EIA Directive
EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:91: been adopted for the EIA of the Proposed Development.
EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:92: and assessed through the EIA maximum 'worst case' dimensions and design
EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:94: EIA that has been undertaken. The Commitments Register (ES Volume III, Appendix
EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:97: the 'Rochdale Envelope' and assessed through the EIA maximum 'worst case'
EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:102: sets out the design parameters that have been used for the purposes of the EIA to
EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:108: climate change. While not required by the EIA Directive, this information will be
EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:114: noise and vibration have been fully assessed within the EIA undertaken.
EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:115: undertaking a MA&ND assessment within an EIA, regard has been had to the COMAH
EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:120: taking account of the assessments undertaken for the EIA. The matters considered
EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:128: emissions; EIA. The matters considered include the condition/state of premises; smoke;
EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:154: protection (electrical or the EIA Scoping Opinion (02.04.19). Additionally, the Electric and Magnetic
EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:155: ‘standard’ EIA methodology of identifying the sensitivity of receptors and
EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:168: Local Development suitability of a site or Locational Policy. Furthermore, a comprehensive EIA of the Proposed
EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:169: approved where their industry. The EIA confirms that the Proposed Development will not
EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:170: SD7 RCBC Flood and Development in areas The EIA has assessed flood risk and water management and includes a
EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:181: development of new Tees SPD (and the Teesworks Design Guide) for energy use. The EIA for
EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:194: ENV7 STBC Ground, Air, Development proposals The EIA of the Proposed Development has considered its potential
EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:194: Plan and Light pollution will be water and human health. Taking account of mitigation, the EIA has not
EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:199: the policy assessment within Section 6 and the EIA that has been undertaken.
EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:210: a the Overarching Poiicy Staiement for Energy (EN-i ) has efiect in reiaiion to
EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:248:and Storage (CCS), capture technology that it is proposed incorporates post-combustion carbon capture technology. The EIA for the
EN010103-002638-NZT DCO 8.12 - NWL SoCG - Final - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:3: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - the
EN010103-002638-NZT DCO 8.12 - NWL SoCG - Final - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:3: accordance with the EIA Regulations
EN010103-002638-NZT DCO 8.12 - NWL SoCG - Final - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:3: EIA Regulations Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
EN010103-002638-NZT DCO 8.12 - NWL SoCG - Final - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:3: findings of the EIA
EN010103-002638-NZT DCO 8.12 - NWL SoCG - Final - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:4: that it accords with the EIA and does not result in
EN010103-001735-Redcar & Cleveland Borough Council - EN010103-001527-NZT-ExQ1-editable-version.pdf:3:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-002232-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Comments on any other information submitted at Deadline 7.pdf:7: related EIA process? [REP2-060, electronic page 13, paragraphs
EN010103-001853-8.3 - STDC SoCG (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:3:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - the assessment
EN010103-001853-8.3 - STDC SoCG (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:3: EIA Regulations
EN010103-001853-8.3 - STDC SoCG (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:3:EIA Regulations Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
EN010103-001853-8.3 - STDC SoCG (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:3: findings of the EIA
EN010103-001853-8.3 - STDC SoCG (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:4: other matters to ensure that it accords with the EIA
EN010103-001853-8.3 - STDC SoCG (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:22: Information & the EIA and availability of baseline data on
EN010103-001853-8.3 - STDC SoCG (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:22: EIA heritage and noise effects. It is agreed that, for
EN010103-001853-8.3 - STDC SoCG (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:22: the EIA topics reviewed by STDC, the assessment
EN010103-001853-8.3 - STDC SoCG (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:23: Cumulative cumulative effects in the EIA has been discussed
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (13).pdf:1:Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the 2017 EIA Regulations)
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (13).pdf:3:Regulations 2017 (the 2017 EIA Regulations) and on the basis of the current information
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (13).pdf:4:Note: The SoS’ duty under Regulation 32 of the 2017 EIA Regulations continues
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (13).pdf:6: Under Regulation 32 of the 2017 EIA Regulations and on the basis of the current
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (13).pdf:6: Note: The SoS’ duty under Regulation 32 of the 2017 EIA Regulations continues
EN010103-000822-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement incl. Appendix 1.pdf:3: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment. The
EN010103-000822-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement incl. Appendix 1.pdf:3: accordance with the EIA Regulations
EN010103-000822-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement incl. Appendix 1.pdf:3: EIA Regulations The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental
EN010103-002069-NZT DCO 8.5 - Environment Agency SoCG (Tracked) August 2-22 (D6).pdf:3: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - the
EN010103-002069-NZT DCO 8.5 - Environment Agency SoCG (Tracked) August 2-22 (D6).pdf:3: accordance with the EIA Regulations
EN010103-002069-NZT DCO 8.5 - Environment Agency SoCG (Tracked) August 2-22 (D6).pdf:3: EIA Regulations Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
EN010103-002069-NZT DCO 8.5 - Environment Agency SoCG (Tracked) August 2-22 (D6).pdf:3: findings of the EIA
EN010103-002069-NZT DCO 8.5 - Environment Agency SoCG (Tracked) August 2-22 (D6).pdf:4: with the EIA and does not result in unacceptable
EN010103-002069-NZT DCO 8.5 - Environment Agency SoCG (Tracked) August 2-22 (D6).pdf:10: February 2019 (EIA The Environment Agency were consulted on the EIA Scoping
EN010103-002069-NZT DCO 8.5 - Environment Agency SoCG (Tracked) August 2-22 (D6).pdf:11: from the Environment Agency EIA scoping consultation
EN010103-002069-NZT DCO 8.5 - Environment Agency SoCG (Tracked) August 2-22 (D6).pdf:11: inform the finalisation of the EIA and the overall DCO
EN010103-002069-NZT DCO 8.5 - Environment Agency SoCG (Tracked) August 2-22 (D6).pdf:15: Environmental throughout the pre-application period to help inform the EIA. It is
EN010103-002414-NZT DCO 5.10 - Other Consents and Licences - Oct 2022 D11 (Tracked).pdf:24: E Consent under OPRED / NSTA Required prior to relevant The EIA is in preparation and will be reviewed
EN010103-002414-NZT DCO 5.10 - Other Consents and Licences - Oct 2022 D11 (Tracked).pdf:24: offshore EIA offshore works commencing. by OPRED (on behalf of the Secretary of
EN010103-002414-NZT DCO 5.10 - Other Consents and Licences - Oct 2022 D11 (Tracked).pdf:25: the Secretary of State’s agreement. The EIA is
EN010103-001590-NZT DCO 8.9 - NGG SoCG - May 2022.pdf:2: findings of the EIA
EN010103-001590-NZT DCO 8.9 - NGG SoCG - May 2022.pdf:3: that it accords with the EIA and does not result in
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:22:9.4.2 The EIA Scoping Addendum Report was submitted in February 2019 and the
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:22: Scoping Opinion was received in April 2019. The EIA PEI Report was
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:142: support the EIA of the Northern Gateway Container Terminal (NGCT) and
EN010103-001788-NZT DCO 5.10 - Other Consents and Licences - June 2022 (Tracked).pdf:25: E Consent under OPRED / NSTA Required prior to relevant The EIA is in preparation and will be reviewed
EN010103-001788-NZT DCO 5.10 - Other Consents and Licences - June 2022 (Tracked).pdf:25: offshore EIA offshore works commencing. by OPRED (on behalf of the Secretary of
EN010103-001788-NZT DCO 5.10 - Other Consents and Licences - June 2022 (Tracked).pdf:25: the Secretary of State’s agreement. The EIA is
EN010103-002046-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:3: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - the assessment of the likely
EN010103-002046-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:3: in accordance with the EIA Regulations
EN010103-002046-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:3: EIA Regulations Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment)
EN010103-002046-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:3: ES Environmental Statement, documenting the findings of the EIA
EN010103-002046-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:4: with the EIA and does not result in unacceptable impacts
EN010103-002046-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:14: assessment ('EIA').
EN010103-002046-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:37: station of up to 860 MW, tying the authorised development to the scope of the EIA carried
EN010103-002046-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:40: Tying the EIA into the Order
EN010103-002053-NZT DCO 5.4 - Design and Access Statement - Tracked - August 2022(D6).pdf:3: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - a term used for the assessment of
EN010103-002053-NZT DCO 5.4 - Design and Access Statement - Tracked - August 2022(D6).pdf:7: the purposes of the Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) of the Proposed
EN010103-002053-NZT DCO 5.4 - Design and Access Statement - Tracked - August 2022(D6).pdf:42: Assessment (‘EIA’), the Applicants have therefore adopted the principles of the
EN010103-002053-NZT DCO 5.4 - Design and Access Statement - Tracked - August 2022(D6).pdf:42: ‘Rochdale Envelope’ approach and assessed (as part of the EIA) fixed maximum
EN010103-002053-NZT DCO 5.4 - Design and Access Statement - Tracked - August 2022(D6).pdf:63: detailed design will be in accordance with the design parameters upon which the EIA
EN010103-002053-NZT DCO 5.4 - Design and Access Statement - Tracked - August 2022(D6).pdf:66: Applicants have defined design parameters upon which to base the EIA to ensure
EN010103-001211-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - a term used
EN010103-001211-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:3: EIA Regulations The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental
EN010103-001211-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:12: 'EIA Regulations').
EN010103-001211-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:12: with the statutory requirements of the PA 2008, the APFP Regulations and the EIA
EN010103-001211-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:16: EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001211-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:16: Volume I – Main Text EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001211-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:16: EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001211-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:16: Methodology EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001211-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:16: Existing Area EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001211-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:16: Development EIA Reg. 14 Rev. 2.0
EN010103-001211-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:16: Programme and Management EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001211-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:16: Design Evolution EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001211-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:16: Planning Policy EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001211-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:16: EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001211-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:16: Risk and Water Resources and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001211-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:16: Hydrogeology and and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001211-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:16: EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001211-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:16: and Nature Conservation and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001211-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:16: and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001211-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:16: Nature Conservation and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001211-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:16: and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001211-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:16: Transport EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001211-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:16: Visual Amenity and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001211-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:16: and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001211-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:17: and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001211-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:17: Tourism EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001211-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:17: EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001211-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:17: Disasters EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001211-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:17: Human Health EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001211-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:17: Combined Effects EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001211-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:17: Significant Effects EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001211-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:17: (o) and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001211-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:24: (o) and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001211-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:24: 6.4.1 Appendix 1A: EIA Scoping -
EN010103-001211-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:24: 6.4.2 Appendix 1B: EIA Scoping -
EN010103-001591-NZT DCO 8.10 - Northern Gas Networks SoCG - May 2022.pdf:3: that it accords with the EIA and does not result in
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:3: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - the
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:3: accordance with the EIA Regulations
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:3: EIA Regulations Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:3: findings of the EIA
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:5: that it accords with the EIA and does not result in
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:13: level for the EIA was discussed at a later date with the MMO,
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:13: technical feedback to help inform the finalisation of the EIA
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:13: associated environmental the existing outfall were discussed in terms of EIA. The
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:13: 2021 (Formal consultation extent of sampling undertaken to inform the EIA.
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:15:Statement (including adequacy pre-application period to help inform the scope of the EIA. It is
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:23: EW attending on behalf of AECOM who are representing OGCI and leading the DCO/EIA
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:23: sand / silt. For the purposes of the EIA, existing data is being used at this time; do the MMO
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:24: at EIA scoping last year and this is now a lot clearer – the GIS is particularly good. SE agreed
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:24: Engagement to- MMO at EIA Scoping in March 2019. EW explained how AECOM has been working to respond
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:24: EIA Scoping modelling; use of the DML; coastal processes and; fisheries). EW confirmed that these were
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:24:4. Project Update EW confirmed that since EIA Scoping, effort has been made to further refine the worst-case
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:24: case being assessed currently for EIA purposes. EW noted the potential plant and construction
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:25: exercises were underway, as per the MMO’s recommendation at EIA scoping. Given the
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:25: Stakeholder recommendations made at EIA scoping.
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:25: EW confirmed that since EIA scoping, engagement has been ongoing on the topic of Thermal
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:26: and other stakeholders at EIA scoping. EW noted that at this early stage, a preliminary
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:27: • Ed Walker (EW), AECOM – supporting IC and RL on the EIA and
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:27: • Ian Campbell (IC), AECOM – PM for the DCO EIA;
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:28: engagement to- EIA Scoping (March 2019) where the MMO raised comments on
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:29: EIA (Slide 10, Annex A)
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:29: EW introduced the next slide which relates to EIA; EW confirmed that
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:29: gathering network – this does form part of the DCO which this EIA is
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:30: dealt with via a separate consenting regime and most likely EIA (this is
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:30: ‘Project as a Whole’ perspective however, the EIAs for each project will
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:30: However, for the purposes of EIA, as there is so much information
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:30: for EIA. EW asked if SE/NW had any thoughts? SE agreed that this
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:32: of detail contained within the EIA and the actual likelihood that works
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:39:EIA Scoping (March 2019)
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:43: separate Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) it is dealt with via a separate consenting regime. However, we remain
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:43: compression of third-party CO2 emissions to be offshore project) is also expected to be subject to EIA.
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:56: • Richard Lowe – AECOM, leading the EIA/DCO
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:56: • Ian Campbell – AECOM, coordinating the EIA/DCO
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:56: DCO/EIA
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:57:date and Status • EIA Scoping (March 2019) they have no
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:57: of data to support fisheries assessment in the EIA
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:60: assessment and where this ‘sits’ in the EIA was welcome at
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:62: identified; these are Nephtys cirrosa and Bathyporeia spp.
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:72:EIA Scoping (March 2019)
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:81:‘Nephtys cirrosa and Bathyporeia spp. in infralittoral sand’ (A5.233; SS.SSa.IFiSa.NcirBat)
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:93:biotopes at these stations are consistent with those found in the 2019 survey - either ‘Nephtys cirrosa and Bathyporeia
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:97: Bathyporeia elegans 16.56
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:97: Bathyporeia elegans 7.11
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:97:Group A was classified as ‘Nephtys cirrosa and Bathyporeia spp. in infralittoral sand’ (A5.233; SS.SSa.IFiSa.NcirBat),
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:97:biotope. The amphipod Bathyporeia sp. and polychaete Nephtys cirrosa are typical of this biotope and dominated the
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:97:A5.233 - Nephtys cirrosa and Bathyporeia spp. in infralittoral sand
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:98:Descriptions: Characterised by Nephtys cirrosa and Bathyporeia spp. (and sometimes Pontocrates spp.), found from the
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:98:are commonly recorced include: the amphipod Bathyporeia spp. and polychaetes such as Chaetozone
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:98:The Teesside Net Zero stations in Tees Bay were classified as either the biotope ‘Nephtys cirrosa and Bathyporeia spp.
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:100: replacement outfall is retained in the DCO and supporting EIA. EW
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:101: ‘Nephtys cirrosa and Bathyporeia spp. in infralittoral sand’ (A5.233) is
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:104: the EIA now but thanks for trying. SE confirmed that no response has
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:104: EIA then that sounds appropriate. EW explained that we do have a
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:130:• The biotope ‘Nephtys cirrosa and Bathyporeia spp. in infralittoral sand’ (A5.233) is characteristic of shallow exposed
EN010103-001795-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022.pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - a term used
EN010103-001795-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022.pdf:3: EIA Regulations The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental
EN010103-001795-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022.pdf:13: 'EIA Regulations').
EN010103-001795-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022.pdf:13: with the statutory requirements of the PA 2008, the APFP Regulations and the EIA
EN010103-001795-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022.pdf:17: Technical Summary EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001795-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022.pdf:17: Volume I – Main Text EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001795-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022.pdf:17: EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001795-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022.pdf:17: Methodology EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001795-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022.pdf:17: Existing Area EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001795-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022.pdf:17: Development EIA Reg. 14 Rev. 2.0
EN010103-001795-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022.pdf:17: Programme and Management EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001795-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022.pdf:17: Design Evolution EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001795-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022.pdf:17: Planning Policy EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001795-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022.pdf:17: EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001795-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022.pdf:17: Risk and Water Resources and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001795-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022.pdf:17: Hydrogeology and and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001795-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022.pdf:17: EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001795-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022.pdf:17: and Nature Conservation and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001795-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022.pdf:17: and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001795-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022.pdf:17: Nature Conservation and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001795-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022.pdf:17: and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001795-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022.pdf:17: Transport EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001795-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022.pdf:18: Visual Amenity and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001795-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022.pdf:18: and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001795-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022.pdf:18: and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001795-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022.pdf:18: Tourism EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001795-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022.pdf:18: EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001795-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022.pdf:18: Disasters EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001795-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022.pdf:18: Human Health EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001795-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022.pdf:18: Combined Effects EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001795-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022.pdf:18: Significant Effects EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001795-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022.pdf:18: (o) and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001795-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022.pdf:25: (o) and EIA Reg. 14 unless
EN010103-001795-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022.pdf:25: 6.4.1 Appendix 1A: EIA Scoping -
EN010103-001795-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022.pdf:25: 6.4.2 Appendix 1B: EIA Scoping -
EN010103-001510-TEXT_ISH1_Session1_NetZeroTeesside_10052022.pdf:17:authority, the NSTA that the subtlety is that so far as the EIA regulations, consent is concerned, their
EN010103-001510-TEXT_ISH1_Session1_NetZeroTeesside_10052022.pdf:17:consent under the 2020, sorry, the 2010 EIA regulations. So those two simply can't be brought within
EN010103-001510-TEXT_ISH1_Session1_NetZeroTeesside_10052022.pdf:18:talked about To the offshore EIA to be submitted q2 2022 with approval q1 2023. Is that what is the
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:1:2.1 The EIA has underestimated the Climate Change impacts of the CCGT power station …………………………………………………5
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:1:4 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT: IEMA/EIA GUIDANCE …………………………………………………………………………………. 15
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:2:16 APPENDIX J: EIA GUIDANCE, “ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF PROJECTS: GUIDANCE ON THE
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:4: • The EIA has underestimated the Climate Change impacts of the CCGT power station as no
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:4: has not been assessed, breaching the EIA Regulations.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:4: • The Environmental Statement does not follow the best practice for EIA for a cumulative
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:5:2.1 The EIA has underestimated the Climate Change impacts of the CCGT power station
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:6: quantification of GHGs for the EIA. However, for the gas to be combusted, it also needs to
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:6: drafting of the EIA further research has emerged. For example, new techniques, in the last
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:11: 25 The EIA has failed to assess the full life-cycle impacts of gas, and has in particular not
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:11: permanent and temporary, positive and negative effects of the development” (EIA Regs
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:14: 36 Schedule 4 (e) of the EIA Regs requires that the Environmental Statement includes a
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:14: NZT project and in the context of the greenhouse gas emissions associated with it as an EIA
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:14: guidance on EIA good practice which states “It is good practice to draw on multiple sources
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:15: 43 The Environmental Statement is not compliant with the EIA regulations requirement
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:15:4 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT: IEMA/EIA GUIDANCE
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:15: 44 The applicant has not followed the latest EIA guidance from IEMA (the “IEMA guidance”,
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:15: EIA process, and second that local policies and budgets and targets should be included in EIA
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:15: 45 As well as the IEMA guidance, the EIA guidance from the European Commission12, strongly
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:15: applicant. The EIA Regs guidance13 (provided at Appendix J, PDF page 41) addresses how a
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:15: 47 The EIA regulations were intended to require, then, that carbon assessment is done for the
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:15: The EU Commission website hosts an official webpage for the EIA Directive, which lists a number of Guidance documents. The site is:
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:15:https://ec.europa.eu/environment/eia/eia-support.htm.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:16: which complies with the above guidance, and best practice, on EIA. Table 21-14 should be
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:16: 50 Currently, the Environmental Statement does not follow the best practice for EIA, from
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:16: the IEMA and EIA guidance, for a cumulative assessment of greenhouse gas emissions,
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:17: • The EIA has underestimated the Climate Change impacts of the CCGT power station as no
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:17: has not been assessed, breaching the EIA Regulations.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:17: • The Environmental Statement does not follow the best practice for EIA for a cumulative
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:19:16 APPENDIX J: EIA GUIDANCE, “ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:28:Figure 4. Gas resource schematic. Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), Where our natural gas comes from, U.S.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:28:ENERGY INFORMATION ADMINISTRATION (EIA) (2020), https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/natural-gas/where-our-natural-gas-
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:29: US EIA, Shale gas production drives world natural gas production growth, US Environmental Information Agency
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:29:Department of Energy, (2016), https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=27512).
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:30:known as Al-Shabab.30 The EIA reference to the GUMP suggests that any domestic gas used in the CCPP would
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:31:EIA.33 Quality data for both emissions and production in 2015 exist for only these six shale-gas fields,
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:31: EIA, Natural Gas: Dry Shale Gas Production Estimates by Play, Energy Information Agency, U.S. Department of
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:31:Energy (2020), https://www.eia.gov/naturalgas/data.php.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:34:LNG, as mentioned above, is a likely source of gas identified in the EIA and CCIA for the Richards Bay
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:147: IEMA and EIA professionals working for organisations Assessment (IEMA) is the professional home of over
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:147: registered to the EIA Quality Mark (www.iema.net/qmark). 18,000 environment and sustainability professionals
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:148: BREEAM – Building Research Establishment modelling and reporting; not to be confused with EIA
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:148: Environmental Assessment Method practitioners who typical have a wider EIA delivery role
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:148: EIA – Environmental Impact Assessment UNFCCC – United Nations Framework Convention on
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:149: (EIA). It is a revision of the 2017 IEMA guidance on
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:149: Change Mitigation and EIA overarching principles (as
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:149: the 2014 amendment to the EIA Directive (2014/52/EU),
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:149: 20175, hereafter referred to as the ‘EIA Regulations’.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:149: 1 Note: Statutory EIA reports are called ‘Environmental Statements’ in England, Wales and Northern Ireland and ‘Environmental
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:149: reading-room/2020/06/26/iema-eia-guide-to-climate-change-resilience-and-adaptation-2020
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:150: role within the EIA. It is no longer an element to With climate change taking centre stage, projects are
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:150: be considered towards the later stages of the EIA increasingly scrutinised and challenged for not mitigating
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:150: should be considered from the outset and change is known as the transition imperative. EIA Climate
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:150: to deliver proportionate EIAs. Mitigation is addressed project developers and stakeholders often asking: ‘what
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:150: change, however specifically in the EIA context it IEMA, this guidance helps practitioners take an informed
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:150: assist assessments. Section VI describes five distinct EIA. It sets out areas for consideration at all stages of the
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:150: as the process of incorporating GHG assessment in EIA
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:150: 1.2 EIA and project linkage
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:150: EIAs can often be undertaken in silo, separate from the
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:150: by delivering the EIA in close cooperation with the
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:151: likely to be greater if mitigation is considered at project on at a later stage, refer to IEMA’s EIA guide on Shaping
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:151: implemented does not end at the pre-application EIA
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:151: The interaction between the design process and EIA are the primary mechanisms. For further information
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:151: process is underpinned by four key principles: refer to IEMA’s EIA guide to Delivering Quality
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:152: • Early mitigation is a key aspect of an EIA as
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:152: Hierarchy? • PAS 2080, EIA GHG emissions mitigation and IEMA GHG
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:152: • Screening establishes whether an EIA is
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:152: EIA required? • ‘Annex I’ developments by definition require an EIA
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:152: SCREENING • Where an EIA is to be undertaken based on
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:152: COMMUNICATION/ Communicate in the wider EIA process?
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:153: design, not just as a part of the EIA process (see Figure • Refrigerant management
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:153: coordinator’ within the design team, who focuses on For EIA GHG emissions mitigation, PAS 2080 also
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:153: EIA to identify opportunities that direct GHG mitigation
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:154: that the EIA is clear in defining any terms used. Figure 3 Net zero is achieved where emissions are first
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:156: not an EIA is required for ‘Schedule 2’ developments
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:156: (Schedule 1 developments by definition require an EIA).
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:156: The EIA Regulations require specific information at the
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:156: significant enough to trigger an EIA. At the screening
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:156: • The possibility of effectively reducing the impact an EIA is needed for a particular project, but in almost all
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:156: likely significant environmental effects to arise which For proposed projects where the need for an EIA has
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:156: may trigger the need for an EIA. Occasionally, this been screened out, it is still important that its GHG
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:156: project. Generally, however, where an EIA is required, change. Undertaking a proportionate assessment of GHG
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:156: it is common for there to be several topics that require emissions on non-EIA projects is therefore good practice
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:156: usually clear cut which topics trigger the need for EIA.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:157: steps for the EIA are addressed in the following sections,
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:157: scope of the EIA and the scope of the GHG assessment.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:157: The scoping process should provide an explanation undertaking an EIA, especially during the scoping stage.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:157: Initial consultation with the project team and wider EIA
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:157: In selecting or developing an approach for an EIA GHG will help with such assessments. It may be sensible that
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:157: a robust, proportionate, appropriate and consistent evidence for the EIA’s GHG scope as well as CEEQUAL
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:157: 17 IEMA (2017) Delivering Proportional EIA. Available at: https://www.iema.net/resources/reading-room/2017/07/18/delivering-
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:157: proportionate-eia
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:159: appropriate for use in EIA depending on the goals and
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:159: undertaking an EIA is different to other GHG assessments worst case
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:159: the particular aims and objectives of the EIA process, In developing the approach, the aim should be to
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:159: • GHG quantification within EIA should follow the
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:160: Step 1: Set the scope and boundaries EIAs should use data that is consistent with and report
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:160: incorporate a description of the proposed project, its assessments in the spirit of delivering proportionate EIAs.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:160: Figure 4: Modular approach of life cycle stages and modules for EIA GHG emissions assessment; the module references
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:163: and the EIA is viewed as the platform for improving
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:164: • Primary (measured), secondary (estimated) or the proposed project outside of EIA process can provide
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:164: buildings can be estimated using published benchmarks Quantification of the GHG emissions for an EIA may
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:164: emissions will be taken because an EIA is completed in
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:165: Calculations may be taken at different scales reflecting that for many EIA topics where only projects within a
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:166: of a good practice approach to EIA.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:167: and EIA identify climate change as one of the defining
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:167: on all topics in the EIA Directive (e.g. human health,
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:167: of the EIA process should be to reduce the project’s EIA for any proposed project must therefore give
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:167: 30 IEMA (2010) Climate Change Mitigation & EIA. Available at: https://www.iema.net/document-download/33006
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:168: A key goal of EIA is to inform the decision maker about The specific context for an individual project and the
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:168: GHG emissions reported in the EIA in a way that aids and scientific evidence35.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:175: When reporting on GHG emissions assessment in EIA, • Noise/vibration and air quality (construction activities,
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:175: for inclusion in environmental statements, of the EIA
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:175: Consistent reporting of GHG emissions in EIA will
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:175: When reporting on GHG emissions and mitigation in EIA,
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:175: related EIA topics? expressed as a change compared to the current and/
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:175: be interrelated with other key EIA topics. To ensure to effects based on the criteria set out
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:175: team will need to liaise with other key EIA topics
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:176: reporting on GHG emissions in EIA? against which to identify the significance of a
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:176: assessment into EIA practice. These challenges and ways
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:176: assessment can be interlinked with other EIA topic
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:176: other EIA topic specialists where necessary (e.g.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:176: by EIA co-ordinators. However, due to the nature
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:176: assessment; to inform the EIA and account for the
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:184: Guidance on the preparation of the EIA Report
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:184: EIA: concept and stages ………………………………………………………………………………….. 10
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:184:EIA REPORT …………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 21
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:184:1 LEGISLATIVE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PREPARATION OF THE EIA REPORT ……………. 23
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:184:2 LEGISLATIVE CHANGES FOR THE PREPARATION OF THE EIA REPORT …………………… 25
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:184:PART B - PRACTICAL GUIDANCE ON THE PREPARATION OF THE EIA REPORT……………… 27
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:184:1 THE EIA REPORT’S CONTENT REQUIREMENTS …………………………………………………….. 31
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:184: 1.4.2 Significance in the context of the preparation of the EIA Report . 48
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:185: 1.7.1 Legislative requirements for EIA monitoring ……………………………….. 57
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:185:2 QUALITY OF THE EIA REPORT …………………………………………………………………………… 63
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:185: 2.1 Format and presentation of the EIA Report ……………………………………………. 63
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:185: 2.1.1 The qualities of a good EIA Report …………………………………………….. 63
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:185: 3.1 Consultations on the EIA Report …………………………………………………………….. 73
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:185: 3.2.4 Decision-making on the EIA Report: in a nutshell ……………………….. 83
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:185:PART C – THE EIA REPORT CHECKLIST …………………………………………………………………….. 85
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:188:EIA Directive European Union Directive 2011/92/EU, as amended by Directive 2014/52/EU on
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:188:EIA process (or EIA) The process of carrying out an Environmental Impact Assessment as required by
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:188: the effects of certain public and private Projects on the environment. The EIA
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:188: process is composed of different steps: preparation of the EIA Report, publicity
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:188:EIA Report The Environmental Impact Assessment Report is the document prepared by the
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:188: additional information specified in Annex IV of the EIA Directive.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:188: the EIA Report addressed to a non-technical audience.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:188: effects of the Project on the environment, based on the examination of the EIA
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:189:Screening The process of determining whether a Project listed in Annex II of the EIA
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:189: II will be made subject to the EIA procedure.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:189: submitted to the Competent Authority under the EIA process.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:192:In 2001, the European Commission published three EIA Guidance Documents concerning specific
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:192:stages in the EIA process: Screening, Scoping, and Environmental Impact Statement Review. These
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:192:These three updated documents concern the following three specific stages of the EIA process:
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:192: EIA Guidance Document on Screening;
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:192: EIA Guidance Document on Scoping;
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:192: EIA Guidance Document on the preparation of the EIA Report.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:192:these stages in the EIA process, drawing upon experiences in Europe and worldwide.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:192:The Screening and Scoping EIA guidance documents aim to improve the decisions taken on the need
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:192:for an EIA and the terms of reference on which the assessment is made. These two documents focus
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:192:on getting the EIA process started well.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:192:The preparation of the EIA Report guidance aims to help Developers and consultants alike prepare
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:192:The three EIA Guidance Documents are designed for use by competent authorities, Developers, and
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:192:EIA practitioners in the European Union Member States and, where applicable, by Candidate
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:192:participate in EIA training and education, to practitioners from around the world, as well as to
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:192:The original 2001 EIA Guidance Documents were prepared by Environmental Resources Management
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:192:Commission. The revised 2017 EIA Guidance Documents have been prepared by Milieu Ltd and
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:192:Environment of the European Commission at http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eia/eia-support.htm.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:192:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:193:EIA: concept and stages
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:193:The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) of Projects is a key instrument of European Union
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:193:Projects on the environment (EIA Directive).
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:193:Since the adoption of the first EIA Directive in 1985 (Directive 85/337/EEC), both the law and EIA
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:193:practices have evolved. The EIA Directive was amended by Directives 97/11/EC, 2003/35/EC, and
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:193:focuses on the modifications made to the EIA Directive since 2001, with a particular emphasis on the
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:193:The EIA Directive requires that public and private Projects that are likely to have significant effects on
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:193:Developer to proceed with the Project. Before Development Consent can be granted, an EIA is
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:193:required if a Project is likely to impact significantly upon the environment. Article 2(1) of the EIA
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:193:The guidance documents in this series cover three stages involved in EIA: Screening, Scoping, and the
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:193:Preparation of the EIA Report.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:193:significant, i.e. the Project is ‘Screened’ to determine whether an EIA is necessary. Projects listed in
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:193:Annex I to the Directive are automatically subjected to an EIA because their environmental effects are
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:193:third stage: the preparation of the EIA Report.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:193:These three stages are complemented by specific steps in the EIA process. This is defined in Article
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:193:describing the EIA process.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:193:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:194:The figure below sets out an overview of the stages and steps usually taken when completing an EIA.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:194:mandatory when undertaking an EIA. By comparison, undertaking the Screening and Scoping stages
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:194:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:195: whether EIA is required. At the end of this stage, a
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:195: (as appropriate) and specifies the information to be included in the EIA
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:195: presented in the EIA Report which contains:
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:195: EIA Report information regarding the project, the Baseline
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:195: specified in Annex IV of the EIA Directive.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:195: The Competent Authority makes the EIA Report
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:195: The Competent Authority examines the EIA report
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:195:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:196:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:197:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:198:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:199:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:200:This Guidance Document is one in a series of three Guidance Documents on EIA that has been
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:200:published by the European Commission. This Guidance Document is about the preparation of the EIA
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:200:cannot, therefore, reflect all of the specific legal requirements and practices of EIA in the different EU
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:200:Member States. As such, any existing national, regional or local guidance on EIAs should always be
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:200:always be read in conjunction with the Directive and with national or local EIA legislation.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:200:The guidance is designed for use by various participants in the EIA process.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:200: Project Developers and EIA practitioners: Project Developers are ultimately responsible for
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:200: preparing a submitting to the Competent Authorities an EIA Report that meets the requirements
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:200: consultants (‘EIA Practitioners’) to support them in the preparation of the EIA Report. Part B
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:200: Section 1 of this Guidance Document reviews the requirements of the EIA Report in detail, and
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:200: Competent Authorities: Competent Authorities will need to review the EIA Report and use the
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:200: Review Bodies: In some EIA regimes, bodies have been set up to review environmental
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:200: information submitted under EIA procedures and to advise Competent Authorities on the
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:200: particular Projects may also undertake reviews of an EIA Report on their own behalf to ensure
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:200: Part A – Overview of legislative requirements for the EIA Report. This section introduces the
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:200: concept of the EIA Report and the relevant provisions of the EIA Directive that govern its
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:200:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:201: Part B – Practical guidance on the preparation of the EIA Report. The practical guidance is
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:201: legislative requirements regarding the preparation and use of the EIA Report. It also provides
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:201: Part C – The EIA Report checklist. The EIA Report checklist allows users to determine if they
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:201: have fulfilled all the relevant information requirements for different parts of the EIA Report. It
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:201: practitioners and Developers during the process of preparing the EIA Report and by Competent
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:201:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:202:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:203:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:204:OF THE EIA REPORT
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:204:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:205:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:206: 1 LEGISLATIVE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PREPARATION OF THE EIA REPORT
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:206:Environmental Impact Assessment Report (hereafter referred to as the EIA Report). This is the first
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:206:step of the EIA process, as mentioned in Article 1(2)(g), that defines the EIA process (see box 2 in the
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:206:Preface). This Guidance Document is designed to support users to prepare and complete the EIA
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:206:sufficient quality to enable this judgement. Many of the EIA Directive’s requirements and provisions
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:206:aim to ensure that the EIA Report is of a sufficient quality to effectively serve this purpose.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:206:Article 5 of the EIA Directive sets out what must be included in the EIA Report, and how to ensure
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:206:Article 5(1) sets out what Developers must include as a minimum in the EIA Report. Annex IV,
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:206:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:207: thereof without the implementation of the Project. This sets the stage for the subsequent EIA, and
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:207: Monitoring: Monitoring Measures proposed should be included in the EIA Report, where
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:207: Non-Technical Summary, i.e. an easily accessible summary of the content of the EIA Report
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:207: Quality of the EIA Report: as well as presenting the Report well, complete with the Non-
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:207: Technical Summary, experts preparing the EIA Report should be competent, and the Competent
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:207: Authority reviewing the EIA Report should have access to sufficient expertise to examine it.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:207:Article 5 also refers to the scope and level of detail that are to be included in the EIA Report:
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:207:The EIA Directive also contains provisions on how the EIA Report, once it has been drafted by the
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:207:Developer, should be used in practice. The EIA Report serves as a tool to 1) communicate the results
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:207:provisions are laid out in Articles 6, 7, and 8 of the EIA Directive.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:207:These and other requirements and provisions regarding the preparation of the EIA Report are covered
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:207:1 More details on how to understand the concept of significant effects have been provided in the EIA Guidance document on Scoping.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:207:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:208: 2 LEGISLATIVE CHANGES FOR THE PREPARATION OF THE EIA REPORT
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:208:A key objective of the 2014 amendments to the EIA Directive has been to improve the quality of EIA,
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:208:including with respect to the collection and assessment of environmental information and to the EIA
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:208: The coverage of environmental issues required in the EIA Report is extended as new
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:208: section 1.4 below). Moreover, the EIA Report will have to cover transboundary effects, and the
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:208: EIA Report and an indication of the main reasons for the option chosen must be given (Article
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:208: Provisions related to the completeness and quality of EIA Reports have been introduced (Article
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:208:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:209:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:210:PART B - PRACTICAL GUIDANCE ON THE PREPARATION OF THE EIA REPORT
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:210:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:211:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:212:This part of the Guidance Document gives practical guidance on the preparation of the EIA Report. It
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:212: The information requirements of the EIA Report. This section reviews all of the information
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:212: that Developers must include in the EIA Report. It is important to note that the content of the EIA
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:212: EIA Report. The Directive requires that the EIA Report covers the Project and Baseline
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:212: The quality of the EIA Report. This section covers the format and presentation of the EIA
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:212: evaluate the EIA Report. It also addresses the Non-Technical Summary that must be included in
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:212: the EIA Report;
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:212: Consultations and decision-making. The EIA Directive has specific requirements regarding the
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:212: use of the EIA Report, both as a tool to inform concerned stakeholders and the public, as well as
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:212:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:213:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:214: 1 THE EIA REPORT’S CONTENT REQUIREMENTS
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:214:Article 5 and Annex IV of the EIA Directive.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:214:been developed through different iterations of the EIA Directive (see the box below In practice - 2014
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:214:The requirement to include a description of the Project in the EIA Report is not new, and earlier iterations of the
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:214:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:215:the Project will be located. It forms the foundation upon which the EIA will rest.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:215:Specifically, developing a robust Baseline scenario for the EIA serves two key purposes:
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:215:Legal requirements of the Baseline scenario in the EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:215:been the EIA procedure’s starting point. However, after the 2014 revisions to the Directive, the
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:215:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:216:It is important to bear in mind that the EIA Directive requires the inclusion of both:
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:216: a description of the current state of the environment in the EIA Report; and
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:216:sections. The box below summarises the changes arising from the 2014 amendments to the EIA
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:216:The specific requirement to include the Baseline scenario in the EIA Report is a new provision of the 2014 EIA
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:216:Directive. However, in most cases, the changes will not have much of an effect on those carrying out the EIA:
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:216: EIAs carried out prior to this requirement have established some kind of Baseline on which to assess the
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:216: The new provision formalises this step in the EIA process and aims to bring about some consistency between
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:216: EIAs, between practice in Member States, and with the provisions on the SEA Directive’s baseline (see the
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:216:estimates can be made to ensure the timely completion of the EIA.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:216:The development of the Baseline can often comprise the bulk of the EIA process, and can occupy a
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:216:significant proportion of the final EIA Report. However, care must be taken to ensure that data
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:216:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:217:impacted, and that environmental data and scientific knowledge are reasonably available. The EIA
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:217:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:218:from EIAs, but also from other environmental assessments and monitoring schemes. This practice is
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:218:available, before starting data collection for the Baseline scenario. In addition, Article 5(4) of the EIA
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:218: National/regional databases of previous EIAs;
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:218:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:219:the SEA/EIA procedures. The ministry of the environment provides a catalogue of environmental data at the national
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:219:Sharing results from other types of environmental assessment procedures or similar Projects’ EIAs is
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:219:they are carried out in the vicinity of the Project covered by the EIA. Care should be taken to ensure
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:219:The similarities between the SEA and EIA provisions also mean that SEA guidance documents and
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:219:reports prepared in this context may be used to inspire an EIA. Below is an example from the 2001
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:219:Box 11: SEA Guidance Document: a comparison with EIA Baseline provisions
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:219:since then. The SEA Guidance can prove useful to applying the EIA provisions to the Baseline. Below are the phrases
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:219: considered in the same way during both assessments, but the aspects themselves may differ between EIA and
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:219: may be affected than an EIA, which may be assessed at a much smaller level of detail.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:219:PART B ‘current state of the environment’ requires that the information be up-to-date. Both the SEA and EIA will
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:219:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:220: implementation of the plan or programme. The same timeframe could be used for an EIA falling under such an
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:220:EIA, given that Developers must provide authorities with data on various issues regularly. EU-level
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:220:IED, may not be directly transferrable to the EIA Report, given that the scope and purpose of these
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:220:collections may differ from EIA requirements. However, previously reported information may prove
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:220: The Baseline assessment is the starting point of an EIA. The Baseline scenario and its assessment
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:220: A Baseline has typically always been included in EIAs, but the 2014 amendments to the EIA
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:220: Directive specify that a Baseline must be included in the EIA Report and that it must include the
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:220:As shown in the box below, Article 3 sets out those environmental factors that EIAs have to consider
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:220:Directive, which provides details about the information required for the EIA Report.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:220:context of the other factors in Article 3(1) of the EIA Directive and thus environmentally related health issues (such as health effects caused
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:220:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:221:Annex IV to the EIA Directive includes direct reference to climate and climate change in two
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:221:understanding these issues in EIAs, the benefits and challenges of integrating them into assessment
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:221:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:222:should be read alongside this section of the EIA guidance document.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:222:because of the Project. The EIA should include an assessment of the direct and indirect greenhouse
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:222:local levels into account, where available. The EIA may also assess the extent to which Projects
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:222:especially at local levels, are challenging to predict. To this end, the EIA analysis should take trends
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:222:adaptation measures considered within EIAs, the Commission Staff working document entitled
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:222:3 For example, such a requirement is already included in the French legislation concerning EIAs.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:222:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:223: Integration of climate change mitigation considerations into EIAs
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:223:The effective assessment of impacts on climate change mitigation within EIAs is heavily dependent
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:223:EIA identifies key European sources of data, including data repositories and online digital datasets
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:223:thought to be useful when integrating climate change in EIA. This guidance document also provides
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:223: Integration of climate change adaptation considerations into EIAs
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:223:As discussed above, the integration of climate change adaptation considerations into EIAs is
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:223:EIA is another important source of information and ideas on how to carry out the assessment (see the
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:223:management approaches in EIAs. It suggests approaches to building adaptive capacity into Projects
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:223:be more resilient to expected risks. It also shows how EIAs can facilitate adaptive capacity and
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:223:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:224:itself to mainstream disaster prevention concerns in the EU legislation and in the EIA Directive in
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:224:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:225:Box 15: Assessment of natural disasters risk in an EIA in Ireland – CJEU, C-215/06, Commission v Ireland
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:225:In 2008, the ECJ ruled that Ireland had failed to fulfil its obligations under several Articles of the EIA Directive. This
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:225:or II to the Directive and, therefore, were not subject to an EIA. However, wind farm construction required a number
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:225:as well as road construction, which were listed in Annex II to the EIA Directive requiring Screening to be carried out.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:225:The competent authority in Ireland assessed that no EIA for these supplementary works was required, given that their
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:225:was no question of difficulties which could have been anticipated by an EIA, even one in conformity with the
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:225:insignificant and that the EIA should have been carried out.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:225:Integration of disaster/accident risk considerations into EIAs
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:225:Including disaster/accident risk assessment in EIAs should address issues such as:
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:225:change). The study on the EIA and risk assessment undertaken as part of the Sixth Framework
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:225:and risk management, lists existing guidelines on the subject and the results of the EIA’s application in
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:225:extraordinary hazards and risks are dealt with in the EIA in the EU Member States, both within the
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:225:regulatory framework and in EIA practice. The study also lists qualitative, semi-quantitative, and
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:225:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:226:Biodiversity Action Plan requiring that ‘all EIAs should take full account of biodiversity concerns’
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:226:Integration of biodiversity considerations into the EIAs
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:226:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:227:The European Commission issued guidance concerning the integration of biodiversity into the EIA in
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:227:that are useful for the integration of biodiversity concerns into the EIAs. Some of these documents are
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:227:Box 18: Guidelines on biodiversity integration in the EIA
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:227: Scoping for EIA.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:227:to the EIA Directive require that this assessment be carried out in coordination with the EIA,
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:227:environmental assessments under Article 2(3) of the EIA Directive (see the Annex to this Guidance
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:227:Document on Other Relevant Guidance and Tools). It is important to bear in mind that EIAs must
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:227:Integration of marine biodiversity into the EIAs
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:227:the marine environment are to be further considered in EIAs for Projects within marine areas. These
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:227:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:228:ecosystem and biodiversity conservation are all subject to the EIA and the Developer will have to
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:228: EMEC, Environmental impact assessment (EIA) guidance for developers at the European Marine Energy Centre
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:228:biodiversity as part of the EIA, is described in the box below.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:228:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:229:The integration of the use of natural resources into EIAs
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:229:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:230: Article 3 of the EIA Directive provides the scope of environmental factors that should be assessed
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:230: by the EIA. This list of environmental issues was broadened by the 2014 amendments to the
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:230: These factors sometimes require EIA practitioners to pay greater attention to issues of risk,
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:230:Article 3 requires that the EIA Report identify, describe, and assess significant effects. Section 1.3
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:230:The EIA Directive stipulates that ‘significant’ effects must be considered when it comes to assessing
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:230:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:231:concept of significant effects is referred to several times throughout the EIA Directive (see the box
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:231:only those relevant for understanding the phrase in the context of the EIA Report. References to cumulative
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:231:As seen in the box above, the concept of significance is a core concept for the EIA Directive; it is one
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:231:that, in essence, guides the EIA process. In addition to the present section, further information on this
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:231: 1.4.2 Significance in the context of the preparation of the EIA Report
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:231:Those preparing the EIA Report may have to determine the significance of the effects of the Project
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:231:upon the environment. This could be because Scoping was not undertaken earlier in the EIA process,
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:231:or additional effects and/or data surface during the evolution of the EIA Report. In these instances, the
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:231:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:232:Furthermore, the EIA Directive requires that significant effects be described in the EIA Report in an
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:232:Box 24: Methodological considerations on the assessment of significant effects in the EIA Report
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:232:‘In order to provide justifiable results, EIA practitioners gather evidence to inform and explain the evaluation of an
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:232:individual effect. Effective EIA practice ensures that the methods used are clearly explained in the environmental
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:232:statement (now EIA Report) so that they can be readily understood by the stakeholders and the public consulted.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:232:regulators and by public and private stakeholders. A common approach used in EIA is the application
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:232:effective and good-quality impact assessments with transparent and clear reporting in the context of EIA and
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:232:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:233:effects, as seen in the legislation box above, Annex IV, point 5 (e) of the EIA Directive requires that
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:233:the cumulation of effects with other existing and/or approved Projects are described in the EIA Report.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:233: by the EIA Directive, this has been clarified by the CJEU – see the box below).
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:233:Box 27: In practice – 2014 amendments to the EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:233:The concept of significance is not a new concept for the EIA Directive; however, the use of the word is more
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:233:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:234: The 2014 amendments align the EIA Directive with the SEA Directive (Annex I(f) to the SEA Directive);
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:234: Effects to be assessed in the EIA should be determined to be significant. This ensures that effort
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:234: anyone preparing an EIA Report who is forced to determine the significance of environmental
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:234:by the EIA Directive. Within the context of the EIA process, Alternatives are different ways of
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:234:The identification of Alternatives to the Project is a long-standing requirement of the EIA Directive,
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:234:but it is often mentioned by practitioners as comprising a difficult element of the EIA process. The
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:234:consideration of Alternatives is an important part of the EIA process, which ought to be reflected in
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:234:the effort and resources allocated to this part of the EIA process (see e.g. Jalava, K., et al., (2010)
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:234:from the outset can reduce unnecessary delays in the EIA process, the adoption of the EIA decision, or
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:234:The legal requirements of the EIA Directive, relating to the assessment of Alternatives, are presented
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:234:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:235:reasonable Alternatives identified will then undergo a detailed description and assessment in the EIA
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:235:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:236:This section further explains the types of Alternatives that should be identified and assessed in the EIA
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:236:Report. It should be noted that each Project and each EIA is different, and there can be no definitive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:236:which case, it would likely be unnecessary to consider them again. In other cases, the EIA practitioner
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:236:for the EIA. Public consultations can also help to identify reasonable Alternatives. Not only do the
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:236:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:237:required, the consideration of certain Alternatives during the preparation of the EIA Report (see the
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:237:the key EIA concepts of significant effects and reasonableness.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:237:The EIA Directive requires that Developers provide the main reasons for selecting the option chosen.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:237:the EIA Directive is a comparison of the environmental effects (Annex IV to the EIA Directive).
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:237:certain situations, this may already be required by other permitting processes parallel to the EIA (e.g.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:237:land-owners in addition to organising public consultations as part of the EIA). In addition, after the
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:237:EIA Report has been drafted (see section B.3.) during public consultations ensuring the public is
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:237:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:238:scenario to be considered and included in the EIA Report. In some cases, however, the ‘do-nothing’
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:238: The EIA Directive requires Developers to describe the reasonable Alternatives that have been
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:238: chosen. This is an important aspect of the EIA Report and one that often challenges practitioners
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:238: The 2014 amendments to the Directive now require the EIA Report to include a description of the
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:238: development programmes) or by the Competent Authority at the EIA Scoping stage. Others might
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:238: concern the technical design and are identified by the Developer. In cases, EIA practitioners may
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:238: of impacts between several options and presented as such in the EIA Report.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:238:effects on the environment are described in the EIA Report. These measures are commonly referred to
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:238:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:239:In addition to the legislative requirements, Recital 35 of the 2014 Directive amending the EIA
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:239:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:240:Measures in an EIA Report. The EIA Report should clearly describe the adverse impact each measure
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:240:This section covers the legislative requirements of the EIA Directive to ensure that adequate
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:240: 1.7.1 Legislative requirements for EIA monitoring
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:240:Measures are, therefore, referred to in Article 8a of the EIA Directive, which outlines the information
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:240:appropriate) should be included in the EIA Report. The description of Monitoring Measures is linked
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:240:stem from other EU or national legislation, then this should be reflected in the EIA Report so as to
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:240:review of the EIA Directive estimated that 50% of Projects developed each year would fall under other
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:240:EU legislation requiring monitoring, and thus monitoring would be carried out regardless of EIA
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:240:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:241:The relevant requirements of the EIA Directive are given in the box below.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:241:Annex IV point 7 on the information referred to in Article 5(1) sets out the information for the EIA Report and
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:241:Monitoring is also referenced in Recital 3513 of the 2014 Directive amending the EIA Directive.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:241:the need for the results of the EIA to be implemented in practice, and for procedures to be put in place
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:241:EIA Report and the Development Consent. A summary is given in the box below.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:241: the EIA Directive should not result in duplication.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:241: Monitoring arrangements have to be examined, where appropriate, during the preparation of the EIA Report
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:241: and are to be included in the EIA Report.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:241: Recital 35 of the 2014 Directive amending the EIA Directive: ‘Member States should ensure that mitigation and compensation measures
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:241:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:242: impacts Projected in the EIA Report and that measures taken to offset such impacts are carried
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:242: to improve the identification of impacts in future EIA Reports;
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:242: the EIA is in line with other EU legislation, especially the SEA Directive14.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:242:The EIA Directive aims to reduce Projects’ significant adverse effects on the environment, as much as
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:242:environment. During the EIA process, such impacts are not only identified, but their evolution is also
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:242:Assessment for future EIAs
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:242:effectiveness of the EIA procedure, with regards to the quality of the data used and the accuracy of the
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:242:approaches and methods. This can improve the transparency, legitimacy, and effectiveness of the EIA
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:242:EIA monitoring. In more practical terms, monitoring should not duplicate the monitoring carried out
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:242: For more information on the importance and utility of EIA follow-up, please refer to Morrison-Saunders A., R. Marshall and J. Arts 2007
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:242:EIA Follow-Up International Best Practice Principles. Special Publication Series No. 6. Fargo, USA: International Association for Impact
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:242:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:243: The EIA Report shall include ‘a description of the measures envisaged
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:243: and programmes, and in preparing information which will be needed for EIAs
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:243:assessments conducted under Article 2(3) of the EIA Directive, OJ C 273/1, 27.07.2016
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:243:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:244:recommended in the EIA Report to avoid, prevent, reduce or to offset effects. The cost of monitoring
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:244:The EIA Directive does not specify how to carry out monitoring, who should do it or how monitoring
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:244:practitioners can take into account when designing Monitoring Measures as part of the EIA Report.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:244:The French ‘Grenelle 2’ law, n°2010-788 of 12 July 2010 introduced a requirement for EIAs to include a description
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:244:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:245: the EIA Report. Monitoring Measures may be linked to other legal requirements, such as those
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:245: EIA Directive as part of the 2014 amendments (Article 8a and Annex IV).
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:245: legal requirements, and that impacts are in line with EIA Report Projections. They should also
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:245: Monitoring Measures can also provide insight into the quality of the EIA procedure carried out,
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:245: and can generate lessons learned and good practices for future EIAs.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:245: proposed Mitigation Measures, then additional measures may be proposed within the EIA Report.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:245:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:246: 2 QUALITY OF THE EIA REPORT
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:246:This section covers the quality of the EIA Report. It addresses the format and presentation of the EIA
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:246:preparing and reviewing the EIA Report.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:246:2.1 FORMAT AND PRESENTATION OF THE EIA REPORT
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:246:The main aim of an EIA Report is to provide prudent information for two types of audiences –
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:246: 2.1.1 The qualities of a good EIA Report
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:246:To this end, Article 3(1) of the EIA Directive requires that significant effects be identified, assessed
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:246:presented in an EIA Report that enables stakeholders and authorities to form opinions and to take
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:246:format and the presentation of the report, it is recommended that the EIA Report clearly sets out the
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:246:The box below provides some of the main characteristics that a good EIA Report should have to meet
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:246:Box 39: The qualities of a good EIA Report
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:246: A description of the Development Consent procedure and how EIA fits within it;
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:246:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:247:As can be seen in the box above, Article 5(1)(e) of the EIA Directive requires Developers to include a
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:247:Non-Technical Summary of the EIA Report. This obligation is reiterated under Annex IV, point 9.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:247:knowledge of the Project, and should be easily identifiable within the EIA Report –provided either at
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:247:EIA Report authors may also consider providing context about the methodology for carrying out the
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:247:EIA, highlighting any significant uncertainties about the outcomes. It may also be useful to describe
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:247:the Development Consent process for the Project, and the role of the EIA in this process, to help lay
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:247:members of the public to understand the context for the EIA.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:247:an EIA Report. These points are further reiterated in the checklist under Part C.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:247: The Non-Technical Summary is easily identifiable and is accessible within the EIA Report;
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:247: EIA in that process;
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:247:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:248:The effectiveness of the EIA procedure relies upon high-quality EIA Reports that can be properly
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:248:review of the EIA Report.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:248:A high-quality EIA Report must be prepared by competent experts, experts who understand the
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:248:of the experts and those reviewing the EIA.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:248:Article 5(3) of the EIA Directive refers to the quality of the expertise used to carry out the EIA report
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:248: the Developer needs to ensure the quality of the experts who prepare the EIA Report;
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:248: and to evaluate the EIA Report; and
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:248:This section examines how experts, used by a Developer to prepare EIA Reports, can be considered to
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:248:EIA experts.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:248:preparing the EIA Report. The EIA Directive does not go into detail, requiring that experts be for
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:248:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:249:The original approach proposed during the 2012 review of the EIA Directive was to include the phrase
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:249:the 2014 Directive amending the EIA Directive: ‘experts involved in the preparation of
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:249:In most cases, the changes will not have much effect on those carrying out the EIA:
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:249:The new provisions provide a more formal check on the EIA Report:
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:249: Experts must be proven to be competent, especially if the EIA is contested afterwards;
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:249: the EIA Report, and look to external expertise where required even if the costs incurred are higher.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:249:Different approaches to ensuring the competence of the experts engaged by Developers to prepare EIA
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:249:Poland has employed several approaches to determine ‘competent experts’ since the 1980s (N.B. a form of EIA
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:249: most EIAs are done at a regional, decentralised level. The approach was, subsequently, abandoned.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:249:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:250: National Commission is to provide opinions on complex EIA matters and cases. There are also Regional EIA
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:250: Committees, which act as advisory bodies for regional directors for environmental protection. The EIA
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:250: proven experience doing EIAs under the supervision of more senior experts. Transparency also plays a
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:250:Many Member States do have such approaches in place that allow for the discovery of EIA experts
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:250:preparation of the EIA Reports have been duly certified. It should be noted that what makes an expert
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:250:This approach requires experts who wish to prepare EIA Reports to undertake specialist training,
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:250:Examples of this approach exist in Belgium, where only accredited persons can be designated as EIA
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:250:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:251:EIAs when being selected for the role of preparing the EIA Report, regardless of their formal
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:251:approach and should be demonstrable in case the quality of the EIA Report is questioned thereafter.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:251:Just as Developers need to ensure that the EIA Report is prepared by competent experts, authorities
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:251:also need to be able to demonstrate that they have sufficient experts to examine and evaluate EIA
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:251:Article 5(3) of the EIA Directive requires that the Competent Authorities have access to the necessary
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:251:expertise required to accurately assess an EIA Report. Recital 33 of the EIA Directive states that:
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:251:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:252:structure and logic of the EIA Report, as well as the overall quality of the data, judgements, and
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:252:channels. In some Member States, where EIAs have been carried out for decades, those reviewing EIA
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:252:In most cases, the changes will not have much of an effect on those examining the EIA Report:
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:252: The Competent Authorities reviewing large number of EIAs already have the necessary expertise;
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:252:necessary to examine EIA Reports, where this is not available in-house. If individual experts are
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:252:detailed above, can also be used to find competent experts to carry out a review of the EIA Report on
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:252:EIA Reports.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:252:Several Member States ensure that all authorities have access to sufficient expertise to review EIA
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:252:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:253:who are then responsible for providing opinions on EIAs. In France, the review body is made up of
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:253:include members of the civil society). For instance, in Cyprus, ten members comprise the EIA
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:253:and body EIA Committee General Council of Technical Commission Netherlands
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:253:Proximity to Integrated into the Integrated into the Integrated into the EIA Integrated into the EIA
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:253:EIA procedure EIA procedure EIA procedure procedure procedure
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:253:involvement EIA Screening Authority for certain body: preparation of the EIA
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:253: each EIA programmes, cf. Scoping of the
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:253: Report SEA). EIA;
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:253: consults the Oversees the EIA conditions during interim
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:253: regard to any EIA Scoping checks if requested;
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:253: EIA issues issues an compliance with checks whether
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:253: opinion on the the requirements the EIA contains
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:253: EIA Report EIA decision necessary
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:253: of the EIA
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:253:Time taken for Opinion on the EIA Opinion on EIA Opinion on the EIA
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:253: EIA Report is ask for additional
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:253:16 The creation of the Committee is provided under Article 5 of the main law on EIA (Law 140(I)/2005 – as amended).
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:253:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:254:EIAs
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:254: EIA study.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:254:The Directive requires that the EIA Report shall be prepared by competent experts:
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:254: Where previously Developers were not formally obliged to use competent experts to prepare EIA
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:254: Reports, they are now required to ensure that the EIA Reports are prepared by such experts;
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:254: Many Member States have adopted systems to ensure that the EIA Report is prepared by
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:254:The Directive requires that Competent Authorities have sufficient expertise to review an EIA Report:
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:254:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:255:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:256:The EIA Report is ultimately an informative decision-making tool: once it has been prepared by the
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:256:information during the preparation of the EIA Report. It looks at the requirements of the EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:256:with regards to public consultation and the role of EIA in the decision on Development Consent,
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:256:3.1 CONSULTATIONS ON THE EIA REPORT
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:256:and, in particular, of applicable time-frames as they impact on those preparing the EIA Report.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:256:Articles 6 and 7 of the EIA Directive are the main provisions of the EIA Directive on consultations. A
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:256:to be consulted during the EIA process, and (iii) lays out some minimum standards to ensure that this
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:256:Furthermore, it should be borne in mind that Article 8 of the EIA Directive requires the results of these
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:256:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:257: public authorities likely to be concerned (Article 6(1) of the EIA Directive):
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:257: the public concerned (Article 6(2), 6(3), 6(4) of the EIA Directive):
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:257:preparation of the EIA Report, the reactions of the Competent Authority/Authorities at the time the
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:257:comments and opinions. Exactly how this is done is up to Member States to decide, although the EIA
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:257:the public. This information includes the EIA Report itself.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:257: relevant parties in affected other Member States (Article 7 of the EIA Directive):
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:257:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:258: no other minimum or maximum is provided, yet Article 6(6) of the EIA Directive requests that
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:258:Some of the requirements detailed above were included in the EIA Directive in 2014 and are
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:258:The Developers and practitioners preparing EIA Reports need to be aware that information needs to be
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:258:the information are also left up to Member States; however, it is worth noting that the EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:258:provide certainty that different steps in the EIA process will occur within a certain period of time.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:258: Explanation of the use of the term ‘reasonable’ by the EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:258:Pursuant to the principle of subsidiarity, the EIA Directive leaves the precise determination of the
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:258:below, Projects requiring an EIA differ in size, scale, location and complexity, and therefore setting
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:258:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:259:Box 51: Understanding the concept of ‘reasonable’ with regard to timing in the EIA procedure
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:259: Recital 36 of the 2014 Directive amending the EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:259: Average duration of the EIA process
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:259:The average duration of an EIA procedure was estimated to be 11.3 months but figures range from 5 to 27
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:259:months. The average time taken to reach the final EIA decision after completion of the consultations was 2
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:259:Source - GHK (2010), Collection of information and data to support the IA study of the review of the EIA Directive.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:259: Defining reasonable time-frames in application of the EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:259:Article 6 of the EIA Directive makes several references to reasonable time-frames when it comes to
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:259:gives 30 days as the minimum amount of time for consulting the public on the EIA Report.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:259:applicable to the EIA procedure (see also the Annex to this Guidance Document on Other Relevant
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:259:EIAs for Projects that are likely to have significant effects on the environment in another Member
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:259:the Espoo Convention could support the interpretation and implementation of the EIA Directive in this
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:259:Practitioners developing the EIA Report should familiarise themselves with these Articles and national
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:259:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:260:Projects are often subject to several environmental assessment procedures, including the EIA. Article
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:260:2(3) of the EIA Directive requires either a coordinated or joint procedure for Projects falling under the
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:260:scope of both the EIA and the Birds/Habitats Directives. In addition, this Article encourages the use of
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:260:coordinated procedures when assessments of the effects on the environment arise from the EIA and
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:260:conducted under Article 2(3) of the EIA Directive provides advice about how to manage different
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:260:In any case, if time-frames are set-out, Recital 36 of the 2014 Directive amending the EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:260:The following box provides a few tips on setting reasonable time-frames for EIAs.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:260:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:261: The EIA Directive requires consultations with three different groups on the content of the EIA
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:261: The Directive sets out an explicit minimum time-frame for public consultations on the EIA
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:261:The definition of the EIA in Article 1 of the Directive refers to:
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:261: impacts of the Project based on the EIA Report and on other relevant information, including
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:261:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:262:environmental conditions stemming from the EIA decision are not sidelined when making the
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:262:Development Consent decision. Thus, the aim is to ensure that the EIA process has informed the
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:262:explains the two different systems envisaged by the EIA Directive that may be used in the Member
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:262:Article 1(2)(g) of the EIA Directive (introduced by the 2014 amendments), which defines the EIA
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:262:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:263:(CJEU). In this judgement, the Court ruled that Article 3 of the EIA Directive is a fundamental
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:263:provision that should guide the whole EIA process. This provision requires the EIA process to not
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:263:information supplied in the EIA Report and of the results of the consultations.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:263:As described above, the Competent Authority must examine the information provided in the EIA
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:263: Examine and justify the different tools and methods used during the preparation of the EIA Report, and
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:263: Examine the information and data provided in the EIA Report and during consultations. Key messages of the
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:263:In relation to this point, the EIA Directive allows for the existence of different EIA systems in the
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:263:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:264:The underlying idea, presented under Recital 21 of the 2014 Directive amending the EIA Directive, is
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:264:regards to the implementation of the EIA Directive. These two systems can be described as, on the one
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:264:hand, a separate EIA procedure, and an integrated procedure where the EIA is one of the assessments
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:264:The integrated procedure system consists of an EIA procedure carried out in parallel with other
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:264: The separate EIA procedure
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:264:Under the separate EIA procedure, the Reasoned Conclusion is adopted via a decision procedure that
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:264:EIA Directive ensures that the environmental conditions set out in the Reasoned Conclusion are
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:264:Conclusion on the EIA are binding, they should be followed when the Development Consent is
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:264:Article 8a(5) of the EIA Directive concerns the time-frames set in which the decisions taken during the
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:264:EIA process must be made.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:264:to more efficient decision-making and increasing certainty as well as avoiding lengthy EIA
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:264:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:265:The EIA Directive requires that the authority, competent for the Development Consent, must ensure
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:265:Article 8a(5). Indeed, in the context of separate EIA procedure, the environmental assessment may
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:265:the EIA procedure in Croatia.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:265:Its Article 92 sets the duration of validity of the final EIA decision for up to two years. More specifically, it renders
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:265:the EIA decision invalid if an operator does not request a permit leading to the construction permit within two
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:265:The 2014 legislative change of the EIA Directive added the word ‘promptly’ to Article 9(1) so as to
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:265:the EIA Directive. This suggests that there is not a specified maximum period (time-frame) in which
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:265:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:266: 3.2.4 Decision-making on the EIA Report: in a nutshell
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:266: information provided in the EIA Report, an assessment of the results of consultations, and, if
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:266: Separated EIA procedure – the Reasoned Conclusion, as a legally binding environmental
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:266:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:267:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:268:PART C – THE EIA REPORT CHECKLIST
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:268:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:269:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:270:reviewing of an EIA Report. The checklist is intended to be used in conjunction with this Guidance
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:270:Document; it can be used at multiple stages of the EIA procedure in various ways:
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:270: for planning and guiding the preparation of an EIA Report by Developers or practitioners;
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:270: for authorities to carry out the examination of the EIA Report once it has been submitted.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:270:been developed as a flexible tool to enable different actors in the EIA procedure to use it at different
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:270:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:271:envisaged by the EIA Directive. It also covers different types of user responsibilities, such as
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:271: the stage of the EIA procedure (e.g. planning, draft report completed, final review etc.);
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:271: include the point in the planning of the EIA Report; or
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:271: review the EIA Report in more detail and decide whether the particular information identified in
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:271:to identify or request further information. This will avoid unnecessary delay to the EIA process.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:271: Developers reviewing the EIA Report, prior to submission, may find that the information
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:271: provided by the EIA practitioners is not sufficient and may request that the practitioners gather
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:271:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:272: during the consultations. The Competent Authorities intervening in the EIA process must be
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:272:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:273:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:274:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:275:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:276:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:277:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:278: suggested as part of the EIA Report’s
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:278:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:279:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:280:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:281:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:282: information for the EIA Report defined been
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:282:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:283:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:284: see http://europa.eu. environment/eia/eia-support
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:284:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:285:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:286: preparing the EIA Report, identified and
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:286:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:287:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:288: the EIA Report and the Developer have
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:288:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:289:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:290: the EIA Report and the Developer have
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:290:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:291:7.1 Is the EIA Report available in one or more
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:291:7.13 Does the EIA Report include a Non-Technical
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:291: Consent process for the Project and the EIA’s
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:291:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:292: responsible for the preparation of the EIA
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:292: EIA Report?
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:292: preparation of the EIA Report?
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:292:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:293:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:294:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:295:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:296:The EIA Directive is just one of many pieces of EU legislation in place that affect environmental and
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:296:Streamlining measures can, therefore, be found in the EIA Directive:
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:296: Joint or coordinated procedures (Article 2(3) of the EIA Directive)
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:296:Article 2(3) of the EIA Directive requires Member States to set up coordinated or joint procedures
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:296:when an assessment is required, both under the EIA Directive and the Habitats Directive (see below).
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:296: Consideration of other assessments (Article 4(4), Article 5(1) of the EIA Directive)
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:296:Article 4(4) of the EIA Directive relating to the Screening stage of the EIA process, as well as Article
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:296:5(1) of the EIA Directive on the preparation of the EIA Report, requires practitioners to take the
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:296: Other relevant information held by authorities (Article 5(4) of the EIA Directive)
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:296:In order to strengthen the availability of data, Article 5(4) of the EIA Directive requires any authorities
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:296:holding relevant information to make it available to the Developers of Projects subject to EIA.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:296:This section introduces the main pieces of EU legislation relevant for streamlining with EIA.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:296:Some of these EU guidance documents are referred to in the relevant sections under Part B of the EIA
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:296:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:297: assessments conducted under Article 2(3) of the EIA Directive;
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:297:proposed Project will have been carried out prior to the EIA. Article 3(2) of the SEA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:297:Annexes I and II to the EIA Directive.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:297:The SEA and EIA are similar procedures, despite the former being carried out on plans and
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:297:much of the work carried out under the SEA can be built upon for the EIA. Alternatives identified
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:297:during the SEA may be relevant for the EIA, some of the data gathered under the SEA may be used to
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:297:form the baseline of the EIA. Practitioners carrying out the EIA should consult the SEA report done
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:297:and Tools) provides guidance on how to take advantage of synergies between the SEA and EIA
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:297:During the Screening procedure of EIA Projects, assessments carried out under the SEA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:297:Joint or coordinated procedures are not directly provided for by the provisions of the EIA and SEA
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:297:Directives, given that one relates to projects (Article 2(3) of the EIA Directive) and the other to
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:297:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:298:undertaken within the framework of the EIA Directive does not dispense with the requirement to carry
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:298: conducted under Article 2(3) of the EIA Directive;
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:298:The scope of the AA and the EIA is different – the EIA should consider all significant environmental
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:298:Article 2(3) of the EIA Directive stipulates that when Projects have to be assessed under both the EIA
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:298:procedures. The EIA Directive makes several references to the Habitats Directive, for example, when
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:298:practitioners in the extent to which the results from an AA assessment is taken into account in an EIA
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:298:Article 2(3) of the EIA Directive, full references in the Annex to this Guidance Document on Other
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:298:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:299:guidance: conducted under Article 2(3) of the EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:299:may be carried out jointly with the EIA procedure. However, the requirement of Article 4(7) of the
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:299:WFD goes beyond the requirements of the EIA Directive in the sense that it covers activities that may
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:299:not be listed in Annex I or II to the EIA Directive.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:299:process of the RBMP. Hence, synergies can be gained for part of an EIA through data collection and
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:299:discussed above, if a Project listed in Annex I or II to the EIA Directive is found to impact the status
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:299:requirements of the Water Framework Directive. This may influence the scope and nature of an EIA
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:299:Article 2(3) of the EIA Directive provides the option for joint or coordinated procedures where
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:299:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:300:adopted in Member States may influence the scope and nature of an EIA Report in the sense that it
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:300:Article 2(3) of the EIA Directive provides the option for joint or coordinated procedures where
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:300:During the preparation of the EIA Report, the existence of air quality objectives as well as existing air
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:300:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:301:Relevant EU Application of EIA Directive to the rehabilitation of landfills.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:301:waste management installations, which are likely to constitute Projects subject to the EIA Directive.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:301:The EIA Directive may also bear relevance for any Project with regard to the waste produced not only
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:301:During the preparation of the EIA Report, the waste produced and returned to the Project location
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:301:‘Interpretation of definitions of Project categories of Annex I and II to the EIA Directive’ (see the
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:301:Annex to this Guidance Document on Other Relevant Guidance and Tools): the EIA Directive and the
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:301:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:302:aligns closely with the EIA Directive and ‘Member States have discretion to use the thresholds set by
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:302:Annex I to the IED in the context of the EIA Directive’ (Commission Guidance Document,
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:302:Interpretation of definitions of Project categories of Annex I and II to the EIA Directive, see the
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:302:considered, the IED does require specific monitoring, part of which can be used for the EIA. The
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:302:in EIA monitoring proposals.
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:302:Article 2(3) of the EIA Directive provides the option for joint or coordinated procedures where
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:302:guidance: under Article 2(3) of the EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:302:The Seveso Directive is highly relevant to a number of assessments under the EIA Directive such as
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:302:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:303:EIA can be gained for a part of the EIA report containing the design of installations and the
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:303:for the Screening, Scoping and Preparation of the EIA Report stages in relation to: quantitative
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:303:Article 2(3) of the EIA Directive provides the option for joint or coordinated procedures where
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:303:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:304:justice requirements under the EIA Directive, or the Access to Justice provisions under the IED
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:304:impact across boundaries. Article 7 of the EIA Directive provides the legal basis for regulating
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:304:Member States' rights and obligations in case of an EIA Procedure for a Project with transboundary
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:304:implementation of the EIA procedure. The main text indicates that public participation should be
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:304:response. Furthermore, just as the EIA Directive requires ‘reasonable timeframes’, so too does the
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:304:Aarhus Convention. These may have an impact on the different stages discussed in the EIA Guidance
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:304:Document series, for instance in relation to consultations, the EIA Directive establishes specific
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:304:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:305:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:306:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:307: Article 2(3) of the EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:307: Commission, Interpretation of definitions of Project categories of annex I and II to the EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:307: Commission Services Non-Paper: Application of EIA Directive to the rehabilitation of landfills
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:307:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:308: EMEC, Environmental impact assessment (EIA) guidance for developers at the European Marine
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:308: of EIA professionals, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 28:1, 15-27
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:308: ood Examples of EIA and SEA Regulation and Practice in five European
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:308:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:309: screening and scoping for EIA
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:309: UK Environment Agency: Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), A handbook for Scoping projects
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:309: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/193705/eiaguida
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:309:Milieu Ltd Preparation of guidance documents for the implementation of EIA Directive
EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:6: commenced at the EIA Scoping Stage with the preparation of the EIA Scoping
EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:7: design evolution of the Proposed Development and the EIA are set out where
EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:7:EIA Scoping (SPZs), Drinking Areas/Safeguard Zones and licensed
EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:7:EIA Scoping contamination prior to commencement of the assessment of the
EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:7: necessary remediation measures should be EIA is being
EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:8:EIA Scoping Land Contamination: Risk Management Conditions and
EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:8:EIA Scoping corridors under the River Tees. Should works be Effects. Key
EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:8:EIA Scoping corridors be provided on the storage and disposal of need to be
EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:9:EIA Scoping connections number of piled foundations. constructed. See
EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:9: EIA is being
EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:9:EIA Scoping land that is temporarily affected during the
EN010103-002629-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 5 - Equinor - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:114: Industry Association (SEIA) to increase the visibility in our supply
EN010103-Advice-00010-1-FINAL_210621 - Net Zero Teeside Meeting Note.pdf:13: the Low-Carbon Electricity Generating which the EIA has assessed the
EN010103-Advice-00010-1-FINAL_210621 - Net Zero Teeside Meeting Note.pdf:13: effects of the electrical connection works. The EIA basis for the assessment.
EN010103-Advice-00010-1-FINAL_210621 - Net Zero Teeside Meeting Note.pdf:17: confirm the worst case number of abnormal loads EIA has assessed the likely significant effects of AILs ES Volume I - Chapter 16: Traffic
EN010103-002248-NZT DCO 9.36 - Nutrient Nitrogen Briefing Paper - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:117:Proposed Development, the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for NZT is being undertaken
EN010103-002248-NZT DCO 9.36 - Nutrient Nitrogen Briefing Paper - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:119:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-002314-NZT DCO 8.13 - PD Teesport SoCG (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:2: findings of the EIA
EN010103-002314-NZT DCO 8.13 - PD Teesport SoCG (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:3: other matters to ensure that it accords with the EIA
EN010103-002247-NZT DCO 9.35 - Applicants' Comments on Deadline 7 Submissions - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-002247-NZT DCO 9.35 - Applicants' Comments on Deadline 7 Submissions - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:19:6.2.13 These paragraphs discuss the concept of the EIA “project”. The conclusion is at
EN010103-002247-NZT DCO 9.35 - Applicants' Comments on Deadline 7 Submissions - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:19: paragraph 22: that the EIA “project” is “the NZT Teesside DCO scheme and the CO2
EN010103-002247-NZT DCO 9.35 - Applicants' Comments on Deadline 7 Submissions - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:19: is that the scope of the EIA “project” is not in dispute. It has never been the
EN010103-002247-NZT DCO 9.35 - Applicants' Comments on Deadline 7 Submissions - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:19: Applicant’s case that the EIA “project” is limited to the DCO elements (the “proposed
EN010103-002247-NZT DCO 9.35 - Applicants' Comments on Deadline 7 Submissions - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:19: projects” to “circumvent” the EIA regime. So far as the examination and
EN010103-002247-NZT DCO 9.35 - Applicants' Comments on Deadline 7 Submissions - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:19: (such rights not being available for “EIA development”). The circumstances are not
EN010103-002247-NZT DCO 9.35 - Applicants' Comments on Deadline 7 Submissions - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:20: the environmental effects of the associated works cannot be deferred…and the EIA
EN010103-002247-NZT DCO 9.35 - Applicants' Comments on Deadline 7 Submissions - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:20:6.2.20 At paragraph 23 of the Opinion it is asserted: “The EIA therefore has to be of the
EN010103-002247-NZT DCO 9.35 - Applicants' Comments on Deadline 7 Submissions - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:20: assess the effects of the EIA “project” on Hornsea Project 4 (“HP4”). The Applicants
EN010103-002247-NZT DCO 9.35 - Applicants' Comments on Deadline 7 Submissions - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:20: under the Infrastructure Planning (EIA) Regulations 2017 (“EIA Regulations”). For the
EN010103-002247-NZT DCO 9.35 - Applicants' Comments on Deadline 7 Submissions - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:20: 5(e) of Schedule 4 of the EIA Regulations 2017. This only imposes a legal requirement
EN010103-002247-NZT DCO 9.35 - Applicants' Comments on Deadline 7 Submissions - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:21: under the EIA Regulations or NPS EN-1). Plainly though, the fundamental point is that
EN010103-002247-NZT DCO 9.35 - Applicants' Comments on Deadline 7 Submissions - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:21: EIA Regulations or NPS EN1 (or both). In short, the issue is entirely academic.
EN010103-002247-NZT DCO 9.35 - Applicants' Comments on Deadline 7 Submissions - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:21:6.2.26 These paragraphs appear to take the concept of the EIA “project” a step further and
EN010103-002247-NZT DCO 9.35 - Applicants' Comments on Deadline 7 Submissions - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:21: outside of the Overlap Zone. That being the case, the EIA “project” (the DCO project
EN010103-002247-NZT DCO 9.35 - Applicants' Comments on Deadline 7 Submissions - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:22: on HP4 (whether under the EIA Regulations or NPS EN1) as part of the DCO
EN010103-002247-NZT DCO 9.35 - Applicants' Comments on Deadline 7 Submissions - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:22: informed by EIA. That separate decision-making process is not only plainly capable
EN010103-002247-NZT DCO 9.35 - Applicants' Comments on Deadline 7 Submissions - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:22: of securing any mitigation shown to be necessary through the process of EIA and
EN010103-001587-NZT DCO 8.5 - Environment Agency SoCG - May 2022.pdf:3: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - the
EN010103-001587-NZT DCO 8.5 - Environment Agency SoCG - May 2022.pdf:3: accordance with the EIA Regulations
EN010103-001587-NZT DCO 8.5 - Environment Agency SoCG - May 2022.pdf:3: EIA Regulations Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
EN010103-001587-NZT DCO 8.5 - Environment Agency SoCG - May 2022.pdf:3: findings of the EIA
EN010103-001587-NZT DCO 8.5 - Environment Agency SoCG - May 2022.pdf:4: with the EIA and does not result in unacceptable
EN010103-001587-NZT DCO 8.5 - Environment Agency SoCG - May 2022.pdf:10: February 2019 (EIA The Environment Agency were consulted on the EIA Scoping
EN010103-001587-NZT DCO 8.5 - Environment Agency SoCG - May 2022.pdf:11: Environment Agency EIA scoping consultation
EN010103-001587-NZT DCO 8.5 - Environment Agency SoCG - May 2022.pdf:11: inform the finalisation of the EIA and the overall DCO
EN010103-001587-NZT DCO 8.5 - Environment Agency SoCG - May 2022.pdf:15: Environmental throughout the pre-application period to help inform the EIA. It is
EN010103-002639-NZT DCO 8.18 - CATS SoCG - Final (signed) - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:2: findings of the EIA
EN010103-002639-NZT DCO 8.18 - CATS SoCG - Final (signed) - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:4: other matters to ensure that it accords with the EIA
EN010103-002460-DLA Piper UK LLP - Other- Protective provisions position statement requested by ExA 19.pdf:66: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (12).pdf:14: 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (12).pdf:14: 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 2
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (12).pdf:14: 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 3
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (12).pdf:14: 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (12).pdf:14: 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 2
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (12).pdf:14: 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 3
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (2).pdf:1:Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the 2017 EIA Regulations)
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (2).pdf:3:Regulations 2017 (the 2017 EIA Regulations) and on the basis of the current information
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (2).pdf:4:Note: The SoS’ duty under Regulation 32 of the 2017 EIA Regulations continues
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (2).pdf:6: Under Regulation 32 of the 2017 EIA Regulations and on the basis of the current
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (2).pdf:6: Note: The SoS’ duty under Regulation 32 of the 2017 EIA Regulations continues
EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:3: Assessment (EIA) process and are reported in the Environmental Statement
EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:4: prior assessment of environmental impacts (through the EIA);
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (7).pdf:1:Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the 2017 EIA Regulations)
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (7).pdf:3:Regulations 2017 (the 2017 EIA Regulations) and on the basis of the current information
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (7).pdf:4:Note: The SoS’ duty under Regulation 32 of the 2017 EIA Regulations continues
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (7).pdf:6: Under Regulation 32 of the 2017 EIA Regulations and on the basis of the current
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (7).pdf:6: Note: The SoS’ duty under Regulation 32 of the 2017 EIA Regulations continues
EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:2: Assessment (EIA) process and are reported in the Environmental Statement
EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:3: • prior assessment of potential environmental impacts (through the EIA);
EN010103-001250-220126 - NZT DCO - Letter to ExA re timing of PM_Exam - Final.pdf:2: implications of the changes in terms of matters such as EIA and the compulsory acquisition of
EN010103-001903-NZT DCO 8.18 - CATS SoCG (Tracked) July 2022 (D4).pdf:2: findings of the EIA
EN010103-001903-NZT DCO 8.18 - CATS SoCG (Tracked) July 2022 (D4).pdf:4: other matters to ensure that it accords with the EIA
EN010103-000904-NZT DCO 6.2.20 ES Vol I Chapter 20 Socio-economics.pdf:2: with the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) to capture the impacts of
EN010103-000904-NZT DCO 6.2.20 ES Vol I Chapter 20 Socio-economics.pdf:5: environmental effects of the Proposed Development, the EIA is being
EN010103-000904-NZT DCO 6.2.20 ES Vol I Chapter 20 Socio-economics.pdf:9: commenced at the EIA Scoping Stage with the preparation of the EIA Scoping
EN010103-000904-NZT DCO 6.2.20 ES Vol I Chapter 20 Socio-economics.pdf:9: EIA is set out where relevant within each of the topic chapters in the ES and
EN010103-000904-NZT DCO 6.2.20 ES Vol I Chapter 20 Socio-economics.pdf:36: have been undertaken as part of the EIA process and are reported in the
EN010103-001415-Andrew Boswell -.pdf:1:requirements of the EIA Regulations. And on the issue “Emissions of greenhouse gases arising from the
EN010103-001917-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - July 2022 (D4).pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - a term used
EN010103-001917-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - July 2022 (D4).pdf:3: EIA Regulations The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental
EN010103-001917-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - July 2022 (D4).pdf:13: 'EIA Regulations').
EN010103-001917-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - July 2022 (D4).pdf:13: with the statutory requirements of the PA 2008, the APFP Regulations and the EIA
EN010103-001917-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - July 2022 (D4).pdf:17: Non-Technical Summary EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001917-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - July 2022 (D4).pdf:18: Volume I – Main Text EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001917-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - July 2022 (D4).pdf:18: EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001917-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - July 2022 (D4).pdf:18: Methodology EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001917-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - July 2022 (D4).pdf:18: Existing Area EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001917-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - July 2022 (D4).pdf:18: Development EIA Reg. 14 Rev. 2.0
EN010103-001917-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - July 2022 (D4).pdf:18: Programme and Management EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001917-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - July 2022 (D4).pdf:18: Design Evolution EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001917-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - July 2022 (D4).pdf:18: Planning Policy EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001917-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - July 2022 (D4).pdf:18: EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001917-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - July 2022 (D4).pdf:18: Risk and Water Resources and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001917-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - July 2022 (D4).pdf:18: Hydrogeology and and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001917-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - July 2022 (D4).pdf:18: EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001917-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - July 2022 (D4).pdf:18: and Nature Conservation and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001917-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - July 2022 (D4).pdf:18: and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001917-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - July 2022 (D4).pdf:18: Nature Conservation and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001917-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - July 2022 (D4).pdf:19: and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001917-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - July 2022 (D4).pdf:19: Transport EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001917-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - July 2022 (D4).pdf:19: Visual Amenity and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001917-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - July 2022 (D4).pdf:19: and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001917-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - July 2022 (D4).pdf:19: and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001917-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - July 2022 (D4).pdf:19: Tourism EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001917-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - July 2022 (D4).pdf:19: EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001917-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - July 2022 (D4).pdf:19: Disasters EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001917-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - July 2022 (D4).pdf:19: Human Health EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001917-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - July 2022 (D4).pdf:19: Combined Effects EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001917-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - July 2022 (D4).pdf:19: Significant Effects EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001917-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - July 2022 (D4).pdf:19: (o) and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001917-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - July 2022 (D4).pdf:29: (o) and EIA Reg. 14 unless
EN010103-001917-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - July 2022 (D4).pdf:29: 6.4.1 Appendix 1A: EIA Scoping -
EN010103-001917-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - July 2022 (D4).pdf:29: 6.4.2 Appendix 1B: EIA Scoping -
EN010103-001239-South Tees Development Corporation - Relevant Representation to NZT DCO - 17.12.21.pdf:17: Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Environmental Statement
EN010103-001226-211025- NZT - s56 Notice - Final_Redacted.pdf:1:‘Accepted application – publicity and consultation for EIA development’
EN010103-001226-211025- NZT - s56 Notice - Final_Redacted.pdf:3:11. The Proposed Development is an Environmental impact Assessment (‘EIA’) development under
EN010103-001226-211025- NZT - s56 Notice - Final_Redacted.pdf:3:therefore includes an Environmental Statement (‘ES’) documenting the findings of the EIA undertaken.
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (5).pdf:14: 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (5).pdf:14: 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 2
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (5).pdf:14: 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 3
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (5).pdf:14: 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (5).pdf:14: 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 2
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (5).pdf:14: 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 3
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:23:9.4.2 The EIA Scoping Addendum Report was submitted in February 2019 and the
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:23: Scoping Opinion was received in April 2019. The EIA PEI Report was
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:119: support the EIA of the Northern Gateway Container Terminal (NGCT) and
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:3: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - a term used
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:3: EIA Regulations The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:7:16.0 EIA Related Consultation …………………………………………………………………………. 214
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:10:Appendix 13.3: list of EIA Consultation Bodies …………………………………………………….. 254
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:10:Appendix 13.4: Letter to EIA Regulation 13 Consultation Bodies……………………………… 255
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:12: ‘EIA Regulations') and have regard to government guidance2. This includes
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:14: 9 to 17 July 2020 EIA Regulation 13: publication of
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:14: notification of EIA consultation
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:18: Advice Note 3 ‘EIA consultation and notification’ (August 2017), which provides
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:18: Appendix 1 of the EIA Scoping Opinion issued by PINS on 2 April 2019, which followed
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:18: a request under EIA Regulation for an EIA Scoping Opinion dated 19 February 2019.
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:21:1.10.4 EIA Regulation 13 places a requirement on applicants, where a DCO application is for
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:21: EIA development, to, at the same time as publishing the Section 48 notice, send a
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:21: copy to the relevant consultation bodies (the ‘EIA consultation bodies’) as defined by
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:21: the EIA Regulations. This was done at the start of the Stage 2 Consultation. The
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:21: letters that were sent to Section 42 consultees, who were also EIA consultation
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:23:1.13 Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Consultation
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:23:1.13.1 The Applicants carried out the following EIA consultation activities:
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:23: Notifying PINS of their intention to carry out an EIA; applying to PINS for a
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:23: Scoping Opinion as to the topics to be covered by the EIA.
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:23: Notifying EIA consultation bodies in accordance with EIA Regulation 13
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:30: Relevant APFP Regulations (as amended) and the 2017 EIA
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:32: Publicise’ notification of EIA consultees under EIA Regulation
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:33: Section 16 EIA Related Provides a summary of the EIA related consultation
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:33: 2017 EIA Regulations in order facilitate the EIA
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:35: 9 to 17 July 2020 publicise’ & EIA
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:35: notification of EIA
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:40: EIA Consultation undertaken as part of the EIA related consultation, including
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:40: Regulations EIA regime is separate to that required that in relation to scoping, the
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:40: responses received under the EIA (‘PEI Report’) for the consultation,
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:40: process, but any reference to this compliance with EIA Regulation 13
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:46: 2017 (‘the EIA Regulations').
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:48: days by Regulation 36(4)©(ii) of the 2017 EIA Regulations in
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:48: consultee) is an EIA consultation body (as defined by
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:48: pursuant to Regulation 13 of the EIA Regulations.
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:49: a statement as to whether the application is EIA development;
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:50: EIA Regulation Where the proposed application is for EIA development, the
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:50: Section 48 (duty bodies’ means for the purposes of the EIA Regulations a body
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:50: EIA Regulation 11(1)©).
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:51: The Planning Inspectorate Advice Note Three: EIA consultation and notification
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:53: In accordance with the EIA Regulations, did The Applicants notified the SoS under the Section 1 (Para 1.6.2) and Section 10 (Para
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:53: the Applicant (prior to carrying out 2017 EIA Regulations – Regulation 8(1)(b) 10.1.1)
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:64: A statement as to whether the application is EIA development or that an EIA is being
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:64: EIA development. undertaken;
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:65: EIA consultation bodies and to any person to the EIA consultation bodies at the same time Notices) and Appendix 13.3 (schedule of EIA
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:65: the EIA Regulations Section 16.
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:65: EIA Regulation 11(1)© bodies by PINS and
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:69: The findings of the Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) work undertaken
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:74: EIA scoping work, which considered that 20km would represent the maximum
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:74: could occur. For example, the EIA scoping indicated that the air quality
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:82: The initial environmental finding and the EIA works being undertaken to assess
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:96: by the initial EIA environmental impact assessment (EIA) scoping work. The
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:100: shown in the SoCC and the EIA advance of the Stage 2
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:102: Advice Note 3 ‘EIA consultation and notification’ (August 2017), which provides
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:102: Appendix 1 of the EIA Scoping Opinion issued by PINS on 2 April 2019, which followed
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:102: a request under EIA Regulation 10(1) for an EIA Scoping Opinion dated 19 February
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:119: The findings of the Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) work undertaken
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:124: will also be made available, including the EIA Scoping Report, various plans,
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:138: whether that application is EIA development, a summary of the main proposals, how
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:139:13.1.8 EIA Regulation 13 places a requirement on applicants, where a DCO application is for
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:139: EIA development, to, at the same time as publishing the Section 48 Notice, send a
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:139: copy of that notice to the relevant consultation bodies (the ‘EIA consultation bodies’)
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:139: and any person notified to them by PINS in accordance with EIA Regulation 11(1)©.
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:139: A list of the EIA consultation bodies who were sent a copy of the Section 48 Notice
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:139: Applicants by PINS under EIA Regulation 11(1)©.
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:151: subject to separate consent applications and an offshore EIA Volume I, Document
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:157: 10. Local community Need to minimise effects on The EIA undertaken for the Proposed Development has No changes required. Chapter 8: Air Quality;
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:159: A separate EIA will be prepared for the works further
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:162: 7. All we would like to say is that Teesside The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) undertaken for the Proposed Development has No changes Chapter 8: Air Quality; Chapter 11:
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:163: for an EIA Scoping Opinion. The review focuses Document Ref. 6.2). In summary: raised in HE’s review dated Ref: 6.2).
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:164: information in the EIA Scoping Report, the
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:165: Management Chapter 5 ‘Construction’; 9 ‘Surface Water’; 11 ‘Noise during EIA Scoping and the Stage 2 Consultation be Ecology (ES Volume
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:166: Further information relating to surface water Deemed Marine Licence (DML) drafting. EIA including updating of the Benthic Ecology
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:167: National Park to the National Park but there will be historic regard to the EIA on 14.01.20 by email. This email Terrestrial Ecology
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:167: Recommend consulting Tees Archaeology. EIA and identifies principal issues. Tees Conservation;
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:168: to be able to scrutinise the EIA and any HRA ‘Landscaping and
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:177: needs of major road users (including Royal Mail) not required by the 2017 EIA Regulations. or works on the highways network Appendix 16B:
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:188: Transport Assessment as part of the EIA. Construction
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:190: Chemical Cluster in the EIA and outline Proposed Development, including reductions in the River Tees Number 1 and 2 Construction
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:223:16.0 EIA RELATED CONSULTATION
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:223:16.1.1 This section provides a brief summary of the EIA related consultation and publicity
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:223:16.2 EIA Notification and Scoping
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:223: Regulations 2017 (the ‘EIA Regulations’ and also seeking an EIA screening opinion
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:223: under Regulation 10(1) of the EIA Regulations. The letter was accompanied by an
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:223: EIA Scoping Report. Both the letter and Scoping Report referred to the Teesside
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:223:16.2.2 PINS issued an EIA Scoping Opinion on 2 April 2019. This was accompanied by the
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:223: responses received from the relevant EIA consultation bodies. The Scoping Opinion
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:223: topics to be covered by the EIA but drew OGCI’s attention to a number of general
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:223:16.2.3 The EIA Scoping Opinion did not include a list of any additional consultation bodies
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:223: pursuant to Regulation 11(1)© of the EIA Regulations.
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:223: the EIA Scoping Opinion is set out at Chapters 8 to 24 of the ES.
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:223:16.3.1 Preliminary Environmental Information (‘PEI’) is defined in the EIA Regulations as
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:223:16.3.2 The EIA Scoping Opinion was used to inform the Applicants’ preparation of a PEI
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:224:16.4 EIA Regulation 13 Notification
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:224:16.4.1 As described in section 12, in accordance with EIA Regulation 13 ‘Pre-application
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:224:16.4.2 EIA Regulation 13 places a requirement on applicants, where a DCO application is for
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:224: EIA development, to, at the same time as publishing the Section 48 notice, send a
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:224: copy of that notice to the relevant consultation bodies (the ‘EIA consultation bodies’)
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:224: and any person notified to them by PINS in accordance with EIA Regulation 11(1)©.
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:224:16.4.3 A list of the EIA consultation bodies who were sent a copy of the Section 48 Notice
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:224: Applicants by PINS under EIA Regulation 11(1)©.
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:245: The Net Zero Teesside Project is an environmental impact assessment (‘EIA’) development for the
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:245: (the ‘EIA Regulations’). This means that an EIA of the Project will be undertaken. This will provide
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:245: Project. The findings of the EIA will be documented within an Environmental Statement (‘ES’) that
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:245: of the EIA Regulations for a ‘scoping opinion’ as to the information to be provided within the ES.
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:245: The application was accompanied by a detailed EIA Scoping Report (AECOM, February 2019). An
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:245: EIA Scoping Opinion was issued by PINS in April 2019. The EIA Scoping Opinion identifies the
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:245: EIA. The EIA of the Project will take account of the EIA Scoping Opinion. The EIA Scoping Opinion
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:245: (and EIA Scoping Report) are available to view on the PINS website at:
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:245: Project and the EIA work proposed to be undertaken were be made available.
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:245: comment upon it. The comments received will be considered before the EIA of the Project is
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:249: • initial environmental findings and the EIA work that is to be undertaken;
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:249: • the findings of the EIA of the Project at that time, presented in the form of a PEIR with Non-
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:250: The OCZ, shown by the purple line in Figure 4.2, has been defined with reference to the early EIA
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:254: available at the events, including the EIA Scoping Report, various plans and PEIR and Non-technical
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:304: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment.
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:315:4.1 NZT is an environmental impact assessment (‘EIA’) development for the purposes of
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:315: ‘EIA Regulations’). This means that an EIA of NZT will be undertaken. This will assess
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:315: findings of the EIA will be documented within an Environmental Statement (‘ES’) that
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:315: scoping opinion’ of the EIA Regulations for a ‘scoping opinion’ as to the information to
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:315: be provided within the ES (‘EIA Scoping Opinion’). The application was accompanied
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:315: by a detailed EIA Scoping Report (AECOM, February 2019). The EIA Scoping Opinion
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:315: was issued by PINS in April 2019. The EIA Scoping Opinion identifies the environmental
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:315: issues and topics relevant to NZT, which should be assessed as part of the EIA. The
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:315: EIA of NZT will take account of the EIA Scoping Opinion. The EIA Scoping Opinion and
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:315: EIA Scoping Report are available to view on the PINS website at:
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:315: details of the initial environmental findings and the EIA work proposed to be undertaken
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:319: • initial environmental findings and the EIA work that is to be undertaken;
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:319: • the findings of the EIA of NZT at that time, presented in the form of a PEIR with
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:320: reference to the early EIA work and extends to 20 km from the centre of the Project Site.
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:324: made available at the events, including the EIA Scoping Report, various plans and PEIR
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:329:The Project is an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:356: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:368: NZT is an environmental impact assessment (‘EIA’) development for the purposes of
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:368: ‘EIA Regulations’). This means that an EIA of NZT will be undertaken. This will assess
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:368: findings of the EIA will be documented within an Environmental Statement (‘ES’) that
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:368: scoping opinion’ of the EIA Regulations for a ‘scoping opinion’ as to the information to
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:368: be provided within the ES (‘EIA Scoping Opinion’). The application was accompanied
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:368: by a detailed EIA Scoping Report (AECOM, February 2019). The EIA Scoping Opinion
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:368: was issued by PINS in April 2019. The EIA Scoping Opinion identifies the environmental
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:368: issues and topics relevant to NZT, which should be assessed as part of the EIA. The
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:368: EIA of NZT will take account of the EIA Scoping Opinion. The EIA Scoping Opinion and
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:368: EIA Scoping Report are available to view on the PINS website at:
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:368: the EIA work proposed to be undertaken were made available.
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:371: • initial environmental findings and the EIA work that was to be undertaken;
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:372: • the findings of the EIA of NZT at that time, presented in the form of a PEIR with a
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:373: reference to the early EIA work and extends to approximately 20 km from the boundaries
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:377: materials will also be made available, including the EIA Scoping Report, various plans,
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:394:procedures; and the findings of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). It is further noted that
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:395:Impact Assessment (EIA) process.
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:395:It is noted that the SoCC provides details on the EIA Scoping Process and that an EIA Scoping Opinion
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:395:scope of the EIA Environmental Statement includes the following topics: air quality; climate change;
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:395:measures identified for the scheme, through the EIA process.
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:401:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:410: (‘EIA’) development for the purposes of Preliminary Environmental Information Report
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:410: ‘EIA Regulations’). This means that an EIA of draft ES and provide information on the likely
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:410: environmental effects. The findings of the EIA Report and the comments received will be
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:410: opinion’ of the EIA Regulations for a ‘scoping
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:410: within the ES (‘EIA Scoping Opinion’). The
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:410: EIA Scoping Report (AECOM, February 2019).
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:410: The EIA Scoping Opinion was issued by
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:410: PINS in April 2019. The EIA Scoping Opinion
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:410: as part of the EIA. The EIA of NZT will take
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:410: account of the EIA Scoping Opinion. The EIA
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:410: Scoping Opinion and EIA Scoping Report are
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:410: the EIA work proposed to be undertaken were
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:412: that are in place as a result of COVID-19. The – initial environmental findings and the EIA
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:413: reference to the early EIA work and extends
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:413: – the findings of the EIA undertaken on NZT
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:418: available, including the EIA Scoping Report,
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:429:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:431: (‘EIA’) development for the purposes of (‘SoCC’) has been prepared by the Applicants
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:431: means that an EIA of NZT will be undertaken 47 places a statutory duty on applicants to
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:431: environmental effects. The findings of the EIA sets out how the Applicants will consult
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:433: – the findings of the EIA undertaken on NZT Redcar and Kirkleatham. It extends beyond
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:433: reference to the early EIA work and extends to
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:441:R/2020/0164/CA: Change of use of first and second floor offices NZT is an Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’)
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:441:R/2020/0230/LB: LBC for demolition of existing shed and The Applicant is therefore required to carry out an EIA of
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:511:Section 42 ‘Duty to consult’ & EIA Regulation 13 ‘Pre-application publicity under Section 48 (duty to
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:511:(the ‘EIA Regulations’) requires applicants, at the same time as publishing the Section 48 Notice, to
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:511:the SoS under EIA Regulation 11(1)©.
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:511:You have also been identified as a consultation body for the purposes of EIA Regulation 13 and
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:514:NZT is an Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) development for the purposes of EIA Regulations.
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:514:The Applicants are therefore required to carry out an EIA of NZT and to submit an Environmental
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:514:Regulation 8(1)(b) of the EIA Regulations that they propose to provide an Environmental Statement
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:515: Section 48 & EIA Regulation 13 Notice
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:520:NZT is an Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) development for the purposes of EIA Regulations.
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:520:The Applicants are therefore required to carry out an EIA of NZT and to submit an Environmental
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:520:Regulation 8(1)(b) of the EIA Regulations that they proposes to provide an Environmental Statement
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:521: Section 48 & EIA Regulation 13 Notice
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:526:NZT is an Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) development for the purposes of EIA Regulations.
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:526:The Applicants are therefore required to carry out an EIA of NZT and to submit an Environmental
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:526:Regulation 8(1)(b) of the EIA Regulations that they proposes to provide an Environmental Statement
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:527: Section 48 & EIA Regulation 13 Notice
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:532:NZT is an Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) development for the purposes of EIA Regulations.
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:532:The Applicants are therefore required to carry out an EIA of NZT and to submit an Environmental
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:532:Regulation 8(1)(b) of the EIA Regulations that they proposes to provide an Environmental Statement
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:533: Section 48 & EIA Regulation 13 Notice
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:538:NZT is an Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) development for the purposes of EIA Regulations.
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:538:The Applicants are therefore required to carry out an EIA of NZT and to submit an Environmental
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:538:Regulation 8(1)(b) of the EIA Regulations that they proposes to provide an Environmental Statement
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:539: Section 48 & EIA Regulation 13 Notice
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:542:Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the ‘EIA Regulations’) that they intend
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:542:to provide an Environmental Statement (‘ES’) in respect of the Project. The Project is therefore ‘EIA
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:542:development’ for the purposes of the EIA Regulations and an ES will form part of the Proposed
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:546:Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the ‘EIA Regulations’) that they intend
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:546:to provide an Environmental Statement (‘ES’) in respect of the Project. The Project is therefore ‘EIA
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:546:development’ for the purposes of the EIA Regulations and an ES will form part of the Proposed
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:599:Publicise) of Infrastructure Planning (EIA) Regulations 2017
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:609:are being undertaken, and will be used to inform the EIA, as well as any required protected species
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:635:production of a Transport Assessment as part of the EIA.
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:638:(EIA). I recommend that a Defra Biodiversity Metric 2.0 assessment is undertaken and that the
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:644:scrutinise the EIA and any HRA scoping documents (and full assessments if appropriate)
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:695: ‘The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017’ (the ‘EIA
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:695: bodies and to any person notified to the Applicants in accordance with EIA Regulation 11(11). In excluding consideration of
EN010103-001859-9.12 - Applicants comments on written Representations - June 2022 (D3).pdf:46: 36 Schedule 4 (e) of the EIA Regs requires that the Environmental Statement includes a description
EN010103-001859-9.12 - Applicants comments on written Representations - June 2022 (D3).pdf:46: project and in the context of the greenhouse gas emissions associated with it as an EIA
EN010103-001859-9.12 - Applicants comments on written Representations - June 2022 (D3).pdf:47: on EIA good practice which states “It is good practice to draw on multiple sources of evidence
EN010103-001859-9.12 - Applicants comments on written Representations - June 2022 (D3).pdf:47: 43 The Environmental Statement is not compliant with the EIA regulations requirement for a
EN010103-001859-9.12 - Applicants comments on written Representations - June 2022 (D3).pdf:47: 4 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT: IEMA/EIA GUIDANCE See the Applicants’ response above.
EN010103-001859-9.12 - Applicants comments on written Representations - June 2022 (D3).pdf:47: 44 The applicant has not followed the latest EIA guidance from IEMA (the “IEMA guidance”,
EN010103-001859-9.12 - Applicants comments on written Representations - June 2022 (D3).pdf:47: budget for the entire UK economy is only a starting point of limited value in the EIA process, and
EN010103-001859-9.12 - Applicants comments on written Representations - June 2022 (D3).pdf:47: second that local policies and budgets and targets should be included in EIA assessments of
EN010103-001859-9.12 - Applicants comments on written Representations - June 2022 (D3).pdf:47: 45 As well as the IEMA guidance, the EIA guidance from the European Commission 12, strongly
EN010103-001859-9.12 - Applicants comments on written Representations - June 2022 (D3).pdf:47: applicant. The EIA Regs guidance13 (provided at Appendix J, PDF page 41) addresses how a
EN010103-001859-9.12 - Applicants comments on written Representations - June 2022 (D3).pdf:47: 47 The EIA regulations were intended to require, then, that carbon assessment is done for the
EN010103-001859-9.12 - Applicants comments on written Representations - June 2022 (D3).pdf:48: complies with the above guidance, and best practice, on EIA. Table 21-14 should be extended to
EN010103-001859-9.12 - Applicants comments on written Representations - June 2022 (D3).pdf:48: 50 Currently, the Environmental Statement does not follow the best practice for EIA, from the IEMA
EN010103-001859-9.12 - Applicants comments on written Representations - June 2022 (D3).pdf:48: and EIA guidance, for a cumulative assessment of greenhouse gas emissions, with local and
EN010103-001859-9.12 - Applicants comments on written Representations - June 2022 (D3).pdf:48: • The EIA has underestimated the Climate Change impacts of the CCGT power station as no full
EN010103-001859-9.12 - Applicants comments on written Representations - June 2022 (D3).pdf:48: not been assessed, breaching the EIA Regulations.
EN010103-001859-9.12 - Applicants comments on written Representations - June 2022 (D3).pdf:48: • The Environmental Statement does not follow the best practice for EIA for a cumulative
EN010103-002410-NZT DCO - 9.46 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Third Written Questions - Oct 2022 (D11).pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-001728-Final GEN.1.4 and GEN1.5 - National Grid Carbon Limited.pdf:1: HLCP project submitted an EIA Scoping Report
EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf:3:2.1 EIA Methodology ………………………………………………………………………………… 6
EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf:3:2.2 EIA Scoping (Selection of Environmental Topics to be assessed) ………………. 6
EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf:7: (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (as amended) (‘the EIA
EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf:8: Regulations’). Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is a systematic
EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf:8: details of the EIA process are provided within Chapter 2: Assessment
EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf:10:2.1 EIA Methodology
EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf:10: Assessment (EIA) methodology, which is summarised below.
EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf:10:2.1.2 The objective of the EIA process is to anticipate the changes (or ‘impacts’) that
EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf:10: the Proposed Development (defined as ‘the baseline’). The EIA process
EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf:10:2.1.3 Where possible, the EIA uses standard methodologies, based on legislation,
EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf:10: ‘significant’ or ‘not significant’. Where the EIA predicts a significant adverse
EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf:10: regimes. Details of the EIA Assessment Methodology are provided within
EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf:10:2.2 EIA Scoping (Selection of Environmental
EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf:10:2.2.1 EIA Scoping is a process that is designed to identify relevant topics that should
EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf:10: be included in the EIA and reported in the Environmental Statement (ES). An
EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf:10: EIA Scoping Report and a request for an EIA Scoping Opinion under
EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf:10: Regulation 10 of the EIA Regulations was submitted to the Planning
EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf:11:2.2.3 Following the completion of an EIA Scoping Report and publication of PINS’
EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf:11: includes the EIA of the Proposed Development, taking account of any
EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf:11: Regulation 12(2) of the EIA Regulations and was published in June 2020. In
EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf:12:2.3.1 Consultation is integral to the preparation of DCO applications and to the EIA
EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf:12:2.3.2 Consultation with key stakeholders has been ongoing throughout the EIA
EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf:12: Chapters 1 and 2 – an introduction to the ES and EIA assessment
EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf:12: in the EIA;
EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf:26: used to inform the EIA.
EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf:28: part of the EIA:
EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf:30:6.1.1 The EIA Regulations state that an ES should include a description of
EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf:30: necessary flexibility and to enable the EIA to consider the ‘worst case’. For
EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf:30: that has been undertaken as part of the EIA and based on the purpose of the
EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf:32: This section provides a brief summary of the overall findings of the EIA.
EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf:32: the EIA.
EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf:32: purposes of the EIA the effects are considered likely to be comparable to, or
EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf:39:7.6.8 In addition, the EIA considers the potential for significant effects on bats as the
EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf:53:8.1.1 The ES explains the findings of the EIA process that has been undertaken for
EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf:53: agreed through the EIA Scoping and wider consultation process the following
EN010103-001467-NZT DCO 5.4 - Design and Access Statement - Clean - Apr 2022.pdf:3: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - a term used for the assessment of
EN010103-001467-NZT DCO 5.4 - Design and Access Statement - Clean - Apr 2022.pdf:7: the purposes of the Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) of the Proposed
EN010103-001467-NZT DCO 5.4 - Design and Access Statement - Clean - Apr 2022.pdf:40: Assessment (‘EIA’), the Applicants have therefore adopted the principles of the
EN010103-001467-NZT DCO 5.4 - Design and Access Statement - Clean - Apr 2022.pdf:40: ‘Rochdale Envelope’ approach and assessed (as part of the EIA) fixed maximum
EN010103-001467-NZT DCO 5.4 - Design and Access Statement - Clean - Apr 2022.pdf:61: detailed design will be in accordance with the design parameters upon which the EIA
EN010103-001467-NZT DCO 5.4 - Design and Access Statement - Clean - Apr 2022.pdf:64: Applicants have defined design parameters upon which to base the EIA to ensure
EN010103-001471-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with Oct 2021 version) - Apr 2022.pdf:165: planning permission ref 14/1454/EIA granted by Stockton-on-Tee Borough Council to be
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (9).pdf:1:Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the 2017 EIA Regulations)
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (9).pdf:3:Regulations 2017 (the 2017 EIA Regulations) and on the basis of the current information
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (9).pdf:4:Note: The SoS’ duty under Regulation 32 of the 2017 EIA Regulations continues
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (9).pdf:6: Under Regulation 32 of the 2017 EIA Regulations and on the basis of the current
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (9).pdf:6: Note: The SoS’ duty under Regulation 32 of the 2017 EIA Regulations continues
EN010103-001473-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide (Tracked) - Apr 2022.pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - a term used
EN010103-001473-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide (Tracked) - Apr 2022.pdf:3: EIA Regulations The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental
EN010103-001473-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide (Tracked) - Apr 2022.pdf:12: 'EIA Regulations').
EN010103-001473-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide (Tracked) - Apr 2022.pdf:12: with the statutory requirements of the PA 2008, the APFP Regulations and the EIA
EN010103-001473-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide (Tracked) - Apr 2022.pdf:16: Technical Summary EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001473-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide (Tracked) - Apr 2022.pdf:16: Volume I – Main Text EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001473-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide (Tracked) - Apr 2022.pdf:16: EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001473-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide (Tracked) - Apr 2022.pdf:16: Methodology EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001473-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide (Tracked) - Apr 2022.pdf:16: Existing Area EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001473-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide (Tracked) - Apr 2022.pdf:16: Development EIA Reg. 14 Rev. 2.0
EN010103-001473-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide (Tracked) - Apr 2022.pdf:16: Programme and Management EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001473-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide (Tracked) - Apr 2022.pdf:16: Design Evolution EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001473-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide (Tracked) - Apr 2022.pdf:16: Planning Policy EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001473-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide (Tracked) - Apr 2022.pdf:16: EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001473-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide (Tracked) - Apr 2022.pdf:17: Risk and Water Resources and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001473-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide (Tracked) - Apr 2022.pdf:17: Hydrogeology and and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001473-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide (Tracked) - Apr 2022.pdf:17: EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001473-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide (Tracked) - Apr 2022.pdf:17: and Nature Conservation and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001473-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide (Tracked) - Apr 2022.pdf:17: and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001473-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide (Tracked) - Apr 2022.pdf:17: Nature Conservation and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001473-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide (Tracked) - Apr 2022.pdf:17: and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001473-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide (Tracked) - Apr 2022.pdf:17: Transport EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001473-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide (Tracked) - Apr 2022.pdf:17: Visual Amenity and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001473-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide (Tracked) - Apr 2022.pdf:17: and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001473-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide (Tracked) - Apr 2022.pdf:17: and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001473-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide (Tracked) - Apr 2022.pdf:17: Tourism EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001473-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide (Tracked) - Apr 2022.pdf:17: EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001473-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide (Tracked) - Apr 2022.pdf:17: Disasters EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001473-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide (Tracked) - Apr 2022.pdf:17: Human Health EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001473-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide (Tracked) - Apr 2022.pdf:17: Combined Effects EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001473-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide (Tracked) - Apr 2022.pdf:17: Significant Effects EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001473-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide (Tracked) - Apr 2022.pdf:17: (o) and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001473-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide (Tracked) - Apr 2022.pdf:24: (o) and EIA Reg. 14 unless
EN010103-001473-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide (Tracked) - Apr 2022.pdf:25: 6.4.1 Appendix 1A: EIA Scoping -
EN010103-001473-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide (Tracked) - Apr 2022.pdf:25: 6.4.2 Appendix 1B: EIA Scoping -
EN010103-001789-NZT DCO 5.10 - Other Consents and Licences - June 2022 (Clean).pdf:22: E Consent under OPRED / NSTA Required prior to relevant The EIA is in preparation and will be reviewed
EN010103-001789-NZT DCO 5.10 - Other Consents and Licences - June 2022 (Clean).pdf:22: offshore EIA offshore works commencing. by OPRED (on behalf of the Secretary of
EN010103-001789-NZT DCO 5.10 - Other Consents and Licences - June 2022 (Clean).pdf:22: the Secretary of State’s agreement. The EIA is
EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:31: at the EIA Scoping Stage with the preparation of the EIA Scoping Opinion Report
EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:31: EIA is set out, where relevant, within each of the topic chapters in the ES and
EN010103-000918-NZT DCO 6.2.25 ES Vol I Chapter 25 Summary of Significant Effects.pdf:2: Ref 6.3), for the purposes of this Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA),
EN010103-001470-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum - Apr 2022.pdf:3: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - the
EN010103-001470-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum - Apr 2022.pdf:3: accordance with the EIA Regulations
EN010103-001470-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum - Apr 2022.pdf:3: EIA Regulations Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
EN010103-001470-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum - Apr 2022.pdf:3: findings of the EIA
EN010103-001470-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum - Apr 2022.pdf:4: ensure that it accords with the EIA and does not
EN010103-001470-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum - Apr 2022.pdf:16: environmental impact assessment (‘EIA’).
EN010103-001470-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum - Apr 2022.pdf:43: of the EIA carried out and reported in the Environmental Statement (Document Ref.
EN010103-001470-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum - Apr 2022.pdf:46: Tying the EIA into the Order
EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:14: EIA that has been undertaken for this project. I have, to date, not been through the
EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:14: nor is it a requirement of the EIA Regulations to do so. Each of those projects will
EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:14: Assessment (EIA). Each EIA has to consider the cumulative effects of that project
EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:15: developments at Stage 1 on the basis that an EIA scoping report had not yet been
EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:85: assessment of carbon emissions should be performed under the EIA is presented in the Institute of Environmental Management and
EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:85: in EIA (IEMA, 2017). IEMA guidance notes that all GHG emissions are
EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:85: assessment undertaken as part of the EIA for the Proposed
EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:220: Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Environmental Statement See response to paragraph 4.1 to 4.12. Since the relevant
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (12).pdf:1:Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the 2017 EIA Regulations)
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (12).pdf:3:Regulations 2017 (the 2017 EIA Regulations) and on the basis of the current information
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (12).pdf:4:Note: The SoS’ duty under Regulation 32 of the 2017 EIA Regulations continues
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (12).pdf:6: Under Regulation 32 of the 2017 EIA Regulations and on the basis of the current
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (12).pdf:6: Note: The SoS’ duty under Regulation 32 of the 2017 EIA Regulations continues
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:3: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - the
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:3: accordance with the EIA Regulations
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:3: EIA Regulations Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:3: findings of the EIA
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:5: that it accords with the EIA and does not result in
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:13: level for the EIA was discussed at a later date with the MMO,
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:13: technical feedback to help inform the finalisation of the EIA
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:13: associated environmental the existing outfall were discussed in terms of EIA. The
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:13: 2021 (Formal consultation extent of sampling undertaken to inform the EIA.
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:15: Statement (including adequacy pre-application period to help inform the scope of the EIA. It is
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:23: EW attending on behalf of AECOM who are representing OGCI and leading the DCO/EIA
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:23: sand / silt. For the purposes of the EIA, existing data is being used at this time; do the MMO
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:24: at EIA scoping last year and this is now a lot clearer – the GIS is particularly good. SE agreed
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:24: Engagement to- MMO at EIA Scoping in March 2019. EW explained how AECOM has been working to respond
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:24: EIA Scoping modelling; use of the DML; coastal processes and; fisheries). EW confirmed that these were
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:24:4. Project Update EW confirmed that since EIA Scoping, effort has been made to further refine the worst-case
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:24: case being assessed currently for EIA purposes. EW noted the potential plant and construction
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:25: exercises were underway, as per the MMO’s recommendation at EIA scoping. Given the
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:25: Stakeholder recommendations made at EIA scoping.
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:25: EW confirmed that since EIA scoping, engagement has been ongoing on the topic of Thermal
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:26: and other stakeholders at EIA scoping. EW noted that at this early stage, a preliminary
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:27: • Ed Walker (EW), AECOM – supporting IC and RL on the EIA and
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:27: • Ian Campbell (IC), AECOM – PM for the DCO EIA;
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:28: engagement to- EIA Scoping (March 2019) where the MMO raised comments on
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:29: EIA (Slide 10, Annex A)
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:29: EW introduced the next slide which relates to EIA; EW confirmed that
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:29: gathering network – this does form part of the DCO which this EIA is
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:30: dealt with via a separate consenting regime and most likely EIA (this is
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:30: ‘Project as a Whole’ perspective however, the EIAs for each project will
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:30: However, for the purposes of EIA, as there is so much information
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:30: for EIA. EW asked if SE/NW had any thoughts? SE agreed that this
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:32: of detail contained within the EIA and the actual likelihood that works
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:39:EIA Scoping (March 2019)
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:43: separate Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) it is dealt with via a separate consenting regime. However, we remain
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:43: compression of third-party CO2 emissions to be offshore project) is also expected to be subject to EIA.
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:56: • Richard Lowe – AECOM, leading the EIA/DCO
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:56: • Ian Campbell – AECOM, coordinating the EIA/DCO
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:56: DCO/EIA
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:57:date and Status • EIA Scoping (March 2019) they have no
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:57: of data to support fisheries assessment in the EIA
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:60: assessment and where this ‘sits’ in the EIA was welcome at
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:62: identified; these are Nephtys cirrosa and Bathyporeia spp.
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:72:EIA Scoping (March 2019)
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:81:‘Nephtys cirrosa and Bathyporeia spp. in infralittoral sand’ (A5.233; SS.SSa.IFiSa.NcirBat)
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:93:biotopes at these stations are consistent with those found in the 2019 survey - either ‘Nephtys cirrosa and Bathyporeia
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:97: Bathyporeia elegans 16.56
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:97: Bathyporeia elegans 7.11
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:97:Group A was classified as ‘Nephtys cirrosa and Bathyporeia spp. in infralittoral sand’ (A5.233; SS.SSa.IFiSa.NcirBat),
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:97:biotope. The amphipod Bathyporeia sp. and polychaete Nephtys cirrosa are typical of this biotope and dominated the
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:97:A5.233 - Nephtys cirrosa and Bathyporeia spp. in infralittoral sand
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:98:Descriptions: Characterised by Nephtys cirrosa and Bathyporeia spp. (and sometimes Pontocrates spp.), found from the
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:98:are commonly recorced include: the amphipod Bathyporeia spp. and polychaetes such as Chaetozone
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:98:The Teesside Net Zero stations in Tees Bay were classified as either the biotope ‘Nephtys cirrosa and Bathyporeia spp.
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:100: replacement outfall is retained in the DCO and supporting EIA. EW
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:101: ‘Nephtys cirrosa and Bathyporeia spp. in infralittoral sand’ (A5.233) is
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:104: the EIA now but thanks for trying. SE confirmed that no response has
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:104: EIA then that sounds appropriate. EW explained that we do have a
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:130:• The biotope ‘Nephtys cirrosa and Bathyporeia spp. in infralittoral sand’ (A5.233) is characteristic of shallow exposed
EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:5: EIA Methodology and Reporting …………………………………………………………………… 63
EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:5: Items Proposed for Scoping Out of EIA …………………………………………………………. 69
EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:7: UK Ltd (AECOM) to prepare this Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Scoping
EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:8:1.8 This EIA Scoping Report covers the on-shore works associated with the Proposed
EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:8: EIA. The interrelation of the onshore and offshore works is discussed further in this
EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:10: Statement (ES), where a development is considered to be ‘EIA development’ under
EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:10: (EIA Regulations).
EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:10:1.19 Regulation 3(1) of the EIA Regulations defines the meaning of ‘EIA development’
EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:10: (with reference to Schedules 1 and 2 to the EIA Regulations). Schedule 1 to the EIA
EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:10: assessment (EIA) is necessary, includes “thermal power stations, and other
EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:10: more.” EIA is compulsory for Schedule 1 developments given the type and/ or the
EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:10: Development will therefore be ‘EIA development’ and consequently a formal EIA
EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:10:1.21 In accordance with Regulation 8(1)(b) of the EIA Regulations, the Applicant notifies
EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:10: development consent, that will present the details of the EIA of the Proposed
EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:10: Development, in accordance with Regulation 10(1) of the EIA Regulations, the
EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:11:1.23 The scoping phase of the EIA process provides a framework for identifying likely
EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:11: environmental impacts for inclusion and consideration within the EIA. The scoping
EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:11: EIA.
EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:11: scoping opinion, as prescribed by Regulation 10(3) of the EIA Regulations and as set
EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:11: information required for an EIA screening request (noting that, as per
EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:12: the form of a Scoping Report that includes the information required by the EIA
EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:13: methodologies, guidance and best practice to be adopted for the EIA of the
EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:31: addressed through separate consent supported by a separate EIA.
EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:32:4.1 The EIA Regulations require that an ES should include an outline of the main
EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:32: impacts of each alternative. Under the EIA Regulations there is no requirement to
EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:32: to be included within the EIA and presented in the ES will consider and assess the
EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:34: account in terms of defining the scope of the EIA.
EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:35: terms of scoping the EIA.
EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:37:5.23 Policies of particular relevance to the scope of the EIA include promoting sustainable
EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:40: part of the EIA. The methodology and assessment criteria that will be used to assess
EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:44:Marine Management Organisation as the EIA/DCO application progresses.
EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:47: potential mineral deposits will be undertaken as part of the EIA, including the
EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:47:6.52 As appropriate, the EIA will inform the design as to where mitigation measures may
EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:48: considered unlikely, although they will still be considered as part of the EIA.
EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:52: ecological survey likely to be required to inform the EIA/EcIA. Once the results of the
EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:57:6.112 The EIA process requires that a clear distinction is drawn between landscape and
EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:59: adequate baseline assessment for the EIA. Further archaeological evaluation such
EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:59:6.128 The purpose of the EIA will be to assess the potential impacts of the Proposed
EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:59: heritage assets will then be quantified and expressed within the EIA. This will
EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:60: standard EIA guidance and will involve:
EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:61: the EIA.
EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:63: EIA Methodology and Reporting
EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:63:7.1 The ES will set out the process followed during the EIA including the methods used
EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:63:7.2 The EIA process is designed to be capable of, and sensitive to, changes that occur
EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:63: incorporated during the EIA. This will be particularly important for the Proposed
EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:63:7.3 The EIA is based on a number of related activities, as follows:
EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:63: and legislation relevant to EIA;
EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:64: issues and findings of the EIA in non-technical language.
EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:64: Volume I: Environmental Statement: This will contain the full text of the EIA with
EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:64: environmental studies conducted during the EIA including relevant data tables,
EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:65: studies undertaken as part of the EIA, and thereby enable comparison between
EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:66:7.16 As indicated above, for the purpose of this EIA moderate and major effects will be
EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:67:7.25 In accordance with the EIA Regulations, consideration will also be given to the
EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:67: scoping opinion, PINS will, in accordance with Regulation 10(6) of the EIA
EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:69: following specialist assessments for inclusion in the EIA are proposed:
EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:69: Items Proposed for Scoping Out of EIA
EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:71: EIA. However, accidental events such as the potential for fuel spillages and
EN010103-001518-NZTP-Action-Points-ISH1.pdf:1: NZT EIA.
EN010103-001512-TEXT_ISH1_Session2_NetZeroTeesside_10052022.pdf:8:that should should be remedied. But in any case, under EIA, or more generally, sir, we consider that the
EN010103-001512-TEXT_ISH1_Session2_NetZeroTeesside_10052022.pdf:13:distinguish one is what is necessary in order to comply with the EIA regulations. And the EIA
EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:12: Impact Assessment (EIA) process.
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (1).pdf:1:Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the 2017 EIA Regulations)
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (1).pdf:3:Regulations 2017 (the 2017 EIA Regulations) and on the basis of the current information
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (1).pdf:4:Note: The SoS’ duty under Regulation 32 of the 2017 EIA Regulations continues
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (1).pdf:6: Under Regulation 32 of the 2017 EIA Regulations and on the basis of the current
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (1).pdf:6: Note: The SoS’ duty under Regulation 32 of the 2017 EIA Regulations continues
EN010103-002503-NZT DCO 6.5 - ES Guide - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:11: EIA Scoping Report
EN010103-002503-NZT DCO 6.5 - ES Guide - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:11: EIA Scoping Opinion to APP-243] Link to Part 2
EN010103-000817-NZT DCO - Section_55_Checklist (19.07.21).pdf:3:4 In accordance with the EIA Regulations3, did the The Applicants notified the SoS under the 2017 EIA Regulations – Regulation 8(1)(b)
EN010103-000817-NZT DCO - Section_55_Checklist (19.07.21).pdf:3: Regulation 8 of The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (2017 EIA Regulations), or where Regulation 37 of
EN010103-000817-NZT DCO - Section_55_Checklist (19.07.21).pdf:3: the 2017 EIA Regulations applies, Regulation 6 of The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2009 (2009 EIA
EN010103-000817-NZT DCO - Section_55_Checklist (19.07.21).pdf:8:17 Does the SoCC set out whether the development is Yes – the SoCC confirms that the Proposed Development is EIA development.
EN010103-000817-NZT DCO - Section_55_Checklist (19.07.21).pdf:8: EIA development9; and does it set out how the
EN010103-000817-NZT DCO - Section_55_Checklist (19.07.21).pdf:8: Regulation 12 of the 2017 EIA Regulations, or where Regulation 37 of the 2017 EIA Regulations applies, Regulation 10 of the 2009 EIA Regulations
EN010103-000817-NZT DCO - Section_55_Checklist (19.07.21).pdf:11: a statement that the Proposed Development is EIA development or that an EIA is being
EN010103-000817-NZT DCO - Section_55_Checklist (19.07.21).pdf:13: the application is EIA main proposals,
EN010103-000817-NZT DCO - Section_55_Checklist (19.07.21).pdf:13: (the ‘EIA Regulations’) that they below:
EN010103-000817-NZT DCO - Section_55_Checklist (19.07.21).pdf:13: Project is therefore ‘EIA Power, 457001 525270
EN010103-000817-NZT DCO - Section_55_Checklist (19.07.21).pdf:13: the EIA Regulations and an ES Compressor
EN010103-000817-NZT DCO - Section_55_Checklist (19.07.21).pdf:17:22 Has a copy of the s48 notice been sent to the EIA Yes – a copy of the Section 48 Notice was sent to the EIA consultation bodies at the
EN010103-000817-NZT DCO - Section_55_Checklist (19.07.21).pdf:17: Applicant in accordance with the EIA Regulations10? Report (Document Ref. 5.1)
EN010103-000817-NZT DCO - Section_55_Checklist (19.07.21).pdf:17: The Applicants have not been notified of any EIA Regulation 11(1)© bodies by PINS
EN010103-000817-NZT DCO - Section_55_Checklist (19.07.21).pdf:17: Regulation 13 of the 2017 EIA Regulations, or where Regulation 37 of the 2017 EIA Regulations applies, Regulation 11 of the 2009 EIA Regulations
EN010103-000817-NZT DCO - Section_55_Checklist (19.07.21).pdf:20: required under the EIA
EN010103-000817-NZT DCO - Section_55_Checklist (19.07.21).pdf:20: The 2017 EIA Regulations, or where Regulation 37 of the 2017 EIA Regulations applies, the 2009 EIA Regulations
EN010103-000817-NZT DCO - Section_55_Checklist (19.07.21).pdf:21: A copy of the EIA Scoping Opinion
EN010103-000817-NZT DCO - Section_55_Checklist (19.07.21).pdf:21: • Advice Note Three: EIA
EN010103-001898-NZT DCO 8.12 - Northumbrian Water Ltd SoCG (Clean) July 2022 (D4).pdf:3: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - the
EN010103-001898-NZT DCO 8.12 - Northumbrian Water Ltd SoCG (Clean) July 2022 (D4).pdf:3: accordance with the EIA Regulations
EN010103-001898-NZT DCO 8.12 - Northumbrian Water Ltd SoCG (Clean) July 2022 (D4).pdf:3: EIA Regulations Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
EN010103-001898-NZT DCO 8.12 - Northumbrian Water Ltd SoCG (Clean) July 2022 (D4).pdf:3: findings of the EIA
EN010103-001898-NZT DCO 8.12 - Northumbrian Water Ltd SoCG (Clean) July 2022 (D4).pdf:4: that it accords with the EIA and does not result in
EN010103-002079-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D6).pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - a term used
EN010103-002079-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D6).pdf:3: EIA Regulations The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental
EN010103-002079-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D6).pdf:13: 'EIA Regulations').
EN010103-002079-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D6).pdf:13: with the statutory requirements of the PA 2008, the APFP Regulations and the EIA
EN010103-002079-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D6).pdf:18: Non-Technical Summary EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002079-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D6).pdf:18: Volume I – Main Text EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002079-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D6).pdf:19: EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002079-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D6).pdf:19: Methodology EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002079-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D6).pdf:19: Existing Area EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002079-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D6).pdf:19: Development EIA Reg. 14 Rev. 2.0
EN010103-002079-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D6).pdf:19: Programme and Management EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002079-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D6).pdf:19: Design Evolution EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002079-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D6).pdf:19: Planning Policy EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002079-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D6).pdf:19: EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002079-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D6).pdf:19: Risk and Water Resources EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002079-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D6).pdf:19: Hydrogeology and and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002079-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D6).pdf:19: EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002079-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D6).pdf:19: and Nature Conservation and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002079-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D6).pdf:19: and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002079-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D6).pdf:19: Nature Conservation and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002079-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D6).pdf:19: and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002079-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D6).pdf:19: Transport EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002079-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D6).pdf:20: Visual Amenity and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002079-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D6).pdf:20: and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002079-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D6).pdf:20: and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002079-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D6).pdf:20: Tourism EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002079-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D6).pdf:20: EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002079-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D6).pdf:20: Disasters EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002079-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D6).pdf:20: Human Health EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002079-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D6).pdf:20: Combined Effects EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002079-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D6).pdf:20: Significant Effects EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002079-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D6).pdf:20: (o) and EIA Reg. 14 unless stated
EN010103-002079-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D6).pdf:30: (o) and EIA Reg. 14 unless
EN010103-002079-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D6).pdf:30: 6.4.1 Appendix 1A: EIA Scoping -
EN010103-002079-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D6).pdf:30: 6.4.2 Appendix 1B: EIA Scoping -
EN010103-002325-NZT DCO 9.39 - Applicants' Response to ExA's RFI Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-000829-NZT DCO 5.4 - Design and Access Statement.pdf:3:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - a term used for the assessment of
EN010103-000829-NZT DCO 5.4 - Design and Access Statement.pdf:7: for the purposes of the Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) of the Proposed
EN010103-000829-NZT DCO 5.4 - Design and Access Statement.pdf:39: Assessment (‘EIA’), the Applicants have therefore adopted the principles of the
EN010103-000829-NZT DCO 5.4 - Design and Access Statement.pdf:39: ‘Rochdale Envelope’ approach and assessed (as part of the EIA) fixed maximum
EN010103-000829-NZT DCO 5.4 - Design and Access Statement.pdf:58: the EIA has been based.
EN010103-000829-NZT DCO 5.4 - Design and Access Statement.pdf:61: Applicants have defined design parameters upon which to base the EIA to ensure
EN010103-002174-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Comments on responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:4: Infrastructure Planning (EIA) AS-032. This has been supplemented with an 1 to its responses to the ExA’s second round of
EN010103-002174-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Comments on responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:5: offshore EIA for the NEP part of the project. The
EN010103-002174-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Comments on responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:9:and the related EIA process? successful delivery of that project depends on
EN010103-001609-Redcar and Clevland Council Local Impact Report.pdf:6: the EIA.
EN010103-002360-NZT ISH6 S1.pdf:9:going to relate to the EIA for the associated offshore transport and storage Infrastructure. We asked for
EN010103-002360-NZT ISH6 S1.pdf:39:then we'll come back and deal with that further question notes. The EIA couldn't be sufficient time, Mr.
EN010103-002363-NZT ISH6 S2.pdf:1:Moving on to the supplementary question about EIA. So the XA asked for some additional information
EN010103-002363-NZT ISH6 S2.pdf:3:significant effects now that have been identified as part of that EIA.
EN010103-002363-NZT ISH6 S2.pdf:4:Was there anything else anybody wanted to draw to our attention in relation to the offshore EIA?
EN010103-002021-Natural England - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:4: Development design and EIA [Environmental Impact boundary for the proposed development, which ensures a
EN010103-001019-NZT DCO 6.4.4 ES Vol III Appendix 2A Transboundary Screening.pdf:2:Regulations 2017 (the 2017 EIA Regulations)
EN010103-001019-NZT DCO 6.4.4 ES Vol III Appendix 2A Transboundary Screening.pdf:4:Regulations 2017 (the 2017 EIA Regulations) and on the basis of the current information
EN010103-001019-NZT DCO 6.4.4 ES Vol III Appendix 2A Transboundary Screening.pdf:4:Note: The SoS’ duty under Regulation 32 of the 2017 EIA Regulations continues
EN010103-001794-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - June 2022.pdf:159: planning permission ref 14/1454/EIA granted by Stockton-on-Tee Borough Council to be
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (7).pdf:14: 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (7).pdf:14: 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 2
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (7).pdf:14: 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 3
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (7).pdf:14: 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (7).pdf:14: 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 2
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (7).pdf:14: 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 3
EN010103-002068-NZT DCO 8.5 - Environment Agency SoCG (Clean) August 2-22 (D6).pdf:3: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - the
EN010103-002068-NZT DCO 8.5 - Environment Agency SoCG (Clean) August 2-22 (D6).pdf:3: accordance with the EIA Regulations
EN010103-002068-NZT DCO 8.5 - Environment Agency SoCG (Clean) August 2-22 (D6).pdf:3: EIA Regulations Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
EN010103-002068-NZT DCO 8.5 - Environment Agency SoCG (Clean) August 2-22 (D6).pdf:3: findings of the EIA
EN010103-002068-NZT DCO 8.5 - Environment Agency SoCG (Clean) August 2-22 (D6).pdf:4: with the EIA and does not result in unacceptable
EN010103-002068-NZT DCO 8.5 - Environment Agency SoCG (Clean) August 2-22 (D6).pdf:10: February 2019 (EIA The Environment Agency were consulted on the EIA Scoping
EN010103-002068-NZT DCO 8.5 - Environment Agency SoCG (Clean) August 2-22 (D6).pdf:11: from the Environment Agency EIA scoping consultation
EN010103-002068-NZT DCO 8.5 - Environment Agency SoCG (Clean) August 2-22 (D6).pdf:11: inform the finalisation of the EIA and the overall DCO
EN010103-002068-NZT DCO 8.5 - Environment Agency SoCG (Clean) August 2-22 (D6).pdf:15: Environmental throughout the pre-application period to help inform the EIA. It is
EN010103-001725-DLA Piper UK LLP - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ1 1.pdf:3:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-001330-NZT DCO 7.6 - Consultation Statement Proposed Changes - Apr 2022_Redacted.pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-001330-NZT DCO 7.6 - Consultation Statement Proposed Changes - Apr 2022_Redacted.pdf:4: assessed as part of the environmental impact assessment (EIA) for the Project.
EN010103-001330-NZT DCO 7.6 - Consultation Statement Proposed Changes - Apr 2022_Redacted.pdf:9: consulted (reflecting the requirements of the EIA Regulations). It is recommended that
EN010103-001330-NZT DCO 7.6 - Consultation Statement Proposed Changes - Apr 2022_Redacted.pdf:14: assessment (EIA) of the Project is likely to change. The Consultation Document also
EN010103-001330-NZT DCO 7.6 - Consultation Statement Proposed Changes - Apr 2022_Redacted.pdf:17: assessment (EIA) of the Project is likely to change. The Consultation Document also
EN010103-001330-NZT DCO 7.6 - Consultation Statement Proposed Changes - Apr 2022_Redacted.pdf:44:The Net Zero Teesside Project is an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) development,
EN010103-001330-NZT DCO 7.6 - Consultation Statement Proposed Changes - Apr 2022_Redacted.pdf:49: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-001330-NZT DCO 7.6 - Consultation Statement Proposed Changes - Apr 2022_Redacted.pdf:51: part of the environmental impact assessment (EIA) for the Proposed
EN010103-002076-NZT DCO 9.30 - ISH 4 Action 9 Contaminated Land Timeline August 2022 (D6).pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-002413-NZT DCO 5.10 - Other Consents and Licences - Oct 2022 D11 (Clean).pdf:26: E Consent under OPRED / NSTA Required prior to relevant The EIA is in preparation and will be
EN010103-002413-NZT DCO 5.10 - Other Consents and Licences - Oct 2022 D11 (Clean).pdf:26: offshore EIA offshore works reviewed by OPRED (on behalf of the
EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf:11: Impact Assessment (EIA) process.
EN010103-001138-NZT DCO 6.4.47 ES Vol III Appendix 24B Assessment of Cumulative Effects Stages 1-3.pdf:4: 126 dwellings. No EIA Scoping Report or ES
EN010103-001138-NZT DCO 6.4.47 ES Vol III Appendix 24B Assessment of Cumulative Effects Stages 1-3.pdf:4:9 N Y N Y N Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y N N N N N N Y N Y N Just within ZoI for traffic N No EIA Scoping Report or ES
EN010103-001138-NZT DCO 6.4.47 ES Vol III Appendix 24B Assessment of Cumulative Effects Stages 1-3.pdf:4: unlikely. No EIA Scoping or
EN010103-001138-NZT DCO 6.4.47 ES Vol III Appendix 24B Assessment of Cumulative Effects Stages 1-3.pdf:5:14 N N N Y N Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y N N N N N N Y N Y N Small scale proposal - 51 N Remote from Site, no EIA
EN010103-001138-NZT DCO 6.4.47 ES Vol III Appendix 24B Assessment of Cumulative Effects Stages 1-3.pdf:6:15 N N N Y N Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y N N N N N N Y N Y N Linked to ID 8. N Remote from Site, no EIA
EN010103-001138-NZT DCO 6.4.47 ES Vol III Appendix 24B Assessment of Cumulative Effects Stages 1-3.pdf:6:18 N N N Y N Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y N N N N N N Y Y Y N Assume overlap in N Remote from Site, no EIA
EN010103-001138-NZT DCO 6.4.47 ES Vol III Appendix 24B Assessment of Cumulative Effects Stages 1-3.pdf:7: should be complete by EIA scoping, EAR or ES
EN010103-001138-NZT DCO 6.4.47 ES Vol III Appendix 24B Assessment of Cumulative Effects Stages 1-3.pdf:7: from PCC Site). No EIA
EN010103-001138-NZT DCO 6.4.47 ES Vol III Appendix 24B Assessment of Cumulative Effects Stages 1-3.pdf:7: EIA scoping, EAR or ES
EN010103-001138-NZT DCO 6.4.47 ES Vol III Appendix 24B Assessment of Cumulative Effects Stages 1-3.pdf:8:25 N N N Y N Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y N N N N N N Y N Y N Y >3km from PCC Site N No EIA scoping / ES
EN010103-001138-NZT DCO 6.4.47 ES Vol III Appendix 24B Assessment of Cumulative Effects Stages 1-3.pdf:9: EIA scoping or ES submitted
EN010103-001138-NZT DCO 6.4.47 ES Vol III Appendix 24B Assessment of Cumulative Effects Stages 1-3.pdf:9: EIA scoping, EAR or ES
EN010103-001138-NZT DCO 6.4.47 ES Vol III Appendix 24B Assessment of Cumulative Effects Stages 1-3.pdf:9: temporal scope from PCC), no EIA scoping,
EN010103-001138-NZT DCO 6.4.47 ES Vol III Appendix 24B Assessment of Cumulative Effects Stages 1-3.pdf:10: construction periods from PCC), no EIA scoping,
EN010103-001138-NZT DCO 6.4.47 ES Vol III Appendix 24B Assessment of Cumulative Effects Stages 1-3.pdf:11: EIA not required but a Development construction
EN010103-001138-NZT DCO 6.4.47 ES Vol III Appendix 24B Assessment of Cumulative Effects Stages 1-3.pdf:19: EIA scoping, EAR or ES
EN010103-002514-NZT DCO 8.19 - CF Fertilisers Ltd SoCG (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:2: findings of the EIA
EN010103-002514-NZT DCO 8.19 - CF Fertilisers Ltd SoCG (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:3: other matters to ensure that it accords with the EIA
EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:7: set of protective provisions for inclusion in the NZT DCO (Environment al Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (”the EIA
EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:7: there is a legal requirement under the EIA Regulations for the
EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:7: material submitted. It is of statutory relevance because of the EIA
EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:7: respect of the storage permit process and the related EIA include protective provisions for the benefit and protection of the carbon
EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:8:elements of the Endurance Store (EIA approval, consent under the licence,
EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:9:the related EIA process. There has been no discussion on the specifics of
EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:13: Document Ref. 6.4). As the offshore EIA is still being developed, there is currently
EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:13: 2017 (‘the Infrastructure EIA Regulations’) an Environmental Statement must contain
EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:13: environment’.4 ‘Proposed development’ is not defined in the Infrastructure EIA
EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:13: amended and codified) (‘the EIA Directive’):
EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:14:15. The UK courts have consistently said that the EIA regime cannot be circumvented by
EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:14:16. It may therefore be that a project for the purposes of EIA is wider than the individual
EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:15: two applications were to be treated as part of the same project for EIA purposes.7
EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:15: the overall project comprising the distribution centre. Consequently, the EIA was
EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:15: proposed development for the purposes of the Infrastructure EIA Regulations includes
EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:17:23. The EIA therefore has to be of the whole project, including the Endurance offshore
EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:17: (i) there is nothing in the Infrastructure EIA Regulations which specifically
EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:18: pursuant to the EIA Regulations, bp considers that providing such an
EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:18: wind turbines falls within the EIA regime as impacts on material assets and climate
EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:19: Hornsea 4 Offshore Wind Farm in the Overlap Area pursuant to the EIA Regulations’
EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:20: the ES. There is a need to assess the impact of the ‘project’ under the EIA Regulations.
EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:21: (ii) The NPS and the EIA regime require the effects of the whole project to be
EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:22: elements of the Endurance Store (EIA approval, consent under the licence, storage
EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:23:44. There is a legal requirement under the EIA Regulations for the Applicant to assess the
EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:23: effects of the NZT Project as a whole. There is also a legal requirement under the EIA
EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:23: relevance because of the EIA Regulations and/or the NPS’s identification of the need
EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:384: Impact Assessment (EIA)
EN010103-001172-EN010103 - The ‘Net Zero Teesside Project’ - Final Section 55 Checklist.pdf:3:4 In accordance with the EIA Regulations3, did the Yes
EN010103-001172-EN010103 - The ‘Net Zero Teesside Project’ - Final Section 55 Checklist.pdf:3: Regulation 8 of The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (2017 EIA Regulations), or where Regulation 37 of
EN010103-001172-EN010103 - The ‘Net Zero Teesside Project’ - Final Section 55 Checklist.pdf:3: the 2017 EIA Regulations applies, Regulation 6 of The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2009 (2009 EIA
EN010103-001172-EN010103 - The ‘Net Zero Teesside Project’ - Final Section 55 Checklist.pdf:9: EIA development9; and does it set out how the
EN010103-001172-EN010103 - The ‘Net Zero Teesside Project’ - Final Section 55 Checklist.pdf:9: 5.1) sets out that the development is EIA development and sets out how the Applicant
EN010103-001172-EN010103 - The ‘Net Zero Teesside Project’ - Final Section 55 Checklist.pdf:9: Regulation 12 of the 2017 EIA Regulations, or where Regulation 37 of the 2017 EIA Regulations applies, Regulation 10 of the 2009 EIA Regulations
EN010103-001172-EN010103 - The ‘Net Zero Teesside Project’ - Final Section 55 Checklist.pdf:11: EIA development location or route of the Proposed Development
EN010103-001172-EN010103 - The ‘Net Zero Teesside Project’ - Final Section 55 Checklist.pdf:11:22 Has a copy of the s48 notice been sent to the EIA Yes
EN010103-001172-EN010103 - The ‘Net Zero Teesside Project’ - Final Section 55 Checklist.pdf:11: A copy of the s48 notice was sent to the EIA consultation bodies as part of the s42
EN010103-001172-EN010103 - The ‘Net Zero Teesside Project’ - Final Section 55 Checklist.pdf:11: Applicant in accordance with the EIA Regulations10?
EN010103-001172-EN010103 - The ‘Net Zero Teesside Project’ - Final Section 55 Checklist.pdf:11: Regulation 13 of the 2017 EIA Regulations, or where Regulation 37 of the 2017 EIA Regulations applies, Regulation 11 of the 2009 EIA Regulations
EN010103-001172-EN010103 - The ‘Net Zero Teesside Project’ - Final Section 55 Checklist.pdf:13: required under the EIA
EN010103-001172-EN010103 - The ‘Net Zero Teesside Project’ - Final Section 55 Checklist.pdf:13: The 2017 EIA Regulations, or where Regulation 37 of the 2017 EIA Regulations applies, the 2009 EIA Regulations
EN010103-001980-NZT DCO 8.2 - STBC SoCG - August 2022(D5) - Clean.pdf:14: 14. EIA assessment It is agreed that the assessment methodology set out at
EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:18: the Commitments Register (Appendix 25A) AS-033. mitigation (i.e. identified through the iterative EIA process and incorporated into
EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:65: differs from that undertaken for many other EIA topics where for the latter only
EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:65: https://www.iema.net/resources/blog/2022/02/28/launch-of-the-updated-eia-guidance-on-assessing-ghg-emissions
EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:66: assessed in the offshore EIA. Operational emissions from the offshore
EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:106: requesting that the EIA contains a worst-case estimation of firewater runoff final design approval prior to commencement of proposed operations, and are
EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:133: purposes of the EIA Regulations; minor and negligible effects are ‘not
EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:133: both “negligible” and “minor-adverse” effects are not significant in EIA terms, the
EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:133: Infrastructure Planning (EIA) Regulations 2017 to a) describe any likely
EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:144: from an EIA assessment, and so the requirements of the WFD are only one
EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:144: aspect of the EIA classification of effects methodology (which is based on DMRB
EN010103-002179-NZT DCO 8.30 - NTG SoCG - Sept 2022(D7) (Tracked).pdf:3: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment -– the
EN010103-002179-NZT DCO 8.30 - NTG SoCG - Sept 2022(D7) (Tracked).pdf:3: accordance with the EIA Regulations
EN010103-002179-NZT DCO 8.30 - NTG SoCG - Sept 2022(D7) (Tracked).pdf:3: EIA Regulations Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
EN010103-002179-NZT DCO 8.30 - NTG SoCG - Sept 2022(D7) (Tracked).pdf:3: findings of the EIA
EN010103-002179-NZT DCO 8.30 - NTG SoCG - Sept 2022(D7) (Tracked).pdf:4: that it accords with the EIA and does not result in
EN010103-002529-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:3: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - the assessment of the likely
EN010103-002529-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:3: in accordance with the EIA Regulations
EN010103-002529-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:3: EIA Regulations Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment)
EN010103-002529-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:3: ES Environmental Statement, documenting the findings of the EIA
EN010103-002529-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:4: with the EIA and does not result in unacceptable impacts
EN010103-002529-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:14: assessment ('EIA').
EN010103-002529-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:38: station of up to 860 MW, tying the authorised development to the scope of the EIA carried
EN010103-002529-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:40: Tying the EIA into the Order
EN010103-001144-NZT DCO 6.4.33 ES Vol III Appendix 14E Coastal Modelling Report.pdf:49:Proposed Development, the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for NZT is being undertaken
EN010103-001144-NZT DCO 6.4.33 ES Vol III Appendix 14E Coastal Modelling Report.pdf:51:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-001919-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO July 2022 (D4).pdf:163: planning permission ref 14/1454/EIA granted by Stockton-on-Tee Borough Council to be
EN010103-002522-NZT DCO 9.49 - Response to ISH6 actions Nov22(D12).pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-001159-NZT DCO 5.7 - Carbon Capture Readiness Assessment.pdf:31: This would be established and considered at all stages of the outline design, EIA and
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (11).pdf:14: 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (11).pdf:14: 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 2
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (11).pdf:14: 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 3
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (11).pdf:14: 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (11).pdf:14: 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 2
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (11).pdf:14: 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 3
EN010103-000828-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum.pdf:3: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - the
EN010103-000828-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum.pdf:3: accordance with the EIA Regulations
EN010103-000828-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum.pdf:3: EIA Regulations Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
EN010103-000828-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum.pdf:3: findings of the EIA
EN010103-000828-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum.pdf:4: ensure that it accords with the EIA and does not
EN010103-000828-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum.pdf:16: environmental impact assessment (‘EIA’).
EN010103-000828-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum.pdf:42: of the EIA carried out and reported in the Environmental Statement (Document Ref.
EN010103-000828-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum.pdf:45: Tying the EIA into the Order
EN010103-002411-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2022 (D11).pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - a term used for the
EN010103-002411-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2022 (D11).pdf:2: EIA Regulations The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment)
EN010103-002411-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2022 (D11).pdf:12: 'EIA Regulations').
EN010103-002411-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2022 (D11).pdf:12: with the statutory requirements of the PA 2008, the APFP Regulations and the EIA
EN010103-002411-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2022 (D11).pdf:18: Non-Technical Summary EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002411-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2022 (D11).pdf:18: Volume I – Main Text EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002411-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2022 (D11).pdf:18: EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002411-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2022 (D11).pdf:18: Methodology EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002411-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2022 (D11).pdf:18: Existing Area EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002411-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2022 (D11).pdf:18: Development EIA Reg. 14 Rev. 2.0
EN010103-002411-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2022 (D11).pdf:18: Programme and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002411-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2022 (D11).pdf:18: Design Evolution EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002411-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2022 (D11).pdf:18: & Planning Policy EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002411-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2022 (D11).pdf:18: EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002411-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2022 (D11).pdf:18: Flood Risk and Water and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002411-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2022 (D11).pdf:18: Hydrogeology and and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002411-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2022 (D11).pdf:18: Vibration EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002411-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2022 (D11).pdf:18: Ecology and Nature and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002411-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2022 (D11).pdf:19: and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002411-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2022 (D11).pdf:19: and Nature Conservation and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002411-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2022 (D11).pdf:19: and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002411-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2022 (D11).pdf:19: Transport EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002411-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2022 (D11).pdf:19: Visual Amenity and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002411-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2022 (D11).pdf:19: and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002411-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2022 (D11).pdf:19: and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002411-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2022 (D11).pdf:19: & Tourism EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002411-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2022 (D11).pdf:19: EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002411-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2022 (D11).pdf:19: & Disasters EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002411-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2022 (D11).pdf:19: Human Health EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002411-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2022 (D11).pdf:19: Combined Effects EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002411-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2022 (D11).pdf:19: Significant Effects EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002411-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2022 (D11).pdf:19: (o) and EIA Reg. 14 unless stated
EN010103-002411-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2022 (D11).pdf:29: (o) and EIA Reg. 14 otherwise stated
EN010103-002411-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2022 (D11).pdf:29: 6.4.1 Appendix 1A: EIA Scoping -
EN010103-002411-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Oct 2022 (D11).pdf:29: 6.4.2 Appendix 1B: EIA Scoping -
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (10).pdf:14: 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (10).pdf:14: 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 2
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (10).pdf:14: 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 3
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (10).pdf:14: 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (10).pdf:14: 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 2
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (10).pdf:14: 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 3
EN010103-001593-NZT DCO 8.12 - Northumbrian Water Ltd SoCG - May 2022.pdf:2: findings of the EIA
EN010103-001593-NZT DCO 8.12 - Northumbrian Water Ltd SoCG - May 2022.pdf:3: that it accords with the EIA and does not result in
EN010103-001910-NZT DCO 9.15 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 3 Submissions July 2022 (D4).pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-001933-NZT ISH3 S1.pdf:3:particular article 49 and the protective provisions section of the EIA.
EN010103-001933-NZT ISH3 S1.pdf:17:before, and that addresses the issue of EIA and explains why the applicants aren't obliged to assess
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:3: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - the
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:3: accordance with the EIA Regulations
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:3: EIA Regulations Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:3: findings of the EIA
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:5: that it accords with the EIA and does not result in
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:13: level for the EIA was discussed at a later date with the MMO,
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:13: technical feedback to help inform the finalisation of the EIA
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:13: associated environmental the existing outfall were discussed in terms of EIA. The
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:13: 2021 (Formal consultation extent of sampling undertaken to inform the EIA.
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:15: Statement (including adequacy pre-application period to help inform the scope of the EIA. It is
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:23: EW attending on behalf of AECOM who are representing OGCI and leading the DCO/EIA
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:23: sand / silt. For the purposes of the EIA, existing data is being used at this time; do the MMO
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:24: at EIA scoping last year and this is now a lot clearer – the GIS is particularly good. SE agreed
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:24: Engagement to- MMO at EIA Scoping in March 2019. EW explained how AECOM has been working to respond
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:24: EIA Scoping modelling; use of the DML; coastal processes and; fisheries). EW confirmed that these were
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:24:4. Project Update EW confirmed that since EIA Scoping, effort has been made to further refine the worst-case
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:24: case being assessed currently for EIA purposes. EW noted the potential plant and construction
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:25: exercises were underway, as per the MMO’s recommendation at EIA scoping. Given the
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:25: Stakeholder recommendations made at EIA scoping.
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:25: EW confirmed that since EIA scoping, engagement has been ongoing on the topic of Thermal
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:26: and other stakeholders at EIA scoping. EW noted that at this early stage, a preliminary
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:27: • Ed Walker (EW), AECOM – supporting IC and RL on the EIA and
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:27: • Ian Campbell (IC), AECOM – PM for the DCO EIA;
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:28: engagement to- EIA Scoping (March 2019) where the MMO raised comments on
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:29: EIA (Slide 10, Annex A)
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:29: EW introduced the next slide which relates to EIA; EW confirmed that
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:29: gathering network – this does form part of the DCO which this EIA is
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:30: dealt with via a separate consenting regime and most likely EIA (this is
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:30: ‘Project as a Whole’ perspective however, the EIAs for each project will
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:30: However, for the purposes of EIA, as there is so much information
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:30: for EIA. EW asked if SE/NW had any thoughts? SE agreed that this
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:32: of detail contained within the EIA and the actual likelihood that works
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:39:EIA Scoping (March 2019)
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:43: separate Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) it is dealt with via a separate consenting regime. However, we remain
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:43: compression of third-party CO2 emissions to be offshore project) is also expected to be subject to EIA.
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:56: • Richard Lowe – AECOM, leading the EIA/DCO
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:56: • Ian Campbell – AECOM, coordinating the EIA/DCO
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:56: DCO/EIA
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:57:date and Status • EIA Scoping (March 2019) they have no
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:57: of data to support fisheries assessment in the EIA
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:60: assessment and where this ‘sits’ in the EIA was welcome at
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:62: identified; these are Nephtys cirrosa and Bathyporeia spp.
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:72:EIA Scoping (March 2019)
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:81:‘Nephtys cirrosa and Bathyporeia spp. in infralittoral sand’ (A5.233; SS.SSa.IFiSa.NcirBat)
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:93:biotopes at these stations are consistent with those found in the 2019 survey - either ‘Nephtys cirrosa and Bathyporeia
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:97: Bathyporeia elegans 16.56
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:97: Bathyporeia elegans 7.11
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:97:Group A was classified as ‘Nephtys cirrosa and Bathyporeia spp. in infralittoral sand’ (A5.233; SS.SSa.IFiSa.NcirBat),
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:97:biotope. The amphipod Bathyporeia sp. and polychaete Nephtys cirrosa are typical of this biotope and dominated the
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:97:A5.233 - Nephtys cirrosa and Bathyporeia spp. in infralittoral sand
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:98:Descriptions: Characterised by Nephtys cirrosa and Bathyporeia spp. (and sometimes Pontocrates spp.), found from the
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:98:are commonly recorced include: the amphipod Bathyporeia spp. and polychaetes such as Chaetozone
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:98:The Teesside Net Zero stations in Tees Bay were classified as either the biotope ‘Nephtys cirrosa and Bathyporeia spp.
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:100: replacement outfall is retained in the DCO and supporting EIA. EW
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:101: ‘Nephtys cirrosa and Bathyporeia spp. in infralittoral sand’ (A5.233) is
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:104: the EIA now but thanks for trying. SE confirmed that no response has
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:104: EIA then that sounds appropriate. EW explained that we do have a
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:130:• The biotope ‘Nephtys cirrosa and Bathyporeia spp. in infralittoral sand’ (A5.233) is characteristic of shallow exposed
EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:21: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment to date.’ out in paragraphs 15.3.30 – 15.3.35 and Table 15-4 of ES Chapter 15
EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:27: The EIA supporting the DCO application demonstrates no significant
EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:27: premature, particularly as the EIA supporting the DCO application
EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:31: Both schemes were included on the short list since they comprised EIA
EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:31: Schedule 2 of the Infrastructure Planning (EIA) Regulations 2017 uses the transport and storage project which forms part of the wider NEP
EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:31: being considered in the offshore EIA for the NEP part of the project.
EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:35: Regulation 14(2)(f) and Schedule 4 of the Infrastructure Planning (EIA)
EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:57: and the related EIA process? possible to provide meaningful comments on the detailed drafting that has
EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:64: EIA contains a worst-case estimation of firewater runoff production, including
EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:76: appearance, landscaping, layout and scale for No EIA Scoping Report or ES
EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:76:9 Caernarvon Close, Beyond Housing, demolition of 19 dwelling 4.9 Unknown Online information on the developer Approved 1 N Y N Y N Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y N N N N N N Y N Y N Just within ZoI for traffic N No EIA Scoping Report or ES No status change that the
EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:77: Redcar facility and combined heat and power plant, Form, Planning Statement, EIA 13/10/2016 ha - small “The application is supported area > 1 ha, waste Applicants are aware of.
EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:77:14 Fabian Road, Eston Gleeson Developments Ltd, 51 residential units 5.6 1.38 ha Online satellite imagery indicates that Approved 1 N N N Y N Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y N N N N N N Y N - 51 Y N N N Remote from Site, no EIA No status change that the
EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:77:15 Redcar Lane, Redcar Bellway Homes NE, reserved matters 9.1 7.71 ha Online news articles dated April 2022 Approved 1 N N N Y N Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y N N N N N N Y N - 126 Y N N Linked to ID 8. N Remote from Site, no EIA No status change that the
EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:77:18 Land north of Theakston Estates (Investments) Limited, 7.7 22.8 ha Online satellite imagery indicates that Allowed on 1 N N N Y N Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y N N N N N N Y Y- Y N Y Assume overlap in temporal N Remote from Site, no EIA No status change that the
EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:77: to old Hall Farm and energy storage facility (up to 49.9 MW), new to last no longer than 12 months. Once 10/11/2017 i.e. small should be complete by Nov EIA scoping or ES submitted; Applicants are aware of.
EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:78: Spencerbeck Farm outbuildings to allow outline planning Desktop Study or DAS - checked 20/01/2021 from PCC). No EIA Scoing or Applicants are aware of.
EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:78: Shakespeare existing car park (14 additional spaces) construction of this development has 12/01/2018 extension EIA scoping or ES submitted. Applicants are aware of.
EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:78: 25 Wilton International, Tourian Renewables Ltd, construction and 3.1 1.1 ha Online news articles indicates that Approved 1 N N N Y N Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y N N N N N N Y N Y N Y >3km from PCC Site N No EIA scoping / ES No status change that the
EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:78: Redcar workshop, Wilton International Wilton Redcar. Statement - checked 21/12/2020. 21/10/2016 scale (<1 EIA scoping or ES submitted Applicants are aware of.
EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:79: Redcar with associated Infrastructure and perimeter m Statement or Transport Statement 12/08/2015 EIA scoping or ES submitted the development is
EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:79: Road, comprising 32 Bungalows and 57 Houses and m construction period of around two 21/03/2019 dwellings, scope (construction) for worst from PCC), no EIA scoping or the development is
EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:79: Of College Road, dwellings with associated works | Land To The of the (Middlesborough Council) 11/10/2018 dwellings, construction periods from PCC), no EIA scoping or change to the conclusions in
EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:80:40 North Tees Site SABIC UK Petrochemicals Limited, Erection of 3.3 2.22 ha Online satellite imagery indicates that Approved 1 N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y N Y N - EIA N Construction scheduled to be N Developments already in No status change that the
EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:84: Newcomen Terrace, Deemed Consent: Demolition of existing shall not be begun later than the 06/08/2020 scale EIA scoping or ES submitted the development is
EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:84: parking and associated Infrastructure works all within this EIA it is assumed that these visual impacts.
EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:86: Hartlepool distribution building, office building, welfare requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:86: TS25 2DF unit, storage bays and associated works (part- those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:86: 1DE requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:86: those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:86: (Former Ewart Condition 1 states: “The development requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:86: Parsons Site), to which this permission relates shall be those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:86: 0LH local centre comprising retail (400sqm) and unacceptable traffic impacts on the A19 requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:86: business incubator units (1150sqm), and Trunk Road. those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:86: Of Middle Warren, construction. A Construction noise impacts. and no requirement for EIA.
EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:86: Warren, Hartlepool the LPA prior to commencment of of EIA Scoping Report or ES are
EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:87: Belasis Scale) for the erection of buildings for office, hereby permitted shall be begun either noise impacts. no requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:87: Avenue/Central research and development, manufacturing and before the expiration of nine years those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:87: Lane Industrial construction phase. requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:87: Estate Billingham those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:87: Road Cowpen Lane construction phase. requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:87: Industrial Estate those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:87: houses, 44 three bed houses and 6 four bed submitted prior to commencement of requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:87: houses the development those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:87: within 3 years of a planning approval. requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:87: those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:87: Middlesbrough landscaping, public realm, cycle store and car development to which this permission requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:87: parking relates must be begun not later than those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:87: Middlesbrough, TS1 later than the expiration of THREE requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:87: 2RQ YEARS from the date of this permission. those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:87: underway. requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:87: those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:87: Ladgate devleopment will be complete prior to requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:87: Lane/Marton construction of the Scheme. those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:87: South Bank Condition 1 states: “The development requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:87: Industrial Estate, to which this permission relates shall be those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:88: Greystones Road, (Amended Scheme) to last no longer than 12 months. Once requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:88: Old Lackenby, Eston installed, there is minimal on-site those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:88: South Terrace Vehicular And Pedestrian Accesses And requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:88: South Bank Landscaping those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:88: Redcar 2021 no requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:88: those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:88:115 Land At South Bank South Tees Development Corporation: Erection 3.6 5.83 Standalone application for 5.83 Approved 1 N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Transport note included on Y Not in itself EIA development, No status change that the
EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:88: South Bank Associated Structures, Hardstanding And outline application boundary. This site 2022 that all trips associated with which is EIA development.
EN010103-001930-NZT ISH3 S2.pdf:2:development is not the term that is used in sheduled, due to the EIA regulations, the term that is used
EN010103-001930-NZT ISH3 S2.pdf:4:next points, the next point that was made was about the definition of project for the purposes of the EIA
EN010103-002049-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:3: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment. The
EN010103-002049-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:4: findings of the EIA.
EN010103-002049-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:6: with the EIA and does not result in unacceptable
EN010103-002049-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:18: of the findings of the EIA as reported within the ES, against the relevant NPSs
EN010103-002049-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:32:3.1.14 The Environmental Impact Assessment (’EIA’) has therefore been undertaken
EN010103-002049-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:73: of the findings of the EIA as reported within the ES, against the relevant NPSs
EN010103-001565-NZT DCO 8.23 - NPL Waste Management Ltd SoCG - May 2022.pdf:4: that it accords with the EIA and does not result in
EN010103-001526-NZT-ExQ1.pdf:3:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-001526-NZT-ExQ1.pdf:56: 22-1 of the ES APP-2014 the EA is quoted as requesting that the EIA contains a worst-case
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (13).pdf:14: 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (13).pdf:14: 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 2
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (13).pdf:14: 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 3
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (13).pdf:14: 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (13).pdf:14: 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 2
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (13).pdf:14: 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 3
EN010103-000064-S42 Letter.pdf:5:NZT is an Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) development for the purposes of EIA Regulations.
EN010103-000064-S42 Letter.pdf:5:The Applicants are therefore required to carry out an EIA of NZT and to submit an Environmental
EN010103-000064-S42 Letter.pdf:5:Regulation 8(1)(b) of the EIA Regulations that they proposes to provide an Environmental Statement
EN010103-000064-S42 Letter.pdf:6: Section 48 & EIA Regulation 13 Notice
EN010103-000064-S42 Letter.pdf:11:NZT is an Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) development for the purposes of EIA Regulations.
EN010103-000064-S42 Letter.pdf:11:The Applicants are therefore required to carry out an EIA of NZT and to submit an Environmental
EN010103-000064-S42 Letter.pdf:11:Regulation 8(1)(b) of the EIA Regulations that they proposes to provide an Environmental Statement
EN010103-000064-S42 Letter.pdf:12: Section 48 & EIA Regulation 13 Notice
EN010103-000064-S42 Letter.pdf:14:Section 42 ‘Duty to consult’ & EIA Regulation 13 ‘Pre-application publicity under Section 48 (duty to
EN010103-000064-S42 Letter.pdf:14:(the ‘EIA Regulations’) requires applicants, at the same time as publishing the Section 48 Notice, to
EN010103-000064-S42 Letter.pdf:14:the SoS under EIA Regulation 11(1)©.
EN010103-000064-S42 Letter.pdf:14:You have also been identified as a consultation body for the purposes of EIA Regulation 13 and
EN010103-000064-S42 Letter.pdf:17:NZT is an Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) development for the purposes of EIA Regulations.
EN010103-000064-S42 Letter.pdf:17:The Applicants are therefore required to carry out an EIA of NZT and to submit an Environmental
EN010103-000064-S42 Letter.pdf:17:Regulation 8(1)(b) of the EIA Regulations that they propose to provide an Environmental Statement
EN010103-000064-S42 Letter.pdf:18: Section 48 & EIA Regulation 13 Notice
EN010103-Advice-00006-1-EN010103_Section 51 Advice-00005 - Project update meeting (1).pdf:2:Status of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)
EN010103-Advice-00006-1-EN010103_Section 51 Advice-00005 - Project update meeting (1).pdf:2:the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and will be able to provide more
EN010103-Advice-00006-1-EN010103_Section 51 Advice-00005 - Project update meeting (1).pdf:2:The Applicant identified emissions to air as a key consideration for the EIA, including
EN010103-Advice-00006-1-EN010103_Section 51 Advice-00005 - Project update meeting (1).pdf:3:particularly in relation to digital EIA. The Inspectorate noted that it was keen to engage
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (11).pdf:1:Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the 2017 EIA Regulations)
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (11).pdf:3:Regulations 2017 (the 2017 EIA Regulations) and on the basis of the current information
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (11).pdf:4:Note: The SoS’ duty under Regulation 32 of the 2017 EIA Regulations continues
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (11).pdf:6: Under Regulation 32 of the 2017 EIA Regulations and on the basis of the current
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (11).pdf:6: Note: The SoS’ duty under Regulation 32 of the 2017 EIA Regulations continues
EN010103-001984-NZT DCO 8.12 - Northumbrian Water Ltd SoCG - August 2022(D5) - Clean.pdf:3: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - the
EN010103-001984-NZT DCO 8.12 - Northumbrian Water Ltd SoCG - August 2022(D5) - Clean.pdf:3: accordance with the EIA Regulations
EN010103-001984-NZT DCO 8.12 - Northumbrian Water Ltd SoCG - August 2022(D5) - Clean.pdf:3: EIA Regulations Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
EN010103-001984-NZT DCO 8.12 - Northumbrian Water Ltd SoCG - August 2022(D5) - Clean.pdf:3: findings of the EIA
EN010103-001984-NZT DCO 8.12 - Northumbrian Water Ltd SoCG - August 2022(D5) - Clean.pdf:4: that it accords with the EIA and does not result in
EN010103-001580-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - May 2022.pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - a term used
EN010103-001580-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - May 2022.pdf:3: EIA Regulations The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental
EN010103-001580-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - May 2022.pdf:13: 'EIA Regulations').
EN010103-001580-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - May 2022.pdf:13: with the statutory requirements of the PA 2008, the APFP Regulations and the EIA
EN010103-001580-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - May 2022.pdf:17: Technical Summary EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001580-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - May 2022.pdf:17: Volume I – Main Text EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001580-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - May 2022.pdf:17: EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001580-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - May 2022.pdf:17: Methodology EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001580-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - May 2022.pdf:17: Existing Area EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001580-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - May 2022.pdf:17: Development EIA Reg. 14 Rev. 2.0
EN010103-001580-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - May 2022.pdf:17: Programme and Management EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001580-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - May 2022.pdf:17: Design Evolution EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001580-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - May 2022.pdf:17: Planning Policy EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001580-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - May 2022.pdf:17: EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001580-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - May 2022.pdf:17: Risk and Water Resources and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001580-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - May 2022.pdf:17: Hydrogeology and and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001580-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - May 2022.pdf:17: EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001580-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - May 2022.pdf:17: and Nature Conservation and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001580-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - May 2022.pdf:17: and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001580-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - May 2022.pdf:17: Nature Conservation and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001580-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - May 2022.pdf:17: and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001580-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - May 2022.pdf:17: Transport EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001580-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - May 2022.pdf:17: Visual Amenity and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001580-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - May 2022.pdf:17: and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001580-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - May 2022.pdf:18: and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001580-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - May 2022.pdf:18: Tourism EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001580-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - May 2022.pdf:18: EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001580-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - May 2022.pdf:18: Disasters EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001580-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - May 2022.pdf:18: Human Health EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001580-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - May 2022.pdf:18: Combined Effects EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001580-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - May 2022.pdf:18: Significant Effects EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001580-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - May 2022.pdf:18: (o) and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001580-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - May 2022.pdf:25: (o) and EIA Reg. 14 unless
EN010103-001580-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - May 2022.pdf:25: 6.4.1 Appendix 1A: EIA Scoping -
EN010103-001580-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - May 2022.pdf:25: 6.4.2 Appendix 1B: EIA Scoping -
EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:12: Impact Assessment (EIA) process.
EN010103-001883-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning (CEPP) - Comments on any other information submitted at Deadline 3.pdf:1:2.3 ©: best practice for EIA for a cumulative assessment of greenhouse gas emissions, with local and regional and sectoral
EN010103-001883-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning (CEPP) - Comments on any other information submitted at Deadline 3.pdf:3: EIA Regulations. GHG emissions do impact targets and budgets at the national, regional or
EN010103-001883-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning (CEPP) - Comments on any other information submitted at Deadline 3.pdf:4: but it does not fulfil making an EIA Regulation compliant cumulative with “with other
EN010103-001883-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning (CEPP) - Comments on any other information submitted at Deadline 3.pdf:4: solus quantification, and can only lead to a solus assessment with respect to the EIA
EN010103-001883-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning (CEPP) - Comments on any other information submitted at Deadline 3.pdf:4: making an EIA Regulation compliant cumulative with “with other existing and/or approved
EN010103-001883-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning (CEPP) - Comments on any other information submitted at Deadline 3.pdf:4: EIA assessment.
EN010103-001883-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning (CEPP) - Comments on any other information submitted at Deadline 3.pdf:4:2.3 ©: best practice for EIA for a cumulative assessment of greenhouse gas emissions, with
EN010103-001883-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning (CEPP) - Comments on any other information submitted at Deadline 3.pdf:4: point of limited value in the EIA process. Table 1 and Figure 6 of the guidance sets out
EN010103-001883-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning (CEPP) - Comments on any other information submitted at Deadline 3.pdf:4: 17 Currently the Environmental Statement does not follow the best practice for EIA, from the
EN010103-001883-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning (CEPP) - Comments on any other information submitted at Deadline 3.pdf:4: IEMA and EIA guidance, for a cumulative assessment of greenhouse gas emissions, with
EN010103-001185-210924 - NZT - Response to PINS s51 advice - Final.pdf:1:application – publicity and consultation for EIA development’ of ‘The Infrastructure Planning
EN010103-001185-210924 - NZT - Response to PINS s51 advice - Final.pdf:1:(Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the ‘EIA Regulations’).
EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:3: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - the
EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:3: accordance with the EIA Regulations
EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:3: EIA Regulations Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:3: findings of the EIA
EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:4: that it accords with the EIA and does not result in
EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:10: March 2019 (EIA PINS consulted with Natural England on the Scoping Report
EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:11: April 2019 (Pre- Technical progress on survey activity (as well as EIA) together with
EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:13: (Publication of date. The findings from key EIA workstreams, including noise and
EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:17: considered as part of the EIA. It is also agreed that cumulative
EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:26: EIA/Habitats regs assessments (e.g. deposition)
EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:28: IC – PM for the project EIA
EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:29: RL noted that as part of the assessment for the EIA, AECOM was reviewing
EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:33: within the EIA and HRA.
EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:39: DCO/EIA
EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:39: • Ian Campbell – AECOM, coordinating the EIA/DCO
EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:39: • Richard Lowe – AECOM, leading the EIA/DCO
EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:39: specifically, the EIA and HRA which we are preparing is particularly
EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:40: • March 2019 – EIA Scoping
EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:40: EW confirmed that there are some elements of the NZT DCO/EIA
EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:40: is progressing at a slightly different timescale to the DCO/EIA for
EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:52: purposes of the EIA, we have adopted very much the worst-case
EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:58:March 2019 – EIA Scoping
EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:58:• The ‘scoping in’ of specific sites and receptors / key approach to EIA and EcIA set out
EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:80:biotopes at these stations are consistent with those found in the 2019 survey - either ‘Nephtys cirrosa and Bathyporeia
EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:84: Bathyporeia elegans 16.56
EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:84: Bathyporeia elegans 7.11
EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:84:Group A was classified as ‘Nephtys cirrosa and Bathyporeia spp. in infralittoral sand’ (A5.233; SS.SSa.IFiSa.NcirBat),
EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:84:biotope. The amphipod Bathyporeia sp. and polychaete Nephtys cirrosa are typical of this biotope and dominated the
EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:84:A5.233 - Nephtys cirrosa and Bathyporeia spp. in infralittoral sand
EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:85:Descriptions: Characterised by Nephtys cirrosa and Bathyporeia spp. (and sometimes Pontocrates spp.), found from the
EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:85:are commonly recorced include: the amphipod Bathyporeia spp. and polychaetes such as Chaetozone
EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:85:The Teesside Net Zero stations in Tees Bay were classified as either the biotope ‘Nephtys cirrosa and Bathyporeia spp.
EN010103-002467-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - a term used for the
EN010103-002467-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:2: EIA Regulations The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment)
EN010103-002467-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:12: 'EIA Regulations').
EN010103-002467-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:12: with the statutory requirements of the PA 2008, the APFP Regulations and the EIA
EN010103-002467-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:18: Non-Technical Summary EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002467-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:18: Volume I – Main Text EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002467-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:18: EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002467-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:18: Methodology EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002467-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:18: Existing Area EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002467-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:18: Development EIA Reg. 14 2.0
EN010103-002467-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:18: Programme and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002467-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:18: Design Evolution EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002467-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:18: Context & Planning Policy EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002467-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:18: EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002467-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:18: Flood Risk and Water and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002467-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:18: Hydrogeology and and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002467-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:19: Vibration EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002467-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:19: Ecology and Nature and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002467-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:19: and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002467-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:19: and Nature Conservation and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002467-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:19: and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002467-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:19: Transport EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002467-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:19: Visual Amenity and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002467-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:19: Heritage and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002467-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:19: and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002467-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:19: & Tourism EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002467-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:19: EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002467-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:19: & Disasters EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002467-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:19: Human Health EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002467-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:19: Combined Effects EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002467-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:19: Significant Effects EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002467-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:20: (o) and EIA Reg. 14 stated
EN010103-002467-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:30: (o) and EIA Reg. 14 otherwise stated
EN010103-002467-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:30: 6.4.1 Appendix 1A: EIA Scoping -
EN010103-002467-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:30: 6.4.2 Appendix 1B: EIA Scoping -
EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf:11: Impact Assessment (EIA) process.
EN010103-001256-220131 - Response to Applicants' Letter of 26.01 Final.pdf:2: of the implications in terms of matters such as EIA and the compulsory
EN010103-001963-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Comments on any other information submitted at Deadline 4.pdf:3: Proposed Development's EIA”. Hornsea Four considers that the Applicant’s position is incorrect,
EN010103-001999-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum - August 2022(D5) - Clean.pdf:3: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - the assessment of the likely
EN010103-001999-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum - August 2022(D5) - Clean.pdf:3: in accordance with the EIA Regulations
EN010103-001999-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum - August 2022(D5) - Clean.pdf:3: EIA Regulations Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment)
EN010103-001999-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum - August 2022(D5) - Clean.pdf:3: ES Environmental Statement, documenting the findings of the EIA
EN010103-001999-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum - August 2022(D5) - Clean.pdf:4: with the EIA and does not result in unacceptable impacts
EN010103-001999-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum - August 2022(D5) - Clean.pdf:14: assessment ('EIA').
EN010103-001999-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum - August 2022(D5) - Clean.pdf:37: station of up to 860 MW, tying the authorised development to the scope of the EIA carried
EN010103-001999-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum - August 2022(D5) - Clean.pdf:40: Tying the EIA into the Order
EN010103-001584-NZT DCO 8.2 - STBC SoCG - May 2022.pdf:14: 1. EIA assessment The assessment methodology set out at Chapter 2
EN010103-000890-NZT DCO 6.2 ES Vol I Cover and Contents.pdf:14:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment – a term used for the assessment
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (9).pdf:14: 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (9).pdf:14: 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 2
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (9).pdf:14: 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 3
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (9).pdf:14: 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (9).pdf:14: 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 2
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (9).pdf:14: 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 3
EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:2: Assessment (EIA) process and are reported in the Environmental Statement
EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:3: • prior assessment of potential environmental impacts (through the EIA);
EN010103-001900-NZT DCO 8.13 - PD Teesport Ltd SoCG (Clean) July 22 (D4).pdf:2: findings of the EIA
EN010103-001900-NZT DCO 8.13 - PD Teesport Ltd SoCG (Clean) July 22 (D4).pdf:3: other matters to ensure that it accords with the EIA
EN010103-000887-NZT DCO 6.2.2 ES Vol I Chapter 2 Assessment Methodology.pdf:2: requirements of the EIA Regulations in relation to the Application outlined
EN010103-000887-NZT DCO 6.2.2 ES Vol I Chapter 2 Assessment Methodology.pdf:2: • Advice Note Three: EIA Notification and Consultation (Planning
EN010103-000887-NZT DCO 6.2.2 ES Vol I Chapter 2 Assessment Methodology.pdf:2: (EIA) includes assessments of the following environmental topics:
EN010103-000887-NZT DCO 6.2.2 ES Vol I Chapter 2 Assessment Methodology.pdf:3: considered as part of the EIA for the Proposed Development and could
EN010103-000887-NZT DCO 6.2.2 ES Vol I Chapter 2 Assessment Methodology.pdf:3:2.2.2 The ES summarises the outcomes of the following EIA activities:
EN010103-000887-NZT DCO 6.2.2 ES Vol I Chapter 2 Assessment Methodology.pdf:3: • adherence to legislation relevant to EIA or technical topics;
EN010103-000887-NZT DCO 6.2.2 ES Vol I Chapter 2 Assessment Methodology.pdf:5:2.4.3 It is also relevant for the EIA to consider future baseline conditions taking
EN010103-000887-NZT DCO 6.2.2 ES Vol I Chapter 2 Assessment Methodology.pdf:5: the baseline studies for the EIA have been undertaken. ‘Future baseline’
EN010103-000887-NZT DCO 6.2.2 ES Vol I Chapter 2 Assessment Methodology.pdf:5: assessment scenarios that are being considered for the purposes of the EIA
EN010103-000887-NZT DCO 6.2.2 ES Vol I Chapter 2 Assessment Methodology.pdf:6: EIA findings, standard terms are used wherever possible to classify effects
EN010103-000887-NZT DCO 6.2.2 ES Vol I Chapter 2 Assessment Methodology.pdf:7: purposes of the EIA Regulations, in accordance with standard EIA practice.
EN010103-000887-NZT DCO 6.2.2 ES Vol I Chapter 2 Assessment Methodology.pdf:8: for the Proposed Development under Regulation 32 of the 2017 EIA
EN010103-000887-NZT DCO 6.2.2 ES Vol I Chapter 2 Assessment Methodology.pdf:8:2.8.1 In accordance with the EIA Regulations, consideration is given to the
EN010103-000887-NZT DCO 6.2.2 ES Vol I Chapter 2 Assessment Methodology.pdf:10: Planning Inspectorate (2017). Advice Note Three: EIA Notification and
EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:12: Impact Assessment (EIA) process.
EN010103-002045-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:3: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - the assessment of the likely
EN010103-002045-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:3: in accordance with the EIA Regulations
EN010103-002045-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:3: EIA Regulations Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment)
EN010103-002045-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:3: ES Environmental Statement, documenting the findings of the EIA
EN010103-002045-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:4: with the EIA and does not result in unacceptable impacts
EN010103-002045-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:14: assessment ('EIA').
EN010103-002045-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:37: station of up to 860 MW, tying the authorised development to the scope of the EIA carried
EN010103-002045-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:40: Tying the EIA into the Order
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (3).pdf:14: 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (3).pdf:14: 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 2
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (3).pdf:14: 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 3
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (3).pdf:14: 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (3).pdf:14: 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 2
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (3).pdf:14: 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 3
EN010103-000827-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft Development Consent Order.pdf:161: planning permission ref 14/1454/EIA granted by Stockton-on-Tee Borough Council to be
EN010103-001986-NZT DCO 8.20 - Exolum Seal Sands & Exolum Riverside SoCG - August 2022(D5).pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - the assessment of the
EN010103-001986-NZT DCO 8.20 - Exolum Seal Sands & Exolum Riverside SoCG - August 2022(D5).pdf:2: undertaken in accordance with the EIA Regulations
EN010103-001986-NZT DCO 8.20 - Exolum Seal Sands & Exolum Riverside SoCG - August 2022(D5).pdf:2: EIA Regulations Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment)
EN010103-001986-NZT DCO 8.20 - Exolum Seal Sands & Exolum Riverside SoCG - August 2022(D5).pdf:3: EIA
EN010103-001986-NZT DCO 8.20 - Exolum Seal Sands & Exolum Riverside SoCG - August 2022(D5).pdf:3: accords with the EIA and does not result in unacceptable
EN010103-001331-NZT DCO 7.5 - Letter Requesting Proposed Changes - Apr 2022_Redacted.pdf:2:consulted upon and assessed as part of the environmental impact assessment (EIA) for the Project.
EN010103-001331-NZT DCO 7.5 - Letter Requesting Proposed Changes - Apr 2022_Redacted.pdf:5:Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017’ (the ‘EIA Regulations’). There is no
EN010103-001331-NZT DCO 7.5 - Letter Requesting Proposed Changes - Apr 2022_Redacted.pdf:5:specific procedure provided for within the EIA Regulations where updated environmental information
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (2).pdf:14: 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (2).pdf:14: 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 2
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (2).pdf:14: 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 3
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (2).pdf:14: 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (2).pdf:14: 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 2
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (2).pdf:14: 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 3
EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf:11: Impact Assessment (EIA) process.
EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:11: Impact Assessment (EIA) process.
EN010103-002313-NZT DCO 8.1 - RCBC SoCG Sept 2022 (D9) - final signed.pdf:16: 14 EIA assessment It is agreed that the assessment methodology set out at
EN010103-001145-NZT DCO 6.4.34 ES Vol III Appendix 15A Ornithology Baseline Part 1.pdf:11:Ordnance Survey 1:25,000 Throughout EIA process • Information on habitats and
EN010103-001106-NZT DCO 6.4.19 ES Vol III Appendix 12B Ecological Impact Assessment Methods.pdf:4: consistent with EIA Regulations, which only require investigation of likely
EN010103-001585-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC TVCA Teesworks SoCG - May 2022.pdf:3:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - the assessment
EN010103-001585-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC TVCA Teesworks SoCG - May 2022.pdf:3: EIA Regulations
EN010103-001585-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC TVCA Teesworks SoCG - May 2022.pdf:3:EIA Regulations Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
EN010103-001585-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC TVCA Teesworks SoCG - May 2022.pdf:3: findings of the EIA
EN010103-001585-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC TVCA Teesworks SoCG - May 2022.pdf:4: other matters to ensure that it accords with the EIA
EN010103-001585-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC TVCA Teesworks SoCG - May 2022.pdf:20: Information & the EIA and availability of baseline data on
EN010103-001585-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC TVCA Teesworks SoCG - May 2022.pdf:20: EIA heritage and noise effects. It is agreed that, for
EN010103-001585-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC TVCA Teesworks SoCG - May 2022.pdf:20: the EIA topics reviewed by STDC, the assessment
EN010103-001585-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC TVCA Teesworks SoCG - May 2022.pdf:21: Cumulative cumulative effects in the EIA has been discussed
EN010103-001215-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:3: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - the
EN010103-001215-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:3: accordance with the EIA Regulations
EN010103-001215-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:3: EIA Regulations Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
EN010103-001215-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:3: findings of the EIA
EN010103-001215-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:4: ensure that it accords with the EIA and does not
EN010103-001215-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:16: environmental impact assessment (‘EIA’).
EN010103-001215-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:43: of the EIA carried out and reported in the Environmental Statement (Document Ref.
EN010103-001215-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:47: Tying the EIA into the Order
EN010103-002246-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Tracked) - Sept 2022 (D8).pdf:17: appearance, landscaping, layout and scale for scale likely. No EIA Scoping
EN010103-002246-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Tracked) - Sept 2022 (D8).pdf:17:9 Caernarvon Close, Beyond Housing, demolition of 19 dwelling 4.9 Unknown Online information on the developer Approved 1 N Y N Y N Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y N N N N N N Y N Y N Just within ZoI for traffic N No EIA Scoping Report or ES No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the
EN010103-002246-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Tracked) - Sept 2022 (D8).pdf:17: International, facility and combined heat and power plant, Form, Planning Statement, EIA 13/10/2016 ha - small “The application is area > 1 ha, waste Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of.
EN010103-002246-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Tracked) - Sept 2022 (D8).pdf:17:14 Fabian Road, Eston Gleeson Developments Ltd, 51 residential 5.6 1.38 ha Online satellite imagery indicates that Approved 1 N N N Y N Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y N N N N N N Y N - 51 Y N N N Remote from Site, no EIA No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the
EN010103-002246-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Tracked) - Sept 2022 (D8).pdf:17:15 Redcar Lane, Bellway Homes NE, reserved matters 9.1 7.71 ha Online news articles dated April 2022 Approved 1 N N N Y N Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y N N N N N N Y N - 126 Y N N Linked to ID 8. N Remote from Site, no EIA No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the
EN010103-002246-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Tracked) - Sept 2022 (D8).pdf:18: 18 Land north of Theakston Estates (Investments) Limited, 7.7 22.8 ha Online satellite imagery indicates that Allowed on 1 N N N Y N Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y N N N N N N Y Y- Y N Y Assume overlap in temporal N Remote from Site, no EIA No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the
EN010103-002246-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Tracked) - Sept 2022 (D8).pdf:18: to old Hall Farm energy storage facility (up to 49.9 MW), new to last no longer than 12 months. 10/11/2017 i.e. small should be complete by Nov EIA scoping or ES submitted; Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of.
EN010103-002246-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Tracked) - Sept 2022 (D8).pdf:18: Spencerbeck Farm outbuildings to allow outline planning Statement, Desktop Study or DAS - 20/01/2021 from PCC). No EIA Scoing or Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of.
EN010103-002246-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Tracked) - Sept 2022 (D8).pdf:18: Shakespeare existing car park (14 additional spaces) construction of this development has 12/01/2018 extension EIA scoping or ES submitted. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of.
EN010103-002246-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Tracked) - Sept 2022 (D8).pdf:18: 25 Wilton Tourian Renewables Ltd, construction and 3.1 1.1 ha Online news articles indicates that Approved 1 N N N Y N Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y N N N N N N Y N Y N Y >3km from PCC Site N No EIA scoping / ES No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the
EN010103-002246-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Tracked) - Sept 2022 (D8).pdf:19: International, workshop, Wilton International Wilton Planning Statement - checked 21/10/2016 scale (<1 EIA scoping or ES submitted Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of.
EN010103-002246-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Tracked) - Sept 2022 (D8).pdf:19: Redcar units with associated Infrastructure and m Statement or Transport Statement 12/08/2015 EIA scoping or ES submitted and the development is Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of.
EN010103-002246-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Tracked) - Sept 2022 (D8).pdf:19: Road, Dwellings, comprising 32 Bungalows and 57 m construction period of around two 21/03/2019 dwellings, scope (construction) for from PCC), no EIA scoping or and the development is Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of.
EN010103-002246-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Tracked) - Sept 2022 (D8).pdf:20: Of College Road, dwellings with associated works | Land To H31 of the (Middlesborough Council) 11/10/2018 dwellings, construction periods (6.9km from PCC), no EIA No change to the Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of.
EN010103-002246-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Tracked) - Sept 2022 (D8).pdf:20:40 North Tees Site SABIC UK Petrochemicals Limited, Erection of 3.3 2.22 ha Online satellite imagery indicates that Approved 1 N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y N Y N - EIA N Construction scheduled to N Developments already in No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the
EN010103-002246-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Tracked) - Sept 2022 (D8).pdf:24: Newcomen Deemed Consent: Demolition of existing shall not be begun later than the 06/08/2020 scale EIA scoping or ES submitted and the development is Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of.
EN010103-002246-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Tracked) - Sept 2022 (D8).pdf:24: parking and associated Infrastructure works purpose of assessment within this EIA visual impacts.
EN010103-002246-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Tracked) - Sept 2022 (D8).pdf:26: Hartlepool distribution building, office building, welfare requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002246-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Tracked) - Sept 2022 (D8).pdf:26: TS25 2DF unit, storage bays and associated works (part- those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002246-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Tracked) - Sept 2022 (D8).pdf:26: 1DE requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002246-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Tracked) - Sept 2022 (D8).pdf:26: those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002246-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Tracked) - Sept 2022 (D8).pdf:27: Lane, (Former Condition 1 states: “The development requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002246-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Tracked) - Sept 2022 (D8).pdf:27: Ewart Parsons to which this permission relates shall those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002246-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Tracked) - Sept 2022 (D8).pdf:27: 0LH and including a local centre comprising retail unacceptable traffic impacts on the requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002246-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Tracked) - Sept 2022 (D8).pdf:27: (400sqm) and business incubator units A19 Trunk Road. those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002246-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Tracked) - Sept 2022 (D8).pdf:27: Of Middle Warren, Infrastructure construction. A Construction noise impacts. and no requirement for EIA.
EN010103-002246-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Tracked) - Sept 2022 (D8).pdf:27: Warren, Hartlepool to the LPA prior to commencment of EIA Scoping Report or ES are
EN010103-002246-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Tracked) - Sept 2022 (D8).pdf:27: Belasis Layout and Scale) for the erection of hereby permitted shall be begun noise impacts. no requirement for EIA.
EN010103-002246-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Tracked) - Sept 2022 (D8).pdf:27: Avenue And development, manufacturing and storage years from EIA Scoping Report or ES are
EN010103-002246-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Tracked) - Sept 2022 (D8).pdf:27: Lane Industrial construction phase. requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002246-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Tracked) - Sept 2022 (D8).pdf:27: Estate Billingham those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002246-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Tracked) - Sept 2022 (D8).pdf:27: Road Cowpen Lane construction phase. requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002246-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Tracked) - Sept 2022 (D8).pdf:27: Industrial Estate those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002246-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Tracked) - Sept 2022 (D8).pdf:27: consisting of 67 two bed houses, 44 three submitted prior to commencement of requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002246-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Tracked) - Sept 2022 (D8).pdf:27: bed houses and 6 four bed houses the development those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002246-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Tracked) - Sept 2022 (D8).pdf:27: within 3 years of a planning approval. requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002246-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Tracked) - Sept 2022 (D8).pdf:27: those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002246-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Tracked) - Sept 2022 (D8).pdf:27: Middlesbrough associated landscaping, public realm, cycle states “The development to which requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002246-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Tracked) - Sept 2022 (D8).pdf:27: store and car parking this permission relates must be begun those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002246-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Tracked) - Sept 2022 (D8).pdf:27: Middlesbrough, be begun later than the expiration of requirement for EIA. Only reached in the ES.
EN010103-002246-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Tracked) - Sept 2022 (D8).pdf:27: TS1 2RQ THREE those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002246-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Tracked) - Sept 2022 (D8).pdf:28: currently underway. requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002246-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Tracked) - Sept 2022 (D8).pdf:28: those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002246-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Tracked) - Sept 2022 (D8).pdf:28: Ladgate likely that the devleopment will be requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002246-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Tracked) - Sept 2022 (D8).pdf:28: Lane/Marton complete prior to construction of the those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002246-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Tracked) - Sept 2022 (D8).pdf:28: South Bank Condition 1 states: “The development requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002246-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Tracked) - Sept 2022 (D8).pdf:28: Industrial Estate, to which this permission relates shall those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002246-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Tracked) - Sept 2022 (D8).pdf:28: (A1053) Greystones (Amended Scheme) to last no longer than 12 months. requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002246-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Tracked) - Sept 2022 (D8).pdf:28: Road, Old Once installed, there is minimal on- those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002246-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Tracked) - Sept 2022 (D8).pdf:28: South Terrace Works; New Vehicular And Pedestrian requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002246-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Tracked) - Sept 2022 (D8).pdf:28: South Bank Accesses And Landscaping those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002246-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Tracked) - Sept 2022 (D8).pdf:28: Redcar 2021 no requirement for EIA.
EN010103-002246-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Tracked) - Sept 2022 (D8).pdf:28: EIA Scoping Report or ES are
EN010103-002246-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Tracked) - Sept 2022 (D8).pdf:29:115 Land At South Bank South Tees Development Corporation: 3.6 5.83 Standalone application for 5.83 Approved 1 N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Transport note included on Y Not in itself EIA No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the
EN010103-002246-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Tracked) - Sept 2022 (D8).pdf:29: And Landscaping Works boundary. This site will be with this development have which is EIA development.
EN010103-002246-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Tracked) - Sept 2022 (D8).pdf:29:120 LAND AT SOUTH ERECTION OF 3,396SQM OF B2/B8 3.6 2.97 Standalone application for additional Approved 1 N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y N N N Y Transport note included on Y Not in itself EIA No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the
EN010103-002246-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Tracked) - Sept 2022 (D8).pdf:29: GRANGETOWN AND ASSOCIATED PLANT, CREATION OF 114 and ID 115. Construction with this development have is EIA development.
EN010103-002246-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Tracked) - Sept 2022 (D8).pdf:29: CORPORATION EXTERNAL ALTERATIONS; CREATION OF 10 within 3 years of a planning approval. requirement for EIA. Only the development no
EN010103-002246-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Tracked) - Sept 2022 (D8).pdf:29: EAST OF SMITHS COMMERCIAL/RETAIL UNITS (CLASS E) AT those with a submitted EIA impacts on the ES
EN010103-002246-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Tracked) - Sept 2022 (D8).pdf:30:123 Land At Seal Sands Erection of an energy recovery facility and 3.4 3.7 The current target date for site Pending 1 N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y ? This scheme comprises EIA n/a n/a Added to the long list at
EN010103-002246-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Tracked) - Sept 2022 (D8).pdf:30: 28 RABY ROAD 2, 3, 4 & 5 storey residential blocks with requirement for EIA. Only 3/4. Due to the nature of
EN010103-002246-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Tracked) - Sept 2022 (D8).pdf:30: HARTLEPOOL commercial units to ground floor providing those with a submitted EIA the development no
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (6).pdf:1:Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the 2017 EIA Regulations)
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (6).pdf:3:Regulations 2017 (the 2017 EIA Regulations) and on the basis of the current information
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (6).pdf:4:Note: The SoS’ duty under Regulation 32 of the 2017 EIA Regulations continues
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (6).pdf:6: Under Regulation 32 of the 2017 EIA Regulations and on the basis of the current
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (6).pdf:6: Note: The SoS’ duty under Regulation 32 of the 2017 EIA Regulations continues
EN010103-002064-NZT DCO 8.1 - RCBC SoCG - August 2022(D6) - Final - Clean.pdf:16: 14 EIA assessment It is agreed that the assessment methodology set out at
EN010103-002065-NZT DCO 8.1 - RCBC SoCG - August 2022(D6) - Final - Tracked.pdf:16: 14 EIA assessment It is agreed that the assessment methodology set out at
EN010103-002625-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - a term used for the
EN010103-002625-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:2: EIA Regulations The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment)
EN010103-002625-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:12: 'EIA Regulations').
EN010103-002625-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:12: with the statutory requirements of the PA 2008, the APFP Regulations and the EIA
EN010103-002625-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:18: Non-Technical Summary EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002625-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:18: Volume I – Main Text EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002625-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:18: EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002625-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:18: Methodology EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002625-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:18: Existing Area EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002625-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:18: Development EIA Reg. 14 2.0
EN010103-002625-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:18: Programme and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002625-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:18: Design Evolution EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002625-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:18: Context & Planning Policy EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002625-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:18: EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002625-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:18: Flood Risk and Water and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002625-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:19: Hydrogeology and and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002625-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:19: Vibration EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002625-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:19: Ecology and Nature and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002625-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:19: and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002625-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:19: and Nature Conservation and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002625-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:19: and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002625-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:19: Transport EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002625-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:19: Visual Amenity and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002625-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:19: Heritage and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002625-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:19: and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002625-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:19: & Tourism EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002625-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:19: EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002625-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:19: & Disasters EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002625-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:19: Human Health EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002625-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:19: Combined Effects EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002625-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:20: Significant Effects EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002625-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:20: (o) and EIA Reg. 14 stated
EN010103-002625-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:30: (o) and EIA Reg. 14 otherwise stated
EN010103-002625-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:30: 6.4.1 Appendix 1A: EIA Scoping -
EN010103-002625-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:30: 6.4.2 Appendix 1B: EIA Scoping -
EN010103-001153-NZT DCO 5.9 - Statutory Nuisance Statement.pdf:4: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment – a term used for the assessment of
EN010103-001153-NZT DCO 5.9 - Statutory Nuisance Statement.pdf:16: significant for the purposes of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA).
EN010103-001985-NZT DCO 8.12 - Northumbrian Water Ltd SoCG - August 2022(D5) - Tracked.pdf:3: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - the
EN010103-001985-NZT DCO 8.12 - Northumbrian Water Ltd SoCG - August 2022(D5) - Tracked.pdf:3: accordance with the EIA Regulations
EN010103-001985-NZT DCO 8.12 - Northumbrian Water Ltd SoCG - August 2022(D5) - Tracked.pdf:3: EIA Regulations Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
EN010103-001985-NZT DCO 8.12 - Northumbrian Water Ltd SoCG - August 2022(D5) - Tracked.pdf:3: findings of the EIA
EN010103-001985-NZT DCO 8.12 - Northumbrian Water Ltd SoCG - August 2022(D5) - Tracked.pdf:4: that it accords with the EIA and does not result in
EN010103-001592-NZT DCO 8.11 - Northern Powergrid SoCG - May 2022.pdf:2: findings of the EIA
EN010103-001592-NZT DCO 8.11 - Northern Powergrid SoCG - May 2022.pdf:3: other matters to ensure that it accords with the EIA
EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:2: Assessment (EIA) process and are reported in the Environmental Statement
EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:3: • prior assessment of potential environmental impacts (through the EIA);
EN010103-001983-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC SoCG - August 2022(D5) - Tracked.pdf:3:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - the assessment
EN010103-001983-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC SoCG - August 2022(D5) - Tracked.pdf:3: EIA Regulations
EN010103-001983-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC SoCG - August 2022(D5) - Tracked.pdf:3:EIA Regulations Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
EN010103-001983-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC SoCG - August 2022(D5) - Tracked.pdf:3: findings of the EIA
EN010103-001983-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC SoCG - August 2022(D5) - Tracked.pdf:4: other matters to ensure that it accords with the EIA
EN010103-001983-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC SoCG - August 2022(D5) - Tracked.pdf:22: Information & the EIA and availability of baseline data on
EN010103-001983-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC SoCG - August 2022(D5) - Tracked.pdf:22: EIA heritage and noise effects. It is agreed that, for
EN010103-001983-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC SoCG - August 2022(D5) - Tracked.pdf:22: the EIA topics reviewed by STDC, the assessment
EN010103-001983-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC SoCG - August 2022(D5) - Tracked.pdf:23: Cumulative cumulative effects in the EIA has been discussed
EN010103-001568-NZT DCO 8.26 - Sembcorp Utilities (UK) Ltd SoCG - May 2022.pdf:2: findings of the EIA
EN010103-001568-NZT DCO 8.26 - Sembcorp Utilities (UK) Ltd SoCG - May 2022.pdf:3: that it accords with the EIA and does not result in
EN010103-001564-NZT DCO 8.22 - Marlow Foods SoCG - May 2022.pdf:2: findings of the EIA
EN010103-001564-NZT DCO 8.22 - Marlow Foods SoCG - May 2022.pdf:3: that it accords with the EIA and does not result in
EN010103-001563-NZT DCO 8.21 - INEOS Nitriles SoCG - May 2022.pdf:2: findings of the EIA
EN010103-001563-NZT DCO 8.21 - INEOS Nitriles SoCG - May 2022.pdf:3: other matters to ensure that it accords with the EIA
EN010103-001258-220204 - NZT DCO - Response to ExA let_31.01.22_re timing of PM_Exam - Final.pdf:2:the Application were consulted upon and assessed as part of the EIA for the Project.
EN010103-001258-220204 - NZT DCO - Response to ExA let_31.01.22_re timing of PM_Exam - Final.pdf:2: assessed as part of the EIA and reported in the Environmental Statement (Document Ref. 6.1
EN010103-001258-220204 - NZT DCO - Response to ExA let_31.01.22_re timing of PM_Exam - Final.pdf:2:Question 2 – What are the proposed changes and what are their implications in terms of EIA and
EN010103-001776-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GEN.1.2 Position Statement Hornsea Project Four and BP - June 2022.pdf:117: (iii) NEP's position and relevance to the Hornsea 4 EIA ………………………………………. 31
EN010103-001776-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GEN.1.2 Position Statement Hornsea Project Four and BP - June 2022.pdf:142: proposed protective provisions). Currently, Orsted's EIA presents only an assessment of the
EN010103-001776-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GEN.1.2 Position Statement Hornsea Project Four and BP - June 2022.pdf:143:16.2 The Cumulative chapter of the Hornsea 4 DCO EIA states: “In May 2019, Drax Group,
EN010103-001776-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GEN.1.2 Position Statement Hornsea Project Four and BP - June 2022.pdf:143:16.4 There is, however, a separate Chapter of the EIA (Chapter 11) entitled “Infrastructure and
EN010103-001776-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GEN.1.2 Position Statement Hornsea Project Four and BP - June 2022.pdf:143: wind farm EIAs”. We note that this only refers to existing or licensed activities, but para
EN010103-001776-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GEN.1.2 Position Statement Hornsea Project Four and BP - June 2022.pdf:145:16.8 As such, it appears that Hornsea 4's EIA assumes that there is a total overlap between two
EN010103-001776-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GEN.1.2 Position Statement Hornsea Project Four and BP - June 2022.pdf:145: therefore a significant adverse effect for the purpose of EIA.
EN010103-001776-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GEN.1.2 Position Statement Hornsea Project Four and BP - June 2022.pdf:145: (iii) NEP's position and relevance to the Hornsea 4 EIA
EN010103-001776-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GEN.1.2 Position Statement Hornsea Project Four and BP - June 2022.pdf:145: the Overlap Zone in Chapter 11 of the EIA is unspecified and undeliverable, and therefore
EN010103-001776-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GEN.1.2 Position Statement Hornsea Project Four and BP - June 2022.pdf:145: cumulative chapter of Orsted's EIA. Again, bp suggests that the ExA asks Orsted to provide
EN010103-001776-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GEN.1.2 Position Statement Hornsea Project Four and BP - June 2022.pdf:150:EIA: Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-001776-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GEN.1.2 Position Statement Hornsea Project Four and BP - June 2022.pdf:175: Without 4D seismic continue operating the (EIA, DCO)
EN010103-002521-NZT DCO 9.48 - Applicants' Comments on D11 Submissons - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-001212-NZT DCO 1.6 - Signposting Document re Update Application Documents - Final.pdf:9: Assessment (EIA).
EN010103-001120-NZT DCO 6.4.36 ES Vol III Appendix 16A Transportation Assessment Part 1.pdf:5: consultation responses (including EIA Scoping, TA Scoping, S42,43 and S44
EN010103-001120-NZT DCO 6.4.36 ES Vol III Appendix 16A Transportation Assessment Part 1.pdf:6: Assessment (EIA). The most relevant paragraphs for the Transport
EN010103-001567-NZT DCO 8.25 - Sabic UK Petrochemicals Limited SoCG - May 2022.pdf:2: findings of the EIA
EN010103-001567-NZT DCO 8.25 - Sabic UK Petrochemicals Limited SoCG - May 2022.pdf:3: other matters to ensure that it accords with the EIA
EN010103-001854-8.3 - STDC SoCG (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:3:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - the assessment
EN010103-001854-8.3 - STDC SoCG (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:3: EIA Regulations
EN010103-001854-8.3 - STDC SoCG (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:3:EIA Regulations Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
EN010103-001854-8.3 - STDC SoCG (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:3: findings of the EIA
EN010103-001854-8.3 - STDC SoCG (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:4: other matters to ensure that it accords with the EIA
EN010103-001854-8.3 - STDC SoCG (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:22: Information & the EIA and availability of baseline data on
EN010103-001854-8.3 - STDC SoCG (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:22: EIA heritage and noise effects. It is agreed that, for
EN010103-001854-8.3 - STDC SoCG (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:23: the EIA topics reviewed by STDC, the assessment
EN010103-001854-8.3 - STDC SoCG (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:23: Cumulative cumulative effects in the EIA has been discussed
EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:4: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - a term used
EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:4: EIA Regulations The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental
EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:13: effects/impacts, taking account of the EIA that has been undertaken. Where relevant
EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:25:2.6.6 The Proposed Development represents an Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’)
EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:25: (‘ES’) (Document Refs. 6.1 - 6.4) that reports the findings of the EIA that has been
EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:25: accommodate this flexibility and ensure a robust EIA of the Proposed Development,
EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:26: its construction and operation to ensure that it remains within the scope of the EIA
EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:39: (the ‘EIA Regulations’).
EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:87: operation in order to ensure that it accords with the EIA carried out and does not
EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:87:6.2.14 The Applicants’ assessment of the Proposed Development, notably through the EIA,
EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:88:6.2.17 EN-1 (paragraph 4.2.1) states that NSIPs that are subject to the European EIA
EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:88: Directive (to be read now as referring to the EIA Regulations) must be accompanied
EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:88: by the Proposed Development. It highlights that the European EIA Directive
EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:88: been adopted for the EIA of the Proposed Development.
EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:89: and assessed through the EIA maximum 'worst case' dimensions and design
EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:91: finalised to ensure that it will be constructed in accordance with the EIA that has
EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:94: the 'Rochdale Envelope' and assessed through the EIA maximum 'worst case'
EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:99: out the design parameters that have been used for the purposes of the EIA to ensure
EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:105: climate change. While not required by the EIA Directive, this information will be
EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:111: and vibration have been fully assessed within the EIA undertaken. Furthermore,
EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:111: assessment within an EIA, regard has been had to the COMAH Regulations and there
EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:116: assessments undertaken for the EIA. The matters considered include the
EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:124: emissions; EIA. The matters considered include the condition/state of premises; smoke;
EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:150: protection (electrical or the EIA Scoping Opinion (02.04.19). Additionally, the Electric and Magnetic
EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:151: ‘standard’ EIA methodology of identifying the sensitivity of receptors and
EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:164: Local Development suitability of a site or Locational Policy. Furthermore, a comprehensive EIA of the Proposed
EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:165: approved where their industry. The EIA confirms that the Proposed Development will not
EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:166: SD7 RCBC Flood and Development in areas The EIA has assessed flood risk and water management and includes a
EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:177: development of new Tees SPD (and the Teesworks Design Guide) for energy use. The EIA for
EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:190: ENV7 STBC Ground, Air, Development proposals The EIA of the Proposed Development has considered its potential
EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:190: Plan and Light pollution will be water and human health. Taking account of mitigation, the EIA has not
EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:195: the policy assessment within Section 6 and the EIA that has been undertaken.
EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:206: a the Overarching Poiicy Staiement for Energy (EN-i ) has efiect in reiaiion to
EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:244:and Storage (CCS), capture technology that it is proposed incorporates post-combustion carbon capture technology. The EIA for the
EN010103-001765-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix PPL.1.3b - South Tees Area SPD - June 2022.pdf:30: by a statutory Environmental Statement and a formal EIA has been carried out, the
EN010103-001765-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix PPL.1.3b - South Tees Area SPD - June 2022.pdf:36: Environmental Statement and a formal EIA has been carried out, the significance
EN010103-001765-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix PPL.1.3b - South Tees Area SPD - June 2022.pdf:61:5.6 Any screening request for EIA should include a plan identifying the site, details of
EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:12: Impact Assessment (EIA) process.
EN010103-001954-Redcar and Cleveland Council - Revised Application Guide (clean and tracked versions).pdf:3:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-000054-TCUP - Late Response - Durham County Council.pdf:1: Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the EIA Regulations) – Regulations 10 and 11
EN010103-001905-NZT DCO 8.23 - NPL Waste Management SoCG (Tracked) - July 2022 (D4).pdf:4: that it accords with the EIA and does not result in
EN010103-001056-NZT DCO 6.4 ES Vol III Cover and Contents.pdf:3:Appendix 1A: EIA Scoping Report
EN010103-001056-NZT DCO 6.4 ES Vol III Cover and Contents.pdf:3:Appendix 1B: EIA Scoping Opinion
EN010103-002006-NZT-ExQ2-FINAL.pdf:2:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-002006-NZT-ExQ2-FINAL.pdf:13: Development design and EIA Environmental Impact Assessment to date.’
EN010103-002006-NZT-ExQ2-FINAL.pdf:19: as part of the DCO. Schedule 2 of the Infrastructure Planning (EIA) Regulations 2017 uses the
EN010103-002006-NZT-ExQ2-FINAL.pdf:31: decision maker in respect of the storage permit process and the related EIA process?
EN010103-002006-NZT-ExQ2-FINAL.pdf:35:MA.2.1 EA In Table 22-1 of Chapter 22 of the ES APP-104 the EA is quoted as requesting that the EIA
EN010103-000907-NZT DCO 6.2.23 ES Vol I Chapter 23 Population and Human Health.pdf:2:23.2.2 The EIA Directive 2014 (Directive 2014/52/EU of the European Parliament
EN010103-000907-NZT DCO 6.2.23 ES Vol I Chapter 23 Population and Human Health.pdf:2: Impact Assessment (EIA) must identify, describe and assess in an
EN010103-000907-NZT DCO 6.2.23 ES Vol I Chapter 23 Population and Human Health.pdf:8: EIA Scoping Opinion (The Planning Inspectorate (PINS), 2019) (see
EN010103-000907-NZT DCO 6.2.23 ES Vol I Chapter 23 Population and Human Health.pdf:8: ‘standard’ EIA methodology of identifying the sensitivity of receptors and
EN010103-000907-NZT DCO 6.2.23 ES Vol I Chapter 23 Population and Human Health.pdf:10: Rochdale Envelope approach is being used within the EIA. The Rochdale
EN010103-000907-NZT DCO 6.2.23 ES Vol I Chapter 23 Population and Human Health.pdf:10: authorities and health authorities, and the findings of the EIA Scoping Opinion
EN010103-000907-NZT DCO 6.2.23 ES Vol I Chapter 23 Population and Human Health.pdf:11: The EIA should clearly identify the range of vulnerable A Framework Construction Worker Travel Plan (CWTP) and
EN010103-002515-NZT DCO 8.30 - NTG SoCG (Clean) - Nov 2022 D12.pdf:3: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment – the
EN010103-002515-NZT DCO 8.30 - NTG SoCG (Clean) - Nov 2022 D12.pdf:3: accordance with the EIA Regulations
EN010103-002515-NZT DCO 8.30 - NTG SoCG (Clean) - Nov 2022 D12.pdf:3: EIA Regulations Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
EN010103-002515-NZT DCO 8.30 - NTG SoCG (Clean) - Nov 2022 D12.pdf:3: findings of the EIA
EN010103-002515-NZT DCO 8.30 - NTG SoCG (Clean) - Nov 2022 D12.pdf:4: that it accords with the EIA and does not result in
EN010103-002422-NZT DCO 9.47 - Sensitivity Assessment of Construction Programme - Oct 2022 (D11).pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-002185-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Response to SWQ GEN.2.2(i) - Sept 2022 (D7).pdf:18: appearance, landscaping, layout and scale for No EIA Scoping Report or ES
EN010103-002185-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Response to SWQ GEN.2.2(i) - Sept 2022 (D7).pdf:18:9 Caernarvon Close, Beyond Housing, demolition of 19 dwelling 4.9 Unknown Online information on the developer Approved 1 N Y N Y N Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y N N N N N N Y N Y N Just within ZoI for traffic N No EIA Scoping Report or ES No status change that the No status change that the
EN010103-002185-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Response to SWQ GEN.2.2(i) - Sept 2022 (D7).pdf:18: International, facility and combined heat and power plant, Form, Planning Statement, EIA 13/10/2016 ha - small “The application is area > 1 ha, waste Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of.
EN010103-002185-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Response to SWQ GEN.2.2(i) - Sept 2022 (D7).pdf:18:14 Fabian Road, Eston Gleeson Developments Ltd, 51 residential 5.6 1.38 ha Online satellite imagery indicates that Approved 1 N N N Y N Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y N N N N N N Y N - 51 Y N N N Remote from Site, no EIA No status change that the No status change that the
EN010103-002185-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Response to SWQ GEN.2.2(i) - Sept 2022 (D7).pdf:19: 15 Redcar Lane, Bellway Homes NE, reserved matters 9.1 7.71 ha Online news articles dated April 2022 Approved 1 N N N Y N Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y N N N N N N Y N - 126 Y N N Linked to ID 8. N Remote from Site, no EIA No status change that the No status change that the
EN010103-002185-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Response to SWQ GEN.2.2(i) - Sept 2022 (D7).pdf:19: 18 Land north of Theakston Estates (Investments) Limited, 7.7 22.8 ha Online satellite imagery indicates that Allowed on 1 N N N Y N Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y N N N N N N Y Y- Y N Y Assume overlap in temporal N Remote from Site, no EIA No status change that the No status change that the
EN010103-002185-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Response to SWQ GEN.2.2(i) - Sept 2022 (D7).pdf:19: to old Hall Farm and energy storage facility (up to 49.9 MW), new to last no longer than 12 months. 10/11/2017 i.e. small should be complete by Nov EIA scoping or ES submitted; Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of.
EN010103-002185-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Response to SWQ GEN.2.2(i) - Sept 2022 (D7).pdf:19: Spencerbeck Farm outbuildings to allow outline planning Desktop Study or DAS - checked 20/01/2021 from PCC). No EIA Scoing or Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of.
EN010103-002185-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Response to SWQ GEN.2.2(i) - Sept 2022 (D7).pdf:19: Shakespeare existing car park (14 additional spaces) construction of this development has 12/01/2018 extension EIA scoping or ES submitted. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of.
EN010103-002185-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Response to SWQ GEN.2.2(i) - Sept 2022 (D7).pdf:20:25 Wilton Tourian Renewables Ltd, construction and 3.1 1.1 ha Online news articles indicates that Approved 1 N N N Y N Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y N N N N N N Y N Y N Y >3km from PCC Site N No EIA scoping / ES No status change that the No status change that the
EN010103-002185-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Response to SWQ GEN.2.2(i) - Sept 2022 (D7).pdf:20: International, workshop, Wilton International Wilton Planning Statement - checked 21/10/2016 scale (<1 EIA scoping or ES submitted Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of.
EN010103-002185-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Response to SWQ GEN.2.2(i) - Sept 2022 (D7).pdf:21: Redcar units with associated Infrastructure and m Statement or Transport Statement 12/08/2015 EIA scoping or ES submitted and the development is Applicants are aware of.
EN010103-002185-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Response to SWQ GEN.2.2(i) - Sept 2022 (D7).pdf:21: Road, comprising 32 Bungalows and 57 Houses and m construction period of around two 21/03/2019 dwellings, scope (construction) for from PCC), no EIA scoping or and the development is Applicants are aware of.
EN010103-002185-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Response to SWQ GEN.2.2(i) - Sept 2022 (D7).pdf:21: Of College Road, dwellings with associated works | Land To The of the (Middlesborough Council) 11/10/2018 dwellings, construction periods from PCC), no EIA scoping or change to the conclusions in Applicants are aware of.
EN010103-002185-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Response to SWQ GEN.2.2(i) - Sept 2022 (D7).pdf:22:40 North Tees Site SABIC UK Petrochemicals Limited, Erection of 3.3 2.22 ha Online satellite imagery indicates that Approved 1 N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y N Y N - EIA N Construction scheduled to N Developments already in No status change that the No status change that the
EN010103-002185-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Response to SWQ GEN.2.2(i) - Sept 2022 (D7).pdf:25: Newcomen Terrace, Deemed Consent: Demolition of existing shall not be begun later than the 06/08/2020 scale EIA scoping or ES submitted and the development is Applicants are aware of.
EN010103-002185-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Response to SWQ GEN.2.2(i) - Sept 2022 (D7).pdf:25: parking and associated Infrastructure works purpose of assessment within this EIA visual impacts.
EN010103-002185-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Response to SWQ GEN.2.2(i) - Sept 2022 (D7).pdf:28: Hartlepool distribution building, office building, welfare requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002185-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Response to SWQ GEN.2.2(i) - Sept 2022 (D7).pdf:28: TS25 2DF unit, storage bays and associated works (part- those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002185-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Response to SWQ GEN.2.2(i) - Sept 2022 (D7).pdf:28: 1DE requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002185-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Response to SWQ GEN.2.2(i) - Sept 2022 (D7).pdf:28: those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002185-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Response to SWQ GEN.2.2(i) - Sept 2022 (D7).pdf:28: (Former Ewart Condition 1 states: “The development requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002185-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Response to SWQ GEN.2.2(i) - Sept 2022 (D7).pdf:28: Parsons Site), to which this permission relates shall those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002185-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Response to SWQ GEN.2.2(i) - Sept 2022 (D7).pdf:28: 0LH a local centre comprising retail (400sqm) and unacceptable traffic impacts on the requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002185-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Response to SWQ GEN.2.2(i) - Sept 2022 (D7).pdf:28: business incubator units (1150sqm), and A19 Trunk Road. those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002185-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Response to SWQ GEN.2.2(i) - Sept 2022 (D7).pdf:28: Of Middle Warren, construction. A Construction noise impacts. and no requirement for EIA.
EN010103-002185-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Response to SWQ GEN.2.2(i) - Sept 2022 (D7).pdf:28: Warren, Hartlepool to the LPA prior to commencment of EIA Scoping Report or ES are
EN010103-002185-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Response to SWQ GEN.2.2(i) - Sept 2022 (D7).pdf:28: Belasis Layout and Scale) for the erection of buildings hereby permitted shall be begun noise impacts. no requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002185-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Response to SWQ GEN.2.2(i) - Sept 2022 (D7).pdf:28: Avenue/Central for office, research and development, either before the expiration of nine those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002185-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Response to SWQ GEN.2.2(i) - Sept 2022 (D7).pdf:28: Lane Industrial construction phase. requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002185-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Response to SWQ GEN.2.2(i) - Sept 2022 (D7).pdf:28: Estate Billingham those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002185-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Response to SWQ GEN.2.2(i) - Sept 2022 (D7).pdf:29: Road Cowpen Lane construction phase. requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002185-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Response to SWQ GEN.2.2(i) - Sept 2022 (D7).pdf:29: Industrial Estate those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002185-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Response to SWQ GEN.2.2(i) - Sept 2022 (D7).pdf:29: bed houses, 44 three bed houses and 6 four submitted prior to commencement of requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002185-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Response to SWQ GEN.2.2(i) - Sept 2022 (D7).pdf:29: bed houses the development those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002185-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Response to SWQ GEN.2.2(i) - Sept 2022 (D7).pdf:29: within 3 years of a planning approval. requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002185-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Response to SWQ GEN.2.2(i) - Sept 2022 (D7).pdf:29: those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002185-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Response to SWQ GEN.2.2(i) - Sept 2022 (D7).pdf:29: Middlesbrough landscaping, public realm, cycle store and car states “The development to which this requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002185-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Response to SWQ GEN.2.2(i) - Sept 2022 (D7).pdf:29: parking permission relates must be begun not those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002185-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Response to SWQ GEN.2.2(i) - Sept 2022 (D7).pdf:29: Middlesbrough, TS1 later than the expiration of THREE requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002185-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Response to SWQ GEN.2.2(i) - Sept 2022 (D7).pdf:29: 2RQ YEARS from the date of this those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002185-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Response to SWQ GEN.2.2(i) - Sept 2022 (D7).pdf:29: underway. requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002185-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Response to SWQ GEN.2.2(i) - Sept 2022 (D7).pdf:29: those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002185-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Response to SWQ GEN.2.2(i) - Sept 2022 (D7).pdf:29: Ladgate likely that the devleopment will be requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002185-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Response to SWQ GEN.2.2(i) - Sept 2022 (D7).pdf:29: Lane/Marton complete prior to construction of the those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002185-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Response to SWQ GEN.2.2(i) - Sept 2022 (D7).pdf:29: South Bank Condition 1 states: “The development requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002185-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Response to SWQ GEN.2.2(i) - Sept 2022 (D7).pdf:29: Industrial Estate, to which this permission relates shall those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002185-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Response to SWQ GEN.2.2(i) - Sept 2022 (D7).pdf:29: (A1053) Greystones (Amended Scheme) to last no longer than 12 months. requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002185-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Response to SWQ GEN.2.2(i) - Sept 2022 (D7).pdf:29: Road, Old Lackenby, Once installed, there is minimal on- those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002185-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Response to SWQ GEN.2.2(i) - Sept 2022 (D7).pdf:30: South Terrace Vehicular And Pedestrian Accesses And requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002185-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Response to SWQ GEN.2.2(i) - Sept 2022 (D7).pdf:30: South Bank Landscaping those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002185-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Response to SWQ GEN.2.2(i) - Sept 2022 (D7).pdf:30: Redcar 2021 no requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002185-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Response to SWQ GEN.2.2(i) - Sept 2022 (D7).pdf:30: those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002185-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Response to SWQ GEN.2.2(i) - Sept 2022 (D7).pdf:30:115 Land At South Bank South Tees Development Corporation: 3.6 5.83 Standalone application for 5.83 Approved 1 N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Transport note included on Y Not in itself EIA No status change that the No status change that the
EN010103-002185-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Response to SWQ GEN.2.2(i) - Sept 2022 (D7).pdf:30: South Bank B2/B8), Associated Structures, Hardstanding Teesworks outline application 2022 that that all trips associated with ID 114 which is EIA
EN010103-002185-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Response to SWQ GEN.2.2(i) - Sept 2022 (D7).pdf:31:120 LAND AT SOUTH ERECTION OF 3,396SQM OF B2/B8 3.6 2.97 Standalone application for additional Approved 1 N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y N N N Y Transport note included on Y Not in itself EIA No status change that the No status change that the
EN010103-002185-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Response to SWQ GEN.2.2(i) - Sept 2022 (D7).pdf:31: TEES DOCK ROAD AREA, INSTALLATION OF SPRINKLER TANK monopile facility linked to ID 73, ID that that all trips associated with ID 73 which is EIA
EN010103-000896-NZT DCO 6.2.4 ES Vol I Chapter 4 Proposed Development.pdf:3: and will be supported by a separate Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA).
EN010103-000896-NZT DCO 6.2.4 ES Vol I Chapter 4 Proposed Development.pdf:3: offshore EIA is still being developed, there is currently limited information
EN010103-000896-NZT DCO 6.2.4 ES Vol I Chapter 4 Proposed Development.pdf:3: off-shore scheme. The offshore EIA will be submitted Q2 2022 for approval
EN010103-000896-NZT DCO 6.2.4 ES Vol I Chapter 4 Proposed Development.pdf:4: environmental effects of the Proposed Development therefore, the EIA is
EN010103-000896-NZT DCO 6.2.4 ES Vol I Chapter 4 Proposed Development.pdf:5: this approach is being applied to the specific aspects of the EIA, this is
EN010103-000896-NZT DCO 6.2.4 ES Vol I Chapter 4 Proposed Development.pdf:14: consented separately supported by a separate EIA (see Section 4.81).
EN010103-000896-NZT DCO 6.2.4 ES Vol I Chapter 4 Proposed Development.pdf:18: therefore been adopted to define appropriate parameters for use in the EIA.
EN010103-000896-NZT DCO 6.2.4 ES Vol I Chapter 4 Proposed Development.pdf:18: devised to enable the EIA to progress in the absence of the final design
EN010103-002025-Environment Agency - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:7: the EA is quoted as requesting that the EIA
EN010103-001894-NZT DCO 8.2 - STBC SoCG (Clean) July 2022(D4) -.pdf:15: 1. EIA assessment The assessment methodology set out at Chapter 2
EN010103-002635-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - Final (signed) - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:3: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - the
EN010103-002635-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - Final (signed) - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:3: accordance with the EIA Regulations
EN010103-002635-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - Final (signed) - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:3: EIA Regulations Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
EN010103-002635-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - Final (signed) - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:3: findings of the EIA
EN010103-002635-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - Final (signed) - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:5: that it accords with the EIA and does not result in
EN010103-002635-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - Final (signed) - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:13: level for the EIA was discussed at a later date with the MMO,
EN010103-002635-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - Final (signed) - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:13: technical feedback to help inform the finalisation of the EIA
EN010103-002635-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - Final (signed) - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:13: associated environmental the existing outfall were discussed in terms of EIA. The
EN010103-002635-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - Final (signed) - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:13: 2021 (Formal consultation extent of sampling undertaken to inform the EIA.
EN010103-002635-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - Final (signed) - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:16: Statement (including adequacy pre-application period to help inform the scope of the EIA. It is
EN010103-001162-NZT DCO 1.4 - Notices for Non-Statutory_Statutory Publicity.pdf:2: 2017 EIA Regulations The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental
EN010103-001162-NZT DCO 1.4 - Notices for Non-Statutory_Statutory Publicity.pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment.
EN010103-001162-NZT DCO 1.4 - Notices for Non-Statutory_Statutory Publicity.pdf:9: Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017’ (the ‘EIA Regulations’)
EN010103-001162-NZT DCO 1.4 - Notices for Non-Statutory_Statutory Publicity.pdf:11: EIA REGULATION 13 NOTICE – DUTY TO PUBLICISE
EN010103-001162-NZT DCO 1.4 - Notices for Non-Statutory_Statutory Publicity.pdf:22:NZT is an Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) development for the purposes of ‘The Infrastructure
EN010103-001162-NZT DCO 1.4 - Notices for Non-Statutory_Statutory Publicity.pdf:22:carry out an EIA of NZT and to submit an Environmental Statement with the DCO application, assessing
EN010103-001162-NZT DCO 1.4 - Notices for Non-Statutory_Statutory Publicity.pdf:26:R/2020/0164/CA: Change of use of first and second floor offices NZT is an Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’)
EN010103-001162-NZT DCO 1.4 - Notices for Non-Statutory_Statutory Publicity.pdf:26:R/2020/0230/LB: LBC for demolition of existing shed and The Applicant is therefore required to carry out an EIA of
EN010103-001162-NZT DCO 1.4 - Notices for Non-Statutory_Statutory Publicity.pdf:39:Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the ‘EIA Regulations’) that they intend
EN010103-001162-NZT DCO 1.4 - Notices for Non-Statutory_Statutory Publicity.pdf:39:to provide an Environmental Statement (‘ES’) in respect of the Project. The Project is therefore ‘EIA
EN010103-001162-NZT DCO 1.4 - Notices for Non-Statutory_Statutory Publicity.pdf:39:development’ for the purposes of the EIA Regulations and an ES will form part of the Proposed
EN010103-001162-NZT DCO 1.4 - Notices for Non-Statutory_Statutory Publicity.pdf:49:Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the ‘EIA Regulations’) that they intend
EN010103-001162-NZT DCO 1.4 - Notices for Non-Statutory_Statutory Publicity.pdf:49:The Project is therefore ‘EIA development’ for the purposes of the EIA
EN010103-001162-NZT DCO 1.4 - Notices for Non-Statutory_Statutory Publicity.pdf:50: length of road specified below. (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the ‘EIA Regulations’) that they intend to provide an
EN010103-001162-NZT DCO 1.4 - Notices for Non-Statutory_Statutory Publicity.pdf:50: The effect of the Order will be to prohibit any vehicle from proceeding Environmental Statement (‘ES’) in respect of the Project. The Project is therefore ‘EIA development’ for the
EN010103-001162-NZT DCO 1.4 - Notices for Non-Statutory_Statutory Publicity.pdf:50: in the lengths of road specified in the schedule below. purposes of the EIA Regulations and an ES will form part of the Proposed Application.
EN010103-001162-NZT DCO 1.4 - Notices for Non-Statutory_Statutory Publicity.pdf:51: (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the ‘EIA Regulations’) that they intend to provide
EN010103-001162-NZT DCO 1.4 - Notices for Non-Statutory_Statutory Publicity.pdf:51: an Environmental Statement (‘ES’) in respect of the Project. The Project is therefore ‘EIA development’ for
EN010103-001162-NZT DCO 1.4 - Notices for Non-Statutory_Statutory Publicity.pdf:51:accommodated and marshalled through the closure where required. the purposes of the EIA Regulations and an ES will form part of the Proposed Application.
EN010103-001162-NZT DCO 1.4 - Notices for Non-Statutory_Statutory Publicity.pdf:53: 5. The Applicants have notified the SoS in writing under Regulation 8(1)(b) of The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the ‘EIA Regulations’) that they intend to
EN010103-001162-NZT DCO 1.4 - Notices for Non-Statutory_Statutory Publicity.pdf:53: provide an Environmental Statement (‘ES’) in respect of the Project. The Project is therefore ‘EIA development’ for the purposes of the EIA Regulations and an ES will form part of the Proposed Application.
EN010103-001162-NZT DCO 1.4 - Notices for Non-Statutory_Statutory Publicity.pdf:60:Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the ‘EIA Regulations’) that they intend
EN010103-001162-NZT DCO 1.4 - Notices for Non-Statutory_Statutory Publicity.pdf:60:to provide an Environmental Statement (‘ES’) in respect of the Project. The Project is therefore ‘EIA
EN010103-001162-NZT DCO 1.4 - Notices for Non-Statutory_Statutory Publicity.pdf:60:development’ for the purposes of the EIA Regulations and an ES will form part of the Proposed
EN010103-001162-NZT DCO 1.4 - Notices for Non-Statutory_Statutory Publicity.pdf:97:Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the ‘EIA Regulations’) that they intend
EN010103-001162-NZT DCO 1.4 - Notices for Non-Statutory_Statutory Publicity.pdf:97:to provide an Environmental Statement (‘ES’) in respect of the Project. The Project is therefore ‘EIA
EN010103-001162-NZT DCO 1.4 - Notices for Non-Statutory_Statutory Publicity.pdf:97:development’ for the purposes of the EIA Regulations and an ES will form part of the Proposed
EN010103-001162-NZT DCO 1.4 - Notices for Non-Statutory_Statutory Publicity.pdf:102:Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the ‘EIA Regulations’) that they intend
EN010103-001162-NZT DCO 1.4 - Notices for Non-Statutory_Statutory Publicity.pdf:102:to provide an Environmental Statement (‘ES’) in respect of the Project. The Project is therefore ‘EIA
EN010103-001162-NZT DCO 1.4 - Notices for Non-Statutory_Statutory Publicity.pdf:102:development’ for the purposes of the EIA Regulations and an ES will form part of the Proposed
EN010103-001162-NZT DCO 1.4 - Notices for Non-Statutory_Statutory Publicity.pdf:117:Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the ‘EIA Regulations’) that they intend
EN010103-001162-NZT DCO 1.4 - Notices for Non-Statutory_Statutory Publicity.pdf:117:to provide an Environmental Statement (‘ES’) in respect of the Project. The Project is therefore ‘EIA
EN010103-001162-NZT DCO 1.4 - Notices for Non-Statutory_Statutory Publicity.pdf:117:development’ for the purposes of the EIA Regulations and an ES will form part of the Proposed
EN010103-002516-NZT DCO 8.30 - NTG SoCG (Tracked) - Nov 2022 D12.pdf:3: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment – the
EN010103-002516-NZT DCO 8.30 - NTG SoCG (Tracked) - Nov 2022 D12.pdf:3: accordance with the EIA Regulations
EN010103-002516-NZT DCO 8.30 - NTG SoCG (Tracked) - Nov 2022 D12.pdf:3: EIA Regulations Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
EN010103-002516-NZT DCO 8.30 - NTG SoCG (Tracked) - Nov 2022 D12.pdf:3: findings of the EIA
EN010103-002516-NZT DCO 8.30 - NTG SoCG (Tracked) - Nov 2022 D12.pdf:4: that it accords with the EIA and does not result in
EN010103-002239-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:3: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - the
EN010103-002239-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:3: accordance with the EIA Regulations
EN010103-002239-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:3: EIA Regulations Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
EN010103-002239-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:3: findings of the EIA
EN010103-002239-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:4: that it accords with the EIA and does not result in
EN010103-002239-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:9: March 2019 (EIA PINS consulted with Natural England on the Scoping Report
EN010103-002239-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:10: April 2019 (Pre- Technical progress on survey activity (as well as EIA) together with
EN010103-002239-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:12: (Publication of date. The findings from key EIA workstreams, including noise and
EN010103-002239-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:16: considered as part of the EIA. It is also agreed that cumulative
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:20: abundant taxa including Bathyporeia guilliamsoniana and Bathyporeia
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:21: Bathyporeia elegans 2.5
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:21: Bathyporeia guilliamsoniana 6.7
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:23: ranging from 24.8% to 55.1%. Bathyporeia sp. were also dominant in four
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:25:Glycera lapidum Eteone longa Nephtys sp. (juv) (20.69%) Bathyporeia elegans (31.59%)
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:25:Magelona johnstoni (55.05%) Bathyporeia elegans Magelona johnstoni (50.22%) Magelona johnstoni (36.31%)
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:25:Nephtys sp. (juv) (22.47%) Magelona johnstoni Nephtys cirrosa (9.05%) Bathyporeia guilliamsoniana (10.34%)
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:25:Fabulina fabula (22.25%) Bathyporeia guilliamsoniana (17.04%) Diastylis bradyi (27.95%)
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:28: • ‘Nephtys cirrosa and Bathyporeia spp. in infralittoral sand’ (A5.233;
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:29: disturbance, as a result of wave action. The amphipod Bathyporeia sp. and
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:29: abundance of these stations. In particular, Bathyporeia elegans and
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:29: Bathyporeia guilliamsoniana were found in high abundance. Magelonid
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:31: 19 ” _ ‘NephtyscirrosaandBathyporeiaspp.in
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:32: A5.233 - Nephtys cirrosa and Bathyporeia spp. in infralittoral sand
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:32: Descriptions: Characterised by Nephtys cirrosa and Bathyporeia spp. (and
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:32: amphipod Bathyporeia spp. and polychaetes such as Chaetozone
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:35: cirrosa and Bathyporeia spp. in infralittoral sand’ or ‘Fabulina fabula and
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:35: found were either ‘Nephtys cirrosa and Bathyporeia spp. in infralittoral sand’
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:39: infralittoral sandy mud’ (A5.331); and ‘Nephtys cirrosa and Bathyporeia spp.
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:54: Bathyporeia elegans
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:54: A5.233 = ‘Nephtys cirrosa and Bathyporeia spp. in infralittoral sand’; A5.242 = ‘Fabulina fabula and Magelona mirabilis with venerid bivalves and amphipods in infralittoral compacted fine muddy sand’;
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:55: f 14b (g)S Infralittoral Sand Bathyporeia elegans A5.2 A5.242 SS.SSa.IMuSa.FfabMag
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:55: Bathyporeia guilliamsoniana
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:57: Bathyporeia guilliamsoniana
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:61:Bathyporeia elegans - - 10 - - 3 10 13 3 7 10 13 217 97 10 13 10 13 - 10 7 - 13
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:61:Bathyporeia guilliamsoniana - - 60 23 - - 3 57 - 87 60 207 - 80 183 53 - 20 13 250 73 7 30
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:68: _ ‘NephtyscirrosaandBathyporeiaspp.in
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:72: Bathyporeia elegans 16.56
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:72: 22 Bathyporeia elegans 7.11
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:72:Group A was classified as ‘Nephtys cirrosa and Bathyporeia spp. in infralittoral sand’
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:72:clay/silt content, characteristic of this biotope. The amphipod Bathyporeia sp. and
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:73:‘Nephtys cirrosa and Bathyporeia spp. in infralittoral sand’ (A5.233;
EN010103-002637-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG - Final (signed) - Oct 2022 (D13).pdf:3: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - the
EN010103-002637-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG - Final (signed) - Oct 2022 (D13).pdf:3: accordance with the EIA Regulations
EN010103-002637-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG - Final (signed) - Oct 2022 (D13).pdf:3: EIA Regulations Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
EN010103-002637-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG - Final (signed) - Oct 2022 (D13).pdf:3: findings of the EIA
EN010103-002637-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG - Final (signed) - Oct 2022 (D13).pdf:4: that it accords with the EIA and does not result in
EN010103-002637-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG - Final (signed) - Oct 2022 (D13).pdf:9: March 2019 (EIA PINS consulted with Natural England on the Scoping Report
EN010103-002637-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG - Final (signed) - Oct 2022 (D13).pdf:10: April 2019 (Pre- Technical progress on survey activity (as well as EIA) together with
EN010103-002637-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG - Final (signed) - Oct 2022 (D13).pdf:12: (Publication of date. The findings from key EIA workstreams, including noise and
EN010103-002637-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG - Final (signed) - Oct 2022 (D13).pdf:17: considered as part of the EIA. It is also agreed that cumulative
EN010103-001786-NZT DCO 8.30 - NTL, NTLL and NTRL SoCG - June 2022 (Clean).pdf:3: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - the
EN010103-001786-NZT DCO 8.30 - NTL, NTLL and NTRL SoCG - June 2022 (Clean).pdf:3: accordance with the EIA Regulations
EN010103-001786-NZT DCO 8.30 - NTL, NTLL and NTRL SoCG - June 2022 (Clean).pdf:3: EIA Regulations Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
EN010103-001786-NZT DCO 8.30 - NTL, NTLL and NTRL SoCG - June 2022 (Clean).pdf:3: findings of the EIA
EN010103-001786-NZT DCO 8.30 - NTL, NTLL and NTRL SoCG - June 2022 (Clean).pdf:4: that it accords with the EIA and does not result in
EN010103-001599-NZT DCO 8.18 - CATS SoCG - May 2022.pdf:2: findings of the EIA
EN010103-001599-NZT DCO 8.18 - CATS SoCG - May 2022.pdf:4: other matters to ensure that it accords with the EIA
EN010103-001687-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words 1.pdf:4:4.3 The key EIA and policy justifications for assessing the impact of the NZT Project on Hornsea Four
EN010103-001589-NZT DCO 8.8 - NGET - SoCG - May 2022.pdf:2: findings of the EIA
EN010103-001589-NZT DCO 8.8 - NGET - SoCG - May 2022.pdf:3: that it accords with the EIA and does not result in
EN010103-001875-Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council.pdf:3:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-001017-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 3.pdf:2:Subject: RE: EN010103 – Teesside Cluster Carbon Capture & Usage – EIA Scoping
EN010103-001017-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 3.pdf:2:Subject: EN010103 – Teesside Cluster Carbon Capture & Usage – EIA Scoping Notification and Consultation
EN010103-001017-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 3.pdf:2:EIA and Land Rights Advisor
EN010103-001017-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 3.pdf:4:Environmental Impact Assessment Scoping consultation (Regulation 15 (4) of the EIA
EN010103-001017-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 3.pdf:4:Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for this development.
EN010103-001017-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 3.pdf:5:Annex A – Advice related to EIA Scoping Requirements
EN010103-001017-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 3.pdf:5:on ecosystems or their components. EcIA may be carried out as part of the EIA process or to
EN010103-001017-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 3.pdf:6:an Appropriate Assessment, in addition to consideration of impacts through the EIA process.
EN010103-001017-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 3.pdf:6:The EIA will need to consider any impacts upon local wildlife and geological sites. Local Sites are
EN010103-001017-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 3.pdf:8:pertaining to the area. The EIA should include assessments of visual effects on the surrounding
EN010103-001017-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 3.pdf:8:The EIA should include a full assessment of the potential impacts of the development on local
EN010103-001017-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 3.pdf:8:The EIA should consider potential impacts on access land, public open land, rights of way and
EN010103-001017-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 3.pdf:11:The EIA should also consider the impact of the scheme upon the railway Infrastructure in the transport assessments,
EN010103-001017-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 3.pdf:13:Subject: Teesside Carbon Capture and Usage Project Pre-Application EIA Scoping Opinion
EN010103-001017-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 3.pdf:13:We have read the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Scoping Report and note the intentions of
EN010103-001017-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 3.pdf:13:Whilst not all strictly within the remit of the intended content of the EIA, following internal consultation
EN010103-001017-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 3.pdf:14: of the EIA. We expect (as per paragraph 6.38) that the potential impacts of discharged water
EN010103-001017-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 3.pdf:14: We note the proposal to scope “Major Accidents or Disaster Vulnerability” out of the EIA at
EN010103-001017-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 3.pdf:14: mechanisms outside of the EIA process, however we would expect to see worst case
EN010103-001017-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 3.pdf:14: significance assessment within the EIA.
EN010103-001017-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 3.pdf:15:Senior EIA & Land Rights Adviser
EN010103-001017-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 3.pdf:18:The EIA should clearly identify the range of vulnerable populations that have been
EN010103-001017-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 3.pdf:19:The EIA should give consideration to best practice guidance such as the Government’s
EN010103-001017-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 3.pdf:19:Good Practice Guide for EIA1. It is important that the EIA identifies and assesses the
EN010103-001017-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 3.pdf:19:of construction) is widely regarded as good practice. Ideally, EIA should start at the stage of
EN010103-001017-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 3.pdf:20:order that the EIA provides a comprehensive assessment of potential impacts.
EN010103-001017-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 3.pdf:20:PHE’s view is that the EIA should appraise and describe the measures that will be used to
EN010103-001017-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 3.pdf:21:Relevant areas outlined in the Government’s Good Practice Guide for EIA include:
EN010103-001017-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 3.pdf:21:The EIA should demonstrate compliance with the waste hierarchy (e.g. with respect to re-
EN010103-001017-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 3.pdf:21:For wastes arising from the installation the EIA should consider:
EN010103-001017-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 3.pdf:22:Within the EIA PHE would expect to see information about how the promoter would
EN010103-001017-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 3.pdf:22:The EIA should include consideration of the COMAH Regulations (Control of Major
EN010103-001017-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 3.pdf:22:information within EIAs as good practice.
EN010103-001017-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 3.pdf:31:With regard to the conclusions reached in section 8 of the Scoping Report, it is agreed that any EIA
EN010103-001017-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 3.pdf:36:Subject: FW: EN010103 – Teesside Cluster Carbon Capture & Usage – EIA Scoping
EN010103-001017-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 3.pdf:36:Subject: EN010103 – Teesside Cluster Carbon Capture & Usage – EIA Scoping Notification and Consultation
EN010103-001017-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 3.pdf:36:EIA and Land Rights Advisor
EN010103-002405-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:19: appearance, landscaping, layout and scale for scale likely. No EIA Scoping
EN010103-002405-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:19:9 Caernarvon Close, Beyond Housing, demolition of 19 dwelling 4.9 Unknown Online information on the developer Approved 1 N Y N Y N Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y N N N N N N Y N Y N Just within ZoI for traffic N No EIA Scoping Report or ES No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the
EN010103-002405-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:19: International, facility and combined heat and power plant, Form, Planning Statement, EIA 13/10/2016 ha - small “The application is area > 1 ha, waste Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of.
EN010103-002405-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:19:14 Fabian Road, Eston Gleeson Developments Ltd, 51 residential 5.6 1.38 ha Online satellite imagery indicates that Approved 1 N N N Y N Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y N N N N N N Y N - 51 Y N N N Remote from Site, no EIA No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the
EN010103-002405-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:19:15 Redcar Lane, Bellway Homes NE, reserved matters 9.1 7.71 ha Online news articles dated April 2022 Approved 1 N N N Y N Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y N N N N N N Y N - 126 Y N N Linked to ID 8. N Remote from Site, no EIA No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the
EN010103-002405-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:20: 18 Redcar and Cleveland Land north of Theakston Estates (Investments) Limited, 7.7 22.8 ha Online satellite imagery indicates that Allowed on 1 N N N Y N Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y N N N N N N Y Y- Y N Y Assume overlap in temporal N Remote from Site, no EIA No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the
EN010103-002405-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:20: to old Hall Farm energy storage facility (up to 49.9 MW), new to last no longer than 12 months. 10/11/2017 i.e. small should be complete by Nov EIA scoping or ES submitted; Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of.
EN010103-002405-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:20: Spencerbeck Farm outbuildings to allow outline planning Statement, Desktop Study or DAS - 20/01/2021 from PCC). No EIA Scoing or Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of.
EN010103-002405-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:20: Shakespeare existing car park (14 additional spaces) construction of this development has 12/01/2018 extension EIA scoping or ES submitted. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of.
EN010103-002405-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:20: 25 Wilton Tourian Renewables Ltd, construction and 3.1 1.1 ha Online news articles indicates that Approved 1 N N N Y N Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y N N N N N N Y N Y N Y >3km from PCC Site N No EIA scoping / ES No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the
EN010103-002405-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:21: International, workshop, Wilton International Wilton Planning Statement - checked 21/10/2016 scale (<1 EIA scoping or ES submitted Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of.
EN010103-002405-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:21: Redcar units with associated Infrastructure and m Statement or Transport Statement 12/08/2015 EIA scoping or ES submitted and the development is Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of.
EN010103-002405-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:21: Road, Dwellings, comprising 32 Bungalows and 57 m construction period of around two 21/03/2019 dwellings, scope (construction) for from PCC), no EIA scoping or and the development is Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of.
EN010103-002405-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:21: Of College Road, dwellings with associated works | Land To of the (Middlesborough Council) 11/10/2018 dwellings, construction periods (6.9km from PCC), no EIA No change to the Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of.
EN010103-002405-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:22:40 North Tees Site SABIC UK Petrochemicals Limited, Erection of 3.3 2.22 ha Online satellite imagery indicates that Approved 1 N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y N Y N - EIA N Construction scheduled to N Developments already in No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the
EN010103-002405-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:25: Newcomen Deemed Consent: Demolition of existing shall not be begun later than the 06/08/2020 scale EIA scoping or ES submitted and the development is Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of.
EN010103-002405-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:25: parking and associated Infrastructure works purpose of assessment within this EIA visual impacts.
EN010103-002405-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:27: Hartlepool distribution building, office building, welfare requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002405-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:27: TS25 2DF unit, storage bays and associated works (part- those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002405-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:27: 1DE requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002405-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:27: those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002405-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:27: Lane, (Former Condition 1 states: “The development requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002405-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:27: Ewart Parsons Site), to which this permission relates shall those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002405-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:27: 0LH and including a local centre comprising retail unacceptable traffic impacts on the requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002405-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:27: (400sqm) and business incubator units A19 Trunk Road. those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002405-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:27: Of Middle Warren, Infrastructure construction. A Construction noise impacts. and no requirement for EIA.
EN010103-002405-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:27: Warren, Hartlepool to the LPA prior to commencment of EIA Scoping Report or ES are
EN010103-002405-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:27: Belasis Layout and Scale) for the erection of hereby permitted shall be begun noise impacts. no requirement for EIA.
EN010103-002405-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:27: Avenue And development, manufacturing and storage years from EIA Scoping Report or ES are
EN010103-002405-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:27: Lane Industrial construction phase. requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002405-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:27: Estate Billingham those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002405-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:28: Road Cowpen Lane construction phase. requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002405-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:28: Industrial Estate those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002405-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:28: bed houses, 44 three bed houses and 6 four submitted prior to commencement of requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002405-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:28: bed houses the development those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002405-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:28: within 3 years of a planning approval. requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002405-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:28: those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002405-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:28: Middlesbrough associated landscaping, public realm, cycle states “The development to which requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002405-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:28: store and car parking this permission relates must be begun those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002405-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:28: Middlesbrough, TS1 be begun later than the expiration of requirement for EIA. Only reached in the ES.
EN010103-002405-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:28: 2RQ THREE those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002405-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:28: currently underway. requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002405-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:28: those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002405-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:28: Ladgate likely that the devleopment will be requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002405-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:28: Lane/Marton complete prior to construction of the those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002405-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:28: South Bank Condition 1 states: “The development requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002405-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:28: Industrial Estate, to which this permission relates shall those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002405-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:28: (A1053) Greystones (Amended Scheme) to last no longer than 12 months. requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002405-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:28: Road, Old Once installed, there is minimal on- those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002405-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:29: South Terrace Vehicular And Pedestrian Accesses And requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002405-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:29: South Bank Landscaping those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002405-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:29: Redcar 2021 no requirement for EIA.
EN010103-002405-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:29: EIA Scoping Report or ES are
EN010103-002405-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:29:115 Land At South Bank South Tees Development Corporation: 3.6 5.83 Standalone application for 5.83 Approved 1 N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Transport note included on Y Not in itself EIA No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the
EN010103-002405-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:29: And Landscaping Works boundary. This site will be with this development have which is EIA development.
EN010103-002405-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:29:120 LAND AT SOUTH ERECTION OF 3,396SQM OF B2/B8 3.6 2.97 Standalone application for additional Approved 1 N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y N N N Y Transport note included on Y Not in itself EIA No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the
EN010103-002405-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:29: GRANGETOWN AND ASSOCIATED PLANT, CREATION OF 114 and ID 115. Construction with this development have is EIA development.
EN010103-002405-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:30: REDCAR TS10 1RD EXTERNAL ALTERATIONS; CREATION OF 10 within 3 years of a planning approval. requirement for EIA. Only the development no
EN010103-002405-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:30: COMMERCIAL/RETAIL UNITS (CLASS E) AT those with a submitted EIA impacts on the ES
EN010103-002405-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:30:123 Land At Seal Sands Erection of an energy recovery facility and 3.4 3.7 The current target date for site Pending 1 N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y ? This scheme comprises EIA n/a n/a Added to the long list at During construction, No status change that the
EN010103-002405-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:30: 28 RABY ROAD 2, 3, 4 & 5 storey residential blocks with requirement for EIA. Only 3/4. Due to the nature of
EN010103-002405-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:30: HARTLEPOOL commercial units to ground floor providing those with a submitted EIA the development no
EN010103-002405-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:30:125 PLOTS 1A AND 1B Construction of a lithium hydroxide monohydrate 3.9 8.6 Q2/Q3 2023 to Q4 2024 Pending 1 N N N Y N Y N Y Y Y N Y Y N N N N N N N Y Y Y Y N Assumed that construction This scheme comprises EIA n/a n/a n/a n/a Added at deadline 11,
EN010103-001686-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:6: rightly acknowledges the principles of the EIA process and the need to consider the ‘project as a
EN010103-001686-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:10: consultation under the related EIA process, there is no opportunity to discuss issues and propose
EN010103-002743-Applicant NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - March 2023.pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - a term used for the
EN010103-002743-Applicant NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - March 2023.pdf:2: EIA Regulations The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment)
EN010103-002743-Applicant NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - March 2023.pdf:12: 'EIA Regulations').
EN010103-002743-Applicant NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - March 2023.pdf:12: with the statutory requirements of the PA 2008, the APFP Regulations and the EIA
EN010103-002743-Applicant NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - March 2023.pdf:18: Non-Technical Summary EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002743-Applicant NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - March 2023.pdf:18: Volume I – Main Text EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002743-Applicant NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - March 2023.pdf:18: EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002743-Applicant NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - March 2023.pdf:18: Methodology EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002743-Applicant NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - March 2023.pdf:18: Existing Area EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002743-Applicant NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - March 2023.pdf:18: Development EIA Reg. 14 Rev. 2.0
EN010103-002743-Applicant NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - March 2023.pdf:18: Programme and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002743-Applicant NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - March 2023.pdf:18: Design Evolution EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002743-Applicant NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - March 2023.pdf:19: Context & Planning Policy EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002743-Applicant NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - March 2023.pdf:19: EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002743-Applicant NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - March 2023.pdf:19: Flood Risk and Water and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002743-Applicant NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - March 2023.pdf:19: Hydrogeology and and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002743-Applicant NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - March 2023.pdf:19: Vibration EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002743-Applicant NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - March 2023.pdf:19: Ecology and Nature and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002743-Applicant NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - March 2023.pdf:19: and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002743-Applicant NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - March 2023.pdf:19: and Nature Conservation and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002743-Applicant NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - March 2023.pdf:19: and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002743-Applicant NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - March 2023.pdf:19: Transport EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002743-Applicant NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - March 2023.pdf:19: Visual Amenity and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002743-Applicant NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - March 2023.pdf:19: Heritage and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002743-Applicant NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - March 2023.pdf:19: and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002743-Applicant NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - March 2023.pdf:19: & Tourism EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002743-Applicant NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - March 2023.pdf:20: EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002743-Applicant NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - March 2023.pdf:20: & Disasters EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002743-Applicant NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - March 2023.pdf:20: Human Health EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002743-Applicant NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - March 2023.pdf:20: Combined Effects EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002743-Applicant NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - March 2023.pdf:20: Significant Effects EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002743-Applicant NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - March 2023.pdf:20: (o) and EIA Reg. 14 stated
EN010103-002743-Applicant NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - March 2023.pdf:30: (o) and EIA Reg. 14 otherwise stated
EN010103-002743-Applicant NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - March 2023.pdf:30: 6.4.1 Appendix 1A: EIA Scoping -
EN010103-002743-Applicant NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - March 2023.pdf:30: 6.4.2 Appendix 1B: EIA Scoping -
EN010103-001571-NZT DCO 8.29 - INEOS UK SNS Ltd SoCG - May 2022.pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - the
EN010103-001571-NZT DCO 8.29 - INEOS UK SNS Ltd SoCG - May 2022.pdf:2: accordance with the EIA Regulations
EN010103-001571-NZT DCO 8.29 - INEOS UK SNS Ltd SoCG - May 2022.pdf:3: findings of the EIA
EN010103-001571-NZT DCO 8.29 - INEOS UK SNS Ltd SoCG - May 2022.pdf:3: that it accords with the EIA and does not result in
EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:4: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - a term used
EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:4: EIA Regulations The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental
EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:23:2.6.6 The Proposed Development represents an Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’)
EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:23: (‘ES’) (Document Refs. 6.1 - 6.4) that reports the findings of the EIA that has been
EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:23: accommodate this flexibility and ensure a robust EIA of the Proposed Development,
EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:24: its construction and operation to ensure that it remains within the scope of the EIA
EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:37: (the ‘EIA Regulations’).
EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:78: operation in order to ensure that it accords with the EIA carried out and does not
EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:78:6.2.13 The Applicants’ assessment of the Proposed Development, notably through the EIA,
EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:78:6.2.16 EN-1 (paragraph 4.2.1) states that NSIPs that are subject to the European EIA
EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:78: Directive (to be read now as referring to the EIA Regulations) must be accompanied
EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:79: by the Proposed Development. It highlights that the European EIA Directive
EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:79: been adopted for the EIA of the Proposed Development.
EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:80: and assessed through the EIA maximum 'worst case' dimensions and design
EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:82: finalised to ensure that it will be constructed in accordance with the EIA that has
EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:84: the 'Rochdale Envelope' and assessed through the EIA maximum 'worst case'
EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:89: out the design parameters that have been used for the purposes of the EIA to ensure
EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:96: climate change. While not required by the EIA Directive, this information will be
EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:101: and vibration have been fully assessed within the EIA undertaken. Furthermore,
EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:102: assessment within an EIA, regard has been had to the COMAH Regulations and there
EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:107: assessments undertaken for the EIA. The matters considered include the
EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:115: emissions; EIA. The matters considered include the condition/state of premises; smoke;
EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:141: protection (electrical or the EIA Scoping Opinion (02.04.19). Additionally, the Electric and Magnetic
EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:142: ‘standard’ EIA methodology of identifying the sensitivity of receptors and
EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:155: Local Plan Development suitability of a site or Locational Policy. Furthermore, a comprehensive EIA of the Proposed
EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:156: approved where their industry. The EIA confirms that the Proposed Development will not
EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:157: SD7 RCBC Flood and Development in areas The EIA has assessed flood risk and water management and includes a
EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:168: development of new Tees SPD (and the Teesworks Design Guide) for energy use. The EIA for
EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:180: ENV7 STBC Local Ground, Air, Development proposals The EIA of the Proposed Development has considered its potential
EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:180: and Light pollution will be water and human health. Taking account of mitigation, the EIA has not
EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:185: the policy assessment within Section 6 and the EIA that has been undertaken.
EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:195: a the Overarching Poiicy Staiement for Energy (EN-i ) has efiect in reiaiion to
EN010103-001214-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft Development Consent Order - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:161: planning permission ref 14/1454/EIA granted by Stockton-on-Tee Borough Council to be
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (8).pdf:1:Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the 2017 EIA Regulations)
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (8).pdf:3:Regulations 2017 (the 2017 EIA Regulations) and on the basis of the current information
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (8).pdf:4:Note: The SoS’ duty under Regulation 32 of the 2017 EIA Regulations continues
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (8).pdf:6: Under Regulation 32 of the 2017 EIA Regulations and on the basis of the current
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (8).pdf:6: Note: The SoS’ duty under Regulation 32 of the 2017 EIA Regulations continues
EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:11: Impact Assessment (EIA) process.
EN010103-002329-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - a term used
EN010103-002329-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:3: EIA Regulations The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental
EN010103-002329-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:13: 'EIA Regulations').
EN010103-002329-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:13: with the statutory requirements of the PA 2008, the APFP Regulations and the EIA
EN010103-002329-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:19: Non-Technical Summary EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002329-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:19: Volume I – Main Text EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002329-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:19: EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002329-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:19: Methodology EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002329-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:19: Existing Area EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002329-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:19: Development EIA Reg. 14 Rev. 2.0
EN010103-002329-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:19: Programme and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002329-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:19: Design Evolution EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002329-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:19: & Planning Policy EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002329-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:19: EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002329-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:19: Flood Risk and Water and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002329-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:19: Hydrogeology and and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002329-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:19: Vibration EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002329-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:19: Ecology and Nature and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002329-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:19: and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002329-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:20: and Nature Conservation and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002329-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:20: and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002329-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:20: Transport EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002329-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:20: Visual Amenity and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002329-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:20: and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002329-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:20: and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002329-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:20: & Tourism EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002329-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:20: EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002329-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:20: & Disasters EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002329-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:20: Human Health EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002329-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:20: Combined Effects EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002329-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:20: Significant Effects EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002329-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:20: (o) and EIA Reg. 14 unless stated
EN010103-002329-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:30: (o) and EIA Reg. 14 otherwise stated
EN010103-002329-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:30: 6.4.1 Appendix 1A: EIA Scoping -
EN010103-002329-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:30: 6.4.2 Appendix 1B: EIA Scoping -
EN010103-002627-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 3 - Shell - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:56:#&'&AA50Pÿ866A@80&ÿ90&9505780PÿQ80SAÿ@5C&ÿ)&&#ÿ'8(9F&7&HRÿd@&ÿUVÿ G#H&0ÿ3xÿaEIA4ÿB#ÿQ@B'@ÿ8G0ÿB#7&0&A7Aÿ05#D&ÿ608(ÿ12vÿ78ÿwsvR
EN010103-002627-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 3 - Shell - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:72: bHÿSTSUÿeGFÿGÿh`IEiabDHÿbHÿDbcÿhDIEiaÿFGc̀FÿDwÿGhDbGàcfÿUyUSpÿaCDEFGHIÿQRIÿgSTSThÿ
EN010103-002627-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 3 - Shell - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:72: t`eÿdGc̀IDHbG ÿicEI`FÿDeHÿEF`ÿGHIÿhDIEiaFÿGiEbh`IÿwDhÿQc̀HIbHuÿEhDF`F
EN010103-002627-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 3 - Shell - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:82:CDHÿRHB4QIRIC4ÿRCÿBÿ4ARVWAHCÿAXIQQIC4QÿA4AHPSÿYDQI4AQQ9ÿ̀DH`CQAaDTTSÿB4Fÿ I4ÿQRA`ÿ@IRdÿQCEIARSQÿ̀HCPHAQQ9ÿHA DIHAQÿDQÿRCÿEC4RI4DAÿA4dB4EI4Pÿ
EN010103-002627-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 3 - Shell - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:82:aCHÿCDHÿEDQRCXAHQÿB4FÿaCHÿ@IFAHÿQCEIARSb DHÿA4AHPSÿRHB4QIRIC4ÿQRHBRAPSÿIQÿFAQIP4AFÿRCÿdAT̀ÿDQÿIFA4RIaSÿB4Fÿ
EN010103-002627-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 3 - Shell - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:82: A4AHPSÿQSQRAXÿQCÿRdBRÿQCEIARSÿQRC`QÿBFFI4PÿRCÿRdAÿRCRBTÿBXCD4Rÿ RdIQÿ̀HCEAQQ9ÿedATTÿEC4RI4DAQÿRCÿIFA4RIaSÿETIXBRAÿEdB4PAÿB4FÿRdAÿBQQCEIBRAFÿ
EN010103-002627-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 3 - Shell - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:82: CaÿPHAA4dCDQAÿPBQAQÿI4ÿRdAÿBRXCQ`dAHA9ÿBEdIAcI4Pÿ@dBRÿIQÿ A4AHPSÿRHB4QIRIC4ÿBQÿBÿXBRAHIBTÿHIQgÿYBQAFÿC4ÿRdAÿHB`IFTSÿAcCTcI4PÿQCEIARBTÿ
EN010103-002627-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 3 - Shell - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:82: I4ÿQRA`ÿ@IRdÿQCEIARSQÿ̀HCPHAQQÿI4ÿBEdIAcI4PÿRdAÿPCBTÿCaÿRdAÿ @dIEdÿECDTFÿdBcAÿB4ÿIX`BERÿC4ÿFAXB4FÿaCHÿCDHÿ̀HCFDERQ9ÿCDHÿC`AHBRIC4BTÿ
EN010103-002627-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 3 - Shell - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:89:feceYYbrsreaÿqÿrxeÿbfreiaeefaefceÿtÿrxeÿibYYÿsfaÿrxeÿieysreaÿscrbtfYÿ XYÿdeÿteisreÿbfÿdyrbyeÿctdfribeYÿpyt syyqvÿYtcbersyÿibYYÿsieÿsreibsyÿ
EN010103-002627-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 3 - Shell - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:94:WÿSSÿeiarbRUÿYbRÿhiUfSdURhÿXitQdrtÿUiaDieifYDtÿhRficYSÿuSYfRUIÿYDhÿQRDfRÿiDfSrhRÿbdrDhiDa
EN010103-002627-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 3 - Shell - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:122:6$C9&7&'#G2ÿ9270$7C&(62ÿ6$(4#'#$(ÿC2('#$(24ÿ&Q$G2Dÿq7$CÿRSRIAÿRSÿ 6$('7&6'5&%ÿ8&G#(B8ÿ927#$4DÿT8ÿ$0ÿu262CQ27ÿeIAÿRSRIAÿ'1272ÿ&72ÿ($ÿ
EN010103-002627-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 3 - Shell - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:124: 9XFÿXISÿXFaEÿuIA@UwSÿSFD@UAÿbIDItFbFDVÿTUS@V@UDSÿG@VX@Dÿ9VIDEIAEÿWXIAVFAFEÿ̀IDQÿIDEÿGISÿWX@FYÿ
EN010103-002627-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 3 - Shell - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:124: xFPwV@uFÿyYY@PFAÿUYÿ9VIDEIAEÿWXIAVFAFEÿ̀IDQfÿ9@DtITUAFfÿYAUbÿghhdÿwDV@aÿghhiÿ9XFÿ@SÿIaSUÿIÿFaaUGÿ
EN010103-002627-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 3 - Shell - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:124: 9@DtITUAFÿC@Aa@DFSÿVEfÿ9@DtITUAFÿxPXIDtFÿVEfÿ9VIDEIAEÿWXIAVFAFEÿ̀IDQÿHIaIcS@Iÿ̀FAXIEfÿ9VIDEIAEÿ
EN010103-002627-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 3 - Shell - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:124: $3$$sÿ'# IDEÿWXI@AÿUYÿDVFADIV@UDIaÿxDVFATA@SFÿ9@DtITUAFÿIDEÿVXFÿCPPUwDV@Dtÿ9VIDEIAESÿWUwDP@afÿ9@DtITUAFiÿ
EN010103-002627-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 3 - Shell - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:137:DEFÿHIPQRÿSITUVQWXÿYEPỲÿYEQIabEIaYÿYEFÿcFPQ̀ÿYEFÿdIWePTcÿEPXÿPeefVFRÿ pfXFhEFQFÿVTÿYEVXÿTTaPfÿtFeIQỲÿhFÿFefPVTÿEIhÿIaQÿeFIefFÿPQFÿ
EN010103-002627-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 3 - Shell - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:137:YEQIabEIaYÿYEFÿcFPQÿFÿPfXIÿeQIiVRFRÿSfFPQÿPTRÿWFPTVTbUafÿFefPTPYVITÿ aTRFQÿQFiVFhÿYPFEIfRFQÿFTbPbFWFTYÿPfXIÿSITYVTaFXÿYIÿgFÿFTEPTSFRÿ
EN010103-002627-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 3 - Shell - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:137:PÿRViFQXFÿHIPQRÿYEVXÿeFQVIRÿSPTÿgFÿFYFTRFRÿ̀ePQYVSafPQfcÿhEFQFÿYEFÿdEPVQÿ xyxÿFSITRÿ̀PTÿaeRPYFÿITÿYEFÿFTbPbFWFTYÿhVYEÿXEPQFEIfRFQXÿXEIafRÿgFÿ
EN010103-002627-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 3 - Shell - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:137:QFWPVTÿITÿYEFÿHIPQRÿUIQÿfITbFQÿYEPTÿTVTFÿcFPQXÿPXÿhFÿYQPTXVYVITFRÿYIÿYEFÿ PÿUVTPfÿXaWWPQcÿIUÿYEFÿFTbPbFWFTYÿPTRÿYEFÿPSYVITXÿYPFTÿXEIafRÿ
EN010103-002627-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 3 - Shell - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:139: sÿ `BQÿ H``BIQFh9QFPÿBQR9S9TUFIV9ÿuIA9TFBADÿTBQEIAhÿF89aÿHA9ÿHeC9ÿFBÿHCCBTHF9ÿDUEEITI9QFÿFIh9ÿFBÿh99FÿF89ÿ9S`9TFHFIBQDÿBEÿF89ÿ
EN010103-002627-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 3 - Shell - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:195:IGÿGH6CBI6XÿP9d6CHE996dÿ8iÿGPCÿ@GAAEIA69IÿIGÿQBR6IiÿB9dÿTGPC96iÿIGÿ l4mWÿ@G9IE9P6QÿIGÿQ6C`6ÿEIQÿE9I69d6dÿHPCHGQ6ÿhEI5ÿBÿQIC6I@5E9FÿS6`6SÿGRÿ
EN010103-002627-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 3 - Shell - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:214:fVFSSgEÿTYFHITQTFYÿTIFGEÿDBFÿYTEiAEEFYÿPHÿXD`Fÿvpd
EN010103-002627-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 3 - Shell - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:214:D`DTHEIÿcPIVÿIVFÿADHITIDITRFÿGFDEABFEÿPQÿGDIFBTDSTIUÿYTEiAEEFYÿDcPRFÿDHYÿTHÿIVFÿST̀VIÿPQÿPIVFBÿBFSFRDHIÿADSTIDITRFÿiPHETYFBDITPHEÿTHÿQPBGTH`ÿPABÿPXTHTPHd
EN010103-002627-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 3 - Shell - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:218: tzÿxlvwqlÿtklÿqpxzoÿnotlosnt|ÿzmÿlolx{|ÿ~xzvwqtsÿtkl|ÿslrrÿsqz~lÿ yYÿFAQGdYGYdÿWEPÿDEFGHÿ̀PWfAFEPAQXÿeAÿDbQWÿfWYQGFAPAFÿHVAÿfWYHAYHÿWaÿHVAÿFWfEIAYHÿ
EN010103-002627-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 3 - Shell - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:224: )`abÿabÿcdÿebfagcfahdÿicbepÿhdÿqdresfcadÿhqfrhgebtÿ”7”ÿ zAÿHmGUEIAWÿUIÿVIWADBGUIWEIÿHQÿGRAÿCHIGDHdBÿHkADÿpRAdd{BÿefeÿEXFUEDXAIGÿ
EN010103-002627-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 3 - Shell - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:253:SQQTUIPPÿbaÿdfdHdgÿvxÿvxÿgdPbadTÿgIRfIbPPuÿaQÿaidÿbfhtIeIaIQRÿQYÿSÿSgQtÿPfÿIRÿvxÿbPPQfbadTÿaQÿgRadgbadTÿSbeÿFwx ÿHIPPIQRÿ
EN010103-002627-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 3 - Shell - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:253:rTTIaIQReÿaQÿQQTUIPPÿIRÿvxÿFvxwÿHIPPIQRÿgdPbadTÿaQÿbÿRtHdgÿQYÿteIRdeeÿbfhtIeIaIQReÿaibaÿidPPÿtRTdgaQQcÿYQgÿbÿaQabPÿfQReITdgbaIQRÿ
EN010103-002627-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 3 - Shell - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:253:QYÿFxÿHIPPIQReÿpiIeÿIRfPtTdeÿgQIeIQRbPÿQQTUIPPÿQYÿFvxvÿHIPPIQRÿQUIRÿaQÿaidÿPIHIadTÿdgIQTÿeIRfdÿaidÿbfhtIeIaIQRÿTbadeÿpidÿYIRbPÿbHQtRaÿ
EN010103-002627-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 3 - Shell - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:256:BGÿeIabÿGBEÿ533ÿB912EÿTD@8$2@@2@IÿcE8BEÿ9Bÿ&'&(ÿ912ÿE592ÿD@27ÿTRÿ01233ÿS5@ÿ912ÿ@5A2ÿGBEÿ533ÿ5498F8982@ÿ5$7ÿS5@ÿT5@27ÿB$ÿ5ÿHE2U95Vÿ78@4BD$9ÿE592ÿE2G32498$6ÿ
EN010103-002627-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 3 - Shell - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:272:QRCB@R9BCVÿRÿ̀@9AHBCVÿaA9@C89EÿAVABCE@ÿSRFC@89aA9@dÿS98HB@ÿTBQB@Egÿ798HB@ÿBCR̀9QA@BRCÿBEÿ98VFTA9TdÿEIA98HÿG8@c88CÿGFEBC8EEÿACHÿ̀BCACS8ÿ̀FCS@BRCEUÿcB@Iÿ
EN010103-002627-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 3 - Shell - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:281:cfeXgWVXcQÿSWQQcVÿfTÿbTWaiUTYÿXVrÿaiqqXSXTQVÿUTeXWfXeXVstÿxrXaÿScQSeiaXcQÿ cpTUWVXcQaÿVrWVÿqTYTUWeÿWQYÿaVWVTÿWgTQSXTaÿpTUbXVVTYÿWQYÿWiVrcUXaTYÿWVÿ
EN010103-002627-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 3 - Shell - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:307:ÿQbÿIRV̀wbgV̀ÿffnÿcbQòUVaÿy`b`ÿIVÿRQVÿcQaaIxP̀ÿVQÿIaVIRweIayÿUgbxQRÿVbgRacQbVÿgRÿaVQbgw`ÿVy`ÿpnVQbgw`ÿQvÿfiqÿgUVIWIVXÿIaÿea`q
EN010103-002627-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 3 - Shell - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:315:RSSRIuataITcÿqaSaÿtR`aÿTeÿaIcWSaÿTbRTÿTbaÿ̀UdÙaI`ÿqRcÿQRÙÿUIÿ mcÿRÿSacWXTÿefÿTbaÿRccUtUXRTUeIÿefÿaRVbÿmÿcbRSaÿRI`ÿaRVbÿiÿcbRSaÿUITeÿeIaÿ
EN010103-002627-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 3 - Shell - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:343:@ABCDEFÿHFÿIAPEQRFÿDESÿDSSRTUUÿAVÿWEIARCARDQWAE X @ABCDEFÿHFÿIAPEQRFÿDESÿDSSRTUUÿAVÿWEIARCARDQWAE X
EN010103-002627-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 3 - Shell - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:345:@ABCDEFÿHFÿIAPEQRFÿDESÿDSSRTUUÿAVÿWEIARCARDQWAE X @ABCDEFÿHFÿIAPEQRFÿDESÿDSSRTUUÿAVÿWEIARCARDQWAE X
EN010103-002627-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 3 - Shell - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:349:@ABCDEFÿHFÿIAPEQRFÿDESÿDSSRTUUÿAVÿWEIARCARDQWAE X
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (14).pdf:14: 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (14).pdf:14: 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 2
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (14).pdf:14: 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 3
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (14).pdf:14: 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (14).pdf:14: 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 2
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (14).pdf:14: 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 3
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (8).pdf:14: 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (8).pdf:14: 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 2
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (8).pdf:14: 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 3
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (8).pdf:14: 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (8).pdf:14: 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 2
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (8).pdf:14: 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 3
EN010103-Advice-00009-1-210419 - Net Zero Teesside FINAL with draft docs feedback.pdf:1:Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) (relating to the offshore works) and storage
EN010103-Advice-00009-1-210419 - Net Zero Teesside FINAL with draft docs feedback.pdf:19: the approach that has been which must be made by the SoS in keeping with his statutory duty under the EIA
EN010103-Advice-00009-1-210419 - Net Zero Teesside FINAL with draft docs feedback.pdf:28: be supported by a separate EIA”. confirming here or adding in cross reference to where this information
EN010103-Advice-00009-1-210419 - Net Zero Teesside FINAL with draft docs feedback.pdf:29:4. 4.1.6 “As the offshore EIA is still being developed, The Applicant may wish to update the Combined Effects Report (and
EN010103-Advice-00009-1-210419 - Net Zero Teesside FINAL with draft docs feedback.pdf:31: by a separate EIA and are not part of this reiterate that point here?
EN010103-001915-NZT DCO 9.20 - Applicants response to Orsted HP4 D3 Submission July 2022 (D4).pdf:10:any impact on Hornsea Project Four as part of the Proposed Development's EIA.
EN010103-002643-NZT DCO 9.51 - Applicants' Response to ExA's RFI dated 2 Nov 2022 - Nov 22 (D13).pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-002315-NZT DCO 8.13 - PD Teesport SoCG (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:2: findings of the EIA
EN010103-002315-NZT DCO 8.13 - PD Teesport SoCG (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:3: other matters to ensure that it accords with the EIA
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (10).pdf:1:Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the 2017 EIA Regulations)
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (10).pdf:3:Regulations 2017 (the 2017 EIA Regulations) and on the basis of the current information
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (10).pdf:4:Note: The SoS’ duty under Regulation 32 of the 2017 EIA Regulations continues
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (10).pdf:6: Under Regulation 32 of the 2017 EIA Regulations and on the basis of the current
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (10).pdf:6: Note: The SoS’ duty under Regulation 32 of the 2017 EIA Regulations continues
EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:2: be considered as part of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) of the
EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:3: subject to EIA, the applicant should:
EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:5: ecological component of the wider EIA.
EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:8: with the EIA methodology described in Chapter 2: Assessment Methodology
EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:10: surveys and the wider EIA has been discussed with Natural England and
EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:14: commenced at the EIA Scoping Stage with the preparation of the EIA Scoping
EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:14: was received from the Planning Inspectorate in April 2019. (Appendix 1A: EIA
EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:14: design evolution of the Proposed Development and the EIA is set out where
EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:14:Coast SPA, potential SPA (pSPA) and Ramsar site within the EIA. Aspects of these designations and
EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:16:used to inform the EIA, as well as any required
EN010103-001572-NZT DCO 8.30 North Tees Ltd North Tees Land Ltd North Tees Rail Ltd SoCG - May 2022.pdf:2: findings of the EIA
EN010103-001572-NZT DCO 8.30 North Tees Ltd North Tees Land Ltd North Tees Rail Ltd SoCG - May 2022.pdf:3: that it accords with the EIA and does not result in
EN010103-Advice-00011-1-Teesside Net Zero Meeting Note_15 Sept 2021_Final.pdf:4:application – publicity and consultation for EIA development’ of ‘The Infrastructure Planning
EN010103-Advice-00011-1-Teesside Net Zero Meeting Note_15 Sept 2021_Final.pdf:4:(Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the ‘EIA Regulations’).
EN010103-001982-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC SoCG - August 2022(D5) - Clean.pdf:3:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - the assessment
EN010103-001982-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC SoCG - August 2022(D5) - Clean.pdf:3: EIA Regulations
EN010103-001982-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC SoCG - August 2022(D5) - Clean.pdf:3:EIA Regulations Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
EN010103-001982-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC SoCG - August 2022(D5) - Clean.pdf:3: findings of the EIA
EN010103-001982-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC SoCG - August 2022(D5) - Clean.pdf:4: other matters to ensure that it accords with the EIA
EN010103-001982-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC SoCG - August 2022(D5) - Clean.pdf:22: Information & the EIA and availability of baseline data on
EN010103-001982-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC SoCG - August 2022(D5) - Clean.pdf:22: EIA heritage and noise effects. It is agreed that, for
EN010103-001982-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC SoCG - August 2022(D5) - Clean.pdf:22: the EIA topics reviewed by STDC, the assessment
EN010103-001982-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC SoCG - August 2022(D5) - Clean.pdf:22: Cumulative cumulative effects in the EIA has been discussed
EN010103-002050-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:3: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment. The
EN010103-002050-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:4: findings of the EIA.
EN010103-002050-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:6: with the EIA and does not result in unacceptable
EN010103-002050-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:17: the findings of the EIA as reported within the ES, against the relevant NPSs and other
EN010103-002050-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:30:3.1.14 The Environmental Impact Assessment (’EIA’) has therefore been undertaken adopting
EN010103-002050-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:69: findings of the EIA as reported within the ES, against the relevant NPSs and other relevant
EN010103-001304-NZT DCO - Notification of Proposed Changes - Document -Final - 18.02.22.pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-001304-NZT DCO - Notification of Proposed Changes - Document -Final - 18.02.22.pdf:4: upon and assessed as part of the environmental impact assessment (EIA)
EN010103-001304-NZT DCO - Notification of Proposed Changes - Document -Final - 18.02.22.pdf:8: changes and parameters of the ‘Rochdale Envelope’ applied to the EIA of
EN010103-001304-NZT DCO - Notification of Proposed Changes - Document -Final - 18.02.22.pdf:22: Option 2 (the HDD) (those considered in the EIA) will reduce the volume
EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:2:22.2.4 In accordance with the EIA Regulations, an assessment of the risk of
EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:3: undertaking a MA&NDs assessment within an EIA. However, there is a
EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:4: generic EIA methodology in which assessments broadly consider the
EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:6: commenced at the EIA Scoping Stage with the preparation of the EIA Scoping
EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:7: EIA are set out where relevant within each of the topic chapters in the ES and
EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:7:EIA Scoping
EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:7:ES to adhere with the EIA Regulations and
EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:9:the EIA. activities will be subject to the requirements at the
EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:9:contain firewater runoff. To achieve this the EIA Appropriate standards will also be referenced to
EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:9:to be considered in the EIA.
EN010103-000888-NZT DCO 6.2.3 ES Vol I Chapter 3 Description of the Existing Environment.pdf:4: Assessment (EIA) have been identified within and outside the boundary of
EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:2: Assessment (EIA) process and are reported in the Environmental Statement
EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:3: • prior assessment of potential environmental impacts (through the EIA);
EN010103-001996-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - August 2022(D5).pdf:165: planning permission ref 14/1454/EIA granted by Stockton-on-Tee Borough Council to be
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:22:9.4.2 The EIA Scoping Addendum Report was submitted in February 2019 and the
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:22: Scoping Opinion was received in April 2019. The EIA PEI Report was
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:136: support the EIA of the Northern Gateway Container Terminal (NGCT) and
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (4).pdf:14: 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (4).pdf:14: 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 2
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (4).pdf:14: 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 3
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (4).pdf:14: 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (4).pdf:14: 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 2
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (4).pdf:14: 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 3
EN010103-001981-NZT DCO 8.2 - STBC SoCG - August 2022(D5) - Tracked.pdf:14: 14. EIA assessment It is agreed that the assessment methodology set out at
EN010103-001981-NZT DCO 8.2 - STBC SoCG - August 2022(D5) - Tracked.pdf:17: 1. EIA assessment The assessment methodology set out at Chapter 2
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:23: frequently within samples (e.g. Paraonis fulgens, Bathyporeia elegans and
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:24: Bathyporeia elegans 1.2
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:24: Bathyporeia elegans 6.7
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:27: squamata, and the amphipod species Bathyporeia pelagica and P.
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:29: primarily consisted of the amphipods: P. arenarius and Bathyoporeia spp.
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:67:Bathyporeia - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 2 - - - -
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:67:Bathyporeia - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - 1 -
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:67:Bathyporeia sarsi - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - -
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:70:Bathyporeia pelagica - - 1 - - -
EN010103-001784-NZT DCO 8.33 - National Highways SoCG - June 2022.pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - the
EN010103-001784-NZT DCO 8.33 - National Highways SoCG - June 2022.pdf:2: accordance with the EIA Regulations
EN010103-001784-NZT DCO 8.33 - National Highways SoCG - June 2022.pdf:2: EIA Regulations Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
EN010103-001784-NZT DCO 8.33 - National Highways SoCG - June 2022.pdf:3: findings of the EIA
EN010103-001784-NZT DCO 8.33 - National Highways SoCG - June 2022.pdf:4: that it accords with the EIA and does not result in
EN010103-001784-NZT DCO 8.33 - National Highways SoCG - June 2022.pdf:8: March 2019 (EIA Scoping) National Highways were consulted on the Scoping Report
EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:12: Impact Assessment (EIA) process.
EN010103-000057-Letter and S35.pdf:4: a the Overarching Poiicy Staiement for Energy (EN-i ) has efiect in reiaiion to
EN010103-001155-NZT DCO 5.11 - Indicative Lighting Strategy.pdf:2: EIA Environmental Protection Act
EN010103-001997-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with July 2022) - August 2022(D5).pdf:164: planning permission ref 14/1454/EIA granted by Stockton-on-Tee Borough Council to be
EN010103-002512-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG - Final (signed) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:3: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - the
EN010103-002512-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG - Final (signed) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:3: accordance with the EIA Regulations
EN010103-002512-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG - Final (signed) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:3: EIA Regulations Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
EN010103-002512-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG - Final (signed) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:3: findings of the EIA
EN010103-002512-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG - Final (signed) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:4: that it accords with the EIA and does not result in
EN010103-002512-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG - Final (signed) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:9: March 2019 (EIA PINS consulted with Natural England on the Scoping Report
EN010103-002512-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG - Final (signed) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:10: April 2019 (Pre- Technical progress on survey activity (as well as EIA) together with
EN010103-002512-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG - Final (signed) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:12: (Publication of date. The findings from key EIA workstreams, including noise and
EN010103-002512-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG - Final (signed) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:17: considered as part of the EIA. It is also agreed that cumulative
EN010103-002525-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:194: planning permission ref 14/1454/EIA granted by Stockton-on-Tee Borough Council to be
EN010103-002245-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:17: appearance, landscaping, layout and scale for scale likely. No EIA Scoping
EN010103-002245-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:17:9 Caernarvon Close, Beyond Housing, demolition of 19 dwelling 4.9 Unknown Online information on the developer Approved 1 N Y N Y N Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y N N N N N N Y N Y N Just within ZoI for traffic N No EIA Scoping Report or ES No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the
EN010103-002245-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:17: International, facility and combined heat and power plant, Form, Planning Statement, EIA 13/10/2016 ha - small “The application is area > 1 ha, waste Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of.
EN010103-002245-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:17:14 Fabian Road, Eston Gleeson Developments Ltd, 51 residential 5.6 1.38 ha Online satellite imagery indicates that Approved 1 N N N Y N Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y N N N N N N Y N - 51 Y N N N Remote from Site, no EIA No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the
EN010103-002245-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:17:15 Redcar Lane, Bellway Homes NE, reserved matters 9.1 7.71 ha Online news articles dated April 2022 Approved 1 N N N Y N Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y N N N N N N Y N - 126 Y N N Linked to ID 8. N Remote from Site, no EIA No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the
EN010103-002245-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:18: 18 Land north of Theakston Estates (Investments) Limited, 7.7 22.8 ha Online satellite imagery indicates that Allowed on 1 N N N Y N Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y N N N N N N Y Y- Y N Y Assume overlap in temporal N Remote from Site, no EIA No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the
EN010103-002245-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:18: to old Hall Farm energy storage facility (up to 49.9 MW), new to last no longer than 12 months. 10/11/2017 i.e. small should be complete by Nov EIA scoping or ES submitted; Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of.
EN010103-002245-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:18: Spencerbeck Farm outbuildings to allow outline planning Statement, Desktop Study or DAS - 20/01/2021 from PCC). No EIA Scoing or Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of.
EN010103-002245-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:18: Shakespeare existing car park (14 additional spaces) construction of this development has 12/01/2018 extension EIA scoping or ES submitted. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of.
EN010103-002245-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:18: 25 Wilton Tourian Renewables Ltd, construction and 3.1 1.1 ha Online news articles indicates that Approved 1 N N N Y N Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y N N N N N N Y N Y N Y >3km from PCC Site N No EIA scoping / ES No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the
EN010103-002245-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:19: International, workshop, Wilton International Wilton Planning Statement - checked 21/10/2016 scale (<1 EIA scoping or ES submitted Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of.
EN010103-002245-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:19: Redcar units with associated Infrastructure and m Statement or Transport Statement 12/08/2015 EIA scoping or ES submitted and the development is Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of.
EN010103-002245-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:19: Road, Dwellings, comprising 32 Bungalows and 57 m construction period of around two 21/03/2019 dwellings, scope (construction) for from PCC), no EIA scoping or and the development is Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of.
EN010103-002245-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:20: Of College Road, dwellings with associated works | Land To H31 of the (Middlesborough Council) 11/10/2018 dwellings, construction periods (6.9km from PCC), no EIA No change to the Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of.
EN010103-002245-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:20:40 North Tees Site SABIC UK Petrochemicals Limited, Erection of 3.3 2.22 ha Online satellite imagery indicates that Approved 1 N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y N Y N - EIA N Construction scheduled to N Developments already in No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the
EN010103-002245-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:24: Newcomen Deemed Consent: Demolition of existing shall not be begun later than the 06/08/2020 scale EIA scoping or ES submitted and the development is Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of.
EN010103-002245-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:24: parking and associated Infrastructure works purpose of assessment within this EIA visual impacts.
EN010103-002245-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:26: Hartlepool distribution building, office building, welfare requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002245-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:26: TS25 2DF unit, storage bays and associated works (part- those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002245-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:26: 1DE requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002245-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:26: those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002245-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:27: Lane, (Former Condition 1 states: “The development requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002245-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:27: Ewart Parsons to which this permission relates shall those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002245-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:27: 0LH and including a local centre comprising retail unacceptable traffic impacts on the requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002245-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:27: (400sqm) and business incubator units A19 Trunk Road. those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002245-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:27: Of Middle Warren, Infrastructure construction. A Construction noise impacts. and no requirement for EIA.
EN010103-002245-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:27: Warren, Hartlepool to the LPA prior to commencment of EIA Scoping Report or ES are
EN010103-002245-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:27: Belasis Layout and Scale) for the erection of hereby permitted shall be begun noise impacts. no requirement for EIA.
EN010103-002245-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:27: Avenue And development, manufacturing and storage years from EIA Scoping Report or ES are
EN010103-002245-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:27: Lane Industrial construction phase. requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002245-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:27: Estate Billingham those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002245-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:27: Road Cowpen Lane construction phase. requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002245-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:27: Industrial Estate those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002245-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:27: consisting of 67 two bed houses, 44 three submitted prior to commencement of requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002245-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:27: bed houses and 6 four bed houses the development those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002245-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:27: within 3 years of a planning approval. requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002245-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:27: those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002245-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:27: Middlesbrough associated landscaping, public realm, cycle states “The development to which requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002245-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:27: store and car parking this permission relates must be begun those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002245-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:27: Middlesbrough, be begun later than the expiration of requirement for EIA. Only reached in the ES.
EN010103-002245-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:27: TS1 2RQ THREE those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002245-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:28: currently underway. requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002245-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:28: those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002245-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:28: Ladgate likely that the devleopment will be requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002245-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:28: Lane/Marton complete prior to construction of the those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002245-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:28: South Bank Condition 1 states: “The development requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002245-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:28: Industrial Estate, to which this permission relates shall those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002245-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:28: (A1053) Greystones (Amended Scheme) to last no longer than 12 months. requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002245-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:28: Road, Old Once installed, there is minimal on- those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002245-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:28: South Terrace Works; New Vehicular And Pedestrian requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002245-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:28: South Bank Accesses And Landscaping those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002245-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:28: Redcar 2021 no requirement for EIA.
EN010103-002245-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:28: EIA Scoping Report or ES are
EN010103-002245-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:29:115 Land At South Bank South Tees Development Corporation: 3.6 5.83 Standalone application for 5.83 Approved 1 N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Transport note included on Y Not in itself EIA No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the
EN010103-002245-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:29: And Landscaping Works boundary. This site will be with this development have which is EIA development.
EN010103-002245-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:29:120 LAND AT SOUTH ERECTION OF 3,396SQM OF B2/B8 3.6 2.97 Standalone application for additional Approved 1 N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y N N N Y Transport note included on Y Not in itself EIA No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the
EN010103-002245-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:29: GRANGETOWN AND ASSOCIATED PLANT, CREATION OF 114 and ID 115. Construction with this development have is EIA development.
EN010103-002245-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:29: CORPORATION EXTERNAL ALTERATIONS; CREATION OF 10 within 3 years of a planning approval. requirement for EIA. Only the development no
EN010103-002245-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:29: EAST OF SMITHS COMMERCIAL/RETAIL UNITS (CLASS E) AT those with a submitted EIA impacts on the ES
EN010103-002245-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:30:123 Land At Seal Sands Erection of an energy recovery facility and 3.4 3.7 The current target date for site Pending 1 N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y ? This scheme comprises EIA n/a n/a Added to the long list at
EN010103-002245-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:30: 28 RABY ROAD 2, 3, 4 & 5 storey residential blocks with requirement for EIA. Only 3/4. Due to the nature of
EN010103-002245-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:30: HARTLEPOOL commercial units to ground floor providing those with a submitted EIA the development no
EN010103-002250-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - a term used
EN010103-002250-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:3: EIA Regulations The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental
EN010103-002250-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:13: 'EIA Regulations').
EN010103-002250-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:13: with the statutory requirements of the PA 2008, the APFP Regulations and the EIA
EN010103-002250-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:19: Non-Technical Summary EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002250-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:19: Volume I – Main Text EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002250-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:19: EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002250-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:19: Methodology EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002250-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:19: Existing Area EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002250-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:19: Development EIA Reg. 14 Rev. 2.0
EN010103-002250-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:19: Programme and Management EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002250-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:19: Design Evolution EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002250-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:19: & Planning Policy EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002250-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:19: EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002250-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:19: Flood Risk and Water EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002250-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:19: Hydrogeology and and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002250-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:19: Vibration EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002250-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:19: and Nature Conservation and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002250-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:19: and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002250-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:20: and Nature Conservation and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002250-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:20: and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002250-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:20: Transport EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002250-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:20: Visual Amenity and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002250-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:20: and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002250-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:20: and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002250-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:20: & Tourism EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002250-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:20: EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002250-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:20: Disasters EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002250-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:20: Human Health EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002250-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:20: Combined Effects EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002250-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:20: Significant Effects EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002250-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:20: (o) and EIA Reg. 14 unless stated
EN010103-002250-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:30: (o) and EIA Reg. 14 otherwise stated
EN010103-002250-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:30: 6.4.1 Appendix 1A: EIA Scoping -
EN010103-002250-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:30: 6.4.2 Appendix 1B: EIA Scoping -
EN010103-001549-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Post-hearing submissions including written summaries of oral case put at any of the hearings held on 10 and 11 May 2022 1.pdf:6: rightly acknowledges the principles of the EIA
EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:3: supported by Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA).
EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:3: high-level principles of the EIA process, and the need to consider the ‘project
EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:4: Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (‘the EIA
EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:5: the high-level principles of the EIA process and the need to consider the
EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:5:Marine 22.03.19 The EIA Scoping Report covers the onshore works associated with the
EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:5: the Scoping Report what the intention is moving forward through the EIA
EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:6: engineering design appraisal and EIA process whereas for the offshore
EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:7: part of any future EIA for the offshore scheme, decommissioning will be
EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:16:24.5.1 Based on the EIA carried out for the onshore scheme, a range of potential
EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:16: engineering design development and the EIA process whereas the offshore
EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:40:24.7.1 This document recognises the high-level principles of EIA process and the
EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:64:24.8.4 This document recognises the high-level principles of EIA process and the
EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:64:24.8.5 A detailed EIA has been undertaken for the onshore scheme, benefitting
EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:64:24.8.6 It will be for the EIA for the offshore scheme to fully identify, assess, report
EN010103-001018-NZT DCO 6.4.3 ES Vol III Appendix 1C Statement of Competence.pdf:3: The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) has been undertaken by
EN010103-001018-NZT DCO 6.4.3 ES Vol III Appendix 1C Statement of Competence.pdf:3: support services. In the UK, EIA co-ordination and preparation is undertaken
EN010103-001018-NZT DCO 6.4.3 ES Vol III Appendix 1C Statement of Competence.pdf:3: AECOM is registered to the EIA Quality Mark. The EIA Quality Mark is a
EN010103-001018-NZT DCO 6.4.3 ES Vol III Appendix 1C Statement of Competence.pdf:3: consultancies) that lead the co-ordination of statutory EIAs in the UK to make
EN010103-001018-NZT DCO 6.4.3 ES Vol III Appendix 1C Statement of Competence.pdf:3: a commitment to excellence in their EIA activities and have this commitment
EN010103-001018-NZT DCO 6.4.3 ES Vol III Appendix 1C Statement of Competence.pdf:3: The EIA Quality Mark registrants adhere to seven key commitments. These
EN010103-001018-NZT DCO 6.4.3 ES Vol III Appendix 1C Statement of Competence.pdf:3: • EIA Management – We commit to using effective project control and
EN010103-001018-NZT DCO 6.4.3 ES Vol III Appendix 1C Statement of Competence.pdf:3: management processes to deliver quality in the EIA we co-ordinate and
EN010103-001018-NZT DCO 6.4.3 ES Vol III Appendix 1C Statement of Competence.pdf:3: • EIA Team Capabilities – We commit to ensuring that all our EIA staff have
EN010103-001018-NZT DCO 6.4.3 ES Vol III Appendix 1C Statement of Competence.pdf:3: • EIA Regulatory Compliance – We commit to delivering Environmental
EN010103-001018-NZT DCO 6.4.3 ES Vol III Appendix 1C Statement of Competence.pdf:3: UK EIA Regulations.
EN010103-001018-NZT DCO 6.4.3 ES Vol III Appendix 1C Statement of Competence.pdf:3: • EIA Context & Influence – We commit to ensuring that all EIAs we
EN010103-001018-NZT DCO 6.4.3 ES Vol III Appendix 1C Statement of Competence.pdf:3: how the EIA process, and any consultation undertaken, influenced the
EN010103-001018-NZT DCO 6.4.3 ES Vol III Appendix 1C Statement of Competence.pdf:3: • EIA Content – We commit to undertaking assessments that include: a
EN010103-001018-NZT DCO 6.4.3 ES Vol III Appendix 1C Statement of Competence.pdf:3: • EIA Presentation – We commit to deliver Environmental Statements that
EN010103-001018-NZT DCO 6.4.3 ES Vol III Appendix 1C Statement of Competence.pdf:3: • Improving EIA practice – We commit to enhance the profile of good
EN010103-001018-NZT DCO 6.4.3 ES Vol III Appendix 1C Statement of Competence.pdf:3: quality EIA by working with IEMA to deliver a mutually agreed set of
EN010103-001018-NZT DCO 6.4.3 ES Vol III Appendix 1C Statement of Competence.pdf:4: work available to the wider EIA community.
EN010103-001018-NZT DCO 6.4.3 ES Vol III Appendix 1C Statement of Competence.pdf:4: considerable experience in all aspects of EIA. AECOM’s EIA co-ordinators
EN010103-001018-NZT DCO 6.4.3 ES Vol III Appendix 1C Statement of Competence.pdf:5:EIA Lead BSc (Hons), MSc, PhD Chartered Geologist (CGeol) and Fellow of the Geological Society (FGS)
EN010103-001018-NZT DCO 6.4.3 ES Vol III Appendix 1C Statement of Competence.pdf:5:Cumulative and Combined Effects BA(Hons), MA (Cantab) PhD, Principal EIA Practitioner on the Institute of Environmental Management and
EN010103-001018-NZT DCO 6.4.3 ES Vol III Appendix 1C Statement of Competence.pdf:5: PGCert, MA Assessment (IEMA) EIA Practitioner Register; Affiliate Member of IEMA.
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (14).pdf:1:Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the 2017 EIA Regulations)
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (14).pdf:3:Regulations 2017 (the 2017 EIA Regulations) and on the basis of the current information
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (14).pdf:4:Note: The SoS’ duty under Regulation 32 of the 2017 EIA Regulations continues
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (14).pdf:6: Under Regulation 32 of the 2017 EIA Regulations and on the basis of the current
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (14).pdf:6: Note: The SoS’ duty under Regulation 32 of the 2017 EIA Regulations continues
EN010103-001637-ClientEarth - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:626: • development and pre-development costs (e.g. surveys and EIAs);
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:3: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - the
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:3: accordance with the EIA Regulations
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:3: EIA Regulations Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:3: findings of the EIA
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:5: that it accords with the EIA and does not result in
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:13: level for the EIA was discussed at a later date with the MMO,
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:13: technical feedback to help inform the finalisation of the EIA
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:13: associated environmental the existing outfall were discussed in terms of EIA. The
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:13: 2021 (Formal consultation extent of sampling undertaken to inform the EIA.
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:15: Statement (including adequacy pre-application period to help inform the scope of the EIA. It is
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:23: EW attending on behalf of AECOM who are representing OGCI and leading the DCO/EIA
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:23: sand / silt. For the purposes of the EIA, existing data is being used at this time; do the MMO
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:24: at EIA scoping last year and this is now a lot clearer – the GIS is particularly good. SE agreed
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:24: Engagement to- MMO at EIA Scoping in March 2019. EW explained how AECOM has been working to respond
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:24: EIA Scoping modelling; use of the DML; coastal processes and; fisheries). EW confirmed that these were
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:24:4. Project Update EW confirmed that since EIA Scoping, effort has been made to further refine the worst-case
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:24: case being assessed currently for EIA purposes. EW noted the potential plant and construction
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:25: exercises were underway, as per the MMO’s recommendation at EIA scoping. Given the
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:25: Stakeholder recommendations made at EIA scoping.
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:25: EW confirmed that since EIA scoping, engagement has been ongoing on the topic of Thermal
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:26: and other stakeholders at EIA scoping. EW noted that at this early stage, a preliminary
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:27: • Ed Walker (EW), AECOM – supporting IC and RL on the EIA and
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:27: • Ian Campbell (IC), AECOM – PM for the DCO EIA;
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:28: engagement to- EIA Scoping (March 2019) where the MMO raised comments on
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:29: EIA (Slide 10, Annex A)
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:29: EW introduced the next slide which relates to EIA; EW confirmed that
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:29: gathering network – this does form part of the DCO which this EIA is
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:30: dealt with via a separate consenting regime and most likely EIA (this is
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:30: ‘Project as a Whole’ perspective however, the EIAs for each project will
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:30: However, for the purposes of EIA, as there is so much information
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:30: for EIA. EW asked if SE/NW had any thoughts? SE agreed that this
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:32: of detail contained within the EIA and the actual likelihood that works
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:39:EIA Scoping (March 2019)
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:43: separate Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) it is dealt with via a separate consenting regime. However, we remain
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:43: compression of third-party CO2 emissions to be offshore project) is also expected to be subject to EIA.
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:56: • Richard Lowe – AECOM, leading the EIA/DCO
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:56: • Ian Campbell – AECOM, coordinating the EIA/DCO
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:56: DCO/EIA
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:57:date and Status • EIA Scoping (March 2019) they have no
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:57: of data to support fisheries assessment in the EIA
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:60: assessment and where this ‘sits’ in the EIA was welcome at
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:62: identified; these are Nephtys cirrosa and Bathyporeia spp.
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:72:EIA Scoping (March 2019)
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:81:‘Nephtys cirrosa and Bathyporeia spp. in infralittoral sand’ (A5.233; SS.SSa.IFiSa.NcirBat)
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:93:biotopes at these stations are consistent with those found in the 2019 survey - either ‘Nephtys cirrosa and Bathyporeia
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:97: Bathyporeia elegans 16.56
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:97: Bathyporeia elegans 7.11
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:97:Group A was classified as ‘Nephtys cirrosa and Bathyporeia spp. in infralittoral sand’ (A5.233; SS.SSa.IFiSa.NcirBat),
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:97:biotope. The amphipod Bathyporeia sp. and polychaete Nephtys cirrosa are typical of this biotope and dominated the
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:97:A5.233 - Nephtys cirrosa and Bathyporeia spp. in infralittoral sand
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:98:Descriptions: Characterised by Nephtys cirrosa and Bathyporeia spp. (and sometimes Pontocrates spp.), found from the
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:98:are commonly recorced include: the amphipod Bathyporeia spp. and polychaetes such as Chaetozone
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:98:The Teesside Net Zero stations in Tees Bay were classified as either the biotope ‘Nephtys cirrosa and Bathyporeia spp.
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:100: replacement outfall is retained in the DCO and supporting EIA. EW
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:101: ‘Nephtys cirrosa and Bathyporeia spp. in infralittoral sand’ (A5.233) is
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:104: the EIA now but thanks for trying. SE confirmed that no response has
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:104: EIA then that sounds appropriate. EW explained that we do have a
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:130:• The biotope ‘Nephtys cirrosa and Bathyporeia spp. in infralittoral sand’ (A5.233) is characteristic of shallow exposed
EN010103-001785-NZT DCO 8.30 - NTL, NTLL and NTRL SoCG - June 2022 (Tracked).pdf:3: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - the
EN010103-001785-NZT DCO 8.30 - NTL, NTLL and NTRL SoCG - June 2022 (Tracked).pdf:3: accordance with the EIA Regulations
EN010103-001785-NZT DCO 8.30 - NTL, NTLL and NTRL SoCG - June 2022 (Tracked).pdf:3: EIA Regulations Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
EN010103-001785-NZT DCO 8.30 - NTL, NTLL and NTRL SoCG - June 2022 (Tracked).pdf:3: findings of the EIA
EN010103-001785-NZT DCO 8.30 - NTL, NTLL and NTRL SoCG - June 2022 (Tracked).pdf:4: that it accords with the EIA and does not result in
EN010103-001906-NZT DCO 8.33 - National Highways SoCG July 2022 (Final) (D4).pdf:3: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - the
EN010103-001906-NZT DCO 8.33 - National Highways SoCG July 2022 (Final) (D4).pdf:3: accordance with the EIA Regulations
EN010103-001906-NZT DCO 8.33 - National Highways SoCG July 2022 (Final) (D4).pdf:3: EIA Regulations Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
EN010103-001906-NZT DCO 8.33 - National Highways SoCG July 2022 (Final) (D4).pdf:3: findings of the EIA
EN010103-001906-NZT DCO 8.33 - National Highways SoCG July 2022 (Final) (D4).pdf:4: that it accords with the EIA and does not result in
EN010103-001906-NZT DCO 8.33 - National Highways SoCG July 2022 (Final) (D4).pdf:10: March 2019 (EIA Scoping) National Highways were consulted on the Scoping Report
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (1).pdf:14: 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (1).pdf:14: 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 2
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (1).pdf:14: 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 3
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (1).pdf:14: 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (1).pdf:14: 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 2
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (1).pdf:14: 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 3
EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:12: Impact Assessment (EIA) process.
EN010103-001472-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - Apr 2022.pdf:151: planning permission ref 14/1454/EIA granted by Stockton-on-Tee Borough Council to be
EN010103-001594-NZT DCO 8.13 - PD Teesport SoCG - May 2022.pdf:2: findings of the EIA
EN010103-001594-NZT DCO 8.13 - PD Teesport SoCG - May 2022.pdf:3: other matters to ensure that it accords with the EIA
EN010103-002175-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D7).pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - a term used
EN010103-002175-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D7).pdf:3: EIA Regulations The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental
EN010103-002175-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D7).pdf:13: 'EIA Regulations').
EN010103-002175-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D7).pdf:13: with the statutory requirements of the PA 2008, the APFP Regulations and the EIA
EN010103-002175-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D7).pdf:18: Non-Technical Summary EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002175-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D7).pdf:18: Volume I – Main Text EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002175-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D7).pdf:19: EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002175-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D7).pdf:19: Methodology EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002175-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D7).pdf:19: Existing Area EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002175-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D7).pdf:19: Development EIA Reg. 14 Rev. 2.0
EN010103-002175-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D7).pdf:19: Programme and Management EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002175-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D7).pdf:19: Design Evolution EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002175-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D7).pdf:19: Planning Policy EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002175-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D7).pdf:19: EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002175-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D7).pdf:19: Risk and Water Resources EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002175-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D7).pdf:19: Hydrogeology and and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002175-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D7).pdf:19: EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002175-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D7).pdf:19: and Nature Conservation and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002175-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D7).pdf:19: and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002175-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D7).pdf:19: Nature Conservation and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002175-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D7).pdf:19: and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002175-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D7).pdf:19: Transport EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002175-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D7).pdf:20: Visual Amenity and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002175-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D7).pdf:20: and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002175-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D7).pdf:20: and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002175-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D7).pdf:20: Tourism EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002175-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D7).pdf:20: EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002175-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D7).pdf:20: Disasters EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002175-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D7).pdf:20: Human Health EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002175-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D7).pdf:20: Combined Effects EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002175-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D7).pdf:20: Significant Effects EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-002175-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D7).pdf:20: (o) and EIA Reg. 14 unless stated
EN010103-002175-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D7).pdf:30: (o) and EIA Reg. 14 unless
EN010103-002175-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D7).pdf:30: 6.4.1 Appendix 1A: EIA Scoping -
EN010103-002175-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Sept 2022(D7).pdf:30: 6.4.2 Appendix 1B: EIA Scoping -
EN010103-001897-NZT DCO 8.11 - Northern Powergrid SoCG (Tracked) - July 22 (D4).pdf:3:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - the assessment
EN010103-001897-NZT DCO 8.11 - Northern Powergrid SoCG (Tracked) - July 22 (D4).pdf:3: EIA Regulations
EN010103-001897-NZT DCO 8.11 - Northern Powergrid SoCG (Tracked) - July 22 (D4).pdf:3:EIA Regulations Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
EN010103-001897-NZT DCO 8.11 - Northern Powergrid SoCG (Tracked) - July 22 (D4).pdf:3: findings of the EIA
EN010103-001897-NZT DCO 8.11 - Northern Powergrid SoCG (Tracked) - July 22 (D4).pdf:4: other matters to ensure that it accords with the EIA
EN010103-002511-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC SoCG (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:3:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - the assessment
EN010103-002511-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC SoCG (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:3: EIA Regulations
EN010103-002511-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC SoCG (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:3:EIA Regulations Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
EN010103-002511-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC SoCG (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:3: findings of the EIA
EN010103-002511-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC SoCG (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:4: other matters to ensure that it accords with the EIA
EN010103-002511-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC SoCG (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:23: Information & the EIA and availability of baseline data on
EN010103-002511-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC SoCG (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:23: EIA heritage and noise effects. It is agreed that, for
EN010103-002511-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC SoCG (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:23: the EIA topics reviewed by STDC, the assessment
EN010103-002511-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC SoCG (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:23: Cumulative cumulative effects in the EIA has been discussed
EN010103-002183-NZT DCO 9.32 - Applicants' Comments on Deadline 6 Submissions - Sept 2022(D7).pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-001793-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with April 2022) - June 2022.pdf:160: planning permission ref 14/1454/EIA granted by Stockton-on-Tee Borough Council to be
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:11:9.3.3 An EIA Scoping Opinion was requested from PINS in February 2019. The
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:14: a separate EIA. However,
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:24: Classification of Effects and Significance Criteria for EIA
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:27: classed as moderate or greater are considered significant in EIA terms (i.e. shaded
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:29:9.3.29 The EIA process enables good decision-making based on the best possible
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:50: support the EIA of the Northern Gateway Container Terminal (NGCT) and QE
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:67: Creek is at ‘high’ risk of tidal flooding. In EIA terms these areas are of Very
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:88: migratory routes for fish. In EIA terms the impact is therefore negligible, which
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:91:9.6.73 In EIA terms, tidal flooding is considered of Very High Importance due to the
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:94:9.8.1 The EIA process enables good decision-making based on the best possible
EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf:21: for EIA purposes. Effects found to be ‘minor’ or ‘negligible’ are considered to
EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf:21: commenced at the EIA Scoping Stage with the preparation of the EIA Scoping
EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf:22: design evolution of the Proposed Development and the EIA is set out where
EN010103-001602-NZT DCO 9.4 - APPENDIX 3 LATEST AUDITED ACCOUNTS – EQUINOR NEW ENERGY LIMITED.pdf:115: Industry Association (SEIA) to increase the visibility in our supply
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:3: considered as part of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) of the
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:10: supported by a separate EIA (see Section 4.83). The Endurance geological
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:18: commenced at the EIA Scoping Stage with the preparation of the EIA Scoping
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:18: EIA is set out, where relevant, within each of the topic chapters in the ES and,
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:19: EIA.
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:20:development will have impacts on the River Tees, course of the design development and EIA
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:22:EIA process. within Section 14.6: Likely Impacts and Effects
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:22: the pre-application period to inform the EIA.
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:22:the EIA should provide a characterisation of fish 6.4), with a summary of this information
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:23:users are considered during the EIA process. Section 14.6: Likely Impacts and Effects of this
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:33: cirrosa and Bathyporeia spp. in infralittoral sand’ (EUNIS A5.233) or ‘Fabulina
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:34:and EIA process for the Proposed Development. An assessment of the Estuary is retained for completeness and as it forms
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:46: require further impact assessment below (see EIA Scoping Report, Appendix
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:47:14.6.4 During the design evolution and EIA process, a series of design changes for
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:48: approach to scoping see EIA Scoping Report, Appendix 1A, ES Volume III,
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:123: Tillin, H.M. and Garrard, S.M. (2019). Nephtys cirrosa and Bathyporeia
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (5).pdf:1:Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the 2017 EIA Regulations)
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (5).pdf:3:Regulations 2017 (the 2017 EIA Regulations) and on the basis of the current information
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (5).pdf:4:Note: The SoS’ duty under Regulation 32 of the 2017 EIA Regulations continues
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (5).pdf:6: Under Regulation 32 of the 2017 EIA Regulations and on the basis of the current
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (5).pdf:6: Note: The SoS’ duty under Regulation 32 of the 2017 EIA Regulations continues
EN010103-002418-NZT DCO 7.13a - Notification of Further Proposed Changes - Oct 2022 (D11).pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:2: Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in accordance with the
EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:2: 2017 (‘the EIA Regulations’), as amended (including as amended by the
EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:3: in the EIA Regulations as detailed below:
EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:3: • Schedule 4 Part 5 of the EIA Regulations requires: “A description of the
EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:3: to be affected or the use of natural resources”. The EIA Regulations state
EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:6: areas being assessed within the EIA.
EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:11: was subsequently extended as further work was undertaken during the EIA
EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:11: and to ensure the most up to date information was used to inform the EIA.
EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:12: consultation with relevant stakeholders and in response to the EIA Scoping
EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:13: of the environmental specialists undertaking the EIA.
EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:15: considered significant effects in relation to the EIA Regulations.
EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:15: during consultation on the EIA Scoping Report and on the PEI Report
EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:17:Environment 30.09.20 The EIA in-combination impact assessment must include Tees REP at Tees Dock. The Tees MGT Teesside Ltd’s Tees REP (ID 68), the
EN010103-002504-NZT DCO 7.13b - Letter Requesting Further Proposed Change - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:4:Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017’ (the ‘EIA Regulations’).
EN010103-002504-NZT DCO 7.13b - Letter Requesting Further Proposed Change - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:4:There is no specific procedure provided for within the EIA Regulations where updated environmental
EN010103-002504-NZT DCO 7.13b - Letter Requesting Further Proposed Change - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:4:considered more generally the consultation requirements provided for by the EIA Regulations to
EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:12: Impact Assessment (EIA) process.
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (3).pdf:1:Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the 2017 EIA Regulations)
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (3).pdf:3:Regulations 2017 (the 2017 EIA Regulations) and on the basis of the current information
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (3).pdf:4:Note: The SoS’ duty under Regulation 32 of the 2017 EIA Regulations continues
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (3).pdf:6: Under Regulation 32 of the 2017 EIA Regulations and on the basis of the current
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (3).pdf:6: Note: The SoS’ duty under Regulation 32 of the 2017 EIA Regulations continues
EN010103-002022-UK Health Security Agency's - Responses to the ExA's ExQ2.pdf:1:accident and natural disaster within EIA, however, the applicant signposts appropriate
EN010103-002022-UK Health Security Agency's - Responses to the ExA's ExQ2.pdf:2:MA&NDs assessment within an EIA. However, there is a considerable amount of information
EN010103-001134-NZT DCO 6.4.45 ES Vol III Appendix 20B- Navigational Risk Assessment Part 1.pdf:6: (EIA) process; and
EN010103-001134-NZT DCO 6.4.45 ES Vol III Appendix 20B- Navigational Risk Assessment Part 1.pdf:10: Harbour Facilities Order. Assessments provided in support of the EIA for this
EN010103-001134-NZT DCO 6.4.45 ES Vol III Appendix 20B- Navigational Risk Assessment Part 1.pdf:11: throughout the EIA process and informed by engagement with relevant
EN010103-001134-NZT DCO 6.4.45 ES Vol III Appendix 20B- Navigational Risk Assessment Part 1.pdf:17:Marine Responsible for the determination of EIA Scoping (March 2019)
EN010103-001134-NZT DCO 6.4.45 ES Vol III Appendix 20B- Navigational Risk Assessment Part 1.pdf:18:Marine Responsible for managing the EIA Scoping (March 2019)
EN010103-001134-NZT DCO 6.4.45 ES Vol III Appendix 20B- Navigational Risk Assessment Part 1.pdf:18:Maritime and Responsible for producing legislation EIA Scoping (March 2019)
EN010103-001134-NZT DCO 6.4.45 ES Vol III Appendix 20B- Navigational Risk Assessment Part 1.pdf:18:PD Teesport Statutory harbour authority EIA Scoping (March 2019)
EN010103-001134-NZT DCO 6.4.45 ES Vol III Appendix 20B- Navigational Risk Assessment Part 1.pdf:18:Trinity House Responsible for safeguarding EIA Scoping (March 2019)
EN010103-001134-NZT DCO 6.4.45 ES Vol III Appendix 20B- Navigational Risk Assessment Part 1.pdf:26: Assessments provided in support of the EIA for this scheme predict an
EN010103-001797-NZT DCO 9.10 - Applicants' Comments on Deadline 1 submissions - June 2022.pdf:2:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-001797-NZT DCO 9.10 - Applicants' Comments on Deadline 1 submissions - June 2022.pdf:11: DCO (“NZT DCO”) EIA, (ii) a SoCG between the Applicants and Orsted to be submitted,
EN010103-002322-NZT DCO 9.36 - Nutrient Nitrogen Briefing Paper Clean Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:118:Proposed Development, the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for NZT is being undertaken
EN010103-002322-NZT DCO 9.36 - Nutrient Nitrogen Briefing Paper Clean Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:120:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf:3:Table 5-1: Summary of Consultation Relevant to the EIA Addendum ………………….. 53
EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf:56:Table 2-1: Summary of Consultation Relevant to the EIA Addendum
EN010103-002324-NZT DCO 9.38 - Applicants' Comments on Deadline 8 Submissions Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:3: (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the ‘EIA
EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:5:21.2.5 The 2017 Regulations state that an EIA (where relevant):
EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:10: climate change and biodiversity are integrated in EIAs undertaken across
EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:10: EIAs undertaken in respect of developments in the UK.
EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:10: relevant in the context of EIAs undertaken in respect of developments in the
EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:11: consideration of greenhouse gas emissions in the EIA process, in line with
EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:11: in EIA (IEMA, 2020) has also been followed. It provides guidance for
EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:13:21.3.1 An EIA Scoping Report was prepared by AECOM and submitted to the
EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:13: Planning Inspectorate in February 2019. The EIA Scoping Report (see
EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:13: approach to the EIA and is intended to facilitate discussions regarding the
EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:13: scope of the EIA.
EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:13:21.3.2 In response to the EIA Scoping Report, the Planning Inspectorate prepared
EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:17: of these activities has been included within the EIA. Construction activities
EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:37:21.4.2 In response to the EIA Scoping Report, the Planning Inspectorate prepared
EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:54:21.5.1 An EIA Scoping Report (see Appendix 1A, ES Volume III, Document Ref.
EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:54: in February 2019. The EIA Scoping Report sets out the proposed approach
EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:54: to the EIA and is intended to facilitate discussions regarding the scope of
EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:54: the EIA.
EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:54:21.5.2 In response to the EIA Scoping Report, the Planning Inspectorate prepared
EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:57:21.5.12 The identification and assessment of climate change resilience within EIA is
EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:82: https://www.iema.net/assets/uploads/EIA%20Guide_GHG%20Assessment
EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:82: https://www.iema.net/assets/newbuild/Policy%202020/IEMA%20EIA%20Cli
EN010103-002075-NZT DCO 9.29 - Cumulative GHG Onshore and Offshore Assessment August 2022 (D6).pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-002075-NZT DCO 9.29 - Cumulative GHG Onshore and Offshore Assessment August 2022 (D6).pdf:12:3.2.2 The GHG calculations have been obtained from the EIA Scoping Report and an early
EN010103-001916-NZT DCO 9.21 - Notification of Further Proposed Changes and Update on Remaining Optionality July 2022 (D4).pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf:7: Assessment (EIA) practice; while minor and negligible effects are considered
EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf:8: will be deemed ‘significant’ in accordance with standard EIA practice; while
EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf:10: commenced at the EIA Scoping Stage with the preparation of the EIA Scoping
EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf:11: design evolution of the Proposed Development and the EIA are set out where
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening.pdf:1:Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the 2017 EIA Regulations)
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening.pdf:3:Regulations 2017 (the 2017 EIA Regulations) and on the basis of the current information
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening.pdf:4:Note: The SoS’ duty under Regulation 32 of the 2017 EIA Regulations continues
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening.pdf:6: Under Regulation 32 of the 2017 EIA Regulations and on the basis of the current
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening.pdf:6: Note: The SoS’ duty under Regulation 32 of the 2017 EIA Regulations continues
EN010103-002634-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 1 (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:3: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment. The
EN010103-002634-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 1 (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:3: accordance with the EIA Regulations
EN010103-002634-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 1 (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:3: EIA Regulations The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental
EN010103-001912-NZT DCO 9.17 - Hydrogeological Impact Assessment July 2022 (D4).pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-001993-NZT DCO 9.25 - Applicants' Comments on Deadline 4 Submissions - August 2022(D5).pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-001993-NZT DCO 9.25 - Applicants' Comments on Deadline 4 Submissions - August 2022(D5).pdf:12:3 IEMA (2022). IEMA publishes updated EIA guidance on assessing GHG emissions. Online.
EN010103-001993-NZT DCO 9.25 - Applicants' Comments on Deadline 4 Submissions - August 2022(D5).pdf:17: and was non EIA development. It should
EN010103-001893-NZT DCO 8.1 - RCBC SoCG (Tracked) July 2022 (D4).pdf:16: 14 EIA assessment It is agreed that the assessment methodology set out at
EN010103-001893-NZT DCO 8.1 - RCBC SoCG (Tracked) July 2022 (D4).pdf:19: 1. EIA assessment The assessment methodology set out at Chapter 2
EN010103-002284-NZT DCO 8.2 - STBC SoCG - Sept 2022(D8) - final signed.pdf:14: 14. EIA assessment It is agreed that the assessment methodology set out at
EN010103-002636-NZT DCO 8.5 - EA SoCG - Final (signed) - Oct 2022 (D13).pdf:3: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - the
EN010103-002636-NZT DCO 8.5 - EA SoCG - Final (signed) - Oct 2022 (D13).pdf:3: accordance with the EIA Regulations
EN010103-002636-NZT DCO 8.5 - EA SoCG - Final (signed) - Oct 2022 (D13).pdf:3: EIA Regulations Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
EN010103-002636-NZT DCO 8.5 - EA SoCG - Final (signed) - Oct 2022 (D13).pdf:3: findings of the EIA
EN010103-002636-NZT DCO 8.5 - EA SoCG - Final (signed) - Oct 2022 (D13).pdf:4: with the EIA and does not result in unacceptable
EN010103-002636-NZT DCO 8.5 - EA SoCG - Final (signed) - Oct 2022 (D13).pdf:10: February 2019 (EIA The Environment Agency were consulted on the EIA Scoping
EN010103-002636-NZT DCO 8.5 - EA SoCG - Final (signed) - Oct 2022 (D13).pdf:11: from the Environment Agency EIA scoping consultation
EN010103-002636-NZT DCO 8.5 - EA SoCG - Final (signed) - Oct 2022 (D13).pdf:11: inform the finalisation of the EIA and the overall DCO
EN010103-002636-NZT DCO 8.5 - EA SoCG - Final (signed) - Oct 2022 (D13).pdf:15: Environmental throughout the pre-application period to help inform the EIA. It is
EN010103-001956-c 16 May 2022.pdf:5: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-001956-c 16 May 2022.pdf:17: effects (‘EIA effects’) from those in the certified environmental
EN010082-000394-7 8 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with Highways England - DRAFT.pdf:2:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010082-000394-7 8 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with Highways England - DRAFT.pdf:6: Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) Scoping Opinion in March 2017, following submission of the Applicant’s
EN010082-000274-Internal Examination Library (2).pdf:5: 6.2.3 - ES Chapter 3 - EIA Approach - Final - November 2017
EN010082-000274-Internal Examination Library (2).pdf:12: Scope of the EIA
EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:2:2009 EIA Regulations The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2009
EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:2:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:12:1.21 The Proposed Development represents an Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) development
EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:12: Ref. 6.1 - 6.4) that reports the findings of the EIA that has been undertaken.
EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:12: EIA Regulations’) came into force on 16 May 2017, replacing ‘The Infrastructure Planning
EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:12: (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2009’ (the ‘2009 EIA Regulations’). The 2009
EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:12: EIA Regulations however continue to apply to certain projects, pursuant to the transitional
EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:12: arrangements set out in Regulation 37 of the 2017 EIA Regulations. That provides that (amongst
EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:12: to the date of the commencement of the 2017 EIA Regulations, then the 2009 EIA Regulations
EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:12: 16 May 2017 (the commencement of the 2017 EIA Regulations), and therefore the 2009 EIA
EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:12: 2017 EIA Regulations in addition to the 2009 EIA Regulations in the preparation of the ES.
EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:12:1.23 The 2017 EIA Regulations amend ‘The Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms
EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:12: (a)) an ES must comply with the 2017 EIA Regulations. For the same reason as set out above -
EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:12: has submitted an ES in the form required by the 2009 EIA Regulations. Notwithstanding this,
EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:12: introduced by the 2017 EIA Regulations.
EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:12: flexibility and ensure a robust EIA of the Proposed Development, SCU has adopted the ‘Rochdale
EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:13: operation to ensure that it remains within the scope of the EIA carried out and does not result in
EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:13:1.27 The Application does not include a development consent obligation as the EIA of the Proposed
EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:17: ‘2009 EIA Regulations’) - now the 2017 EIA Regulations, although as explained in Section 1
EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:17: (paragraphs 1.25 - 1.26) the 2009 EIA Regulations apply to the Proposed Development.
EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:17: exceeding 50 megawatts (‘MW’). It is also falls under Schedule 1 of the 2009 EIA Regulations,
EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:17: output of 300 megawatts or more’. As such, an EIA is required for the Proposed Development
EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:17: and an ES must be prepared in accordance with the relevant EIA Regulations.
EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:21: EIA undertaken for the Proposed Development will therefore have regard to the relevant policies
EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:31: with the EIA carried out and does not result in unacceptable impacts. In preparing the draft
EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:31:5.16 SCU’s assessment of the Proposed Development, notably through the EIA, has identified some
EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:32:5.20 EN-1 (paragraph 4.2.1) states that proposed developments that are subject to the European EIA
EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:32: significantly affected by them. It highlights that the European EIA Directive specifically refers
EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:32: the ES, the Applicant obtained an EIA Scoping Opinion from the PINS in March 2017. The scope
EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:32: and coverage of the ES accords with the EIA Scoping Opinion and Chapter 3 ‘EIA Approach
EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:32: and Methodology ‘ of ES Volume I (Application Document Ref. 6.2.3) sets out how the EIA has
EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:32: taken into account the EIA Scoping Opinion and the technical scope of the EIA that has been
EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:33: SCU has adopted the principles of the ‘Rochdale Envelope’ and has assessed through the EIA
EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:33: are still to be finalised to ensure that it will be constructed in accordance with the EIA that has
EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:65: and the EIA that has been undertaken.
EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:67: to its construction and operation to ensure that it remains within the scope of the EIA carried
EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:67: the EIA for the Proposed Development and also consulted with RCBC and a number of technical
EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:68:7.13 The Application does not include a development consent obligation as the EIA of the Proposed
EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:69: with the EIA undertaken and does not result in unacceptable effects.
EN010082-000499-_DOC_40066269(1)_DEADLINE 2_ EM v2 (Formatted - Clean).pdf:2:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010082-000499-_DOC_40066269(1)_DEADLINE 2_ EM v2 (Formatted - Clean).pdf:2:2009 EIA Regulations The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2009
EN010082-000499-_DOC_40066269(1)_DEADLINE 2_ EM v2 (Formatted - Clean).pdf:2:2017 EIA Regulations The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017
EN010082-000499-_DOC_40066269(1)_DEADLINE 2_ EM v2 (Formatted - Clean).pdf:7: regulation 3 of the 2009 EIA Regulations , and has had regard to the documents and matters referred
EN010082-000499-_DOC_40066269(1)_DEADLINE 2_ EM v2 (Formatted - Clean).pdf:7: The 2017 EIA Regulations came into force on 16 May 2017, replacing the 2009 EIA Regulations. The 2009 EIA Regulations however continue to apply to
EN010082-000499-_DOC_40066269(1)_DEADLINE 2_ EM v2 (Formatted - Clean).pdf:7:certain projects, pursuant to the transitional arrangements set out in Regulation 37 of the 2017 EIA Regulations, which provides that where a request has been
EN010082-000499-_DOC_40066269(1)_DEADLINE 2_ EM v2 (Formatted - Clean).pdf:7:made that the SoS adopts a scoping opinion, prior to the date of the commencement of the 2017 EIA Regulations, then the 2009 EIA Regulations continue to
EN010082-000499-_DOC_40066269(1)_DEADLINE 2_ EM v2 (Formatted - Clean).pdf:7:February 2017, before 16 May 2017 when the 2017 EIA Regulations came into force. Consequently the 2009 EIA Regulations are those that apply to the
EN010082-000499-_DOC_40066269(1)_DEADLINE 2_ EM v2 (Formatted - Clean).pdf:7:Application. However in consideration of the SoS’s scoping opinion which drew attention to the 2017 EIA Regulations, with regard to the EIA carried out, the
EN010082-000499-_DOC_40066269(1)_DEADLINE 2_ EM v2 (Formatted - Clean).pdf:7:Applicant has chosen to both comply with the 2009 EIA Regulations while also voluntarily addressing the additional elements introduced by the 2017 EIA
EN010082-000499-_DOC_40066269(1)_DEADLINE 2_ EM v2 (Formatted - Clean).pdf:7:Regulations. However, the draft DCO correctly refers to the 2009 EIA Regulations.
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:3:3 EIA APPROACH AND TOPIC AREAS ……………………………………. 19
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:5:Regulations 2009 (as amended) (the EIA Regulations).
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:7: by the Applicant under Regulation 8 of the EIA Regulations in order to
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:7: 6(1)(b) of the EIA Regulations that it proposes to provide an ES in
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:7: Regulation 4(2)(a) of the EIA Regulations, the Proposed Development
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:7: is determined to be EIA development.
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:7:1.3 The EIA Regulations enable an Applicant, before making an
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:7: (EIA Regulation 8 (9))
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:7: the EIA Regulations;
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:8:1.8 Regulation 8(3) of the EIA Regulations states that a request for a
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:8:1.10 The SoS has a duty under Regulation 8(6) of the EIA Regulations to
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:8: undertaking the EIA.
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:9: consideration to those comments in carrying out the EIA.
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:9: Section 3: EIA approach and topic areas
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:13:2.19 Section 5.9 of the Scoping Report confirms that the EIA will set out
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:16: possible as this will form the basis of the EIA. It is understood that at
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:16: of Schedule 4 Part 1 of the EIA Regulations and there should
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:17: considered as part of the EIA and this is welcomed.
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:18: EIA Regulations. The Applicant should ensure that the parameters are
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:18: Proposed Development changes substantially during the EIA process,
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:19:2.59 The EIA Regulations require that the Applicant provide ‘An outline of
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:21:3 EIA APPROACH AND TOPIC AREAS
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:21: and technology-specific impacts that should be considered in the EIA.
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:21: When undertaking the EIA, the Applicant must have regard to both
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:23: overarching EIA methodology chapter in the ES, and approach any
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:24: that vibration will be considered in the EIA, along with noise. The
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:24: assessed during the EIA process, which are as follows:
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:36: the construction phase, should be assessed in the EIA. The Applicant
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:40: whether the Proposed Development is EIA development and if it is,
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:47:4.41 Regulation 24 of the EIA Regulations require the SoS to publicise a
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:49: EIA Regulations) as a statement:
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:49: (EIA Regulations, Regulation 2)
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:49: the EIA Regulations set out the information for inclusion in ES.
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:50:A1.6 Schedule 4 Part 1 of the EIA Regulations states this information
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:51: (EIA Regulations, Schedule 4 Part 1)
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:51:Schedule 4 Part 2 of the EIA Regulations. This includes the consideration of
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:51: (EIA Regulations, Schedule 4 Part 2)
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:52: (EIA) process is iterative, and therefore the proposals may change
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:52: Schedule 4 Part 1 of the EIA Regulations.
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:53:A1.16 In general the SoS recommends that the physical scope for the EIA
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:54:A1.26 In terms of the EIA methodology, the SoS recommends that
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:55:A1.29 The EIA Regulations require the identification of the ‘likely significant
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:55: clearly the interpretation of ‘significant’ in terms of each of the EIA
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:55: EIA Regulations (see Schedule 4 Part 1 of the EIA Regulations). These
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:56: development, their location, and key aspects that may affect the EIA.
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:58:A1.49 As set out in EIA Regulations Schedule 4 Part 1 paragraph 23, the ES
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:58: the Applicant in the EIA process – for example the local community
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:60:A1.59 The EIA Regulations require a Non-technical Summary (EIA
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:61:accordance with the Planning Inspectorate’s Advice Note Three: ‘EIA
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:76:amended) (the EIA Regulations) – Regulations 8 and 9
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:82:Ref: EN010082 - Proposed Teesside Combined Cycle Power Plant - EIA Scoping
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:82:Cycle Power Plant EIA Scoping Notification and Consultation. Having reviewed the Scoping
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:86:Environmental Impact Assessment Scoping consultation (Regulation 15 (3) (i) of the EIA
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:86:Consultation - EIA Scoping Notification and Consultation
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:86:Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for this development.
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:87:Annex A – Advice related to EIA Scoping Requirements
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:87:on ecosystems or their components. EcIA may be carried out as part of the EIA process or to
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:88:an Appropriate Assessment, in addition to consideration of impacts through the EIA process.
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:88:The EIA will need to consider any impacts upon local wildlife and geological sites. Local Sites are
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:90:pertaining to the area. The EIA should include assessments of visual effects on the surrounding
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:90:The EIA should include a full assessment of the potential impacts of the development on local
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:92:proposed EIA would appear comprehensive. However, the comments that have been made by our
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:96:EIA and Land Rights Advisor
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:98:The EIA should give consideration to best practice guidance such as the
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:98:Government’s Good Practice Guide for EIA1. It is important that the EIA identifies
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:98:phasing of construction) is widely regarded as good practice. Ideally, EIA should
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:99:regarding emissions in order that the EIA provides a comprehensive assessment of
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:100:PHE’s view is that the EIA should appraise and describe the measures that will be
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:102:Relevant areas outlined in the Government’s Good Practice Guide for EIA include:
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:102:The EIA should demonstrate compliance with the waste hierarchy (e.g. with respect
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:102:For wastes arising from the installation the EIA should consider:
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:102:Within the EIA PHE would expect to see information about how the promoter would
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:102:The EIA should include consideration of the COMAH Regulations (Control of Major
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:103:negligible.” PHE supports the inclusion of this information within EIAs as good
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:108: EIA AND LAND RIGHTS ADVISOR ON BEHALF OF Contact: Mr D Pedlow
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:110:respond to the accompanying request for an EIA.
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:110:consultants to discuss the contents of the EIA
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:110:respond to the accompanying request for an EIA.
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:110:consultants to discuss the contents of the EIA
EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:110:EIA submitted for the proposed document will be required to contain the topics set out in table 8.1 of
EN010082-000361-Appendix A - DCO 6.3.14_Tees CCPP_ES_Annex H_HRA_UPDATED 230418.pdf:18: context of the EIA Regulations.
EN010082-000648-Tees CCPP Decision Letter 5 April 2019 (2).pdf:2: Assessment (“EIA”); air quality and emissions; biodiversity, ecology and natural
EN010082-000379-6.2.5 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 5 Project Description - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf:9:5.18 To deal with the two scenarios within the EIA, the technical assessments (for
EN010082-000379-6.2.5 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 5 Project Description - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf:10: topic assessments within the EIA adopt a reasonable worst case scenario in
EN010082-000379-6.2.5 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 5 Project Description - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf:20: preparation of a standalone supplementary report to the EIA (the Carbon
EN010082-000142-EN010082-1.1-Application Cover Letter-Final-November 2017.pdf:3:The Project represents an Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) development and therefore the
EN010082-000142-EN010082-1.1-Application Cover Letter-Final-November 2017.pdf:3:Application includes an Environmental Statement (‘ES’) that reports the findings of the EIA that has been
EN010082-000142-EN010082-1.1-Application Cover Letter-Final-November 2017.pdf:3:‘The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017’ (the ‘2017 EIA
EN010082-000142-EN010082-1.1-Application Cover Letter-Final-November 2017.pdf:3:Impact Assessment) Regulations 2009’ (the ‘2009 EIA Regulations’). The 2009 EIA Regulations however
EN010082-000142-EN010082-1.1-Application Cover Letter-Final-November 2017.pdf:3:of the 2017 EIA Regulations. That regulation provides that (amongst other circumstances) where a
EN010082-000142-EN010082-1.1-Application Cover Letter-Final-November 2017.pdf:3:of the 2017 EIA Regulations, then the 2009 EIA Regulations “continue to apply to any application for an
EN010082-000142-EN010082-1.1-Application Cover Letter-Final-November 2017.pdf:3:received by the SoS on 21 February 2017, before 16 May 2017 (the commencement of the 2017 EIA
EN010082-000142-EN010082-1.1-Application Cover Letter-Final-November 2017.pdf:3:Regulations), and therefore the 2009 EIA Regulations are those that apply to the Application.
EN010082-000142-EN010082-1.1-Application Cover Letter-Final-November 2017.pdf:3:The 2017 EIA Regulations amend ‘The Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and
EN010082-000142-EN010082-1.1-Application Cover Letter-Final-November 2017.pdf:3:must comply with the 2017 EIA Regulations. For the same reason as set out above - the transitional
EN010082-000142-EN010082-1.1-Application Cover Letter-Final-November 2017.pdf:3:an ES in the form required by the 2009 EIA Regulations.
EN010082-000142-EN010082-1.1-Application Cover Letter-Final-November 2017.pdf:3:However in the Scoping Opinion the SoS did draw attention to the 2014 EIA Directive stating “Under the
EN010082-000142-EN010082-1.1-Application Cover Letter-Final-November 2017.pdf:4:In consideration of the SoS’s scoping opinion, the applicant has chosen to both comply with the 2009 EIA
EN010082-000142-EN010082-1.1-Application Cover Letter-Final-November 2017.pdf:4:Regulations while also voluntarily addressing the additional elements introduced by the 2017 EIA
EN010082-000142-EN010082-1.1-Application Cover Letter-Final-November 2017.pdf:4:abovementioned EIA Regulations and APFP Regulations, and associated policy and guidance. The
EN010082-000142-EN010082-1.1-Application Cover Letter-Final-November 2017.pdf:5:the scope of the EIA carried out and does not result in unacceptable impacts. These would require the
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:15: Impact Assessment (EIA) is required (EIA development).
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:15: 2009 EIA Regulations) a request for an opinion as to the information to
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:15: 6(1)(b) of the 2009 EIA Regulations that it proposed to provide an ES in
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:15: 4(2)(a) of the 2009 EIA Regulations, the Proposed Development was
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:15: determined to be EIA development, and the application was accompanied
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:15:1.5.4. The 2009 EIA Regulations were revoked and replaced by the
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:15: 13 of the 2009 EIA Regulations had been complied with [OD-001, OD-
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:15: 2009 EIA regulations and, together with the environmental information
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:19: reviewing the implications of the proposed change for the EIA AS-009.
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:19: of the EIA as the conclusions on the significance of effects remain
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:25: certain public and private projects on the environment (the EIA
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:25:3.3.2. The EIA Directive defines the procedure by which information about the
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:25:3.3.4. The current EIA legislation for NSIP cases is the Infrastructure Planning
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:25: (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the 2017 EIA
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:25: Impact Assessment) Regulations 2009 (the 2009 EIA Regulations)
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:25: subject to transitional provisions in Regulation 37 of the 2017 EIA
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:25:3.3.5. The 2017 EIA Regulations came into force on 16 May 2017, before the
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:26: EIA Regulations states that the 2009 EIA Regulations will continue to
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:26: opinion defined by the 2009 EIA Regulations.
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:26: EIA Regulations in the pre-application period APP-043. However, the
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:26: 2017 EIA Regulations on a voluntary basis APP-043.
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:26: this application, the provisions in Regulation 37(2)(a)(ii) of the 2017 EIA
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:26: against the 2009 EIA Regulations.
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:26:3.3.8. The 2009 EIA Regulations establish the minimum information to be
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:26: an ES under the EIA Regulations and this is reinforced by Regulation
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:26: decision on EIA Development. Regulation 3(2) of the 2009 EIA
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:26: proposed development is EIA development under Schedule 2 of the 2009
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:26: EIA Regulations. The Applicant has provided an ES APP-041 to APP-081
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:34:3.6.1. Under Regulation 24 of the 2009 EIA Regulations and on the basis of the
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:34: Regulation 24of the 2009 EIA Regulations was therefore not considered
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:36: considerations in Chapter 5. Detailed consideration is given to the EIA in
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:40:4.6.1. The overarching EIA methodology is described in ES Chapter 3 [APP-
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:40: 045]. The EIA process involves identification of sensitive receptors that
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:41: the EIA. At the ISH on the Scope of the Application3, I asked the
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:41: Chapter 3 ‘EIA Approach’, paragraphs 3.17 and Table 3.2 APP-045.
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:41: Applicant responded that Table 3.2 in ES Chapter 3 ‘EIA Approach’ has
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:41: and the DCO. The Applicant considers that the EIA takes account of all
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:41: requested change. This was advertised in accordance with the EIA
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:41: constitute ‘other environmental information’ as defined in the 2009 EIA
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:42: Applicant’s ES. In accordance with Schedule 4, Part 2 of the 2009 EIA
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:42: provide the basis for determining applications for EIA development, the
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:43: the EIA regulations in this regard have been met.
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:49: of requested change to application on the EIA’ AS-009, which concluded
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:54: keeping with his statutory duty under the EIA Regulations (or HRA
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:54: remit of what has been assessed in the submitted EIA. This type of
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:57: EIA scoping and the Section 42 consultation have been addressed by the
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:59: subject to EIA, the Applicant should ensure that the ES clearly sets out
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:97: Change on the EIA’ AS-009, which concluded that there would be no
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:106: beyond the remit of what has been assessed in the submitted EIA”. The
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:124: development and the EIA Regulations at an ISH. The Applicant confirmed
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:125: that if the extent of the extension proposed constitutes EIA development,
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:136: 6.2.3 - ES Chapter 3 - EIA Approach - Final - November 2017
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:143: Scope of the EIA
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:155:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:157:the 2009 EIA Regulations The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:157:the 2017 EIA Regulations the Infrastructure Planning (Environmental
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:157:The EIA Directive Council Directive 2011/92/EU on the
EN010082-000173-EN010082-6.2.2-ES Chapter 2-Legislation Policy and Guidance-Final-November 2017.pdf:3: most relevance to the EIA of the Project. Each technical chapter also refers to
EN010082-000173-EN010082-6.2.2-ES Chapter 2-Legislation Policy and Guidance-Final-November 2017.pdf:3: Regulations 2009 (the 2009 EIA Regulations) and The Infrastructure
EN010082-000173-EN010082-6.2.2-ES Chapter 2-Legislation Policy and Guidance-Final-November 2017.pdf:3: EIA Regulations) (1).
EN010082-000173-EN010082-6.2.2-ES Chapter 2-Legislation Policy and Guidance-Final-November 2017.pdf:3: the 2009 EIA Regulations, under the paragraph 2 category of ‘Thermal power
EN010082-000173-EN010082-6.2.2-ES Chapter 2-Legislation Policy and Guidance-Final-November 2017.pdf:3: megawatts or more’. As such, an EIA is required for the Project and an ES
EN010082-000173-EN010082-6.2.2-ES Chapter 2-Legislation Policy and Guidance-Final-November 2017.pdf:3: must be prepared in accordance with the 2009 EIA Regulations (2).
EN010082-000173-EN010082-6.2.2-ES Chapter 2-Legislation Policy and Guidance-Final-November 2017.pdf:3: (1) Section 1.6 sets out how this ES addresses the 2017 EIA Regulations and transitional provisions regarding the
EN010082-000173-EN010082-6.2.2-ES Chapter 2-Legislation Policy and Guidance-Final-November 2017.pdf:3: applicability of the 2009 EIA Regulations.
EN010082-000173-EN010082-6.2.2-ES Chapter 2-Legislation Policy and Guidance-Final-November 2017.pdf:7: 4.2 Environmental Projects subject to the EU EIA Directive must be accompanied by an
EN010082-000173-EN010082-6.2.2-ES Chapter 2-Legislation Policy and Guidance-Final-November 2017.pdf:12: the purposes of assessing DCO applications. The EIA undertaken for the
EN010082-000173-EN010082-6.2.2-ES Chapter 2-Legislation Policy and Guidance-Final-November 2017.pdf:20: discharges. The EIA which is to accompany the DCO application will
EN010082-000173-EN010082-6.2.2-ES Chapter 2-Legislation Policy and Guidance-Final-November 2017.pdf:20: account of the findings of the EIA as reported within the ES, against the
EN010082-000576-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Clean).pdf:4: Assessment (EIA) process and are reported in the Environmental Statement (ES).
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:2:3 EIA APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY 3-1
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:2:3.2 EIA SCOPING 3-4
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:3:3 EIA APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:3: (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2009 (the 2009 EIA
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:3: Regulations) (1), the EIA process includes the following activities:
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:3: Assessment (‘EIA’) including obtaining a Scoping Opinion and consulting
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:3: (1) Section 1.6 sets out how this ES addresses the 2017 EIA Regulations and transitional provisions regarding the
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:3: applicability of the 2009 EIA Regulations.
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:4: EIA is not a linear process, but an iterative one, in which findings are revisited
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:4: and modified as the application and the EIA progress.
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:4:Figure 3.1 Overview of EIA Process for DCO
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:5:3.4 An EIA Scoping Report (Annex A) for the Project was submitted to a range of
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:5: responses from a range of consultees. Scoping responses specific to each EIA
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:5:3.5 The scoping process for the Project involved setting out the scope of the EIA in
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:5: EIA to address. The scoping process was advised by interaction with the
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:5: information to be used in the EIA.
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:6: 3 EIA Process and Methodology
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:6:3.2 EIA SCOPING
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:6:3.10 When it is determined that an EIA will actually be required, the next stage in
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:6: any EIA process is to identify the likely significant effects of the Project that
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:7:3.11 The scoping process for the Project involved setting out the scope of the EIA in
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:7: EIA to address. The scoping process was advised by interaction with the
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:7: EIA.
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:7:3.2.2 Scope of the EIA
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:7: technical scope for the EIA. The table sought to clearly set out how a
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:7: topic/sub-topic would be taken forward in the EIA process and the degree of
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:7: reasonably expected to be put in place, the EIA considers such matters but
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:7: demonstrated, the EIA takes the necessary steps in terms eg of Project Site
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:7: be scoped in and those which could be scoped out of the EIA. Each of the
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:7:3.16 In addition since undertaking the EIA scoping exercise and receiving the
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:8: development (see also Chapter 5). The EIA team has considered the
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:8:Table 3.2 The Influence of Project Phasing on the Technical Scope of the EIA
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:11:3.3.2 EIA Scoping Consultation
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:11: the accompanying request for an EIA Scoping Opinion, made pursuant to
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:11: Regulation 8 of the 2009 EIA Regulations.
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:11: number of matters pertaining to the EIA process and noted that the main
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:11: potential issues to be address within the EIA were:
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:13: this EIA which has in turn informed part of the DCO submission. The stages
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:14:3.46 A key aspect of the EIA has been the interface between the EIA team and the
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:14: operation (see also Chapter 5). As the EIA has progressed the results have
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:14: integrated. This has been an iterative process during the EIA to date.
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:16: EIA process. The 2009 EIA Regulations require an Environmental Statement
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:16: basis for assessing the effects of the Project. In practice the EIA takes account
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:16: It is noted that Schedule 4 (paragraph 18) of the 2009 EIA Regulations (1)
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:16: environmental effects. As part of the EIA process a review of feasible
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:16: (1) Schedule 4 paragraph 2 of the 2017 EIA Regulations.
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:17:3.59 The process followed during scoping and onwards through the overall EIA
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:17: the environment considered as receptors in scoping and the EIA, to the extent
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:19:Figure 3.3 EIA Methodology Describe Baseline
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:19: considering inputs from stakeholders through The EIA process will interact with the project design team to develop
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:19: level baseline, currently planned against standards effects further or noise levels of equipment, sizes of structures). The EIA process will
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:19: EIA and is undertaken to refine the assessment and present
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:19: numbers of jobs generated in the local economy. In evaluating significance, the EIA process seeks to inform regulators and
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:20:3.62 In identifying significant effects, the EIA also takes into account their nature
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:21:3.63 Finally the EIA has, where necessary, assessed both:
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:21:3.65 One of the key objectives of an EIA is to identify and define socially and
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:21: significant adverse effect of the Project identified during the EIA process, the
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:22:3.68 The mitigation measures developed during the EIA process, as well as
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:22: Sembcorp as integral aspects of the Project. EIA is intended to ensure that
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:22: the EIA team considers should be given to them in making decisions on the
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:22:3.73 Ideally through the design, EIA and consultation processes by the time of an
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:23: measures aimed directly at the impact then the EIA has considered ways to
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:24: matrices and threshold analysis. The method adopted for this EIA broadly
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:24: EIA for further assessment. The following three stages set out how the
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:24: cumulative effects are subsequently assessed in the EIA.
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:25: effects taking into account measures already identified in the EIA. Where
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:27: purposes of the EIA to assess such cumulative positive impacts.
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:29: Development and Topics Screened for Further Assessment in the EIA
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:29: require more detailed assessment in the EIA. The screening exercise was
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:29: • For each screened development, a judgement was made by the EIA team
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:29: out of the need for further assessment in the EIA based on the separation
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:29:3.93 Subsequently during the EIA, each cumulative scheme/impact topic that was
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:45: • They would not constitute EIA development ion their own right.
EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:45:3.99 The EIA has been undertaken during the initial FEED phase of the Project and
EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:5: Within the EIA, PHE would expect to see information about how the promoter would Information provided in
EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:6: to the accompanying request for an EIA. This Scoping Report provides consultees with
EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:6: the EIA I therefore have no adverse comments at this stage.’
EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:14:6.25 The process of contamination and water resources risk assessment for the EIA
EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:21:6.47 A site-specific Flood Risk Assessment has been undertaken as part of the EIA
EN010082-000274-Internal Examination Library.pdf:5: 6.2.3 - ES Chapter 3 - EIA Approach - Final - November 2017
EN010082-000274-Internal Examination Library.pdf:12: Scope of the EIA
EN010082-000395-7 9 - Tees CCPP - SoCG Statement of Commonality - Deadline 2.pdf:2:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010082-Advice-00011-1-Planning Inspectorate comments on draft NSER.pdf:1: Emma Cottam – EIA and Land Rights Advisor
EN010082-Advice-00011-1-Planning Inspectorate comments on draft NSER.pdf:1: Lucy Hicks - EIA and Land Rights Advisor
EN010082-000314-TEES - Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening (1).pdf:2:Cumulative impacts more detailed assessment in the EIA. This includes other
EN010082-000314-TEES - Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening (1).pdf:4:(Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the 2017 EIA Regulations). The
EN010082-000314-TEES - Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening (1).pdf:4:commencement of the 2017 EIA Regulations). The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental
EN010082-000314-TEES - Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening (1).pdf:4:Impact Assessment) Regulations 2009 (the 2009 EIA Regulations) are therefore considered
EN010082-000314-TEES - Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening (1).pdf:4:to be the applicable EIA Regulations. Under Regulation 24 of the 2009 EIA Regulations and
EN010082-000314-TEES - Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening (1).pdf:4:Note: The Secretary of State’s duty under Regulation 24 of the EIA Regulations continues
EN010082-000314-TEES - Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening (1).pdf:5:(Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the 2017 EIA Regulations). The
EN010082-000314-TEES - Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening (1).pdf:5:2017 EIA Regulations). The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment)
EN010082-000314-TEES - Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening (1).pdf:5:Regulations 2009 (the 2009 EIA Regulations) are therefore considered to be the applicable
EN010082-000314-TEES - Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening (1).pdf:5:EIA Regulations.
EN010082-000314-TEES - Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening (1).pdf:5:Under Regulation 24 of the 2009 EIA Regulations and on the basis of the current
EN010082-000314-TEES - Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening (1).pdf:5:Note: The Secretary of State’s duty under Regulation 24 of the 2009 EIA Regulations
EN010082-000643-Sembcorp Utilities (UK) Limited.pdf:2: From an EIA perspective all the air quality modelling work and assessments following from it
EN010082-000643-Sembcorp Utilities (UK) Limited.pdf:2: follows that the MWe gross and MWe net values are immaterial to these aspects of the EIA.
EN010082-000643-Sembcorp Utilities (UK) Limited.pdf:2: The same logic applies to the CCR assessment work. All EIA assessments that are based on
EN010082-000643-Sembcorp Utilities (UK) Limited.pdf:3:notwithstanding that this is in fact immaterial when considering the EIA and CCR work (as noted
EN010082-000643-Sembcorp Utilities (UK) Limited.pdf:3:that the use of net or gross is immaterial when considering the EIA and CCR work that has been carried
EN010082-000643-Sembcorp Utilities (UK) Limited.pdf:3:or gross, and that the use of net or gross when considering the EIA and CCR work is immaterial.
EN010082-000179-EN010082-6.2.8-ES-Chapter 8-Noise and Vibration-Final-November 2017.pdf:4:8.8 As is usual in EIAs, the inventory of construction plant items has been based
EN010082-000179-EN010082-6.2.8-ES-Chapter 8-Noise and Vibration-Final-November 2017.pdf:37:R/2016/0418/FFM Wilton Approved Retention as built of the CSG Wilton facility 0.49 km from Project Y Not EIA Unlikely to
EN010082-000179-EN010082-6.2.8-ES-Chapter 8-Noise and Vibration-Final-November 2017.pdf:37: 0.49 km from Project Y Not EIA Unlikely to
EN010082-000179-EN010082-6.2.8-ES-Chapter 8-Noise and Vibration-Final-November 2017.pdf:37:R/2015/0682/FFM Wilton Approved Provision of oil refinery at Wilton Waste 0.49 km from Project Y Not EIA Unlikely to
EN010082-000179-EN010082-6.2.8-ES-Chapter 8-Noise and Vibration-Final-November 2017.pdf:38: 0.49 km from Project Y Not EIA Unlikely to
EN010082-000185-EN010082-6.2.14-ES Chapter 14-Human Health-Final-November 2017.pdf:3:14.2 The amended Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Directive
EN010082-000185-EN010082-6.2.14-ES Chapter 14-Human Health-Final-November 2017.pdf:3: (the EIA Regulations). Under the EIA Regulations (Regulation 5(2) and
EN010082-000185-EN010082-6.2.14-ES Chapter 14-Human Health-Final-November 2017.pdf:3: paragraph 4 of Schedule 4) the EIA must identify, describe and assess, the
EN010082-000185-EN010082-6.2.14-ES Chapter 14-Human Health-Final-November 2017.pdf:4:14.8 The findings of other aspects of the EIA have also been drawn upon (such as
EN010082-000185-EN010082-6.2.14-ES Chapter 14-Human Health-Final-November 2017.pdf:5: Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and the conclusions drawn.
EN010082-000185-EN010082-6.2.14-ES Chapter 14-Human Health-Final-November 2017.pdf:17: EIA and the evidence base, including the findings of the stakeholder
EN010082-000185-EN010082-6.2.14-ES Chapter 14-Human Health-Final-November 2017.pdf:17:14.68 Recommendations, or mitigation measures, are also developed during the EIA
EN010082-000185-EN010082-6.2.14-ES Chapter 14-Human Health-Final-November 2017.pdf:18: EIA methodology. The approach identifies all human receptors located within
EN010082-000267-TEES CCPP Section 55 Acceptance of Applications Checklist Final.pdf:4:4 In accordance with the EIA Regulations 4, did the (a) The Applicant did not request the Secretary of State to adopt a screening opinion
EN010082-000267-TEES CCPP Section 55 Acceptance of Applications Checklist Final.pdf:4: notify the Secretary of State in writing that it proposed provided notification under Regulation 6(1)(b) of the EIA Regulations that it proposed to
EN010082-000267-TEES CCPP Section 55 Acceptance of Applications Checklist Final.pdf:4: Regulation 8 of The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (2017 EIA Regulations), or Regulation 6 of The Infrastructure Planning
EN010082-000267-TEES CCPP Section 55 Acceptance of Applications Checklist Final.pdf:4: (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2009 (2009 EIA Regulations) (where Regulation 37 of the 2017 EIA Regulations applies).
EN010082-000267-TEES CCPP Section 55 Acceptance of Applications Checklist Final.pdf:10: EIA development 10; and does it set out how the
EN010082-000267-TEES CCPP Section 55 Acceptance of Applications Checklist Final.pdf:10: Consultation Report (Doc 5.1) and states that the Project is EIA development.
EN010082-000267-TEES CCPP Section 55 Acceptance of Applications Checklist Final.pdf:10: Regulation 12 of the 2017 EIA Regulations, or Regulation 10 of the 2009 EIA Regulations (where Regulation 37 of the 2017 EIA Regulations applies).
EN010082-000267-TEES CCPP Section 55 Acceptance of Applications Checklist Final.pdf:12: EIA development or route of the proposed development &2
EN010082-000267-TEES CCPP Section 55 Acceptance of Applications Checklist Final.pdf:13:22 Has a copy of the s48 notice been sent to the EIA Yes -the notice was sent to the EIA consultation bodies on 15 June 2017 or 16 June
EN010082-000267-TEES CCPP Section 55 Acceptance of Applications Checklist Final.pdf:13: applicant in accordance with the EIA Regulations 11?
EN010082-000267-TEES CCPP Section 55 Acceptance of Applications Checklist Final.pdf:13: Regulation 13 of the 2017 EIA Regulations, or Regulation 11 of the 2009 EIA Regulations (where Regulation 37 of the 2017 EIA Regulations applies).
EN010082-000267-TEES CCPP Section 55 Acceptance of Applications Checklist Final.pdf:16: required under the EIA Regulations 14 and any al Statement Developme
EN010082-000267-TEES CCPP Section 55 Acceptance of Applications Checklist Final.pdf:16: The 2017 EIA Regulations, or the 2009 EIA Regulations (where Regulation 37 of the 2017 EIA Regulations applies)
EN010082-000210-EN010082-6.3.20-ES Annex L-CEMP-Final-November 2017.pdf:3: Assessment (EIA) process and are reported in the Environmental Statement
EN010082-000404-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - UPDATED.pdf:4: Assessment (EIA) process and are reported in the Environmental Statement (ES).
EN010082-000353-Tees CCPP Preliminary Meeting Note Final.pdf:5:(the EIA) and then headings which relate to sections of the EIA which are generally in
EN010082-000274-Internal Examination Library (3).pdf:5: 6.2.3 - ES Chapter 3 - EIA Approach - Final - November 2017
EN010082-000274-Internal Examination Library (3).pdf:12: Scope of the EIA
EN010082-000184-EN010082-6.2.13-ES Chapter 13-Socio Economic Characteristics-Final-November 2017.pdf:4: as part of the EIA process. The formal Scoping Opinion is set out in Annex B.
EN010082-000184-EN010082-6.2.13-ES Chapter 13-Socio Economic Characteristics-Final-November 2017.pdf:18: purposes of this socio-economic assessment and the 2008 EIA Regulations.
EN010082-000184-EN010082-6.2.13-ES Chapter 13-Socio Economic Characteristics-Final-November 2017.pdf:18: accepted EIA practice, the sensitivity of receptors is considered against the
EN010082-000556-7.4 - Tees CCPP - Environment Agency SoCG - DRAFT UNSIGNED - 22.08.18.pdf:6: the PINS as a consultation body in relation to any EIA scoping; and
EN010082-000556-7.4 - Tees CCPP - Environment Agency SoCG - DRAFT UNSIGNED - 22.08.18.pdf:6: in March 2017 in response to SCU’s request for an Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) Scoping
EN010082-000556-7.4 - Tees CCPP - Environment Agency SoCG - DRAFT UNSIGNED - 22.08.18.pdf:7:2.12 The letter stated that certain information should be included in the scope of the EIA, as follows:
EN010082-000581-8.61 - Tees CCPP - Stack Diameter Sensitivity Study.pdf:3: Assessment (‘EIA’) for the Proposed Power Plant, consisting of two
EN010082-000187-EN010082-6.2.16-ES-Chapter 16-Summary of Cumulative and Indirect Effects-Final-November 2017.pdf:3: considered in the EIA following the methodology set out in Chapter 3, Section
EN010082-000525-7.3 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with Redcar Cleveland - FINAL - 06.07.18.pdf:16:10.2 The Applicant has therefore applied the ‘Rochdale Envelope’ approach to the EIA of the Proposed
EN010082-000525-7.3 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with Redcar Cleveland - FINAL - 06.07.18.pdf:16: Requirement 4 ‘Detailed design’ Parameters’ of the draft DCO. It is agreed that the EIA provides a
EN010082-000525-7.3 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with Redcar Cleveland - FINAL - 06.07.18.pdf:33:27.4 The non-material change submission pack included an ‘Implications of Requested Change on EIA’ note
EN010082-000551-8.54 - Explanatory Memorandum - Tracked (v3).pdf:2:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010082-000551-8.54 - Explanatory Memorandum - Tracked (v3).pdf:2:2009 EIA Regulations The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2009
EN010082-000551-8.54 - Explanatory Memorandum - Tracked (v3).pdf:2:2017 EIA Regulations The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017
EN010082-000551-8.54 - Explanatory Memorandum - Tracked (v3).pdf:8: regulation 3 of the 2009 EIA Regulations , and has had regard to the documents and matters referred to
EN010082-000551-8.54 - Explanatory Memorandum - Tracked (v3).pdf:8: The 2017 EIA Regulations came into force on 16 May 2017, replacing the 2009 EIA Regulations. The 2009 EIA Regulations however continue to apply to
EN010082-000551-8.54 - Explanatory Memorandum - Tracked (v3).pdf:8:certain projects, pursuant to the transitional arrangements set out in Regulation 37 of the 2017 EIA Regulations, which provides that where a request has been
EN010082-000551-8.54 - Explanatory Memorandum - Tracked (v3).pdf:8:made that the SoS adopts a scoping opinion, prior to the date of the commencement of the 2017 EIA Regulations, then the 2009 EIA Regulations continue to
EN010082-000551-8.54 - Explanatory Memorandum - Tracked (v3).pdf:8:February 2017, before 16 May 2017 when the 2017 EIA Regulations came into force. Consequently the 2009 EIA Regulations are those that apply to the
EN010082-000551-8.54 - Explanatory Memorandum - Tracked (v3).pdf:8:Application. However in consideration of the SoS’s scoping opinion which drew attention to the 2017 EIA Regulations, with regard to the EIA carried out, the
EN010082-000551-8.54 - Explanatory Memorandum - Tracked (v3).pdf:8:Applicant has chosen to both comply with the 2009 EIA Regulations while also voluntarily addressing the additional elements introduced by the 2017 EIA
EN010082-000551-8.54 - Explanatory Memorandum - Tracked (v3).pdf:8:Regulations. However, the draft DCO correctly refers to the 2009 EIA Regulations.
EN010082-000393-7 7 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with Historic England - DRAFT.pdf:2:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010082-000393-7 7 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with Historic England - DRAFT.pdf:6: 2017 in response to SCU’s request for an Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) Scoping Opinion.
EN010082-000393-7 7 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with Historic England - DRAFT.pdf:7: EIA undertaken for the refurbishment of the former Teesside Power Station in 2008 concluded that there
EN010082-000393-7 7 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with Historic England - DRAFT.pdf:14: Thank you for consulting us on the EIA scoping report for the proposed Tees
EN010082-000521-8.47 - Tees CCPP Examination – ISH Environmental Matters – follow up items on Air Quality.pdf:3:full in the EIA, due to the considerable length of these files. The required tables have
EN010082-000388-7 2 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with NE - Signed_Redacted.pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010082-000388-7 2 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with NE - Signed_Redacted.pdf:7: 2017 in response to SCU’s request for an Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) Scoping Opinion.
EN010082-000388-7 2 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with NE - Signed_Redacted.pdf:7: below summarises NE’s key comments relating to EIA Scoping and section 42 consultation, and the
EN010082-000388-7 2 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with NE - Signed_Redacted.pdf:7: 2.7 It is agreed that all comments made by NE in respect of EIA Scoping and the section 42 consultation
EN010082-000388-7 2 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with NE - Signed_Redacted.pdf:8: Scoping Response The EIA will need to consider any impacts The ES has considered these sites and no
EN010082-000143-EN010082-1.2-Application Guide-Final-November 2017.pdf:2: 2009 EIA Regulations The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
EN010082-000143-EN010082-1.2-Application Guide-Final-November 2017.pdf:2: 2017 EIA Regulations The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
EN010082-000143-EN010082-1.2-Application Guide-Final-November 2017.pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010082-000143-EN010082-1.2-Application Guide-Final-November 2017.pdf:7: (the ‘2009 EIA Regulations’ or ‘EIA Regs’).
EN010082-000143-EN010082-1.2-Application Guide-Final-November 2017.pdf:7: 2.3 ‘The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017’ (the ‘2017 EIA
EN010082-000143-EN010082-1.2-Application Guide-Final-November 2017.pdf:7: Regulations’ or ‘EIA Regs’) came into force on 16 May 2017, replacing the 2009 EIA Regulations.
EN010082-000143-EN010082-1.2-Application Guide-Final-November 2017.pdf:7: The 2009 EIA Regulations however continue to apply to certain projects, pursuant to the transitional
EN010082-000143-EN010082-1.2-Application Guide-Final-November 2017.pdf:7: arrangements set out in Regulation 37 of the 2017 EIA Regulations. That regulation provides that
EN010082-000143-EN010082-1.2-Application Guide-Final-November 2017.pdf:7: opinion, prior to the date of the commencement of the 2017 EIA Regulations, then the 2009 EIA
EN010082-000143-EN010082-1.2-Application Guide-Final-November 2017.pdf:7: May 2017 (the commencement of the 2017 EIA Regulations), and therefore the 2009 EIA Regulations
EN010082-000143-EN010082-1.2-Application Guide-Final-November 2017.pdf:7: 2.4 The 2017 EIA Regulations amend the ‘APFP Regulations so that (pursuant to Regulation 5(2)(a)) an ES
EN010082-000143-EN010082-1.2-Application Guide-Final-November 2017.pdf:7: must comply with the 2017 EIA Regulations. For the same reason as set out above - the transitional
EN010082-000143-EN010082-1.2-Application Guide-Final-November 2017.pdf:7: submit an ES in the form required by the 2009 EIA Regulations.
EN010082-000143-EN010082-1.2-Application Guide-Final-November 2017.pdf:7: 2.5 However, in the Scoping Opinion the SoS did draw attention to the 2014 EIA Directive, stating:
EN010082-000143-EN010082-1.2-Application Guide-Final-November 2017.pdf:7: 2009 EIA Regulations while also voluntarily addressing the additional elements introduced by the
EN010082-000143-EN010082-1.2-Application Guide-Final-November 2017.pdf:7: 2017 EIA Regulations.
EN010082-000143-EN010082-1.2-Application Guide-Final-November 2017.pdf:7: 2.10 The Project represents an Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) development and therefore the
EN010082-000143-EN010082-1.2-Application Guide-Final-November 2017.pdf:7: Application includes an Environmental Statement (‘ES’) that reports the findings of the EIA that has
EN010082-000143-EN010082-1.2-Application Guide-Final-November 2017.pdf:9: 6.1 Environmental Statement Non- APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 1.0
EN010082-000143-EN010082-1.2-Application Guide-Final-November 2017.pdf:9: 6.2 Environmental Statement – APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 1.0
EN010082-000143-EN010082-1.2-Application Guide-Final-November 2017.pdf:9: 6.2.1 Environmental Statement – APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 1.0
EN010082-000143-EN010082-1.2-Application Guide-Final-November 2017.pdf:10: 6.2.2 Environmental Statement – APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 1.0
EN010082-000143-EN010082-1.2-Application Guide-Final-November 2017.pdf:10: 6.2.3 Environmental Statement – APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 1.0
EN010082-000143-EN010082-1.2-Application Guide-Final-November 2017.pdf:10: Chapter 3 EIA Approach and
EN010082-000143-EN010082-1.2-Application Guide-Final-November 2017.pdf:10: 6.2.4 Environmental Statement APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 1.0
EN010082-000143-EN010082-1.2-Application Guide-Final-November 2017.pdf:10: 6.2.5 Environmental Statement – APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 1.0
EN010082-000143-EN010082-1.2-Application Guide-Final-November 2017.pdf:10: 6.2.6 Environmental Statement APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 1.0
EN010082-000143-EN010082-1.2-Application Guide-Final-November 2017.pdf:10: 6.2.7 Environmental Statement – APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 1.0
EN010082-000143-EN010082-1.2-Application Guide-Final-November 2017.pdf:10: 6.2.8 Environmental Statement – APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 1.0
EN010082-000143-EN010082-1.2-Application Guide-Final-November 2017.pdf:10: proposed development) and EIA Regs.
EN010082-000143-EN010082-1.2-Application Guide-Final-November 2017.pdf:10: 6.2.10 Environmental Statement APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 1.0
EN010082-000143-EN010082-1.2-Application Guide-Final-November 2017.pdf:10: 6.2.11 Environmental Statement – APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 1.0
EN010082-000143-EN010082-1.2-Application Guide-Final-November 2017.pdf:10: sites and registered battlefields) and EIA Regs.
EN010082-000143-EN010082-1.2-Application Guide-Final-November 2017.pdf:10: 6.2.13 Environmental Statement – APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 1.0
EN010082-000143-EN010082-1.2-Application Guide-Final-November 2017.pdf:10: 6.2.14 Environmental Statement – APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 1.0
EN010082-000143-EN010082-1.2-Application Guide-Final-November 2017.pdf:10: 6.2.15 Environmental Statement – APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 1.0
EN010082-000143-EN010082-1.2-Application Guide-Final-November 2017.pdf:10: 6.2.16 Environmental Statement – APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 1.0
EN010082-000143-EN010082-1.2-Application Guide-Final-November 2017.pdf:10: 6.2.17 Environmental Statement – APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 1.0
EN010082-000143-EN010082-1.2-Application Guide-Final-November 2017.pdf:11: 6.2.18 Environmental Statement – APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 1.0
EN010082-000143-EN010082-1.2-Application Guide-Final-November 2017.pdf:11: 6.3 Environmental Statement – APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 1.0
EN010082-000143-EN010082-1.2-Application Guide-Final-November 2017.pdf:11: 6.3.1 Annex A Scoping Report APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 1.0
EN010082-000143-EN010082-1.2-Application Guide-Final-November 2017.pdf:11: 6.3.2 Annex B Scoping Opinion APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 1.0
EN010082-000143-EN010082-1.2-Application Guide-Final-November 2017.pdf:11: assessment) and EIA Regs.
EN010082-000143-EN010082-1.2-Application Guide-Final-November 2017.pdf:11: features) and EIA Regs.
EN010082-000143-EN010082-1.2-Application Guide-Final-November 2017.pdf:11: 6.3.5 Annex D2 Envirocheck APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 1.0
EN010082-000143-EN010082-1.2-Application Guide-Final-November 2017.pdf:11: 6.3.6 Annex D3 Site Condition Report APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 1.0
EN010082-000143-EN010082-1.2-Application Guide-Final-November 2017.pdf:11: 6.3.7 Annex D4 Framework Construction Site APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 1.0
EN010082-000143-EN010082-1.2-Application Guide-Final-November 2017.pdf:11: 6.3.8 Annex E1 Stack Height Assessment APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 1.0
EN010082-000143-EN010082-1.2-Application Guide-Final-November 2017.pdf:11: 6.3.9 Annex E2 Green House Gas Assessment APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 1.0
EN010082-000143-EN010082-1.2-Application Guide-Final-November 2017.pdf:11: 6.3.10 Annex F1 Noise Baseline APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 1.0
EN010082-000143-EN010082-1.2-Application Guide-Final-November 2017.pdf:11: 6.3.11 Annex F2 Noise Model Inputs and APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 1.0
EN010082-000143-EN010082-1.2-Application Guide-Final-November 2017.pdf:11: 6.3.12 Annex G1 Effects of Air Quality on APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 1.0
EN010082-000143-EN010082-1.2-Application Guide-Final-November 2017.pdf:11: 6.3.13 Annex G2 Preliminary Ecological APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 1.0
EN010082-000143-EN010082-1.2-Application Guide-Final-November 2017.pdf:11: 6.3.14 Annex G3 Breeding Bird Survey APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 1.0
EN010082-000143-EN010082-1.2-Application Guide-Final-November 2017.pdf:11: and EIA Regs.
EN010082-000143-EN010082-1.2-Application Guide-Final-November 2017.pdf:11: 6.3.16 Annex I1 Transport Assessment APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 1.0
EN010082-000143-EN010082-1.2-Application Guide-Final-November 2017.pdf:11: 6.3.17 Annex I2 Draft Construction Traffic APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 1.0
EN010082-000143-EN010082-1.2-Application Guide-Final-November 2017.pdf:11: 6.3.18 Annex J Gazetteer of Non- Designated APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 1.0
EN010082-000143-EN010082-1.2-Application Guide-Final-November 2017.pdf:11: 6.3.19 Annex K Landscape and Visual Amenity APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 1.0
EN010082-000143-EN010082-1.2-Application Guide-Final-November 2017.pdf:11: 6.3.20 Annex L Draft Construction APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 1.0
EN010082-000653-Tees CCPP - Correspondence received after the close of Examination (1).pdf:20:• From an EIA perspective all the air quality modelling work and assessments following from it
EN010082-000653-Tees CCPP - Correspondence received after the close of Examination (1).pdf:20: follows that the MWe gross and MWe net values are immaterial to these aspects of the EIA.
EN010082-000653-Tees CCPP - Correspondence received after the close of Examination (1).pdf:20: The same logic applies to the CCR assessment work. All EIA assessments that are based on
EN010082-000653-Tees CCPP - Correspondence received after the close of Examination (1).pdf:21:notwithstanding that this is in fact immaterial when considering the EIA and CCR work (as noted
EN010082-000653-Tees CCPP - Correspondence received after the close of Examination (1).pdf:21:that the use of net or gross is immaterial when considering the EIA and CCR work that has been carried
EN010082-000653-Tees CCPP - Correspondence received after the close of Examination (1).pdf:21:or gross, and that the use of net or gross when considering the EIA and CCR work is immaterial.
EN010082-000396-8 5 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Comments on Relevant Reps - FINAL (2).pdf:2:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:10: Applicant National Policy Statements (‘NPSs’), why further mitigation is not proposed. this has been determined on the basis of guidance from the IAQM as discussed below for the purposes of the EIA. Of note is that at
EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:22: turbine building in every dimension). The EIA and HRA (based on the air quality results for the ES – APP-049) therefore applied
EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:28: APP-005 does not include a development consent obligation as the EIA has design of the Proposed Development or secured by requirements forming part of the draft DCO APP-005.
EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:28: planning terms. Please explain. Paragraph 1.27 of the Planning Statement APP-036 states the EIA of the Proposed Development has not identified the need for
EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:31: in accordance with the EIA Regulations, major and moderate impacts are
EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:31: purposes of the socio-economic assessment and the EIA Regulations. significance of its effect).”
EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:32: in EIA terms; and
EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:32: basis for the EIA should be that both these forms of mitigation definitely will be delivered: thus, any effects that might have arisen
EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:32: The EIA and ES has adopted this approach and has therefore not reported the significance of effects in the absence of mitigation where
EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:32: “Tertiary mitigation will be required regardless of any EIA assessment, as it is imposed, for example as a result of legislative
EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:32: Environment consultees. Scoping Opinion and issue of the ES. The development is not EIA and so is assumed not to raise any concerns in regard to such
EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:32: relevant developments have been considered in the cumulative would not change the overall conclusions on cumulative effects for any EIA topic.
EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:40: What would be the implications of a change to the stack height for the EIA
EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:40: Agency states that the maximum height of the co-located stacks is 75m above existing two stacks as a worst case scenario. This approach is undertaken to ensure that the EIA captures the theoretical worst case, so that if
EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:42: Table 3.2 in ES Chapter 3 EIA Approach APP-045 has been expanded and amended to provide an explanation for each topic. It
EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:43: Council reasonable to the nature of the project and that it is important to remember that the emphasis in EIA is on likely significant effects
EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:44: For the avoidance of doubt, please confirm that the full height of the stacks as produced early in the overall EIA process to support local community consultation.
EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:45: the overall findings of the EIA.
EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:45:Q1.9.1 Applicant Paragraph 8.8 of the Environmental Statement (ES) APP-050 states that the This approach was not specifically agreed with consultees. However, it reflects good practice in EIA in terms of assessing the ‘likely
EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:49:Q1.10.2 Applicant Emerging Policy SD4 of the Redcar and Cleveland Draft Publication New Public Health England raised issues at EIA Scoping stage that were subsequently addressed in the HIA (APP-056). The HIA presents
EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:52:Q1.11.4 Applicant Paragraph 10.26 of the ES APP-056 states that a Travel Plan for the The preparation of an operational travel plan was ruled out at the EIA Scoping stage of the Project. The Scoping Opinion issued on
EN010082-000382-NMC Cover letter redacted.pdf:2:Please refer to Environmental Statement (‘ES’) Volume 1, Chapter 3 ‘EIA Approach’ (Examination Ref:
EN010082-000382-NMC Cover letter redacted.pdf:3:on EIA’ note (Application Document Ref: 8.3) to test and substantiate this conclusion (enclosed with
EN010082-000382-NMC Cover letter redacted.pdf:3:material to the overall findings of the EIA.
EN010082-000382-NMC Cover letter redacted.pdf:5: - Implications of Requested Change on EIA note
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:2:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:2:2009 EIA Regulations The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2009
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:2:2017 EIA Regulations The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:4: EIA RELATED CONSULTATION
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:6:13 EIA RELATED CONSULTATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:6: THE EIA REGULATIONS
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:6: EIA NOTIFICATION AND SCOPING - EIA REGULATIONS 6(1) AND 8(1)
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:6: EIA REGULATION 11 NOTIFICATION
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:10: Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2009’ (the ‘2009 EIA Regulations’) and
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:11:EIA Scoping Submission of a request for an EIA Scoping Opinion February 2017 – March 2017
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:11: to the SoS and receipt of EIA Scoping Opinion. (Scoping Opinion
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:12:Sections 42, 43, 44, 45, Section 42 ‘Duty to consult’: consultation with Section 42 and EIA
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:12: Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) Regulation 11 Publicity: on 14 and 21 June 2017.
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:12: out at the same time with EIA consultation bodies
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:17:EIA RELATED CONSULTATION
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:17: EIA related consultation activities. These are covered in detail at Section 13 of this report. The
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:17: • Notifying PINS of SCU’s intention to carry out an EIA and applying to PINS for a Scoping
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:17: Opinion as to the topics to be covered by the EIA.
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:17: • Notifying consultation bodies in accordance with the EIA Regulation 11 of the 2009 EIA
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:17:1.51 In February 2017, SCU submitted an EIA Scoping Report to PINS. The Scoping Report provided
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:17: formal notification under Regulation 6(1)(b) of the 2009 EIA Regulations of SCU’s intention
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:17: to undertake an EIA for the Proposed Development and to produce an ES documenting the
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:17: findings of this. The Scoping Report also formally requested a Scoping Opinion pursuant to EIA
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:17: be ‘scoped out’ of the EIA, where it was not considered likely for these to lead to significant
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:17:1.53 PEI is defined in the 2009 EIA Regulations as “information … which (a) has been compiled by the
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:17:1.56 In accordance with EIA Regulation 11 ‘Pre-application publicity under Section 48 (‘Duty to
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:18: the Stage 1 Consultation, Stage 2 Consultation, and EIA related consultation. The consultation
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:21: Compliance and the ‘2009 EIA Regulations) relating to pre-application
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:22:Section 13 EIA Related Provides a brief summary of the EIA related consultation carried
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:22: Consultation out by SCU in accordance with the 2009 EIA Regulations and
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:22: the 2017 EIA Regulations in order to facilitate the EIA process
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:25:EIA Regulations Consultation undertaken as part of the EIA EIA related consultation, including that in
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:25: consultation responses received under the EIA compliance with EIA Regulation 11 and
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:29: EIA Regulations’).
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:29: EIA Regulations’) came into force on 16 May 2017, replacing the 2009 EIA Regulations. The
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:29: arrangements set out in Regulation 37 of the 2017 EIA Regulations. This provides that (amongst
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:29: opinion, prior to the date of the commencement of the 2017 EIA Regulations, then the 2009 EIA
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:29: of State on 21 February 2017, i.e. before 16 May 2017 (the commencement of the 2017 EIA
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:29: Regulations), and therefore the 2009 EIA Regulations are those that apply to the Application.
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:31: © a statement as to whether the application is EIA development;
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:31:EIA Regulation 11: Pre-application publicity under Where the proposed application is for EIA development, the applicant
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:31: EIA Regulations a body prescribed under Section 42(a)) ‘such persons
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:31: notified to the applicant by PINS in accordance with EIA Regulation
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:32: • PINS Advice Note 3 ‘EIA consultation and notification’ (version 6 dated June 2015 at the time
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:33: Did the applicant before carrying out the s42 consultation either SCU notified the SoS under the 2009 EIA Regulations – Section 13
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:36: Does the SoCC set out whether the development is EIA Yes - the SoCC confirms that the Proposed Development is EIA Section 6 and Appendix 6.7 (copy
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:36: development (EIA Regulation 10)? development. of final SoCC).
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:36: for development consent to the SoS. c) A statement that the Proposed Development is EIA development Notice as published in the relevant
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:36: c) A statement as to whether the application is and that an EIA is being undertaken. newspapers and publications).
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:36: EIA development. d) A summary of the Proposed Development, including its location.
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:37: Has a copy of the Section 48 Notice been sent to the EIA Yes - a copy of the Section 48 Notice was sent to consultation Section 10, Appendix 10.1 and
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:37: accordance with EIA Regulation 9(1)© (EIA Regulation 11)? SCU has not been notified of any EIA Regulation 9(1)© bodies by letters and Section 48 Notices).
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:38: • PINS Advice Note 3 ‘EIA consultation and notification’ (June 2015, which is the version that
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:40: environmental impact assessment (’EIA’) work undertaken on the Proposed Development (e.g. the
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:46: and consultees to discuss the EIA methodologies and approach set out and ensured most value
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:46: was obtained from the consultation and EIA processes.
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:51: EIA development and that a PEIR would be made available as part of the Stage 2 Consultation. A
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:55:7.4 In addition, SCU has had regard to PINS Advice Note 3 ‘EIA consultation and notification’
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:55:7.5 PINS did not notify SCU of any consultees under EIA Regulation 9(1)(a) in connection with its EIA
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:69:11.7 EIA Regulation 11 (2009 EIA Regulations) places a requirement on applicants, where an
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:69: application for consent for EIA development is proposed, to, at the same time as publishing the
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:69: notified to them by the PINS in accordance with EIA Regulation 9(1)©.
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:69:11.8 SCU have complied with Regulation 11 of the 2009 EIA Regulations by including the information
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:69: on the EIA Regulation in the section 42 letter. An example of the section 42 letter which includes
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:69: this EIA Regulation 11 information letter is included at Appendix 10.1. A copy of the Section 48
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:69:11.9 PINS did not notify SCU of any EIA Regulation 9(1)© bodies.
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:85: 11 North York Moors Park This Authority notes that in relation to the EIA cumula- ES Volume I, Chapter 10 ‘Traffic and transport’ (Applica- ES Volume 1, Chapter 10 Traffic and Transport (Ref
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:85: EIA in respect of that project predicts up to 127 two HGV movements a day for up to 5 years is included. Document Ref. 2.1).
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:90: struction phase. The traffic section of the EIA has stated
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:94:13 EIA RELATED CONSULTATION
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:94:13.1 This section provides a brief summary of the EIA consultation that has taken place during the pre-
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:94:THE EIA REGULATIONS
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:94:13.2 The 2017 EIA Regulations came into force on 16 May 2017, replacing the 2009 EIA Regulations.
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:94:13.3 The 2009 EIA Regulations continue to apply to certain projects, pursuant to the transitional
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:94: arrangements set out in Regulation 37 of the 2017 EIA Regulations, which provides that (amongst
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:94: to the date of the commencement of the 2017 EIA Regulations, then the 2009 EIA Regulations
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:94: 16 May 2017 (the commencement of the 2017 EIA Regulations), and therefore the 2009 EIA
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:94:EIA NOTIFICATION AND SCOPING - EIA REGULATIONS 6(1) AND 8(1)
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:94:13.4 At an early stage in the pre-application process SCU identified the Proposed Development as EIA
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:94: start to discuss the proposed scope of the EIA, including the studies and survey work that would
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:94: were used to inform the preparation of the EIA Scoping Report (Application Document Ref. 6.4.1)
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:94: detailing the environmental topics that SCU proposed to include within the scope of the EIA for
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:94:13.6 In February 2017 SCU submitted the EIA Scoping Report to PINS. The Scoping Report provided
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:94: formal notification under Regulation 6(1)(b) of the 2009 EIA Regulations of SCU’s intention to
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:94: undertake an EIA for the Proposed Development and to produce an ES documenting the findings
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:94: 8 of the 2009 EAI Regulations. Following receipt of the EIA Scoping Report, PINS consulted the
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:94: relevant consultation bodies in accordance with Regulation 8(6) of the 2009 EIA Regulations to
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:94: was broadly satisfied with the suggested approach and topics to be covered by the EIA but drew
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:94: areas which were subsequently addressed during the EIA process.
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:95:13.8 PEI is defined in the 2009 EIA Regulations as “information … which (a) has been compiled by the
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:95: (and of any associated development)”. The EIA Scoping Opinion provided by PINS on 31 March
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:95:EIA REGULATION 11 NOTIFICATION
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:95:13.11 In accordance with Regulation 11 of the 2009 EIA Regulations ‘Pre-application publicity under
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:95:13.12 Example copies of the letters and notices sent in accordance with EIA Regulation 11 are provided
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:95:13.13 A schedule detailing the EIA consultation bodies who were notified is provided at Appendix 7.1.
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:118: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:118: The EIA The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:125: (“EIA”) to be prepared as it is a project that comes within
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:125: therefore “EIA development” (as defined in those Regulations.)
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:125: 5.2 An EIA is a detailed assessment of the likely significant
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:125: of the EIA are reported in an Environmental Statement (“ES”)
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:125: an “EIA scoping opinion” to determine the scope (notably the
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:125: environmental topics to be covered) and the extent of the EIA
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:125: accompanied by a detailed EIA Scoping Report. PINS issued its
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:125: account by Sembcorp in undertaking the EIA work for the
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:125: 5.4 The EIA process involves Sembcorp producing Preliminary
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:125: statutory consultation on the project. The PEI will inform the EIA
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:125: work and the findings of the EIA will be contained with the ES
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:137: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:137: The EIA The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:153: A3.1 The project requires an Environmental Impact Assessment (“EIA”) to be
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:153: and is therefore “EIA development” (as defined in those Regulations.)
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:153: A3.2 An EIA is a detailed assessment of the likely significant environmental
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:153: landscape and visual and transport, among others. The findings of the EIA are
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:153: A3.3 Sembcorp submitted a request to PINS on 20th February 2017 for an “EIA
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:153: covered) and the extent of the EIA work to be undertaken for the project. The
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:153: request was accompanied by a detailed EIA Scoping Report. PINS issued its
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:153: Sembcorp in undertaking the EIA work for the project. These documents are
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:153: A3.4 The EIA process involves Sembcorp producing Preliminary
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:153: consultation on the project. The PEI will inform the EIA work and
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:153: the findings of the EIA will be contained with the ES that will form
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:165: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:165: The EIA The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:180: The Project is an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) development and so the Applicant will prepare an Environmental
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:182: A3.1 The project requires an Environmental Impact Assessment (“EIA”) to be
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:182: and is therefore “EIA development” (as defined in those Regulations.)
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:182: A3.2 An EIA is a detailed assessment of the likely significant environmental
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:182: landscape and visual and transport, among others. The findings of the EIA are
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:182: A3.3 Sembcorp submitted a request to PINS on 20th February 2017 for an “EIA
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:182: covered) and the extent of the EIA work to be undertaken for the project. The
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:182: request was accompanied by a detailed EIA Scoping Report. PINS issued its
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:182: Sembcorp in undertaking the EIA work for the project. These documents are
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:182: A3.4 The EIA process involves Sembcorp producing Preliminary Environmental
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:182: EIA work and the findings of the EIA will be contained with the ES that will form
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:186: EIA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:186: The EIA Regula-tions . . . . . . The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assess-ment) Regulations 2009
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:200: The Project is an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) development and so the Applicant
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:203: A3.1 The project requires an Environmental Impact Assessment (“EIA”) to be prepared as it is a project that
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:203: 2009” (as amended) and is therefore “EIA development” (as defined in those Regulations.)
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:203: A3.2 An EIA is a detailed assessment of the likely significant environmental effects of a project
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:203: others. The findings of the EIA are reported in an Environmental Statement (“ES”).
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:203: A3.3 Sembcorp submitted a request to PINS on 20th February 2017 for an “EIA scoping opinion” to
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:203: determine the scope (notably the environmental topics to be covered) and the extent of the EIA work
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:203: to be undertaken for the project. The request was accompanied by a detailed EIA Scoping Report. PINS
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:203: undertaking the EIA work for the project. These documents are available on the PINS website
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:203: A3.4 The EIA process involves Sembcorp producing Preliminary Environmental Information (“PEI”) on the
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:203: and be made available during the Stage 2 statutory consultation on the project. The PEI will inform the EIA
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:203: work and the findings of the EIA will be contained with the ES that will form part of the DCO application
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:207: The Project is an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:282: EIA Regulation 11 ‘Pre-application publicity under section 48 (duty to publicise)’
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:282: Regulations 2009 (the ‘2009 EIA Regulations’) requires that prospective applicants, at the same time as
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:282: ‘consultation bodies’ and to any person notified to the applicant by the SoS under EIA Regulation 9(1)©. A
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:282: the event that you may be a ‘consultation body’ for the purposes of the EIA Regulations.
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:282: (‘EIA’). Therefore the Project is classified as EIA development under the 2009 EIA Regulations and the
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:282: EIA Regulations.
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:282: ‘The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017’ (the ‘2017 EIA
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:282: Regulations’) came into force on 16 May 2017, replacing the 2009 EIA Regulations. The 2009 EIA Regulations
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:282: 37 of the 2017 EIA Regulations. That provides that (amongst other circumstances) where a request has been
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:282: made that the SoS adopts a scoping opinion, prior to the date of the commencement of the 2017 EIA
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:282: Regulations, then the 2009 EIA Regulations “continue to apply to any application for an order granting
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:283: February 2017, before 16 May 2017 (the commencement of the 2017 EIA Regulations). Therefore, the 2009
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:283: EIA Regulations continue to apply to the Project.
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:283: The 2017 EIA Regulations amend ‘The Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedures)
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:283: 2017 EIA Regulations. For the same reason as set out above - the transitional arrangements in Regulation 37
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:283: apply, and therefore Sembcorp is required to submit an ES in the form required by the 2009 EIA Regulations.
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:287: 5. The Project represents Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) development and therefore an EIA will be
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:287: undertaken. The findings of the EIA will be reported in an Environmental Statement that will be submitted
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:293: (the ‘EIA Regulations’) which requires an Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:293: (EIA) to be undertaken and an Environmental Statement (ES) to be submitted
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:293: EIA process before the production of the final ES. The purpose of the PEIR is
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:295: EIA APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:295: The Project has been subjected to its own stand-alone EIA process, undertaken
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:295: in accordance with the EIA Regulations and guidance provide by the Planning
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:295: this has been done, the EIA takes the environmental worst-case as the basis of
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:296: Figure 2 EIA Methodology Describe Baseline
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:296: considering inputs from stakeholders through The EIA process will interact with the project design team to develop
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:296: level baseline, currently planned against standards effects further or noise levels of equipment, sizes of structures). The EIA process will
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:296: EIA and is undertaken to refine the assessment and present
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:296: numbers of jobs generated in the local economy. In evaluating significance, the EIA process seeks to inform regulators and
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:297: The scope of the EIA was defined by identifying the potential areas of
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:297: setting, in order to identify the key issues to be addressed. The EIA covers the
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:297: Consultation is a key aspect of the EIA process. It allows the EIA scope to be
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:297: agreed, and ensures that the EIA focuses on the environmental and socio-
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:357: (‘Sembcorp’) of PO Box 1985, Wilton International, up to two CCGT units, including up to two waste heat (‘EIA’) development and therefore an EIA will be undertaken.
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:357: Middlesbrough, Teesside, TS90 8WS, intends to submit an recovery steam generators, up to two condensing steam The findings of the EIA will be reported in an Environmental
EN010082-000515-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Clean v3.pdf:4: Assessment (EIA) process and are reported in the Environmental Statement (ES).
EN010082-000648-Tees CCPP Decision Letter 5 April 2019 (1).pdf:2: Assessment (“EIA”); air quality and emissions; biodiversity, ecology and natural
EN010082-Advice-00009-1-EN010082 Tees CCPP meeting note.pdf:1: Emma Cottam (EIA and Land Rights Advisor)
EN010082-Advice-00009-1-EN010082 Tees CCPP meeting note.pdf:1: Lucy Hicks (EIA and Land Rights Advisor)
EN010082-000516-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Tracked v3.pdf:4: Assessment (EIA) process and are reported in the Environmental Statement (ES).
EN010082-000314-TEES - Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening (3).pdf:2:Cumulative impacts more detailed assessment in the EIA. This includes other
EN010082-000314-TEES - Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening (3).pdf:4:(Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the 2017 EIA Regulations). The
EN010082-000314-TEES - Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening (3).pdf:4:commencement of the 2017 EIA Regulations). The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental
EN010082-000314-TEES - Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening (3).pdf:4:Impact Assessment) Regulations 2009 (the 2009 EIA Regulations) are therefore considered
EN010082-000314-TEES - Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening (3).pdf:4:to be the applicable EIA Regulations. Under Regulation 24 of the 2009 EIA Regulations and
EN010082-000314-TEES - Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening (3).pdf:4:Note: The Secretary of State’s duty under Regulation 24 of the EIA Regulations continues
EN010082-000314-TEES - Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening (3).pdf:5:(Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the 2017 EIA Regulations). The
EN010082-000314-TEES - Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening (3).pdf:5:2017 EIA Regulations). The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment)
EN010082-000314-TEES - Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening (3).pdf:5:Regulations 2009 (the 2009 EIA Regulations) are therefore considered to be the applicable
EN010082-000314-TEES - Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening (3).pdf:5:EIA Regulations.
EN010082-000314-TEES - Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening (3).pdf:5:Under Regulation 24 of the 2009 EIA Regulations and on the basis of the current
EN010082-000314-TEES - Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening (3).pdf:5:Note: The Secretary of State’s duty under Regulation 24 of the 2009 EIA Regulations
EN010082-000430-Redcar and Cleveland Local Impact Report - signed_Redacted.pdf:4: with regard to the content and scope of the EIA.
EN010082-000172-EN010082-6.2.1-ES Chapter 1-Introduction-Final-November 2017.pdf:2:1.6 THE NEW EIA REGULATIONS AND TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS 1-8
EN010082-000172-EN010082-6.2.1-ES Chapter 1-Introduction-Final-November 2017.pdf:3: Assessment (EIA) that has been undertaken. In doing so, it describes the
EN010082-000172-EN010082-6.2.1-ES Chapter 1-Introduction-Final-November 2017.pdf:3: (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2009 (the ‘2009 EIA
EN010082-000172-EN010082-6.2.1-ES Chapter 1-Introduction-Final-November 2017.pdf:3: (1) Regulation 4 of the Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the ‘2017 EIA
EN010082-000172-EN010082-6.2.1-ES Chapter 1-Introduction-Final-November 2017.pdf:3: Regulations’). The context of for this ES in regard to the 2009 and 2017 EIA Regulations is discussed in Section 1.6.
EN010082-000172-EN010082-6.2.1-ES Chapter 1-Introduction-Final-November 2017.pdf:6: flexibility does, however, introduce some complexity into the EIA process.
EN010082-000172-EN010082-6.2.1-ES Chapter 1-Introduction-Final-November 2017.pdf:6:1.14 The 2009 (and 2017) EIA Regulations require an ES to provide a description of
EN010082-000172-EN010082-6.2.1-ES Chapter 1-Introduction-Final-November 2017.pdf:6:1.16 In practice the EIA takes account of all the reasonable variations (up to the
EN010082-000172-EN010082-6.2.1-ES Chapter 1-Introduction-Final-November 2017.pdf:8:1.4.1 EIA Study Team
EN010082-000172-EN010082-6.2.1-ES Chapter 1-Introduction-Final-November 2017.pdf:8:1.18 The preparation of the EIA is being led by Environmental Resources
EN010082-000172-EN010082-6.2.1-ES Chapter 1-Introduction-Final-November 2017.pdf:8: (IEMA’s) EIA Quality Mark, a scheme which allows organisations to make a
EN010082-000172-EN010082-6.2.1-ES Chapter 1-Introduction-Final-November 2017.pdf:8: commitment to excellence in their EIA activities, and have this commitment
EN010082-000172-EN010082-6.2.1-ES Chapter 1-Introduction-Final-November 2017.pdf:8:1.19 Specific topics in this EIA are being addressed by the following shown in Table
EN010082-000172-EN010082-6.2.1-ES Chapter 1-Introduction-Final-November 2017.pdf:8:Table 1.1 EIA Project Team
EN010082-000172-EN010082-6.2.1-ES Chapter 1-Introduction-Final-November 2017.pdf:8: EIA Project Director ERM Kevin Murphy, BSc (Hons, PhD
EN010082-000172-EN010082-6.2.1-ES Chapter 1-Introduction-Final-November 2017.pdf:8: EIA Project Manager ERM Roderick Ellison MSc BSc (hons) CEnv
EN010082-000172-EN010082-6.2.1-ES Chapter 1-Introduction-Final-November 2017.pdf:9:1.21 As an initial stage in undertaking the EIA, a Scoping Report (see Annex A) was
EN010082-000172-EN010082-6.2.1-ES Chapter 1-Introduction-Final-November 2017.pdf:9: noted in Chapter 3, the technical scope of the EIA has derived from both the
EN010082-000172-EN010082-6.2.1-ES Chapter 1-Introduction-Final-November 2017.pdf:9: under Regulation 10(b) of the 2009 EIA Regulations (Regulation 12(b) of the
EN010082-000172-EN010082-6.2.1-ES Chapter 1-Introduction-Final-November 2017.pdf:9: 2017 EIA Regulations). The purpose of the PEIR was to provide information
EN010082-000172-EN010082-6.2.1-ES Chapter 1-Introduction-Final-November 2017.pdf:10: influence the design process and the subsequent EIA and content of the ES.
EN010082-000172-EN010082-6.2.1-ES Chapter 1-Introduction-Final-November 2017.pdf:10:1.6 THE NEW EIA REGULATIONS AND TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS
EN010082-000172-EN010082-6.2.1-ES Chapter 1-Introduction-Final-November 2017.pdf:10:1.23 The 2017 EIA Regulations came into force on 16th May 2017, replacing the 2009
EN010082-000172-EN010082-6.2.1-ES Chapter 1-Introduction-Final-November 2017.pdf:10: EIA Regulations. The 2017 EIA regulations implement the Environmental
EN010082-000172-EN010082-6.2.1-ES Chapter 1-Introduction-Final-November 2017.pdf:10: Impact Assessment (EIA) Directive 2014, the purpose of which was to
EN010082-000172-EN010082-6.2.1-ES Chapter 1-Introduction-Final-November 2017.pdf:10: streamline the existing EIA regime.
EN010082-000172-EN010082-6.2.1-ES Chapter 1-Introduction-Final-November 2017.pdf:10:1.26 However in the Scoping Opinion the SoS did draw attention to the 2014 EIA
EN010082-000172-EN010082-6.2.1-ES Chapter 1-Introduction-Final-November 2017.pdf:11: comply with the 2009 EIA Regulations while also voluntarily addressing the
EN010082-000172-EN010082-6.2.1-ES Chapter 1-Introduction-Final-November 2017.pdf:11: additional elements introduced by the 2017 EIA Regulations.
EN010082-000172-EN010082-6.2.1-ES Chapter 1-Introduction-Final-November 2017.pdf:11:1.28 It should also be noted that under the 2017 EIA Regulations, where a scoping
EN010082-000172-EN010082-6.2.1-ES Chapter 1-Introduction-Final-November 2017.pdf:11: • Chapter 1 details the purpose of the EIA and Development Consent Order
EN010082-000172-EN010082-6.2.1-ES Chapter 1-Introduction-Final-November 2017.pdf:11: • Chapter 3 describes the EIA process applied in the EIA. This chapter also
EN010082-000172-EN010082-6.2.1-ES Chapter 1-Introduction-Final-November 2017.pdf:11: key alternatives to the design assumptions adopted within this EIA and
EN010082-000172-EN010082-6.2.1-ES Chapter 1-Introduction-Final-November 2017.pdf:14:Table 1.2 EIA Requirements and where they are Addressed in this ES
EN010082-000172-EN010082-6.2.1-ES Chapter 1-Introduction-Final-November 2017.pdf:14: Required Information 2009 EIA Regulations Required Information 2017 EIA Regulations How the 2017 EIA Regulations Reference to where Addressed in the
EN010082-000172-EN010082-6.2.1-ES Chapter 1-Introduction-Final-November 2017.pdf:14: operational phases; relevant, requisite demolition works, and the EIA Regulations and have been relevant information under the sub-
EN010082-000172-EN010082-6.2.1-ES Chapter 1-Introduction-Final-November 2017.pdf:14: including a comparison of the environmental 2009 EIA Regulations and are options) is considered for each topic in
EN010082-000172-EN010082-6.2.1-ES Chapter 1-Introduction-Final-November 2017.pdf:15:Required Information 2009 EIA Regulations Required Information 2017 EIA Regulations How the 2017 EIA Regulations Reference to where Addressed in the
EN010082-000172-EN010082-6.2.1-ES Chapter 1-Introduction-Final-November 2017.pdf:15: current state of the environment (baseline ESs produced under the 2009 EIA economic setting for the Project and
EN010082-000172-EN010082-6.2.1-ES Chapter 1-Introduction-Final-November 2017.pdf:15:archaeological heritage, landscape and the (for example organic matter, erosion, addressed under the 2009 EIA
EN010082-000172-EN010082-6.2.1-ES Chapter 1-Introduction-Final-November 2017.pdf:16:Required Information 2009 EIA Regulations Required Information 2017 EIA Regulations How the 2017 EIA Regulations Reference to where Addressed in the
EN010082-000172-EN010082-6.2.1-ES Chapter 1-Introduction-Final-November 2017.pdf:16:from: (b)the use of natural resources, in particular 2009 EIA Regulations. This ES and are be summarised along with
EN010082-000172-EN010082-6.2.1-ES Chapter 1-Introduction-Final-November 2017.pdf:17:Required Information 2009 EIA Regulations Required Information 2017 EIA Regulations How the 2017 EIA Regulations Reference to where Addressed in the
EN010082-000172-EN010082-6.2.1-ES Chapter 1-Introduction-Final-November 2017.pdf:17:Paragraph 20 of Schedule 4 Paragraph 6 of Schedule 4 Although introducing a specific The overall approach to the EIA is
EN010082-000172-EN010082-6.2.1-ES Chapter 1-Introduction-Final-November 2017.pdf:17:on the environment. significant effects on the environment, produced under the 2009 EIA Each technical topic chapter (Chapters 6
EN010082-000172-EN010082-6.2.1-ES Chapter 1-Introduction-Final-November 2017.pdf:17: 2009 EIA Regulations and this ES to 15 where relevant.
EN010082-000172-EN010082-6.2.1-ES Chapter 1-Introduction-Final-November 2017.pdf:17:significant adverse effects on the environment. any identified significant adverse effects on addressed under the 2009 EIA Mitigation measures specific to
EN010082-000172-EN010082-6.2.1-ES Chapter 1-Introduction-Final-November 2017.pdf:17: construction and operational phases. EIA and is picked up in this ES in Construction Environmental
EN010082-000172-EN010082-6.2.1-ES Chapter 1-Introduction-Final-November 2017.pdf:17: adverse effects of the development on the under the 2009 EIA Regulations accident scenarios and the control
EN010082-000172-EN010082-6.2.1-ES Chapter 1-Introduction-Final-November 2017.pdf:18:Required Information 2009 EIA Regulations Required Information 2017 EIA Regulations How the 2017 EIA Regulations Reference to where Addressed in the
EN010082-000172-EN010082-6.2.1-ES Chapter 1-Introduction-Final-November 2017.pdf:18: the descriptions and assessments included in under the 2009 EIA Regulations each of the technical topic Chapters 6 to
EN010082-000533-TEES - 180724 - Tees Second Written Questions - Final.pdf:5: • If SCR is implemented, could it affect the findings of LSE for the EIA or HRA?
EN010082-000562-Report on the Implications for European Sites.pdf:7: EIA AS-009;
EN010082-000562-Report on the Implications for European Sites.pdf:23: Change on the EIA’ AS-009, which concluded that there would be no
EN010082-000202-EN010082-6.3.12-ES Annex G1-Effects of Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:7: context of the EIA Regulations.
EN010082-000373-6.2.5 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 5 - Project Description - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf:9:5.18 To deal with the two scenarios within the EIA, the technical assessments (for
EN010082-000373-6.2.5 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 5 - Project Description - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf:10: topic assessments within the EIA adopt a reasonable worst case scenario in
EN010082-000373-6.2.5 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 5 - Project Description - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf:20: preparation of a standalone supplementary report to the EIA (the Carbon
EN010082-000536-8.46 - Tees CCPP - Applicant's Response to ExA's Second WQs - Deadline 5 - FINAL - 07.08.18.pdf:8: one additional industrial facility that may be operational, that being the Tees Renewable Energy Plant. The EIA for
EN010082-000536-8.46 - Tees CCPP - Applicant's Response to ExA's Second WQs - Deadline 5 - FINAL - 07.08.18.pdf:10: EIA or HRA?
EN010082-000367-Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Consultation Notice.pdf:1:4. The Project qualifies as Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) development for the purposes of the
EN010082-000367-Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Consultation Notice.pdf:1: therefore accompanied by an Environmental Statement (‘ES’), setting out the findings of the EIA.
EN010082-000181-EN010082-6.2.10-ES Chapter 10-Traffic and Transport-Final-November 2017.pdf:5: as part of the EIA process. The formal Scoping Opinion is set out in Annex B.
EN010082-000181-EN010082-6.2.10-ES Chapter 10-Traffic and Transport-Final-November 2017.pdf:8:North Yorkshire County Council NYCC would expect most traffic will be generated at the construction phase. The traffic section of the EIA has A draft CTMP is provided as
EN010082-000181-EN010082-6.2.10-ES Chapter 10-Traffic and Transport-Final-November 2017.pdf:8:North York Moors Park This Authority notes that in relation to the EIA cumulative impact assessment of traffic impacts in relation to the The York Potash Project Transport
EN010082-000181-EN010082-6.2.10-ES Chapter 10-Traffic and Transport-Final-November 2017.pdf:9:Authority (NYMPA) (PEIR York Potash project ( project 34 table 7.1 Appendix C – it states the project is a low traffic generator. The EIA in Assessment, prepared by Royal
EN010082-Advice-00002-1-161214_EN010082_Final meeting note for 14 December 2016.doc_.pdf:1: Alison Down (EIA and Land Rights Advisor)
EN010082-Advice-00002-1-161214_EN010082_Final meeting note for 14 December 2016.doc_.pdf:1: Emma Cottam (EIA and Land Rights Advisor)
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:15: Impact Assessment (EIA) is required (EIA development).
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:15: 2009 EIA Regulations) a request for an opinion as to the information to
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:15: 6(1)(b) of the 2009 EIA Regulations that it proposed to provide an ES in
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:15: 4(2)(a) of the 2009 EIA Regulations, the Proposed Development was
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:15: determined to be EIA development, and the application was accompanied
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:15:1.5.4. The 2009 EIA Regulations were revoked and replaced by the
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:15: 13 of the 2009 EIA Regulations had been complied with [OD-001, OD-
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:15: 2009 EIA regulations and, together with the environmental information
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:19: reviewing the implications of the proposed change for the EIA AS-009.
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:19: of the EIA as the conclusions on the significance of effects remain
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:25: certain public and private projects on the environment (the EIA
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:25:3.3.2. The EIA Directive defines the procedure by which information about the
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:25:3.3.4. The current EIA legislation for NSIP cases is the Infrastructure Planning
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:25: (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the 2017 EIA
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:25: Impact Assessment) Regulations 2009 (the 2009 EIA Regulations)
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:25: subject to transitional provisions in Regulation 37 of the 2017 EIA
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:25:3.3.5. The 2017 EIA Regulations came into force on 16 May 2017, before the
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:26: EIA Regulations states that the 2009 EIA Regulations will continue to
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:26: opinion defined by the 2009 EIA Regulations.
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:26: EIA Regulations in the pre-application period APP-043. However, the
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:26: 2017 EIA Regulations on a voluntary basis APP-043.
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:26: this application, the provisions in Regulation 37(2)(a)(ii) of the 2017 EIA
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:26: against the 2009 EIA Regulations.
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:26:3.3.8. The 2009 EIA Regulations establish the minimum information to be
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:26: an ES under the EIA Regulations and this is reinforced by Regulation
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:26: decision on EIA Development. Regulation 3(2) of the 2009 EIA
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:26: proposed development is EIA development under Schedule 2 of the 2009
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:26: EIA Regulations. The Applicant has provided an ES APP-041 to APP-081
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:34:3.6.1. Under Regulation 24 of the 2009 EIA Regulations and on the basis of the
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:34: Regulation 24of the 2009 EIA Regulations was therefore not considered
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:36: considerations in Chapter 5. Detailed consideration is given to the EIA in
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:40:4.6.1. The overarching EIA methodology is described in ES Chapter 3 [APP-
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:40: 045]. The EIA process involves identification of sensitive receptors that
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:41: the EIA. At the ISH on the Scope of the Application3, I asked the
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:41: Chapter 3 ‘EIA Approach’, paragraphs 3.17 and Table 3.2 APP-045.
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:41: Applicant responded that Table 3.2 in ES Chapter 3 ‘EIA Approach’ has
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:41: and the DCO. The Applicant considers that the EIA takes account of all
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:41: requested change. This was advertised in accordance with the EIA
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:41: constitute ‘other environmental information’ as defined in the 2009 EIA
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:42: Applicant’s ES. In accordance with Schedule 4, Part 2 of the 2009 EIA
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:42: provide the basis for determining applications for EIA development, the
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:43: the EIA regulations in this regard have been met.
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:49: of requested change to application on the EIA’ AS-009, which concluded
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:54: keeping with his statutory duty under the EIA Regulations (or HRA
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:54: remit of what has been assessed in the submitted EIA. This type of
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:57: EIA scoping and the Section 42 consultation have been addressed by the
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:59: subject to EIA, the Applicant should ensure that the ES clearly sets out
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:97: Change on the EIA’ AS-009, which concluded that there would be no
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:106: beyond the remit of what has been assessed in the submitted EIA”. The
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:124: development and the EIA Regulations at an ISH. The Applicant confirmed
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:125: that if the extent of the extension proposed constitutes EIA development,
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:136: 6.2.3 - ES Chapter 3 - EIA Approach - Final - November 2017
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:143: Scope of the EIA
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:155:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:157:the 2009 EIA Regulations The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:157:the 2017 EIA Regulations the Infrastructure Planning (Environmental
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:157:The EIA Directive Council Directive 2011/92/EU on the
EN010082-000186-EN010082-6.2.15-ES Chapter 15-Major Accidents-Final-November 2017.pdf:3: 2017 EIA Regulations; specifically in relation to this chapter Paragraph 8 of
EN010082-000186-EN010082-6.2.15-ES Chapter 15-Major Accidents-Final-November 2017.pdf:7: Public Health Within the EIA PHE would expect to see information about how the promoter would respond to accidents Flooding is addressed
EN010082-000186-EN010082-6.2.15-ES Chapter 15-Major Accidents-Final-November 2017.pdf:8:Public Health The EIA should include consideration of the COMAH Regulations (Control of Major Accident Hazards). COMAH regulations
EN010082-000186-EN010082-6.2.15-ES Chapter 15-Major Accidents-Final-November 2017.pdf:15: factors identified in the Paragraph 4 of Schedule 4 of the 2017 EIA Regulations
EN010082-000186-EN010082-6.2.15-ES Chapter 15-Major Accidents-Final-November 2017.pdf:17:15.37 In the context of this chapter, typical methods employed within EIA to
EN010082-000653-Tees CCPP - Correspondence received after the close of Examination.pdf:20:• From an EIA perspective all the air quality modelling work and assessments following from it
EN010082-000653-Tees CCPP - Correspondence received after the close of Examination.pdf:20: follows that the MWe gross and MWe net values are immaterial to these aspects of the EIA.
EN010082-000653-Tees CCPP - Correspondence received after the close of Examination.pdf:20: The same logic applies to the CCR assessment work. All EIA assessments that are based on
EN010082-000653-Tees CCPP - Correspondence received after the close of Examination.pdf:21:notwithstanding that this is in fact immaterial when considering the EIA and CCR work (as noted
EN010082-000653-Tees CCPP - Correspondence received after the close of Examination.pdf:21:that the use of net or gross is immaterial when considering the EIA and CCR work that has been carried
EN010082-000653-Tees CCPP - Correspondence received after the close of Examination.pdf:21:or gross, and that the use of net or gross when considering the EIA and CCR work is immaterial.
EN010082-000350-Placeholder for ExA's Written Questions.pdf:21: a development consent obligation as the EIA has not identified the need for mitigation in order to
EN010082-000350-Placeholder for ExA's Written Questions.pdf:25: stated in paragraph 11.21 of the ES APP-053 that in accordance with the EIA Regulations, major and
EN010082-000350-Placeholder for ExA's Written Questions.pdf:25: assessment and the EIA Regulations.
EN010082-000350-Placeholder for ExA's Written Questions.pdf:25: Confirm the level of significance that is considered to be ‘significant’ in EIA terms; and
EN010082-000350-Placeholder for ExA's Written Questions.pdf:35: What would be the implications of a change to the stack height for the EIA and the DCO?
EN010082-000212-EN010082-5.6-Design Access Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010082-000212-EN010082-5.6-Design Access Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:5: Assessment (‘EIA’) of the Proposed Development to ensure that its likely significant effects have
EN010082-000212-EN010082-5.6-Design Access Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:16: (‘EIA’), SCU has adopted the ‘Rochdale Envelope’ approach and, where relevant, assessed
EN010082-000212-EN010082-5.6-Design Access Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:16: assessment within the EIA is robust and that there is sufficient certainty as to air quality effects
EN010082-000212-EN010082-5.6-Design Access Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:30: fixed design details and maximum design parameters upon which the EIA has been based.
EN010082-000212-EN010082-5.6-Design Access Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:32: design parameters upon which to base the EIA to ensure that the likely significant effects of the
EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf:13:7.20 The Project requires a DCO (the purpose of the EIA) and an Environmental
EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf:19:7.45 The statutory criteria used in this EIA for assessment of impacts at sensitive
EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf:27:Table 7.10 Determination of Significance of an Effect on Human Receptors for EIA
EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf:28: the context of the EIA Regulations
EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf:45: undertake an EIA then it is assumed that following screening by the
EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf:45: screening an application for EIA that are relevant to emissions to atmosphere
EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf:46: cumulative EIA
EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf:46: R/2015/0149/OOM Teesdock Approved MGT Teesside Ltd (MGT) proposes to Operational Y Not EIA No potential
EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf:46: R/2016/0484/FFM Former Croda Approved Proposed anaerobic biogas production Operational Y Not EIA No potential
EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf:47: cumulative EIA
EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf:47:R/2015/0682/FFM Wilton Waste Approved Provision of oil refinery at Wilton Waste Operational Y Not EIA No potential
EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf:48: cumulative EIA
EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf:48:R/2013/0608/FFM Teesport Approved Waste treatment facility. Operational Y Not EIA No potential
EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf:48:R/2012/0314/FFM Lotte Approved Construction of a polyethylene Operational Y Not EIA No potential
EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf:49: cumulative EIA
EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf:49:R/2012/0934/RSM Land at Approved Proposed anaerobic digestion plant (steel Operational Y Not EIA No potential
EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf:50: cumulative EIA
EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf:55: modelled inputs for the EIA it can be concluded with a high level of certainty
EN010082-000552-8.53 - Explanatory Memorandum - Clean (v3).pdf:2:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010082-000552-8.53 - Explanatory Memorandum - Clean (v3).pdf:2:2009 EIA Regulations The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2009
EN010082-000552-8.53 - Explanatory Memorandum - Clean (v3).pdf:2:2017 EIA Regulations The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017
EN010082-000552-8.53 - Explanatory Memorandum - Clean (v3).pdf:7: regulation 3 of the 2009 EIA Regulations , and has had regard to the documents and matters referred
EN010082-000552-8.53 - Explanatory Memorandum - Clean (v3).pdf:7: The 2017 EIA Regulations came into force on 16 May 2017, replacing the 2009 EIA Regulations. The 2009 EIA Regulations however continue to apply to
EN010082-000552-8.53 - Explanatory Memorandum - Clean (v3).pdf:7:certain projects, pursuant to the transitional arrangements set out in Regulation 37 of the 2017 EIA Regulations, which provides that where a request has been
EN010082-000552-8.53 - Explanatory Memorandum - Clean (v3).pdf:7:made that the SoS adopts a scoping opinion, prior to the date of the commencement of the 2017 EIA Regulations, then the 2009 EIA Regulations continue to
EN010082-000552-8.53 - Explanatory Memorandum - Clean (v3).pdf:7:February 2017, before 16 May 2017 when the 2017 EIA Regulations came into force. Consequently the 2009 EIA Regulations are those that apply to the
EN010082-000552-8.53 - Explanatory Memorandum - Clean (v3).pdf:7:Application. However in consideration of the SoS’s scoping opinion which drew attention to the 2017 EIA Regulations, with regard to the EIA carried out, the
EN010082-000552-8.53 - Explanatory Memorandum - Clean (v3).pdf:7:Applicant has chosen to both comply with the 2009 EIA Regulations while also voluntarily addressing the additional elements introduced by the 2017 EIA
EN010082-000552-8.53 - Explanatory Memorandum - Clean (v3).pdf:7:Regulations. However, the draft DCO correctly refers to the 2009 EIA Regulations.
EN010082-000398-8 7 - Tees CCPP - Written Summary of Oral Case (ISH 10 04 18) - FINAL.pdf:2:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010082-000398-8 7 - Tees CCPP - Written Summary of Oral Case (ISH 10 04 18) - FINAL.pdf:6: Georgia Sweeney (‘GS’), EIA Coordinator, ERM;
EN010082-000398-8 7 - Tees CCPP - Written Summary of Oral Case (ISH 10 04 18) - FINAL.pdf:6: Caroline Burn (‘CB’), EIA Coordinator, ERM;
EN010082-000398-8 7 - Tees CCPP - Written Summary of Oral Case (ISH 10 04 18) - FINAL.pdf:7: EIA implications or otherwise and if the provider chosen does not in fact require this increase to the
EN010082-000398-8 7 - Tees CCPP - Written Summary of Oral Case (ISH 10 04 18) - FINAL.pdf:7:2.18 The Applicant also confirmed that the EIA has been reviewed in respect of the relevant topics that would
EN010082-000398-8 7 - Tees CCPP - Written Summary of Oral Case (ISH 10 04 18) - FINAL.pdf:7:2.21 It was agreed the pack of information relating to the requested change would cross-reference back to EIA
EN010082-000398-8 7 - Tees CCPP - Written Summary of Oral Case (ISH 10 04 18) - FINAL.pdf:13: Chapter 3 EIA Approach, paragraph 3.17 and Table 3.2 APP- 045. Each topic basis for assessment
EN010082-000398-8 7 - Tees CCPP - Written Summary of Oral Case (ISH 10 04 18) - FINAL.pdf:14:2.120 CB advised that Table 3.2 in ES Chapter 3 EIA Approach APP-045 has been expanded and amended to
EN010082-000398-8 7 - Tees CCPP - Written Summary of Oral Case (ISH 10 04 18) - FINAL.pdf:15:2.136 KM confirmed that Chapter 3 (EIA Approach and Methodology) of the ES explains that the EIA takes
EN010082-000398-8 7 - Tees CCPP - Written Summary of Oral Case (ISH 10 04 18) - FINAL.pdf:15: community consultation. This work was conducted early in the overall EIA process in response to local
EN010082-000398-8 7 - Tees CCPP - Written Summary of Oral Case (ISH 10 04 18) - FINAL.pdf:15: the assessments were progressed at different stages in the EIA process (visual impact to assist
EN010082-000398-8 7 - Tees CCPP - Written Summary of Oral Case (ISH 10 04 18) - FINAL.pdf:15: progressively during the EIA process the potential suppliers provided multiple dimensions of
EN010082-000398-8 7 - Tees CCPP - Written Summary of Oral Case (ISH 10 04 18) - FINAL.pdf:17: was represented in the assessment. The photomontages were produced early in the overall EIA process to
EN010082-000180-EN010082-6.2.9-ES Chapter 9-Ecology and Nature Conservation-Final-November 2017.pdf:5: Natural England The EIA will need to consider any impacts on local wildlife and geological sites No significant effects have been identified on these sites
EN010082-000180-EN010082-6.2.9-ES Chapter 9-Ecology and Nature Conservation-Final-November 2017.pdf:12: National Policy Statement for Energy(EN-1) requires that EIA development
EN010082-000180-EN010082-6.2.9-ES Chapter 9-Ecology and Nature Conservation-Final-November 2017.pdf:19:9.48 A HRA has been undertaken as part of the EIA process, due to the Project’s
EN010082-000180-EN010082-6.2.9-ES Chapter 9-Ecology and Nature Conservation-Final-November 2017.pdf:35: cumulative effects EIA
EN010082-000170-EN010082-6.1-ES Non Technical Summary-Final-November 2017.pdf:3: (the ‘EIA Regulations’) which requires an Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010082-000170-EN010082-6.1-ES Non Technical Summary-Final-November 2017.pdf:3: (EIA) to be undertaken and an Environmental Statement (ES) to be submitted
EN010082-000170-EN010082-6.1-ES Non Technical Summary-Final-November 2017.pdf:3: with the draft DCO for a project of this scale and type. The 2017 EIA
EN010082-000170-EN010082-6.1-ES Non Technical Summary-Final-November 2017.pdf:3: Regulations came into force on 16th May 2017, replacing the 2009 EIA
EN010082-000170-EN010082-6.1-ES Non Technical Summary-Final-November 2017.pdf:3: Regulations and implementing the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)
EN010082-000170-EN010082-6.1-ES Non Technical Summary-Final-November 2017.pdf:3: Directive 2014, the purpose of which was to streamline the existing EIA
EN010082-000170-EN010082-6.1-ES Non Technical Summary-Final-November 2017.pdf:3: the benefit of transitional provisions whereby the 2009 EIA Regulations will
EN010082-000170-EN010082-6.1-ES Non Technical Summary-Final-November 2017.pdf:3: comply with the 2009 EIA Regulations whilst also voluntarily addressing the
EN010082-000170-EN010082-6.1-ES Non Technical Summary-Final-November 2017.pdf:3: additional elements introduced by the 2017 EIA Regulations.
EN010082-000170-EN010082-6.1-ES Non Technical Summary-Final-November 2017.pdf:6:0.3 EIA APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY
EN010082-000170-EN010082-6.1-ES Non Technical Summary-Final-November 2017.pdf:6:0.7 The Project has been subjected to its own stand-alone EIA process, undertaken
EN010082-000170-EN010082-6.1-ES Non Technical Summary-Final-November 2017.pdf:6: in accordance with the EIA Regulations and guidance provide by the Planning
EN010082-000170-EN010082-6.1-ES Non Technical Summary-Final-November 2017.pdf:6: this has been done, the EIA takes the environmental worst-case as the basis of
EN010082-000170-EN010082-6.1-ES Non Technical Summary-Final-November 2017.pdf:6:0.11 The scope of the EIA was defined by identifying the potential areas of
EN010082-000170-EN010082-6.1-ES Non Technical Summary-Final-November 2017.pdf:6: setting, in order to identify the key issues to be addressed. The EIA covers the
EN010082-000170-EN010082-6.1-ES Non Technical Summary-Final-November 2017.pdf:8:Figure 2 EIA Methodology Describe Baseline
EN010082-000170-EN010082-6.1-ES Non Technical Summary-Final-November 2017.pdf:8: considering inputs from stakeholders through The EIA process will interact with the project design team to develop
EN010082-000170-EN010082-6.1-ES Non Technical Summary-Final-November 2017.pdf:8: level baseline, currently planned against standards effects further or noise levels of equipment, sizes of structures). The EIA process will
EN010082-000170-EN010082-6.1-ES Non Technical Summary-Final-November 2017.pdf:8: EIA and is undertaken to refine the assessment and present
EN010082-000170-EN010082-6.1-ES Non Technical Summary-Final-November 2017.pdf:8: numbers of jobs generated in the local economy. In evaluating significance, the EIA process seeks to inform regulators and
EN010082-000170-EN010082-6.1-ES Non Technical Summary-Final-November 2017.pdf:9:0.13 Consultation is a key aspect of the EIA process. It allows the EIA scope to be
EN010082-000170-EN010082-6.1-ES Non Technical Summary-Final-November 2017.pdf:9: agreed, and ensures that the EIA focuses on the environmental and socio-
EN010082-000170-EN010082-6.1-ES Non Technical Summary-Final-November 2017.pdf:9: accordance with the EIA regulations, information was provided in the form of
EN010082-000170-EN010082-6.1-ES Non Technical Summary-Final-November 2017.pdf:19:0.75 The EIA included a health impact assessment to look at how, if at all, the
EN010082-000170-EN010082-6.1-ES Non Technical Summary-Final-November 2017.pdf:19: traffic, these have been assessed elsewhere in the EIA to be not significant; all
EN010082-000170-EN010082-6.1-ES Non Technical Summary-Final-November 2017.pdf:20: new EIA regulations require an assessment of major accidents and hazards. A
EN010082-000517-8.43 - Tees CCPP - Written Summary of Oral Case - Env Matters ISH - FINAL - 05.07.18.pdf:2:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010082-000517-8.43 - Tees CCPP - Written Summary of Oral Case - Env Matters ISH - FINAL - 05.07.18.pdf:7: Georgia Sweeney (‘GS’), EIA Coordinator, ERM;
EN010082-000517-8.43 - Tees CCPP - Written Summary of Oral Case - Env Matters ISH - FINAL - 05.07.18.pdf:8:2.18 CHM confirmed that the Applicant undertook two assessments, one at the PEIR and one at the EIA stage
EN010082-000595-8.71 - Tees CCPP - Explanatory Memorandum - Tracked (Version 4).pdf:2:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010082-000595-8.71 - Tees CCPP - Explanatory Memorandum - Tracked (Version 4).pdf:2:2009 EIA Regulations The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2009
EN010082-000595-8.71 - Tees CCPP - Explanatory Memorandum - Tracked (Version 4).pdf:2:2017 EIA Regulations The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017
EN010082-000595-8.71 - Tees CCPP - Explanatory Memorandum - Tracked (Version 4).pdf:8: regulation 3 of the 2009 EIA Regulations , and has had regard to the documents and matters referred to
EN010082-000595-8.71 - Tees CCPP - Explanatory Memorandum - Tracked (Version 4).pdf:8: The 2017 EIA Regulations came into force on 16 May 2017, replacing the 2009 EIA Regulations. The 2009 EIA Regulations however continue to apply to
EN010082-000595-8.71 - Tees CCPP - Explanatory Memorandum - Tracked (Version 4).pdf:8:certain projects, pursuant to the transitional arrangements set out in Regulation 37 of the 2017 EIA Regulations, which provides that where a request has been
EN010082-000595-8.71 - Tees CCPP - Explanatory Memorandum - Tracked (Version 4).pdf:8:made that the SoS adopts a scoping opinion, prior to the date of the commencement of the 2017 EIA Regulations, then the 2009 EIA Regulations continue to
EN010082-000595-8.71 - Tees CCPP - Explanatory Memorandum - Tracked (Version 4).pdf:8:February 2017, before 16 May 2017 when the 2017 EIA Regulations came into force. Consequently the 2009 EIA Regulations are those that apply to the
EN010082-000595-8.71 - Tees CCPP - Explanatory Memorandum - Tracked (Version 4).pdf:8:Application. However in consideration of the SoS’s scoping opinion which drew attention to the 2017 EIA Regulations, with regard to the EIA carried out, the
EN010082-000595-8.71 - Tees CCPP - Explanatory Memorandum - Tracked (Version 4).pdf:8:Applicant has chosen to both comply with the 2009 EIA Regulations while also voluntarily addressing the additional elements introduced by the 2017 EIA
EN010082-000595-8.71 - Tees CCPP - Explanatory Memorandum - Tracked (Version 4).pdf:8:Regulations. However, the draft DCO correctly refers to the 2009 EIA Regulations.
EN010082-000577-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Tracked).pdf:4: Assessment (EIA) process and are reported in the Environmental Statement (ES).
EN010082-000274-Internal Examination Library (1).pdf:5: 6.2.3 - ES Chapter 3 - EIA Approach - Final - November 2017
EN010082-000274-Internal Examination Library (1).pdf:12: Scope of the EIA
EN010082-000294-Cover Letter for Certificates of Compliance.pdf:1:‘2009 EIA Regulations’), please find enclosed the following:
EN010082-000294-Cover Letter for Certificates of Compliance.pdf:1:• Certificate of compliance with Regulation 13 of the 2009 EIA Regulations.
EN010082-000294-Cover Letter for Certificates of Compliance.pdf:2:Certificates of compliance with Section 56 of the PA 2008 & Regulation 13 of the 2009 EIA Regulations
EN010082-000189-EN010082-6.2.18-ES_Chapter 18-Conclusions-Final-November 2017.pdf:2:18.1 An EIA has been undertaken of Sembcorp Utilities (UK) Limited (‘Sembcorp’)
EN010082-000189-EN010082-6.2.18-ES_Chapter 18-Conclusions-Final-November 2017.pdf:2: Project’) on land within the Wilton International site, Teesside. The EIA
EN010082-000189-EN010082-6.2.18-ES_Chapter 18-Conclusions-Final-November 2017.pdf:2:18.2 The scoping process also involved setting out the scope of the EIA in terms of
EN010082-000189-EN010082-6.2.18-ES_Chapter 18-Conclusions-Final-November 2017.pdf:2: and socio-economic setting, identifying the key issues for the EIA to address.
EN010082-000189-EN010082-6.2.18-ES_Chapter 18-Conclusions-Final-November 2017.pdf:2: EIA teams was required for certain subjects such as air quality and noise. This
EN010082-000189-EN010082-6.2.18-ES_Chapter 18-Conclusions-Final-November 2017.pdf:2:18.5 The scoping process for the Project involved setting out the scope of the EIA in
EN010082-000189-EN010082-6.2.18-ES_Chapter 18-Conclusions-Final-November 2017.pdf:2: information to be used in the EIA.
EN010082-000189-EN010082-6.2.18-ES_Chapter 18-Conclusions-Final-November 2017.pdf:2:18.6 During the next four months or so the EIA proceeded with data acquisition,
EN010082-000189-EN010082-6.2.18-ES_Chapter 18-Conclusions-Final-November 2017.pdf:2: the PEIR informed the completion of the EIA and production of this ES which
EN010082-000189-EN010082-6.2.18-ES_Chapter 18-Conclusions-Final-November 2017.pdf:3: forms part of the DCO submission. As a matter of necessity the EIA work has
EN010082-000189-EN010082-6.2.18-ES_Chapter 18-Conclusions-Final-November 2017.pdf:3: (EPC) contractor. The topic assessments within the EIA therefore adopt a
EN010082-000189-EN010082-6.2.18-ES_Chapter 18-Conclusions-Final-November 2017.pdf:3: iterative assessment between the EIA and design teams ensued. The subjects
EN010082-000409-8.14 - Table 3.2 update.pdf:1: The Influence of Project Phasing on the Technical Scope of the EIA (Scenario 1: 1700 MW project constructed in one phase; Scenario 2: phased
EN010082-000498-_DOC_40066241(1)_DEADLINE 2_ EM v2 (Formatted - Tracked).pdf:2:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010082-000498-_DOC_40066241(1)_DEADLINE 2_ EM v2 (Formatted - Tracked).pdf:2:2009 EIA Regulations The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2009
EN010082-000498-_DOC_40066241(1)_DEADLINE 2_ EM v2 (Formatted - Tracked).pdf:2:2017 EIA Regulations The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017
EN010082-000498-_DOC_40066241(1)_DEADLINE 2_ EM v2 (Formatted - Tracked).pdf:7: regulation 3 of the 2009 EIA Regulations , and has had regard to the documents and matters referred
EN010082-000498-_DOC_40066241(1)_DEADLINE 2_ EM v2 (Formatted - Tracked).pdf:7: The 2017 EIA Regulations came into force on 16 May 2017, replacing the 2009 EIA Regulations. The 2009 EIA Regulations however continue to apply to
EN010082-000498-_DOC_40066241(1)_DEADLINE 2_ EM v2 (Formatted - Tracked).pdf:7:certain projects, pursuant to the transitional arrangements set out in Regulation 37 of the 2017 EIA Regulations, which provides that where a request has been
EN010082-000498-_DOC_40066241(1)_DEADLINE 2_ EM v2 (Formatted - Tracked).pdf:7:made that the SoS adopts a scoping opinion, prior to the date of the commencement of the 2017 EIA Regulations, then the 2009 EIA Regulations continue to
EN010082-000498-_DOC_40066241(1)_DEADLINE 2_ EM v2 (Formatted - Tracked).pdf:7:February 2017, before 16 May 2017 when the 2017 EIA Regulations came into force. Consequently the 2009 EIA Regulations are those that apply to the
EN010082-000498-_DOC_40066241(1)_DEADLINE 2_ EM v2 (Formatted - Tracked).pdf:7:Application. However in consideration of the SoS’s scoping opinion which drew attention to the 2017 EIA Regulations, with regard to the EIA carried out, the
EN010082-000498-_DOC_40066241(1)_DEADLINE 2_ EM v2 (Formatted - Tracked).pdf:7:Applicant has chosen to both comply with the 2009 EIA Regulations while also voluntarily addressing the additional elements introduced by the 2017 EIA
EN010082-000498-_DOC_40066241(1)_DEADLINE 2_ EM v2 (Formatted - Tracked).pdf:7:Regulations, but . However, the draft DCO correctly refers to the 2009 EIA Regulations.
EN010082-000389-7 3 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with Redcar Cleveland - DRAFT.pdf:16: The Applicant has therefore applied the ‘Rochdale Envelope’ approach to the EIA of the Proposed
EN010082-000389-7 3 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with Redcar Cleveland - DRAFT.pdf:16: Requirement 4 ‘Detailed design’ Parameters’ of the draft DCO. It is agreed that the EIA provides a
EN010082-000141-EN010082-1.4-Notices for Statutory Publicity-Final-November 2017.pdf:2: EIA Regulations The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations
EN010082-000141-EN010082-1.4-Notices for Statutory Publicity-Final-November 2017.pdf:6: and The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2009 (‘the EIA
EN010082-000141-EN010082-1.4-Notices for Statutory Publicity-Final-November 2017.pdf:7: EIA REGULATION 11 NOTICE – DUTY TO PUBLICISE
EN010082-000141-EN010082-1.4-Notices for Statutory Publicity-Final-November 2017.pdf:7: EIA regulation 11 is contained at Appendix 2.3.
EN010082-000141-EN010082-1.4-Notices for Statutory Publicity-Final-November 2017.pdf:43:EIA Regulation 11 ‘Pre-application publicity under section 48 (duty to publicise)’
EN010082-000141-EN010082-1.4-Notices for Statutory Publicity-Final-November 2017.pdf:43:Regulations 2009 (the ‘2009 EIA Regulations’) requires that prospective applicants, at the same time as
EN010082-000141-EN010082-1.4-Notices for Statutory Publicity-Final-November 2017.pdf:43:‘consultation bodies’ and to any person notified to the applicant by the SoS under EIA Regulation 9(1)©. A
EN010082-000141-EN010082-1.4-Notices for Statutory Publicity-Final-November 2017.pdf:43:the event that you may be a ‘consultation body’ for the purposes of the EIA Regulations.
EN010082-000141-EN010082-1.4-Notices for Statutory Publicity-Final-November 2017.pdf:43:(‘EIA’). Therefore the Project is classified as EIA development under the 2009 EIA Regulations and the
EN010082-000141-EN010082-1.4-Notices for Statutory Publicity-Final-November 2017.pdf:43:EIA Regulations.
EN010082-000141-EN010082-1.4-Notices for Statutory Publicity-Final-November 2017.pdf:43:‘The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017’ (the ‘2017 EIA
EN010082-000141-EN010082-1.4-Notices for Statutory Publicity-Final-November 2017.pdf:43:Regulations’) came into force on 16 May 2017, replacing the 2009 EIA Regulations. The 2009 EIA Regulations
EN010082-000141-EN010082-1.4-Notices for Statutory Publicity-Final-November 2017.pdf:43:37 of the 2017 EIA Regulations. That provides that (amongst other circumstances) where a request has been
EN010082-000141-EN010082-1.4-Notices for Statutory Publicity-Final-November 2017.pdf:43:made that the SoS adopts a scoping opinion, prior to the date of the commencement of the 2017 EIA
EN010082-000141-EN010082-1.4-Notices for Statutory Publicity-Final-November 2017.pdf:43:Regulations, then the 2009 EIA Regulations “continue to apply to any application for an order granting
EN010082-000141-EN010082-1.4-Notices for Statutory Publicity-Final-November 2017.pdf:44:February 2017, before 16 May 2017 (the commencement of the 2017 EIA Regulations). Therefore, the 2009
EN010082-000141-EN010082-1.4-Notices for Statutory Publicity-Final-November 2017.pdf:44:EIA Regulations continue to apply to the Project.
EN010082-000141-EN010082-1.4-Notices for Statutory Publicity-Final-November 2017.pdf:44:The 2017 EIA Regulations amend ‘The Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedures)
EN010082-000141-EN010082-1.4-Notices for Statutory Publicity-Final-November 2017.pdf:44:2017 EIA Regulations. For the same reason as set out above - the transitional arrangements in Regulation 37
EN010082-000141-EN010082-1.4-Notices for Statutory Publicity-Final-November 2017.pdf:44:apply, and therefore Sembcorp is required to submit an ES in the form required by the 2009 EIA Regulations.
EN010082-000141-EN010082-1.4-Notices for Statutory Publicity-Final-November 2017.pdf:46:5. The Project represents Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) development and therefore an EIA will be
EN010082-000141-EN010082-1.4-Notices for Statutory Publicity-Final-November 2017.pdf:46: undertaken. The findings of the EIA will be reported in an Environmental Statement that will be submitted
EN010082-000501-8.9 - Tees CCPP - Abbreviation List.pdf:4: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf:13:7.20 The Project requires a DCO (the purpose of the EIA) and an Environmental
EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf:19:7.45 The statutory criteria used in this EIA for assessment of impacts at sensitive
EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf:27:Table 7.10 Determination of Significance of an Effect on Human Receptors for EIA
EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf:28: the context of the EIA Regulations
EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf:45: undertake an EIA then it is assumed that following screening by the
EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf:45: screening an application for EIA that are relevant to emissions to atmosphere
EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf:46: cumulative EIA
EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf:46:R/2015/0149/OOM Teesdock Approved MGT Teesside Ltd (MGT) proposes to Operational Y Not EIA No potential
EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf:46:R/2016/0484/FFM Former Croda Approved Proposed anaerobic biogas production Operational Y Not EIA No potential
EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf:46:R/2015/0682/FFM Wilton Waste Approved Provision of oil refinery at Wilton Waste Operational Y Not EIA No potential
EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf:47: cumulative EIA
EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf:48: cumulative EIA
EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf:48:R/2013/0608/FFM Teesport Approved Waste treatment facility. Operational Y Not EIA No potential
EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf:48:R/2012/0314/FFM Lotte Approved Construction of a polyethylene Operational Y Not EIA No potential
EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf:48:R/2012/0934/RSM Land at Approved Proposed anaerobic digestion plant (steel Operational Y Not EIA No potential
EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf:49: cumulative EIA
EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf:50: cumulative EIA
EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf:55: modelled inputs for the EIA it can be concluded with a high level of certainty
EN010082-000563-TEES - 180905 Rule 17 and publication of RIES.pdf:2:environmental information and conducting the other activities required by EIA
EN010082-000563-TEES - 180905 Rule 17 and publication of RIES.pdf:2:SoS in keeping with his statutory duty under the EIA Regulations (or HRA
EN010082-000368-1.2 - Tees CCPP - Application Guide - Rev 3.pdf:2:2009 EIA Regulations The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment)
EN010082-000368-1.2 - Tees CCPP - Application Guide - Rev 3.pdf:2:2017 EIA Regulations The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment)
EN010082-000368-1.2 - Tees CCPP - Application Guide - Rev 3.pdf:2:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010082-000368-1.2 - Tees CCPP - Application Guide - Rev 3.pdf:6: Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2009 (the ‘2009 EIA
EN010082-000368-1.2 - Tees CCPP - Application Guide - Rev 3.pdf:6: Regulations' or 'EIA Regs’).
EN010082-000368-1.2 - Tees CCPP - Application Guide - Rev 3.pdf:6:2.3 ‘The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017’ (the ‘2017 EIA
EN010082-000368-1.2 - Tees CCPP - Application Guide - Rev 3.pdf:6: Regulations’ or ‘EIA Regs’) came into force on 16 May 2017, replacing the 2009 EIA Regulations. The
EN010082-000368-1.2 - Tees CCPP - Application Guide - Rev 3.pdf:6: 2009 EIA Regulations however continue to apply to certain projects, pursuant to the transitional
EN010082-000368-1.2 - Tees CCPP - Application Guide - Rev 3.pdf:6: arrangements set out in Regulation 37 of the 2017 EIA Regulations. That regulation provides that
EN010082-000368-1.2 - Tees CCPP - Application Guide - Rev 3.pdf:6: prior to the date of the commencement of the 2017 EIA Regulations, then the 2009 EIA Regulations
EN010082-000368-1.2 - Tees CCPP - Application Guide - Rev 3.pdf:6: commencement of the 2017 EIA Regulations), and therefore the 2009 EIA Regulations are those that
EN010082-000368-1.2 - Tees CCPP - Application Guide - Rev 3.pdf:6:2.4 The 2017 EIA Regulations amend the ‘APFP Regulations so that (pursuant to Regulation 5(2)(a)) an ES
EN010082-000368-1.2 - Tees CCPP - Application Guide - Rev 3.pdf:6: must comply with the 2017 EIA Regulations. For the same reason as set out above - the transitional
EN010082-000368-1.2 - Tees CCPP - Application Guide - Rev 3.pdf:6: ES in the form required by the 2009 EIA Regulations.
EN010082-000368-1.2 - Tees CCPP - Application Guide - Rev 3.pdf:6:2.5 However, in the Scoping Opinion the SoS did draw attention to the 2014 EIA Directive, stating:
EN010082-000368-1.2 - Tees CCPP - Application Guide - Rev 3.pdf:6: EIA Regulations while also voluntarily addressing the additional elements introduced by the 2017 EIA
EN010082-000368-1.2 - Tees CCPP - Application Guide - Rev 3.pdf:6:2.10 The Project represents an Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) development and therefore the
EN010082-000368-1.2 - Tees CCPP - Application Guide - Rev 3.pdf:6: Application includes an Environmental Statement (‘ES’) that reports the findings of the EIA that has been
EN010082-000368-1.2 - Tees CCPP - Application Guide - Rev 3.pdf:9: 6.1 Environmental Statement APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 1.0
EN010082-000368-1.2 - Tees CCPP - Application Guide - Rev 3.pdf:9: 6.2 Environmental Statement – APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 1.0
EN010082-000368-1.2 - Tees CCPP - Application Guide - Rev 3.pdf:9: 6.2.1 Environmental Statement – APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 1.0
EN010082-000368-1.2 - Tees CCPP - Application Guide - Rev 3.pdf:9: 6.2.2 Environmental Statement – APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 1.0
EN010082-000368-1.2 - Tees CCPP - Application Guide - Rev 3.pdf:9: 6.2.3 Environmental Statement – APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 1.0
EN010082-000368-1.2 - Tees CCPP - Application Guide - Rev 3.pdf:9: Chapter 3 EIA Approach
EN010082-000368-1.2 - Tees CCPP - Application Guide - Rev 3.pdf:9: 6.2.4 Environmental Statement – APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 1.0
EN010082-000368-1.2 - Tees CCPP - Application Guide - Rev 3.pdf:9: 6.2.5 Environmental Statement – APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 2.0
EN010082-000368-1.2 - Tees CCPP - Application Guide - Rev 3.pdf:9: 6.2.6 Environmental Statement – APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 1.0
EN010082-000368-1.2 - Tees CCPP - Application Guide - Rev 3.pdf:9: 6.2.7 Environmental Statement – APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 2.0
EN010082-000368-1.2 - Tees CCPP - Application Guide - Rev 3.pdf:9: 6.2.8 Environmental Statement – APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 1.0
EN010082-000368-1.2 - Tees CCPP - Application Guide - Rev 3.pdf:9: the proposed development) and EIA
EN010082-000368-1.2 - Tees CCPP - Application Guide - Rev 3.pdf:10: 6.2.10 Environmental Statement – APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 1.0
EN010082-000368-1.2 - Tees CCPP - Application Guide - Rev 3.pdf:10: 6.2.11 Environmental Statement – APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 3.0
EN010082-000368-1.2 - Tees CCPP - Application Guide - Rev 3.pdf:10: battlefields) and EIA Regs.
EN010082-000368-1.2 - Tees CCPP - Application Guide - Rev 3.pdf:10: 6.2.13 Environmental Statement – APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 1.0
EN010082-000368-1.2 - Tees CCPP - Application Guide - Rev 3.pdf:10: 6.2.14 Environmental Statement – APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 1.0
EN010082-000368-1.2 - Tees CCPP - Application Guide - Rev 3.pdf:10: 6.2.15 Environmental Statement – APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 1.0
EN010082-000368-1.2 - Tees CCPP - Application Guide - Rev 3.pdf:10: 6.2.16 Environmental Statement – APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 1.0
EN010082-000368-1.2 - Tees CCPP - Application Guide - Rev 3.pdf:10: 6.2.17 Environmental Statement – APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 1.0
EN010082-000368-1.2 - Tees CCPP - Application Guide - Rev 3.pdf:10: 6.2.18 Environmental Statement – APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 1.0
EN010082-000368-1.2 - Tees CCPP - Application Guide - Rev 3.pdf:10: 6.3 Environmental Statement – APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 1.0
EN010082-000368-1.2 - Tees CCPP - Application Guide - Rev 3.pdf:10: 6.3.1 Annex A Scoping Report APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 1.0
EN010082-000368-1.2 - Tees CCPP - Application Guide - Rev 3.pdf:10: 6.3.2 Annex B Scoping Opinion APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 1.0
EN010082-000368-1.2 - Tees CCPP - Application Guide - Rev 3.pdf:10: (any flood risk assessment) and EIA
EN010082-000368-1.2 - Tees CCPP - Application Guide - Rev 3.pdf:10: features) and EIA Regs.
EN010082-000368-1.2 - Tees CCPP - Application Guide - Rev 3.pdf:10: 6.3.5 Annex D2 Envirocheck APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 1.0
EN010082-000368-1.2 - Tees CCPP - Application Guide - Rev 3.pdf:10: 6.3.6 Annex D3 Site Condition Report APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 1.0
EN010082-000368-1.2 - Tees CCPP - Application Guide - Rev 3.pdf:10: 6.3.7 Annex D4 Framework Construction APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 1.0
EN010082-000368-1.2 - Tees CCPP - Application Guide - Rev 3.pdf:10: 6.3.8 Annex E1 Stack Height Assessment APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 1.0
EN010082-000368-1.2 - Tees CCPP - Application Guide - Rev 3.pdf:10: 6.3.9 Annex E2 Green House Gas APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 1.0
EN010082-000368-1.2 - Tees CCPP - Application Guide - Rev 3.pdf:11: 6.3.10 Annex F1 Noise Baseline APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 1.0
EN010082-000368-1.2 - Tees CCPP - Application Guide - Rev 3.pdf:11: 6.3.11 Annex F2 Noise Model Inputs and APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 1.0
EN010082-000368-1.2 - Tees CCPP - Application Guide - Rev 3.pdf:11: 6.3.12 Annex G1 Effects of Air Quality on APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 1.0
EN010082-000368-1.2 - Tees CCPP - Application Guide - Rev 3.pdf:11: 6.3.13 Annex G2 Preliminary Ecological APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 1.0
EN010082-000368-1.2 - Tees CCPP - Application Guide - Rev 3.pdf:11: 6.3.14 Annex G3 Breeding Bird Survey APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 1.0
EN010082-000368-1.2 - Tees CCPP - Application Guide - Rev 3.pdf:11: required by regulation 48(1) and EIA
EN010082-000368-1.2 - Tees CCPP - Application Guide - Rev 3.pdf:11: 6.3.16 Annex I1 Transport Assessment APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 1.0
EN010082-000368-1.2 - Tees CCPP - Application Guide - Rev 3.pdf:11: 6.3.17 Annex I2 Draft Construction Traffic APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 1.0
EN010082-000368-1.2 - Tees CCPP - Application Guide - Rev 3.pdf:11: 6.3.18 Annex J Gazetteer of Non- APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 1.0
EN010082-000368-1.2 - Tees CCPP - Application Guide - Rev 3.pdf:11: 6.3.19 Annex K Landscape and Visual APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 2.0
EN010082-000368-1.2 - Tees CCPP - Application Guide - Rev 3.pdf:11: 6.3.20 Annex L Draft Construction APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA Regs. 1.0
EN010082-000588-1.2 - Tees CCPP - Application Guide - Rev 3 - FINAL.pdf:2:2009 EIA Regulations The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment)
EN010082-000588-1.2 - Tees CCPP - Application Guide - Rev 3 - FINAL.pdf:2:2017 EIA Regulations The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment)
EN010082-000588-1.2 - Tees CCPP - Application Guide - Rev 3 - FINAL.pdf:2:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010082-000588-1.2 - Tees CCPP - Application Guide - Rev 3 - FINAL.pdf:8: 6.2.3 Environmental Statement – Chapter 3 EIA Approach and 1.0 1.0 22.11.17 – Original Submission
EN010082-000588-1.2 - Tees CCPP - Application Guide - Rev 3 - FINAL.pdf:10: 8.2 Implications of Requested Change on EIA note - 1.0 02.05.18 – Deadline 2
EN010082-000205-EN010082-6.3.15-ES Annex H-HRA-Final-November 2017.pdf:17: context of the EIA Regulations.
EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf:4: the development of the EIA. The viewpoint locations were agreed with
EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf:5: strategies pertaining to the area. The EIA should include assessments of visual effects on the assessment. Visual impacts
EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf:5:Natural England scoping The EIA should include a full assessment of the potential impacts of the development on local This has been taken into
EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf:12:11.21 The EIA Regulations stipulate that the significance of each potential impact is
EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf:12: the EIA Regulations, whereas minor and negligible impacts are considered to
EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf:42:11.51 During EIA Scoping a number of other planned projects were identified for
EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf:42: impacts with the Project (see Chapter 3 EIA Approach and Methodology,
EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf:42: important to remember that the emphasis in EIA is on likely significant effects
EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf:42: assessment considers the other development screened in at the EIA scoping
EN010082-000392-7 6 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with CAA - Signed_Redacted.pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010082-000392-7 6 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with CAA - Signed_Redacted.pdf:6: March 2017 in response to SCU’s request for an Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) Scoping
EN010082-000392-7 6 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with CAA - Signed_Redacted.pdf:6: Opinion. SCU’s request for an EIA Scoping Opinion sought for aviation to be scoped out of the EIA
EN010082-000392-7 6 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with CAA - Signed_Redacted.pdf:6: 2.2 A response was not received with regard to the request for EIA scoping opinion.
EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf:4: the development of the EIA. The viewpoint locations were agreed with
EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf:5: strategies pertaining to the area. The EIA should include assessments of visual effects on the assessment. Visual impacts
EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf:5:Natural England scoping The EIA should include a full assessment of the potential impacts of the development on local This has been taken into
EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf:12:11.21 The EIA Regulations stipulate that the significance of each potential impact is
EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf:12: the EIA Regulations, whereas minor and negligible impacts are considered to
EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf:42:11.51 During EIA Scoping a number of other planned projects were identified for
EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf:42: impacts with the Project (see Chapter 3 EIA Approach and Methodology,
EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf:42: important to remember that the emphasis in EIA is on likely significant effects
EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf:42: assessment considers the other development screened in at the EIA scoping
EN010082-000314-TEES - Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening (2).pdf:2:Cumulative impacts more detailed assessment in the EIA. This includes other
EN010082-000314-TEES - Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening (2).pdf:4:(Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the 2017 EIA Regulations). The
EN010082-000314-TEES - Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening (2).pdf:4:commencement of the 2017 EIA Regulations). The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental
EN010082-000314-TEES - Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening (2).pdf:4:Impact Assessment) Regulations 2009 (the 2009 EIA Regulations) are therefore considered
EN010082-000314-TEES - Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening (2).pdf:4:to be the applicable EIA Regulations. Under Regulation 24 of the 2009 EIA Regulations and
EN010082-000314-TEES - Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening (2).pdf:4:Note: The Secretary of State’s duty under Regulation 24 of the EIA Regulations continues
EN010082-000314-TEES - Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening (2).pdf:5:(Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the 2017 EIA Regulations). The
EN010082-000314-TEES - Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening (2).pdf:5:2017 EIA Regulations). The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment)
EN010082-000314-TEES - Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening (2).pdf:5:Regulations 2009 (the 2009 EIA Regulations) are therefore considered to be the applicable
EN010082-000314-TEES - Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening (2).pdf:5:EIA Regulations.
EN010082-000314-TEES - Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening (2).pdf:5:Under Regulation 24 of the 2009 EIA Regulations and on the basis of the current
EN010082-000314-TEES - Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening (2).pdf:5:Note: The Secretary of State’s duty under Regulation 24 of the 2009 EIA Regulations
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:5:1.5 OTHER CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE EIA 6
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:5:2.2 EIA STUDY TEAM 9
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:5:5 EIA METHODOLOGY 36
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:5:5.2 EIA REGULATIONS AND GUIDANCE 36
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:5:5.3 BASELINE FOR THE EIA 37
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:6:8.1 SUMMARY OF EIA SCOPE 118
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:7: Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) of the applicant’s proposal to
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:7: (the ‘2009 EIA Regulations’) (as amended by the Infrastructure Planning
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:7: 1 of the 2009 EIA Regulations.
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:7: 300 MWe and therefore an EIA is required. The Planning Inspectorate (PINS)
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:9: Sembcorp gives notice, pursuant to Regulation 6(1) (b) of the 2009 EIA
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:9: Part 1 of Schedule 4 of the 2009 EIA Regulations as is reasonably required to
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:11: to the accompanying request for an EIA Scoping Opinion, made pursuant to
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:11: Regulation 8 of the 2009 EIA Regulations. This request for a Scoping Opinion
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:11: is made pursuant to Regulation 8 of the 2009 EIA Regulations, and includes:
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:12: adopted for assessing the likely significant effects of the Project. The EIA will
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:12: On receipt of the request for an EIA scoping opinion and this Scoping Report,
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:12: It is important to note that the submission of a request for an EIA scoping
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:12: opinion is a precursor to the more detailed EIA process. This includes the
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:12:1.5 OTHER CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE EIA
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:12: considered as part of the Project’s EIA.
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:13: the assessment of cumulative effects in the EIA, where relevant information is
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:13: 5.10) is an integral part of the EIA process and ensures that all aspects of
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:13: ERM (2001) Guidance on EIA: Scoping, prepared for the European
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:14: 2. The Applicant and Study Team The Sembcorp and EIA study teams, and
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:14: 5. EIA Methodology Introduction to the EIA process, regulations,
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:14: the EIA and sets out the next steps in the pre-
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:15:2.2 EIA STUDY TEAM
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:15: The preparation of the EIA is being led by Environmental Resources
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:15: (IEMA’s) EIA Quality Mark, a scheme which allows organisations to make a
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:15: commitment to excellence in their EIA activities, and have this commitment
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:15: Specific environmental topics in this Scoping Report and the EIA are being
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:20: topic assessments within the EIA will adopt a reasonable worst case scenario
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:26: ascertain whether CHP is viable. The extent to which the EIA will assess the
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:26: preparation of a standalone supplementary report to the EIA that addresses
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:26: for carbon capture technology. The EIA will describe the CCR requirements
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:29: A more detailed review will be conducted during the EIA process and during
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:29: Regulations 2009 (the 2009 EIA Regulations).
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:29: the EIA Regulations, under the category of ‘Thermal power stations and other
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:29: such, an EIA is required for the Project and an ES must be prepared in
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:29: accordance with the 2009 EIA Regulations.
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:34: the purposes of assessing DCO applications. The EIA undertaken for the
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:40: relation to atmospheric emissions, noise and aqueous discharges. The EIA
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:41: account of the findings of the EIA as reported within the ES, against the
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:42:5 EIA METHODOLOGY
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:42: adopted for the EIA. It describes the approach that will be used to identify,
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:42: temporal, spatial and technical scope of the EIA. Further details on individual
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:42:5.2 EIA REGULATIONS AND GUIDANCE
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:42: EIA is a procedure required under the terms of European Union Directives
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:42: The primary objective of an EIA is inscribed under Article 2 of the directive
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:42: “The results of consultations and information gathered pursuant to (the EIA
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:42: (1) The new Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Directive (2014/52/EU) has to be transposed into UK legislation by
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:43: In addition to the relevant Directives, and where relevant, the EIA will be
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:43: Regulations 2009 (the 2009 EIA Regulations);
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:43: Advice note three: EIA consultation and notification, Planning
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:43:5.3 BASELINE FOR THE EIA
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:43: Schedule 4 of the 2009 EIA Regulations (Part 1 paragraph 19) requires the EIA
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:44:Figure 5.1 EIA Methodology Describe
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:44: considering inputs from stakeholders through The EIA p
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:44: EIA and i
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:44: numbers of jobs generated in the local economy. In evaluating significance, the EIA process seeks to inform regulators and
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:45: topics that will be addressed in the EIA.
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:45: In accordance with Schedule 4 Part 1 paragraph 20 of the 2009 EIA
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:45: used interchangeably with ‘secondary’ effects. However the 2009 EIA
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:45: EIA ‘secondary’ (and higher order) effects are taken to be part of a chain of
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:45: Schedule 4 (Part 1 paragraph 21) of the 2009 EIA Regulations requires that
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:46: EIA, the specialists undertaking the assessments will identify mitigation
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:47: (the ‘technical scope’) that makes up the EIA. In some instances reference is
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:47: refined further in the course of the EIA and reported in the ES.
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:47: 6.10, the proposed technical scope for the EIA is summarised in Section 8.1.
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:48: This does, however, introduce some complexity into the EIA process common
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:48: for their delivery. The 2009 EIA Regulations require an ES to provide a
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:49: variations in design and other aspects of the Project. The EIA will take
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:49: Envelope’ principle. Suitably applied in EIA it can help to avoid the need for
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:49: It is noted that Schedule 4 (part 1 paragraph 18) of the 2009 EIA Regulations
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:49: environmental effects. The EIA will consider the main alternatives, and set
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:49: The EIA will address alternatives including location and technology. It will
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:50: For the purposes of this EIA, this has been taken to be made up of those
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:50: contribute to potential cumulative effects along with the Project. This EIA
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:50: Project. Generally, only schemes where an EIA was required are considered
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:52: for the EIA. Descriptions are given, under each topic heading, of the baseline
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:52: operational phases and the proposed EIA methodology to be applied in
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:52: considerations, i.e. scoped in to the EIA process.
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:56:The Preliminary Environmental Information Report (PEIR) and formal EIA
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:56:upon the design to be assessed in the EIA; however, at this stage it is expected
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:56:As the EIA proceeds, the PEIR will provide further details of these potential
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:59: through the EIA consultation process.
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:59: NPS EN1 recognises the need for EIA to account for the existing status of, and
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:70: EIA.
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:82:EIA work in the area has demonstrated.
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:82:RCBC during the EIA process. However, the BS 4142 criteria do take into
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:95: suggest that this should be documented in the EIA with appropriate
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:107:than minor significance, and will be fully investigated in the EIA process.
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:111: At this stage in the EIA it would appear that tourism is not an important
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:113: detailed EIA stage to enable a proportionate assessment and avoid inclusion
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:115:assessed in the EIA.
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:115:will be assessed further in the EIA.
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:115:be verified during the EIA stages as part of the assessment process.
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:118:wirelines. The suggested viewpoint locations for the EIA are shown below in
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:123: consultees to discuss the EIA methodologies and approach set out to ensure
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:123: most value is obtained from the consultation and EIA processes.
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:124:8.1 SUMMARY OF EIA SCOPE
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:124: be assessed during the EIA process.
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:124: technical scope for the EIA. The table seeks to clearly set out how a topic/sub-
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:124: topic will be taken forward in the EIA process and the degree of effort and
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:124: mitigation measures of known effectiveness will be put in place, the EIA will
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:124: standards needs to be demonstrated, the EIA will take the necessary steps in
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:124: The findings of the EIA, based on the application of the methodologies set out
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:124: State and the scoping opinion on the report returned to Sembcorp, the full EIA
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:129: The outcome of the EIA process is the production of an ES to accompany the
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:129: EIA.
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:129: stage under Sections 42 and 48 of the Planning Act 2008. Once the EIA process
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:130: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:133: This annex sets out the proposed methodology that will be used in the EIA
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:133: identify those projects / plans that will be considered further in the EIA:
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:134: matrices and threshold analysis. The method adopted for this EIA includes
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:134: EIA for further assessment. The following three stages set out how the
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:134: cumulative effects will be subsequently assessed in the EIA.
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:134: effects will take into account measures already identified in the EIA.
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:136: purposes of the EIA to assess such cumulative positive impacts.
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:138:Development and Topics Screened for Further Assessment in the EIA
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:138:undertaken in the EIA. The screening exercise was undertaken as follows.
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:138: For each screened development, a judgement was made by the EIA team
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:138: out of the need for further assessment in the EIA based on the separation
EN010082-000378-5.6 - Tees CCPP - Design & Access Statement - tracked Rev 3.pdf:2:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010082-000378-5.6 - Tees CCPP - Design & Access Statement - tracked Rev 3.pdf:5: Assessment (‘EIA’) of the Proposed Development to ensure that its likely significant effects have been
EN010082-000378-5.6 - Tees CCPP - Design & Access Statement - tracked Rev 3.pdf:16: (‘EIA’), SCU has adopted the ‘Rochdale Envelope’ approach and, where relevant, assessed
EN010082-000378-5.6 - Tees CCPP - Design & Access Statement - tracked Rev 3.pdf:16: assessment within the EIA is robust and that there is sufficient certainty as to air quality effects
EN010082-000378-5.6 - Tees CCPP - Design & Access Statement - tracked Rev 3.pdf:31: fixed design details and maximum design parameters upon which the EIA has been based.
EN010082-000378-5.6 - Tees CCPP - Design & Access Statement - tracked Rev 3.pdf:33: design parameters upon which to base the EIA to ensure that the likely significant effects of the
EN010082-000648-Tees CCPP Decision Letter 5 April 2019 (3).pdf:2: Assessment (“EIA”); air quality and emissions; biodiversity, ecology and natural
EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf:3: the development of the EIA. The viewpoint locations were agreed with
EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf:4: plans or strategies pertaining to the area. The EIA should include assessments of visual assessment. Visual impacts
EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf:4: Natural England scoping The EIA should include a full assessment of the potential impacts of the development on This has been taken into
EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf:11:11.21 The EIA Regulations stipulate that the significance of each potential impact is
EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf:11: the EIA Regulations, whereas minor and negligible impacts are considered to
EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf:41:11.51 During EIA Scoping a number of other planned projects were identified for
EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf:41: impacts with the Project (see Chapter 3 EIA Approach and Methodology,
EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf:41: important to remember that the emphasis in EIA is on likely significant effects
EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf:41: assessment considers the other development screened in at the EIA scoping
EN010082-000558-6.3.20 - Annex L CEMP Clean v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:4: Assessment (EIA) process and are reported in the Environmental Statement (ES).
EN010082-Advice-00003-1-170203_EN010082_Draft Teesside meeting note dated 1 February 2017.pdf:1: Emma Cottam (EIA and Land Rights Advisor)
EN010082-Advice-00003-1-170203_EN010082_Draft Teesside meeting note dated 1 February 2017.pdf:2:those covering the ES structure, project description, and EIA methodology.
EN010082-Advice-00003-1-170203_EN010082_Draft Teesside meeting note dated 1 February 2017.pdf:2:The Applicant explained that it may seek to scope some topics out of the EIA. To
EN010082-Advice-00003-1-170203_EN010082_Draft Teesside meeting note dated 1 February 2017.pdf:2:support any requests to scope topics out of the EIA, the Inspectorate explained that
EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf:3: the development of the EIA. The viewpoint locations were agreed with
EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf:4: strategies pertaining to the area. The EIA should include assessments of visual effects on the assessment. Visual impacts
EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf:4:Natural England scoping The EIA should include a full assessment of the potential impacts of the development on local This has been taken into
EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf:11:11.21 The EIA Regulations stipulate that the significance of each potential impact is
EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf:11: the EIA Regulations, whereas minor and negligible impacts are considered to
EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf:41:11.51 During EIA Scoping a number of other planned projects were identified for
EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf:41: impacts with the Project (see Chapter 3 EIA Approach and Methodology,
EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf:41: important to remember that the emphasis in EIA is on likely significant effects
EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf:41: assessment considers the other development screened in at the EIA scoping
EN010082-000215-EN010082-5.9-Statutory Nuisance Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:8: purposes of the EIA.
EN010082-000215-EN010082-5.9-Statutory Nuisance Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:13: Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) as having the potential for
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:5:3 EIA APPROACH AND TOPIC AREAS ……………………………………. 19
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:7:Regulations 2009 (as amended) (the EIA Regulations).
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:9: by the Applicant under Regulation 8 of the EIA Regulations in order to
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:9: 6(1)(b) of the EIA Regulations that it proposes to provide an ES in
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:9: Regulation 4(2)(a) of the EIA Regulations, the Proposed Development
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:9: is determined to be EIA development.
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:9:1.3 The EIA Regulations enable an Applicant, before making an
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:9: (EIA Regulation 8 (9))
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:9: the EIA Regulations;
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:10:1.8 Regulation 8(3) of the EIA Regulations states that a request for a
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:10:1.10 The SoS has a duty under Regulation 8(6) of the EIA Regulations to
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:10: undertaking the EIA.
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:11: consideration to those comments in carrying out the EIA.
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:11: Section 3: EIA approach and topic areas
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:15:2.19 Section 5.9 of the Scoping Report confirms that the EIA will set out
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:18: possible as this will form the basis of the EIA. It is understood that at
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:18: of Schedule 4 Part 1 of the EIA Regulations and there should
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:19: considered as part of the EIA and this is welcomed.
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:20: EIA Regulations. The Applicant should ensure that the parameters are
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:20: Proposed Development changes substantially during the EIA process,
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:21:2.59 The EIA Regulations require that the Applicant provide ‘An outline of
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:23:3 EIA APPROACH AND TOPIC AREAS
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:23: and technology-specific impacts that should be considered in the EIA.
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:23: When undertaking the EIA, the Applicant must have regard to both
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:25: overarching EIA methodology chapter in the ES, and approach any
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:26: that vibration will be considered in the EIA, along with noise. The
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:26: assessed during the EIA process, which are as follows:
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:38: the construction phase, should be assessed in the EIA. The Applicant
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:42: whether the Proposed Development is EIA development and if it is,
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:49:4.41 Regulation 24 of the EIA Regulations require the SoS to publicise a
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:51: EIA Regulations) as a statement:
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:51: (EIA Regulations, Regulation 2)
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:51: the EIA Regulations set out the information for inclusion in ES.
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:52:A1.6 Schedule 4 Part 1 of the EIA Regulations states this information
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:53: (EIA Regulations, Schedule 4 Part 1)
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:53:Schedule 4 Part 2 of the EIA Regulations. This includes the consideration of
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:53: (EIA Regulations, Schedule 4 Part 2)
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:54: (EIA) process is iterative, and therefore the proposals may change
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:54: Schedule 4 Part 1 of the EIA Regulations.
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:55:A1.16 In general the SoS recommends that the physical scope for the EIA
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:56:A1.26 In terms of the EIA methodology, the SoS recommends that
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:57:A1.29 The EIA Regulations require the identification of the ‘likely significant
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:57: clearly the interpretation of ‘significant’ in terms of each of the EIA
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:57: EIA Regulations (see Schedule 4 Part 1 of the EIA Regulations). These
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:58: development, their location, and key aspects that may affect the EIA.
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:60:A1.49 As set out in EIA Regulations Schedule 4 Part 1 paragraph 23, the ES
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:60: the Applicant in the EIA process – for example the local community
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:62:A1.59 The EIA Regulations require a Non-technical Summary (EIA
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:63:accordance with the Planning Inspectorate’s Advice Note Three: ‘EIA
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:78:amended) (the EIA Regulations) – Regulations 8 and 9
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:84:Ref: EN010082 - Proposed Teesside Combined Cycle Power Plant - EIA Scoping
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:84:Cycle Power Plant EIA Scoping Notification and Consultation. Having reviewed the Scoping
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:88:Environmental Impact Assessment Scoping consultation (Regulation 15 (3) (i) of the EIA
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:88:Consultation - EIA Scoping Notification and Consultation
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:88:Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for this development.
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:89:Annex A – Advice related to EIA Scoping Requirements
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:89:on ecosystems or their components. EcIA may be carried out as part of the EIA process or to
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:90:an Appropriate Assessment, in addition to consideration of impacts through the EIA process.
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:90:The EIA will need to consider any impacts upon local wildlife and geological sites. Local Sites are
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:92:pertaining to the area. The EIA should include assessments of visual effects on the surrounding
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:92:The EIA should include a full assessment of the potential impacts of the development on local
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:94:proposed EIA would appear comprehensive. However, the comments that have been made by our
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:98:EIA and Land Rights Advisor
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:100:The EIA should give consideration to best practice guidance such as the
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:100:Government’s Good Practice Guide for EIA1. It is important that the EIA identifies
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:100:phasing of construction) is widely regarded as good practice. Ideally, EIA should
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:101:regarding emissions in order that the EIA provides a comprehensive assessment of
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:102:PHE’s view is that the EIA should appraise and describe the measures that will be
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:104:Relevant areas outlined in the Government’s Good Practice Guide for EIA include:
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:104:The EIA should demonstrate compliance with the waste hierarchy (e.g. with respect
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:104:For wastes arising from the installation the EIA should consider:
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:104:Within the EIA PHE would expect to see information about how the promoter would
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:104:The EIA should include consideration of the COMAH Regulations (Control of Major
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:105:negligible.” PHE supports the inclusion of this information within EIAs as good
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:110: EIA AND LAND RIGHTS ADVISOR ON BEHALF OF Contact: Mr D Pedlow
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:112:respond to the accompanying request for an EIA.
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:112:consultants to discuss the contents of the EIA
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:112:respond to the accompanying request for an EIA.
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:112:consultants to discuss the contents of the EIA
EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:112:EIA submitted for the proposed document will be required to contain the topics set out in table 8.1 of
EN010082-000183-EN010082-6.2.12-ES Chapter 12-Cultural Heritage-Final-November 2017.pdf:12: the landscape and visual impact specialist for the EIA on December 13th-14th,
EN010082-000183-EN010082-6.2.12-ES Chapter 12-Cultural Heritage-Final-November 2017.pdf:13: those assets which may be affected were identified through the EIA
EN010082-000183-EN010082-6.2.12-ES Chapter 12-Cultural Heritage-Final-November 2017.pdf:17:12.43 For an effect to be considered significant in the context of the EIA Regulations
EN010082-Advice-00001-1-160517_Teesside CCGT.pdf:1: David Price (EIA Manager)
EN010082-Advice-00001-1-160517_Teesside CCGT.pdf:2:consultees of the EIA regulations 2009. The Applicant was also advised to consult
EN010082-Advice-00001-1-160517_Teesside CCGT.pdf:2:Advice note 3: EIA Notification and Consultation for further information.
EN010082-Advice-00001-1-160517_Teesside CCGT.pdf:3:Regulations Assessment (HRA) report and the EIA chapter of the Environmental
EN010082-Advice-00012-3-Tees CCPP Consultation Report Pins comments final.pdf:1:In accordance with the EIA Regulations, did the applicant Paragraph 55 in the summary section states notification under
EN010082-Advice-00012-3-Tees CCPP Consultation Report Pins comments final.pdf:3:Does the SoCC set out whether the development is EIA The SoCC will be provided at Appendix 6.7.
EN010082-Advice-00012-3-Tees CCPP Consultation Report Pins comments final.pdf:3:with the SoCC? EIA development. A copy of the final SoCC will be provided at
EN010082-Advice-00012-3-Tees CCPP Consultation Report Pins comments final.pdf:4:a statement as to whether the application is EIA development A copy of the s48 notice will be provided at Appendix 11.1.
EN010082-Advice-00012-3-Tees CCPP Consultation Report Pins comments final.pdf:4:Has a copy of the s48 notice been sent to the EIA Paragraph 11.9 states PINS did not notify the applicant of any EIA
EN010082-Advice-00012-3-Tees CCPP Consultation Report Pins comments final.pdf:4:applicant in accordance with the EIA Regulations?
EN010082-000145-EN010082-2.2-Explanatory Memorandum-Final-November 2017.pdf:2:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010082-000145-EN010082-2.2-Explanatory Memorandum-Final-November 2017.pdf:2:2009 EIA Regulations The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2009
EN010082-000145-EN010082-2.2-Explanatory Memorandum-Final-November 2017.pdf:2:2017 EIA Regulations The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017
EN010082-000145-EN010082-2.2-Explanatory Memorandum-Final-November 2017.pdf:7: accordance with regulation 3 of the 2009 EIA Regulations1, and has had regard to the documents
EN010082-000145-EN010082-2.2-Explanatory Memorandum-Final-November 2017.pdf:7:1 The 2017 EIA Regulations came into force on 16 May 2017, replacing the 2009 EIA Regulations. The 2009 EIA Regulations however continue to
EN010082-000145-EN010082-2.2-Explanatory Memorandum-Final-November 2017.pdf:7: apply to certain projects, pursuant to the transitional arrangements set out in Regulation 37 of the 2017 EIA Regulations, which provides that
EN010082-000145-EN010082-2.2-Explanatory Memorandum-Final-November 2017.pdf:7: where a request has been made that the SoS adopts a scoping opinion, prior to the date of the commencement of the 2017 EIA Regulations,
EN010082-000145-EN010082-2.2-Explanatory Memorandum-Final-November 2017.pdf:7: then the 2009 EIA Regulations continue to apply to any application for an order granting development consent. The Applicant submitted such
EN010082-000145-EN010082-2.2-Explanatory Memorandum-Final-November 2017.pdf:7: a request to the SoS and it was received by the SoS on 21 February 2017, before 16 May 2017 when the 2017 EIA Regulations came into force.
EN010082-000145-EN010082-2.2-Explanatory Memorandum-Final-November 2017.pdf:7: Consequently the 2009 EIA Regulations are those that apply to the Application. However in consideration of the SoS’s scoping opinion which
EN010082-000145-EN010082-2.2-Explanatory Memorandum-Final-November 2017.pdf:7: drew attention to the 2017 EIA Regulations, with regard the EIA carried out, the Applicant has chosen to both comply with the 2009 EIA Regula-
EN010082-000145-EN010082-2.2-Explanatory Memorandum-Final-November 2017.pdf:7: tions while also voluntarily addressing the additional elements introduced by the 2017 EIA Regulations, but the draft DCO correctly refers to the
EN010082-000145-EN010082-2.2-Explanatory Memorandum-Final-November 2017.pdf:7: 2009 EIA Regulations.
EN010082-000557-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP Tracked v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:4: Assessment (EIA) process and are reported in the Environmental Statement (ES).
EN010082-000365-8.2 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Schedule of Amended Document & Plans - Rev 1.pdf:2:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010082-000365-8.2 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Schedule of Amended Document & Plans - Rev 1.pdf:10: 3 EIA Approach and Methodology
EN010082-Advice-00012-2-TEES - 171013 - Draft Documents review meeting 13 October 2017.pdf:1: Emma Cottam – EIA and Land Rights Advisor
EN010082-000648-Tees CCPP Decision Letter 5 April 2019.pdf:2: Assessment (“EIA”); air quality and emissions; biodiversity, ecology and natural
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:15: Impact Assessment (EIA) is required (EIA development).
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:15: 2009 EIA Regulations) a request for an opinion as to the information to
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:15: 6(1)(b) of the 2009 EIA Regulations that it proposed to provide an ES in
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:15: 4(2)(a) of the 2009 EIA Regulations, the Proposed Development was
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:15: determined to be EIA development, and the application was accompanied
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:15:1.5.4. The 2009 EIA Regulations were revoked and replaced by the
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:15: 13 of the 2009 EIA Regulations had been complied with [OD-001, OD-
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:15: 2009 EIA regulations and, together with the environmental information
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:19: reviewing the implications of the proposed change for the EIA AS-009.
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:19: of the EIA as the conclusions on the significance of effects remain
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:25: certain public and private projects on the environment (the EIA
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:25:3.3.2. The EIA Directive defines the procedure by which information about the
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:25:3.3.4. The current EIA legislation for NSIP cases is the Infrastructure Planning
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:25: (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the 2017 EIA
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:25: Impact Assessment) Regulations 2009 (the 2009 EIA Regulations)
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:25: subject to transitional provisions in Regulation 37 of the 2017 EIA
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:25:3.3.5. The 2017 EIA Regulations came into force on 16 May 2017, before the
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:26: EIA Regulations states that the 2009 EIA Regulations will continue to
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:26: opinion defined by the 2009 EIA Regulations.
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:26: EIA Regulations in the pre-application period APP-043. However, the
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:26: 2017 EIA Regulations on a voluntary basis APP-043.
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:26: this application, the provisions in Regulation 37(2)(a)(ii) of the 2017 EIA
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:26: against the 2009 EIA Regulations.
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:26:3.3.8. The 2009 EIA Regulations establish the minimum information to be
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:26: an ES under the EIA Regulations and this is reinforced by Regulation
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:26: decision on EIA Development. Regulation 3(2) of the 2009 EIA
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:26: proposed development is EIA development under Schedule 2 of the 2009
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:26: EIA Regulations. The Applicant has provided an ES APP-041 to APP-081
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:34:3.6.1. Under Regulation 24 of the 2009 EIA Regulations and on the basis of the
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:34: Regulation 24of the 2009 EIA Regulations was therefore not considered
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:36: considerations in Chapter 5. Detailed consideration is given to the EIA in
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:40:4.6.1. The overarching EIA methodology is described in ES Chapter 3 [APP-
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:40: 045]. The EIA process involves identification of sensitive receptors that
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:41: the EIA. At the ISH on the Scope of the Application3, I asked the
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:41: Chapter 3 ‘EIA Approach’, paragraphs 3.17 and Table 3.2 APP-045.
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:41: Applicant responded that Table 3.2 in ES Chapter 3 ‘EIA Approach’ has
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:41: and the DCO. The Applicant considers that the EIA takes account of all
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:41: requested change. This was advertised in accordance with the EIA
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:41: constitute ‘other environmental information’ as defined in the 2009 EIA
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:42: Applicant’s ES. In accordance with Schedule 4, Part 2 of the 2009 EIA
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:42: provide the basis for determining applications for EIA development, the
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:43: the EIA regulations in this regard have been met.
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:49: of requested change to application on the EIA’ AS-009, which concluded
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:54: keeping with his statutory duty under the EIA Regulations (or HRA
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:54: remit of what has been assessed in the submitted EIA. This type of
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:57: EIA scoping and the Section 42 consultation have been addressed by the
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:59: subject to EIA, the Applicant should ensure that the ES clearly sets out
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:97: Change on the EIA’ AS-009, which concluded that there would be no
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:106: beyond the remit of what has been assessed in the submitted EIA”. The
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:124: development and the EIA Regulations at an ISH. The Applicant confirmed
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:125: that if the extent of the extension proposed constitutes EIA development,
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:136: 6.2.3 - ES Chapter 3 - EIA Approach - Final - November 2017
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:143: Scope of the EIA
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:155:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:157:the 2009 EIA Regulations The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:157:the 2017 EIA Regulations the Infrastructure Planning (Environmental
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:157:The EIA Directive Council Directive 2011/92/EU on the
EN010082-000372-5.6 - Tees CCPP - Design & Access Statement - clean Rev 3.pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010082-000372-5.6 - Tees CCPP - Design & Access Statement - clean Rev 3.pdf:5: Assessment (‘EIA’) of the Proposed Development to ensure that its likely significant effects have been
EN010082-000372-5.6 - Tees CCPP - Design & Access Statement - clean Rev 3.pdf:16: (‘EIA’), SCU has adopted the ‘Rochdale Envelope’ approach and, where relevant, assessed
EN010082-000372-5.6 - Tees CCPP - Design & Access Statement - clean Rev 3.pdf:16: assessment within the EIA is robust and that there is sufficient certainty as to air quality effects
EN010082-000372-5.6 - Tees CCPP - Design & Access Statement - clean Rev 3.pdf:31: fixed design details and maximum design parameters upon which the EIA has been based.
EN010082-000372-5.6 - Tees CCPP - Design & Access Statement - clean Rev 3.pdf:33: design parameters upon which to base the EIA to ensure that the likely significant effects of the
EN010082-000653-Tees CCPP - Correspondence received after the close of Examination (2).pdf:20:• From an EIA perspective all the air quality modelling work and assessments following from it
EN010082-000653-Tees CCPP - Correspondence received after the close of Examination (2).pdf:20: follows that the MWe gross and MWe net values are immaterial to these aspects of the EIA.
EN010082-000653-Tees CCPP - Correspondence received after the close of Examination (2).pdf:20: The same logic applies to the CCR assessment work. All EIA assessments that are based on
EN010082-000653-Tees CCPP - Correspondence received after the close of Examination (2).pdf:21:notwithstanding that this is in fact immaterial when considering the EIA and CCR work (as noted
EN010082-000653-Tees CCPP - Correspondence received after the close of Examination (2).pdf:21:that the use of net or gross is immaterial when considering the EIA and CCR work that has been carried
EN010082-000653-Tees CCPP - Correspondence received after the close of Examination (2).pdf:21:or gross, and that the use of net or gross when considering the EIA and CCR work is immaterial.
EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:13:7.20 The Project requires a DCO (the purpose of the EIA) and an Environmental
EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:19:7.45 The statutory criteria used in this EIA for assessment of impacts at sensitive
EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:27:Table 7.10 Determination of Significance of an Effect on Human Receptors for EIA
EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:28: the context of the EIA Regulations
EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:45: undertake an EIA then it is assumed that following screening by the
EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:45: screening an application for EIA that are relevant to emissions to atmosphere
EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:46: cumulative EIA
EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:46:R/2015/0149/OOM Teesdock Approved MGT Teesside Ltd (MGT) proposes to Operational Y Not EIA No potential
EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:46:R/2016/0484/FFM Former Croda Approved Proposed anaerobic biogas production Operational Y Not EIA No potential
EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:46:R/2015/0682/FFM Wilton Waste Approved Provision of oil refinery at Wilton Waste Operational Y Not EIA No potential
EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:47: cumulative EIA
EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:48: cumulative EIA
EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:48:R/2013/0608/FFM Teesport Approved Waste treatment facility. Operational Y Not EIA No potential
EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:48:R/2012/0314/FFM Lotte Approved Construction of a polyethylene Operational Y Not EIA No potential
EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:48:R/2012/0934/RSM Land at Approved Proposed anaerobic digestion plant (steel Operational Y Not EIA No potential
EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:49: cumulative EIA
EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:50: cumulative EIA
EN010082-000518-8.44 - Tees CCPP - Written Summary of Oral Case - Draft DCO - ISH - FINAL - 06.07.18.pdf:2:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010082-000518-8.44 - Tees CCPP - Written Summary of Oral Case - Draft DCO - ISH - FINAL - 06.07.18.pdf:7: extension proposed constitutes EIA development, then automatically the permitted development rights are
EN010082-000518-8.44 - Tees CCPP - Written Summary of Oral Case - Draft DCO - ISH - FINAL - 06.07.18.pdf:9: APP-057 in the Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’).
EN010082-000653-Tees CCPP - Correspondence received after the close of Examination (3).pdf:20:• From an EIA perspective all the air quality modelling work and assessments following from it
EN010082-000653-Tees CCPP - Correspondence received after the close of Examination (3).pdf:20: follows that the MWe gross and MWe net values are immaterial to these aspects of the EIA.
EN010082-000653-Tees CCPP - Correspondence received after the close of Examination (3).pdf:20: The same logic applies to the CCR assessment work. All EIA assessments that are based on
EN010082-000653-Tees CCPP - Correspondence received after the close of Examination (3).pdf:21:notwithstanding that this is in fact immaterial when considering the EIA and CCR work (as noted
EN010082-000653-Tees CCPP - Correspondence received after the close of Examination (3).pdf:21:that the use of net or gross is immaterial when considering the EIA and CCR work that has been carried
EN010082-000653-Tees CCPP - Correspondence received after the close of Examination (3).pdf:21:or gross, and that the use of net or gross when considering the EIA and CCR work is immaterial.
EN010082-000390-7 4 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with Environment Agency - DRAFT (2).pdf:6: in March 2017 in response to SCU’s request for an Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) Scoping
EN010082-000390-7 4 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with Environment Agency - DRAFT (2).pdf:6:2.5 The letter stated that certain information should be included in the scope of the EIA, as follows:
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:3:1.5 OTHER CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE EIA 6
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:3:2.2 EIA STUDY TEAM 9
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:3:5 EIA METHODOLOGY 36
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:3:5.2 EIA REGULATIONS AND GUIDANCE 36
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:3:5.3 BASELINE FOR THE EIA 37
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:4:8.1 SUMMARY OF EIA SCOPE 118
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:5: Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) of the applicant’s proposal to
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:5: (the ‘2009 EIA Regulations’) (as amended by the Infrastructure Planning
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:5: 1 of the 2009 EIA Regulations.
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:5: 300 MWe and therefore an EIA is required. The Planning Inspectorate (PINS)
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:7: Sembcorp gives notice, pursuant to Regulation 6(1) (b) of the 2009 EIA
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:7: Part 1 of Schedule 4 of the 2009 EIA Regulations as is reasonably required to
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:9: to the accompanying request for an EIA Scoping Opinion, made pursuant to
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:9: Regulation 8 of the 2009 EIA Regulations. This request for a Scoping Opinion
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:9: is made pursuant to Regulation 8 of the 2009 EIA Regulations, and includes:
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:10: adopted for assessing the likely significant effects of the Project. The EIA will
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:10: On receipt of the request for an EIA scoping opinion and this Scoping Report,
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:10: It is important to note that the submission of a request for an EIA scoping
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:10: opinion is a precursor to the more detailed EIA process. This includes the
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:10:1.5 OTHER CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE EIA
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:10: considered as part of the Project’s EIA.
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:11: the assessment of cumulative effects in the EIA, where relevant information is
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:11: 5.10) is an integral part of the EIA process and ensures that all aspects of
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:11: ERM (2001) Guidance on EIA: Scoping, prepared for the European
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:12: 2. The Applicant and Study Team The Sembcorp and EIA study teams, and
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:12: 5. EIA Methodology Introduction to the EIA process, regulations,
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:12: the EIA and sets out the next steps in the pre-
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:13:2.2 EIA STUDY TEAM
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:13: The preparation of the EIA is being led by Environmental Resources
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:13: (IEMA’s) EIA Quality Mark, a scheme which allows organisations to make a
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:13: commitment to excellence in their EIA activities, and have this commitment
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:13: Specific environmental topics in this Scoping Report and the EIA are being
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:18: topic assessments within the EIA will adopt a reasonable worst case scenario
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:24: ascertain whether CHP is viable. The extent to which the EIA will assess the
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:24: preparation of a standalone supplementary report to the EIA that addresses
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:24: for carbon capture technology. The EIA will describe the CCR requirements
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:27: A more detailed review will be conducted during the EIA process and during
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:27: Regulations 2009 (the 2009 EIA Regulations).
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:27: the EIA Regulations, under the category of ‘Thermal power stations and other
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:27: such, an EIA is required for the Project and an ES must be prepared in
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:27: accordance with the 2009 EIA Regulations.
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:32: the purposes of assessing DCO applications. The EIA undertaken for the
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:38: relation to atmospheric emissions, noise and aqueous discharges. The EIA
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:39: account of the findings of the EIA as reported within the ES, against the
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:40:5 EIA METHODOLOGY
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:40: adopted for the EIA. It describes the approach that will be used to identify,
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:40: temporal, spatial and technical scope of the EIA. Further details on individual
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:40:5.2 EIA REGULATIONS AND GUIDANCE
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:40: EIA is a procedure required under the terms of European Union Directives
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:40: The primary objective of an EIA is inscribed under Article 2 of the directive
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:40: “The results of consultations and information gathered pursuant to (the EIA
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:40: (1) The new Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Directive (2014/52/EU) has to be transposed into UK legislation by
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:41: In addition to the relevant Directives, and where relevant, the EIA will be
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:41: Regulations 2009 (the 2009 EIA Regulations);
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:41: Advice note three: EIA consultation and notification, Planning
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:41:5.3 BASELINE FOR THE EIA
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:41: Schedule 4 of the 2009 EIA Regulations (Part 1 paragraph 19) requires the EIA
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:42:Figure 5.1 EIA Methodology Describe
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:42: considering inputs from stakeholders through The EIA p
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:42: EIA and i
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:42: numbers of jobs generated in the local economy. In evaluating significance, the EIA process seeks to inform regulators and
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:43: topics that will be addressed in the EIA.
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:43: In accordance with Schedule 4 Part 1 paragraph 20 of the 2009 EIA
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:43: used interchangeably with ‘secondary’ effects. However the 2009 EIA
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:43: EIA ‘secondary’ (and higher order) effects are taken to be part of a chain of
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:43: Schedule 4 (Part 1 paragraph 21) of the 2009 EIA Regulations requires that
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:44: EIA, the specialists undertaking the assessments will identify mitigation
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:45: (the ‘technical scope’) that makes up the EIA. In some instances reference is
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:45: refined further in the course of the EIA and reported in the ES.
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:45: 6.10, the proposed technical scope for the EIA is summarised in Section 8.1.
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:46: This does, however, introduce some complexity into the EIA process common
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:46: for their delivery. The 2009 EIA Regulations require an ES to provide a
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:47: variations in design and other aspects of the Project. The EIA will take
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:47: Envelope’ principle. Suitably applied in EIA it can help to avoid the need for
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:47: It is noted that Schedule 4 (part 1 paragraph 18) of the 2009 EIA Regulations
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:47: environmental effects. The EIA will consider the main alternatives, and set
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:47: The EIA will address alternatives including location and technology. It will
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:48: For the purposes of this EIA, this has been taken to be made up of those
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:48: contribute to potential cumulative effects along with the Project. This EIA
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:48: Project. Generally, only schemes where an EIA was required are considered
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:50: for the EIA. Descriptions are given, under each topic heading, of the baseline
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:50: operational phases and the proposed EIA methodology to be applied in
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:50: considerations, i.e. scoped in to the EIA process.
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:54:The Preliminary Environmental Information Report (PEIR) and formal EIA
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:54:upon the design to be assessed in the EIA; however, at this stage it is expected
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:54:As the EIA proceeds, the PEIR will provide further details of these potential
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:57: through the EIA consultation process.
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:57: NPS EN1 recognises the need for EIA to account for the existing status of, and
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:68: EIA.
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:80:EIA work in the area has demonstrated.
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:80:RCBC during the EIA process. However, the BS 4142 criteria do take into
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:93: suggest that this should be documented in the EIA with appropriate
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:105:than minor significance, and will be fully investigated in the EIA process.
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:109: At this stage in the EIA it would appear that tourism is not an important
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:111: detailed EIA stage to enable a proportionate assessment and avoid inclusion
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:113:assessed in the EIA.
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:113:will be assessed further in the EIA.
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:113:be verified during the EIA stages as part of the assessment process.
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:116:wirelines. The suggested viewpoint locations for the EIA are shown below in
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:121: consultees to discuss the EIA methodologies and approach set out to ensure
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:121: most value is obtained from the consultation and EIA processes.
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:122:8.1 SUMMARY OF EIA SCOPE
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:122: be assessed during the EIA process.
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:122: technical scope for the EIA. The table seeks to clearly set out how a topic/sub-
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:122: topic will be taken forward in the EIA process and the degree of effort and
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:122: mitigation measures of known effectiveness will be put in place, the EIA will
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:122: standards needs to be demonstrated, the EIA will take the necessary steps in
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:122: The findings of the EIA, based on the application of the methodologies set out
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:122: State and the scoping opinion on the report returned to Sembcorp, the full EIA
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:127: The outcome of the EIA process is the production of an ES to accompany the
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:127: EIA.
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:127: stage under Sections 42 and 48 of the Planning Act 2008. Once the EIA process
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:128: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:131: This annex sets out the proposed methodology that will be used in the EIA
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:131: identify those projects / plans that will be considered further in the EIA:
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:132: matrices and threshold analysis. The method adopted for this EIA includes
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:132: EIA for further assessment. The following three stages set out how the
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:132: cumulative effects will be subsequently assessed in the EIA.
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:132: effects will take into account measures already identified in the EIA.
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:134: purposes of the EIA to assess such cumulative positive impacts.
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:136:Development and Topics Screened for Further Assessment in the EIA
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:136:undertaken in the EIA. The screening exercise was undertaken as follows.
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:136: For each screened development, a judgement was made by the EIA team
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:136: out of the need for further assessment in the EIA based on the separation
EN010082-000445-Pinkney And Gerrick Woods Citation.pdf:1:whole. Discrete flushes are characterised by great horsetail (Equisetum telmateia), hemp-
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:15: Impact Assessment (EIA) is required (EIA development).
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:15: 2009 EIA Regulations) a request for an opinion as to the information to
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:15: 6(1)(b) of the 2009 EIA Regulations that it proposed to provide an ES in
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:15: 4(2)(a) of the 2009 EIA Regulations, the Proposed Development was
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:15: determined to be EIA development, and the application was accompanied
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:15:1.5.4. The 2009 EIA Regulations were revoked and replaced by the
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:15: 13 of the 2009 EIA Regulations had been complied with [OD-001, OD-
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:15: 2009 EIA regulations and, together with the environmental information
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:19: reviewing the implications of the proposed change for the EIA AS-009.
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:19: of the EIA as the conclusions on the significance of effects remain
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:25: certain public and private projects on the environment (the EIA
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:25:3.3.2. The EIA Directive defines the procedure by which information about the
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:25:3.3.4. The current EIA legislation for NSIP cases is the Infrastructure Planning
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:25: (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the 2017 EIA
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:25: Impact Assessment) Regulations 2009 (the 2009 EIA Regulations)
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:25: subject to transitional provisions in Regulation 37 of the 2017 EIA
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:25:3.3.5. The 2017 EIA Regulations came into force on 16 May 2017, before the
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:26: EIA Regulations states that the 2009 EIA Regulations will continue to
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:26: opinion defined by the 2009 EIA Regulations.
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:26: EIA Regulations in the pre-application period APP-043. However, the
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:26: 2017 EIA Regulations on a voluntary basis APP-043.
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:26: this application, the provisions in Regulation 37(2)(a)(ii) of the 2017 EIA
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:26: against the 2009 EIA Regulations.
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:26:3.3.8. The 2009 EIA Regulations establish the minimum information to be
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:26: an ES under the EIA Regulations and this is reinforced by Regulation
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:26: decision on EIA Development. Regulation 3(2) of the 2009 EIA
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:26: proposed development is EIA development under Schedule 2 of the 2009
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:26: EIA Regulations. The Applicant has provided an ES APP-041 to APP-081
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:34:3.6.1. Under Regulation 24 of the 2009 EIA Regulations and on the basis of the
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:34: Regulation 24of the 2009 EIA Regulations was therefore not considered
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:36: considerations in Chapter 5. Detailed consideration is given to the EIA in
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:40:4.6.1. The overarching EIA methodology is described in ES Chapter 3 [APP-
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:40: 045]. The EIA process involves identification of sensitive receptors that
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:41: the EIA. At the ISH on the Scope of the Application3, I asked the
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:41: Chapter 3 ‘EIA Approach’, paragraphs 3.17 and Table 3.2 APP-045.
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:41: Applicant responded that Table 3.2 in ES Chapter 3 ‘EIA Approach’ has
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:41: and the DCO. The Applicant considers that the EIA takes account of all
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:41: requested change. This was advertised in accordance with the EIA
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:41: constitute ‘other environmental information’ as defined in the 2009 EIA
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:42: Applicant’s ES. In accordance with Schedule 4, Part 2 of the 2009 EIA
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:42: provide the basis for determining applications for EIA development, the
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:43: the EIA regulations in this regard have been met.
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:49: of requested change to application on the EIA’ AS-009, which concluded
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:54: keeping with his statutory duty under the EIA Regulations (or HRA
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:54: remit of what has been assessed in the submitted EIA. This type of
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:57: EIA scoping and the Section 42 consultation have been addressed by the
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:59: subject to EIA, the Applicant should ensure that the ES clearly sets out
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:97: Change on the EIA’ AS-009, which concluded that there would be no
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:106: beyond the remit of what has been assessed in the submitted EIA”. The
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:124: development and the EIA Regulations at an ISH. The Applicant confirmed
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:125: that if the extent of the extension proposed constitutes EIA development,
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:136: 6.2.3 - ES Chapter 3 - EIA Approach - Final - November 2017
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:143: Scope of the EIA
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:155:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:157:the 2009 EIA Regulations The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:157:the 2017 EIA Regulations the Infrastructure Planning (Environmental
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:157:The EIA Directive Council Directive 2011/92/EU on the
EN010082-000176-EN010082-6.2.5-ES Chapter 5 -Project Description-Final-November 2017.pdf:9:5.18 To deal with the two scenarios within the EIA, the technical assessments (for
EN010082-000176-EN010082-6.2.5-ES Chapter 5 -Project Description-Final-November 2017.pdf:10: topic assessments within the EIA adopt a reasonable worst case scenario in
EN010082-000176-EN010082-6.2.5-ES Chapter 5 -Project Description-Final-November 2017.pdf:20: preparation of a standalone supplementary report to the EIA (the Carbon
EN010082-000366-8.3 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Implication of Non-Mat Change - Final Issue.pdf:1:Implications of Requested Change on the EIA
EN010082-000366-8.3 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Implication of Non-Mat Change - Final Issue.pdf:3:1.4 The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for the Project takes account of
EN010082-000366-8.3 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Implication of Non-Mat Change - Final Issue.pdf:5: the air quality basis of assessment modelled inputs for the EIA, it can be
EN010082-000366-8.3 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Implication of Non-Mat Change - Final Issue.pdf:6: considered in the EIA. As can be seen within the table, the magnitude of
EN010082-000366-8.3 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Implication of Non-Mat Change - Final Issue.pdf:14: height change does not materially alter the overall findings of the EIA in as
EN010082-000314-TEES - Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening.pdf:2:Cumulative impacts more detailed assessment in the EIA. This includes other
EN010082-000314-TEES - Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening.pdf:4:(Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the 2017 EIA Regulations). The
EN010082-000314-TEES - Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening.pdf:4:commencement of the 2017 EIA Regulations). The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental
EN010082-000314-TEES - Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening.pdf:4:Impact Assessment) Regulations 2009 (the 2009 EIA Regulations) are therefore considered
EN010082-000314-TEES - Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening.pdf:4:to be the applicable EIA Regulations. Under Regulation 24 of the 2009 EIA Regulations and
EN010082-000314-TEES - Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening.pdf:4:Note: The Secretary of State’s duty under Regulation 24 of the EIA Regulations continues
EN010082-000314-TEES - Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening.pdf:5:(Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the 2017 EIA Regulations). The
EN010082-000314-TEES - Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening.pdf:5:2017 EIA Regulations). The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment)
EN010082-000314-TEES - Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening.pdf:5:Regulations 2009 (the 2009 EIA Regulations) are therefore considered to be the applicable
EN010082-000314-TEES - Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening.pdf:5:EIA Regulations.
EN010082-000314-TEES - Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening.pdf:5:Under Regulation 24 of the 2009 EIA Regulations and on the basis of the current
EN010082-000314-TEES - Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening.pdf:5:Note: The Secretary of State’s duty under Regulation 24 of the 2009 EIA Regulations
EN010082-000510-CONSULTATION REPORT FOR NON-MATERIAL CHANGE.pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010082-000510-CONSULTATION REPORT FOR NON-MATERIAL CHANGE.pdf:15: The proposed changes to the original DCO application are: and adversely impact the EIA.
EN010082-000510-CONSULTATION REPORT FOR NON-MATERIAL CHANGE.pdf:16: According to Annex A of Implications of Requested Change on the EIA (IRCE),
EN010082-000510-CONSULTATION REPORT FOR NON-MATERIAL CHANGE.pdf:23: requested change at each viewpoint considered in the EIA. As is
EN010082-000510-CONSULTATION REPORT FOR NON-MATERIAL CHANGE.pdf:23: provided in the EIA Scoping Report APP-062 along with
EN010082-000510-CONSULTATION REPORT FOR NON-MATERIAL CHANGE.pdf:27: According to Annex A of Implications of Requested Change on the EIA building height being similar, or very large buildings being
EN010082-000510-CONSULTATION REPORT FOR NON-MATERIAL CHANGE.pdf:33:to Environmental Statement (‘ES’) Volume 1, Chapter 3 ‘EIA Approach’ (Application Document Ref:
EN010082-000510-CONSULTATION REPORT FOR NON-MATERIAL CHANGE.pdf:35:4. The Project qualifies as Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) development for the purposes of the
EN010082-000510-CONSULTATION REPORT FOR NON-MATERIAL CHANGE.pdf:35: therefore accompanied by an Environmental Statement (‘ES’), setting out the findings of the EIA.
EN010082-000510-CONSULTATION REPORT FOR NON-MATERIAL CHANGE.pdf:40:4. The Project qualifies as Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) development 8. If you wish to respond to this notice, or make representations in respect of the
EN010082-000510-CONSULTATION REPORT FOR NON-MATERIAL CHANGE.pdf:40: by an Environmental Statement (‘ES’), setting out the findings of the EIA. be sent. Representations may be submitted in the following ways:
EN010082-000510-CONSULTATION REPORT FOR NON-MATERIAL CHANGE.pdf:41:4. The Project qualifies as Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) development for the purposes of the
EN010082-000510-CONSULTATION REPORT FOR NON-MATERIAL CHANGE.pdf:41: therefore accompanied by an Environmental Statement (‘ES’), setting out the findings of the EIA.
EN010082-000510-CONSULTATION REPORT FOR NON-MATERIAL CHANGE.pdf:48: 4. The Project qualifies as Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) development for the purposes of the Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) © for any loss or damage caused
EN010082-000510-CONSULTATION REPORT FOR NON-MATERIAL CHANGE.pdf:48: Regulations 2009. The Application was therefore accompanied by an Environmental Statement (‘ES’), setting out the findings of the EIA. by an error or inaccuracy in
EN010082-000510-CONSULTATION REPORT FOR NON-MATERIAL CHANGE.pdf:54: Car removals 4. The Project qualifies as Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) development for the purposes of the Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment)
EN010082-000510-CONSULTATION REPORT FOR NON-MATERIAL CHANGE.pdf:54: t also scrap cars removed free. Regulations 2009. The Application was therefore accompanied by an Environmental Statement (‘ES’), setting out the findings of the EIA.
EN010082-000510-CONSULTATION REPORT FOR NON-MATERIAL CHANGE.pdf:78:According to Annex A of Implications of Requested Change on the EIA (IRCE),
EN010082-000579-8.59 - Tees CCPP - Applicant's Responses to the ExA's Information Requests - Deadline 7 - FINAL - 26.09.18.pdf:8: environmental information and conducting the other activities required by EIA draft DCO.
EN010082-000579-8.59 - Tees CCPP - Applicant's Responses to the ExA's Information Requests - Deadline 7 - FINAL - 26.09.18.pdf:8: in keeping with his statutory duty under the EIA Regulations (or HRA Regulations). A stack diameter of 8.5 m would lead to an impact at one ecological receptor marginally above the 1%
EN010082-000579-8.59 - Tees CCPP - Applicant's Responses to the ExA's Information Requests - Deadline 7 - FINAL - 26.09.18.pdf:9: amendments to the description of the authorised development in Schedule 1) has been assessed in the submitted EIA. This type of wording for a requirement, i.e. to allow a small degree of
EN010082-000484-Environment Agency D3 Submission.pdf:2:According to Annex A of Implications of Requested Change on the EIA (IRCE),
EN010082-000171-EN010082-6.2 ES Volume 1 Chapters-Final-November 2017.pdf:3:CHAPTER 3 EIA APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.1
EN010082-Advice-00005-1-170510_EN010082_Teesside meeting note dated 10 May 2017.pdf:1: Alison Down (EIA and Land Rights Advisor)
EN010082-Advice-00005-1-170510_EN010082_Teesside meeting note dated 10 May 2017.pdf:1: Emma Cottam (EIA and Land Rights Advisor)
EN010082-Advice-00005-1-170510_EN010082_Teesside meeting note dated 10 May 2017.pdf:1: Lucy Hicks (EIA and Land Rights Advisor)
TR030002-000733-York Potash Limited (Annual Report and Accounts). Appendix 2.pdf:91: EIA Environmental impact assessment
TR030002-000772-York Potash Ltd.pdf:8:MHF Overall Site Layout 143022-EIA-001 Rev 2 3.7 27 March 2015
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:7: the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for the Harbour.
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:20: currently being investigated as part of the Harbour facility EIA.
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:21:3.2.1 Formal EIA Scoping Opinions have been received for the Mine (from the NYMNPA), for the MTS (from
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:67:118 - Leisure centre, business, civic and A review of the EIA screening request concluded that the project would have no effect on N
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:69:flare stack and ancillary access roads, EIA was undertaken and hence no significance environmental effects are predicted with
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:69: examined in more detail as part of the EIA for the Harbour. As this assessment is not yet
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:80: • evidence provided for and from the EIA; and
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:82: will be addressed as the EIA and the HRA for the Harbour facility progress.
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:82: the intertidal area affected and will be fully defined in the EIA for the Harbour facility.
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:93: undertaken as part of the EIA process.
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:97: operational phase. This potential mitigation measure will be further explored during the EIA studies for
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:99: would arise is currently bening investigated as part of the EIA for the Harbour facility. Early
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:99: is considered likely to be beneficial and which will be investigated as part of the EIA, namely:
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:100: the sediment plume as currently predicted by the EIA studies undertaken to date.
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:100: been investigated. These aspects will be progressed as part of the EIA studies for the Harbour facility
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:127: as part of the EIA studies. The assessment undertaken to date concludes that there is the potential for
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:127:11.4.15 In addition to the potential effect of the Harbour facility, the EIA studies will include a cumulative
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:130: for the Harbour faciliy is ongoing as part of the EIA studies; this will include an assessment of the
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:166:Common Pouchwort Calypogeia fissa 2
TR030002-000346-York Potash Ltd.pdf:3: 3. Redcar Library, Kirklealham St, Redcar, Cleveiand TS1O 1RT Mondays to cleared. Bentley Swift 01642645329 and grill also gas hob, sowing, £20. Tel. 07833 jacket
TR030002-000499-Section 17 App 17.1 Flood Risk Assessment.pdf:17: EIA process. The only FRA relevant comment raised by PINS for the assessment of impacts on flood
TR030002-000481-Section 12 App 12.2 Transport Assessment_1 of 2.pdf:5: North York Moors National Park Authority (NYMNPA), reference NYM/2014/0679/MEIA, and Redcar
TR030002-000481-Section 12 App 12.2 Transport Assessment_1 of 2.pdf:6: inform the TA and EIA.
TR030002-000481-Section 12 App 12.2 Transport Assessment_1 of 2.pdf:18: application for the Mine and MTS (references NYM/2014/0679/MEIA and R/2014/0627/FFM). For
TR030002-000723-York Potash Limited (Covering Letter and Document List).pdf:7:MHF Overall Site Layout 143022-EIA-001 Rev 2 3.7 27 March 2015
TR030002-000778-151009 TR030002 Tata Steel UK Limited and Others.pdf:29: “the 2009 EIA Regulations” means the Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
TR030002-000778-151009 TR030002 Tata Steel UK Limited and Others.pdf:35:with the 2009 EIA Regulations and any orders, rules or regulations made under the 2008 Act.
TR030002-000778-151009 TR030002 Tata Steel UK Limited and Others.pdf:51:updated environmental information supplied pursuant to the 2009 EIA Regulations.
TR030002-000778-151009 TR030002 Tata Steel UK Limited and Others.pdf:52:or any updated environmental information supplied pursuant to the 2009 EIA Regulations.
TR030002-000429-EIA Appendices Index.pdf:1:Appendix 5.1 Hydraulic Studies to Support EIA
TR030002-000429-EIA Appendices Index.pdf:1:York Potash Project Harbour facilities EIA: Appendices Index © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd
TR030002-000429-EIA Appendices Index.pdf:2:York Potash Project Harbour facilities EIA: Appendices Index © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd
TR030002-000429-EIA Appendices Index.pdf:3:York Potash Project Harbour facilities EIA: Appendices Index © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd
TR030002-000429-EIA Appendices Index.pdf:4:York Potash Project Harbour facilities EIA: Appendices Index © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd
TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf:1:4.1.1 The purpose of EIA is to provide an independent assessment of a project's potential environmental
TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf:1: x A summary of the EIA process.
TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf:1: raised have been addressed through the EIA process.
TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf:1: x The results of the scoping exercise undertaken to define the issues to be addressed by the EIA
TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf:1:4.2.1 The EIA has been undertaken in accordance with the Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf:1: x PINS Advice Note 3: EIA consultation and notification (The `Planning Inspectorate, 2013);
TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf:2:4.3.1 EIA is an iterative tool for systematically examining and assessing the impacts and effects of the
TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf:2: The formal reporting mechanism for an EIA is the ES. In accordance with Schedule 4, Part 1 of the EIA
TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf:2: x A non-technical summary (NTS) of the information provided under this Part of the EIA
TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf:2:4.3.2 The following stages were included in this EIA:
TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf:2: x Scoping – to determine the issues that the EIA should address.
TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf:3:4.3.3 The approach adopted in the EIA process for the proposed scheme for each of these stages is
TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf:3: findings of the EIA process to prevent or reduce the significance of a potential impact. This would then
TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf:3: accordance with the relevant EIA Regulations.
TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf:3: required for the EIA and preparation of the ES. The study consisted of the following tasks:
TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf:4: Scoping Report to inform the EIA. At the time of writing the PER, some of these studies had been
TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf:6:4.3.20 The EIA has been undertaken within a framework that allows for a transparent approach to the
TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf:7:4.3.21 EIA provides an assessment of the impacts on sensitive receptors as a result of the effects of a
TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf:7: effect may result in both a direct and indirect impact on a single receptor. Given this the EIA framework
TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf:8: purposes of this EIA. While this table provides guidelines of a generic nature, it should be noted that
TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf:10:4.3.31 In the context of the EIA Regulations, ‘significant impacts’ are taken to be those of moderate or major
TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf:10:4.3.32 It should be reiterated that, although this section sets out the overall approach adopted for this EIA
TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf:10:4.3.36 Appropriate mitigation measures have been identified and recommended in this ES where the EIA
TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf:10:4.3.38 The EIA Regulations and relevant guidance require an ES to provide an indication of any difficulties
TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf:11:4.3.39 The assessment undertaken here also establishes and takes into account uncertainty in the EIA
TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf:11: the environment (the EIA Directive) states (in Annex III) that an ES should include “A description of the
TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf:11:4.4.3 In line with IEMA’s Guidelines for EIA (2004), cumulative impacts are defined as:
TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf:11: However the EIA and Habitats Directives and their associated regulations require the consideration of
TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf:12:4.4.5 The EIA Regulations do not define 'cumulative' but guidance on cumulative effects assessment is
TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf:12: impacts will be taken into account in the EIA process and, generally, can be excluded from the scope of
TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf:12: within the EIA process. The standard EIA approach assesses whether an impact is minor, moderate or
TR030002-000748-Document 8.3 Appendix 5 - Shipping Notes Part 2.pdf:25:EIA - Environmental Impact Assessment
TR030002-000113-150121_TR030002_York_Potash_Harbour_Meeting_Note.pdf:1: Laura Allen – Senior EIA and Land Rights Advisor
TR030002-000113-150121_TR030002_York_Potash_Harbour_Meeting_Note.pdf:1: Hannah Nelson – EIA and Land Rights Advisor
TR030002-000018-Examination Library (4).pdf:13:APP-194 Section 4: Approach to Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)
TR030002-000018-Examination Library (4).pdf:13:APP-199 Section 5: Appendix 5.1 Hydraulic Studies to Support EIA
TR030002-000460-Section 3 App 3.1 Waste management.pdf:23: that further ground investigation is proposed), the EIA assumes dredging 181,000m3 + the top 15% of
TR030002-000460-Section 3 App 3.1 Waste management.pdf:24: undertaken as part of the EIA process.
TR030002-000471-Section 7 App 7.1 Benthic and sediment sampling strategy.pdf:3:Subject : York Potash Port Facility EIA: proposed sampling
TR030002-000471-Section 7 App 7.1 Benthic and sediment sampling strategy.pdf:3:ecology for the York Potash Port Facility Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). The strategy
TR030002-000471-Section 7 App 7.1 Benthic and sediment sampling strategy.pdf:3:As part of the application for the DCO, an EIA process is currently underway to assess the
TR030002-000471-Section 7 App 7.1 Benthic and sediment sampling strategy.pdf:3:In support of the EIA, YPL wishes to proceed with a programme of sediment sampling for
TR030002-000471-Section 7 App 7.1 Benthic and sediment sampling strategy.pdf:4:disposal, as well as informing the EIA process (e.g. water quality effects and implications under
TR030002-000471-Section 7 App 7.1 Benthic and sediment sampling strategy.pdf:4:Figure 1 Study area for EIA for proposed development
TR030002-000471-Section 7 App 7.1 Benthic and sediment sampling strategy.pdf:5:material will be investigated through the EIA process and informed by information on the physical
TR030002-000471-Section 7 App 7.1 Benthic and sediment sampling strategy.pdf:5:required on an annual basis will be predicted during the EIA process.
TR030002-000471-Section 7 App 7.1 Benthic and sediment sampling strategy.pdf:6:Sediment samples were collected as part of the EIA for the Northern Gateway Container
TR030002-000471-Section 7 App 7.1 Benthic and sediment sampling strategy.pdf:6:Figure 3 Sediment sample locations for the NGCT EIA and QEII Jetty EIA
TR030002-000471-Section 7 App 7.1 Benthic and sediment sampling strategy.pdf:8:The data will then be compared to two sets of standards that are available to inform the EIA,
TR030002-000471-Section 7 App 7.1 Benthic and sediment sampling strategy.pdf:9:the QEII jetty refurbishment EIA which demonstrated that the biological communities within the
TR030002-000567-Doc 7.3 Project Position Statement.pdf:8: allocated application reference number NYM/2014/0676/MEIA
TR030002-000502-Section 20 App 20.2 Landscape assessment.pdf:6:Significance values of moderate or major should be considered as likely significant effects for the purposes of the EIA regulations and should be taken into account by decision making bodies.
TR030002-000105-141121_TR030002_Teleconference meeting note_PINS and EA.pdf:1: Laura Allen – Senior EIA and Land Rights Advisor
TR030002-000105-141121_TR030002_Teleconference meeting note_PINS and EA.pdf:1: Hannah Nelson – EIA and Land Rights Advisor
TR030002-000895-160113_TR03002_Draft DCO (Comparite with First Draft DCO (Document 4.1)).pdf:6: “the 2009 EIA Regulations” means the Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
TR030002-000895-160113_TR03002_Draft DCO (Comparite with First Draft DCO (Document 4.1)).pdf:12:inconsistent with the 2009 EIA Regulations and any orders, rules or regulations made under the
TR030002-000895-160113_TR03002_Draft DCO (Comparite with First Draft DCO (Document 4.1)).pdf:26:pursuant to the 2009 EIA Regulations.
TR030002-000895-160113_TR03002_Draft DCO (Comparite with First Draft DCO (Document 4.1)).pdf:26:or any updated environmental information supplied pursuant to the 2009 EIA Regulations.
TR030002-000053-141105_TR030002_Comments_s51_Advice.pdf:12:impact assessment (EIA) that has been carried out and the applicant is advised to
TR030002-000053-141105_TR030002_Comments_s51_Advice.pdf:12:ousting the National Infrastructure EIA regulations that apply to discharge of
TR030002-000053-141105_TR030002_Comments_s51_Advice.pdf:26:following the outcome of the EIA for the Harbour Facility. This is clearly reflected in
TR030002-000053-141105_TR030002_Comments_s51_Advice.pdf:28: far under the EIA for the Harbour Facility. The Planning Inspectorate advises that
TR030002-000053-141105_TR030002_Comments_s51_Advice.pdf:32: awaited as a result of the Harbour Facilities EIA and therefore the appropriate
TR030002-000751-Document 1.4B Document List.pdf:7:MHF Overall Site Layout 143022-EIA-001 Rev 2 3.7 27 March 2015
TR030002-000734-York Potash Limited (SoCG & Appendices 1-8).pdf:26:R/2013/0685/SC SCREENING AND SCOPING OPINION FOR EIA required on 12
TR030002-000734-York Potash Limited (SoCG & Appendices 1-8).pdf:26:R/2014/0183 SCREENING OPINION FOR INSTALLATION EIA not required on 14
TR030002-000734-York Potash Limited (SoCG & Appendices 1-8).pdf:26:R/2014/0577 SCREENING OPINION FOR AMENDMENTS EIA not required on 15
TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf:11:Significance values of moderate, moderate major or major should be considered as likely significant effects for the purposes of the EIA regulations and should be taken into account by decision making bodies.
TR030002-000671-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 1 to 9.pdf:4:Appendix 10 Harbour facilities EIA Scoping Opinion list of statutory consultees
TR030002-000671-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 1 to 9.pdf:18: NYMNPA on 29 January 2013 (Ref: NYM/2013/0062/MEIA). The
TR030002-000671-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 1 to 9.pdf:18: Country Planning (EIA) Regulations 2011. YPL submitted further
TR030002-000671-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 1 to 9.pdf:48: (Application number: NYM/2014/0676/MEIA) (Application number: R/2014/0627/FFM) local businesses who have
TR030002-000671-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 1 to 9.pdf:50: (EIA) of the mine, MTS and MHF, against major developments
TR030002-000671-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 1 to 9.pdf:56: Impact Assessment (EIA) process.
TR030002-000671-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 1 to 9.pdf:57: and Natural England approach to EIA
TR030002-000671-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 1 to 9.pdf:57: Source: Royal HaskoningDHV, EIA Lead Consultant
TR030002-000671-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 1 to 9.pdf:101: Impact Assessments (EIAs), which are would be designed using guidance from the
TR030002-000671-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 1 to 9.pdf:101: The EIAs look in detail at the potential
TR030002-000671-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 1 to 9.pdf:115:6844150 Supportive In favour No concerns Supportive of the project which will bring jobs to the area and feed into the Yes In favour The mine will bring Satisfied in Supportive based on Supportive There will inevitably be Yes The EIA is a The need for Construction impacts Positive Modern planning
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:5:3.0 EIA APPROACH AND TOPIC AREAS ………………………………. 18
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:9: Regulations 2009 (SI 2263) (as amended) (the ‘EIA Regulations’)
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:9: during the EIA process, prior to application submission, the
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:9: 6(1)(b) of the EIA Regulations that it proposes to provide an
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:9: Regulation 4(2)(a) of the EIA Regulations, the proposed
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:9: development is determined to be EIA development.
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:9:1.4 The EIA Regulations enable an applicant, before making an
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:9: (EIA Regulation 8 (9))
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:9: i the EIA Regulations
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:10:1.9 Regulation 8(3) of the EIA Regulations states that a request for a
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:10: (EIA Regulation 8 (3))
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:10:1.11 The SoS has a duty under Regulation 8(6) of the EIA Regulations
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:10: in accordance with Regulation 9(1)(a) of the EIA Regulations. The
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:11: undertaking the EIA.
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:11: carrying out the EIA.
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:11: Section 3 EIA approach and topic areas
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:20: EIA. The level of assessment is proposed to be high level and
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:21: considered as part of an integrated approach to EIA, this should
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:22: possible, as this will form the basis of the EIA. It is understood
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:22: Schedule 4 Part 1 of the EIA Regulations. There should be more
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:22:2.72 The EIA Regulations state that the ES should include ‘An outline of
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:22: the environmental effects’ (See EIA Regulations Schedule 4 Part 1
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:24: ES. It is recommended that the EIA covers the life span of the
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:26:3.0 EIA APPROACH AND TOPIC AREAS
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:28: PRoWs. The EIA should still consider the indirect affects of users of
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:28: the EIA for all Options proposed as it is recognised that the
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:28: scoped out of the EIA.
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:28: these receptors cannot be scoped out of the EIA.
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:29: considered in the EIA for the proposed development. In term so
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:29: the proposals and when undertaking the EIA, the applicant must
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:29: • project introduction, description of the EIA process
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:29: measures identified during the EIA process for each of the
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:31: of the EIA.
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:33: PD Ports should be considered as part of the EIA.
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:33:3.45 The EIA should consider effects on marine ecology relating to,
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:38: undertaken to inform the EIA. The SoS suggests that the
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:40: environmental topics proposed for inclusion in the EIA.
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:42: arise from the regulatory requirements under the EIA Regulations
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:42: included, there is no requirement under the EIA Regulations for an
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:42: referring to specific terminology under both the EIA and Habitats
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:46:4.24 Regulation 24 of the EIA Regulations, which inter alia require the
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:61:Ms H. Nelson – EIA and Land Rights Advisor
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:65:PLANNING ACT 2008 (AS AMENDED) AND THE INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING (EIA)
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:65:i) that ‘The desk-based assessment undertaken to inform the NGCT EIA highlighted that
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:66:ix) that ‘The EIA will determine the requirement for the implementation of mitigation
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:66:(however this will be fully investigated during the EIA).’
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:69:Thank you for your EIA Scoping consultation letter of 6 December 2013.
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:81: scope of the environmental impact assessment (“EIA”) for the York Potash Port and
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:81: must be considered in the EIA.
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:82:5. The proposed method of dredging is yet to be decided. For the EIA, if a method is still
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:82: The EIA must assess the fate of any material disposed of at sea, in particular,
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:82:11. The EIA must assess the cumulative impacts of the proposed disposal with other
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:82: Approach to EIA and the environmental statement
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:83: will be assessed during the EIA. The EIA must also assess the potential to alter the
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:84:28. The MMO considers that the EIA must assess the potential impacts from noise and
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:84:31. The EIA must assess commercial navigation in-combination and cumulatively with
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:84:33. The EIA must assess cumulative impacts from within the Project, for example, the
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:85: the Scoping Report, the Applicant will assess any likely implications in the EIA. If
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:85: order that such activities may be assessed in the EIA.
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:87:EIA and Land Rights Advisor
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:89:Environmental Impact Assessment Scoping consultation (Regulation 15 (3) (i) of the EIA
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:89:scope of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for this development.
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:91:Annex A – Advice related to EIA Scoping Requirements
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:91:on ecosystems or their components. EcIA may be carried out as part of the EIA process or to
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:92:Appropriate Assessment, in addition to consideration of impacts through the EIA process. We invite
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:94:The EIA will need to consider any impacts upon local wildlife and geological sites. Local Sites are
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:96:pertaining to the area. The EIA should include assessments of visual effects on the surrounding
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:96:The EIA should include a full assessment of the potential impacts of the development on local
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:99:EIA and Land Rights Advisor
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:103:EIA and Land Rights Advisor
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:109:The EIA should give consideration to best practice guidance such as the
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:109:Government’s Good Practice Guide for EIA1. It is important that the EIA identifies
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:109:applications. We recommend that the EIA includes consideration of the impacts of
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:109:phasing of construction) is widely regarded as good practice. Ideally, EIA should
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:110:regarding emissions in order that the EIA provides a comprehensive assessment of
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:111:PHE’s view is that the EIA should appraise and describe the measures that will be
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:112:Relevant areas outlined in the Government’s Good Practice Guide for EIA include:
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:113:The EIA should demonstrate compliance with the waste hierarchy (e.g. with respect
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:113:For wastes arising from the installation the EIA should consider:
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:113:Within the EIA PHE would expect to see information about how the promoter would
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:113:The EIA should include consideration of the COMAH Regulations (Control of Major
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:114:negligible.” PHE supports the inclusion of this information within EIAs as good
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:123:(as amended) (the EIA Regulations) as a statement:
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:123: (EIA Regulations Regulation 2)
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:123:line with best practice and case law. The EIA Regulations Schedule 4,
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:123:Schedule 4 Part 1 of the EIA Regulations states this information includes:
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:124: EIA Regulations Schedule 4 Part 1
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:124:Schedule 4 Part 2 of the EIA Regulations. This includes the consideration
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:125:The SoS acknowledges that the EIA process is iterative, and therefore the
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:126:EIA Regulations.
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:126:In general the SoS recommends that the physical scope for the EIA should
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:128:In terms of the EIA methodology, the SoS recommends that reference
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:128:The EIA Regulations require the identification of the ‘likely significant
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:129:interpretation of ‘significant’ in terms of each of the EIA topics.
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:129:significantly affected is a requirement of the EIA Regulations (see
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:129:Schedule 4 Part 1 of the EIA Regulations). These occur where a number of
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:130:location and key aspects that may affect the EIA and how these have been
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:131:As set out in EIA Regulations Schedule 4 Part 1 paragraph 23, the ES
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:131:information (PEI) (this term is defined in the EIA Regulations under
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:132:Act, this could usefully assist the applicant in the EIA process – for
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:133:The EIA Regulations require a Non Technical Summary (EIA Regulations
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:135:The following EIA scoping consultation responses were received
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:1: site-specific information obtained from surveys and studies undertaken as part of the EIA for the
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:30: construction noise levels at the noise sensitive receptors included in the EIA (reported in ES Section
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:82:EIA process. A specification for this monitoring is currently being developed.
TR030002-000109-Harbour Facility Order initial meeting.pdf:2:EIA Scoping
TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:4: Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’)
TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:4: The scheme comprises an EIA development under Section 10(g) of
TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:4: Assessment) Regulations 2009 (‘the 2009 EIA Regulations’) as updated
TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:5: (Amendment) Regulations 2012 (March 2012). The scope of the EIA
TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:13: Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’)……………………………………………… 14
TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:29: Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’)
TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:29: considered that the scheme comprises an EIA development under
TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:29: (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2009 (‘the 2009 EIA
TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:29: of harbours and port installations. An EIA to consider the likely
TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:29:3.22 Information from the EIA is set out in an Environmental Statement (‘ES’)
TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:29:3.23 To confirm the scope of the EIA, the applicant submitted a request in
TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:29: December 2013 to the Planning Inspectorate to provide an EIA scoping
TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:29: opinion under regulation 8 of the 2009 EIA Regulations. The Planning
TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:29: confirmed its agreement that the EIA should address the following
TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:30: formed after taking into account the 2009 EIA Regulations, the nature
TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:30: Regulation 8(6) of the EIA Regulations, the Planning Inspectorate
TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:38: scheme through EIA to take place as described in the Environmental
TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:82: which set out the findings of an EIA of the proposed Harbour Facilities
TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:86:7.104 It must therefore be concluded that the approach to the EIA is in
TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:88: states that where port development is subject to an EIA, it is important to
TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:96: 85/337/EEC (EIA Directive) and
TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:96: Directive 97/11/EEC (EIA Directive
TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:97: included a formal EIA Scoping Opinion
TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:114: R/2013/0685 Screening and scoping opinion for EIA required on 12
TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:114: R/2014/0183 Screening opinion for installation a EIA not required on
TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:114: R/2014/0577 Screening opinion for amendments EIA not required on
TR030002-000467-Section 6 App 6.1 Land quality investigation meeting note.pdf:3:polyhalite bulk fertiliser. Royal HaskoningDHV (RHDHV) has been commissioned by YPL as EIA
TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:4: within the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) process. The standard EIA approach assesses
TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:6: surveys are usually also undertaken to support the wider EIA process. For this project they include:
TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:44:impact of operations for the proposed port terminal could to inform the EIA (see Section 11 of the ES for sufficient significance to cause deterioration, the
TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:48: Murphy, J., Cocker, A., Munro, B., Vetori, C. and Woodward, R. (2012) Integrating WFD in EIA:
TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:48: experience so far. IEMA EIA Quality Mark Article. http://www.iema.net/qmark/articles [Accessed
TR030002-000253-Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening document (5).pdf:4:Regulations 2009 (as amended) (the EIA Regulations) and on the basis of the current
TR030002-000253-Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening document (5).pdf:4:Note: The Secretary of State’s duty under Regulation 24 of the EIA Regulations continues
TR030002-000253-Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening document (5).pdf:5:Regulations 2009 (as amended) (the EIA Regulations) and on the basis of the current
TR030002-000253-Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening document (5).pdf:5:Note: The Secretary of State’s duty under Regulation 24 of the EIA Regulations continues
TR030002-000750-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Tracked).pdf:6: “the 2009 EIA Regulations” means the Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
TR030002-000750-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Tracked).pdf:12:with the 2009 EIA Regulations and any orders, rules or regulations made under the 2008 Act.
TR030002-000750-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Tracked).pdf:26:statement or any updated environmental information supplied pursuant to the 2009 EIA Regulations.
TR030002-000750-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Tracked).pdf:26:or any updated environmental information supplied pursuant to the 2009 EIA Regulations.
TR030002-000018-Examination Library.pdf:13:APP-194 Section 4: Approach to Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)
TR030002-000018-Examination Library.pdf:13:APP-199 Section 5: Appendix 5.1 Hydraulic Studies to Support EIA
TR030002-000110-130729 York Potash meeting - Minutes of the meeting with key statutory bodies.pdf:1:York Potash Planning Application NYM/2013/0062/MEIA
TR030002-000110-130729 York Potash meeting - Minutes of the meeting with key statutory bodies.pdf:1:1.2 The main Agenda items were Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), Habitats
TR030002-000110-130729 York Potash meeting - Minutes of the meeting with key statutory bodies.pdf:2: which would cover the EIA for the mine head, pipeline and other facilities and
TR030002-000110-130729 York Potash meeting - Minutes of the meeting with key statutory bodies.pdf:2: problem in relation to both EIA and HRA.
TR030002-000110-130729 York Potash meeting - Minutes of the meeting with key statutory bodies.pdf:3: linked to the pipeline, would need to be covered by the EIA and HRA, namely the
TR030002-000110-130729 York Potash meeting - Minutes of the meeting with key statutory bodies.pdf:3:4.3 AMEC also advised that for EIA as well as HRA purposes, sufficient detailed
TR030002-000110-130729 York Potash meeting - Minutes of the meeting with key statutory bodies.pdf:4: with its proposals to address outstanding EIA issues in the draft Plan. TP commented
TR030002-000110-130729 York Potash meeting - Minutes of the meeting with key statutory bodies.pdf:5: AMEC ES review were unexpected and presented at the last minute, the detailed EIA
TR030002-000453-ES Section 18 Infrastructure.pdf:16: Note that sufficient ground investigation work has been undertaken to inform the EIA and DCO application.
TR030002-000453-ES Section 18 Infrastructure.pdf:18: December 2013 and April 2014, and consultation responses received during the EIA scoping process
TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:82: 143022-EIA-001 Rev 0 – Overall Site Layout For Planning
TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:82: 143022-EIA-002 Rev 0 – Overall Site Layout Sections
TR030002-000420-Doc 1.4 Document List.pdf:7:MHF Overall Site Layout 143022-EIA-001 Rev 2 3.7 27 March 2015
TR030002-000572-Doc 7.3 Appendix 4 - Economic Impact Report.pdf:11: the EIA (such as noise, landscape and visual and and has set a range of targets including 50
TR030002-000572-Doc 7.3 Appendix 4 - Economic Impact Report.pdf:47: that between 2,000 and 3,000 employees have the EIA and people’s perception of those impacts
TR030002-000572-Doc 7.3 Appendix 4 - Economic Impact Report.pdf:47: number of “special qualities” – or the qualities that 8.21 Within the EIA, the study areas considered
TR030002-000572-Doc 7.3 Appendix 4 - Economic Impact Report.pdf:49: for the EIA, which set out the actual effect on the by 15 years, as plants designed for visual screening
TR030002-000572-Doc 7.3 Appendix 4 - Economic Impact Report.pdf:49: 8.32 As set out in the EIA, the proposals would
TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf:2: the scope of the terrestrial ecology surveys that have been undertaken to inform the EIA process was
TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf:3: Table 10-1 Summary of scoping comments received from PINS during EIA scoping phase and Section 42 consultation
TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf:4:Environmental Management (IEEM). EcIA may be carried out as part of the EIA process or to support other forms of
TR030002-000769-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:6: “the 2009 EIA Regulations” means the Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
TR030002-000769-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:12:with the 2009 EIA Regulations and any orders, rules or regulations made under the 2008 Act.
TR030002-000769-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:26:updated environmental information supplied pursuant to the 2009 EIA Regulations.
TR030002-000769-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:26:or any updated environmental information supplied pursuant to the 2009 EIA Regulations.
TR030002-000736-Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council (Local Impact Report).pdf:3:dealt with the main application for the minehead (NYM/2014/0676/MEIA)
TR030002-000736-Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council (Local Impact Report).pdf:20:which are adverse and significant but for those that are, the EIA process has
TR030002-000736-Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council (Local Impact Report).pdf:20:Potash and their consultants are ongoing. The EIA has also identified positive
TR030002-000018-Examination Library (5).pdf:13:APP-194 Section 4: Approach to Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)
TR030002-000018-Examination Library (5).pdf:13:APP-199 Section 5: Appendix 5.1 Hydraulic Studies to Support EIA
TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf:3:Option 1 and 2. The EIA should still consider indirect effects of users of the public rights of way in terms Scoping Report (Appe
TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf:3:The Secretary of State agreed to the proposal to scope out recreation and access via water from the EIA Section 21.1
TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf:4:21.3.6 Section 4 of this ES describes the generic assessment methodology adopted for this EIA. The specific
TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf:2:11.2.9 During this consultation, the Environment Agency recommended that the EIA for the proposed scheme
TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf:8: section of the ES and, therefore, reference has been made to the findings of the EIA for these topic
TR030002-001865-The York Potash Harbour Facilities Order 2016 - Tracked Changes showing non-material amendments.pdf:4: “the 2009 EIA Regulations” means the Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
TR030002-001865-The York Potash Harbour Facilities Order 2016 - Tracked Changes showing non-material amendments.pdf:11:2009 EIA Regulations and any orders, rules or regulations made under the 2008 Act.
TR030002-001865-The York Potash Harbour Facilities Order 2016 - Tracked Changes showing non-material amendments.pdf:24:supplied under the 2009 EIA Regulations.
TR030002-001865-The York Potash Harbour Facilities Order 2016 - Tracked Changes showing non-material amendments.pdf:25:any updated environmental information supplied under the 2009 EIA Regulations.
TR030002-001865-The York Potash Harbour Facilities Order 2016 - Tracked Changes showing non-material amendments.pdf:30:statement or any updated environmental information supplied under the 2009 EIA Regulations.
TR030002-000253-Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening document.pdf:4:Regulations 2009 (as amended) (the EIA Regulations) and on the basis of the current
TR030002-000253-Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening document.pdf:4:Note: The Secretary of State’s duty under Regulation 24 of the EIA Regulations continues
TR030002-000253-Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening document.pdf:5:Regulations 2009 (as amended) (the EIA Regulations) and on the basis of the current
TR030002-000253-Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening document.pdf:5:Note: The Secretary of State’s duty under Regulation 24 of the EIA Regulations continues
TR030002-000099-141104_TR030002_Meeting_Note.pdf:1: Laura Allen (Senior EIA and Land Rights Advisor)
TR030002-000099-141104_TR030002_Meeting_Note.pdf:1: Hannah Nelson (EIA and Land Rights Advisor)
TR030002-000099-141104_TR030002_Meeting_Note.pdf:5:however the EIA advisors and Lawyer will remain the same.
TR030002-000722-York Potash Limited 4.pdf:5: Harbour facilities Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), other than in the cumulative
TR030002-000722-York Potash Limited 4.pdf:5:2.5. An EIA was undertaken for the proposed Harbour facilities in accordance with the
TR030002-000722-York Potash Limited 4.pdf:5: 2012, and with reference to relevant guidance notes from PINS. The EIA process incorporated
TR030002-000722-York Potash Limited 4.pdf:5: 7. The PER presented the initial findings of the EIA undertaken by Royal HaskoningDHV on
TR030002-000722-York Potash Limited 4.pdf:5: behalf of YPL. In addition to the responses received in the PINS Scoping Opinion, the EIA also
TR030002-000722-York Potash Limited 4.pdf:8:4.2. The methodology adopted for the assessment of potential impacts followed the generic EIA
TR030002-000722-York Potash Limited 4.pdf:10: Sediment quality data from samples collected as part of the EIAs for the Northern Gateway
TR030002-000722-York Potash Limited 4.pdf:10: A sediment quality survey undertaken as part of the EIA for the Harbour facilities during
TR030002-000722-York Potash Limited 4.pdf:12: Results of a benthic survey undertaken in 2008 as part of the EIA for the consented QEII
TR030002-000722-York Potash Limited 4.pdf:18:8.2. The methodology adopted for the assessment of potential impacts followed the generic EIA
TR030002-000722-York Potash Limited 4.pdf:19: technical studies which were also undertaken to support the EIA process. Survey and technical
TR030002-000738-York Potash Limited 3.pdf:5:the EIA.
TR030002-000738-York Potash Limited 3.pdf:6: Harbour facilities Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), other than in the cumulative
TR030002-000738-York Potash Limited 3.pdf:6:2.5. An EIA was undertaken for the proposed Harbour facilities in accordance with the
TR030002-000738-York Potash Limited 3.pdf:6: 2012, and with reference to relevant guidance notes from PINS. The EIA process incorporated
TR030002-000738-York Potash Limited 3.pdf:6: 7. The PER presented the initial findings of the EIA undertaken by Royal HaskoningDHV on
TR030002-000738-York Potash Limited 3.pdf:6: behalf of YPL. In addition to the responses received in the PINS Scoping Opinion, the EIA also
TR030002-000738-York Potash Limited 3.pdf:9: Sediment quality data from samples collected as part of the EIAs for the Northern Gateway
TR030002-000738-York Potash Limited 3.pdf:9: A sediment quality survey undertaken as part of the EIA for the Harbour facilities during
TR030002-000738-York Potash Limited 3.pdf:11: Results of a benthic survey undertaken in 2008 as part of the EIA for the consented QEII
TR030002-000673-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 22 to 31.pdf:4:Appendix 10 Harbour facilities EIA Scoping Opinion list of statutory consultees
TR030002-000673-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 22 to 31.pdf:15:Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) to be focusing on the construction period
TR030002-000673-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 22 to 31.pdf:15:The EIA looks in detail at the potential impacts
TR030002-000673-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 22 to 31.pdf:15:EIA are:
TR030002-000673-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 22 to 31.pdf:39: 5.0 Habitats and Species of Principal Importance as described in the EIA scoping response: The ES should
TR030002-000673-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 22 to 31.pdf:41: for the EIA.
TR030002-000673-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 22 to 31.pdf:41: of the risks associated with disturbance to potentially contaminated sediment will be undertaken during the EIA process.
TR030002-000673-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 22 to 31.pdf:42: of submission) then the EIA should assess the potential impacts of all the material being disposed of offshore.
TR030002-000673-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 22 to 31.pdf:42: and approach channel and the volume will be predicted during the EIA process. The applicant must decide whether to
TR030002-000673-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 22 to 31.pdf:42: 5.10 Cumulative impacts - The PER has not identified any plans or projects for inclusion within the EIA and final ES, it
TR030002-000673-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 22 to 31.pdf:42: aware that depending on the outcomes of the full EIA, additional mitigation measures may be required. The applicant
TR030002-000673-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 22 to 31.pdf:42: the applicant has not chosen a preferred option for the scheme at the time of submission of the ES, then the EIA should
TR030002-000673-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 22 to 31.pdf:45: 3. The scope of the EIA makes reference to the 'socio-economics' as being one of the key topics that are to be investigated.
TR030002-000673-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 22 to 31.pdf:59: Environmental Report. Full methodology and data shall be submitted with the final EIA.3. Noise and Vibration: The proposed
TR030002-000673-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 22 to 31.pdf:59: phases of the development. A full noise mitigation scheme shall be provided with the formal EIA report which shall detail
TR030002-000673-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 22 to 31.pdf:59: mitigation for the construction and operational phases. Full methodologies and raw data shall be provided with the EIA.4.
TR030002-000450-ES Section 15 Archaeology and heritage.pdf:1: known and recorded heritage assets had been considered as part of the EIA.
TR030002-000450-ES Section 15 Archaeology and heritage.pdf:6:the proposals on undesignated archaeological / heritage assets, and will also further, assessed as part of the EIA. This is also
TR030002-000450-ES Section 15 Archaeology and heritage.pdf:6: informed the EIA and requirement for, and scop
TR030002-000450-ES Section 15 Archaeology and heritage.pdf:8: not significantly) from the standard approach adopted more generally within this EIA, as set out in
TR030002-000450-ES Section 15 Archaeology and heritage.pdf:11:15.4.20 An impact significance of ‘major’ or ‘moderate’ would be considered to be ‘significant’ in EIA terms.
TR030002-000450-ES Section 15 Archaeology and heritage.pdf:11: the NGCT EIA (AOC Archaeology, 2005) (Appendix 15.2). There is also the Geoarchaeological Stage
TR030002-000450-ES Section 15 Archaeology and heritage.pdf:29: the terms of the NPPF (2012). Overall, the EIA has identified nothing that would preclude the
TR030002-000454-ES Section 19 Socioeconomics.pdf:2:The scope of the EIA makes reference to socio-economics as being one of the key topics to be investigated. As part of Sections 19.
TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:1:EIA Process and Methodology ………………………………………………………….. 15
TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:15:EIA Process and Methodology (PM)
TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:16:The approach to the EIA described in ES Chapter 3 (Approach to the EIA) (Doc
TR030002-001855-Development Consent Order as made by the Secretary of State.pdf:4: “the 2009 EIA Regulations” means the Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
TR030002-001855-Development Consent Order as made by the Secretary of State.pdf:11:2009 EIA Regulations and any orders, rules or regulations made under the 2008 Act.
TR030002-001855-Development Consent Order as made by the Secretary of State.pdf:24:supplied under the 2009 EIA Regulations.
TR030002-001855-Development Consent Order as made by the Secretary of State.pdf:24:any updated environmental information supplied under the 2009 EIA Regulations.
TR030002-001855-Development Consent Order as made by the Secretary of State.pdf:29:statement or any updated environmental information supplied under the 2009 EIA Regulations.
TR030002-000500-Section 19 App 19.1 Socio economic legislation_policy_guidance.pdf:14: the EIA (such as noise, landscape and visual and and has set a range of targets including 50
TR030002-000500-Section 19 App 19.1 Socio economic legislation_policy_guidance.pdf:51: that between 2,000 and 3,000 employees have the EIA and people’s perception of those impacts
TR030002-000500-Section 19 App 19.1 Socio economic legislation_policy_guidance.pdf:51: number of “special qualities” – or the qualities that 8.21 Within the EIA, the study areas considered
TR030002-000500-Section 19 App 19.1 Socio economic legislation_policy_guidance.pdf:53: for the EIA, which set out the actual effect on the by 15 years, as plants designed for visual screening
TR030002-000500-Section 19 App 19.1 Socio economic legislation_policy_guidance.pdf:53: 8.32 As set out in the EIA, the proposals would
TR030002-000898-160113_TR030002_Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:5: “the 2009 EIA Regulations” means the Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
TR030002-000898-160113_TR030002_Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:12:inconsistent with the 2009 EIA Regulations and any orders, rules or regulations made under the
TR030002-000898-160113_TR030002_Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:25:2009 EIA Regulations.
TR030002-000898-160113_TR030002_Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:26:or any updated environmental information supplied pursuant to the 2009 EIA Regulations.
TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:6: ASSESSMENT (EIA) REGULATIONS AND HABITAT REGULATIONS
TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:10: (Amendment) Regulations 2012 (the EIA Regulations). It was
TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:10: main ES (Document 6.5) APP-185 and, as required by the EIA
TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:29: Impact Assessment) Regulations 2009 (EIA Regulations) and on the
TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:29: 24 of the EIA Regulations was therefore not considered necessary.
TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:31: those that are, the EIA process has identified mitigation measures
TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:45: IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA) REGULATIONS AND HABITAT
TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:50: in preparing the EIA and had no further comment to make RR-020.
TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:193:APP-194 Section 4: Approach to Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)
TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:193:APP-199 Section 5: Appendix 5.1 Hydraulic Studies to Support EIA
TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:213: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:220: “the 2009 EIA Regulations” means the Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:227:inconsistent with the 2009 EIA Regulations and any orders, rules or regulations made under the
TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:240:2009 EIA Regulations.
TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:240:EIA Regulations.
TR030002-000854-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:6: “the 2009 EIA Regulations” means the Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
TR030002-000854-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:13:inconsistent with the 2009 EIA Regulations and any orders, rules or regulations made under the
TR030002-000854-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:26:2009 EIA Regulations.
TR030002-000854-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:27:or any updated environmental information supplied pursuant to the 2009 EIA Regulations.
TR030002-000018-Examination Library (3).pdf:13:APP-194 Section 4: Approach to Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)
TR030002-000018-Examination Library (3).pdf:13:APP-199 Section 5: Appendix 5.1 Hydraulic Studies to Support EIA
TR030002-000863-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:6: “the 2009 EIA Regulations” means the Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
TR030002-000863-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:13:inconsistent with the 2009 EIA Regulations and any orders, rules or regulations made under the
TR030002-000863-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:26:2009 EIA Regulations.
TR030002-000863-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:27:or any updated environmental information supplied pursuant to the 2009 EIA Regulations.
TR030002-000455-ES Section 20 Landscape and visual environment.pdf:5: The EIA should include a full assessment of potential impacts on local Section 20.6 and Appendix 20.2
TR030002-000455-ES Section 20 Landscape and visual environment.pdf:6:20.4.7 For the purposes of the EIA Regulations, landscape and visual impacts identified as being moderate,
TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:44: EIA Process and Methodology (PM)
TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:46: The approach to the EIA described in ES For all parameters, the baseline conditions are described
TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:46: Chapter 3 (Approach to the EIA) (Doc 6.4) using either existing information where it remains valid
TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:46: the assessment. Looking at the individual inform the EIA. The following provides an overview of the
TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:46: a number of years has been used to for each aspect of the EIA.
TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:48: undertaken specifically for the EIA in 2014.
TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:70: Terminal EIA (which included capital dredging closer to
TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:88: 2014-0676/MEIA which was the subject of a committee
TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:92: potential issue during the scoping phase of the EIA.
TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:102: effects arising during both construction to the EIA have been applied with respect to the HRA.
TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:104: The ‘other plans and projects’ included in The EIA and HRA considers the effects of maintenance
TR030002-000018-Examination Library (2).pdf:13:APP-194 Section 4: Approach to Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)
TR030002-000018-Examination Library (2).pdf:13:APP-199 Section 5: Appendix 5.1 Hydraulic Studies to Support EIA
TR030002-000253-Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening document (3).pdf:4:Regulations 2009 (as amended) (the EIA Regulations) and on the basis of the current
TR030002-000253-Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening document (3).pdf:4:Note: The Secretary of State’s duty under Regulation 24 of the EIA Regulations continues
TR030002-000253-Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening document (3).pdf:5:Regulations 2009 (as amended) (the EIA Regulations) and on the basis of the current
TR030002-000253-Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening document (3).pdf:5:Note: The Secretary of State’s duty under Regulation 24 of the EIA Regulations continues
TR030002-000451-ES Section 16 Commercial navigation.pdf:1: considered in the EIA process.
TR030002-000451-ES Section 16 Commercial navigation.pdf:2: Assessment will be undertaken to inform the EIA. The were presented in the PER and formed part of the
TR030002-000451-ES Section 16 Commercial navigation.pdf:2: The EIA must assess the commercial navigation in- The Marine Navigation Risk Assessment has taken into
TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:6:The MMO considers that the EIA must assess the potential impacts from noise and vibration on marine receptors An underwater noise
TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:7:provided with the formal EIA. Full methodologies and raw data shall be provided in the EIA.
TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:8: as part of the EIA, and is presented in Section 12.
TR030002-000840-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:5: “the 2009 EIA Regulations” means the Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
TR030002-000840-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:12:inconsistent with the 2009 EIA Regulations and any orders, rules or regulations made under the
TR030002-000840-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:25:2009 EIA Regulations.
TR030002-000840-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:26:or any updated environmental information supplied pursuant to the 2009 EIA Regulations.
TR030002-000482-Section 12 App 12.2 Transport Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:11:NYM/2010/0262/EIA NYMNPA Discount, too far from study area. No ES
TR030002-000482-Section 12 App 12.2 Transport Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:11: development), reference NYM/2010/0262/EIA, for which approval was granted on appeal on 26 June 2012
TR030002-000482-Section 12 App 12.2 Transport Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:11:NYM/2013/0593/EIA NYMNPA application submitted to the National Park Authority and North Yorkshire County Council. The application to this Authority was approved in December Discount, too far from study area. No ES
TR030002-000482-Section 12 App 12.2 Transport Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:18:NYM/2010/0262/EIA NYMNPA ES
TR030002-000482-Section 12 App 12.2 Transport Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:18: proposed development), reference NYM/2010/0262/EIA, for which approval was granted on appeal on 26 June 2012 Following completion of the construction works there will a minimal
TR030002-000482-Section 12 App 12.2 Transport Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:18:NYM/2013/0593/EIA NYMNPA planning application submitted to the National Park Authority and North Yorkshire County Council. The application to this Authority was approved ES
TR030002-000705-Applicant response to First Questions - Appendix 7.pdf:5:the Environmental Imp pact Assessm ment (EIA) prrocess for the
TR030002-000672-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 10 to 21.pdf:4:Appendix 10 Harbour facilities EIA Scoping Opinion list of statutory consultees
TR030002-000672-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 10 to 21.pdf:6: Harbour facilities EIA Scoping Opinion list of statutory
TR030002-000672-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 10 to 21.pdf:38: Assessment (EIA) and this is being information identified to date in relation to
TR030002-000672-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 10 to 21.pdf:38: The EIA looks in detail at the potential An Environmental Statement, reporting
TR030002-000672-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 10 to 21.pdf:38: impacts of the Project on the on the findings from the EIA, will be
TR030002-000672-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 10 to 21.pdf:38: EIA, an in-depth assessment has been
TR030002-000672-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 10 to 21.pdf:295:2.11 The harbour development is classed as ‘EIA development’ as defined in the
TR030002-000672-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 10 to 21.pdf:315:Planning and EIA Director
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:5:4 APPROACH TO EIA AND THE ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT 29
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:7: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:9: required as part of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) process. In this
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:10: about the proposed scheme, to identify additional information to inform the EIA and to
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:10: Note 7 released by PINS on screening and scoping under the EIA Regulations (Planning
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:11: The proposed study area for the EIA is the area over which the direct and indirect
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:16: presents the proposed approach to the EIA and ES. Section 5 identifies the potential
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:16: applicable) the likely implications of any decommissioning will be covered in the EIA.
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:17: private projects on the environment (the EIA Directive) and Directive 97/11/EEC (which
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:17: Additional legislation which is likely to be of relevance to the EIA process is identified
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:18: assessment as part of the EIA.
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:19: Within the EIA, options for the disposal of waste will be identified in accordance with the
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:22: the elements that are shaded grey have been or are being assessed within EIAs that
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:22: The elements shaded green form part of the current EIA process, of which this
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:23: Assessed within the EIAs
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:23: Included within the EIA
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:23: The operational processes that are within the scope of this EIA process comprise the
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:34: dredging required on an annual basis will be predicted during the EIA process (see
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:35: Alternative uses for the dredged material will be explored through the EIA process and
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:35: to an assessment of sediment quality which would be undertaken as part of the EIA
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:37:4 APPROACH TO EIA AND THE ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:37: The EIA for the proposed scheme will conform to the requirements of the Infrastructure
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:37: proposed scheme. The general steps in the process that will be followed as the EIA is
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:37: The process of EIA is an iterative and evolutionary one that builds up layers of data as
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:37: Further work that is considered necessary to fulfil the data requirements for the EIA is
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:37: The ES is a formal report that documents the findings of the EIA process. The ES will
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:37: • Project introduction, including a description of the EIA process, including details
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:37: during the EIA process for each of the environmental issues under
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:38: produced during the undertaking of the EIA.
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:38: Figure 4.1 The EIA process
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:38: Screening report Screening To formally confirm route for EIA and lead Appropriate level of information
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:38: EIA Consultation Consult with statutory and non-statutory Local knowledge and
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:38: Statement EIA guidance.
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:40: Consultation is an important part of the EIA process. A comprehensive approach
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:40: potential impacts of the proposed scheme are identified at an early stage in the EIA
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:41: the context of a comprehensive EIA of the proposed scheme are considered in turn.
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:45:5.1.3 Approach to the EIA for all options
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:51:5.2.3 Approach to the EIA for all options
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:51: is proposed that these aspects are scoped out of the EIA process.
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:52: In parallel with the EIA, a Flood Risk Assessment will be undertaken in accordance with
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:53: Sediment samples were collected as part of the EIA for the NGCT during 2006 (Royal
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:54:Figure 5.3 Sediment sample locations for the NGCT EIA and QEII Jetty EIA
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:56:Bay C) as part of the EIA for the NGCT. The modelling predicted that dispersion under
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:56:The NGCT EIA concluded that, in the context of the existing disposal of maintenance
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:56:associated with all options will be considered within the EIA.
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:57:5.3.3 Approach to EIA for all options
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:57: these will be explored during the EIA process.
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:58: management facility). This will be examined in more detail within the EIA.
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:62:sediment concentrations. However, this effect will be considered fully within the EIA.
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:62:be considered within the EIA.
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:63: considered within the EIA.
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:63:5.4.3 Approach to EIA for all options
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:63: Benthic invertebrate surveys were undertaken as part of the EIAs for the NGCT and the
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:63: additional sampling will be used to inform the EIA for this section of the ES.
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:63: The EIA will consider any impacts upon local wildlife sites in the area; these sites will be
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:63: identified through consultation with the Tees Valley Wildlife Trust. The EIA will also
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:63: section of the EIA, particularly the prediction of sediment plume dispersion during capital
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:63: This aspect of the EIA will also inform a WFD compliance assessment, which will be
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:63: As part of the EIA, a benthic survey is proposed within the footprint of the proposed
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:67: As part of the NGCT EIA, a breeding bird survey was conducted on the Teesport Estate
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:67:5.5.3 Approach to EIA for all options
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:68: part of the EIA process.
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:68: The EIA will determine the requirement for the implementation of mitigation measures to
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:68: investigated during the EIA):
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:70:5.6.3 Approach to EIA for all options
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:70: inform the EIA. In addition to the Extended Phase 1 habitat survey, it is proposed that
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:71: As set out in Section 5.4.3, the EIA will also assess the impacts of the proposals on
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:71: terrestrial ecology). Mitigation measures will be identified during the EIA process, but
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:73:5.7.3 Approach to EIA for all options
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:73: as part of the EIA. The ES will be informed by desk-based assessment, comprising
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:74: be explored during the EIA process.
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:74: basis of the significance of the potential impacts identified within the EIA.
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:75: separately within the air quality and noise sections of the EIA.
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:76:5.8.3 Approach to EIA for all options
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:76: The transport section of the EIA will assess the traffic impact on the local highway
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:76: The EIA will consider potential impacts on the local highway network during the
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:76: the EIA.
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:77: The EIA will determine the requirement for the implementation of mitigation measures to
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:77: investigated during the EIA):
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:78: covering the EIA scoping area
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:79:5.9.3 Approach to EIA for all options
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:80: given the exclusion of the materials handling facility at Wilton from the scope of this EIA
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:80: The EIA will determine the requirement for the implementation of mitigation measures to
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:80: this will be fully investigated during the EIA):
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:81:5.10.3 Approach to EIA for all options
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:82: The EIA will determine the requirement for the implementation of mitigation measures to
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:82: during the EIA).
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:83: The desk-based assessment undertaken to inform the NGCT EIA highlighted that within
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:84: the current EIA process) could impact upon potential buried historic/prehistoric land
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:84: potential setting effects that would be assessed as part of the EIA, although at this stage
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:84:5.11.3 Approach to the EIA for all options
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:85: The EIA will determine the requirement for the implementation of mitigation measures to
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:85: acceptable level (however this will be fully investigated during the EIA).
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:88:5.12.3 Approach to the EIA for all options
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:88: A Marine Navigation Risk Assessment will be undertaken to inform the EIA process.
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:89:5.13.3 Approach to the EIA for all options
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:90: for mitigation measures to be implemented will be fully investigated during the EIA.
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:90: systems and an appropriate approach for the EIA, information has been obtained from
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:93:5.14.3 Approach to the EIA for all options
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:93: scheme will be fully addressed within the EIA.
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:94:5.15.3 Approach to the EIA for all options
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:96:5.16.3 Approach to the EIA for all options
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:98: aspect of the EIA. These effects will be assessed separately within the EIA process and
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:98:5.17.3 Approach to the EIA for Option 1 and Option 2
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:98: It is considered that this topic can be scoped out of the EIA for Options 1 and 2 given
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:98:5.17.4 Approach to the EIA for Option 3
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:98: proposed conveyor route to the marine terminal, the EIA will assess the routes and
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:98: the EIA as no significant impacts to such activities are anticipated.
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:99: EIA process.
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:99: Impact Assessment (EIA) Directive (85/337/EEC) and associated EIA Regulations
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:99: EIA process for a development. Consequently, generally completed projects can be
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:99: of EIAs for NGCT, No.1 Quay and QEII jetty. The initial list is provided below (noting
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:100:The EIA will identify whether there is the potential for cumulative impacts for each
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:104: handling facility, conveyor route and marine terminal), and the scope of the EIA and ES.
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:104: This Environmental Scoping Report represents the first reporting stage in the EIA
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:104: The process of EIA is an iterative and evolutionary one that builds up layers of data as
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:104: proposed approach to the EIA associated with progression of Options 1, 2 and 3.
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:105:Table 6.1 Summary of potential environmental impacts and proposed approach to the EIA for each sc
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:105:Topic Potential impacts Proposed approach to EIA
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:105: associated with the anticipated presence of made ground. scoped out of the EIA.
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:106:Topic Potential impacts Proposed approach to EIA
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:106: • Release of sediment into the water column leading to increased also inform this section of the EIA.
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:106: • Disturbance to existing road users, including increased risk of EIA.
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:107:Topic Potential impacts Proposed approach to EIA
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:108:Topic Potential impacts Proposed approach to EIA
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:108:Landscape and • Potential for impacts upon the existing local landscape • The EIA will be informed by a prop
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:108: Option 3 • The EIA will assess the routes and a
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:110:HR Wallingford, (2009). Teesport, QEII Berth: Hydraulic studies to support the EIA.
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:110:Planning Inspectorate (2012). Screening and scoping under the EIA Regulations.
TR030002-000253-Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening document (4).pdf:4:Regulations 2009 (as amended) (the EIA Regulations) and on the basis of the current
TR030002-000253-Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening document (4).pdf:4:Note: The Secretary of State’s duty under Regulation 24 of the EIA Regulations continues
TR030002-000253-Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening document (4).pdf:5:Regulations 2009 (as amended) (the EIA Regulations) and on the basis of the current
TR030002-000253-Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening document (4).pdf:5:Note: The Secretary of State’s duty under Regulation 24 of the EIA Regulations continues
TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:5: receptors cannot be scoped out of the EIA.
TR030002-000771-York Potash Ltd (3).pdf:6: “the 2009 EIA Regulations” means the Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
TR030002-000771-York Potash Ltd (3).pdf:12:with the 2009 EIA Regulations and any orders, rules or regulations made under the 2008 Act.
TR030002-000771-York Potash Ltd (3).pdf:26:updated environmental information supplied pursuant to the 2009 EIA Regulations.
TR030002-000771-York Potash Ltd (3).pdf:26:or any updated environmental information supplied pursuant to the 2009 EIA Regulations.
TR030002-000578-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 3.pdf:19: An important part of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) process is to review
TR030002-000569-Doc 7.3 Appendix 2a - MDT Planning Statement.pdf:66: Economic Chapter of the EIA that inform the application.
TR030002-000569-Doc 7.3 Appendix 2a - MDT Planning Statement.pdf:74: the actual estimated impacts presented in the EIA and people’s perception of those impacts gauged
TR030002-000569-Doc 7.3 Appendix 2a - MDT Planning Statement.pdf:81:8.13 It is for the EIA to assess and report the residual environmental effects of the proposed
TR030002-000569-Doc 7.3 Appendix 2a - MDT Planning Statement.pdf:84: this Statement and the planning authority will no doubt consider the EIA and other reported effects
TR030002-000569-Doc 7.3 Appendix 2a - MDT Planning Statement.pdf:87: the project’s EIA, it would not be appropriate to attempt a definitive summary in this MDT Planning
TR030002-000814-York Potash Ltd.pdf:8:MHF Overall Site Layout 143022-EIA-001 Rev 2 3.7 27 March 2015
TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:33:EIA process. A specification for this monitoring is currently being developed.
TR030002-000018-Examination Library (1).pdf:13:APP-194 Section 4: Approach to Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)
TR030002-000018-Examination Library (1).pdf:13:APP-199 Section 5: Appendix 5.1 Hydraulic Studies to Support EIA
TR030002-000253-Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening document (2).pdf:4:Regulations 2009 (as amended) (the EIA Regulations) and on the basis of the current
TR030002-000253-Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening document (2).pdf:4:Note: The Secretary of State’s duty under Regulation 24 of the EIA Regulations continues
TR030002-000253-Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening document (2).pdf:5:Regulations 2009 (as amended) (the EIA Regulations) and on the basis of the current
TR030002-000253-Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening document (2).pdf:5:Note: The Secretary of State’s duty under Regulation 24 of the EIA Regulations continues
TR030002-000095-140325_TR030002_Meeting Note - Teleconference with applicant.pdf:1: Laura Allen (Senior EIA and Land Rights
TR030002-000095-140325_TR030002_Meeting Note - Teleconference with applicant.pdf:1: Hannah Nelson (EIA and Land Rights Advisor)
TR030002-000865-York Potash Limited.pdf:9:MHF Overall Site Layout 143022-EIA-001 Rev 2 3.7 27 March 2015
TR030002-000501-Section 20 App 20.1 LVIA methodology.pdf:3: LVIA is either carried out formally as part of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) process
TR030002-000501-Section 20 App 20.1 LVIA methodology.pdf:3: The key purpose of EIA Directives and legislation is to ensure that likely significant effects on the
TR030002-000501-Section 20 App 20.1 LVIA methodology.pdf:3: has been prepared to identify likely significant landscape and visual effects to inform the EIA and
TR030002-000501-Section 20 App 20.1 LVIA methodology.pdf:4: EIA Regulations1 specify that an assessment of likely significant effects should cover certain
TR030002-000501-Section 20 App 20.1 LVIA methodology.pdf:4: Table 1: Relationship between EIA Regulations and LVIA Process
TR030002-000501-Section 20 App 20.1 LVIA methodology.pdf:4: EIA Aspects Interpretation of EIA Aspects Within LVIA Process/ Reporting
TR030002-000501-Section 20 App 20.1 LVIA methodology.pdf:10: undertaken. Available quantitative evidence from other EIA disciplines for example noise,
TR030002-000501-Section 20 App 20.1 LVIA methodology.pdf:13: considered as likely significant effects in terms of EIA Regulations.
TR030002-000501-Section 20 App 20.1 LVIA methodology.pdf:14: 13. Iterative EIA Process and Mitigation Design
TR030002-000501-Section 20 App 20.1 LVIA methodology.pdf:14: EIA and project development activities are normally parallel processes. The outcome of EIA
TR030002-000465-Section 5 App 5.1 Hydraulic studies to support EIA.pdf:1:Support EIA
TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:1: Where the development is subject to EIA, the application should ensure that the ES clearly sets out Section 5.1.4
TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:3:The MMO considers that the EIA must assess potential impacts from noise and vibration on marine receptors during both construction an
TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:10: assessment of potential impacts on waterbirds in the EIA process (this section of the ES) and the HRA
TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:21:9.4.43 As part of the NGCT EIA, a breeding bird survey was conducted on the Teesport Estate by ESL (ESL,
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:1: Where the development is subject to EIA, the application should ensure that the ES clearly sets Section 5.1.4
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:4:8.3.2 The results of a benthic survey undertaken in December 2008 as part of the EIA for the consented QEII
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:4: recovered during benthic surveys to inform the EIAs for both NGCT and the QEII jetty refurbishment.
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:5:The EIA should consider effects on marine ecology relating to, inter alia, increased disturbance and displacement, habitat loss and
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:6:The EIA will need to consider impacts upon local wildlife and geological sites. Contact the Tees Valley Wildlife Trust, local
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:7:the EIA however.
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:8:offshore. The applicant should ensure that if this is the case (or unknown at the time of submission) the EIA should assess the
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:9:The EIA will need to consider whether there would be a likely significant effect on the Teesmouth and Cleveland Coast SPA. Also
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:9:existing ecological condition of Bran Sands lagoon has not undertaken as part of the EIA process. However, the usage of the lago
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:11:EIA process. However, consideration should as part of the EIA process would
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:17: on designated sites. This noise modelling has been used to inform a number of areas of the EIA,
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:23: our existing knowledge of the sensitivity of the Tees estuary, gained from previous EIAs undertaken
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:23:8.3.26 The findings of the EIA with regard to the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime, marine sediment
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:25:8.4.3 A benthic survey undertaken during December 2008 in support of the QEII Berth EIA demonstrated that
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:25:8.4.4 A benthic survey of the lower Tees estuary was undertaken during 2006 to inform the EIA undertaken
TR030002-000253-Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening document (1).pdf:4:Regulations 2009 (as amended) (the EIA Regulations) and on the basis of the current
TR030002-000253-Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening document (1).pdf:4:Note: The Secretary of State’s duty under Regulation 24 of the EIA Regulations continues
TR030002-000253-Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening document (1).pdf:5:Regulations 2009 (as amended) (the EIA Regulations) and on the basis of the current
TR030002-000253-Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening document (1).pdf:5:Note: The Secretary of State’s duty under Regulation 24 of the EIA Regulations continues
TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:7:1.3.3 Two forms of port terminal have been considered within the EIA, namely an open quay and a solid quay
TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:8: sought but, for the purposes of the EIA, it has been assumed that the rest of the dredged material (with
TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:9: decommission it. As such, decommissioning of the port terminal was not considered in the EIA.
TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:10:1.4 The EIA process and method
TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:10: EIA and the ES
TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:10:1.4.1 The objectives of the EIA process are to ensure that environmental factors are considered throughout
TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:10:1.4.3 Consultation is an ongoing part of an EIA that seeks the opinions of the planning authorities, statutory
TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:11:response to the impacts predicted in the EIA. Impacts are then reassessed, taking into account the
TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:31: and the Construction Village and P&R. The MTS Portal and the MHF were ‘scoped out’ of the EIA for
TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:37:6.1.2 The EIA, its findings and the outcomes of the consultation process have been integral to the iterative
TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:37: prevent or minimise potential adverse impacts. The EIA has also identified the potential for
TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:37: enhancements. In summary, key findings of the EIA for the Harbour facilities include:
TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:38: impacts, not all of which would be adverse and significant but, for those that would be, the EIA process
TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:38: identified mitigation measures to avoid such impacts where possible. The EIA also highlighted where,
TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:38:6.1.4 For a full report of the EIA process, its findings and the Harbour facilities proposals, please refer to the
TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf:7:6.3.8 The methodology adopted for the assessment of potential impacts follows the generic EIA methodology
TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf:10:6.4.2 During the scoping phase of the EIA it was agreed with RCBC that geodiversity did not require
TR030002-000674-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_1 of 2.pdf:40:3.2.1 A formal Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Scoping Opinion has been received for the Harbour
TR030002-000674-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_1 of 2.pdf:44:4.1.5 The road traffic assessment undertaken for the EIA of the Harbour facilities predicted the potential
TR030002-000674-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_1 of 2.pdf:44: data collection and technical studies undertaken as part of the EIA for the Harbour facilities, as reported
TR030002-000674-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_1 of 2.pdf:54: those considered by the CIA undertaken as part of the EIA for the Harbour facilities. The CIA identified
TR030002-000674-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_1 of 2.pdf:60:7.1.4 A full description of all waterbird data used to inform the HRA (and EIA) is provided in Section 9 of the
TR030002-000674-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_1 of 2.pdf:84:118 - Leisure centre, business, A review of the EIA screening request concluded N N
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:3:4 APPROACH TO EIA AND THE ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT 29
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:5: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:7: required as part of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) process. In this
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:8: about the proposed scheme, to identify additional information to inform the EIA and to
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:8: Note 7 released by PINS on screening and scoping under the EIA Regulations (Planning
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:9: The proposed study area for the EIA is the area over which the direct and indirect
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:14: presents the proposed approach to the EIA and ES. Section 5 identifies the potential
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:14: applicable) the likely implications of any decommissioning will be covered in the EIA.
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:15: private projects on the environment (the EIA Directive) and Directive 97/11/EEC (which
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:15: Additional legislation which is likely to be of relevance to the EIA process is identified
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:16: assessment as part of the EIA.
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:17: Within the EIA, options for the disposal of waste will be identified in accordance with the
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:20: the elements that are shaded grey have been or are being assessed within EIAs that
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:20: The elements shaded green form part of the current EIA process, of which this
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:21: Assessed within the EIAs
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:21: Included within the EIA
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:21: The operational processes that are within the scope of this EIA process comprise the
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:32: dredging required on an annual basis will be predicted during the EIA process (see
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:33: Alternative uses for the dredged material will be explored through the EIA process and
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:33: to an assessment of sediment quality which would be undertaken as part of the EIA
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:35:4 APPROACH TO EIA AND THE ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:35: The EIA for the proposed scheme will conform to the requirements of the Infrastructure
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:35: proposed scheme. The general steps in the process that will be followed as the EIA is
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:35: The process of EIA is an iterative and evolutionary one that builds up layers of data as
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:35: Further work that is considered necessary to fulfil the data requirements for the EIA is
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:35: The ES is a formal report that documents the findings of the EIA process. The ES will
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:35: • Project introduction, including a description of the EIA process, including details
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:35: during the EIA process for each of the environmental issues under
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:36: produced during the undertaking of the EIA.
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:36: Figure 4.1 The EIA process
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:36: Screening report Screening To formally confirm route for EIA and lead Appropriate level of information
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:36: EIA Consultation Consult with statutory and non-statutory Local knowledge and
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:36: Statement EIA guidance.
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:38: Consultation is an important part of the EIA process. A comprehensive approach
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:38: potential impacts of the proposed scheme are identified at an early stage in the EIA
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:39: the context of a comprehensive EIA of the proposed scheme are considered in turn.
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:43:5.1.3 Approach to the EIA for all options
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:49:5.2.3 Approach to the EIA for all options
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:49: is proposed that these aspects are scoped out of the EIA process.
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:50: In parallel with the EIA, a Flood Risk Assessment will be undertaken in accordance with
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:51: Sediment samples were collected as part of the EIA for the NGCT during 2006 (Royal
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:52:Figure 5.3 Sediment sample locations for the NGCT EIA and QEII Jetty EIA
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:54:Bay C) as part of the EIA for the NGCT. The modelling predicted that dispersion under
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:54:The NGCT EIA concluded that, in the context of the existing disposal of maintenance
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:54:associated with all options will be considered within the EIA.
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:55:5.3.3 Approach to EIA for all options
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:55: these will be explored during the EIA process.
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:56: management facility). This will be examined in more detail within the EIA.
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:60:sediment concentrations. However, this effect will be considered fully within the EIA.
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:60:be considered within the EIA.
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:61: considered within the EIA.
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:61:5.4.3 Approach to EIA for all options
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:61: Benthic invertebrate surveys were undertaken as part of the EIAs for the NGCT and the
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:61: additional sampling will be used to inform the EIA for this section of the ES.
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:61: The EIA will consider any impacts upon local wildlife sites in the area; these sites will be
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:61: identified through consultation with the Tees Valley Wildlife Trust. The EIA will also
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:61: section of the EIA, particularly the prediction of sediment plume dispersion during capital
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:61: This aspect of the EIA will also inform a WFD compliance assessment, which will be
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:61: As part of the EIA, a benthic survey is proposed within the footprint of the proposed
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:65: As part of the NGCT EIA, a breeding bird survey was conducted on the Teesport Estate
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:65:5.5.3 Approach to EIA for all options
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:66: part of the EIA process.
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:66: The EIA will determine the requirement for the implementation of mitigation measures to
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:66: investigated during the EIA):
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:68:5.6.3 Approach to EIA for all options
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:68: inform the EIA. In addition to the Extended Phase 1 habitat survey, it is proposed that
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:69: As set out in Section 5.4.3, the EIA will also assess the impacts of the proposals on
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:69: terrestrial ecology). Mitigation measures will be identified during the EIA process, but
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:71:5.7.3 Approach to EIA for all options
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:71: as part of the EIA. The ES will be informed by desk-based assessment, comprising
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:72: be explored during the EIA process.
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:72: basis of the significance of the potential impacts identified within the EIA.
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:73: separately within the air quality and noise sections of the EIA.
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:74:5.8.3 Approach to EIA for all options
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:74: The transport section of the EIA will assess the traffic impact on the local highway
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:74: The EIA will consider potential impacts on the local highway network during the
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:74: the EIA.
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:75: The EIA will determine the requirement for the implementation of mitigation measures to
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:75: investigated during the EIA):
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:76: covering the EIA scoping area
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:77:5.9.3 Approach to EIA for all options
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:78: given the exclusion of the materials handling facility at Wilton from the scope of this EIA
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:78: The EIA will determine the requirement for the implementation of mitigation measures to
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:78: this will be fully investigated during the EIA):
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:79:5.10.3 Approach to EIA for all options
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:80: The EIA will determine the requirement for the implementation of mitigation measures to
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:80: during the EIA).
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:81: The desk-based assessment undertaken to inform the NGCT EIA highlighted that within
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:82: the current EIA process) could impact upon potential buried historic/prehistoric land
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:82: potential setting effects that would be assessed as part of the EIA, although at this stage
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:82:5.11.3 Approach to the EIA for all options
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:83: The EIA will determine the requirement for the implementation of mitigation measures to
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:83: acceptable level (however this will be fully investigated during the EIA).
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:86:5.12.3 Approach to the EIA for all options
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:86: A Marine Navigation Risk Assessment will be undertaken to inform the EIA process.
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:87:5.13.3 Approach to the EIA for all options
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:88: for mitigation measures to be implemented will be fully investigated during the EIA.
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:88: systems and an appropriate approach for the EIA, information has been obtained from
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:91:5.14.3 Approach to the EIA for all options
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:91: scheme will be fully addressed within the EIA.
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:92:5.15.3 Approach to the EIA for all options
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:94:5.16.3 Approach to the EIA for all options
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:96: aspect of the EIA. These effects will be assessed separately within the EIA process and
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:96:5.17.3 Approach to the EIA for Option 1 and Option 2
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:96: It is considered that this topic can be scoped out of the EIA for Options 1 and 2 given
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:96:5.17.4 Approach to the EIA for Option 3
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:96: proposed conveyor route to the marine terminal, the EIA will assess the routes and
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:96: the EIA as no significant impacts to such activities are anticipated.
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:97: EIA process.
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:97: Impact Assessment (EIA) Directive (85/337/EEC) and associated EIA Regulations
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:97: EIA process for a development. Consequently, generally completed projects can be
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:97: of EIAs for NGCT, No.1 Quay and QEII jetty. The initial list is provided below (noting
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:98:The EIA will identify whether there is the potential for cumulative impacts for each
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:102: handling facility, conveyor route and marine terminal), and the scope of the EIA and ES.
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:102: This Environmental Scoping Report represents the first reporting stage in the EIA
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:102: The process of EIA is an iterative and evolutionary one that builds up layers of data as
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:102: proposed approach to the EIA associated with progression of Options 1, 2 and 3.
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:103:Table 6.1 Summary of potential environmental impacts and proposed approach to the EIA for each sc
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:103:Topic Potential impacts Proposed approach to EIA
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:103: associated with the anticipated presence of made ground. scoped out of the EIA.
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:104:Topic Potential impacts Proposed approach to EIA
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:104: • Release of sediment into the water column leading to increased also inform this section of the EIA.
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:104: • Disturbance to existing road users, including increased risk of EIA.
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:105:Topic Potential impacts Proposed approach to EIA
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:106:Topic Potential impacts Proposed approach to EIA
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:106:Landscape and • Potential for impacts upon the existing local landscape • The EIA will be informed by a prop
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:106: Option 3 • The EIA will assess the routes and a
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:108:HR Wallingford, (2009). Teesport, QEII Berth: Hydraulic studies to support the EIA.
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:108:Planning Inspectorate (2012). Screening and scoping under the EIA Regulations.
TR030002-000106-141120_TR030002_Teleconference meeting note_PINS and MMO.pdf:1: Laura Allen – Senior EIA and Land Rights Advisor
TR030002-000106-141120_TR030002_Teleconference meeting note_PINS and MMO.pdf:1: Hannah Nelson – EIA and Land Rights Advisor
TR030002-000573-Doc 7.3 Appendix 5 - MHF Planning Statement.pdf:58: Impact Assessment (EIA) confirms the site has limited suitable habitat and
TR030002-000573-Doc 7.3 Appendix 5 - MHF Planning Statement.pdf:68: Chapter 5 - The EIA Process and Method
TR030002-000894-160113_TR030002 Draft DCO (Comparite with Deadline 4 Draft DCO (Document 4.1C)).pdf:5: “the 2009 EIA Regulations” means the Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
TR030002-000894-160113_TR030002 Draft DCO (Comparite with Deadline 4 Draft DCO (Document 4.1C)).pdf:12:inconsistent with the 2009 EIA Regulations and any orders, rules or regulations made under the
TR030002-000894-160113_TR030002 Draft DCO (Comparite with Deadline 4 Draft DCO (Document 4.1C)).pdf:25:2009 EIA Regulations.
TR030002-000894-160113_TR030002 Draft DCO (Comparite with Deadline 4 Draft DCO (Document 4.1C)).pdf:26:or any updated environmental information supplied pursuant to the 2009 EIA Regulations.
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:3:3.0 EIA APPROACH AND TOPIC AREAS ………………………………. 18
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:7: Regulations 2009 (SI 2263) (as amended) (the ‘EIA Regulations’)
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:7: during the EIA process, prior to application submission, the
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:7: 6(1)(b) of the EIA Regulations that it proposes to provide an
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:7: Regulation 4(2)(a) of the EIA Regulations, the proposed
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:7: development is determined to be EIA development.
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:7:1.4 The EIA Regulations enable an applicant, before making an
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:7: (EIA Regulation 8 (9))
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:7: i the EIA Regulations
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:8:1.9 Regulation 8(3) of the EIA Regulations states that a request for a
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:8: (EIA Regulation 8 (3))
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:8:1.11 The SoS has a duty under Regulation 8(6) of the EIA Regulations
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:8: in accordance with Regulation 9(1)(a) of the EIA Regulations. The
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:9: undertaking the EIA.
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:9: carrying out the EIA.
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:9: Section 3 EIA approach and topic areas
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:18: EIA. The level of assessment is proposed to be high level and
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:19: considered as part of an integrated approach to EIA, this should
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:20: possible, as this will form the basis of the EIA. It is understood
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:20: Schedule 4 Part 1 of the EIA Regulations. There should be more
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:20:2.72 The EIA Regulations state that the ES should include ‘An outline of
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:20: the environmental effects’ (See EIA Regulations Schedule 4 Part 1
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:22: ES. It is recommended that the EIA covers the life span of the
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:24:3.0 EIA APPROACH AND TOPIC AREAS
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:26: PRoWs. The EIA should still consider the indirect affects of users of
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:26: the EIA for all Options proposed as it is recognised that the
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:26: scoped out of the EIA.
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:26: these receptors cannot be scoped out of the EIA.
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:27: considered in the EIA for the proposed development. In term so
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:27: the proposals and when undertaking the EIA, the applicant must
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:27: • project introduction, description of the EIA process
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:27: measures identified during the EIA process for each of the
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:29: of the EIA.
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:31: PD Ports should be considered as part of the EIA.
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:31:3.45 The EIA should consider effects on marine ecology relating to,
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:36: undertaken to inform the EIA. The SoS suggests that the
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:38: environmental topics proposed for inclusion in the EIA.
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:40: arise from the regulatory requirements under the EIA Regulations
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:40: included, there is no requirement under the EIA Regulations for an
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:40: referring to specific terminology under both the EIA and Habitats
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:44:4.24 Regulation 24 of the EIA Regulations, which inter alia require the
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:59:Ms H. Nelson – EIA and Land Rights Advisor
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:63:PLANNING ACT 2008 (AS AMENDED) AND THE INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING (EIA)
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:63:i) that ‘The desk-based assessment undertaken to inform the NGCT EIA highlighted that
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:64:ix) that ‘The EIA will determine the requirement for the implementation of mitigation
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:64:(however this will be fully investigated during the EIA).’
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:67:Thank you for your EIA Scoping consultation letter of 6 December 2013.
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:79: scope of the environmental impact assessment (“EIA”) for the York Potash Port and
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:79: must be considered in the EIA.
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:80:5. The proposed method of dredging is yet to be decided. For the EIA, if a method is still
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:80: The EIA must assess the fate of any material disposed of at sea, in particular,
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:80:11. The EIA must assess the cumulative impacts of the proposed disposal with other
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:80: Approach to EIA and the environmental statement
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:81: will be assessed during the EIA. The EIA must also assess the potential to alter the
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:82:28. The MMO considers that the EIA must assess the potential impacts from noise and
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:82:31. The EIA must assess commercial navigation in-combination and cumulatively with
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:82:33. The EIA must assess cumulative impacts from within the Project, for example, the
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:83: the Scoping Report, the Applicant will assess any likely implications in the EIA. If
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:83: order that such activities may be assessed in the EIA.
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:85:EIA and Land Rights Advisor
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:87:Environmental Impact Assessment Scoping consultation (Regulation 15 (3) (i) of the EIA
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:87:scope of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for this development.
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:89:Annex A – Advice related to EIA Scoping Requirements
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:89:on ecosystems or their components. EcIA may be carried out as part of the EIA process or to
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:90:Appropriate Assessment, in addition to consideration of impacts through the EIA process. We invite
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:92:The EIA will need to consider any impacts upon local wildlife and geological sites. Local Sites are
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:94:pertaining to the area. The EIA should include assessments of visual effects on the surrounding
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:94:The EIA should include a full assessment of the potential impacts of the development on local
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:97:EIA and Land Rights Advisor
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:101:EIA and Land Rights Advisor
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:107:The EIA should give consideration to best practice guidance such as the
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:107:Government’s Good Practice Guide for EIA1. It is important that the EIA identifies
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:107:applications. We recommend that the EIA includes consideration of the impacts of
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:107:phasing of construction) is widely regarded as good practice. Ideally, EIA should
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:108:regarding emissions in order that the EIA provides a comprehensive assessment of
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:109:PHE’s view is that the EIA should appraise and describe the measures that will be
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:110:Relevant areas outlined in the Government’s Good Practice Guide for EIA include:
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:111:The EIA should demonstrate compliance with the waste hierarchy (e.g. with respect
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:111:For wastes arising from the installation the EIA should consider:
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:111:Within the EIA PHE would expect to see information about how the promoter would
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:111:The EIA should include consideration of the COMAH Regulations (Control of Major
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:112:negligible.” PHE supports the inclusion of this information within EIAs as good
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:121:(as amended) (the EIA Regulations) as a statement:
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:121: (EIA Regulations Regulation 2)
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:121:line with best practice and case law. The EIA Regulations Schedule 4,
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:121:Schedule 4 Part 1 of the EIA Regulations states this information includes:
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:122: EIA Regulations Schedule 4 Part 1
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:122:Schedule 4 Part 2 of the EIA Regulations. This includes the consideration
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:123:The SoS acknowledges that the EIA process is iterative, and therefore the
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:124:EIA Regulations.
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:124:In general the SoS recommends that the physical scope for the EIA should
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:126:In terms of the EIA methodology, the SoS recommends that reference
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:126:The EIA Regulations require the identification of the ‘likely significant
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:127:interpretation of ‘significant’ in terms of each of the EIA topics.
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:127:significantly affected is a requirement of the EIA Regulations (see
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:127:Schedule 4 Part 1 of the EIA Regulations). These occur where a number of
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:128:location and key aspects that may affect the EIA and how these have been
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:129:As set out in EIA Regulations Schedule 4 Part 1 paragraph 23, the ES
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:129:information (PEI) (this term is defined in the EIA Regulations under
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:130:Act, this could usefully assist the applicant in the EIA process – for
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:131:The EIA Regulations require a Non Technical Summary (EIA Regulations
TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:12:46 The residual impacts identified with the submitted EIA do not give rise to
TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:31: the NYMNPA on 29 January 2013 (Ref: NYM/2013/0062/MEIA). The
TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:32: (EIA) Regulations 2011. YPL submitted further information on 23rd April
TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:74: with the EIA confirming a minor adverse impact during
TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:85:6.57 With regard to the Wilton Portal works, the EIA chapter on the MHF
TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:90: opportunities, the EIA includes an assessment of the potential impacts of
TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:91:6.68 As set out in the EIA, the proposals are assessed to not result in any
TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:91: particularly the case given that the findings of the EIA that predict a limited
TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:92:6.76 Notwithstanding this comparison, or the results of the EIA assessment on
TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:92: economic chapter of the EIA, as well as highlighted in the Economic
TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:94: evidenced in the submitted EIA) allows the MDT Planning Statement to
TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:95: of the submitted ES that presents the findings of an EIA of the YPL Project,
TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:103: with the application, that takes the forms of a Chapter in the submitted EIA,
TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:112: impacts identified with the submitted EIA do not give rise to the need for
TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:113: activities. The EIA undertaken by the applicants, as detailed above,
TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:121: Chapter 5 - The EIA Process and Method
TR030002-000670-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement - Main Text.pdf:6: dialogue has continued as the EIA preparation process proceeded.
TR030002-000670-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement - Main Text.pdf:7: made, YPL wrote to NYMNPA to confirm that the EIA that will form
TR030002-000670-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement - Main Text.pdf:14:Appendix 10 Harbour facilities EIA Scoping Opinion list of statutory consultees
TR030002-000670-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement - Main Text.pdf:17:EIA
TR030002-000670-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement - Main Text.pdf:33: Impact Assessment (EIA) are detailed in
TR030002-000670-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement - Main Text.pdf:46: article 6(1)(b) of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)
TR030002-000670-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement - Main Text.pdf:46: 2009/2263) (as amended (“the EIA Regulations”). This sought to
TR030002-000670-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement - Main Text.pdf:46:6.5 The Secretary of State has a duty under Regulation 8(6) of the EIA
TR030002-000670-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement - Main Text.pdf:47: the EIA and HRA of the harbour facilities proposals undertaken in
TR030002-000670-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement - Main Text.pdf:47: accordance with the Infrastructure Planning (EIA) Regulations 2009.
TR030002-000670-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement - Main Text.pdf:47:6.9 In defining the scope of the EIA and preparing the PER, YPL’s
TR030002-000670-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement - Main Text.pdf:47: Source: Royal Haskoning DHV, EIA Lead Consultant
TR030002-000670-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement - Main Text.pdf:49: findings of the EIA for the Harbour Facilities (as they were known at the
TR030002-000670-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement - Main Text.pdf:58: Planning Inspectorate in relation to EIA development;
TR030002-000670-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement - Main Text.pdf:67: Area has been assessed as part of the EIA;
TR030002-000670-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement - Main Text.pdf:68: the findings of this assessment is informing the EIA and requirement
TR030002-000107-141128_TR030002_Teleconference meeting note_PINS and Applicant.pdf:1: Laura Allen – Senior EIA and Land Rights Advisor
TR030002-000107-141128_TR030002_Teleconference meeting note_PINS and Applicant.pdf:1: Hannah Nelson – EIA and Land Rights Advisor
TR030002-000107-141128_TR030002_Teleconference meeting note_PINS and Applicant.pdf:2:construction compound would be assessed in the submitted EIA.
TR030002-000107-141128_TR030002_Teleconference meeting note_PINS and Applicant.pdf:2:these works would need to be assessed in the EIA. The applicant also confirmed that
TR030002-000107-141128_TR030002_Teleconference meeting note_PINS and Applicant.pdf:3:this work. The applicant confirmed that these proposals would be assessed in the EIA
TR030002-000107-141128_TR030002_Teleconference meeting note_PINS and Applicant.pdf:3:the DCO application and therefore would not be considered in the EIA. The
TR030002-000107-141128_TR030002_Teleconference meeting note_PINS and Applicant.pdf:3:contribution would not need to be assessed in the EIA.
TR030002-000107-141128_TR030002_Teleconference meeting note_PINS and Applicant.pdf:3:EIA and HRA are deliverable in the draft DCO.
TR030002-000457-ES Section 22 Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:2:22.2.5 The Tees Bay C disposal site is outside the domain of the hydrodynamic model used for the EIA
TR030002-000560-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_1 of 2.pdf:4: 1.4 The EIA process and method ………………………………………………………………………………………. 38
TR030002-000560-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_1 of 2.pdf:8:1.1.3 The full ES presents the findings of an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) into the potential
TR030002-000560-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_1 of 2.pdf:8: proposed YPP Harbour facilities and the legislative context for the EIA process, including the approach
TR030002-000560-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_1 of 2.pdf:8: taken to the EIA.
TR030002-000435-ES Section 1 Introduction.pdf:1: the findings of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) process.
TR030002-000435-ES Section 1 Introduction.pdf:1:1.2.3 The objectives of the EIA process are to ensure that environmental factors are considered throughout
TR030002-000435-ES Section 1 Introduction.pdf:1:1.2.4 The EIA process encompasses an assessment of temporary and permanent potential direct and
TR030002-000435-ES Section 1 Introduction.pdf:4: context of the EIA for the proposed harbour facilities. Section 3 presents a description of the proposed
TR030002-000435-ES Section 1 Introduction.pdf:4: scheme and Section 4 describes the approach taken to the EIA (and the Cumulative Impact
TR030002-000435-ES Section 1 Introduction.pdf:5:considered during the EIA process. Potential impacts that could arise during the construction,
TR030002-000483-Section 12 App 12.3 Construction Traffic Management Plan.pdf:5: North York Moors National Park Authority (NYMNPA), reference NYM/2014/0679/MEIA, and Redcar
TR030002-000756-Document 8.3 Appendix 5 - Shipping Notes Part 3.pdf:2:EIA - Environmental Impact Assessment
TR030002-000754-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Clean).pdf:6: “the 2009 EIA Regulations” means the Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
TR030002-000754-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Clean).pdf:12:with the 2009 EIA Regulations and any orders, rules or regulations made under the 2008 Act.
TR030002-000754-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Clean).pdf:25:updated environmental information supplied pursuant to the 2009 EIA Regulations.
TR030002-000754-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Clean).pdf:26:or any updated environmental information supplied pursuant to the 2009 EIA Regulations.
TR030002-000676-Doc 7.2 - Summary of Proposals Document.pdf:14: Assessment (EIA) and this is being information identified to date in relation to
TR030002-000676-Doc 7.2 - Summary of Proposals Document.pdf:14: The EIA looks in detail at the potential An Environmental Statement, reporting
TR030002-000676-Doc 7.2 - Summary of Proposals Document.pdf:14: impacts of the Project on the on the findings from the EIA, will be
TR030002-000676-Doc 7.2 - Summary of Proposals Document.pdf:14: EIA, an in-depth assessment has been
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:6:The EIA should provide results of sediment quality testing from the berth pocket and dredge channel. Section 7.4
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:7:and suspended sediment concentrations (SSC) and designated sites should be presented in the EIA.
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:13:7.4.3 Sediment samples were collected as part of the EIA for the NGCT during 2006 (Royal Haskoning,
TR030002-000576-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 1.pdf:8:York Potash Minehead EIA: Preliminary
TR030002-000576-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 1.pdf:16: EIA for the Dove’s Nest minehead development, including the following:
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:5:environmental impact assessment (EIA) of the development.
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:13: the Tees Estuary and Tees Bay as part of the environmental impact assessment (EIA) of
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:23: As part of the EIA studies the wave study has included the set up of a third generation
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:24: purposes of informing the EIA. The reflection coefficients for the quay extension area
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:47: For the purposes of the EIA the backhoe dredger is not considered because whilst the
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:55: of the area were studied using the suite of numerical models established for the EIA
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:61: Dredging Research Limited (2005) PD Teesport – Northern Gateway EIA, Dredging
TR030002-000390-North Yorkshire County Council.pdf:4:(planning reference NYM/2014/0679/MEIA) have been carried forward into the Harbour
TR030002-000390-North Yorkshire County Council.pdf:4:planning application NYM/2014/0679/MEIA it would not wish to raise any objections to the
TR030002-000390-North Yorkshire County Council.pdf:4:conclusions of the submissions relating to NYM/2014/0679/MEIA in relation to this
TR030002-000437-ES Section 3 Project description_1 of 2.pdf:2:3.1.6 Table 3-1 sets out the parameters for each element of the Harbour facilities proposals. The EIA has
TR030002-000437-ES Section 3 Project description_1 of 2.pdf:19: Table 3-1 Parameters of Works used as the basis for assessment in the EIA
TR030002-000437-ES Section 3 Project description_1 of 2.pdf:34: (given that further ground investigation is proposed), the EIA assumes dredging 181,000m3 + the top
TR030002-000437-ES Section 3 Project description_1 of 2.pdf:34:3.1.37 Given the variety of dredge methods that could be employed by a dredging contractor, the EIA has
TR030002-000436-ES Section 2 Legislation_regulation_policy.pdf:1: EIA Directive) and Directive 97/11/EEC (which amends Directive 85/337/EEC).
TR030002-000436-ES Section 2 Legislation_regulation_policy.pdf:3:2.6.4 Consideration of potential waste disposal options has been undertaken as part of the EIA process (see
TR030002-000436-ES Section 2 Legislation_regulation_policy.pdf:3: EIA process.
TR030002-000436-ES Section 2 Legislation_regulation_policy.pdf:4:2.7.7 A review of the policy contained within the MPS has been undertaken as part of the EIA, with relevant
TR030002-000436-ES Section 2 Legislation_regulation_policy.pdf:5:2.7.10 The relevant planning policies from each of these documents in the context of the EIA for the proposed
TR030002-000881-Document 1.4G - Document List.pdf:7:MHF Overall Site Layout 143022-EIA-001 Rev 2 3.7 27 March 2015
TR030002-000249-York Potash_RIES_25 Nov 2015.pdf:41: Support EIA APP-199
TR030002-000351-Section 55 Checklist.pdf:9:2.10 Does the SOCC set out whether the development is EIA Yes.
TR030002-000351-Section 55 Checklist.pdf:10: information? sets out at paragraph 2.11 that the scheme is EIA development, and
TR030002-000351-Section 55 Checklist.pdf:12:© a statement as to whether the application is EIA development; Yes.
TR030002-000351-Section 55 Checklist.pdf:12: All notices state that the application is EIA development.
TR030002-000351-Section 55 Checklist.pdf:13:2.14 Has a copy of the s48 notice been sent to the EIA consultation Yes.
TR030002-000351-Section 55 Checklist.pdf:13: EIA consultation bodies. The letter states in the final paragraph of the first
TR030002-000351-Section 55 Checklist.pdf:13: (the EIA Regulations)11?
TR030002-000351-Section 55 Checklist.pdf:15: the EIA Regulations and any scoping or screening opinions or
TR030002-000351-Section 55 Checklist.pdf:15: Impact Assessment) Regulations 2009 (as amended) (the EIA Regulations)
TR030002-000688-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:7:MHF Overall Site Layout 143022-EIA-001 Rev 2 3.7 27 March 2015
TR030002-000059-140113_TR030002_late scoping responses.pdf:1:The following EIA scoping consultation responses were received
TR030002-000059-140113_TR030002_late scoping responses.pdf:20:Transport Assessment (this may be incorporated into the EIA). I am also advised that in
TR030002-000447-ES Section 12 Traffic and transport.pdf:5: to be subject to formal EIAs.
TR030002-000447-ES Section 12 Traffic and transport.pdf:7: the derivation of assessment traffic flows, to inform the TA and EIA. Agency
TR030002-000447-ES Section 12 Traffic and transport.pdf:14:12.3.38 Note that for the purposes of the EIA, major and moderate impacts are deemed to be significant. In
TR030002-000762-Tata Steel UK Limited and others.pdf:2:should already have been carried out, particularly in the context of EIA requirements (applying the
TR030002-000762-Tata Steel UK Limited and others.pdf:7:We do not accept the Applicant's assertion that no further EIA is required or should be considered in
TR030002-000111-130523_Meeting Note_York Potash Pipeline teleconference with applicant and Natural England.pdf:1: Laura Allen (Senior EIA Advisor)
TR030002-000111-130523_Meeting Note_York Potash Pipeline teleconference with applicant and Natural England.pdf:1: Hannah Nelson (EIA Advisor)
TR030002-000494-Section 15 App 15.1 Archaeology desk based appraisal.pdf:16: the Tees Estuary, have also been conducted in the surrounding area to inform various EIAs for a
TR030002-000494-Section 15 App 15.1 Archaeology desk based appraisal.pdf:29: as part of the EIA process and outlined within the relevant chapter of the ES.
TR030002-000494-Section 15 App 15.1 Archaeology desk based appraisal.pdf:31: As part of the EIA process and subsequent ES Chapter(s), further tie in will need to be made with
TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:10: Harbour facilities Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), other than in the cumulative
TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:10:2.5. An EIA was undertaken for the proposed Harbour facilities in accordance with the
TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:10: 2012, and with reference to relevant guidance notes from PINS. The EIA process incorporated
TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:10: 7. The PER presented the initial findings of the EIA undertaken by Royal HaskoningDHV on
TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:10: behalf of YPL. In addition to the responses received in the PINS Scoping Opinion, the EIA also
TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:13:4.2. The methodology adopted for the assessment of potential impacts followed the generic EIA
TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:15: Sediment quality data from samples collected as part of the EIAs for the Northern Gateway
TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:15: A sediment quality survey undertaken as part of the EIA for the Harbour facilities during
TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:17: Results of a benthic survey undertaken in 2008 as part of the EIA for the consented QEII
TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:23:8.2. The methodology adopted for the assessment of potential impacts followed the generic EIA
TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:24: technical studies which were also undertaken to support the EIA process. Survey and technical
TR030002-000434-ES Contents_index.pdf:12:Table 3-1 Parameters of Works used as the basis for assessment in the EIA
TR030002-000434-ES Contents_index.pdf:16:Figure 7-1 Sediment sample locations for the NGCT EIA and QEII Jetty EIA
TR030002-000434-ES Contents_index.pdf:19:Table 10-1 Summary of scoping comments received from PINS during EIA scoping
TR030002-000820-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:5: “the 2009 EIA Regulations” means the Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
TR030002-000820-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:12:inconsistent with the 2009 EIA Regulations and any orders, rules or regulations made under the
TR030002-000820-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:25:2009 EIA Regulations.
TR030002-000820-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:26:or any updated environmental information supplied pursuant to the 2009 EIA Regulations.
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:10: and deposition onto the seabed from the EIA studies for the YPP Harbour facilities,
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:16:1.1.1 The Infrastructure Planning (EIA) Regulations 2009 SI No. 2263 requires that the likely cumulative
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:16: (EIA). In their Guidelines for EIA (2004), IEMA define cumulative impacts as:
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:17: impacts will be taken into account in the EIA process for each relevant project element. Consequently,
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:17: account of in the EIA). It is relevant to note, however, that the environmental impacts of recently
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:17:1.4.3 In the context of EIA, the term ‘committed development’ conventionally refers to development for which
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:26:in nature and certainly not previously subject to EIA.
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:28: relevant topic chapters of the EIA. The significance of any cumulative impacts is determined by the
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:47: 159 NYM/2010/0262/EIA Moorland Energy THE GAS TRANSMISSION LINE BETWEEN EBBERSTON MOOR AND THE PROPOSED GAS
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:47: DEVELOPMENT), REFERENCE NYM/2010/0262/EIA, FOR WHICH APPROVAL WAS GRANTED
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:47: 160 NYM/2013/0593/EIA Third Energy THE PROPOSED THIRD ENERGY GAS TRANSMISSION PIPELINE FROM
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:47: NYM/2013/0593/EIA, WAS APPROVED IN DECEMBER 2013 AND WE UNDERSTAND THAT NYCC
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:54: completed well in advance of commencement of the YPP. In addition, the EIA for the project concluded
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:71: the EIA methodology. The main sensitive receptors with respect to tourism would be the local
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:88: application for the Mine and MTS to NYMNPA and RCBC reference NYM/2014/0679/MEIA and
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:109:6.4.1 In line with the requirements of the codified EIA Directive (2011/92/EU), the impact assessment must
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:161: Objective, the benchmark for assessment within the EIA, at all YPP component locations.
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:180:14.1.2 The MTS Portal and the MHF were ‘scoped out’ of the EIA process for amenity and recreation because
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:186: Moorland Energy, NYM/2010/0262/EIA (ID 159).
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:186: Third Energy, NYM/2013/0593/EIA (ID 160).
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:188: Moorland Energy, NYM/2010/0262/EIA
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:189: Third Energy, NYM-2013/0593/EIA
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:190: Moorland Energy, NYM/2010/0262/EIA
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:190:16.2.19 Whilst the EIA supporting this application acknowledges some minor and short term (during
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:191: Third Energy, NYM/2013/0593/EIA
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:246: impacted by surrounding developments outside the scope of the EIA process for the YPP. However,
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:251: been identified and assessed using the publically available EIA studies that have been undertaken for
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:251:25.2.2 As part of the EIA studies for the above projects, numerical modelling was undertaken by HR
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:251: established and calibrated in support of the EIA for the NGCT. This suite of modelling activities
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:251:25.2.3 The maintenance dredging programme in the Tees has not been subject to EIA; however, a
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:252: findings of the EIA studies undertaken for each project and the Maintenance Dredging Baseline
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:253: dredge volume. The EIA studies make informed assumptions about the most likely dredge plant that
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:253: identified from the EIA studies undertaken for each project and the CIA assumes that the construction
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:254: deposition onto the seabed from the EIA studies for the YPP Harbour facilities, NGCT and QEII
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:257:25.4.12 Predictive modelling of the effect on wave conditions was undertaken as part of the EIA studies for the
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:268: results of the EIA studies undertaken for the projects scoped into the CIA and draws, in particular, on
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:269: at peak concentration (as predicted by the EIA studies for each project) at any location.
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:269: concentrations were assessed in the EIA) and disposed offshore.
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:270:26.4.10 In terms of dispersion of suspended sediment during dredging, the EIA studies for the Harbour facilities
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:271: part of the EIA, it is necessary to include maintenance dredging within the CIA in order to assess
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:273:27.3.2 A survey of the benthic invertebrate communities was undertaken as part of the EIA for the YPP
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:275:27.4.16 Underwater noise modelling has been undertaken as part of the EIA studies for the Harbour facilities,
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:279: assessed. Noise levels have predicted at the receptor locations modelled as part of the EIA studies
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:280: navigation studies undertaken as part of the EIAs for the various projects scoped into this assessment.
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:281: the EIA concluded that that there would be an impact of negligible significance on existing and new
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:282:29.4.8 During the EIA studies for the QEII Berth Development, No 1 Quay and NGCT (which included a
TR030002-000896-160113_TR030002_Response to Examining Authority's Rule 8.pdf:10:MHF Overall Site Layout 143022-EIA-001 Rev 2 3.7 27 March 2015
TR030002-000575-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Alternative Sites Assessment.pdf:21: (January 2013) (Application ref: NYM/2013/0062/MEIA).
TR030002-000575-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Alternative Sites Assessment.pdf:74: a requirement for the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) to report on the
TR030002-000575-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Alternative Sites Assessment.pdf:74: potential alternatives which have been considered (see Chapter 2 of the EIA
TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:34:EIA process. A specification for this monitoring is currently being developed.
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:1: x A description of the methodology and studies that were undertaken to inform the EIA process.
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:1: x An assessment of potential effects based on the studies undertaken for the EIA.
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:3:part of the EIA.
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:3:assessed during the EIA. The EIA must also assess the potential to alter the sediment regime
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:4: inform this EIA. Validated models have
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:4:74,903 tonnes in total. The EIA must assess the fate of any material disposed at sea, in
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:4:Paragraph 5.3.2 states numerical modelling from NGCT has been used and that the calibration inform this EIA. There have been no s
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:4: inform this EIA. Validated models have
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:5:(or unknown at the time of submission) the EIA should assess the impacts of all material being enhancement proposals. The propose
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:6: represents the study area for this aspect of the EIA and is shown in Figure 5-1.
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:6: numerical modelling tools first established and calibrated in support of the EIA for the consented (but
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:7:5.3.3 For the EIA process for the harbour facilities, new modelling studies were undertaken (as described in
TR030002-000371-141125_York_Potash_ExAs_Draft_DCO.PDF:4: “the 2009 EIA Regulations” means the Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
TR030002-000371-141125_York_Potash_ExAs_Draft_DCO.PDF:11:inconsistent with the 2009 EIA Regulations and any orders, rules or regulations made under the
TR030002-000371-141125_York_Potash_ExAs_Draft_DCO.PDF:25:2009 EIA Regulations.
TR030002-000371-141125_York_Potash_ExAs_Draft_DCO.PDF:25:EIA Regulations.
TR030002-000427-Doc 4.1 Draft DCO (including requirements).pdf:6: “the 2009 EIA Regulations” means the Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
TR030002-000427-Doc 4.1 Draft DCO (including requirements).pdf:11:inconsistent with the 2009 EIA Regulations and any orders, rules or regulations made under the
TR030002-000698-Natural England 1.pdf:5: Regulations 2009 (‘the EIA Regs’).5
TR030002-000698-Natural England 1.pdf:5: Regs. 2(1), 8(6), 9(1), 13(2)(b), 17(3)(g), 18(3)(f), 19(3)(e) of the EIA Regs.
TR030002-000698-Natural England 1.pdf:7: Regulations 2009 (‘EIA Regs’) transposed Council Directive 85/337/EEC on
TR030002-000698-Natural England 1.pdf:7: 2011/92/EU (‘the EIAD’). Development consent cannot lawfully be granted
TR030002-000698-Natural England 1.pdf:7: for EIA development unless there has been substantial compliance with the
TR030002-000698-Natural England 1.pdf:7: EIA Regs.10
TR030002-000698-Natural England 1.pdf:7: the EIA Regulations. These include providing:
TR030002-000698-Natural England 1.pdf:7: Regulation 8(6) of the EIA Regs.
TR030002-000698-Natural England 1.pdf:8:3.1.4. Regulation 3(2) of the EIA Regs provides that a DCO must not be made
TR030002-000698-Natural England 1.pdf:8: conscientiously. Where the development qualifies as EIA Development
TR030002-000698-Natural England 1.pdf:8: EIA Regs, reg. 2(1).
TR030002-000698-Natural England 1.pdf:19: Act 2008 is relevant to this Application. Section 4.7 regarding EIA
TR030002-000897-160113_TR03002_Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:5: “the 2009 EIA Regulations” means the Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
TR030002-000897-160113_TR03002_Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:12:inconsistent with the 2009 EIA Regulations and any orders, rules or regulations made under the
TR030002-000897-160113_TR03002_Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:25:2009 EIA Regulations.
TR030002-000897-160113_TR03002_Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:26:or any updated environmental information supplied pursuant to the 2009 EIA Regulations.
TR030002-000417-Doc 1.5 s55 Checklist.pdf:10:2.10 Does the SOCC set out whether the development is EIA Paragraph 2.11 of the SoCC (Appendix 18 of the Consultation
TR030002-000417-Doc 1.5 s55 Checklist.pdf:10: development10; and does it set out how the applicant Report (Doc 6.1)) explains that the development is EIA
TR030002-000417-Doc 1.5 s55 Checklist.pdf:12: © a statement as to whether the application is EIA Yes. In paragraph 2 of the notice (Doc 1.3).
TR030002-000417-Doc 1.5 s55 Checklist.pdf:13:2.14 Has a copy of the s48 notice been sent to the EIA The Consultation Report (Doc 6.1) states at paragraph 6.53
TR030002-000417-Doc 1.5 s55 Checklist.pdf:13: Assessment) Regulations 2009 (the EIA Regulations)11?
TR030002-000417-Doc 1.5 s55 Checklist.pdf:16: under the EIA Regulations and any scoping or screening (Doc 6.4) which comprises 24 Sections:
TR030002-000417-Doc 1.5 s55 Checklist.pdf:17: Appendix 5.1 – Hydraulic studies to support EIA
EIA_2017_00041-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:1: EIA/2017/00041
EIA_2017_00041-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:1:EIA/2017/00041
EIA_2017_00041-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:1:EIA/2017/00041 Request for Update
EIA_2017_00041-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:2: EIA/2017/00041
EIA_2017_00041-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:2:(EIA)
EIA_2017_00041-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:2:The purpose of an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is to protect the environment
EIA_2017_00041-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:2:MMO is the appropriate authority for ensuring the requirements of EIA are met in
EIA_2017_00041-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:2:An EIA is a multi-stage process. The main steps are:
EIA_2017_00041-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:2:1. Screening - The applicant provides information and MMO determines whether an EIA
EIA_2017_00041-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:2: are to be considered during the EIA.
EIA_2017_00041-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:3: EIA/2017/00041
EIA_2017_00041-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:3:Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) information
EIA_2017_00041-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:4: EIA/2017/00041
EIA_2017_00041-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:5: EIA/2017/00041
EIA_2017_00041-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:5:Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and produced the NGCT Environmental
EIA_2017_00041-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:5:The purpose of this request is to seek an EIA screening opinion from the MMO under
EIA_2017_00041-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:5:In addition to the provision of an EIA Screening Opinion under the 2007 Regulations, we
EIA_2017_00041-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:6: EIA/2017/00041
EIA_2017_00041-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:7: EIA/2017/00041
I&BPB6776R001F01_NGCT scoping document.pdf:4:HaskoningDHV carried out an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and produced the NGCT
I&BPB6776R001F01_NGCT scoping document.pdf:4:The proposed scheme is defined in full within Section 3 of the 2006 ES (which is appended to the EIA
I&BPB6776R001F01_NGCT scoping document.pdf:6: several sediment quality surveys have been undertaken at various locations within the Tees estuary, the most recent being in 2014 to inform the EIA
I&BPB6776R001F01_NGCT scoping document.pdf:8: informed through a review of relevant EIAs undertaken for consented schemes in the Tees estuary since 2006.
I&BPB6776R001F01_NGCT scoping document.pdf:13: be screened into the EIA process.
I&BPB6776R001F01_NGCT scoping document.pdf:14: whether or not the application has been screened into the EIA process.
I&BPB6776R001F01_NGCT scoping document.pdf:14: resolution of a question of fact in order to enable it to make its EIA consent
I&BPB6776R001F01_NGCT scoping document.pdf:14:that an EIA is not required if the MMO is satisfied that an assessment of any significant
I&BPB6776R001F01_NGCT scoping document.pdf:14:by the appropriate authority. In this instance the MMO can defer an EIA consent decision,
I&BPB6776R001F01_NGCT scoping document.pdf:14:the application was to be screened into the EIA process and the ES covers all relevant
I&BPB6776R001F01_NGCT scoping document.pdf:16: NGCT approach channel dredge. Dredging is not considered an EIA project, but
I&BPB6776R001F01_NGCT scoping document.pdf:17: original EIA.
I&BPB6776R001F01_NGCT scoping document.pdf:17: marine licence. In order to consider deferring an EIA consent decision for a
I&BPB6776R001F01_NGCT scoping document.pdf:17: marine licence application, to an EIA consent decision for a HRO, we would need
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:3: 1.4 Requirement for EIA and Appropriate Assessment 17
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:6: 7.1.2 Surveys undertaken for the EIA 211
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:14:1.8 Key scheme parameters assessed in EIA process 15
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:22:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:22:ES Environmental Statement (reporting outcome of EIA)
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:33: Impact Assessment (EIA) process undertaken for the proposed NGCT and
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:33: for EIA is also described which includes a statement of the various legislation
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:34: under which the EIA has been prepared. A broad overview of the EIA process
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:34: follows which is accompanied by a description of the EIA study area.
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:34: the EIA process. The potential impacts of the proposed development during the
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:34: have been assessed through the EIA process:
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:36: this potential option for disposal has been included in the EIA process as a
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:41: 8. Figure 1.8 shows the key scheme parameters as assessed in the EIA process
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:45: the EIA (see Section 6). It is proposed that maintenance dredgings will be
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:46: the potential to materially affect the findings of the EIA process. The
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:46:1.4 Requirement for EIA and Appropriate Assessment
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:47: the EIA, is contained within Appendix 1.
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:48: 1. EIA is a tool for systematically examining and assessing the potential impacts of
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:48: • A definition of the study area for the EIA;
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:48: 2. In terms of the process, the following main stages are typically included in EIA:
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:48: • Screening (i.e. determining whether the proposed scheme requires an EIA to be
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:48: • Scoping (i.e. determining the issues that the EIA should address);
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:48: Scoping Report. Scoping is the first stage of the EIA process and is undertaken
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:48: stages of the EIA process. The environmental scoping study consisted of the
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:49: subsequent stages of the EIA. Lists of consultees and details of consultation
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:50: maintained throughout the EIA process. The consultation exercise was initiated
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:50: identified, and where necessary, included in the EIA process.
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:50: 4. Informal consultation occurred throughout the EIA process where information,
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:51: the EIA
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:52: the EIA
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:53: the EIA
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:54: the EIA
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:55: 1. The study area for the EIA comprises the area over which the potential direct and
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:55: environmental parameters addressed in the EIA process (e.g. noise, air quality, water
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:112: EIA, the potential impacts of transporting 100% of containers by road have been
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:114: sedimentary studies that have been undertaken as part of the EIA (see Section 6). It
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:120: excluded from the scheme and is not considered further in the EIA.
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:134: distance rail lines, most airports and large ports, that an EIA is required in every
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:137: content of an EIA where required.
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:146: • If a port developer is required to prepare an ES under the EIA procedures due to the
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:175: assessment since it is considered that the work ancillary to the production of the EIA
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:188: provided much of the background to the present studies to support the EIA.
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:197: 10. For the EIA investigations the SEDPLUME-RW(3D) model was used to simulate
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:208: report of the hydrodynamic and sedimentological studies to support the EIA (HR
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:240:7.1.2 Surveys undertaken for the EIA
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:240: 1. A survey was undertaken as part of the EIA to establish the baseline physical,
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:271: samples from the 2005 site investigation undertaken as part of this EIA, where
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:307: EIA (see Section 10.1.4). The following paragraphs provide some context to the
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:325: 3. The biological survey undertaken in support of this EIA and other information
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:326: survey data collected as part of this EIA with the Canadian Sediment Quality
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:335: and immediately adjacent land for the purposes of the EIA is WeBS data. The
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:371: quality survey that has been undertaken as part of the EIA process (see Section
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:420: assessment of road traffic impacts associated with schemes requiring an EIA. It
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:451: sediment transport studies undertaken as part of the EIA (Section 6 and
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:461: outflow has been specifically modelled as part of the EIA. This impact is
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:525: EIA to be undertaken but PD Teesport consulted with English Nature when
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:525: ecological potential of this area of mudflat. Although EIA was not required to
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:526: deepening the Seaton Channel. An EIA was undertaken to accompany the
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:526: same suite of numerical models developed for this EIA was used to assess the
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:534: present EIA studies, to increase the source of fine material at the entrance of the
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:534: 1.5km offshore of Redcar. An EIA was undertaken in connection with this
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:535: described in Section 28.4; this section draws from the findings of the EIA
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:539:Dredging Research Limited (2005) PD Teesport – Northern Gateway EIA, Dredging
I&BPB6776L001F01.pdf:1:Northern Gateway Container Terminal - 2008 Harbour Revision Order extension – request for EIA
I&BPB6776L001F01.pdf:1:carried out an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and produced the NGCT Environmental
I&BPB6776L001F01.pdf:1:At our meeting in April 2017, the MMO recommended that PDT submits a request for an EIA screening
I&BPB6776L001F01.pdf:2:request an EIA screening opinion from the MMO under Regulation 11(4) the 2007 Regulations as well as
I&BPB6776L001F01.pdf:2:In addition to the provision of an EIA Screening Opinion under the 2007 Regulations, we are also
Decision Letter.pdf:1:PD Teesport Case reference: EIA/2017/00041
20171212 EIA Scoping Response Teesport Extension Final.pdf:1:MMO Reference: EIA/2017/00041
20171212 EIA Scoping Response Teesport Extension Final.pdf:2:3 Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) …………………………………………………… 4
20171212 EIA Scoping Response Teesport Extension Final.pdf:3: extend the HRO for a further 15 years. An EIA scoping report was submitted to
20171212 EIA Scoping Response Teesport Extension Final.pdf:4:3 Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)
20171212 EIA Scoping Response Teesport Extension Final.pdf:4: certain public and private projects on the environment (“the EIA Directive”) aims
20171212 EIA Scoping Response Teesport Extension Final.pdf:4: or location are subject to an EIA before permission is granted.
20171212 EIA Scoping Response Teesport Extension Final.pdf:4: amended) (“the Regulations”) transpose the EIA Directive into UK law for marine
20171212 EIA Scoping Response Teesport Extension Final.pdf:4: EIA Directive, specifically, Schedule A2, article number:
20171212 EIA Scoping Response Teesport Extension Final.pdf:5: we outline that the following aspects be considered further during the EIA and
20171212 EIA Scoping Response Teesport Extension Final.pdf:8: The topics highlighted in this scoping opinion must be assessed during the EIA
20171212 EIA Scoping Response Teesport Extension Final.pdf:8: should not necessarily be seen as a definitive list of all EIA requirements. Given
20171212 MMO Letter with additional comments Teesport Scoping.pdf:1: Our reference: EIA/2017/00041
20171212 MMO Letter with additional comments Teesport Scoping.pdf:1:Ref: EIA/2017/00041 – Northern Gateway Container Terminal
MLA_2020_00079-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:2:Assessment (EIA) and produced the NGCT Environmental Statement (ES) in 2006 (Royal
MLA_2020_00079-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:2:quay would be constructed in two or three phases. For the purpose of the EIA, a two
MLA_2020_00079-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:2:CSD represents an upper bounding case for the purposes of the EIA. Dredging is to be
MLA_2020_00079-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:7:Please refer to Section 4.8 of the EIA Report
MLA_2020_00079-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:8:under the EIA Directive, specifically:
MLA_2020_00079-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:8:and determined to be an EIA project, there is no requirement to request an additional
MLA_2020_00079-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:8:EIA screening opinion. PDT has, therefore, undertaken an EIA for the scheme and has
MLA_2020_00079-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:8:submitted the attached EIA Report in support of this marine licence application.
MLA_2020_00079-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:8:Please refer to Section 29 of the EIA Report. As detailed within the HRA, it is concluded
MLA_2020_00079-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:9:Potential impacts to SSSIs have been considered throughout the EIA process. Refer to
MLA_2020_00079-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:9:Section 9, 11 and 29 of the EIA Report. No significant effects on SSSIs are predicted as a
MLA_2020_00079-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:9:in Section 28 and Appendix 19 of the EIA Report. Deterioration in status of the water
MLA_2020_00079-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:9:Appendix 6 of the EIA Report for meeting minutes.
MLA_2020_00079-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:13:Please refer to Section 26 of the EIA Report
MLA_2020_00079-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:14:Please refer to Section 26 of the EIA Report
MLA_2020_00079-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:14:Please refer to Section 26 of the EIA Report
MLA_2020_00079-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:15:Please refer to Section 3.3 of the EIA Report where alternative options for the disposal
MLA_2020_00079-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:17:In order to reflect the worst case with respect to the piling, for the purpose of the EIA, a
MLA_2020_00079-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:17:Please refer to the EIA Report
MLA_2020_00079-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:17:Please refer to the EIA Report
MLA_2020_00079-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:17:Please refer to the EIA Report
MLA_2020_00079-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:18:Further detail is provided in Section 3.2 of the EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00079-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:19:the scheme, however, this application and the accompanying EIA includes reclamation,
MLA_2020_00079-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:20:piling, for the purpose of the EIA, a two phase approach has been assumed. The
MLA_2020_00079-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:20:Please refer to the EIA Report
MLA_2020_00079-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:20:Please refer to the EIA Report
MLA_2020_00079-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:20:Please refer to the EIA Report
MLA_2020_00079-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:23:Please refer to the EIA Report where potential impacts of this activity are assessed in
MLA_2020_00079-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:23:Please refer to the EIA Report where proposed mitigation measures are detailed, where
MLA_2020_00079-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:23:Please refer to the EIA Report where residual impacts are identified.
MLA_2020_00079-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:25:10 of the EIA Report). It is concluded that the effect of the habitat improvement
MLA_2020_00079-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:27:impact of the NGCT ; this is discussed further in Section 9 of the EIA Report.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:3:5 APPROACH TO EIA 40
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:3:5.1 The EIA process 40
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:8:Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and produced the NGCT Environmental Statement (ES) in 2006
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:9:SEIR would be updated and developed into an EIA Report suitable to support the marine licence application.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:9:scheme description. Section 4 presents the legislative framework and Section 5 provides detail on the EIA
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:9:(baseline) environment for the various parameters considered during the EIA process. The potential impacts
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:13:EIA.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:17:for the purposes of the EIA.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:21:the open structure therefore represents an upper bounding case for the purposes of the EIA presented in
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:25: Key scheme parameters assessed in EIA process
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:30:be used for this activity, but a CSD represents an upper bounding case for the purposes of the EIA.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:30:three phases. In order to reflect the worst case with respect to the piling, for the purpose of the EIA, a two
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:32:and sedimentary studies that have been undertaken as part of the 2006 EIA (see Section 6). It is proposed
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:33:This is the preferred and proposed location for the scheme and is the location assessed in this EIA Report.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:37:disposal scenarios that are assessed in this EIA Report.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:38:dredged material has been excluded from the scheme and is not considered further in the EIA.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:38:This EIA Report assesses the potential impacts associated with the disposal of dredged material at the Tees
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:38:During production of the recent Hartlepool approach channel EIA Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2019),
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:39:However, the scenario which has been assessed in this EIA Report comprises:
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:40:The phasing of the development as described above is considered in this EIA Report. However, the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:40: • An anchored retaining wall (the solution which has been assessed in this EIA representing an upper
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:42:The requirement for EIA is established by the European Directive 2011/92/EU (codifying previous EIA
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:42:projects on the environment (the EIA Directive). The EIA Directive is implemented via various regulations;
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:42:confirmed that the proposed scheme comprised a Schedule A2 project under the EIA Directive, specifically:
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:42:be an EIA project, there is no requirement to request an additional EIA screening opinion. PDT has,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:42:therefore, undertaken an EIA for the scheme and has submitted this EIA Report in support of the marine
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:42:this is considered further in this EIA Report and is examined in detail via an HRA (see Section 29).
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:47:5 APPROACH TO EIA
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:47:The purpose of EIA is to provide an independent assessment of a project's potential environmental impacts
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:47:for the assessment of impacts which has been adopted within this EIA Report. In summary, this section
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:47: • A summary of the EIA process.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:47: raised have been addressed through the EIA process.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:47: • The results of the scoping exercise undertaken to define the issues to be addressed by the EIA
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:47:5.1 The EIA process
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:47:EIA is an iterative tool for systematically examining and assessing the impacts and effects of the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:47:formal reporting mechanism for an EIA is the EIA Report. In accordance with Schedule 3 of the 2007
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:47:Regulations (as amended), the EIA Report should include such information as is reasonably required to
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:48: • A non-technical summary of the information provided under this part of the EIA Regulations.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:48:The following stages were included in this EIA:
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:48: • Scoping – to determine the issues that the EIA should address (via the HRO extension process and
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:48:As noted in Section 4, it was not considered necessary to request an additional EIA Screening Opinion for
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:48:the scheme as the scheme has previously been confirmed as EIA development. PDT has therefore
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:48:undertaken an EIA for the scheme and has submitted this EIA Report in support of the marine licence
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:49:the EIA Report. Within this EIA Report, the description of the baseline environment consists of the following
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:50:this EIA Report and the conclusions reached regarding the sensitivity of receptors has been presented in
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:50:The EIA has been undertaken within a framework that allows for a transparent approach to the assessment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:50:and the resulting conclusions presented within this EIA Report. This section sets out the assigned definitions
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:50:that are used in the assessment process for a number of topics considered in the EIA Report. In addition,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:51:EIA provides an assessment of the impacts on sensitive receptors as a result of the effects of a development
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:51:effect may result in both a direct and indirect impact on a single receptor. Given this the EIA framework
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:51:purposes of this EIA. While this table provides guidelines of a generic nature, it should be noted that more
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:52:In the context of the EIA Regulations, ‘significant impacts’ are taken to be those of moderate or major
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:52:It should be reiterated that, although this section sets out the overall approach adopted for this EIA (using,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:53:Appropriate mitigation measures have been identified and recommended in this EIA Report where the EIA
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:53:topic chapters of this EIA Report.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:54:The EIA Regulations and relevant guidance require an EIA Report to provide an indication of any difficulties
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:54:The EIA Regulations also require that an EIA Report is prepared by competent experts. This EIA Report
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:54:Assessor for EIA under IEMA’s voluntary EIA Quality Mark scheme. Through this scheme, EIA activity is
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:54:independently reviewed, on an annual basis, to ensure it delivers excellence in areas including EIA
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:54:environment (the EIA Directive) states that an EIA should identify, describe and assess in an appropriate
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:55:This EIA Report has given due consideration to the potential for different residual impacts to have a
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:55:chapters of the EIA Report.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:55:In line with IEMA’s Guidelines for EIA (2004), cumulative impacts are defined as: “…the impacts on the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:55:However, the EIA and Habitats Directives and their associated regulations require the consideration of direct
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:55:The EIA Regulations do not define 'cumulative' but guidance on cumulative effects assessment is provided
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:55:taken into account in the EIA process and, generally, can be excluded from the scope of CIA. However, the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:56:assessed in subsequent sections of this EIA Report, informed by the predicted changes to the hydrodynamic
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:57: The suite of modelling activities undertaken specifically for the York Potash Harbour Facilities EIA
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:57:in the interim period within the Tees estuary, and therefore it is considered that the findings of the 2014 EIA
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:73:the extent of intertidal exposed at low water. The studies undertaken to inform this EIA have concluded that
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:75:This section of the EIA Report considers the following potential environmental impacts:
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:75:requirements of the NPS which are of relevance to this section of the EIA Report.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:75: NPS for Ports requirement NPS reference EIA Report reference
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:75:licence application). Table 7.2 also includes a reference to the relevant section of this EIA Report where
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:76: Response / section of the EIA Report
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:78:water bodies within and adjacent to the proposed scheme footprint is of relevance to this section of the EIA
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:86:A sediment quality survey was undertaken in the Tees estuary during July 2014 to inform the EIA for the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:86:Royal HaskoningDHV carried out an EIA on behalf of PDT in 2012 for proposed strengthening of the existing
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:104:This section of the EIA Report considers the following potential environmental impacts:
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:104:reference to section of this EIA Report where the requirement has been addressed
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:104: NPS requirement EIA Report reference
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:104: Where the development is subject to EIA, the application
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:105: NPS requirement EIA Report reference
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:105:(than the HRO extension process) (Appendix 5). Table 9.2 also signposts to the relevant section of this EIA
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:105: Response / section of the EIA Report
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:105: incorporated into this EIA Report.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:105:Natural England were adopted within the benthic ecological survey effort undertaken to inform this EIA
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:106: Response / section of the EIA Report
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:106: into this EIA Report.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:107:For this section of the EIA Report, the study area comprises the likely maximum extent over which potentially
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:107:This section of the EIA Report has been informed through a combination of desk-based assessment and
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:110:The findings of the EIA with regard to the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime, marine sediment quality,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:112:are not of relevance to this section of the EIA Report (shown in italics), however have been included for
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:112:within this EIA Report.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:114:not of relevance to this section of the EIA Report, but are addressed elsewhere as necessary)
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:131:findings of which were used to inform the EIA for the York Potash Harbour Facilities (Royal HaskoningDHV,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:131:2014). Although the underwater noise assessment was undertaken to inform the EIA for the York Potash
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:131: noise emissions from a BD were also assessed within the York Potash Harbour Facilities EIA. As
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:140:This section of the EIA Report considers the following potential environmental impacts:
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:140: Section of EIA report
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:140: Where the development is subject to EIA, the application should
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:141: Response / section of the EIA Report
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:141: Response / section of the EIA Report
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:141:The study area for this section of the EIA Report comprises the area which has the potential to be both
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:142:Baseline data to inform this EIA Report with regard to the assessment of potential impact to waterbirds using
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:151:which are considered elsewhere in this EIA Report):
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:161:The noise modelling undertaken as part of the NGCT EIA studies predicted construction noise levels at a
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:162:during production of the York Potash Harbour Facilities EIA in 2014. The same modelling package was
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:162:used during production of this EIA Report and the York Potash Harbour Facilities ES (SoundPLAN), and the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:162:Harbour Facilities EIA therefore provide useful context to this report.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:162:package which has been used (both EIAs used the SoundPLAN model) and the proximity of the proposed
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:162:EIA (with regard to the effectiveness of acoustic barriers) can be reasonably applied to the proposed NGCT
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:168:This section of the EIA report considers the following potential impacts to fish and shellfish:
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:168:licence application). Table 12.1 also includes a reference to the relevant section of this EIA Report where
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:168: Response / section of the EIA Report
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:169: Response / section of the EIA Report
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:170:impacts on marine sediment quality, water quality and marine ecology are relevant to this section of the EIA
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:182:summary of all species within this EIA Report. Rather, the information provided in Table 12.4 is focussed
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:191:EIA for the York Potash Harbour Facilities (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2014). As justified in Section 9.5, it is
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:191:Harbour Facilities EIA can be used to inform this EIA Report.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:192:time. The assessment undertaken in support of the York Potash Harbour Facilities EIA concluded that the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:195:This section of the EIA Report considers the following potential impacts to commercial navigation:
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:195:this section of the EIA Report, where they are relevant to the proposed scheme.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:195:applicable to this section of the EIA Report.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:195:been undertaken. However, the information presented in the SEIR has been re-formatted into an EIA
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:196:The study area for this section of the EIA Report comprises the Tees estuary, extending from the mouth of
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:196:This section of the EIA Report has been informed by desk-based review of publicly available documents
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:198:construction process, for the purposes of this EIA).
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:201:This section of the EIA Report summarises a review of the transport baseline environment that informed the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:201:(Reference: R/2006/0433/OO). The planning application was supported by an EIA, which itself was
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:206:EIA Report.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:208:applicable to this section of the EIA Report.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:209:Based on the information presented in Section 18.1, the study area for this section of the EIA Report
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:209:Disturbance to water based recreational activities were therefore scoped out of the EIA for the York Potash
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:213:date of the 2008 HRO). Table 20.1 also includes a reference to the relevant section of this EIA Report
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:214: Response / section of the EIA Report where comment has
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:214:proposed scheme footprint) and adjacent areas that could be indirectly impacted. The EIA, therefore,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:222:valid. This section of the EIA Report is therefore focussed on potential impacts to Infrastructure within the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:222:applicable to this section of the EIA Report.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:222:The study area for this section of the EIA Report comprises the area which has the potential to be directly
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:225:(with regard to this section of the EIA Report), is the Infrastructure which is reliant on the abstracted water
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:228:these impacts as part of the EIA Report. The NPS states that applicants should describe the existing socio-
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:228:applicable to this section of the EIA Report.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:229:The study area used for this section of the EIA Report comprises the north-east region of the UK. This wide-
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:237:states that EIA Reports produced under these Regulations should assess: “the impact of the project on
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:242:states that EIA Reports produced under these Regulations should include a description of the likely
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:244:Within the Hartlepool Channel EIA Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2018), it was concluded that the beneficial
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:259:baseline. As such, these impacts are already taken into account in the EIA process for the proposed
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:260:purposes of the EIA, it is estimated that the scheme would be developed in two phases. It is anticipated
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:260:Overall, for the purposes of the EIA, the construction period for the full development is expected to be 120
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:267:volume. The EIAs have made informed assumptions about the most likely dredge plant that would be
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:267:EIA studies undertaken for each project and the CIA assumes that the construction phases of the projects
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:267:A review of all EIA studies for the above projects highlights that the maximum increase in suspended
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:269:predicted to be increased by less than 4mm, with the tide arriving up to 2 minutes earlier. The EIA studies
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:269:The EIA studies undertaken for the York Potash Harbour Facilities showed that the harbour facility itself
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:270:The York Potash Harbour Facilities EIA predicted that currents will be reduced within the deepened areas.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:271:EIA studies for each project) at any location.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:274:Airborne noise modelling was undertaken as part of the EIA studies for both projects. Based on the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:279:This section of the EIA Report draws together information regarding the potential for the proposed scheme
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:281:European sites. This section of the EIA Report is intended to present all of the information necessary to
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:281: assessed as part of the EIA for their potential to
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:281: presented elsewhere in this EIA Report have
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:285:Section 11 of this EIA Report. Although the qualifying interest features of the Teesmouth and Cleveland
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:288: project (not both). Given the findings of the NGCT EIA, it is
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:290: However, as an EIA has not been
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:292:and Cleveland Coast pSPA and Ramsar site. With reference to the relevant sections of the EIA Report
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:292: • site-specific information obtained from surveys and studies undertaken as part of the EIA for the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:292: • evidence provided within the EIA Report; and,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:297:EIA. That study concluded that the increased movements of vessels associated with that scheme (which
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:300:production of the York Potash Harbour Facilities EIA in 2014. This approach is considered appropriate, as
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:303:identified as a risk in this EIA Report for the NGCT project. The mitigation measures proposed for the York
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:307:Royal Haskoning, 2011. Tees Dock No. 1 Quay – revised scope for EIA in relation to capital dredging
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:310:Uploaded onto MCMS separately due to document properties (unable to combine into this EIA
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:322: 4 Proposed approach to EIA
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:322: SR outlined the proposed approach to the EIA to support the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:322: consenting routes for the project requiring EIA, it is not
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:322: intended to submit an EIA Screening Report as it is
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:322: acknowledged that the proposed scheme represents EIA
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:323: would need to be assessed as part of the EIA for their
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:327: Our reference: EIA/2017/00041
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:327:Ref: EIA/2017/00041 – Northern Gateway Container Terminal
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:332:3 Proposed approach to EIA
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:332: Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) on the basis that the scheme
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:332: was previously determined as EIA during 2006, and this was also
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:333: into an EIA Report (containing all information required for the marine
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:335: would be sufficient for the EIA Report (in RHDHV’s view). No
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:338: provided much of the background to the present studies to support the EIA.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:347: 10. For the EIA investigations the SEDPLUME-RW(3D) model was used to simulate
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:358: report of the hydrodynamic and sedimentological studies to support the EIA (HR
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:388:Assessment (EIA) and produced the NGCT Environmental Statement (ES) in 2006 (Royal Haskoning,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:391:have been undertaken as part of the 2006 EIA.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:392:A benthic survey of the lower Tees estuary was undertaken in 2006 to inform the EIA undertaken for the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:393:Figure 2 Grab samples recovered during 2006 (NGCT EIA) and 2014 (York Potash Harbour
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:394:Figure 3 Epifaunal trawls undertaken during 2006 (NGCT EIA) and 2014 (York Potash
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:394:Harbour Facilities EIA)
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:395:survey undertaken to inform the NGCT EIA identified the presence of Group B in the navigation channel;
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:395:The benthic infaunal survey undertaken to inform the QEII Berth EIA (undertaken during 2008) consisted
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:395:EIA, to enable the samples to be comparatively assessed within a broader context.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:395:The benthic infaunal survey undertaken as part of the York Potash Harbour Facilities EIA consisted of 32
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:396:Sediment samples were collected as part of the EIA for the NGCT during 2006 (Royal Haskoning, 2006)
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:400:EIA for the York Potash Harbour Facilities project. A total of six vibrocores were taken within the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:402:The Marine Management Organisation (MMO) provided an EIA Scoping Opinion (reference
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:402:EIA/2017/00041) in December 2017 for the NGCT HRO extension project. The Scoping Opinion stated
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:403:As noted above, the MMO provided an EIA Scoping Opinion (reference EIA/2017/00041) in December
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:421:Sediment samples were collected as part of the EIA for the NGCT during 2006 (Royal Haskoning,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:424:Royal HaskoningDHV carried out an EIA on behalf of PDT in 2012 for proposed strengthening of the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:424:adjacent areas within Tees Dock. Prior to submission of the EIA, Royal HaskoningDHV produced a
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:425:A sediment quality survey was undertaken in the Tees estuary during July 2014 to inform the EIA for
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:430:Appendix 12 to the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2019)) which
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:430:The predicted impact of the proposed NGCT on intertidal habitat is described in Section 9 of the EIA Report.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:430:The EIA Report concludes that the proposed NGCT would result in the direct loss of intertidal habitat due
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:431:designated sites. These considerations are dealt with in the EIA Report (with respect to SSSIs) and the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:431:The marine ecology survey report (Appendix 12 of the EIA Report) describes the key biotopes assigned to
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:449:benthic ecological survey to inform an EIA for the proposed scheme.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:450: sediment quality samples are required to advise the EIA, however NE defers to the Marine
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:454:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:460:(EIA) was conducted and a subsequent Environmental Statement (ES) produced by Royal HaskoningDHV
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:461:A benthic survey of the lower Tees Estuary was undertaken in 2006 to inform the EIA undertaken for the NGCT
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:461:The benthic infaunal survey undertaken to inform the QEII Berth EIA in 2008 consisted of grab samples at two
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:461:As part of the York Potash Harbour Facilities EIA, a benthic infaunal and epifaunal survey was conducted in
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:500:A benthic epifaunal survey was conducted to inform the 2006 NGCT EIA. The survey involved use of
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:500:infaunal surveys that have been undertaken to inform EIAs for developments within and adjacent to
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:501:The benthic infaunal survey undertaken to inform the QEII Berth EIA (undertaken during 2008)
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:501:with data from the 25 stations sampled during the infaunal survey undertaken for the NGCT EIA, to
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:501:The benthic infaunal survey undertaken as part of the York Potash Harbour Facilities EIA (Royal
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:501:The 2006 survey undertaken to inform the NGCT EIA identified the presence of group B in the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:567:1.2.2 The planning application was part of a wider Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) which was
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:629:(EIA) Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2019). In summary, the proposed scheme comprises:
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:629:the EIA Report indicates that all effects will be experienced within or immediately adjacent to the footprint
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:629:As reported in the EIA Report, it is not expected that the existing maintenance dredging strategy will need
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:629:and sedimentary studies undertaken as part of the EIA (see Section 6 of the EIA Report). As a result,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:634:have been assessed in detail as part of the EIA studies, therefore, only a summary of the findings are
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:636:been observed in previous surveys within the Tees (reported within the EIA Report), annelid taxa,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:636:stations. Mollusc taxa generally contributed most to biomass. The EIA Report (Royal HaskoningDHV,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:636:As part of the hydrodynamic assessment undertaken by HR Wallingford to inform the EIA, the dispersion
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:636:undertaken to inform the EIA has predicted that peak suspended solid concentrations in the main channel
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:637:terminal has potential to disturb fish due to lighting omitted from the terminal. As described in the EIA
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:637:A detailed underwater noise survey and modelling exercise was used to inform the EIA for the York
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:637:Potash Harbour Facilities (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2014). As justified in the EIA Report, it is concluded that
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:637:EIA could be used to inform the potential disturbance impacts to fish from the proposed NGCT. To
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:638:The EIA Report has assessed the potential disturbance of lighting (during both construction and operation)
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:638:scheme. An impact of negligible significance is predicted. The EIA Report concludes that proposed
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:638:(e.g. sky glow, light spill, glare and light intrusion). Nevertheless, the EIA Report states that during
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:638:during night time operations. The EIA Report concluded that the fish populations of the estuary as a
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:639:As outlined in the EIA Report, the landside elements of the proposed scheme have commenced, and
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:639:implemented. The EIA Report identifies that there are a number of conditions attached to the planning
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:639:commencement of the landside works. The EIA Report notes that the future development of the wider
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:642: WFD protected areas within 2km See Figure A1. Note that European designated sites have been considered within the EIA Report and
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:643: WFD protected areas within 2km See Figure A1. Note that European designated sites have been considered within the EIA Report and
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:651: Within 2km of any WFD protected ✓ (bathing Yes. However, note that European designated sites have been considered within the EIA
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:654: proposed for the purposes of the EIA that the terminal construction would be undertaken in two phases
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:654: bounding case for the purposes of the EIA.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:660: protected area have been considered within the EIA Report so are not
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:667: Within 2km of any WFD protected area ✓ Yes. However, impacts on European Designated Sites are considered in the EIA Report.
20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:2:EIA Decision………………………………………………………………………………………………. 28
20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:3:This document is the Environmental Impact Assessment (“EIA”) consent decision
20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:3:Management Organisation’s (“MMO”) evaluation and conclusions to inform the EIA
20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:3:approval for the Project, also requiring EIA consent, to the MMO on 26 January
20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:5:to an EIA before permission is granted.
20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:5:the applicant that the proposed works constitute an EIA development under
20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:6:Environmental Statement (“ES”) titledIBPB8270R001F01 EIA REPORT.
20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:9:The Project, as an EIA proposal, was advertised for 2 successive weeks in 2
20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:9:The MMO, as the appropriate authority for this EIA determination, has considered
20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:10:dredging. Modelling included within the EIA indicates that the river basin dredging
20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:17: volume assessed within the NGCT EIA), should it be apparent that the
20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:28:EIA Decision
20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:28:expertise, the MMO has concluded a favourable determination and that EIA consent
LON_LIB1-#22563159-v1-Teesside_Gazette_6_May_2020.PDF:2: OAP requires an environmental impact assessment (“EIA”) consent and is
LON_LIB1-#22563159-v1-Teesside_Gazette_6_May_2020.PDF:2: subject to the requirement for an EIA under the Marine Works (Environ-
LON_LIB1-#22563159-v1-Teesside_Gazette_6_May_2020.PDF:2: mental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2007 (“the EIA Regulations”).
LON_LIB1-#22563159-v1-Teesside_Gazette_6_May_2020.PDF:2: on the No.1 site across the UK for funeral notices ANGEL ROOFING documents required by the EIA Regulations can be viewed on line in
LON_LIB1-#22563159-v1-Teesside_Gazette_6_May_2020.PDF:2: in accordance with Schedule 5 of the EIA Regulations. Copies of written
LON_LIB1-#22563159-v1-Teesside_Gazette_6_May_2020.PDF:2: 07535730975 Call The MMO is an appropriate authority under the EIA Regulations. In
LON_LIB1-#22563159-v1-Teesside_Gazette_6_May_2020.PDF:2: anytime 24/7 make the EIA consent decision for the project. The MMO will also make
I&BPB8270MM001F0.1.pdf:2: 4 Proposed approach to EIA
I&BPB8270MM001F0.1.pdf:2: SR outlined the proposed approach to the EIA to support the
I&BPB8270MM001F0.1.pdf:2: consenting routes for the project requiring EIA, it is not
I&BPB8270MM001F0.1.pdf:2: intended to submit an EIA Screening Report as it is
I&BPB8270MM001F0.1.pdf:2: acknowledged that the proposed scheme represents EIA
I&BPB8270MM001F0.1.pdf:3: would need to be assessed as part of the EIA for their
LON_LIB1-#22528705-v1-Teesside_Gazette_29_4_2020.PDF:2: requires an environmental impact assessment (“EIA”) consent and is
LON_LIB1-#22528705-v1-Teesside_Gazette_29_4_2020.PDF:2: subject to the requirement for an EIA under the Marine Works (Environ-
LON_LIB1-#22528705-v1-Teesside_Gazette_29_4_2020.PDF:2: Leather £30 fully fitted Gardens Cleared, Rotovated, Levelled, Turfed, no matter how bad! mental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2007 (“the EIA Regulations”).
LON_LIB1-#22528705-v1-Teesside_Gazette_29_4_2020.PDF:2: from £149 Middlesbrough | 07990 972470 | Redcar documents required by the EIA Regulations can be viewed on line in
LON_LIB1-#22528705-v1-Teesside_Gazette_29_4_2020.PDF:2: in accordance with Schedule 5 of the EIA Regulations. Copies of written
LON_LIB1-#22528705-v1-Teesside_Gazette_29_4_2020.PDF:2: With over 15 Million pages views in January, The MMO is an appropriate authority under the EIA Regulations. In
LON_LIB1-#22528705-v1-Teesside_Gazette_29_4_2020.PDF:2: rubber seals etc. . . repaired. we can connect you with the right audience make the EIA consent decision for the project. The MMO will also make
MLA202000079 - Publicise EIA request.pdf:2:environmental impact assessment (“EIA”) consent and is subject to the requirement for an
MLA202000079 - Publicise EIA request.pdf:2:EIA under the Marine Works (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2007 (“the
MLA202000079 - Publicise EIA request.pdf:2:EIA Regulations”). An environmental statement has been prepared by the applicant.
MLA202000079 - Publicise EIA request.pdf:2:A copy of the application, environmental statement and other documents required by the EIA
MLA202000079 - Publicise EIA request.pdf:3:Schedule 5 of the EIA Regulations. Copies of written representations received by MMO will
MLA202000079 - Publicise EIA request.pdf:3:appropriate authority under the EIA Regulations. In determining the application, the MMO as
MLA202000079 - Publicise EIA request.pdf:3:appropriate authority will make the EIA consent decision for the project. The MMO will also
52555455.pdf:1: EIA Decision and Regulatory Decision deceased, late of Shotley Park Care
52555455.pdf:1: in excellent condition, like new, EIA Consent Decision Durham, DH8 0TJ; 13 Milford
52555455.pdf:1: out an Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) under the below by 23/05/2022, after which
52555455.pdf:1: 01642 557282 Marine Works (EIA) Regulations 2007 (“the Regulations”) date the Estate will be distributed
52555455.pdf:1: MMO has decided to grant EIA consent for the project on Barrington Chambers,Victoria
52555455.pdf:1: £3000 ONO considerations on which the EIA consent decision was
52555455.pdf:1: Effect of EIA Decision on the
52555455.pdf:1: Following the above EIA consent decision in accordance
52553196.pdf:1: Domestic and Commercial All types of Garden & Ground works undertaken. EIA Decision and Regulatory Decision
52553196.pdf:1: Carpet and Upholstery Cleaning Service • Turfing, Gravelling, Patios & Paths Laid. EIA Consent Decision
52553196.pdf:1: Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) under the Marine Works (EIA)
52553196.pdf:1: • Spot & Stain Removal • Guttering SPECIAL OFFER decided to grant EIA consent for the project on 2 March 2022 subject
52553196.pdf:1: CLEANED &/or maintained, considerations on which the EIA consent decision was based, and
52553196.pdf:1: Effect of EIA Decision on the Regulatory Decision
52553196.pdf:1:Lounge/through lounge £20-30 01642 034 561 Following the above EIA consent decision in accordance with
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:3:5 APPROACH TO EIA 40
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:3:5.1 The EIA process 40
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:8:Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and produced the NGCT Environmental Statement (ES) in 2006
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:9:SEIR would be updated and developed into an EIA Report suitable to support the marine licence application.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:9:scheme description. Section 4 presents the legislative framework and Section 5 provides detail on the EIA
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:9:(baseline) environment for the various parameters considered during the EIA process. The potential impacts
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:13:EIA.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:17:for the purposes of the EIA.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:21:the open structure therefore represents an upper bounding case for the purposes of the EIA presented in
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:25: Key scheme parameters assessed in EIA process
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:30:be used for this activity, but a CSD represents an upper bounding case for the purposes of the EIA.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:30:three phases. In order to reflect the worst case with respect to the piling, for the purpose of the EIA, a two
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:32:and sedimentary studies that have been undertaken as part of the 2006 EIA (see Section 6). It is proposed
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:33:This is the preferred and proposed location for the scheme and is the location assessed in this EIA Report.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:37:disposal scenarios that are assessed in this EIA Report.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:38:dredged material has been excluded from the scheme and is not considered further in the EIA.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:38:This EIA Report assesses the potential impacts associated with the disposal of dredged material at the Tees
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:38:During production of the recent Hartlepool approach channel EIA Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2019),
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:39:However, the scenario which has been assessed in this EIA Report comprises:
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:40:The phasing of the development as described above is considered in this EIA Report. However, the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:40: • An anchored retaining wall (the solution which has been assessed in this EIA representing an upper
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:42:The requirement for EIA is established by the European Directive 2011/92/EU (codifying previous EIA
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:42:projects on the environment (the EIA Directive). The EIA Directive is implemented via various regulations;
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:42:confirmed that the proposed scheme comprised a Schedule A2 project under the EIA Directive, specifically:
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:42:be an EIA project, there is no requirement to request an additional EIA screening opinion. PDT has,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:42:therefore, undertaken an EIA for the scheme and has submitted this EIA Report in support of the marine
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:42:this is considered further in this EIA Report and is examined in detail via an HRA (see Section 29).
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:47:5 APPROACH TO EIA
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:47:The purpose of EIA is to provide an independent assessment of a project's potential environmental impacts
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:47:for the assessment of impacts which has been adopted within this EIA Report. In summary, this section
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:47: • A summary of the EIA process.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:47: raised have been addressed through the EIA process.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:47: • The results of the scoping exercise undertaken to define the issues to be addressed by the EIA
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:47:5.1 The EIA process
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:47:EIA is an iterative tool for systematically examining and assessing the impacts and effects of the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:47:formal reporting mechanism for an EIA is the EIA Report. In accordance with Schedule 3 of the 2007
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:47:Regulations (as amended), the EIA Report should include such information as is reasonably required to
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:48: • A non-technical summary of the information provided under this part of the EIA Regulations.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:48:The following stages were included in this EIA:
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:48: • Scoping – to determine the issues that the EIA should address (via the HRO extension process and
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:48:As noted in Section 4, it was not considered necessary to request an additional EIA Screening Opinion for
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:48:the scheme as the scheme has previously been confirmed as EIA development. PDT has therefore
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:48:undertaken an EIA for the scheme and has submitted this EIA Report in support of the marine licence
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:49:the EIA Report. Within this EIA Report, the description of the baseline environment consists of the following
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:50:this EIA Report and the conclusions reached regarding the sensitivity of receptors has been presented in
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:50:The EIA has been undertaken within a framework that allows for a transparent approach to the assessment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:50:and the resulting conclusions presented within this EIA Report. This section sets out the assigned definitions
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:50:that are used in the assessment process for a number of topics considered in the EIA Report. In addition,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:51:EIA provides an assessment of the impacts on sensitive receptors as a result of the effects of a development
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:51:effect may result in both a direct and indirect impact on a single receptor. Given this the EIA framework
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:51:purposes of this EIA. While this table provides guidelines of a generic nature, it should be noted that more
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:52:In the context of the EIA Regulations, ‘significant impacts’ are taken to be those of moderate or major
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:52:It should be reiterated that, although this section sets out the overall approach adopted for this EIA (using,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:53:Appropriate mitigation measures have been identified and recommended in this EIA Report where the EIA
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:53:topic chapters of this EIA Report.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:54:The EIA Regulations and relevant guidance require an EIA Report to provide an indication of any difficulties
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:54:The EIA Regulations also require that an EIA Report is prepared by competent experts. This EIA Report
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:54:Assessor for EIA under IEMA’s voluntary EIA Quality Mark scheme. Through this scheme, EIA activity is
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:54:independently reviewed, on an annual basis, to ensure it delivers excellence in areas including EIA
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:54:environment (the EIA Directive) states that an EIA should identify, describe and assess in an appropriate
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:55:This EIA Report has given due consideration to the potential for different residual impacts to have a
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:55:chapters of the EIA Report.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:55:In line with IEMA’s Guidelines for EIA (2004), cumulative impacts are defined as: “…the impacts on the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:55:However, the EIA and Habitats Directives and their associated regulations require the consideration of direct
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:55:The EIA Regulations do not define 'cumulative' but guidance on cumulative effects assessment is provided
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:55:taken into account in the EIA process and, generally, can be excluded from the scope of CIA. However, the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:56:assessed in subsequent sections of this EIA Report, informed by the predicted changes to the hydrodynamic
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:57: The suite of modelling activities undertaken specifically for the York Potash Harbour Facilities EIA
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:57:in the interim period within the Tees estuary, and therefore it is considered that the findings of the 2014 EIA
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:73:the extent of intertidal exposed at low water. The studies undertaken to inform this EIA have concluded that
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:75:This section of the EIA Report considers the following potential environmental impacts:
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:75:requirements of the NPS which are of relevance to this section of the EIA Report.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:75: NPS for Ports requirement NPS reference EIA Report reference
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:75:licence application). Table 7.2 also includes a reference to the relevant section of this EIA Report where
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:76: Response / section of the EIA Report
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:78:water bodies within and adjacent to the proposed scheme footprint is of relevance to this section of the EIA
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:86:A sediment quality survey was undertaken in the Tees estuary during July 2014 to inform the EIA for the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:86:Royal HaskoningDHV carried out an EIA on behalf of PDT in 2012 for proposed strengthening of the existing
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:104:This section of the EIA Report considers the following potential environmental impacts:
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:104:reference to section of this EIA Report where the requirement has been addressed
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:104: NPS requirement EIA Report reference
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:104: Where the development is subject to EIA, the application
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:105: NPS requirement EIA Report reference
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:105:(than the HRO extension process) (Appendix 5). Table 9.2 also signposts to the relevant section of this EIA
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:105: Response / section of the EIA Report
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:105: incorporated into this EIA Report.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:105:Natural England were adopted within the benthic ecological survey effort undertaken to inform this EIA
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:106: Response / section of the EIA Report
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:106: into this EIA Report.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:107:For this section of the EIA Report, the study area comprises the likely maximum extent over which potentially
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:107:This section of the EIA Report has been informed through a combination of desk-based assessment and
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:110:The findings of the EIA with regard to the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime, marine sediment quality,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:112:are not of relevance to this section of the EIA Report (shown in italics), however have been included for
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:112:within this EIA Report.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:114:not of relevance to this section of the EIA Report, but are addressed elsewhere as necessary)
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:131:findings of which were used to inform the EIA for the York Potash Harbour Facilities (Royal HaskoningDHV,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:131:2014). Although the underwater noise assessment was undertaken to inform the EIA for the York Potash
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:131: noise emissions from a BD were also assessed within the York Potash Harbour Facilities EIA. As
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:140:This section of the EIA Report considers the following potential environmental impacts:
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:140: Section of EIA report
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:140: Where the development is subject to EIA, the application should
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:141: Response / section of the EIA Report
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:141: Response / section of the EIA Report
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:141:The study area for this section of the EIA Report comprises the area which has the potential to be both
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:142:Baseline data to inform this EIA Report with regard to the assessment of potential impact to waterbirds using
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:151:which are considered elsewhere in this EIA Report):
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:161:The noise modelling undertaken as part of the NGCT EIA studies predicted construction noise levels at a
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:162:during production of the York Potash Harbour Facilities EIA in 2014. The same modelling package was
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:162:used during production of this EIA Report and the York Potash Harbour Facilities ES (SoundPLAN), and the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:162:Harbour Facilities EIA therefore provide useful context to this report.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:162:package which has been used (both EIAs used the SoundPLAN model) and the proximity of the proposed
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:162:EIA (with regard to the effectiveness of acoustic barriers) can be reasonably applied to the proposed NGCT
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:168:This section of the EIA report considers the following potential impacts to fish and shellfish:
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:168:licence application). Table 12.1 also includes a reference to the relevant section of this EIA Report where
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:168: Response / section of the EIA Report
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:169: Response / section of the EIA Report
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:170:impacts on marine sediment quality, water quality and marine ecology are relevant to this section of the EIA
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:182:summary of all species within this EIA Report. Rather, the information provided in Table 12.4 is focussed
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:191:EIA for the York Potash Harbour Facilities (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2014). As justified in Section 9.5, it is
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:191:Harbour Facilities EIA can be used to inform this EIA Report.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:192:time. The assessment undertaken in support of the York Potash Harbour Facilities EIA concluded that the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:195:This section of the EIA Report considers the following potential impacts to commercial navigation:
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:195:this section of the EIA Report, where they are relevant to the proposed scheme.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:195:applicable to this section of the EIA Report.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:195:been undertaken. However, the information presented in the SEIR has been re-formatted into an EIA
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:196:The study area for this section of the EIA Report comprises the Tees estuary, extending from the mouth of
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:196:This section of the EIA Report has been informed by desk-based review of publicly available documents
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:198:construction process, for the purposes of this EIA).
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:201:This section of the EIA Report summarises a review of the transport baseline environment that informed the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:201:(Reference: R/2006/0433/OO). The planning application was supported by an EIA, which itself was
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:206:EIA Report.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:208:applicable to this section of the EIA Report.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:209:Based on the information presented in Section 18.1, the study area for this section of the EIA Report
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:209:Disturbance to water based recreational activities were therefore scoped out of the EIA for the York Potash
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:213:date of the 2008 HRO). Table 20.1 also includes a reference to the relevant section of this EIA Report
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:214: Response / section of the EIA Report where comment has
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:214:proposed scheme footprint) and adjacent areas that could be indirectly impacted. The EIA, therefore,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:222:valid. This section of the EIA Report is therefore focussed on potential impacts to Infrastructure within the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:222:applicable to this section of the EIA Report.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:222:The study area for this section of the EIA Report comprises the area which has the potential to be directly
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:225:(with regard to this section of the EIA Report), is the Infrastructure which is reliant on the abstracted water
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:228:these impacts as part of the EIA Report. The NPS states that applicants should describe the existing socio-
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:228:applicable to this section of the EIA Report.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:229:The study area used for this section of the EIA Report comprises the north-east region of the UK. This wide-
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:237:states that EIA Reports produced under these Regulations should assess: “the impact of the project on
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:242:states that EIA Reports produced under these Regulations should include a description of the likely
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:244:Within the Hartlepool Channel EIA Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2018), it was concluded that the beneficial
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:259:baseline. As such, these impacts are already taken into account in the EIA process for the proposed
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:260:purposes of the EIA, it is estimated that the scheme would be developed in two phases. It is anticipated
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:260:Overall, for the purposes of the EIA, the construction period for the full development is expected to be 120
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:267:volume. The EIAs have made informed assumptions about the most likely dredge plant that would be
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:267:EIA studies undertaken for each project and the CIA assumes that the construction phases of the projects
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:267:A review of all EIA studies for the above projects highlights that the maximum increase in suspended
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:269:predicted to be increased by less than 4mm, with the tide arriving up to 2 minutes earlier. The EIA studies
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:269:The EIA studies undertaken for the York Potash Harbour Facilities showed that the harbour facility itself
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:270:The York Potash Harbour Facilities EIA predicted that currents will be reduced within the deepened areas.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:271:EIA studies for each project) at any location.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:274:Airborne noise modelling was undertaken as part of the EIA studies for both projects. Based on the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:279:This section of the EIA Report draws together information regarding the potential for the proposed scheme
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:281:European sites. This section of the EIA Report is intended to present all of the information necessary to
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:281: assessed as part of the EIA for their potential to
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:281: presented elsewhere in this EIA Report have
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:285:Section 11 of this EIA Report. Although the qualifying interest features of the Teesmouth and Cleveland
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:288: project (not both). Given the findings of the NGCT EIA, it is
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:290: However, as an EIA has not been
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:292:and Cleveland Coast pSPA and Ramsar site. With reference to the relevant sections of the EIA Report
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:292: • site-specific information obtained from surveys and studies undertaken as part of the EIA for the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:292: • evidence provided within the EIA Report; and,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:297:EIA. That study concluded that the increased movements of vessels associated with that scheme (which
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:300:production of the York Potash Harbour Facilities EIA in 2014. This approach is considered appropriate, as
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:303:identified as a risk in this EIA Report for the NGCT project. The mitigation measures proposed for the York
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:307:Royal Haskoning, 2011. Tees Dock No. 1 Quay – revised scope for EIA in relation to capital dredging
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:310:Uploaded onto MCMS separately due to document properties (unable to combine into this EIA
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:322: 4 Proposed approach to EIA
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:322: SR outlined the proposed approach to the EIA to support the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:322: consenting routes for the project requiring EIA, it is not
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:322: intended to submit an EIA Screening Report as it is
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:322: acknowledged that the proposed scheme represents EIA
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:323: would need to be assessed as part of the EIA for their
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:327: Our reference: EIA/2017/00041
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:327:Ref: EIA/2017/00041 – Northern Gateway Container Terminal
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:332:3 Proposed approach to EIA
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:332: Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) on the basis that the scheme
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:332: was previously determined as EIA during 2006, and this was also
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:333: into an EIA Report (containing all information required for the marine
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:335: would be sufficient for the EIA Report (in RHDHV’s view). No
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:338: provided much of the background to the present studies to support the EIA.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:347: 10. For the EIA investigations the SEDPLUME-RW(3D) model was used to simulate
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:358: report of the hydrodynamic and sedimentological studies to support the EIA (HR
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:388:Assessment (EIA) and produced the NGCT Environmental Statement (ES) in 2006 (Royal Haskoning,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:391:have been undertaken as part of the 2006 EIA.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:392:A benthic survey of the lower Tees estuary was undertaken in 2006 to inform the EIA undertaken for the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:393:Figure 2 Grab samples recovered during 2006 (NGCT EIA) and 2014 (York Potash Harbour
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:394:Figure 3 Epifaunal trawls undertaken during 2006 (NGCT EIA) and 2014 (York Potash
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:394:Harbour Facilities EIA)
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:395:survey undertaken to inform the NGCT EIA identified the presence of Group B in the navigation channel;
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:395:The benthic infaunal survey undertaken to inform the QEII Berth EIA (undertaken during 2008) consisted
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:395:EIA, to enable the samples to be comparatively assessed within a broader context.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:395:The benthic infaunal survey undertaken as part of the York Potash Harbour Facilities EIA consisted of 32
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:396:Sediment samples were collected as part of the EIA for the NGCT during 2006 (Royal Haskoning, 2006)
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:400:EIA for the York Potash Harbour Facilities project. A total of six vibrocores were taken within the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:402:The Marine Management Organisation (MMO) provided an EIA Scoping Opinion (reference
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:402:EIA/2017/00041) in December 2017 for the NGCT HRO extension project. The Scoping Opinion stated
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:403:As noted above, the MMO provided an EIA Scoping Opinion (reference EIA/2017/00041) in December
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:421:Sediment samples were collected as part of the EIA for the NGCT during 2006 (Royal Haskoning,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:424:Royal HaskoningDHV carried out an EIA on behalf of PDT in 2012 for proposed strengthening of the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:424:adjacent areas within Tees Dock. Prior to submission of the EIA, Royal HaskoningDHV produced a
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:425:A sediment quality survey was undertaken in the Tees estuary during July 2014 to inform the EIA for
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:430:Appendix 12 to the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2019)) which
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:430:The predicted impact of the proposed NGCT on intertidal habitat is described in Section 9 of the EIA Report.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:430:The EIA Report concludes that the proposed NGCT would result in the direct loss of intertidal habitat due
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:431:designated sites. These considerations are dealt with in the EIA Report (with respect to SSSIs) and the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:431:The marine ecology survey report (Appendix 12 of the EIA Report) describes the key biotopes assigned to
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:449:benthic ecological survey to inform an EIA for the proposed scheme.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:450: sediment quality samples are required to advise the EIA, however NE defers to the Marine
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:454:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:460:(EIA) was conducted and a subsequent Environmental Statement (ES) produced by Royal HaskoningDHV
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:461:A benthic survey of the lower Tees Estuary was undertaken in 2006 to inform the EIA undertaken for the NGCT
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:461:The benthic infaunal survey undertaken to inform the QEII Berth EIA in 2008 consisted of grab samples at two
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:461:As part of the York Potash Harbour Facilities EIA, a benthic infaunal and epifaunal survey was conducted in
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:500:A benthic epifaunal survey was conducted to inform the 2006 NGCT EIA. The survey involved use of
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:500:infaunal surveys that have been undertaken to inform EIAs for developments within and adjacent to
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:501:The benthic infaunal survey undertaken to inform the QEII Berth EIA (undertaken during 2008)
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:501:with data from the 25 stations sampled during the infaunal survey undertaken for the NGCT EIA, to
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:501:The benthic infaunal survey undertaken as part of the York Potash Harbour Facilities EIA (Royal
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:501:The 2006 survey undertaken to inform the NGCT EIA identified the presence of group B in the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:567:1.2.2 The planning application was part of a wider Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) which was
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:629:(EIA) Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2019). In summary, the proposed scheme comprises:
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:629:the EIA Report indicates that all effects will be experienced within or immediately adjacent to the footprint
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:629:As reported in the EIA Report, it is not expected that the existing maintenance dredging strategy will need
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:629:and sedimentary studies undertaken as part of the EIA (see Section 6 of the EIA Report). As a result,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:634:have been assessed in detail as part of the EIA studies, therefore, only a summary of the findings are
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:636:been observed in previous surveys within the Tees (reported within the EIA Report), annelid taxa,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:636:stations. Mollusc taxa generally contributed most to biomass. The EIA Report (Royal HaskoningDHV,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:636:As part of the hydrodynamic assessment undertaken by HR Wallingford to inform the EIA, the dispersion
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:636:undertaken to inform the EIA has predicted that peak suspended solid concentrations in the main channel
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:637:terminal has potential to disturb fish due to lighting omitted from the terminal. As described in the EIA
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:637:A detailed underwater noise survey and modelling exercise was used to inform the EIA for the York
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:637:Potash Harbour Facilities (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2014). As justified in the EIA Report, it is concluded that
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:637:EIA could be used to inform the potential disturbance impacts to fish from the proposed NGCT. To
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:638:The EIA Report has assessed the potential disturbance of lighting (during both construction and operation)
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:638:scheme. An impact of negligible significance is predicted. The EIA Report concludes that proposed
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:638:(e.g. sky glow, light spill, glare and light intrusion). Nevertheless, the EIA Report states that during
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:638:during night time operations. The EIA Report concluded that the fish populations of the estuary as a
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:639:As outlined in the EIA Report, the landside elements of the proposed scheme have commenced, and
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:639:implemented. The EIA Report identifies that there are a number of conditions attached to the planning
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:639:commencement of the landside works. The EIA Report notes that the future development of the wider
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:642: WFD protected areas within 2km See Figure A1. Note that European designated sites have been considered within the EIA Report and
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:643: WFD protected areas within 2km See Figure A1. Note that European designated sites have been considered within the EIA Report and
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:651: Within 2km of any WFD protected ✓ (bathing Yes. However, note that European designated sites have been considered within the EIA
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:654: proposed for the purposes of the EIA that the terminal construction would be undertaken in two phases
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:654: bounding case for the purposes of the EIA.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:660: protected area have been considered within the EIA Report so are not
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:667: Within 2km of any WFD protected area ✓ Yes. However, impacts on European Designated Sites are considered in the EIA Report.
MLA202000079 - Screening by agreement letter.pdf:1:89 of The Marine Works EIA Regulations 2007 (as amended) (“the Regulations”).
MLA202000079 - Screening by agreement letter.pdf:1:EIA development.
PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:3:6 REQUIREMENT FOR AND SCOPE OF EIA 5
PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:5:Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and produced the NGCT Environmental Statement (ES) in 2006
PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:5:The proposed scheme has been subject to an EIA which has assessed the potential environmental impacts
PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:5:of the EIA Report, which has been submitted to the MMO in support of a marine licence application.
PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:6:for the purposes of the EIA.
PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:6:construction. In order to reflect the worst case with respect to the piling, for the purpose of the EIA, a two
PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:7:been undertaken within the EIA.
PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:7:desires of the Tees Estuary Partnership. For the purposes of the EIA, it has been assumed that dredged
PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:8:have been considered in the EIA Report.
PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:8: • An anchored retaining wall (the solution assessed in the EIA, representing an upper bounding
PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:9:6 REQUIREMENT FOR AND SCOPE OF EIA
PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:9:be an EIA project, there is no requirement to request an additional EIA screening opinion prior to submission
PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:9:of the marine licence application. PDT has, therefore, undertaken an EIA for the scheme and has submitted
PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:9:an EIA Report in support of the marine licence application.
PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:9:The scope of the EIA has been informed by comments received from the MMO during production of the
PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:9:The EIA Report reports the findings of the EIA process. The following environmental parameters / topics
PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:9:the proposed scheme is not required (as agreed with the MMO in October 2018), the EIA Report includes
PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:17:The EIA Regulations require that an assessment is made of the potential for cumulative effects to arise.
Licence Document (Marine).pdf:8: (EIA), a two phase approach has been assumed, with
Licence Document (Marine).pdf:10: to the piling, for the purpose of the EIA, a two phase
Licence Document (Marine).pdf:15: million m3 per month (the peak monthly volume assessed within the NGCT EIA), should it be apparent that the
Returns.pdf:3: assessed within the NGCT EIA), should it be apparent that the dredging and
Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:2:EIA Decision………………………………………………………………………………………………. 28
Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:3:This document is the Environmental Impact Assessment (“EIA”) consent decision
Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:3:Management Organisation’s (“MMO”) evaluation and conclusions to inform the EIA
Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:3:approval for the Project, also requiring EIA consent, to the MMO on 26 January
Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:5:to an EIA before permission is granted.
Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:5:the applicant that the proposed works constitute an EIA development under
Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:6:Environmental Statement (“ES”) titledIBPB8270R001F01 EIA REPORT.
Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:9:The Project, as an EIA proposal, was advertised for 2 successive weeks in 2
Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:9:The MMO, as the appropriate authority for this EIA determination, has considered
Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:10:dredging. Modelling included within the EIA indicates that the river basin dredging
Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:17: volume assessed within the NGCT EIA), should it be apparent that the
Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:28:EIA Decision
Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:28:expertise, the MMO has concluded a favourable determination and that EIA consent
MLA_2021_00215-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:3:Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Screening Request was submitted to the Marine
MLA_2021_00215-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:3:(EIA/2021/00011)
MLA_2021_00215-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:3:that the proposed scheme does not constitute an EIA Development (Appendix B) as it
MLA_2021_00215-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:4:An EIA Screening Request was submitted to Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council to
MLA_2021_00215-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:4:determine whether the proposed scheme constituted ‘EIA Development’ on the 15th of
MLA_2021_00215-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:4:RCBC issued their EIA Screening Opinion on 7th April 2021 (R/2021/0126/SC) which
MLA_2021_00215-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:4:confirmed that the proposed scheme does not constitute an EIA Development
MLA_2021_00215-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:4:Planning (EIA) Regulations 2017, but in the opinion of the Local Planning Authority,
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:4:Table 1 EIA Screening Opinion comments received from MMO and RCBC on the proposed
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:6:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:6:MWR Marine Works (EIA) Regulations 2007 (as amended)
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:6:TCPR Town and Country Planning (EIA) Regulations 2017
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:8:Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Screening Requests were submitted to the Marine Management
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:8:RCBC issued their EIA Screening Opinion on 7th April 2021 (R/2021/0126/SC) which confirmed that the
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:8:proposed scheme does not constitute an EIA Development (Appendix A) for the following reason:
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:8: “The development proposed, falls within Schedule 2 (10g) of the Town and Country Planning (EIA)
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:8:The MMO provided their Screening Opinion on the 23rd April 2021 (EIA/2021/00011) which confirmed that
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:8:the proposed scheme does not constitute an EIA Development (Appendix B) as it does not fall within
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:16:1.1, as the proposed scheme does not constitute and EIA Development, the terrestrial components of the
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:20:As discussed in Section 1.3 the proposed scheme has been screened out of the requirement for an EIA
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:20:As the proposed scheme is screened out of the requirement for an EIA, PDT’s PD rights are applicable to
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:23:3.3.1 EIA Screening Requests
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:23:An EIA Screening Request was submitted to RCBC (R/2021/0126/SC) and the MMO (EIA/2021/00011) to
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:23:determine whether the proposed scheme constituted ‘EIA Development’. Both RCBC and the MMO
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:23:confirmed that the project is not an EIA project (Appendices A and B, respectively). Their responses are
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:23:Table 1 EIA Screening Opinion comments received from MMO and RCBC on the proposed scheme
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:35:This is supported by recent surveys undertaken to inform the Northern Gateway Container Terminal EIA
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:49:Royal HaskoningDHV (2020) Northern Gateway Container Terminal EIA Report. Report PB8270-RHD-ZZ-
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:51: Planning (EIA) Regulations 2017, but in the opinion of the Local Planning Authority, having
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:52:environment and/or the local population that an EIA is required.
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:54:warrant the submission of an EIA.
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:54:flooding that would require the submission of an EIA.
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:54:It is not considered that any change would be so significant to require an EIA.
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:54:an EIA would be required.
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:57:MMO Reference: EIA/2021/00011
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:57:3. Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) ……………………………………………………… 3
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:57: EIA Screening Opinion ………………………………………………………………………………. 4
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:59:3. Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:59:environmental effects by virtue of their nature, size or location are subject to an EIA
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:60:EIA Screening Opinion
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:4:Table 1 EIA Screening Opinion comments received from MMO and RCBC on the proposed
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:6:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:6:MWR Marine Works (EIA) Regulations 2007 (as amended)
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:6:TCPR Town and Country Planning (EIA) Regulations 2017
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:8:Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Screening Requests were submitted to the Marine Management
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:8:RCBC issued their EIA Screening Opinion on 7th April 2021 (R/2021/0126/SC) which confirmed that the
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:8:proposed scheme does not constitute an EIA Development (Appendix A) for the following reason:
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:8: “The development proposed, falls within Schedule 2 (10g) of the Town and Country Planning (EIA)
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:8:The MMO provided their Screening Opinion on the 23rd April 2021 (EIA/2021/00011) which confirmed that
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:8:the proposed scheme does not constitute an EIA Development (Appendix B) as it does not fall within
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:16:1.1, as the proposed scheme does not constitute and EIA Development, the terrestrial components of the
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:20:As discussed in Section 1.3 the proposed scheme has been screened out of the requirement for an EIA
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:20:As the proposed scheme is screened out of the requirement for an EIA, PDT’s PD rights are applicable to
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:23:3.3.1 EIA Screening Requests
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:23:An EIA Screening Request was submitted to RCBC (R/2021/0126/SC) and the MMO (EIA/2021/00011) to
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:23:determine whether the proposed scheme constituted ‘EIA Development’. Both RCBC and the MMO
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:23:confirmed that the project is not an EIA project (Appendices A and B, respectively). Their responses are
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:23:Table 1 EIA Screening Opinion comments received from MMO and RCBC on the proposed scheme
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:35:This is supported by recent surveys undertaken to inform the Northern Gateway Container Terminal EIA
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:49:Royal HaskoningDHV (2020) Northern Gateway Container Terminal EIA Report. Report PB8270-RHD-ZZ-
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:51: Planning (EIA) Regulations 2017, but in the opinion of the Local Planning Authority, having
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:52:environment and/or the local population that an EIA is required.
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:54:warrant the submission of an EIA.
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:54:flooding that would require the submission of an EIA.
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:54:It is not considered that any change would be so significant to require an EIA.
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:54:an EIA would be required.
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:57:MMO Reference: EIA/2021/00011
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:57:3. Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) ……………………………………………………… 3
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:57: EIA Screening Opinion ………………………………………………………………………………. 4
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:59:3. Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:59:environmental effects by virtue of their nature, size or location are subject to an EIA
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:60:EIA Screening Opinion
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:2: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:3: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:4: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:5: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:6:in the modelling area. DNV’s work is a part of a larger Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:6: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:7: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:8: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:9: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:10: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:11: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:12:and mask the relative impacts that are important in the EIA.
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:12: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:13: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:14: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:15: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:16: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:17: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:18: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:19: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:20: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:21: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:22: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:23: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:24: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:25: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:26: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:27: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:28: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:29: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:30: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:31: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:32: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:33: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:34: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:35: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:36: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:37: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:38: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:39: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:40: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:41: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:42: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:43: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:44: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:45: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:46: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:47: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:48: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:49: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:50: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:51: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:52: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:53: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:54: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:55: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:56: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:57: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:58: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:59: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:60: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:61: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:62: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:63: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:64: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:65: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:66: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:67: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:68: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:69: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:70: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:71: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:72: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:73: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:74: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:75: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:76: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:77: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:78: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:79: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:80: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:81: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:82: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:83: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:84: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:85: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:86: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:87: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:88: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:89: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:90: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:91: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:92: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:93: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:94: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:95: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:96: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:97: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:98: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:99: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:100: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:101: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:102: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:103: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:104: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:105: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:106: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:107: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:108: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:109: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:110: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:111: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:117: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:118: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:119: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:120: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:121:in the modelling area. DNV’s work is a part of a larger Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:121: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:122: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:123: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:124: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:125: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:126: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:127:and mask the relative impacts that are important in the EIA.
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:127: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:128: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:129: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:130: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:131: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:132: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:133: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:134: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:135: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:136: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:137: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:138: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:139: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:140: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:141: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:142: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:143: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:144: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:145: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:146: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:147: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:148: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:149: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:150: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:151: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:152: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:153: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:154: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:155: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:156: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:157: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:158: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:159: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:160: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:161: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:162: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:163: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:164: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:165: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:166: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:167: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:168: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:169: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:170: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:171: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:172: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:173: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:174: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:175: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:176: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:177: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:178: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:179: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:180: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:181: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:182: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:183: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:184: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:185: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:186: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:187: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:188: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:189: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:190: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:191: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:192: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:193: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:194: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:195: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:196: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:197: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:198: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:199: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:200: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:201: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:202: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:203: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:204: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:205: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:206: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:207: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:208: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:209: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:210: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:211: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:212: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:213: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:214: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:215: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:216: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:217: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:218: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:219: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:220: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:221: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:222: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:223: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:224: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:225: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:226: eia - terrc facility_10317420041121192953.doc
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:2:In the EIA process the regulatory agencies and interested parties have been invited to comment on the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1141-MLA.2020.00506.2 SBQ MLV2 FIR 19 Response.pdf:2: original EIA. The MMO do not require additional modelling at this time.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1141-MLA.2020.00506.2 SBQ MLV2 FIR 19 Response.pdf:3:(both within the original Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Report submitted in support of the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1141-MLA.2020.00506.2 SBQ MLV2 FIR 19 Response.pdf:4:Variation 1 compares the Cutter Suction Dredger (CSD) technique with those assessed in the EIA.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1141-MLA.2020.00506.2 SBQ MLV2 FIR 19 Response.pdf:8: assessed within the EIA), should it be apparent that the dredging and disposal from South
PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1127 MLA.2020.00506.R8 Response to Consultation Comments on Scheme of Monitoring.pdf:8: SSCs) from the four modelled dredging phases set out in Section 6 of EIA report2, than one week prior to commencement of dredging activities. However, STDL will
PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1127 MLA.2020.00506.R8 Response to Consultation Comments on Scheme of Monitoring.pdf:8:2 South Bank Quay, EIA Report, Royal Haskoning DHV, 6 November 2020
PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1127 MLA.2020.00506.R8 Response to Consultation Comments on Scheme of Monitoring.pdf:9: influenced. Further, the EIA report concludes that the plume effects arising from activities.
20210119 MLA202000506 Tees South Bank Quay CP advice + JPQC.pdf:1:4. South Bank Quay EIA Report. Royal HaskoningDHV for Tees Valley Combined Authority,
20210119 MLA202000506 Tees South Bank Quay CP advice + JPQC.pdf:3:Question 7 Is the EIA methodology and assessment presented clearly and fully
20210119 MLA202000506 Tees South Bank Quay CP advice + JPQC.pdf:3: adopted by different disciplines in separate chapters. In general, the EIA method is as expected.
20210119 MLA202000506 Tees South Bank Quay CP advice + JPQC.pdf:5: not used in the EIA itself.
20210119 MLA202000506 Tees South Bank Quay CP advice + JPQC.pdf:6: understandably not provided as part of the EIA.
20210119 MLA202000506 Tees South Bank Quay CP advice + JPQC.pdf:7: to climate change, despite the standard EIA methods indicating that this should be done. The
20210119 MLA202000506 Tees South Bank Quay CP advice + JPQC.pdf:7: climate-induced environmental change, hence the requirement within EIA legislation to take
PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1127 MLA.2020.00506.R8 Response to Consultation Comments on Scheme of Monitoring.pdf:8: SSCs) from the four modelled dredging phases set out in Section 6 of EIA report2, than one week prior to commencement of dredging activities. However, STDL will
PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1127 MLA.2020.00506.R8 Response to Consultation Comments on Scheme of Monitoring.pdf:8:2 South Bank Quay, EIA Report, Royal Haskoning DHV, 6 November 2020
PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1127 MLA.2020.00506.R8 Response to Consultation Comments on Scheme of Monitoring.pdf:9: influenced. Further, the EIA report concludes that the plume effects arising from activities.
20210128 MLA202000507 Tee south bank phase 2 shellfish advice + JPQC.pdf:2: EIA, the responses given to the questions in the advice request to MLA/2020/00506 are
20210128 MLA202000507 Tee south bank phase 2 shellfish advice + JPQC.pdf:3:Question 8: Is the EIA methodology and assessment presented clearly and fully justified?
20210128 MLA202000507 Tee south bank phase 2 shellfish advice + JPQC.pdf:3:19. Yes, EIA methodology and assessment presented is clear and fully justified.
MLA 2020 00506 South Bank Phase 1 MLA 2020 00507 Phase 2.pdf:1:The EIA assessment has included both direct physical impacts and indirect visual or setting
MLA 2020 00506 South Bank Phase 1 MLA 2020 00507 Phase 2.pdf:2:Section 16.4.2 of the EIA states “…given this potential, geoarchaeological assessment of
MLA 2020 00506 South Bank Phase 1 MLA 2020 00507 Phase 2.pdf:2:The EIA highlights that the dredging for the Turning Circle and the Berth Pocket along the
MLA 2020 00506 South Bank Phase 1 MLA 2020 00507 Phase 2.pdf:3:heritage assets, but this is less than substantial overall. It is proposed in EIA section 16.5
338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21.pdf:1:Please see Annex 1 below for further information and specific comments on the provided EIA.
338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21.pdf:3:Annex 1 – Comments on the EIA Report
338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21.pdf:3:specific survey monitoring for the South Bank Wharf area are not presented within the EIA, but
338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21.pdf:3:results. within the EIA, but are due for submission as a supplementary report in April. We
338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21.pdf:3:9.5.1.2 We note that, in relation to the North Tees Mudflat, the EIA states that ‘based on
338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21.pdf:4:Capital dredging dredging in front of the new quay. It is stated within the EIA that the complete loss
338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21.pdf:5: 12.5.2 We note the EIA states that ‘little terns within the SPA / Ramsar site nest almost
338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21.pdf:5: 12.5.2 We note the EIA states that Sandwich tern ‘as a passage feature of the SPA, it is
338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21.pdf:7: site integrity at this stage, based on the information provided in the EIA. We
338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21.pdf:8: Appropriate Assessment within the applicant’s EIA Report and shadow
338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21.pdf:9: However, we note that the EIA states that construction will take 3 years
PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1124 Updated Scheme of Monitoring - May 2022.pdf:1:The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020) predicted that during
PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1124 Updated Scheme of Monitoring - May 2022.pdf:4:Royal HaskoningDHV (2020). South Bank Quay EIA Report.
PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1124 P03 South Bank Phase 1 Scheme of Monitoring.pdf:2:Assessment (EIA) (the outputs of which are presented in the EIA Report which supported the marine
PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1124 P03 South Bank Phase 1 Scheme of Monitoring.pdf:3:The EIA Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020) predicted that sediment suspended within the dredging
PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1124 P03 South Bank Phase 1 Scheme of Monitoring.pdf:5:Royal HaskoningDHV (2020). South Bank Quay EIA Report.
20210121 MLA202000506 Tees South Bank Quay Phase I Benthic ecology + JPQC.pdf:1:9. The above cited reports represent the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and associated
20210121 MLA202000506 Tees South Bank Quay Phase I Benthic ecology + JPQC.pdf:2: EIA, the responses given to the questions in the advice request to MLA/2020/00507 are
20210121 MLA202000506 Tees South Bank Quay Phase I Benthic ecology + JPQC.pdf:2: which were not available at the time of writing the EIA report. It is presently assumed that the
20210121 MLA202000506 Tees South Bank Quay Phase I Benthic ecology + JPQC.pdf:2: the EIA process should the new data not support those of previous findings. Can the applicant
20210121 MLA202000506 Tees South Bank Quay Phase I Benthic ecology + JPQC.pdf:2:18. Yes, the EIA report clearly explains, with the aid of clear figures and diagrams, the construction
20210121 MLA202000506 Tees South Bank Quay Phase I Benthic ecology + JPQC.pdf:3:Question 8: Is the EIA methodology and assessment presented clearly and fully justified?
20210121 MLA202000506 Tees South Bank Quay Phase I Benthic ecology + JPQC.pdf:3:20. Yes, the EIA clearly sets out the impact assessment methodology: it uses a well-established
20210121 MLA202000506 Tees South Bank Quay Phase I Benthic ecology + JPQC.pdf:3: area. Is there any evidence of this in the EIA report to quantify this which may therefore be
20210121 MLA202000506 Tees South Bank Quay Phase I Benthic ecology + JPQC.pdf:3:25. No, transboundary impacts are not addressed within the EIA although I would consider that they
20210121 MLA202000506 Tees South Bank Quay Phase I Benthic ecology + JPQC.pdf:3: impact, can the applicant please clarify this (perhaps it is stated elsewhere within the EIA
20210121 MLA202000506 Tees South Bank Quay Phase I Benthic ecology + JPQC.pdf:4: conducted during 2020 although the data are not yet ready for review within the EIA. The
20210121 MLA202000506 Tees South Bank Quay Phase I Benthic ecology + JPQC.pdf:4: methods used for this survey are not, however, provided as part of this EIA report.
20210121 MLA202000506 Tees South Bank Quay Phase I Benthic ecology + JPQC.pdf:4: used within the EIA, though this should be clarified by the applicant as per my response to
20210610 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phases 1 Follow-up UWN advice.pdf:1: information and also on 18th February 2021 (review of EIA Report). Please refer to these previous
EA MLA_2020_00506 22 February 2021 OFFICIAL.pdf:2:pollution posed to the Tees estuary water quality can be safely managed. The EIA
EA MLA_2020_00506 22 February 2021 OFFICIAL.pdf:2:specific sediment surveys. The EIA notes in paragraph 7.4.3 that a site-specific sediment
EA MLA_2020_00506 22 February 2021 OFFICIAL.pdf:2:repeat the process within Section 7 of the EIA statement to show the site specific
EA MLA_2020_00506 22 February 2021 OFFICIAL.pdf:2:The EIA discusses previous benthic ecology assessments in the Tees Estuary, notably
EA MLA_2020_00506 22 February 2021 OFFICIAL.pdf:2:the Anglo American Harbour Facilities project undertaken in 2014. The EIA goes on to
EA MLA_2020_00506 22 February 2021 OFFICIAL.pdf:2:of subtidal. We acknowledge and support the use of vertipools, however the EIA does
EA MLA_2020_00506 22 February 2021 OFFICIAL.pdf:3:proposed dredging programme, the EIA assessment states this is predicted to be
EA MLA_2020_00506 22 February 2021 OFFICIAL.pdf:4:The land-based construction and riverbank excavation are noted in the EIA to have the
MLA-2020-00506.pdf:1: These fishing operations are unlikely to be affected by the activities, EIA shows sediment
MLA202000506 & MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phases 1&2 UWN advice + JPQC.pdf:1:5. South Bank Quay EIA Report dated 6th November 2020. Reference: PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1100
MLA202000506 & MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phases 1&2 UWN advice + JPQC.pdf:2: However, as the EIA presented does not differentiate between the two phases in terms of my advisory
MLA202000506 & MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phases 1&2 UWN advice + JPQC.pdf:2: EIA report appropriately identifies the key migratory fish species in the Tees estuary and recognises the
MLA202000506 & MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phases 1&2 UWN advice + JPQC.pdf:2: marine mammal baseline. The four marine mammal species considered in the EIA Report are harbour
MLA202000506 & MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phases 1&2 UWN advice + JPQC.pdf:2:10. In terms of potential impacts, the EIA Report confirms that the proposed new quay wall (and all piling
MLA202000506 & MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phases 1&2 UWN advice + JPQC.pdf:2: with the water. The EIA Report states that the closest piling is approximately 20 m from the river edge,
MLA202000506 & MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phases 1&2 UWN advice + JPQC.pdf:2: extended periods of time (e.g. 24 hours in this instance). I agree with the EIA Report that there is the
MLA202000506 & MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phases 1&2 UWN advice + JPQC.pdf:3:18. Furthermore, the EIA Report acknowledges that temporary behavioural alterations and masking may also
MLA202000506 & MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phases 1&2 UWN advice + JPQC.pdf:3: minutes spent discharging and commuting to and from the disposal site. The EIA Report suggests that
MLA202000506 & MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phases 1&2 UWN advice + JPQC.pdf:4:23. For fish, I believe the general conclusions and the points raised in the EIA Report are not unreasonable,
MLA202000506 & MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phases 1&2 UWN advice + JPQC.pdf:4:Question 8: Is the EIA methodology and assessment presented clearly and fully justified?
MLA202000506 & MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phases 1&2 UWN advice + JPQC.pdf:4:30. Yes, generally the EIA methodology and assessment are clearly justified.
MLA202000506 & MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phases 1&2 UWN advice + JPQC.pdf:4:32. Cumulative effects are considered in chapter 27 of the EIA Report. Please note that I am unable to
MLA202000506 & MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phases 1&2 UWN advice + JPQC.pdf:5: immediately downstream) and the ongoing maintenance dredging. The EIA Report concludes that
MLA202000506 & MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phases 1&2 UWN advice + JPQC.pdf:8:The EIA has assessed the worst-case scenario of building the quay and dredging the channel in one
20210115 MLA202000506 South Bank Quay-phase 1 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:1:4. South Bank Quay, EIA Report, Royal Haskoning DHV, 6 November 2020.
20210115 MLA202000506 South Bank Quay-phase 1 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:2: review are exactly the same and the impacts for the two phases are not separated within the EIA,
20210115 MLA202000506 South Bank Quay-phase 1 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:2:9. Yes, the information presented in the EIA report correctly acknowledges the potential impacts to
20210115 MLA202000506 South Bank Quay-phase 1 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:3:12. The EIA report describes the likely key impacts on fish and shellfish ecology from the effects of
20210115 MLA202000506 South Bank Quay-phase 1 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:3:14. Section 13.3.2 of the EIA report refers to the methodology used to describe the existing environment
20210115 MLA202000506 South Bank Quay-phase 1 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:5: for a cross-sectional area of the river to be influenced. Further, the EIA report concludes that the
20210115 MLA202000506 South Bank Quay-phase 1 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:10:Question 8. Is the EIA methodology and assessment presented clearly and fully justified?
20210115 MLA202000506 South Bank Quay-phase 1 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:10:45. To the best of my knowledge the EIA methodology and assessment are presented clearly and are
20210115 MLA202000506 South Bank Quay-phase 1 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:10:47. Cumulative impacts have been correctly considered within section 27 of the EIA report (document
20210115 MLA202000506 South Bank Quay-phase 1 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:11: this nature. No fisheries specific surveys have been undertaken to inform the EIA.
20210115 MLA202000506 South Bank Quay-phase 1 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:11: 2019 (NGCT benthic survey, epibenthic trawls) (see section 9.4.3 of the EIA for more details of
PC1084-RHD-SB-XX-NT-Z-0001-South Bank SSC monitoring plan V3.pdf:2:The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020) predicted that during
PC1084-RHD-SB-XX-NT-Z-0001-South Bank SSC monitoring plan V3.pdf:3:Linked to the relatively limited extent of the sediment plume, the EIA Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020)
PC1084-RHD-SB-XX-NT-Z-0001-South Bank SSC monitoring plan V3.pdf:4:The Cumulative Impact Assessment (CIA) of the EIA report then considers the potential cumulative effects
PC1084-RHD-SB-XX-NT-Z-0001-South Bank SSC monitoring plan V3.pdf:11: 6. Royal HaskoningDHV (2020) South Bank Quay Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Report
20220518 MLA202000506 L2021003331Tees South Bank (phase 1) Monitoring Plan Fisheries advice FINAL.pdf:1: 5.1. South Bank Quay, EIA Report, Royal HaskoningDHV, 6 November 2020
20220518 MLA202000506 L2021003331Tees South Bank (phase 1) Monitoring Plan Fisheries advice FINAL.pdf:3: the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) (see Figure 1)
20220518 MLA202000506 L2021003331Tees South Bank (phase 1) Monitoring Plan Fisheries advice FINAL.pdf:6:23. Within the EIA report, I note that it states “In the vicinity of the proposed scheme (i.e., in the
20220518 MLA202000506 L2021003331Tees South Bank (phase 1) Monitoring Plan Fisheries advice FINAL.pdf:6: However, it was recognised in the EIA (section 6.5.2) that SSC during dredging operations can
20220518 MLA202000506 L2021003331Tees South Bank (phase 1) Monitoring Plan Fisheries advice FINAL.pdf:6: phases set out in Section 6 of EIA report (documents reviewed, point 5.1, see Annex 4)), the
20220518 MLA202000506 L2021003331Tees South Bank (phase 1) Monitoring Plan Fisheries advice FINAL.pdf:6: volumes of dredging occurring in sequence. I also note that the EIA report concludes that the
20220518 MLA202000506 L2021003331Tees South Bank (phase 1) Monitoring Plan Fisheries advice FINAL.pdf:7: EIA stage. However, during the EIA review, concerns were raised by Cefas specialists1,4
20220518 MLA202000506 L2021003331Tees South Bank (phase 1) Monitoring Plan Fisheries advice FINAL.pdf:7:25. Taking into consideration the EIA findings and the NOAA (2018) report (as latest evidence
20220518 MLA202000506 L2021003331Tees South Bank (phase 1) Monitoring Plan Fisheries advice FINAL.pdf:13:activities (extracted from EIA, documents reviewed point 5.1)
MLA_2020_00506_1 South Bank Wharf Variation Response FINAL 392938.pdf:2:(including all measures as set out within the EIA report, dated 06/11/2020), is not likely to damage the
338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21 (1).pdf:1:Please see Annex 1 below for further information and specific comments on the provided EIA.
338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21 (1).pdf:3:Annex 1 – Comments on the EIA Report
338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21 (1).pdf:3:specific survey monitoring for the South Bank Wharf area are not presented within the EIA, but
338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21 (1).pdf:3:results. within the EIA, but are due for submission as a supplementary report in April. We
338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21 (1).pdf:3:9.5.1.2 We note that, in relation to the North Tees Mudflat, the EIA states that ‘based on
338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21 (1).pdf:4:Capital dredging dredging in front of the new quay. It is stated within the EIA that the complete loss
338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21 (1).pdf:5: 12.5.2 We note the EIA states that ‘little terns within the SPA / Ramsar site nest almost
338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21 (1).pdf:5: 12.5.2 We note the EIA states that Sandwich tern ‘as a passage feature of the SPA, it is
338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21 (1).pdf:7: site integrity at this stage, based on the information provided in the EIA. We
338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21 (1).pdf:8: Appropriate Assessment within the applicant’s EIA Report and shadow
338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21 (1).pdf:9: However, we note that the EIA states that construction will take 3 years
20210201 MLA202000506 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Phases 1 and 2 - EIA Licence Advice Minute - SEAL Advice v2+SJB.pdf:1:4. South Bank Quay: EIA Report, Royal Haskoning (November 2020). Version P01.01/S0
20210201 MLA202000506 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Phases 1 and 2 - EIA Licence Advice Minute - SEAL Advice v2+SJB.pdf:2: advice for dredge and disposal. Further, there is only one EIA report for both phases, which
20210201 MLA202000506 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Phases 1 and 2 - EIA Licence Advice Minute - SEAL Advice v2+SJB.pdf:3:17. The applicant specifies throughout the EIA that they have conducted an assessment of
20210201 MLA202000506 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Phases 1 and 2 - EIA Licence Advice Minute - SEAL Advice v2+SJB.pdf:3:18. General dredging best practice is referenced throughout the EIA. The practices specified
20210201 MLA202000506 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Phases 1 and 2 - EIA Licence Advice Minute - SEAL Advice v2+SJB.pdf:4:Is the EIA methodology and assessment presented clearly and fully justified?
20210201 MLA202000506 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Phases 1 and 2 - EIA Licence Advice Minute - SEAL Advice v2+SJB.pdf:4:23. The EIA methodology is clear, and typical of usual practice.
20210201 MLA202000506 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Phases 1 and 2 - EIA Licence Advice Minute - SEAL Advice v2+SJB.pdf:6:38. The EIA report presented is generally detailed and well constructed, however the data on
20210603 MLA2020005067 Tees South Bank Quay Supplementary Report Review Fisheries advice MG GE + JP.pdf:1: previous Cefas fisheries advice on the EIA report1).
20210603 MLA2020005067 Tees South Bank Quay Supplementary Report Review Fisheries advice MG GE + JP.pdf:1:6. The fisheries assessment presented in the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) report was
20210603 MLA2020005067 Tees South Bank Quay Supplementary Report Review Fisheries advice MG GE + JP.pdf:2:7. I recognise that Cefas fisheries advisors were previously consulted both during the EIA review 1 and
20210603 MLA2020005067 Tees South Bank Quay Supplementary Report Review Fisheries advice MG GE + JP.pdf:2: fish species described in the EIA Report, reaffirming that the lower Tees estuary acts as nursery
20210603 MLA2020005067 Tees South Bank Quay Supplementary Report Review Fisheries advice MG GE + JP.pdf:2: in the EIA report (i.e., underestimation of pelagic species). However, it should be recognised that
20210603 MLA2020005067 Tees South Bank Quay Supplementary Report Review Fisheries advice MG GE + JP.pdf:3:14. These results confirm the wharf offers shelter for juvenile fish, as per the EIA report conclusions.
20210603 MLA2020005067 Tees South Bank Quay Supplementary Report Review Fisheries advice MG GE + JP.pdf:3: Results confirm the EIA findings by showing peek upstream movements in July and August with
20210603 MLA2020005067 Tees South Bank Quay Supplementary Report Review Fisheries advice MG GE + JP.pdf:3: within the EIA report.
20210603 MLA2020005067 Tees South Bank Quay Supplementary Report Review Fisheries advice MG GE + JP.pdf:3: of impacts (see Table 4.3, document 4) maintaining that all impacts conclusions set out in the EIA
20210603 MLA2020005067 Tees South Bank Quay Supplementary Report Review Fisheries advice MG GE + JP.pdf:3: valid complement to the EIA findings in the context of fish species present in this area.
20210615 MLA202000506 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Phases 1 and 2 - EIA _ SEAL Advice Followup+SJB.pdf:2:10. Advice was initially provided for this application at the EIA stage (Joe Perry, 1st February
20220608 MLA2020005061 L20121003331 Cefas advice Final.pdf:2:The indicative durations of the proposed dredging works are detailed in Section 3.6.1 of the EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:1:EIA Report
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:2: Author(s): RHDHV EIA Team
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:2: Drafted by: RHDHV EIA Team
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:4:5 APPROACH TO THE EIA 34
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:4:5.1 The EIA process 34
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:9:Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in support of a marine licence application to the Marine
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:9:The study area for the EIA in respect of the proposed scheme is the area over which the direct and indirect
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:12:This report presents the findings of the EIA process and explains how the conclusions have been reached.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:12:describes the EIA process and defines the EIA methodology adopted.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:12:the EIA process. The potential impacts of the proposed scheme during construction and operational phases
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:12:production of this EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:13:throughout this report as the ‘landside EIA’). The planning application was submitted to allow the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:15:Dock Road was included as part of the scheme description for the landside EIA on the basis that permissions
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:15:for demolition had not been granted at the point the landside EIA was submitted. As noted above, RCBC
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:16:demolition of this building has been incorporated into the landside EIA and associated planning application
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:22:of this EIA, a dredge envelope has been assessed (Figure 1.1). As shown on the drawing, dredging is
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:22:construction of the quay however the assessment undertaken within this EIA assumes that the dredging is
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:25:In order to provide the greatest flexibility with regard to phasing of the proposed scheme, the EIA has
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:29:purposes of this EIA, it has been assumed that the measures detailed in the outline remediation strategy
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:30:proposed for the backing land (which have been subject to a separate planning application and EIA).
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:33:During production of the recent Hartlepool approach channel EIA Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2019),
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:35:The non-works HRO application is not linked to this EIA or the related marine licence application. However,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:36:The requirement for EIA is established by the European Directive 2011/92/EU (codifying previous EIA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:36:projects on the environment (the EIA Directive). The EIA Directive is implemented via various regulations;
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:36:An agreement was previously reached between a third party and the MMO to undertake an EIA for a very
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:36:Assessment) Regulations 2007, as amended. We assume that RCBC is of the opinion that an EIA is also
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:36:a Scoping Opinion was issued by RCBC in 2019. We have therefore proceeded on the basis that an EIA is
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:36:required under both sets of EIA Regulations, without undertaking a formal EIA screening process (on the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:42:5 APPROACH TO THE EIA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:42:The purpose of EIA is to provide an independent assessment of a project’s potential environmental impacts
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:42:assessment of impacts which has been adopted within this EIA Report. In summary, this section presents:
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:42: • A summary of the EIA process.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:42: raised have been addressed through the EIA process.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:42: • The results of the scoping exercise undertaken to define the issues to be addressed by the EIA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:42:5.1 The EIA process
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:42:EIA is an iterative tool for systematically examining and assessing the impacts and effects of the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:42:formal reporting mechanism for an EIA is the EIA Report. In accordance with Schedule 3 of the 2007
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:42:Regulations (as amended), the EIA Report should include such information as is reasonably required to
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:43: • A non-technical summary of the information provided under this part of the EIA Regulations.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:43:The following stages were included in this EIA:
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:43:An agreement was previously reached between a third party and the MMO to undertake an EIA for a
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:43:On this basis, STDC has undertaken an EIA for the proposed scheme voluntarily under the Marine Works
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:43:(Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017, without submitting a formal EIA Screening Request.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:43:validity of the 2019 Scoping Opinions to inform this EIA (see Appendix 2). The scoping note presented the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:44: of the EIA for the proposed scheme in light of the preferred option for the berth length, alignment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:44: • The key elements of the proposed approach to the marine EIA for each environmental parameter.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:44:the EIA Report. Within this EIA Report, the description of the baseline environment consists of the following
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:45:this EIA Report and the conclusions reached regarding the sensitivity of receptors has been presented in
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:45:The EIA has been undertaken within a framework that allows for a transparent approach to the assessment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:45:and the resulting conclusions presented within this EIA Report. This section sets out the assigned definitions
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:45:that are used in the assessment process for a number of topics considered in the EIA Report. In addition,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:46:EIA provides an assessment of the impacts on sensitive receptors as a result of the effects of a development
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:46:effect may result in both a direct and indirect impact on a single receptor. Given this the EIA framework
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:46:purposes of this EIA. While this table provides guidelines of a generic nature, it should be noted that more
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:47:In the context of the EIA Regulations, ‘significant impacts’ are taken to be those of moderate or major
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:47:It should be reiterated that, although this section sets out the overall approach adopted for this EIA (using,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:48:Appropriate mitigation measures have been identified and recommended in this EIA Report where the EIA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:48:topic chapters of this EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:49:The EIA Regulations and relevant guidance require an EIA Report to provide an indication of any difficulties
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:49:The EIA Regulations also require that an EIA Report is prepared by competent experts. This EIA Report
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:49:Assessor for EIA under IEMA’s voluntary EIA Quality Mark scheme. Through this scheme, EIA activity is
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:49:independently reviewed, on an annual basis, to ensure it delivers excellence in areas including EIA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:49:environment (the EIA Directive) states that an EIA should identify, describe and assess in an appropriate
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:50:This EIA Report has given due consideration to the potential for different residual impacts to have a
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:50:chapters of the EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:50:In line with IEMA’s Guidelines for EIA (2004), cumulative impacts are defined as: “…the impacts on the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:50:However, the EIA and Habitats Directives and their associated regulations require the consideration of direct
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:50:The EIA Regulations do not define 'cumulative' but guidance on cumulative effects assessment is provided
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:50:taken into account in the EIA process and, generally, can be excluded from the scope of CIA. However, the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:51:populations, within the other relevant sections of this EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:142:and sedimentary regime (see Section 6) as well as recent survey data collected to inform other project EIAs
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:142:within the estuary, the latest being from a survey undertaken in 2019 to inform the NGCT EIA.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:142:The findings of this assessment have the potential to influence other technical sections within this EIA,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:142:requirements of the NPS which are of relevance to this section of the EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:142: NPS for Ports requirement NPS reference EIA Report reference
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:143:of the EIA Report are contained within Table 7.2.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:143: The MMO would expect water quality to be scoped into the EIA.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:144:section of the EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:145:can be quantified. Therefore, for EIA, in the same way, if contaminant levels in the sediments under
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:147:applicable information to this EIA is outlined below.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:153:A sediment quality survey was undertaken in the Tees estuary during July 2014 to inform the EIA for the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:153:Royal HaskoningDHV carried out an EIA on behalf of PDT in 2012 for proposed strengthening of the existing
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:169:This section of the EIA Report considers the likely effects of the proposed scheme with respect to land
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:169:The findings of this assessment have the potential to influence other technical sections within this EIA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:169:the NPPF with regard to land quality and geology and signposts to the applicable section of this EIA Report
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:169: NPPF reference NPPF requirement EIA reference
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:170: NPPF reference NPPF requirement EIA reference
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:172:requirement to undertake the following, which are directly or indirectly linked to this section of the EIA Report:
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:173:Consultation is a key part of the EIA process. Consultation regarding land quality and geology has been
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:178:Major or moderate environmental impacts are considered to be ‘significant’ in EIA terms. Whilst minor
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:180:post submission of this EIA; this therefore reaffirms the precautionary approach undertaken within the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:184:(including part of the proposed scheme footprint which is the subject of this EIA) to break the Made Ground
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:187:not considered ‘significant’ in terms of this EIA assessment.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:191:This section of the EIA Report considers the following potential environmental impacts for the construction
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:191: section of this EIA Report where the requirement has been addressed
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:191: NPS requirement NPS reference EIA Report reference
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:191: Where the development is subject to EIA, the application
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:192: NPS requirement NPS reference EIA Report reference
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:192:EIA. The MMO confirmed that this was the case in September 2020 and RCBC issued a formal Scoping
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:192:detailed in Table 9.2. This table also signposts to the relevant section of this EIA Report where the comment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:192: Response / section of the EIA Report where
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:193: Response / section of the EIA Report where
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:193: EIA development be submitted, and determined, prior to this document
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:194: Response / section of the EIA Report where
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:194:For this section of the EIA Report, the study area comprises the likely maximum extent over which potentially
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:194:This section of the EIA Report has been informed through a desk-based assessment. The desk-based
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:197:notification are not of relevance to this section of the EIA Report (shown in italics), however have been
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:197:section of the EIA Report, but are addressed elsewhere as necessary. The other sections relevant to the italicised features
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:217: reference to section of this EIA Report where the requirement has been addressed
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:217: NPS requirement EIA Report reference
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:218: NPS requirement EIA Report reference
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:218: procedures requiring an EIA and mitigation
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:219:Summary of comments received during the EIA scoping phase
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:219:the EIA Report where the comment has been addressed.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:219: Response / section of the EIA Report where
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:219:The study area for the EIA is the area over which the direct and indirect effects of the proposed scheme
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:220:The assessment methodology presented in Section 5 has been used to inform this section of the EIA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:222:included within this section of the EIA Report are:
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:222:a density estimate of 0.52/km2 (Hammond et al., 2017). The potential impacts for the EIA assessments are
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:225:Brigg (SCOS, 2019). The potential impacts for the EIA assessments are put into the context of the North-
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:244:This section of the EIA Report considers the following potential environmental impacts:
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:244:of the EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:244:this EIA Report. The information presented in this section relates to terrestrial ecology only.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:248:The study area for this section of the EIA Report comprises the area which has the potential to be both
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:248:Table 11.3 Study areas used for terrestrial ecology receptors considered in this EIA Report
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:249:adjacent landside EIA development) and 2020 (for the proposed scheme which is subject of this report) by
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:253:concluded to be not significant in terms of the EIA Regulations.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:254:applicable to this section of the EIA Report (which concentrates on terrestrial ecology). Cross reference to
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:257:adjacent land EIA development. The main terrestrial habitat within the footprint of the Proposed Scheme
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:260:lies within the footprint of the adjacent landside development EIA and is fully assessed as part of those
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:262:during survey works for the adjacent land-side EIA in the summer of 2020.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:262:side EIA scheme; however the amount of suitable habitat within the footprint of the proposed scheme is
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:263:scheme footprint during the surveys undertaken to inform the landside EIA.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:263:Several red listed birds were recorded nearby within the land-side EIA development, including linnet Linaria
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:264:Studies undertaken as part of the adjacent landside EIA record habitats of regional significance for dingy
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:264:recorded within the adjacent footprint of the landsite development which was subject to a separate EIA and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:265:of the adjacent landside EIA and is fully assessed within the documents supporting that application. Due to
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:270:Potential impacts on waterbirds and seabirds assessed in this section of the EIA Report are broadly
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:270:The assessment of potential impacts has been informed by the following sections of this EIA Report:
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:270: Section of EIA report
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:270: Where the development is subject to EIA, the application should
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:273:A summary of the comments relevant to ornithological receptors that were received during the EIA scoping
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:273: Response / section of the EIA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:274:The study area for this section of the EIA Report comprises the area within the Tees estuary that has the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:276:winter period. It was therefore agreed with Natural England that, for the purpose of this EIA, the assessment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:300:In terms of receptor sensitivity, the EIA for NGCT (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020) referred to monitoring
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:307:Potential impacts on fish resources and fisheries activities that are assessed in this section of the EIA Report
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:308:Site-specific comments relevant to fish and fisheries that were received during the EIA scoping process are
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:308:detailed in Table 13.2. This table also signposts to the relevant section of this EIA Report where the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:308: Response / section of the EIA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:309: Response / section of the EIA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:309:For this section of the EIA Report, the study area comprises the likely maximum extent over which potentially
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:309:This section of the EIA Report has been informed through a desk-based assessment. The desk-based
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:311:Dock turning circle, to inform the EIA undertaken for the consented Anglo American Harbour facilities (Royal
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:312:As outlined in the MMO Scoping Opinion EIA/2019/00017, key migratory fish species that have been
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:318:Consultation with the NEIFCA as part of other EIAs recently undertaken in the Tees estuary indicated that
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:323:A detailed underwater noise survey and modelling exercise was undertaken in 2014 to inform the EIA for
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:332:This section of the EIA Report considers the following potential impacts to commercial navigation:
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:332:respectively) have been assessed within this section of the EIA Report, where they are relevant to the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:349:For the purposes of EIA, ‘major’ and ‘moderate’ impacts are generally deemed to be significant (in EIA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:358:in EIA terms.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:362:This section of the EIA Report considers the potential airborne noise and vibration impacts of the proposed
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:366:The study area for this section of the EIA Report is the area that has the potential to be directly and/or
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:378:This section of the EIA Report provides an overview of baseline air quality within the area, identifies
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:379: Section of EIA report
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:380: Section of EIA report
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:382: 2 August 2019 the EIA was agreed
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:397:This section of the EIA Report presents the findings of a Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (LVIA)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:398:Various European Union (EU) Directives underpin the requirement for EIA (which includes LVIA) and are
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:398:EIA.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:400: these are significant in terms of EIA.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:418:proposed scheme footprint ranges between minor moderate adverse to minor adverse. In terms of EIA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:418:is minor adverse. In terms of EIA these effects are not significant.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:418:in views from the site of the transporter bridge is minor adverse. In terms of EIA the effect is not significant.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:419:In terms of EIA these effects are not significant.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:419:significance of effect in the view is minor negligible adverse. In terms of EIA these effects are not
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:421:This section of the EIA Report considers the following potential environmental impacts:
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:422:proposed scheme, which has in turn informed this section of the EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:422:Table 20.2 summarises the requirements of the NPS which are of relevance to this section of the EIA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:422: NPS for Ports requirement NPS reference EIA Report reference
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:423: NPS for Ports requirement NPS reference EIA Report reference
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:423:This section of the EIA Report and the FRA has been guided and informed by relevant local policy, studies
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:424:reviewed and used to inform the assessment for this section of the EIA Report and the FRA.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:424:downstream of the Tees Barrage. This information was used to inform this section of the EIA Report, as
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:424:The study area for this section of the EIA Report comprises the area which has the potential to be both
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:424:This section of the EIA Report has been informed through a combination of desk-based assessment and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:425:The findings of the EIA with regard to the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime (as set out in Section 6)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:425:and the magnitude of impacts in this EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:428:To inform this section of the EIA Report a separate FRA has been undertaken specific to the proposed
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:441:As outlined in Section 5, the scope of the EIA for the proposed scheme was agreed in August 2020 based
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:441:the EIA application for STDC’s landside proposals. To date, no comments have been received on the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:442:As detailed within Section 1, the study area for the EIA covers the marine elements of the proposed scheme
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:444:as being either moderate or substantial (as per Table 21.4) are classified as ‘significant’ in EIA terms.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:460:This section of the EIA Report describes the existing environment in relation to climate change and details
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:464:and requirements of, an assessment of GHG emissions within an EIA, as well as considerations for
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:473:the construction of offshore wind farms, which would be subject to a separate planning application and EIA.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:474:states that EIA Reports produced under these Regulations should include a description of the likely
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:476:potential impact of a proposed scheme on human health. This section of the EIA Report has therefore been
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:476:In the consultation stages of the aforementioned EIA regulations, the general interpretation was that effects
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:476:the findings of the assessments undertaken for other sections of the EIA, notably air quality and noise and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:476:Section 18 of this EIA Report refers to the Government’s health-based ambient air quality objectives, and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:476:Section 8 of this EIA Report considers the potential impacts of the proposed scheme on human health of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:484:been used as a proxy to inform this EIA in the absence of data at the time of writing), it is concluded that the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:490:baseline. As such, these impacts are already taken into account in the EIA process for the proposed
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:501:volume. The EIAs for the schemes scoped into the CIA have made informed assumptions about the most
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:501:and deposition footprint has been identified from the EIA studies undertaken for each project and the CIA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:501:A review of all EIA studies for the above projects highlights that the maximum increase in suspended
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:504:minutes earlier). The EIA studies undertaken for the Anglo American Harbour Facilities predicted that there
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:504:The EIA studies undertaken for the Anglo American Harbour Facilities showed that the harbour facility itself
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:504:The Anglo American Harbour Facilities EIA predicted that currents will be reduced within the deepened
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:506:where sediment plumes combine at peak concentration (as predicted by the EIA studies for each project)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:506:In relation to sediment contamination, data collected to inform the EIAs indicates that concentrations are
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:506:Where the EIA reports larger contaminant concentrations, such as for Anglo American Harbour Facilities,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:512:adjacent landside EIA development. In addition, once the larger area of habitat from the landside
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:512:Of relevance to the proposed scheme, ecology surveys for the adjacent landside EIA development recorded:
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:512:As a more sizable development, the landside EIA proposes a number of mitigation measures including off
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:512:worse than minor adverse in significance when considered cumulatively with the landside EIA.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:514:supporting habitat was considered a negligible impact in the EIAs for both the Anglo American Harbour
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:517:traffic flow were assessed as part the NGCT EIA (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020), Anglo American Harbour
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:519:Section 20 of this EIA report has confirmed that there would be no direct or indirect impact on flood risk and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:520:natural resources has therefore not been undertaken within this EIA. It is therefore concluded that there is
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:547: Tidal propagation with the tide arriving up to 2 minutes earlier). The EIA studies undertaken for the Anglo American Harbour Facilities predicted that there will be no impact on tidal propagation
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:551:This section of the EIA Report draws together information regarding the potential for the proposed scheme
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:552:European sites. This section of the EIA Report is intended to present all of the information necessary to
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:559:Section 12 of this EIA Report. Although the qualifying interest features of the Teesmouth and Cleveland
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:571:and Cleveland Coast SPA and Ramsar site. With reference to the relevant sections of the EIA Report where
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:571: • site-specific information obtained from surveys and studies undertaken as part of the EIA for the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:571: • evidence provided within the EIA Report; and,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:593:Jones, D. and Marten, K. (2016). Dredging sound levels, numerical modelling and EIA. Maritime Solutions
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:596:PD Teesport. (2018). South Bank Quay EIA Report. Doc number I&BPB6595R003F0.1 Appendix 8:
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-34.pdf:1:The indicative durations of the proposed dredging works are detailed in Section 3.6.1 of the EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-34.pdf:5:the estuary as a whole. As detailed in Section 7.6.1 of the EIA Report, the potential increase in
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-34.pdf:6:As can be seen from the plots of change in baseline current speed provided within the EIA Report chapter,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-34.pdf:15:A cumulative impact assessment (CIA) is presented in Section 27 of the EIA Report. Section 27.5.2
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-34.pdf:15:public domain – the models used to inform the EIA for the NGCT are not within the public domain.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-34.pdf:15:As reported in Section 27.5.3 of the EIA Report, the potential for cumulative effects only arises should the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-34.pdf:16:scenario where sediment plumes combine at peak concentration (as predicted by the EIA studies for each
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-34.pdf:16:We would also like to reiterate that the sediment plumes shown in Section 6 of the EIA Report are maximum
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-34.pdf:16:to certain months of the year from a construction perspective, and based on the conclusions of the EIA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-34.pdf:17:Cumulative impacts have been correctly considered within section 27 of the EIA report (document 4).
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-34.pdf:17:of writing the EIA report. It is presently assumed that the benthic communities within the proposed project
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-34.pdf:17:within the EIA process should the new data not support those of previous findings. Can you please confirm
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-34.pdf:17:The assessment presented in the EIA Report was based on the findings from other benthic surveys
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-34.pdf:17:201 of the EIA Report, the confidence in the mudflat habitat classification within the footprint of the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-34.pdf:18:there any evidence of this in the EIA report to quantify this which may therefore be used to support the
MLA_2020_00506-Returns-56.pdf:4: assessed within the EIA), should it be apparent that the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-25.pdf:1:The indicative durations of the proposed dredging works are detailed in Section 3.6.1 of the EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-25.pdf:5:the estuary as a whole. As detailed in Section 7.6.1 of the EIA Report, the potential increase in
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-25.pdf:6:As can be seen from the plots of change in baseline current speed provided within the EIA Report chapter,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-25.pdf:15:A cumulative impact assessment (CIA) is presented in Section 27 of the EIA Report. Section 27.5.2
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-25.pdf:15:public domain – the models used to inform the EIA for the NGCT are not within the public domain.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-25.pdf:15:As reported in Section 27.5.3 of the EIA Report, the potential for cumulative effects only arises should the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-25.pdf:16:scenario where sediment plumes combine at peak concentration (as predicted by the EIA studies for each
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-25.pdf:16:We would also like to reiterate that the sediment plumes shown in Section 6 of the EIA Report are maximum
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-25.pdf:16:to certain months of the year from a construction perspective, and based on the conclusions of the EIA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-25.pdf:17:Cumulative impacts have been correctly considered within section 27 of the EIA report (document 4).
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-25.pdf:17:of writing the EIA report. It is presently assumed that the benthic communities within the proposed project
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-25.pdf:17:within the EIA process should the new data not support those of previous findings. Can you please confirm
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-25.pdf:17:The assessment presented in the EIA Report was based on the findings from other benthic surveys
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-25.pdf:17:201 of the EIA Report, the confidence in the mudflat habitat classification within the footprint of the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-25.pdf:18:there any evidence of this in the EIA report to quantify this which may therefore be used to support the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-EN-SB-ME-EV-1144-MLA.2022.00506.2 South Bank Quay FIR 20 Response.pdf:2:benthic ecology assessed within the original EIA.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-EN-SB-ME-EV-1144-MLA.2022.00506.2 South Bank Quay FIR 20 Response.pdf:2:The Applicant considers that this comment relates to work previously undertaken for the original EIA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-EN-SB-ME-EV-1144-MLA.2022.00506.2 South Bank Quay FIR 20 Response.pdf:3:material provided in Appendix A illustrating the footprint of the berth assessed within the original EIA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-EN-SB-ME-EV-1144-MLA.2022.00506.2 South Bank Quay FIR 20 Response.pdf:3:The photo below, taken from the original EIA Report (Plate 9.1), shows the habitat is not mudflat.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-EN-SB-ME-EV-1144-MLA.2022.00506.2 South Bank Quay FIR 20 Response.pdf:3:quality of habitat and limited colonisation and species diversity (taken from Plate 9.1 of the original EIA Report).
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-EN-SB-ME-EV-1144-MLA.2022.00506.2 South Bank Quay FIR 20 Response.pdf:4:the EIA Report with respect to shellfish receptors (minor adverse).
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-EN-SB-ME-EV-1144-MLA.2022.00506.2 South Bank Quay FIR 20 Response.pdf:5:Title of Table 4.2, “Summary of findings from the original EIA Report and with consideration of MLV2 with
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-EN-SB-ME-EV-1144-MLA.2022.00506.2 South Bank Quay FIR 20 Response.pdf:5:Update Table 4.2, “Summary of findings from the original EIA Report and with consideration of MLV2
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-EN-SB-ME-EV-1144-MLA.2022.00506.2 South Bank Quay FIR 20 Response.pdf:6:EIA (ideally the values presented as a total assessed under the EIA, and values for Phases 1 and 2
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-EN-SB-ME-EV-1144-MLA.2022.00506.2 South Bank Quay FIR 20 Response.pdf:6:The Applicant’s position, therefore, is that the conclusions of the original EIA Report with respect to the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-EN-SB-ME-EV-1144-MLA.2022.00506.2 South Bank Quay FIR 20 Response.pdf:6:Furthermore, it is considered that this comment relates to work previously undertaken for the original EIA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-EN-SB-ME-EV-1144-MLA.2022.00506.2 South Bank Quay FIR 20 Response.pdf:6:modelled within the original EIA, in order for me to determine whether impacts from the proposed
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-EN-SB-ME-EV-1144-MLA.2022.00506.2 South Bank Quay FIR 20 Response.pdf:7:of the additional dredge quantities proposed under MLV2) will remain within the scope of the original EIA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-EN-SB-ME-EV-1144-MLA.2022.00506.2 South Bank Quay FIR 20 Response.pdf:7:comparison of the suspended sediment concentrations and plumes modelled within the original EIA, with
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-EN-SB-ME-EV-1144-MLA.2022.00506.2 South Bank Quay FIR 20 Response.pdf:7:modelled within the original EIA, with the most up to date modelling which take into account the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-EN-SB-ME-EV-1144-MLA.2022.00506.2 South Bank Quay FIR 20 Response.pdf:7: EIA Report EIA Report -Phase EIA Report MLV1 (m3) MLV2 (m3)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-EN-SB-ME-EV-1144-MLA.2022.00506.2 South Bank Quay FIR 20 Response.pdf:7: Dredging Total Total 820,0001 Total 980,000 Same as EIA Total 1,347,000
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-EN-SB-ME-EV-1144-MLA.2022.00506.2 South Bank Quay FIR 20 Response.pdf:8: EIA Report EIA Report -Phase EIA Report MLV1 (m3) MLV2 (m3)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-EN-SB-ME-EV-1144-MLA.2022.00506.2 South Bank Quay FIR 20 Response.pdf:8:project to exceed the total dredge and disposal volumes assessed within the original EIA Report. It was
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-EN-SB-ME-EV-1144-MLA.2022.00506.2 South Bank Quay FIR 20 Response.pdf:8:of the project approach or exceed the total volumes originally assessed within the EIA Report, the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-EN-SB-ME-EV-1144-MLA.2022.00506.2 South Bank Quay FIR 20 Response.pdf:8:disposal volumes. It is understood that an EIA Report may be required to be submitted in support of a
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-EN-SB-ME-EV-1144-MLA.2022.00506.2 South Bank Quay FIR 20 Response.pdf:9:assessment in the original EIA for South Bank Quay (SBQ), identified a number of other projects with
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-EN-SB-ME-EV-1144-MLA.2022.00506.2 South Bank Quay FIR 20 Response.pdf:9:EIA, among others) which may interact cumulatively. To the best of my knowledge these concerns were
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-EN-SB-ME-EV-1144-MLA.2022.00506.2 South Bank Quay FIR 20 Response.pdf:10:1.34million m3 has been drawn from as I cannot find reference to this figure in the EIA (document 8). I
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-EN-SB-ME-EV-1144-MLA.2022.00506.2 South Bank Quay FIR 20 Response.pdf:10:the original EIA assessment in order to put the project works into the context of wider activity ongoing
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-EN-SB-ME-EV-1144-MLA.2022.00506.2 South Bank Quay FIR 20 Response.pdf:10:original EIA and, in my opinion, it would take significant consideration of the entire case history in order
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-EN-SB-ME-EV-1144-MLA.2022.00506.2 South Bank Quay FIR 20 Response.pdf:10:envelope of those originally assessed under the current EIA. This would be a significant undertaking
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-EN-SB-ME-EV-1144-MLA.2022.00506.2 South Bank Quay FIR 20 Response.pdf:11: EIA Report EIA Report EIA Report MLV1 MLV2
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-EN-SB-ME-EV-1144-MLA.2022.00506.2 South Bank Quay FIR 20 Response.pdf:11:The Applicant notes the MMO’s response to the EIA screening request submitted regarding MLV2,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-EN-SB-ME-EV-1144-MLA.2022.00506.2 South Bank Quay FIR 20 Response.pdf:11:confirming that this variation would not require an EIA. As such, the Applicant considers that MMO have
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-EN-SB-ME-EV-1144-MLA.2022.00506.2 South Bank Quay FIR 20 Response.pdf:11:assessed the changes requested under MLV2 to be within the parameters of the original EIA Report
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-EN-SB-ME-EV-1144-MLA.2022.00506.2 South Bank Quay FIR 20 Response.pdf:11:It is therefore considered that the scope MLV2 is within the parameters assessed within the original EIA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-EN-SB-ME-EV-1144-MLA.2022.00506.2 South Bank Quay FIR 20 Response.pdf:12: assessed within the original EIA Report and at the time of submitting MLV2.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-EN-SB-ME-EV-1144-MLA.2022.00506.2 South Bank Quay FIR 20 Response.pdf:14:– Informing the EIA Informing MLV2
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-EN-SB-ME-EV-1144-MLA.2022.00506.2 South Bank Quay FIR 20 Response.pdf:15:– Informing the EIA Informing MLV2
PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1124 Updated Scheme of Monitoring - May 2022.pdf:1:The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020) predicted that during
PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1124 Updated Scheme of Monitoring - May 2022.pdf:4:Royal HaskoningDHV (2020). South Bank Quay EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:3:Figure 1-2 Footprint of dredging assessed in the EIA report (grey areas for Phases 1 and 2) and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:4:dredging activities under the previously assessed project [Phases 1 and 2, reproduced from EIA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:4:EIA Report] 13
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:4:activities under the previously assessed project Phases 1 and 2, reproduced from EIA Report16
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:4:centre of the disposal site Phases 1 and 2, reproduced from EIA Report 18
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:4:disposal site Phases 1 and 2, reproduced from EIA Report 21
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:5:numerical modelling exercise to inform the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) that was prepared as
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:5:of the EIA Report and the accompanying Appendix 5: Hydrodynamics and Sedimentary Plume
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:5:Modelling of the EIA Report and comprised:
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:7:Figure 1-2 Footprint of dredging assessed in the EIA report (grey areas for Phases 1 and 2) and in updated assessments (red
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:8:Full details were provided within Chapter 6: Hydrodynamics and Sedimentary Processes of the EIA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:8:EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:15:for the original Phase 1 and Phase 2 of the South Bank Quay project (reproduced from the EIA Report) and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:17: previously assessed project Phases 1 and 2, reproduced from EIA Report
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:18:previously assessed project Phases 1 and 2, reproduced from EIA Report
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:21: assessed project Phases 1 and 2, reproduced from EIA Report
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:23:previously assessed project with all sediment release at the centre of the disposal site Phases 1 and 2, reproduced from EIA Report
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:26: assessed project with all sediment release at the centre of the disposal site Phases 1 and 2, reproduced from EIA Report
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:29:Full details were provided within Chapter 6: Hydrodynamics and Sedimentary Processes of the EIA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:29:EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:2: not requiring further EIA, therefore I do not believe there are any further clarifications required for this activity.
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:3:original environmental impact assessment (EIA) for the South Bank Quay project (as described in document 11, Section 26.3.1 and Section
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:3:those concluded within the EIA Report previously submitted”. In my opinion, there are some gaps in the information provided and it would be
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:4:changes are sufficiently negligible for the conclusions of the EIA to remain valid, it would be useful to understand what proportion of this
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:4:within the original EIA, in order for me to determine whether impacts from the proposed variation are sufficiently negligible. Please note that I
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:5:arising from this method of dredging were not included in the original project EIA. To the best of my knowledge, Cefas fisheries advisors
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:5:dredging methods which were assessed in the original project EIA, whereby material is removed by being scooped up by a hydraulic
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:5:dredging in the original project EIA (document 11) and Cefas fisheries advisors were not consulted in relation to the change in methodology,
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:5:could please clarify how the impacts associated with cutter suction dredging compare to methods already assessed within the original EIA. It
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:5:whether the dredging schedule related to this current variation is consistent with that assessed within the original EIA. In the original project
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:5:EIA (document 11, section 3.9), it was indicated that capital dredging activities for Phases 1 and 2 of the South Bank Quay project had an
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:7: suspended sediment concentrations and plumes modelled within the original EIA. The MMO do not require additional modelling at this
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:8: The EIA report (PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1100, 2020) concluded that adverse effects as a result of the proposed scheme on shellfish
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:9: processes, it is considered that the conclusions of previous assessments presented within the EIA Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020)
MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 - South Bank Quay - Phase 1 EIA Intent to Deferral Letter-11.pdf:1:Assessment) (EIA) Regulations 2007 (as amended) (“the Regulations”).
MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 - South Bank Quay - Phase 1 EIA Intent to Deferral Letter-11.pdf:2:Intent to Defer EIA Consent Decision
MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 - South Bank Quay - Phase 1 EIA Intent to Deferral Letter-11.pdf:2:ability to determine that an EIA is not required in relation to a regulated activity if it is
MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 - South Bank Quay - Phase 1 EIA Intent to Deferral Letter-11.pdf:2:requirements of the EIA Directive in relation to that project.
MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 - South Bank Quay - Phase 1 EIA Intent to Deferral Letter-11.pdf:2:The MMO confirms its intent to defer an EIA consent decision under the Regulations, by
MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 - South Bank Quay - Phase 1 EIA Intent to Deferral Letter-11.pdf:2:sufficient to meet requirements of the EIA Directive in relation to the project.
MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 - South Bank Quay - Phase 1 EIA Intent to Deferral Letter-11.pdf:2:- Conclusion of EIA assessment
MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 - South Bank Quay - Phase 1 EIA Intent to Deferral Letter-11.pdf:2:the event that they are not satisfied that the EIA assessment meets the criteria stipulated
MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 - South Bank Quay - Phase 1 EIA Intent to Deferral Letter-11.pdf:2:above. In the event that this occurs the application will be subject to EIA assessment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:4:5.1.1 Summary of baseline set out in the EIA Report 32
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:4:5.2.3 Summary of new data and comparison with that reported in the EIA Report 37
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:5:to Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) under the Marine Works (Environmental Impact Assessment)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:5:Regulations 2017. An EIA Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020) was submitted to Redcar and Cleveland
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:5:presented in the EIA Report was informed by existing publicly available survey data from other projects
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:5:assessment presented in the EIA Report was based on a combination of existing publicly available
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:5:with the EIA Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020).
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:12:Figure 2.1). As noted in the EIA Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020), the nearest WFD water quality
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:12:and 2020 which were not available at the time of drafting the EIA Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020). A
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:13:The assessment presented in the EIA Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020) used simple calculations of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:14:on the Tees estuary (presented in Section 6.5 of the EIA Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020)) has been
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:15:south-western dredging transect (taken from Section 6.5 of the EIA, Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:16:points in the Tees estuary (point 3 is Smiths Dock), taken from Section 6.5 of the EIA Report (Royal
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:17:In line with the results presented in the EIA Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020), the tool indicates that
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:17:Overall, therefore, the conclusions remain the same as those presented in the EIA Report (Royal
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:18:seven of the 25 samples). As reported in the EIA Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020), this opportunistic
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:20:at the North Tees Mudflat (which as reported in the EIA Report would not be impacted as a result of the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:21:comparable with the 40 species that were recorded in the 2019 NGCT survey, reported in the EIA Report
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:21:presented within the EIA Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020) remain valid.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:23:Comparison with the site-specific intertidal observations reported in the EIA Report
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:23:in the EIA Report (which were based on the results of the 2019 NGCT survey). The intertidal biotopes
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:24:and sediment) biotopes. The main species and algal cover reported in the EIA Report for the proposed
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:24:the results presented in the EIA report, which the impact assessment was based on, remain valid.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:24:materially different to the those recorded during the 2019 NGCT survey, which the EIA Report for the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:24:smothering) remains the same as assessed in the EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:24:INNS than that assessed within the EIA Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020). As such, the assessment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:24:and mitigation proposed in relation to INNS within the EIA Report remain valid and no update to the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:25:Table 3.1 Comparison of the sensitivity of key species and biotopes to the pressures induced by the relevant impacts within the EIA report. Receptors highlighted
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:25:in grey cells are ones that the assessment in the EIA Report was based on (i.e. key features recorded in the 2019 NGCT survey), and receptors in light blue cells are ones
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:27:ulvae and C. volutator, have similar sensitivities to the characterising species considered within the EIA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:27:sensitivity of the biotope which the assessment in the EIA Report was based on).
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:27:The sensitivity of the benthic receptors (species and biotopes) considered in the EIA Report (Royal
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:27:the North Tees Mudflat, as stated within the EIA Report. As such, the minor adverse impact predicted in
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:27:the EIA Report due to loss of intertidal mudflat can be downgraded to no impact.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:27:medium sensitivity – higher than the sensitivity used in the EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:27:Association, 2021). As stated within the EIA Report (and Section 6 of this report), the predicted increase in
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:28:within the EIA Report). This is mainly because for fucoid biotopes, smothering can reduce the seaweed’s
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:28:The benthic species on which the assessment in the EIA Report was based (which were recorded during
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:28:salinity eulittoral rock was accounted for in the EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:28:smothering. The magnitude of the impact remains as low, as reported in the EIA Report. Considering this,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:28:the EIA Report (which was assessed as negligible significance).
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:30:EIA Report, in that the dominant fish species within the lower Tees estuary appears to be plaice, with notable
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:30:drawn in the EIA Report that the lower Tees estuary acts as a nursery ground for, inter alia, plaice, whiting
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:33:these surveys), the EIA assumed that the existing wharf would have value for sheltering fish, including
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:33:commercial species, it confirms the assumption set out in the EIA Report that the structure offers shelter for
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:33:The EIA Report presented the counts of upstream salmonid movements between the beginning of 2012 and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:33:presented in the EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:33:were assessed in the EIA Report, and describes the rationale for the updated assessment of impacts based
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:34:Table 4.3 Review of the conclusions presented in the EIA Report regarding fish and shellfish resources in light of the supplementary data
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:34:Impact EIA Report EIA Report supplementary data
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:34: assessing impacts in the EIA Report. Specifically, the site-specific survey results provide further evidence of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:34: Moderate Minor adverse Minor adverse Wharf. The surveys did not indicate any unforeseen sensitivities not considered in the EIA Report. In addition,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:34: detailed in the EIA Report following review of the site-specific sediment quality data. As such, the conclusion
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:34: presented in the EIA Report remains valid.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:34: The negligible impact significant reported in the EIA Report was based on the fact that mobile individuals would
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:34: EIA Report are therefore required with regard to this impact.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:34:land-based piling negligible (piling) (piling) (piling) in the EIA Report. It is therefore concluded that there is no reason to amend the significance of this potential
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:34: Loss of habitat was considered in the EIA Report with specific regard to the removal of the existing wharf
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:34: conclusion set out in the EIA Report with regard to loss of habitat remains valid.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:34:vessel traffic used when assessing this impact in the EIA Report. The site-specific surveys did not indicate any unforeseen
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:34: sensitivities that were not considered in the EIA Report. As such, the conclusions presented in the EIA Report
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:35:Given that the findings of the site-specific surveys align with the baseline environment set out in the EIA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:35:set out in the EIA Report are considered to remain valid.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:36:The ornithological assessment presented in the EIA Report was, in part, informed by an estuarine bird
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:36:2021, inclusive. At the time the EIA Report was produced, data were available from survey visits up to and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:36:information from Wetland Bird Survey (WeBS) low tide counts was relatively old, the EIA was undertaken
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:36:and March 2021, inclusive) and reviews the conclusions of the EIA regarding non-breeding waterbirds. As
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:36:considered in the EIA, the conclusions of the EIA regarding breeding birds are not revisited.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:36:5.1.1 Summary of baseline set out in the EIA Report
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:36:Based on the survey data available at the time the EIA Report was produced, it was concluded that the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:37:The data from the site-specific surveys, which include the data used in the EIA Report plus the data from
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:41:5.2.3 Summary of new data and comparison with that reported in the EIA Report
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:41:In summary, the data from the surveys undertaken since the EIA Report provides evidence to support the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:41:The above aligns with the baseline detailed in the EIA Report, in that it illustrates preferential usage of the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:41:indicates the importance of the North Tees Mudflat at low tide. The EIA Report, which lacked data from
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:41:reported in the EIA baseline, hence there are no previously unconsidered sensitivities present within the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:41:in the EIA Report, and describes the rationale for the updated assessment of impacts based on the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:42:Table 5.3 Review of the conclusions of the EIA Report regarding overwintering waterbird receptors based on supplementary data
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:42: impact in EIA supplementary
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:42: in EIA Report
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:42: The impact significance reported in the EIA Report was based on the fact that the habitat anticipated to be lost, namely the intertidal
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:42: with the use of the North Tees Mudflats by the same species. As such, the impact significance detailed in the EIA Report is considered
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:42: The assessment of this impact reported in the EIA Report focused on the foraging and feeding capability of tern species, given that
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:42: in the EIA Report is unchanged.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:42: It is therefore concluded that the negligible significance impact reported in the EIA Report remains valid.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:42: In the absence of up-to-date site-specific low tide count data at the time of writing the EIA Report, the assessment of noise and visual
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:43: impact in EIA supplementary
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:43: in EIA Report
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:43: such, the assumption used in the EIA Report is considered appropriate and accurate, and hence the conclusions drawn in the EIA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:43: Airborne noise modelling undertaken to support the EIA indicated that the L Amax levels at North Tees Mudflat during the operation
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:43: As with construction phase impacts, the data presented in Section 5.2 provide evidence that the assumption used in the EIA Report
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:43: is appropriate and accurate, and hence the conclusions drawn in the EIA Report remain valid.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:43: The impact significance detailed in the EIA Report was based on the fact that the magnitude of vessel traffic increase would be very
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:43: magnitude of impact. Given that the assessment detailed in the EIA Report was based on the assumption that the North Tees Mudflat
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:43: supports non-breeding waterbirds, the impact significance detailed in the EIA Report remains valid.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:43: The negligible impact significance detailed in the EIA Report was based around the fact that the habitats at South Bank are of low
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:43: Given the above, the negligible impact significance reported in the EIA Report remains valid.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:43: breeding waterbirds, the negligible impact significance detailed in the EIA Report remains valid.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:44:The supplementary data aligns with the baseline information set out in the EIA Report by providing evidence
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:44:qualifying features) other than those already identified within the EIA Report. As such, the conclusions of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:44:the assessment in the EIA Report are considered to remain valid.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:45:The WFD Compliance Assessment presented in the EIA Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020) was informed
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:45:in the EIA Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020). With regard to PBDEs, the data did not indicate that the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:45:within the 2019 NGCT survey, which the WFD Compliance Assessment presented in the EIA Report was
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:45:As a result, the conclusions in the WFD Compliance Assessment presented in the EIA Report (Royal
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:46:specific trawls reflect the results of the 2014 and 2019 trawls described in the EIA Report (Royal
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:46:Bank Wharf (prior to completion of the site-specific surveys), the assessment in the EIA Report was
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:46:conclusions of the WFD Compliance Assessment set out in the EIA Report are considered to remain valid
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:46:assessed within the EIA Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020). As such, the assessment and mitigation
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:46:proposed within the EIA Report remain valid and no update to the assessment is required.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:47:Quay scheme. It was recognised within the supporting EIA Report that site-specific survey data was not
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:48:Royal HaskoningDHV. South Bank Quay EIA Report
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_Cefas_comments_for_action_RFI_19.pdf:2: significance of effect recorded at the time of writing the EIA Report with respect to shellfish
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_Cefas_comments_for_action_RFI_19.pdf:2:5. Title of Table 4.2, “Summary of findings from the original EIA Report and with consideration of
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_Cefas_comments_for_action_RFI_19.pdf:3: suspended sediment concentrations and plumes modelled within the original EIA, in order for
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_Cefas_comments_for_action_RFI_19.pdf:3: scope of the original EIA assessment. I recognise that the Applicant has provided the
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_Cefas_comments_for_action_RFI_19.pdf:3: sediment concentrations and plumes modelled within the original EIA, with the most up to date
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_Cefas_comments_for_action_RFI_19.pdf:4: assessment in the original EIA for South Bank Quay (SBQ), identified a number of other projects
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_Cefas_comments_for_action_RFI_19.pdf:4: of writing the SBQ EIA, among others) which may interact cumulatively. To the best of my
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_Cefas_comments_for_action_RFI_19.pdf:4: this figure in the EIA (document 8). I recognise that the marine licence issued in relation to this
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_Cefas_comments_for_action_RFI_19.pdf:5: changes to the scope of this development since the original EIA and, in my opinion, it would take
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_Cefas_comments_for_action_RFI_19.pdf:5: assessed under the current EIA. This would be a significant undertaking which I estimate would
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_Cefas_comments_for_action_RFI_19.pdf:5: EIA Report EIA Report EIA Report MLV1 MLV2
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:1:EIA Report
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:2: Author(s): RHDHV EIA Team
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:2: Drafted by: RHDHV EIA Team
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:4:5 APPROACH TO THE EIA 34
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:4:5.1 The EIA process 34
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:9:Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in support of a marine licence application to the Marine
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:9:The study area for the EIA in respect of the proposed scheme is the area over which the direct and indirect
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:12:This report presents the findings of the EIA process and explains how the conclusions have been reached.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:12:describes the EIA process and defines the EIA methodology adopted.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:12:the EIA process. The potential impacts of the proposed scheme during construction and operational phases
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:12:production of this EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:13:throughout this report as the ‘landside EIA’). The planning application was submitted to allow the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:15:Dock Road was included as part of the scheme description for the landside EIA on the basis that permissions
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:15:for demolition had not been granted at the point the landside EIA was submitted. As noted above, RCBC
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:16:demolition of this building has been incorporated into the landside EIA and associated planning application
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:22:of this EIA, a dredge envelope has been assessed (Figure 1.1). As shown on the drawing, dredging is
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:22:construction of the quay however the assessment undertaken within this EIA assumes that the dredging is
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:25:In order to provide the greatest flexibility with regard to phasing of the proposed scheme, the EIA has
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:29:purposes of this EIA, it has been assumed that the measures detailed in the outline remediation strategy
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:30:proposed for the backing land (which have been subject to a separate planning application and EIA).
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:33:During production of the recent Hartlepool approach channel EIA Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2019),
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:35:The non-works HRO application is not linked to this EIA or the related marine licence application. However,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:36:The requirement for EIA is established by the European Directive 2011/92/EU (codifying previous EIA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:36:projects on the environment (the EIA Directive). The EIA Directive is implemented via various regulations;
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:36:An agreement was previously reached between a third party and the MMO to undertake an EIA for a very
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:36:Assessment) Regulations 2007, as amended. We assume that RCBC is of the opinion that an EIA is also
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:36:a Scoping Opinion was issued by RCBC in 2019. We have therefore proceeded on the basis that an EIA is
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:36:required under both sets of EIA Regulations, without undertaking a formal EIA screening process (on the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:42:5 APPROACH TO THE EIA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:42:The purpose of EIA is to provide an independent assessment of a project’s potential environmental impacts
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:42:assessment of impacts which has been adopted within this EIA Report. In summary, this section presents:
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:42: • A summary of the EIA process.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:42: raised have been addressed through the EIA process.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:42: • The results of the scoping exercise undertaken to define the issues to be addressed by the EIA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:42:5.1 The EIA process
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:42:EIA is an iterative tool for systematically examining and assessing the impacts and effects of the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:42:formal reporting mechanism for an EIA is the EIA Report. In accordance with Schedule 3 of the 2007
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:42:Regulations (as amended), the EIA Report should include such information as is reasonably required to
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:43: • A non-technical summary of the information provided under this part of the EIA Regulations.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:43:The following stages were included in this EIA:
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:43:An agreement was previously reached between a third party and the MMO to undertake an EIA for a
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:43:On this basis, STDC has undertaken an EIA for the proposed scheme voluntarily under the Marine Works
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:43:(Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017, without submitting a formal EIA Screening Request.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:43:validity of the 2019 Scoping Opinions to inform this EIA (see Appendix 2). The scoping note presented the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:44: of the EIA for the proposed scheme in light of the preferred option for the berth length, alignment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:44: • The key elements of the proposed approach to the marine EIA for each environmental parameter.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:44:the EIA Report. Within this EIA Report, the description of the baseline environment consists of the following
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:45:this EIA Report and the conclusions reached regarding the sensitivity of receptors has been presented in
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:45:The EIA has been undertaken within a framework that allows for a transparent approach to the assessment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:45:and the resulting conclusions presented within this EIA Report. This section sets out the assigned definitions
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:45:that are used in the assessment process for a number of topics considered in the EIA Report. In addition,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:46:EIA provides an assessment of the impacts on sensitive receptors as a result of the effects of a development
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:46:effect may result in both a direct and indirect impact on a single receptor. Given this the EIA framework
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:46:purposes of this EIA. While this table provides guidelines of a generic nature, it should be noted that more
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:47:In the context of the EIA Regulations, ‘significant impacts’ are taken to be those of moderate or major
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:47:It should be reiterated that, although this section sets out the overall approach adopted for this EIA (using,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:48:Appropriate mitigation measures have been identified and recommended in this EIA Report where the EIA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:48:topic chapters of this EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:49:The EIA Regulations and relevant guidance require an EIA Report to provide an indication of any difficulties
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:49:The EIA Regulations also require that an EIA Report is prepared by competent experts. This EIA Report
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:49:Assessor for EIA under IEMA’s voluntary EIA Quality Mark scheme. Through this scheme, EIA activity is
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:49:independently reviewed, on an annual basis, to ensure it delivers excellence in areas including EIA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:49:environment (the EIA Directive) states that an EIA should identify, describe and assess in an appropriate
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:50:This EIA Report has given due consideration to the potential for different residual impacts to have a
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:50:chapters of the EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:50:In line with IEMA’s Guidelines for EIA (2004), cumulative impacts are defined as: “…the impacts on the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:50:However, the EIA and Habitats Directives and their associated regulations require the consideration of direct
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:50:The EIA Regulations do not define 'cumulative' but guidance on cumulative effects assessment is provided
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:50:taken into account in the EIA process and, generally, can be excluded from the scope of CIA. However, the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:51:populations, within the other relevant sections of this EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:142:and sedimentary regime (see Section 6) as well as recent survey data collected to inform other project EIAs
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:142:within the estuary, the latest being from a survey undertaken in 2019 to inform the NGCT EIA.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:142:The findings of this assessment have the potential to influence other technical sections within this EIA,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:142:requirements of the NPS which are of relevance to this section of the EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:142: NPS for Ports requirement NPS reference EIA Report reference
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:143:of the EIA Report are contained within Table 7.2.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:143: The MMO would expect water quality to be scoped into the EIA.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:144:section of the EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:145:can be quantified. Therefore, for EIA, in the same way, if contaminant levels in the sediments under
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:147:applicable information to this EIA is outlined below.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:153:A sediment quality survey was undertaken in the Tees estuary during July 2014 to inform the EIA for the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:153:Royal HaskoningDHV carried out an EIA on behalf of PDT in 2012 for proposed strengthening of the existing
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:169:This section of the EIA Report considers the likely effects of the proposed scheme with respect to land
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:169:The findings of this assessment have the potential to influence other technical sections within this EIA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:169:the NPPF with regard to land quality and geology and signposts to the applicable section of this EIA Report
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:169: NPPF reference NPPF requirement EIA reference
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:170: NPPF reference NPPF requirement EIA reference
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:172:requirement to undertake the following, which are directly or indirectly linked to this section of the EIA Report:
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:173:Consultation is a key part of the EIA process. Consultation regarding land quality and geology has been
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:178:Major or moderate environmental impacts are considered to be ‘significant’ in EIA terms. Whilst minor
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:180:post submission of this EIA; this therefore reaffirms the precautionary approach undertaken within the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:184:(including part of the proposed scheme footprint which is the subject of this EIA) to break the Made Ground
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:187:not considered ‘significant’ in terms of this EIA assessment.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:191:This section of the EIA Report considers the following potential environmental impacts for the construction
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:191: section of this EIA Report where the requirement has been addressed
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:191: NPS requirement NPS reference EIA Report reference
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:191: Where the development is subject to EIA, the application
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:192: NPS requirement NPS reference EIA Report reference
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:192:EIA. The MMO confirmed that this was the case in September 2020 and RCBC issued a formal Scoping
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:192:detailed in Table 9.2. This table also signposts to the relevant section of this EIA Report where the comment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:192: Response / section of the EIA Report where
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:193: Response / section of the EIA Report where
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:193: EIA development be submitted, and determined, prior to this document
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:194: Response / section of the EIA Report where
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:194:For this section of the EIA Report, the study area comprises the likely maximum extent over which potentially
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:194:This section of the EIA Report has been informed through a desk-based assessment. The desk-based
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:197:notification are not of relevance to this section of the EIA Report (shown in italics), however have been
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:197:section of the EIA Report, but are addressed elsewhere as necessary. The other sections relevant to the italicised features
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:217: reference to section of this EIA Report where the requirement has been addressed
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:217: NPS requirement EIA Report reference
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:218: NPS requirement EIA Report reference
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:218: procedures requiring an EIA and mitigation
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:219:Summary of comments received during the EIA scoping phase
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:219:the EIA Report where the comment has been addressed.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:219: Response / section of the EIA Report where
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:219:The study area for the EIA is the area over which the direct and indirect effects of the proposed scheme
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:220:The assessment methodology presented in Section 5 has been used to inform this section of the EIA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:222:included within this section of the EIA Report are:
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:222:a density estimate of 0.52/km2 (Hammond et al., 2017). The potential impacts for the EIA assessments are
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:225:Brigg (SCOS, 2019). The potential impacts for the EIA assessments are put into the context of the North-
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:244:This section of the EIA Report considers the following potential environmental impacts:
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:244:of the EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:244:this EIA Report. The information presented in this section relates to terrestrial ecology only.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:248:The study area for this section of the EIA Report comprises the area which has the potential to be both
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:248:Table 11.3 Study areas used for terrestrial ecology receptors considered in this EIA Report
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:249:adjacent landside EIA development) and 2020 (for the proposed scheme which is subject of this report) by
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:253:concluded to be not significant in terms of the EIA Regulations.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:254:applicable to this section of the EIA Report (which concentrates on terrestrial ecology). Cross reference to
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:257:adjacent land EIA development. The main terrestrial habitat within the footprint of the Proposed Scheme
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:260:lies within the footprint of the adjacent landside development EIA and is fully assessed as part of those
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:262:during survey works for the adjacent land-side EIA in the summer of 2020.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:262:side EIA scheme; however the amount of suitable habitat within the footprint of the proposed scheme is
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:263:scheme footprint during the surveys undertaken to inform the landside EIA.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:263:Several red listed birds were recorded nearby within the land-side EIA development, including linnet Linaria
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:264:Studies undertaken as part of the adjacent landside EIA record habitats of regional significance for dingy
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:264:recorded within the adjacent footprint of the landsite development which was subject to a separate EIA and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:265:of the adjacent landside EIA and is fully assessed within the documents supporting that application. Due to
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:270:Potential impacts on waterbirds and seabirds assessed in this section of the EIA Report are broadly
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:270:The assessment of potential impacts has been informed by the following sections of this EIA Report:
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:270: Section of EIA report
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:270: Where the development is subject to EIA, the application should
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:273:A summary of the comments relevant to ornithological receptors that were received during the EIA scoping
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:273: Response / section of the EIA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:274:The study area for this section of the EIA Report comprises the area within the Tees estuary that has the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:276:winter period. It was therefore agreed with Natural England that, for the purpose of this EIA, the assessment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:300:In terms of receptor sensitivity, the EIA for NGCT (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020) referred to monitoring
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:307:Potential impacts on fish resources and fisheries activities that are assessed in this section of the EIA Report
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:308:Site-specific comments relevant to fish and fisheries that were received during the EIA scoping process are
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:308:detailed in Table 13.2. This table also signposts to the relevant section of this EIA Report where the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:308: Response / section of the EIA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:309: Response / section of the EIA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:309:For this section of the EIA Report, the study area comprises the likely maximum extent over which potentially
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:309:This section of the EIA Report has been informed through a desk-based assessment. The desk-based
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:311:Dock turning circle, to inform the EIA undertaken for the consented Anglo American Harbour facilities (Royal
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:312:As outlined in the MMO Scoping Opinion EIA/2019/00017, key migratory fish species that have been
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:318:Consultation with the NEIFCA as part of other EIAs recently undertaken in the Tees estuary indicated that
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:323:A detailed underwater noise survey and modelling exercise was undertaken in 2014 to inform the EIA for
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:332:This section of the EIA Report considers the following potential impacts to commercial navigation:
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:332:respectively) have been assessed within this section of the EIA Report, where they are relevant to the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:349:For the purposes of EIA, ‘major’ and ‘moderate’ impacts are generally deemed to be significant (in EIA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:358:in EIA terms.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:362:This section of the EIA Report considers the potential airborne noise and vibration impacts of the proposed
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:366:The study area for this section of the EIA Report is the area that has the potential to be directly and/or
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:378:This section of the EIA Report provides an overview of baseline air quality within the area, identifies
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:379: Section of EIA report
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:380: Section of EIA report
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:382: 2 August 2019 the EIA was agreed
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:397:This section of the EIA Report presents the findings of a Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (LVIA)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:398:Various European Union (EU) Directives underpin the requirement for EIA (which includes LVIA) and are
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:398:EIA.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:400: these are significant in terms of EIA.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:418:proposed scheme footprint ranges between minor moderate adverse to minor adverse. In terms of EIA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:418:is minor adverse. In terms of EIA these effects are not significant.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:418:in views from the site of the transporter bridge is minor adverse. In terms of EIA the effect is not significant.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:419:In terms of EIA these effects are not significant.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:419:significance of effect in the view is minor negligible adverse. In terms of EIA these effects are not
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:421:This section of the EIA Report considers the following potential environmental impacts:
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:422:proposed scheme, which has in turn informed this section of the EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:422:Table 20.2 summarises the requirements of the NPS which are of relevance to this section of the EIA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:422: NPS for Ports requirement NPS reference EIA Report reference
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:423: NPS for Ports requirement NPS reference EIA Report reference
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:423:This section of the EIA Report and the FRA has been guided and informed by relevant local policy, studies
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:424:reviewed and used to inform the assessment for this section of the EIA Report and the FRA.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:424:downstream of the Tees Barrage. This information was used to inform this section of the EIA Report, as
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:424:The study area for this section of the EIA Report comprises the area which has the potential to be both
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:424:This section of the EIA Report has been informed through a combination of desk-based assessment and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:425:The findings of the EIA with regard to the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime (as set out in Section 6)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:425:and the magnitude of impacts in this EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:428:To inform this section of the EIA Report a separate FRA has been undertaken specific to the proposed
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:441:As outlined in Section 5, the scope of the EIA for the proposed scheme was agreed in August 2020 based
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:441:the EIA application for STDC’s landside proposals. To date, no comments have been received on the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:442:As detailed within Section 1, the study area for the EIA covers the marine elements of the proposed scheme
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:444:as being either moderate or substantial (as per Table 21.4) are classified as ‘significant’ in EIA terms.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:460:This section of the EIA Report describes the existing environment in relation to climate change and details
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:464:and requirements of, an assessment of GHG emissions within an EIA, as well as considerations for
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:473:the construction of offshore wind farms, which would be subject to a separate planning application and EIA.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:474:states that EIA Reports produced under these Regulations should include a description of the likely
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:476:potential impact of a proposed scheme on human health. This section of the EIA Report has therefore been
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:476:In the consultation stages of the aforementioned EIA regulations, the general interpretation was that effects
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:476:the findings of the assessments undertaken for other sections of the EIA, notably air quality and noise and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:476:Section 18 of this EIA Report refers to the Government’s health-based ambient air quality objectives, and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:476:Section 8 of this EIA Report considers the potential impacts of the proposed scheme on human health of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:484:been used as a proxy to inform this EIA in the absence of data at the time of writing), it is concluded that the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:490:baseline. As such, these impacts are already taken into account in the EIA process for the proposed
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:501:volume. The EIAs for the schemes scoped into the CIA have made informed assumptions about the most
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:501:and deposition footprint has been identified from the EIA studies undertaken for each project and the CIA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:501:A review of all EIA studies for the above projects highlights that the maximum increase in suspended
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:504:minutes earlier). The EIA studies undertaken for the Anglo American Harbour Facilities predicted that there
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:504:The EIA studies undertaken for the Anglo American Harbour Facilities showed that the harbour facility itself
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:504:The Anglo American Harbour Facilities EIA predicted that currents will be reduced within the deepened
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:506:where sediment plumes combine at peak concentration (as predicted by the EIA studies for each project)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:506:In relation to sediment contamination, data collected to inform the EIAs indicates that concentrations are
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:506:Where the EIA reports larger contaminant concentrations, such as for Anglo American Harbour Facilities,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:512:adjacent landside EIA development. In addition, once the larger area of habitat from the landside
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:512:Of relevance to the proposed scheme, ecology surveys for the adjacent landside EIA development recorded:
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:512:As a more sizable development, the landside EIA proposes a number of mitigation measures including off
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:512:worse than minor adverse in significance when considered cumulatively with the landside EIA.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:514:supporting habitat was considered a negligible impact in the EIAs for both the Anglo American Harbour
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:517:traffic flow were assessed as part the NGCT EIA (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020), Anglo American Harbour
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:519:Section 20 of this EIA report has confirmed that there would be no direct or indirect impact on flood risk and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:520:natural resources has therefore not been undertaken within this EIA. It is therefore concluded that there is
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:547: Tidal propagation with the tide arriving up to 2 minutes earlier). The EIA studies undertaken for the Anglo American Harbour Facilities predicted that there will be no impact on tidal propagation
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:551:This section of the EIA Report draws together information regarding the potential for the proposed scheme
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:552:European sites. This section of the EIA Report is intended to present all of the information necessary to
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:559:Section 12 of this EIA Report. Although the qualifying interest features of the Teesmouth and Cleveland
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:571:and Cleveland Coast SPA and Ramsar site. With reference to the relevant sections of the EIA Report where
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:571: • site-specific information obtained from surveys and studies undertaken as part of the EIA for the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:571: • evidence provided within the EIA Report; and,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:593:Jones, D. and Marten, K. (2016). Dredging sound levels, numerical modelling and EIA. Maritime Solutions
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:596:PD Teesport. (2018). South Bank Quay EIA Report. Doc number I&BPB6595R003F0.1 Appendix 8:
MLA_2020_00506-Returns-46.pdf:5: assessed within the EIA), should it be apparent that the
MLA_2020_00506-Licence Document (Marine).pdf:17: million m3 per month (the peak monthly volume assessed within the EIA), should it be apparent that the dredging and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:2:engagement with the MMO, including an EIA Screening Opinion (see Appendix C). The following
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:3:(EIA) Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020) (herein referred to as the ‘EIA Report’), which provides an
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:3:identified receptors. The EIA Report assessed a worst case scenario based on Phase 1 and Phase 2
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:3:Within Section 3.6, the EIA Report acknowledges the removal of OSPAR material as ‘excavation of soils
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:3:/ landside materials within the riverbank’. Section 3.6.2 of the EIA Report notes that the volume of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:4:Whilst the EIA Report assessed as worst case scenario based on programme, dredging and disposal
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:4:The EIA Report submitted in support of the original marine licence application provided an assessment of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:4:EIA Report was submitted, the proposed approach to delivering the scheme was to dredge and dispose
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:4:basis on which the scheme was originally assessed within the EIA.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:4:At the time of writing the EIA Report, given uncertainty on phasing, the EIA assumed that the dredging
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:4:case scenario. The total volume of dredged material for the two phases assessed within the EIA is
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:5:In addition, as previously mentioned the programme assessed within the EIA Report reflected a worst
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:5:Section 13 of the EIA Report provided an assessment of potential effects upon fish and fisheries from the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:5:construction and operation of both Phase 1 and Phase 2 of the scheme, whilst Section 26 of the EIA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:5:dredged material to sea. This section provides a review of the EIA Report and considers the effects
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:5:The EIA Report reviewed the following information sources to define the existing environment with
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:5:EIA Report identified that the intertidal and subtidal habitat supported a number of benthic-feeding fish
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:6:circle were also reviewed to inform the EIA Report. The 2014 surveys recorded a total of 13 finfish
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:6:5km north of the scheme, was also reviewed to provide wider context for the EIA Report. Five species of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:6:The EIA Report identified that several key migratory fish species, all listed under Section 41 of the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:6:It is noted within the EIA Report that population numbers of salmonid within the Tees have been
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:6:EIA Report identifies that the peak number of upstream migrations counted in any given month between
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:7:note identified that the peak migrations identified within the EIA Report remain unchanged. Table 4.1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:7:The EIA Report identified at least 31 species of fish and shellfish species that may be commercially
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:7:present within the OSPAR Region II (Greater North Sea) as identified in the EIA Report. Furthermore,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:8:A literature review undertaken at the time of writing the EIA Report identified eight species which may
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:8:spawning area. The EIA Report notes, however, that all species listed above have extensive nursery and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:8:The EIA Report notes that it may be possible that other species use the Tees estuary and adjacent
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:9:original EIA Report have been afforded further considered within this section:
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:9:Without mitigation, the EIA Report concludes that the construction of the scheme would result in a
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:9:dredging campaign. The mitigation proposed within the EIA Report, which forms a condition on the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:9:implementing this mitigation, the EIA Report concludes an effect of minor adverse significance.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:9:quality arising from dredging activities will be no greater than that assessed in the original EIA Report
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:9:Without mitigation, the original EIA Report concluded that direct loss of, and alteration to, habitat and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:10:since the EIA Report. At present, the OSPAR material would be removed through excavation and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:10:as part of MLV2). It is therefore considered that the conclusion drawn within the EIA Report remains valid
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:10:writing the EIA Report, it is considered that the potential effects upon fish and shellfish receptors from the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:10:changes applied for in MLV2 are within the scope of what was assessed in the original EIA Report. For
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:10:this reason, it is considered that the potential effects are no greater than those presented within the EIA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:10:Table 4.2 Summary of findings from the original EIA Report and with consideration of MLV2 with regard to
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:10: Original EIA Report Conclusion Re-appraisal
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:10:Chapter 9 of the EIA Report provided an assessment of potential effects upon benthic ecology from the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:10:of the EIA Report and considers the effects associated with the changes requested as part of MLV2 with
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:10:The EIA Report reviewed the following information sources to define the existing environment with
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:11:As noted within the EIA Report, the majority of the dredging footprint is located within the subtidal zone
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:11:other priority habitats have been recorded within the immediate vicinity of the scheme and the EIA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:11:Medium and broadscale habitat classifications were identified during the EIA Report using EMODnet.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:11:energy infralittoral sand. The EIA Report notes that isolated patches of mudflat within the footprint of the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:11:The EIA Report reviewed the following benthic surveys which had been previously undertaken within the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:13:the original EIA Report have been considered further within this section:
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:14:The EIA Report identifies and assesses the loss of two habitats for benthic species – existing structures
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:14:dredging footprint. Whilst at the time of writing the original EIA Report the information regarding the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:14:of existing structures were not heavily colonised. It is noted within the EIA Report that any species
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:14:environment. Overall, the EIA Report records an effect of minor adverse significance upon benthic
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:14:In terms of habitat loss as a result of dredging, the EIA Report identifies that the dredge footprint is within
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:14:the works area on the opposite side of the river channel to this habitat. The EIA Report does note that
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:14:considered to be of high conservation importance. Despite that, as a conservative estimate, the EIA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:14:The EIA Report therefore concludes an effect of minor adverse significance with respect to direct loss of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:14:within the EIA Report remains valid and applicable to the changes requested within MLV2.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:15:The sediment plume modelling undertaken for the original EIA Report predicted that highest
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:15:The EIA Report also reviews the sensitivity of the benthic species identified within the area affected by
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:15:nature of the predicted increase in suspended sediment concentrations, the EIA Report concludes an
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:15:support of the original EIA Report - see Appendix 5 of the EIA Report) is 25kg/m3, over four times greater
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:15:Noting that the OSPAR material was originally considered within the EIA Report as material to be
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:15:under MLV2 are lower than the worst case scenario volumes assessed within the EIA Report (as a result
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:15:original EIA Report remain unchanged and applicable to the changes requested under MLV2 –
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:15:Even without mitigation, the EIA Report concludes a negligible significance regarding the smothering of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:16:to be lower than that previously modelled and assessed within the original EIA Report, which modelled
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:16:threatened and / or declining species and habitats) undertaken at the time of writing the EIA Report
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:16:scheme within the EIA Report. Despite the Phase 1 and Phase 2 cumulative disposal at-sea volumes
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:16:being greater than that original assessed as a worst case within the EIA, since each phase will be
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:16:is no greater than that assessed within the original EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:16:applied for in MLV2 are within the scope of what was assessed in the original EIA Report and the further
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:16:those presented within the EIA Report, as summarised within the Table 5.1.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:17:Table 5.1 Summary of findings from the original EIA Report and with consideration of MLV2 with regard to
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:17: Original EIA Report Conclusion (with Re-appraisal
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:17:This note provides a review of the findings of the original EIA Report submitted in support of the marine
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:17:the scheme as set out within the EIA Report and consideration of the changes requested in MLV2 is set
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:17:Table 6.1 Summary of findings from the original EIA Report and with consideration of MLV2
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:17: Original EIA Report Re-appraisal
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:17:the significance of effect recorded at the time of writing the EIA Report with respect to benthic, fish or
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:17:effects are no greater than those set out in the original EIA Report and the changes requested as part of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:18:Royal HaskoningDHV (2020). South Bank Quay EIA Report. Document Reference PC1084-RHD-SB-
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:25:MMO Reference: EIA/2021/00049
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:25:3. Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) ……………………………………………………… 4
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:25: EIA Screening Opinion ………………………………………………………………………………. 4
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:26:and operation of a new quay. The original application was screened into EIA and the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:28:3. Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:28:environmental effects by virtue of their nature, size or location are subject to an EIA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:28:EIA Screening Opinion
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:33:Figure 1-2 Footprint of dredging assessed in the EIA report (grey areas for Phases 1 and 2) and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:34:dredging activities under the previously assessed project [Phases 1 and 2, reproduced from EIA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:34:EIA Report] 13
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:34:activities under the previously assessed project Phases 1 and 2, reproduced from EIA Report16
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:34:centre of the disposal site Phases 1 and 2, reproduced from EIA Report 18
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:34:disposal site Phases 1 and 2, reproduced from EIA Report 21
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:35:numerical modelling exercise to inform the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) that was prepared as
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:35:of the EIA Report and the accompanying Appendix 5: Hydrodynamics and Sedimentary Plume
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:35:Modelling of the EIA Report and comprised:
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:37:Figure 1-2 Footprint of dredging assessed in the EIA report (grey areas for Phases 1 and 2) and in updated assessments (red
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:38:Full details were provided within Chapter 6: Hydrodynamics and Sedimentary Processes of the EIA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:38:EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:45:for the original Phase 1 and Phase 2 of the South Bank Quay project (reproduced from the EIA Report) and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:47: previously assessed project Phases 1 and 2, reproduced from EIA Report
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:48:previously assessed project Phases 1 and 2, reproduced from EIA Report
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:51: assessed project Phases 1 and 2, reproduced from EIA Report
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:53:previously assessed project with all sediment release at the centre of the disposal site Phases 1 and 2, reproduced from EIA Report
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:56: assessed project with all sediment release at the centre of the disposal site Phases 1 and 2, reproduced from EIA Report
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:59:Full details were provided within Chapter 6: Hydrodynamics and Sedimentary Processes of the EIA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:59:EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00506-Returns.pdf:4: assessed within the EIA), should it be apparent that the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1139 South Bank Quay Phase 1 FIR 18 Response.pdf:2:The original EIA (which assessed the impacts of Phase 1 and 2 combined) did not identify any significant
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1139 South Bank Quay Phase 1 FIR 18 Response.pdf:2:volume assessed in the EIA Report for Phase 1 and 2 combined, no significant impacts are predicted to
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1139 South Bank Quay Phase 1 FIR 18 Response.pdf:2:This approach was reviewed and agreed by MMO through EIA/2021/00049, which screened out the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1139 South Bank Quay Phase 1 FIR 18 Response.pdf:2:variations of requiring an EIA.
MLA_2020_00506-Cefas RFI South Bank Phase 1 & 2-15.pdf:2: the EIA report (document 4). However, Cefas note that the Net Zero
MLA_2020_00506-Cefas RFI South Bank Phase 1 & 2-15.pdf:2: were not available at the time of writing the EIA report. It is presently
MLA_2020_00506-Cefas RFI South Bank Phase 1 & 2-15.pdf:2: impacts, to be revised within the EIA process should the new data not
MLA_2020_00506-Cefas RFI South Bank Phase 1 & 2-15.pdf:2: intertidal vs subtidal area. Is there any evidence of this in the EIA report
MLA_2020_00506-Decision Letter (Marine).pdf:2:Phase 2 of the project approach the total volumes assessed within the EIA , you are to
MLA_2020_00506-Decision Letter (Marine).pdf:2:liaise with the MMO. An updated EIA may be required in support of continued dredge
MLA_2020_00506-20230224_Natural_England_Comments_MMO_Response_v1.pdf:1: of the original EIA report.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1137-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay Marine Licence Variation 2 RFI 17-66.pdf:1: pose impacts different / greater than those covered in the EIA that has been previously provided?
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1137-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay Marine Licence Variation 2 RFI 17-66.pdf:3:the Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020) that in turn supported the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1137-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay Marine Licence Variation 2 RFI 17-66.pdf:3:arising from the dredging of OSPAR material is within the parameters assessed as part of the EIA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1137-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay Marine Licence Variation 2 RFI 17-66.pdf:3:effects on the integrity of Water Framework Directive (WFD) waterbodies) set out within the EIA Report
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1137-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay Marine Licence Variation 2 RFI 17-66.pdf:4:the EIA Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020) submitted in support of the original marine licence application
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1137-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay Marine Licence Variation 2 RFI 17-66.pdf:4:marine ecology, fish or ornithological receptors beyond those concluded within the EIA Report previously
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1137-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay Marine Licence Variation 2 RFI 17-66.pdf:4:Risks to navigation were previously assessed within section 14 of the EIA Report (Royal HaskoningDHV,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1137-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay Marine Licence Variation 2 RFI 17-66.pdf:4:1,133,000m3. It is also noted that the original NRA (included as Appendix 9 of the EIA Report (Royal
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1137-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay Marine Licence Variation 2 RFI 17-66.pdf:4:the EIA Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020) submitted in support of the original marine licence. As such,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1137-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay Marine Licence Variation 2 RFI 17-66.pdf:4:the conclusions of navigational risk set out within the NRA Addendum and EIA report remain unchanged
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1137-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay Marine Licence Variation 2 RFI 17-66.pdf:4:considered that the sediment quality is within the parameters assessed within the EIA Report (Royal
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1137-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay Marine Licence Variation 2 RFI 17-66.pdf:4:the EIA report remain valid and applicable for MLV2.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1137-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay Marine Licence Variation 2 RFI 17-66.pdf:5:remain as presented within the HRA set out within section 29 of the EIA Report (Royal HaskoningDHV,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1137-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay Marine Licence Variation 2 RFI 17-66.pdf:6:Royal HaskoningDHV (2020) South Bank Quay EIA Report. Document reference PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-
MLA_2020_00506-Licence Document (Marine)-45.pdf:16: million m3 per month (the peak monthly volume assessed within the EIA), should it be apparent that the dredging and
PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1123 Written Scheme of Investigation.pdf:4:The MLAs were supported by an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020)
PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1123 Written Scheme of Investigation.pdf:7:The desk based assessment undertaken for the EIA Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020) established the
PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1123 Written Scheme of Investigation.pdf:7:as set out in the Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment undertaken for the EIA Report (Royal
PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1123 Written Scheme of Investigation.pdf:10:wharf and the jetties were determined in the EIA Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020) as early 20th century
PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1123 Written Scheme of Investigation.pdf:10:The EIA Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020) suggested that, although extensive dredging and reclamation
PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1123 Written Scheme of Investigation.pdf:13:The EIA Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020) assessed the following direct impacts during construction:
PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1123 Written Scheme of Investigation.pdf:13:The EIA Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020) proposed that the PAD would be formalised in a WSI. This
PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1123 Written Scheme of Investigation.pdf:14:Following submission of the EIA Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020) and MLAs, a consultation response
PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1123 Written Scheme of Investigation.pdf:30:Royal HaskoningDHV (2020). South Bank Quay EIA Report.
PC1084-RHD-SB-XX-NT-Z-0001-South Bank SSC monitoring plan V3.pdf:2:The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020) predicted that during
PC1084-RHD-SB-XX-NT-Z-0001-South Bank SSC monitoring plan V3.pdf:3:Linked to the relatively limited extent of the sediment plume, the EIA Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020)
PC1084-RHD-SB-XX-NT-Z-0001-South Bank SSC monitoring plan V3.pdf:4:The Cumulative Impact Assessment (CIA) of the EIA report then considers the potential cumulative effects
PC1084-RHD-SB-XX-NT-Z-0001-South Bank SSC monitoring plan V3.pdf:11: 6. Royal HaskoningDHV (2020) South Bank Quay Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Report
MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:2:environments and requires Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in support of a
MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:2:operational phase. For the purposes of the EIA it has been assumed that construction
MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:2:outlined in Section 3.9 of the EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:3:An enquiry was submitted to the MMO in July 2020 with regard to the scope of the EIA -
MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:7:and is presented in Section 4.9 of the EIA Report. Section 4.9.1 outlines how the
MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:7:and is presented in Section 4.9 of the EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:7:An EIA has been undertaken and the findings are presented in the attached report. Due
MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:7:to the size, the EIA Report has been uploaded in parts comprising the main body and
MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:7:29 of the EIA Report where the assessment is presented.
MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:8:and 12 of the EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:8:the proposed scheme and is presented in Section 28 of the EIA Report. The scoping
MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:13:be used by the Contractor. However, for the purposes of the EIA, it has been assumed
MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:13:offshore disposal of dredged material (see Section 26 of the EIA Report). The disposal of
MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:15:Please refer to Section 3 and Appendix 1 of the EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:17:Mitigation measures are detailed in the EIA Report. No significant environmental
MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:17:Mitigation measures are detailed in the EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:19:For the purposes of the EIA, it has been assumed that the dredge and disposal activity
MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:19:Potential impacts are detailed in the supporting EIA Report. No significant impacts are
MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:19:Mitigation measures are detailed in the supporting EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:19:Residual impact are detailed in the supporting EIA. No significant residual impacts are
MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:22:The proposed demolition methodology is detailed in Section 3.3 of the EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:23:Potential impacts are outlined in the EIA Report. No significant environmental impacts
MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:23:Mitigation measures are outlined in the EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:23:As detailed in the EIA Report, no significant residual impacts are predicted.
MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:24:Impacts associated with the installation of the rock blanket are addressed in the EIA
MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:24:Mitigation measures are outlined in the EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:25:As detailed in the EIA Report, no significant residual impacts are predicted.
MLA_2020_00506-Licence Document (Marine)-58.pdf:17: million m3 per month (the peak monthly volume assessed within the EIA), should it be apparent that the dredging and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:5:The proposed scheme has been subject to an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) which has assessed
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:5:the Non-Technical Summary (NTS) of the EIA Report, which has been submitted to the Marine Management
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:9:proposed for the backing land (which have been subject to a separate planning application and EIA).
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:10:The EIA Report reports the findings of the EIA process. The following environmental parameters / topics
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:20:The EIA Regulations require that an assessment is made of the potential for cumulative effects to arise.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:5:to as the proposed scheme). This report accompanies the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:12:sediment quality survey was undertaken in the Tees estuary during July 2019 to inform the EIA for the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:15:A full description of the proposed scheme is provided in the EIA Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020),
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:51:Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in support of a marine licence application to the Marine
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:51:EIA.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:51:Two separate EIAs are being undertaken in support of the port facility and the landside application, with
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:51: • ‘Marine’ EIA (to be undertaken by Royal HaskoningDHV and which is the subject of this note) –
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:51: the riverbank). The findings of the EIA will be reported in an Environmental Statement (ES) which
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:52: • ‘Landside’ EIA (being led by Lichfields – submitted as part of an outline planning application) – the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:52: proposed quay (which is covered above under the ‘marine’ EIA). This comprises a number of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:52:Opinions (which are publicly available online) with specific regard to the ‘marine’ EIA. Given the very close
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:52:is to reach agreement with the MMO and RCBC on the approach to the EIA without requesting Scoping
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:52:Opinions under the respective EIA regulations. A telephone meeting is therefore proposed to be held with
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:52: of the EIA for the proposed scheme in light of the preferred option for the berth length, alignment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:52: • The key elements of the proposed approach to the ‘marine’ EIA for each environmental parameter
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:52:EIA/2019/00017) in response to a request for a Scoping Opinion for the previously proposed scheme. The
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:54:to the previously proposed scheme detailed that the EIA would address the following topic areas:
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:54:topic or the surveys or studies to be undertaken as part of the EIA.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:54:that need to be assessed within the EIA. Detail of relevance to the ‘marine’ EIA to be undertaken on behalf
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:54: RCBC with regard to the ‘marine’ EIA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:54:RCBC confirmed in June 2019 that the list of topics and parameters proposed for the EIA to be undertaken
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:55:used to inform the proposed scope of environmental assessment for the ‘marine’ EIA for the current
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:55:applicable to the ‘marine’ EIA in isolation.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:58: RCBC confirmed that the proposed list of topics to be included in the EIA appears comprehensive and would provide sufficient scope for the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:59: Any future EIA should be comprehensive, covering all appropriate and specific environmental/ecological areas given the adjacent land designations
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:61:EIA for the current scheme being progressed by STDC. The proposed scope is detailed below.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:61:inform other areas of the EIA (e.g. marine ecology, fisheries).
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:63:EIA, as well as information from publicly available studies previously undertaken for consented schemes
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:63:We understand that built heritage was scoped out of the landside EIA and therefore we propose to liaise
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:63:of the marine EIA.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:63:inform the EIA.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:64:A Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (LVIA) will be undertaken as part of the EIA. This will involve
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:64:A land quality desk study and Preliminary Risk Assessment (PRA) Report will inform the EIA chapter. No
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:64:The EIA will include consideration of potential effects associated with the generation of waste and how
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:65:A desk based socio-economic assessment will be undertaken as part of the EIA to understand the impacts
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:65:the programme of survey works undertaken to inform the EIA for the proposed Northern Gateway
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:75:We are in agreement with the topics/constraints to be scoped into the EIA document listed in page 4
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:75:Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for this development.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:76:of the landside EIA, as well as information from publicly available studies previously undertaken for
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:76:We understand that built heritage was scoped out of the landside EIA and therefore we propose to
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:76:landside parts of the marine EIA.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:76:This follows consultation on scoping of the EIA with the MMO.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:79:assessment for the EIA (The South Bank Port Facility – Environmental Impact
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:80: environments and will require Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in support of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:80: 2.1. An EIA scoping opinion was provided by the MMO for a scheme that was previously
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:80: Assessment) (EIA) Regulations 2007 as amended (reference EIA/2019/00017).
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:80: 2.2. The MMO notes that two separate EIA’s are proposed for the scheme: one covering
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:80: advise that both EIAs should consider the scheme as a whole ensuring that all
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:80: proposed EIAs should demonstrate that the whole scheme has been assessed.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:80: are appropriate for the proposed EIA for the development.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:81: EIA. However, should the applicant request it the MMO would be prepared to
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:81: EIA.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:81: are appropriate for the proposed EIA for the development.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:85:the process of undertaking an EIA to support applications and the information below relates to
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:85:the proposed scope of noise and vibration assessment as part of the EIA. We understand that
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:139:modelling exercise to inform the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) that is being prepared as part of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:174:Section 6 (Hydrodynamic and Sedimentary Processes) of the EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:253: Impact Assessment (EIA) for Geology and Ground Conditions.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:285:site with respect to land contamination, characterise the baseline environment to inform and support the EIA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:138: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:141: Marine Works EIA (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations governing EIA’s for
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:293: 1100_EIA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:294: 1100_EIA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:295: 1100_EIA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:296: 1100_EIA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:297: 1100_EIA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:313:LVIA is either carried out formally as part of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) process or
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:313:the same, although the approach for a non EIA development may be simplified and classification of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:350:The proposed scheme is defined in full within the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Report (Royal
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:362:consultation undertaken to inform the EIA. The Environment Agency confirmed the requirement to consider
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:362:of the EIA Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020).
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:362:Following consultation with the LLFA as part of the September 2020 EIA scoping consultation, which for the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:377:This FRA has reviewed the flood risk to the proposed scheme to support the development of the EIA Report
MLA_2020_00506-NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21 (1)-12.pdf:1:Please see Annex 1 below for further information and specific comments on the provided EIA.
MLA_2020_00506-NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21 (1)-12.pdf:3:Annex 1 – Comments on the EIA Report
MLA_2020_00506-NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21 (1)-12.pdf:3:specific survey monitoring for the South Bank Wharf area are not presented within the EIA, but
MLA_2020_00506-NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21 (1)-12.pdf:3:results. within the EIA, but are due for submission as a supplementary report in April. We
MLA_2020_00506-NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21 (1)-12.pdf:3:9.5.1.2 We note that, in relation to the North Tees Mudflat, the EIA states that ‘based on
MLA_2020_00506-NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21 (1)-12.pdf:4:Capital dredging dredging in front of the new quay. It is stated within the EIA that the complete loss
MLA_2020_00506-NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21 (1)-12.pdf:5: 12.5.2 We note the EIA states that ‘little terns within the SPA / Ramsar site nest almost
MLA_2020_00506-NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21 (1)-12.pdf:5: 12.5.2 We note the EIA states that Sandwich tern ‘as a passage feature of the SPA, it is
MLA_2020_00506-NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21 (1)-12.pdf:7: site integrity at this stage, based on the information provided in the EIA. We
MLA_2020_00506-NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21 (1)-12.pdf:8: Appropriate Assessment within the applicant’s EIA Report and shadow
MLA_2020_00506-NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21 (1)-12.pdf:9: However, we note that the EIA states that construction will take 3 years
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:4:5.1.1 Summary of baseline set out in the EIA Report 32
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:4:5.2.3 Summary of new data and comparison with that reported in the EIA Report 37
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:5:to Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) under the Marine Works (Environmental Impact Assessment)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:5:Regulations 2017. An EIA Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020) was submitted to Redcar and Cleveland
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:5:presented in the EIA Report was informed by existing publicly available survey data from other projects
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:5:assessment presented in the EIA Report was based on a combination of existing publicly available
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:5:with the EIA Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020).
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:12:Figure 2.1). As noted in the EIA Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020), the nearest WFD water quality
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:12:and 2020 which were not available at the time of drafting the EIA Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020). A
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:13:The assessment presented in the EIA Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020) used simple calculations of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:14:on the Tees estuary (presented in Section 6.5 of the EIA Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020)) has been
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:15:south-western dredging transect (taken from Section 6.5 of the EIA, Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:16:points in the Tees estuary (point 3 is Smiths Dock), taken from Section 6.5 of the EIA Report (Royal
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:17:In line with the results presented in the EIA Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020), the tool indicates that
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:17:Overall, therefore, the conclusions remain the same as those presented in the EIA Report (Royal
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:18:seven of the 25 samples). As reported in the EIA Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020), this opportunistic
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:20:at the North Tees Mudflat (which as reported in the EIA Report would not be impacted as a result of the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:21:comparable with the 40 species that were recorded in the 2019 NGCT survey, reported in the EIA Report
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:21:presented within the EIA Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020) remain valid.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:23:Comparison with the site-specific intertidal observations reported in the EIA Report
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:23:in the EIA Report (which were based on the results of the 2019 NGCT survey). The intertidal biotopes
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:24:and sediment) biotopes. The main species and algal cover reported in the EIA Report for the proposed
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:24:the results presented in the EIA report, which the impact assessment was based on, remain valid.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:24:materially different to the those recorded during the 2019 NGCT survey, which the EIA Report for the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:24:smothering) remains the same as assessed in the EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:24:INNS than that assessed within the EIA Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020). As such, the assessment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:24:and mitigation proposed in relation to INNS within the EIA Report remain valid and no update to the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:25:Table 3.1 Comparison of the sensitivity of key species and biotopes to the pressures induced by the relevant impacts within the EIA report. Receptors highlighted
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:25:in grey cells are ones that the assessment in the EIA Report was based on (i.e. key features recorded in the 2019 NGCT survey), and receptors in light blue cells are ones
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:27:ulvae and C. volutator, have similar sensitivities to the characterising species considered within the EIA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:27:sensitivity of the biotope which the assessment in the EIA Report was based on).
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:27:The sensitivity of the benthic receptors (species and biotopes) considered in the EIA Report (Royal
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:27:the North Tees Mudflat, as stated within the EIA Report. As such, the minor adverse impact predicted in
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:27:the EIA Report due to loss of intertidal mudflat can be downgraded to no impact.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:27:medium sensitivity – higher than the sensitivity used in the EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:27:Association, 2021). As stated within the EIA Report (and Section 6 of this report), the predicted increase in
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:28:within the EIA Report). This is mainly because for fucoid biotopes, smothering can reduce the seaweed’s
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:28:The benthic species on which the assessment in the EIA Report was based (which were recorded during
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:28:salinity eulittoral rock was accounted for in the EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:28:smothering. The magnitude of the impact remains as low, as reported in the EIA Report. Considering this,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:28:the EIA Report (which was assessed as negligible significance).
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:30:EIA Report, in that the dominant fish species within the lower Tees estuary appears to be plaice, with notable
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:30:drawn in the EIA Report that the lower Tees estuary acts as a nursery ground for, inter alia, plaice, whiting
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:33:these surveys), the EIA assumed that the existing wharf would have value for sheltering fish, including
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:33:commercial species, it confirms the assumption set out in the EIA Report that the structure offers shelter for
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:33:The EIA Report presented the counts of upstream salmonid movements between the beginning of 2012 and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:33:presented in the EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:33:were assessed in the EIA Report, and describes the rationale for the updated assessment of impacts based
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:34:Table 4.3 Review of the conclusions presented in the EIA Report regarding fish and shellfish resources in light of the supplementary data
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:34:Impact EIA Report EIA Report supplementary data
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:34: assessing impacts in the EIA Report. Specifically, the site-specific survey results provide further evidence of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:34: Moderate Minor adverse Minor adverse Wharf. The surveys did not indicate any unforeseen sensitivities not considered in the EIA Report. In addition,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:34: detailed in the EIA Report following review of the site-specific sediment quality data. As such, the conclusion
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:34: presented in the EIA Report remains valid.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:34: The negligible impact significant reported in the EIA Report was based on the fact that mobile individuals would
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:34: EIA Report are therefore required with regard to this impact.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:34:land-based piling negligible (piling) (piling) (piling) in the EIA Report. It is therefore concluded that there is no reason to amend the significance of this potential
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:34: Loss of habitat was considered in the EIA Report with specific regard to the removal of the existing wharf
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:34: conclusion set out in the EIA Report with regard to loss of habitat remains valid.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:34:vessel traffic used when assessing this impact in the EIA Report. The site-specific surveys did not indicate any unforeseen
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:34: sensitivities that were not considered in the EIA Report. As such, the conclusions presented in the EIA Report
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:35:Given that the findings of the site-specific surveys align with the baseline environment set out in the EIA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:35:set out in the EIA Report are considered to remain valid.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:36:The ornithological assessment presented in the EIA Report was, in part, informed by an estuarine bird
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:36:2021, inclusive. At the time the EIA Report was produced, data were available from survey visits up to and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:36:information from Wetland Bird Survey (WeBS) low tide counts was relatively old, the EIA was undertaken
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:36:and March 2021, inclusive) and reviews the conclusions of the EIA regarding non-breeding waterbirds. As
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:36:considered in the EIA, the conclusions of the EIA regarding breeding birds are not revisited.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:36:5.1.1 Summary of baseline set out in the EIA Report
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:36:Based on the survey data available at the time the EIA Report was produced, it was concluded that the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:37:The data from the site-specific surveys, which include the data used in the EIA Report plus the data from
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:41:5.2.3 Summary of new data and comparison with that reported in the EIA Report
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:41:In summary, the data from the surveys undertaken since the EIA Report provides evidence to support the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:41:The above aligns with the baseline detailed in the EIA Report, in that it illustrates preferential usage of the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:41:indicates the importance of the North Tees Mudflat at low tide. The EIA Report, which lacked data from
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:41:reported in the EIA baseline, hence there are no previously unconsidered sensitivities present within the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:41:in the EIA Report, and describes the rationale for the updated assessment of impacts based on the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:42:Table 5.3 Review of the conclusions of the EIA Report regarding overwintering waterbird receptors based on supplementary data
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:42: impact in EIA supplementary
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:42: in EIA Report
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:42: The impact significance reported in the EIA Report was based on the fact that the habitat anticipated to be lost, namely the intertidal
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:42: with the use of the North Tees Mudflats by the same species. As such, the impact significance detailed in the EIA Report is considered
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:42: The assessment of this impact reported in the EIA Report focused on the foraging and feeding capability of tern species, given that
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:42: in the EIA Report is unchanged.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:42: It is therefore concluded that the negligible significance impact reported in the EIA Report remains valid.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:42: In the absence of up-to-date site-specific low tide count data at the time of writing the EIA Report, the assessment of noise and visual
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:43: impact in EIA supplementary
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:43: in EIA Report
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:43: such, the assumption used in the EIA Report is considered appropriate and accurate, and hence the conclusions drawn in the EIA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:43: Airborne noise modelling undertaken to support the EIA indicated that the L Amax levels at North Tees Mudflat during the operation
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:43: As with construction phase impacts, the data presented in Section 5.2 provide evidence that the assumption used in the EIA Report
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:43: is appropriate and accurate, and hence the conclusions drawn in the EIA Report remain valid.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:43: The impact significance detailed in the EIA Report was based on the fact that the magnitude of vessel traffic increase would be very
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:43: magnitude of impact. Given that the assessment detailed in the EIA Report was based on the assumption that the North Tees Mudflat
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:43: supports non-breeding waterbirds, the impact significance detailed in the EIA Report remains valid.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:43: The negligible impact significance detailed in the EIA Report was based around the fact that the habitats at South Bank are of low
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:43: Given the above, the negligible impact significance reported in the EIA Report remains valid.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:43: breeding waterbirds, the negligible impact significance detailed in the EIA Report remains valid.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:44:The supplementary data aligns with the baseline information set out in the EIA Report by providing evidence
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:44:qualifying features) other than those already identified within the EIA Report. As such, the conclusions of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:44:the assessment in the EIA Report are considered to remain valid.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:45:The WFD Compliance Assessment presented in the EIA Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020) was informed
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:45:in the EIA Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020). With regard to PBDEs, the data did not indicate that the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:45:within the 2019 NGCT survey, which the WFD Compliance Assessment presented in the EIA Report was
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:45:As a result, the conclusions in the WFD Compliance Assessment presented in the EIA Report (Royal
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:46:specific trawls reflect the results of the 2014 and 2019 trawls described in the EIA Report (Royal
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:46:Bank Wharf (prior to completion of the site-specific surveys), the assessment in the EIA Report was
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:46:conclusions of the WFD Compliance Assessment set out in the EIA Report are considered to remain valid
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:46:assessed within the EIA Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020). As such, the assessment and mitigation
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:46:proposed within the EIA Report remain valid and no update to the assessment is required.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:47:Quay scheme. It was recognised within the supporting EIA Report that site-specific survey data was not
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:48:Royal HaskoningDHV. South Bank Quay EIA Report
R-2021-0830-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:32:Cleveland Channels, which were assessed by ARUP in the EIA for the planning application covering
R-2021-0830-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:32:fully at the time the EIA was submitted. Based on the Tees Rivers Trust assessment, mitigation or
R-2021-0830-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:33:Wintering Birds County This was identified in the EIA for South Bank. Re-
R-2021-0830-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:32:Cleveland Channels, which were assessed by ARUP in the EIA for the planning application covering
R-2021-0830-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:32:fully at the time the EIA was submitted. Based on the Tees Rivers Trust assessment, mitigation or
R-2021-0830-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:33:Wintering Birds County This was identified in the EIA for South Bank. Re-
R-2021-0830-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:38:Cleveland Channels, which were assessed by ARUP in the EIA for the planning application covering
R-2021-0830-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:38:fully at the time the EIA was submitted. Based on the Tees Rivers Trust assessment, mitigation or
R-2021-0830-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:39:Wintering Birds County This was identified in the EIA for South Bank. Re-
R-2022-0816-FFM-Steel House PandR Cover Letter(1).pdf:10:EIA
R-2022-0816-FFM-Steel House PandR Cover Letter(1).pdf:10:(Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (as amended) (hereafter ‘the EIA Regulations
R-2022-0816-FFM-Steel House PandR Cover Letter(1).pdf:10:2017’). The scheme falls within Paragraph 10 (b) of Schedule 2 of the EIA Regulations 2017 which
R-2022-0816-FFM-Steel House PandR Cover Letter(1).pdf:10:For Schedule 2 developments, EIA is required only in situations where the development could give rise
R-2022-0816-FFM-Steel House PandR Cover Letter(1).pdf:10:As the site falls within the thresholds of Schedule 2 of the EIA Regulations 2017, we note that the
R-2022-0816-FFM-Steel House PandR Cover Letter(1).pdf:10:that the scheme is not an EIA development.
R-2021-0754-FFM-Officer Report 0754.pdf:7:The outline application was EIA development and the transport implications
R-2021-0754-FFM-Officer Report 0754.pdf:9:as to whether the development constitutes EIA development. It is
R-2021-0754-FFM-Officer Report 0754.pdf:9:EIA development. At this time the impacts of the proposed wider
R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf:8:C3.1 The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) has been carried out in accordance with the EIA
R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf:23: undertaken as part of the EIA for this development has been undertaken based on a worst-case
R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf:24: C7.1. In EIA terms, it is not expected that any residual effects will be significant.
R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf:28:C8.8 In EIA terms, it is not expected that any residual effects will be significant.
R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf:29: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2021-0754-FFM-63455 01 LM Wind Access Road - Cover Letter 18.08.21.pdf:2:EIA Screening
R-2021-0754-FFM-63455 01 LM Wind Access Road - Cover Letter 18.08.21.pdf:2:For Schedule 2 developments, EIA is required only in situations where the development could give rise to
R-2021-0754-FFM-63455 01 LM Wind Access Road - Cover Letter 18.08.21.pdf:2:The outline application was EIA development and the environmental impacts of the proposal were
R-2021-0754-FFM-63455 01 LM Wind Access Road - Cover Letter 18.08.21.pdf:3:view that the scheme is not an EIA development.
R-2021-0754-FFM-63455 01 LM Wind Access Road - Cover Letter 18.08.21.pdf:3:R/2020/0357/OOM. The outline application was EIA development and the transport implications were
Environmental Statement, Chapter H Ground Conditions and Remediation Section 6 Mitigation.pdf:1: been considered within this EIA, albeit it is anticipated that these will be removed subject to
R-2021-0610-PND-Officer Report 0610.pdf:2:development with regard to whether the demolition would constitute EIA
R-2021-0610-PND-Officer Report 0610.pdf:2:supported by an EIA with the significance not being beyond the local area.
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:10: Environmental Impact Assessment Statement of Conformity (EIA SoC).
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:43:8.1 Chapter 8 of the EIA SoC identifies that construction of the proposed
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_2of2.pdf:1:Tees Valley ERF EIA: Statement Figure 3.7 Landscape planting scheme
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_2of2.pdf:2:Tees Valley ERF EIA: Statement Figure 6.1 ZTV building only www.torltd.co.uk
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_2of2.pdf:3:Tees Valley ERF EIA: Statement Figure 6.2 ZTV stack only www.torltd.co.uk
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_2of2.pdf:4:Tees Valley ERF EIA: Statement Figure 6.3 ZTV building and stack www.torltd.co.uk
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_2of2.pdf:5:Tees Valley ERF EIA: Statement Figure 6.4 Original ZTV DSM 15km
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_2of2.pdf:6:Tees Valley ERF EIA: Statement Figure 13.1 Local projects considered for
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_2of2.pdf:7:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_2of2.pdf:8:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_2of2.pdf:9:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:5:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:5: 4. Approach to the EIA Statement of Conformity
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:6:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:6:1.1 This Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Statement of Conformity (SoC) is
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:6:1.3 This EIA SoC has been prepared and is submitted in accordance with the Town
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:6: amended), (henceforth referred to as the EIA Regulations) to provide a
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:6: Planning and EIA history
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:6: outline scheme was subject to the EIA process and was supported by an
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:6:1.5 Where an EIA is required for a proposed development, information on the likely
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:6: has already been subject to EIA which was reported within the December 2019
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:6:1.6 Regulation 3 of the EIA Regulations states:
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:6: subsequent consent for EIA development unless an EIA has been carried out in
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:6: consider how the EIA Regulations apply to “subsequent applications” which are
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:6: defined as meaning (as set out in EIA Regulation 2):
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:7:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:7:1.8 The EIA Regulations therefore prohibit development consent being granted,
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:7: likely significant effects of the development. The EIA Regulations seek to ensure
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:7:1.9 Since the Tees Valley ERF is an EIA development, it follows that any subsequent
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:7: EIA development and will thus have to be determined by reference to an ES.
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:7:1.10 In relation to the outline scheme, it is necessary to consider the EIA Regulations
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:7: voluntarily, as provided within this EIA SoC report.
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:7:1.13 The scope of the EIA SoC report and general approach is provided in chapter 4:
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:7: Approach to the EIA Statement of Conformity.
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:7:1.14 This report contains an EIA SoC for each environmental topic. Each topic
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:8:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:8: the reserved matters EIA SoC. Where environmental effects are new, or where
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:8: 4. Approach to the EIA SoC report - sets out the approach to scoping and
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:9:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:10:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:11:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:11: to the reserved matters application to which this EIA SoC refers. In September
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:12:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:13:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:14:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:15:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:16:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:17:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:18:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:19:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:20:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:21:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:22:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:23:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:24:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:25:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:26:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:27:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:28:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:29:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:30:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:31:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:32:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:33:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:34:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:35:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:36:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:37:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:38:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:39:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:39: (over and above that undertaken as part of the EIA process). The risk
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:39: the EIA process.
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:40:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:40:4.0 Approach to the EIA Statement of Conformity report
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:40:4.1 The EIA SoC assesses the proposed ERF design, layout and alterations to be
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:40: within this EIA SoC. The topics are as follows:
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:41:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:42:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:42: completed by STDC. As such, the EIA SoC has considered ecology and
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:43:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:44:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:45:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:46:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:47:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:48:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:49:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:50:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:51:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:51: flood risk are detailed in chapter 8 of this EIA SoC.
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:51: significant in EIA terms with the proposed mitigation in place. Mitigation measures
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:52:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:53:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:54:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:55:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:56:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:57:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:58:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:59:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:60:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:61:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:62:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:63:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:64:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:65:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:66:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:67:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:68:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:69:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:70:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:71:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:72:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:73:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:74:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:75:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:76:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:77:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:78:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:79:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:79: the local level (significant in EIA terms), prior to the implementation of mitigation
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:80:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:80: significant in EIA terms. Therefore, mitigation in the form of the CEMP is proposed
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:81:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:81: significance, which is not significant in EIA terms
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:82:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:83:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:84:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:85:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:86:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:87:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:88:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:89:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:90:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:91:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:92:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:93:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:94:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:95:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:96:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:97:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:98:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:99:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:100:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:101:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:102:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:103:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:104:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:105:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:105: information provided in chapters 5 – 13 of this EIA SoC.
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:106:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:107:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:108:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:109:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:110:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:111:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:112:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:113:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:114:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:115:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:116:EIA SoC
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:117:Tees Valley ERF EIA: Statement Figure 2.1
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:118: Tees Valley ERF EIA: Statement Figure 3.1 Site layout
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:119:Tees Valley ERF EIA: Statement Figure 3.2a ERF elevation
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:120:Tees Valley ERF EIA: Statement Figure 3.2b ERF elevation drawings south
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:121:Tees Valley ERF EIA: Statement Figure 3.2c ERF elevation drawings south
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:122:Tees Valley ERF EIA: Statement Figure 3.2d ERF elevation drawings north
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:123:Tees Valley ERF EIA: Statement Figure 3.3a Site section A
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:124:Tees Valley ERF EIA: Statement Figure 3.3b Site sections B and C
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:125:Tees Valley ERF EIA: Statement Figure 3.3c Site sections D and E
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:126:Tees Valley ERF EIA: Statement Figure 3.4 Indicative CHP
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:127: ERF EIA: Statement Figure3.5
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:128:Tees Valley ERF EIA: Statement Figure 3.6 Vehicle circulation routes on site
R-2023-0246-RMM-NEAR.pdf:1:that appears in the submitted EIA Statement of Conformity, that statement is an accurate summary
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Planning_Supporting_Statement.pdf:8: Environmental impact assessment (EIA)
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Planning_Supporting_Statement.pdf:8:1.22 The proposed ERF development falls within Schedule 1 of the EIA Regulations
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Planning_Supporting_Statement.pdf:16:3.3 A detailed description of the proposals is provided in the EIA Statement of
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Planning_Supporting_Statement.pdf:18:4.2 The EIA Statement of Conformity summarises how the detailed proposals are
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Planning_Supporting_Statement.pdf:18: compliant with the findings of the EIA undertaken for the outline scheme, cross
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Planning_Supporting_Statement.pdf:23: EIA compliance
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Planning_Supporting_Statement.pdf:23:4.51 An EIA Statement of Conformity has been submitted in support of the application.
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Planning_Supporting_Statement.pdf:23:4.55 The EIA Statement of Conformity should be read in its entirety for further details of
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Planning_Supporting_Statement.pdf:27: have already been addressed by the outline planning permission. The EIA was
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Planning_Supporting_Statement.pdf:27: of the ERF remains within the parameters assessed in the EIA.
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Planning_Supporting_Statement.pdf:28: under the EIA and stated within the ES. The technical information accompanying
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Planning_Supporting_Statement.pdf:29: reserved matters application, and the EIA Statement of Conformity confirms the
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Planning_Supporting_Statement.pdf:32: application was subject to EIA and was accompanied by an ES that identifies the
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Planning_Supporting_Statement.pdf:34: EIA and was therefore accompanied by an ES.
R-2023-0246-RMM-ApplicationFormRedacted.pdf:4: evolution report. The outline application was an EIA application and an ES was submitted.
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:89:• Non-native plant species cover less than 5% (other than buddleia and red
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:139: buddleia and red valerian. These can total up to 10% between them with
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:139:considered to be invasive species (sea-buckthorn as well as buddleia) which
R-2021-0832-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:32:Cleveland Channels, which were assessed by ARUP in the EIA for the planning application covering
R-2021-0832-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:32:fully at the time the EIA was submitted. Based on the Tees Rivers Trust assessment, mitigation or
R-2021-0832-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:33:Wintering Birds County This was identified in the EIA for South Bank. Re-
R-2021-0832-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:32:Cleveland Channels, which were assessed by ARUP in the EIA for the planning application covering
R-2021-0832-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:32:fully at the time the EIA was submitted. Based on the Tees Rivers Trust assessment, mitigation or
R-2021-0832-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:33:Wintering Birds County This was identified in the EIA for South Bank. Re-
R-2021-0832-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:38:Cleveland Channels, which were assessed by ARUP in the EIA for the planning application covering
R-2021-0832-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:38:fully at the time the EIA was submitted. Based on the Tees Rivers Trust assessment, mitigation or
R-2021-0832-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:39:Wintering Birds County This was identified in the EIA for South Bank. Re-
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_23. Use of natural resources.pdf:1:states that EIA Reports produced under these Regulations should include a description of the likely
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:1:5 APPROACH TO THE EIA
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:1:The purpose of EIA is to provide an independent assessment of a project’s potential environmental impacts
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:1:assessment of impacts which has been adopted within this EIA Report. In summary, this section presents:
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:1: • A summary of the EIA process.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:1: raised have been addressed through the EIA process.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:1: • The results of the scoping exercise undertaken to define the issues to be addressed by the EIA
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:1:5.1 The EIA process
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:1:EIA is an iterative tool for systematically examining and assessing the impacts and effects of the
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:1:formal reporting mechanism for an EIA is the EIA Report. In accordance with Schedule 3 of the 2007
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:1:Regulations (as amended), the EIA Report should include such information as is reasonably required to
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:2: • A non-technical summary of the information provided under this part of the EIA Regulations.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:2:The following stages were included in this EIA:
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:2:An agreement was previously reached between a third party and the MMO to undertake an EIA for a
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:2:On this basis, STDC has undertaken an EIA for the proposed scheme voluntarily under the Marine Works
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:2:(Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017, without submitting a formal EIA Screening Request.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:2:validity of the 2019 Scoping Opinions to inform this EIA (see Appendix 2). The scoping note presented the
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:3: of the EIA for the proposed scheme in light of the preferred option for the berth length, alignment
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:3: • The key elements of the proposed approach to the marine EIA for each environmental parameter.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:3:the EIA Report. Within this EIA Report, the description of the baseline environment consists of the following
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:4:this EIA Report and the conclusions reached regarding the sensitivity of receptors has been presented in
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:4:The EIA has been undertaken within a framework that allows for a transparent approach to the assessment
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:4:and the resulting conclusions presented within this EIA Report. This section sets out the assigned definitions
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:4:that are used in the assessment process for a number of topics considered in the EIA Report. In addition,
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:5:EIA provides an assessment of the impacts on sensitive receptors as a result of the effects of a development
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:5:effect may result in both a direct and indirect impact on a single receptor. Given this the EIA framework
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:5:purposes of this EIA. While this table provides guidelines of a generic nature, it should be noted that more
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:6:In the context of the EIA Regulations, ‘significant impacts’ are taken to be those of moderate or major
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:6:It should be reiterated that, although this section sets out the overall approach adopted for this EIA (using,
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:7:Appropriate mitigation measures have been identified and recommended in this EIA Report where the EIA
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:7:topic chapters of this EIA Report.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:8:The EIA Regulations and relevant guidance require an EIA Report to provide an indication of any difficulties
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:8:The EIA Regulations also require that an EIA Report is prepared by competent experts. This EIA Report
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:8:Assessor for EIA under IEMA’s voluntary EIA Quality Mark scheme. Through this scheme, EIA activity is
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:8:independently reviewed, on an annual basis, to ensure it delivers excellence in areas including EIA
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:8:environment (the EIA Directive) states that an EIA should identify, describe and assess in an appropriate
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:9:This EIA Report has given due consideration to the potential for different residual impacts to have a
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:9:chapters of the EIA Report.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:9:In line with IEMA’s Guidelines for EIA (2004), cumulative impacts are defined as: “…the impacts on the
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:9:However, the EIA and Habitats Directives and their associated regulations require the consideration of direct
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:9:The EIA Regulations do not define 'cumulative' but guidance on cumulative effects assessment is provided
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:9:taken into account in the EIA process and, generally, can be excluded from the scope of CIA. However, the
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_4. Legislative framework.pdf:1:The non-works HRO application is not linked to this EIA or the related marine licence application. However,
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_4. Legislative framework.pdf:2:The requirement for EIA is established by the European Directive 2011/92/EU (codifying previous EIA
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_4. Legislative framework.pdf:2:projects on the environment (the EIA Directive). The EIA Directive is implemented via various regulations;
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_4. Legislative framework.pdf:2:An agreement was previously reached between a third party and the MMO to undertake an EIA for a very
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_4. Legislative framework.pdf:2:Assessment) Regulations 2007, as amended. We assume that RCBC is of the opinion that an EIA is also
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_4. Legislative framework.pdf:2:a Scoping Opinion was issued by RCBC in 2019. We have therefore proceeded on the basis that an EIA is
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_4. Legislative framework.pdf:2:required under both sets of EIA Regulations, without undertaking a formal EIA screening process (on the
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf:1:This section of the EIA Report considers the potential airborne noise and vibration impacts of the proposed
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf:5:The study area for this section of the EIA Report is the area that has the potential to be directly and/or
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:5:The proposed scheme has been subject to an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) which has assessed
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:5:the Non-Technical Summary (NTS) of the EIA Report, which has been submitted to the Marine Management
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:9:proposed for the backing land (which have been subject to a separate planning application and EIA).
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:10:The EIA Report reports the findings of the EIA process. The following environmental parameters / topics
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:20:The EIA Regulations require that an assessment is made of the potential for cumulative effects to arise.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:1:and sedimentary regime (see Section 6) as well as recent survey data collected to inform other project EIAs
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:1:within the estuary, the latest being from a survey undertaken in 2019 to inform the NGCT EIA.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:1:The findings of this assessment have the potential to influence other technical sections within this EIA,
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:1:requirements of the NPS which are of relevance to this section of the EIA Report.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:1: NPS for Ports requirement NPS reference EIA Report reference
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:2:of the EIA Report are contained within Table 7.2.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:2: The MMO would expect water quality to be scoped into the EIA.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:3:section of the EIA Report.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:4:can be quantified. Therefore, for EIA, in the same way, if contaminant levels in the sediments under
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:6:applicable information to this EIA is outlined below.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:12:A sediment quality survey was undertaken in the Tees estuary during July 2014 to inform the EIA for the
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:12:Royal HaskoningDHV carried out an EIA on behalf of PDT in 2012 for proposed strengthening of the existing
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf:1:This section of the EIA Report presents the findings of a Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (LVIA)
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf:2:Various European Union (EU) Directives underpin the requirement for EIA (which includes LVIA) and are
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf:2:EIA.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf:4: these are significant in terms of EIA.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf:22:proposed scheme footprint ranges between minor moderate adverse to minor adverse. In terms of EIA
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf:22:is minor adverse. In terms of EIA these effects are not significant.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf:22:in views from the site of the transporter bridge is minor adverse. In terms of EIA the effect is not significant.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf:23:In terms of EIA these effects are not significant.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf:23:significance of effect in the view is minor negligible adverse. In terms of EIA these effects are not
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:26: Tidal propagation with the tide arriving up to 2 minutes earlier). The EIA studies undertaken for the Anglo American Harbour Facilities predicted that there will be no impact on tidal propagation
R-2020-0685-ESM-Response from applicant.PDF:2:and we would draw your attention to appendix 9 of the EIA which contains a Navigation Risk Assessment
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf:1:This section of the EIA Report considers the following potential impacts to commercial navigation:
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf:1:respectively) have been assessed within this section of the EIA Report, where they are relevant to the
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:7:been used as a proxy to inform this EIA in the absence of data at the time of writing), it is concluded that the
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:1:The development is one which it was agreed fell under Schedule 1 of the EIA
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:4:With respect to projects that require a marine licence the EIA Directive
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:5:EIA, MMO must ensure that applications for a marine licence are compliant
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:5:set of EIA regulations, then it is advised that the applicant submit a request
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:6:ability to determine that an EIA is not required in relation to a regulated activity
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:7:are (or will be) sufficient to meet the requirements of the EIA Directive in
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:7:their planning and EIA assessment surrounding the scheme. The MMO has
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:7:determined that an EIA consent decision under the Regulations is not
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:7:(2012) accompanied by EIA.
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:16: EIA
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:17:been considered as required by the EIA Regulations. The alternative
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:18:data collected to inform other project EIAs within the estuary.
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:19:influence other technical chapters within this EIA, including:
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:26:which is not considered significant in terms of this EIA assessment.
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:41:EIA Report are broadly categorised into the following:
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:41:sections of this EIA Report:
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:61:EIA terms.
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:73:between minor moderate adverse to minor adverse. In terms of EIA these
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:73:adverse. In terms of EIA these effects are not significant.
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:73:the transporter bridge is minor adverse. In terms of EIA the effect is not
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:73:adverse. In terms of EIA these effects are not significant.
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:74:in the view is minor negligible adverse. In terms of EIA these effects are not
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:89:In the establishment of the EIA regulations detailed above, the general
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:93:EIA in the absence of data at the time of writing), it is concluded that the
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 11_Air quality assessment method.pdf:1: 1100_EIA
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 11_Air quality assessment method.pdf:2: 1100_EIA
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 11_Air quality assessment method.pdf:3: 1100_EIA
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 11_Air quality assessment method.pdf:4: 1100_EIA
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 11_Air quality assessment method.pdf:5: 1100_EIA
R-2020-0685-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:1:MMO Reference: EIA/2019/00017
R-2020-0685-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:1:3 Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) …………………………………………………… 3
R-2020-0685-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:3:3 Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)
R-2020-0685-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:3:certain public and private projects on the environment (“the EIA Directive”) aims to
R-2020-0685-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:3:location are subject to an EIA before permission is granted.
R-2020-0685-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:3:amended) (“the Regulations”) transpose the EIA Directive into UK law for marine
R-2020-0685-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:3:constitute an EIA development under Schedule A2 (88) of the Regulations,
R-2020-0685-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:4:during the EIA and must be included in any resulting ES.
R-2020-0685-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:12:EIAs for other developments in the vicinity have identified that the lower Tees
R-2020-0685-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:13:The topics highlighted in this scoping opinion must be assessed during the EIA
R-2020-0685-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:13:This statement, however, should not necessarily be seen as a definitive list of all EIA
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:1:This section of the EIA Report considers the likely effects of the proposed scheme with respect to land
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:1:The findings of this assessment have the potential to influence other technical sections within this EIA
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:1:the NPPF with regard to land quality and geology and signposts to the applicable section of this EIA Report
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:1: NPPF reference NPPF requirement EIA reference
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:2: NPPF reference NPPF requirement EIA reference
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:4:requirement to undertake the following, which are directly or indirectly linked to this section of the EIA Report:
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:5:Consultation is a key part of the EIA process. Consultation regarding land quality and geology has been
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:10:Major or moderate environmental impacts are considered to be ‘significant’ in EIA terms. Whilst minor
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:12:post submission of this EIA; this therefore reaffirms the precautionary approach undertaken within the
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:16:(including part of the proposed scheme footprint which is the subject of this EIA) to break the Made Ground
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:19:not considered ‘significant’ in terms of this EIA assessment.
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:9:modelling exercise to inform the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) that is being prepared as part of
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:44:Section 6 (Hydrodynamic and Sedimentary Processes) of the EIA Report.
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 13_Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology.pdf:2:LVIA is either carried out formally as part of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) process or
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 13_Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology.pdf:2:the same, although the approach for a non EIA development may be simplified and classification of
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:1:This section of the EIA Report considers the following potential environmental impacts:
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:2:proposed scheme, which has in turn informed this section of the EIA Report.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:2:Table 20.2 summarises the requirements of the NPS which are of relevance to this section of the EIA
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:2: NPS for Ports requirement NPS reference EIA Report reference
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:3: NPS for Ports requirement NPS reference EIA Report reference
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:3:This section of the EIA Report and the FRA has been guided and informed by relevant local policy, studies
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:4:reviewed and used to inform the assessment for this section of the EIA Report and the FRA.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:4:downstream of the Tees Barrage. This information was used to inform this section of the EIA Report, as
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:4:The study area for this section of the EIA Report comprises the area which has the potential to be both
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:4:This section of the EIA Report has been informed through a combination of desk-based assessment and
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:5:The findings of the EIA with regard to the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime (as set out in Section 6)
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:5:and the magnitude of impacts in this EIA Report.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:8:To inform this section of the EIA Report a separate FRA has been undertaken specific to the proposed
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:1:This section of the EIA Report considers the following potential environmental impacts for the construction
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:1: section of this EIA Report where the requirement has been addressed
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:1: NPS requirement NPS reference EIA Report reference
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:1: Where the development is subject to EIA, the application
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:2: NPS requirement NPS reference EIA Report reference
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:2:EIA. The MMO confirmed that this was the case in September 2020 and RCBC issued a formal Scoping
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:2:detailed in Table 9.2. This table also signposts to the relevant section of this EIA Report where the comment
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:2: Response / section of the EIA Report where
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:3: Response / section of the EIA Report where
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:3: EIA development be submitted, and determined, prior to this document
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:4: Response / section of the EIA Report where
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:4:For this section of the EIA Report, the study area comprises the likely maximum extent over which potentially
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:4:This section of the EIA Report has been informed through a desk-based assessment. The desk-based
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:7:notification are not of relevance to this section of the EIA Report (shown in italics), however have been
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:7:section of the EIA Report, but are addressed elsewhere as necessary. The other sections relevant to the italicised features
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1111_Appendix 1_Waste Report.pdf:4:to as the proposed scheme). This report accompanies the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1111_Appendix 1_Waste Report.pdf:11:sediment quality survey was undertaken in the Tees estuary during July 2019 to inform the EIA for the
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1111_Appendix 1_Waste Report.pdf:14:A full description of the proposed scheme is provided in the EIA Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020),
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:8: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:11: Marine Works EIA (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations governing EIA’s for
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:1:populations, within the other relevant sections of this EIA Report.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1109_Appendix 15_Flood Risk Assessment.pdf:8:The proposed scheme is defined in full within the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Report (Royal
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1109_Appendix 15_Flood Risk Assessment.pdf:20:consultation undertaken to inform the EIA. The Environment Agency confirmed the requirement to consider
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1109_Appendix 15_Flood Risk Assessment.pdf:20:of the EIA Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020).
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1109_Appendix 15_Flood Risk Assessment.pdf:20:Following consultation with the LLFA as part of the September 2020 EIA scoping consultation, which for the
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1109_Appendix 15_Flood Risk Assessment.pdf:35:This FRA has reviewed the flood risk to the proposed scheme to support the development of the EIA Report
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_2. Need for the proposed scheme.pdf:1:throughout this report as the ‘landside EIA’). The planning application was submitted to allow the
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:1:Potential impacts on waterbirds and seabirds assessed in this section of the EIA Report are broadly
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:1:The assessment of potential impacts has been informed by the following sections of this EIA Report:
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:1: Section of EIA report
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:1: Where the development is subject to EIA, the application should
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:4:A summary of the comments relevant to ornithological receptors that were received during the EIA scoping
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:4: Response / section of the EIA
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:5:The study area for this section of the EIA Report comprises the area within the Tees estuary that has the
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:7:winter period. It was therefore agreed with Natural England that, for the purpose of this EIA, the assessment
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:31:In terms of receptor sensitivity, the EIA for NGCT (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020) referred to monitoring
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf:1:potential impact of a proposed scheme on human health. This section of the EIA Report has therefore been
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf:1:In the consultation stages of the aforementioned EIA regulations, the general interpretation was that effects
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf:1:the findings of the assessments undertaken for other sections of the EIA, notably air quality and noise and
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf:1:Section 18 of this EIA Report refers to the Government’s health-based ambient air quality objectives, and
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf:1:Section 8 of this EIA Report considers the potential impacts of the proposed scheme on human health of
R-2020-0685-ESM-MLA202000507 - South Bank Quay - Phase 2 EIA Intent to Deferral Letter.pdf:1:Assessment) (EIA) Regulations 2007 (as amended) (“the Regulations”).
R-2020-0685-ESM-MLA202000507 - South Bank Quay - Phase 2 EIA Intent to Deferral Letter.pdf:2:Intent to Defer EIA Consent Decision
R-2020-0685-ESM-MLA202000507 - South Bank Quay - Phase 2 EIA Intent to Deferral Letter.pdf:2:ability to determine that an EIA is not required in relation to a regulated activity if it is satisfied
R-2020-0685-ESM-MLA202000507 - South Bank Quay - Phase 2 EIA Intent to Deferral Letter.pdf:2:body, and such assessments are (or will be) sufficient to meet the requirements of the EIA
R-2020-0685-ESM-MLA202000507 - South Bank Quay - Phase 2 EIA Intent to Deferral Letter.pdf:2:The MMO confirms its intent to defer an EIA consent decision under the Regulations, by
R-2020-0685-ESM-MLA202000507 - South Bank Quay - Phase 2 EIA Intent to Deferral Letter.pdf:2:meet requirements of the EIA Directive in relation to the project.
R-2020-0685-ESM-MLA202000507 - South Bank Quay - Phase 2 EIA Intent to Deferral Letter.pdf:2:- Conclusion of EIA assessment
R-2020-0685-ESM-MLA202000507 - South Bank Quay - Phase 2 EIA Intent to Deferral Letter.pdf:2:the event that they are not satisfied that the EIA assessment meets the criteria stipulated
R-2020-0685-ESM-MLA202000507 - South Bank Quay - Phase 2 EIA Intent to Deferral Letter.pdf:2:above. In the event that this occurs the application will be subject to EIA assessment
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:1:This section of the EIA Report considers the following potential environmental impacts:
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:1:of the EIA Report.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:1:this EIA Report. The information presented in this section relates to terrestrial ecology only.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:5:The study area for this section of the EIA Report comprises the area which has the potential to be both
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:5:Table 11.3 Study areas used for terrestrial ecology receptors considered in this EIA Report
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:6:adjacent landside EIA development) and 2020 (for the proposed scheme which is subject of this report) by
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:10:concluded to be not significant in terms of the EIA Regulations.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:11:applicable to this section of the EIA Report (which concentrates on terrestrial ecology). Cross reference to
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:14:adjacent land EIA development. The main terrestrial habitat within the footprint of the Proposed Scheme
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:17:lies within the footprint of the adjacent landside development EIA and is fully assessed as part of those
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:19:during survey works for the adjacent land-side EIA in the summer of 2020.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:19:side EIA scheme; however the amount of suitable habitat within the footprint of the proposed scheme is
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:20:scheme footprint during the surveys undertaken to inform the landside EIA.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:20:Several red listed birds were recorded nearby within the land-side EIA development, including linnet Linaria
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:21:Studies undertaken as part of the adjacent landside EIA record habitats of regional significance for dingy
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:21:recorded within the adjacent footprint of the landsite development which was subject to a separate EIA and
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:22:of the adjacent landside EIA and is fully assessed within the documents supporting that application. Due to
R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:5: Habitats Regulation Assessment (contained within EIA Volume 2)
R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:5: Water Framework Directive Compliance Assessment (contained within EIA Volume 2)
R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:5: Transport Statement (contained with EIA Volume 3 Appendix 10)
R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:6: the need for Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’).
R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:6: inform discussions regarding the validity of the 2019 Scoping Opinions to inform the EIA for the
R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:6:1.8 On this basis, STDC has undertaken an EIA for the proposed scheme voluntarily under the
R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:6: submitting a formal EIA Screening Request.
R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:12: greatest flexibility with regard to phasing of the proposed scheme, the EIA has assessed the
R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:23:5.7 EIA is required for developments, which on the grounds of their nature, scale and location are
R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:23: likely to give rise to significant environmental effects. The purpose of an EIA is to ensure that
R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:23:5.8 For planning applications, EIA is governed by the Town and Country Planning (Environmental
R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:23: Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the EIA Regulations) as updated by The Town and
R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:24:5.11 In undertaking the EIA for the current application the technical team has worked closely with
R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:24:5.12 The key findings from the EIA are summarised below.
R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:32: Regeneration Masterplan. The EIA process which has been undertaken has clearly established
R-2020-0685-ESM-MMO.pdf:1:authority (the MMO) the ability to determine that an EIA is not required in relation to
R-2020-0685-ESM-MMO.pdf:1:will be) sufficient to meet the requirements of the EIA Directive in relation to that
R-2020-0685-ESM-MMO.pdf:1:planning and EIA assessment surrounding the scheme. The MMO has determined
R-2020-0685-ESM-MMO.pdf:1:that an EIA consent decision under the Regulations is not required for the proposed
R-2020-0685-ESM-MMO.pdf:1:Country Planning Regulations (2012) accompanied by EIA.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:1:This section of the EIA Report provides an overview of baseline air quality within the area, identifies
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:2: Section of EIA report
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:3: Section of EIA report
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:5: 2 August 2019 the EIA was agreed
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:1: reference to section of this EIA Report where the requirement has been addressed
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:1: NPS requirement EIA Report reference
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:2: NPS requirement EIA Report reference
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:2: procedures requiring an EIA and mitigation
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:3:Summary of comments received during the EIA scoping phase
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:3:the EIA Report where the comment has been addressed.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:3: Response / section of the EIA Report where
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:3:The study area for the EIA is the area over which the direct and indirect effects of the proposed scheme
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:4:The assessment methodology presented in Section 5 has been used to inform this section of the EIA
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:6:included within this section of the EIA Report are:
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:6:a density estimate of 0.52/km2 (Hammond et al., 2017). The potential impacts for the EIA assessments are
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:9:Brigg (SCOS, 2019). The potential impacts for the EIA assessments are put into the context of the North-
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_1. Introduction.pdf:1:EIA Report
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_1. Introduction.pdf:2: Author(s): RHDHV EIA Team
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_1. Introduction.pdf:2: Drafted by: RHDHV EIA Team
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_1. Introduction.pdf:4:5 APPROACH TO THE EIA 34
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_1. Introduction.pdf:4:5.1 The EIA process 34
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_1. Introduction.pdf:9:Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in support of a marine licence application to the Marine
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_1. Introduction.pdf:9:The study area for the EIA in respect of the proposed scheme is the area over which the direct and indirect
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_1. Introduction.pdf:12:This report presents the findings of the EIA process and explains how the conclusions have been reached.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_1. Introduction.pdf:12:describes the EIA process and defines the EIA methodology adopted.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_1. Introduction.pdf:12:the EIA process. The potential impacts of the proposed scheme during construction and operational phases
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_1. Introduction.pdf:12:production of this EIA Report.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:5:As outlined in Section 5, the scope of the EIA for the proposed scheme was agreed in August 2020 based
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:5:the EIA application for STDC’s landside proposals. To date, no comments have been received on the
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:6:As detailed within Section 1, the study area for the EIA covers the marine elements of the proposed scheme
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:8:as being either moderate or substantial (as per Table 21.4) are classified as ‘significant’ in EIA terms.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1107_Appendix 7_Land quality desk study.pdf:7: Impact Assessment (EIA) for Geology and Ground Conditions.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1107_Appendix 7_Land quality desk study.pdf:39:site with respect to land contamination, characterise the baseline environment to inform and support the EIA
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_30. References.pdf:6:Jones, D. and Marten, K. (2016). Dredging sound levels, numerical modelling and EIA. Maritime Solutions
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_30. References.pdf:9:PD Teesport. (2018). South Bank Quay EIA Report. Doc number I&BPB6595R003F0.1 Appendix 8:
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_3. Description of the proposed scheme.pdf:1:Dock Road was included as part of the scheme description for the landside EIA on the basis that permissions
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_3. Description of the proposed scheme.pdf:1:for demolition had not been granted at the point the landside EIA was submitted. As noted above, RCBC
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_3. Description of the proposed scheme.pdf:2:demolition of this building has been incorporated into the landside EIA and associated planning application
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_3. Description of the proposed scheme.pdf:8:of this EIA, a dredge envelope has been assessed (Figure 1.1). As shown on the drawing, dredging is
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_3. Description of the proposed scheme.pdf:8:construction of the quay however the assessment undertaken within this EIA assumes that the dredging is
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_3. Description of the proposed scheme.pdf:11:In order to provide the greatest flexibility with regard to phasing of the proposed scheme, the EIA has
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_3. Description of the proposed scheme.pdf:15:purposes of this EIA, it has been assumed that the measures detailed in the outline remediation strategy
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_3. Description of the proposed scheme.pdf:16:proposed for the backing land (which have been subject to a separate planning application and EIA).
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_3. Description of the proposed scheme.pdf:19:During production of the recent Hartlepool approach channel EIA Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2019),
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:1:baseline. As such, these impacts are already taken into account in the EIA process for the proposed
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:12:volume. The EIAs for the schemes scoped into the CIA have made informed assumptions about the most
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:12:and deposition footprint has been identified from the EIA studies undertaken for each project and the CIA
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:12:A review of all EIA studies for the above projects highlights that the maximum increase in suspended
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:15:minutes earlier). The EIA studies undertaken for the Anglo American Harbour Facilities predicted that there
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:15:The EIA studies undertaken for the Anglo American Harbour Facilities showed that the harbour facility itself
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:15:The Anglo American Harbour Facilities EIA predicted that currents will be reduced within the deepened
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:17:where sediment plumes combine at peak concentration (as predicted by the EIA studies for each project)
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:17:In relation to sediment contamination, data collected to inform the EIAs indicates that concentrations are
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:17:Where the EIA reports larger contaminant concentrations, such as for Anglo American Harbour Facilities,
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:23:adjacent landside EIA development. In addition, once the larger area of habitat from the landside
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:23:Of relevance to the proposed scheme, ecology surveys for the adjacent landside EIA development recorded:
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:23:As a more sizable development, the landside EIA proposes a number of mitigation measures including off
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:23:worse than minor adverse in significance when considered cumulatively with the landside EIA.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:25:supporting habitat was considered a negligible impact in the EIAs for both the Anglo American Harbour
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:28:traffic flow were assessed as part the NGCT EIA (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020), Anglo American Harbour
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:30:Section 20 of this EIA report has confirmed that there would be no direct or indirect impact on flood risk and
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:31:natural resources has therefore not been undertaken within this EIA. It is therefore concluded that there is
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:1:This section of the EIA Report draws together information regarding the potential for the proposed scheme
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:2:European sites. This section of the EIA Report is intended to present all of the information necessary to
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:9:Section 12 of this EIA Report. Although the qualifying interest features of the Teesmouth and Cleveland
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:21:and Cleveland Coast SPA and Ramsar site. With reference to the relevant sections of the EIA Report where
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:21: • site-specific information obtained from surveys and studies undertaken as part of the EIA for the
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:21: • evidence provided within the EIA Report; and,
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:1:Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in support of a marine licence application to the Marine
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:1:EIA.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:1:Two separate EIAs are being undertaken in support of the port facility and the landside application, with
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:1: • ‘Marine’ EIA (to be undertaken by Royal HaskoningDHV and which is the subject of this note) –
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:1: the riverbank). The findings of the EIA will be reported in an Environmental Statement (ES) which
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:2: • ‘Landside’ EIA (being led by Lichfields – submitted as part of an outline planning application) – the
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:2: proposed quay (which is covered above under the ‘marine’ EIA). This comprises a number of
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:2:Opinions (which are publicly available online) with specific regard to the ‘marine’ EIA. Given the very close
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:2:is to reach agreement with the MMO and RCBC on the approach to the EIA without requesting Scoping
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:2:Opinions under the respective EIA regulations. A telephone meeting is therefore proposed to be held with
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:2: of the EIA for the proposed scheme in light of the preferred option for the berth length, alignment
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:2: • The key elements of the proposed approach to the ‘marine’ EIA for each environmental parameter
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:2:EIA/2019/00017) in response to a request for a Scoping Opinion for the previously proposed scheme. The
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:4:to the previously proposed scheme detailed that the EIA would address the following topic areas:
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:4:topic or the surveys or studies to be undertaken as part of the EIA.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:4:that need to be assessed within the EIA. Detail of relevance to the ‘marine’ EIA to be undertaken on behalf
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:4: RCBC with regard to the ‘marine’ EIA
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:4:RCBC confirmed in June 2019 that the list of topics and parameters proposed for the EIA to be undertaken
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:5:used to inform the proposed scope of environmental assessment for the ‘marine’ EIA for the current
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:5:applicable to the ‘marine’ EIA in isolation.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:8: RCBC confirmed that the proposed list of topics to be included in the EIA appears comprehensive and would provide sufficient scope for the
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:9: Any future EIA should be comprehensive, covering all appropriate and specific environmental/ecological areas given the adjacent land designations
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:11:EIA for the current scheme being progressed by STDC. The proposed scope is detailed below.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:11:inform other areas of the EIA (e.g. marine ecology, fisheries).
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:13:EIA, as well as information from publicly available studies previously undertaken for consented schemes
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:13:We understand that built heritage was scoped out of the landside EIA and therefore we propose to liaise
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:13:of the marine EIA.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:13:inform the EIA.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:14:A Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (LVIA) will be undertaken as part of the EIA. This will involve
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:14:A land quality desk study and Preliminary Risk Assessment (PRA) Report will inform the EIA chapter. No
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:14:The EIA will include consideration of potential effects associated with the generation of waste and how
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:15:A desk based socio-economic assessment will be undertaken as part of the EIA to understand the impacts
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:15:the programme of survey works undertaken to inform the EIA for the proposed Northern Gateway
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 3_Scoping consultation.pdf:2:We are in agreement with the topics/constraints to be scoped into the EIA document listed in page 4
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 3_Scoping consultation.pdf:2:Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for this development.
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 3_Scoping consultation.pdf:3:of the landside EIA, as well as information from publicly available studies previously undertaken for
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 3_Scoping consultation.pdf:3:We understand that built heritage was scoped out of the landside EIA and therefore we propose to
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 3_Scoping consultation.pdf:3:landside parts of the marine EIA.
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 3_Scoping consultation.pdf:3:This follows consultation on scoping of the EIA with the MMO.
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 3_Scoping consultation.pdf:6:assessment for the EIA (The South Bank Port Facility – Environmental Impact
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 3_Scoping consultation.pdf:7: environments and will require Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in support of
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 3_Scoping consultation.pdf:7: 2.1. An EIA scoping opinion was provided by the MMO for a scheme that was previously
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 3_Scoping consultation.pdf:7: Assessment) (EIA) Regulations 2007 as amended (reference EIA/2019/00017).
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 3_Scoping consultation.pdf:7: 2.2. The MMO notes that two separate EIA’s are proposed for the scheme: one covering
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 3_Scoping consultation.pdf:7: advise that both EIAs should consider the scheme as a whole ensuring that all
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 3_Scoping consultation.pdf:7: proposed EIAs should demonstrate that the whole scheme has been assessed.
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 3_Scoping consultation.pdf:7: are appropriate for the proposed EIA for the development.
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 3_Scoping consultation.pdf:8: EIA. However, should the applicant request it the MMO would be prepared to
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 3_Scoping consultation.pdf:8: EIA.
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 3_Scoping consultation.pdf:8: are appropriate for the proposed EIA for the development.
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 3_Scoping consultation.pdf:12:the process of undertaking an EIA to support applications and the information below relates to
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 3_Scoping consultation.pdf:12:the proposed scope of noise and vibration assessment as part of the EIA. We understand that
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_22. Climate change.pdf:1:This section of the EIA Report describes the existing environment in relation to climate change and details
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_22. Climate change.pdf:5:and requirements of, an assessment of GHG emissions within an EIA, as well as considerations for
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_22. Climate change.pdf:14:the construction of offshore wind farms, which would be subject to a separate planning application and EIA.
R-2020-0685-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:8:the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for this development.
R-2020-0685-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:8:Annex A – Advice related to EIA Scoping Requirements
R-2020-0685-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:9:actions on ecosystems or their components. EcIA may be carried out as part of the EIA
R-2020-0685-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:10:EIA process.
R-2020-0685-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:10:The EIA will need to consider any impacts upon local wildlife and geological sites. Local Sites
R-2020-0685-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:12:strategies pertaining to the area. The EIA should include assessments of visual effects on the
R-2020-0685-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:12:The EIA should include a full assessment of the potential impacts of the development on
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:1:Potential impacts on fish resources and fisheries activities that are assessed in this section of the EIA Report
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:2:Site-specific comments relevant to fish and fisheries that were received during the EIA scoping process are
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:2:detailed in Table 13.2. This table also signposts to the relevant section of this EIA Report where the
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:2: Response / section of the EIA
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:3: Response / section of the EIA
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:3:For this section of the EIA Report, the study area comprises the likely maximum extent over which potentially
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:3:This section of the EIA Report has been informed through a desk-based assessment. The desk-based
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:5:Dock turning circle, to inform the EIA undertaken for the consented Anglo American Harbour facilities (Royal
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:6:As outlined in the MMO Scoping Opinion EIA/2019/00017, key migratory fish species that have been
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:12:Consultation with the NEIFCA as part of other EIAs recently undertaken in the Tees estuary indicated that
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:17:A detailed underwater noise survey and modelling exercise was undertaken in 2014 to inform the EIA for
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:11:For the purposes of EIA, ‘major’ and ‘moderate’ impacts are generally deemed to be significant (in EIA
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:20:in EIA terms.
R-2020-0685-ESM-HIGHWAYS ENGLAND.pdf:6: for EIA (SYSTRA) (SYSTRA) (SYSTRA)
R-2020-0685-ESM-HIGHWAYS ENGLAND.pdf:10:An Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) has been produced (by Royal HaskoningDHV) in support of the
R-2020-0685-ESM-HIGHWAYS ENGLAND.pdf:10:same EIA has been used for both applications.
R-2020-0685-ESM-HIGHWAYS ENGLAND.pdf:11:4. Review of the EIA
R-2020-0685-ESM-HIGHWAYS ENGLAND.pdf:11:Chapter 15 of the EIA is concerned with the Traffic and Transport impacts of the development. A supporting
R-2020-0685-ESM-HIGHWAYS ENGLAND.pdf:11:attached as an appendix to the EIA.
R-2020-0685-ESM-HIGHWAYS ENGLAND.pdf:11:outline planning permission. The EIA and Transport Statement submitted for the two quay applications therefore
R-2020-0685-ESM-HIGHWAYS ENGLAND.pdf:11:the TS and EIA do not take into account these 50 vehicles movements per hour. However, it is anticipated that
R-2020-0685-ESM-HIGHWAYS ENGLAND.pdf:11:human receptors have been determined within the EIA, and found to be not significant and consequently, no
R-2019-0427-FFM-201920 Ecology report final.pdf:16:was until recently a mixture of young trees and Buddleia bushes on the sides of the embankment but
R-2021-0473-ESM-Officer Report 0473.pdf:1:supported by an EIA compliance Statement.
R-2021-0473-ESM-Officer Report 0473.pdf:4:that this subsequent EIA application does not change the conclusions of the
R-2021-0473-ESM-Officer Report 0473.pdf:4:Please note that the outline EIA for this proposal (R/2020/0357/OOM) was
R-2021-0473-ESM-Officer Report 0473.pdf:5: Site context history and EIA compliance
R-2021-0473-ESM-Officer Report 0473.pdf:5:Site Context, History and EIA Compliance
R-2021-0473-ESM-Officer Report 0473.pdf:5:The applicant in support of the application has prepared an EIA Compliance
R-2021-0473-ESM-EA R_2021_0473_ESM 8 July 2021 OFFICIAL.pdf:1:subsequent EIA application does not change the conclusions of the original Environment
R-2021-0473-ESM-EA R_2021_0473_ESM 8 July 2021 OFFICIAL.pdf:1:Please note that the outline EIA for this proposal (R/2020/0357/OOM) was approved
R-2021-0473-ESM-LM Wind ES Compliance Statement 26.05.21.pdf:3:4.0 EIA Screening of Reserved Matters Submission 8
R-2021-0473-ESM-LM Wind ES Compliance Statement 26.05.21.pdf:5: • EIA Compliance Statement, prepared by Lichfields (this document);
R-2021-0473-ESM-LM Wind ES Compliance Statement 26.05.21.pdf:12:4.0 EIA Screening of Reserved Matters
R-2021-0473-ESM-LM Wind ES Compliance Statement 26.05.21.pdf:12: Regulations 2018 (‘the 2017 EIA Regulations (as amended)’). The application comprises a
R-2021-0473-ESM-LM Wind ES Compliance Statement 26.05.21.pdf:12: the 2017 EIA Regulations (as amended) which relates to Infrastructure projects on a site
R-2021-0473-ESM-LM Wind ES Compliance Statement 26.05.21.pdf:12:4.4 To the extent to which it is relevant to the process of EIA, the ES (July 2020) and SES
R-2021-0473-ESM-LM Wind ES Compliance Statement 26.05.21.pdf:12: view that an EIA is not required to assist in its consideration of the Reserved Matters
R-2021-0473-ESM-63455 LM Wind RM Covering Letter.pdf:2:• EIA Compliance Statement, prepared by Lichfields;
R-2023-0300-DCO-CATS North Sea Limited - Letter re EIA Scoping Request.asd.dotx.pdf:1: Assessment) Regulations 2017 (The EIA Regulations) –Regulation 10
R-2023-0300-DCO-PINS Scoping Opinion R 2023 0300 DCO.pdf:1:Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the EIA Regulations) – Regulations 10 and 11
R-2023-0300-DCO-PINS Scoping Opinion R 2023 0300 DCO.pdf:2: EIA process and
R-2023-0300-DCO-H2TE - Statutory consultation letter.pdf:1:(Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the EIA Regulations)
R-2023-0300-DCO-H2TE - Statutory consultation letter.pdf:1:If you consider that you are not a consultation body as defined in the EIA Regulations
R-2023-0300-DCO-H2TE - Statutory consultation letter.pdf:2:10(11) of the EIA Regulations that you do not have any comments to make on the
R-2023-0300-DCO-H2TE - Statutory consultation letter.pdf:2:You should also be aware of your duty under Regulation 11(3) of the EIA Regulations,
R-2023-0300-DCO-H2TE - Statutory consultation letter.pdf:2:EIA Advisor
R-2023-0300-DCO-Redcar BC H2 Teesside DCO EN0700009 Project RC010.pdf:1: EIA Regulations) –Regulation 10 and 11 Application by H2
R-2023-0300-DCO-HIGHWAYS ENGLAND.pdf:2:a review of an Environmental Impact Assessment EIA Scoping document (dated April
R-2023-0300-DCO-HIGHWAYS ENGLAND.pdf:2:This JSJV Technical Memorandum TM comments on the suitability of the EIA
R-2023-0300-DCO-HIGHWAYS ENGLAND.pdf:3: (Source: EIA Scoping Submission Drawing – ‘Figure 1’)
R-2023-0300-DCO-NSIP(1).pdf:1:Subject: NSIP - R/2023/0300/DCO - EIA Consultation document - HSE Response
R-2023-0300-DCO-NSIP(1).pdf:1:Attachments: NSIP - EIA - H2 Teeside Project - HSE Response.pdf; eCon_Health and Safety
R-2023-0300-DCO-NSIP(1).pdf:1:Please see attached copy of HSEs response to the EIA Consultation document R/2023/0300/DCO.
R-2023-0300-DCO-NSIP(1).pdf:1:Subject: NSIP - R/2023/0300/DCO - EIA Consultation document
R-2023-0300-DCO-NSIP(1).pdf:2:relating to the above project. HSE does not comment on EIA Scoping Reports but the following information is likely
R-2021-0166-FFM-Officer Report 0166.pdf:9:been given to the following species with the EIA concluding the following;
R-2021-0166-FFM-Ecological Assessment.pdf:14:individual valued ecological receptors which would be considered significant in EIA terms or else of
R-2022-0494-FFM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:10:been given to the following species with the EIA concluding the following;
R-2022-0494-FFM-19293141_1.pdf:6:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2022-0494-FFM-19293141_1.pdf:7: Impact Assessment (EIA) for the outline planning application for one of the sites within the
R-2022-0205-SC-Screening Opinion Response.pdf:1:AND EIA
R-2022-0205-SC-Screening Opinion Response.pdf:1:Planning (EIA) Regulations 2017, but in the opinion of the Local Planning Authority,
R-2022-0205-SC-Screening Opinion Response.pdf:4:environment and/or the local population that an EIA is required.
R-2022-0205-SC-Screening Opinion Response.pdf:4:not be so great as to warrant the submission of an EIA.
R-2022-0205-SC-Screening Opinion Response.pdf:5:significant impacts with regard to flooding that would require the submission of an EIA.
R-2022-0205-SC-Screening Opinion Response.pdf:5:significant such that an EIA would be required.
R-2022-0205-SC-Screening Opinion Response.pdf:5:It is not considered that any change would be so significant to require an EIA.
R-2022-0205-SC-Screening Opinion Response.pdf:5:considered that the impacts will not be significant such that an EIA is not required.
R-2022-0205-SC-Screening Opinion Report.pdf:4:environment and/or the local population that an EIA is required.
R-2022-0205-SC-Screening Opinion Report.pdf:5:warrant the submission of an EIA.
R-2022-0205-SC-Screening Opinion Report.pdf:5:impacts with regard to flooding that would require the submission of an EIA.
R-2022-0205-SC-Screening Opinion Report.pdf:5:an EIA would be required.
R-2022-0205-SC-Screening Opinion Report.pdf:5:It is not considered that any change would be so significant to require an EIA.
R-2022-0205-SC-Screening Opinion Report.pdf:6:considered that the impacts will not be significant such that an EIA is not required.
R-2022-0205-SC-Screening Opinion Report.pdf:6:That an EIA is not required.
R-2022-0205-SC-Screening Opinion Report.pdf:6:Planning (EIA) Regulations 2017, but in the opinion of the Local Planning Authority, having
R-2022-0205-SC-Screening Opinion Report.pdf:9:environment and/or the local population that an EIA is required.
R-2022-0205-SC-Screening Opinion Report.pdf:9:warrant the submission of an EIA.
R-2022-0205-SC-Screening Opinion Report.pdf:9:impacts with regard to flooding that would require the submission of an EIA.
R-2022-0205-SC-Screening Opinion Report.pdf:9:an EIA would be required.
R-2022-0205-SC-Screening Opinion Report.pdf:10:It is not considered that any change would be so significant to require an EIA.
R-2022-0205-SC-Screening Opinion Report.pdf:10:considered that the impacts will not be significant such that an EIA is not required.
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:1: EIA Screening Request Report
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:3:purpose of providing an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Screening Request to Redcar and
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:3:Brans Sands should be considered to constitute EIA development.
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:3:The EIA Screening assessment has identified that significant effects on the environment are
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:3:considered unlikely and the effects that have been identified would not justify an EIA. It is
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:3:concluded that the Proposed Development should not be considered to constitute EIA
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:3:development as defined by the EIA and Marine Works EIA Regulations.
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:4:2. Review of EIA Screening Criteria 10
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:4:2.2 Overview of the EIA Screening Criteria 10
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:4:3. EIA Screening of the Development Characteristics 13
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:4:4. EIA Screening of Site Location and Site Sensitivity 21
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:5:5. Terrestrial EIA Screening of Impacts 31
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:5:6. Marine EIA Screening 41
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:6:7. Summary of EIA Screening Assessment 51
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:6: Table 3.1 Schedules included in the EIA Regulations and Marine Works EIA Regulations 10
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:7: (EIA) development, and therefore if an EIA is required to assess the potential for
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:7: and the Marine Management Organisation (MMO) to provide EIA Screening Opinions in
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:8: Regulations 2017 2 (the EIA Regulations) and the Marine Works (EIA) Regulations 2007
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:8: (the Marine Works EIA Regulations), as amended 3.
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:8: 1.3.2 In accordance with Regulation 6(2) of the EIA Regulations and Schedule 23 of the Marine
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:8: subject to an EIA (Section 7).
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:9: 1.6.2 Wood carries out EIAs to quality standards that comply with those identified by the
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:9: Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment (IEMA). Its EIA Quality Mark
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:9: commitments relating to EIA management, team capabilities, regulatory compliance, EIA
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:9: context and influence, EIA content, and improving EIA practice. Wood’s approach to
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:9: our EIA reports, interviewing staff and assessing case studies and presentations made by
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:10:2. Review of EIA Screening Criteria
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:10: 2.1.1 This Section presents an overview of the EIA screening criteria that are considered
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:10: the EIA Regulations and Schedule 2 of the Marine Works EIA Regulations for an EIA
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:10:2.2 Overview of the EIA Screening Criteria
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:10: development projects as set out in Schedules 1 and 2 of the EIA Regulations and
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:10: Schedules A1 and A2 of the Marine EIA Regulations, see Table 3.1 below.
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:10:Table 3.1 Schedules included in the EIA Regulations and Marine Works EIA Regulations
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:10: The EIA Regulations The Marine Works EIA Regulations
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:10: “Schedule 1 development” for which an EIA is required in Schedule A1 development’ for which an EIA is required in
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:10: “Schedule 2 development” for which an EIA is required ‘Schedule A2 development’ for which an EIA may be
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:10: 2.2.2 Schedule 1 and A1 list types of projects for which an EIA is mandatory. These are
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:10: and therefore an EIA is not considered to be a mandatory requirement.
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:10: 2.2.3 Schedule 2 and A2 list project descriptions for which an EIA may be required, if they
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:10: size or location. Criteria is provided within Schedule 2 and Schedule 3 of the EIA
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:10: Regulations and Schedule 1 of the Marine Works EIA Regulations to assist in the
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:10: consideration of significance. Schedule 2 contains thresholds, above which an EIA is
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:11: 2.2.4 Under the EIA Regulations and the Marine Works EIA Regulations, a development
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:11: described in Schedule 2 or A2 may be an EIA development if any part of it lies within, or
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:11: relevant threshold and criteria identified in the EIA Regulations for that category of
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:11: 2.2.8 In accordance with both the EIA and Marine (EIA) Works Regulations, Schedule 2/A2
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:13:3. EIA Screening of the Development
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:21:4. EIA Screening of Site Location and Site
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:21: 4.1.1 With regard to Schedule 3, paragraph 2 of the EIA Regulations and Schedule 23 of the
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:31:5. Terrestrial EIA Screening of Impacts
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:31: 5.1.1 This section specifically considers the EIA screening of impacts in relation to the
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:41:6. Marine EIA Screening
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:41: Development this report not only constitutes a formal request for EIA Screening Opinion
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:41: Marine Works (EIA) Regulations) have been deemed not to be applicable to the
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:49: 6.11.1 The Marine Works (EIA) Regulations require the cumulative effects of a project to be
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:49:27 https://www.iema.net/corporate-programmes/eia-quality-mark/impact-assessment-outlook-journal
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:50: 6.11.3 Based on this EIA Screening it is not considered likely that synergistic cumulative
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:51:7. Summary of EIA Screening Assessment
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:51: 7.1.1 This EIA Screening Assessment has considered whether the Proposed Development is
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:51: 7.1.2 The Proposed Development falls under Schedule 2 of the EIA Regulations and A2 of the
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:51: Marine Works (EIA) Regulations. While the Site is located in a sensitive area as defined
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:51: by the EIA and Marine Works Regulations the existing environment within the site and
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:51: 7.1.5 Accordingly, this EIA Screening assessment has identified that significant effects on the
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:51: justify an EIA. It is concluded that the Proposed Development should not be considered
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:51: to constitute EIA development as defined by the EIA and Marine Works EIA Regulations.
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:51: findings of this EIA screening exercise, detailing the methodology for the works to be
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:58: Bran Sands EIA Screening Report
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:109:A formal EIA Screening Opinion is sought from the MMO, via the submission of the Screening
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:109:EIA Development.
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:109:If the MMO agrees this does not require an EIA, it is anticipated that the Environmental Appraisal
R-2021-1048-FFM-Officer Report 1048.pdf:17:The application is supported by an Ecological Impact Assessment (EIA) and a
R-2021-1048-FFM-Officer Report 1048.pdf:18:been given to the following species with the EIA concluding the following;
R-2021-1048-FFM-Officer Report 1048.pdf:20:With regard to habitats across the site the EIA acknowledges that All habitats
R-2021-1048-FFM-63262_01 NZT Site Remediation Cover Letter - 30.11.21.PDF:6:our opinion that the application proposal is not one giving rise to a need for EIA as defined in the
R-2021-1048-FFM-63262_01 NZT Site Remediation Cover Letter - 30.11.21.PDF:6:The Regulations define “EIA development” as “development which is either (a) Schedule 1 development; or
R-2021-1048-FFM-63262_01 NZT Site Remediation Cover Letter - 30.11.21.PDF:6:environmental effects that may give rise to a need for EIA as an exception to the requirements of the
R-2021-1048-FFM-TW-SIZ-XX-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S1-P02-NZT_FRA.pdf:6:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2021-0878-ESM-61586_01 - LM Hardstading Cover Letter - 19.10.21.PDF:1:application for a scheme identified as falling within Paragraph 10 of Schedule 2 of the 2017 EIA Regulations
R-2021-0878-ESM-61586_01 - LM Hardstading Cover Letter - 19.10.21.PDF:2:To the extent to which it is relevant to the process of EIA, the ES (July 2020) and SES (September 2020)
R-2021-0878-ESM-61586_01 - LM Hardstading Cover Letter - 19.10.21.PDF:2:Council agrees with our view that an EIA is not required to assist in its consideration of the Reserved Matters
R-2020-0357-OOM-Consultee Response - MMO.pdf:2:With respect to projects that require a marine licence the EIA Directive (codified in Directive
R-2020-0357-OOM-Consultee Response - MMO.pdf:2:that require EIA, MMO must ensure that applications for a marine licence are compliant with the
R-2020-0357-OOM-Consultee Response - MMO.pdf:2:If this consultation request relates to a project capable of falling within either set of EIA
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:4: (EIA) and other regulatory, permitting and planning support across a range of commercial,
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:4:H1.6 Arcadis is a member of the IEMA EIA Quality Mark.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:12: greater is a significant impact for the purposes of this EIA.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:19: Arcadis and these are used to inform the baseline assessment to this EIA.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:29: 1 Earthworks: for the purpose of this EIA it is assumed that the construction stage of the
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:29: adverse significance (considered ‘significant’ in EIA terms) if mitigation actions are not carried
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:30:H5.10 The assessment of significance undertaken within this EIA supports the remedial strategy with
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:31: in terms of this EIA assessment.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:31: be of minor adverse significance which is not considered ‘significant’ in terms of this EIA
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:32: this EIA assessment.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:32: to be of moderate significance which is considered ‘significant’ in terms of this EIA
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:33: been considered within this EIA, albeit it is anticipated that these will be removed subject to
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:39: considered significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:39: significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:39: significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:39: considered significant in EIA term.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:39: negligible significance. This is not considered significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:39: significance. This is not considered significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:3: judgement of those undertaking the Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) as well as topic
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:5:N2.2 This approach accords with EIA legislation and best practice which focuses on the main or
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:9: reference is made to Minor or Moderate ‘insignificant’ residual effects where relevant. The EIA
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:10: in EIA terms;
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:10: 3 There are only two receptors subject to significant impacts in EIA terms and these are the
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:10: significant impacts in EIA terms during the operational phase. These are Viewpoint 1
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:11:N4.8 Various schemes have been identified for potential consideration in this EIA. These have been
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:11: information is provided and a brief review of its potential relevance to this EIA with regard to
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:23: there are considered to be no cumulative impacts and this is therefore not significant in EIA
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:24: undertaking this EIA relate to:
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:26: 3 EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:3: (‘EIA’) Regulations 2017 (as amended) requires an ES to provide:
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:3:O1.4 In accordance with Regulation 26(3) of the 2017 EIA Regulations (as amended), the PPG further
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:4: chapters of the ES, including those measures ‘embedded’ into the design as part of the EIA
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:4:O2.2 As set out in Chapter B of this ES, the iterative process of EIA has resulted in the incorporation
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:4: 1 Maximum Development Height: for the purpose of this EIA, the maximum
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:4: 3 Earthworks: the EIA is based on the assumption that the site will be cut and fill neutral.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:4: It is also assumed for the purpose of this EIA that all hazardous site-won materials resulting
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:16: required mitigation measure identified within the EIA.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:18:O4.1 This ES sets out the findings of an EIA of the proposed development at part of the South
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:19: 6 EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:4: scale Environmental Impact Assessments (EIA).
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:20: significant effect and a ‘negligible’ or ‘slight’ impact will not result in a significant effect in EIA
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:27: of this EIA that any material resulting from demolition will either not be taken off site, or it will
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:27: assumptions have been made using best practice, in conjunction with input from the EIA
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:32: predicted to result in a negligible impact and not significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:32: significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:33: is predicted to result in a negligible impact and not significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:33: significant in EIA terms
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:33: is predicted to result in a negligible impact and not significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:33: in EIA terms
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:37: proposed development in EIA terms.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:37: uses and no changes to the data provided for this assessment in EIA terms.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:40: 15 EIA: Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:3: member of the IEMA EIA Quality Mark.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:4: Susan Wagstaff - experience in EIA with regard to the water Lead Hydrogeology
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:4: environment and hydrogeology since 2000 on a variety of EIA Reviewer
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:4: developments, also an external reviewer of EIAs
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:4: Flood Risk Management, EIA and River Restoration.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:15: included in the Ground Conditions and Remediation chapter for the EIA.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:17:G3.5 The methodology for the assessment of potential impacts follows the generic EIA methodology
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:20:G3.7 In terms of the EIA Regulations, it is only those impacts that are likely to have significant
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:20: positive and/or negative environmental effects that require detailed assessment. As the EIA
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:20: equivalent to significant effects when discussed in terms of the EIA Regulations. Those levels of
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:20: effect which are shaded in Table G3.4 equate to those considered significant under the EIA
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:21: Shaded Cell = Significant in terms of EIA Regulations.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:21: Unshaded cell = Not significant in terms of EIA Regulations.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:21: considered to be minor or less, these are generally not deemed significant in terms of the EIA
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:21: potentially minor effects could be judged as significant in terms of the EIA Regulations, and
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:24: who are undertaking the EIA for marine works and the separate planning application
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:56: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - July 2020.pdf:3: have formed the basis of this Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’), and considers the
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - July 2020.pdf:3: years experience in co-ordinating EIAs for a range of major development projects across the UK.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - July 2020.pdf:13: summarising the sensitive receptors for the EIA.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - July 2020.pdf:18: relevant to this EIA.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - July 2020.pdf:19: This permission is of relevance to this EIA insofar as it grants permission for the storage of soil
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - July 2020.pdf:19: account in this EIA. Further information on earthworks are included within the following
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - July 2020.pdf:19: structures on site has been taken into account in this EIA. This is explained in further detail
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - July 2020.pdf:20: be known. The EIA is therefore supported by a Parameters Plan which is submitted for approval
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - July 2020.pdf:20: purpose of this EIA, it is however assumed that there will be no opportunities for deliveries via
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - July 2020.pdf:21: As explained within previous sections of the ES, the EIA has assessed the requirement to
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - July 2020.pdf:21: For the purpose of this EIA, the maximum development height at the site will be 46m within all
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - July 2020.pdf:21: For the purpose of this EIA, the minimum finished floor level (‘FFL’) will be 5.79m AOD. This
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - July 2020.pdf:21: The EIA is based on the assumption that the site will be cut and fill neutral.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - July 2020.pdf:22: basis on which the EIA has been undertaken.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - July 2020.pdf:24: EIA.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - July 2020.pdf:24: arrangements for the site. For the purpose of assessment within this EIA it will be assumed that
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - July 2020.pdf:24:1.4 For the purpose of this EIA it is assumed that the development life will be a minimum of 50
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - July 2020.pdf:24: purpose of this EIA it is assumed that there will be one main construction compound near to the
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - July 2020.pdf:25: its location and function. For this reason, the EIA is based on the above compound details. If the
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - July 2020.pdf:25: As explained in section B.4 of this chapter, for the purpose of this EIA it is assumed that all
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - July 2020.pdf:25: EIA it is anticipated that the level of demolition material will be greater than 50,000m3. Once
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - July 2020.pdf:26: For the purpose of this EIA, it is assumed that piling will be used for the construction of the
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - July 2020.pdf:35: an EIA suggests that it is good practice to consider the evolution of the site in the absence of the
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - July 2020.pdf:36: In undertaking the EIA, the technical team has worked closely with STDC and relevant statutory
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - July 2020.pdf:37: 4 Earthworks: for the purposes of this EIA, the earthworks are proposed to be cut and fill
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - July 2020.pdf:37: ES. The EIA has been based on the final scheme design as shown on the accompanying
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - July 2020.pdf:38: 9 EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix C - July 2020.pdf:105: Scope of the EIA Not acceptable It may be necessary for the CTMP to
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf:10:M3.8 This section sets out the method used in the EIA for assessing the potential significance of
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf:11:M3.12 Those impacts assessed as Moderate Adverse or above are considered significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf:18: Moderate - Substantial Adverse and therefore significant in EIA terms. This conclusion is based
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf:20: impacts in EIA terms following mitigation.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf:21: Adverse. This is not significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0357-OOM-EA R_2020_0357_OOM 29 October 2020 OFFICIAL.pdf:2:The EIA proposal has not included a WFD assessment. Several non-main watercourses
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix L - July 2020.pdf:38:produce the EIA landscape chapter and LVIA. Having conducted initial site visits, we have proposed
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix L - July 2020.pdf:38:technical lead for the EIA should contact the relevant officer at RCBC and seek they opinion on the
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 5).PDF:3:Subject: STDC - EIA addendum for air quality 35
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:3: out the findings of an Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) that is being submitted to
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:3: developments, EIA is required where significant environmental effects are likely. It has been
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:3: agreed with RCBC that the proposed development is EIA development and the findings of the
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:3: EIA are set out within an Environmental Statement (‘ES’).
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:3: 3 Sections 4.0 to 14.0: provide a topic by topic review of the findings of the EIA;
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:3: The EIA Process
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:3:1.5 The EIA process aims to ensure that any significant effects arising from a development are
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:3:1.6 For this development, EIA has been carried out to consider the likely significant effects that may
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:4: top assessments, surveys and fieldwork information available to the EIA team. All those matters
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:4: Highways England (‘HE’) has informed the scope of the EIA, the process in relation to the
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:4: methods by which the EIA has been carried out, as a means to seek environmental data, to
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:4:1.10 The EIA has had regard to planning and environmental policy and legislation at a national and
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:4:1.11 The EIA has been undertaken during the Covid-19 pandemic and where this is relevant to
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:5: and from the development site by ship. This application will also be supported by an EIA.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:7: demolition has been included within this EIA assessment and is considered as part of the
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:8: response to end user requirement specifications. The EIA is supported by a Parameters Plan
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:8:3.5 For the purpose of this EIA, the maximum development height at the site will be 46m AOD
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:9:3.8 The EIA is based on the assumption that the site will be cut and fill neutral.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:9: on which the EIA has been undertaken.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:10: arrangements for the site. For the purpose of assessment within this EIA it is assumed that these
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:10:3.21 The EIA Regulations require consideration to be given to alternatives to the scheme that may
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:12:4.11 None of the residual effects of the development are considered to be significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:13: brown hare. These impacts are considered significant in EIA terms. There are expected to be
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:16:9.1 An assessment of ground conditions has been undertaken by Atkins as part of this EIA. It
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:21: EIA.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:22:16.1 The EIA process has identified the need for the preparation and agreement of a number of
R-2020-0357-OOM-Transport Assessment.pdf:62:Statement (ES). The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) will be carried out
R-2020-0357-OOM-Transport Assessment.pdf:62:in accordance with the EIA Regulations and guidance contained in relevant
R-2020-0357-OOM-Transport Assessment.pdf:63: The scope of the EIA assessment; and
R-2020-0357-OOM-Transport Assessment.pdf:103: Scope of the EIA Not acceptable It may be necessary for the CTMP to
R-2020-0357-OOM-Transport Assessment.pdf:111: the EIA necessary for the CTMP to be
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - July 2020.pdf:4: Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Regulations 1. The following summarises relevant
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - July 2020.pdf:5: reported as likely significant effects in EIA terms. The EIA process requires that likely
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - July 2020.pdf:9: consistent with the EIA Regulations.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - July 2020.pdf:11: effects in the EIA following the consideration of the other significance criteria set out in this
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - July 2020.pdf:20:E5.11 It follows that there would be no adverse impacts from construction noise, in policy and EIA
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - July 2020.pdf:20: in policy and EIA terms.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - July 2020.pdf:22: noise and therefore is assessed as not significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:13:the timelines that we are currently working to for planning submission. With the EIA
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:20:My colleagues and I are working on an EIA for the South Tees Development Corporation’s
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:21:application and EIA for the land-based development. The landside development will include
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:21:below for the EIA chapter and we would like to address any queries that you may have.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:4: Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) submitted to Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council (‘RCBC’) to
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:4: developments, EIA is required where significant environmental effects are likely. Through an
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:4: proposed development is EIA development.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:4: 3 Sections 4.0 to 14.0: provide a topic by topic review of the findings of the EIA;
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:4: The EIA Process
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:4: Impact Assessment (EIA) of the proposed development. The EIA process aims to ensure that
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:4:1.7 For this development, EIA has been carried out to consider the likely significant effects that may
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:5: top assessments, surveys and fieldwork information available to the EIA team. All those matters
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:5: Environment Agency (‘EA’) and Highways England (‘HE’)) has informed the scope of the EIA,
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:5: the process in relation to the methods by which the EIA has been carried out, as a means to seek
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:5:1.11 The EIA has had regard to planning and environmental policy and legislation at a national and
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:5:1.12 The EIA has been undertaken during the Covid-19 pandemic and where this is relevant to
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:6: and from the development site by ship. This application will also be supported by an EIA.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:9: demolition has been included within this EIA assessment and is considered as part of the
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:10: response to end user requirement specifications. The EIA is supported by a Parameters Plan
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:11:3.5 For the purpose of this EIA, the maximum development height at the site will be 46m AOD
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:11:3.8 The EIA is based on the assumption that the site will be cut and fill neutral.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:12: on which the EIA has been undertaken.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:12: arrangements for the site. For the purpose of assessment within this EIA it is assumed that these
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:13:3.22 The EIA Regulations require consideration to be given to alternatives to the scheme that may
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:14:4.11 None of the residual effects of the development are considered to be significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:15: wetland habits and brown hare. These impacts are considered significant in EIA terms. There
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:19:9.1 An assessment of ground conditions has been undertaken by Atkins as part of this EIA. It
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:23: inform this EIA.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:24:16.1 The EIA process has identified the need for the preparation and agreement of a number of
R-2020-0357-OOM-Archaeological Advice - Business Park and Warehousing Tees Dock RD R-2020-0357-OOM.pdf:1:1. The application is supported by an EIA whose cultural heritage chapter appears at chapter M of
R-2020-0357-OOM-Archaeological Advice - Business Park and Warehousing Tees Dock RD R-2020-0357-OOM.pdf:1:3. Chapter H of the EIA ‘Ground Conditions and Remediation’ notes that the made-up ground on the
R-2020-0357-OOM-Archaeological Advice - Business Park and Warehousing Tees Dock RD R-2020-0357-OOM.pdf:2:effects that would be Moderate - Substantial Adverse and therefore significant in EIA terms”
R-2020-0357-OOM-Archaeological Advice - Business Park and Warehousing Tees Dock RD R-2020-0357-OOM.pdf:3:8. (a) We agree with the assessment in chapter M of the EIA that it is unlikely that any remains to be
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf:3: the EIA Quality Mark with the Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf:3:J1.7 Additionally, our Lead EIA coordinators are experienced EIA practitioners with depth of
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf:3: experience in EIA and hold Chartership status such as Chartered Environmentalist, Chartered
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf:19:J5.12 As the EIA assumption is that the site will be cut and fill neutral, there will be no surplus
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf:20: purpose of this EIA it has been assumed that waste will be generated in equal quantities across
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf:21: construction works and this further strengthens the conclusion of no significant impact in EIA
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - July 2020.pdf:13: in EIA terms.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - July 2020.pdf:24: beneficial. This is considered significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - July 2020.pdf:25: This is considered significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - July 2020.pdf:27: considered significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - July 2020.pdf:28: substantial beneficial effect. This is considered significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf:8:C3.1 The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) has been carried out in accordance with the EIA
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf:23: undertaken as part of the EIA for this development has been undertaken based on a worst-case
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf:24: C7.1. In EIA terms, it is not expected that any residual effects will be significant.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf:28:C8.8 In EIA terms, it is not expected that any residual effects will be significant.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf:29: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix G - July 2020.pdf:3:Subject: RE: NWG Strategies - 2020s0709: South Tees - SIZ1 EIA Consultation
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix G - July 2020.pdf:3:Subject: FW: 2020s0709: South Tees - SIZ1 EIA Consultation
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix G - July 2020.pdf:3:undertake a high level assessment for water management for an EIA chapter for one of the sites (SIZ1) within the
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix G - July 2020.pdf:4:Subject: 2020s0709: South Tees EIA Consultation
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix G - July 2020.pdf:4:We are writing to consult with Northumbrian Water regarding the proposal for the South Bank EIA. Lichfields have
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix G - July 2020.pdf:6:Subject: RE: 2020s0709: South Tees EIA Consultation
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix G - July 2020.pdf:6:Subject: 2020s0709: South Tees EIA Consultation
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix G - July 2020.pdf:6:EIA. Lichfields have asked in one of their briefing notes that the chapter authors liaise with the various bodies:
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix G - July 2020.pdf:9:Subject: FW: 2020s0709 South Tees EIA Consultation
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix G - July 2020.pdf:9:Subject: RE: 2020s0709 South Tees EIA Consultation
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix G - July 2020.pdf:10:Subject: FW: 2020s0709 South Tees EIA Consultation
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix G - July 2020.pdf:10:Subject: 2020s0709 South Tees EIA Consultation
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix G - July 2020.pdf:10:We are writing to consult with the Environment Agency regarding the proposals for the South Bank EIA/wider STDC
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix G - July 2020.pdf:14: A draft environmental statement where required by EIA Regulations (please note
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix G - July 2020.pdf:27:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix G - July 2020.pdf:28: Assessment (EIA) for the outline planning application for one of the sites within the STDC
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix D - July 2020.pdf:27: iv. The percentage cover of non-native, invasive plant species. (Note: except buddleia
R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf:3: the need for Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’). Whilst a formal screening request was
R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf:3: permission. The development is therefore an EIA development, as confirmed under Regulation
R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf:4: development site by ship. It will be subject to its own EIA and will consider this outline
R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf:4: discuss and agree the extent of each EIA.
R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf:11:2.36 RCBC issued an Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) Scoping Opinion (reference.
R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf:13:3.11 The EIA has been progressed on the basis that all existing structures on the site will be
R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf:13:3.12 For the purpose of the EIA, the maximum development height at the site will be 46m within all
R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf:13:3.13 For the purpose of this EIA, the minimum finished floor level (‘FFL’) will be 5.79m AOD. This
R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf:13:3.16 The EIA is based on the assumption that the site will be cut and fill neutral.
R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf:28:4.42 This has been validated by the conclusion drawn from the EIA process undertaken for the
R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf:29:5.5 EIA is required for developments, which on the grounds of their nature, scale and location are
R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf:29: likely to give rise to significant environmental effects. The purpose of an EIA is to ensure that
R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf:29:5.6 For planning applications, EIA is governed by the Town and Country Planning (Environmental
R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf:29: Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the EIA Regulations) as updated by The Town and
R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf:30:5.8 In undertaking the EIA for the current application the technical team has worked closely with
R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf:30: EIA relate to ecology, however these should be considered within the context of STDC’S
R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf:45:5.103 Overall the socio-economic assessment undertaken by Lichfields as part of the EIA
R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf:53:7.2 The EIA and other assessments undertaken to accompany this planning application have
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:2:A2.0 EIA Regulations 4
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:2:A3.0 Scope of the EIA 6
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:2: Compliance with the EIA Regulations 21
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:2:A7.0 EIA Processes, Assumptions and Difficulties 27
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:3: Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) of proposals for a general industry and storage or distribution
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:3: application and the legislative context and the approach to, and scope of, the EIA.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:4: parts of the development site subject to this outline planning application and EIA.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:4: market demand. It will be subject to its own EIA and will consider this outline application as a
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:4: the extent of each EIA.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:6:A2.0 EIA Regulations
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:6:A2.1 EIA is a process undertaken in respect of a certain type of development prior to the grant of
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:6:A2.2 The need for EIA is currently derived from the EU Directive No 2014/52/EU (Ref 3) on the
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:6: will cease to have effect on 31 December 2020. This EIA has been carried out in accordance with
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:6: (EU Exit) Regulations 2018 (Ref 7) came into force. This does not change how the 2017 EIA
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:6: Part 10(a) (Infrastructure Projects) of Schedule 2 of the 2017 EIA Regulations (as amended).
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:6: exceeding 0.5ha. For Schedule 2 developments, the Regulations require that an EIA be
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:6:A2.7 In light of these selection criteria, EIA will be required for Schedule 2 development in three
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:6: the need for EIA.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:7: planning permission. The development is therefore an EIA development, as confirmed under
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:7:A2.10 The EIA considers the potential for significant effects arising during the construction and
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:7: operational phases of the proposed development. For the purpose of this EIA the construction
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:8:A3.0 Scope of the EIA
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:8: opinion on the scope of the EIA (the ‘scoping opinion’). This is a voluntary process and is not a
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:8: consultees and key stakeholders were taken into account in both scoping the EIA and in carrying
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:8: which took place between the EIA team and stakeholders and correspondence, where available,
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:9: assessment in this EIA. In
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:12: assessed within this EIA.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:12: have been picked up in the EIA.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:13:A3.7 In consultation with RCBC, the topics that the project team have scoped out of the EIA are set
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:13: undertaken as part of this EIA process and this considered climate variables such as
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:14: disasters, in accordance with Schedule 4, Part 8 of the 2017 EIA Regulations (as amended).
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:18:A4.1 The applicant has assembled an experienced and competent team to undertake the EIA of the
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:18: Table A4.1 The EIA team
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:18: of the co-ordination of the EIA, and within Chapters C to M under the heading ‘About the
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:18: carrying out the EIA).
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:18: EIA Co-ordination
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:18: Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment (“IEMA”) EIA ‘Quality Mark’. Further
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:18: with IEMA guidelines and the EIA Regulations. Both are also accredited members of the Royal
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:19: Figure A4.1 IEMA EIA Quality Mark Statement
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:20:A5.1 The findings of the EIA are set out in this ES which comprise three volumes: -
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:20: place with the local community, consultees, and stakeholders in relation to the EIA is also
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:20: construction and operational phases of the development. For the purpose of this EIA the
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:23: Compliance with the EIA Regulations
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:23: comprises an ES. The EIA has been prepared with reference to best practise including that
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:26: proposed development remains materially the same as the of how the EIA has been scoped
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:26: of the EIA process.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:27:A6.1 The EIA has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the 2017 Regulations (as
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:27: criteria adopted for the EIA (see below);
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:27: of EIA significance criteria, comprising: -
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:29:A7.0 EIA Processes, Assumptions and
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:29:A7.1 The EIA considers the likely significant environmental effects of the proposed development
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:29: assessment survey and fieldwork and information available to the EIA team. Regard is given to
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:29:A7.2 The EIA has been completed with reference to best practice and relevant legislation and has
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:29: site and for consultation and assessment of the likely significant impacts by the EIA team.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:29: sought incorporates inputs from the EIA process that are necessary or appropriate to avoid or
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:29:A7.5 The EIA process has been informed by a series of maximum development parameters and
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:29: significance on the environment is established within the EIA (Rochdale Envelope compliant). If
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:29: data or assumptions in carrying out the EIA. This has included information made available
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:30: (Mitigation, Monitoring and Compensation) establishes a series of outcomes from the EIA
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:30: alignment with conclusions of this ES. For the purpose of this EIA, these measures have
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:30: relied as the basis of EIA;
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:31:A8.2 The Coronavirus Regulations amend Regulation 23 of the 2017 EIA Regulations (as amended),
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:32: 2 EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:2:one which it was agreed fell under Schedule 1 of the EIA Regulations and it is
R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:8:The EIA proposal has not included a WFD assessment. Several non-main
R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:26:8. (a) We agree with the assessment in chapter M of the EIA that it is unlikely
R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:37:the EIA process. The ES sets out the revisions to the regulations in terms of
R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:37:competency and the assessment of EIA documents.
R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:38: EIA
R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:39:The EIA process has been informed by a series of maximum development
R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:39:‘worst case’ on significance on the environment is established within the EIA
R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:39: reasonably available data or assumptions in carrying out the EIA.
R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:40:warehouses and the development cannot be known. The EIA has therefore
R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:41:For the purpose of this EIA, the maximum development height at the site will
R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:46:introduced as part of the strategy have been considered. In EIA terms, it is
R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:58:construction noise, in policy and EIA terms the construction noise exposure
R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:58:below the SOAEL threshold therefore not significant in policy and EIA terms.
R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:59:and therefore is assessed as not significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:64:neutral. It is also assumed for the purpose of this EIA that any material
R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:64:have been made using best practice, in conjunction with input from the EIA
R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:66:associated with the construction of the proposed development in EIA terms.
R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:66:provided for this assessment in EIA terms.
R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:74:1 Earthworks: for the purpose of this EIA it is assumed that the construction
R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:74:adverse significance (considered ‘significant’ in EIA terms) if mitigation actions
R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:74:The ES concludes the assessment of significance undertaken within this EIA
R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:75:adverse significance which is not considered ‘significant’ in terms of this EIA
R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:75:adverse significance which is not considered ‘significant’ in terms of this EIA
R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:75:moderate significance which is considered ‘significant’ in terms of this EIA
R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:76: considered within this EIA, albeit it is anticipated that these will be
R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:77:EIA terms.
R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:77:negligible significance. This is not considered significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:77:negligible significance. This is not considered significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:77:significant in EIA term.
R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:77:considered significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:78:significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:98:7 and 8 are considered to be negligible and not significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:98:significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:100:sets out that Built Heritage has been scoped out of the EIA, therefore the
R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:101:Adverse and therefore significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:102:EIA terms.
R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:103:We agree with the assessment in chapter M of the EIA that it is unlikely that
R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:105:therefore not significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:106:the time of undertaking this EIA relate to:
R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:108:measure identified within the EIA.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:3: over 15 years’ experience as a town planner for major development with a specialism in EIA.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:6: can be carried out either as a standalone assessment or as part of a broader EIA. The GLVIA3
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:6: specific procedures in EIA with which an LVIA must comply.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:6:L3.5 This report has been prepared as part of a broader EIA and addresses matters of individual
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:6:L3.6 The key purpose of EIA directives and legislation are to ensure that likely significant effects on
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:6: inform the EIA and decision-making process, but also to identify lesser effects, to help provide a
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:8: EIA and LVIA
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:8:L3.12 EIA Regulations specify than an assessment of likely significant effects should cover certain
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:8: Table L3.1 Relationship between EIA Regulations and LVIA processes
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:8: Relationship between EIA Regulations and LVIA Process
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:8: EIA Aspects Interpretation of EIA Aspects Within LVIA Process/Reporting
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:21: EIA terms. Those classified as minor or negligible are likely to be not significant in EIA terms
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:45:L5.2 EIA is an iterative process which informs the development of the project design. Where the
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:61: significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:61: considered significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - July 2020.pdf:3: Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Regulations (as amended) Ref 2 he has led on the
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - July 2020.pdf:4: Regulations 2017 (EIA Regulations)
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - July 2020.pdf:4:K2.2 At the European level, the EIA Directive 2011/92/EU Ref 3 places a requirement upon projects
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - July 2020.pdf:4: Ref 3, identifies the important role that the Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) process
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - July 2020.pdf:4: can play in assessing climate change impacts. It states that EIAs shall identify, describe and
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - July 2020.pdf:4: 2017 EIA Regulations (as amended), under Part 1 Regulation 5(2)© state that EIAs shall
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - July 2020.pdf:24: 8 EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:4: The EIA Team 5
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:4: EIA, Significance, Methodology, Processes and Difficulties 5
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:8: 25 of the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’)) Regulations
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:8: 2017 and the Town and Country Planning and Infrastructure Planning (EIA) Regulations which
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:8: came into force on 01 October 2018 (hereafter referred to as ‘the EIA Regulations’). The Town
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:8: Regulation 17 provides an update to Regulation 25 of the EIA Regulations.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:8: methodologies and the availability of the document and updates, were relevant to the EIA
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:8: information to inform the EIA;
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:9: development zones, maximum building parameters and access. The EIA has been undertaken
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:9: O (Mitigation, Monitoring and Compensation) of the ES (July 2020). The applicant and the EIA
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:9: separate to the EIA process as it responds to matters that are not of relevance to the EIA.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:9:1.13 The findings of the EIA were set out in the ES (July 2020) which comprised three volumes:
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:9:1.14 The scope of the EIA covered the following matters:
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:12: The EIA Team
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:12: EIA Co-ordination
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:12: Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment (‘IEMA’) EIA ‘Quality Mark’.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:12: member of IEMA with over 12 years’ experience in project managing EIA projects, has reviewed
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:12: the submission in accordance with IEMA guidelines and the EIA Regulations. Both are also
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:12:1.30 Regulation 18(5) (a) of the EIA Regulations requires the developer to ensure the ES is prepared
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:12: (5) (a) of the EIA Regulations.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:12: EIA, Significance, Methodology, Processes and Difficulties
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:12: of EIA significance criteria, comprising: -
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:13:1.36 Given the current COVID 19 pandemic, in accordance with the ‘EIA Regulations 2017 (as
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:14:2.9 To the extent that it is relevant to the process of EIA, the ES (July 2020) includes a brief
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:15: environmental information of relevance to the EIA.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:15: under Regulation 25 of the EIA Regulations and the submission of this SES has been done on a
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:20: consultee comments, where necessary and relevant to the EIA. It identifies any new or altered
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:23: therefore significant in EIA terms) effect on driver delay at seven junctions within the
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:24: should be read alongside Table C7.1 of the July 2020 ES. In EIA terms, it is not expected that
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:27:3.32 In EIA terms, it is not expected that any residual effects will be significant. This is consistent
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:28: consultee comments, where necessary and relevant to the EIA. It identifies any new or altered
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:51: the EIA. It identifies any new or altered significant effects that could arise as a result of the
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:51: scale Environmental Impact Assessments (EIA).
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:64: in EIA terms.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:64: considered to be significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:64: is predicted to result in a negligible impact and not considered to be significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:64: considered to be significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:65: is predicted to result in a negligible impact and not considered to be significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:65: to be significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:65: air quality is predicted to be not significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:66: this assessment in EIA terms.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:67: necessary and relevant to the EIA. It identifies any new or altered significant effects which could
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:71: Adverse. This is not significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:75: be undertaken as part of this EIA process or submitted at Reserved Matters stage once further
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:75: scheme detailed are known. Assessments undertaken as part of the EIA process and therefore
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:78: 25 EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0357-OOM-ApplicationFormRedacted.pdf:7:Assistance provided with informal EIA Scoping request.
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:5:1.2.1 Planning and EIA approach 1
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:5:5.1.1 The EIA Process 30
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:10:Figure 5-1: The EIA Process 30
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:12:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:14: the Scheme. It also documents the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:14:1.2.1 Planning and EIA approach
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:14: process of an EIA.
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:14: The Scheme has been submitted under the new EIA regulations. The purpose of the
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:14: 2017 EIA Regulations has been to transport the 2014 amended Environmental Impact
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:14: Assessment Directive into UK Law. The 2017 EIA Regulations set out more stringent
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:14: EIA development and increases the scope and subject matter for ES.
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:14: The new EIA Regulations also bring about:
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:14: • A requirement that competent experts undertake EIA.
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:14: The new EIA Regulations place a requirement to ensure the completeness and quality
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:15: stages of EIA
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:16: An EIA is an interpretive process that identifies, predicts and evaluates the likely
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:16: construction methods of proposed works. The EIA consultation process is covered in
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:19: proposal, which would fall under Schedule 1 Category 10 of the EIA regulations, as
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:26: Part II of Sch.4 of the EIA Regulations 2017 requires the Environmental Statement
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:38: (Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and Environmental Management), Della
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:38: agreed that the proposals would form EIA Schedule 1 Development. The supporting
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:38: Consultation responses obtained from the EIA Scoping Response from key stakeholders
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:38: that the scheme is a Schedule 1, category 10 development under the EIA regulations.
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:38: December. The following topic areas were formerly scoped into the EIA. Full details of
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:39: be carried out as part of the EIA process or to support other forms of
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:43:5.1.1 The EIA Process
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:43: consenting requirements. Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is widely recognised
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:43: However, it is also becoming increasingly recognised that EIA needs to be more effective
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:43: and more proportionate to deliver these benefits as (IEMA Proportionate EIA Strategy,
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:43: EIA process in order to enable the iteration of design development and reporting in the
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:43: Figure 5-1: The EIA Process
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:47: significant within the terms of EIA regulations; therefore, any potential impacts of
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:47: EIA is a sequential process, and this concept is reflected in the mitigation process.
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:59: comprising largely of Sea Buckthorn Hippophae rhamnoides as well as Buddleia, Birch
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:59: some Rowan Sorbus aucuparia and Willow Salix spp. Buddleia bushes were also present
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:60: The widespread coverage of Buddleia on site would also provide foraging habitat for
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:64: such as Sea Buckthorn, Buddleia, Birch and Willow make up the scrub habitat on site.
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:67: Scrub. Scrub species such as Sea Buckthorn, Buddleia, Birch Betula sp. and Willow sp.
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:89: EIA should include assessments of visual effects on the surrounding area
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:89: as changes in topography. The EIA should include a full assessment of the
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:90: Rights of Way, Access land, Coastal access and National Trails The EIA
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:95: resource of the area. It does not form part of an Environment Impact Assessment (EIA).
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:121: EIA Methodology is summarised in Chapter 5. The methodology for the hydrology
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:121: assessment of potential impacts follows the generic EIA methodology guided by IEMA
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:124: In terms of the EIA Regulations, it is only those impacts that are likely to have significant
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:124: the EIA Regulations guide the assessor to focus on effects that are likely to be
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:124: considered to be equivalent to significant effects when discussed in terms of the EIA
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:125: Shaded Cell = Significant in terms of EIA Regulations.
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:125: Unshaded cell = Not significant in terms of EIA Regulations.
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:128: standard regulatory guidelines. accordance with EIA
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:137: result in a large level of effect, which would be deemed to be significant in EIA terms.
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:138: significant in EIA terms.
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:148: Quality. Water resources was scoped into EIA, particularly the flood risk and drainage
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:188: Way forms part of The EIA Scoping Response from R&CBC (R&CBC, 2019) and states
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:193: The EIA Scoping Response (R&CBC, 2019) response from the Cleveland Police CPO/ALO
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:212: Assessment (EIA).
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:216: although the impacts are only likely to be significant in EIA terms when the traffic on
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:219: context of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Regulations. In line with Part 7
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:235: amended EIA Directive (Council Directive 97/11/EC, amending Directive 85/337/EEC),
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:235: Schedule 3 paragraph 1(b) of the EIA Regulations, which refers to the selection criteria
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:235: existing and/or approved development’ to be taken into account. The EIA Regulations
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:235: Schedule 4 paragraph 5 of the EIA Regulations requires ‘A description of the likely
R-2019-0767-OOM-Environmental Statement ES Volume 2.pdf:6:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 Ecology Report.pdf:2:Small-leaved cotoneaster occurs on adjacent land and may be present. Buddleia is
R-2019-0767-OOM-ApplicationFormRedacted.pdf:5:Redcar Borough Council as part of which was agreed that the proposals would form EIA Schedule 1 Development. The supporting information and level of
R-2019-0767-OOM-ApplicationFormRedacted.pdf:5:Consultation responses obtained from the EIA Scoping Response from key stakeholders have been taken on board as part of the preparation of the planning
R-2019-0767-OOM-20191201 ERF Planning DAS_Issued.pdf:7:EIA Environmental Impacts Assessment
R-2019-0767-OOM-20191201 ERF Planning DAS_Issued.pdf:12: requirement for the scope and process of an EIA. A revision to the EU directive on EIA came into
R-2019-0767-OOM-20191201 ERF Planning DAS_Issued.pdf:12: force in May 2014 after being adopted by the European Parliament. The purpose of the 2017 EIA
R-2019-0767-OOM-20191201 ERF Planning DAS_Issued.pdf:12: into UK Law. The 2017 EIA Regulations set out more stringent procedural requirements to be taken
R-2019-0767-OOM-20191201 ERF Planning DAS_Issued.pdf:12: consent should be granted for EIA development.
R-2019-0767-OOM-20191201 ERF Planning DAS_Issued.pdf:24: Offices. During the meeting it was agreed that the proposals would form EIA Schedule 1
R-2019-0767-OOM-20191201 ERF Planning DAS_Issued.pdf:24: Consultation responses obtained from the EIA Scoping Response from key stakeholders have been
R-2019-0767-OOM-20191201 ERF Planning DAS_Issued.pdf:35: and non-native Buddleia (Buddleia davidii), was also recommended. This survey was followed by
R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix B Scoping Response.pdf:5:Natural England has previously provided comments on the content of the EIA in our letter dated 9th
R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix B Scoping Response.pdf:8:taken into consideration when undertaking the EIA and preparing plans for the
R-2019-0767-OOM-Non Technical Summary_Final.pdf:2:(EIA). EIA is a tool for identification, examining and assessing the predicted impacts and effects of a
R-2019-0767-OOM-Non Technical Summary_Final.pdf:2:The EIA has been subject to a Screening and Scoping Opinion from Redcar and Cleveland Borough
R-2019-0767-OOM-Non Technical Summary_Final.pdf:2:Council in 2019. This process decides if an EIA is required (screening) and then helps to focus the
R-2019-0767-OOM-Non Technical Summary_Final.pdf:7: Soils, Geology and Hydro- Soils are scoped out of the EIA based on the lack of impact to
R-2019-0767-OOM-Non Technical Summary_Final.pdf:11:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix B Screening.pdf:1:confirmation of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Screening.
R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix B Screening.pdf:1:undertake the associated EIA and Planning services. Hartlepool Borough Council will be
R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix B Screening.pdf:1:other Tees Valley authorities. The EIA will support an outline planning application for
R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix B Screening.pdf:1:Statutory EIA requirements are defined within the Town and Country Planning
R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix B Screening.pdf:1:determination of whether the development falls within the Regulations. The EIA
R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix B Screening.pdf:1:Regulations specify the types of development for which an EIA is mandatory (Schedule 1
R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix B Screening.pdf:1:Projects) and categories of development where an EIA may be required subject to the
R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix B Screening.pdf:2:The next stage of the EIA process is Scoping, this refers to the determination of the extent of issues to be
R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix B Screening.pdf:2: • The development constitutes a Schedule 1 EIA development.
R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 13 Grangetown Prairie Transport Statement.pdf:48:Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for this development.
R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 13 Grangetown Prairie Transport Statement.pdf:49:Advice related to EIA Scoping Requirements
R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 13 Grangetown Prairie Transport Statement.pdf:50:on ecosystems or their components. EcIA may be carried out as part of the EIA process or to support
R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 13 Grangetown Prairie Transport Statement.pdf:50:Appropriate Assessment, in addition to consideration of impacts through the EIA process.
R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 13 Grangetown Prairie Transport Statement.pdf:51:of the EIA.
R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 13 Grangetown Prairie Transport Statement.pdf:51:The EIA will need to consider any impacts upon local wildlife and geological sites. Local Sites are
R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 13 Grangetown Prairie Transport Statement.pdf:53:pertaining to the area. The EIA should include assessments of visual effects on the surrounding area
R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 13 Grangetown Prairie Transport Statement.pdf:53:The EIA should include a full assessment of the potential impacts of the development on local
R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 13 Grangetown Prairie Transport Statement.pdf:54:The EIA should consider potential impacts on rights of way and coastal access routes in the vicinity of
R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 13 Grangetown Prairie Transport Statement.pdf:58:The above policies are considered relevant as part of EIA and should be taken into consideration
R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 13 Grangetown Prairie Transport Statement.pdf:58:when undertaken the EIA and preparing plans for the development.
R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:1:it was agreed fell under Schedule 1 of the EIA Regulations and it is therefore
R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:6: This conclusion contradicts the text in the EIA…..where it states that all
R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:27:regulatory framework and purpose of the EIA process. The ES sets out the
R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:27:EIA documents.
R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:29:The EIA Regulations require consideration of reasonable alternatives and this
R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:30:procedures under the EIA regulations. In terms of the latter procedure the ES
R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:31:This section of the ES set out the methodology of the application of the EIA
R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:32: considered significant within the terms of EIA regulations; therefore, any
R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:33:and the application of the EIA procedure. It provides an informed narrative
R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:36:rhamnoides as well as Buddleia, Birch Betula sp. and Willow Salix spp.
R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:36:Buddleia bushes were also present on the sides of the embankment.
R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:38:cardui have also been recorded on site. The widespread coverage of Buddleia
R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:52:EIA terms.
R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:53:significant in EIA terms.
R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:63:The Teesdale Way forms part of The EIA Scoping Response and states that
R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix B Scoping Letter Request.pdf:1:EIA will support an outline planning application for development, supported
R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix B Scoping Letter Request.pdf:3: of the scheme, alternatives, methodology for the EIA, the impact
R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix B Scoping Letter Request.pdf:3:Proposed Content of the EIA
R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix B Scoping Letter Request.pdf:3:The proposed content of the EIA will be developed following desk-based
R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix B Scoping Letter Request.pdf:3:parameters. The EIA will assess the potential significant impacts associated
R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix B Scoping Letter Request.pdf:3:EIA of the outline submission will be based on Parameters Plans relating to
R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix B Scoping Letter Request.pdf:7:Other EIA requirements
R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix B Scoping Letter Request.pdf:8:Lead - EIA and Environmental Management
R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix A Statement of Quality Environmental Statement.pdf:1:Hartlepool Borough Council. JBA Consulting is a member of the IEMA EIA Quality
R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix A Statement of Quality Environmental Statement.pdf:1:Mark. The EIA Quality Mark is a scheme operated by IEMA that allows organisations
R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix A Statement of Quality Environmental Statement.pdf:1:(both developers and consultancies) that lead the co-ordination of statutory EIAs in
R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix A Statement of Quality Environmental Statement.pdf:1:the UK to make a commitment to excellence in their EIA activities and have this
R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix A Statement of Quality Environmental Statement.pdf:1:The EIA Quality Mark is a voluntary scheme, with organisations free to choose whether
R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix A Statement of Quality Environmental Statement.pdf:1:they are ready to operate to its seven EIA Commitments.
R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix A Statement of Quality Environmental Statement.pdf:1: • EIA Co-ordinator – Dorian Latham BA PhD CEnv MIEEM
R-2021-0831-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:32:Cleveland Channels, which were assessed by ARUP in the EIA for the planning application covering
R-2021-0831-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:32:fully at the time the EIA was submitted. Based on the Tees Rivers Trust assessment, mitigation or
R-2021-0831-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:33:Wintering Birds County This was identified in the EIA for South Bank. Re-
R-2021-0831-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:38:Cleveland Channels, which were assessed by ARUP in the EIA for the planning application covering
R-2021-0831-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:38:fully at the time the EIA was submitted. Based on the Tees Rivers Trust assessment, mitigation or
R-2021-0831-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:39:Wintering Birds County This was identified in the EIA for South Bank. Re-
R-2021-0831-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:32:Cleveland Channels, which were assessed by ARUP in the EIA for the planning application covering
R-2021-0831-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:32:fully at the time the EIA was submitted. Based on the Tees Rivers Trust assessment, mitigation or
R-2021-0831-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:33:Wintering Birds County This was identified in the EIA for South Bank. Re-
R-2023-0224-CD-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:32: emissions Environmental Modelling Studies for the EIA.
R-2023-0224-CD-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie Biodiversity Improvement Plan.pdf:7: results presented in an appendix to the ecology chapter of the Dorman Point2 EIA (INCA, 2018). The
R-2023-0224-CD-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie Biodiversity Improvement Plan.pdf:8: the sides of the embankment was a mixture of young trees with Buddleia sp. bushes.
R-2023-0224-CD-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie Biodiversity Improvement Plan.pdf:9: largely of Sea Buckthorn Hippophae rhamnoides as well as Buddleia, Birch Betula sp. and Willow
R-2023-0224-CD-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie Biodiversity Improvement Plan.pdf:9: aucuparia and Willow Salix spp. Buddleia bushes were also present on the sides of the embankment.
R-2023-0224-CD-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie Biodiversity Improvement Plan.pdf:13: Buddleia, birch Betula sp. and willow Salix spp’. It
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (3 of 3).pdf:123: including the preparation of, and contributions to, EIAs and HRAs for energy recovery facilities, port
R-2023-0224-CD-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie Air Quality Impacts on SSSI.pdf:6: including the preparation of, and contributions to, EIAs and HRAs for energy recovery facilities, port
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:21: (PDS) and the EIA screening report.
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:51: that fall outside the requirements of the EIA Directive and Regulations’. Therefore,
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:3:EIA SCREENING
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:4: EIA SCREENING
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:5:EIA Screening Viridor Waste Limited
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:5:1.1 This report sets out the environmental impact assessment (EIA) screening exercise
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:5: the proposal constitutes an EIA development as defined by the Town and Country
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:5: hereafter the EIA Regulations).
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:5: which provides guidance on the application of EIA in England. The flow chart from
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:6:EIA Screening Viridor Waste Limited
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:7:EIA Screening Viridor Waste Limited
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:8:EIA Screening Viridor Waste Limited
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:9:EIA Screening Viridor Waste Limited
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:10:EIA Screening Viridor Waste Limited
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:11:EIA Screening Viridor Waste Limited
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:11:4.1 The EIA Regulations are applied to certain types of development that may have
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:11: to have significant environmental effects, are termed EIA developments.
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:11: as EIA development. A planning application for EIA development must be
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:11: determine if the site is in a sensitive area as defined in the EIA Regulations. If the
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:11: environment, then it is EIA development.
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:11: thresholds is a strong indication that EIA is not required(1). If the development
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:11: development is EIA development.
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:11: Regulation 5(7) of the EIA Regulations enables the Secretary of State to direct that a development of a type
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:11: described in schedule 2 is EIA development even if it does not exceed or meet any of the applicable
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:12:EIA Screening Viridor Waste Limited
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:12: EIA Regulations (i.e. any change to or extension of development of a description
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:12: Sensitive areas defined in the EIA Regulations include:
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:12: development need to be examined. Projects falling under section 13(a) of the EIA
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:13:EIA Screening Viridor Waste Limited
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:13: schedule 2 development and the requirement for EIA now rests on whether “the
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:13:4.17 Schedule 3 of the EIA Regulations sets out a series of selection criteria to be used
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:13: thus requiring EIA. The guidance states that, for section 11(b) developments, the
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:14:EIA Screening Viridor Waste Limited
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:14:4.19 As set out above, the EIA Regulations require that the potential for significant
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:15:EIA Screening Viridor Waste Limited
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:16:EIA Screening Viridor Waste Limited
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:17:EIA Screening Viridor Waste Limited
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:17: With reference to the construction of the Tees Valley ERF, the EIA Statement of
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:17: ERF EIA Statement of Conformity (see section 11), which focussed on the worst
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:17:4.40 With reference to the ERF and the EIA Statement of Conformity, average daily
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:17: be breached. However, as noted above for the ERF construction traffic, the EIA
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:18:EIA Screening Viridor Waste Limited
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:19:EIA Screening Viridor Waste Limited
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:20:EIA Screening Viridor Waste Limited
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:20: significant environmental effects. However, with regard to schedule 3 of the EIA
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:21:EIA Screening Viridor Waste Limited
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:22:EIA Screening Viridor Waste Limited
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:22:4.63 As set out in the EIA Statement of Conformity that accompanies the Tees Valley
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:22: which is not significant in EIA terms. This assessment takes into consideration the
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:22:4.67 With reference to the Tees Valley ERF and the EIA Statement of Conformity,
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:23:EIA Screening Viridor Waste Limited
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:24:EIA Screening Viridor Waste Limited
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:25:EIA Screening Viridor Waste Limited
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:26:EIA Screening Viridor Waste Limited
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:27:EIA Screening Viridor Waste Limited
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:28:EIA Screening Viridor Waste Limited
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:29:EIA Screening Viridor Waste Limited
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:30:EIA Screening Viridor Waste Limited
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:31:EIA Screening Viridor Waste Limited
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:31:4.123 Schedule 3, part 1(b), of the EIA Regulations states that during screening “The
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:32:EIA Screening Viridor Waste Limited
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:32:4.124 For consistency with the Tees Valley ERF EIA Statement of Conformity (submitted
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:33:EIA Screening Viridor Waste Limited
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:33:4.125 The Tees Valley ERF EIA Statement of Conformity concluded that significant
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:34:EIA Screening Viridor Waste Limited
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:34: 2022. The EIA undertaken for Dorman Point included consideration of the ERF
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:35:EIA Screening Viridor Waste Limited
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:35: web-based guidance and the relevant criteria from schedule 3 of the EIA
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:36:EIA Screening Viridor Waste Limited
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:36:5.1 This report has worked through the EIA screening process and concluded that:
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:36: • The proposed development is not an EIA development
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:36: EIA as it is unlikely to result in significant environmental effects.
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:37:EIA Screening Viridor Waste Limited
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:40:EIA Screening Viridor Waste Limited
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:40:Tees Valley ERF EIA Statement of Conformity – submitted formally with the Tees Valley
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:45:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:45: 4. Approach to the EIA Statement of Conformity
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:46:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:46:1.1 This Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Statement of Conformity (SoC) is
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:46:1.3 This EIA SoC has been prepared and is submitted in accordance with the Town
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:46: amended), (henceforth referred to as the EIA Regulations) to provide a
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:46: Planning and EIA history
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:46: outline scheme was subject to the EIA process and was supported by an
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:46:1.5 Where an EIA is required for a proposed development, information on the likely
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:46: has already been subject to EIA which was reported within the December 2019
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:46:1.6 Regulation 3 of the EIA Regulations states:
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:46: subsequent consent for EIA development unless an EIA has been carried out in
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:46: consider how the EIA Regulations apply to “subsequent applications” which are
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:46: defined as meaning (as set out in EIA Regulation 2):
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:47:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:47:1.8 The EIA Regulations therefore prohibit development consent being granted,
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:47: likely significant effects of the development. The EIA Regulations seek to ensure
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:47:1.9 Since the Tees Valley ERF is an EIA development, it follows that any subsequent
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:47: EIA development and will thus have to be determined by reference to an ES.
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:47:1.10 In relation to the outline scheme, it is necessary to consider the EIA Regulations
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:47: voluntarily, as provided within this EIA SoC report.
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:47:1.13 The scope of the EIA SoC report and general approach is provided in chapter 4:
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:47: Approach to the EIA Statement of Conformity.
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:47:1.14 This report contains an EIA SoC for each environmental topic. Each topic
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:48:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:48: the reserved matters EIA SoC. Where environmental effects are new, or where
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:48: 4. Approach to the EIA SoC report - sets out the approach to scoping and
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:49:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:50:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:51:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:51: to the reserved matters application to which this EIA SoC refers. In September
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:52:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:53:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:54:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:55:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:56:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:57:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:58:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:59:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:60:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:61:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:62:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:63:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:64:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:65:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:66:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:67:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:68:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:69:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:70:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:71:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:72:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:73:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:74:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:75:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:76:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:77:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:78:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:79:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:79: (over and above that undertaken as part of the EIA process). The risk
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:79: the EIA process.
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:80:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:80:4.0 Approach to the EIA Statement of Conformity report
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:80:4.1 The EIA SoC assesses the proposed ERF design, layout and alterations to be
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:80: within this EIA SoC. The topics are as follows:
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:81:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:82:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:82: completed by STDC. As such, the EIA SoC has considered ecology and
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:83:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:84:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:85:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:86:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:87:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:88:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:89:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:90:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:91:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:91: flood risk are detailed in chapter 8 of this EIA SoC.
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:91: significant in EIA terms with the proposed mitigation in place. Mitigation measures
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:92:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:93:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:94:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:95:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:96:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:97:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:98:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:99:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:100:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:101:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:102:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:103:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:104:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:105:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:106:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:107:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:108:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:109:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:110:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:111:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:112:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:113:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:114:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:115:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:116:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:117:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:118:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:119:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:119: the local level (significant in EIA terms), prior to the implementation of mitigation
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:120:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:120: significant in EIA terms. Therefore, mitigation in the form of the CEMP is proposed
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:121:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:121: significance, which is not significant in EIA terms
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:122:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:123:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:124:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:125:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:126:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:127:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:128:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:129:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:130:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:131:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:132:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:133:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:134:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:135:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:136:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:137:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:138:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:139:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:140:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:141:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:142:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:143:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:144:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:145:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:145: information provided in chapters 5 – 13 of this EIA SoC.
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:146:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:147:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:148:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:149:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:150:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:151:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:152:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:153:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:154:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:155:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:156:EIA SoC
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Planning_and_Design_Statement.pdf:8: Environmental impact assessment (EIA)
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Planning_and_Design_Statement.pdf:8: requires EIA and has prepared a screening document. This finds that:
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Planning_and_Design_Statement.pdf:8: • The proposed development is not an EIA development.
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Planning_and_Design_Statement.pdf:8: EIA as it is unlikely to result in significant environmental effects.
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Planning_and_Design_Statement.pdf:8: RCBC has all the relevant information to confirm that the proposal is not EIA
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Planning_and_Design_Statement.pdf:40:5.118. The applicant has considered whether Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Planning_and_Design_Statement.pdf:40:5.120. Whilst EIA is not required, a series of environmental studies have been carried out
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_2of2.pdf:1:Tees Valley ERF EIA: Statement Figure 2.1
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_2of2.pdf:2: Tees Valley ERF EIA: Statement Figure 3.1 Site layout
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_2of2.pdf:3:Tees Valley ERF EIA: Statement Figure 3.2a ERF elevation
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_2of2.pdf:4:Tees Valley ERF EIA: Statement Figure 3.2b ERF elevation drawings south
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_2of2.pdf:5:Tees Valley ERF EIA: Statement Figure 3.2c ERF elevation drawings south
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_2of2.pdf:6:Tees Valley ERF EIA: Statement Figure 3.2d ERF elevation drawings north
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_2of2.pdf:7:Tees Valley ERF EIA: Statement Figure 3.3a Site section A
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_2of2.pdf:8:Tees Valley ERF EIA: Statement Figure 3.3b Site sections B and C
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_2of2.pdf:9:Tees Valley ERF EIA: Statement Figure 3.3c Site sections D and E
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_2of2.pdf:10:Tees Valley ERF EIA: Statement Figure 3.4 Indicative CHP
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_2of2.pdf:11: ERF EIA: Statement Figure3.5
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_2of2.pdf:12:Tees Valley ERF EIA: Statement Figure 3.6 Vehicle circulation routes on site
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_2of2.pdf:13:Tees Valley ERF EIA: Statement Figure 3.7 Landscape planting scheme
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_2of2.pdf:14:Tees Valley ERF EIA: Statement Figure 6.1 ZTV building only
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_2of2.pdf:15:Tees Valley ERF EIA: Statement Figure 6.2 ZTV stack only
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_2of2.pdf:16:Tees Valley ERF EIA: Statement Figure 6.3 ZTV building and stack
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_2of2.pdf:17:Tees Valley ERF EIA: Statement Figure 6.4 Original ZTV DSM 15km
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_2of2.pdf:18:Tees Valley ERF EIA: Statement Figure 13.1 Local projects considered for
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.pdf:5:D1.5 The author has extensive experience in environmental assessment to form part of EIA
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.pdf:6: Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Regulations 1. The following summarises relevant
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.pdf:7: adverse effect in EIA terms.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.pdf:7: reported as likely significant effects in EIA terms. The EIA process requires that likely
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.pdf:10: assessing impacts and threshold levels to determine significant effects in EIA terms.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.pdf:10:D3.10 In the absence of detailed information, a qualitative assessment is undertaken in this EIA. It is
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:15: mitigate the impact on non-motorised users. This is considered Not Significant in EIA terms;
R-2020-0820-ESM-Application Form(1).pdf:5:Assistance provided with informal EIA Scoping Request
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:5: development scale Environmental Impact Assessments (‘EIA’).
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:5: wider EIA across a broad range of sectors. He is a Chartered Environmentalist (‘CEnv’),
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:5: of experience in air quality, odour and EIA.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:18: notes are included below to show how the EPUK/IAQM guidance relates to the EIA significance
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:18: criteria used within this ES. The EIA significance criteria are then adopted within the Potential
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:19: is shown in Table E3.2. The EIA significance criteria used within this ES include Substantial,
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:36: 16 EIA: Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:4: developments with a specialism in EIA. Duncan Mackay has been assisted by Jenny Ferguson
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:7: can be carried out either as a standalone assessment or as part of a broader EIA. The GLVIA3
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:7: specific procedures in EIA with which an LVIA must comply.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:7:J3.5 This report has been prepared as part of a broader EIA and addresses matters of individual
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:7:J3.6 The key purpose of EIA directives and legislation is to ensure that likely significant effects on the
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:7: has been prepared to identify likely significant landscape and visual effects to inform the EIA
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:9: EIA and LVIA
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:9:J3.12 EIA Regulations specify that an assessment of likely significant effects should cover certain
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:9: Table J3.1: Relationship between EIA Regulations and LVIA processes
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:9: Relationship between EIA Regulations and LVIA Process
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:9: EIA Aspects Interpretation of EIA Aspects Within LVIA Process/Reporting
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:22: in EIA terms. Those classified as Minor or Negligible are likely to be Not Significant in EIA
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:36: EIA are listed above. However, to aid understanding of the wider visual context and cumulative
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:38:J5.1 EIA is an iterative process which informs the development of the project design. Where the
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:7: Statements for Environmental Impact Assessments (EIA) and other regulatory, permitting and
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:7:G1.6 Arcadis is a member of the IEMA EIA Quality Mark.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:16: is a significant impact for the purposes of this EIA.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:17: proposed development on groundwater is however still considered in this EIA (see Sections G5
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:21: Arcadis and these are used to inform the baseline assessment to this EIA.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:31: 1 Earthworks: for the purpose of this EIA it is assumed that the construction stage of the
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:32: receptors (considered ‘Significant’ in EIA terms) if mitigation actions are not carried out.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:32:G5.1 For the purpose of this EIA process it is assumed that the proposed development site will be cut
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:33: be of Minor Adverse significance which is considered ‘Not Significant’ in terms of this EIA
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:37: significance. These effects are considered Not Significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:37: is considered Not Significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:37: significance. This is considered ‘Not Significant’ in EIA terms.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.pdf:6: Regulations 2017 (as amended) (‘the EIA Regulations’) as they are all above the 5ha threshold. It
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.pdf:7: (EIA) developments because they are likely to have significant effects on the environment by
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.pdf:7: 2 In section 3.0 to outline, informally, the topics to be scoped in and out of each of the EIAs;
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.pdf:7: each of the EIAs; and
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.pdf:9: EIA, the demolition of all other on-site Infrastructure will be subject to separate consents. Other
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.pdf:18: For the purpose of this EIA, and associated HRA, it will be necessary to assess the principle of
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.pdf:22: scope out operational effects from the assessment of all 5 EIAs. This is on the following
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.pdf:23: 3 Above Ground Heritage– this topic will be scoped into the Long Acres EIA, on the grounds
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.pdf:23: topic will be scoped out of the other four EIAs, as there are no listed buildings within the
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.pdf:23:3.4 It is proposed to scope the following topics out of all 5 EIAs, however reference should be made
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.pdf:23:4.1 In accordance with the EIA 2017 Regulations (as amended) each EIA will include an assessment
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.pdf:29:5.1 Each EIA will be prepared in accordance with the requirements of the 2017 EIA Regulations (as
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.pdf:29: criteria adopted for the EIA (see below);
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.pdf:29: significance criteria for the EIA which will comprise:-
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.pdf:30:5.7 The findings of each EIA will be set out in an ES which will comprise three volumes as follows:-
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.pdf:31:requirements of the 2017 EIA Regs. as well as the approach that has been taken on the Southbank submission recently
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.pdf:32:sites, the outline planning applications and the proposed scope of the Environmental Impact Assessments (‘EIA’).
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.pdf:32:On the information set out within the Note, it is our intention to informally scope the EIA with you and the Council.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.pdf:33:EIAs and please do let us know if you have any questions on the above or the note.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:43:EIA’s.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:44:planning applications and EIAs for Teesworks has started.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:44:My colleague Jenny Ferguson and I prepared the LVIA and EIA chapter for the previous outline
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:44:planning application. We will be preparing 5no. LVIAs and EIA chapters to support the current
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020.pdf:6:Subject: RE: 2020s0709: South Tees - EIA Consultation 2020s1483
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020.pdf:6:Subject: FW: 2020s0709: South Tees - EIA Consultation 2020s1483
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020.pdf:6:JBA were appointed back in June to undertake a high level assessment for water management for an EIA chapter for
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020.pdf:6:JBA have subsequently been appointed to undertake 5 further EIA water management chapters for other 5 other
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020.pdf:7: redacted) to be included as an appendix to the EIA assessment.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020.pdf:8:Subject: RE: NWG Strategies - 2020s0709: South Tees - SIZ1 EIA Consultation
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020.pdf:9:Subject: FW: 2020s0709: South Tees - SIZ1 EIA Consultation
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020.pdf:9:undertake a high level assessment for water management for an EIA chapter for one of the sites (SIZ1) within the
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020.pdf:9:Subject: 2020s0709: South Tees EIA Consultation
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020.pdf:9:We are writing to consult with Northumbrian Water regarding the proposal for the South Bank EIA. Lichfields have
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020.pdf:17:As EIA proposals, the best option you will have on gaining more bespoke advice for the ES is to request a scoping
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020.pdf:21: A draft environmental statement where required by EIA Regulations (please note
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020.pdf:34:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020.pdf:35: Assessment (EIA) for the outline planning application for the Lackenby site within the STDC
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Socio Economic - Dec 2020.PDF:14: ‘significant’ in EIA terms.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Socio Economic - Dec 2020.PDF:26: Beneficial in the AOI. This effect is considered significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Socio Economic - Dec 2020.PDF:27: Beneficial in the AOI. This effect is considered significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Socio Economic - Dec 2020.PDF:29: considered significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Socio Economic - Dec 2020.PDF:30: considered significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:5: developments, EIA is required where significant environmental effects are likely by virtue of
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:5: development is EIA development and the findings of the EIA are set out within an
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:6:1.10 With regards to the EIA process, the submission of five separate applications and ESs will allow
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:13: the EIA has not assessed the requirement to demolish the existing structures on site.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:14:3.6 For the purpose of this EIA, the maximum development height will be 46m AOD within all of
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:14:3.8 The EIA is based on the assumption that the site will be cut and fill neutral. If this is not
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:32:5.5 EIA is required for developments, which on the grounds of their nature, scale and location are
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:32: likely to give rise to significant environmental effects. The purpose of an EIA is to ensure that
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:32:5.6 For planning applications, EIA is governed by the Town and Country Planning (Environmental
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:32: Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the EIA Regulations) as updated by The Town and
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:33:5.8 In undertaking the EIA for the current application the technical team has worked closely with
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:51:5.133 Overall the socio-economic assessment undertaken by Lichfields as part of the EIA
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:55:5.171 In terms of overall conclusions and cumulative effects, the comprehensive EIA undertaken for
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF:4: the EIA Quality Mark with the Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF:4:K1.7 Additionally, our Waste and Materials Leads are experienced EIA practitioners with depth of
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF:4: experience in EIA and hold Chartership status such as Chartered Environmentalist, Chartered
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF:14: Table K3.3 has been produced in line with the methodology used in the rest of the EIA and
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF:14: Significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF:20:K5.9 As the EIA assumption is that the site will be cut and fill neutral, there will be no surplus
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF:21: purpose of this EIA it has been assumed that waste will be generated in equal quantities across
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:5:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:6:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:7:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:8:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:9:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:10:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:11:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:12:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:13:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:14:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:15:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:16:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:17:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:18:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:19:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:20:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:21:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:22:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:23:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:24:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:25:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:26:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:27:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:28:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:29:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:30:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:31:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:32:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:33:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:34:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:35:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:36:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:37:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:38:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:39:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:40:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:41:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:42:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:43:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:44:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:45:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:46:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:47:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:48:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:49:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:50:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:51:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:52:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:53:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:54:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:55:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:56:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:57:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:58:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:59:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:60:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:61:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:65:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:67:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:68:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:69:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:70:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:71:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:72:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:73:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:74:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:75:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:76:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:77:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:78:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:79:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:80:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:81:(EIA) will be carried out in accordance with the EIA Regulations and guidance
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:81:be included in the scope of the traffic and transportation assessment of the EIA. A
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:81: The scope of the EIA assessment.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:81:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:82:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:83:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:84:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:96: Scope of the EIA Acceptable The CTMP will need to be
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:98:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:101:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:102:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:103:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:257:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:258:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:259:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:260:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:263:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:264:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:265:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:266:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:267:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:268:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:269:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:270:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:271:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:272:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:273:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:274:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:275:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:276:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:277:(EIA) will be carried out in accordance with the EIA Regulations and guidance
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:277:be included in the scope of the traffic and transportation assessment of the EIA. A
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:277: The scope of the EIA assessment.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:277:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:278:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:279:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:292: Scope of the EIA Acceptable The CTMP will need to be
R-2020-0820-ESM-EA R_2020_0820_ESM 16 February 2021 OFFICIAL.pdf:1:The EIA proposal has not included a Water Framework Directive (WFD) assessment or a
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:3: out the findings of an Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) that has been submitted to
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:3: developments, EIA is required where significant environmental effects are likely by virtue of
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:3: development is EIA development and the findings of the EIA are set out within an ES.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:3: 3 Sections 4.0 to 12.0: provide a topic by topic review of the findings of the EIA;
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:3: The EIA Process
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:3:1.5 The EIA process aims to ensure that any significant effects arising from a development are
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:3:1.6 For this development, EIA has been carried out to consider the likely significant effects that may
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:4: surroundings, desk top assessments, surveys and fieldwork information available to the EIA
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:4: 1 Informed the scope of the EIA;
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:4: 2 Informed the methods by which the EIA has been carried out;
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:4:1.10 The EIA has had regard to planning and environmental policy and legislation at a national and
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:4:1.11 The EIA has been undertaken during the Covid-19 pandemic and where this is relevant to
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:6:1.16 With regards to the EIA process, the submission of five separate applications and ESs will allow
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:7:2.6 The EIA team have reviewed the site and surroundings and have identified that the following
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:9:3.5 For the purpose of this EIA, the maximum building height will be 36 metres above the
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:10:3.12 The EIA Regulations specify that it is good practice to consider any alternatives to the scheme
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:10: based on the clear aspirations to bring the site forward for the uses assessed in the EIA.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:17: are Not Significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:25:14.1 The EIA process has identified the need for the preparation and agreement of a number of
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:6: to the 2017 Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Regulations (as amended) Ref 2 he has
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:7: Regulations 2017 (EIA Regulations)
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:7:I2.2 At the European level, the EIA Directive 2011/92/EU Ref 3 places a requirement upon projects
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:7: Ref 3, identifies the important role that the Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) process
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:7: can play in assessing climate change impacts. It states that EIAs shall identify, describe and
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:7: 2017 EIA Regulations (as amended), under Part 1 Regulation 5(2)© state that EIAs shall
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:15: Government to meet its statutory commitments and therefore be significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:15: significant or not significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:21: in EIA terms.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:23: considered significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:29: 8 EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:4:A3.0 EIA Regulations 4
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:4:A4.0 Scope of the EIA 6
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:4: Compliance with the EIA Regulations 21
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:4:A8.0 EIA Processes, Assumptions and Difficulties 27
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:6: “Teesworks”. It sets out the findings of an Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) of
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:6: application and the legislative context and the approach to, and scope of, the EIA.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:6: MRTPI). All authors are experienced at preparing introductory chapters to EIAs and co-
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:6: ordinating EIAs for a range of large-scale development projects, including other industrial
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:7: planning application and EIA.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:8:A2.9 Each application will be subject to its own EIA. However, the cumulative effects of this proposed
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:8: discuss and agree the scope of each EIA and approach to cumulative effects and mitigation.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:9:A3.0 EIA Regulations
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:9:A3.1 EIA is a process undertaken in respect of a certain type of development prior to the grant of
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:9:A3.2 The need for EIA is currently derived from the European Union (‘EU’) Directive No 2014/52/EU
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:9: will cease to have effect on 31 December 2020. This EIA has been carried out in accordance with
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:9: an EIA be undertaken where the development “is likely to have significant effects on the
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:9:A3.7 In light of these selection criteria, EIA will be required for Schedule 2 development in three
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:9: rise to the need for EIA. Whilst a formal screening request was not submitted, this has been
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:9: the application for planning permission. The development is therefore an EIA development, as
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:10:A3.9 The EIA considers the potential for significant effects arising during the construction and
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:11:A4.0 Scope of the EIA
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:11: opinion on the scope of the EIA (the ‘scoping opinion’). This is a voluntary process and is not a
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:12:A4.9 In consultation with RCBC, the topics that the project team have scoped out of the EIA, fully or
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:14: associated EIAs are being prepared by the same project team who have been in regular dialogue
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:14: to discuss and agree the scope of each EIA and approach to cumulative effects and mitigation.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:22: the ERF EIA).
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:23:A5.1 The applicant has assembled an experienced and competent team to undertake the EIA of the
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:23: Table A5.1 The EIA team
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:23: below, in respect of the co-ordination of the EIA, and within Chapters C to K under the heading
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:23: involved in carrying out the EIA).
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:23: EIA Co-ordination
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:23: Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment (“IEMA”) EIA ‘Quality Mark’. Further
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:23: ordinating EIAs for a range of major development projects across the UK. Heather is working
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:23: towards her EIA Practitioner membership of IEMA and has 1 year of experience in EIA projects.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:23: Mel is working towards her EIA Practitioner membership of IEMA and has 2 years of experience
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:23: in EIA projects. Their coordination role included the production of this chapter of the ES and
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:23: IEMA, has reviewed this chapter and Chapters B, L and M in accordance with the EIA
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:23: Regulation requirements. Kate has over 10 years of experience in co-ordinating EIAs for a range
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:24: Figure A5.1 IEMA EIA Quality Mark Scheme
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:25:A6.1 The findings of the EIA are set out in this ES which comprise three volumes: -
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:25: place with the local community, consultees, and stakeholders in relation to the EIA is also
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:26: Compliance with the EIA Regulations
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:26: comprises an ES. The EIA has been prepared with reference to best practice including that
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:28: proposed development remains materially the same as the of how the EIA has been scoped
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:29: part of the EIA process.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:30:A7.1 The EIA has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the 2017 Regulations (as
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:30: criteria adopted for the EIA (see below);
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:30: of EIA significance criteria, comprising: -
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:32:A8.0 EIA Processes, Assumptions and
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:32:A8.1 The EIA considers the likely significant environmental effects of the proposed development
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:32: assessment survey and fieldwork and information available to the EIA team. Regard is given to
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:32:A8.2 The EIA has been completed with reference to best practice and relevant legislation and has
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:32: site and for consultation and assessment of the likely significant impacts by the EIA team.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:32: sought incorporates inputs from the EIA process that are necessary or appropriate to avoid or
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:32:A8.5 The EIA process has been informed by a series of maximum development parameters and
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:32: within the EIA (Rochdale Envelope compliant). If relevant and required, matters can be
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:32: in the iron and steel making process. For the purposes of this EIA, it is assumed that all
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:32: not be considered in this EIA. The baseline conditions on the site are therefore as existing, and
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:33: data or assumptions in carrying out the EIA. This has included information existing only in
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:33: Environmental Management Plan (FCEMP) has been prepared as part of the EIA and this
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:33: have been relied upon as the basis for the adopted methodologies with the EIA;
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:35:A9.2 The Coronavirus Regulations amend Regulation 23 of the 2017 EIA Regulations (as amended),
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:36: 5 EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter I - Climate Change - Dec 2020.pdf:4: standard methods for an EIA GHG Assessment.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter I - Climate Change - Dec 2020.pdf:15: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:12:within separate EIAs.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:13:of the 5 EIAs for air quality.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:14:I hope you are well. I’m working on the air quality chapters for the EIAs for five sites within
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:6: Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’), and considers the design rationale underpinning the
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:6: Management and Assessment (‘IEMA’) and has 3 years experience in co-ordinating EIAs for a
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:6: towards her EIA Practitioner membership of IEMA and has 1 year of experience in EIA projects.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:6: Melissa is working towards her EIA Practitioner membership of IEMA and has 2 years of
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:6: experience in EIA projects. Their coordination role included the production of this chapter of
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:6: reviewed this chapter in accordance with the EIA Regulation requirements. Kate has over 10
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:6: years of experience of co-ordinating EIAs for a range of development projects.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:10: by summarising the sensitive receptors for the EIA.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:16: scope of each EIA and approach to cumulative effects and mitigation.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:17: provided in Chapter A, Section A.4: Scope of the EIA (see table A4.1).
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:19: there is not any relevant planning history to the planning application and this EIA.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:24: development cannot be known. The EIA is therefore supported by a Parameters Plan which is
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:25:B6.11 For the purpose of this EIA, the maximum development height at the site will be 46m AOD
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:25:B6.12 For the purpose of this EIA, the minimum finished floor level (‘FFL’) will be 10m AOD. This will
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:25:B6.13 The EIA is based on the assumption that the development of the site will be cut and fill neutral
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:25:B6.17 For the purpose of this EIA it is assumed that the main access into the site will be via a new
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:26: is the basis on which the EIA has been undertaken.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:27: construction access arrangements. For the purpose of the EIA it is assumed this will take up to 6
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:28: the works which are the subject of this EIA and do not form part of the development that has
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:28:B7.11 For the purpose of this EIA is cannot be assumed that the Hot Metals Railway that extends into
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:28:B7.12 For the purpose of this EIA, it is assumed that the development life of the site will be a
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:28: assessed as part of this EIA.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:28: the purpose of this EIA it is assumed that there will be one main construction compound for the
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:29: necessary) although this process sits outside the scope of the EIA.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:29:B7.20 For the purpose of this EIA process it is assumed that the development of the site will be cut and
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:29:B7.23 For the purpose of this EIA, access is reserved, however an assumption has been made on where
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:29: submitted to accompany this EIA (Appendix B3) shows the indicative location of these access
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:29:B7.27 For the purpose of this EIA, it is assumed that all construction works will be undertaken using
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:29: starting on site. This EIA assumption will assess the worst case scenario.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:39: an EIA suggests that it is good practice to consider the evolution of the site in the absence of the
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:41: of waste. However, it is assumed for the purposes of this EIA that the site
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:43: 4 Earthworks: for the purposes of this EIA, the earthworks are proposed to be cut and fill
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:43: 5 Access Arrangements: for the purposes of this EIA, it is assumed that there will be a
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:44: 14 EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:4: (‘EIA’) Regulations 2017 (as amended) (‘2017 EIA Regulations (as amended)’) (Ref 1) requires
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:4:M1.4 In accordance with Regulation 26(3) of the 2017 EIA Regulations (as amended), the PPG further
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:4: Tertiary mitigation will be required regardless of any EIA assessment, as it is imposed, for
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:5: Management and Assessment (‘IEMA’) and has 3 years’ experience in co-ordinating EIAs for a
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:5: towards her EIA Practitioner membership of IEMA and has 1 year of experience in EIA projects.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:5: Melissa is working towards her EIA Practitioner membership of IEMA and has 2 years of
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:5: experience in EIA projects. Their coordination role included the production of this chapter of
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:5: this chapter in accordance with the EIA Regulation requirements. Kate has over 10 years of
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:5: experience of co-ordinating EIAs for a range of development projects.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:6:M2.1 As set out in Chapter B of this ES, the iterative process of EIA has resulted in the incorporation
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:19:M3.1 This ES sets out the finding of an EIA of proposals for up to 92,903 sqm of B2 (General
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:19: revisited as required by the 2017 EIA Regulations, and where necessary, updated as part of
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:20: 17 EIA - Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter D - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.pdf:14:My colleagues and I are working on an EIA for the South Tees Development Corporation’s (STDC)
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter D - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.pdf:14:development. Arup is assisting with the planning application and EIA for the land-based development. The
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter D - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.pdf:15:EIA chapter and we would like to address any queries that you may have.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:5: is a member of the IEMA Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Quality Mark.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:5: assessment, EIA and SEA.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:5: and EIA.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:6: Dorian Latham - over 30 years’ experience in delivering multi discipline Lead EIA Reviewer
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:6: sections. Dorian is the National EIA and Environmental Lead for JBA
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:17:F3.3 The assessment is necessary to meet the requirements of the NPPF (Ref 37), the EIA
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:19:F3.6 The methodology for the assessment of potential impacts follows the generic EIA methodology
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:22:F3.8 In terms of the EIA Regulations (Ref 33), it is only those impacts that are likely to have
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:22: the EIA Regulations guide the assessor to focus on effects that are likely to be significant, the
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:22: equivalent to significant effects when discussed in terms of the EIA Regulations (Ref 33). Those
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:22: considered ‘Significant’ under the EIA Regulations with the others constituting no effect or an
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:23: Key: Shaded Cell = Significant in terms of EIA Regulations.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:23: Unshaded cell = Not significant in terms of EIA Regulations.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:23: terms of the EIA Regulations (Ref 33). However, depending on the receptor being considered, it
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:23: is possible that some potentially minor effects could be judged as significant in terms of the EIA
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:23: scoped into the assessment. This is not a formal Scoping Opinion under the EIA Regulations. A
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:40:F5.5 Assessment of major hazards and accidents was introduced by the 2014/52/EU EIA Directive,
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:61: 14 EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:9:C3.1 The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) has been carried out in accordance with the EIA
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:17:C5.5 For the purpose of this EIA, the main access to the site is proposed to be directly from the
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:20: Significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:21: north on Tees Dock Road. The effect is Not Significant in EIA terms;
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:21: This is Not Significant in EIA terms;
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:22: northbound carriageway. This is considered to be Significant in EIA terms;
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:22: unlikely to affect these amenities. This is Not Significant in EIA terms;
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:22: considered to be Negligible. This is considered to be Not Significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:24: C7.1. In EIA terms, it is expected there will be a Significant Moderate Adverse residual
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:29: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby EcIA Rev A.pdf:16:individual valued ecological receptors which would be considered significant in EIA terms or else of
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:4: The professional judgement of those undertaking the Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’)
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:5: Management and Assessment (‘IEMA’) and has 3 years’ experience in co-ordinating EIAs for a
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:5: towards her EIA Practitioner membership of IEMA and has 1 year of experience in EIA projects.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:5: Melissa is working towards her EIA Practitioner membership of IEMA and has 2 years of
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:5: experience in EIA projects. Their coordination role included the production of this chapter of
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:5: this chapter in accordance with the EIA Regulation requirements. Kate has over 10 years of
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:5: experience of co-ordinating EIAs for a range of development projects.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:6:L2.2 This approach accords with EIA legislation and best practice which focuses on the main or
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:10: reference is made to Minor or Negligible ‘insignificant’ residual effects where relevant. The EIA
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:12: prepared for other EIA developments within the Teeswork area and based on discussions with
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:12: brief review of its potential relevance to this EIA. Point locations for these schemes are shown
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:21: and West of The Dorman Point EIA has
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:21: the ERF EIA).
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:22: EIA has been
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:23: EIA has been
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:24: with outline approval associated with the requirement to create sites that are EIAs have been
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:25: EIA and no further
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:43: of climate impacts for EIA. GHG emissions are inherently cumulative and the location of the
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:46: to be Significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:46: Significant in EIA terms. It is not expected that the cumulative emissions will compromise the
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:68: an assessment of climate impacts for EIA. GHG emissions are inherently cumulative. The
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:72: 9 EIA – Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0270-FFM-2020_05_29_STDC Eston Road EcIA_Issue.PDF:59: buddleia and Red Valerian. These can total up to 10% between them with
R-2020-0270-FFM-2020_05_29_STDC Eston Road EcIA_Issue.PDF:59:considered to be invasive species (sea-buckthorn as well as buddleia) which
R-2020-0270-FFM-DXL-JBAU-00-00-C-RP-0001-S03-P01-FRA_and_Design_Justification.PDF:2:was Anthony Greally of Litchfield Planning. Mark McMillan and Nadeia Tourigny of JBA
R-2020-0270-FFM-DXL-JBAU-00-00-C-RP-0001-S03-P01-FRA_and_Design_Justification.PDF:25: Method statement prepared by: Nadeia Tourigny, BSc, MSc 11/05/2020
R-2020-0270-FFM-DXL-JBAU-00-00-C-RP-0001-S03-P01-FRA_and_Design_Justification.PDF:25: Calculations prepared by: Nadeia Tourigny, BSc, MSc 11/05/2020
R-2020-0270-FFM-DXL-JBAU-00-00-C-RP-0001-S03-P01-FRA_and_Design_Justification.PDF:51:Author Nadeia Tourigny
R-2020-0270-FFM-DXL-JBAU-00-00-C-RP-0001-S03-P01-FRA_and_Design_Justification.PDF:52:Author Nadeia Tourigny
R-2020-0270-FFM-DXL-JBAU-00-00-C-RP-0001-S03-P01-FRA_and_Design_Justification.PDF:53:Author Nadeia Tourigny
R-2020-0724-PND-60722_FINAL Cover Letter_Nov 2020.PDF:3:(Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 as updated (“the EIA regulations 2017”). The
R-2020-0724-PND-60722_FINAL Cover Letter_Nov 2020.PDF:3:Schedule 2 of the EIA Regulations 2017, which relates to Urban Development Projects.
R-2020-0724-PND-60722_FINAL Cover Letter_Nov 2020.PDF:3:For Schedule 2 developments, EIA is required only in situations where the development could give rise to
R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:1: minimise, reduce or offset the possible environmental effects identified in the EIA process.
R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:5: The EIA will need to consider any impacts upon local
R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:5: identifies the key receptors and pathways of the pollutant linkages. The EIA process assigns a
R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:7: with the EIA regulations, only effects of moderate or greater are considered to be significant.
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:308: including the preparation of, and contributions to, EIAs and HRAs for energy recovery facilities, port
R-2023-0253-RMM-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie Biodiversity Improvement Plan.pdf:7: results presented in an appendix to the ecology chapter of the Dorman Point2 EIA (INCA, 2018). The
R-2023-0253-RMM-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie Biodiversity Improvement Plan.pdf:8: the sides of the embankment was a mixture of young trees with Buddleia sp. bushes.
R-2023-0253-RMM-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie Biodiversity Improvement Plan.pdf:9: largely of Sea Buckthorn Hippophae rhamnoides as well as Buddleia, Birch Betula sp. and Willow
R-2023-0253-RMM-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie Biodiversity Improvement Plan.pdf:9: aucuparia and Willow Salix spp. Buddleia bushes were also present on the sides of the embankment.
R-2023-0253-RMM-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie Biodiversity Improvement Plan.pdf:13: Buddleia, birch Betula sp. and willow Salix spp’. It
R-2023-0253-RMM-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie Air Quality Impacts on SSSI.pdf:6: including the preparation of, and contributions to, EIAs and HRAs for energy recovery facilities, port
R-2023-0253-RMM-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:32: emissions Environmental Modelling Studies for the EIA.
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:7: • South Bank Quay EIA Report – PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1100
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:28:and the results of the hydrodynamic and sediment plume modelling, the EIA has predicted an impact
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:40:or habitats of importance were recorded within the EIA.
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:44: The EIA has concluded that due to the unproductive nature of the aquifer designations of both
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:45: The EIA has identified that Construction activities will disturb soils and groundwater and may
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:72: • The EIA identified the following key NSR’s
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:72: Summary of EIA Noise Impact Assessment
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:72: According to the EIA the Noise effects on human receptors (NSR1) during construction are not
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:72: the study area is likely to arise from impulsive sources, such as impact piling works. The EIA has
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:74:Baseline noise measurements as undertaken in the EIA
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:113:demolished as part of the proposed scheme. The EIA has assessed these as being of low heritage
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:162:The planning applications were supported by an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Report (Royal
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:162:description of the scheme can be found in the EIA Report, however, in summary it comprises the following:
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:168:Gateway Container Terminal (NGCT) Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). The 2019 NGCT survey
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:169: addition, as detailed in the EIA Report it is predicted that suspended
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:170: 2019 NGCT survey. As detailed in the EIA Report it is predicted that
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:188: Section 11.2.2 of the EIA Report.
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:200: physical landscape features, presented in the EIA Report.
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:201: economic impacts presented in the EIA Report.
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:7: • South Bank Quay EIA Report – PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1100
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:28:and the results of the hydrodynamic and sediment plume modelling, the EIA has predicted an impact
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:40:or habitats of importance were recorded within the EIA.
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:44: The EIA has concluded that due to the unproductive nature of the aquifer designations of both
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:45: The EIA has identified that Construction activities will disturb soils and groundwater and may
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:72: • The EIA identified the following key NSR’s
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:72: Summary of EIA Noise Impact Assessment
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:72: According to the EIA the Noise effects on human receptors (NSR1) during construction are not
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:72: the study area is likely to arise from impulsive sources, such as impact piling works. The EIA has
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:74:Baseline noise measurements as undertaken in the EIA
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:113:demolished as part of the proposed scheme. The EIA has assessed these as being of low heritage
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:160: Section 11.2.2 of the EIA Report.
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:172: physical landscape features, presented in the EIA Report.
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:173: economic impacts presented in the EIA Report.
R-2021-0397-PND-63262_Cover letter PDF_May 2021.PDF:3:consideration as to whether the proposed demolition project could be considered to be EIA development.
R-2021-0397-PND-63262_Cover letter PDF_May 2021.PDF:3:schedule 2 (e.g. paragraph 5(a) Coke Ovens). Such development could be considered to be EIA development,
R-2021-0397-PND-63262_Cover letter PDF_May 2021.PDF:3:whether it is EIA development.
R-2021-0397-PND-officer report.pdf:2:development with regard to whether the demolition would constitute EIA
R-2021-0397-PND-officer report.pdf:3:the works to be supported by an EIA with the significance not being beyond
R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation EcIA_Issue.PDF:27:• Non-native plant species cover less than 5% (other than buddleia and red
R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation EcIA_Issue.PDF:77: buddleia and red valerian. These can total up to 10% between them with
R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation EcIA_Issue.PDF:77:considered to be invasive species (sea-buckthorn as well as buddleia) which
R-2020-0318-FFM-MMO response.pdf:2:With respect to projects that require a marine licence the EIA Directive (codified in Directive
R-2020-0318-FFM-MMO response.pdf:2:that require EIA, MMO must ensure that applications for a marine licence are compliant with the
R-2020-0318-FFM-MMO response.pdf:2:If this consultation request relates to a project capable of falling within either set of EIA
R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 13 Climate Change and GHG.pdf:12: sectors, including projects in the built and natural environment. EIA for any proposed project must
R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR Statement of Community Engagement Annex 1 - EIA Screening Response.pdf:1: 4. Annex 1: EIA Screening Response
R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR Statement of Community Engagement Annex 1 - EIA Screening Response.pdf:4:I note an EIA scoping report has been submitted in support of this request. Air Quality and Noise
R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR Statement of Community Engagement Annex 1 - EIA Screening Response.pdf:5:addendum EIA that will accompany any future application.
R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR Statement of Community Engagement Annex 1 - EIA Screening Response.pdf:5:I note that the applicant has provided an EIA scoping request with section 6.2 in respect of
R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:4: EIA (Ref 9.13) and has involved review of the following sources of baseline data:
R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR Statement of Community Engagement Annex 4 - Consultation Tracker.pdf:3: and EIA when it is
R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR Statement of Community Engagement Annex 3.B - Sample Letter to Councillors.pdf:4:Green Lithium has prepared an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) that assesses the
R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 14 Contaminated Lands.pdf:7:14.15. EIA is a process that identifies the likely significant environmental effects (both beneficial and adverse)
R-2023-0291-ESM-ApplicationFormRedacted.pdf:9: Confirmation of the scheme being a Schedule 1 EIA development requiring a full Environmental Impact Assessment. With agreement of the
R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR Statement of Community Engagement Annex 2 - Public Notices.pdf:2: Green Lithium has prepared an Environmental Impact Assessment (“EIA”) that assesses the
R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 10 Landscape.pdf:6:10.22. A ‘Pre-Application and EIA Scoping Request’ report was submitted by Sol Environment Ltd on 10th August
R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 10 Landscape.pdf:6: level review of the Site and surroundings, a description of the development, the EIA screening and
R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 10 Landscape.pdf:9:10.46. Impacts which are moderate-major and above are considered ‘significant’ in EIA terms (shaded in Table
R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:2:15.1. This chapter contains the overall conclusions of the EIA. The EIA has examined the potential impacts
R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:2:15.2. The EIA has been prepared in accordance with the Scoping Opinion issued by RCBC. The requirements
R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:2: of the Scoping Opinion are fully met by the EIA.
R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:2:15.3. The conclusions from each topic assessed in the EIA are provided below.
R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR Planning Statement.pdf:12:1.34. The Environmental Impact Assessment Directive1 (the “EIA Directive”) requires that, before granting
R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR Planning Statement.pdf:12: procedure known as environmental impact assessment (or “EIA”) of any project which is likely to have
R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR Planning Statement.pdf:12:1.35. The aim of the EIA Directive is to ensure that the authority giving consent for a project makes its decision
R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR Planning Statement.pdf:12: in the knowledge of any likely significant effects on the environment. The current version of the EIA
R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR Planning Statement.pdf:12: Regulations 2017 (the EIA Regulations).
R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR Planning Statement.pdf:12:1.36. The EIA Regulations specify the types of development for which an EIA is mandatory (Schedule 1 Projects)
R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR Planning Statement.pdf:12: and those categories of development where an EIA may be required (Schedule 2 Projects). The Proposed
R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR Planning Statement.pdf:12: Development is within the descriptions for ‘Schedule 1 EIA developments’ and so must be considered
R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR Planning Statement.pdf:12: the ‘LPA’) to formally ascertain as to whether the development requires an EIA to be provided as part of
R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR Planning Statement.pdf:12: proposed facility meets the definition of a Schedule 1 EIA development and therefore requires the
R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR Planning Statement.pdf:65:4.45. To address this requirement an EIA has been undertaken separately to this document, the EIA has
R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR Planning Statement.pdf:65: EIA have shown that no signification impacts will occur from the Proposed Development. Also, the Site
R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR Planning Statement.pdf:71: submission and EIA to demonstrate that no adverse visual impacts will occur as a consequence of the
R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR Planning Statement.pdf:75:5.43. The Applicant has undertaken an EIA to ensure that any impacts from the process and construction are
R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR Planning Statement.pdf:78:6.4 The Proposed Development meets the description of a Schedule 1 EIA Development and also meets the
R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR Planning Statement.pdf:86: out of the EIA.
R-2023-0291-ESM-Officer Letter_R20220675SCP.pdf:3:I note an EIA scoping report has been submitted in support of this request. Air Quality and Noise
R-2023-0291-ESM-Officer Letter_R20220675SCP.pdf:4:addendum EIA that will accompany any future application.
R-2023-0291-ESM-Officer Letter_R20220675SCP.pdf:4:I note that the applicant has provided an EIA scoping request with section 6.2 in respect of
R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR Statement of Community Engagement Annex 3.A - Local Businesses.pdf:3:The applicant has prepared an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) that assesses the
R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Green Lithium Appendix 9 - Water.pdf:31: Sol 2022 Pre-Application and EIA Scoping Request Lithium Hydroxide Refining Facility. Green
R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 1 to 6.pdf:8: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 1 to 6.pdf:12: Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (hereafter referred to as the EIA Regulations).
R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 1 to 6.pdf:16:LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK FOR THE EIA
R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 1 to 6.pdf:16: Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (hereafter referred to as the EIA
R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 1 to 6.pdf:16:1.19. The EIA Regulations require that, before consent is granted for certain types of development, an EIA
R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 1 to 6.pdf:16: must be undertaken. The EIA Regulations set out the types of development which must always be
R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 1 to 6.pdf:16: subject to an EIA (Schedule 1 development) and other developments which may require assessments if
R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 1 to 6.pdf:16: they give rise to significant environmental impacts (Schedule 2 development). The reporting of an EIA
R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 1 to 6.pdf:16: Installation meets the definition of a Schedule 1 EIA development according to Paragraph 6 which states:
R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 1 to 6.pdf:16:1.21. Alongside the EIA Regulations the following legislation has also been followed;
R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 1 to 6.pdf:17:1.22. An EIA Scoping exercise was undertaken by RCBC (Ref R/2022/0675/SCP) to determine what topics the
R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 1 to 6.pdf:17: EIA should include. It was based on a review of the Proposed Development provided by the Applicant
R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 1 to 6.pdf:17:1.23. The following environmental topics were scoped into the EIA and are addressed within this document:
R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 1 to 6.pdf:18:EIA ASSESSMENT
R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 1 to 6.pdf:18:1.26. The EIA will consider all likely environmental effects that could occur from the Proposed Development.
R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 1 to 6.pdf:20: • An introduction to the Proposed Development and the EIA (Chapter 1);
R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 1 to 6.pdf:20: • An overview of the approach and methodology of the EIA (Chapter 3);
R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 1 to 6.pdf:21:1.38. In conclusion, with reference to the EIA Regulations, the ES contains those matters which must be
R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 1 to 6.pdf:22: throughout the EIA process. The design process has considered the following key environmental design
R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 1 to 6.pdf:22:1.40. The EIA process is designed to enable informed decision-making based on the best available information
R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 1 to 6.pdf:22:1.41. A number of assumptions have been made during the EIA process and are described below:
R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 1 to 6.pdf:23:1.43. Any limitations to the EIA are summarised in each technical chapter, where relevant, together with the
R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 1 to 6.pdf:23: etc. for the purposes of the EIA.
R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 1 to 6.pdf:37:3.3. Consultation is an essential part of the EIA process and has been used to:
R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 1 to 6.pdf:38:3.4. Both statutory and non-statutory consultees have been consulted as part of the EIA. In addition, the
R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 1 to 6.pdf:58:5.1. The EIA Regulations require that the EIA Report must include “a description of the physical characteristics
R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 1 to 6.pdf:67:5.55. The EIA Regulations (Ref 5.1) states that an ES should include:
R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 1 to 6.pdf:67:5.56. The EIA Regulations do not expressly require the Applicant to study alternatives; however, the nature of
R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 1 to 6.pdf:67: consideration. Moreover, case law indicates that the EIA regulations do not require an assessment of
R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR Statement of Community Engagement.pdf:4: • EIA developments
R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR Statement of Community Engagement.pdf:4:1.6. The Proposed Development is within the descriptions for ‘Schedule 1 EIA developments’ and so must be
R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR Statement of Community Engagement.pdf:5: the proposed facility meets the definition of a Schedule 1 EIA development and therefore requires the
R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR Statement of Community Engagement.pdf:5: Development is considered an EIA Development, due to size and sensitive nature of surroundings.
R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR Statement of Community Engagement.pdf:7: consultees in the form of a Pre-Application and EIA Screening and Scoping enquiry under Regulation 6(1)
R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR Statement of Community Engagement.pdf:7: of the EIA Regulations.
R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR Statement of Community Engagement.pdf:8: definition of an EIA Development. The Screening and associated Public Consultation Responses are
R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR ES Vol 3 Exec Summary.pdf:5:PLANNING APPLICATIONS AND EIA DEVELOPMENTS
R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR ES Vol 3 Exec Summary.pdf:5:1.9. The EIA Regulations require that, before consent is granted for certain types of development, an EIA
R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR ES Vol 3 Exec Summary.pdf:5: must be undertaken. The EIA Regulations set out the types of development which must always be
R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR ES Vol 3 Exec Summary.pdf:5: subject to an EIA (Schedule 1 development) and other developments which may require assessments if
R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR ES Vol 3 Exec Summary.pdf:5: they give rise to significant environmental impacts (Schedule 2 development). The reporting of an EIA
R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR ES Vol 3 Exec Summary.pdf:5: Installation meets the definition of a Schedule 1 EIA development.
R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR ES Vol 3 Exec Summary.pdf:5:1.12. The following technical chapters have been included in the EIA, determined through the Scoping Stage
R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR ES Vol 3 Exec Summary.pdf:11:4.1. The EIA provides an air quality assessment, which presents the potential effects and impacts of the
R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR ES Vol 3 Exec Summary.pdf:12:5.1. The EIA provides an Ecological Impact Assessment (EcIA) and presents the current ecological baseline at
R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR ES Vol 3 Exec Summary.pdf:15:8.2. The EIA included an assessment of the generation of wastes from the proposed development and the
R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR Ventilation and Extraction Statement.pdf:2:provided within Volume 1 and Volume 2 of the EIA.
R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR Statement of Community Engagement Annex 3.C - Online Public Consultation Page.pdf:10: Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) that provides a rigorous assessment on all aspects of
R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR Statement of Community Engagement Annex 3.C - Online Public Consultation Page.pdf:10: The conclusions of the EIA have been presented over 3 volumes and will be available for
R-2023-0291-ESM-20230328 Green Lithium TS_RG_RF.pdf:5:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2023-0291-ESM-20230328 Green Lithium TS_RG_RF.pdf:6:1.2.5 A pre-application and EIA scoping request was submitted to RCBC in 2022. This Transport Statement
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:89:• Non-native plant species cover less than 5% (other than buddleia and red
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:139: buddleia and red valerian. These can total up to 10% between them with
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:139:considered to be invasive species (sea-buckthorn as well as buddleia) which
R-2021-0608-PND-Officer Report 0608.pdf:2:development with regard to whether the demolition would constitute EIA
R-2021-0608-PND-Officer Report 0608.pdf:3:considered EIA development therefore requiring the submission of an ES, the
R-2021-0608-PND-Officer Report 0608.pdf:3:require the submission of a EIA.
R-2021-0608-PND-Officer Report 0608.pdf:3:supported by an EIA with the significance not being beyond the local area.
R-2021-0608-PND-210801_Ecolgy screening (EIA criteria) for Teesworks demolitions_INCA_RevA.pdf:3: determining whether the demolition works constitute EIA development for Ecology.
R-2021-0608-PND-210801_Ecolgy screening (EIA criteria) for Teesworks demolitions_INCA_RevA.pdf:3: • The report concludes that an EIA is not required.
R-2021-0608-PND-210801_Ecolgy screening (EIA criteria) for Teesworks demolitions_INCA_RevA.pdf:3:ecology, based on the requirements of an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), to
R-2021-0608-PND-210801_Ecolgy screening (EIA criteria) for Teesworks demolitions_INCA_RevA.pdf:3:demonstrate whether the need for an EIA is triggered.
R-2021-0608-PND-210801_Ecolgy screening (EIA criteria) for Teesworks demolitions_INCA_RevA.pdf:7:The EIA screening process poses several questions, which inform whether a project has the
R-2021-0608-PND-210801_Ecolgy screening (EIA criteria) for Teesworks demolitions_INCA_RevA.pdf:11: determining whether the demolition works constitute EIA development for Ecology.
R-2021-0608-PND-210801_Ecolgy screening (EIA criteria) for Teesworks demolitions_INCA_RevA.pdf:11: • The report concludes that an EIA is not required.
20210128 MLA202000507 Tee south bank phase 2 shellfish advice + JPQC.pdf:2: EIA, the responses given to the questions in the advice request to MLA/2020/00506 are
20210128 MLA202000507 Tee south bank phase 2 shellfish advice + JPQC.pdf:3:Question 8: Is the EIA methodology and assessment presented clearly and fully justified?
20210128 MLA202000507 Tee south bank phase 2 shellfish advice + JPQC.pdf:3:19. Yes, EIA methodology and assessment presented is clear and fully justified.
EA MLA_2020_00507 22 February 2021 OFFICIAL.pdf:1:pollution posed to the Tees estuary water quality can be safely managed. The EIA
EA MLA_2020_00507 22 February 2021 OFFICIAL.pdf:2:specific sediment surveys. The EIA notes in paragraph 7.4.3 that a site-specific sediment
EA MLA_2020_00507 22 February 2021 OFFICIAL.pdf:2:repeat the process within Section 7 of the EIA statement to show the site specific
EA MLA_2020_00507 22 February 2021 OFFICIAL.pdf:2:The EIA discusses previous benthic ecology assessments in the Tees Estuary, notably
EA MLA_2020_00507 22 February 2021 OFFICIAL.pdf:2:the Anglo American Harbour Facilities project undertaken in 2014. The EIA goes on to
EA MLA_2020_00507 22 February 2021 OFFICIAL.pdf:2:of subtidal. We acknowledge and support the use of vertipools, however the EIA does
EA MLA_2020_00507 22 February 2021 OFFICIAL.pdf:3:proposed dredging programme, the EIA assessment states this is predicted to be
EA MLA_2020_00507 22 February 2021 OFFICIAL.pdf:4:The land-based construction and riverbank excavation are noted in the EIA to have the
MLA 2020 00506 South Bank Phase 1 MLA 2020 00507 Phase 2.pdf:1:The EIA assessment has included both direct physical impacts and indirect visual or setting
MLA 2020 00506 South Bank Phase 1 MLA 2020 00507 Phase 2.pdf:2:Section 16.4.2 of the EIA states “…given this potential, geoarchaeological assessment of
MLA 2020 00506 South Bank Phase 1 MLA 2020 00507 Phase 2.pdf:2:The EIA highlights that the dredging for the Turning Circle and the Berth Pocket along the
MLA 2020 00506 South Bank Phase 1 MLA 2020 00507 Phase 2.pdf:3:heritage assets, but this is less than substantial overall. It is proposed in EIA section 16.5
338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21.pdf:1:Please see Annex 1 below for further information and specific comments on the provided EIA.
338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21.pdf:3:Annex 1 – Comments on the EIA Report
338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21.pdf:3:specific survey monitoring for the South Bank Wharf area are not presented within the EIA, but
338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21.pdf:3:results. within the EIA, but are due for submission as a supplementary report in April. We
338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21.pdf:3:9.5.1.2 We note that, in relation to the North Tees Mudflat, the EIA states that ‘based on
338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21.pdf:4:Capital dredging dredging in front of the new quay. It is stated within the EIA that the complete loss
338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21.pdf:5: 12.5.2 We note the EIA states that ‘little terns within the SPA / Ramsar site nest almost
338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21.pdf:5: 12.5.2 We note the EIA states that Sandwich tern ‘as a passage feature of the SPA, it is
338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21.pdf:7: site integrity at this stage, based on the information provided in the EIA. We
338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21.pdf:8: Appropriate Assessment within the applicant’s EIA Report and shadow
338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21.pdf:9: However, we note that the EIA states that construction will take 3 years
20210121 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phase II Benthic ecology JPQC.pdf:1:9. The above cited reports represent the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and associated
20210121 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phase II Benthic ecology JPQC.pdf:2: EIA, the responses given to the questions in the advice request to MLA/2020/00506 are
20210121 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phase II Benthic ecology JPQC.pdf:2: which were not available at the time of writing the EIA report. It is presently assumed that the
20210121 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phase II Benthic ecology JPQC.pdf:2: the EIA process should the new data not support those of previous findings. Can the applicant
20210121 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phase II Benthic ecology JPQC.pdf:2:18. Yes, the EIA report clearly explains, with the aid of clear figures and diagrams, the construction
20210121 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phase II Benthic ecology JPQC.pdf:3:Question 8: Is the EIA methodology and assessment presented clearly and fully justified?
20210121 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phase II Benthic ecology JPQC.pdf:3:20. Yes, the EIA clearly sets out the impact assessment methodology: it uses a well-established
20210121 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phase II Benthic ecology JPQC.pdf:3: area. Is there any evidence of this in the EIA report to quantify this which may therefore be
20210121 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phase II Benthic ecology JPQC.pdf:3:25. No, transboundary impacts are not addressed within the EIA although I would consider that they
20210121 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phase II Benthic ecology JPQC.pdf:3: impact, can the applicant please clarify this (perhaps it is stated elsewhere within the EIA
20210121 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phase II Benthic ecology JPQC.pdf:4: conducted during 2020 although the data are not yet ready for review within the EIA. The
20210121 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phase II Benthic ecology JPQC.pdf:4: methods used for this survey are not, however, provided as part of this EIA report.
20210121 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phase II Benthic ecology JPQC.pdf:4: used within the EIA, though this should be clarified by the applicant as per my response to
20210119 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay CP advice + JPQC.pdf:1:4. South Bank Quay EIA Report. Royal HaskoningDHV for Tees Valley Combined Authority,
20210119 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay CP advice + JPQC.pdf:3:Question 7 Is the EIA methodology and assessment presented clearly and fully
20210119 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay CP advice + JPQC.pdf:3: adopted by different disciplines in separate chapters. In general, the EIA method is as expected.
20210119 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay CP advice + JPQC.pdf:5: not used in the EIA itself.
20210119 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay CP advice + JPQC.pdf:6: understandably not provided as part of the EIA.
20210119 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay CP advice + JPQC.pdf:7: to climate change, despite the standard EIA methods indicating that this should be done. The
20210119 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay CP advice + JPQC.pdf:7: climate-induced environmental change, hence the requirement within EIA legislation to take
20210115 MLA202000507 South Bank Quay-phase 2 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:1:4. South Bank Quay, EIA Report, Royal Haskoning DHV, 6 November 2020.
20210115 MLA202000507 South Bank Quay-phase 2 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:2: review are exactly the same and the impacts for the two phases are not separated within the EIA,
20210115 MLA202000507 South Bank Quay-phase 2 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:2:9. Yes, the information presented in the EIA report correctly acknowledges the potential impacts to
20210115 MLA202000507 South Bank Quay-phase 2 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:3:12. The EIA report describes the likely key impacts on fish and shellfish ecology from the effects of
20210115 MLA202000507 South Bank Quay-phase 2 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:3:14. Section 13.3.2 of the EIA report refers to the methodology used to describe the existing environment
20210115 MLA202000507 South Bank Quay-phase 2 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:5: for a cross-sectional area of the river to be influenced. Further, the EIA report concludes that the
20210115 MLA202000507 South Bank Quay-phase 2 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:10:Question 8. Is the EIA methodology and assessment presented clearly and fully justified?
20210115 MLA202000507 South Bank Quay-phase 2 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:10:45. To the best of my knowledge the EIA methodology and assessment are presented clearly and are
20210115 MLA202000507 South Bank Quay-phase 2 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:10:47. Cumulative impacts have been correctly considered within section 27 of the EIA report (document
20210115 MLA202000507 South Bank Quay-phase 2 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:11: this nature. No fisheries specific surveys have been undertaken to inform the EIA.
20210115 MLA202000507 South Bank Quay-phase 2 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:11: 2019 (NGCT benthic survey, epibenthic trawls) (see section 9.4.3 of the EIA for more details of
MLA202000506 & MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phases 1&2 UWN advice + JPQC.pdf:1:5. South Bank Quay EIA Report dated 6th November 2020. Reference: PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1100
MLA202000506 & MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phases 1&2 UWN advice + JPQC.pdf:2: However, as the EIA presented does not differentiate between the two phases in terms of my advisory
MLA202000506 & MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phases 1&2 UWN advice + JPQC.pdf:2: EIA report appropriately identifies the key migratory fish species in the Tees estuary and recognises the
MLA202000506 & MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phases 1&2 UWN advice + JPQC.pdf:2: marine mammal baseline. The four marine mammal species considered in the EIA Report are harbour
MLA202000506 & MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phases 1&2 UWN advice + JPQC.pdf:2:10. In terms of potential impacts, the EIA Report confirms that the proposed new quay wall (and all piling
MLA202000506 & MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phases 1&2 UWN advice + JPQC.pdf:2: with the water. The EIA Report states that the closest piling is approximately 20 m from the river edge,
MLA202000506 & MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phases 1&2 UWN advice + JPQC.pdf:2: extended periods of time (e.g. 24 hours in this instance). I agree with the EIA Report that there is the
MLA202000506 & MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phases 1&2 UWN advice + JPQC.pdf:3:18. Furthermore, the EIA Report acknowledges that temporary behavioural alterations and masking may also
MLA202000506 & MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phases 1&2 UWN advice + JPQC.pdf:3: minutes spent discharging and commuting to and from the disposal site. The EIA Report suggests that
MLA202000506 & MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phases 1&2 UWN advice + JPQC.pdf:4:23. For fish, I believe the general conclusions and the points raised in the EIA Report are not unreasonable,
MLA202000506 & MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phases 1&2 UWN advice + JPQC.pdf:4:Question 8: Is the EIA methodology and assessment presented clearly and fully justified?
MLA202000506 & MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phases 1&2 UWN advice + JPQC.pdf:4:30. Yes, generally the EIA methodology and assessment are clearly justified.
MLA202000506 & MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phases 1&2 UWN advice + JPQC.pdf:4:32. Cumulative effects are considered in chapter 27 of the EIA Report. Please note that I am unable to
MLA202000506 & MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phases 1&2 UWN advice + JPQC.pdf:5: immediately downstream) and the ongoing maintenance dredging. The EIA Report concludes that
MLA202000506 & MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phases 1&2 UWN advice + JPQC.pdf:8:The EIA has assessed the worst-case scenario of building the quay and dredging the channel in one
MLA-2020-00507.pdf:1: These fishing operations are unlikely to be affected by the activities, EIA shows sediment
20210201 MLA202000506 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Phases 1 and 2 - EIA Licence Advice Minute - SEAL Advice v2+SJB.pdf:1:4. South Bank Quay: EIA Report, Royal Haskoning (November 2020). Version P01.01/S0
20210201 MLA202000506 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Phases 1 and 2 - EIA Licence Advice Minute - SEAL Advice v2+SJB.pdf:2: advice for dredge and disposal. Further, there is only one EIA report for both phases, which
20210201 MLA202000506 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Phases 1 and 2 - EIA Licence Advice Minute - SEAL Advice v2+SJB.pdf:3:17. The applicant specifies throughout the EIA that they have conducted an assessment of
20210201 MLA202000506 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Phases 1 and 2 - EIA Licence Advice Minute - SEAL Advice v2+SJB.pdf:3:18. General dredging best practice is referenced throughout the EIA. The practices specified
20210201 MLA202000506 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Phases 1 and 2 - EIA Licence Advice Minute - SEAL Advice v2+SJB.pdf:4:Is the EIA methodology and assessment presented clearly and fully justified?
20210201 MLA202000506 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Phases 1 and 2 - EIA Licence Advice Minute - SEAL Advice v2+SJB.pdf:4:23. The EIA methodology is clear, and typical of usual practice.
20210201 MLA202000506 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Phases 1 and 2 - EIA Licence Advice Minute - SEAL Advice v2+SJB.pdf:6:38. The EIA report presented is generally detailed and well constructed, however the data on
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:5:The proposed scheme has been subject to an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) which has assessed
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:5:the Non-Technical Summary (NTS) of the EIA Report, which has been submitted to the Marine Management
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:9:proposed for the backing land (which have been subject to a separate planning application and EIA).
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:10:The EIA Report reports the findings of the EIA process. The following environmental parameters / topics
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:20:The EIA Regulations require that an assessment is made of the potential for cumulative effects to arise.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:1:EIA Report
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:2: Author(s): RHDHV EIA Team
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:2: Drafted by: RHDHV EIA Team
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:4:5 APPROACH TO THE EIA 34
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:4:5.1 The EIA process 34
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:9:Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in support of a marine licence application to the Marine
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:9:The study area for the EIA in respect of the proposed scheme is the area over which the direct and indirect
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:12:This report presents the findings of the EIA process and explains how the conclusions have been reached.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:12:describes the EIA process and defines the EIA methodology adopted.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:12:the EIA process. The potential impacts of the proposed scheme during construction and operational phases
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:12:production of this EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:13:throughout this report as the ‘landside EIA’). The planning application was submitted to allow the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:15:Dock Road was included as part of the scheme description for the landside EIA on the basis that permissions
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:15:for demolition had not been granted at the point the landside EIA was submitted. As noted above, RCBC
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:16:demolition of this building has been incorporated into the landside EIA and associated planning application
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:22:of this EIA, a dredge envelope has been assessed (Figure 1.1). As shown on the drawing, dredging is
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:22:construction of the quay however the assessment undertaken within this EIA assumes that the dredging is
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:25:In order to provide the greatest flexibility with regard to phasing of the proposed scheme, the EIA has
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:29:purposes of this EIA, it has been assumed that the measures detailed in the outline remediation strategy
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:30:proposed for the backing land (which have been subject to a separate planning application and EIA).
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:33:During production of the recent Hartlepool approach channel EIA Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2019),
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:35:The non-works HRO application is not linked to this EIA or the related marine licence application. However,
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:36:The requirement for EIA is established by the European Directive 2011/92/EU (codifying previous EIA
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:36:projects on the environment (the EIA Directive). The EIA Directive is implemented via various regulations;
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:36:An agreement was previously reached between a third party and the MMO to undertake an EIA for a very
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:36:Assessment) Regulations 2007, as amended. We assume that RCBC is of the opinion that an EIA is also
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:36:a Scoping Opinion was issued by RCBC in 2019. We have therefore proceeded on the basis that an EIA is
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:36:required under both sets of EIA Regulations, without undertaking a formal EIA screening process (on the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:42:5 APPROACH TO THE EIA
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:42:The purpose of EIA is to provide an independent assessment of a project’s potential environmental impacts
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:42:assessment of impacts which has been adopted within this EIA Report. In summary, this section presents:
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:42: • A summary of the EIA process.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:42: raised have been addressed through the EIA process.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:42: • The results of the scoping exercise undertaken to define the issues to be addressed by the EIA
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:42:5.1 The EIA process
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:42:EIA is an iterative tool for systematically examining and assessing the impacts and effects of the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:42:formal reporting mechanism for an EIA is the EIA Report. In accordance with Schedule 3 of the 2007
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:42:Regulations (as amended), the EIA Report should include such information as is reasonably required to
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:43: • A non-technical summary of the information provided under this part of the EIA Regulations.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:43:The following stages were included in this EIA:
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:43:An agreement was previously reached between a third party and the MMO to undertake an EIA for a
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:43:On this basis, STDC has undertaken an EIA for the proposed scheme voluntarily under the Marine Works
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:43:(Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017, without submitting a formal EIA Screening Request.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:43:validity of the 2019 Scoping Opinions to inform this EIA (see Appendix 2). The scoping note presented the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:44: of the EIA for the proposed scheme in light of the preferred option for the berth length, alignment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:44: • The key elements of the proposed approach to the marine EIA for each environmental parameter.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:44:the EIA Report. Within this EIA Report, the description of the baseline environment consists of the following
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:45:this EIA Report and the conclusions reached regarding the sensitivity of receptors has been presented in
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:45:The EIA has been undertaken within a framework that allows for a transparent approach to the assessment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:45:and the resulting conclusions presented within this EIA Report. This section sets out the assigned definitions
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:45:that are used in the assessment process for a number of topics considered in the EIA Report. In addition,
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:46:EIA provides an assessment of the impacts on sensitive receptors as a result of the effects of a development
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:46:effect may result in both a direct and indirect impact on a single receptor. Given this the EIA framework
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:46:purposes of this EIA. While this table provides guidelines of a generic nature, it should be noted that more
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:47:In the context of the EIA Regulations, ‘significant impacts’ are taken to be those of moderate or major
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:47:It should be reiterated that, although this section sets out the overall approach adopted for this EIA (using,
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:48:Appropriate mitigation measures have been identified and recommended in this EIA Report where the EIA
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:48:topic chapters of this EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:49:The EIA Regulations and relevant guidance require an EIA Report to provide an indication of any difficulties
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:49:The EIA Regulations also require that an EIA Report is prepared by competent experts. This EIA Report
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:49:Assessor for EIA under IEMA’s voluntary EIA Quality Mark scheme. Through this scheme, EIA activity is
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:49:independently reviewed, on an annual basis, to ensure it delivers excellence in areas including EIA
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:49:environment (the EIA Directive) states that an EIA should identify, describe and assess in an appropriate
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:50:This EIA Report has given due consideration to the potential for different residual impacts to have a
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:50:chapters of the EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:50:In line with IEMA’s Guidelines for EIA (2004), cumulative impacts are defined as: “…the impacts on the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:50:However, the EIA and Habitats Directives and their associated regulations require the consideration of direct
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:50:The EIA Regulations do not define 'cumulative' but guidance on cumulative effects assessment is provided
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:50:taken into account in the EIA process and, generally, can be excluded from the scope of CIA. However, the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:51:populations, within the other relevant sections of this EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:142:and sedimentary regime (see Section 6) as well as recent survey data collected to inform other project EIAs
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:142:within the estuary, the latest being from a survey undertaken in 2019 to inform the NGCT EIA.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:142:The findings of this assessment have the potential to influence other technical sections within this EIA,
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:142:requirements of the NPS which are of relevance to this section of the EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:142: NPS for Ports requirement NPS reference EIA Report reference
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:143:of the EIA Report are contained within Table 7.2.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:143: The MMO would expect water quality to be scoped into the EIA.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:144:section of the EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:145:can be quantified. Therefore, for EIA, in the same way, if contaminant levels in the sediments under
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:147:applicable information to this EIA is outlined below.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:153:A sediment quality survey was undertaken in the Tees estuary during July 2014 to inform the EIA for the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:153:Royal HaskoningDHV carried out an EIA on behalf of PDT in 2012 for proposed strengthening of the existing
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:169:This section of the EIA Report considers the likely effects of the proposed scheme with respect to land
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:169:The findings of this assessment have the potential to influence other technical sections within this EIA
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:169:the NPPF with regard to land quality and geology and signposts to the applicable section of this EIA Report
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:169: NPPF reference NPPF requirement EIA reference
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:170: NPPF reference NPPF requirement EIA reference
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:172:requirement to undertake the following, which are directly or indirectly linked to this section of the EIA Report:
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:173:Consultation is a key part of the EIA process. Consultation regarding land quality and geology has been
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:178:Major or moderate environmental impacts are considered to be ‘significant’ in EIA terms. Whilst minor
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:180:post submission of this EIA; this therefore reaffirms the precautionary approach undertaken within the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:184:(including part of the proposed scheme footprint which is the subject of this EIA) to break the Made Ground
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:187:not considered ‘significant’ in terms of this EIA assessment.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:191:This section of the EIA Report considers the following potential environmental impacts for the construction
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:191: section of this EIA Report where the requirement has been addressed
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:191: NPS requirement NPS reference EIA Report reference
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:191: Where the development is subject to EIA, the application
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:192: NPS requirement NPS reference EIA Report reference
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:192:EIA. The MMO confirmed that this was the case in September 2020 and RCBC issued a formal Scoping
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:192:detailed in Table 9.2. This table also signposts to the relevant section of this EIA Report where the comment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:192: Response / section of the EIA Report where
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:193: Response / section of the EIA Report where
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:193: EIA development be submitted, and determined, prior to this document
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:194: Response / section of the EIA Report where
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:194:For this section of the EIA Report, the study area comprises the likely maximum extent over which potentially
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:194:This section of the EIA Report has been informed through a desk-based assessment. The desk-based
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:197:notification are not of relevance to this section of the EIA Report (shown in italics), however have been
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:197:section of the EIA Report, but are addressed elsewhere as necessary. The other sections relevant to the italicised features
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:217: reference to section of this EIA Report where the requirement has been addressed
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:217: NPS requirement EIA Report reference
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:218: NPS requirement EIA Report reference
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:218: procedures requiring an EIA and mitigation
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:219:Summary of comments received during the EIA scoping phase
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:219:the EIA Report where the comment has been addressed.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:219: Response / section of the EIA Report where
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:219:The study area for the EIA is the area over which the direct and indirect effects of the proposed scheme
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:220:The assessment methodology presented in Section 5 has been used to inform this section of the EIA
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:222:included within this section of the EIA Report are:
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:222:a density estimate of 0.52/km2 (Hammond et al., 2017). The potential impacts for the EIA assessments are
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:225:Brigg (SCOS, 2019). The potential impacts for the EIA assessments are put into the context of the North-
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:244:This section of the EIA Report considers the following potential environmental impacts:
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:244:of the EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:244:this EIA Report. The information presented in this section relates to terrestrial ecology only.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:248:The study area for this section of the EIA Report comprises the area which has the potential to be both
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:248:Table 11.3 Study areas used for terrestrial ecology receptors considered in this EIA Report
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:249:adjacent landside EIA development) and 2020 (for the proposed scheme which is subject of this report) by
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:253:concluded to be not significant in terms of the EIA Regulations.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:254:applicable to this section of the EIA Report (which concentrates on terrestrial ecology). Cross reference to
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:257:adjacent land EIA development. The main terrestrial habitat within the footprint of the Proposed Scheme
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:260:lies within the footprint of the adjacent landside development EIA and is fully assessed as part of those
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:262:during survey works for the adjacent land-side EIA in the summer of 2020.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:262:side EIA scheme; however the amount of suitable habitat within the footprint of the proposed scheme is
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:263:scheme footprint during the surveys undertaken to inform the landside EIA.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:263:Several red listed birds were recorded nearby within the land-side EIA development, including linnet Linaria
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:264:Studies undertaken as part of the adjacent landside EIA record habitats of regional significance for dingy
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:264:recorded within the adjacent footprint of the landsite development which was subject to a separate EIA and
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:265:of the adjacent landside EIA and is fully assessed within the documents supporting that application. Due to
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:270:Potential impacts on waterbirds and seabirds assessed in this section of the EIA Report are broadly
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:270:The assessment of potential impacts has been informed by the following sections of this EIA Report:
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:270: Section of EIA report
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:270: Where the development is subject to EIA, the application should
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:273:A summary of the comments relevant to ornithological receptors that were received during the EIA scoping
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:273: Response / section of the EIA
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:274:The study area for this section of the EIA Report comprises the area within the Tees estuary that has the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:276:winter period. It was therefore agreed with Natural England that, for the purpose of this EIA, the assessment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:300:In terms of receptor sensitivity, the EIA for NGCT (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020) referred to monitoring
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:307:Potential impacts on fish resources and fisheries activities that are assessed in this section of the EIA Report
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:308:Site-specific comments relevant to fish and fisheries that were received during the EIA scoping process are
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:308:detailed in Table 13.2. This table also signposts to the relevant section of this EIA Report where the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:308: Response / section of the EIA
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:309: Response / section of the EIA
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:309:For this section of the EIA Report, the study area comprises the likely maximum extent over which potentially
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:309:This section of the EIA Report has been informed through a desk-based assessment. The desk-based
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:311:Dock turning circle, to inform the EIA undertaken for the consented Anglo American Harbour facilities (Royal
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:312:As outlined in the MMO Scoping Opinion EIA/2019/00017, key migratory fish species that have been
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:318:Consultation with the NEIFCA as part of other EIAs recently undertaken in the Tees estuary indicated that
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:323:A detailed underwater noise survey and modelling exercise was undertaken in 2014 to inform the EIA for
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:332:This section of the EIA Report considers the following potential impacts to commercial navigation:
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:332:respectively) have been assessed within this section of the EIA Report, where they are relevant to the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:349:For the purposes of EIA, ‘major’ and ‘moderate’ impacts are generally deemed to be significant (in EIA
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:358:in EIA terms.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:362:This section of the EIA Report considers the potential airborne noise and vibration impacts of the proposed
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:366:The study area for this section of the EIA Report is the area that has the potential to be directly and/or
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:378:This section of the EIA Report provides an overview of baseline air quality within the area, identifies
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:379: Section of EIA report
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:380: Section of EIA report
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:382: 2 August 2019 the EIA was agreed
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:397:This section of the EIA Report presents the findings of a Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (LVIA)
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:398:Various European Union (EU) Directives underpin the requirement for EIA (which includes LVIA) and are
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:398:EIA.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:400: these are significant in terms of EIA.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:418:proposed scheme footprint ranges between minor moderate adverse to minor adverse. In terms of EIA
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:418:is minor adverse. In terms of EIA these effects are not significant.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:418:in views from the site of the transporter bridge is minor adverse. In terms of EIA the effect is not significant.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:419:In terms of EIA these effects are not significant.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:419:significance of effect in the view is minor negligible adverse. In terms of EIA these effects are not
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:421:This section of the EIA Report considers the following potential environmental impacts:
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:422:proposed scheme, which has in turn informed this section of the EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:422:Table 20.2 summarises the requirements of the NPS which are of relevance to this section of the EIA
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:422: NPS for Ports requirement NPS reference EIA Report reference
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:423: NPS for Ports requirement NPS reference EIA Report reference
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:423:This section of the EIA Report and the FRA has been guided and informed by relevant local policy, studies
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:424:reviewed and used to inform the assessment for this section of the EIA Report and the FRA.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:424:downstream of the Tees Barrage. This information was used to inform this section of the EIA Report, as
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:424:The study area for this section of the EIA Report comprises the area which has the potential to be both
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:424:This section of the EIA Report has been informed through a combination of desk-based assessment and
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:425:The findings of the EIA with regard to the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime (as set out in Section 6)
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:425:and the magnitude of impacts in this EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:428:To inform this section of the EIA Report a separate FRA has been undertaken specific to the proposed
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:441:As outlined in Section 5, the scope of the EIA for the proposed scheme was agreed in August 2020 based
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:441:the EIA application for STDC’s landside proposals. To date, no comments have been received on the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:442:As detailed within Section 1, the study area for the EIA covers the marine elements of the proposed scheme
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:444:as being either moderate or substantial (as per Table 21.4) are classified as ‘significant’ in EIA terms.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:460:This section of the EIA Report describes the existing environment in relation to climate change and details
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:464:and requirements of, an assessment of GHG emissions within an EIA, as well as considerations for
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:473:the construction of offshore wind farms, which would be subject to a separate planning application and EIA.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:474:states that EIA Reports produced under these Regulations should include a description of the likely
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:476:potential impact of a proposed scheme on human health. This section of the EIA Report has therefore been
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:476:In the consultation stages of the aforementioned EIA regulations, the general interpretation was that effects
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:476:the findings of the assessments undertaken for other sections of the EIA, notably air quality and noise and
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:476:Section 18 of this EIA Report refers to the Government’s health-based ambient air quality objectives, and
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:476:Section 8 of this EIA Report considers the potential impacts of the proposed scheme on human health of
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:484:been used as a proxy to inform this EIA in the absence of data at the time of writing), it is concluded that the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:490:baseline. As such, these impacts are already taken into account in the EIA process for the proposed
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:501:volume. The EIAs for the schemes scoped into the CIA have made informed assumptions about the most
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:501:and deposition footprint has been identified from the EIA studies undertaken for each project and the CIA
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:501:A review of all EIA studies for the above projects highlights that the maximum increase in suspended
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:504:minutes earlier). The EIA studies undertaken for the Anglo American Harbour Facilities predicted that there
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:504:The EIA studies undertaken for the Anglo American Harbour Facilities showed that the harbour facility itself
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:504:The Anglo American Harbour Facilities EIA predicted that currents will be reduced within the deepened
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:506:where sediment plumes combine at peak concentration (as predicted by the EIA studies for each project)
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:506:In relation to sediment contamination, data collected to inform the EIAs indicates that concentrations are
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:506:Where the EIA reports larger contaminant concentrations, such as for Anglo American Harbour Facilities,
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:512:adjacent landside EIA development. In addition, once the larger area of habitat from the landside
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:512:Of relevance to the proposed scheme, ecology surveys for the adjacent landside EIA development recorded:
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:512:As a more sizable development, the landside EIA proposes a number of mitigation measures including off
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:512:worse than minor adverse in significance when considered cumulatively with the landside EIA.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:514:supporting habitat was considered a negligible impact in the EIAs for both the Anglo American Harbour
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:517:traffic flow were assessed as part the NGCT EIA (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020), Anglo American Harbour
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:519:Section 20 of this EIA report has confirmed that there would be no direct or indirect impact on flood risk and
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:520:natural resources has therefore not been undertaken within this EIA. It is therefore concluded that there is
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:547: Tidal propagation with the tide arriving up to 2 minutes earlier). The EIA studies undertaken for the Anglo American Harbour Facilities predicted that there will be no impact on tidal propagation
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:551:This section of the EIA Report draws together information regarding the potential for the proposed scheme
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:552:European sites. This section of the EIA Report is intended to present all of the information necessary to
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:559:Section 12 of this EIA Report. Although the qualifying interest features of the Teesmouth and Cleveland
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:571:and Cleveland Coast SPA and Ramsar site. With reference to the relevant sections of the EIA Report where
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:571: • site-specific information obtained from surveys and studies undertaken as part of the EIA for the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:571: • evidence provided within the EIA Report; and,
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:593:Jones, D. and Marten, K. (2016). Dredging sound levels, numerical modelling and EIA. Maritime Solutions
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:596:PD Teesport. (2018). South Bank Quay EIA Report. Doc number I&BPB6595R003F0.1 Appendix 8:
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:5:to as the proposed scheme). This report accompanies the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:12:sediment quality survey was undertaken in the Tees estuary during July 2019 to inform the EIA for the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:15:A full description of the proposed scheme is provided in the EIA Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020),
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:51:Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in support of a marine licence application to the Marine
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:51:EIA.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:51:Two separate EIAs are being undertaken in support of the port facility and the landside application, with
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:51: • ‘Marine’ EIA (to be undertaken by Royal HaskoningDHV and which is the subject of this note) –
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:51: the riverbank). The findings of the EIA will be reported in an Environmental Statement (ES) which
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:52: • ‘Landside’ EIA (being led by Lichfields – submitted as part of an outline planning application) – the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:52: proposed quay (which is covered above under the ‘marine’ EIA). This comprises a number of
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:52:Opinions (which are publicly available online) with specific regard to the ‘marine’ EIA. Given the very close
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:52:is to reach agreement with the MMO and RCBC on the approach to the EIA without requesting Scoping
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:52:Opinions under the respective EIA regulations. A telephone meeting is therefore proposed to be held with
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:52: of the EIA for the proposed scheme in light of the preferred option for the berth length, alignment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:52: • The key elements of the proposed approach to the ‘marine’ EIA for each environmental parameter
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:52:EIA/2019/00017) in response to a request for a Scoping Opinion for the previously proposed scheme. The
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:54:to the previously proposed scheme detailed that the EIA would address the following topic areas:
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:54:topic or the surveys or studies to be undertaken as part of the EIA.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:54:that need to be assessed within the EIA. Detail of relevance to the ‘marine’ EIA to be undertaken on behalf
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:54: RCBC with regard to the ‘marine’ EIA
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:54:RCBC confirmed in June 2019 that the list of topics and parameters proposed for the EIA to be undertaken
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:55:used to inform the proposed scope of environmental assessment for the ‘marine’ EIA for the current
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:55:applicable to the ‘marine’ EIA in isolation.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:58: RCBC confirmed that the proposed list of topics to be included in the EIA appears comprehensive and would provide sufficient scope for the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:59: Any future EIA should be comprehensive, covering all appropriate and specific environmental/ecological areas given the adjacent land designations
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:61:EIA for the current scheme being progressed by STDC. The proposed scope is detailed below.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:61:inform other areas of the EIA (e.g. marine ecology, fisheries).
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:63:EIA, as well as information from publicly available studies previously undertaken for consented schemes
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:63:We understand that built heritage was scoped out of the landside EIA and therefore we propose to liaise
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:63:of the marine EIA.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:63:inform the EIA.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:64:A Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (LVIA) will be undertaken as part of the EIA. This will involve
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:64:A land quality desk study and Preliminary Risk Assessment (PRA) Report will inform the EIA chapter. No
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:64:The EIA will include consideration of potential effects associated with the generation of waste and how
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:65:A desk based socio-economic assessment will be undertaken as part of the EIA to understand the impacts
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:65:the programme of survey works undertaken to inform the EIA for the proposed Northern Gateway
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:75:We are in agreement with the topics/constraints to be scoped into the EIA document listed in page 4
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:75:Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for this development.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:76:of the landside EIA, as well as information from publicly available studies previously undertaken for
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:76:We understand that built heritage was scoped out of the landside EIA and therefore we propose to
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:76:landside parts of the marine EIA.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:76:This follows consultation on scoping of the EIA with the MMO.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:79:assessment for the EIA (The South Bank Port Facility – Environmental Impact
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:80: environments and will require Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in support of
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:80: 2.1. An EIA scoping opinion was provided by the MMO for a scheme that was previously
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:80: Assessment) (EIA) Regulations 2007 as amended (reference EIA/2019/00017).
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:80: 2.2. The MMO notes that two separate EIA’s are proposed for the scheme: one covering
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:80: advise that both EIAs should consider the scheme as a whole ensuring that all
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:80: proposed EIAs should demonstrate that the whole scheme has been assessed.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:80: are appropriate for the proposed EIA for the development.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:81: EIA. However, should the applicant request it the MMO would be prepared to
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:81: EIA.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:81: are appropriate for the proposed EIA for the development.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:85:the process of undertaking an EIA to support applications and the information below relates to
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:85:the proposed scope of noise and vibration assessment as part of the EIA. We understand that
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:139:modelling exercise to inform the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) that is being prepared as part of
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:174:Section 6 (Hydrodynamic and Sedimentary Processes) of the EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:253: Impact Assessment (EIA) for Geology and Ground Conditions.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:285:site with respect to land contamination, characterise the baseline environment to inform and support the EIA
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-10.pdf:1:The indicative durations of the proposed dredging works are detailed in Section 3.6.1 of the EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-10.pdf:5:the estuary as a whole. As detailed in Section 7.6.1 of the EIA Report, the potential increase in
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-10.pdf:6:As can be seen from the plots of change in baseline current speed provided within the EIA Report chapter,
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-10.pdf:15:A cumulative impact assessment (CIA) is presented in Section 27 of the EIA Report. Section 27.5.2
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-10.pdf:15:public domain – the models used to inform the EIA for the NGCT are not within the public domain.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-10.pdf:15:As reported in Section 27.5.3 of the EIA Report, the potential for cumulative effects only arises should the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-10.pdf:16:scenario where sediment plumes combine at peak concentration (as predicted by the EIA studies for each
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-10.pdf:16:We would also like to reiterate that the sediment plumes shown in Section 6 of the EIA Report are maximum
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-10.pdf:16:to certain months of the year from a construction perspective, and based on the conclusions of the EIA
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-10.pdf:17:Cumulative impacts have been correctly considered within section 27 of the EIA report (document 4).
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-10.pdf:17:of writing the EIA report. It is presently assumed that the benthic communities within the proposed project
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-10.pdf:17:within the EIA process should the new data not support those of previous findings. Can you please confirm
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-10.pdf:17:The assessment presented in the EIA Report was based on the findings from other benthic surveys
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-10.pdf:17:201 of the EIA Report, the confidence in the mudflat habitat classification within the footprint of the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-10.pdf:18:there any evidence of this in the EIA report to quantify this which may therefore be used to support the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:1:EIA Report
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:2: Author(s): RHDHV EIA Team
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:2: Drafted by: RHDHV EIA Team
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:4:5 APPROACH TO THE EIA 34
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:4:5.1 The EIA process 34
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:9:Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in support of a marine licence application to the Marine
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:9:The study area for the EIA in respect of the proposed scheme is the area over which the direct and indirect
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:12:This report presents the findings of the EIA process and explains how the conclusions have been reached.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:12:describes the EIA process and defines the EIA methodology adopted.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:12:the EIA process. The potential impacts of the proposed scheme during construction and operational phases
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:12:production of this EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:13:throughout this report as the ‘landside EIA’). The planning application was submitted to allow the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:15:Dock Road was included as part of the scheme description for the landside EIA on the basis that permissions
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:15:for demolition had not been granted at the point the landside EIA was submitted. As noted above, RCBC
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:16:demolition of this building has been incorporated into the landside EIA and associated planning application
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:22:of this EIA, a dredge envelope has been assessed (Figure 1.1). As shown on the drawing, dredging is
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:22:construction of the quay however the assessment undertaken within this EIA assumes that the dredging is
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:25:In order to provide the greatest flexibility with regard to phasing of the proposed scheme, the EIA has
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:29:purposes of this EIA, it has been assumed that the measures detailed in the outline remediation strategy
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:30:proposed for the backing land (which have been subject to a separate planning application and EIA).
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:33:During production of the recent Hartlepool approach channel EIA Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2019),
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:35:The non-works HRO application is not linked to this EIA or the related marine licence application. However,
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:36:The requirement for EIA is established by the European Directive 2011/92/EU (codifying previous EIA
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:36:projects on the environment (the EIA Directive). The EIA Directive is implemented via various regulations;
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:36:An agreement was previously reached between a third party and the MMO to undertake an EIA for a very
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:36:Assessment) Regulations 2007, as amended. We assume that RCBC is of the opinion that an EIA is also
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:36:a Scoping Opinion was issued by RCBC in 2019. We have therefore proceeded on the basis that an EIA is
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:36:required under both sets of EIA Regulations, without undertaking a formal EIA screening process (on the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:42:5 APPROACH TO THE EIA
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:42:The purpose of EIA is to provide an independent assessment of a project’s potential environmental impacts
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:42:assessment of impacts which has been adopted within this EIA Report. In summary, this section presents:
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:42: • A summary of the EIA process.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:42: raised have been addressed through the EIA process.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:42: • The results of the scoping exercise undertaken to define the issues to be addressed by the EIA
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:42:5.1 The EIA process
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:42:EIA is an iterative tool for systematically examining and assessing the impacts and effects of the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:42:formal reporting mechanism for an EIA is the EIA Report. In accordance with Schedule 3 of the 2007
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:42:Regulations (as amended), the EIA Report should include such information as is reasonably required to
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:43: • A non-technical summary of the information provided under this part of the EIA Regulations.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:43:The following stages were included in this EIA:
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:43:An agreement was previously reached between a third party and the MMO to undertake an EIA for a
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:43:On this basis, STDC has undertaken an EIA for the proposed scheme voluntarily under the Marine Works
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:43:(Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017, without submitting a formal EIA Screening Request.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:43:validity of the 2019 Scoping Opinions to inform this EIA (see Appendix 2). The scoping note presented the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:44: of the EIA for the proposed scheme in light of the preferred option for the berth length, alignment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:44: • The key elements of the proposed approach to the marine EIA for each environmental parameter.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:44:the EIA Report. Within this EIA Report, the description of the baseline environment consists of the following
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:45:this EIA Report and the conclusions reached regarding the sensitivity of receptors has been presented in
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:45:The EIA has been undertaken within a framework that allows for a transparent approach to the assessment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:45:and the resulting conclusions presented within this EIA Report. This section sets out the assigned definitions
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:45:that are used in the assessment process for a number of topics considered in the EIA Report. In addition,
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:46:EIA provides an assessment of the impacts on sensitive receptors as a result of the effects of a development
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:46:effect may result in both a direct and indirect impact on a single receptor. Given this the EIA framework
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:46:purposes of this EIA. While this table provides guidelines of a generic nature, it should be noted that more
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:47:In the context of the EIA Regulations, ‘significant impacts’ are taken to be those of moderate or major
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:47:It should be reiterated that, although this section sets out the overall approach adopted for this EIA (using,
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:48:Appropriate mitigation measures have been identified and recommended in this EIA Report where the EIA
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:48:topic chapters of this EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:49:The EIA Regulations and relevant guidance require an EIA Report to provide an indication of any difficulties
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:49:The EIA Regulations also require that an EIA Report is prepared by competent experts. This EIA Report
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:49:Assessor for EIA under IEMA’s voluntary EIA Quality Mark scheme. Through this scheme, EIA activity is
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:49:independently reviewed, on an annual basis, to ensure it delivers excellence in areas including EIA
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:49:environment (the EIA Directive) states that an EIA should identify, describe and assess in an appropriate
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:50:This EIA Report has given due consideration to the potential for different residual impacts to have a
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:50:chapters of the EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:50:In line with IEMA’s Guidelines for EIA (2004), cumulative impacts are defined as: “…the impacts on the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:50:However, the EIA and Habitats Directives and their associated regulations require the consideration of direct
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:50:The EIA Regulations do not define 'cumulative' but guidance on cumulative effects assessment is provided
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:50:taken into account in the EIA process and, generally, can be excluded from the scope of CIA. However, the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:51:populations, within the other relevant sections of this EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:142:and sedimentary regime (see Section 6) as well as recent survey data collected to inform other project EIAs
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:142:within the estuary, the latest being from a survey undertaken in 2019 to inform the NGCT EIA.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:142:The findings of this assessment have the potential to influence other technical sections within this EIA,
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:142:requirements of the NPS which are of relevance to this section of the EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:142: NPS for Ports requirement NPS reference EIA Report reference
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:143:of the EIA Report are contained within Table 7.2.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:143: The MMO would expect water quality to be scoped into the EIA.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:144:section of the EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:145:can be quantified. Therefore, for EIA, in the same way, if contaminant levels in the sediments under
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:147:applicable information to this EIA is outlined below.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:153:A sediment quality survey was undertaken in the Tees estuary during July 2014 to inform the EIA for the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:153:Royal HaskoningDHV carried out an EIA on behalf of PDT in 2012 for proposed strengthening of the existing
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:169:This section of the EIA Report considers the likely effects of the proposed scheme with respect to land
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:169:The findings of this assessment have the potential to influence other technical sections within this EIA
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:169:the NPPF with regard to land quality and geology and signposts to the applicable section of this EIA Report
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:169: NPPF reference NPPF requirement EIA reference
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:170: NPPF reference NPPF requirement EIA reference
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:172:requirement to undertake the following, which are directly or indirectly linked to this section of the EIA Report:
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:173:Consultation is a key part of the EIA process. Consultation regarding land quality and geology has been
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:178:Major or moderate environmental impacts are considered to be ‘significant’ in EIA terms. Whilst minor
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:180:post submission of this EIA; this therefore reaffirms the precautionary approach undertaken within the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:184:(including part of the proposed scheme footprint which is the subject of this EIA) to break the Made Ground
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:187:not considered ‘significant’ in terms of this EIA assessment.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:191:This section of the EIA Report considers the following potential environmental impacts for the construction
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:191: section of this EIA Report where the requirement has been addressed
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:191: NPS requirement NPS reference EIA Report reference
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:191: Where the development is subject to EIA, the application
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:192: NPS requirement NPS reference EIA Report reference
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:192:EIA. The MMO confirmed that this was the case in September 2020 and RCBC issued a formal Scoping
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:192:detailed in Table 9.2. This table also signposts to the relevant section of this EIA Report where the comment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:192: Response / section of the EIA Report where
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:193: Response / section of the EIA Report where
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:193: EIA development be submitted, and determined, prior to this document
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:194: Response / section of the EIA Report where
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:194:For this section of the EIA Report, the study area comprises the likely maximum extent over which potentially
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:194:This section of the EIA Report has been informed through a desk-based assessment. The desk-based
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:197:notification are not of relevance to this section of the EIA Report (shown in italics), however have been
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:197:section of the EIA Report, but are addressed elsewhere as necessary. The other sections relevant to the italicised features
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:217: reference to section of this EIA Report where the requirement has been addressed
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:217: NPS requirement EIA Report reference
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:218: NPS requirement EIA Report reference
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:218: procedures requiring an EIA and mitigation
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:219:Summary of comments received during the EIA scoping phase
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:219:the EIA Report where the comment has been addressed.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:219: Response / section of the EIA Report where
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:219:The study area for the EIA is the area over which the direct and indirect effects of the proposed scheme
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:220:The assessment methodology presented in Section 5 has been used to inform this section of the EIA
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:222:included within this section of the EIA Report are:
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:222:a density estimate of 0.52/km2 (Hammond et al., 2017). The potential impacts for the EIA assessments are
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:225:Brigg (SCOS, 2019). The potential impacts for the EIA assessments are put into the context of the North-
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:244:This section of the EIA Report considers the following potential environmental impacts:
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:244:of the EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:244:this EIA Report. The information presented in this section relates to terrestrial ecology only.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:248:The study area for this section of the EIA Report comprises the area which has the potential to be both
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:248:Table 11.3 Study areas used for terrestrial ecology receptors considered in this EIA Report
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:249:adjacent landside EIA development) and 2020 (for the proposed scheme which is subject of this report) by
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:253:concluded to be not significant in terms of the EIA Regulations.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:254:applicable to this section of the EIA Report (which concentrates on terrestrial ecology). Cross reference to
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:257:adjacent land EIA development. The main terrestrial habitat within the footprint of the Proposed Scheme
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:260:lies within the footprint of the adjacent landside development EIA and is fully assessed as part of those
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:262:during survey works for the adjacent land-side EIA in the summer of 2020.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:262:side EIA scheme; however the amount of suitable habitat within the footprint of the proposed scheme is
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:263:scheme footprint during the surveys undertaken to inform the landside EIA.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:263:Several red listed birds were recorded nearby within the land-side EIA development, including linnet Linaria
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:264:Studies undertaken as part of the adjacent landside EIA record habitats of regional significance for dingy
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:264:recorded within the adjacent footprint of the landsite development which was subject to a separate EIA and
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:265:of the adjacent landside EIA and is fully assessed within the documents supporting that application. Due to
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:270:Potential impacts on waterbirds and seabirds assessed in this section of the EIA Report are broadly
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:270:The assessment of potential impacts has been informed by the following sections of this EIA Report:
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:270: Section of EIA report
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:270: Where the development is subject to EIA, the application should
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:273:A summary of the comments relevant to ornithological receptors that were received during the EIA scoping
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:273: Response / section of the EIA
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:274:The study area for this section of the EIA Report comprises the area within the Tees estuary that has the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:276:winter period. It was therefore agreed with Natural England that, for the purpose of this EIA, the assessment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:300:In terms of receptor sensitivity, the EIA for NGCT (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020) referred to monitoring
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:307:Potential impacts on fish resources and fisheries activities that are assessed in this section of the EIA Report
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:308:Site-specific comments relevant to fish and fisheries that were received during the EIA scoping process are
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:308:detailed in Table 13.2. This table also signposts to the relevant section of this EIA Report where the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:308: Response / section of the EIA
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:309: Response / section of the EIA
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:309:For this section of the EIA Report, the study area comprises the likely maximum extent over which potentially
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:309:This section of the EIA Report has been informed through a desk-based assessment. The desk-based
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:311:Dock turning circle, to inform the EIA undertaken for the consented Anglo American Harbour facilities (Royal
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:312:As outlined in the MMO Scoping Opinion EIA/2019/00017, key migratory fish species that have been
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:318:Consultation with the NEIFCA as part of other EIAs recently undertaken in the Tees estuary indicated that
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:323:A detailed underwater noise survey and modelling exercise was undertaken in 2014 to inform the EIA for
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:332:This section of the EIA Report considers the following potential impacts to commercial navigation:
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:332:respectively) have been assessed within this section of the EIA Report, where they are relevant to the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:349:For the purposes of EIA, ‘major’ and ‘moderate’ impacts are generally deemed to be significant (in EIA
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:358:in EIA terms.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:362:This section of the EIA Report considers the potential airborne noise and vibration impacts of the proposed
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:366:The study area for this section of the EIA Report is the area that has the potential to be directly and/or
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:378:This section of the EIA Report provides an overview of baseline air quality within the area, identifies
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:379: Section of EIA report
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:380: Section of EIA report
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:382: 2 August 2019 the EIA was agreed
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:397:This section of the EIA Report presents the findings of a Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (LVIA)
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:398:Various European Union (EU) Directives underpin the requirement for EIA (which includes LVIA) and are
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:398:EIA.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:400: these are significant in terms of EIA.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:418:proposed scheme footprint ranges between minor moderate adverse to minor adverse. In terms of EIA
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:418:is minor adverse. In terms of EIA these effects are not significant.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:418:in views from the site of the transporter bridge is minor adverse. In terms of EIA the effect is not significant.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:419:In terms of EIA these effects are not significant.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:419:significance of effect in the view is minor negligible adverse. In terms of EIA these effects are not
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:421:This section of the EIA Report considers the following potential environmental impacts:
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:422:proposed scheme, which has in turn informed this section of the EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:422:Table 20.2 summarises the requirements of the NPS which are of relevance to this section of the EIA
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:422: NPS for Ports requirement NPS reference EIA Report reference
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:423: NPS for Ports requirement NPS reference EIA Report reference
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:423:This section of the EIA Report and the FRA has been guided and informed by relevant local policy, studies
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:424:reviewed and used to inform the assessment for this section of the EIA Report and the FRA.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:424:downstream of the Tees Barrage. This information was used to inform this section of the EIA Report, as
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:424:The study area for this section of the EIA Report comprises the area which has the potential to be both
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:424:This section of the EIA Report has been informed through a combination of desk-based assessment and
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:425:The findings of the EIA with regard to the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime (as set out in Section 6)
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:425:and the magnitude of impacts in this EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:428:To inform this section of the EIA Report a separate FRA has been undertaken specific to the proposed
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:441:As outlined in Section 5, the scope of the EIA for the proposed scheme was agreed in August 2020 based
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:441:the EIA application for STDC’s landside proposals. To date, no comments have been received on the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:442:As detailed within Section 1, the study area for the EIA covers the marine elements of the proposed scheme
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:444:as being either moderate or substantial (as per Table 21.4) are classified as ‘significant’ in EIA terms.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:460:This section of the EIA Report describes the existing environment in relation to climate change and details
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:464:and requirements of, an assessment of GHG emissions within an EIA, as well as considerations for
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:473:the construction of offshore wind farms, which would be subject to a separate planning application and EIA.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:474:states that EIA Reports produced under these Regulations should include a description of the likely
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:476:potential impact of a proposed scheme on human health. This section of the EIA Report has therefore been
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:476:In the consultation stages of the aforementioned EIA regulations, the general interpretation was that effects
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:476:the findings of the assessments undertaken for other sections of the EIA, notably air quality and noise and
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:476:Section 18 of this EIA Report refers to the Government’s health-based ambient air quality objectives, and
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:476:Section 8 of this EIA Report considers the potential impacts of the proposed scheme on human health of
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:484:been used as a proxy to inform this EIA in the absence of data at the time of writing), it is concluded that the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:490:baseline. As such, these impacts are already taken into account in the EIA process for the proposed
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:501:volume. The EIAs for the schemes scoped into the CIA have made informed assumptions about the most
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:501:and deposition footprint has been identified from the EIA studies undertaken for each project and the CIA
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:501:A review of all EIA studies for the above projects highlights that the maximum increase in suspended
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:504:minutes earlier). The EIA studies undertaken for the Anglo American Harbour Facilities predicted that there
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:504:The EIA studies undertaken for the Anglo American Harbour Facilities showed that the harbour facility itself
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:504:The Anglo American Harbour Facilities EIA predicted that currents will be reduced within the deepened
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:506:where sediment plumes combine at peak concentration (as predicted by the EIA studies for each project)
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:506:In relation to sediment contamination, data collected to inform the EIAs indicates that concentrations are
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:506:Where the EIA reports larger contaminant concentrations, such as for Anglo American Harbour Facilities,
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:512:adjacent landside EIA development. In addition, once the larger area of habitat from the landside
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:512:Of relevance to the proposed scheme, ecology surveys for the adjacent landside EIA development recorded:
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:512:As a more sizable development, the landside EIA proposes a number of mitigation measures including off
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:512:worse than minor adverse in significance when considered cumulatively with the landside EIA.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:514:supporting habitat was considered a negligible impact in the EIAs for both the Anglo American Harbour
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:517:traffic flow were assessed as part the NGCT EIA (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020), Anglo American Harbour
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:519:Section 20 of this EIA report has confirmed that there would be no direct or indirect impact on flood risk and
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:520:natural resources has therefore not been undertaken within this EIA. It is therefore concluded that there is
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:547: Tidal propagation with the tide arriving up to 2 minutes earlier). The EIA studies undertaken for the Anglo American Harbour Facilities predicted that there will be no impact on tidal propagation
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:551:This section of the EIA Report draws together information regarding the potential for the proposed scheme
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:552:European sites. This section of the EIA Report is intended to present all of the information necessary to
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:559:Section 12 of this EIA Report. Although the qualifying interest features of the Teesmouth and Cleveland
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:571:and Cleveland Coast SPA and Ramsar site. With reference to the relevant sections of the EIA Report where
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:571: • site-specific information obtained from surveys and studies undertaken as part of the EIA for the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:571: • evidence provided within the EIA Report; and,
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:593:Jones, D. and Marten, K. (2016). Dredging sound levels, numerical modelling and EIA. Maritime Solutions
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:596:PD Teesport. (2018). South Bank Quay EIA Report. Doc number I&BPB6595R003F0.1 Appendix 8:
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:138: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:141: Marine Works EIA (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations governing EIA’s for
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:293: 1100_EIA
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:294: 1100_EIA
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:295: 1100_EIA
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:296: 1100_EIA
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:297: 1100_EIA
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:313:LVIA is either carried out formally as part of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) process or
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:313:the same, although the approach for a non EIA development may be simplified and classification of
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:350:The proposed scheme is defined in full within the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Report (Royal
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:362:consultation undertaken to inform the EIA. The Environment Agency confirmed the requirement to consider
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:362:of the EIA Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020).
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:362:Following consultation with the LLFA as part of the September 2020 EIA scoping consultation, which for the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:377:This FRA has reviewed the flood risk to the proposed scheme to support the development of the EIA Report
MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:2:environments and requires Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in support of a
MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:2:operational phase. For the purposes of the EIA it has been assumed that construction
MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:2:outlined in Section 3.9 of the EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:3:An enquiry was submitted to the MMO in July 2020 with regard to the scope of the EIA -
MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:7:and is presented in Section 4.9 of the EIA Report. Section 4.9.1 outlines how the
MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:7:and is presented in Section 4.9 of the EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:7:An EIA has been undertaken and the findings are presented in the attached report. Due
MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:7:to the file size, the EIA Report has been uploaded in parts, comprising the main body
MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:7:29 of the EIA Report where the assessment is presented.
MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:8:and 12 of the EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:8:the proposed scheme and is presented in Section 28 of the EIA Report. The scoping
MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:13:be used by the Contractor. However, for the purposes of the EIA, it has been assumed
MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:13:offshore disposal of dredged material (see Section 26 of the EIA Report). The disposal of
MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:15:Please refer to Section 3 and Appendix 1 of the EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:16:The proposed demolition methodology is detailed in Section 3.3 of the EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:16:Potential impacts are outlined in the EIA Report. No significant environmental impacts
MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:16:Mitigation measures are outlined in the EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:16:As detailed in the EIA Report, no significant residual impacts are predicted.
MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:18:For the purposes of the EIA, it has been assumed that the dredge and disposal activity
MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:18:Potential impacts are detailed in the supporting EIA Report. No significant impacts are
MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:18:Mitigation measures are detailed in the supporting EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:18:Residual impact are detailed in the supporting EIA. No significant residual impacts are
MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:21:Impacts associated with the installation of the rock blanket are addressed in the EIA
MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:21:Mitigation measures are outlined in the EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:22:As detailed in the EIA Report, no significant residual impacts are predicted.
MLA_2020_00507-Licence Document (Marine)-14.pdf:15: million m3 per month (the peak monthly volume assessed within the EIA), should it be apparent that the dredging and
MLA_2020_00507-Returns-15.pdf:5: assessed within the EIA), should it be apparent that the
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:1:EIA Report
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:2: Author(s): RHDHV EIA Team
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:2: Drafted by: RHDHV EIA Team
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:4:5 APPROACH TO THE EIA 34
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:4:5.1 The EIA process 34
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:9:Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in support of a marine licence application to the Marine
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:9:The study area for the EIA in respect of the proposed scheme is the area over which the direct and indirect
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:12:This report presents the findings of the EIA process and explains how the conclusions have been reached.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:12:describes the EIA process and defines the EIA methodology adopted.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:12:the EIA process. The potential impacts of the proposed scheme during construction and operational phases
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:12:production of this EIA Report.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:13:throughout this report as the ‘landside EIA’). The planning application was submitted to allow the
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:15:Dock Road was included as part of the scheme description for the landside EIA on the basis that permissions
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:15:for demolition had not been granted at the point the landside EIA was submitted. As noted above, RCBC
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:16:demolition of this building has been incorporated into the landside EIA and associated planning application
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:22:of this EIA, a dredge envelope has been assessed (Figure 1.1). As shown on the drawing, dredging is
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:22:construction of the quay however the assessment undertaken within this EIA assumes that the dredging is
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:25:In order to provide the greatest flexibility with regard to phasing of the proposed scheme, the EIA has
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:29:purposes of this EIA, it has been assumed that the measures detailed in the outline remediation strategy
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:30:proposed for the backing land (which have been subject to a separate planning application and EIA).
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:33:During production of the recent Hartlepool approach channel EIA Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2019),
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:35:The non-works HRO application is not linked to this EIA or the related marine licence application. However,
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:36:The requirement for EIA is established by the European Directive 2011/92/EU (codifying previous EIA
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:36:projects on the environment (the EIA Directive). The EIA Directive is implemented via various regulations;
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:36:An agreement was previously reached between a third party and the MMO to undertake an EIA for a very
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:36:Assessment) Regulations 2007, as amended. We assume that RCBC is of the opinion that an EIA is also
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:36:a Scoping Opinion was issued by RCBC in 2019. We have therefore proceeded on the basis that an EIA is
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:36:required under both sets of EIA Regulations, without undertaking a formal EIA screening process (on the
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:42:5 APPROACH TO THE EIA
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:42:The purpose of EIA is to provide an independent assessment of a project’s potential environmental impacts
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:42:assessment of impacts which has been adopted within this EIA Report. In summary, this section presents:
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:42: • A summary of the EIA process.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:42: raised have been addressed through the EIA process.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:42: • The results of the scoping exercise undertaken to define the issues to be addressed by the EIA
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:42:5.1 The EIA process
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:42:EIA is an iterative tool for systematically examining and assessing the impacts and effects of the
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:42:formal reporting mechanism for an EIA is the EIA Report. In accordance with Schedule 3 of the 2007
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:42:Regulations (as amended), the EIA Report should include such information as is reasonably required to
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:43: • A non-technical summary of the information provided under this part of the EIA Regulations.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:43:The following stages were included in this EIA:
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:43:An agreement was previously reached between a third party and the MMO to undertake an EIA for a
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:43:On this basis, STDC has undertaken an EIA for the proposed scheme voluntarily under the Marine Works
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:43:(Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017, without submitting a formal EIA Screening Request.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:43:validity of the 2019 Scoping Opinions to inform this EIA (see Appendix 2). The scoping note presented the
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:44: of the EIA for the proposed scheme in light of the preferred option for the berth length, alignment
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:44: • The key elements of the proposed approach to the marine EIA for each environmental parameter.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:44:the EIA Report. Within this EIA Report, the description of the baseline environment consists of the following
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:45:this EIA Report and the conclusions reached regarding the sensitivity of receptors has been presented in
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:45:The EIA has been undertaken within a framework that allows for a transparent approach to the assessment
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:45:and the resulting conclusions presented within this EIA Report. This section sets out the assigned definitions
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:45:that are used in the assessment process for a number of topics considered in the EIA Report. In addition,
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:46:EIA provides an assessment of the impacts on sensitive receptors as a result of the effects of a development
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:46:effect may result in both a direct and indirect impact on a single receptor. Given this the EIA framework
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:46:purposes of this EIA. While this table provides guidelines of a generic nature, it should be noted that more
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:47:In the context of the EIA Regulations, ‘significant impacts’ are taken to be those of moderate or major
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:47:It should be reiterated that, although this section sets out the overall approach adopted for this EIA (using,
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:48:Appropriate mitigation measures have been identified and recommended in this EIA Report where the EIA
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:48:topic chapters of this EIA Report.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:49:The EIA Regulations and relevant guidance require an EIA Report to provide an indication of any difficulties
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:49:The EIA Regulations also require that an EIA Report is prepared by competent experts. This EIA Report
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:49:Assessor for EIA under IEMA’s voluntary EIA Quality Mark scheme. Through this scheme, EIA activity is
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:49:independently reviewed, on an annual basis, to ensure it delivers excellence in areas including EIA
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:49:environment (the EIA Directive) states that an EIA should identify, describe and assess in an appropriate
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:50:This EIA Report has given due consideration to the potential for different residual impacts to have a
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:50:chapters of the EIA Report.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:50:In line with IEMA’s Guidelines for EIA (2004), cumulative impacts are defined as: “…the impacts on the
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:50:However, the EIA and Habitats Directives and their associated regulations require the consideration of direct
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:50:The EIA Regulations do not define 'cumulative' but guidance on cumulative effects assessment is provided
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:50:taken into account in the EIA process and, generally, can be excluded from the scope of CIA. However, the
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:51:populations, within the other relevant sections of this EIA Report.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:142:and sedimentary regime (see Section 6) as well as recent survey data collected to inform other project EIAs
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:142:within the estuary, the latest being from a survey undertaken in 2019 to inform the NGCT EIA.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:142:The findings of this assessment have the potential to influence other technical sections within this EIA,
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:142:requirements of the NPS which are of relevance to this section of the EIA Report.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:142: NPS for Ports requirement NPS reference EIA Report reference
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:143:of the EIA Report are contained within Table 7.2.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:143: The MMO would expect water quality to be scoped into the EIA.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:144:section of the EIA Report.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:145:can be quantified. Therefore, for EIA, in the same way, if contaminant levels in the sediments under
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:147:applicable information to this EIA is outlined below.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:153:A sediment quality survey was undertaken in the Tees estuary during July 2014 to inform the EIA for the
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:153:Royal HaskoningDHV carried out an EIA on behalf of PDT in 2012 for proposed strengthening of the existing
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:169:This section of the EIA Report considers the likely effects of the proposed scheme with respect to land
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:169:The findings of this assessment have the potential to influence other technical sections within this EIA
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:169:the NPPF with regard to land quality and geology and signposts to the applicable section of this EIA Report
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:169: NPPF reference NPPF requirement EIA reference
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:170: NPPF reference NPPF requirement EIA reference
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:172:requirement to undertake the following, which are directly or indirectly linked to this section of the EIA Report:
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:173:Consultation is a key part of the EIA process. Consultation regarding land quality and geology has been
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:178:Major or moderate environmental impacts are considered to be ‘significant’ in EIA terms. Whilst minor
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:180:post submission of this EIA; this therefore reaffirms the precautionary approach undertaken within the
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:184:(including part of the proposed scheme footprint which is the subject of this EIA) to break the Made Ground
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:187:not considered ‘significant’ in terms of this EIA assessment.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:191:This section of the EIA Report considers the following potential environmental impacts for the construction
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:191: section of this EIA Report where the requirement has been addressed
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:191: NPS requirement NPS reference EIA Report reference
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:191: Where the development is subject to EIA, the application
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:192: NPS requirement NPS reference EIA Report reference
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:192:EIA. The MMO confirmed that this was the case in September 2020 and RCBC issued a formal Scoping
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:192:detailed in Table 9.2. This table also signposts to the relevant section of this EIA Report where the comment
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:192: Response / section of the EIA Report where
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:193: Response / section of the EIA Report where
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:193: EIA development be submitted, and determined, prior to this document
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:194: Response / section of the EIA Report where
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:194:For this section of the EIA Report, the study area comprises the likely maximum extent over which potentially
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:194:This section of the EIA Report has been informed through a desk-based assessment. The desk-based
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:197:notification are not of relevance to this section of the EIA Report (shown in italics), however have been
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:197:section of the EIA Report, but are addressed elsewhere as necessary. The other sections relevant to the italicised features
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:217: reference to section of this EIA Report where the requirement has been addressed
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:217: NPS requirement EIA Report reference
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:218: NPS requirement EIA Report reference
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:218: procedures requiring an EIA and mitigation
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:219:Summary of comments received during the EIA scoping phase
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:219:the EIA Report where the comment has been addressed.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:219: Response / section of the EIA Report where
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:219:The study area for the EIA is the area over which the direct and indirect effects of the proposed scheme
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:220:The assessment methodology presented in Section 5 has been used to inform this section of the EIA
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:222:included within this section of the EIA Report are:
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:222:a density estimate of 0.52/km2 (Hammond et al., 2017). The potential impacts for the EIA assessments are
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:225:Brigg (SCOS, 2019). The potential impacts for the EIA assessments are put into the context of the North-
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:244:This section of the EIA Report considers the following potential environmental impacts:
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:244:of the EIA Report.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:244:this EIA Report. The information presented in this section relates to terrestrial ecology only.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:248:The study area for this section of the EIA Report comprises the area which has the potential to be both
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:248:Table 11.3 Study areas used for terrestrial ecology receptors considered in this EIA Report
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:249:adjacent landside EIA development) and 2020 (for the proposed scheme which is subject of this report) by
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:253:concluded to be not significant in terms of the EIA Regulations.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:254:applicable to this section of the EIA Report (which concentrates on terrestrial ecology). Cross reference to
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:257:adjacent land EIA development. The main terrestrial habitat within the footprint of the Proposed Scheme
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:260:lies within the footprint of the adjacent landside development EIA and is fully assessed as part of those
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:262:during survey works for the adjacent land-side EIA in the summer of 2020.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:262:side EIA scheme; however the amount of suitable habitat within the footprint of the proposed scheme is
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:263:scheme footprint during the surveys undertaken to inform the landside EIA.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:263:Several red listed birds were recorded nearby within the land-side EIA development, including linnet Linaria
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:264:Studies undertaken as part of the adjacent landside EIA record habitats of regional significance for dingy
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:264:recorded within the adjacent footprint of the landsite development which was subject to a separate EIA and
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:265:of the adjacent landside EIA and is fully assessed within the documents supporting that application. Due to
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:270:Potential impacts on waterbirds and seabirds assessed in this section of the EIA Report are broadly
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:270:The assessment of potential impacts has been informed by the following sections of this EIA Report:
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:270: Section of EIA report
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:270: Where the development is subject to EIA, the application should
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:273:A summary of the comments relevant to ornithological receptors that were received during the EIA scoping
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:273: Response / section of the EIA
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:274:The study area for this section of the EIA Report comprises the area within the Tees estuary that has the
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:276:winter period. It was therefore agreed with Natural England that, for the purpose of this EIA, the assessment
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:300:In terms of receptor sensitivity, the EIA for NGCT (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020) referred to monitoring
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:307:Potential impacts on fish resources and fisheries activities that are assessed in this section of the EIA Report
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:308:Site-specific comments relevant to fish and fisheries that were received during the EIA scoping process are
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:308:detailed in Table 13.2. This table also signposts to the relevant section of this EIA Report where the
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:308: Response / section of the EIA
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:309: Response / section of the EIA
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:309:For this section of the EIA Report, the study area comprises the likely maximum extent over which potentially
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:309:This section of the EIA Report has been informed through a desk-based assessment. The desk-based
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:311:Dock turning circle, to inform the EIA undertaken for the consented Anglo American Harbour facilities (Royal
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:312:As outlined in the MMO Scoping Opinion EIA/2019/00017, key migratory fish species that have been
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:318:Consultation with the NEIFCA as part of other EIAs recently undertaken in the Tees estuary indicated that
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:323:A detailed underwater noise survey and modelling exercise was undertaken in 2014 to inform the EIA for
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:332:This section of the EIA Report considers the following potential impacts to commercial navigation:
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:332:respectively) have been assessed within this section of the EIA Report, where they are relevant to the
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:349:For the purposes of EIA, ‘major’ and ‘moderate’ impacts are generally deemed to be significant (in EIA
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:358:in EIA terms.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:362:This section of the EIA Report considers the potential airborne noise and vibration impacts of the proposed
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:366:The study area for this section of the EIA Report is the area that has the potential to be directly and/or
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:378:This section of the EIA Report provides an overview of baseline air quality within the area, identifies
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:379: Section of EIA report
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:380: Section of EIA report
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:382: 2 August 2019 the EIA was agreed
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:397:This section of the EIA Report presents the findings of a Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (LVIA)
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:398:Various European Union (EU) Directives underpin the requirement for EIA (which includes LVIA) and are
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:398:EIA.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:400: these are significant in terms of EIA.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:418:proposed scheme footprint ranges between minor moderate adverse to minor adverse. In terms of EIA
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:418:is minor adverse. In terms of EIA these effects are not significant.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:418:in views from the site of the transporter bridge is minor adverse. In terms of EIA the effect is not significant.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:419:In terms of EIA these effects are not significant.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:419:significance of effect in the view is minor negligible adverse. In terms of EIA these effects are not
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:421:This section of the EIA Report considers the following potential environmental impacts:
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:422:proposed scheme, which has in turn informed this section of the EIA Report.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:422:Table 20.2 summarises the requirements of the NPS which are of relevance to this section of the EIA
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:422: NPS for Ports requirement NPS reference EIA Report reference
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:423: NPS for Ports requirement NPS reference EIA Report reference
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:423:This section of the EIA Report and the FRA has been guided and informed by relevant local policy, studies
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:424:reviewed and used to inform the assessment for this section of the EIA Report and the FRA.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:424:downstream of the Tees Barrage. This information was used to inform this section of the EIA Report, as
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:424:The study area for this section of the EIA Report comprises the area which has the potential to be both
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:424:This section of the EIA Report has been informed through a combination of desk-based assessment and
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:425:The findings of the EIA with regard to the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime (as set out in Section 6)
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:425:and the magnitude of impacts in this EIA Report.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:428:To inform this section of the EIA Report a separate FRA has been undertaken specific to the proposed
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:441:As outlined in Section 5, the scope of the EIA for the proposed scheme was agreed in August 2020 based
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:441:the EIA application for STDC’s landside proposals. To date, no comments have been received on the
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:442:As detailed within Section 1, the study area for the EIA covers the marine elements of the proposed scheme
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:444:as being either moderate or substantial (as per Table 21.4) are classified as ‘significant’ in EIA terms.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:460:This section of the EIA Report describes the existing environment in relation to climate change and details
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:464:and requirements of, an assessment of GHG emissions within an EIA, as well as considerations for
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:473:the construction of offshore wind farms, which would be subject to a separate planning application and EIA.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:474:states that EIA Reports produced under these Regulations should include a description of the likely
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:476:potential impact of a proposed scheme on human health. This section of the EIA Report has therefore been
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:476:In the consultation stages of the aforementioned EIA regulations, the general interpretation was that effects
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:476:the findings of the assessments undertaken for other sections of the EIA, notably air quality and noise and
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:476:Section 18 of this EIA Report refers to the Government’s health-based ambient air quality objectives, and
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:476:Section 8 of this EIA Report considers the potential impacts of the proposed scheme on human health of
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:484:been used as a proxy to inform this EIA in the absence of data at the time of writing), it is concluded that the
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:490:baseline. As such, these impacts are already taken into account in the EIA process for the proposed
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:501:volume. The EIAs for the schemes scoped into the CIA have made informed assumptions about the most
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:501:and deposition footprint has been identified from the EIA studies undertaken for each project and the CIA
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:501:A review of all EIA studies for the above projects highlights that the maximum increase in suspended
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:504:minutes earlier). The EIA studies undertaken for the Anglo American Harbour Facilities predicted that there
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:504:The EIA studies undertaken for the Anglo American Harbour Facilities showed that the harbour facility itself
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:504:The Anglo American Harbour Facilities EIA predicted that currents will be reduced within the deepened
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:506:where sediment plumes combine at peak concentration (as predicted by the EIA studies for each project)
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:506:In relation to sediment contamination, data collected to inform the EIAs indicates that concentrations are
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:506:Where the EIA reports larger contaminant concentrations, such as for Anglo American Harbour Facilities,
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:512:adjacent landside EIA development. In addition, once the larger area of habitat from the landside
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:512:Of relevance to the proposed scheme, ecology surveys for the adjacent landside EIA development recorded:
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:512:As a more sizable development, the landside EIA proposes a number of mitigation measures including off
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:512:worse than minor adverse in significance when considered cumulatively with the landside EIA.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:514:supporting habitat was considered a negligible impact in the EIAs for both the Anglo American Harbour
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:517:traffic flow were assessed as part the NGCT EIA (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020), Anglo American Harbour
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:519:Section 20 of this EIA report has confirmed that there would be no direct or indirect impact on flood risk and
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:520:natural resources has therefore not been undertaken within this EIA. It is therefore concluded that there is
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:547: Tidal propagation with the tide arriving up to 2 minutes earlier). The EIA studies undertaken for the Anglo American Harbour Facilities predicted that there will be no impact on tidal propagation
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:551:This section of the EIA Report draws together information regarding the potential for the proposed scheme
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:552:European sites. This section of the EIA Report is intended to present all of the information necessary to
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:559:Section 12 of this EIA Report. Although the qualifying interest features of the Teesmouth and Cleveland
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:571:and Cleveland Coast SPA and Ramsar site. With reference to the relevant sections of the EIA Report where
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:571: • site-specific information obtained from surveys and studies undertaken as part of the EIA for the
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:571: • evidence provided within the EIA Report; and,
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:593:Jones, D. and Marten, K. (2016). Dredging sound levels, numerical modelling and EIA. Maritime Solutions
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:596:PD Teesport. (2018). South Bank Quay EIA Report. Doc number I&BPB6595R003F0.1 Appendix 8:
R-2020-0371-SCP-EA R_2020_0371_SCP 14 August 2020 OFFICIAL.pdf:1:We are in agreement with the topics/constraints to be scoped into the EIA document
R-2020-0371-SCP-EA R_2020_0371_SCP 14 August 2020 OFFICIAL.pdf:6:however this plan is not yet approved. Should this EIA development be submitted, and
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:1:Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in support of a marine licence application to the Marine
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:1:EIA.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:1:Two separate EIAs are being undertaken in support of the port facility and the landside application, with
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:1: • ‘Marine’ EIA (to be undertaken by Royal HaskoningDHV and which is the subject of this note) –
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:1: the riverbank). The findings of the EIA will be reported in an Environmental Statement (ES) which
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:2: • ‘Landside’ EIA (being led by Lichfields – submitted as part of an outline planning application) – the
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:2: proposed quay (which is covered above under the ‘marine’ EIA). This comprises a number of
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:2:Opinions (which are publicly available online) with specific regard to the ‘marine’ EIA. Given the very close
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:2:is to reach agreement with the MMO and RCBC on the approach to the EIA without requesting Scoping
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:2:Opinions under the respective EIA regulations. A telephone meeting is therefore proposed to be held with
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:2: of the EIA for the proposed scheme in light of the preferred option for the berth length, alignment
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:2: • The key elements of the proposed approach to the ‘marine’ EIA for each environmental parameter
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:2:EIA/2019/00017) in response to a request for a Scoping Opinion for the previously proposed scheme. The
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:4:to the previously proposed scheme detailed that the EIA would address the following topic areas:
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:4:topic or the surveys or studies to be undertaken as part of the EIA.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:4:that need to be assessed within the EIA. Detail of relevance to the ‘marine’ EIA to be undertaken on behalf
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:4: RCBC with regard to the ‘marine’ EIA
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:4:RCBC confirmed in June 2019 that the list of topics and parameters proposed for the EIA to be undertaken
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:5:used to inform the proposed scope of environmental assessment for the ‘marine’ EIA for the current
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:5:applicable to the ‘marine’ EIA in isolation.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:8: RCBC confirmed that the proposed list of topics to be included in the EIA appears comprehensive and would provide sufficient scope for the
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:9: Any future EIA should be comprehensive, covering all appropriate and specific environmental/ecological areas given the adjacent land designations
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:11:EIA for the current scheme being progressed by STDC. The proposed scope is detailed below.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:11:inform other areas of the EIA (e.g. marine ecology, fisheries).
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:13:EIA, as well as information from publicly available studies previously undertaken for consented schemes
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:13:We understand that built heritage was scoped out of the landside EIA and therefore we propose to liaise
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:13:of the marine EIA.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:13:inform the EIA.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:14:A Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (LVIA) will be undertaken as part of the EIA. This will involve
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:14:A land quality desk study and Preliminary Risk Assessment (PRA) Report will inform the EIA chapter. No
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:14:The EIA will include consideration of potential effects associated with the generation of waste and how
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:15:A desk based socio-economic assessment will be undertaken as part of the EIA to understand the impacts
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:15:the programme of survey works undertaken to inform the EIA for the proposed Northern Gateway
R-2020-0371-SCP-NEAR.pdf:1:This will draw from the findings of the studies undertaken as part of the landside EIA, as well as information from
R-2020-0371-SCP-NEAR.pdf:1:We understand that built heritage was scoped out of the landside EIA and therefore we propose to liaise with RCBC
R-2020-0371-SCP-NEAR.pdf:1:planning department to confirm if the same approach can be undertaken for the landside parts of the marine EIA.
R-2020-0371-SCP-NEAR.pdf:1:This follows consultation on scoping of the EIA with the MMO.
R-2020-0371-SCP-323395 R_2020_0371_SCP - Natural England.pdf:1:Environmental Impact Assessment Scoping consultation (Regulation 15 (4) of the EIA
R-2020-0371-SCP-323395 R_2020_0371_SCP - Natural England.pdf:1:Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for this development.
R-2020-0371-SCP-323395 R_2020_0371_SCP - Natural England.pdf:2:Annex A – Advice related to EIA Scoping Requirements
R-2020-0371-SCP-323395 R_2020_0371_SCP - Natural England.pdf:2:on ecosystems or their components. EcIA may be carried out as part of the EIA process or to
R-2020-0371-SCP-323395 R_2020_0371_SCP - Natural England.pdf:3:an Appropriate Assessment, in addition to consideration of impacts through the EIA process.
R-2020-0371-SCP-323395 R_2020_0371_SCP - Natural England.pdf:3:The EIA will need to consider any impacts upon local wildlife and geological sites. Local Sites are
R-2020-0371-SCP-323395 R_2020_0371_SCP - Natural England.pdf:5:pertaining to the area. The EIA should include assessments of visual effects on the surrounding
R-2020-0371-SCP-323395 R_2020_0371_SCP - Natural England.pdf:5:The EIA should include a full assessment of the potential impacts of the development on local
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 13_Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology.pdf:2:LVIA is either carried out formally as part of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) process or
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 13_Landscape and visual impact assessment methodology.pdf:2:the same, although the approach for a non EIA development may be simplified and classification of
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:1:Potential impacts on fish resources and fisheries activities that are assessed in this section of the EIA Report
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:2:Site-specific comments relevant to fish and fisheries that were received during the EIA scoping process are
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:2:detailed in Table 13.2. This table also signposts to the relevant section of this EIA Report where the
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:2: Response / section of the EIA
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:3: Response / section of the EIA
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:3:For this section of the EIA Report, the study area comprises the likely maximum extent over which potentially
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:3:This section of the EIA Report has been informed through a desk-based assessment. The desk-based
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:5:Dock turning circle, to inform the EIA undertaken for the consented Anglo American Harbour facilities (Royal
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:6:As outlined in the MMO Scoping Opinion EIA/2019/00017, key migratory fish species that have been
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:12:Consultation with the NEIFCA as part of other EIAs recently undertaken in the Tees estuary indicated that
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:17:A detailed underwater noise survey and modelling exercise was undertaken in 2014 to inform the EIA for
R-2020-0684-ESM-Response from applicant.PDF:2:and we would draw your attention to appendix 9 of the EIA which contains a Navigation Risk Assessment
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:1:5 APPROACH TO THE EIA
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:1:The purpose of EIA is to provide an independent assessment of a project’s potential environmental impacts
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:1:assessment of impacts which has been adopted within this EIA Report. In summary, this section presents:
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:1: • A summary of the EIA process.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:1: raised have been addressed through the EIA process.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:1: • The results of the scoping exercise undertaken to define the issues to be addressed by the EIA
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:1:5.1 The EIA process
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:1:EIA is an iterative tool for systematically examining and assessing the impacts and effects of the
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:1:formal reporting mechanism for an EIA is the EIA Report. In accordance with Schedule 3 of the 2007
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:1:Regulations (as amended), the EIA Report should include such information as is reasonably required to
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:2: • A non-technical summary of the information provided under this part of the EIA Regulations.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:2:The following stages were included in this EIA:
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:2:An agreement was previously reached between a third party and the MMO to undertake an EIA for a
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:2:On this basis, STDC has undertaken an EIA for the proposed scheme voluntarily under the Marine Works
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:2:(Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017, without submitting a formal EIA Screening Request.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:2:validity of the 2019 Scoping Opinions to inform this EIA (see Appendix 2). The scoping note presented the
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:3: of the EIA for the proposed scheme in light of the preferred option for the berth length, alignment
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:3: • The key elements of the proposed approach to the marine EIA for each environmental parameter.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:3:the EIA Report. Within this EIA Report, the description of the baseline environment consists of the following
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:4:this EIA Report and the conclusions reached regarding the sensitivity of receptors has been presented in
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:4:The EIA has been undertaken within a framework that allows for a transparent approach to the assessment
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:4:and the resulting conclusions presented within this EIA Report. This section sets out the assigned definitions
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:4:that are used in the assessment process for a number of topics considered in the EIA Report. In addition,
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:5:EIA provides an assessment of the impacts on sensitive receptors as a result of the effects of a development
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:5:effect may result in both a direct and indirect impact on a single receptor. Given this the EIA framework
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:5:purposes of this EIA. While this table provides guidelines of a generic nature, it should be noted that more
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:6:In the context of the EIA Regulations, ‘significant impacts’ are taken to be those of moderate or major
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:6:It should be reiterated that, although this section sets out the overall approach adopted for this EIA (using,
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:7:Appropriate mitigation measures have been identified and recommended in this EIA Report where the EIA
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:7:topic chapters of this EIA Report.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:8:The EIA Regulations and relevant guidance require an EIA Report to provide an indication of any difficulties
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:8:The EIA Regulations also require that an EIA Report is prepared by competent experts. This EIA Report
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:8:Assessor for EIA under IEMA’s voluntary EIA Quality Mark scheme. Through this scheme, EIA activity is
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:8:independently reviewed, on an annual basis, to ensure it delivers excellence in areas including EIA
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:8:environment (the EIA Directive) states that an EIA should identify, describe and assess in an appropriate
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:9:This EIA Report has given due consideration to the potential for different residual impacts to have a
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:9:chapters of the EIA Report.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:9:In line with IEMA’s Guidelines for EIA (2004), cumulative impacts are defined as: “…the impacts on the
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:9:However, the EIA and Habitats Directives and their associated regulations require the consideration of direct
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:9:The EIA Regulations do not define 'cumulative' but guidance on cumulative effects assessment is provided
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:9:taken into account in the EIA process and, generally, can be excluded from the scope of CIA. However, the
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:1:Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in support of a marine licence application to the Marine
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:1:EIA.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:1:Two separate EIAs are being undertaken in support of the port facility and the landside application, with
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:1: • ‘Marine’ EIA (to be undertaken by Royal HaskoningDHV and which is the subject of this note) –
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:1: the riverbank). The findings of the EIA will be reported in an Environmental Statement (ES) which
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:2: • ‘Landside’ EIA (being led by Lichfields – submitted as part of an outline planning application) – the
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:2: proposed quay (which is covered above under the ‘marine’ EIA). This comprises a number of
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:2:Opinions (which are publicly available online) with specific regard to the ‘marine’ EIA. Given the very close
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:2:is to reach agreement with the MMO and RCBC on the approach to the EIA without requesting Scoping
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:2:Opinions under the respective EIA regulations. A telephone meeting is therefore proposed to be held with
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:2: of the EIA for the proposed scheme in light of the preferred option for the berth length, alignment
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:2: • The key elements of the proposed approach to the ‘marine’ EIA for each environmental parameter
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:2:EIA/2019/00017) in response to a request for a Scoping Opinion for the previously proposed scheme. The
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:4:to the previously proposed scheme detailed that the EIA would address the following topic areas:
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:4:topic or the surveys or studies to be undertaken as part of the EIA.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:4:that need to be assessed within the EIA. Detail of relevance to the ‘marine’ EIA to be undertaken on behalf
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:4: RCBC with regard to the ‘marine’ EIA
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:4:RCBC confirmed in June 2019 that the list of topics and parameters proposed for the EIA to be undertaken
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:5:used to inform the proposed scope of environmental assessment for the ‘marine’ EIA for the current
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:5:applicable to the ‘marine’ EIA in isolation.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:8: RCBC confirmed that the proposed list of topics to be included in the EIA appears comprehensive and would provide sufficient scope for the
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:9: Any future EIA should be comprehensive, covering all appropriate and specific environmental/ecological areas given the adjacent land designations
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:11:EIA for the current scheme being progressed by STDC. The proposed scope is detailed below.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:11:inform other areas of the EIA (e.g. marine ecology, fisheries).
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:13:EIA, as well as information from publicly available studies previously undertaken for consented schemes
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:13:We understand that built heritage was scoped out of the landside EIA and therefore we propose to liaise
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:13:of the marine EIA.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:13:inform the EIA.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:14:A Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (LVIA) will be undertaken as part of the EIA. This will involve
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:14:A land quality desk study and Preliminary Risk Assessment (PRA) Report will inform the EIA chapter. No
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:14:The EIA will include consideration of potential effects associated with the generation of waste and how
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:15:A desk based socio-economic assessment will be undertaken as part of the EIA to understand the impacts
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:15:the programme of survey works undertaken to inform the EIA for the proposed Northern Gateway
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:1:This section of the EIA Report considers the following potential environmental impacts for the construction
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:1: section of this EIA Report where the requirement has been addressed
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:1: NPS requirement NPS reference EIA Report reference
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:1: Where the development is subject to EIA, the application
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:2: NPS requirement NPS reference EIA Report reference
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:2:EIA. The MMO confirmed that this was the case in September 2020 and RCBC issued a formal Scoping
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:2:detailed in Table 9.2. This table also signposts to the relevant section of this EIA Report where the comment
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:2: Response / section of the EIA Report where
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:3: Response / section of the EIA Report where
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:3: EIA development be submitted, and determined, prior to this document
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:4: Response / section of the EIA Report where
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:4:For this section of the EIA Report, the study area comprises the likely maximum extent over which potentially
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:4:This section of the EIA Report has been informed through a desk-based assessment. The desk-based
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:7:notification are not of relevance to this section of the EIA Report (shown in italics), however have been
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:7:section of the EIA Report, but are addressed elsewhere as necessary. The other sections relevant to the italicised features
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:5:The proposed scheme has been subject to an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) which has assessed
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:5:the Non-Technical Summary (NTS) of the EIA Report, which has been submitted to the Marine Management
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:9:proposed for the backing land (which have been subject to a separate planning application and EIA).
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:10:The EIA Report reports the findings of the EIA process. The following environmental parameters / topics
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:20:The EIA Regulations require that an assessment is made of the potential for cumulative effects to arise.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:1:baseline. As such, these impacts are already taken into account in the EIA process for the proposed
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:12:volume. The EIAs for the schemes scoped into the CIA have made informed assumptions about the most
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:12:and deposition footprint has been identified from the EIA studies undertaken for each project and the CIA
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:12:A review of all EIA studies for the above projects highlights that the maximum increase in suspended
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:15:minutes earlier). The EIA studies undertaken for the Anglo American Harbour Facilities predicted that there
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:15:The EIA studies undertaken for the Anglo American Harbour Facilities showed that the harbour facility itself
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:15:The Anglo American Harbour Facilities EIA predicted that currents will be reduced within the deepened
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:17:where sediment plumes combine at peak concentration (as predicted by the EIA studies for each project)
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:17:In relation to sediment contamination, data collected to inform the EIAs indicates that concentrations are
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:17:Where the EIA reports larger contaminant concentrations, such as for Anglo American Harbour Facilities,
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:23:adjacent landside EIA development. In addition, once the larger area of habitat from the landside
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:23:Of relevance to the proposed scheme, ecology surveys for the adjacent landside EIA development recorded:
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:23:As a more sizable development, the landside EIA proposes a number of mitigation measures including off
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:23:worse than minor adverse in significance when considered cumulatively with the landside EIA.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:25:supporting habitat was considered a negligible impact in the EIAs for both the Anglo American Harbour
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:28:traffic flow were assessed as part the NGCT EIA (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020), Anglo American Harbour
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:30:Section 20 of this EIA report has confirmed that there would be no direct or indirect impact on flood risk and
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:31:natural resources has therefore not been undertaken within this EIA. It is therefore concluded that there is
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_1. Introduction.pdf:1:EIA Report
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_1. Introduction.pdf:2: Author(s): RHDHV EIA Team
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_1. Introduction.pdf:2: Drafted by: RHDHV EIA Team
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_1. Introduction.pdf:4:5 APPROACH TO THE EIA 34
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_1. Introduction.pdf:4:5.1 The EIA process 34
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_1. Introduction.pdf:9:Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in support of a marine licence application to the Marine
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_1. Introduction.pdf:9:The study area for the EIA in respect of the proposed scheme is the area over which the direct and indirect
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_1. Introduction.pdf:12:This report presents the findings of the EIA process and explains how the conclusions have been reached.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_1. Introduction.pdf:12:describes the EIA process and defines the EIA methodology adopted.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_1. Introduction.pdf:12:the EIA process. The potential impacts of the proposed scheme during construction and operational phases
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_1. Introduction.pdf:12:production of this EIA Report.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:5:As outlined in Section 5, the scope of the EIA for the proposed scheme was agreed in August 2020 based
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:5:the EIA application for STDC’s landside proposals. To date, no comments have been received on the
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:6:As detailed within Section 1, the study area for the EIA covers the marine elements of the proposed scheme
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:8:as being either moderate or substantial (as per Table 21.4) are classified as ‘significant’ in EIA terms.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:1:This section of the EIA Report considers the following potential environmental impacts:
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:2:proposed scheme, which has in turn informed this section of the EIA Report.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:2:Table 20.2 summarises the requirements of the NPS which are of relevance to this section of the EIA
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:2: NPS for Ports requirement NPS reference EIA Report reference
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:3: NPS for Ports requirement NPS reference EIA Report reference
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:3:This section of the EIA Report and the FRA has been guided and informed by relevant local policy, studies
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:4:reviewed and used to inform the assessment for this section of the EIA Report and the FRA.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:4:downstream of the Tees Barrage. This information was used to inform this section of the EIA Report, as
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:4:The study area for this section of the EIA Report comprises the area which has the potential to be both
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:4:This section of the EIA Report has been informed through a combination of desk-based assessment and
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:5:The findings of the EIA with regard to the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime (as set out in Section 6)
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:5:and the magnitude of impacts in this EIA Report.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:8:To inform this section of the EIA Report a separate FRA has been undertaken specific to the proposed
R-2020-0684-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:1:MMO Reference: EIA/2019/00017
R-2020-0684-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:1:3 Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) …………………………………………………… 3
R-2020-0684-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:3:3 Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)
R-2020-0684-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:3:certain public and private projects on the environment (“the EIA Directive”) aims to
R-2020-0684-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:3:location are subject to an EIA before permission is granted.
R-2020-0684-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:3:amended) (“the Regulations”) transpose the EIA Directive into UK law for marine
R-2020-0684-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:3:constitute an EIA development under Schedule A2 (88) of the Regulations,
R-2020-0684-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:4:during the EIA and must be included in any resulting ES.
R-2020-0684-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:12:EIAs for other developments in the vicinity have identified that the lower Tees
R-2020-0684-ESM-HIGHWAYS ENGLAND.pdf:6: for EIA (SYSTRA) (SYSTRA) (SYSTRA)
R-2020-0684-ESM-HIGHWAYS ENGLAND.pdf:10:An Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) has been produced (by Royal HaskoningDHV) in support of the
R-2020-0684-ESM-HIGHWAYS ENGLAND.pdf:10:same EIA has been used for both applications.
R-2020-0684-ESM-HIGHWAYS ENGLAND.pdf:11:4. Review of the EIA
R-2020-0684-ESM-HIGHWAYS ENGLAND.pdf:11:Chapter 15 of the EIA is concerned with the Traffic and Transport impacts of the development. A supporting
R-2020-0684-ESM-HIGHWAYS ENGLAND.pdf:11:attached as an appendix to the EIA.
R-2020-0684-ESM-HIGHWAYS ENGLAND.pdf:11:outline planning permission. The EIA and Transport Statement submitted for the two quay applications therefore
R-2020-0684-ESM-HIGHWAYS ENGLAND.pdf:11:the TS and EIA do not take into account these 50 vehicles movements per hour. However, it is anticipated that
R-2020-0684-ESM-HIGHWAYS ENGLAND.pdf:11:human receptors have been determined within the EIA, and found to be not significant and consequently, no
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:1:This section of the EIA Report considers the likely effects of the proposed scheme with respect to land
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:1:The findings of this assessment have the potential to influence other technical sections within this EIA
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:1:the NPPF with regard to land quality and geology and signposts to the applicable section of this EIA Report
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:1: NPPF reference NPPF requirement EIA reference
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:2: NPPF reference NPPF requirement EIA reference
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:4:requirement to undertake the following, which are directly or indirectly linked to this section of the EIA Report:
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:5:Consultation is a key part of the EIA process. Consultation regarding land quality and geology has been
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:10:Major or moderate environmental impacts are considered to be ‘significant’ in EIA terms. Whilst minor
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:12:post submission of this EIA; this therefore reaffirms the precautionary approach undertaken within the
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:16:(including part of the proposed scheme footprint which is the subject of this EIA) to break the Made Ground
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:19:not considered ‘significant’ in terms of this EIA assessment.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:1:This section of the EIA Report considers the following potential environmental impacts:
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:1:of the EIA Report.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:1:this EIA Report. The information presented in this section relates to terrestrial ecology only.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:5:The study area for this section of the EIA Report comprises the area which has the potential to be both
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:5:Table 11.3 Study areas used for terrestrial ecology receptors considered in this EIA Report
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:6:adjacent landside EIA development) and 2020 (for the proposed scheme which is subject of this report) by
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:10:concluded to be not significant in terms of the EIA Regulations.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:11:applicable to this section of the EIA Report (which concentrates on terrestrial ecology). Cross reference to
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:14:adjacent land EIA development. The main terrestrial habitat within the footprint of the Proposed Scheme
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:17:lies within the footprint of the adjacent landside development EIA and is fully assessed as part of those
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:19:during survey works for the adjacent land-side EIA in the summer of 2020.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:19:side EIA scheme; however the amount of suitable habitat within the footprint of the proposed scheme is
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:20:scheme footprint during the surveys undertaken to inform the landside EIA.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:20:Several red listed birds were recorded nearby within the land-side EIA development, including linnet Linaria
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:21:Studies undertaken as part of the adjacent landside EIA record habitats of regional significance for dingy
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:21:recorded within the adjacent footprint of the landsite development which was subject to a separate EIA and
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:22:of the adjacent landside EIA and is fully assessed within the documents supporting that application. Due to
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1111_Appendix 1_Waste Report.pdf:4:to as the proposed scheme). This report accompanies the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1111_Appendix 1_Waste Report.pdf:11:sediment quality survey was undertaken in the Tees estuary during July 2019 to inform the EIA for the
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1111_Appendix 1_Waste Report.pdf:14:A full description of the proposed scheme is provided in the EIA Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020),
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf:1:This section of the EIA Report considers the potential airborne noise and vibration impacts of the proposed
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf:5:The study area for this section of the EIA Report is the area that has the potential to be directly and/or
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_4. Legislative framework.pdf:1:The non-works HRO application is not linked to this EIA or the related marine licence application. However,
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_4. Legislative framework.pdf:2:The requirement for EIA is established by the European Directive 2011/92/EU (codifying previous EIA
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_4. Legislative framework.pdf:2:projects on the environment (the EIA Directive). The EIA Directive is implemented via various regulations;
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_4. Legislative framework.pdf:2:An agreement was previously reached between a third party and the MMO to undertake an EIA for a very
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_4. Legislative framework.pdf:2:Assessment) Regulations 2007, as amended. We assume that RCBC is of the opinion that an EIA is also
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_4. Legislative framework.pdf:2:a Scoping Opinion was issued by RCBC in 2019. We have therefore proceeded on the basis that an EIA is
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_4. Legislative framework.pdf:2:required under both sets of EIA Regulations, without undertaking a formal EIA screening process (on the
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:8: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:11: Marine Works EIA (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations governing EIA’s for
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:9:modelling exercise to inform the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) that is being prepared as part of
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:44:Section 6 (Hydrodynamic and Sedimentary Processes) of the EIA Report.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_22. Climate change.pdf:1:This section of the EIA Report describes the existing environment in relation to climate change and details
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_22. Climate change.pdf:5:and requirements of, an assessment of GHG emissions within an EIA, as well as considerations for
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_22. Climate change.pdf:14:the construction of offshore wind farms, which would be subject to a separate planning application and EIA.
R-2020-0684-ESM-MLA202000506 - South Bank Quay - Phase 1 EIA Intent to Deferral Letter.pdf:1:Assessment) (EIA) Regulations 2007 (as amended) (“the Regulations”).
R-2020-0684-ESM-MLA202000506 - South Bank Quay - Phase 1 EIA Intent to Deferral Letter.pdf:2:Intent to Defer EIA Consent Decision
R-2020-0684-ESM-MLA202000506 - South Bank Quay - Phase 1 EIA Intent to Deferral Letter.pdf:2:ability to determine that an EIA is not required in relation to a regulated activity if it is satisfied
R-2020-0684-ESM-MLA202000506 - South Bank Quay - Phase 1 EIA Intent to Deferral Letter.pdf:2:body, and such assessments are (or will be) sufficient to meet the requirements of the EIA
R-2020-0684-ESM-MLA202000506 - South Bank Quay - Phase 1 EIA Intent to Deferral Letter.pdf:2:The MMO confirms its intent to defer an EIA consent decision under the Regulations, by
R-2020-0684-ESM-MLA202000506 - South Bank Quay - Phase 1 EIA Intent to Deferral Letter.pdf:2:meet requirements of the EIA Directive in relation to the project.
R-2020-0684-ESM-MLA202000506 - South Bank Quay - Phase 1 EIA Intent to Deferral Letter.pdf:2:- Conclusion of EIA assessment
R-2020-0684-ESM-MLA202000506 - South Bank Quay - Phase 1 EIA Intent to Deferral Letter.pdf:2:the event that they are not satisfied that the EIA assessment meets the criteria stipulated
R-2020-0684-ESM-MLA202000506 - South Bank Quay - Phase 1 EIA Intent to Deferral Letter.pdf:2:above. In the event that this occurs the application will be subject to EIA assessment
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:1:The development is one which it was agreed fell under Schedule 1 of the EIA
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:5:With respect to projects that require a marine licence the EIA Directive
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:5:EIA, MMO must ensure that applications for a marine licence are compliant
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:5:set of EIA regulations, then it is advised that the applicant submit a request
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:7:ability to determine that an EIA is not required in relation to a regulated activity
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:7:are (or will be) sufficient to meet the requirements of the EIA Directive in
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:7:their planning and EIA assessment surrounding the scheme. The MMO has
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:7:determined that an EIA consent decision under the Regulations is not
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:7:(2012) accompanied by EIA.
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:16: EIA
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:17:been considered as required by the EIA Regulations. The alternative
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:18:data collected to inform other project EIAs within the estuary.
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:19:influence other technical chapters within this EIA, including:
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:26:which is not considered significant in terms of this EIA assessment.
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:41:EIA Report are broadly categorised into the following:
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:41:sections of this EIA Report:
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:61:EIA terms.
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:73:between minor moderate adverse to minor adverse. In terms of EIA these
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:73:adverse. In terms of EIA these effects are not significant.
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:73:the transporter bridge is minor adverse. In terms of EIA the effect is not
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:73:adverse. In terms of EIA these effects are not significant.
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:74:in the view is minor negligible adverse. In terms of EIA these effects are not
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:89:In the establishment of the EIA regulations detailed above, the general
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:93:EIA in the absence of data at the time of writing), it is concluded that the
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf:1:This section of the EIA Report considers the following potential impacts to commercial navigation:
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf:1:respectively) have been assessed within this section of the EIA Report, where they are relevant to the
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_2. Need for the proposed scheme.pdf:1:throughout this report as the ‘landside EIA’). The planning application was submitted to allow the
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 11_Air quality assessment method.pdf:1: 1100_EIA
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 11_Air quality assessment method.pdf:2: 1100_EIA
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 11_Air quality assessment method.pdf:3: 1100_EIA
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 11_Air quality assessment method.pdf:4: 1100_EIA
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 11_Air quality assessment method.pdf:5: 1100_EIA
R-2020-0684-ESM-CONSULTATION MMO 0684.pdf:2:With respect to projects that require a marine licence the EIA Directive (codified in Directive
R-2020-0684-ESM-CONSULTATION MMO 0684.pdf:2:that require EIA, MMO must ensure that applications for a marine licence are compliant with the
R-2020-0684-ESM-CONSULTATION MMO 0684.pdf:2:If this consultation request relates to a project capable of falling within either set of EIA
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:1:and sedimentary regime (see Section 6) as well as recent survey data collected to inform other project EIAs
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:1:within the estuary, the latest being from a survey undertaken in 2019 to inform the NGCT EIA.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:1:The findings of this assessment have the potential to influence other technical sections within this EIA,
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:1:requirements of the NPS which are of relevance to this section of the EIA Report.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:1: NPS for Ports requirement NPS reference EIA Report reference
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:2:of the EIA Report are contained within Table 7.2.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:2: The MMO would expect water quality to be scoped into the EIA.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:3:section of the EIA Report.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:4:can be quantified. Therefore, for EIA, in the same way, if contaminant levels in the sediments under
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:6:applicable information to this EIA is outlined below.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:12:A sediment quality survey was undertaken in the Tees estuary during July 2014 to inform the EIA for the
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:12:Royal HaskoningDHV carried out an EIA on behalf of PDT in 2012 for proposed strengthening of the existing
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:1:This section of the EIA Report draws together information regarding the potential for the proposed scheme
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:2:European sites. This section of the EIA Report is intended to present all of the information necessary to
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:9:Section 12 of this EIA Report. Although the qualifying interest features of the Teesmouth and Cleveland
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:21:and Cleveland Coast SPA and Ramsar site. With reference to the relevant sections of the EIA Report where
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:21: • site-specific information obtained from surveys and studies undertaken as part of the EIA for the
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:21: • evidence provided within the EIA Report; and,
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1109_Appendix 15_Flood Risk Assessment.pdf:8:The proposed scheme is defined in full within the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Report (Royal
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1109_Appendix 15_Flood Risk Assessment.pdf:20:consultation undertaken to inform the EIA. The Environment Agency confirmed the requirement to consider
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1109_Appendix 15_Flood Risk Assessment.pdf:20:of the EIA Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020).
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1109_Appendix 15_Flood Risk Assessment.pdf:20:Following consultation with the LLFA as part of the September 2020 EIA scoping consultation, which for the
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1109_Appendix 15_Flood Risk Assessment.pdf:35:This FRA has reviewed the flood risk to the proposed scheme to support the development of the EIA Report
R-2020-0684-ESM-MMO.pdf:1:authority (the MMO) the ability to determine that an EIA is not required in relation to
R-2020-0684-ESM-MMO.pdf:1:will be) sufficient to meet the requirements of the EIA Directive in relation to that
R-2020-0684-ESM-MMO.pdf:1:planning and EIA assessment surrounding the scheme. The MMO has determined
R-2020-0684-ESM-MMO.pdf:1:that an EIA consent decision under the Regulations is not required for the proposed
R-2020-0684-ESM-MMO.pdf:1:Country Planning Regulations (2012) accompanied by EIA.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_30. References.pdf:6:Jones, D. and Marten, K. (2016). Dredging sound levels, numerical modelling and EIA. Maritime Solutions
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_30. References.pdf:9:PD Teesport. (2018). South Bank Quay EIA Report. Doc number I&BPB6595R003F0.1 Appendix 8:
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:26: Tidal propagation with the tide arriving up to 2 minutes earlier). The EIA studies undertaken for the Anglo American Harbour Facilities predicted that there will be no impact on tidal propagation
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 3_Scoping consultation.pdf:2:We are in agreement with the topics/constraints to be scoped into the EIA document listed in page 4
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 3_Scoping consultation.pdf:2:Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for this development.
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 3_Scoping consultation.pdf:3:of the landside EIA, as well as information from publicly available studies previously undertaken for
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 3_Scoping consultation.pdf:3:We understand that built heritage was scoped out of the landside EIA and therefore we propose to
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 3_Scoping consultation.pdf:3:landside parts of the marine EIA.
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 3_Scoping consultation.pdf:3:This follows consultation on scoping of the EIA with the MMO.
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 3_Scoping consultation.pdf:6:assessment for the EIA (The South Bank Port Facility – Environmental Impact
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 3_Scoping consultation.pdf:7: environments and will require Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in support of
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 3_Scoping consultation.pdf:7: 2.1. An EIA scoping opinion was provided by the MMO for a scheme that was previously
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 3_Scoping consultation.pdf:7: Assessment) (EIA) Regulations 2007 as amended (reference EIA/2019/00017).
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 3_Scoping consultation.pdf:7: 2.2. The MMO notes that two separate EIA’s are proposed for the scheme: one covering
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 3_Scoping consultation.pdf:7: advise that both EIAs should consider the scheme as a whole ensuring that all
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 3_Scoping consultation.pdf:7: proposed EIAs should demonstrate that the whole scheme has been assessed.
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 3_Scoping consultation.pdf:7: are appropriate for the proposed EIA for the development.
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 3_Scoping consultation.pdf:8: EIA. However, should the applicant request it the MMO would be prepared to
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 3_Scoping consultation.pdf:8: EIA.
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 3_Scoping consultation.pdf:8: are appropriate for the proposed EIA for the development.
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 3_Scoping consultation.pdf:12:the process of undertaking an EIA to support applications and the information below relates to
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 3_Scoping consultation.pdf:12:the proposed scope of noise and vibration assessment as part of the EIA. We understand that
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:7:been used as a proxy to inform this EIA in the absence of data at the time of writing), it is concluded that the
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:1:Potential impacts on waterbirds and seabirds assessed in this section of the EIA Report are broadly
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:1:The assessment of potential impacts has been informed by the following sections of this EIA Report:
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:1: Section of EIA report
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:1: Where the development is subject to EIA, the application should
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:4:A summary of the comments relevant to ornithological receptors that were received during the EIA scoping
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:4: Response / section of the EIA
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:5:The study area for this section of the EIA Report comprises the area within the Tees estuary that has the
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:7:winter period. It was therefore agreed with Natural England that, for the purpose of this EIA, the assessment
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:31:In terms of receptor sensitivity, the EIA for NGCT (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020) referred to monitoring
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1107_Appendix 7_Land quality desk study.pdf:7: Impact Assessment (EIA) for Geology and Ground Conditions.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1107_Appendix 7_Land quality desk study.pdf:39:site with respect to land contamination, characterise the baseline environment to inform and support the EIA
R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:5: Habitats Regulation Assessment (contained within EIA Volume 2)
R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:5: Water Framework Directive Compliance Assessment (contained within EIA Volume 2)
R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:5: Transport Statement (contained with EIA Volume 3 Appendix 10)
R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:6: the need for Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’).
R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:6: inform discussions regarding the validity of the 2019 Scoping Opinions to inform the EIA for the
R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:6:1.8 On this basis, STDC has undertaken an EIA for the proposed scheme voluntarily under the
R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:6: submitting a formal EIA Screening Request.
R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:12: greatest flexibility with regard to phasing of the proposed scheme, the EIA has assessed the
R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:23:5.7 EIA is required for developments, which on the grounds of their nature, scale and location are
R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:23: likely to give rise to significant environmental effects. The purpose of an EIA is to ensure that
R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:23:5.8 For planning applications, EIA is governed by the Town and Country Planning (Environmental
R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:23: Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the EIA Regulations) as updated by The Town and
R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:24:5.11 In undertaking the EIA for the current application the technical team has worked closely with
R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:24:5.12 The key findings from the EIA are summarised below.
R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:32: Regeneration Masterplan. The EIA process which has been undertaken has clearly established
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_3. Description of the proposed scheme.pdf:1:Dock Road was included as part of the scheme description for the landside EIA on the basis that permissions
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_3. Description of the proposed scheme.pdf:1:for demolition had not been granted at the point the landside EIA was submitted. As noted above, RCBC
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_3. Description of the proposed scheme.pdf:2:demolition of this building has been incorporated into the landside EIA and associated planning application
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_3. Description of the proposed scheme.pdf:8:of this EIA, a dredge envelope has been assessed (Figure 1.1). As shown on the drawing, dredging is
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_3. Description of the proposed scheme.pdf:8:construction of the quay however the assessment undertaken within this EIA assumes that the dredging is
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_3. Description of the proposed scheme.pdf:11:In order to provide the greatest flexibility with regard to phasing of the proposed scheme, the EIA has
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_3. Description of the proposed scheme.pdf:15:purposes of this EIA, it has been assumed that the measures detailed in the outline remediation strategy
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_3. Description of the proposed scheme.pdf:16:proposed for the backing land (which have been subject to a separate planning application and EIA).
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_3. Description of the proposed scheme.pdf:19:During production of the recent Hartlepool approach channel EIA Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2019),
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:11:For the purposes of EIA, ‘major’ and ‘moderate’ impacts are generally deemed to be significant (in EIA
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:20:in EIA terms.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf:1:potential impact of a proposed scheme on human health. This section of the EIA Report has therefore been
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf:1:In the consultation stages of the aforementioned EIA regulations, the general interpretation was that effects
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf:1:the findings of the assessments undertaken for other sections of the EIA, notably air quality and noise and
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf:1:Section 18 of this EIA Report refers to the Government’s health-based ambient air quality objectives, and
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf:1:Section 8 of this EIA Report considers the potential impacts of the proposed scheme on human health of
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:1: reference to section of this EIA Report where the requirement has been addressed
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:1: NPS requirement EIA Report reference
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:2: NPS requirement EIA Report reference
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:2: procedures requiring an EIA and mitigation
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:3:Summary of comments received during the EIA scoping phase
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:3:the EIA Report where the comment has been addressed.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:3: Response / section of the EIA Report where
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:3:The study area for the EIA is the area over which the direct and indirect effects of the proposed scheme
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:4:The assessment methodology presented in Section 5 has been used to inform this section of the EIA
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:6:included within this section of the EIA Report are:
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:6:a density estimate of 0.52/km2 (Hammond et al., 2017). The potential impacts for the EIA assessments are
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:9:Brigg (SCOS, 2019). The potential impacts for the EIA assessments are put into the context of the North-
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf:1:This section of the EIA Report presents the findings of a Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (LVIA)
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf:2:Various European Union (EU) Directives underpin the requirement for EIA (which includes LVIA) and are
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf:2:EIA.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf:4: these are significant in terms of EIA.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf:22:proposed scheme footprint ranges between minor moderate adverse to minor adverse. In terms of EIA
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf:22:is minor adverse. In terms of EIA these effects are not significant.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf:22:in views from the site of the transporter bridge is minor adverse. In terms of EIA the effect is not significant.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf:23:In terms of EIA these effects are not significant.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf:23:significance of effect in the view is minor negligible adverse. In terms of EIA these effects are not
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:1:populations, within the other relevant sections of this EIA Report.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:1:This section of the EIA Report provides an overview of baseline air quality within the area, identifies
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:2: Section of EIA report
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:3: Section of EIA report
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:5: 2 August 2019 the EIA was agreed
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_23. Use of natural resources.pdf:1:states that EIA Reports produced under these Regulations should include a description of the likely
R-2020-0684-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:8:the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for this development.
R-2020-0684-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:8:Annex A – Advice related to EIA Scoping Requirements
R-2020-0684-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:9:actions on ecosystems or their components. EcIA may be carried out as part of the EIA
R-2020-0684-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:10:EIA process.
R-2020-0684-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:10:The EIA will need to consider any impacts upon local wildlife and geological sites. Local Sites
R-2020-0684-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:12:strategies pertaining to the area. The EIA should include assessments of visual effects on the
R-2020-0684-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:12:The EIA should include a full assessment of the potential impacts of the development on
R-2021-0405-FFM-NATURAL HERITAGE 0405.pdf:1:It is important that mitigation measures are followed as per 10.0 EIA. It is also important that a net gain in terms of
R-2021-0405-FFM-210512, EcIA for South Bank Site Remediation_INCA_RevA Final.PDF:12:Japanese Rose Rosa rugosa, were present on the adjacent South Bank area. Buddleia bushes
R-2021-0405-FFM-210512, EcIA for South Bank Site Remediation_INCA_RevA Final.PDF:12:Buddleia davidii are widespread and cotoneaster bushes are occasional.
R-2021-0405-FFM-210512, EcIA for South Bank Site Remediation_INCA_RevA Final.PDF:19:7.12 Four INNS were recorded - Buddleia, a Cotoneaster sp., Spanish bluebell Hyacinthoides
R-2021-0405-FFM-210512, EcIA for South Bank Site Remediation_INCA_RevA Final.PDF:22:8.25 The buddleias, Spanish bluebells and daffodils on site are not considered to warrant special
R-2021-0405-FFM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:9:It is important that mitigation measures are followed as per 10.0 EIA. It is also
R-2021-0405-FFM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:12:been given to the following species with the EIA concluding the following;
R-2021-0405-FFM-63262_01 - South Bank Remediation Cover Letter - 13.05.21.PDF:7:our opinion that the application proposal is not one giving rise to a need for EIA as defined in the
R-2021-0405-FFM-63262_01 - South Bank Remediation Cover Letter - 13.05.21.PDF:7:The Regulations define “EIA development” as “development which is either (a) Schedule 1 development; or
R-2021-0405-FFM-63262_01 - South Bank Remediation Cover Letter - 13.05.21.PDF:7:evaluating whether Schedule 2 development requires an EIA. For the construction of roads, the indicative
R-2021-0405-FFM-63262_01 - South Bank Remediation Cover Letter - 13.05.21.PDF:7:issues, in this case, to consider in determining whether the development may be EIA development are
R-2020-0539-PND-60772_South Bank pump houses cover letter_September 2020.PDF:3:(Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 as updated (“the EIA regulations 2017”). The
R-2020-0539-PND-60772_South Bank pump houses cover letter_September 2020.PDF:3:EIA Regulations 2017, which relates to Urban Development Projects.
R-2020-0539-PND-60772_South Bank pump houses cover letter_September 2020.PDF:3:For Schedule 2 developments, EIA is required only in situations where the development could give rise to
R-2019-0331-SCP-284160 R_2019_0331_SCP - EIA Scoping, South Bank Wharf Redevelopment, South Bank, Middlesbrough.pdf:1:Environmental Impact Assessment Scoping consultation (Regulation 15 (4) of the EIA
R-2019-0331-SCP-284160 R_2019_0331_SCP - EIA Scoping, South Bank Wharf Redevelopment, South Bank, Middlesbrough.pdf:1:Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for this development.
R-2019-0331-SCP-284160 R_2019_0331_SCP - EIA Scoping, South Bank Wharf Redevelopment, South Bank, Middlesbrough.pdf:2:Annex A – Advice related to EIA Scoping Requirements
R-2019-0331-SCP-284160 R_2019_0331_SCP - EIA Scoping, South Bank Wharf Redevelopment, South Bank, Middlesbrough.pdf:2:on ecosystems or their components. EcIA may be carried out as part of the EIA process or to
R-2019-0331-SCP-284160 R_2019_0331_SCP - EIA Scoping, South Bank Wharf Redevelopment, South Bank, Middlesbrough.pdf:3:an Appropriate Assessment, in addition to consideration of impacts through the EIA process.
R-2019-0331-SCP-284160 R_2019_0331_SCP - EIA Scoping, South Bank Wharf Redevelopment, South Bank, Middlesbrough.pdf:3:The EIA will need to consider any impacts upon local wildlife and geological sites. Local Sites are
R-2019-0331-SCP-284160 R_2019_0331_SCP - EIA Scoping, South Bank Wharf Redevelopment, South Bank, Middlesbrough.pdf:5:pertaining to the area. The EIA should include assessments of visual effects on the surrounding
R-2019-0331-SCP-284160 R_2019_0331_SCP - EIA Scoping, South Bank Wharf Redevelopment, South Bank, Middlesbrough.pdf:5:The EIA should include a full assessment of the potential impacts of the development on local
R-2019-0331-SCP-Letter to RCBC 19.05.20 Scoping Request FINAL.pdf:1: 1 development under the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Regulations, by reason of the size
R-2019-0331-SCP-Officer Letter_R20190331SCP.pdf:8:the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for this development.
R-2019-0331-SCP-Officer Letter_R20190331SCP.pdf:8:Annex A – Advice related to EIA Scoping Requirements
R-2019-0331-SCP-Officer Letter_R20190331SCP.pdf:9:actions on ecosystems or their components. EcIA may be carried out as part of the EIA
R-2019-0331-SCP-Officer Letter_R20190331SCP.pdf:10:EIA process.
R-2019-0331-SCP-Officer Letter_R20190331SCP.pdf:10:The EIA will need to consider any impacts upon local wildlife and geological sites. Local Sites
R-2019-0331-SCP-Officer Letter_R20190331SCP.pdf:12:strategies pertaining to the area. The EIA should include assessments of visual effects on the
R-2019-0331-SCP-Officer Letter_R20190331SCP.pdf:12:The EIA should include a full assessment of the potential impacts of the development on
R-2020-0679-PND-60722_Cover letter torpedo v2_Nov 2020.PDF:3:(Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 as updated (“the EIA regulations 2017”). The
R-2020-0679-PND-60722_Cover letter torpedo v2_Nov 2020.PDF:3:EIA Regulations 2017, which relates to Urban Development Projects.
R-2020-0679-PND-60722_Cover letter torpedo v2_Nov 2020.PDF:3:For Schedule 2 developments, EIA is required only in situations where the development could give rise to
R-2021-0589-PND-Officer Report 0589.pdf:2:development with regard to whether the demolition would constitute EIA
R-2021-0589-PND-Officer Report 0589.pdf:3:supported by an EIA with the significance not being beyond the local area.
R-2021-0589-PND-63262_Cover letter Prior Approval_July 2021.PDF:3:consideration as to whether the proposed demolition project could be considered to be EIA development.
R-2021-0589-PND-63262_Cover letter Prior Approval_July 2021.PDF:3:Paragraph 4a). Such development could be considered to be EIA development, where “the development as
R-2021-0589-PND-63262_Cover letter Prior Approval_July 2021.PDF:3:duty to screen the development to determine whether it is EIA development.
R-2022-0343-ESM-64764 SeAH EIA Compliance Statement (2) May 2022 pdf.pdf:1:EIA Compliance Statement
R-2022-0343-ESM-64764 SeAH EIA Compliance Statement (2) May 2022 pdf.pdf:3:SeAH Monopile Facility : EIA Compliance Statement
R-2022-0343-ESM-64764 SeAH EIA Compliance Statement (2) May 2022 pdf.pdf:3:4.0 EIA Screening of Reserved Matters Submission 7
R-2022-0343-ESM-64764 SeAH EIA Compliance Statement (2) May 2022 pdf.pdf:5:SeAH Monopile Facility : EIA Compliance Statement
R-2022-0343-ESM-64764 SeAH EIA Compliance Statement (2) May 2022 pdf.pdf:5: • EIA Compliance Statement, prepared by Lichfields (this document);
R-2022-0343-ESM-64764 SeAH EIA Compliance Statement (2) May 2022 pdf.pdf:6:SeAH Monopile Facility : EIA Compliance Statement
R-2022-0343-ESM-64764 SeAH EIA Compliance Statement (2) May 2022 pdf.pdf:7:SeAH Monopile Facility : EIA Compliance Statement
R-2022-0343-ESM-64764 SeAH EIA Compliance Statement (2) May 2022 pdf.pdf:8:SeAH Monopile Facility : EIA Compliance Statement
R-2022-0343-ESM-64764 SeAH EIA Compliance Statement (2) May 2022 pdf.pdf:9:SeAH Monopile Facility : EIA Compliance Statement
R-2022-0343-ESM-64764 SeAH EIA Compliance Statement (2) May 2022 pdf.pdf:10:SeAH Monopile Facility : EIA Compliance Statement
R-2022-0343-ESM-64764 SeAH EIA Compliance Statement (2) May 2022 pdf.pdf:11:SeAH Monopile Facility : EIA Compliance Statement
R-2022-0343-ESM-64764 SeAH EIA Compliance Statement (2) May 2022 pdf.pdf:11:4.0 EIA Screening of Reserved Matters
R-2022-0343-ESM-64764 SeAH EIA Compliance Statement (2) May 2022 pdf.pdf:11: Regulations 2018 (‘the 2017 EIA Regulations (as amended)’). The application comprises a
R-2022-0343-ESM-64764 SeAH EIA Compliance Statement (2) May 2022 pdf.pdf:11: of the 2017 EIA Regulations (as amended) which relates to Infrastructure projects on a site
R-2022-0343-ESM-64764 SeAH EIA Compliance Statement (2) May 2022 pdf.pdf:11:4.4 To the extent to which it is relevant to the process of EIA, the ES (July 2020) and SES
R-2022-0343-ESM-64764 SeAH EIA Compliance Statement (2) May 2022 pdf.pdf:12:SeAH Monopile Facility : EIA Compliance Statement
R-2022-0343-ESM-64764 SeAH EIA Compliance Statement (2) May 2022 pdf.pdf:12: our view that an EIA is not required to assist in its consideration of the Reserved Matters
R-2022-0343-ESM-64764 SeAH EIA Compliance Statement (2) May 2022 pdf.pdf:13:SeAH Monopile Facility : EIA Compliance Statement
R-2022-0343-ESM-Officer report 0343.pdf:1:supported by an EIA compliance Statement.
R-2022-0343-ESM-Officer report 0343.pdf:5: Site context history and EIA compliance
R-2022-0343-ESM-Officer report 0343.pdf:5:Site Context, History and EIA Compliance
R-2022-0343-ESM-Officer report 0343.pdf:5:The applicant in support of the application has prepared an EIA Compliance
R-2022-0343-ESM-64764 SeAH EIA Compliance Statement April 2022.pdf:1:EIA Compliance Statement
R-2022-0343-ESM-64764 SeAH EIA Compliance Statement April 2022.pdf:3:SeAH Monopile Facility : EIA Compliance Statement
R-2022-0343-ESM-64764 SeAH EIA Compliance Statement April 2022.pdf:3:4.0 EIA Screening of Reserved Matters Submission 7
R-2022-0343-ESM-64764 SeAH EIA Compliance Statement April 2022.pdf:5:SeAH Monopile Facility : EIA Compliance Statement
R-2022-0343-ESM-64764 SeAH EIA Compliance Statement April 2022.pdf:5: • EIA Compliance Statement, prepared by Lichfields (this document);
R-2022-0343-ESM-64764 SeAH EIA Compliance Statement April 2022.pdf:6:SeAH Monopile Facility : EIA Compliance Statement
R-2022-0343-ESM-64764 SeAH EIA Compliance Statement April 2022.pdf:7:SeAH Monopile Facility : EIA Compliance Statement
R-2022-0343-ESM-64764 SeAH EIA Compliance Statement April 2022.pdf:8:SeAH Monopile Facility : EIA Compliance Statement
R-2022-0343-ESM-64764 SeAH EIA Compliance Statement April 2022.pdf:9:SeAH Monopile Facility : EIA Compliance Statement
R-2022-0343-ESM-64764 SeAH EIA Compliance Statement April 2022.pdf:10:SeAH Monopile Facility : EIA Compliance Statement
R-2022-0343-ESM-64764 SeAH EIA Compliance Statement April 2022.pdf:11:SeAH Monopile Facility : EIA Compliance Statement
R-2022-0343-ESM-64764 SeAH EIA Compliance Statement April 2022.pdf:11:4.0 EIA Screening of Reserved Matters
R-2022-0343-ESM-64764 SeAH EIA Compliance Statement April 2022.pdf:11: Regulations 2018 (‘the 2017 EIA Regulations (as amended)’). The application comprises a
R-2022-0343-ESM-64764 SeAH EIA Compliance Statement April 2022.pdf:11: of the 2017 EIA Regulations (as amended) which relates to Infrastructure projects on a site
R-2022-0343-ESM-64764 SeAH EIA Compliance Statement April 2022.pdf:11:4.4 To the extent to which it is relevant to the process of EIA, the ES (July 2020) and SES
R-2022-0343-ESM-64764 SeAH EIA Compliance Statement April 2022.pdf:12:SeAH Monopile Facility : EIA Compliance Statement
R-2022-0343-ESM-64764 SeAH EIA Compliance Statement April 2022.pdf:12: our view that an EIA is not required to assist in its consideration of the Reserved Matters
R-2022-0343-ESM-64764 SeAH EIA Compliance Statement April 2022.pdf:13:SeAH Monopile Facility : EIA Compliance Statement
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 1.2 Statement of Expertise - formatted.pdf:3: Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Quality Mark. This means that RPS adheres to the
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 1.2 Statement of Expertise - formatted.pdf:3: • EIA Management – We commit to using effective project control and management processes
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 1.2 Statement of Expertise - formatted.pdf:3: to deliver quality in the EIA we co-ordinate and the Environmental Statements we produce.
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 1.2 Statement of Expertise - formatted.pdf:3: • EIA Team Capabilities – We commit to ensuring that all our EIA staff have the opportunity to
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 1.2 Statement of Expertise - formatted.pdf:3: • EIA Regulatory Compliance – We commit to delivering Environmental Statements that meet
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 1.2 Statement of Expertise - formatted.pdf:3: the requirements established within the appropriate UK EIA Regulations.
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 1.2 Statement of Expertise - formatted.pdf:3: • EIA Context & Influence – We commit to ensuring that all EIAs we coordinate are effectively
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 1.2 Statement of Expertise - formatted.pdf:3: scoped and that we will transparently indicate how the EIA process, and any consultation
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 1.2 Statement of Expertise - formatted.pdf:3: • EIA Content – We commit to undertaking assessments that include: a robust analysis of the
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 1.2 Statement of Expertise - formatted.pdf:3: • EIA Presentation – We commit to deliver Environmental Statements that set out
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 1.2 Statement of Expertise - formatted.pdf:3: • Improving EIA practice – We commit to enhance the profile of good quality EIA by working
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 1.2 Statement of Expertise - formatted.pdf:3: appropriate examples of our work available to the wider EIA community.
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 1.2 Statement of Expertise - formatted.pdf:3: evidence to EFRA on the future of waste management in England. He has DCO and EIA
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 1.2 Statement of Expertise - formatted.pdf:3: technologies, across the UK, the majority of which were EIA development and he has acted as
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 1.2 Statement of Expertise - formatted.pdf:3: experience includes acting as project director for the EIA and planning application for Suez’s
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 1.2 Statement of Expertise - formatted.pdf:4: and the provision of strategic planning advise and the preparation and co-ordination of EIA and
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 1.2 Statement of Expertise - formatted.pdf:4: specialises in EIA and has managed multi-disciplinary teams to deliver high quality Environmental
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 1.2 Statement of Expertise - formatted.pdf:4: experienced project manager and co-ordinator of multi-disciplinary EIAs. She has detailed
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 1.2 Statement of Expertise - formatted.pdf:4: knowledge of the EIA process and offers a holistic approach to resolving difficulties in complex
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 1.2 Statement of Expertise - formatted.pdf:5:1.3.4 Jill has developed a strong understanding of the ecology requirements within an EIA through her
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 1.2 Statement of Expertise - formatted.pdf:5: ecology surveys for complex EIA schemes, has produced terrestrial ecology chapters for EIA,
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 1.2 Statement of Expertise - formatted.pdf:6: residential and mixed-use developments, including those requiring input into the EIA process. She
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 1.2 Statement of Expertise - formatted.pdf:7: assessments for EIAs and acts as an expert witness at planning appeals through written
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 1.2 Statement of Expertise - formatted.pdf:7: Historic Environment Scotland on CHIA in the context of EIA.
R-2020-0411-FFM-411 NEAR.pdf:1:1. The application is an EIA application from which the historic heritage was scoped out from the
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 1.1 Information Required with an ES.pdf:3: ‘18.—(1) Subject to regulation 9, an EIA application must be accompanied by an environmental
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:1: minimise, reduce or offset the possible environmental effects identified in the EIA process.
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:5: The EIA will need to consider any impacts upon local
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:5: identifies the key receptors and pathways of the pollutant linkages. The EIA process assigns a
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:7: with the EIA regulations, only effects of moderate or greater are considered to be significant.
R-2020-0411-FFM-SEC8563 Redcar EfW Outfall Pipe Phase 1 Note_Final_20.10.29(1).pdf:5:the REC Ecological Technical Appendix to the EIA in July 2020. These found limited suitability for the REC
R-2020-0411-FFM-EA R_2020_0411_FFM v2 10 November 2020 OFFICIAL .pdf:1:Thank you for reconsulting us on the above EIA proposal which we received 29 October
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 1 Introduction.pdf:1: Impact Assessment (EIA) process and accompanies the planning application for the proposed
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 1 Introduction.pdf:1: Purpose of EIA
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 1 Introduction.pdf:1:1.2.1 EIA is a means of identifying and collating information to inform an assessment of the likely
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 1 Introduction.pdf:1: significant environmental effects of a project. The findings of the EIA process are reported in an
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 1 Introduction.pdf:1: The EIA Directive
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 1 Introduction.pdf:1:1.2.2 The legislative framework for EIA is set by European Directive 2011/92/EU, as amended by
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 1 Introduction.pdf:1: Directive 2014/52/EU (collectively referred to as the EIA Directive). Directive 2014/52/EU entered
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 1 Introduction.pdf:1: The EIA Regulations
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 1 Introduction.pdf:1:1.2.3 The requirements of the EIA Directive have been transposed into UK legislation through the Town
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 1 Introduction.pdf:1: regulations are referred to in this ES as ‘the EIA Regulations’.
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 1 Introduction.pdf:1:1.3 Need for EIA
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 1 Introduction.pdf:1:1.3.1 Schedule 1 of the EIA Regulations identifies development types that always require EIA.
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 1 Introduction.pdf:1: Schedule 2 identifies development types that require EIA if they are likely to lead to significant
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 1 Introduction.pdf:1: development is defined within the EIA Regulations as development of a description mentioned in
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 1 Introduction.pdf:2:1.3.2 The proposed development falls within the category 10 of Schedule 1 of the EIA Regulations.
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 1 Introduction.pdf:2:1.3.3 Therefore, the proposed development is classed as an EIA development and an ES must be
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 1 Introduction.pdf:2:1.4.1 This ES has been prepared in accordance with the EIA Regulations. Although there is no
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 1 Introduction.pdf:2: 18 and Schedule 4 of the EIA Regulations. For the avoidance of doubt, the specified information
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 1 Introduction.pdf:2: Chapter 4 outlines the approach and methodology adopted for the EIA. The remainder of Volume
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 1 Introduction.pdf:3:1.7.1 The EIA has been managed by RPS, taking into account information provided by the Applicant
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.3 WFD.pdf:2:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.3 WFD.pdf:4: (Environment Impact Assessment) (EIA) Regulations 2017 (as amended) for the proposed
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.3 WFD.pdf:5:1.1.5 Whilst the EIA process is an efficient mechanism to gather the relevant information for a WFD
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf:1: Impact Assessment (EIA) undertaken to consider the noise and vibration effects of the
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf:1: possible environmental effects identified in the EIA process.
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf:8:12.2.41 During the EIA scoping process, a Scoping Request was submitted to Redcar and Cleveland
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf:8: scope of the overall EIA including the noise and vibration assessment.
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf:8: noise and vibration issues proposed to be ‘scoped out’ of the EIA for further assessment, on the
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf:11: considered to be not significant in EIA terms. Effects with a significance level of moderate are not
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf:11: significant/not significant in EIA terms is made. Effects with a significance level of major or
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf:11: substantial are considered to be significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf:14: the potentially moderate adverse effect may be significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf:16: adverse effect, which would not be considered significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf:19: effect, which is potentially significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf:20: not considered significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 11 Air Quality.pdf:9: terms of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Regulations.
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 11 Air Quality.pdf:25: Regulations 2017 (as amended) (the ‘EIA Regulations’), consideration has been given to the
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 11 Air Quality.pdf:29:11.6.24 In accordance with the EIA Regulations, consideration has been given to the expected significant
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 2 Project Description.pdf:1: accordance with Regulation 18 and Schedule 4 of the EIA Regulations.
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 2 Project Description.pdf:21: EIA process and set out in the topic chapters of this ES. They include strategies and control
R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf:18: not significant in terms of the EIA Regulations. While there will be some adverse impacts from
R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf:22: which is not considered significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf:23: significant effects are not considered likely in terms of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)
R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf:26:5.8.38 The EIA Regulations refer to 'material assets', including architectural and archaeological heritage.
R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf:27:5.8.39 The EIA regulations require consideration of vulnerability to major accidents and/or disasters. The
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf:2: These include climate change, EIA, flood risk and coastal change, the natural environment, water
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf:7: recognised EIA methodology, which is described in further detail in Chapter 4: Environmental
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 3 Needs and Alternatives - formatted.pdf:1: project and the main alternatives considered by the applicant during the EIA process. It includes a
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 3 Needs and Alternatives - formatted.pdf:3:4.3.1 The EIA Regulations require that an ES should include:
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 3 Needs and Alternatives - formatted.pdf:7:4.3.14 The EIA process has influenced the iterative design process of the project, through the
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 13 - Other Environmental Effects.pdf:1: considered likely in terms of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Regulations, including
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 13 - Other Environmental Effects.pdf:5:13.8.1 The EIA Regulations refer to 'material assets', including architectural and archaeological heritage.
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 13 - Other Environmental Effects.pdf:5:13.9.1 The EIA regulations require consideration of vulnerability to major accidents and/or disasters. The
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 4 - EIA Methodology.pdf:1: Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) of the project. The chapter also includes details of the
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 4 - EIA Methodology.pdf:1: consultation undertaken to inform the EIA and the overall approach to the assessment of the likely
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 4 - EIA Methodology.pdf:1:4.2.1 Scoping is the process of identifying the issues to be addressed during the EIA process. It is an
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 4 - EIA Methodology.pdf:1: important preliminary procedure, which sets the context for the EIA process.
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 4 - EIA Methodology.pdf:1:4.2.2 Regulation 15 of the EIA Regulations allows an applicant to request that the local planning
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 4 - EIA Methodology.pdf:1: ES. Whilst there is no formal requirement in the EIA Regulations to seek a Scoping Opinion prior
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 4 - EIA Methodology.pdf:2: EIA process, the following topics have been identified as requiring consideration within this ES:
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 4 - EIA Methodology.pdf:2:4.4 Topics Scoped out of the EIA Process
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 4 - EIA Methodology.pdf:4: Assessment is not considered necessary in this instance and is scoped out of the EIA process.
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 4 - EIA Methodology.pdf:4:4.4.17 The EIA Regulations refer to 'material assets', including architectural and archaeological heritage.
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 4 - EIA Methodology.pdf:4:4.4.18 The EIA Regulations require consideration of vulnerability to major accidents and/or disasters.
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 4 - EIA Methodology.pdf:5: Relevant EIA Guidance
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 4 - EIA Methodology.pdf:5:4.5.1 The EIA process has taken into account relevant government or institute guidance, including:
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 4 - EIA Methodology.pdf:6: information set out in Chapter 2 (Project Description) of this ES, EIA good practice guidance
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 4 - EIA Methodology.pdf:6: conditions during the main period of the EIA work in the period 2019 to 2020.
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 4 - EIA Methodology.pdf:6: the EIA process.
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 4 - EIA Methodology.pdf:7:4.5.13 During the EIA process, environmental issues have been taken into account as part of an ongoing
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 4 - EIA Methodology.pdf:7: iterative design process. The process of EIA has therefore been used as a means of informing the
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 4 - EIA Methodology.pdf:7:4.5.16 The EIA Regulations require the identification of the likely significant environmental effects of the
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 4 - EIA Methodology.pdf:10: considered to be significant in terms of the EIA Regulations within this assessment.
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 4 - EIA Methodology.pdf:10:4.5.34 The EIA Regulations require consideration of cumulative effects, which are effects on a receptor
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 4 - EIA Methodology.pdf:10: included within the EIA that have not already been considered in order to identify any secondary,
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 4 - EIA Methodology.pdf:11: Cleveland Borough Council and their consultees on their approach to the EIA through the scoping
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 4 - EIA Methodology.pdf:11: throughout the EIA and design process in order to agree methodologies and request and share
R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf:7:1.3.1 RPS Consulting UK& Ireland has prepared and managed the planning application and EIA, and
R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf:8: EIA including the following:
R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf:32: EIA process and set out in the topic chapters of this ES. They include strategies and control
R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf:71: and stakeholders, the EIA Scoping exercise, and the review of the planning policy context it is
R-2020-0411-FFM-Pre-App Consultation Report 14-07-2020 Final (1).pdf:2: Formal Pre-Application Meetings, EIA Scoping …………………………………………………………. 4
R-2020-0411-FFM-Pre-App Consultation Report 14-07-2020 Final (1).pdf:4:Formal Pre-Application Meetings, EIA Scoping
R-2020-0411-FFM-Pre-App Consultation Report 14-07-2020 Final (1).pdf:5:Impact Assessment Report to be submitted to RCBC, and informed the technical studies of the EIA.
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 10.1 Transport Assessment.pdf:43: an EIA.”
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:4: Purpose of EIA ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..1
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:4:3 GENERAL APPROACH TO EIA ……………………………………………………………………………………………….7
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:4: EIA Methodology ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..9
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:4: Relevant EIA Guidance ……………………………………………………………………………………………………9
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:6:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:7: Assessment (EIA) for Redcar Energy Centre (REC) on land at the Redcar Bulk Terminal (hereafter
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:7:1.4 This Scoping Report sets out the proposed approach and key issues to be included within the EIA
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:7: EIA Regulations’). A letter to the Council requesting such an opinion accompanies this report. It is
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:7: Purpose of EIA
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:7:1.5 EIA is the process of identifying and assessing the significant effects likely to arise from a
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:7: (ES) (the report of the EIA process) is known as scoping. Scoping is not a mandatory requirement,
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:7: environmental issues are identified at an early stage of the EIA process. This allows subsequent
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:7: EIA Regulations. The ES will support the planning application to be submitted to Redcar and
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:8: • the EIA Regulations and EIA good practice guidance; and
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:13:3 GENERAL APPROACH TO EIA
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:13:3.1 The legislative framework for EIA is set by European Directive 2011/92/EU, as amended by
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:13: Directive 2014/52/EU (collectively referred to as the EIA Directive). Directive 2014/52/EU requires
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:13:3.2 The EIA Directive requires an EIA to be completed in support of an application for development
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:13: requirements are transposed into law by the EIA Regulations.
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:13:3.3 The process of identifying whether or not EIA is required for a development is known as screening.
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:13: Projects of the type listed in Schedule 1 of the Regulations require EIA in all cases. Projects of the
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:13: type listed in Schedule 2 may require EIA in certain circumstances.
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:13:3.5 Therefore, the proposed development is classed as an EIA development and an ES must be
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:13: specified in Regulation 18(3), including any relevant information specified in Schedule 4 of the EIA
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:15: approach to EIA in order to meet these legal requirements.
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:15: quickly and easily. The ES will describe the EIA process and its findings and will include the
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:15: EIA Methodology
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:15: Relevant EIA Guidance
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:15:3.9 The EIA process will take into account relevant government or institute guidance, including:
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:16: conditions during the main period of the EIA work. Consideration will also be given to any likely
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:16:3.16 The EIA Regulations require the identification of the likely significant environmental effects of the
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:18:3.28 The EIA Regulations require that where significant effects are identified 'a description of any
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:18:3.29 The development of mitigation measures is part of an iterative EIA process. Therefore, measures
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:18: will be developed throughout the EIA process in response to the findings of initial assessments.
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:21: EIA process.
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:22:4.17 The EIA Regulations require consideration of climate change. Although a separate climate change
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:23:4.28 The EIA Regulations refer to 'material assets', including architectural and archaeological heritage.
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:23:4.29 The EIA regulations require consideration of vulnerability to major accidents and/or disasters. The
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:25: EIA and the structure of the ES.
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:25: effects. The EIA Regulations require an ES to include:
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:25:5.5 Where mitigation measures have been identified and developed through the EIA process and have
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:25:5.6 This chapter will briefly set out the need for the proposed development. In addition, the EIA
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:25: alternatives considered during the EIA process, including a description of the alternative design
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:25:5.8 Details of the overall approach to EIA will be set out in this chapter, together with details of the
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:29: to merit consideration of the EIA process, rather than consider the effects upon every feature that
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:50:Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for this development.
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:51:We passed on the notification to our planning advisors, Lichfields, who are familiar with the EIA
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:51:nature and purpose and technical capacity as required by Regulation 15 of the EIA Regulations. We
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:52:EIA Scope
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:52:of the EIA Regulations. As above, however, there is limited commentary on the likely significant
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:52:the proposals on protected species. Anglo American’s (formerly Sirius) EIA of its adjacent
R-2020-0411-FFM-Redcar Volume 1 Front Cover.pdf:2:Chapter 4: EIA Methodology
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:2: an Appropriate Assessment, in addition to consideration of impacts through the EIA process.
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:3: These include climate change, EIA, flood risk and coastal change, the natural environment, water
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:8: (Scoping response) A Water Framework Directive (WFD) completed and is appended to the EIA
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:11: the 2017 EIA Regulations where the effect is classified as being of ‘major’, ‘moderate’, or ‘minor’
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:7: considered to be not significant in Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) terms.
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:14: which is not significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:17: is predicted to be negligible, which is not significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:17: reversible. The level of effect is predicted to be negligible, which is not significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:18: The level of effect is predicted to be of negligible, which is not significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0411-FFM-EA R_2020_0411_FFM 24 September 2020 OFFICIAL.pdf:1:Thank you for consulting us on the above EIA planning application which we received 12
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 7.2 Ecology PEA.pdf:13: dominated by birch species (Betula spp.) with a few buddleia (Buddleja spp).
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 7.2 Ecology PEA.pdf:13: rugosa) (an INNS), buddleia and some self-seeded birch.
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 7.2 Ecology PEA.pdf:14: flowering species including buddleia and rosebay willow herb scattered within the Application Site.
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:3:6.2.14 Table 6.1 sets out the consultation undertaken as part of the EIA process, relevant to the LVIA.
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:7:6.2.26 The purpose of an EIA is to determine the likely significant environmental effects of a project. It is
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:7: should be stressed that not all landscape and visual effects arising will be significant in EIA terms.
R-2021-0728-PND-Officer Report(1).pdf:2:development with regard to whether the demolition would constitute EIA
R-2021-0728-PND-Officer Report(1).pdf:3:considered EIA development therefore requiring the submission of an ES, the
R-2021-0728-PND-Officer Report(1).pdf:3:require the submission of an EIA.
R-2021-0728-PND-Officer Report(1).pdf:3:supported by an EIA with the significance not being beyond the local area.
R-2021-0728-PND-Cover Letter.pdf:2:consideration as to whether the proposed demolition project could be considered to be EIA development.
R-2021-0728-PND-Cover Letter.pdf:2:listed in column 1 of schedule 2 (eg. Paragraph 4). Such development could be considered to be EIA
R-2021-0465-FFM-LM Wind Detailed Applicaiton Covering Letter 28.05.21.pdf:3:(Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (EIA Regulations) (as amended), which relates to
R-2021-0465-FFM-LM Wind Detailed Applicaiton Covering Letter 28.05.21.pdf:3:industrial estate development projects where the development exceeds 5ha. For such developments, EIA is
R-2021-0465-FFM-LM Wind Detailed Applicaiton Covering Letter 28.05.21.pdf:3:under Part 1, Regulation 2 of the EIA Regulations. There are no ecological statutory designations of national
R-2021-0152-CD-Officer report _R20210152CD.pdf:1:subject to an EIA and was granted in outline, subject to conditions.
R-2023-0179-SCP-424840_HyGreen_Redcar_EIA_Scoping_NEresponse_28.3.23.pdf:1:Country Planning EIA Regulations 2017): Scoping opinion for HyGreen hydrogen project
R-2023-0179-SCP-424840_HyGreen_Redcar_EIA_Scoping_NEresponse_28.3.23.pdf:1:Statement described in the submitted EIA Regulations Regulation 15 report1 and accompanying
R-2023-0179-SCP-424840_HyGreen_Redcar_EIA_Scoping_NEresponse_28.3.23.pdf:1:Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for the proposed development.
R-2023-0179-SCP-424840_HyGreen_Redcar_EIA_Scoping_NEresponse_28.3.23.pdf:2:Annex A – Natural England Advice on EIA Scoping
R-2023-0179-SCP-424840_HyGreen_Redcar_EIA_Scoping_NEresponse_28.3.23.pdf:3:part of the EIA process or to support other forms of environmental assessment or appraisal.
R-2023-0179-SCP-424840_HyGreen_Redcar_EIA_Scoping_NEresponse_28.3.23.pdf:4:impacts through the EIA process. Further guidance is set out in Planning Practice Guidance on
R-2023-0179-SCP-HSE.pdf:1:Attachments: eCon_Health and Safety Executive .docx; EIA scoping opinion Hygreen Hydrogen
R-2023-0179-SCP-HSE.pdf:1:Thank you for your request for comments on the EIA Scoping Opinion for Hygreen Hydrogen Project on Land at the
R-2023-0179-SCP-HSE.pdf:2:HSE suggests that an EIA should show that the operators of the pipelines have been consulted regarding the
R-2023-0179-SCP-HSE.pdf:7:EIA Scoping Report P139 Tod Point substation
R-2023-0179-SCP-HSE.pdf:8:EIA Scoping Report P145
R-2023-0179-SCP-HSE.pdf:9:EIA Scoping Report P15: 2.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE EXISTING ENVIRONMENT
R-2023-0179-SCP-230306 - HyGreen - EIA Scoping Opinion Request Letter - Final.pdf:1:2017 (THE ‘2017 EIA REGULATIONS’) – REGULATION 15 ‘SCOPING OPINIONS OF THE LOCAL
R-2023-0179-SCP-230306 - HyGreen - EIA Scoping Opinion Request Letter - Final.pdf:1:Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Scoping Opinion from Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council
R-2023-0179-SCP-230306 - HyGreen - EIA Scoping Opinion Request Letter - Final.pdf:1:(‘RCBC’) under the 2017 EIA Regulations in respect of the HyGreen Hydrogen Project.
R-2023-0179-SCP-230306 - HyGreen - EIA Scoping Opinion Request Letter - Final.pdf:2:The Applicant has determined that the Proposed Development is EIA development due to its nature
R-2023-0179-SCP-230306 - HyGreen - EIA Scoping Opinion Request Letter - Final.pdf:2:request for an EIA Scoping Opinion from RCBC under Regulation 15 of the 2017 EIA Regulations as to
R-2023-0179-SCP-230306 - HyGreen - EIA Scoping Opinion Request Letter - Final.pdf:2:the scope of the EIA to be undertaken for the Proposed Development.
R-2023-0179-SCP-230306 - HyGreen - EIA Scoping Opinion Request Letter - Final.pdf:2:Regulation 15(2) of the 2017 EIA Regulations sets out the information that must be included with a
R-2023-0179-SCP-230306 - HyGreen - EIA Scoping Opinion Request Letter - Final.pdf:2:request for a Scoping Opinion. This letter is accompanied by an EIA Scoping Report prepared by
R-2023-0179-SCP-230306 - HyGreen - EIA Scoping Opinion Request Letter - Final.pdf:2:Information Required for a Request for an EIA Scoping Opinion
R-2023-0179-SCP-230306 - HyGreen - EIA Scoping Opinion Request Letter - Final.pdf:2: Description of Information Supplementary Descriptions Section in EIA Scoping
R-2023-0179-SCP-230306 - HyGreen - EIA Scoping Opinion Request Letter - Final.pdf:3: Description of Information Supplementary Descriptions Section in EIA Scoping
R-2023-0179-SCP-230306 - HyGreen - EIA Scoping Opinion Request Letter - Final.pdf:3: particular soil, land, water and out of the EIA
R-2023-0179-SCP-230306 - HyGreen - EIA Scoping Opinion Request Letter - Final.pdf:3: Impact Assessment (EIA)
R-2023-0179-SCP-230306 - HyGreen - EIA Scoping Opinion Request Letter - Final.pdf:3: out of the EIA
R-2023-0179-SCP-230306 - HyGreen - EIA Scoping Opinion Request Letter - Final.pdf:3:I would be grateful if you could confirm receipt of the Applicant’s request for an EIA Scoping Opinion
R-2023-0179-SCP-230306 - HyGreen - EIA Scoping Opinion Request Letter - Final.pdf:3:out at Regulation 15(5) of the 2017 EIA Regulations.
R-2023-0179-SCP-Figure A-1 - Site Location Plan.pdf:1:Filename: \\na.aecomnet.com\lfs\EMEA\Bristol-UKBRI2\Legacy\UKBRI2FP001\VOL1BE\Projects\!Environmental\General\GIS\Projects\H2 Teesside\02_Maps\EIA Scoping\HyGreen_EIA_Scoping.aprx Revision: 01 Drawn: MAB Checked: BM Approved: AK Date: 2023-02-28
R-2023-0179-SCP-Figure A-1 - Site Location Plan.pdf:1: EIA Scoping
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:3: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:6:Request for an EIA Scoping Opinion ……………………………………………………………………………… 9
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:7:7.0 Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Process ………………………………………….. 118
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:7:EIA Methodology and Reporting……………………………………………………………………………….. 118
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:7:Other Matters Proposed for Scoping Out of the EIA ……………………………………………………. 124
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:8: Assessment (EIA) Scoping Report to inform the scope and content of an EIA for the
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:8:1.1.3 This EIA Scoping Report considers the environmental context of the Proposed
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:8: is proposed do not require formal assessment as part of the EIA.
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:8:1.1.4 EIA is an iterative process that feeds into the engineering design process to mitigate
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:8: iteration, along with the findings of the EIA will be reported in an Environmental
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:8: Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (herein referred to as the ‘EIA Regulations’).
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:8:1.1.6 The Proposed Development does not fall under Schedule 1 of the EIA Regulations for
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:8: which EIA would be mandatory, and in its entirety does not fall under Schedule 2 of
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:8: the EIA Regulations for which EIA may be required. However, it could be considered
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:8: or more of the types of developments described within Schedule 2 of the EIA
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:9: defined in the EIA Regulations, is over the size threshold in Schedule 2 (in respect of
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:9: environmental effects (as outlined in Section 6 of this report), an EIA is proposed to
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:9: separated from the Production Facility for the purposes of considering EIA.
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:9: Therefore, the Proposed Development in its entirety will be assessed within the EIA.
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:9:1.1.10 Although not mandatory, submission of the EIA Scoping Report to RCBC commences
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:9: the EIA process and represents the first notification to RCBC, as the relevant Local
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:9: Planning Authority (LPA), that the Applicant will undertake an EIA in respect of the
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:9: Proposed Development and produce an ES to report the findings of the EIA.
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:9: Request for an EIA Scoping Opinion
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:9:1.1.11 Having determined that an EIA will be undertaken, in accordance with Regulation
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:9: 15(1) of the EIA Regulations, the Applicant is requesting the LPA’s opinion as to the
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:9:1.1.12 The scoping phase of the EIA process provides a framework for identifying likely
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:9: environmental impacts for inclusion and consideration within the EIA. The scoping
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:9:1.1.13 This EIA Scoping Report has been prepared to facilitate early pre-application
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:9: EIA.
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:9: Requirements for Requesting an EIA Scoping Opinion
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:9:1.1.14 This EIA Scoping Report has been prepared in accordance with the relevant
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:9: in a request for an EIA scoping opinion, as prescribed by Regulation 15(2) of the EIA
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:9: provided within this EIA Scoping Report.
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:9:1.1.15 The information to be included within the EIA Scoping Report is the same as the
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:9: information required for an EIA screening opinion request (noting that such a request
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:9: is not being made for the Proposed Development given it is assumed to be EIA
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:10:Table 1-1: Information Required for a Request for an EIA Scoping Opinion
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:10: Description of Information Supplementary Descriptions (Regulation 6(2)) Section in EIA
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:11: methodologies, guidance and best practice to be adopted for the EIA of the
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:11: • Section 7 – Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Process: provides an overview
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:11: of the EIA process and an outline structure for the proposed ES; and
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:11: of the EIA.
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:15:2.1.21 These potential options are considered in this EIA Scoping Report. The viability of
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:20: at the EIA scoping stage. It is expected that the current optionality would be reduced
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:21: continue to be adopted to define appropriate parameters for use in the EIA.
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:27: therefore, will not be assessed as part of the Proposed Development within the EIA.
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:30: the EIA and is not discussed within the remainder of this Scoping Report.
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:31:4.1.1 The EIA Regulations require that an ES should include an outline of the reasonable
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:32:5.1.1 This chapter of the EIA Scoping Report provides an overview of the planning and
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:50: part of the EIA. The methodology and assessment criteria that will be used to assess
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:65:6.1.70 As appropriate, the EIA will inform the design as to where mitigation measures may
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:80:6.1.120 The EIA process requires that a clear distinction is drawn between landscape and
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:91: to air during an emergency shutdown will not be assessed as part of the EIA.
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:92: discussed with consultees to determine if further monitoring is required for the EIA
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:92: in brief as part of the EIA where an operational vibration pathway is identified.
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:94: of this EIA Scoping Report. The significance of changes in construction road traffic
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:95: effects on NSRs remaining will be identified and reported in the EIA.
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:99: includes the Production Facility. For the purposes of EIA Scoping, a high-level review
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:102: a MA&Ds assessment within an EIA. However, the scope of the assessment has been
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:102: developed with reference to “Major Accidents and Disasters in EIA: A Primer” (IEMA,
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:102: will underpin the MA&D assessment within the EIA.
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:105: scenarios have been identified for assessment as part of the EIA.
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:105: in the EIA, the following assessment process will be used:
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:106:6.1.260 For the purpose of this EIA Scoping Report, materials and waste comprise:
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:111: (IEMA) published new guidance on assessing human health as part of EIA (IEMA,
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:112:6.1.281 Other relevant EIA technical topics will also inform the human health assessment.
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:115:6.1.296 In accordance with the EIA Regulations, consideration will also be given to the
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:118:7.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA) PROCESS
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:118: EIA Methodology and Reporting
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:118:7.1.1 The EIA will be carried out in accordance with the requirements defined by the EIA
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:118:7.1.2 The ES will set out the process followed during the EIA including the methods used
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:118:7.1.3 The EIA process is designed to be capable of, and sensitive to, changes that occur as
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:118: incorporated during the EIA. This will be particularly important for the Proposed
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:118: likely to be made following submission of this EIA Scoping Report.
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:118:7.1.4 The EIA is based on a number of related activities, as follows:
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:118: and legislation relevant to EIA;
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:118: of the EIA, moderate and major effects will be deemed ‘significant’.
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:119: issues and findings of the EIA in non-technical language;
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:119: • Volume I: Environmental Statement (ES): this will contain the full text of the EIA
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:120: environmental studies conducted during the EIA including relevant data tables,
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:121: studies undertaken as part of the EIA, and thereby enable comparison between
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:122:7.1.25 In accordance with the EIA Regulations, consideration will be given to the potential
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:122: this EIA Scoping Report:
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:123:7.1.29 Following the publication of this EIA Scoping Report, a non-statutory public
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:124:8.1.1 This request for an EIA scoping opinion has identified the potential for significant
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:124: Development. The following specialist assessments for inclusion in the EIA are
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:124: Other Matters Proposed for Scoping Out of the EIA
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:124: here. Other matters scoped out of the EIA that are not included earlier in the Scoping
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:125: versatile) and to farm holdings is therefore scoped out of the EIA.
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:126:9.1.1 Below is the full list of reference documents for the EIA Scoping Report, using the
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:138:Filename: \\na.aecomnet.com\lfs\EMEA\Bristol-UKBRI2\Legacy\UKBRI2FP001\VOL1BE\Projects\!Environmental\General\GIS\Projects\H2 Teesside\02_Maps\EIA Scoping\HyGreen_EIA_Scoping.aprx Revision: 01 Drawn: MAB Checked: BM Approved: AK Date: 2023-02-28
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:138: EIA Scoping
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:139:Filename: \\na.aecomnet.com\lfs\EMEA\Bristol-UKBRI2\Legacy\UKBRI2FP001\VOL1BE\Projects\!Environmental\General\GIS\Projects\H2 Teesside\02_Maps\EIA Scoping\HyGreen_EIA_Scoping.aprx Revision: 01 Drawn: MAB Checked: BM Approved: AK Date: 2023-02-28
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:139: EIA Scoping
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:140: Filename: \\na.aecomnet.com\lfs\EMEA\Bristol-UKBRI2\Legacy\UKBRI2FP001\VOL1BE\Projects\!Environmental\General\GIS\Projects\H2 Teesside\02_Maps\EIA Scoping\HyGreen_EIA_Scoping.aprx
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:140: EIA Scoping
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:141: Filename: \\na.aecomnet.com\lfs\EMEA\Bristol-UKBRI2\Legacy\UKBRI2FP001\VOL1BE\Projects\!Environmental\General\GIS\Projects\H2 Teesside\02_Maps\EIA Scoping\HyGreen_EIA_Scoping.aprx
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:141: EIA Scoping
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:142: Filename: \\na.aecomnet.com\lfs\EMEA\Bristol-UKBRI2\Legacy\UKBRI2FP001\VOL1BE\Projects\!Environmental\General\GIS\Projects\H2 Teesside\02_Maps\EIA Scoping\HyGreen_EIA_Scoping.aprx
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:142: EIA Scoping
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:143: Filename: \\na.aecomnet.com\lfs\EMEA\Bristol-UKBRI2\Legacy\UKBRI2FP001\VOL1BE\Projects\!Environmental\General\GIS\Projects\H2 Teesside\02_Maps\EIA Scoping\HyGreen_EIA_Scoping.aprx
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:143: EIA Scoping
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:144: Filename: \\na.aecomnet.com\lfs\EMEA\Bristol-UKBRI2\Legacy\UKBRI2FP001\VOL1BE\Projects\!Environmental\General\GIS\Projects\H2 Teesside\02_Maps\EIA Scoping\HyGreen_EIA_Scoping.aprx
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:144: EIA Scoping
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:145: Filename: \\na.aecomnet.com\lfs\EMEA\Bristol-UKBRI2\Legacy\UKBRI2FP001\VOL1BE\Projects\!Environmental\General\GIS\Projects\H2 Teesside\02_Maps\EIA Scoping\HyGreen_EIA_Scoping.aprx
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:145: EIA Scoping
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:151: Emissions from combustion equipment will assessed for the purposes of the EIA within the Air Quality
R-2023-0179-SCP-Figure A-4 - Statutory Designated Ecological Sites within 10km of the Proposed Development Site Boundary.pdf:1: Filename: \\na.aecomnet.com\lfs\EMEA\Bristol-UKBRI2\Legacy\UKBRI2FP001\VOL1BE\Projects\!Environmental\General\GIS\Projects\H2 Teesside\02_Maps\EIA Scoping\HyGreen_EIA_Scoping.aprx
R-2023-0179-SCP-Figure A-4 - Statutory Designated Ecological Sites within 10km of the Proposed Development Site Boundary.pdf:1: EIA Scoping
R-2023-0179-SCP-Figure A-5 - Water Receptors within 5km of the Proposed Development Site Boundary.pdf:1: Filename: \\na.aecomnet.com\lfs\EMEA\Bristol-UKBRI2\Legacy\UKBRI2FP001\VOL1BE\Projects\!Environmental\General\GIS\Projects\H2 Teesside\02_Maps\EIA Scoping\HyGreen_EIA_Scoping.aprx
R-2023-0179-SCP-Figure A-5 - Water Receptors within 5km of the Proposed Development Site Boundary.pdf:1: EIA Scoping
R-2023-0179-SCP-Figure A-6 - Environmental Constraints within 1km of the Proposed Development Site Boundary.pdf:1: Filename: \\na.aecomnet.com\lfs\EMEA\Bristol-UKBRI2\Legacy\UKBRI2FP001\VOL1BE\Projects\!Environmental\General\GIS\Projects\H2 Teesside\02_Maps\EIA Scoping\HyGreen_EIA_Scoping.aprx
R-2023-0179-SCP-Figure A-6 - Environmental Constraints within 1km of the Proposed Development Site Boundary.pdf:1: EIA Scoping
R-2023-0179-SCP-SCOPING OPINION DECISION.pdf:1:REGULATIONS 2017 (THE ‘2017 EIA REGULATIONS’)
R-2023-0179-SCP-SCOPING OPINION DECISION.pdf:2: EIA process and
R-2023-0179-SCP-SCOPING OPINION DECISION.pdf:7:Environmental Statement described in the submitted EIA Regulations Regulation 15 report1 and
R-2023-0179-SCP-SCOPING OPINION DECISION.pdf:7:scope of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for the proposed development.
R-2023-0179-SCP-SCOPING OPINION DECISION.pdf:7:Annex A – Natural England Advice on EIA Scoping
R-2023-0179-SCP-SCOPING OPINION DECISION.pdf:9:as part of the EIA process or to support other forms of environmental assessment or appraisal.
R-2023-0179-SCP-SCOPING OPINION DECISION.pdf:10:impacts through the EIA process. Further guidance is set out in Planning Practice Guidance on
R-2023-0179-SCP-SCOPING OPINION DECISION.pdf:20:HSE suggests that an EIA should show that the operators of the pipelines have been consulted
R-2023-0179-SCP-Figure A-7 - Major Accidents and Disasters Receptors within 5km of the Proposed Development Site Boundary.pdf:1: Filename: \\na.aecomnet.com\lfs\EMEA\Bristol-UKBRI2\Legacy\UKBRI2FP001\VOL1BE\Projects\!Environmental\General\GIS\Projects\H2 Teesside\02_Maps\EIA Scoping\HyGreen_EIA_Scoping.aprx
R-2023-0179-SCP-Figure A-7 - Major Accidents and Disasters Receptors within 5km of the Proposed Development Site Boundary.pdf:1: EIA Scoping
R-2023-0179-SCP-Figure A-8 - Other Developments to be Considered in the Cumulative Impact Assessment.pdf:1: Filename: \\na.aecomnet.com\lfs\EMEA\Bristol-UKBRI2\Legacy\UKBRI2FP001\VOL1BE\Projects\!Environmental\General\GIS\Projects\H2 Teesside\02_Maps\EIA Scoping\HyGreen_EIA_Scoping.aprx
R-2023-0179-SCP-Figure A-8 - Other Developments to be Considered in the Cumulative Impact Assessment.pdf:1: EIA Scoping
R-2023-0179-SCP-Figure A-2 - Proposed Planning Boundary and Parts of the Proposed Development Site.pdf:1:Filename: \\na.aecomnet.com\lfs\EMEA\Bristol-UKBRI2\Legacy\UKBRI2FP001\VOL1BE\Projects\!Environmental\General\GIS\Projects\H2 Teesside\02_Maps\EIA Scoping\HyGreen_EIA_Scoping.aprx Revision: 01 Drawn: MAB Checked: BM Approved: AK Date: 2023-02-28
R-2023-0179-SCP-Figure A-2 - Proposed Planning Boundary and Parts of the Proposed Development Site.pdf:1: EIA Scoping
R-2023-0179-SCP-Figure A-3 - Ecological Constraints within 1km of the Proposed Development Site Boundary.pdf:1: Filename: \\na.aecomnet.com\lfs\EMEA\Bristol-UKBRI2\Legacy\UKBRI2FP001\VOL1BE\Projects\!Environmental\General\GIS\Projects\H2 Teesside\02_Maps\EIA Scoping\HyGreen_EIA_Scoping.aprx
R-2023-0179-SCP-Figure A-3 - Ecological Constraints within 1km of the Proposed Development Site Boundary.pdf:1: EIA Scoping
R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:6: Environmental Impact Assessments (EIA) and other regulatory, permitting and planning
R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:6:H1.6 Arcadis is a member of the IEMA EIA Quality Mark.
R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:16: is a significant impact for the purposes of this EIA.
R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:17: of the proposed development on groundwater is however still considered in this EIA (see
R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:17:H3.19 This chapter and the EIA assume that the site will be cut and fill neutral and that excavated
R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:17: Statement. For the purpose of this EIA, the demolition of all other on -site Infrastructure will be
R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:22: Arcadis and these are used to inform the baseline assessment to this EIA.
R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:36: 1 Earthworks: for the purpose of this EIA it is assumed that the construction stage of the
R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:38:H5.16 The assessment of significance undertaken within this EIA supports the remedial strategy with
R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:38:H5.17 For the purpose of this EIA process, it is assumed that the proposed development site will be cut
R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:39: EIA
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:6: Regulations 2017 (as amended) (‘the EIA Regulations’) as they are all above the 5ha threshold. It
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:7: (EIA) developments because they are likely to have significant effects on the environment by
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:7: 2 In section 3.0 to outline, informally, the topics to be scoped in and out of each of the EIAs;
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:7: each of the EIAs; and
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:9: EIA, the demolition of all other on-site Infrastructure will be subject to separate consents. Other
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:18: For the purpose of this EIA, and associated HRA, it will be necessary to assess the principle of
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:22: scope out operational effects from the assessment of all 5 EIAs. This is on the following
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:23: 3 Above Ground Heritage– this topic will be scoped into the Long Acres EIA, on the grounds
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:23: topic will be scoped out of the other four EIAs, as there are no listed buildings within the
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:23:3.4 It is proposed to scope the following topics out of all 5 EIAs, however reference should be made
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:23:4.1 In accordance with the EIA 2017 Regulations (as amended) each EIA will include an assessment
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:29:5.1 Each EIA will be prepared in accordance with the requirements of the 2017 EIA Regulations (as
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:29: criteria adopted for the EIA (see below);
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:29: significance criteria for the EIA which will comprise:-
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:30:5.7 The findings of each EIA will be set out in an ES which will comprise three volumes as follows:-
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:31:requirements of the 2017 EIA Regs. as well as the approach that has been taken on the Southbank submission recently
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:32:sites, the outline planning applications and the proposed scope of the Environmental Impact Assessments (‘EIA’).
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:32:On the information set out within the Note, it is our intention to informally scope the EIA with you and the Council.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:33:EIAs and please do let us know if you have any questions on the above or the note.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:14:My colleagues and I are working on an EIA for the South Tees Development Corporation’s (STDC)
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:14:development. Arup is assisting with the planning application and EIA for the land-based development. The
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:15:EIA chapter and we would like to address any queries that you may have.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:4: standard methods for an EIA GHG Assessment.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:15: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:4: (‘EIA’) Regulations 2017 (as amended) (‘2017 EIA Regulations (as amended)’) (Ref 1) requires
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:4:O1.4 In accordance with Regulation 26(3) of the 2017 EIA Regulations (as amended), the PPG further
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:4: Tertiary mitigation will be required regardless of any EIA assessment, as it is imposed, for
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:5: Management and Assessment (‘IEMA’) and has 3 years’ experience in co-ordinating EIAs for a
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:5: towards her EIA Practitioner membership of IEMA and has 1 year of experience in EIA projects.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:5: Melissa is working towards her EIA Practitioner membership of IEMA and has 2 years of
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:5: experience in EIA projects. Their coordination role included the production of this chapter of
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:5: this chapter in accordance with the EIA Regulation requirements. Kate has over 10 years of
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:5: experience of co-ordinating EIAs for a range of development projects.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:6:O2.1 As set out in Chapter B of this ES, the iterative process of EIA has resulted in the incorporation
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:8: site; for the purposes of this EIA, it is
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:8: to accompany this EIA (at Appendix B3)
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:14: EIA).
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:22:O3.1 This ES sets out the finding of an EIA of proposals for up to 139,353 sqm of general industrial
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:22: revisited as required by the 2017 EIA Regulations, and where necessary, updated as part of
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:23: 18 EIA - Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:6:Subject: RE: 2020s0709: South Tees - EIA Consultation 2020s1483
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:6:Subject: FW: 2020s0709: South Tees - EIA Consultation 2020s1483
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:6:JBA were appointed back in June to undertake a high level assessment for water management for an EIA chapter for
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:6:JBA have subsequently been appointed to undertake 5 further EIA water management chapters for other 5 other
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:7: redacted) to be included as an appendix to the EIA assessment.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:8:Subject: RE: NWG Strategies - 2020s0709: South Tees - SIZ1 EIA Consultation
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:9:Subject: FW: 2020s0709: South Tees - SIZ1 EIA Consultation
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:9:undertake a high level assessment for water management for an EIA chapter for one of the sites (SIZ1) within the
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:9:Subject: 2020s0709: South Tees EIA Consultation
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:9:We are writing to consult with Northumbrian Water regarding the proposal for the South Bank EIA. Lichfields have
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:17:As EIA proposals, the best option you will have on gaining more bespoke advice for the ES is to request a scoping
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:21: A draft environmental statement where required by EIA Regulations (please note
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:34:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:35: Assessment (EIA) for the outline planning application for one of the sites within the STDC
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:36:2 Lichfield, 29 October 2020. STDC Outline Planning Applications: EIA Project Briefing Note:
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:5:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:6:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:7:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:8:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:9:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:10:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:11:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:12:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:13:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:14:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:15:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:16:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:17:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:18:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:19:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:20:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:21:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:22:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:23:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:24:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:25:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:26:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:27:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:28:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:29:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:30:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:31:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:32:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:33:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:34:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:35:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:36:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:37:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:38:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:39:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:40:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:41:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:42:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:43:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:44:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:45:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:46:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:47:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:48:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:49:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:50:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:51:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:52:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:53:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:54:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:55:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:56:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:57:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:58:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:59:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:60:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:64:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:66:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:67:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:68:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:69:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:70:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:71:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:72:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:73:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:74:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:75:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:76:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:77:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:78:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:79:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:80:(EIA) will be carried out in accordance with the EIA Regulations and guidance
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:80:be included in the scope of the traffic and transportation assessment of the EIA. A
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:80: The scope of the EIA assessment.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:80:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:81:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:82:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:83:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:95: Scope of the EIA Acceptable The CTMP will need to be
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:97:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:252:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:253:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:254:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:255:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:256:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:257:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:258:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:259:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:260:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:261:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:262:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:263:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:264:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:265:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:266:(EIA) will be carried out in accordance with the EIA Regulations and guidance
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:266:be included in the scope of the traffic and transportation assessment of the EIA. A
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:266: The scope of the EIA assessment.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:266:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:267:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:268:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:281: Scope of the EIA Acceptable The CTMP will need to be
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:5: developments, EIA is required where significant environmental effects are likely by virtue of
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:5: development is EIA development and the findings of the EIA are set out within an
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:6:1.10 With regards to the EIA process, the submission of five separate applications and ESs will allow
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:13: regarding ground conditions has been taken into account in the accompanying EIA.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:13: into account in the accompanying EIA.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:14: the ERF scheme has been reflected in the baseline position of the accompanying EIA. Given that
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:14: not constitute EIA development.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:16: EIA, are designed in a complementary way.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:17:3.8 For the purpose of this EIA, the maximum development height will be 46.8m AOD within all of
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:17:3.10 The EIA is based on the assumption that the site will be cut and fill neutral. If this is not
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:36:5.7 EIA is required for developments, which on the grounds of their nature, scale and location are
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:36: likely to give rise to significant environmental effects. The purpose of an EIA is to ensure that
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:36:5.8 For planning applications, EIA is governed by the Town and Country Planning (Environmental
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:36: Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the EIA Regulations) as updated by The Town and
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:36:5.10 In undertaking the EIA for the current application the technical team has worked closely with
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:55:5.127 Overall the socio-economic assessment undertaken by Lichfields as part of the EIA
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:59:5.165 In terms of overall conclusions and cumulative effects, the comprehensive EIA undertaken for
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:12:within separate EIAs.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:13:of the 5 EIAs for air quality.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:14:I hope you are well. I’m working on the air quality chapters for the EIAs for five sites within
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:4: to the 2017 Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Regulations (as amended) Ref 2 he has
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:5: Regulations 2017 (EIA Regulations)
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:5:J2.2 At the European level, the EIA Directive 2011/92/EU Ref 3 places a requirement upon projects
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:5: Ref 3, identifies the important role that the Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) process
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:5: can play in assessing climate change impacts. It states that EIAs shall identify, describe and
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:5: 2017 EIA Regulations (as amended), under Part 1 Regulation 5(2)© state that EIAs shall
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:13: significant or not significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:19: in EIA terms.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:21: considered significant in EIA terms
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:27: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020.PDF:13:K3.9 This section sets out the method used in the EIA for assessing the potential significance of
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020.PDF:13: and Substantial Effects are considered significant in EIA terms and are identified in bold.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020.PDF:20: between Moderate and Substantial Adverse which would be significant in EIA terms. This
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020.PDF:22: Minor Adverse. This is not considered significant in EIA terms. Table K7.1 below looks at the
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020.PDF:23: EIA terms.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:5: development scale Environmental Impact Assessments (‘EIA’).
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:5: wider EIA across a broad range of sectors. He is a Chartered Environmentalist (‘CEnv’),
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:5: of experience in air quality, odour and EIA.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:18: notes are included below to show how the EPUK/IAQM guidance relates to the EIA significance
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: criteria used within this ES. The EIA significance criteria are then adopted within the Potential
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: is shown in Table F3.2. The EIA significance criteria used within this ES include Substantial,
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:38: 16 EIA: Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:5: Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’), and considers the design rationale underpinning the
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:5: Management and Assessment (‘IEMA’) and has 3 years experience in co-ordinating EIAs for a
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:5: towards her EIA Practitioner membership of IEMA and has 1 year of experience in EIA projects.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:5: Melissa is working towards her EIA Practitioner membership of IEMA and has 2 years of
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:5: experience in EIA projects. Their coordination role included the production of this chapter of
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:5: reviewed this chapter in accordance with the EIA Regulation requirements. Kate has over 10
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:5: years of experience of co-ordinating EIAs for a range of development projects.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:9: by summarising the sensitive receptors for the EIA.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:15: EIA and approach to cumulative effects and mitigation.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:17: considered in the cumulative assessment is provided in Chapter A, Section A.4: Scope of the EIA
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:18: relevant to this EIA.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:18:B4.18 This permission is of relevance to this EIA insofar as it grants permission for the remediation
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:18: conditions has been taken into account in this EIA. Further information on site preparation are
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:19:B4.21 This permission is of relevance to this EIA insofar as it grants permission for the storage of soil
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:19: account in this EIA. Further information on earthworks are included within section B6.0 of this
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:19:B4.24 The permission is of relevance to this EIA insofar that it grants outline permission for a final
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:19: this EIA. Given that the final land take of the scheme is still to be determined and, ind eed, in
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:19:B4.27 This permission is of relevance to this EIA insofar that the Eston Road improvements are
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:19: including development proposed in this outline EIA application. The permission will be
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:20: not constitute EIA development.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:20: screening opinion is of relevance to this EIA though it is assumed that this development will not
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:25: users are known, the final layout and scale of buildings cannot be established. The EIA is
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:25: level of certainty about the development in order to undertake the appropriate level of EIA.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:25: which is the subject of this EIA, are designed in a complementary way.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:26:B6.11 For the purpose of this EIA, the maximum development height at the site will be 46.8m AOD
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:26:B6.12 For the purpose of this EIA, the minimum finished floor level (‘FFL’) will be 8.0m AOD. This
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:26:B6.13 The EIA is based on the assumption that the development of the site will be cut and fill neutral
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:28: construction access arrangements. For the purpose of the EIA it is assumed this will take up to 6
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:29: the works which are the subject of this EIA and do not form part of the development that has
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:29:B7.11 For the purpose of this EIA, it is assumed that the development life of the site will be a
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:29: the purpose of this EIA it is assumed that there will be one main construction compound for the
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:29: necessary) although this process sits outside the scope of the EIA.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:30:B7.18 For the purpose of this EIA process it is assumed that the site will be cut and fill neutral. If this
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:30: concluded prior to construction works for the development considered in this EIA. The
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:30:B7.24 For the purpose of this EIA, it is assumed that all construction works will be undertaken using
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:30: starting on site. This EIA assumption will assess the worst case scenario.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:38: 5 A minimum of 3 access points into the site; for the purposes of this EIA, it is assumed that
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:38: Parameters Plan submitted to accompany this EIA (Appendix B3) shows the potential
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:39: an EIA suggests that it is good practice to consider the evolution of the site in the absence of the
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:42: of waste. However, it is assumed for the purposes of this EIA that the site
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:44: 4 Earthworks: for the purposes of this EIA, the earthworks are proposed to be cut and fill
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:44: 5 Access Arrangements: However, for the purposes of this EIA it is assumed that there
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:45: 16 EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0819-ESM-EA R_2020_0819_ESM 16 February 2021 OFFICIAL.pdf:1:The EIA proposal has not included a Water Framework Directive (WFD) assessment or a
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:7: Regulations 2017 (as amended) (‘the EIA Regulations’) as they are all above the 5ha threshold. It
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:8: (EIA) developments because they are likely to have significant effects on the environment by
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:8: 2 In section 3.0 to outline, informally, the topics to be scoped in and out of each of the EIAs;
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:8: each of the EIAs; and
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:10: EIA, the demolition of all other on-site Infrastructure will be subject to separate consents. Other
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:19: For the purpose of this EIA, and associated HRA, it will be necessary to assess the principle of
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:23: scope out operational effects from the assessment of all 5 EIAs. This is on the following
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:24: 3 Above Ground Heritage– this topic will be scoped into the Long Acres EIA, on the grounds
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:24: topic will be scoped out of the other four EIAs, as there are no listed buildings within the
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:24:3.4 It is proposed to scope the following topics out of all 5 EIAs, however reference should be made
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:24:4.1 In accordance with the EIA 2017 Regulations (as amended) each EIA will include an assessment
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:30:5.1 Each EIA will be prepared in accordance with the requirements of the 2017 EIA Regulations (as
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:30: criteria adopted for the EIA (see below);
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:30: significance criteria for the EIA which will comprise:-
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:31:5.7 The findings of each EIA will be set out in an ES which will comprise three volumes as follows:-
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:32:requirements of the 2017 EIA Regs. as well as the approach that has been taken on the Southbank submission recently
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:33:sites, the outline planning applications and the proposed scope of the Environmental Impact Assessments (‘EIA’).
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:33:On the information set out within the Note, it is our intention to informally scope the EIA with you and the Council.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:34:EIAs and please do let us know if you have any questions on the above or the note.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:41: mitigate the impact on non-motorised users. This is considered Not Significant in EIA terms;
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:4: developments with a specialism in EIA. Duncan Mackay has been assisted by Jenny Ferguson
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:7: can be carried out either as a standalone assessment or as part of a broader EIA. The GLVIA3
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:7: specific procedures in EIA with which an LVIA must comply.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:7:L3.5 This report has been prepared as part of a broader EIA and addresses matters of individual
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:7:L3.6 The key purpose of EIA directives and legislation is to ensure that likely significant effects on the
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:7: has been prepared to identify likely significant landscape and visual effects to inform the EIA
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:9: EIA and LVIA
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:9:L3.12 EIA Regulations specify that an assessment of likely significant effects should cover certain
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:9: Table L3.1 Relationship between EIA Regulations and LVIA process
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:9: Relationship between EIA Regulations and LVIA Process
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:9: EIA Aspects Interpretation of EIA Aspects Within LVIA Process/Reporting
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:22: EIA terms. Those classified as Minor or Negligible are likely to be Not Significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:35: EIA are listed above. However, to aid understanding of the wider visual context and cumulative
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:37:L5.1 EIA is an iterative process which informs the development of the project design. Where the
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:4: is a member of the IEMA Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Quality Mark.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:4: assessment, EIA and SEA.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:4: and EIA.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:5: Dorian Latham - over 30 years’ experience in delivering multi discipline Lead EIA Reviewer
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:5: sections. Dorian is the National EIA and Environmental Lead for JBA
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:17:G3.3 The assessment is necessary to meet the requirements of the NPPF (Ref 37), the EIA
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:19:G3.5 The methodology for the assessment of potential impacts follows the generic EIA methodology
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:22:G3.6 In terms of the EIA Regulations (Ref 33), it is only those impacts that are likely to have
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:22: the EIA Regulations guide the assessor to focus on effects that are likely to be significant, the
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:22: equivalent to significant effects when discussed in terms of the EIA Regulations (Ref 33). Those
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:22: EIA Regulations with the others constituting no effect or an effect which is ‘Not Significant’.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:23:Shaded Cell = Significant in terms of EIA Regulations.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:23:Unshaded cell = Not significant in terms of EIA Regulations.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:23: less, these are generally not deemed significant in terms of the EIA Regulations (Ref 33).
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:23: effects could be judged as significant in terms of the EIA Regulations, and where this is judged
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:23: scoped into the assessment. This is not a formal Scoping Opinion under the EIA Regulations. A
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:39: Assessment of major hazards and accidents was introduced by the 2014/52/EU EIA Directive,
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:60: 14 EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:6: 6. Non-native plant species cover less than 5% (other than Buddleia and Red Valerian, which
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:6: 4. The percentage cover of non-native, invasive plant species. (NB except Buddleia and Red
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:13:of the embankment is a mixture of young trees with Buddleia bushes.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:5:E1.5 The author has extensive experience in environmental assessment to form part of EIA
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:6: Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) Regulations 1. The following summarises relevant
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:7: adverse effect in EIA terms.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:7: reported as likely significant effects in EIA terms. The EIA process requires that likely
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:10: assessing impacts and threshold levels to determine significant effects in EIA terms.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:10:E3.10 In the absence of detailed information, a qualitative assessment is undertaken in this EIA. It is
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:3: out the findings of an Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) that has been submitted to
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:3: developments, EIA is required where significant environmental effects are likely by virtue of
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:3: development is EIA development and the findings of the EIA are set out within an ES.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:3: 3 Sections 4.0 to 14.0: provide a topic by topic review of the findings of the EIA;
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:3: The EIA Process
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:3:1.5 The EIA process aims to ensure that any significant effects arising from a development are
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:3:1.6 For this development, EIA has been carried out to consider the likely significant effects that may
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:4: surroundings, desk top assessments, surveys and fieldwork information available to the EIA
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:4: 1 Informed the scope of the EIA;
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:4: 2 Informed the methods by which the EIA has been carried out;
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:4:1.10 The EIA has had regard to planning and environmental policy and legislation at a national and
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:4:1.11 The EIA has been undertaken during the Covid-19 pandemic and where this is relevant to
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:6:1.16 With regards to the EIA process, the submission of five separate applications and ESs will allow
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:8:2.6 The EIA team have reviewed the site and surroundings and have identified that the following
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:10:3.5 For the purpose of this EIA, the maximum building height will be 36 metres above prevailing
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:10:3.12 The EIA Regulations specify that it is good practice to consider any alternatives to the scheme
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:11: based on the clear aspirations to bring the site forward for the uses assessed in the EIA.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:13: being Significant in EIA terms, which for this site are Dingy Skipper butterfly, Odonata species;
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:25: between Moderate and Substantial Adverse which would be Significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:25: construction stage. Neither are significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:28:16.1 The EIA process has identified the need for the preparation and agreement of a number of
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:4: the EIA Quality Mark with the Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:4:M1.7 Additionally, our Waste and Materials Leads are experienced EIA practitioners with depth of
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:4: experience in EIA and hold Chartership status such as Chartered Environmentalist, Chartered
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:14: Table M3.3 has been produced in line with the methodology used in the rest of the EIA and
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:15: Significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:20:M5.9 As the EIA assumption is that the site will be cut and fill neutral, there will be no surplus
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:21: purpose of this EIA it has been assumed that waste will be generated in equal quantities across
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:43:EIA’s.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:44:planning applications and EIAs for Teesworks has started.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:44:My colleague Jenny Ferguson and I prepared the LVIA and EIA chapter for the previous outline
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:44:planning application. We will be preparing 5no. LVIAs and EIA chapters to support the current
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:4: The professional judgement of those undertaking the Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’)
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:5: Management and Assessment (‘IEMA’) and has 3 years’ experience in co-ordinating EIAs for a
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:5: towards her EIA Practitioner membership of IEMA and has 1 year of experience in EIA projects.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:5: Melissa is working towards her EIA Practitioner membership of IEMA and has 2 years of
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:5: experience in EIA projects. Their coordination role included the production of this chapter of
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:5: this chapter in accordance with the EIA Regulation requirements. Kate has over 10 years of
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:5: experience of co-ordinating EIAs for a range of development projects.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:6:N2.2 This approach accords with EIA legislation and best practice which focuses on the main or
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:10: reference is made to Minor or Negligible ‘insignificant’ residual effects where relevant. The EIA
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:12: prepared for other EIA developments within the Teesworks area and based on discussions with
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:12: brief review of its potential relevance to this EIA. Point locations for these schemes are shown
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:21: and West of The Dorman Point EIA has
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:21: the ERF EIA).
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:22: EIA has been
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:23: EIA has been
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:24: with outline approval associated with the requirement to create sites that are EIAs have been
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:25: EIA and no further
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:30: necessarily significant in EIA terms, on some of the Valued Ecological Receptors (‘VERs’) which
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:44: of climate impacts for EIA. GHG emissions are inherently cumulative and the location of the
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:47: to be Significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:47: Significant in EIA terms. It is not expected that the cumulative emissions will compromise the
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:70: an assessment of climate impacts for EIA. GHG emissions are inherently cumulative. The
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:74: 10 EIA - Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:5: which involved reviewing EIAs. His specialist interests are mammals, amphibians and reptiles
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:5: Natural England and its predecessor bodies and included the assessment of numerous EIAs and
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:10: definitions are applied to the EIA terminology used throughout the ES as follows:
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:11: Not Significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:22: dominant species though Sallow Salix sp., Dog Rose Rosa canina and Butterfly bush Buddleia
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:27: these designated sites and their qualifying features will not be further assessed in this EIA and
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:27: be no impact on the SSSI, i.e. effects in EIA terms are Neutral and Not Significant.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:29: therefore the impact would be negligible at a local level, and EIA terms would be Negligible and
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:32:D8.1 While the purpose of an EIA is to identify significant effects the biodiversity of any site is wider
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:37: considered significant in EIA terms are:
R-2020-0819-ESM-ApplicationFormRedacted.pdf:5:Assistance provided with informal EIA Scoping Request
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economic - Dec 2020.PDF:13: in EIA terms.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economic - Dec 2020.PDF:25: Beneficial in the AOI. This effect is considered significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economic - Dec 2020.PDF:26: Beneficial in the AOI. This effect is considered significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economic - Dec 2020.PDF:28: considered significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economic - Dec 2020.PDF:29: considered significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:9:C3.1 The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) has been carried out in accordance with the EIA
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:18:C5.5 For the purpose of this EIA, the main access into the site will be via the new roundabout
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:25: safety is expected to be Negligible. This is Not Significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:27: C7.1. In EIA terms it is expected that there will be a Significant and Moderate Adverse
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:32: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:3:A3.0 EIA Regulations 4
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:3:A4.0 Scope of the EIA 6
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:3: Compliance with the EIA Regulations 21
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:3:A8.0 EIA Processes, Assumptions and Difficulties 27
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:4: “Teesworks”. It sets out the findings of an Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) of
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:4: application and the legislative context and the approach to, and scope of, the EIA.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:4: MRTPI). All authors are experienced at preparing introductory chapters to EIAs and co-
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:4: ordinating EIAs for a range of large-scale development projects, including other industrial
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:5: planning application and EIA.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:6:A2.9 Each application will be subject to its own EIA. However, the cumulative effects of this proposed
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:6: discuss and agree the scope of each EIA and approach to cumulative effects and mitigation.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:7:A3.0 EIA Regulations
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:7:A3.1 EIA is a process undertaken in respect of a certain type of development prior to the grant of
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:7:A3.2 The need for EIA is currently derived from the European Union (‘EU’) Directive No 2014/52/EU
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:7: will cease to have effect on 31 December 2020. This EIA has been carried out in accordance with
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:7: an EIA be undertaken where the development “is likely to have significant effects on the
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:7:A3.7 In light of these selection criteria, EIA will be required for Schedule 2 development in three
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:7: gives rise to the need for EIA. Whilst a formal screening request was not submitted, this has
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:7: accompany the application for planning permission. The development is therefore an EIA
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:8:A3.8 The EIA considers the potential for significant effects arising during the construction and
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:9:A4.0 Scope of the EIA
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:9: opinion on the scope of the EIA (the ‘scoping opinion’). This is a voluntary process and is not a
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:10:A4.9 In consultation with RCBC, the topics that the project team have scoped out of the EIA, fully or
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:11: associated EIAs are being prepared by the same project team who have been in regular dialogue
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:11: to discuss and agree the scope of each EIA and approach to cumulative effects and mitigation.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:20: and West of The Dorman Point EIA has assessed
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:20: the ERF EIA).
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:21:A5.1 The applicant has assembled an experienced and competent team to undertake the EIA of the
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:21: Table A5.1 The EIA team
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:21: below, in respect of the co-ordination of the EIA, and within Chapters C to M under the heading
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:21: involved in carrying out the EIA).
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:21: EIA Co-ordination
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:21: Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment (“IEMA”) EIA ‘Quality Mark’. Further
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:21: ordinating EIAs for a range of major development projects across the UK. Heather is working
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:21: towards her EIA Practitioner membership of IEMA and has 1 year of experience in EIA projects.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:21: Mel is working towards her EIA Practitioner membership of IEMA and has 2 years of experience
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:21: in EIA projects. Their coordination role included the production of this chapter of the ES and
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:21: IEMA, has reviewed this chapter and Chapters B, N and O in accordance with the EIA
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:21: Regulation requirements. Kate has over 10 years of experience in co-ordinating EIAs for a range
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:22: Figure A5.1 IEMA EIA Quality Mark Scheme
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:23:A6.1 The findings of the EIA are set out in this ES which comprises three volumes: -
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:23: place with the local community, consultees, and stakeholders in relation to the EIA is also
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:24: Compliance with the EIA Regulations
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:24: comprises an ES. The EIA has been prepared with reference to best practice including that
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:26: proposed development remains materially the same as the of how the EIA has been scoped
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:27: part of the EIA process.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:28:A7.1 The EIA has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the 2017 Regulations (as
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:28: criteria adopted for the EIA (see below);
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:28: of EIA significance criteria, comprising: -
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:30:A8.0 EIA Processes, Assumptions and
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:30:A8.1 The EIA considers the likely significant environmental effects of the proposed development
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:30: assessment survey and fieldwork and information available to the EIA team. Regard is given to
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:30:A8.2 The EIA has been completed with reference to best practice and relevant legislation and has
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:30: site and for consultation and assessment of the likely significant impacts by the EIA team.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:30: sought incorporates inputs from the EIA process that are necessary or appropriate to avoid or
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:30:A8.5 The EIA process has been informed by a series of maximum development parameters and
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:30: the EIA (Rochdale Envelope compliant). If relevant and required, matters can be reconsidered
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:30: provided in section B4 of Chapter B). For the purposes of this EIA, it is assumed that all
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:30: therefore, not be considered in this EIA.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:30: B4.19 – B4.21) and for the purposes of the EIA, it is assumed that this permission has not been
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:31: data or assumptions in carrying out the EIA. This has included information existing only in
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:31: Environmental Management Plan (FCEMP) has been prepared as part of the EIA and this
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:31: have been relied upon as the basis for the adopted methodologies within the EIA;
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:33:A9.2 The Coronavirus Regulations amend Regulation 23 of the 2017 EIA Regulations (as amended),
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:34: 5 EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020.PDF:60: just exclude Lackenby and Foundry from the EIAs for those sites. Let me know what you
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF:4: the EIA Quality Mark with the Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment.
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF:4:M1.7 Additionally, our Waste and Materials Leads are experienced EIA practitioners with depth of
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF:4: experience in EIA and hold Chartership status such as Chartered Environmentalist, Chartered
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF:14: Table M3.3 has been produced in line with the methodology used in the rest of the EIA and
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF:15: Significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF:20:M5.9 As the EIA assumption is that the site will be cut and fill neutral within the wider Teesworks
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF:21: purpose of this EIA it has been assumed that waste will be generated in equal quantities across
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:4: The professional judgement of those undertaking the Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’)
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:5: Management and Assessment (‘IEMA’) and has 3 years’ experience in co-ordinating EIAs for a
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:5: towards her EIA Practitioner membership of IEMA and has 1 year of experience in EIA projects.
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:5: Melissa is working towards her EIA Practitioner membership of IEMA and has 2 years of
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:5: experience in EIA projects. Their coordination role included the production of this chapter of
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:5: this chapter in accordance with the EIA Regulation requirements. Kate has over 10 years of
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:5: experience of co-ordinating EIAs for a range of development projects.
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:6:N2.2 This approach accords with EIA legislation and best practice which focuses on the main or
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:11: reference is made to Minor or Negligible ‘insignificant’ residual effects where relevant. The EIA
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:14: prepared for other EIA developments within the Teesworks area and based on discussions with
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:14: brief review of its potential relevance to this EIA. Point locations for these schemes are shown
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:23: and West of The Dorman Point EIA has
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:23: the ERF EIA).
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:24: EIA has been
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:25: EIA has been
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:26: with outline approval associated with the requirement to create sites that are EIAs have been
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:27: EIA and no further
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:32: necessarily significant in EIA terms, on some of the Valued Ecological Receptors (‘VERs’) which
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:46: of climate impacts for EIA. GHG emissions are inherently cumulative and the location of the
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:49: to be Significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:49: Significant in EIA terms. It is not expected that the cumulative emissions will compromise the
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:72: an assessment of climate impacts for EIA. GHG emissions are inherently cumulative. The
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:77: 9 EIA - Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:5: is a member of the IEMA Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Quality Mark.
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:5: assessment, EIA and SEA.
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:5: and EIA.
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:6: Dorian Latham - over 30 years’ experience in delivering multi discipline Lead EIA Reviewer
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:6: sections. Dorian is the National EIA and Environmental Lead for JBA
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:18:G3.3 The assessment is necessary to meet the requirements of the NPPF (Ref 37), the EIA
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:20:G3.5 The methodology for the assessment of potential impacts follows the generic EIA methodology
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:23:G3.7 In terms of the EIA Regulations (Ref 33), it is only those impacts that are likely to have
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:23: the EIA Regulations guide the assessor to focus on effects that are likely to be significant, the
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:23: equivalent to significant effects when discussed in terms of the EIA Regulations (Ref 33). Those
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:23: EIA Regulations with the others constituting no effect or an effect which is ‘Not Significant’.
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:24: Shaded Cell = Significant in terms of EIA Regulations.
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:24: Unshaded cell = Not significant in terms of EIA Regulations.
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:24: considered to be minor or less, these are generally not deemed significant in terms of the EIA
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:24: some potentially minor effects could be judged as significant in terms of the EIA Regulations,
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:24: scoped into the assessment. This is not a formal Scoping Opinion under the EIA Regulations. A
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:43:G5.5 Assessment of major hazards and accidents was introduced by the 2014/52/EU EIA Directive,
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:69: 13 EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:9:C3.1 The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) has been carried out in accordance with the EIA
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:18:C5.5 For the purpose of the EIA, it is assumed that the main access into the site will be via the
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:26: C7.1. In EIA terms it is not expected that any residual effects will be significant. The impacts will
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:31: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:5: Environmental Impact Assessments (EIA) and other regulatory, permitting and planning
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:5:H1.6 Arcadis is a member of the IEMA EIA Quality Mark.
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:14: is a significant impact for the purposes of this EIA.
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:20: Arcadis and these are used to inform the baseline assessment to this EIA.
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:31: 1 Earthworks: for the purpose of this EIA the earthworks are proposed to be cut and fill
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:32: receptors (considered ‘Significant’ in EIA terms) if mitigation actions are not carried out.
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:33:H5.15 For the purpose of this EIA process, it is assumed that the proposed development site will be cut
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:33: be of Minor Adverse significance which is considered ‘Not Significant’ in terms of this EIA
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:37: significance. These effects are considered Not Significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:37: This is not considered significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:37: significance. This is considered ‘Not Significant’ in EIA terms.
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:5:E1.5 The author has extensive experience in environmental assessment to form part of EIA
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:6: Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) Regulations 1. The following summarises relevant
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:7: adverse effect in EIA terms.
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:7: reported as likely significant effects in EIA terms. The EIA process requires that likely
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:10: assessing impacts and threshold levels to determine significant effects in EIA terms.
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:10:E3.10 In the absence of detailed information, a qualitative assessment is undertaken in this EIA. It is
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:22: there is the potential that the offices will be refurbished (outside of this EIA process), it is
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:4: (‘EIA’) Regulations 2017 (as amended) (‘2017 EIA Regulations (as amended)’) (Ref 1) requires
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:4:O1.4 In accordance with Regulation 26(3) of the 2017 EIA Regulations (as amended), the PPG further
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:4: Tertiary mitigation will be required regardless of any EIA assessment, as it is imposed, for
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:5: Management and Assessment (‘IEMA’) and has 3 years’ experience in co-ordinating EIAs for a
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:5: towards her EIA Practitioner membership of IEMA and has 1 year of experience in EIA projects.
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:5: Melissa is working towards her EIA Practitioner membership of IEMA and has 2 years of
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:5: experience in EIA projects. Their coordination role included the production of this chapter of
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:5: this chapter in accordance with the EIA Regulation requirements. Kate has over 10 years of
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:5: experience of co-ordinating EIAs for a range of development projects.
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:6:O2.1 As set out in Chapter B of this ES, the iterative process of EIA has resulted in the incorporation
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:8: site; for the purposes of this EIA, it is assumed
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:8: submitted to accompany this EIA (Appendix B3)
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:22:O3.1 This ES sets out the finding of an EIA of proposals for up to 185,806 sqm of general industrial
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:22: revisited as required by the 2017 EIA Regulations, and where necessary, updated as part of
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:23: 18 EIA - Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:3: out the findings of an Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) that has been submitted to
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:3: developments, EIA is required where significant environmental effects are likely by virtue of
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:3: development is EIA development and the findings of the EIA are set out within an ES.
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:3: 3 Sections 4.0 to 13.0: provide a topic by topic review of the findings of the EIA;
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:3: The EIA Process
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:3:1.5 The EIA process aims to ensure that any significant effects arising from a development are
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:3:1.6 For this development, EIA has been carried out to consider the likely significant effects that may
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:4: surroundings, desk top assessments, surveys and fieldwork information available to the EIA
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:4: • Informed the scope of the EIA;
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:4: • Informed the methods by which the EIA has been carried out;
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:4:1.10 The EIA has had regard to planning and environmental policy and legislation at a national and
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:4:1.11 The EIA has been undertaken during the Covid-19 pandemic and where this is relevant to
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:6:1.16 With regards to the EIA process, the submission of five separate applications and ESs will allow
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:8:2.6 The EIA team have reviewed the site and surroundings and have identified that the following
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:9:3.5 For the purpose of this EIA, the maximum building height will be 36 metres above prevailing
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:10:3.13 The EIA Regulations specify that it is good practice to consider any alternatives to the scheme
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:10: on the clear aspirations to bring the site forward for the uses assessed in the EIA.
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:14: being Significant in EIA terms and for habitats which are classed as being of high
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:26: effects are significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:29:15.1 The EIA process has identified the need for the preparation and agreement of a number of
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020(1).PDF:13:K3.9 This section sets out the method used in the EIA for assessing the potential significance of
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020(1).PDF:13: and Substantial Effects are considered significant in EIA terms and are identified in bold.
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020(1).PDF:21: between Moderate Adverse and Substantial Adverse, which would be significant in EIA
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020(1).PDF:24: Adverse. This is not considered significant in EIA terms. Table K7.1 below looks at the sensitive
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020(1).PDF:25: Adverse which is not significant in EIA terms. A summary is shown in Table K8.1 below.
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:12:within separate EIAs.
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:13:of the 5 EIAs for air quality.
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:14:I hope you are well. I’m working on the air quality chapters for the EIAs for five sites within
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:6: Regulations 2017 (as amended) (‘the EIA Regulations’) as they are all above the 5ha threshold. It
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:7: (EIA) developments because they are likely to have significant effects on the environment by
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:7: 2 In section 3.0 to outline, informally, the topics to be scoped in and out of each of the EIAs;
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:7: each of the EIAs; and
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:9: EIA, the demolition of all other on-site Infrastructure will be subject to separate consents. Other
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:18: For the purpose of this EIA, and associated HRA, it will be necessary to assess the principle of
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:22: scope out operational effects from the assessment of all 5 EIAs. This is on the following
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:23: 3 Above Ground Heritage– this topic will be scoped into the Long Acres EIA, on the grounds
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:23: topic will be scoped out of the other four EIAs, as there are no listed buildings within the
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:23:3.4 It is proposed to scope the following topics out of all 5 EIAs, however reference should be made
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:23:4.1 In accordance with the EIA 2017 Regulations (as amended) each EIA will include an assessment
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:29:5.1 Each EIA will be prepared in accordance with the requirements of the 2017 EIA Regulations (as
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:29: criteria adopted for the EIA (see below);
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:29: significance criteria for the EIA which will comprise:-
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:30:5.7 The findings of each EIA will be set out in an ES which will comprise three volumes as follows:-
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:31:requirements of the 2017 EIA Regs. as well as the approach that has been taken on the Southbank submission recently
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:32:sites, the outline planning applications and the proposed scope of the Environmental Impact Assessments (‘EIA’).
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:32:On the information set out within the Note, it is our intention to informally scope the EIA with you and the Council.
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:33:EIAs and please do let us know if you have any questions on the above or the note.
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:4: developments with a specialism in EIA. Duncan Mackay has been assisted by Jenny Ferguson
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:7: can be carried out either as a standalone assessment or as part of a broader EIA. The GLVIA3
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:7: specific procedures in EIA with which an LVIA must comply.
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:7:L3.5 This report has been prepared as part of a broader EIA and addresses matters of individual
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:7:L3.6 The key purpose of EIA directives and legislation is to ensure that likely significant effects on the
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:7: has been prepared to identify likely significant landscape and visual effects to inform the EIA
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:9: EIA and LVIA
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:9:L3.12 EIA Regulations specify than an assessment of likely significant effects should cover certain
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:9: Table L3.1 Relationship between EIA Regulations and LVIA processes
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:9: Relationship between EIA Regulations and LVIA Process
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:9: EIA Aspects Interpretation of EIA Aspects Within LVIA Process/Reporting
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:22: EIA terms. Those classified as Minor or Negligible are likely to be Not Significant in EIA terms
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:34: EIA are listed above. However, to aid understanding of the wider visual context and cumulative
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:36:L5.1 EIA is an iterative process which informs the development of the project design. Where the
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economics - Dec 2020.PDF:13: in EIA terms.
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economics - Dec 2020.PDF:26: Beneficial in the AOI. This effect is considered significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economics - Dec 2020.PDF:27: Beneficial in the AOI. This effect is considered significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economics - Dec 2020.PDF:29: considered significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economics - Dec 2020.PDF:30: considered significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:6: 6. Non-native plant species cover less than 5% (other than Buddleia and Red Valerian, which
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:6: 4. The percentage cover of non-native, invasive plant species. (NB except Buddleia and Red
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:4: Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’), and considers the design rationale underpinning the
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:4: Management and Assessment (‘IEMA’) and has 3 years’ experience in co-ordinating EIAs for a
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:4: towards her EIA Practitioner membership of IEMA and has 1 year of experience in EIA projects.
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:4: Melissa is working towards her EIA Practitioner membership of IEMA and has 2 years of
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:4: experience in EIA projects. Their coordination role included the production of this chapter of
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:4: reviewed this chapter in accordance with the EIA Regulation requirements. Kate has over 10
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:4: years of experience of co-ordinating EIAs for a range of development projects.
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:8: by summarising the sensitive receptors for the EIA.
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:15: scope of each EIA and approach to cumulative effects and mitigation.
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:16: considered in the cumulative assessment is provided in Chapter A, Section A.4: Scope of the EIA
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:18: relevant to this EIA.
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:18:B4.18 This permission is of relevance to this EIA insofar as it grants permission for the storage of soil
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:18: account in this EIA. Further information on earthworks are included within the Section B7.0 of
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:24: users are known, the final layout and scale of buildings cannot be established. The EIA is
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:24: level of certainty about the development in order to undertake the appropriate level of EIA.
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:25:B6.11 For the purpose of this EIA, the maximum development height at the site will be 43.5m AOD
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:25:B6.12 For the purpose of this EIA, the minimum finished floor level (‘FFL’) will be 5.2m AOD.
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:25:B6.13 The EIA is based on the assumption that development will be cut and fill neutral within the
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:27: EIA.
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:27: the removal and remediation of the existing licenced landfill on site. For the purpose of the EIA
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:28:B7.9 For the purpose of this EIA, sufficient assessment will be provided to enable a decision to be
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:28:B7.12 For the purpose of this EIA is has not been assumed that the Hot Metals Railway that extends
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:28:B7.13 For the purpose of this EIA, it is assumed that the development life of the site will be a
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:28: the purpose of this EIA it is assumed that there will be one main construction compound for the
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:29:B7.21 For the purpose of this EIA process it is assumed that the site will produce an element of site
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:29:B7.23 For the purposes of EIA, it is assumed that access onto the public highway will be obtained from
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:29:B7.26 For the purpose of this EIA, it is assumed that all construction works will be undertaken using
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:29: starting on site. This EIA assumption will assess the worst-case scenario.
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:37: 5 A minimum of 1 vehicular access point into the site; for the purposes of this EIA, it is
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:37: accompany this EIA (Appendix B3) shows the location of the access point into the site
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:38: an EIA suggests that it is good practice to consider the evolution of the site in the absence of the
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:40: of waste. However, it is assumed for the purposes of this EIA that any site
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:41: This EIA assumes that remediation will be necessary on site and it is
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:42: 4 Earthworks: for the purposes of this EIA, the earthworks are proposed to be cut and fill
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:42: 5 Access Arrangements: For the purpose of this EIA it is assumed that there will be a
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:42: minimum of 1 access point. For the purpose of this EIA, the transport chapter has been
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:43: 13 EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:3:A3.0 EIA Regulations 4
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:3:A4.0 Scope of the EIA 6
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:3: Compliance with the EIA Regulations 21
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:3:A8.0 EIA Processes, Assumptions and Difficulties 27
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:4: “Teesworks”. It sets out the findings of an Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) of
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:4: application and the legislative context and the approach to, and scope of, the EIA.
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:4: MRTPI). All authors are experienced at preparing introductory chapters to EIAs and co-
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:4: ordinating EIAs for a range of large-scale development projects, including other industrial
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:5: planning application and EIA.
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:6:A2.9 Each application will be subject to its own EIA. However, the cumulative effects of this proposed
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:6: discuss and agree the scope of each EIA and approach to cumulative effects and mitigation.
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:7:A3.0 EIA Regulations
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:7:A3.1 EIA is a process undertaken in respect of a certain type of development prior to the grant of
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:7:A3.2 The need for EIA is currently derived from the European Union (‘EU’) Directive No 2014/52/EU
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:7: will cease to have effect on 31 December 2020. This EIA has been carried out in accordance with
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:7: an EIA be undertaken where the development “is likely to have significant effects on the
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:7:A3.7 In light of these selection criteria, EIA will be required for Schedule 2 development in three
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:7: gives rise to the need for EIA.
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:7: permission. The development is therefore an EIA development, as confirmed under Regulation
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:8:A3.10 The EIA considers the potential for significant effects arising during the construction and
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:9:A4.0 Scope of the EIA
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:9: opinion on the scope of the EIA (the ‘scoping opinion’). This is a voluntary process and is not a
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:10:A4.7 In consultation with RCBC, the topics that the project team have scoped out of the EIA, fully or
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:12: associated EIAs are being prepared by the same project team who have been in regular dialogue
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:12: to discuss and agree the scope of each EIA and approach to cumulative effects and mitigation.
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:20: and West of The Dorman Point EIA has assessed
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:20: the ERF EIA).
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:21:A5.1 The applicant has assembled an experienced and competent team to undertake the EIA of the
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:21: Table A4.1 The EIA team
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:21: below, in respect of the co-ordination of the EIA, and within Chapters C to M under the heading
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:21: involved in carrying out the EIA).
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:21: EIA Co-ordination
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:21: Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment (“IEMA”) EIA ‘Quality Mark’. Further
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:21: co-ordinating EIAs for a range of major development projects across the UK. Heather is working
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:21: towards her EIA Practitioner membership of IEMA and has 1 year of experience in EIA projects.
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:21: Mel is working towards her EIA Practitioner membership of IEMA and has 2 years of experience
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:21: in EIA projects. Their coordination role included the production of this chapter of the ES and
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:21: IEMA, has reviewed this chapter and Chapters B, N and O in accordance with the EIA
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:21: Regulation requirements. Kate has over 10 years of experience in co-ordinating EIAs for a range
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:22: Figure A4.1 IEMA EIA Quality Mark Scheme
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:23:A6.1 The findings of the EIA are set out in this ES which comprise three volumes: -
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:23: place with the local community, consultees, and stakeholders in relation to the EIA is also
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:24: Compliance with the EIA Regulations
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:24: comprises an ES. The EIA has been prepared with reference to best practice including that
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:26: proposed development remains materially the same as the of how the EIA has been scoped
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:27: part of the EIA process.
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:28:A7.1 The EIA has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the 2017 Regulations (as
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:28: criteria adopted for the EIA (see below);
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:28: of EIA significance criteria, comprising: -
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:30:A8.0 EIA Processes, Assumptions and
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:30:A8.1 The EIA considers the likely significant environmental effects of the proposed development
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:30: assessment survey and fieldwork and information available to the EIA team. Regard is given to
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:30:A8.2 The EIA has been completed with reference to best practice and relevant legislation and has
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:30: site and for consultation and assessment of the likely significant impacts by the EIA team.
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:30: sought incorporates inputs from the EIA process that are necessary or appropriate to avoid or
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:30:A8.5 The EIA process has been informed by a series of maximum development parameters and
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:30: the EIA (Rochdale Envelope compliant). If relevant and required, matters can be reconsidered
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:30: B4.21). However, for the purposes of the EIA, it is assumed that this permission has not been
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:31: data or assumptions in carrying out the EIA. This has included information existing only in
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:31: Environmental Management Plan (FCEMP) has been prepared as part of the EIA and this
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:31: have been relied upon as the basis for the adopted methodologies within the EIA;
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:33:A9.2 The Coronavirus Regulations amend Regulation 23 of the 2017 EIA Regulations (as amended),
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:34: 5 EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0822-ESM-ApplicationFormRedacted.pdf:5:Assistance provided with informal EIA Scoping Request
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:5:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:6:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:7:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:8:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:9:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:10:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:11:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:12:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:13:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:14:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:15:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:16:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:17:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:18:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:19:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:20:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:21:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:22:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:23:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:24:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:25:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:26:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:27:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:28:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:29:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:30:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:31:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:32:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:33:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:34:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:35:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:36:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:37:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:38:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:39:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:40:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:41:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:42:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:43:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:44:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:45:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:46:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:47:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:48:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:49:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:50:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:51:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:52:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:56:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:58:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:59:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:60:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:61:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:62:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:63:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:64:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:65:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:66:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:67:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:68:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:69:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:70:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:71:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:72:(EIA) will be carried out in accordance with the EIA Regulations and guidance
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:72:be included in the scope of the traffic and transportation assessment of the EIA. A
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:72: The scope of the EIA assessment.
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:72:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:73:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:74:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:75:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:87: Scope of the EIA Acceptable The CTMP will need to be
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:89:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:114: \\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:115: \\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:116: \\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:117: \\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:202:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:203:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:204:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:205:\\GLOBAL\EUROPE\NEWCASTLE\JOBS\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:208:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:209:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:210:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:211:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:212:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:213:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:214:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:215:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:216:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:217:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:218:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:219:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:220:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:221:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:222:(EIA) will be carried out in accordance with the EIA Regulations and guidance
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:222:be included in the scope of the traffic and transportation assessment of the EIA. A
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:222: The scope of the EIA assessment.
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:222:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:223:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:224:F:\270000\279257\00 TEESWORK EIAS\04 DELIVERABLES\4-05 EIA CHAPTERS\ES TRANSPORT CHAPTERS\TRANSPORT
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:237: Scope of the EIA Acceptable The CTMP will need to be
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:14:My colleagues and I are working on an EIA for the South Tees Development Corporation’s (STDC)
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:14:development. Arup is assisting with the planning application and EIA for the land-based development. The
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:15:EIA chapter and we would like to address any queries that you may have.
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:5: which involved reviewing EIAs. His specialist interests are mammals, amphibians and reptiles
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:5: Natural England and its predecessor bodies and included the assessment of numerous EIAs and
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:10: EIA terminology as follows:
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:11: Not Significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:28: impact on the SSSI, i.e. effects in EIA terms are Neutral and Not Significant.
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:28: potential effects in EIA terms are Neutral and Not Significant.
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:33:D8.1 While the purpose of an EIA is to identify significant effects the biodiversity of any site is wider
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:40: would be considered significant in EIA terms are:
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:40: considered significant in EIA terms. The other VERs for which effects are considered to be Not
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:5: development scale Environmental Impact Assessments (‘EIA’).
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:5: wider EIA across a broad range of sectors. He is a Chartered Environmentalist (‘CEnv’),
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:5: of experience in air quality, odour and EIA.
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:18: notes are included below to show how the EPUK/IAQM guidance relates to the EIA significance
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: criteria used within this ES. The EIA significance criteria are then adopted within the Potential
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:19: is shown in Table F3.3. The EIA significance criteria used within this ES include Substantial,
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:38: 16 EIA: Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:4: to the 2017 Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Regulations (as amended) Ref 2 he has
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:5: Regulations 2017 (EIA Regulations)
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:5:J2.2 At the European level, the EIA Directive 2011/92/EU Ref 3 places a requirement upon projects
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:5: Ref 3, identifies the important role that the Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) process
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:5: can play in assessing climate change impacts. It states that EIAs shall identify, describe and
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:5: 2017 EIA Regulations (as amended), under Part 1 Regulation 5(2)© state that EIAs shall
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:13: significant or not significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:20: EIA terms.
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:22: considered significant in EIA terms.
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:29: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
R-2020-0465-FFM-60722_01 - Cover Letter - 24.08.20.PDF:6:our opinion that the application proposal is not one giving rise to a need for EIA as defined in the
R-2020-0465-FFM-60722_01 - Cover Letter - 24.08.20.PDF:6:The Regulations define “EIA development” as “development which is either (a) Schedule 1 development; or
R-2020-0465-FFM-60722_01 - Cover Letter - 24.08.20.PDF:6:environmental effects that may give rise to a need for EIA as an exception to the requirements of the
R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:69: buddleia and red valerian. These can total up to 10% between them with
R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:9: Environmental Impact Assessment Statement of Conformity (EIA SoC).
R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:42:8.1 Chapter 8 of the EIA SoC identifies that construction of the proposed
1)
c) on or
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:695: regulations made pursuant to the PA 2008 (Section 42 and EIA Regulation 13) in addition to non-
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:697: 2008 (Section 42 and EIA Regulation 13) in addition to non-prescribed persons;
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:703: Planning Act 2008 (Section 42 and EIA Regulation 13) in addition to non-
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:727:assessment (EIA)
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:727:A comprehensive EIA is currently being prepared for the elements of NZT that will
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:727:on environmental receptors such as people and ecology. The EIA will consider
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:727:design where possible. The EIA work is being undertaken following the approaches
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:727:been finalised, the EIA is being based on worst case assumptions; it is expected
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:727:The EIA will consider the potential effects of NZT on a number of environmental
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:728:— The findings of the EIA work undertaken to date - presented in the form of
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:734:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:736: (‘EIA’) development for the purposes of (‘SoCC’) has been prepared by the Applicants
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:736: means that an EIA of NZT will be undertaken 47 places a statutory duty on applicants to
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:736: environmental effects. The findings of the EIA sets out how the Applicants will consult
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:738: – the findings of the EIA undertaken on NZT Redcar and Kirkleatham. It extends beyond
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:738: reference to the early EIA work and extends to
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:781: An Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is being
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:781: The EIA considers all likely significant effects on the
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:781: The EIA has been informed by a Scoping Opinion
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:783:Cumulative and Combined A long-list of developments to be assessed in the EIA has been identified.
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:795: • the findings of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) work undertaken to date –
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:799:The design of the NZT Project is being further developed and may be further refined as the EIA process
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:799:defined as the basis for technical assessments supporting the EIA – this is known as the ‘Rochdale
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:802: Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) to consider
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:802: The EIA, which is underway,
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:802:Since the Stage 1 Consultation, significant progress has been made on the EIA for the Project. This
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:803:The assessment provided in support of this Stage 2 consultation is preliminary and the EIA is subject to
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:803:ongoing refinement. The final findings of the EIA will be set out in an Environmental Statement. To inform
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:837:Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the ‘EIA Regulations’) that they intend
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:837:to provide an Environmental Statement (‘ES’) in respect of the Project. The Project is therefore ‘EIA
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:837:development’ for the purposes of the EIA Regulations and an ES will form part of the Proposed
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:847:Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the ‘EIA Regulations’) that they intend
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:847:The Project is therefore ‘EIA development’ for the purposes of the EIA
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:848: length of road specified below. (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the ‘EIA Regulations’) that they intend to provide an
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:848: The effect of the Order will be to prohibit any vehicle from proceeding Environmental Statement (‘ES’) in respect of the Project. The Project is therefore ‘EIA development’ for the
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:848: in the lengths of road specified in the schedule below. purposes of the EIA Regulations and an ES will form part of the Proposed Application.
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:849: (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the ‘EIA Regulations’) that they intend to provide
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:849: an Environmental Statement (‘ES’) in respect of the Project. The Project is therefore ‘EIA development’ for
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:849:accommodated and marshalled through the closure where required. the purposes of the EIA Regulations and an ES will form part of the Proposed Application.
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:851: 5. The Applicants have notified the SoS in writing under Regulation 8(1)(b) of The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the ‘EIA Regulations’) that they intend to
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:851: provide an Environmental Statement (‘ES’) in respect of the Project. The Project is therefore ‘EIA development’ for the purposes of the EIA Regulations and an ES will form part of the Proposed Application.
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:855:APPENDIX 13.3: LIST OF EIA CONSULTATION BODIES
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:856:Appendix 13.3 – Bodies consulted under EIA Reg. 13.
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:888:APPENDIX 13.4: LETTER TO EIA REGULATION 13 CONSULTATION BODIES
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:890:Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the ‘EIA Regulations’) that they intend
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:890:to provide an Environmental Statement (‘ES’) in respect of the Project. The Project is therefore ‘EIA
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:890:development’ for the purposes of the EIA Regulations and an ES will form part of the Proposed
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:894:Section 42 ‘Duty to consult’ & EIA Regulation 13 ‘Pre-application publicity under Section 48 (duty to
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:894:(the ‘EIA Regulations’) requires applicants, at the same time as publishing the Section 48 Notice, to
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:894:the SoS under EIA Regulation 11(1)©.
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:894:You have also been identified as a consultation body for the purposes of EIA Regulation 13 and
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:897:NZT is an Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) development for the purposes of EIA Regulations.
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:897:The Applicants are therefore required to carry out an EIA of NZT and to submit an Environmental
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:897:Regulation 8(1)(b) of the EIA Regulations that they propose to provide an Environmental Statement
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:898: Section 48 & EIA Regulation 13 Notice
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:1047:Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the ‘EIA Regulations’) that they intend
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:1047:to provide an Environmental Statement (‘ES’) in respect of the Project. The Project is therefore ‘EIA
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:1047:development’ for the purposes of the EIA Regulations and an ES will form part of the Proposed
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:1050:Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the ‘EIA Regulations’) that they intend
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:1050:to provide an Environmental Statement (‘ES’) in respect of the Project. The Project is therefore ‘EIA
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:1050:development’ for the purposes of the EIA Regulations and an ES will form part of the Proposed
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:1171:responses from the likes of the EA, Natural England and the MMO on the technical aspects of the EIA. In view of
EN010103-002238-NZT DCO 8.5 - SoCG - Environment Agency September (Tracked) 2022 (D8).pdf:3: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - the
EN010103-002238-NZT DCO 8.5 - SoCG - Environment Agency September (Tracked) 2022 (D8).pdf:3: accordance with the EIA Regulations
EN010103-002238-NZT DCO 8.5 - SoCG - Environment Agency September (Tracked) 2022 (D8).pdf:3: EIA Regulations Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
EN010103-002238-NZT DCO 8.5 - SoCG - Environment Agency September (Tracked) 2022 (D8).pdf:3: findings of the EIA
EN010103-002238-NZT DCO 8.5 - SoCG - Environment Agency September (Tracked) 2022 (D8).pdf:4: with the EIA and does not result in unacceptable
EN010103-002238-NZT DCO 8.5 - SoCG - Environment Agency September (Tracked) 2022 (D8).pdf:10: February 2019 (EIA The Environment Agency were consulted on the EIA Scoping
EN010103-002238-NZT DCO 8.5 - SoCG - Environment Agency September (Tracked) 2022 (D8).pdf:11: from the Environment Agency EIA scoping consultation
EN010103-002238-NZT DCO 8.5 - SoCG - Environment Agency September (Tracked) 2022 (D8).pdf:11: inform the finalisation of the EIA and the overall DCO
EN010103-002238-NZT DCO 8.5 - SoCG - Environment Agency September (Tracked) 2022 (D8).pdf:15: Environmental throughout the pre-application period to help inform the EIA. It is
EN010103-002255-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:3: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - the assessment of the likely
EN010103-002255-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:3: in accordance with the EIA Regulations
EN010103-002255-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:3: EIA Regulations Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment)
EN010103-002255-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:3: ES Environmental Statement, documenting the findings of the EIA
EN010103-002255-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:4: with the EIA and does not result in unacceptable impacts
EN010103-002255-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:14: assessment ('EIA').
EN010103-002255-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:38: station of up to 860 MW, tying the authorised development to the scope of the EIA carried
EN010103-002255-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:40: Tying the EIA into the Order
EN010103-002326-NZT DCO 9.40 - Applicants' Response to SWQ CA.2.19 Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-002406-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:19: appearance, landscaping, layout and scale for scale likely. No EIA Scoping
EN010103-002406-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:19:9 Caernarvon Close, Beyond Housing, demolition of 19 dwelling 4.9 Unknown Online information on the developer Approved 1 N Y N Y N Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y N N N N N N Y N Y N Just within ZoI for traffic N No EIA Scoping Report or ES No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the
EN010103-002406-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:19: International, facility and combined heat and power plant, Form, Planning Statement, EIA 13/10/2016 ha - small “The application is area > 1 ha, waste Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of.
EN010103-002406-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:19:14 Fabian Road, Eston Gleeson Developments Ltd, 51 residential 5.6 1.38 ha Online satellite imagery indicates that Approved 1 N N N Y N Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y N N N N N N Y N - 51 Y N N N Remote from Site, no EIA No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the
EN010103-002406-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:19:15 Redcar Lane, Bellway Homes NE, reserved matters 9.1 7.71 ha Online news articles dated April 2022 Approved 1 N N N Y N Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y N N N N N N Y N - 126 Y N N Linked to ID 8. N Remote from Site, no EIA No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the
EN010103-002406-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:20: 18 Redcar and Cleveland Land north of Theakston Estates (Investments) Limited, 7.7 22.8 ha Online satellite imagery indicates that Allowed on 1 N N N Y N Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y N N N N N N Y Y- Y N Y Assume overlap in temporal N Remote from Site, no EIA No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the
EN010103-002406-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:20: to old Hall Farm energy storage facility (up to 49.9 MW), new to last no longer than 12 months. 10/11/2017 i.e. small should be complete by Nov EIA scoping or ES submitted; Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of.
EN010103-002406-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:20: Spencerbeck Farm outbuildings to allow outline planning Statement, Desktop Study or DAS - 20/01/2021 from PCC). No EIA Scoing or Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of.
EN010103-002406-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:20: Shakespeare existing car park (14 additional spaces) construction of this development has 12/01/2018 extension EIA scoping or ES submitted. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of.
EN010103-002406-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:20: 25 Wilton Tourian Renewables Ltd, construction and 3.1 1.1 ha Online news articles indicates that Approved 1 N N N Y N Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y N N N N N N Y N Y N Y >3km from PCC Site N No EIA scoping / ES No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the
EN010103-002406-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:21: International, workshop, Wilton International Wilton Planning Statement - checked 21/10/2016 scale (<1 EIA scoping or ES submitted Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of.
EN010103-002406-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:21: Redcar units with associated Infrastructure and m Statement or Transport Statement 12/08/2015 EIA scoping or ES submitted and the development is Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of.
EN010103-002406-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:21: Road, Dwellings, comprising 32 Bungalows and 57 m construction period of around two 21/03/2019 dwellings, scope (construction) for from PCC), no EIA scoping or and the development is Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of.
EN010103-002406-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:21: Of College Road, dwellings with associated works | Land To of the (Middlesborough Council) 11/10/2018 dwellings, construction periods (6.9km from PCC), no EIA No change to the Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of.
EN010103-002406-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:22:40 North Tees Site SABIC UK Petrochemicals Limited, Erection of 3.3 2.22 ha Online satellite imagery indicates that Approved 1 N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y N Y N - EIA N Construction scheduled to N Developments already in No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the
EN010103-002406-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:25: Newcomen Deemed Consent: Demolition of existing shall not be begun later than the 06/08/2020 scale EIA scoping or ES submitted and the development is Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of.
EN010103-002406-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:25: parking and associated Infrastructure works purpose of assessment within this EIA visual impacts.
EN010103-002406-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:27: Hartlepool distribution building, office building, welfare requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002406-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:27: TS25 2DF unit, storage bays and associated works (part- those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002406-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:27: 1DE requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002406-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:27: those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002406-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:27: Lane, (Former Condition 1 states: “The development requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002406-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:27: Ewart Parsons Site), to which this permission relates shall those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002406-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:27: 0LH and including a local centre comprising retail unacceptable traffic impacts on the requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002406-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:27: (400sqm) and business incubator units A19 Trunk Road. those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002406-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:27: Of Middle Warren, Infrastructure construction. A Construction noise impacts. and no requirement for EIA.
EN010103-002406-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:27: Warren, Hartlepool to the LPA prior to commencment of EIA Scoping Report or ES are
EN010103-002406-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:27: Belasis Layout and Scale) for the erection of hereby permitted shall be begun noise impacts. no requirement for EIA.
EN010103-002406-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:27: Avenue And development, manufacturing and storage years from EIA Scoping Report or ES are
EN010103-002406-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:27: Lane Industrial construction phase. requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002406-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:27: Estate Billingham those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002406-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:28: Road Cowpen Lane construction phase. requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002406-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:28: Industrial Estate those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002406-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:28: bed houses, 44 three bed houses and 6 four submitted prior to commencement of requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002406-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:28: bed houses the development those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002406-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:28: within 3 years of a planning approval. requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002406-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:28: those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002406-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:28: Middlesbrough associated landscaping, public realm, cycle states “The development to which requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002406-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:28: store and car parking this permission relates must be begun those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002406-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:28: Middlesbrough, TS1 be begun later than the expiration of requirement for EIA. Only reached in the ES.
EN010103-002406-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:28: 2RQ THREE those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002406-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:28: currently underway. requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002406-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:28: those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002406-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:28: Ladgate likely that the devleopment will be requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002406-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:28: Lane/Marton complete prior to construction of the those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002406-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:28: South Bank Condition 1 states: “The development requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002406-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:28: Industrial Estate, to which this permission relates shall those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002406-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:28: (A1053) Greystones (Amended Scheme) to last no longer than 12 months. requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002406-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:28: Road, Old Once installed, there is minimal on- those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002406-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:29: South Terrace Vehicular And Pedestrian Accesses And requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002406-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:29: South Bank Landscaping those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002406-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:29: Redcar 2021 no requirement for EIA.
EN010103-002406-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:29: EIA Scoping Report or ES are
EN010103-002406-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:29:115 Land At South Bank South Tees Development Corporation: 3.6 5.83 Standalone application for 5.83 Approved 1 N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Transport note included on Y Not in itself EIA No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the
EN010103-002406-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:29: And Landscaping Works boundary. This site will be with this development have which is EIA development.
EN010103-002406-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:29:120 LAND AT SOUTH ERECTION OF 3,396SQM OF B2/B8 3.6 2.97 Standalone application for additional Approved 1 N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y N N N Y Transport note included on Y Not in itself EIA No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the
EN010103-002406-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:29: GRANGETOWN AND ASSOCIATED PLANT, CREATION OF 114 and ID 115. Construction with this development have is EIA development.
EN010103-002406-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:30: REDCAR TS10 1RD EXTERNAL ALTERATIONS; CREATION OF 10 within 3 years of a planning approval. requirement for EIA. Only the development no
EN010103-002406-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:30: COMMERCIAL/RETAIL UNITS (CLASS E) AT those with a submitted EIA impacts on the ES
EN010103-002406-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:30:123 Land At Seal Sands Erection of an energy recovery facility and 3.4 3.7 The current target date for site Pending 1 N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y ? This scheme comprises EIA n/a n/a Added to the long list at During construction, No status change that the
EN010103-002406-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:30: 28 RABY ROAD 2, 3, 4 & 5 storey residential blocks with requirement for EIA. Only 3/4. Due to the nature of
EN010103-002406-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:30: HARTLEPOOL commercial units to ground floor providing those with a submitted EIA the development no
EN010103-002406-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:30:125 PLOTS 1A AND 1B Construction of a lithium hydroxide monohydrate 3.9 8.6 Q2/Q3 2023 to Q4 2024 Pending 1 N N N Y N Y N Y Y Y N Y Y N N N N N N N Y Y Y Y N Assumed that construction This scheme comprises EIA n/a n/a n/a n/a Added at deadline 11,
EN010103-002286-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:3:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - the assessment
EN010103-002286-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:3: EIA Regulations
EN010103-002286-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:3:EIA Regulations Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
EN010103-002286-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:3: findings of the EIA
EN010103-002286-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:4: other matters to ensure that it accords with the EIA
EN010103-002286-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:22: Information & the EIA and availability of baseline data on
EN010103-002286-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:22: EIA heritage and noise effects. It is agreed that, for
EN010103-002286-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:22: the EIA topics reviewed by STDC, the assessment
EN010103-002286-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:22: Cumulative cumulative effects in the EIA has been discussed
EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf:2: undertaking relevant parts of the EIA (which has been taken into account in
EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf:11: purposes of the EIA Regulations; minor and negligible effects are ‘not
EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf:12: commenced at the EIA Scoping Stage with the preparation of the EIA Scoping
EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf:13: the EIA is set out where relevant within each of the topic chapters in the ES
EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf:14:Secretary of April 2019 (EIA Scoping The ES should confirm and justify that there is no The level of operational traffic has been quantified within the
EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf:20: Assessment as part of the EIA.
EN010103-002550-NZT DCO 5.4 - DAS (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:3: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - a term used for the assessment of
EN010103-002550-NZT DCO 5.4 - DAS (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:7: the purposes of the Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) of the Proposed
EN010103-002550-NZT DCO 5.4 - DAS (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:39: Assessment (‘EIA’), the Applicants have therefore adopted the principles of the
EN010103-002550-NZT DCO 5.4 - DAS (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:39: ‘Rochdale Envelope’ approach and assessed (as part of the EIA) fixed maximum
EN010103-002550-NZT DCO 5.4 - DAS (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:59: detailed design will be in accordance with the design parameters upon which the EIA
EN010103-002550-NZT DCO 5.4 - DAS (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:62: Applicants have defined design parameters upon which to base the EIA to ensure
EN010103-001683-Marine Management Organisation - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ1.pdf:3:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-001683-Marine Management Organisation - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ1.pdf:57: 22-1 of the ES APP-2014 the EA is quoted as requesting that the EIA contains a worst-case
EN010103-002249-NZT DCO 9.37 - Justification of Corridor Widths - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-002285-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:3:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - the assessment
EN010103-002285-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:3: EIA Regulations
EN010103-002285-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:3:EIA Regulations Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
EN010103-002285-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:3: findings of the EIA
EN010103-002285-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:4: other matters to ensure that it accords with the EIA
EN010103-002285-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:22: Information & the EIA and availability of baseline data on
EN010103-002285-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:22: EIA heritage and noise effects. It is agreed that, for
EN010103-002285-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:22: the EIA topics reviewed by STDC, the assessment
EN010103-002285-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:22: Cumulative cumulative effects in the EIA has been discussed
EN010103-002058-NZT DCO 7.9 - Letter Requesting Further Proposed Changes - August 2022.pdf:3:Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017’ (the ‘EIA Regulations’).
EN010103-002058-NZT DCO 7.9 - Letter Requesting Further Proposed Changes - August 2022.pdf:3:There is no specific procedure provided for within the EIA Regulations where updated environmental
EN010103-002058-NZT DCO 7.9 - Letter Requesting Further Proposed Changes - August 2022.pdf:4:considered more generally the consultation requirements provided for by the EIA Regulations to
EN010103-002321-NZT DCO 9.36 - Nutrient Nitrogen Briefing Paper (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:128:Proposed Development, the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for NZT is being undertaken
EN010103-002321-NZT DCO 9.36 - Nutrient Nitrogen Briefing Paper (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:130:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-001715-South Tees Development Corporation - Responses to comments on Relevant Representations.pdf:44: Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Environmental See response to paragraph 4.1 to 4.12. Since the relevant No further comments
EN010103-001105-NZT DCO 6.4.18 ES Vol III Appendix 12A Legislation and Planning Policy Relevant to Ecology.pdf:9:Statement for Energy (EN-1) and geological Assessment (EIA) the applicant should ensure that the Environmental Statement (ES) clearly sets out any
EN010103-001105-NZT DCO 6.4.18 ES Vol III Appendix 12A Legislation and Planning Policy Relevant to Ecology.pdf:9: Applicant’s assessment ‘Where the development is subject to EIA the applicant should ensure that the ES clearly sets out any effects
EN010103-001105-NZT DCO 6.4.18 ES Vol III Appendix 12A Legislation and Planning Policy Relevant to Ecology.pdf:9: Infrastructure where EIA is not required to help the SoS consider thoroughly the potential effects of a
EN010103-001105-NZT DCO 6.4.18 ES Vol III Appendix 12A Legislation and Planning Policy Relevant to Ecology.pdf:11: – paragraph 2.7.2 length and take this into consideration in the preparation of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and
EN010103-001573-NZT DCO 8.35 - Huntsman Polyurethanes (UK) Ltd SoCG - May 2022.pdf:2: findings of the EIA
EN010103-001573-NZT DCO 8.35 - Huntsman Polyurethanes (UK) Ltd SoCG - May 2022.pdf:3: other matters to ensure that it accords with the EIA
EN010103-002042-DLA Piper UK LLP - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:2:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-002043-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO August 2022 (D6).pdf:165: planning permission ref 14/1454/EIA granted by Stockton-on-Tee Borough Council to be
EN010103-001598-NZT DCO 8.17 - Air Products SoCG - May 2022.pdf:3: that it accords with the EIA and does not result in
EN010103-002237-NZT DCO 8.5 - SoCG - Environment Agency September (Clean) 2022 (D8).pdf:3: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - the
EN010103-002237-NZT DCO 8.5 - SoCG - Environment Agency September (Clean) 2022 (D8).pdf:3: accordance with the EIA Regulations
EN010103-002237-NZT DCO 8.5 - SoCG - Environment Agency September (Clean) 2022 (D8).pdf:3: EIA Regulations Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
EN010103-002237-NZT DCO 8.5 - SoCG - Environment Agency September (Clean) 2022 (D8).pdf:3: findings of the EIA
EN010103-002237-NZT DCO 8.5 - SoCG - Environment Agency September (Clean) 2022 (D8).pdf:4: with the EIA and does not result in unacceptable
EN010103-002237-NZT DCO 8.5 - SoCG - Environment Agency September (Clean) 2022 (D8).pdf:10: February 2019 (EIA The Environment Agency were consulted on the EIA Scoping
EN010103-002237-NZT DCO 8.5 - SoCG - Environment Agency September (Clean) 2022 (D8).pdf:11: from the Environment Agency EIA scoping consultation
EN010103-002237-NZT DCO 8.5 - SoCG - Environment Agency September (Clean) 2022 (D8).pdf:11: inform the finalisation of the EIA and the overall DCO
EN010103-002237-NZT DCO 8.5 - SoCG - Environment Agency September (Clean) 2022 (D8).pdf:15: Environmental throughout the pre-application period to help inform the EIA. It is
EN010103-000812-NZT DCO 1.1 - Application Cover Letter.pdf:5:The Proposed Development represents an Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) development and
EN010103-000812-NZT DCO 1.1 - Application Cover Letter.pdf:5:EIA undertaken. The EIA has been carried out, and the ES prepared, in accordance with ‘The
EN010103-000812-NZT DCO 1.1 - Application Cover Letter.pdf:7:within the scope of the EIA carried out and does not result in unacceptable impacts. These will require
EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf:2: Impact Assessment (EIA) of the Proposed Development. The assessment
EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf:4: subject to EIA, the applicant should:
EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf:7: ecosystems and forms the ecological component of the wider EIA.
EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf:10: III, Document Ref. 6.4) broadly accords with the EIA methodology described
EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf:12: Development design and EIA to date.
EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf:13:Pathfinder maps and aerial EIA process (based on aerial photography) relevant to
EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf:18:15.3.33 The EIA Scoping Opinion Report which was submitted in February 2019 and
EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf:18: the EIA is set out where relevant in each of the topic chapters in the ES and
EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf:18:Cleveland Coast SPA, SPA extension and Ramsar considered within the EIA. Aspects of the
EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf:20:undertaken and will be used to inform the EIA, as
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (6).pdf:14: 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (6).pdf:14: 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 2
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (6).pdf:14: 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 3
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (6).pdf:14: 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (6).pdf:14: 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 2
EN010103-001182-NZT EL (6).pdf:14: 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 3
EN010103-001583-NZT DCO 8.1 - RCBC SoCG - May 2022.pdf:17: 1. EIA assessment The assessment methodology set out at Chapter 2
EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:30:6 Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and Environmental Statement (ES) …………………. 24
EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:42: • If it is correct that the ramp experience and may be relied upon as a Maximum Design Scenario to inform the EIA.
EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:51:6 Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and Environmental Statement (ES)
EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:51: single receptor using the Source- Source-Pathway-Receptor (SPR) model approach to Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), in general terms.
EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:52: Does progress with the EIA following stakeholder consultation, a decision was made by the Applicant to scope these potential impacts in to
EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:54: Notwithstanding, in the absence of any meaningful technical details to inform updates to the EIA and CEA, the
EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:54: Applicant is currently concluding an EIA screening exercise considering “no overlap” with the Endurance Project.
EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:54: assessment updates submitted into Examination at Deadline 7 (Endurance overlap EIA Annex).
EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:54: risk assessment and EIA Energy Balancing Infrastructure (AS-020) sets out an environmental risk assessment in relation to the Hornsea
EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:54: accidents and disasters (including accords with non-significant effects in EIA terms. Given this, the potential effects from accidents has not reached
EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:54: AS-020 and REP2-028) is a threshold for consideration in the EIA (i.e. significant effects are unlikely) and therefore the S-P-R approaches and
EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:54: taken into account in the ES and EIA significance matrix used for each technical assessment are not deemed relevant to the consideration of major
EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:54: of Schedule 4 of the EIA taken in respect of major accidents and / or disasters (as set out in Section 5.8.2 of A1.5 Environmental Impact
EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:54: accident such as a fire in a battery Paragraph 8 of Schedule 4 of the EIA Regulations states that the Environmental Statement should provide, “A
EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:54: EIA significance matrix technical topic chapters. The Environmental Statement, as supplemented by the information provided in G1.2
EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:54: all considered therefore to be sufficient and consistent with the EIA Regulations.
EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:57: The RSPB Applicant REP2-038 noted an Ornithology EIA and HRA Annex) that have been submitted into the Examination at Deadline 5.
EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:59: HRA.2.5 Applicant Barrier effects in relation to Please clarify which seabird species you considered in relation to barrier effects in the EIA and the screening of Likely
EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:60: to have been overlooked Ornithology EIA and HRA Annex (G5.25) which will be submitted at Deadline 5, the Applicant will include both flying
EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:60: in relation to the EIA and the and sitting birds within displacement assessments to ensure both displacement and barrier effects are accounted for.
EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:60: Effects for the HRA. Which project phase(s) did you consider in relation to barrier effects in the EIA and the screening of Likely Significant
EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:60: each seabird species? EIA and HRA Annex (G5.25) at Deadline 5, the Applicant will include both flying and sitting birds within displacement
EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:60: to barrier effects in the EIA maximum foraging range was used for other auk species?
EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:60: effects in the EIA and the
EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:61: consideration based on mean Ornithology EIA and HRA Annex (G5.25) at Deadline 5.
EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:62: Appendix B of Natural England’s These revised assessments will be presented within the Ornithology EIA and HRA Annex (G5.25) which is submitted
EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:64: Applicant therefore consider It is not common practice to clarify how each mitigation measure resulting from the EIA process is secured in the DCO
EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:64: EIA should have given attention to Hornsea Four alone has been assessed as negligible. As such, the physical presence of Infrastructure from comparable
EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:65: variation meaning negligible. As such, the cumulative impact would remain to be not significant in EIA terms.
EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:77: any EIA that has assessed the effects of sea spray.
EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:92: include “a desk-based or a significant impact in EIA terms. As such, the Applicant is confident that any post-consent assessment of
EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:121: post-EIA scoping and identified clear constraints to development. This approach
EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:140: EIA with commitments integrated into this project design via consultation.” Limits, additional and amended commitments and input on design at the OnSS.
EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:147: impact is negligible, and this is not significant in EIA terms.
EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:151: to seek independent legal advice. Our clients would suggest that an independent design and EIA matters as part of ExQ2. .
EN010103-002642-NZT DCO 9.50 - Applicants' Comments on D12 Submissons - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-002642-NZT DCO 9.50 - Applicants' Comments on D12 Submissons - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:17: covered by EIA) on Hornsea Four has been provided, including an assessment
EN010103-002510-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC SoCG (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:3:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - the assessment
EN010103-002510-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC SoCG (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:3: EIA Regulations
EN010103-002510-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC SoCG (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:3:EIA Regulations Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
EN010103-002510-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC SoCG (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:3: findings of the EIA
EN010103-002510-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC SoCG (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:4: other matters to ensure that it accords with the EIA
EN010103-002510-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC SoCG (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:22: Information & the EIA and availability of baseline data on
EN010103-002510-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC SoCG (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:22: EIA heritage and noise effects. It is agreed that, for
EN010103-002510-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC SoCG (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:22: the EIA topics reviewed by STDC, the assessment
EN010103-002510-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC SoCG (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:23: Cumulative cumulative effects in the EIA has been discussed
EN010103-002533-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons Tracked Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:3: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment. The
EN010103-002533-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons Tracked Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:4: findings of the EIA.
EN010103-002533-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons Tracked Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:6: with the EIA and does not result in unacceptable
EN010103-002533-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons Tracked Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:18: account of the findings of the EIA as reported within the ES, against the
EN010103-002533-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons Tracked Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:32:3.1.14 The Environmental Impact Assessment (’EIA’) has therefore been undertaken
EN010103-002533-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons Tracked Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:73: of the findings of the EIA as reported within the ES, against the relevant NPSs
EN010103-002429-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Comments on any other information submitted at Deadline 11.pdf:4: being the case, the EIA “project” (the DCO project and the transportation and injection of CO2 from
EN010103-002429-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Comments on any other information submitted at Deadline 11.pdf:4: in EIA terms. This is set out in paragraphs 15 to 22 of the Richard Harwood KC Advice and concludes
EN010103-002429-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Comments on any other information submitted at Deadline 11.pdf:7: opportunity for limited consultation under the related EIA process, there is no opportunity to discuss
EN010103-002513-NZT DCO 8.19 - CF Fertilisers Ltd SoCG (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:2: findings of the EIA
EN010103-002513-NZT DCO 8.19 - CF Fertilisers Ltd SoCG (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:3: other matters to ensure that it accords with the EIA
EN010103-001544-Stockton Borough Council - Local Impact Reports (LIRs) from Local Authorities.pdf:1: is no need for the LIR to replicate the EIA. Nor is it necessary to replicate any assessment
EN010103-001544-Stockton Borough Council - Local Impact Reports (LIRs) from Local Authorities.pdf:9: importance. The EIA includes relevant chapters on this aspect and subject to no
EN010103-001544-Stockton Borough Council - Local Impact Reports (LIRs) from Local Authorities.pdf:10: section of the submitted EIA. All relevant developments have been considered.
EN010103-001197-NZT DCO 6.2.4 - ES Vol I Chapter 4 - Oct 2021.pdf:3: and will be supported by a separate Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA).
EN010103-001197-NZT DCO 6.2.4 - ES Vol I Chapter 4 - Oct 2021.pdf:3: offshore EIA is still being developed, there is currently limited information
EN010103-001197-NZT DCO 6.2.4 - ES Vol I Chapter 4 - Oct 2021.pdf:3: off-shore scheme. The offshore EIA will be submitted Q2 2022 for approval
EN010103-001197-NZT DCO 6.2.4 - ES Vol I Chapter 4 - Oct 2021.pdf:4: environmental effects of the Proposed Development therefore, the EIA is
EN010103-001197-NZT DCO 6.2.4 - ES Vol I Chapter 4 - Oct 2021.pdf:5: this approach is being applied to the specific aspects of the EIA, this is
EN010103-001197-NZT DCO 6.2.4 - ES Vol I Chapter 4 - Oct 2021.pdf:14: consented separately supported by a separate EIA (see Section 4.81).
EN010103-001197-NZT DCO 6.2.4 - ES Vol I Chapter 4 - Oct 2021.pdf:18: therefore been adopted to define appropriate parameters for use in the EIA.
EN010103-001197-NZT DCO 6.2.4 - ES Vol I Chapter 4 - Oct 2021.pdf:18: devised to enable the EIA to progress in the absence of the final design
EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:11: Impact Assessment (EIA) process.
EN010103-001466-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons - Apr 2022.pdf:4: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment. The
EN010103-001466-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons - Apr 2022.pdf:4: documenting the findings of the EIA.
EN010103-001466-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons - Apr 2022.pdf:7: EIA and does not result in unacceptable
EN010103-001466-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons - Apr 2022.pdf:17: of the findings of the EIA as reported within the ES, against the relevant NPSs
EN010103-001466-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons - Apr 2022.pdf:31:3.1.14 The Environmental Impact Assessment (’EIA’) has therefore been undertaken
EN010103-001466-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons - Apr 2022.pdf:71: of the findings of the EIA as reported within the ES, against the relevant NPSs
EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:1:Appendix 1B: EIA Scoping Opinion
EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:6: (the EIA Regulations) for the proposed Teesside Cluster Carbon Capture & Usage
EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:6:1.1.2 In accordance with Regulation 10 of the EIA Regulations, an Applicant may ask
EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:6:1.1.4 The Applicant has notified the SoS under Regulation 8(1)(b) of the EIA
EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:6: 6(2)(a) of the EIA Regulations, the Proposed Development is EIA development.
EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:6:1.1.5 Regulation 10(9) of the EIA Regulations requires that before adopting a scoping
EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:6:1.1.6 This Opinion has taken into account the requirements of the EIA Regulations as
EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:7:1.1.10 Regulation 10(3) of the EIA Regulations states that a request for a scoping
EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:7: encompasses the relevant aspects identified in the EIA Regulations.
EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:7: be co-ordinated with the EIA in accordance with Regulation 26 of the EIA
EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:7:1.2.1 In accordance with Regulation 10(6) of the EIA Regulations the Inspectorate
EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:7: 11(1)(a) of the duty imposed on them by Regulation 11(3) of the EIA
EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:12:2.3.14 The EIA Regulations require that the Applicant provide ‘A description of the
EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:12: Regulation 14 of the EIA Regulations.
EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:15:3.3.2 The Applicant should note that in accordance with Regulation 5 of the EIA
EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:15: Regulations, EIA is a process which includes the preparation of the ES but also
EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:17:3.3.20 The EIA Regulations require an estimate, by type and quantity, of expected
EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:19:3.3.30 Schedule 4 Part 5 of the EIA Regulations requires a description of the likely
EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:19:3.3.31 Regulation 32 of the EIA Regulations inter alia requires the Inspectorate to
EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:58: should not impede the ability of the ES to adhere with the EIA
EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:59: - Advice Note Three: EIA Notification and Consultation;
EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:81:Senior EIA and Land Rights Adviser
EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:81:Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the EIA Regulations) – Regulations 10 and
EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:89:detail of the Statement that will present details of the EIA.
EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:90:should be scoped into the EIA.
EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:90:The applicant has provided an EIA Scoping Report which has a section on
EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:90:assessment will be carried out as part of the EIA, which will assess the potential
EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:90:The Council’s Planning Policy section have no comments on the scope of the EIA,
EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:90:EIA.
EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:95:Subject: RE: EN010103 – Teesside Cluster Carbon Capture & Usage – EIA Scoping
EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:95:It was noticed that the EIA Scoping Consultation report supplied to did not address the aspects of
EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:95:component of the proposed development will be considered within a separate EIA exercise.
EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:95:Please therefore direct an separate EIA Scoping Consultation that addresses any aspects of the
EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:95:Subject: EN010103 – Teesside Cluster Carbon Capture & Usage – EIA Scoping Notification and Consultation
EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:96:EIA and Land Rights Advisor
EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:97:(ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT) REGULATIONS 2017 (THE EIA
EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:99:For the purposes of the Environmental Impact Assessment (“EIA”) Scoping Report prepared
EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:100:The EIA Scoping Report covers the onshore works associated with the Project only, with
EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:100:EIA process. While the Scoping Report notes that the onshore and offshore works will be
EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:101:taken into account in terms of defining the scope of the EIA. It should be noted that, while
EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:101:should therefore be considered during the EIA process.
EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:101:potential impacts. The MMO would expect this to be presented in detail during the EIA
EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:101:scoped into the EIA. Should works be required within intertidal or estuarine areas of the
EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:101:River Tees and/or North Sea, then the EIA should provide a characterisation of fish ecology
EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:101:Tees and/or North Sea, the MMO would expect the EIA to include a desk-based review of
EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:102:fisheries and other marine users are considered during the EIA process.
EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:103:will be scoped in to the EIA. While the Scoping Report purports to cover works down to
EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:105:Proposal: EN010103-000010 – Teesside Cluster Carbon Capture & Usage – EIA Scoping Notification and
EN010103-002000-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum - August 2022(D5) - Tracked.pdf:3: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - the assessment of the likely
EN010103-002000-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum - August 2022(D5) - Tracked.pdf:3: in accordance with the EIA Regulations
EN010103-002000-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum - August 2022(D5) - Tracked.pdf:3: EIA Regulations Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment)
EN010103-002000-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum - August 2022(D5) - Tracked.pdf:3: ES Environmental Statement, documenting the findings of the EIA
EN010103-002000-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum - August 2022(D5) - Tracked.pdf:4: with the EIA and does not result in unacceptable impacts
EN010103-002000-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum - August 2022(D5) - Tracked.pdf:14: assessment ('EIA').
EN010103-002000-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum - August 2022(D5) - Tracked.pdf:37: station of up to 860 MW, tying the authorised development to the scope of the EIA carried
EN010103-002000-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum - August 2022(D5) - Tracked.pdf:40: Tying the EIA into the Order
EN010103-000813-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide.pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - a term used
EN010103-000813-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide.pdf:3: EIA Regulations The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental
EN010103-000813-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide.pdf:12: 'EIA Regulations').
EN010103-000813-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide.pdf:12: with the statutory requirements of the PA 2008, the APFP Regulations and the EIA
EN010103-000813-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide.pdf:15: 6.1 Non-Technical Summary APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA
EN010103-000813-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide.pdf:15: 6.2 Environmental Statement Volume I – APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA
EN010103-000813-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide.pdf:15: 6.2.1 Chapter 1 Introduction APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA
EN010103-000813-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide.pdf:15: 6.2.2 Chapter 2 Assessment Methodology APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA
EN010103-000813-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide.pdf:15: 6.2.3 Chapter 3 Description of the Existing Area APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA
EN010103-000813-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide.pdf:15: 6.2.4 Chapter 4 Proposed Development APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA
EN010103-000813-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide.pdf:15: 6.2.5 Chapter 5 Construction Programme and APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA
EN010103-000813-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide.pdf:15: 6.2.6 Chapter 6 Alternatives and Design APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA
EN010103-000813-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide.pdf:15: 6.2.7 Chapter 7 Legislative Context & Planning APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA
EN010103-000813-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide.pdf:15: 6.2.8 Chapter 8 Air Quality APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA
EN010103-000813-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide.pdf:15: Water Resources and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-000813-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide.pdf:15: Contaminated Land and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-000813-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide.pdf:15: 6.2.11 Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA
EN010103-000813-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide.pdf:15: Conservation and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-000813-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide.pdf:15: and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-000813-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide.pdf:15: Conservation and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-000813-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide.pdf:15: and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-000813-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide.pdf:15: 6.2.16 Chapter 16 Traffic and Transport APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA
EN010103-000813-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide.pdf:15: and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-000813-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide.pdf:15: and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-000813-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide.pdf:15: and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-000813-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide.pdf:15: 6.2.20 Chapter 20 Socio-economics & Tourism APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA
EN010103-000813-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide.pdf:16: 6.2.21 Chapter 21 Climate Change APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA
EN010103-000813-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide.pdf:16: 6.2.22 Chapter 22 Major Accidents & Disasters APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA
EN010103-000813-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide.pdf:16: 6.2.23 Chapter 23 Population & Human Health APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA
EN010103-000813-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide.pdf:16: 6.2.24 Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA
EN010103-000813-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide.pdf:16: 6.2.25 Chapter 25 Summary of Significant Effects APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) and EIA
EN010103-000813-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide.pdf:16: and EIA Reg. 14 unless
EN010103-000813-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide.pdf:21: and EIA Reg. 14 unless
EN010103-000813-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide.pdf:21: 6.4.1 Appendix 1A: EIA Scoping Report -
EN010103-000813-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide.pdf:21: 6.4.2 Appendix 1B: EIA Scoping Opinion -
EN010103-001913-NZT DCO 9.18 - Further information to Historic Environment Questions July 2022 (D4).pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:17: Assessment) Regulations 2017 (“the EIA Regulations”) to describe the reasonable alternatives that
EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:17: environmental effects of the Proposed Development, the EIA has been undertaken adopting the
EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:18: HPQC set out that the requirement in the EIA Regulations is an example of where it is necessary to
EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:56: “When deciding whether to make an order granting development consent for EIA development the
EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:59: v North Norfolk District Council 2015 1 WLR 3710 the Supreme Court held that even where a breach of EIA Regulations
EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:60: that ” the Secretary of State failed lawfully to comply with … Reg.30 of the EIA Regulations . The
EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:66: in the context of SEA or EIA, is for the court to intervene only if the decision-maker has acted irrationally (see e.g. Spurrier
EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:88: Impact Assessment Directive 2011/92/EU (as amended) (“the EIA Directive”) and the Infrastructure Planning (Environmental
EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:88: Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (“the EIA Regulations”), greenhouse gas emissions would have to be assessed and
EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:90: 95. One cannot say that she misunderstood the purpose of environmental impact assessment under the EIA Directive and
EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:90: the EIA Regulations , or the relevance of an assessment of CO2 emissions in an environmental statement for a project within
EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:90: under regulation 21 of the EIA Regulations , is not incompatible with a statement of national policy in which the Government
EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:166: Hornsea Project Four should be further considered in the NZT Proposed Development EIA”. That
EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:166: part of the Proposed Development’s Environmental Impact Assessment (“EIA”).
EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:166:2. SCOPE OF EIA
EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:166: in the Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the “EIA
EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:166: Regulations”). Relevant parts of the EIA Regulations are set out and considered below.
EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:166: Regulation 4 EIA Regulations
EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:166:2.2 The starting point with regards EIA is in Regulation 4, which states that for ‘EIA development’ (such
EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:166: consent unless an EIA has been carried out in respect of the application.
EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:167: Regulation 5 EIA Regulations
EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:167:2.3 Regulation 5 sets out the EIA process, one stage of which includes the preparation of the ES (with
EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:167:2.4 Regulation 5(2) states that the EIA must: “identify, describe and assess in an appropriate manner, in
EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:167: Regulation 14 EIA Regulations
EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:168:2.13 Accordingly there is no obligation under EIA Regulation 14(2) to assess the Proposed Development’s
EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:168: Schedule 4 Paragraph 4 EIA Regulations
EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:168:2.14 Schedule 4 of the EIA Regulations provides the information to be included in the ES.
EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:168: Schedule 4 Paragraph 5 EIA Regulations
EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:168: Scoping Opinion adopted by the Planning Inspectorate (on behalf of the Secretary of State pursuant to Regulation 10 of the EIA
EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:169:2.20 There is therefore no statutory obligation under paragraph 5 of schedule 4 to the EIA Regulations to
EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:169: Schedule 4 Paragraph 3 EIA Regulations
EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:169: schedule 4 paragraph 3 of the EIA Regulations:
EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:169:2.23 Secondly and as noted above, the test under the EIA Regulations remains to assess a proposed
EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:169: development with and not on another project. Paragraph 3 of schedule 4 to the EIA Regulations does
EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:169: Summary in relation to EIA Regulations
EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:169:2.24 The EIA Regulations do not therefore require the ES in respect of the Proposed Development to
EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:170: of other developments” (paragraph 4.2.5). This requirement of NPS EN-1 is similar to the EIA
EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:170: Hornsea 4 Offshore Wind Farm in the Overlap Area pursuant to the EIA Regulations, bp considers
EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:182: (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (“the 2017 EIA
EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:185: the Environmental Impact Assessment (“EIA”) Regulations had been met. It
EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:206: 29. The project constituted EIA development to which the Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment)
EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:206: Regulations 2017 (SI 2017 No. 572 ) (“the EIA Regulations 2017 ”) applied.
EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:206: 30. Regulation 4(2) prohibits the granting of a DCO “unless an EIA has been carried out in respect of that application.”
EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:206: Regulation 5(1) defines EIA as a process consisting of (a) the preparation of an ES, (b) compliance with publicity, notification
EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:206: and consultation requirements in the EIA Regulations 2017 on the application and the ES, and © compliance in this case
EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:206: “When deciding whether to make an order granting development consent for EIA development the
EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:206: 32. The EIA “must identify, describe and assess in an appropriate manner” “the direct and indirect significant effects of the
EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:209: • The EIA Directive requires projects with significant environmental
EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:217: 66. Regulation 5(5) of the EIA Regulations 2017 does not impinge upon the legal principles above on the extent of the
EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:226: 113. At PR 7.3.65 the Panel concluded that the ES was fully compliant with the EIA Regulations 2017 . The SST accepted
EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:226: to deal with the separate issue of whether the SST subsequently complied with regulation 21(1) of the EIA Regulations 2017
EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:234: the SST at any stage. In this context, regulation 21(1) of the EIA Regulations 2017 is relevant (see 31 above). The SST
EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:235: 177. Notwithstanding regulation 21(1) of the EIA Regulations 2017 and the contents of DL11, the defendant's legal team
EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:243: (ii) compliance with the EIA Regulations 2017 in relation to the main alternatives studied by the applicant and the main
EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:244: that IP2 had said that they were satisfied that the EIA had addressed alternatives, relying also upon the HIA, including the
EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:244: IP2's view that “the EIA has addressed alternatives” and that IP1 had carried out an options appraisal on alternatives for the
EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:244: 252. The Panel addressed the EIA requirement for assessment of alternatives in PR 5.4.72 to 5.4.73. Its conclusions focused
EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:245: by IP1 had complied with the EIA Regulations 2017 and whether compulsory acquisition of land was justified. Although
EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:245: regulation 21(1) of the EIA Regulations 2017 required the SST to take into account the “environmental information”, which
EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:245: 258. Accordingly, the approach taken by the Panel and by the SST under the EIA Regulations 2017 did not go beyond that
EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:245: The NPSNN goes on to set out requirements which should be considered “in particular,” namely the EIA Directive and the
EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:249: information” as defined in regulation 3(1) of the EIA Regulations 2017 . Compliance with a requirement to take information
EN010103-000892-NZT DCO 6.2.6 ES Vol I Chapter 6 Alternatives and Design Evolution.pdf:2: 2017 (the ‘EIA Regulations’) state that the Environmental Statement should
EN010103-000892-NZT DCO 6.2.6 ES Vol I Chapter 6 Alternatives and Design Evolution.pdf:2:6.1.4 Under the EIA Regulations there is no general requirement to assess the
EN010103-000892-NZT DCO 6.2.6 ES Vol I Chapter 6 Alternatives and Design Evolution.pdf:4: likely significant environmental effects of the Proposed Development, the EIA
EN010103-000892-NZT DCO 6.2.6 ES Vol I Chapter 6 Alternatives and Design Evolution.pdf:9: the draft DCO incorporates flexibility on these matters and the EIA has
EN010103-000892-NZT DCO 6.2.6 ES Vol I Chapter 6 Alternatives and Design Evolution.pdf:18: that has been undertaken as part of the EIA and based on the purpose of the
EN010103-001597-NZT DCO 8.16 - Network Rail SoCG - May 2022.pdf:2: findings of the EIA
EN010103-001597-NZT DCO 8.16 - Network Rail SoCG - May 2022.pdf:3: other matters to ensure that it accords with the EIA
EN010103-001901-NZT DCO 8.13 - PD Teesport Ltd SoCG (Tracked) July 22 (D4).pdf:2: findings of the EIA
EN010103-001901-NZT DCO 8.13 - PD Teesport Ltd SoCG (Tracked) July 22 (D4).pdf:3: other matters to ensure that it accords with the EIA
EN010103-001962-c 16 May 2022.pdf:5: Regulations 2017 (”the EIA Regulations”) does not use the term
EN010103-001962-c 16 May 2022.pdf:5: proposed development is part of the project for EIA purposes is also
EN010103-001962-c 16 May 2022.pdf:8: project, for the purposes of Schedule 2 of the EIA Regualtions,
EN010103-001469-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Tracked) - Apr 2022.pdf:3: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - the
EN010103-001469-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Tracked) - Apr 2022.pdf:3: accordance with the EIA Regulations
EN010103-001469-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Tracked) - Apr 2022.pdf:3: EIA Regulations Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
EN010103-001469-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Tracked) - Apr 2022.pdf:3: findings of the EIA
EN010103-001469-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Tracked) - Apr 2022.pdf:4: ensure that it accords with the EIA and does not
EN010103-001469-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Tracked) - Apr 2022.pdf:16: environmental impact assessment (‘EIA’).
EN010103-001469-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Tracked) - Apr 2022.pdf:43: of the EIA carried out and reported in the Environmental Statement (Document Ref.
EN010103-001469-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Tracked) - Apr 2022.pdf:48: Tying the EIA into the Order
EN010103-002626-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 2 - bp - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:2: RSEÿY`IFDÿ ẁIÿ̀IÿaR̀xEIaÿbIRPEIaÿaFGEIaÿExF̀BEEaÿ
EN010103-002626-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 2 - bp - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:64: deiagebÿpciÿwdcfeÿYfeyadcpYÿcyfihbcyrÿgpYeÿ eYciceyfeÿgpÿwsYcfaiÿdcYd $938ÿ$'86(Fÿ3%ÿ$6%3%6ÿG3'ÿ'3%ÿBi77ÿS3GAÿ
EN010103-002626-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 2 - bp - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:184:89ÿA9BACABDEFÿGDHGABAEIAPGQÿRSA9TÿCP9TDIPGÿE9BÿEGGSUAETPGQÿTIE9GEUTAS9GÿA9ÿVSIPAW9ÿUDIIP9UAPGÿEIPÿA9ATAEFFXÿIPUSIBPBÿA9ÿTYPÿVD9UTAS9EFÿUDIIP9UXÿSVÿTYSGPÿ
EN010103-002626-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 2 - bp - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:184:89ÿTYPÿUS9GSFABETPBÿVA9E9UAEFÿGTETPdP9TGQÿTYPÿEGGPTGÿE9BÿFAEHAFATAPGÿSVÿ9S9gipÿBSFFEIÿVD9UTAS9EFÿUDIIP9UXÿGDHGABAEIAPGQÿRSA9TÿCP9TDIPGQÿEGGSUAETPGQÿE9Bÿ
EN010103-002626-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 2 - bp - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:184:VD9UTAS9EFÿUDIIP9UXÿGDHGABAEIAPGQÿRSA9TÿCP9TDIPGÿE9BÿEGGSUAETPGÿEIPÿTIE9GFETPBÿA9TSÿipÿBSFFEIGÿDGA9WÿECPIEWPÿIETPGÿSVÿPaUYE9WPbÿ89ÿTYPÿUS9GSFABETPBÿ
EN010103-002626-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 2 - bp - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:184:VA9E9UAEFÿGTETPdP9TGQÿPaUYE9WPÿEBRDGTdP9TGÿEIAGA9WÿqYP9ÿTYPÿS`P9A9Wÿ9PTÿEGGPTGÿE9BÿTYPÿ̀ISVATGÿVSIÿTYPÿXPEIÿIPTEA9PBÿHXÿ9S9gipÿBSFFEIÿVD9UTAS9EFÿ
EN010103-002626-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 2 - bp - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:184:UDIIP9UXÿGDHGABAEIAPGQÿRSA9TÿCP9TDIPGÿE9BÿEGGSUAETPGÿEIPÿTIE9GFETPBÿA9TSÿipÿBSFFEIGÿEIPÿIPUSW9AsPBÿA9ÿEÿGP`EIETPÿUSd`S9P9TÿSVÿPhDATXÿE9BÿIP`SITPBÿA9ÿ
EN010103-002626-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 2 - bp - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:184:STYPIÿUSd`IPYP9GACPÿA9USdPbÿtaUYE9WPÿWEA9GÿE9BÿFSGGPGÿEIAGA9WÿS9ÿFS9WgTPIdÿA9TIEgWISD`ÿVSIPAW9ÿUDIIP9UXÿHSIISqA9WGÿDGPBÿTSÿVA9E9UPÿTYPÿWISD`uGÿ9S9g
EN010103-002626-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 2 - bp - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:184:TYPÿHDGA9PGGÿUSdHA9ETAS9ÿE9BÿAGÿIPUSW9AsPBÿGP`EIETPFXÿVISdÿWSSBqAFFÿAVÿTYPÿEGGPTÿAGÿGP`EIEHFPÿSIÿEIAGPGÿVISdÿUS9TIEUTDEFÿSIÿSTYPIÿFPWEFÿIAWYTGb
EN010103-002626-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 2 - bp - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:187:s)ÿXYX`Aÿ074ÿR2'(Dÿ$64)0$8$46ÿ'$9ÿ3)6ÿR3%ÿD2'D420$4%ÿ$)ÿ074%4ÿ%4RV4)0%ÿ@$07ÿ&322Q$)Rÿ3V'()0%ÿ0'0399$)RÿtXaAge`ÿV$99$')ÿcXYXYÿteiAYXhÿV$99$')dÿ@7424ÿ
EN010103-002626-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 2 - bp - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:226: EIA6D'ÿDGG9Aÿ79A67)ÿ'9GGÿ&)A979GAÿ&)I(%9ÿ()ÿR'D)ÿDGG9AG ÿ dW1Yÿÿ W1dWÿÿ W1dÿÿ XYÿÿ U0VWÿ
EN010103-002626-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 2 - bp - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:233: bheiaj
EN010103-002626-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 2 - bp - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:288: `UR`icbWTI`SbÿcTÿIS`SbbUWTWSÿRSgUbUeIbÿWeÿWXSbSÿTbbicQWUeIbÿTIpÿ̀eiapÿRSbiaWÿUIÿTÿcTWSRUTaÿ̀XTIVSÿWeÿWXSÿ̀TRRUIVÿgTaiSbÿeYÿWXSÿVReiQybÿTbbSWbÿ
EN010103-002626-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 2 - bp - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:288: QRÙSbÿTIpeRÿQRepi`WUeIÿ̀eiapÿRSbiaWÿUIÿTÿcTWSRUTaÿ̀XTIVSÿUIÿWXSURÿ̀TRRUIVÿTceiIWbÿfUWXUIÿWXSÿISiWÿYUITI`UTaÿSTRxÿ
EN010103-002626-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 2 - bp - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:340:1)0ÿBI1GHRC)12ÿhÿ1BEIAC)12g ÿ eSdqdÿÿ YV̀69ÿÿ 87VWY`ÿ
EN010103-002626-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 2 - bp - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:340: R12g)GEIAC)12ÿBAfAb0Eÿ1ÿ&87V6p`ÿ()00)12VÿACEIÿRHgC1(AIfÿR01g)2QÿAGmHgC(E2CgVÿiAgÿBA)Gÿ)2ÿ)2gCA0(E2CgÿbECiEE2ÿnH0fÿ678`ÿA2GÿiBI)0ÿ6789ÿlrEÿA(1H2CÿBIEgE2CEGÿAgÿ)21IQA2)RÿRAB)CA0ÿEFBE2G)CHIEÿ
EN010103-002526-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:200: planning permission ref 14/1454/EIA granted by Stockton-on-Tee Borough Council to be
EN010103-000063-Acknowledgement of S46 Notification.pdf:1: Planning Act 2008 (Section 42 and EIA Regulation 13) in addition to non-
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:3: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - the
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:3: accordance with the EIA Regulations
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:3: EIA Regulations Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:3: findings of the EIA
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:5: that it accords with the EIA and does not result in
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:13: level for the EIA was discussed at a later date with the MMO,
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:13: technical feedback to help inform the finalisation of the EIA
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:13: associated environmental the existing outfall were discussed in terms of EIA. The
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:13: 2021 (Formal consultation extent of sampling undertaken to inform the EIA.
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:15: Statement (including adequacy pre-application period to help inform the scope of the EIA. It is
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:22: EW attending on behalf of AECOM who are representing OGCI and leading the DCO/EIA
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:22: sand / silt. For the purposes of the EIA, existing data is being used at this time; do the MMO
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:23: at EIA scoping last year and this is now a lot clearer – the GIS is particularly good. SE agreed
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:23: Engagement to- MMO at EIA Scoping in March 2019. EW explained how AECOM has been working to respond
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:23: EIA Scoping modelling; use of the DML; coastal processes and; fisheries). EW confirmed that these were
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:23:4. Project Update EW confirmed that since EIA Scoping, effort has been made to further refine the worst-case
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:23: case being assessed currently for EIA purposes. EW noted the potential plant and construction
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:24: exercises were underway, as per the MMO’s recommendation at EIA scoping. Given the
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:24: Stakeholder recommendations made at EIA scoping.
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:24: EW confirmed that since EIA scoping, engagement has been ongoing on the topic of Thermal
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:25: and other stakeholders at EIA scoping. EW noted that at this early stage, a preliminary
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:26: • Ed Walker (EW), AECOM – supporting IC and RL on the EIA and
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:26: • Ian Campbell (IC), AECOM – PM for the DCO EIA;
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:27: engagement to- EIA Scoping (March 2019) where the MMO raised comments on
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:28: EIA (Slide 10, Annex A)
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:28: EW introduced the next slide which relates to EIA; EW confirmed that
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:28: gathering network – this does form part of the DCO which this EIA is
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:29: dealt with via a separate consenting regime and most likely EIA (this is
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:29: ‘Project as a Whole’ perspective however, the EIAs for each project will
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:29: However, for the purposes of EIA, as there is so much information
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:29: for EIA. EW asked if SE/NW had any thoughts? SE agreed that this
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:31: of detail contained within the EIA and the actual likelihood that works
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:38:EIA Scoping (March 2019)
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:42: separate Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) it is dealt with via a separate consenting regime. However, we remain
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:42: compression of third-party CO2 emissions to be offshore project) is also expected to be subject to EIA.
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:55: • Richard Lowe – AECOM, leading the EIA/DCO
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:55: • Ian Campbell – AECOM, coordinating the EIA/DCO
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:55: DCO/EIA
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:56:date and Status • EIA Scoping (March 2019) they have no
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:56: of data to support fisheries assessment in the EIA
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:59: assessment and where this ‘sits’ in the EIA was welcome at
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:61: identified; these are Nephtys cirrosa and Bathyporeia spp.
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:71:EIA Scoping (March 2019)
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:80:‘Nephtys cirrosa and Bathyporeia spp. in infralittoral sand’ (A5.233; SS.SSa.IFiSa.NcirBat)
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:92:biotopes at these stations are consistent with those found in the 2019 survey - either ‘Nephtys cirrosa and Bathyporeia
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:96: Bathyporeia elegans 16.56
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:96: Bathyporeia elegans 7.11
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:96:Group A was classified as ‘Nephtys cirrosa and Bathyporeia spp. in infralittoral sand’ (A5.233; SS.SSa.IFiSa.NcirBat),
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:96:biotope. The amphipod Bathyporeia sp. and polychaete Nephtys cirrosa are typical of this biotope and dominated the
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:96:A5.233 - Nephtys cirrosa and Bathyporeia spp. in infralittoral sand
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:97:Descriptions: Characterised by Nephtys cirrosa and Bathyporeia spp. (and sometimes Pontocrates spp.), found from the
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:97:are commonly recorced include: the amphipod Bathyporeia spp. and polychaetes such as Chaetozone
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:97:The Teesside Net Zero stations in Tees Bay were classified as either the biotope ‘Nephtys cirrosa and Bathyporeia spp.
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:99: replacement outfall is retained in the DCO and supporting EIA. EW
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:100: ‘Nephtys cirrosa and Bathyporeia spp. in infralittoral sand’ (A5.233) is
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:103: the EIA now but thanks for trying. SE confirmed that no response has
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:103: EIA then that sounds appropriate. EW explained that we do have a
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:129:• The biotope ‘Nephtys cirrosa and Bathyporeia spp. in infralittoral sand’ (A5.233) is characteristic of shallow exposed
EN010103-002633-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 1 (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:3: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment. The
EN010103-002633-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 1 (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:3: accordance with the EIA Regulations
EN010103-002633-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 1 (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:3: EIA Regulations The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental
EN010103-001896-NZT DCO 8.11 - Northern Powergrid SoCG (Clean) - July 22 (D4).pdf:3:EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - the assessment
EN010103-001896-NZT DCO 8.11 - Northern Powergrid SoCG (Clean) - July 22 (D4).pdf:3: EIA Regulations
EN010103-001896-NZT DCO 8.11 - Northern Powergrid SoCG (Clean) - July 22 (D4).pdf:3:EIA Regulations Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
EN010103-001896-NZT DCO 8.11 - Northern Powergrid SoCG (Clean) - July 22 (D4).pdf:3: findings of the EIA
EN010103-001896-NZT DCO 8.11 - Northern Powergrid SoCG (Clean) - July 22 (D4).pdf:4: other matters to ensure that it accords with the EIA
EN010103-002320-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Tacked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:18: appearance, landscaping, layout and scale for scale No EIA Scoping Report or ES
EN010103-002320-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Tacked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:18:9 Caernarvon Close, Beyond Housing, demolition of 19 dwelling 4.9 Unknown Online information on the developer Approved 1 N Y N Y N Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y N N N N N N Y N Y N Just within ZoI for traffic N No EIA Scoping Report or ES No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the Applicants are
EN010103-002320-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Tacked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:18: International, facility and combined heat and power plant, Form, Planning Statement, EIA 13/10/2016 ha - small “The application is area > 1 ha, waste Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. aware of.
EN010103-002320-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Tacked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:18:14 Fabian Road, Eston Gleeson Developments Ltd, 51 residential 5.6 1.38 ha Online satellite imagery indicates that Approved 1 N N N Y N Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y N N N N N N Y N - 51 Y N N N Remote from Site, no EIA No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the Applicants are
EN010103-002320-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Tacked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:18:15 Redcar Lane, Bellway Homes NE, reserved matters 9.1 7.71 ha Online news articles dated April 2022 Approved 1 N N N Y N Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y N N N N N N Y N - 126 Y N N Linked to ID 8. N Remote from Site, no EIA No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the Applicants are
EN010103-002320-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Tacked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:19: 18 Land north of Theakston Estates (Investments) Limited, 7.7 22.8 ha Online satellite imagery indicates that Allowed on 1 N N N Y N Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y N N N N N N Y Y- Y N Y Assume overlap in temporal N Remote from Site, no EIA No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the Applicants are
EN010103-002320-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Tacked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:19: to old Hall Farm energy storage facility (up to 49.9 MW), new to last no longer than 12 months. 10/11/2017 i.e. small should be complete by Nov EIA scoping or ES submitted; Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. aware of.
EN010103-002320-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Tacked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:19: Spencerbeck Farm outbuildings to allow outline planning Statement, Desktop Study or DAS - 20/01/2021 from PCC). No EIA Scoing or Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. aware of.
EN010103-002320-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Tacked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:19: Shakespeare existing car park (14 additional spaces) construction of this development has 12/01/2018 extension EIA scoping or ES submitted. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. aware of.
EN010103-002320-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Tacked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:19: 25 Wilton Tourian Renewables Ltd, construction and 3.1 1.1 ha Online news articles indicates that Approved 1 N N N Y N Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y N N N N N N Y N Y N Y >3km from PCC Site N No EIA scoping / ES No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the Applicants are
EN010103-002320-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Tacked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:20: International, workshop, Wilton International Wilton Planning Statement - checked 21/10/2016 scale (<1 EIA scoping or ES submitted Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. aware of.
EN010103-002320-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Tacked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:20: Redcar units with associated Infrastructure and m Statement or Transport Statement 12/08/2015 EIA scoping or ES submitted and the development is Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. aware of.
EN010103-002320-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Tacked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:20: Road, Dwellings, comprising 32 Bungalows and 57 m construction period of around two 21/03/2019 dwellings, scope (construction) for from PCC), no EIA scoping or and the development is Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. aware of.
EN010103-002320-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Tacked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:20: Of College Road, dwellings with associated works | Land To of the (Middlesborough Council) 11/10/2018 dwellings, construction periods (6.9km from PCC), no EIA No change to the Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. aware of.
EN010103-002320-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Tacked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:21:40 North Tees Site SABIC UK Petrochemicals Limited, Erection of 3.3 2.22 ha Online satellite imagery indicates that Approved 1 N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y N Y N - EIA N Construction scheduled to N Developments already in No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the Applicants are
EN010103-002320-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Tacked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:24: Newcomen Deemed Consent: Demolition of existing shall not be begun later than the 06/08/2020 scale EIA scoping or ES submitted and the development is Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. aware of.
EN010103-002320-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Tacked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:24: parking and associated Infrastructure works purpose of assessment within this EIA visual impacts.
EN010103-002320-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Tacked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:27: Hartlepool distribution building, office building, welfare requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002320-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Tacked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:27: TS25 2DF unit, storage bays and associated works (part- those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002320-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Tacked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:27: 1DE requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002320-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Tacked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:27: those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002320-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Tacked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:27: Lane, (Former Condition 1 states: “The development requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002320-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Tacked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:27: Ewart Parsons Site), to which this permission relates shall those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002320-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Tacked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:27: 0LH and including a local centre comprising retail unacceptable traffic impacts on the requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002320-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Tacked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:27: (400sqm) and business incubator units A19 Trunk Road. those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002320-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Tacked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:27: Of Middle Warren, Infrastructure construction. A Construction noise impacts. and no requirement for EIA.
EN010103-002320-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Tacked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:27: Warren, Hartlepool to the LPA prior to commencment of EIA Scoping Report or ES are
EN010103-002320-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Tacked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:27: Belasis Layout and Scale) for the erection of buildings hereby permitted shall be begun noise impacts. no requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002320-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Tacked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:27: Avenue/Central for office, research and development, either before the expiration of nine those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002320-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Tacked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:27: Lane Industrial construction phase. requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002320-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Tacked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:27: Estate Billingham those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002320-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Tacked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:27: Road Cowpen Lane construction phase. requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002320-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Tacked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:27: Industrial Estate those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002320-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Tacked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:27: bed houses, 44 three bed houses and 6 four submitted prior to commencement of requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002320-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Tacked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:27: bed houses the development those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002320-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Tacked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:27: within 3 years of a planning approval. requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002320-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Tacked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:27: those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002320-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Tacked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:27: Middlesbrough landscaping, public realm, cycle store and car states “The development to which requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002320-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Tacked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:27: parking this permission relates must be begun those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002320-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Tacked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:28: Middlesbrough, TS1 later than the expiration of THREE requirement for EIA. Only reached in the ES.
EN010103-002320-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Tacked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:28: 2RQ YEARS from the date of this those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002320-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Tacked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:28: currently underway. requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002320-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Tacked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:28: those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002320-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Tacked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:28: Ladgate likely that the devleopment will be requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002320-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Tacked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:28: Lane/Marton complete prior to construction of the those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002320-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Tacked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:28: South Bank Condition 1 states: “The development requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002320-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Tacked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:28: Industrial Estate, to which this permission relates shall those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002320-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Tacked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:28: (A1053) Greystones (Amended Scheme) to last no longer than 12 months. requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002320-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Tacked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:28: Road, Old Once installed, there is minimal on- those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002320-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Tacked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:28: South Terrace Vehicular And Pedestrian Accesses And requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002320-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Tacked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:28: South Bank Landscaping those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002320-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Tacked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:28: Redcar 2021 no requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002320-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Tacked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:28: those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002320-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Tacked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:29:115 Land At South Bank South Tees Development Corporation: 3.6 5.83 Standalone application for 5.83 Approved 1 N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Transport note included on Y Not in itself EIA No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the Applicants are
EN010103-002320-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Tacked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:29: And Landscaping Works boundary. This site will be with this development have which is EIA development.
EN010103-002320-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Tacked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:29:120 LAND AT SOUTH ERECTION OF 3,396SQM OF B2/B8 3.6 2.97 Standalone application for additional Approved 1 N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y N N N Y Transport note included on Y Not in itself EIA No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the Applicants are
EN010103-002320-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Tacked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:29: GRANGETOWN AND ASSOCIATED PLANT, CREATION OF 114 and ID 115. Construction with this development have is EIA development.
EN010103-002320-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Tacked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:29: CORPORATION EXTERNAL ALTERATIONS; CREATION OF 10 within 3 years of a planning approval. requirement for EIA. Only the development no impacts
EN010103-002320-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Tacked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:29: EAST OF SMITHS COMMERCIAL/RETAIL UNITS (CLASS E) AT those with a submitted EIA on the ES
EN010103-002320-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Tacked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:29:123 Land At Seal Sands Erection of an energy recovery facility and 3.4 3.7 The current target date for site Pending 1 N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y ? This scheme comprises EIA n/a n/a Added to the long list at During construction, potential cumulative
EN010103-002320-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Tacked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:30: 28 RABY ROAD 2, 3, 4 & 5 storey residential blocks with requirement for EIA. Only 3/4. Due to the nature of
EN010103-002320-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Tacked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:30: HARTLEPOOL commercial units to ground floor providing those with a submitted EIA the development no impacts
EN010103-001990-NZT DCO 9.22 - Written Summary of ISH3 - August 2022(D5).pdf:11: REP1-035: Applicants’ summary of oral submissions for ISH1, Appendix 6, which addresses the issue of the EIA and
EN010103-001990-NZT DCO 9.22 - Written Summary of ISH3 - August 2022(D5).pdf:11: explains why the Applicants are not obliged by the EIA Regulations to assess the impact of the offshore works on
EN010103-001895-NZT DCO 8.2 - STBC SoCG (Tracked) July 2022(D4) -.pdf:15: 1. EIA assessment The assessment methodology set out at Chapter 2
EN010103-000061-S46 Notification.pdf:2: ‘The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017’ (the ‘EIA
EN010103-000061-S46 Notification.pdf:2: bodies and to any person notified to the Applicants in accordance with EIA Regulation 11(1(© on or
EN010103-000061-S46 Notification.pdf:2: regulations made pursuant to the PA 2008 (Section 42 and EIA Regulation 13) in addition to non-
EN010103-001902-NZT DCO 8.18 - CATS SoCG (Clean) July 2022 (D4).pdf:2: findings of the EIA
EN010103-001902-NZT DCO 8.18 - CATS SoCG (Clean) July 2022 (D4).pdf:4: other matters to ensure that it accords with the EIA
EN010103-002644-NZT DCO 9.52 - End of Examination Negotiation Status - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-002240-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:3: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - the
EN010103-002240-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:3: accordance with the EIA Regulations
EN010103-002240-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:3: EIA Regulations Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact
EN010103-002240-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:3: findings of the EIA
EN010103-002240-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:4: that it accords with the EIA and does not result in
EN010103-002240-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:9: March 2019 (EIA PINS consulted with Natural England on the Scoping Report
EN010103-002240-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:10: April 2019 (Pre- Technical progress on survey activity (as well as EIA) together with
EN010103-002240-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:12: (Publication of date. The findings from key EIA workstreams, including noise and
EN010103-002240-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:16: considered as part of the EIA. It is also agreed that cumulative
EN010103-001936-nzt ish3 s4.pdf:1:conclusion must be that the project in sheduled, two terms under the EIA regulations includes the
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (4).pdf:1:Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the 2017 EIA Regulations)
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (4).pdf:3:Regulations 2017 (the 2017 EIA Regulations) and on the basis of the current information
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (4).pdf:4:Note: The SoS’ duty under Regulation 32 of the 2017 EIA Regulations continues
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (4).pdf:6: Under Regulation 32 of the 2017 EIA Regulations and on the basis of the current
EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (4).pdf:6: Note: The SoS’ duty under Regulation 32 of the 2017 EIA Regulations continues
EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:12: Impact Assessment (EIA) process.
EN010103-001182-NZT EL.pdf:14: 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1
EN010103-001182-NZT EL.pdf:14: 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 2
EN010103-001182-NZT EL.pdf:14: 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 3
EN010103-001182-NZT EL.pdf:14: 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1
EN010103-001182-NZT EL.pdf:14: 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 2
EN010103-001182-NZT EL.pdf:14: 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 3
EN010103-002319-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:18: appearance, landscaping, layout and scale for scale No EIA Scoping Report or ES
EN010103-002319-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:18:9 Caernarvon Close, Beyond Housing, demolition of 19 dwelling 4.9 Unknown Online information on the developer Approved 1 N Y N Y N Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y N N N N N N Y N Y N Just within ZoI for traffic N No EIA Scoping Report or ES No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the Applicants are
EN010103-002319-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:18: International, facility and combined heat and power plant, Form, Planning Statement, EIA 13/10/2016 ha - small “The application is area > 1 ha, waste Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. aware of.
EN010103-002319-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:18:14 Fabian Road, Eston Gleeson Developments Ltd, 51 residential 5.6 1.38 ha Online satellite imagery indicates that Approved 1 N N N Y N Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y N N N N N N Y N - 51 Y N N N Remote from Site, no EIA No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the Applicants are
EN010103-002319-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:18:15 Redcar Lane, Bellway Homes NE, reserved matters 9.1 7.71 ha Online news articles dated April 2022 Approved 1 N N N Y N Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y N N N N N N Y N - 126 Y N N Linked to ID 8. N Remote from Site, no EIA No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the Applicants are
EN010103-002319-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:19: 18 Land north of Theakston Estates (Investments) Limited, 7.7 22.8 ha Online satellite imagery indicates that Allowed on 1 N N N Y N Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y N N N N N N Y Y- Y N Y Assume overlap in temporal N Remote from Site, no EIA No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the Applicants are
EN010103-002319-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:19: to old Hall Farm energy storage facility (up to 49.9 MW), new to last no longer than 12 months. 10/11/2017 i.e. small should be complete by Nov EIA scoping or ES submitted; Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. aware of.
EN010103-002319-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:19: Spencerbeck Farm outbuildings to allow outline planning Statement, Desktop Study or DAS - 20/01/2021 from PCC). No EIA Scoing or Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. aware of.
EN010103-002319-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:19: Shakespeare existing car park (14 additional spaces) construction of this development has 12/01/2018 extension EIA scoping or ES submitted. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. aware of.
EN010103-002319-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:19: 25 Wilton Tourian Renewables Ltd, construction and 3.1 1.1 ha Online news articles indicates that Approved 1 N N N Y N Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y N N N N N N Y N Y N Y >3km from PCC Site N No EIA scoping / ES No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the Applicants are
EN010103-002319-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:20: International, workshop, Wilton International Wilton Planning Statement - checked 21/10/2016 scale (<1 EIA scoping or ES submitted Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. aware of.
EN010103-002319-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:20: Redcar units with associated Infrastructure and m Statement or Transport Statement 12/08/2015 EIA scoping or ES submitted and the development is Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. aware of.
EN010103-002319-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:20: Road, Dwellings, comprising 32 Bungalows and 57 m construction period of around two 21/03/2019 dwellings, scope (construction) for from PCC), no EIA scoping or and the development is Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. aware of.
EN010103-002319-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:20: Of College Road, dwellings with associated works | Land To of the (Middlesborough Council) 11/10/2018 dwellings, construction periods (6.9km from PCC), no EIA No change to the Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. aware of.
EN010103-002319-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:21:40 North Tees Site SABIC UK Petrochemicals Limited, Erection of 3.3 2.22 ha Online satellite imagery indicates that Approved 1 N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y N Y N - EIA N Construction scheduled to N Developments already in No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the Applicants are
EN010103-002319-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:24: Newcomen Deemed Consent: Demolition of existing shall not be begun later than the 06/08/2020 scale EIA scoping or ES submitted and the development is Applicants are aware of. Applicants are aware of. aware of.
EN010103-002319-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:24: parking and associated Infrastructure works purpose of assessment within this EIA visual impacts.
EN010103-002319-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:27: Hartlepool distribution building, office building, welfare requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002319-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:27: TS25 2DF unit, storage bays and associated works (part- those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002319-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:27: 1DE requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002319-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:27: those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002319-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:27: Lane, (Former Condition 1 states: “The development requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002319-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:27: Ewart Parsons Site), to which this permission relates shall those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002319-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:27: 0LH and including a local centre comprising retail unacceptable traffic impacts on the requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002319-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:27: (400sqm) and business incubator units A19 Trunk Road. those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002319-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:27: Of Middle Warren, Infrastructure construction. A Construction noise impacts. and no requirement for EIA.
EN010103-002319-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:27: Warren, Hartlepool to the LPA prior to commencment of EIA Scoping Report or ES are
EN010103-002319-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:27: Belasis Layout and Scale) for the erection of buildings hereby permitted shall be begun noise impacts. no requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002319-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:27: Avenue/Central for office, research and development, either before the expiration of nine those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002319-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:27: Lane Industrial construction phase. requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002319-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:27: Estate Billingham those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002319-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:27: Road Cowpen Lane construction phase. requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002319-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:27: Industrial Estate those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002319-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:27: bed houses, 44 three bed houses and 6 four submitted prior to commencement of requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002319-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:27: bed houses the development those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002319-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:27: within 3 years of a planning approval. requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002319-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:27: those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002319-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:27: Middlesbrough landscaping, public realm, cycle store and car states “The development to which requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002319-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:27: parking this permission relates must be begun those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002319-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:28: Middlesbrough, TS1 later than the expiration of THREE requirement for EIA. Only reached in the ES.
EN010103-002319-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:28: 2RQ YEARS from the date of this those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002319-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:28: currently underway. requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002319-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:28: those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002319-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:28: Ladgate likely that the devleopment will be requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002319-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:28: Lane/Marton complete prior to construction of the those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002319-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:28: South Bank Condition 1 states: “The development requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002319-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:28: Industrial Estate, to which this permission relates shall those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002319-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:28: (A1053) Greystones (Amended Scheme) to last no longer than 12 months. requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002319-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:28: Road, Old Once installed, there is minimal on- those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002319-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:28: South Terrace Vehicular And Pedestrian Accesses And requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002319-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:28: South Bank Landscaping those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002319-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:28: Redcar 2021 no requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-002319-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:28: those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-002319-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:29:115 Land At South Bank South Tees Development Corporation: 3.6 5.83 Standalone application for 5.83 Approved 1 N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Transport note included on Y Not in itself EIA No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the Applicants are
EN010103-002319-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:29: And Landscaping Works boundary. This site will be with this development have which is EIA development.
EN010103-002319-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:29:120 LAND AT SOUTH ERECTION OF 3,396SQM OF B2/B8 3.6 2.97 Standalone application for additional Approved 1 N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y N N N Y Transport note included on Y Not in itself EIA No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the No status change that the Applicants are
EN010103-002319-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:29: GRANGETOWN AND ASSOCIATED PLANT, CREATION OF 114 and ID 115. Construction with this development have is EIA development.
EN010103-002319-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:29: CORPORATION EXTERNAL ALTERATIONS; CREATION OF 10 within 3 years of a planning approval. requirement for EIA. Only the development no impacts
EN010103-002319-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:29: EAST OF SMITHS COMMERCIAL/RETAIL UNITS (CLASS E) AT those with a submitted EIA on the ES
EN010103-002319-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:29:123 Land At Seal Sands Erection of an energy recovery facility and 3.4 3.7 The current target date for site Pending 1 N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y ? This scheme comprises EIA n/a n/a Added to the long list at During construction, potential cumulative
EN010103-002319-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:30: 28 RABY ROAD 2, 3, 4 & 5 storey residential blocks with requirement for EIA. Only 3/4. Due to the nature of
EN010103-002319-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:30: HARTLEPOOL commercial units to ground floor providing those with a submitted EIA the development no impacts
EN010103-001994-NZT DCO 9.26 - Riparian Mammal Report - August 2022(D5).pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:5: (the EIA Regulations) for the proposed Teesside Cluster Carbon Capture & Usage
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:5:1.1.2 In accordance with Regulation 10 of the EIA Regulations, an Applicant may ask
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:5:1.1.4 The Applicant has notified the SoS under Regulation 8(1)(b) of the EIA
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:5: 6(2)(a) of the EIA Regulations, the Proposed Development is EIA development.
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:5:1.1.5 Regulation 10(9) of the EIA Regulations requires that before adopting a scoping
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:5:1.1.6 This Opinion has taken into account the requirements of the EIA Regulations as
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:6:1.1.10 Regulation 10(3) of the EIA Regulations states that a request for a scoping
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:6: encompasses the relevant aspects identified in the EIA Regulations.
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:6: be co-ordinated with the EIA in accordance with Regulation 26 of the EIA
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:6:1.2.1 In accordance with Regulation 10(6) of the EIA Regulations the Inspectorate
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:6: 11(1)(a) of the duty imposed on them by Regulation 11(3) of the EIA
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:11:2.3.14 The EIA Regulations require that the Applicant provide ‘A description of the
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:11: Regulation 14 of the EIA Regulations.
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:14:3.3.2 The Applicant should note that in accordance with Regulation 5 of the EIA
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:14: Regulations, EIA is a process which includes the preparation of the ES but also
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:16:3.3.20 The EIA Regulations require an estimate, by type and quantity, of expected
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:18:3.3.30 Schedule 4 Part 5 of the EIA Regulations requires a description of the likely
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:18:3.3.31 Regulation 32 of the EIA Regulations inter alia requires the Inspectorate to
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:57: should not impede the ability of the ES to adhere with the EIA
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:58: - Advice Note Three: EIA Notification and Consultation;
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:80:Senior EIA and Land Rights Adviser
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:80:Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the EIA Regulations) – Regulations 10 and
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:88:detail of the Statement that will present details of the EIA.
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:89:should be scoped into the EIA.
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:89:The applicant has provided an EIA Scoping Report which has a section on
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:89:assessment will be carried out as part of the EIA, which will assess the potential
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:89:The Council’s Planning Policy section have no comments on the scope of the EIA,
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:89:EIA.
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:94:Subject: RE: EN010103 – Teesside Cluster Carbon Capture & Usage – EIA Scoping
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:94:It was noticed that the EIA Scoping Consultation report supplied to did not address the aspects of
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:94:component of the proposed development will be considered within a separate EIA exercise.
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:94:Please therefore direct an separate EIA Scoping Consultation that addresses any aspects of the
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:94:Subject: EN010103 – Teesside Cluster Carbon Capture & Usage – EIA Scoping Notification and Consultation
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:95:EIA and Land Rights Advisor
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:96:(ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT) REGULATIONS 2017 (THE EIA
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:98:For the purposes of the Environmental Impact Assessment (“EIA”) Scoping Report prepared
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:99:The EIA Scoping Report covers the onshore works associated with the Project only, with
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:99:EIA process. While the Scoping Report notes that the onshore and offshore works will be
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:100:taken into account in terms of defining the scope of the EIA. It should be noted that, while
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:100:should therefore be considered during the EIA process.
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:100:potential impacts. The MMO would expect this to be presented in detail during the EIA
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:100:scoped into the EIA. Should works be required within intertidal or estuarine areas of the
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:100:River Tees and/or North Sea, then the EIA should provide a characterisation of fish ecology
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:100:Tees and/or North Sea, the MMO would expect the EIA to include a desk-based review of
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:101:fisheries and other marine users are considered during the EIA process.
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:102:will be scoped in to the EIA. While the Scoping Report purports to cover works down to
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:104:Proposal: EN010103-000010 – Teesside Cluster Carbon Capture & Usage – EIA Scoping Notification and
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:116:Subject: RE: EN010103 – Teesside Cluster Carbon Capture & Usage – EIA Scoping
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:116:Subject: EN010103 – Teesside Cluster Carbon Capture & Usage – EIA Scoping Notification and Consultation
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:116:EIA and Land Rights Advisor
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:118:Environmental Impact Assessment Scoping consultation (Regulation 15 (4) of the EIA
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:118:Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for this development.
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:119:Annex A – Advice related to EIA Scoping Requirements
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:119:on ecosystems or their components. EcIA may be carried out as part of the EIA process or to
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:120:an Appropriate Assessment, in addition to consideration of impacts through the EIA process.
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:120:The EIA will need to consider any impacts upon local wildlife and geological sites. Local Sites are
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:122:pertaining to the area. The EIA should include assessments of visual effects on the surrounding
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:122:The EIA should include a full assessment of the potential impacts of the development on local
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:122:The EIA should consider potential impacts on access land, public open land, rights of way and
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:125:The EIA should also consider the impact of the scheme upon the railway Infrastructure in the transport assessments,
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:127:Subject: Teesside Carbon Capture and Usage Project Pre-Application EIA Scoping Opinion
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:127:We have read the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Scoping Report and note the intentions of
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:127:Whilst not all strictly within the remit of the intended content of the EIA, following internal consultation
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:128: of the EIA. We expect (as per paragraph 6.38) that the potential impacts of discharged water
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:128: We note the proposal to scope “Major Accidents or Disaster Vulnerability” out of the EIA at
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:128: mechanisms outside of the EIA process, however we would expect to see worst case
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:128: significance assessment within the EIA.
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:129:Senior EIA & Land Rights Adviser
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:132:The EIA should clearly identify the range of vulnerable populations that have been
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:133:The EIA should give consideration to best practice guidance such as the Government’s
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:133:Good Practice Guide for EIA1. It is important that the EIA identifies and assesses the
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:133:of construction) is widely regarded as good practice. Ideally, EIA should start at the stage of
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:134:order that the EIA provides a comprehensive assessment of potential impacts.
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:134:PHE’s view is that the EIA should appraise and describe the measures that will be used to
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:135:Relevant areas outlined in the Government’s Good Practice Guide for EIA include:
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:135:The EIA should demonstrate compliance with the waste hierarchy (e.g. with respect to re-
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:135:For wastes arising from the installation the EIA should consider:
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:136:Within the EIA PHE would expect to see information about how the promoter would
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:136:The EIA should include consideration of the COMAH Regulations (Control of Major
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:136:information within EIAs as good practice.
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:145:With regard to the conclusions reached in section 8 of the Scoping Report, it is agreed that any EIA
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:150:Subject: FW: EN010103 – Teesside Cluster Carbon Capture & Usage – EIA Scoping
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:150:Subject: EN010103 – Teesside Cluster Carbon Capture & Usage – EIA Scoping Notification and Consultation
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:150:EIA and Land Rights Advisor
EN010103-000824-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons.pdf:3: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment. The
EN010103-000824-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons.pdf:4: findings of the EIA.
EN010103-000824-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons.pdf:6: with the EIA and does not result in unacceptable
EN010103-000824-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons.pdf:16: findings of the EIA as reported within the ES, against the relevant NPSs and other relevant
EN010103-000824-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons.pdf:29:3.1.14 The Environmental Impact Assessment (’EIA’) has therefore been undertaken adopting
EN010103-000824-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons.pdf:68: findings of the EIA as reported within the ES, against the relevant NPSs and other relevant
EN010103-000893-NZT DCO 6.2.7 ES Vol I Chapter 7 Legislative Context and Planning Policy.pdf:39: carrying out the EIA for the Proposed Development.
EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:12: Impact Assessment (EIA) process.
EN010103-001987-NZT DCO 8.34 - Position Statement Orsted Hornsea Project 4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:7: under the related EIA process, there is no opportunity to discuss issues and propose
EN010103-001995-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D5).pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - a term used
EN010103-001995-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D5).pdf:3: EIA Regulations The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental
EN010103-001995-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D5).pdf:13: 'EIA Regulations').
EN010103-001995-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D5).pdf:13: with the statutory requirements of the PA 2008, the APFP Regulations and the EIA
EN010103-001995-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D5).pdf:18: Non-Technical Summary EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001995-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D5).pdf:18: Volume I – Main Text EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001995-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D5).pdf:18: EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001995-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D5).pdf:18: Methodology EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001995-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D5).pdf:18: Existing Area EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001995-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D5).pdf:18: Development EIA Reg. 14 Rev. 2.0
EN010103-001995-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D5).pdf:18: Programme and Management EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001995-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D5).pdf:18: Design Evolution EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001995-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D5).pdf:18: Planning Policy EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001995-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D5).pdf:18: EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001995-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D5).pdf:19: Risk and Water Resources and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001995-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D5).pdf:19: Hydrogeology and and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001995-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D5).pdf:19: EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001995-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D5).pdf:19: and Nature Conservation and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001995-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D5).pdf:19: and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001995-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D5).pdf:19: Nature Conservation and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001995-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D5).pdf:19: and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001995-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D5).pdf:19: Transport EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001995-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D5).pdf:19: Visual Amenity and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001995-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D5).pdf:19: and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001995-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D5).pdf:19: and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001995-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D5).pdf:19: Tourism EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001995-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D5).pdf:19: EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001995-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D5).pdf:19: Disasters EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001995-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D5).pdf:19: Human Health EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001995-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D5).pdf:20: Combined Effects EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001995-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D5).pdf:20: Significant Effects EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001995-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D5).pdf:20: (o) and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001995-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D5).pdf:29: (o) and EIA Reg. 14 unless
EN010103-001995-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D5).pdf:29: 6.4.1 Appendix 1A: EIA Scoping -
EN010103-001995-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - August 2022(D5).pdf:29: 6.4.2 Appendix 1B: EIA Scoping -
EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:7: were classed as minor planning applications with site boundaries of less than 1 hectare and not EIA
EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:7: for long listing, however, since this does not comprise EIA development, it would not have been short listed.
EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:14: the dunes and the beach to inform the DCO application and associated EIA. This investigation works has provided
EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:26: appearance, landscaping, layout and scale for No EIA Scoping Report or ES
EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:26: 9 Caernarvon Close, Beyond Housing, demolition of 19 dwelling 4.9 Unknown Online information on the developer Approved 1 N Y N Y N Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y N N N N N N Y N Y N Just within ZoI for traffic N No EIA Scoping Report or ES
EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:27: Redcar facility and combined heat and power plant, Form, Planning Statement, EIA 13/10/2016 ha - small “The application is supported > 1 ha, waste development
EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:27:14 Fabian Road, Eston Gleeson Developments Ltd, 51 residential units 5.6 1.38 ha Online satellite imagery indicates that Approved 1 N N N Y N Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y N N N N N N Y N - 51 Y N N N Remote from Site, no EIA
EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:27:15 Redcar Lane, Redcar Bellway Homes NE, reserved matters 9.1 7.71 ha Online satellite imagery indicates that Approved 1 N N N Y N Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y N N N N N N Y N - 126 Y N N Linked to ID 8. N Remote from Site, no EIA
EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:27:18 Land north of Theakston Estates (Investments) Limited, 7.7 22.8 ha Online satellite imagery indicates that Allowed on 1 N N N Y N Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y N N N N N N Y Y- Y N Y Assume overlap in temporal N Remote from Site, no EIA
EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:27: to old Hall Farm and energy storage facility (up to 49.9 MW), new to last no longer than 12 months. Once 10/11/2017 i.e. small should be complete by Nov EIA scoping or ES submitted;
EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:28: Spencerbeck Farm outbuildings to allow outline planning Desktop Study or DAS - checked 20/01/2021 from PCC). No EIA Scoing or
EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:28: Shakespeare existing car park (14 additional spaces) including construction of this development has 12/01/2018 extension EIA scoping or ES submitted.
EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:28: 25 Wilton International, Tourian Renewables Ltd, construction and 3.1 1.1 ha Online news articles indicates that Approved 1 N N N Y N Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y N N N N N N Y N Y N Y >3km from PCC Site N No EIA scoping / ES
EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:29: Redcar workshop, Wilton International Wilton Redcar. Statement - checked 21/12/2020. 21/10/2016 scale (<1 EIA scoping or ES submitted
EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:29: Redcar with associated Infrastructure and perimeter m Statement or Transport Statement 12/08/2015 EIA scoping or ES submitted
EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:29: Road, comprising 32 Bungalows and 57 Houses and m construction period of around two 21/03/2019 dwellings, scope (construction) for worst from PCC), no EIA scoping or
EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:29: Of College Road, dwellings with associated works | Land To The of the (Middlesborough Council) 11/10/2018 dwellings, construction periods from PCC), no EIA scoping or
EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:30:40 North Tees Site Sabic SABIC UK Petrochemicals Limited, Erection of 3.3 2.22 ha Online satellite imagery indicates that Approved 1 N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y N Y N - EIA N Construction scheduled to be N Developments already in
EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:35: Newcomen Terrace, Consent: Demolition of existing cinema and shall not be begun later than the 06/08/2020 scale EIA scoping or ES submitted
EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:35: parking and associated Infrastructure works all EIA it is assumed that these works will visual impacts.
EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:37: Hartlepool distribution building, office building, welfare requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:37: TS25 2DF unit, storage bays and associated works (part- those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:37: 1DE requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:37: those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:37: (Former Ewart Condition 1 states: “The development requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:37: Parsons Site), to which this permission relates shall be those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:37: local centre comprising retail (400sqm) and unacceptable traffic impacts on the A19 requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:37: business incubator units (1150sqm), and Trunk Road. those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:37: Of Middle Warren, construction. A Construction noise impacts. and no requirement for EIA.
EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:37: Warren, Hartlepool the LPA prior to commencment of of EIA Scoping Report or ES are
EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:38: Belasis Scale) for the erection of buildings for office, hereby permitted shall be begun either noise impacts. no requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:38: Avenue/Central research and development, manufacturing and before the expiration of nine years from those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:38: Lane Industrial construction phase. requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:38: Estate Billingham those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:38: Road Cowpen Lane construction phase. requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:38: Industrial Estate those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:38: houses, 44 three bed houses and 6 four bed submitted prior to commencement of requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:38: houses the development those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:38: within 3 years of a planning approval. requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:38: those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:38: Middlesbrough public realm, cycle store and car parking development to which this permission requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:38: relates must be begun not later than the those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:38: Middlesbrough, TS1 than the expiration of THREE requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:38: 2RQ YEARS from the date of this permission. those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:38: underway. requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:38: those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:38: Ladgate devleopment will be complete prior to requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:38: Lane/Marton construction of the Scheme. those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:38: Bank Industrial Condition 1 states: “The development requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:38: Estate, South Bank to which this permission relates shall be those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:39: Greystones Road, (Amended Scheme) to last no longer than 12 months. Once requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:39: Old Lackenby, Eston installed, there is minimal on-site those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:39: South Terrace Vehicular And Pedestrian Accesses And requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:39: South Bank Landscaping those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:39: Redcar 2021 no requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:39: those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:39:115 Land At South Bank South Tees Development Corporation: Erection 3.6 5.83 Standalone application for 5.83 hectares Approved 1 N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Transport note included on Y Not in itself EIA development,
EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:39: South Bank Associated Structures, Hardstanding And application boundary. This site will be 2022 that all trips associated with which is EIA development.
EN010103-001892-NZT DCO 8.1 - RCBC SoCG (Clean) July 2022 (D4).pdf:16: 14 EIA assessment It is agreed that the assessment methodology set out at
EN010103-002532-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons Clean Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:3: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment. The
EN010103-002532-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons Clean Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:4: findings of the EIA.
EN010103-002532-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons Clean Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:6: with the EIA and does not result in unacceptable
EN010103-002532-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons Clean Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:18: of the findings of the EIA as reported within the ES, against the relevant NPSs
EN010103-002532-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons Clean Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:32:3.1.14 The Environmental Impact Assessment (’EIA’) has therefore been undertaken
EN010103-002532-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons Clean Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:72: of the findings of the EIA as reported within the ES, against the relevant NPSs
EN010103-000898-NZT DCO 6.2.12 ES Vol I Chapter 12 Terrestrial Ecology.pdf:2: be considered as part of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) of the
EN010103-000898-NZT DCO 6.2.12 ES Vol I Chapter 12 Terrestrial Ecology.pdf:3: subject to EIA, the applicant should:
EN010103-000898-NZT DCO 6.2.12 ES Vol I Chapter 12 Terrestrial Ecology.pdf:6: ecological component of the wider EIA.
EN010103-000898-NZT DCO 6.2.12 ES Vol I Chapter 12 Terrestrial Ecology.pdf:9: with the EIA methodology described in Chapter 2: Assessment Methodology
EN010103-000898-NZT DCO 6.2.12 ES Vol I Chapter 12 Terrestrial Ecology.pdf:15: commenced at the EIA Scoping Stage with the preparation of the EIA Scoping
EN010103-000898-NZT DCO 6.2.12 ES Vol I Chapter 12 Terrestrial Ecology.pdf:15: the EIA is set out where relevant within each of the topic chapters in the ES
EN010103-000898-NZT DCO 6.2.12 ES Vol I Chapter 12 Terrestrial Ecology.pdf:19:undertaken and will be used to inform the EIA, as
EN010103-001918-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with June 2022) - July 2022 (D4).pdf:161: planning permission ref 14/1454/EIA granted by Stockton-on-Tee Borough Council to be
EN010103-002251-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:174: planning permission ref 14/1454/EIA granted by Stockton-on-Tee Borough Council to be
EN010103-001914-NZT DCO 9.19 - Further Response to Written Question GEN.1.37 - July 2022 (D4).pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-001914-NZT DCO 9.19 - Further Response to Written Question GEN.1.37 - July 2022 (D4).pdf:13: Appendix A, there are two schemes which represent EIA development.
EN010103-001914-NZT DCO 9.19 - Further Response to Written Question GEN.1.37 - July 2022 (D4).pdf:13: 73 and 114. ID 115 is not EIA development, however, has been shortlisted
EN010103-001914-NZT DCO 9.19 - Further Response to Written Question GEN.1.37 - July 2022 (D4).pdf:14: APP-106. Only two additional EIA developments have been identified
EN010103-001914-NZT DCO 9.19 - Further Response to Written Question GEN.1.37 - July 2022 (D4).pdf:17: appearance, landscaping, layout and scale for No EIA Scoping Report or ES
EN010103-001914-NZT DCO 9.19 - Further Response to Written Question GEN.1.37 - July 2022 (D4).pdf:17: 9 Caernarvon Close, Beyond Housing, demolition of 19 dwelling 4.9 Unknown Online information on the developer Approved 1 N Y N Y N Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y N N N N N N Y N Y N Just within ZoI for traffic N No EIA Scoping Report or ES
EN010103-001914-NZT DCO 9.19 - Further Response to Written Question GEN.1.37 - July 2022 (D4).pdf:18: Redcar facility and combined heat and power plant, Form, Planning Statement, EIA 13/10/2016 ha - small “The application is supported > 1 ha, waste development
EN010103-001914-NZT DCO 9.19 - Further Response to Written Question GEN.1.37 - July 2022 (D4).pdf:18:14 Fabian Road, Eston Gleeson Developments Ltd, 51 residential units 5.6 1.38 ha Online satellite imagery indicates that Approved 1 N N N Y N Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y N N N N N N Y N - 51 Y N N N Remote from Site, no EIA
EN010103-001914-NZT DCO 9.19 - Further Response to Written Question GEN.1.37 - July 2022 (D4).pdf:18:15 Redcar Lane, Redcar Bellway Homes NE, reserved matters 9.1 7.71 ha Online satellite imagery indicates that Approved 1 N N N Y N Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y N N N N N N Y N - 126 Y N N Linked to ID 8. N Remote from Site, no EIA
EN010103-001914-NZT DCO 9.19 - Further Response to Written Question GEN.1.37 - July 2022 (D4).pdf:18:18 Land north of Theakston Estates (Investments) Limited, 7.7 22.8 ha Online satellite imagery indicates that Allowed on 1 N N N Y N Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y N N N N N N Y Y- Y N Y Assume overlap in temporal N Remote from Site, no EIA
EN010103-001914-NZT DCO 9.19 - Further Response to Written Question GEN.1.37 - July 2022 (D4).pdf:18: to old Hall Farm and energy storage facility (up to 49.9 MW), new to last no longer than 12 months. Once 10/11/2017 i.e. small should be complete by Nov EIA scoping or ES submitted;
EN010103-001914-NZT DCO 9.19 - Further Response to Written Question GEN.1.37 - July 2022 (D4).pdf:19: Spencerbeck Farm outbuildings to allow outline planning Desktop Study or DAS - checked 20/01/2021 from PCC). No EIA Scoing or
EN010103-001914-NZT DCO 9.19 - Further Response to Written Question GEN.1.37 - July 2022 (D4).pdf:19: Shakespeare existing car park (14 additional spaces) including construction of this development has 12/01/2018 extension EIA scoping or ES submitted.
EN010103-001914-NZT DCO 9.19 - Further Response to Written Question GEN.1.37 - July 2022 (D4).pdf:19: 25 Wilton International, Tourian Renewables Ltd, construction and 3.1 1.1 ha Online news articles indicates that Approved 1 N N N Y N Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y N N N N N N Y N Y N Y >3km from PCC Site N No EIA scoping / ES
EN010103-001914-NZT DCO 9.19 - Further Response to Written Question GEN.1.37 - July 2022 (D4).pdf:20: Redcar workshop, Wilton International Wilton Redcar. Statement - checked 21/12/2020. 21/10/2016 scale (<1 EIA scoping or ES submitted
EN010103-001914-NZT DCO 9.19 - Further Response to Written Question GEN.1.37 - July 2022 (D4).pdf:20: Redcar with associated Infrastructure and perimeter m Statement or Transport Statement 12/08/2015 EIA scoping or ES submitted
EN010103-001914-NZT DCO 9.19 - Further Response to Written Question GEN.1.37 - July 2022 (D4).pdf:20: Road, comprising 32 Bungalows and 57 Houses and m construction period of around two 21/03/2019 dwellings, scope (construction) for worst from PCC), no EIA scoping or
EN010103-001914-NZT DCO 9.19 - Further Response to Written Question GEN.1.37 - July 2022 (D4).pdf:20: Of College Road, dwellings with associated works | Land To The of the (Middlesborough Council) 11/10/2018 dwellings, construction periods from PCC), no EIA scoping or
EN010103-001914-NZT DCO 9.19 - Further Response to Written Question GEN.1.37 - July 2022 (D4).pdf:21:40 North Tees Site Sabic SABIC UK Petrochemicals Limited, Erection of 3.3 2.22 ha Online satellite imagery indicates that Approved 1 N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y N Y N - EIA N Construction scheduled to be N Developments already in
EN010103-001914-NZT DCO 9.19 - Further Response to Written Question GEN.1.37 - July 2022 (D4).pdf:26: Newcomen Terrace, Consent: Demolition of existing cinema and shall not be begun later than the 06/08/2020 scale EIA scoping or ES submitted
EN010103-001914-NZT DCO 9.19 - Further Response to Written Question GEN.1.37 - July 2022 (D4).pdf:26: parking and associated Infrastructure works all EIA it is assumed that these works will visual impacts.
EN010103-001914-NZT DCO 9.19 - Further Response to Written Question GEN.1.37 - July 2022 (D4).pdf:28: Hartlepool distribution building, office building, welfare requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-001914-NZT DCO 9.19 - Further Response to Written Question GEN.1.37 - July 2022 (D4).pdf:28: TS25 2DF unit, storage bays and associated works (part- those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-001914-NZT DCO 9.19 - Further Response to Written Question GEN.1.37 - July 2022 (D4).pdf:28: 1DE requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-001914-NZT DCO 9.19 - Further Response to Written Question GEN.1.37 - July 2022 (D4).pdf:28: those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-001914-NZT DCO 9.19 - Further Response to Written Question GEN.1.37 - July 2022 (D4).pdf:28: (Former Ewart Condition 1 states: “The development requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-001914-NZT DCO 9.19 - Further Response to Written Question GEN.1.37 - July 2022 (D4).pdf:28: Parsons Site), to which this permission relates shall be those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-001914-NZT DCO 9.19 - Further Response to Written Question GEN.1.37 - July 2022 (D4).pdf:28: local centre comprising retail (400sqm) and unacceptable traffic impacts on the A19 requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-001914-NZT DCO 9.19 - Further Response to Written Question GEN.1.37 - July 2022 (D4).pdf:28: business incubator units (1150sqm), and Trunk Road. those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-001914-NZT DCO 9.19 - Further Response to Written Question GEN.1.37 - July 2022 (D4).pdf:28: Of Middle Warren, construction. A Construction noise impacts. and no requirement for EIA.
EN010103-001914-NZT DCO 9.19 - Further Response to Written Question GEN.1.37 - July 2022 (D4).pdf:28: Warren, Hartlepool the LPA prior to commencment of of EIA Scoping Report or ES are
EN010103-001914-NZT DCO 9.19 - Further Response to Written Question GEN.1.37 - July 2022 (D4).pdf:29: Belasis Scale) for the erection of buildings for office, hereby permitted shall be begun either noise impacts. no requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-001914-NZT DCO 9.19 - Further Response to Written Question GEN.1.37 - July 2022 (D4).pdf:29: Avenue/Central research and development, manufacturing and before the expiration of nine years from those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-001914-NZT DCO 9.19 - Further Response to Written Question GEN.1.37 - July 2022 (D4).pdf:29: Lane Industrial construction phase. requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-001914-NZT DCO 9.19 - Further Response to Written Question GEN.1.37 - July 2022 (D4).pdf:29: Estate Billingham those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-001914-NZT DCO 9.19 - Further Response to Written Question GEN.1.37 - July 2022 (D4).pdf:29: Road Cowpen Lane construction phase. requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-001914-NZT DCO 9.19 - Further Response to Written Question GEN.1.37 - July 2022 (D4).pdf:29: Industrial Estate those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-001914-NZT DCO 9.19 - Further Response to Written Question GEN.1.37 - July 2022 (D4).pdf:29: houses, 44 three bed houses and 6 four bed submitted prior to commencement of requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-001914-NZT DCO 9.19 - Further Response to Written Question GEN.1.37 - July 2022 (D4).pdf:29: houses the development those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-001914-NZT DCO 9.19 - Further Response to Written Question GEN.1.37 - July 2022 (D4).pdf:29: within 3 years of a planning approval. requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-001914-NZT DCO 9.19 - Further Response to Written Question GEN.1.37 - July 2022 (D4).pdf:29: those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-001914-NZT DCO 9.19 - Further Response to Written Question GEN.1.37 - July 2022 (D4).pdf:29: Middlesbrough public realm, cycle store and car parking development to which this permission requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-001914-NZT DCO 9.19 - Further Response to Written Question GEN.1.37 - July 2022 (D4).pdf:29: relates must be begun not later than the those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-001914-NZT DCO 9.19 - Further Response to Written Question GEN.1.37 - July 2022 (D4).pdf:29: Middlesbrough, TS1 than the expiration of THREE requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-001914-NZT DCO 9.19 - Further Response to Written Question GEN.1.37 - July 2022 (D4).pdf:29: 2RQ YEARS from the date of this permission. those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-001914-NZT DCO 9.19 - Further Response to Written Question GEN.1.37 - July 2022 (D4).pdf:29: underway. requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-001914-NZT DCO 9.19 - Further Response to Written Question GEN.1.37 - July 2022 (D4).pdf:29: those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-001914-NZT DCO 9.19 - Further Response to Written Question GEN.1.37 - July 2022 (D4).pdf:29: Ladgate devleopment will be complete prior to requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-001914-NZT DCO 9.19 - Further Response to Written Question GEN.1.37 - July 2022 (D4).pdf:29: Lane/Marton construction of the Scheme. those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-001914-NZT DCO 9.19 - Further Response to Written Question GEN.1.37 - July 2022 (D4).pdf:29: Bank Industrial Condition 1 states: “The development requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-001914-NZT DCO 9.19 - Further Response to Written Question GEN.1.37 - July 2022 (D4).pdf:29: Estate, South Bank to which this permission relates shall be those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-001914-NZT DCO 9.19 - Further Response to Written Question GEN.1.37 - July 2022 (D4).pdf:30: Greystones Road, (Amended Scheme) to last no longer than 12 months. Once requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-001914-NZT DCO 9.19 - Further Response to Written Question GEN.1.37 - July 2022 (D4).pdf:30: Old Lackenby, Eston installed, there is minimal on-site those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-001914-NZT DCO 9.19 - Further Response to Written Question GEN.1.37 - July 2022 (D4).pdf:30: South Terrace Vehicular And Pedestrian Accesses And requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-001914-NZT DCO 9.19 - Further Response to Written Question GEN.1.37 - July 2022 (D4).pdf:30: South Bank Landscaping those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-001914-NZT DCO 9.19 - Further Response to Written Question GEN.1.37 - July 2022 (D4).pdf:30: Redcar 2021 no requirement for EIA. Only
EN010103-001914-NZT DCO 9.19 - Further Response to Written Question GEN.1.37 - July 2022 (D4).pdf:30: those with a submitted EIA
EN010103-001914-NZT DCO 9.19 - Further Response to Written Question GEN.1.37 - July 2022 (D4).pdf:30:115 Land At South Bank South Tees Development Corporation: Erection 3.6 5.83 Standalone application for 5.83 hectares Approved 1 N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Transport note included on Y Not in itself EIA development,
EN010103-001914-NZT DCO 9.19 - Further Response to Written Question GEN.1.37 - July 2022 (D4).pdf:30: South Bank Associated Structures, Hardstanding And application boundary. This site will be 2022 that all trips associated with which is EIA development.
EN010103-001914-NZT DCO 9.19 - Further Response to Written Question GEN.1.37 - July 2022 (D4).pdf:33:1 (NS) Not yet submitted PINS Application not yet Net Zero Teesside (Offshore): Offshore elements to be consented by Marine 0 Unknown Not yet EIA Scoping Report submitted. ES due to be submitted 2
EN010103-001468-NZT DCO 5.4 - Design and Access Statement - Tracked - Apr 2022.pdf:3: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - a term used for the assessment of
EN010103-001468-NZT DCO 5.4 - Design and Access Statement - Tracked - Apr 2022.pdf:7: the purposes of the Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) of the Proposed
EN010103-001468-NZT DCO 5.4 - Design and Access Statement - Tracked - Apr 2022.pdf:42: Assessment (‘EIA’), the Applicants have therefore adopted the principles of the
EN010103-001468-NZT DCO 5.4 - Design and Access Statement - Tracked - Apr 2022.pdf:42: ‘Rochdale Envelope’ approach and assessed (as part of the EIA) fixed maximum
EN010103-001468-NZT DCO 5.4 - Design and Access Statement - Tracked - Apr 2022.pdf:63: detailed design will be in accordance with the design parameters upon which the EIA
EN010103-001468-NZT DCO 5.4 - Design and Access Statement - Tracked - Apr 2022.pdf:66: Applicants have defined design parameters upon which to base the EIA to ensure
EN010103-001562-NZT DCO 8.19 - CF Fertilisers UK Ltd SoCG - May 2022.pdf:2: findings of the EIA
EN010103-001562-NZT DCO 8.19 - CF Fertilisers UK Ltd SoCG - May 2022.pdf:3: other matters to ensure that it accords with the EIA
EN010103-001474-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Apr 2022.pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - a term used
EN010103-001474-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Apr 2022.pdf:3: EIA Regulations The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental
EN010103-001474-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Apr 2022.pdf:12: 'EIA Regulations').
EN010103-001474-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Apr 2022.pdf:12: with the statutory requirements of the PA 2008, the APFP Regulations and the EIA
EN010103-001474-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Apr 2022.pdf:15: Technical Summary EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001474-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Apr 2022.pdf:16: Volume I – Main Text EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001474-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Apr 2022.pdf:16: EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001474-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Apr 2022.pdf:16: Methodology EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001474-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Apr 2022.pdf:16: Existing Area EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001474-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Apr 2022.pdf:16: Development EIA Reg. 14 Rev. 2.0
EN010103-001474-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Apr 2022.pdf:16: Programme and Management EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001474-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Apr 2022.pdf:16: Design Evolution EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001474-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Apr 2022.pdf:16: Planning Policy EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001474-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Apr 2022.pdf:16: EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001474-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Apr 2022.pdf:16: Risk and Water Resources and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001474-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Apr 2022.pdf:16: Hydrogeology and and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001474-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Apr 2022.pdf:16: EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001474-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Apr 2022.pdf:16: and Nature Conservation and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001474-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Apr 2022.pdf:16: and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001474-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Apr 2022.pdf:16: Nature Conservation and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001474-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Apr 2022.pdf:16: and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001474-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Apr 2022.pdf:16: Transport EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001474-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Apr 2022.pdf:16: Visual Amenity and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001474-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Apr 2022.pdf:16: and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001474-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Apr 2022.pdf:16: and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001474-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Apr 2022.pdf:16: Tourism EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001474-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Apr 2022.pdf:16: EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001474-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Apr 2022.pdf:17: Disasters EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001474-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Apr 2022.pdf:17: Human Health EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001474-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Apr 2022.pdf:17: Combined Effects EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001474-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Apr 2022.pdf:17: Significant Effects EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001474-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Apr 2022.pdf:17: (o) and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001474-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Apr 2022.pdf:24: (o) and EIA Reg. 14 unless
EN010103-001474-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Apr 2022.pdf:24: 6.4.1 Appendix 1A: EIA Scoping -
EN010103-001474-NZT DCO 1.2 - Application Guide - Apr 2022.pdf:24: 6.4.2 Appendix 1B: EIA Scoping -
EN010103-001928-FGP Limited.pdf:8: that it accords with the EIA and does not result in
EN010103-002052-NZT DCO 5.4 - Design and Access Statement - Clean - August 2022(D6).pdf:3: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - a term used for the assessment of
EN010103-002052-NZT DCO 5.4 - Design and Access Statement - Clean - August 2022(D6).pdf:7: the purposes of the Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) of the Proposed
EN010103-002052-NZT DCO 5.4 - Design and Access Statement - Clean - August 2022(D6).pdf:41: Assessment (‘EIA’), the Applicants have therefore adopted the principles of the
EN010103-002052-NZT DCO 5.4 - Design and Access Statement - Clean - August 2022(D6).pdf:41: ‘Rochdale Envelope’ approach and assessed (as part of the EIA) fixed maximum
EN010103-002052-NZT DCO 5.4 - Design and Access Statement - Clean - August 2022(D6).pdf:61: detailed design will be in accordance with the design parameters upon which the EIA
EN010103-002052-NZT DCO 5.4 - Design and Access Statement - Clean - August 2022(D6).pdf:64: Applicants have defined design parameters upon which to base the EIA to ensure
EN010103-001848-1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022(D3).pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - a term used
EN010103-001848-1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022(D3).pdf:3: EIA Regulations The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental
EN010103-001848-1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022(D3).pdf:13: 'EIA Regulations').
EN010103-001848-1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022(D3).pdf:13: with the statutory requirements of the PA 2008, the APFP Regulations and the EIA
EN010103-001848-1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022(D3).pdf:17: Non-Technical Summary EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001848-1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022(D3).pdf:17: Volume I – Main Text EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001848-1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022(D3).pdf:17: EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001848-1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022(D3).pdf:17: Methodology EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001848-1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022(D3).pdf:18: Existing Area EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001848-1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022(D3).pdf:18: Development EIA Reg. 14 Rev. 2.0
EN010103-001848-1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022(D3).pdf:18: Programme and Management EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001848-1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022(D3).pdf:18: Design Evolution EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001848-1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022(D3).pdf:18: Planning Policy EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001848-1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022(D3).pdf:18: EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001848-1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022(D3).pdf:18: Risk and Water Resources and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001848-1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022(D3).pdf:18: Hydrogeology and and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001848-1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022(D3).pdf:18: EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001848-1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022(D3).pdf:18: and Nature Conservation and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001848-1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022(D3).pdf:18: and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001848-1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022(D3).pdf:18: Nature Conservation and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001848-1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022(D3).pdf:18: and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001848-1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022(D3).pdf:18: Transport EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001848-1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022(D3).pdf:18: Visual Amenity and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001848-1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022(D3).pdf:19: and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001848-1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022(D3).pdf:19: and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001848-1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022(D3).pdf:19: Tourism EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001848-1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022(D3).pdf:19: EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001848-1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022(D3).pdf:19: Disasters EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001848-1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022(D3).pdf:19: Human Health EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001848-1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022(D3).pdf:19: Combined Effects EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001848-1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022(D3).pdf:19: Significant Effects EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001848-1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022(D3).pdf:19: (o) and EIA Reg. 14
EN010103-001848-1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022(D3).pdf:28: (o) and EIA Reg. 14 unless
EN010103-001848-1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022(D3).pdf:28: 6.4.1 Appendix 1A: EIA Scoping -
EN010103-001848-1.2 - Application Guide - June 2022(D3).pdf:29: 6.4.2 Appendix 1B: EIA Scoping -
EN010103-000903-NZT DCO 6.2.19 ES Vol I Chapter 19 Marine Heritage.pdf:5: commenced at the EIA Scoping Stage with the preparation of the EIA Scoping
EN010103-000903-NZT DCO 6.2.19 ES Vol I Chapter 19 Marine Heritage.pdf:5: design evolution of the Proposed Development and the EIA is set out where
EN010103-000903-NZT DCO 6.2.19 ES Vol I Chapter 19 Marine Heritage.pdf:6: • the requirements of EIA as set out in the EIA Directive 2014/52/EU
EN010103-000903-NZT DCO 6.2.19 ES Vol I Chapter 19 Marine Heritage.pdf:7: significance of effects identified through the EIA process and the level of harm
EN010103-000903-NZT DCO 6.2.19 ES Vol I Chapter 19 Marine Heritage.pdf:9: purposes of the EIA Regulations, in accordance with standard EIA practice.
EN010103-002252-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:183: planning permission ref 14/1454/EIA granted by Stockton-on-Tee Borough Council to be
EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:12: Impact Assessment (EIA) process.
EN010103-001187-NZT DCO 5.11 Indicative Lighting Strategy - Reprovided(2).pdf:2: EIA Environmental Protection Act
EN010103-001859-9.12 - Applicants comments on written Representations - June 2022 (D3).pdf:2: EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN010103-001859-9.12 - Applicants comments on written Representations - June 2022 (D3).pdf:35: that carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology is not the best way to decarbonise the UK energy Assessment (IEMA) in 2017 for assessing the significance of GHG emissions from a project for EIA. IEMA
EN010103-001859-9.12 - Applicants comments on written Representations - June 2022 (D3).pdf:35: led to an incorrect carbon intensity being calculated and assessed for the scheme. a) Whether the EIA has underestimated the Climate Change impacts of the CCGT power station as
EN010103-001859-9.12 - Applicants comments on written Representations - June 2022 (D3).pdf:35: the project has become very crucial, as recent policy and science are requiring deep cuts to methane c) Whether the Environmental Statement follows best practice for EIA for a cumulative assessment
EN010103-001859-9.12 - Applicants comments on written Representations - June 2022 (D3).pdf:35: • The EIA has underestimated the Climate Change impacts of the CCGT power station as no full which methane leakage is rapidly curtailed in line with the methane reduction pathway implied
EN010103-001859-9.12 - Applicants comments on written Representations - June 2022 (D3).pdf:35: not been assessed, breaching the EIA Regulations. compliant annual projections in the Environmental Statement (previous bullet).
EN010103-001859-9.12 - Applicants comments on written Representations - June 2022 (D3).pdf:35: • The Environmental Statement does not follow the best practice for EIA for a cumulative 50GW offshore wind by 2030, and b) government (BEIS) and CCC trajectories for offshore wind
EN010103-001859-9.12 - Applicants comments on written Representations - June 2022 (D3).pdf:36: While the EIA Regulations place a requirement to assess the cumulative impact of a scheme with other
EN010103-001859-9.12 - Applicants comments on written Representations - June 2022 (D3).pdf:36: 2022 that the approach to cumulative assessment for GHG emissions differs to that for many EIA topics.
EN010103-001859-9.12 - Applicants comments on written Representations - June 2022 (D3).pdf:37: Bullet Point c: best practice for EIA for a cumulative assessment of greenhouse gas emissions, with
EN010103-001859-9.12 - Applicants comments on written Representations - June 2022 (D3).pdf:37: The Applicants’ EIA evaluated the significance of GHG emissions from the Proposed Development in the
EN010103-001859-9.12 - Applicants comments on written Representations - June 2022 (D3).pdf:38: 2.1 The EIA has underestimated the Climate Change impacts of the CCGT power station
EN010103-001859-9.12 - Applicants comments on written Representations - June 2022 (D3).pdf:39: GHGs for the EIA. However, for the gas to be combusted, it also needs to be extracted or mined,
EN010103-001859-9.12 - Applicants comments on written Representations - June 2022 (D3).pdf:39: of the EIA further research has emerged. For example, new techniques, in the last few years, have
EN010103-001859-9.12 - Applicants comments on written Representations - June 2022 (D3).pdf:43: 25 The EIA has failed to assess the full life-cycle impacts of gas, and has in particular not quantified
EN010103-001859-9.12 - Applicants comments on written Representations - June 2022 (D3).pdf:43: negative effects of the development” (EIA Regs Schedule 4 (5
teesworks_-_keywords_-_eia.txt · Last modified: 2024/04/02 18:10 by 127.0.0.1